<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">105696</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105696</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="version">10.7554/eLife.105696.3</article-id><article-version article-version-type="publication-state">version of record</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Neuroscience</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Differential roles of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in neocortical pyramidal cell excitability</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>Joshua D</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-2062</contrib-id><email>jgarc4@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Chenyu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>Ryan PD</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Banks</surname><given-names>Emmie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fenton</surname><given-names>Timothy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>DeKeyser</surname><given-names>Jean-Marc</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Abramova</surname><given-names>Tatiana V</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>George</surname><given-names>Alfred L</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3993-966X</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con8"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ben-Shalom</surname><given-names>Roy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con9"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hackos</surname><given-names>David H</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con10"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>Kevin J</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7084-1532</contrib-id><email>kevin.bender@ucsf.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con11"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043mz5j54</institution-id><institution>Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043mz5j54</institution-id><institution>Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04gndp242</institution-id><institution>Department of Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc.</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">South San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05rrcem69</institution-id><institution>Department of Neurology, MIND Institute, University of California Davis School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Sacramento</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04fzwnh64</institution-id><institution>Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Huguenard</surname><given-names>John R</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00f54p054</institution-id><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Huguenard</surname><given-names>John R</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00f54p054</institution-id><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>15</day><month>07</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>RP105696</elocation-id><history><date date-type="sent-for-review" iso-8601-date="2024-12-18"><day>18</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-12-20"><day>20</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.17.629038"/></event><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a reviewed preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2025-02-17"><day>17</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105696.1"/></event><event><event-desc>The reviewed preprint was revised.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2025-06-04"><day>04</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105696.2"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2025, Garcia et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Garcia et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-105696-v2.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-105696-figures-v2.pdf"/><abstract><p>Mature neocortical pyramidal cells functionally express two sodium channel (Na<sub>V</sub>) isoforms: Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6. These isoforms are differentially localized to pyramidal cell compartments, and as such are thought to contribute to different aspects of neuronal excitability. But determining their precise roles in pyramidal cell excitability has been hampered by a lack of tools that allow for selective, acute block of each isoform individually. Here, we leveraged aryl sulfonamide-based molecule (ASC) inhibitors of Na<sub>V</sub> channels that exhibit state-dependent block of both Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, along with knock-in mice with changes in Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 or Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 structure that prevents ASC binding. This allowed for acute, potent, and reversible block of individual isoforms that permitted dissection of the unique contributions of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in pyramidal cell excitability. Remarkably, block of each isoform had contrasting—and in some situations, opposing—effects on neuronal action potential output, with Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 block decreasing and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 block increasing output. Thus, Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms have unique roles in regulating different aspects of pyramidal cell excitability, and our work may help guide the development of therapeutics designed to temper hyperexcitability through selective Na<sub>V</sub> isoform blockade.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>sodium channel</kwd><kwd>epilepsy</kwd><kwd>dendrite</kwd><kwd>pyramidal cell</kwd><kwd>action potential</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>Mouse</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Mental Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>MH134674</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>Joshua D</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Mental Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>MH125978</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>Kevin J</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Mental Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>MH126960</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>Kevin J</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006792</institution-id><institution>Hartwell Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Ben-Shalom</surname><given-names>Roy</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund5"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution>FamiliesSCN2A Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Ben-Shalom</surname><given-names>Roy</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 have unique functional roles in neocortical pyramidal cells, regulating dendritic and axonal excitability, respectively.