<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">102714</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.102714</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="version">10.7554/eLife.102714.3</article-id><article-version article-version-type="publication-state">version of record</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Immunology and Inflammation</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Microbiology and Infectious Disease</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The <italic>Shigella flexneri</italic> effector IpaH1.4 facilitates RNF213 degradation and protects cytosolic bacteria against interferon-induced ubiquitylation</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Saavedra-Sanchez</surname><given-names>Luz</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4362-8928</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dickinson</surname><given-names>Mary S</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7227-9640</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Apte</surname><given-names>Shruti S</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yifeng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>De Jong</surname><given-names>Maarten</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-286X</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Skavicus</surname><given-names>Samantha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Heaton</surname><given-names>Nicholas S</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund5"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alto</surname><given-names>Neal M</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-3853</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con8"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>Jorn</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-4608</contrib-id><email>jorn.coers@duke.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con9"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00py81415</institution-id><institution>Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05byvp690</institution-id><institution>Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Dallas</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00py81415</institution-id><institution>Department of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University Medical Center</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Helaine</surname><given-names>Sophie</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03vek6s52</institution-id><institution>Harvard Medical School</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Soldati-Favre</surname><given-names>Dominique</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01swzsf04</institution-id><institution>University of Geneva</institution></institution-wrap><country>Switzerland</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>28</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>RP102714</elocation-id><history><date date-type="sent-for-review" iso-8601-date="2024-09-05"><day>05</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-09-05"><day>05</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.05.611450"/></event><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a reviewed preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-11-20"><day>20</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.102714.1"/></event><event><event-desc>The reviewed preprint was revised.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2025-10-03"><day>03</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.102714.2"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2024, Saavedra-Sanchez et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Saavedra-Sanchez et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-102714-v1.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-102714-figures-v1.pdf"/><related-article related-article-type="commentary" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/elife.109371" id="ra1"/><abstract><p>A central signal that marshals host defense against many infections is the lymphocyte-derived cytokine interferon-gamma (IFNγ). The IFNγ receptor is expressed on most human cells, and its activation leads to the expression of antimicrobial proteins that execute diverse cell-autonomous immune programs. One such immune program consists of the sequential detection, ubiquitylation, and destruction of intracellular pathogens. Recently, the IFNγ-inducible ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF213 was identified as a pivotal mediator of such a defense axis. RNF213 provides host protection against viral, bacterial, and protozoan pathogens. To establish infections, potentially susceptible intracellular pathogens must have evolved mechanisms that subdue RNF213-controlled cell-autonomous immunity. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrate here that a causative agent of bacillary dysentery, <italic>Shigella flexneri</italic>, uses the type III secretion system (T3SS) effector IpaH1.4 to induce the degradation of RNF213. <italic>S. flexneri</italic> mutants lacking IpaH1.4 expression are bound and ubiquitylated by RNF213 in the cytosol of IFNγ-primed host cells. Linear (M1-) and lysine-linked ubiquitylation of <italic>S. flexneri</italic> requires RNF213 but is independent of the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC). We find that ubiquitylation of <italic>S. flexneri</italic> is insufficient to kill intracellular bacteria, suggesting that <italic>S. flexneri</italic> employs additional virulence factors to escape from host defenses that operate downstream from RNF213-driven ubiquitylation. In brief, this study identified the bacterial IpaH1.4 protein as an inhibitor of mammalian RNF213 and highlights evasion of RNF213-driven immunity as a characteristic of the human-tropic pathogen <italic>Shigella</italic>.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd><italic>Shigella</italic></kwd><kwd>RNF213</kwd><kwd>ubiquitin</kwd><kwd>autophagy</kwd><kwd>xenophagy</kwd><kwd>E3 ligase</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>Other</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043z4tv69</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>AI139425</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>Jorn</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043z4tv69</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>AI083359</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Alto</surname><given-names>Neal M</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043z4tv69</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>AI137031</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Heaton</surname><given-names>Nicholas S</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00np6vq88</institution-id><institution>Welch Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>I-1704</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Alto</surname><given-names>Neal M</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund5"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01d35cw23</institution-id><institution>Burroughs Wellcome Fund</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Heaton</surname><given-names>Nicholas S</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund6"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043z4tv69</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>AI168107</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Heaton</surname><given-names>Nicholas S</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>The enteric bacterial <italic>Shigella</italic> secretes a virulence factor that degrades the pivotal human defense protein RNF213, thereby protecting cytosolic bacteria from interferon-driven ubiquitylation and associated innate immunity.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>publishing-route</meta-name><meta-value>prc</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>The lymphocyte-derived cytokine interferon-gamma (IFNγ) is a strong inducer of cell-autonomous immunity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Casanova et al., 2024</xref>). The IFNγ-inducible E3 ubiquitin ligase ring finger protein 213 (RNF213) provides protection against a diverse group of intracellular pathogens that includes viruses, protozoa, and bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Hernandez et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Houzelstein et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Thery et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Matta et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Martina et al., 2021</xref>). RNF213 binds to bacteria that enter the host cell cytosol. Once bound to Gram-negative bacteria such as <italic>Salmonella</italic>, RNF213 directly ubiquitylates the bacterial surface molecule, lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In addition to RNF213, the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) was reported to play a critical role in the ubiquitylation of cytosolic bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Noad et al., 2017</xref>). Whereas LUBAC catalyzes linear ubiquitin chains, the types of ubiquitin linkages deposited on bacterial surfaces by RNF213 are unknown. Following ubiquitylation, cytosolic bacteria can be captured by ubiquitin-binding proteins and delivered into autolysosomes for degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>).</p><p>While the predominantly vacuolar pathogen <italic>Salmonella</italic> is susceptible to RNF213-mediated cytosolic host defense (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>), the cytosol-adapted Gram-negative pathogen <italic>Burkholderia thailandensis</italic> is resistant. <italic>B. thailandensis</italic> escapes RNF213-driven host defense in part through the secretion of the virulence factor TssM, a ubiquitin esterase that removes ubiquitin from LPS on the bacterial surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Szczesna et al., 2024</xref>). However, whether and how other cytosolic bacterial pathogens escape from RNF213-driven ubiquitylation is unknown.</p><p><italic>Shigella</italic> spp. are the etiological agent of bacillary dysentery and a leading cause of diarrheal deaths, malnutrition, and growth retardation in children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Troeger et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Libby et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Bagamian et al., 2023</xref>). <italic>Shigella</italic> spp. invade the intestinal epithelium, enter the host cell cytosol of infected human colonic epithelial cells, and trigger an acute inflammatory response that involves the secretion of IFNγ by lymphocytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Mellouk and Enninga, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Levine et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Raqib et al., 1995a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Raqib et al., 1995b</xref>). IFNγ signaling in epithelial cells induces the expression of human guanylate binding protein 1 (GBP1), a defense protein that blocks bacterial intracellular motility and cell-to-cell spread (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Kutsch et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Kutsch et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Piro et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Wandel et al., 2017</xref>). To counter this potent cell-autonomous immune program, <italic>Shigella flexneri</italic> employs its type III secretion system (T3SS) to deliver the GBP1 inhibitor IpaH9.8 into the host cell cytosol. Loss of IpaH9.8 results in diminished <italic>S. flexneri</italic> virulence and a potent antibacterial host response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Piro et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Wandel et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Goers et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Li et al., 2017</xref>).</p><p>IpaH9.8 belongs to a family of T3SS effectors that contain a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain involved in substrate recognition and a novel E3 ligase (NEL) domain that transfers K48-linked ubiquitin to its bound substrate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Bullones-Bolaños et al., 2022</xref>). K48-linked ubiquitylation tags the substrate for proteasomal degradation. These IpaH proteins belong to a ‘second wave’ of T3SS effectors that are under the control of the transcriptional regulator MxiE. Second wave T3SS effectors have been shown to promote host cell survival, to dampen inflammation, and to counteract cell-autonomous immune programs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Schnupf and Sansonetti, 2019</xref>), yet their full repertoire of targets remains to be determined.</p><p>In the present work, we found that the MxiE-regulated T3SS effector IpaH1.4 facilitates the proteasomal degradation of RNF213. Remarkably, RNF213 functions independent of LUBAC to promote the linear and lysine-linked ubiquitylation of <italic>ipaH1.4-</italic>deficient <italic>S. flexneri</italic> mutants. We observed that ubiquitylated <italic>S. flexneri</italic> continued to replicate inside the host cell cytosol, indicating that <italic>S. flexneri</italic> employs additional unknown virulence mechanisms to interfere with its degradation. Thus, our study demonstrates that the human enteric pathogen <italic>S. flexneri</italic> directly interferes with RNF213 expression and also limits host defense downstream of RNF213-driven ubiquitylation.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Deletion of <italic>mxiE</italic> renders <italic>S. flexneri</italic> susceptible to linear ubiquitylation</title><p>Previous studies identified a cell-autonomous host defense program in which mammalian cells attach linear ubiquitin (M1) to the surface of the Gram-negative pathogen <italic>Salmonella enterica</italic> upon bacterial spillage into the host cell cytosol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Noad et al., 2017</xref>). Recently, it was reported that the cytosol-adapted pathogen <italic>B. thailandensis</italic> secretes a ubiquitin esterase that renders the bacteria resistant to this type of cytosolic ubiquitylation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Szczesna et al., 2024</xref>). We therefore hypothesized that resistance to host-driven linear ubiquitylation is a common feature of bacterial pathogens that are adapted to a cytosolic milieu. To test this concept, we monitored ubiquitylation of the professional cytosolic pathogen <italic>S. flexneri</italic> (serotype 2a, strain 257T) by immunofluorescence. We found that wild-type (WT) <italic>S. flexneri</italic> remained largely devoid of M1-linked ubiquitin in both alveolar A549 and colonic HT29 epithelial cell lines under both unprimed and IFNγ-primed conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A–C</xref>). In contrast to WT <italic>S. flexneri</italic>, a Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> mutant strain that has diminished expression of ‘second-wave’ T3SS effector proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Kane et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Mavris et al., 2002</xref>), was robustly stained with anti-M1 antibodies in IFNγ-primed host cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A–C</xref>). These observations indicate that <italic>S. flexneri</italic> uses MxiE-dependent effectors to evade an IFNγ-activated ubiquitylation pathway that targets cytosolic bacteria.</p><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Mutation of the bacterial transcription factor MxiE results in ubiquitylation of <italic>S</italic>. <italic>flexneri</italic> in IFNγ-primed epithelial cells.</title><p>(<bold>A–C</bold>) Cells were primed with 100 U/ml IFNγ or left unprimed and then infected with WT or <italic>ΔmxiE S. flexneri</italic> at an MOI of 50–100. Cells were fixed 3–4 hr post-infection (hpi) and stained for linear ubiquitin (M1-Ub) with anti-M1 antibody. Percentage of M1-Ub-positive bacteria was quantified in infected A549 epithelial cells at 4 hpi (<bold>B</bold>) and HT29 epithelial cells at 3 hpi (<bold>C</bold>). Graphs show the average of three independent experiments and depict means ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests was performed; all statistically significant comparisons are shown. ***p &lt; 0.001; ****p &lt; 0.0001; ns, not significant.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig1-v1.tif"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Linear and lysine-linked ubiquitin is attached to <italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>mxiE</italic></title><p>The ubiquitin protein contains seven lysine residues. Any of these lysine residues or the N-terminal methionine of the acceptor ubiquitin can form isopeptide bonds with the C-terminal glycine residue of the donor ubiquitin to form chains. To determine which ubiquitin linkage types are present on the surface of <italic>S. flexneri</italic>Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> bacteria, we generated A549 cells that overexpressed internally tagged ubiquitin (INT-Ub) variants, which contain only a single lysine residue or lack lysines altogether. As a ubiquitin acceptor, the lysine-less (7KR) variant can only be assembled into ubiquitin chains via its N-terminal methionine. We found that 7KR INT-Ub robustly co-localized with <italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>mxiE,</italic> albeit with diminished efficiency compared to WT INT-Ub (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title><italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> mutants become decorated with linear and lysine-linked ubiquitin in IFNγ-primed A549 cells<italic>.</italic></title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) WT A549 cells expressing the indicated internally Strep-tagged ubiquitin (INT-Ub) variants were primed with 100 U/ml IFNγ overnight and co-localization of INT-Ub with cytosolic <italic>S. flexneri</italic> (Sf) Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> was assessed at 4 hpi. Ubiquitin linkage-specific antibodies were used to determine the percentage of <italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> staining positive for K27-linked ubiquitin (K27-Ub) (<bold>B</bold>) or K63-linked ubiquitin (<bold>C</bold>) in IFNγ-primed untransduced WT A549 cells. Co-staining of anti-M1 and anti-ubiquitin (FK2) on the surface of <italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> in IFNγ-primed (100 U/ml) A549 cells is shown in (<bold>D</bold>). Quantification of anti-M1-FK2 co-staining in untreated and IFNγ-primed A549 cells is depicted in (<bold>E</bold>). All infections were done at an MOI of 50–100. Data were generated from at least three independent experiments and show mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons was performed of all groups against WT-ubiquitin group (<bold>A</bold>). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests was performed for (<bold>B</bold>) and (<bold>C</bold>). An unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test was performed between ‘both FK2 + M1’ groups (gray bars) (<bold>E</bold>). *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001; ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig2-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Addition of an N-terminal HA-tag significantly reduces targeting of 7KR ubiquitin to <italic>S. flexneri</italic> ΔmxiE.</title><p>N-terminally untagged and N-terminally HA-tagged versions of the internally Strep-tagged ubiquitin (INT-Ub) 7KR mutant variant were expressed in A549 cells. Cells were primed with 100 U/ml IFNγ overnight and co-localization of INT-Ub with cytosolic <italic>S. flexneri</italic> (Sf) ΔmxiE was assessed at 4 hpi. An unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test was conducted. **p &lt; 0.01.