<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">105575</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105575</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="version">10.7554/eLife.105575.2</article-id><article-version article-version-type="publication-state">version of record</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Short Report</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Developmental Biology</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Neuroscience</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Afadin sorts different retinal neuron types into accurate cellular layers</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Lum</surname><given-names>Matthew R</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6992-4365</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>Sachin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>Hannah K</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Mengya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>Yujuan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Liang</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6292-5995</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Melissa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>La Torre</surname><given-names>Anna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con8"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Della Santina</surname><given-names>Luca</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con9"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Ying</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con10"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-1649</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con11"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Welsbie</surname><given-names>Derek S</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con12"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-8972</contrib-id><email>Xin.Duan@ucsf.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con13"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043mz5j54</institution-id><institution>Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00f54p054</institution-id><institution>Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Palo Alto</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05rrcem69</institution-id><institution>Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Davis</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/048sx0r50</institution-id><institution>College of Optometry, University of Houston</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Houston</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/0168r3w48</institution-id><institution>Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Diego</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043mz5j54</institution-id><institution>Department of Physiology and Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Xiaorong</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/0153tk833</institution-id><institution>University of Virginia</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>Lois EH</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00dvg7y05</institution-id><institution>Boston Children's Hospital</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><fn fn-type="con" id="equal-contrib1"><label>†</label><p>These authors contributed equally to this work</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>14</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>RP105575</elocation-id><history><date date-type="sent-for-review" iso-8601-date="2024-12-24"><day>24</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-12-25"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.24.630272"/></event><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a reviewed preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2025-02-21"><day>21</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105575.1"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2025, Lum, Patel, Graham et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Lum, Patel, Graham et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-105575-v1.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-105575-figures-v1.pdf"/><related-article related-article-type="article-reference" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.105627" id="ra1"/><abstract><p>Neurons use cell-adhesion molecules (CAMs) to interact with other neurons and the extracellular environment: the combination of CAMs specifies migration patterns, neuronal morphologies, and synaptic connections across diverse neuron types. Yet little is known regarding the intracellular signaling cascade mediating the CAM recognitions at the cell surface across different neuron types. Using mouse genetics and viral labeling, we investigated the neural developmental role of Afadin (Mandai et al., 1997; Takai and Nakanishi, 2003; Takahashi et al., 1999), a cytosolic adapter protein that connects multiple CAM families to intracellular F-actin. We introduced the conditional Afadin mouse mutant (Beaudoin et al., 2012) to an embryonic retinal Cre, <italic>Six3<sup>Cre</sup></italic> (Oliver et al., 1995; Liu and Cvekl, 2017; Diacou et al., 2018). We reported that the mouse mutants lead to the scrambled retinal neuron distribution, including bipolar cells (BCs), amacrine cells (ACs), and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), across three cellular layers of the retina. This scrambled pattern was first reported here at neuron-type resolution. Importantly, the mutants do not display deficits for BCs, ACs, or RGCs in terms of neural fate specifications or survival. Additionally, the displayed RGC types still maintain synaptic partners with putative AC types, indicating that other molecular determinants instruct synaptic choices independent of Afadin. Lastly, there is a significant decline in visual function and mis-targeting of RGC axons to incorrect zones of the superior colliculus, one of the major retinorecipient areas. Collectively, our study uncovers a unique cellular role of Afadin in sorting retinal neuron types into proper cellular layers as the structural basis for orderly visual processing.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>mouse</kwd><kwd>retina</kwd><kwd>neuron types</kwd><kwd>genetics</kwd><kwd>Afadin</kwd><kwd>lamination</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>Mouse</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03wkg3b53</institution-id><institution>National Eye Institute</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01EY030138</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03cvfxv40</institution-id><institution>BrightFocus Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>G2024005F</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Mengya</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05ez53b31</institution-id><institution>Glaucoma Research Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>CFC3</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>La Torre</surname><given-names>Anna</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><name><surname>Welsbie</surname><given-names>Derek S</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04drjs621</institution-id><institution>Research to Prevent Blindness</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>Stein Innovation Award</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Genetic perturbation of Afadin in the retina reveals its importance for the precise organization of the retinal layers while leaving neuronal fate and numbers unaffected.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>publishing-route</meta-name><meta-value>prc</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>The central nervous system (CNS) consists of complex circuits that are established during development and fine-tuned through both activity-dependent and apoptotic mechanisms. However, how neurons form these complex circuits—and, more specifically, how cell surface molecules promote correct neuronal migration and synapse formation—is not fully resolved. Cell-adhesion molecules (CAMs) have been shown to be key mediators of CNS lamination and synaptogenesis. Work from ours and others focused on using the inner retina of the mouse as a developmental system to understand mechanisms regulating these developmental questions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Graham and Duan, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Lefebvre et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Sun et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Matsuoka et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Hoon et al., 2014</xref>). Specifically, our past studies showed that type II cadherin (Cdhs), in combination, plays key roles in establishing appropriate synapses between retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and BCs, as well as RGCs with amacrine cells (ACs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Duan et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Duan et al., 2018</xref>). Among the molecular machinery that composes the adherens junction (AJ) complex, β-catenin has been shown to be important in neuronal laminar organization, leading to embryonic deficits and major retinal neuron loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Fu et al., 2006</xref>).</p><p>While we assume that all intracellular components of cell-surface adhesion complexes are critical for retinal neuron survival and patterning, not all components of the AJ complex equally regulate the same aspects of these developmental programs. Afadin is a cytosolic adaptor protein that links Nectin, a Ca<sup>2+</sup>-independent immunoglobulin-like CAM, to F-actin microfilaments in the cytoskeleton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Mandai et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Takai and Nakanishi, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Takahashi et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Takai et al., 2008</xref>). Afadin recruits cadherins to AJs mediated by Nectin, p120-catenin, and α-catenin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Takai and Nakanishi, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Takahashi et al., 1999</xref>). While Afadin has multiple direct interactions with AJ proteins, it is not a core part of the cadherin–catenin complex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Sawyer et al., 2009</xref>).</p><p>Past genetic studies in the mouse CNS showed that loss of Afadin in both the hippocampal and cortical regions of the mouse brain leads to a decrease in dendritic spine density and number of synapses, with variable effects on dendritic arborization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Beaudoin et al., 2012</xref>). Additionally, Afadin plays an important role in cortical lamination: deletion of Afadin in the mouse telencephalon leads to cellular mislocalization and a resultant double-cortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Yamamoto et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Gil-Sanz et al., 2014</xref>). Notably, the <italic>drosophila</italic> homologue of Afadin is called <italic>Canoe</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Yu and Zallen, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Mandai et al., 2013</xref>), where the mutant phenotypes in the ommatidial eye were likely closely tied to the disruption of cellular junctions or synaptic complex, though given the broad role of Afadin (Canoe), they may also be due to other cell-surface signaling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Matsuo et al., 1999</xref>).