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>publishing-route</meta-name><meta-value>prc</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Voltage-gated sodium channels (Na<sub>V</sub>) are critical for all aspects of neuronal excitability, from action potential (AP) initiation to axonal propagation, transmitter release, and dendritic excitability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Meeks and Mennerick, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Shu et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Palmer and Stuart, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Spratt et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Nelson et al., 2024</xref>). In mature neocortical pyramidal cells, electrogenesis and subsequent propagation of APs is systematically regulated with Na<sub>V</sub> recruitment first initiated in the axon initial segment (AIS), with forward propagation along the axon and backpropagation into soma and dendrites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Shu et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Palmer and Stuart, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Baranauskas et al., 2013</xref>). This coordinated process is supported by membrane expression of the Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2. Current models, based on immunostaining of channels and empirical measurements of excitability, suggest that Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 are differentially expressed across neurites. In the AIS, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 predominates, with the highest membrane density in the AP initiation region of the AIS most distal to the soma. Na<sub>V</sub>1.2, by contrast, has higher relative membrane density in the proximal AIS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Shu et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Tian et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Ye et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Yu et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Jenkins and Bender, 2025</xref>). Along the axon, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 appears enriched at nodes of Ranvier and terminals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Caldwell et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Kaplan et al., 2001</xref>). Somatodendritic densities are far lower, and current models suggest that the somatic and perisomatic membrane expresses equal levels of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2, whereas dendritic regions more distal to the soma are enriched exclusively with Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Spratt et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Nelson et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Fleidervish et al., 2010</xref>). Thus, each channel isoform likely has a unique role in AP initiation and propagation simply based on their differential distribution in neuronal compartments.</p><p>To date, efforts to understand the unique contributions of different Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms have relied largely on experiments in which channel genetic expression has been manipulated, either through constitutive or conditional knockout approaches. While these approaches have strong merit, interpretation is complicated by compensatory changes in other Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms or other ion channel classes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Spratt et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Katz et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). Pharmacological approaches, which are both acute and reversible, would be preferred, but identifying highly selective compounds that target particular Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms is difficult, as <italic>ScnXa</italic> gene family isoforms have high degrees of amino acid sequence homology. Some compounds exhibit high potency, but differences in the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>) for individual isoforms can be limited (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Ragsdale and Avoli, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Denomme et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bosmans et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Filipis et al., 2023</xref>). This is especially true for the separation of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 from Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, as these two channels have especially high sequence similarity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Catterall et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">de Lera Ruiz and Kraus, 2015</xref>).</p><p>Aryl sulfonamide compounds (ASCs) constitute a unique class of Na<sub>V</sub> inhibitors that potently bind activated Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms, resulting in a stabilization of the inactivated state (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Goodchild et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Johnson et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Johnson et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Roecker et al., 2017</xref>). The binding pocket is shielded from ASCs when channels are closed due to the positioning of the S4 voltage sensing domain, but is bound rapidly by ASMs when exposed. Unbinding is promoted by strong hyperpolarization, but occurs much more slowly at physiological voltages (e.g., tau of 10<sup>2</sup>–10<sup>3</sup> s at –80 and –40 mV, respectively) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>). In spiking neurons, this essentially imparts use dependence to ASC block (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>), as the probability of channel block will increase in proportion with AP rates.</p><p>ASCs exhibit high potency for a subset of Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms: Na<sub>V</sub>1.2, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, and Na<sub>V</sub>1.