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig2-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>In addition to its incorporation into linear ubiquitin chains, 7KR ubiquitin can also function as donor ubiquitin and be attached as mono-ubiquitin to a substrate or to an existing ubiquitin chain as a chain terminator. To distinguish between 7KR INT-Ub signals originating from linear versus mono-ubiquitylation, we generated an N-terminally HA-tagged 7KR INT-Ub variant. The N-terminal tag prevents linear ubiquitylation but still allows 7KR INT-Ub to be attached as mono-ubiquitin via its C-terminal carboxyl group. We found that the addition of this N-terminal HA-tag significantly reduced but not completely abolished the number of Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> bacteria decorated with 7KR INT-Ub (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2 –figure supplement 1</xref>). These data indicate that much of the association of 7KR INT-Ub with cytosolic Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> bacteria is due to the formation of M1-linked linear ubiquitin chains.</p><p>Collectively, our data confirmed that M1-linked ubiquitin is bound to <italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> but also indicated that other additional ubiquitin linkage types are attached to <italic>mxiE</italic>-deficient bacteria. The functional importance of these lysine-linked ubiquitin chains was demonstrated by improved bacterial targeting of INT-Ub variants that can form additional K27-linkages or both K27- and K63-linkages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>). Linkage-specific antibodies against K27 and K63 confirmed that these two linkage types are present on <italic>ΔmxiE</italic> bacteria in IFNγ-primed A549 cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B, C</xref>). Staining with an antibody that detects most ubiquitin linkage types (FK2) showed near complete overlap with anti-M1 staining (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D, E</xref>). Because the percentage of FK2-positive but M1-negative bacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>) was much smaller than the percentage of bacteria that were K27- or K63-positive (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B, C</xref>), these data suggest that most <italic>S. flexneri ΔmxiE</italic> bacteria are decorated with both linear and lysine-linked ubiquitin.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>The ubiquitylation of <italic>S. flexneri ΔmxiE</italic> is dependent on RNF213 but not LUBAC</title><p>Previous work showed that the multimeric E3 ligase LUBAC can deposit M1-linked ubiquitin on the surface of cytosolic <italic>S. enterica</italic> Typhimurium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Noad et al., 2017</xref>). Moreover, <italic>S. flexneri</italic> secretes the MxiE-regulated effector IpaH1.4 which specifically recognizes and marks the LUBAC components HOIP and HOIL-1 for proteasomal degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Liu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Hiragi et al., 2023</xref>). Consequently, we hypothesized that LUBAC was essential for the ubiquitylation of <italic>ΔmxiE</italic>. To test this hypothesis, we infected HOIP- and HOIL-1-deficient A549 cells (HOIP<sup>KO</sup>, HOIL-1<sup>KO</sup>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>) with the <italic>ΔmxiE</italic> mutant under IFNγ-primed conditions. Unexpectedly, deletion of either HOIP or HOIL-1, each an essential component of the LUBAC complex, did not diminish linear ubiquitylation of <italic>ΔmxiE</italic> when compared to WT cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). Similarly, the internally tagged 7KR-Ub variant decorated <italic>S. flexneri ΔmxiE</italic> independent of the LUBAC component HOIP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>). Collectively, these data demonstrate that LUBAC is dispensable for linear ubiquitylation of <italic>ΔmxiE</italic> bacteria in the host cell cytosol of IFNγ-primed A549 cells.</p><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Ubiquitylation of <italic>S. flexneri ΔmxiE</italic> is dependent on RNF213 but not LUBAC.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Immunoblotting for HOIP, HOIL-1, and RNF213 protein expression in untreated and IFNγ-primed WT and the corresponding gene deletion (KO) A549 cells. (<bold>B</bold>) Percentage Δ<italic>mxiE S. flexneri</italic> bacteria stained with anti-M1-linked ubiquitin in IFNγ-primed WT, HOIP<sup>KO</sup>, HOIL-1<sup>KO</sup>, and RNF213<sup>KO</sup> A549 cells. (<bold>C</bold>) Percentage of WT and 7KR INT-Ub-positive Δ<italic>mxiE S. flexneri</italic> in IFNγ-primed WT, HOIP<sup>KO</sup>, and RNF213<sup>KO</sup> A549 cells. (<bold>D–G</bold>) Untreated and IFNγ-primed A549 and HT29 cells were infected with the indicated <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains and immuno-stained for RNF213 and ubiquitin (FK2). Representative immunofluorescence microscopy images are shown for A549 infections in (<bold>F</bold>). RNF213-<italic>S. flexneri</italic> colocalization percentages were quantified in A549 (<bold>D</bold>) and HT29 (<bold>E</bold>) cells. (<bold>G</bold>) Quantification of ubiquitin and RNF213 colocalization with Δ<italic>mxiE S. flexneri</italic> in A549 cells. Percentages of Δ<italic>mxiE S. flexneri</italic> staining positive for antibodies specific for K27-linked (<bold>H</bold>) and K63-linked ubiquitin (<bold>I</bold>) are also provided. All data are represented by the mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons was performed of all groups against WT A549 group in (<bold>A</bold>). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests was performed in (<bold>C, D, F</bold>). An unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test was performed between the ‘Ub+ and RNF213+’ groups (gray bars) in (<bold>G</bold>). For (<bold>H, I</bold>), an unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test was performed. Comparisons not shown are non-significant. **p &lt; 0.01; ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title>PDF file containing original western blots for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig3-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata2"><label>Figure 3—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Original files for western blot analysis displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig3-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig3-v1.tif"/></fig><p>The ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF213 was recently shown to ubiquitylate pathogen-containing vacuoles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Hernandez et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>) as well as Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria inside the host cell cytosol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Thery et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Szczesna et al., 2024</xref>). Like HOIL-1, RNF213 is an IFNγ-inducible protein (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Hernandez et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>). Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we detected RNF213 on the surface of <italic>ΔmxiE</italic> but not WT bacteria in IFNγ-primed A549 as well as colonic HT29 cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D–G</xref>). The vast majority of ubiquitylated <italic>S. flexneri ΔmxiE</italic> mutants (~93%) co-stained with anti-RNF213 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3G</xref>), indicative of a functional role for RNF213 in the ubiquitylation of <italic>ΔmxiE</italic> bacteria. To directly probe for RNF213 function, we infected a pool of CRISPR-generated A549 RNF213<sup>KO</sup> cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>) with <italic>S. flexneri ΔmxiE</italic> and stained these IFNγ-primed cells for M1-, K27-, and K63-linked ubiquitin. We found that in the absence of human RNF213, antibodies specific for M1-, K27-, and K63-linked ubiquitin no longer stained the surface of <italic>S. flexneri ΔmxiE</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B, H–I</xref>). In agreement with these immunofluorescence data, both WT and lysine-less ubiquitin (7KR-Ub) localized to <italic>ΔmxiE</italic> bacteria in WT but not in RNF213<sup>KO</sup> cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>). Together, these data demonstrate that human RNF213 is essential for the linear and lysine-linked ubiquitylation of MxiE-deficient <italic>S. flexneri</italic> mutants.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Ectopic expression of <italic>S. flexneri</italic> virulence factors IpaH1.4 or IpaH2.5 induces RNF213 degradation</title><p>The transcription factor MxiE induces the expression of several secreted effector proteins of the IpaH family that act as bacterial ubiquitin E3 ligases and tag host proteins for proteasomal degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Wandel et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Li et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Liu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Luchetti et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Hansen et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Otsubo et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Rohde et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ashida et al., 2010</xref>). Since our data revealed that the <italic>S. flexneri</italic> virulence factor MxiE blocks bacterial ubiquitylation by RNF213, we hypothesized that <italic>S. flexneri</italic> infections induce the proteasomal degradation of RNF213 in a MxiE-dependent manner. To test this hypothesis, we measured RNF213 protein levels by immunoblotting in cells that had been infected with WT or <italic>ΔmxiE S. flexneri</italic>. Our data revealed that RNF213 protein levels are drastically reduced upon infection with WT <italic>S. flexneri</italic> and that the deletion of <italic>mxiE</italic> partially restored RNF213 expression in infected cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>). Similarly, and as reported previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Noad et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Liu et al., 2022</xref>), HOIP protein expression is diminished in cells infected with WT <italic>S. flexneri</italic> but much less so in the case of infections with <italic>ΔmxiE S. flexneri</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title><italic>S. flexneri</italic> virulence factors IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 induce proteasomal degradation of RNF213 (<bold>A, B</bold>).</title><p>All <italic>S</italic>. <italic>flexneri</italic> strains express PilT to enhance adhesion and infection rates, and infections were carried out at an MOI of 5–25 for 3 hr. (<bold>A</bold>) Untreated and IFNγ-primed (100 U/ml) A549 cells were infected with indicated <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains expressing GFP. Protein lysates were probed for expression of RNF213, HOIP, and GFP. GFP expression serves as a bacterial protein loading control. (<bold>B</bold>) Infected and uninfected A549 cells were cultured in the presence of different concentrations of the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 and RNF213 expression was monitored by immunoblotting. (<bold>C</bold>) HEK 293T cells stably expressing mCherry-RNF213 were transiently transfected with individual GFP-tagged IpaH effectors for 24 hr and RNF213 expression was assessed. (<bold>D</bold>) WT and catalytically inactive C368S mutants of IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 were transiently transfected into HEK 293T cells expressing mCherry-RNF213 and cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting. (<bold>C, D</bold>) Denaturation of cell lysates at lower temperature (56°C) was required for RNF213 detection but also resulted in the formation of double bands for all IpaH-GFP constructs. Images are representative of three independent experiments. UI: uninfected.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title>PDF file containing original western blots for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig4-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata2"><label>Figure 4—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Original files for western blot analysis displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig4-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig4-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Ubiquitin-activated interaction trap (UBAIT) identifies mouse Rnf213 as likely interaction partner of IpaH2.5.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Diagram showing the experimental procedure for UBAIT detection of IpaH2.5 and IpaH3 (control) substrates from the colon and cecum of mice infected with <italic>Salmonella enterica</italic> Typhimurium (S. Tm). (<bold>B</bold>) Mass spectrometry of hits identified in the Strep-IpaH2.5 UBAIT (left) as compared to Strep-IpaH3 UBAIT (right). The top 12 proteins identified in the Strep-IpaH2.5 UBAIT samples as determined by peptide abundance are shown. The corresponding peptide abundances from Strep-IpaH3 UBAIT are shown. RNF213 and the previously identified IpaH2.5 substrate RNF31 (HOIP) are highlighted. PSM = peptide spectrum match. ND = not detected. NR = not reported.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig4-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>To directly test whether <italic>S. flexneri</italic> promotes proteasomal degradation of RNF213, we conducted infections in the presence of the proteasomal inhibitor MG132. As expected, MG132 largely restored RNF213 total protein levels in <italic>S. flexneri</italic>-infected cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>). We next tested whether a specific IpaH effector facilitates the degradation of RNF213. To this end, we transiently expressed GFP-fusion proteins of individual IpaH family members in HEK 293T cells that ectopically expressed RNF213 and measured their effects on RNF213 protein levels by immunoblotting. Our mini-screen revealed that the ectopic expression of the two closely related paralogs IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 was sufficient to promote RNF213 degradation in HEK 293T cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C</xref>). Of note, the substrate-binding LRR domains of IpaH2.5 and IpaH1.4 are 98.9% identical in DNA sequence and were previously shown to have comparable substrate specificity and functional redundancy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>). Both IpaH1.4 and 2.5 share a highly conserved NEL E3 ubiquitin ligase domain that contains an essential catalytic cysteine residue at position 368 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Liu et al., 2022</xref>). Catalytically inactive forms of IpaH1.4 or IpaH2.5, in which Cys368 is mutated to a serine (C/S), failed to degrade RNF213 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>). As an additional control, we included overexpression of IpaH9.8, an inhibitor of GBPs, which also did not impact RNF213 expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>), as anticipated.</p><p>To investigate potential physical interactions between IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5, we reanalyzed a previously generated dataset that employed a method known as ubiquitin-activated interaction traps (UBAITs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Hansen et al., 2021</xref>). As depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1A</xref>, the human ubiquitin gene was fused to the 3′ end of IpaH2.5, producing a C-terminal IpaH2.5-ubiquitin fusion protein. When incubated with ATP, a ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1, and a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2, the IpaH2.5-ubiquitin ‘bait’ protein is capable of binding to and ubiquitylating target substrates. This ubiquitylation creates an iso-peptide bond between the IpaH2.5 bait and its substrate, thereby enabling purification via a Strep affinity tag incorporated into the fusion construct (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Hansen et al., 2021</xref>). IpaH2.5-ubiquitin bait and IpaH3-ubiquitin control proteins were incubated with lysates from murine intestinal tissue. To detect interaction partners in a physiologically relevant setting, we used intestinal lysates derived from mice infected with <italic>Salmonella,</italic> which in contrast to <italic>Shigella</italic> causes pronounced inflammation in WT mice and therefore better simulates human <italic>Shigellosis</italic> in an animal model. Using UBAIT, we identified HOIP (Rnf31) as a likely IpaH2.5 binding partner (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1B</xref>), thus confirming previous observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>) and validating the effectiveness of our approach. Strikingly, we identified mouse Rnf213 as the most abundant interaction partner of the IpaH2.5-ubiquitin bait protein (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1B</xref>). Collectively, our data and concurrent reports showing direct interactions between IpaH1.4 and human RNF213 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Naydenova et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Zhou et al., 2025</xref>) indicate that the virulence factors IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 directly bind and degrade mouse as well as human RNF213.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Loss of IpaH1.4 is sufficient to render <italic>S. flexneri</italic> susceptible to RNF213-driven ubiquitylation in human and murine host cells</title><p>Given that ectopic expression of either IpaH1.4 or IpaH2.5 was sufficient to degrade RNF213, we expected these two endogenous effectors to be functionally redundant. However, we found that genetic deletion of <italic>ipaH1.4</italic> in either <italic>S. flexneri</italic> serotype 2a strain 257T (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A, B</xref>) or in serotype 5a strain M90T (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1A</xref>) was sufficient to restore RNF213 protein expression and RNF213 recruitment to cytosolic bacteria. A deletion mutant of <italic>ipaH2.5</italic> was as resistant to RNF213 targeting as co-isogenic WT bacteria, and a Δ<italic>ipaH1.4-ipaH2.5</italic> double mutant was indistinguishable from the Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> single deletion mutant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1A</xref>). These data suggested that endogenous IpaH2.5 is non-functional, which agrees with a previous characterization of <italic>ipaH2.5</italic> as a minimally expressed pseudogene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Silué et al., 2020</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Loss of IpaH1.4 is sufficient to render <italic>S</italic>. <italic>flexneri</italic> susceptible to RNF213-driven ubiquitylation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) IFNγ-primed WT and HOIP<sup>KO</sup> A549 cells were infected with the indicated PilT<sup>+</sup>, GFP<sup>+</sup><italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains for 3 hr at an MOI of 25 and RNF213 protein levels were assessed by Western blotting. Bacterial GFP and host actin are used as host protein loading controls. (<bold>B</bold>) Percentages of RNF213<sup>+</sup> WT and Δ<italic>ipaH1.4 S. flexneri</italic> in IFNγ-primed A549 cells are shown. (<bold>C</bold>) Representative microscopy images depicting RNF213 recruitment to cytosolic Δ<italic>IpaH1.4</italic> bacteria complemented with empty vector, WT IpaH1.4, or catalytically inactive IpaH1.4 (C368S) in IFNγ-primed WT A549 cells. (<bold>D</bold>) Percentages of RNF213<sup>+</sup> indicated <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains in IFNγ-primed WT A549 cells are shown. (<bold>E</bold>) Percentages WT and Δ<italic>IpaH1.4 S. flexneri</italic> stained positive for anti-M1-linked antibody in IFNγ-primed WT and RNF213<sup>KO</sup> A549 cells are depicted. (<bold>F</bold>) The ilux operon was introduced into <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains to use bioluminescence relative light units (RLU) as a proxy for bacterial growth. RLU was measured in IFNγ-primed WT A549 cells infected with the indicated <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains at an MOI of 5. (<bold>B, D, E</bold>) Data represent the mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. An unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test was conducted for (<bold>B</bold>). One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons was performed between all groups against the group Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> expressing WT IpaH1.4 (<bold>D</bold>) and WT A549 cells (<bold>E</bold>). ***p &lt; 0.001; ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata1"><label>Figure 5—source data 1.