</p><p>The mouse neural retina offers a laminarly organized structure and well-characterized cellular composition across three cellular layers. During development, retinal progenitor cells span the retinal neuroepithelium via basal and apical processes, proliferate via asymmetric and symmetric divisions at the ventricular surface, and differentiate into six neuronal types via both transcriptional regulatory networks and environmental cues—these include rod and cone photoreceptors (PRs), horizontal cells (HCs), BCs, ACs, RGCs, and one glial cell type, Müller glia (MGs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Turner and Cepko, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Cepko, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Livesey and Cepko, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Yan et al., 2020</xref>). Thus, the distinct locations and temporal order offer a clear system to examine the roles of multifaceted molecules in every step of development, such as that for Afadin. By restricting the roles of Afadin into restricted RGC subsets or AC subsets, our recent study linked Afadin to the combinatorial Cdh complex that enables the selective RGC-AC synaptic choice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Duan et al., 2018</xref>). Yet it is unknown what role Afadin plays in neuronal migration, neuronal layer sorting, and brain target selection. Here, we utilized a developmental neural retina-specific Cre driver (<italic>Six3<sup>Cre</sup></italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Oliver et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Liu and Cvekl, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Diacou et al., 2018</xref>) to generate a conditional Afadin mutant (<italic>Six3<sup>Cre</sup>; Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic>). This conditional mutant allows us to characterize the role of Afadin in early development. Here, we report that the Afadin mutant significantly alters retinal neuronal migration and neuronal layer sorting, though it has little effect on cellular differentiation within the inner retina.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Early Afadin conditional mutant scrambles retinal neuron layer organization</title><p>We utilized a murine conditional knockout model in which exon 2 of Afadin was flanked by LoxP sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1U</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Beaudoin et al., 2012</xref>). Cre-mediated recombination results in the excision of exon 2, resulting in a frameshift mutation and a premature stop codon. These conditional alleles were crossed with <italic>Six3<sup>Cre</sup></italic> transgenic mice to mediate gene deletion, particularly within the developing retinal neuroepithelium starting at E9 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Oliver et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Liu and Cvekl, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Diacou et al., 2018</xref>). Upon conditional knockout, Afadin mutants (hereafter referred to as AfadincKO) displayed aberrant lamination patterning at four different postnatal time points examined: P2, P7, P14, and P60 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E–H</xref>). At P2, control retinas (<italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic>) exist as a singularly laminated piece of tissue resulting from the proliferation and early differentiation of early-born retinal neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). In contrast, AfadincKO, the central retina is disrupted and contains rosette-like structures with regions devoid of cells at P2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>). At P7, the inner and outer plexiform layers are evident in control mice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>) but notably disrupted in AfadincKO, with the OPL omitted and instead existing as a singular fused nuclear layer (fused INL/ONL) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>). P7 and older mutants also show columns of neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>, arrow; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>) spanning the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and rosettes in the fused INL/ONL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>, asterisks). By P14, most, if not all, retinal neuron types and Müller glial cells have been established (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Turner and Cepko, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Cepko, 2014</xref>). To determine whether loss of Afadin affects retinal neuron densities or cell fate differentiation in addition to cellular layer organization, we examined mouse retinas and quantified neuronal subtypes in controls and mutants at P14 using well-established molecular markers: RBPMS to label RGCs, Chx10 to label BCs, and AP2α to label ACs. We found that the densities of the three major inner retinal neuronal types did not differ significantly between controls and mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1T</xref>), indicating retinal neurons in AfadincKO differentiate and proliferate via expected proportions, and Afadin is likely not involved in fate determination or cell survival regulations. When we used P14 mice to quantify the mislocalization of retinal types across three cellular layers, RGCs, ACs, and BCs were significantly scrambled across three cellular layers, compared to control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1S</xref>). Collectively, these results revealed the roles of Afadin in sorting inner retinal neurons into proper layers, likely integrating the positioning cues from the environment when specifying the layers.</p><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Retina-specific Afadin conditional mutants disrupt the cellular layer organization.</title><p>(<bold>A–H</bold>) Postnatal time course of mouse retinal cryosections in Afadin control (<italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic>) and Afadin knockout (AfadincKO). The <italic>Six3<sup>Cre</sup></italic>-Afadin knockout (<bold>E–H</bold>) displays disruption of the tri-neuronal layer organization. As a result, it leads to a fused singular outer layer (fused INL/ONL) compared to control retinae (<bold>A–D</bold>), which contain three distinct nuclear laminae separated by two plexiform layers. Rosettes (<bold>F–H</bold>, asterisks) in the fused INL/ONL are visible from as early as P2 to adulthood and are devoid of cell bodies and primarily contain neurites (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G, K and L</xref>) (<bold>F–H</bold>). The IPL is retained in AfadincKO but contains columnar-like structures of displaced neurons (F, arrow). In adult AfadincKO mice (<bold>H</bold>), there is significant shrinkage of the fused INL/ONL (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E–H</xref>). Scale bars (<bold>A–H</bold>): 100 μm. (<bold>I–T</bold>) Afadin conditional knockout results in the mislocalization of major retinal cell types. In cross-section view (<bold>I–R</bold>), the control retina displays stereotypical lamination of three major cell types: bipolar cells (Chx10), retinal ganglion cells (RBPMS), and amacrine cells (AP2a) (<bold>I–M</bold>). In control retinae, RGCs and BCs stayed in the GCL and INL strictly, with very little displacement. ACs have about 13.2 ± 0.4% displacement (<bold>S</bold>). In contrast, AfadincKO showed aberrant localization of three major cell types (<bold>N–R</bold>). RGCs, ACs, and BCs display 33.9 ± 0.4%, 42.0 ± 3.7%, and 37.6 ± 2.4%, respectively (<bold>S</bold>). Across three replicates, there was no significant difference between cell counts across the three cell types (<bold>T</bold>). Unpaired two-sided Student’s <italic>t</italic>-tests; n.s., not significant; ****p&lt;0.0001; ***p&lt;0.001. Data presented as mean percentage mislocalized ± SEM. Mislocalization and cell density quantification were obtained from P14 mice. n=3 mice in each condition. Scale bars (<bold>I–T</bold>): 100 μm. (<bold>U</bold>) Generation of AfadincKO mice. <italic>Six3<sup>Cre</sup></italic> transgenic mouse crossed with Afadin conditional knockout mouse. Exon 2 is flanked by LoxP sites, enabling Cre-mediated deletion, resulting in a frameshift and premature stop codon.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Cell type quantifications.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig1-data1-v1.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Synaptic rosettes persist despite lateral displacement of cell types.</title><p>(<bold>A–H</bold>) Wholemount retinal cross-sections display lateral displacement of major cell types in AfadincKO. In a wholemount section view, AfadincKO (<bold>E–H</bold>) displays lateral displacement of cell types within unexpected laminae, which are absent in control (<bold>A–D</bold>). Notably, BCs (Chx10) are seen in the GCL (<bold>E</bold>), and RGCs are visible in the fused INL/ONL (<bold>G, H</bold>). ACs are found throughout all laminae in AfadincKO. The IPL in the AfadincKO contains regularly interspaced clusters of RGCs, BCs, and ACs, which form vertical bridging columns (<bold>F</bold>); IPL for the control retina is not shown. The rosettes are visible, with the neurites of RBPMS +RGCs projecting inward toward the rosette center (<bold>H</bold>). Scale bars (<bold>A–H</bold>): 50 μm. (<bold>I–L</bold>) Rosettes in the fused INL/ONL have characteristics of an ectopic IPL. Wholemount section (<bold>I</bold>) of an outer region of the fused INL/ONL showing starburst amacrine cell (SAC) processes labeled by VAChT forming a central rosette structure upon which BC processes colocalize. In a 60x magnification of the dashed region in (I), the spoke-like processes of rod bipolar cells stained with PKCα are visible (<bold>J</bold>). RGC dendrites also co-cluster in the rosette structure projecting centrally (<bold>L</bold>, RBPMS). A subset of these RGCs is Cartpt-positive, which labels ooDSGCs, indicating an ectopic IPL circuit composed of DSGCs is retained at the histological level (<bold>K</bold>). Scale bar (<bold>I</bold>): 300 μm; Scale bar (<bold>J</bold>): 50 μm; Scale bars (<bold>K, L</bold>): 30 μm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig2-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Canonical synaptic pairs persist in AfadincKO despite mislocalization (related to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</title><p>(<bold>A–F</bold>) Canonical amacrine cell (AC) and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) synaptic pairs in the inner plexiform layer (<bold>A–C</bold>) continue to co-fasciculate in AfadincKO (<bold>D–F</bold>), despite ectopic localization of both subtypes in the outer nuclear layer (ONL). These pairings include ON/OFF direction-selective RGCs (Cartpt) and SACs (VAChT) (left), glutamatergic ACs (VGlut3) and S3-IPL-targeting RGCs (Kv4.2) (center), and dopaminergic ACs (TH) and intrinsically photosensitive RGCs (ipRGCs) (OPN4) (right). Scale bars (<bold>A–F</bold>): 50 μm. (<bold>G, H</bold>) In the wholemount view, both αRGCs (Spp1) (<bold>G</bold>) and melanopsin-positive ipRGCs (<bold>H</bold>) were retained near the rosette structures in the fused INL/ONL. Additionally, TdTomato-positive RGCs from AAV-Retrograde injection into the SC are shown (<bold>H</bold>). Scale bars (<bold>G, H</bold>): 50 μm. (<bold>I</bold>) A diagram illustrating the major findings and wholemount sectioning procedure is shown (<bold>I</bold>).</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig2-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Representative AfadincKO wholemount.</title><p>Representative wholemount displaying rosettes in the fused INL/ONL (<bold>A</bold>): wholemount retina labeled with RBPMS and VAChT aids in the quantification of the number of rosettes per retina. Quantification (<bold>B</bold>) of rosettes across four adult AfadincKO mice: 160±13 rosettes across four adult AfadincKO mice. Data presented as mean rosette count ± SD.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2s2sdata1"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Rosette count.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig2-figsupp2-data1-v1.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig2-figsupp2-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Mis-localized neurons in AfadincKO form an ectopic inner plexiform layer</title><p>In addition to scrambled neuronal locations in the wrong cellular layers, we also observed unusual outer layer ‘rosette’ structures and IPL bridging columns in AfadincKO that were evident as early as P2. To better characterize these substructures in our model, we utilized wholemount retina sections to obtain an <italic>en face</italic> view of the IPL and fused INL/ONL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E–H</xref>). Interestingly, these rosettes retained some degree of canonical neuronal patterning (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1A–F</xref>). They comprised radially arranged rod BCs projecting inwards towards ACs and RGCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2I and J</xref>). The subtype identities of RGCs within the clusters were diverse, including Osteopontin (Spp1)<sup>+</sup> αRGCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Zhao et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Duan et al., 2015</xref>), Melanopsin (Opn4)<sup>+</sup> intrinsically photosensitive RGCs (ipRGCs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Provencio et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Provencio et al., 1998</xref>), and Cartpt<sup>+</sup> ON-OFF direction-selective ganglion cells (ooDSGCs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Kay et al., 2011</xref>). In addition, dendrites of Carpt<sup>+</sup> ooDSGCs are projected centrally. They colocalized with starburst amacrine cell (SAC) dendrites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2J and K</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1D</xref>), reminiscent of traditional synaptic pairings at the IPL among these cell types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Wei and Feller, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Wei et al., 2011</xref>). We next quantified the number of ‘rosettes’, which numbered approximately 160±13 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2A and B</xref>) across four AfadincKO retinas in adults. This suggested that rosette formation was likely not a random occurrence but was likely a result of compensatory mechanisms of retinal lamination independent of Afadin and its CAM partners.