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Goodchild et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Johnson et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Johnson et al., 2022</xref>). These isoforms share sequence homology at the binding pocket, each containing a tyrosine–tryptophan (YW) motif that helps stabilize ASC binding. By contrast, Na<sub>V</sub>1.1 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.3 harbor a serine–arginine (SR) sequence at the same site. Mutagenesis of Na<sub>V</sub>1.7 from YW to SR results in a 145-fold decrease in ASC binding without affecting channel biophysical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>). Here, we engaged a similar strategy for Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, using knock-in mice with YW→SR substitutions in either or both channels. This allows for selective, potent ASC-mediated block of YW-containing channels while preserving the function of SR-containing channels. With these tools, we dissected the individual roles of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in neocortical pyramidal cell excitability. We found that Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 have unique—and at times conflicting—effects on overall AP excitability. Moreover, results suggest that ASCs can function as ‘on-demand’ pharmacological inhibitors that help normalize cellular excitability in seizure-like conditions. Together, this work highlights the importance of distinct Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms localized to specific cellular domains and their respective contribution to AP properties to help facilitate activity across pyramidal neurons.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="methods"><title>Methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Reagent type (species) or resource</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Designation</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Source or reference</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Identifiers</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gene (<italic>Homo sapiens</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn2a</italic> Human tagged ORF clone</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Origene</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NM_021007</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub>1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gene (<italic>Homo sapiens</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn8a</italic> Human tagged ORF clone</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Origene</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NM_014191</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub>1.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>, both sexes)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">C57BL/6J</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Jackson Laboratory</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664">IMSR_JAX:000664</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Wildtype mice</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>, both sexes)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">C57BL/6N</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Janvier Labs</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:IMSR_RJ:C57BL-6NRJ">IMSR_RJ:C57BL-6NRJ</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Mating with founders</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>, both sexes)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn8a</italic> YW→SR KI</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genentech;<break/><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Deng et al., 2023</xref>;<break/>PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37352856/">37352856</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N/A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 GNE-4076 insensitive mice</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>, both sexes)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn2a</italic> YW→SR KI</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genentech; this manuscript</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N/A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 GNE-4076 insensitive mice</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>, both sexes)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Dual <italic>Scn8a/2</italic>a YW→SR KI</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genentech; this manuscript</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N/A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Both GNE-4076 insensitive</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cell line (<italic>Homo sapiens</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">HEK293T</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ATCC<break/>CRL-3216</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:CVCL_0063">CVCL_0063</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">IC<sub>50</sub> curves; biophysics</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cell line (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ND7/23 (low Na<sub>V</sub>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Al George Lab;<break/><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Vanoye et al., 2024</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38771640/">38771640</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">IC<sub>50</sub> curves; biophysics</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pIR-CMV-SCN2A-Variant-1-IRES-mScarlet</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Addgene</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:Addgene_162279">Addgene_162279</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 Plasmid #162279</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pcDNA4TO-SCN8A-Variant-3-IRES-mScarlet</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Addgene</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:Addgene_209411">Addgene_209411</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 Plasmid #209411</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2A_Y1564S_W1565R F</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PCR primers</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ATTCTGTCC<break/>CGGATTAAT<break/>CTGGTGTTT<break/>ATTGTTCT</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2A_Y1564S_W1565R R</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PCR primers</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AGATTAATC<break/>CGGGACAG<break/>AATGTTTGT<break/><named-content content-type="sequence">CATTTCTTGA</named-content></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">8A_Y1555S_W1556R