</label><caption><title>PDF file containing original western blots for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata2"><label>Figure 5—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Original files for western blot analysis displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>ipaH1.4</italic> but not <italic>ipaH2.5</italic> results in RNF213 recruitment to cytosolic <italic>S</italic>. <italic>flexneri</italic>.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) A549 cells were primed with IFNγ (100 U/ml) and infected with the indicated strains expressing GFP for 4 hr at an MOI of 100. RNF213 recruitment to cytosolic bacteria was quantified. (<bold>B</bold>) IFNγ-primed A549 RNF213<sup>KO</sup> cells were infected with the indicated PilT<sup>+</sup> <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains for 3 hr at an MOI of 25 and HOIP protein levels were assessed by Western blotting. (<bold>C</bold>) Representative microscopy images showing anti-M1-linked ubiquitin staining of Δ<italic>ipaH1.4 S. flexneri</italic> bacteria in IFNγ-primed WT A549 cells. Quantified data are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E</xref>. Percentages of WT and Δ<italic>ipaH1.4 S. flexneri</italic> bacteria stained with anti-K27-linked ubiquitin (<bold>D</bold>) or anti-K63-linked ubiquitin (<bold>E</bold>) in IFNγ-primed WT A549 cells. (<bold>F</bold>) Percentages of anti-M1-linked ubiquitin positive Δ<italic>ipaH1.4 S. flexneri</italic> bacteria in IFNγ-primed WT, RNF213<sup>KO</sup>, HOIL-1<sup>KO</sup>, and HOIP<sup>KO</sup> A549 cells. Data are represented by the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. An unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test was conducted for (<bold>D, E</bold>). Data are represented by the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests was performed for (<bold>A, F</bold>); all statistically significant comparisons are shown. ****p &lt; 0.0001; ***p &lt; 0.001; **p &lt; 0.01; ns, not significant.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s1sdata1"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>PDF file containing original western blots for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1B</xref>, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s1sdata2"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Original files for western blot analysis displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1B</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Mouse Rnf213 binds to Δ<italic>ipaH1.4 S</italic>. <italic>flexneri</italic> and facilitates linear ubiquitylation of cytosolic bacteria.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Immunoblotting for mouse Rnf213 protein expression in untreated and IFNγ-primed WT and IFNγ-primed Rnf213<sup>KO/KO</sup> mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells. Each lane represents MEFs from separate mouse embryos that were used for infections. (<bold>B, C</bold>) MEF cells were primed with mouse IFNγ (100 U/ml) and infected with the indicated strains expressing GFP and PilT for 2 hr at an MOI of 100. Rnf213-<italic>S. flexneri</italic> colocalization percentages were quantified and are shown in (<bold>B</bold>). (<bold>C</bold>) Percentage of M1-linked ubiquitin positive <italic>S. flexneri</italic> in IFNγ-primed WT and Rnf213<sup>KO/KO</sup> MEF cells. All data are represented by the mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. An unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test was performed in (<bold>B</bold>). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were performed in (<bold>C</bold>). **p &lt; 0.01; ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s2sdata1"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>PDF file containing original western blots for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2A</xref>, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-figsupp2-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s2sdata2"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Original files for western blot analysis displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2A</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-figsupp2-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-102714-fig5-figsupp2-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Previous work showed that IpaH1.4 binds to and degrades the LUBAC subunit HOIP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Noad et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Liu et al., 2022</xref>). To determine whether the degradation of RNF213 could be indirect and HOIP-dependent, or vice versa, we monitored RNF213 expression in HOIP<sup>KO</sup> cells and HOIP expression in RNF213<sup>KO</sup> cells. We found that expression of RNF213 remained at WT levels in the absence of HOIP and that the degree of IpaH1.4-dependent RNF213 degradation was comparable in WT and HOIP<sup>KO</sup> cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). Similarly, infections with WT but not Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> mutant <italic>S. flexneri</italic> resulted in a substantial reduction of HOIP protein expression in RNF213<sup>KO</sup> cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1B</xref>). These observations show that IpaH1.4 targets RNF213 and HOIP for degradation independent from each other.</p><p>The sustained RNF213 expression in cells infected with <italic>S. flexneri</italic>Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>) correlated with staining of cytosolic Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> bacteria with RNF213 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B, C</xref>). As expected, the complementation of the Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> mutant with WT IpaH1.4 efficiently prevented RNF213 recruitment to cytosolic bacteria, whereas complementation with catalytically inactive IpaH1.4 did not (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C, D</xref>). Through the use of linkage-specific antibodies, we also observed M1-, K27-, and K63-linked ubiquitin on cytosolic Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> bacteria in IFNγ-primed WT A549 cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1C–E</xref>). In contrast to IFNγ-primed WT A549 cells, IFNγ-primed RNF213<sup>KO</sup> A549 cells lacked linear ubiquitylation of Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E</xref>). This ubiquitylation of <italic>S. flexneri</italic>Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> was independent of LUBAC, as it occurred in HOIL-1<sup>KO</sup>, HOIP<sup>KO</sup>, and WT A549 cells at comparable frequencies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1F</xref>).</p><p>Although <italic>S. flexneri</italic> is a human-adapted pathogen, some IFNγ-inducible host defense programs targeting <italic>S. flexneri</italic> and the corresponding bacterial evasion mechanisms transcend host barriers. For example, the <italic>Shigella</italic> virulence factor IpaH9.8 inhibits both human and murine guanylate binding proteins (GBPs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Li et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Ji et al., 2019</xref>). We therefore asked whether RNF213 ubiquitylates <italic>S. flexneri ΔipaH1.4</italic> in at least one other mammalian species, the mouse. To do so, we infected unprimed and IFNγ-primed WT and Rnf213<sup>KO/KO</sup> mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2A</xref>) with <italic>S. flexneri</italic> WT and <italic>ΔipaH1.4</italic> mutant. We observed that <italic>ΔipaH1.4</italic> bacteria became decorated with mouse Rnf213 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2B</xref>) and linear ubiquitin chains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2C</xref>). The IFNγ-dependent increase in the percentage of M1-ubiquitin-decorated <italic>ΔipaH1.4 S. flexneri</italic> bacteria was reversed in <italic>Rnf213</italic><sup>KO/KO</sup> MEFs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1C</xref>). Collectively, these data depict a conserved role for the mammalian ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF213 in cytosolic immune surveillance and demonstrate that IpaH1.4 can evade both mouse and human RNF213-driven linear ubiquitylation.</p><p>Ubiquitylated microbial cargo can be delivered into microbicidal lysosomes in an autophagy-like process commonly referred to as xenophagy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Tripathi-Giesgen et al., 2021</xref>). Previous work showed that linear ubiquitylation of <italic>S. enterica</italic> leads to bacterial clearance by xenophagy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>). In contrast to the xenophagic killing of ubiquitylated <italic>S. enterica,</italic> we found that ubiquitylated <italic>S. flexneri ΔIpaH1.4</italic> and <italic>ΔmxiE</italic> mutant bacteria continued to replicate inside IFNγ-primed A549 cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5H</xref>), reminiscent of the continued growth of ubiquitylated <italic>B. thailandensis tssM</italic> mutants inside the host cell cytosol of human IFNγ-primed cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Szczesna et al., 2024</xref>). Thus, our data indicate that <italic>S. flexneri</italic>, like <italic>B. thailandensis</italic>, can block ubiquitin-dependent xenophagy both at the stage of ubiquitylation and at another so far undetermined downstream step of this cell-autonomous host defense pathway.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Xenophagy is a cell-autonomous defense program in which intracellular pathogens are captured and delivered into degradative lysosomes. Ubiquitylation of intracellular pathogens is the most common initiating step for xenophagy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Tripathi-Giesgen et al., 2021</xref>). Like other steps of the xenophagy cascade, pathogen ubiquitylation is augmented in cells primed with the lymphocyte-derived cytokine IFNγ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Hernandez et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Matta et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Haldar et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Fernandez et al., 2024</xref>). An antimicrobial E3 ubiquitin ligase, RNF213, is itself an IFNγ-inducible protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Hernandez et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Houzelstein et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Thery et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Matta et al., 2024</xref>). Here, we report that the enteric human pathogen <italic>S. flexneri</italic> employs the T3SS effector IpaH1.4 to induce the proteasomal degradation of RNF213. Accordingly, loss of IpaH1.4 results in RNF213-dependent ubiquitylation of <italic>S. flexneri</italic>. However, IpaH1.4-deficient <italic>S. flexneri</italic> mutants, despite their ubiquitylation, continue to replicate inside the cytosol of IFNγ-primed human cells. These observations suggest that <italic>S. flexneri</italic> not only evades RNF213-driven ubiquitylation but also the downstream degradation of ubiquitylated bacteria.</p><p>Accompanying previous reports on <italic>Chlamydia</italic> and <italic>Burkholderia</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Szczesna et al., 2024</xref>), our study on <italic>Shigella</italic> provides evidence that host-adapted intracellular pathogens escape from RNF213-driven host defense. Each of these pathogens evolved a mechanistically distinct strategy to escape ubiquitylation by RNF213. The soil-dwelling accidental pathogen <italic>B. thailandensis</italic> is recognized and ubiquitylated by RNF213 but instantly removes ubiquitin from its surface through the activity of its secreted ubiquitin esterase TssM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Szczesna et al., 2024</xref>). The human pathogen <italic>Chlamydia trachomatis</italic> decorates its surrounding vacuole with the secreted T3SS effector GarD, which renders the <italic>Chlamydia</italic>-containing vacuole invisible to RNF213 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>). In contrast to TssM and GarD, the <italic>Shigella</italic> effector IpaH1.4 is a direct inhibitor of RNF213, which is further supported by recently published biochemical studies demonstrating direct interactions between the LRR domain of IpaH1.4 and the RING domain of RNF213 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Naydenova et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Zhou et al., 2025</xref>).</p><p>IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 have nearly 99% sequence identity in their substrate-binding LRR domains, and overexpression of either paralog is sufficient to trigger RNF213 degradation. However, only IpaH1.4 appears to be essential for <italic>S. flexneri</italic>-triggered RNF213 degradation – as shown in the present work – or for HOIP degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>). While these observations agree with a previous report demonstrating low expression of IpaH2.5 under standard culture conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Silué et al., 2020</xref>), it remains to be seen whether IpaH2.5 is expressed and possibly redundant with IpaH1.4 for virulence during in vivo infections.</p><p>The mechanism by which IpaH1.4 and its paralog IpaH2.5 promote RNF213 degradation can be gleaned from previous studies characterizing IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 as ubiquitin E3 ligases that directly conjugate K48-linked ubiquitin to the LUBAC subunit HOIP leading to HOIP degradation by the proteasome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>). Indeed, studies published during the revisions of our manuscript show that IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 similarly bind to and directly ubiquitylate RNF213 to facilitate RNF213’s proteasomal degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Naydenova et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Zhou et al., 2025</xref>). Such direct interactions are additionally supported by our data showing that transient IpaH2.5–RNF213 interactions can be trapped via formation of covalent bonds between these proteins in a UBAIT assay.</p><p>The deletion of <italic>ipaH1.4</italic> leads to <italic>S. flexneri</italic> ubiquitylation in IFNγ-primed host cells. Different ubiquitin linkage types and their incorporation into heterotypic conjugates create a rich diversity of ubiquitin modifications with unique functional outputs, which is commonly referred to as the ‘ubiquitin code.’ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Komander and Rape, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Dikic and Schulman, 2023</xref>). We found that at least three linkage types are attached to <italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> in an RNF213-dependent manner: K27, K63, and linear (M1). Linear ubiquitylation is a head-to-tail inter-ubiquitin linkage through the amino group of the N-terminal methionine (M1) and the C-terminal carboxyl group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Kirisako et al., 2006</xref>). The LUBAC complex is the only recognized ubiquitin E3 ligase able to conjugate M1-linked ubiquitin chains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Sasaki and Iwai, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Gao et al., 2023</xref>). However, we observed that LUBAC is dispensable for M1-linked ubiquitylation of cytosolic <italic>S. flexneri</italic>Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic>. We found that lysine-less internally tagged ubiquitin or an M1-specific antibody bound to <italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> in cells lacking LUBAC (HOIL-1<sup>KO</sup> or HOIP<sup>KO</sup>) but failed to bind bacteria in RNF213-deficient cells. These data corroborate our previous observations, which suggested that IFNγ-induced linear ubiquitylation of <italic>Chlamydia-</italic> and <italic>Toxoplasma</italic>-containing vacuoles occurs independent of LUBAC in human cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Hernandez et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>). While RNF213 itself may catalyze such linear ubiquitin conjugation, it is equally possible that this reaction is carried out by additional ubiquitin E3 ligases that are being recruited to the bacterial surface alongside RNF213.</p><p>It was previously reported that RNF213 ubiquitylates LPS on the surface of <italic>S. enterica</italic>, prompting the recruitment of LUBAC, which catalyzes the conjugation of linear ubiquitin to the surface of <italic>S. enterica</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>). Whereas LUBAC was found to be essential for M1-linked ubiquitylation of cytosolic <italic>S. enterica</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Noad et al., 2017</xref>)<italic>,</italic> we find that LUBAC is dispensable for M1-linked ubiquitylation of <italic>S. flexneri</italic>Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> bacteria. While differences between <italic>S. enterica</italic> and <italic>S. flexneri</italic>, for example, in the composition of their bacterial cell walls, could possibly contribute to these discrepant results, it is also important to note that the previous <italic>S. enterica</italic> infection studies were conducted in naïve cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Otten et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Noad et al., 2017</xref>), whereas our studies were performed under IFNγ priming conditions. We therefore propose that a boost in the expression of RNF213 and other IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) renders LUBAC obsolete for M1-linked ubiquitylation of Gram-negative bacteria. Future studies are needed to determine how RNF213 co-operates with LUBAC and other host factors to ubiquitin-tag intracellular pathogens.</p><p><italic>Shigella</italic> is a human-adapted pathogen that secretes T3SS effectors to directly interfere with type I and III IFN signaling in epithelial cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Alphonse et al., 2022</xref>). Additionally, <italic>Shigella</italic> employs virulence factors that inhibit ISGs which act downstream from IFN signaling. For example, the T3SS effector IpaH9.8 blocks the activity of IFNγ-inducible antimicrobial ISGs such as GBP1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Piro et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Wandel et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Goers et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Li et al., 2017</xref>). Here, we report that IpaH1.4 inactivates another ISG, that is RNF213. Because ubiquitylated <italic>S. flexneri</italic> Δ<italic>ipaH1.4</italic> and Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> mutants continue to replicate inside the cytosol of IFNγ-primed host cells, we propose that <italic>S. flexneri</italic> also uses a mxiE-independent T3SS effector to interfere with host defenses occurring downstream from RNF213. Collectively, these data indicate that <italic>Shigella</italic> is equipped with redundant counter-immune mechanisms. This type of bacterial effector redundancy is not unique to <italic>Shigella</italic>. It was recently shown that the rodent pathogen <italic>Citrobacter rodentium</italic> can tolerate various combinations of individual T3SS effector deletions in vivo, an observation that led to the ‘T3SS effector networks’ hypothesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Ruano-Gallego et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Sanchez-Garrido et al., 2022</xref>). Further characterization of the <italic>Shigella</italic> T3SS effector network that renders bacteria resistant to IFNγ-inducible cell-autonomous immune program will provide a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of this important human enteric pathogen. Given the rise of extensively drug-resistant <italic>Shigella</italic> strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Tsai et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Donkor et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Matanza and Clements, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">O’Flanagan et al., 2023</xref>), such an understanding may prove to be essential for the development of critically needed novel therapeutic approaches to treat Shigellosis.