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Axon pathfinding to central visual targets remains intact in AfadincKO</title><p>Prior work exploring the role of Afadin and N-cadherin in the mouse dorsal telencephalon revealed that loss of either led to severe defects in axonal pathfinding, in addition to neuronal mislocalization and increased progenitor cell proliferation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Yamamoto et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Gil-Sanz et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Rakotomamonjy et al., 2017</xref>). We asked whether loss of Afadin in the retina would affect RGC projections to the superior colliculus (SC), one of the primary retinorecipient areas in the mouse receiving input from more than 85% of RGCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Cang et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Matcham et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Tsai et al., 2022</xref>). To delineate the contributions from the right and left eyes, we administered intravitreal injections with CTB-488 and CTB-555 to label projection neurons, that is, RGCs from the eyes: these dyes are subsequently transported via RGC axons to the SC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). Interestingly, though RGCs did project to the SC, ipsilateral/contralateral segregation was disrupted. While most (&gt;97%*) projecting axons should cross at the midline in mice and project contralaterally, we noted an unusually high number of aberrant ipsilateral projections in AfadincKO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). Using an AAV(Retro)-mediated axonal projection-based retrograde labeling for RGC labeling, we delivered AAV-Retro TdTomato into the brain targets. We observed retrogradely labeled RGC distributions inside the retina (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). To our surprise, the retrograde labeling also labeled RGCs displaced into the fused INL/ONL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C–E</xref>). Approximately 42.2 ± 8.8% of the TdTomato labeled RGCs were mislocalized in AfadincKO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>), while only a few RGCs were displaced into the INL in the control conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C and F</xref>). Altogether, these results suggest that Afadin loss leads to axonal pathfinding deficits; on the other hand, the scrambled RGCs still grow their axons onto the central targets, including the SC.</p><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>A significant fraction of displaced RGCs project to the central targets in the SC.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) SC sections labeled with bilateral retina injections. CTB-488 and CTB-555 dye were injected into the left and right eye, respectively, of both <italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic> and AfadincKO mice. An ectopic CTB-488 patch was found close to the midline of the left SC. Scale bar: 500 um. (<bold>B</bold>) Illustration showing stereotaxic protocol. AAV (Retro)-TdTomato was injected unilaterally into the right SC of adult mice. The retrograde virus was uptaken by RGC terminals in the SC and selectively labeled RGC somata in the retina. (<bold>C–E</bold>) Displaced RGCs in AfadincKO send axons to the SC. Retinal cross-sections of <italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic> mice show retrograde-AAV labeled RGCs restricted to the GCL layer (<bold>C</bold>). In AfadincKO sections, RGCs co-labeled by RBPMS and TdTomato are mislocalized into the fused INL/ONL (dashed circle) and are close to an IPL column (<bold>D</bold>). TdTomato-positive RGCs (arrows) are also mislocalized to a rosette structure in the fused INL/ONL (<bold>E</bold>). Scale bar: 50 um. (<bold>F</bold>) Quantifications of AAVretro-labeled RGC somata. 2.7 ± 2.4% of RGCs co-labeled with RBPMS and anti-TdTomato in control mice displayed mislocalization beyond GCL, versus 42.2 ± 8.8% of RGCs in AfadincKO. Unpaired two-sided Student’s <italic>t</italic>-tests; ****p&lt;0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title>AAV retrograde data.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig3-v1.tif"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Photoreceptor loss in AfadincKO disrupts visual function</title><p>Associated with Afadin mutants in the inner retina, we inquired about the functional changes associated with such drastic anatomical changes. We observed a progressive PR loss within the same mutants. Thus, the mutants in their current form prevented us from further inquiring about functional changes associated with the inner retina physiological functions and instead encouraged examination of how Afadin loss affected PR lamination and survival. In adult mice at P60 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A and B</xref>), we observed a close-to-complete loss of central PRs; there was noted peripheral sparing, as <italic>Six3<sup>Cre</sup></italic> drives primarily central retinal neuroepithelium during development. Using Recoverin, which primarily labels rods and a small subset of BCs, we observed a significant loss of Recoverin<sup>+</sup> rods in AfadincKO mice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C–J</xref>). The mechanisms leading to the loss of PRs are currently unknown; however, the loss is likely due to the postnatal disruption of the organization and connectivity. Yet, the same mutants caused no major losses of BCs, ACs, and RGCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1T</xref>). Using the same set of mutants at P60, we sought to obtain a comprehensive measurement of visual function in AfadincKO mice. Given the degree of disorganization and PR loss, we noted significantly reduced scotopic and photopic ERG responses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4M</xref>), with flattened a and b waves in scotopic conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4K and L</xref>). Altogether, these results indicate that loss of Afadin affects PR stability, leading to significant visual deficits.</p><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Afadin mutants lose photoreceptor-mediated visual function in adults.</title><p>(<bold>A, B</bold>) Retinal cryosection displaying thinning and rod photoreceptor loss. Retinal cryosection taken from the central retina of AfadincKO (<bold>B</bold>) displays loss of recoverin-positive rod photoreceptors; the photoreceptor layer is maintained in control (<bold>A</bold>). Yellow arrow: displays remnant recoverin-positive patch in the peripheral retina. Scale bars: 500 um. (<bold>C–J</bold>) Postnatal time course of AfadincKO displaying progressive photoreceptor loss. Recoverin-positive photoreceptors display aberrant lamination in AfadincKO (<bold>G–J</bold>) but not in <italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic> (<bold>C–F</bold>). By early adulthood, AfadincKO have a near-complete loss of photoreceptors (<bold>J</bold>). Dashed red lines indicate the transition from ONL to OPL. Solid red lines indicate the transition from fused INL/ONL to IPL. Scale bars: 50 um. (<bold>K–M</bold>) Representative ERG traces shown for one right eye of both <italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic> (<bold>K</bold>) and AfadincKO (<bold>L</bold>) mouse when shown a dark-adapted intensity program of 30 cd.s/m<sup>2</sup> white stimulus. In the control mouse, the a-wave amplitude was –273.3 uV, and the b-wave amplitude was 718.6 uV. In the mutant, the a-wave amplitude was –14.33 uV, and the b-wave amplitude was 40.95 uV. The ERG responses were quantified in (<bold>M</bold>). Average a-wave and b-wave responses for <italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic> and AfadincKO mice after dark-adapting overnight. Under scotopic conditions using 30 cd·s/m<sup>2</sup> flash of white light, the average a-wave response was 235.6±49.0 uV for control and 17.0±4.3 uV for AfadincKO mice; the average b-wave response was 564.4±121.2 uV for control and 89.4±48.3 uV for AfadincKO mice. Under photopic conditions using 10 cd·s/m<sup>2</sup> flash of white light, the average a-wave response was 8.2±6.7 uV for control and 8.3±6.3 uV for AfadincKO mice; the average b-wave response was 142.7±84.2 uV for control and 50.4±35.4 uV for AfadincKO mice. Unpaired two-sided Student’s <italic>t</italic>-tests; ns, not significant; ****p&lt;0.0001; *p&lt;0.1. Data presented as mean wave response (uV) ± SEM between right and left eyes across 6 different mice. ERG quantification was obtained from adult mice. n=6 mice per condition.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title>ERG quantification.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata2"><label>Figure 4—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Raw electrophysiology ERG data exported from Diagnosys machine.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig4-data2-v1.pdf"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105575-fig4-v1.tif"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Herein, we demonstrate that developmental loss of Afadin significantly affects normal retinal development. We observed profound disorganization of retinal neuronal layers, including RGCs, ACs, and BCs. Interestingly, we also noted the appearance of rosette-like structures containing SACs and radially directed RGC dendrites, suggesting some retention of cellular organization and perhaps indicative of other compensatory mechanisms that regulate synaptogenesis. This disorganization also affects RGC axonal projections onto the SC. The roles of Afadin in CNS development were examined in other regions of the CNS: In the hippocampus, Afadin loss leads to mislocalization of CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cells; additionally, the spine density of CA1 pyramidal cell neurons is reduced, with the authors postulating that that may be a consequence of reduced cadherin puncta density (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Beaudoin et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Toyoshima et al., 2014</xref>). Similarly, loss of Afadin in the dorsal telencephalon leads to both the dispersion of neural progenitor cells and an increase in their total numbers. Neuronal differentiation was not significantly affected, but cells were localized to inappropriate cortical layers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Rakotomamonjy et al., 2017</xref>). Interestingly, while we also noted retinal neuron mislocalization into the wrong layers, we did not observe major differences in cell numbers among the retinal subtypes we profiled. This may speak to the varied roles of Afadin or their constituent adherent complexes in different parts of the brain and spinal cord.