F</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PCR primers</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">CATCCTCTC<break/>CCGGATTAA<break/>CCTGGTGTT<break/>TGTT</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">8A_Y1555S_W1556R R</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PCR primers</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GGTTAATCC<break/>GGGAGAGG<break/>ATGTTCTCC<break/>ATCTG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GNE-4076 or Compound 5</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Merck &amp; Co, Inc;<break/><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Roecker et al., 2017</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28389149/">28389149</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Used at 200 nM</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">IGOR Pro v6.3 &amp; v9</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Wavemetrics</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_000325">SCR_000325</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N/A</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Prism 10</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GraphPad</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_002798">SCR_002798</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N/A</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NEURON Compartmental Models</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">modelDB</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_007271">SCR_007271</ext-link> and <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_003105">SCR_003105</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://modeldb.science/2019342">https://modeldb.science/2019342</ext-link></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Python</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.python.org/">https://www.python.org/</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_008394">SCR_008394</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N/A</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Benchling</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.benchling.com/">https://www.benchling.com/</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_013955">SCR_013955</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N/A</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s2-1"><title>Experimental models and subjects details</title><sec id="s2-1-1"><title>Mouse strains</title><p>All animal procedures are in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines in accordance with the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). The following mouse strains were used in this study: C57BL/6J, YW→SR Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 KI (<italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>), YW→SR Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 KI (<italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>), and YW→SR dual KI (<italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>). All experimental procedures were performed on mice maintained in-house on a 12:12 hr light–dark cycle under standard conditions with ad libitum access to food and water. For genotyping, genomic DNA was isolated from tail clip biopsies for PCR. Both male and female mice aged postnatal day (P)18–59 were used across all genotypes. C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories, and YW→SR KI mice were developed by the Hackos Lab (Genentech).</p></sec><sec id="s2-1-2"><title>Generation of <italic>SCN8A</italic> or <italic>SCN2A</italic> YW→SR KI mouse</title><p>As described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Deng et al., 2023</xref>), CRISPR/Cas9 technology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Cong et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Mali et al., 2013</xref>) was used to generate a genetically modified mouse strain with either an <italic>Scn8a</italic> or <italic>Scn2a</italic> YW→SR knock-in mutation. A single-guide RNA (sgRNA) target and protospacer adjacent motifs (PAM) were identified for <italic>Scn8a</italic> ENSMUSG00000023033 or <italic>Scn2a</italic> ENSMUSG00000075318 genomic regions of interest using the CRISPR design tool (Benchling) that uses the algorithm described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Hsu et al., 2013</xref> to provide ‘MIT’ specificity scores for each sgRNA, as well as the top 15 predicted off-target loci and corresponding MIT off-target scores. The same guide target and PAM were used for both genes. Guide target: 5′ <named-content content-type="sequence">CATTCTCTACTGGATTAATC</named-content> 3′; PAM: TGG with an algorithm score of 42.3.</p><p>For the YW→SR mutation on the <italic>Scn8a</italic> gene, predicted cut sites are between 100,933,463–100,933,464 genome coordinates. The following oligonucleotide donor sequence was used: 5′ <named-content content-type="sequence">ATGCTTATCTGCCTTAACATGGTGACCATGATGGTGGAGACAGACACACAGAGCAAGCAGATGGAGAACATTCTCTCTCGGATTAATCTGGTCTTCGTCATCTTCTTCACCTGCGAGTGTGTGCTCAAAATGTTTGCCTTGAGACACTACTATTTC</named-content> 3′. The first point mutation of Y1553S (TAC→TCT) is located at 100,933,454–100,933,456 genome coordinates, and a second point mutation of W1554R (TGG→CGG) is located at 100,933,457–100,933,459 genome coordinates.</p><p>For the YW→SR mutation on the <italic>Scn2a</italic> gene, predicted cut sites are between 166,900 and 166,901 genome coordinates. The following oligonucleotide donor sequence was used: 5′ <named-content content-type="sequence">GAAATAGTAGTGTCTCAAGGCAAACATTTTGAGCACACACTCGCAGGTGAAGAAGATGACGAAGACCAGGTTGATCCGAGAGAGAATGTTCTCCATCTGCTTGCTCTGTGTGTCTGTCTCCACCATCATGGTCACCATGTTAAGGCAGATAAGCAT</named-content> 3′. The first point mutation of Y1553S (TAC→TCT) is located at 101,035,573–101,035,575 genome coordinates, and a second point mutation of W1554R (TGG→CGG) is located at 101,035,576–101,035,578 genome coordinates. Additionally, two silent mutations were created in the beginning of the gRNA to prevent Cas9 from cutting the donor oligo. The first silent mutation (ATT→ATC) is located at 101,035,579–101,035,581 genome coordinates, and the second silent mutation (AAT→AAC) 101,035,582–101,035,584 genome coordinates.</p><p>After homology-directed repair of Cas9-induced chromosome breaks with the oligonucleotide donor, the YW→SR protein will be expressed. Once an sgRNA decision was finalized, the off-target list was used to identify the top 15, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) amplicon primers were designed for the on-target locus, and each of the off-target synthetic guide RNAs was obtained from Synthego. CAS9 protein was obtained from PROTEIN SOURCE and complexed with sgRNA before microinjection. Reagent concentrations for microinjection were as follows: 25 ng/µl Cas9 mRNA (Thermo Fisher; A29378) + 13 ng/µl sgRNA (Synthego), Oligonucleotide donor (50 ng/µl) (IDT).