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Cell culture</title><p>A549 (ATCC #CCL-185), HT-29 (ATCC #HTB-38), and MEFs were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 1% MEM non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 55 µM 2-Mercaptoethanol (Gibco) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS). MEFs were generated from E12 to E14 embryos as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Coers et al., 2008</xref>). Cells were grown at 37°C in 5% C0<sub>2</sub>. Cell lines were authenticated using GenePrint10 (Promega) by the Duke University DNA Analysis Facility. All cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Knock out cell lines and mammalian expression systems</title><p>The production and characterization of A549 knockout cell lines (pooled RNF213KO, HOIP<sup>KO</sup> clone, and HOIL-1<sup>KO</sup> clone) was previously reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Hernandez et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Walsh et al., 2022</xref>). Various GFP-tagged IpaH expression constructs including the IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 C/S mutants were previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>). Internally Strep-tagged ubiquitin (INT-Ub) and Internally Strep-tagged and N-Terminally HA-tagged ubiquitin (NTerm-HA-Ub_ INT-Strep) open reading frames were cloned via Gateway cloning into the lentiviral expression plasmid pLEX307, a gift from Dr. David Root (Addgene plasmid # 41392; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://n2t.net/addgene:41392">http://n2t.net/addgene:41392</ext-link>; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:Addgene_41392">Addgene_41392</ext-link>). DNA of full-length human RNF213 with N-terminal mCherry was a gift from Daisuke Morito (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Sugihara et al., 2019</xref>). RNF213 was amplified in segments using PCR and cloned using Golden Gate assembly with the enzyme kit BsmBI-v2 (New England Biolabs). Endogenous BsmBI sites were removed from RNF213 by introducing silent mutations in primers used to add enzyme overhangs for Golden Gate assembly. RNF213 was first cloned into a modified Gateway donor vector pDONR221 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing a golden gate cloning site in between ATTP sites to make pENTR-mCherry-RNF213. mCherry-RNF213 was transferred into piggybac vector PB-TA-ERN using LR clonase enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for dox-inducible expression of mCherry-RNF213. PB-TA-ERN (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Kim et al., 2016</xref>) was a gift from Knut Woltjen (Addgene plasmid #80474; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://n2t.net/addgene:80474">http://n2t.net/addgene:80474</ext-link>; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:Addgene_80474">Addgene_80474</ext-link>). Whole plasmid sequencing of PB-TA-ERN-mCherry-RNF213 and the INT-Ub vectors was performed by Plasmidsaurus using Oxford Nanopore Technology with custom analysis and annotation. The INT-Ub protein sequences are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>. For mCherry-RNF213 expression in human cells, 293T cells (ATCC CRL-3216) were transfected with PB-TA-ERN and piggybac transposase (pRP[Exp]-EGFP-EF1A&gt;hyPBase, VectorBuilder) using lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were grown for approximately 8 days to allow for loss of the transiently transfected vectors, while mCherry-RNF213 that had integrated into the 293T genome was being maintained.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Production of Rnf213 knockout mouse and derived cells</title><p>RNF213 knockout mice were generated using a modified iGONAD methodology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Skavicus and Heaton, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Gurumurthy et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Ohtsuka et al., 2018</xref>). Briefly, 1 day time-mated, vaginal-plug-positive 8- to 24-week-old C57BL/6J female mice were put under isoflurane anesthesia. A dorsal surgical incision was made, and the ovary/oviduct was exposed. The oviduct was injected with a 0.5-μl Cas9/CRISPR mix which included 6.1 μM Cas9 protein (IDT, Cat. #1081058), 30 μM sgRNAs (IDT, Alt-R CRISPR–Cas9 sgRNA), and 0.02% Fast Green FCF (VWR, Cat. #AAA16520-14) in Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. #11058021). The 30 μM sgRNA concentration included the following two sgRNAs targeting exon 28 of <italic>Rnf213</italic>: 5′-<named-content content-type="sequence">TTAAATACTGGTAAGGTCGT</named-content>(TGG)-3′ and 5′-<named-content content-type="sequence">AGTCGGAGTAGCAAAATCCC</named-content>(TGG)-3′. After the Cas9/sgRNA mix injection, the oviducts were covered with tissue and then electroporated using a CUY21EDIT II (BEX Co, Ltd) electroporator with the settings: Square mA mode, Pd V: 60 V, Pd A: 100 mA, Pd on: 5 ms, Pd off: 50 ms, Pd N: 3, and Decay: 10%. This procedure was done on both sets of oviducts in the mouse. After surgery, female mice were housed together and at 19–21 days post-surgery monitored for pup birth. Pups were genotyped, and three founder mice with out-of-frame 101, 284, or 407 bp deletions within exon 28, respectively, were selected and bred to homozygosity. Loss of Rnf213 protein expression in cells derived from these knockout mice was validated by western blotting.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Lentivirus production</title><p>Plasmids were transfected into HEK 293T cells using the TransIT 293 transfection reagent (Mirus). Wells were transfected with 1 µg plasmid, 750 ng pGAGpol, 250 ng VSVG. Six hours post-transfection, media was aspirated and replaced with fresh DMEM. Twenty-four hours post-transfection, media was aspirated and replaced with pseudoparticle DMEM (3% FBS, 1% MEM non-essential amino acids, 20 mM HEPES). Supernatant was collected 48 and 72 hr after transfection. Supernatants containing lentivirus were filtered using 0.45 µm filters (Corning) and later mixed with 10 µg/ml polybrene (Millipore Sigma). Virus was frozen at –80 until use. For cell transduction, A549 cells were diluted to a concentration of 3.33 × 10<sup>4</sup> cells/ml and mixed with 10 µg/ml polybrene. 500 µl of lentivirus was added to each well of a 6-well plate, and 1.5 ml of diluted cells were added on top. Cells were selected in media with 1 µg/ml of puromycin and expanded.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>IpaH mini-screen</title><p>HEK 293T that express PiggyBac RNF213 were seeded at 10<sup>5</sup> cells/well. Sixteen hours before transfection, aTc was added to cells to induce expression of RNF213. The next morning, 2.5 µg of IpaH effector-encoding plasmids were used to transfect HEK 293T using the TransIT 293 transfection reagent (Mirus). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer and prepared for immunoblotting, as described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Piro et al., 2017</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Bacterial strains</title><p>All <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains were grown on Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB, Millipore Sigma) agar plates in the presence of 0.01% of Congo Red (Millipore Sigma) and red colonies were cultured in TSB broth culture. <italic>S. flexneri</italic> 2457T wild-type and mutant strains (<italic>ΔmxiE and ΔipaH1.4</italic>) were previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Piro et al., 2017</xref>). <italic>S. flexneri</italic> M90T strains (wild-type, <italic>ΔipaH2.5</italic>, <italic>ΔipaH1.4</italic>, and Δ<italic>ipaH1.4-ipaH2.5</italic>) were also previously reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>). For immunofluorescence studies, we used fluorescent <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains carrying the pGFPmut2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Cormack et al., 1996</xref>) or the pJUMP45-2A (sfGFP) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Valenzuela-Ortega and French, 2021</xref>) plasmids. Bacteria were transformed with the ilux pGEX(-) plasmid (Addgene plasmid #107879) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Gregor et al., 2018</xref>) to generate bioluminescent bacteria, as previously reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Dickinson et al., 2023</xref>). Where specified, <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains were used that harbor the pilT plasmid which encodes an adhesin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Clerc and Sansonetti, 1987</xref>) and enhances bacterial adhesion to host cells. To complement the <italic>ΔipaH1.4</italic> strain, full-length IpaH1.4 and its catalytically inactive variant C368S were cloned into the bacterial expression vector pDSW206 using Takara In-Fusion Snap Assembly Master Mix (Cat# 638948) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Bacterial transformation was performed as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Piro et al., 2017</xref>). Antibiotics were used as needed at the following concentration: carbenicillin (50 µg/ml), kanamycin (50 µg/ml), spectinomycin (50 µg/ml), and chloramphenicol (100 µg/ml).</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Infection procedures</title><p>For immunofluorescence staining, A549, HT29, and MEF cells were seeded at 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells per well on cover slips in 24-well plates. HT29 cells were plated at 2 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells per well. For Western blotting, cells were plated at 2 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells per well in 24-well plates. Cells were either left untreated or treated overnight with human or mouse cytokine IFNγ at a final concentration of 100 U/ml, as indicated. The day before infection, <italic>S. flexneri</italic> was inoculated into TSB with antibiotics as needed and grown overnight at 37°C with aeration. The next day, bacteria were diluted (1:20) in TSB with antibiotics and grown for 1 hr 30 min. To induce the expression of WT and C368S mutant IpaH1.4 in complemented <italic>ΔipaH1.4</italic> bacteria<italic>,</italic> 1 mM IPTG (Invitrogen 15529-019) was added 1 hr after subculturing. Subsequently, the optical density of the broth culture was measured and pelleted bacteria were washed in sterile PBS and resuspended in DMEM. Infections were carried out at an approximate multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50–100, unless otherwise specified. Cells were centrifuged at 1000 × <italic>g</italic> for 10 min at the time of infection and infected cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO<sub>2</sub>. Cells were washed with warm HBSS two times after 90 min (A549 and HT29 cells) or 60 min (MEFs) post infection. Following these washes, gentamicin at a final concentration of 50 µg/ml (for A549 and MEFs) or 100 µg/ml (for HT29) was added to the media. For fluorescence microscopy, infected cells were fixed with 4% PFA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4 hpi (A549 cells), 3 hpi (HT29), or 2 hpi (MEFs). All <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains carried the plasmid pGFPmut2 to visualize bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. For western blotting, bioluminescence experiments, and MEF infections, <italic>S. flexneri</italic> strains expressed PilT for improved adhesion and infection rates.</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Immunofluorescence microscopy</title><p>Cells were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS and then permeabilized either with 0.1% Triton in PBS for 15 min or with ice-cold methanol for 1 min followed by 0.05% saponin in blocking buffer. Blocking buffer was composed of 5% BSA, 2.2% glycine ± 0.05% saponin or 10% goat serum and 0.05% saponin in PBS. Following permeabilization, coverslips were blocked for 30 min at room temperature (RT). Next, coverslips were incubated with the respective primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit monoclonal anti-RNF213 (Sigma HPA026790; 1:1000), rabbit monoclonal anti-linear (M1) ubiquitin; clone 1E3 (Sigma ZRB2114; 1:250), mouse polyclonal anti-ubiquitin FK2 (Cayman Chemical 14220; 1:100), rabbit monoclonal anti-K63 ubiquitin, clone Apu3 (Sigma 05-1308; 1:100), rabbit monoclonal anti-K27 (Abcam ab181537; 1:100), mouse monoclonal anti-Strep (Genscript A01732; 1:200), custom rabbit anti-mRnf213 antibody from an animal immunized with peptides RKSNEGGNTQPEDQRKPGEGR (aa296–316) and KDTVEYEFIYEQAQKKGE (aa429–446) (Life Technologies, 1:100). Coverslips were then washed three times with 0.05% Triton in PBS or 0.05% saponin and incubated with an Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000, Invitrogen) and nuclear dye Hoechst 33258 (2 µg/ml; Invitrogen) for 1 hr at RT. Next, coverslips were washed three times with 0.05% Triton or 0.05% saponin in PBS and mounted on glass slides using a mix of mowiol 4-88 combined with para-phenylenediamine antifading agent (9:1). Coverslips were imaged at a Zeiss Axio Imager microscope with Apotome 3 using a 63×/1.4 NA Oil immersion lens. Two to eleven fields of view were captured per coverslip to account for at least 100 bacteria, and z slices with an interval of 0.5 µm were taken per field of view. Images were processed on the software program Fiji. Bacteria that had protein signal surrounding at least 50% of its visible surface were considered as targeted.</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Bacterial luminescence assay</title><p>Infections were conducted with bacterial strains carrying the pilT plasmid to promote cell adhesion and the ilux plasmid as a bioluminescence reporter. Host cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 2.5 × 10<sup>4</sup> cells per well. An approximate MOI of 5 in an infection volume of 100 µl per well was used. Twenty-five minutes post-infection, wells were washed once with 200 µl of warm HBSS and then fresh DMEM containing 50 µg /ml gentamicin was added to each well. Bacterial bioluminescence was measured on a multimode microplate reader (Biotek Synergy H1, Agilent) every 30 min, starting at 1 hpi and finishing at 8 hpi.</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title>Western blotting</title><p>After infection, cells were washed two times with cold HBSS and lysed in RIPA buffer (Sigma) in the presence of 4 U/ml DNAse I (NEB) and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Lysates were incubated at 4°C for 30 min and centrifuged at 20,000 × <italic>g</italic> for 12 min at 4°C. Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA kit (Thermo Fisher) and normalized. Normalized samples were mixed with Laemmli buffer that contained 5% β-mercaptoethanol and heated at 95°C for 10 min. Samples were heated at 56°C for 10 min when samples were prepared for RNF213 immunoblotting. Ten to thirty µg of protein sample were resolved on a 4–20% Mini-Protean TGX stain-free gels (Bio-Rad) and then blotted onto a PVDF membrane using a tank transfer system overnight at 4°C. After the transfer, PVDF membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween20 (Sigma-Aldrich) (TBS-T) for 1 hr at RT. Subsequently, membranes were incubated with primary antibody diluted in blocking solution overnight at 4°C. After primary antibody incubation, blots were washed three times with TBST and incubated with the respective secondary antibody in blocking solution for 1 hr at RT. Afterwards, membranes were washed with TBS-T and developed with Clarity ECL (Cytiva). Blots were imaged on an Azure 500 visualization system. Primary antibodies used in this study include rabbit monoclonal anti-RNF213 (Sigma HPA026790; 1:2000), rabbit polyclonal anti-GAPDH (Abcam ab9845; 1:10000); mouse monoclonal anti HOIL-1, clone E3E (Sigma MABC576; 1:500); custom rabbit anti-mRnf213 (Life Technologies, 1:500); rabbit polyclonal anti-HOIP (Abcam ab46322; 1:500); and monoclonal Anti-β-Actin (Sigma A2228; 1:6000). Images were processed in Fiji.</p></sec><sec id="s4-11"><title>UBAIT substrate capture assays</title><p>UBAIT assays were performed essentially as described before (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Hansen et al., 2021</xref>). Briefly, unknown substrates were captured from colon and cecum lysates from 6- to 8-week-old wild-type C57BL/6 (Charles River) mice. All mouse infection experiments conducted were in accordance with the policies of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at UT Southwestern. Mice were orally infected by gavage with 1x10<sup>9</sup> <italic>S. enterica</italic> Typhimurium S1344 WT, and after 4 days mice were euthanized, and colon and cecum were removed, washed, and homogenized in Lysis Buffer (1x ubiquitination buffer (Boston Biochem), 1x protease inhibitor (Sigma), 1 mM DTT). Homogenates were then centrifuged at 13,000 × <italic>g</italic> at 4°C for 10 min and supernatants were added to UBAIT reactions. The supernatant was incubated with 25 µg of purified Strep-IpaH2.5-3xFLAG-Ub or Strep-IpaH3-3xFLAG-Ub and rotated at 4°C. After 1 hr, His-UbE1 (100 nM), His-UbcH5b (2000 nM), energy regeneration buffer (Boston Biochem), MgCl (1 mM), and 1x ubiquitination buffer were added to a final volume of 500 µl. The reaction was run at 30°C for 10 min and then 300 µl TBS buffer (25 mM Tris-HCL pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT) and 30 µl of washed Strep-Tactin Superflow beads (Iba LifeSciences) were added and rotated for 2 hr at 4°C. The beads were washed four times in TBS-T (TBS + 0.5% Triton-X100) and two times in TBS. Strep-IpaH2.5-3xFLAG-Ub was eluted from the beads in 150 µl Strep-tag elution buffer (Iba LifeSciences). Eluted sample and beads were centrifuged, and supernatant moved to a new tube. SDS (0.25% final concentration) and DTT (5 mM final concentration) were added, and samples were heated at 95°C for 5 min. Next, 1.2 ml TBS was added, followed by 20 µl of M2-FLAG beads (Sigma). The mixture was rotated for 2 hr at 4°C. M2-FLAG beads were washed four times in TBS-T followed by 2 times in TBS. Finally, 35 µl of hot (95°C) SDS–PAGE Loading Buffer was added and the beads were heated for an additional 5 min at 95°C. Samples were electrophoresed on a gradient precast SDS–PAGE gel (Bio-Rad) and Coomassie stained. A lane of gel above the band with unmodified Strep-IpaH2.5-3xFLAG-Ub or Strep-IpaH3-3xFLAG-Ub was excised, and proteins were digested overnight with trypsin (Pierce) following reduction and alkylation with DTT and iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich). Following solid-phase extraction cleanup with an Oasis HLB µelution plate (Waters), the resulting peptides were reconstituted in 10 µl of 2% (vol/vol) acetonitrile (ACN) and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water. Two µl of each sample were injected onto an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo) mass spectrometer, coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC-Nano liquid chromatography systems (Thermo) at the Mass Spectrometry Core at University of Texas Southwestern. Samples were injected onto a 75 μm i.d., 75 cm long, (Lumos) EasySpray column (Thermo), and eluted with a gradient from 0 to 28% buffer B over 90 min. Buffer A contained 2% (vol/vol) ACN and 0.1% formic acid in water, and buffer B contained 80% (vol/vol) ACN, 10% (vol/vol) trifluoroethanol, and 0.1% formic acid in water. The Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer operated in positive ion mode with a source voltage of 2.0–2.4 kV and an ion transfer tube temperature of 275°C. MS scans were acquired at 120,000 resolution in the Orbitrap and up to 10 MS/MS spectra were obtained in the Orbitrap for each full spectrum acquired using higher-energy collisional dissociation for ions with charges 2–7. Dynamic exclusion was set for 25 s after an ion was selected for fragmentation. Raw MS data files were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer v.2.4 (Thermo), with peptide identification performed using Sequest HT searching against the human reviewed protein database from UniProt. Fragment and precursor tolerances of 10 ppm and 0.6 Da (Lumos) were specified, and three missed cleavages were allowed. Carbamidomethylation of Cys was set as a fixed modification and oxidation of Met was set as a variable modification. The false-discovery rate cutoff was 1% for all peptides. The abundance of identified peptides found for Strep-IpaH2.5 UBAIT was compared to those found for control IpaH3 UBAIT that was included in the same experiment. Hits for IpaH2.5 were included when abundance levels were at least twofold higher than UBAIT controls.