</p><p>It is being increasingly appreciated that cell adhesion complexes play a role in mediating neuronal migration, cellular layer sorting, and synaptogenesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Yamagata and Sanes, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Yamagata et al., 2003</xref>). Our work utilized the developing retina to elucidate some of the partners that mediate these interactions. However, our current study raises several questions that remain to be explored: What other mechanisms drive synaptogenesis within the retina; additionally, what is the role of cell adhesion complexes in regulating axonal pathfinding? The rosette-like structures that retain elements of normal synaptic pairings suggest that synaptogenesis may be a layered process, largely driven by cell adhesion complexes but possibly fine-tuned by other extracellular or intracellular mechanisms, irrespective of activity. Indeed, considerable work has shown that gap junctions and the electrical synapses they facilitate are precursors to the eventual formation of chemical synapses between neuronal pairs. Moreover, through what mechanisms does the loss of Afadin disrupt RGC projections and pathfinding? In the spinal neuroepithelium, deletion of Afadin leads to miswiring of motor circuits, such that certain, typically ipsilaterally projecting neurons instead project bilaterally in the Afadin knockout, leading to loss of left-right limb (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Dewitz et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Skarlatou et al., 2020</xref>). They propose that this is due to a duplication of the central canal that alters midline signaling within the spinal cord. Whether similar structural abnormalities exist in the SC and to what extent midline signaling is compromised remains to be examined.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Animal experiments</title><p>Mice were maintained under regular housing conditions with standard access to food and drink in a pathogen-free facility. Male and female mice were used in roughly equal numbers; no sexual dimorphisms were observed. Animals with noticeable health problems or abnormalities were not used. All ages and numbers were documented. PCR of tail biopsy PCR determined genotypes.</p><p>The following mouse lines were used:</p><list list-type="order" id="list1"><list-item><p><italic>Six3<sup>Cre</sup></italic> expresses Cre recombinase in all of the retina except its far periphery as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Lefebvre et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Duan et al., 2018</xref>).</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic> mice were generated by targeting the second exon of Afadin with flanking loxP sites as previously characterized in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Beaudoin et al., 2012</xref>.</p></list-item></list></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Electroretinogram (ERG) recording</title><p>Six <italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic> and six AfadincKO mice were dark-adapted overnight, and ERG data was collected in dim red light. Mice were first anesthetized with a combination of ketamine/xylazine/acepromazine (70/10/2 mg/kg), and proparacaine eye drops were administered as local anesthesia. Pupils were then dilated with 1% Tropicamide. The mouse was placed on a heating pad (39°C) under a dim red light provided by the overhead lamp of the Diagnosys Celeris ERG apparatus (Diagnosys LLC). The light-guide electrodes were placed onto the corneas. For scotopic conditions, we used a white stimulus with 30 cd·s/m<sup>2</sup> luminance intensity. Signals were captured for 300 ms after each step to assess scotopic a- and b-wave function. Following the dark-adapted protocol, we used a photopic intensity ramp protocol to assess function in a light-adapted state. For photopic conditions, we used a white stimulus with 10 cd·s/m<sup>2</sup> luminance intensity. Signals were captured for 300ms after each step to assess scotopic a- and b-wave function. Following the recordings, each mouse was placed in its home cage on a heating pad (39°C) to aid recovery from anesthesia.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Intravitreal Injection</title><p>Intravitreal injection protocol, as previously established in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Zhao et al., 2023</xref>. Mice were first anesthetized with a combination of ketamine/xylazine/acepromazine (70/10/2 mg/kg). Then, CTB-488 (Invitrogen, C34775) and CTB-555 (Invitrogen, C34776) dye was injected into the vitreous chamber of the right and left eye, respectively, with a fine glass pipette (Sutter Instrument Company). The toxin was allowed to travel anterograde for 2 weeks before processing brain tissue.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Stereotaxic injection into the superior colliculus for AAV-Retro</title><p>Stereotaxic injection protocol as previously established by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Tsai et al., 2022</xref>. Mice were anesthetized with continuous 2% isoflurane/oxygen on a stereotaxic setup (Model 940, David Kopf Instruments). Meloxicam (5 mg/kg) was administered IP before the surgery and for two consecutive days after the surgery. AAV viruses were loaded into a pulled glass pipette connected with a syringe (Hamilton, 7634-O) by a dual ferrule adaptor (Hamilton, 55750–0). Injection speed and volume were controlled by a Microinjection Syringe pump (WPI, UMP3T-1). AAV (Retrograde, RG) -Cag-tdTomato (Addgene, 59462-AAVrg) was injected into the right and left SC of P60+adult <italic>Afadin<sup>F/F</sup></italic> (control) and AfadincKO mice. Coordinates for superior colliculi injection: (3.9–4.2 mm posterior, 0.6–0.7 mm lateral to bregma, and 1.4–1.0 mm below the skull). Volume: 600 nl for a saturated SC injection. Three weeks later, the mice were humanely euthanized via transcardial perfusion. Brain and retinas were collected in 4% PFA for immunohistochemical analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Histology and image acquisition</title><p>Retina section histology as previously established (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Toma et al., 2024</xref>). Retina wholemount protocols were previously described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Duan et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Duan et al., 2015</xref>. A lethal overdose of anesthesia sacrificed the mice. The eyes were dissected and post-fixed with 4% PFA on ice for 1 h and rinsed with 1× PBS. Retinas were analyzed as cryosections and whole mounts. For frozen sections, tissues were immersed in 30% sucrose for 2 h, then frozen in OCT before sectioning in a cryostat (20 μm). For immunohistochemistry, sections were incubated in PBS with 3% donkey serum and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h blocking, followed by primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. For wholemount retinas, tissues were incubated with blocking buffer (5% normal donkey serum, 0.5% Triton X-100 in 1× PBS) overnight, followed by primary antibodies for 2–4 days at 4°C. Secondary antibodies were applied for 2 h at room temperature. Sections and wholemounts were washed with 1× PBS and mounted using Fluoromount-G Mounting Medium, with and without DAPI (Invitrogen). Confocal images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM900 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy).</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Wholemount sectioning</title><p>Retina section histology was described in (N. Tsai, M.R.L., X. D, manuscript in preparation). Eyes were collected and fixed in 4% PFA on ice for 30 min, dissected to remove the cornea and lens, and then placed back into fresh 4% PFA on ice for another 30 min. The sclera was peeled off from each retina, and four radial cuts were made. Retinas were then placed in 30% sucrose/PBS and kept at 4°C until the retinas equilibrated/sank. Retinas were mounted onto a 0.45 μm membrane filter (MF-Millipore, HABG01300) and stretched until flat. The retina and filter paper then underwent two cycles of drying and rewetting and 30% sucrose/PBS before drying for 5 min. The membrane filter was then trimmed to match the retina size. The retina and filter paper were then adhered onto a stage made through mounting a block of tissue freezing medium (EMS, 72592) by mounting a block of tissue freezing medium (EMS, 72592), which was formed earlier within an embedding mold (Polysciences) onto a cryostat chuck and sectioning to form a flat stage. The retina was then quickly embedded with a thin layer of tissue-freezing medium. The chuck was placed back onto a block of dry ice to solidify the tissue freezing tissue-freezing medium. The embedded retina block with chuck was then incubated at –80°C overnight. Following equilibration within the cryostat, the retina was cut flat by maintaining the orientation of the chuck with the cryostat blade while preparing the block and subsequent sectioning. Sections of 12 um thickness were collected onto superfrost plus slides (Fisherbrand, 12-550-1).</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Reagent and resource sharing</title><p>Requests for reagents and further inquiries may be directed to the corresponding author, Xin Duan (xin.duan@ucsf.edu).</p><sec id="s4-7-1"><title>Quantifications and statistical analysis</title><p>GraphPad Prism 9/10 was used to generate all graphs and complete all statistical analyses. Statistical significance definitions: n.s., not significant; *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001; ****p&lt;0.0001. All data are presented as means ± SEM unless stated otherwise.</p><sec id="s4-7-1-1"><title>Mislocalization and cell density quantification</title><p>Mislocalization and cell density images were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH). In practice, every eighth section was systematically sampled during cryostat preparation, thus ensuring coverage of the entire visual field. The boundaries of the INL-IPL, IPL-GCL, and AC_layer-BC_layer were used as landmarks for mislocalization quantifications. Definitions of mislocalization: RGCs were considered mislocalized if present past the INL-IPL boundary (outer retina) or within the IPL columns; ACs were considered mislocalized if present in the GCL, IPL columns, or past the AC_layer-BC_layer (outer retina); BCs were considered mislocalized if present in the GCL, IPL columns, or within the AC_layer. Notably, the mislocalization was very robust and apparent to multiple co-authors. Five images were analyzed for each mouse (three mice for control and three mice for KO). An unpaired two-sided <italic>t</italic>-test was used to determine the statistical significance of the mislocalization difference between cell types across control and cKO conditions. Data presented as mean percentage mislocalized ± SEM.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7-1-2"><title>AAV-retro mislocalization</title><p>Definitions of mislocalization for AAV-retro: TdTomato-positive RGCs were considered mislocalized if present past the INL-IPL boundary (outer retina) or within the IPL columns. Notably, the mislocalization was very robust and apparent to multiple co-authors. An unpaired two-sided t-test was used to determine the significance between control and cKO conditions. Data presented as Mean percentage mislocalized ± SEM.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7-1-3"><title>Rosette count</title><p>Rosette counts were obtained manually using Cell Counter in ImageJ across four adult AfadincKO mice ranging in age from P40 to P70. Data presented as Mean rosette count ± SD.