</p></sec><sec id="s4-12"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>Graphpad Prism 10.2.2 was used to generate graphs and to perform statistical analyses. Experiments were conducted in three to five biological replicates. Data in graphs are displayed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses included Student <italic>t</italic>-test one- and two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. Significance was considered when p values were &lt;0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s4-13"><title>Data storage</title><p>A large UBAIT mass spectrometry dataset broadly probing for IpaH protein family interaction partners was originally generated and published in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">de Jong et al., 2016</xref>. The numerical values of all other quantified data depicted in data panels in this manuscript are openly available in the Digital Repositories at Duke under the digital object identifier <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7924/r4vq36v59">https://doi.org/10.7924/r4vq36v59</ext-link>.</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con8"><p>Data curation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con9"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other"><p>All mouse infection experiments were conducted by the Alto lab at UT Southwestern in accordance with the policies of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at UT Southwestern. All other studies were conducted in the Coers lab at Duke University Medical School and were approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC Registration #: 10-6174-01).</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-102714-mdarchecklist1-v1.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>Ubiquitin constructs.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-102714-supp1-v1.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>The numerical values of all other quantified data depicted in data panels in this manuscript are openly available in the Digital Repositories at Duke under the digital object identifier: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7924/r4vq36v59">https://doi.org/10.7924/r4vq36v59</ext-link>.</p><p>The following dataset was generated:</p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset1"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saavedra-Sanchez</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Dickinson</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Apte</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>de Jong</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Skavicus</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Heaton</surname><given-names>NS</given-names></name><name><surname>lto</surname><given-names>NM</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year><data-title>Data from: The Shigella flexneri effector IpaH1.4 facilitates RNF213 degradation and protects cytosolic bacteria against interferon-induced ubiquitylation</data-title><source>Duke Research Data Repository</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7924/r4vq36v59</pub-id></element-citation></p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI139425 (to JC), AI083359 (to NMA), AI137031 (to NSH), and AI168107 (to NSH); and the Welch Foundation (grant I-1704 to NMA). NSH holds an Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. We would like to thank members of the Coers lab as well as the labs of Drs. Clare Smith, David Tobin, and Edward Miao for providing valuable feedback.</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alphonse</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Wanford</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Voak</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Gay</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Venkhaya</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Burroughs</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Mathew</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Frowde</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Alrehaili</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dickenson</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Munk</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Panina</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahmood</surname><given-names>IF</given-names></name><name><surname>Llorian</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Stanifer</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Boulant</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Berchtold</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Bergeron</surname><given-names>JRC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wack</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesser</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>Odendall</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>A family of conserved bacterial virulence factors dampens interferon responses by blocking calcium signaling</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>185</volume><fpage>2354</fpage><lpage>2369</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.028</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35568036</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashida</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmidt-Supprian</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogawa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sasakawa</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>A bacterial E3 ubiquitin ligase IpaH9.8 targets NEMO/IKKgamma to dampen the host NF-kappaB-mediated inflammatory response</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20010814</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bagamian</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Anderson Iv</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Blohm</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Scheele</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Shigella and childhood stunting: Evidence, gaps, and future research directions</article-title><source>PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases</source><volume>17</volume><elocation-id>e0011475</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pntd.0011475</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37699032</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bullones-Bolaños</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernal-Bayard</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramos-Morales</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>The NEL family of bacterial E3 ubiquitin ligases</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>23</volume><elocation-id>7725</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms23147725</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35887072</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casanova</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>MacMicking</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Nathan</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Interferon-gamma and infectious diseases: lessons and prospects</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>384</volume><elocation-id>eadl2016</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.adl2016</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clerc</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sansonetti</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1987">1987</year><article-title>Entry of Shigella flexneri into HeLa cells: evidence for directed phagocytosis involving actin polymerization and myosin accumulation</article-title><source>Infection and Immunity</source><volume>55</volume><fpage>2681</fpage><lpage>2688</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/iai.55.11.2681-2688.1987</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3312007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernstein-Hanley</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Grotsky</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Parvanova</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Howard</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Dietrich</surname><given-names>WF</given-names></name><name><surname>Starnbach</surname><given-names>MN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Chlamydia muridarum evades growth restriction by the IFN-gamma-inducible host resistance factor Irgb10</article-title><source>Journal of Immunology</source><volume>180</volume><fpage>6237</fpage><lpage>6245</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.6237</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18424746</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cormack</surname><given-names>BP</given-names></name><name><surname>Valdivia</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Falkow</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996</year><article-title>FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP)</article-title><source>Gene</source><volume>173</volume><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1119(95)00685-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8707053</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Jong</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Alto</surname><given-names>NM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Shigella flexneri suppresses NF-κB activation by inhibiting linear ubiquitin chain ligation</article-title><source>Nature Microbiology</source><volume>1</volume><elocation-id>16084</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.84</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27572974</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dickinson</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kutsch</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sistemich</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernandez</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Piro</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Needham</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesser</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>Herrmann</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>LPS-aggregating proteins GBP1 and GBP2 are each sufficient to enhance caspase-4 activation both in cellulo and in vitro</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>120</volume><elocation-id>e2216028120</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2216028120</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37023136</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dikic</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulman</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>An expanded lexicon for the ubiquitin code</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>273</fpage><lpage>287</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41580-022-00543-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36284179</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Donkor</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Odoom</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Osman</surname><given-names>AH</given-names></name><name><surname>Darkwah</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kotey</surname><given-names>FCN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>A systematic review on antimicrobial resistance in ghana from a one health perspective</article-title><source>Antibiotics</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>662</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics13070662</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39061344</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fernandez</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Sweeney</surname><given-names>YC</given-names></name><name><surname>Suchland</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Carrell</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Soge</surname><given-names>OO</given-names></name><name><surname>Phan</surname><given-names>IQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Rockey</surname><given-names>DD</given-names></name><name><surname>Patton</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hybiske</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>CT135 mediates the resistance of <italic>Chlamydia trachomatis</italic> to primate interferon gamma stimulated immune defenses</article-title><source>iScience</source><volume>27</volume><elocation-id>110143</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.isci.2024.110143</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38947519</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>XH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>The mechanism of linear ubiquitination in regulating cell death and correlative diseases</article-title><source>Cell Death &amp; Disease</source><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>659</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41419-023-06183-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goers</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Stedman</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Canning</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mou</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Ernst</surname><given-names>NH</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesser</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title><italic>Shigella</italic> IpaH9.8 limits GBP1-dependent LPS release from intracytosolic bacteria to suppress caspase-4 activation</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>120</volume><elocation-id>e2218469120</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2218469120</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37014865</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gregor</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Gwosch</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahl</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hell</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Strongly enhanced bacterial bioluminescence with the <italic>ilux</italic> operon for single-cell imaging</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>115</volume><fpage>962</fpage><lpage>967</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1715946115</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29339494</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gurumurthy</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakamura</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Inui</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kawano</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogiwara</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Takabayashi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuyama</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakagawa</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Miura</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohtsuka</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Creation of CRISPR-based germline-genome-engineered mice without ex vivo handling of zygotes by i-GONAD</article-title><source>Nature Protocols</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>2452</fpage><lpage>2482</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41596-019-0187-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31341289</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haldar</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Foltz</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Finethy</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Piro</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Feeley</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Pilla-Moffett</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Komatsu</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Frickel</surname><given-names>E-M</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Ubiquitin systems mark pathogen-containing vacuoles as targets for host defense by guanylate binding proteins</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>112</volume><fpage>E5628</fpage><lpage>E5637</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1515966112</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26417105</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hansen</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>de Jong</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>LS</given-names></name><name><surname>Heisler</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name><name><surname>Alto</surname><given-names>LT</given-names></name><name><surname>Alto</surname><given-names>NM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Pathogenic ubiquitination of GSDMB inhibits NK cell bactericidal functions</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>184</volume><fpage>3178</fpage><lpage>3191</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.036</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34022140</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hernandez</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Walsh</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Saavedra Sanchez</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Dickinson</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Interferon-Inducible E3 Ligase RNF213 facilitates host-protective linear and K63-Linked ubiquitylation of <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> parasitophorous vacuoles</article-title><source>mBio</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>e0188822</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mbio.01888-22</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36154443</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hiragi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishide</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Takagi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizushima</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Structural insight into the recognition of the linear ubiquitin assembly complex by Shigella E3 ligase IpaH1.4/2.5</article-title><source>Journal of Biochemistry</source><volume>173</volume><fpage>317</fpage><lpage>326</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jb/mvac109</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36610722</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Houzelstein</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Simon-Chazottes</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Batista</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Tokuda</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Langa Vives</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Flamand</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Montagutelli</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Panthier</surname><given-names>J-J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The ring finger protein 213 gene (Rnf213) contributes to Rift Valley fever resistance in mice</article-title><source>Mammalian Genome</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>30</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00335-020-09856-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33420513</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Structural mechanism for guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) targeting by the Shigella E3 ligase IpaH9.8</article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>15</volume><elocation-id>e1007876</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1007876</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31216343</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kane</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Schuch</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Day</surname><given-names>WA</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Maurelli</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>MxiE regulates intracellular expression of factors secreted by the Shigella flexneri 2a type III secretion system</article-title><source>Journal of Bacteriology</source><volume>184</volume><fpage>4409</fpage><lpage>4419</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.184.16.4409-4419.2002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12142411</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S-I</given-names></name><name><surname>Oceguera-Yanez</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakurai</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakagawa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamanaka</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Woltjen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Inducible transgene expression in human iPS cells using versatile all-in-one piggyBac transposons</article-title><source>Methods in Molecular Biology</source><volume>1357</volume><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>131</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/7651_2015_251</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26025620</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirisako</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kamei</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Murata</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukumoto</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanie</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sano</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tokunaga</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>A ubiquitin ligase complex assembles linear polyubiquitin chains</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>4877</fpage><lpage>4887</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.emboj.7601360</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17006537</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Komander</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Rape</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>The ubiquitin code</article-title><source>Annual Review of Biochemistry</source><volume>81</volume><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>229</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22524316</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kutsch</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sistemich</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesser</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldberg</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Herrmann</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Direct binding of polymeric GBP1 to LPS disrupts bacterial cell envelope functions</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>39</volume><elocation-id>e104926</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15252/embj.2020104926</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32510692</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kutsch</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>González-Prieto</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesser</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The GBP1 microcapsule interferes with IcsA-dependent septin cage assembly around Shigella flexneri</article-title><source>Pathogens and Disease</source><volume>79</volume><elocation-id>ftab023</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femspd/ftab023</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33885766</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levine</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kotloff</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Barry</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Pasetti</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>Sztein</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Clinical trials of Shigella vaccines: two steps forward and one step back on a long, hard road</article-title><source>Nature Reviews. Microbiology</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>540</fpage><lpage>553</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro1662</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17558427</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Ubiquitination and degradation of GBPs by a Shigella effector to suppress host defence</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>551</volume><fpage>378</fpage><lpage>383</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature24467</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29144452</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Libby</surname><given-names>TE</given-names></name><name><surname>Delawalla</surname><given-names>MLM</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Shimari</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>MacLennan</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Vannice</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name><name><surname>Pavlinac</surname><given-names>PB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Consequences of Shigella infection in young children: a systematic review</article-title><source>International Journal of Infectious Diseases</source><volume>129</volume><fpage>78</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijid.2023.01.034</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36736579</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Mechanistic insights into the subversion of the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex by the E3 ligase IpaH1.4 of <italic>Shigella flexneri</italic></article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>119</volume><elocation-id>e2116776119</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2116776119</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luchetti</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Roncaioli</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chavez</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Schubert</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Kofoed</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Reja</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheung</surname><given-names>TK</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Webster</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Lehoux</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Skippington</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Reeder</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Haley</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Newton</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kayagaki</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Vance</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Dixit</surname><given-names>VM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Shigella ubiquitin ligase IpaH7.8 targets gasdermin D for degradation to prevent pyroptosis and enable infection</article-title><source>Cell Host &amp; Microbe</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>1521</fpage><lpage>1530</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2021.08.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34492225</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martina</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Asselman</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Thery</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Boucher</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Delhaye</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Maia</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Dermaut</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Eyckerman</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Impens</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Proteome profiling of RNF213 depleted cells reveals nitric oxide regulator DDAH1 antilisterial activity</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>735416</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2021.735416</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34804992</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matanza</surname><given-names>XM</given-names></name><name><surname>Clements</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Pathogenicity and virulence of <italic>Shigella sonnei</italic>: a highly drug-resistant pathogen of increasing prevalence</article-title><source>Virulence</source><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>2280838</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/21505594.2023.2280838</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37994877</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matta</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kohio</surname><given-names>HP</given-names></name><name><surname>Chandra</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Doench</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Philips</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sibley</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Genome-wide and targeted CRISPR screens identify RNF213 as a mediator of interferon gamma-dependent pathogen restriction in human cells</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>121</volume><elocation-id>e2315865120</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2315865120</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38147552</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mavris</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sansonetti</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Parsot</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Identification of the cis-acting site involved in activation of promoters regulated by activity of the type III secretion apparatus in Shigella flexneri</article-title><source>Journal of Bacteriology</source><volume>184</volume><fpage>6751</fpage><lpage>6759</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.184.24.6751-6759.2002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12446624</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mellouk</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Enninga</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Cytosolic access of intracellular bacterial pathogens: the shigella paradigm</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>35</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2016.00035</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27092296</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naydenova</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Boyle</surname><given-names>KB</given-names></name><name><surname>Pathe</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pothukuchi</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Crespillo-Casado</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Scharte</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammoudi</surname><given-names>P-M</given-names></name><name><surname>Otten</surname><given-names>EG</given-names></name><name><surname>Alto</surname><given-names>NM</given-names></name><name><surname>Randow</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year><article-title>Shigella flexneri evades LPS ubiquitylation through IpaH1.4-mediated degradation of RNF213</article-title><source>Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>1741</fpage><lpage>1751</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41594-025-01530-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40205224</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noad</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>von der Malsburg</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Pathe</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Michel</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Komander</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Randow</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>LUBAC-synthesized linear ubiquitin chains restrict cytosol-invading bacteria by activating autophagy and NF-κB</article-title><source>Nature Microbiology</source><volume>2</volume><elocation-id>17063</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.63</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28481331</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O’Flanagan</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Siddiq</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Llewellyn</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Antimicrobial resistance in sexually transmitted <italic>Shigella</italic> in men who have sex with men: a systematic review</article-title><source>International Journal of STD &amp; AIDS</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>374</fpage><lpage>384</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/09564624231154942</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36786731</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohtsuka</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Miura</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Takabayashi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuyama</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Koyano</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Arifin</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakamura</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wada</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurumurthy</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>i-GONAD: a robust method for in situ germline genome engineering using CRISPR nucleases</article-title><source>Genome Biology</source><volume>19</volume><elocation-id>25</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-018-1400-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29482575</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Otsubo</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Mimuro</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ashida</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamazaki</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Murata</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sasakawa</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Shigella effector IpaH4.5 targets 19S regulatory particle subunit RPN13 in the 26S proteasome to dampen cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation</article-title><source>Cellular Microbiology</source><volume>21</volume><elocation-id>e12974</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cmi.12974</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30414351</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Otten</surname><given-names>EG</given-names></name><name><surname>Werner</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Crespillo-Casado</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Boyle</surname><given-names>KB</given-names></name><name><surname>Dharamdasani</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Pathe</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Santhanam</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Randow</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Ubiquitylation of lipopolysaccharide by RNF213 during bacterial infection</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>594</volume><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-021-03566-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34012115</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Piro</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernandez</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Luoma</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Feeley</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Finethy</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Yirga</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Frickel</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesser</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Detection of cytosolic <italic>Shigella flexneri</italic> via a C-Terminal Triple-Arginine Motif of GBP1 inhibits actin-based motility</article-title><source>mBio</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>e01979-17</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.01979-17</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29233899</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raqib</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindberg</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wretlind</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Bardhan</surname><given-names>PK</given-names></name><name><surname>Andersson</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Andersson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995a</year><article-title>Persistence of local cytokine production in shigellosis in acute and convalescent stages</article-title><source>Infection and Immunity</source><volume>63</volume><fpage>289</fpage><lpage>296</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/iai.63.1.289-296.1995</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7806368</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raqib</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wretlind</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Andersson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindberg</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995b</year><article-title>Cytokine secretion in acute shigellosis is correlated to disease activity and directed more to stool than to plasma</article-title><source>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</source><volume>171</volume><fpage>376</fpage><lpage>384</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/infdis/171.2.376</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7531208</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rohde</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Breitkreutz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chenal</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sansonetti</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Parsot</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Type III secretion effectors of the IpaH family are E3 ubiquitin ligases</article-title><source>Cell Host &amp; Microbe</source><volume>1</volume><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2007.02.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18005683</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ruano-Gallego</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanchez-Garrido</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kozik</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Núñez-Berrueco</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Cepeda-Molero</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mullineaux-Sanders</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Naemi Baghshomali</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Slater</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Glegola-Madejska</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Roumeliotis</surname><given-names>TI</given-names></name><name><surname>Pupko</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernández</surname><given-names>LÁ</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodríguez-Patón</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Choudhary</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Frankel</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Type III secretion system effectors form robust and flexible intracellular virulence networks</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>371</volume><elocation-id>eabc9531</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.abc9531</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33707240</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanchez-Garrido</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruano-Gallego</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Choudhary</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Frankel</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>The type III secretion system effector network hypothesis</article-title><source>Trends in Microbiology</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>524</fpage><lpage>533</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2021.10.