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Reagents and resources</title><table-wrap id="inlinetable1" position="anchor"><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">Primary <bold>a</bold>ntibodies</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><bold>Antibodies</bold></td><td align="left" valign="top"><bold>Source</bold></td><td align="left" valign="top"><bold>Catalog number</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Chicken anti-GFP</td><td align="left" valign="top">Abcam</td><td align="left" valign="top">ab13970</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Rabbit anti-RFP</td><td align="left" valign="top">Rockland</td><td align="left" valign="top">600-401-379</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Rabbit anti-RBPMS</td><td align="left" valign="top">Proteintech</td><td align="left" valign="top">15187-1-AP</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Rabbit anti-Recoverin</td><td align="left" valign="top">Millipore</td><td align="left" valign="top">AB5585</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Rabbit anti-Cartpt</td><td align="left" valign="top">Phoenix Pharmaceuticals</td><td align="left" valign="top">H-003-62</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Goat anti-Chx10</td><td align="left" valign="top">Santa Cruz Biotechnology</td><td align="left" valign="top">sc-21690</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Goat anti-VAChT</td><td align="left" valign="top">Promega</td><td align="left" valign="top">G4481</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Goat anti-Chat</td><td align="left" valign="top">Millipore</td><td align="left" valign="top">AB144P</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Mouse anti-Brn3a</td><td align="left" valign="top">Millipore</td><td align="left" valign="top">mab1585</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Mouse anti-PKCα</td><td align="left" valign="top">Abcam</td><td align="left" valign="top">AB11723</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Rat anti-tdTomato</td><td align="left" valign="top">Kerafast</td><td align="left" valign="top">EST203</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3"><bold>Secondary antibodies</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="top">Source</td><td align="left" valign="top">Identifier</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Alexa Fluor 488</td><td align="left" valign="top">Invitrogen</td><td align="left" valign="top">-</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Alexa Fluor 568</td><td align="left" valign="top">Invitrogen</td><td align="left" valign="top">-</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Alexa Fluor 633</td><td align="left" valign="top">Invitrogen</td><td align="left" valign="top">-</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3"><bold>AAV vectors</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"> AAVrg-Cag-TdTomato</td><td align="left" valign="top">Addgene</td><td align="left" valign="top">59462-AAVrg</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf2"><p>Reviewing editor, eLife</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Investigation</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Resources, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con8"><p>Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con9"><p>Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con10"><p>Supervision</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con11"><p>Supervision, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con12"><p>Supervision</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con13"><p>Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other"><p>All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care (IACUC) at the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF, IACUC approval: AN200631). Mice were maintained under standard housing conditions with unrestricted access to food and water in a pathogen-free facility.</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-105575-mdarchecklist1-v1.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>All immunohistochemistry and electrophysiology data presented here are linked to the figures in the publication. Raw immunohistochemistry data related to the manuscript are deposited at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/bioimages/studies/S-BIAD2528">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/bioimages/studies/S-BIAD2528</ext-link>. Additional requests can be directed to the corresponding author, Xin Duan (xin.duan@ucsf.edu).</p><p>The following dataset was generated:</p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset1"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lum</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year><data-title>Afadin Sorts Different Retinal Neuron Types into Accurate Cellular Layers</data-title><source>BioImage Archive</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/bioimages/studies/S-BIAD2528">S-BIAD2528</pub-id></element-citation></p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank E Dang and L Pena for their assistance in animal care. We also thank YM Kuo and SL Wang for their technical support. We acknowledge (NEI P30EY002162) for vision core support, RPB unrestricted fund to UCSF-Ophthalmology; from Bright Focus Foundation Glaucoma Research Fellowship to MZ; from NIH (R01EY030138) and RBP Stein Award to XD; Glaucoma Research Foundation (Catalyst for a Cure to ALT, YH, DSW, and XD).</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beaudoin</surname><given-names>GMJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Schofield</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Nuwal</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Zang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ullian</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Reichardt</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Afadin, a Ras/Rap effector that controls cadherin function, promotes spine and excitatory synapse density in the hippocampus</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>99</fpage><lpage>110</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4565-11.2012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22219273</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Savier</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Barchini</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Visual function, organization, and development of the mouse superior colliculus</article-title><source>Annual Review of Vision Science</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>262</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-vision-091517-034142</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29852095</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cepko</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Intrinsically different retinal progenitor cells produce specific types of progeny</article-title><source>Nature Reviews. Neuroscience</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>615</fpage><lpage>627</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn3767</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25096185</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dewitz</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pimpinella</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hackel</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Akalin</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Jessell</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Zampieri</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Nuclear organization in the spinal cord depends on motor neuron lamination orchestrated by catenin and afadin function</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>1681</fpage><lpage>1694</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.059</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29444423</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diacou</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Cvekl</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Six3 and Six6 are jointly required for the maintenance of multipotent retinal progenitors through both positive and negative regulation</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>2510</fpage><lpage>2523</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30485816</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Krishnaswamy</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>De la Huerta</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanes</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Type II cadherins guide assembly of a direction-selective retinal circuit</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>158</volume><fpage>793</fpage><lpage>807</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.047</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25126785</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Qiao</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Bei</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>I-J</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanes</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Subtype-specific regeneration of retinal ganglion cells following axotomy: effects of osteopontin and mTOR signaling</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>85</volume><fpage>1244</fpage><lpage>1256</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25754821</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Krishnaswamy</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Laboulaye</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>YR</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamagata</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Toma</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanes</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Cadherin combinations recruit dendrites of distinct retinal neurons to a shared interneuronal scaffold</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>99</volume><fpage>1145</fpage><lpage>1154</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30197236</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name><name><surname>Mu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Beta-catenin is essential for lamination but not neurogenesis in mouse retinal development</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>299</volume><fpage>424</fpage><lpage>437</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16959241</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gil-Sanz</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Landeira</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Proliferative defects and formation of a double cortex in mice lacking Mltt4 and Cdh2 in the dorsal telencephalon</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>10475</fpage><lpage>10487</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1793-14.2014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25100583</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>HK</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Molecular mechanisms regulating synaptic specificity and retinal circuit formation</article-title><source>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Developmental Biology</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e379</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/wdev.379</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32267095</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoon</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Okawa</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Della Santina</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>ROL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Functional architecture of the retina: development and disease</article-title><source>Progress in Retinal and Eye Research</source><volume>42</volume><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>84</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.06.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24984227</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kay</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>De la Huerta</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>IJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamagata</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Meister</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanes</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Retinal ganglion cells with distinct directional preferences differ in molecular identity, structure, and central projections</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>7753</fpage><lpage>7762</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0907-11.2011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21613488</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lefebvre</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanes</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Kay</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Development of dendritic form and function</article-title><source>Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>741</fpage><lpage>777</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26422333</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Cvekl</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Six3 in a small population of progenitors at E8.5 is required for neuroretinal specification via regulating cell signaling and survival in mice</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>428</volume><fpage>164</fpage><lpage>175</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.05.026</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28579317</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Livesey</surname><given-names>FJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Cepko</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Vertebrate neural cell-fate determination: lessons from the retina</article-title><source>Nature