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34840074</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasaki</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>LUBAC-mediated linear ubiquitination in tissue homeostasis and disease</article-title><source>Journal of Biochemistry</source><volume>174</volume><fpage>99</fpage><lpage>107</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jb/mvad045</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37279649</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schnupf</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sansonetti</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Shigella pathogenesis: new insights through advanced methodologies</article-title><source>Microbiology Spectrum</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>2019</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/microbiolspec.bai-0023-2019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30953429</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silué</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Marcantonio</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Campbell-Valois</surname><given-names>F-X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>RNA-Seq analysis of the T3SA regulon in Shigella flexneri reveals two new chromosomal genes upregulated in the on-state</article-title><source>Methods</source><volume>176</volume><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.03.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30905752</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skavicus</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Heaton</surname><given-names>NS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Approaches for timeline reductions in pathogenesis studies using genetically modified mice</article-title><source>Microbiology Spectrum</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e0252123</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.02521-23</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37695101</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugihara</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Morito</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Ainuki</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirano</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogino</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitamura</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirata</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagata</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>The AAA+ ATPase/ubiquitin ligase mysterin stabilizes cytoplasmic lipid droplets</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>218</volume><fpage>949</fpage><lpage>960</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201712120</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30705059</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Szczesna</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lacoursiere</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonini</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Pol</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Koc</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Ward</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Geurink</surname><given-names>PP</given-names></name><name><surname>Pruneda</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Thurston</surname><given-names>TLM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Bacterial esterases reverse lipopolysaccharide ubiquitylation to block host immunity</article-title><source>Cell Host &amp; Microbe</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>913</fpage><lpage>924</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2024.04.012</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thery</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Martina</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Asselman</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Vessely</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Repo</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sedeyn</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Moschonas</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Bredow</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Teo</surname><given-names>QW</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Leandro</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Eggermont</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>De Sutter</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Boucher</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hochepied</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Festjens</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Callewaert</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Saelens</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Dermaut</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Knobeloch</surname><given-names>K-P</given-names></name><name><surname>Beling</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanyal</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Radoshevich</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Eyckerman</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Impens</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Ring finger protein 213 assembles into a sensor for ISGylated proteins with antimicrobial activity</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>12</volume><elocation-id>5772</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-021-26061-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34599178</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tripathi-Giesgen</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Behrends</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Alpi</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The ubiquitin ligation machinery in the defense against bacterial pathogens</article-title><source>EMBO Reports</source><volume>22</volume><elocation-id>e52864</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15252/embr.202152864</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34515402</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Troeger</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Colombara</surname><given-names>DV</given-names></name><name><surname>Rao</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Khalil</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Brewer</surname><given-names>TG</given-names></name><name><surname>Guerrant</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Houpt</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Kotloff</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Misra</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Petri</surname><given-names>WA</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Platts-Mills</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Riddle</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Swartz</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Forouzanfar</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Reiner</surname><given-names>RC</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Hay</surname><given-names>SI</given-names></name><name><surname>Mokdad</surname><given-names>AH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Global disability-adjusted life-year estimates of long-term health burden and undernutrition attributable to diarrhoeal diseases in children younger than 5 years</article-title><source>The Lancet Global Health</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>e255</fpage><lpage>e269</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30045-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29433665</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Liao</surname><given-names>YS</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukushige</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chiou</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>WC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Shigellosis in Taiwan: an old enteric pathogen with changing epidemiology and increasing antimicrobial resistance</article-title><source>Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>346</fpage><lpage>353</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmii.2023.10.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37951802</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Valenzuela-Ortega</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>French</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Joint universal modular plasmids (JUMP): a flexible vector platform for synthetic biology</article-title><source>Synthetic Biology</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>ysab003</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/synbio/ysab003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33623824</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walsh</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Reitano</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Dickinson</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kutsch</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernandez</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Barnes</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Schott</surname><given-names>BH</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name><name><surname>Valdivia</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Bastidas</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>The bacterial effector GarD shields <italic>Chlamydia trachomatis</italic> inclusions from RNF213-mediated ubiquitylation and destruction</article-title><source>Cell Host &amp; Microbe</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>1671</fpage><lpage>1684</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2022.08.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36084633</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wandel</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Pathe</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Werner</surname><given-names>EI</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellison</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Boyle</surname><given-names>KB</given-names></name><name><surname>von der Malsburg</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rohde</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Randow</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>GBPs inhibit motility of Shigella flexneri but are targeted for degradation by the bacterial ubiquitin ligase IpaH9.8</article-title><source>Cell Host &amp; Microbe</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>507</fpage><lpage>518</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2017.09.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29024643</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>YF</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year><article-title>Shigella effector IpaH1.4 subverts host E3 ligase RNF213 to evade antibacterial immunity</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>16</volume><elocation-id>3099</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-025-58432-y</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.102714.3.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>eLife Assessment</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Helaine</surname><given-names>Sophie</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Harvard Medical School</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="evidence-strength"><kwd>Convincing</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="claim-importance"><kwd>Fundamental</kwd></kwd-group></front-stub><body><p>In this manuscript, the authors report the <bold>fundamental</bold> finding that a secreted ubiquitin ligase of Shigella, called IpaH1.4, mediates the degradation of a host defense factor, RNF213. The data are <bold>convincing</bold> and represent a major contribution to our understanding of cell-autonomous immunity and bacterial pathogenesis as they provide new mechanistic insight into how the cytosolic bacterial pathogen Shigella flexneri evades IFN-induced host immunity.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.102714.3.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Shigella flexneri is a bacterial pathogen that is an important globally significant cause of diarrhea. Shigella pathogenesis remains poorly understood. In their manuscript, Saavedra-Sanchez et al report their discovery that a secreted E3 ligase effector of Shigella, called IpaH1.4, mediates the degradation of a host E3 ligase called RNF213. RNF213 was previously described to mediate ubiquitylation of intracellular bacteria, an initial step in their targeting to xenophagosomes. Thus, Shigella IpaH1.4 appears to be an important factor to permit evasion of RNF213-mediated host defense. Strengths: The work is focused, convincing, well-performed and important, and the manuscript is well-written. The revised version addressed all the concerns raised during the initial review.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.102714.3.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>The authors find that the bacterial pathogen Shigella flexneri uses the T3SS effector IpaH1.4 to induce degradation of the IFNg-induced protein RNF213. They show that in the absence of IpaH1.4, cytosolic Shigella is bound by RNF213. Furthermore, RNF213 conjugates linear and lysine-linked ubiquitin to Shigella independently of LUBAC. Intriguingly, they find that Shigella lacking ipaH1.4 or mxiE, which regulates the expression of some T3SS effectors, are not killed even when ubiquitylated by RNF213 and that these mutants are still able to replicate within the cytosol, suggesting that Shigella encodes additional effectors to escape from host defenses mediated by RNF213-driven ubiquitylation.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The authors take a variety of approaches, including host and bacterial genetics, gain-of-function and loss-of-function assays, cell biology, biochemistry, . Overall, the experiments are elegantly designed, rigorous, and convincing.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa3"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.102714.3.sa3</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #3 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>In this study the authors set out to investigate whether and how Shigella avoids cell autonomous immunity initiated through M1-linked ubiquitin and the immune sensor and E3 ligase RNF213. The key findings are that the Shigella flexneri T3SS effector, IpaH1.4 induces degradation of RNF213. Without IpaH1.4, the bacteria are marked with RNF213 and ubiquitin following stimulation with IFNg. Interestingly, this is not sufficient to initiate the destruction of the bacteria, leading the authors to conclude that Shigella deploys additional virulence factors to avoid this host immune response. The second key finding of this study is that M1 chains decorate the mxiE/ipaH Shigella mutant independent of LUBAC, which is by and large, considered the only enzyme capable of generating M1-linked ubiquitin chains. These findings are fundamental in nature and of general interest.</p><p>Strengths and weaknesses:</p><p>The data is well-controlled and clearly presented with appropriate methodology. The authors provide compelling evidence that demonstrates that IpaH1.4 is the effector responsible for the degradation of RNF213 via the proteasome and their conclusions are well supported. They have clearly demonstrated how Shigella disarms RNF213-mediated immunity.</p><p>This work builds on prior work from the same laboratory that suggests that M1 ubiquitin chains can be formed independently of LUBAC (in the prior publication this related to Chlamydia inclusions). Two key pieces of evidence support this statement - fluorescence microscopy-based images and accompanying quantification in Hoip and Hoil knockout cells for association of M1-ub, using an M1 specific antibody, and the use of an internally tagged Ub-K7R mutant. Whilst it remains possible that the M1 antibody is non-specific, as acknowledged by the authors, the data in supplementary figure 1, comparing K7R-ub and the N-terminally tagged K7R ub variant, provides evidence that during Shigella infection, LUBAC independent M1-ubiquitin chains are indeed formed. This represents an important new angle in ubiquitin biology.</p><p>The importance of IFNgamma priming for RNF213 association to the mxiE or ipaH1.4 remains an interesting question that awaits future studies that compare different intracellular bacteria and the role of RNF213.</p><p>Overall, the findings are important for the host-pathogen field, cell autonomous/innate immune signaling fields and microbial pathogenesis fields and the work is a very valuable addition to the recent advances in understanding the role of RNF213 in host immune responses to bacteria.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="author-comment" id="sa4"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.102714.3.sa4</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Saavedra Sanchez</surname><given-names>Luz</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Duke University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dickinson</surname><given-names>Mary S</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Duke University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Apte</surname><given-names>Shruti S</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Duke University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yifeng</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Duke University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>De Jong</surname><given-names>Maarten</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Dallas</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Skavicusa</surname><given-names>Samantha</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Duke University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Heaton</surname><given-names>Nicholas S</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Duke University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alto</surname><given-names>Neal M</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Dallas</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Coers</surname><given-names>Jorn</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Duke University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Durham</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</bold></p><p>Shigella flexneri is a bacterial pathogen that is an important globally significant cause of diarrhea. Shigella pathogenesis remains poorly understood. In their manuscript, Saavedra-Sanchez et al report their discovery that a secreted E3 ligase effector of Shigella, called IpaH1.4, mediates the degradation of a host E3 ligase called RNF213. RNF213 was previously described to mediate ubiquitylation of intracellular bacteria, an initial step in their targeting of xenophagosomes. Thus, Shigella IpaH1.4 appears to be an important factor in permitting evasion of RNF213-mediated host defense.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The work is focused, convincing, well-performed, and important. The manuscript is well-written.</p></disp-quote><p>We would like to thank the reviewer for their time evaluating our manuscript and the positive assessment of the novelty and importance of our study. We provide a comprehensive response to each of the reviewer’s specific recommendations below and highlight any changes made to the manuscript in response to those recommendations.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):</bold></p><p>(1) In the abstract (and similarly on p.10), the authors claim to have shown &quot;IpaH1.4 protein as a direct inhibitor of mammalian RNF213&quot;. However, they do not show the interaction is direct. This, in my opinion, would require demonstrating an interaction between purified recombinant proteins. I presume that the authors are relying on their UBAIT data to support the direct interaction, but this is a fairly artificial scenario that might be prone to indirect substrates. I would therefore prefer that the 'direct' statement be modified (or better supported with additional data). Similarly, on p.7, the section heading states &quot;S. flexneri virulence factors IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 are sufficient to induce RNF213 degradation&quot;. The corresponding experiment is to show sufficiency in a 293T cell, but this leaves open the participation of additional 293T-expressed factors. So I would remove &quot;are sufficient to&quot;, or alternatively add &quot;...in 293T cells&quot;.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with the reviewer and made the recommended changes to the text in the abstract, in the results section on page 7, and in the Discussion on page 11. During the revision of our manuscript two additional studies were published that provide convincing biochemical evidence for the direct interaction between IpaH1.4 and RNF213 (PMID: 40205224; PMID: 40164614). These studies address the reviewer’s concern extensively and are now briefly discussed and cited in our revised MS.