Reviews. Neuroscience</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>109</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35053522</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11252990</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mandai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakanishi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Satoh</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Obaishi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wada</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishioka</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Itoh</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizoguchi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Aoki</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujimoto</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuda</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsukita</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Takai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Afadin: A novel actin filament-binding protein with one PDZ domain localized at cadherin-based cell-to-cell adherens junction</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>139</volume><fpage>517</fpage><lpage>528</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.139.2.517</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9334353</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mandai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Rikitake</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimono</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Takai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Afadin/AF-6 and canoe: roles in cell adhesion and beyond</article-title><source>Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science</source><volume>116</volume><fpage>433</fpage><lpage>454</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-394311-8.00019-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23481206</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matcham</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Toma</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>NY</given-names></name><name><surname>Sze</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>P-Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Stewart</surname><given-names>IF</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Cadherin-13 maintains retinotectal synapses via transneuronal interactions</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>44</volume><elocation-id>e1310232023</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1310-23.2023</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38123991</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsuo</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Takahashi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamamoto</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>The Canoe protein is necessary in adherens junctions for development of ommatidial architecture in the Drosophila compound eye</article-title><source>Cell and Tissue Research</source><volume>298</volume><fpage>397</fpage><lpage>404</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004419900107</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10639730</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsuoka</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen-Ba-Charvet</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name><name><surname>Parray</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Badea</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Chédotal</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolodkin</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Transmembrane semaphorin signalling controls laminar stratification in the mammalian retina</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>470</volume><fpage>259</fpage><lpage>263</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature09675</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21270798</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliver</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Mailhos</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wehr</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Copeland</surname><given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Jenkins</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Gruss</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>Six3, a murine homologue of the sine oculis gene, demarcates the most anterior border of the developing neural plate and is expressed during eye development</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>121</volume><fpage>4045</fpage><lpage>4055</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.121.12.4045</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8575305</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Provencio</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>De Grip</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayes</surname><given-names>WP</given-names></name><name><surname>Rollag</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Melanopsin: An opsin in melanophores, brain, and eye</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>95</volume><fpage>340</fpage><lpage>345</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.95.1.340</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9419377</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Provencio</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodriguez</surname><given-names>IR</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayes</surname><given-names>WP</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreira</surname><given-names>EF</given-names></name><name><surname>Rollag</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>A novel human opsin in the inner retina</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>600</fpage><lpage>605</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-02-00600.2000</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10632589</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rakotomamonjy</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Brunner</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jüschke</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Reichardt</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name><name><surname>Chenn</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Afadin controls cell polarization and mitotic spindle orientation in developing cortical radial glia</article-title><source>Neural Development</source><volume>12</volume><elocation-id>7</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13064-017-0085-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28482867</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sawyer</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname><given-names>NJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Slep</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaul</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Peifer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>The Drosophila afadin homologue Canoe regulates linkage of the actin cytoskeleton to adherens junctions during apical constriction</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>186</volume><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.200904001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19596848</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skarlatou</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hérent</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Toscano</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Mendes</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bouvier</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zampieri</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Afadin signaling at the spinal neuroepithelium regulates central canal formation and gait selection</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>31</volume><elocation-id>107741</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107741</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32521266</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>LO</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Rivlin-Etzion</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hand</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Brady</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuoka</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Yau</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Feller</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolodkin</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>On and off retinal circuit assembly by divergent molecular mechanisms</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>342</volume><elocation-id>1241974</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1241974</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24179230</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takahashi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakanishi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyahara</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Satoh</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Satoh</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishioka</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Aoki</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nomoto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizoguchi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Takai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Nectin/PRR: an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule recruited to cadherin-based adherens junctions through interaction with Afadin, a PDZ domain-containing protein</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>145</volume><fpage>539</fpage><lpage>549</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.145.3.539</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10225955</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakanishi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Nectin and afadin: novel organizers of intercellular junctions</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>116</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.00167</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12456712</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ikeda</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogita</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Rikitake</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>The immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule nectin and its associated protein afadin</article-title><source>Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>309</fpage><lpage>342</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175339</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18593353</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toma</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>HK</given-names></name><name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Modgil</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Shang</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>NY</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kriegstein</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Körbelin</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Liao</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>TN</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Perivascular neurons instruct 3D vascular lattice formation via neurovascular contact</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>187</volume><fpage>2767</fpage><lpage>2784</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38733989</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toyoshima</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Maruo</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Supriyanto</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Togashi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Inoue</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Mori</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Takai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Afadin regulates puncta adherentia junction formation and presynaptic differentiation in hippocampal neurons</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e89763</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0089763</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24587018</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>NY</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Toma</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Takatoh</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Pai</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Matcham</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Marciano</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubenstein</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Ullian</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Trans-Seq maps a selective mammalian retinotectal synapse instructed by Nephronectin</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>659</fpage><lpage>674</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41593-022-01068-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35524141</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Cepko</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1987">1987</year><article-title>A common progenitor for neurons and glia persists in rat retina late in development</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>328</volume><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>136</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/328131a0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3600789</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Feller</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Organization and development of direction-selective circuits in the retina</article-title><source>Trends in Neurosciences</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>638</fpage><lpage>645</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tins.2011.08.002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamby</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Feller</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Development of asymmetric inhibition underlying direction selectivity in the retina</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>469</volume><fpage>402</fpage><lpage>406</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature09600</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yamagata</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanes</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiner</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Synaptic adhesion molecules</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Cell Biology</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>621</fpage><lpage>632</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0955-0674(03)00107-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14519398</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yamagata</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanes</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Dscam and Sidekick proteins direct lamina-specific synaptic connections in vertebrate retina</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>451</volume><fpage>465</fpage><lpage>469</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature06469</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18216854</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yamamoto</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Konno</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Maruo</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuzaki</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Takai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Impairment of radial glial scaffold-dependent neuronal migration and formation of double cortex by genetic ablation of afadin</article-title><source>Brain Research</source><volume>1620</volume><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>152</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25988834</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>YR</given-names></name><name><surname>van Zyl</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Regev</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Shekhar</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Juric</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanes</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Cell atlas of the human fovea and peripheral retina</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>9802</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-66092-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32555229</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>HH</given-names></name><name><surname>Zallen</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Abl and Canoe/Afadin mediate mechanotransduction at tricellular junctions</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>370</volume><elocation-id>eaba5528</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aba5528</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33243859</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Toma</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kinde</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>KY</given-names></name><name><surname>Lum</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hooper</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Kriegstein</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>La Torre</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Liao</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Welsbie</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Osteopontin drives retinal ganglion cell resiliency in glaucomatous optic neuropathy</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>42</volume><elocation-id>113038</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37624696</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105575.2.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>eLife Assessment</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Xiaorong</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>University of Virginia</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="claim-importance"><kwd>Important</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="evidence-strength"><kwd>Solid</kwd></kwd-group></front-stub><body><p>This study demonstrates the critical role of Afadin on the generation and maintenance of complex cellular layers in the mouse retina. The data are <bold>solid</bold>, which provides <bold>important</bold> insights into how cell-adhesion molecules contribute to retinal organization. However, further investigations are needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying the cellular disorganization phenotype in the retina and axonal projection to the brain.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105575.2.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>In this study, the authors examined the role of Afadin, a key adaptor protein associated with cell-adhesion molecules, in retinal development. Using a conditional knockout mouse line (Six3-Cre; AfadinF/F), the authors successfully characterized a disorganized pattern of various neuron types in the mutant retinae. Despite these altered distributions, the retinal neurons maintained normal cell numbers and seemingly preserved some synaptic connections. Notably, tracing results indicated mistargeting of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon projections to the superior colliculus, and electroretinography (ERG) analyses suggested deficits in visual functions.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>This compelling study provides solid evidence addressing the important question of how cell-adhesion molecules influence neuronal development. Compared to previous research conducted in other parts of the central nervous system (CNS), the clearly defined lamination of cell types in the retina serves as a unique model for studying the aberrant neuronal localizations caused by Afadin knockout. The data suggest that cell-cell interactions are critical for retinal cellular organization and proper axon pathfinding, while aspects of cell fate determination and synaptogenesis remain less understood. This work has broad implications not only for retinal studies but also for developmental biology and regenerative medicine.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>While the phenotypes observed in the Afadin knockout (cKO) mice are intriguing, I would expect to see evidence confirming that Afadin is indeed knocked out in the retina through immunostaining. Specifically, is Afadin knocked out only in certain retinal regions and not others, as suggested by Figures 4A-B? Are Afadin levels different among distinct neuron types, which could mean that its knockout may have a more pronounced impact on certain cell types, such as rods compared to others?</p><p>The authors suggest that synapses may form between canonical synaptic partners, based on the proximity of their processes (Figure 2). However, more solid evidence is needed to verify these synapses through the use of synaptic marker staining or transsynaptic labeling before drawing further conclusions.</p><p>Although the Afadin cKO mice displayed dramatic phenotypes, additional experiments are necessary to clarify the details of this process. By manipulating Afadin levels in specific cell types or at different developmental time points, we could gain a better understanding of how Afadin regulates accurate retinal lamination and axonal projection.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105575.2.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>This study by Lum and colleagues reports on the role of Afadin, a cytosolic adapter protein that organizes multiple cell adhesion molecule families, in the generation and maintenance of complex cellular layers in the mouse retina. They used a conditional deletion approach, removing Afadin in retinal progenitors, and allowing them to analyze broad effects on retinal neuron development.</p><p>The study presents high-quality and extensive characterization of the cellular phenotypes, supporting the main conclusions of the paper. They show that Afadin loss results in significant disorganization of the retinal cellular layers and the neuropil, producing rosettes and displacement of cells away from their resident layers. The major classes of neurons in the inner retina are affected, and some neurons are, remarkably, displaced to the other side of the inner plexiform layer. Nevertheless, they mostly target their synaptic partners, including the RGCs to distant retinorecipient targets in the brain. The main conclusions are as follows. Afadin is necessary for establishing and maintaining the retinal architecture. It is not necessary for the generation of the correct numbers/densities of retinal neuron subtypes. Moreover, Afadin loss preserves associations between known synaptic partners and preserves axonal targeting to retinorecipient layers. The consequences on photoreceptor viability and visual processing are also interesting, underscoring the essential function for maintaining retinal structure and function. Overall the main conclusions describing the consequences are supported by the results.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The study provides new knowledge on the requirement of Afadin in retinal development. The introduction and discussion effectively set up the rationale for this work, and place it in the context of previous studies of Afadin in other regions of the CNS.</p><p>The study presents high-quality and extensive characterizations of the cellular phenotypes resulting from Afadin loss. By analyzing various aspects of retinal organization - from cellular densities to axon targeting to brain - the study narrows down the role of a structure for promoting the establishment of the layers, or maintenance. The data are straightforward and convincing, and the interpretations are bounded by the data shown (though minor weakness re. survival). Another important finding is that the targeting of retinal neuron processes to synaptic partners, including retinorecipient targets in the brain, are intact.</p><p>The study is important as it establishes a focused requirement for Afadin to set up and preserve the overall cellular organizations within the retinal tissue. The demonstration that Afadin is needed for photoreceptor viability and overall visual function enhances impact by establishing its functional importance.</p><p>The manuscript is well well-written and presented. The images are attractive and compelling, and the figures are well organized.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>(1) Expanding on the developmental mechanism is beyond the scope of the study, and would not add to the main conclusions. However, the manuscript would be improved by providing more clarity on the developmental emergence of the defects. The study left me questioning whether the rosettes and cell displacements occur during earlier stages of retina development, or are progressive. For instance, do the RGCs migrate and establish within the GCL correctly at first, and then are displaced with the progressive disorganization? Or are they disorganized and delaminate en route? Images of RGC staining at P0, or earlier during their migration, would be informative. Data in Figure 1 is limited to DAPI staining at P7. Figure 4 shows an image of rod photoreceptors at P7, with their displacement in the GCL layer (and not contained within a rosette). Are the progenitors mislocalized due to delamination?