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) In the abstract the authors state &quot;Linear (M1-) and lysine-linked ubiquitin is conjugated to bacteria by RNF213 independent of the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC).&quot; However, it is not shown that RNF213 is able to directly perform M1-ubiquitylation. It is shown that RNF213 is required for M1-linked ubiquitylation in IpaH1.4 or MxiE mutants, this is different than showing conjugation is done by RNF213 itself. This should be reworded.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree and edited the text accordingly</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) Introduction: one of the main points of the paper is that RNF213 conjugates linear ubiquitin to the surface of bacteria in a manner independent of the previously characterized linear ubiquitin conjugation (LUBAC) complex. This is indeed an interesting result, but the introduction does not put this discovery in much context. I would suggest adding some discussion of what was known, if anything, about the type of Ub chain formed by RNF213, and specifically whether linear Ub had previously been observed or not.</p></disp-quote><p>We now provide context in the Introduction on page 3 and briefly discuss previous work that had implicated LUBAC in the ubiquitylation of cytosolic bacteria. We emphasize that LUBAC specifically generates linear (M1-linked) ubiquitin chains, while the types of ubiquitin linkages deposited on bacteria through RNF213-dependent pathways had remained unidentified.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) Figure 3C: is the difference in 7KR-Ub between WT and HOIP KO cells significant? If so, the authors may wish to acknowledge the possibility that HOIP partially contributes to M1-Ub of MxiE mutant Shigella</p></disp-quote><p>The frequencies at which bacteria are decorated with 7KR-Ub is not statistically different between WT and HOIP KO cells. We have included this information in the panel description of Figure 3.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(5) On page 11, the authors state that &quot;...we observed that LUBAC is dispensable for M1-linked ubiquitylation of cytosolic S. flexneri ∆ipaH1.4. We found that lysine-less internally tagged ubiquitin or an M1-specific antibody bound to S. flexneri ∆ipaH1.4 in cells lacking LUBAC (HOIL-1KO or HOIPKO) but failed to bind bacteria in RNF213-deficient cells&quot;. In fact, what is shown is that M1-ubiquitylation in ∆ipaH1.4 infection is RNF213-dependent (5E), but the work with lysine mutants, HOIP or HOIL-1 KOs are all with ∆mxiE, not ∆ipaH1.4 (3B) in this version of the manuscript. Ideally, the data with ∆ipaH1.4 could be added, but alternatively, the conclusion could be re-worded.</p></disp-quote><p>We now include the data demonstrating that staining of ∆ipaH1.4 with an M1-specific antibody is unchanged from WT cells in HOIL-1 KO and HOIP KO cells. These data are shown in supplementary data (Fig. S3E) and referred to on page 9 of the revised manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(6) The UBAIT experiment should be explained in a bit more detail in the text. The approach is not necessarily familiar to all readers, and the rationale for using Salmonella-infected ceca/colons is not well explained (and seems odd). Some appropriate caution about interpreting these data might also be welcome. Did HOIP or HOIL show up in the UBAIT? This perhaps also deserves some discussion.</p></disp-quote><p>As expected, HOIP (listed under its official gene name Rnf31 in the table of Fig.S2B) was identified as a candidate IpaH1.4 interaction partner as the third most abundant hit from the UBAIT screen. Remarkably, Rnf213 was the hit with the highest abundance in the IpaH1.4 UBAIT screen. To address the reviewer’s comments, we now explain the UBAIT approach in more detail and provide the rational for using intestinal protein lysates from <italic>Salmonella</italic> infected mice. The text on page 8 reads as follows: “To investigate potential physical interactions between IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5, we reanalyzed a previously generated dataset that employed a method known as ubiquitin-activated interaction traps (UBAITs) (32). As shown in Fig. S2A, the human ubiquitin gene was fused to the 3′ end of IpaH2.5, producing a C-terminal IpaH2.5-ubiquitin fusion protein. When incubated with ATP, ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1, and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2, the IpaH2.5-ubiquitin &quot;bait&quot; protein is capable of binding to and ubiquitylating target substrates. This ubiquitylation creates an iso-peptide bond between the IpaH2.5 bait and its substrate, thereby enabling purification via a Strep affinity tag incorporated into the fusion construct (32). IpaH2.5-ubiquitin bait and IpaH3-ubiquitin control proteins were incubated with lysates from murine intestinal tissue. To detect interaction partners in a physiologically relevant setting, we used intestinal lysates derived from mice infected with <italic>Salmonella,</italic> which in contrast to <italic>Shigella</italic> causes pronounced inflammation in WT mice and therefore better simulates human <italic>Shigellosis</italic> in an animal model. Using UBAIT we identified HOIP (Rnf31) as a likely IpaH2.5 binding partner (Fig. S2B), thus confirming previous observations (28) and validating the effectiveness our approach. Strikingly, we identified mouse Rnf213 as the most abundant interaction partner of the IpaH2.5-ubiquitin bait protein (Fig. S2B). Collectively, our data and concurrent reports showing direct interactions between IpaH1.4 and human RNF213 (36, 37) indicate that the virulence factors IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5 directly bind and degrade mouse as well as human RNF213.”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(7) It would be helpful if the authors discussed their results in the context of the prior work showing IpaH1.4/2.5 mediate the degradation of HOIP. Do the authors see HOIP degradation? If indeed HOIP and RNF213 are both degraded by IpaH1.4 and IpaH2.5, are there conserved domains between RNF213 and HOIP being targeted? Or is only one the direct target? A HOIP-RNF213 interaction has previously been shown (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47289-2">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47289-2</ext-link>). Since they interact, is it possible one is degraded indirectly? To help clarify this, a simple experiment would be to test if RNF213 degraded in HOIP KO cells (or vice-versa)?</p></disp-quote><p>We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestions. We conducted the proposed experiments and found that WT <italic>S. flexneri</italic> infections result in RNF213 degradation in both WT and HOIP KO cells. Similarly, we found that HOIP degradation was independent of RNF213. We have included these data in Figs. 5A and S3B of our revised submission. A study published during revisions of our paper demonstrates that the LRR of IpaH1.4 binds to the RING domains of both RNF213 and LUBAC (PMID: 40205224). We refer to this work in our revised manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</bold></p><p>Summary:</p><p>The authors find that the bacterial pathogen Shigella flexneri uses the T3SS effector IpaH1.4 to induce degradation of the IFNg-induced protein RNF213. They show that in the absence of IpaH1.4, cytosolic Shigella is bound by RNF213. Furthermore, RNF213 conjugates linear and lysine-linked ubiquitin to Shigella independently of LUBAC. Intriguingly, they find that Shigella lacking ipaH1.4 or mxiE, which regulates the expression of some T3SS effectors, are not killed even when ubiquitylated by RNF213 and that these mutants are still able to replicate within the cytosol, suggesting that Shigella encodes additional effectors to escape from host defenses mediated by RNF213-driven ubiquitylation.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The authors take a variety of approaches, including host and bacterial genetics, gain-of-function and loss-of-function assays, cell biology, and biochemistry. Overall, the experiments are elegantly designed, rigorous, and convincing.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>The authors find that ipaH1.4 mutant S. flexneri no longer degrades RNF213 and recruits RNF213 to the bacterial surface. The authors should perform genetic complementation of this mutant with WT ipaH1.4 and the catalytically inactive ipaH1.4 to confirm that ipaH1.4 catalytic activity is indeed responsible for the observed phenotype.</p></disp-quote><p>We would like to thank the reviewer for their time evaluating our manuscript and the positive assessment of our work, especially its scientific rigor. We conducted the experiment suggested by the reviewer and included the new data in the revised manuscript. As expected, complementation of the ∆ipaH1.4 with WT IpaH1.4 but not with the catalytically dead C338S mutant restored the ability of Shigella to efficiently escape from recognition by RNF213 (Figs. 5C-D).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):</bold></p><p>The authors should perform genetic complementation of the ipaH1.4 mutant with WT ipaH1.4 and the catalytically inactive ipaH1.4 to confirm that ipaH1.4 catalytic activity is indeed responsible for the observed phenotype.</p></disp-quote><p>We performed the suggested experiment and show in Figs. 5C-D that complementation of the ∆ipaH1.4 mutant with WT IpaH1.4 but not with the catalytically dead C338S mutant restored the ability of <italic>Shigella</italic> to efficiently escape from recognition by RNF213. These data demonstrate that the catalytic activity of IpaH1.4 is required for evasion of RNF213 binding to the bacteria.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #3 (Public review):</bold></p><p>Summary:</p><p>In this study, the authors set out to investigate whether and how Shigella avoids cell-autonomous immunity initiated through M1-linked ubiquitin and the immune sensor and E3 ligase RNF213. The key findings are that the Shigella flexneri T3SS effector, IpaH1.4 induces degradation of RNF213. Without IpaH1.4, the bacteria are marked with RNF213 and ubiquitin following stimulation with IFNg. Interestingly, this is not sufficient to initiate the destruction of the bacteria, leading the authors to conclude that Shigella deploys additional virulence factors to avoid this host immune response. The second key finding of this paper is the suggestion that M1 chains decorate the mxiE/ipaH Shigella mutant independent of LUBAC, which is, by and large, considered the only enzyme capable of generating M1-linked ubiquitin chains.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The data is for the most part well controlled and clearly presented with appropriate methodology. The authors convincingly demonstrate that IpaH1.4 is the effector responsible for the degradation of RNF213 via the proteasome, although the site of modification is not identified.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>(1)The work builds on prior work from the same laboratory that suggests that M1 ubiquitin chains can be formed independently of LUBAC (in the prior publication this related to Chlamydia inclusions). In this study, two pieces of evidence support this statement -fluorescence microscopy-based images and accompanying quantification in Hoip and Hoil knockout cells for association of M1-ub, using an antibody, to Shigella mutants and the use of an internally tagged Ub-K7R mutant, which is unable to be incorporated into ubiquitin chains via its lysine residues. Given that clones of the M1-specific antibody are not always specific for M1 chains, and because it remains formally possible that the Int-K7R Ub can be added to the end of the chain as a chain terminator or as mono-ub, the authors should strengthen these findings relating to the claim that another E3 ligase can generate M1 chains de novo.</p><p>(2) The main weakness relating to the infection work is that no bacterial protein loading control is assayed in the western blots of infected cells, leaving the reader unable to determine if changes in RNF213 protein levels are the result of the absent bacterial protein (e.g. IpaH1.4) or altered infection levels.</p><p>(3)The importance of IFNgamma priming for RNF213 association to the mxiE or ipaH1.4 strain could have been investigated further as it is unclear if RNF213 coating is enhanced due to increased protein expression of RNF213 or another factor. This is of interest as IFNgamma priming does not seem to be needed for RNF213 to detect and coat cytosolic Salmonella.</p><p>Overall, the findings are important for the host-pathogen field, cell-autonomous/innate immune signaling fields, and microbial pathogenesis fields. If further evidence for LUBAC independent M1 ubiquitylation is achieved this would represent a significant finding.</p></disp-quote><p>We would like to thank the reviewer for their time evaluating our manuscript and the positive assessment of our work and its significance. We provide a comprehensive response to the main three critiques listed under ‘weaknesses’ and also have responded to each of the reviewer’s specific recommendations below. We highlight any changes made to the manuscript in response to those recommendations.</p><p>(1) As the reviewer correctly pointed out, 7KR ubiquitin cannot only be used for linear ubiquitylation but can also function as a donor ubiquitin and can be attached as mono-ubiquitin to a substrate or to an existing ubiquitin chain as a chain terminator. To distinguish between 7KR INT-Ub signals originating from linear versus mono-ubiquitylation, we followed the reviewer’s advice and generated a N-terminally tagged 7KR INT-Ub variant. The N-terminal tag prevents linear ubiquitylation but still allows 7KR INT-Ub to be attached as a mono-ubiquitin. We found that the addition of this N-terminal tag significantly reduced but not completely abolished the number of Δ<italic>mxiE</italic> bacteria decorated with 7KR INT-Ub. These data are shown in a new Fig. S1 and indicate that 7KR lacking the N-terminal tag is attached to bacteria both in the form of linear (M1-linked) ubiquitin and as donor ubiquitin, possibly as a chain terminator. While we cannot rule out that the anti-M1 antibodies used here cross-react with other ubiquitin linkages, we reason that the 7KR data strongly argues that linear ubiquitin is part of the ubiquitin coat encasing IpaH1.4-deficient cytosolic <italic>Shigella.</italic> Collectively, our data show that both linear and lysine-linked (especially K27 and K63) ubiquitin chains are part of the RNF213-dependent ubiquitin coat on the surface of IpaH1.4 mutants. And furthermore, our data strongly indicate that this ubiquitylation of IpaH1.4 mutants is independent of LUBAC.</p><p>(2) We used GFP-expressing strains of <italic>S. flexneri</italic> for our infection studies and were therefore able to use GFP expression as a loading control. We have incorporated these data into our revised figures. These new data (Figs. 4A, 5A, and S3B) show that bacterial infection levels were comparable between WT and mutant infections and that therefore the degradation of RNF213 (or HOIP – see new data in Fig. S3B) is not due to differences in infection efficiency.</p><p>(3) We agree with the reviewer that the mechanism by which RNF213 binds to bacteria is an important unanswered question. Similarly, whether other ISGs have auxiliary functions in this process or whether binding efficiencies vary between different bacterial species are important questions in the field. However, these questions go far beyond the scope of this study and were therefore not addressed in our revisions.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):</bold></p><p>(1) An N-terminally tagged K7R-ub should be used as a control to test whether the signal found around the mutant shigella is being added via the N terminal Met into chains. As it is known that certain batches of the M1-specific antibodies are in fact not specific and able to detect other chain types, the authors should test the specificity of the antibody used in this study (eg against different di-Ub linkage types) and include this data in the manuscript.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with the reviewer in principle. The anti-linear ubiquitin (anti-M1) monoclonal antibody, clone 1E3, prominently used in this study was tested by the manufacturer (Sigma) by Western blotting analysis and according to the manufacturer “this antibody detected ubiquitin in linear Ub, but not Ub K11, Ub K48, Ub K63.” However, this analysis did not include all possible Ub linkage types and thus the reviewer is correct that the anti-M1 antibody could theoretically also detect some other linkage types. To address this concern, we added new data during revisions demonstrating that 7KR INT-Ub targeting to <italic>S. flexneri</italic> is largely dependent on the N-terminus (M1) of ubiquitin. Our combined observations therefore overwhelmingly support the conclusion that linear (M1-linked) as well as K-linked ubiquitin is being attached to the surface of IpH1.4 <italic>S. flexneri</italic> bacteria in an RNF213-dependent and LUBAC-independent manner.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) The M1 signal detected on bacteria with the antibody is still present in either Hoip or Hoil KO’s but due to the potential non-specificity of the antibody, the authors should test whether K7R ub is detected on bacteria in the Hoil ko (in addition to Hoip KO). This would strengthen the authors’ data on LUBAC-independent M1 and is important because Hoil can catalyse non-canonical ubiquitylation.</p></disp-quote><p>The specific linear ubiquitin-ligating activity of LUBAC is enacted by HOIP. We show that linear ubiquitylation of susceptible <italic>S. flexneri</italic> mutants as assessed by anti-M1 ubiquitin staining or 7KR INT-Ub recruitment occurs in HOIPKO cells at WT levels (Figs. 3B, 3C, S3E [new data]). In our view , these data unequivocally show that the observed linear ubiquitylation of cytosolic <italic>S. flexneri ipaH1.4</italic> and <italic>mxiE</italic> mutants is independent of LUBAC.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) For Figure 4A, do mxiE bacteria show similar invasion - authors should include a bacterial protein control to show levels of bacteria in WT and mxiE infected conditions. A similar control should be included in Figure 5A.</p></disp-quote><p>We used GFP-expressing strains of <italic>S. flexneri</italic> for our infection studies and were therefore able to use GFP expression as a loading control. We have incorporated these data into our revised figures. These new data (Figs. 4A, 5A, and S3B) show that bacterial infection levels were comparable between WT and mutant infections and that therefore the degradation of RNF213 (or HOIP – see new data in Fig. S3B) is not due to differences in infection efficiency.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) Can the authors speculate why IFNg priming is needed for the coating of Shigella mxiE mutant but not in the case of Salmonella or Burkholderia? Is this just amounts of RNF213 or something else?</p></disp-quote><p>In our studies we did not directly compare ubiquitylation rates of cytosolic <italic>Shigella, Burkholderia,</italic> and <italic>Salmonella</italic> bacteria with each other under the same experimental conditions. However, such a direct comparison is needed to determine whether IFNgamma priming is required for RNF213-dependent bacterial ubiquitylation of some but not other pathogens. Two papers published during the revisions of our manuscript (PMID: 40164614, PMID: 40205224) reports robust RNF213 targeting to IpaH1.4 <italic>Shigella</italic> mutants in unprimed cells HeLa cells (whereas we used A549 and HT29 cells). Therefore, differences in reagents, cell lines, and/or other experimental conditions may determine whether IFNgamma priming is necessary to observe substantial RNF213 translocation to cytosolic bacteria.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(5) Typos - there are several, but this is hard to annotate with line numbers so the authors should proofread again carefully.</p></disp-quote><p>We proofread the manuscript and corrected the small number of typos we identified</p></body></sub-article></article>