</p><p>A few additional thoughts on how these defects compare to other mutants with rosettes might give us more context for understanding the results.</p><p>(2) The manuscript reports that the densities of major inner retinal classes are unaffected. There are a few details missing for this point. How were the cell densities quantified (in terms of ROI size), and normalized? This information is lacking in the methods. There is a striking thickening of the GCL in the DAPI-labeled images shown in Figure 1. What are these cells?</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="author-comment" id="sa3"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105575.2.sa3</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lum</surname><given-names>Matthew R</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>Sachin</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>Hannah K</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Mengya</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>Yujuan</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Liang</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Palo Alto</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Melissa</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>La Torre</surname><given-names>Anna</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California Davis</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Davis</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Della Santina</surname><given-names>Luca</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Ying</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Stanford University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Palo Alto</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Welsbie</surname><given-names>Derek S</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California San Diego Medical Center</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Diego</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Public Reviews:</bold></p><p>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</p><p>Summary:</p><p>In this study, the authors examined the role of Afadin, a key adaptor protein associated with cell-adhesion molecules, in retinal development. Using a conditional knockout mouse line (Six3-Cre; AfadinF/F), the authors successfully characterized a disorganized pattern of various neuron types in the mutant retinae. Despite these altered distributions, the retinal neurons maintained normal cell numbers and seemingly preserved some synaptic connections. Notably, tracing results indicated mistargeting of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon projections to the superior colliculus, and electroretinography (ERG) analyses suggested deficits in visual functions.</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for the summary and highlights of our study. We appreciate the input from Reviewer 1 and the Editor on this study, with focus on laminar choices, synaptic choices and axonal projections.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Strengths:</p><p>This compelling study provides solid evidence addressing the important question of how cell-adhesion molecules influence neuronal development. Compared to previous research conducted in other parts of the central nervous system (CNS), the clearly defined lamination of cell types in the retina serves as a unique model for studying the aberrant neuronal localizations caused by Afadin knockout. The data suggest that cell-cell interactions are critical for retinal cellular organization and proper axon pathfinding, while aspects of cell fate determination and synaptogenesis remain less understood. This work has broad implications not only for retinal studies but also for developmental biology and regenerative medicine.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>While the phenotypes observed in the Afadin knockout (cKO) mice are intriguing, I would expect to see evidence confirming that Afadin is indeed knocked out in the retina through immunostaining. Specifically, is Afadin knocked out only in certain retinal regions and not others, as suggested by Figures 4A-B? Are Afadin levels different among distinct neuron types, which could mean that its knockout may have a more pronounced impact on certain cell types, such as rods compared to others?</p><p>The authors suggest that synapses may form between canonical synaptic partners, based on the proximity of their processes (Figure 2). However, more solid evidence is needed to verify these synapses through the use of synaptic marker staining or transsynaptic labeling before drawing further conclusions.</p><p>Although the Afadin cKO mice displayed dramatic phenotypes, additional experiments are necessary to clarify the details of this process. By manipulating Afadin levels in specific cell types or at different developmental time points, we could gain a better understanding of how Afadin regulates accurate retinal lamination and axonal projection.</p></disp-quote><p>Regarding the antibody confirming the Knockout, we tested the commercially available antibody from Sigma but weren’t able to confirm its specificity. There was a homemade antibody from another Japan-based laboratory, but it was not available to share at the moment when the study was conducted. Nonetheless, the original allele was derived for hippocampal and cortical studies by Louis Reichardt’s Lab (UCSF), with verified efficacies of the KO allele.</p><p>Regarding phenotypical penetrance, this may likely come from the mosaicism of the clone and the symmetric cell division, leading to a rosette-like structure. At this moment, we reason that Afadin KO does NOT lead to direct neuronal loss, and the selective rod loss may derive from other issues, but we lack direct evidence to validate this point.</p><p>In regards to the specific neuronal types and synaptic pairs, we acknowledge the limitations of the current Figure 2 in linking the mutant phenotypes to circuit changes. However, the current genetic reagents (Six3Cre) are not compatible with neuron-type specific labeling of synaptic labeling – i.e., cell type-specific Cre and additional Cre-dependent AAV tools might be desired. To do so, we will need to initiate cell-type-specific breeding of transgenic markers such as Hb9GFP for ooDSGCs, or Chat-Cre, VGlut3-Cre for starburst amacrine cells, vG3 amacrine cells, followed by retinal physiology. These experiments take multi-allelic genetic crosses for a very low breeding yield (1/16 or 1/32 Mendelian ratio). These extensive genetic tests are beyond the scope of the current manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</bold></p><p>Summary:</p><p>This study by Lum and colleagues reports on the role of Afadin, a cytosolic adapter protein that organizes multiple cell adhesion molecule families, in the generation and maintenance of complex cellular layers in the mouse retina. They used a conditional deletion approach, removing Afadin in retinal progenitors, and allowing them to analyze broad effects on retinal neuron development.</p><p>The study presents high-quality and extensive characterization of the cellular phenotypes, supporting the main conclusions of the paper. They show that Afadin loss results in significant disorganization of the retinal cellular layers and the neuropil, producing rosettes and displacement of cells away from their resident layers. The major classes of neurons in the inner retina are affected, and some neurons are, remarkably, displaced to the other side of the inner plexiform layer. Nevertheless, they mostly target their synaptic partners, including the RGCs to distant retinorecipient targets in the brain. The main conclusions are as follows. Afadin is necessary for establishing and maintaining the retinal architecture. It is not necessary for the generation of the correct numbers/densities of retinal neuron subtypes. Moreover, Afadin loss preserves associations between known synaptic partners and preserves axonal targeting to retinorecipient layers. The consequences on photoreceptor viability and visual processing are also interesting, underscoring the essential function for maintaining retinal structure and function. Overall, the main conclusions describing the consequences are supported by the results.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The study provides new knowledge on the requirement of Afadin in retinal development. The introduction and discussion effectively set up the rationale for this work, and place it in the context of previous studies of Afadin in other regions of the CNS.</p><p>The study presents high-quality and extensive characterizations of the cellular phenotypes resulting from Afadin loss. By analyzing various aspects of retinal organization - from cellular densities to axon targeting to brain - the study narrows down the role of a structure for promoting the establishment of the layers, or maintenance. The data are straightforward and convincing, and the interpretations are bounded by the data shown (though minor weakness re. survival). Another important finding is that the targeting of retinal neuron processes to synaptic partners, including retinorecipient targets in the brain, are intact.</p><p>The study is important as it establishes a focused requirement for Afadin to set up and preserve the overall cellular organizations within the retinal tissue. The demonstration that Afadin is needed for photoreceptor viability and overall visual function enhances impact by establishing its functional importance.</p><p>The manuscript is well well-written and presented. The images are attractive and compelling, and the figures are well organized.</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for your high praise on the logic, data presentation, and significance of the current manuscript. We appreciate your comments on the novelty and impact of our study using retinal circuits as a model.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>(1) Expanding on the developmental mechanism is beyond the scope of the study, and would not add to the main conclusions. However, the manuscript would be improved by providing more clarity on the developmental emergence of the defects. The study left me questioning whether the rosettes and cell displacements occur during earlier stages of retina development, or are progressive. For instance, do the RGCs migrate and establish within the GCL correctly at first, and then are displaced with the progressive disorganization? Or are they disorganized and delaminate en route? Images of RGC staining at P0, or earlier during their migration, would be informative. Data in Figure 1 is limited to DAPI staining at P7. Figure 4 shows an image of rod photoreceptors at P7, with their displacement in the GCL layer (and not contained within a rosette). Are the progenitors mislocalized due to delamination? A few additional thoughts on how these defects compare to other mutants with rosettes might give us more context for understanding the results.</p></disp-quote><p>We chose P7 as our focus due to the lamination in controls. In the revised manuscript, we plan to include earlier time points, as suggested by the reviewer. The data in Figure 1 at P7 utilizes well-established cell type markers (RBPMS, Chx10, Ap2α) and is not limited only to DAPI. Additionally, we will revise the discussion section and place our mutant analyses in the context of other mutants with rosettes (beta-catenin, etc.) in the retina. Finally, we will address the comment on progenitor lamination by exploring earlier developmental time points.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) The manuscript reports that the densities of major inner retinal classes are unaffected. There are a few details missing for this point. How were the cell densities quantified (in terms of ROI size), and normalized? This information is lacking in the methods. There is a striking thickening of the GCL in the DAPI-labeled images shown in Figure 1. What are these cells?</p></disp-quote><p>We will revise the manuscript, particularly the methods section, to address these comments. Additionally, we will tackle ROI units and normalization. The cells in the thickened GCL were identified as displaced amacrine cells and bipolar cells.</p></body></sub-article></article>