</p><p>After zygote microinjection and embryo transfer, genomic DNA was prepared from tail tip biopsies of potential G0 founders, and G0 animals were first analyzed by droplet digital PCR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Hindson et al., 2011</xref>) (Bio-Rad). Primers were used to amplify the HDR event (ON Target) and the 15 most likely off-target sites. Only G0 mosaic founders positive for the intended mutation were screened by targeted amplicon NGS. Amplicons were submitted for NGS analysis.</p><p>Founders were selected for mating with wildtype C57BL/6N mice for germline transmission of the gene-edited chromosome. Subsequent analysis of genomic DNA from G1 pups was used to confirm germline transmission of the targeted gene and the absence of off-target hits elsewhere in the genome.</p><p>To generate the dual <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> line, <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>, and <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> mice were crossed, and analysis of genomic DNA was used to confirm germline transmission of the targeted gene.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Method details</title><sec id="s2-2-1"><title>Synthesis of GNE4076</title><p>GNE-4076 was synthesized as previously described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Roecker et al., 2017</xref>, and is Compound 5 in the original manuscript. We use GNE-4076 throughout this manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2-2"><title>Generation of <italic>SCN2A</italic> YW→SR and <italic>SCN8A</italic> YW→SR constructs</title><p>The double mutation Y1564S/W1565R was introduced into the adult splice isoform of recombinant human Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 (NCBI accession number NM_021007; AddGene #162279) using site-directed mutagenesis as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Thompson et al., 2023</xref>). The corresponding mutations (Y1555S/W15556R) were engineered in recombinant human Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (adult isoform) as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Vanoye et al., 2024</xref>). Mutagenic primer sequences are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. All plasmids were nanopore sequenced (Primoridium Labs, Arcadia, CA) to confirm the variants and exclude unwanted mutations.</p><table-wrap id="table1" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><title>Mutagenic primer sequences for Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Primer name</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence (5′ to 3′)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">2A_Y1564S_W1565R_F</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>attctgt</sc><bold><sc>C</sc></bold><sc>c</sc><bold><sc>C</sc></bold><sc>ggattaatctggtgtttattgttct</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">2A_Y1564S_W1565R_R</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>agattaatcc</sc><bold><sc>G</sc></bold><sc>g</sc><bold><sc>G</sc></bold><sc>acagaatgtttgtcatttcttga</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">8A_Y1555S_W1556R_F</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>catcctct</sc><bold><sc>C</sc></bold><sc>c</sc><bold><sc>C</sc></bold><sc>ggattaacctggtgtttgtt</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">8A_Y1555S_W1556R_R</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>ggttaatcc</sc><bold><sc>G</sc></bold><sc>g</sc><bold><sc>G</sc></bold><sc>agaggatgttctccatctg</sc></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2-2-3"><title>Electrophysiology in immortalized cell lines</title><p>HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with WT or mutant Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 using the Invitrogen Lipofectamine LTX kit, whereas Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 plasmids were electroporated into the LoNa<sub>V</sub> derivative of ND7/23 cells using Maxcyte technology as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Vanoye et al., 2024</xref>). HEK293T cells were acquired from ATCC (CRL-3216) where mycoplasma testing shows no detection of contamination. LoNa<sub>V</sub> derivative of ND7/23 cells is a mix of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons and mouse neuroblastomas that have been modified and previously validated by Al George’s Lab as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Vanoye et al., 2024</xref>. These cells were not generated from the original source of the parental line ND7/23; therefore, we are unable to authenticate with ATCC. LoNa<sub>V</sub> ND7/23 cells have been tested for mycoplasma and show no detection of contamination.</p><p>Na<sub>V</sub> channel currents were recorded from HEK293 or ND7/23 cells via whole-cell patch clamp using a Molecular Devices Axopatch 200B amplifier. The recording pipet intracellular solution contained (in mM): 120 CsF, 10 NaCl, 2 MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 10 HEPES, adjusted to pH 7.2 with CsOH. The extracellular recording solution contained (in mM): 155 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1 MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 1.5 CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 10 HEPES, adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH. Currents were recorded at a 20-kHz sampling frequency and filtered at 5 kHz. Series resistance compensation was applied at 80%. Solutions containing GNE-4076 were applied using a Fluicell Dynaflow perfusion system.</p><p>We characterized dose–response curves in both WT and mutant Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 channels by pulsing cells from –80 to –12 mV for 20 ms at a rate of 0.5 Hz to establish a baseline current. Cells were then perfused with GNE-4076 starting at 30 nM and increased up to 100 μM. To allow adequate GNE-4076 onboarding to NaV isoforms/mutants at each successive dose, cells were depolarized to –12 mV for 10 s followed by similar test pulses used to acquire baseline current. Between dose increases, cells were held at –80 mV to allow adequate unbinding of GNE-4076.</p><p>We also characterized the activation and steady-state inactivation properties of both WT and mutant Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 channels. To measure activation, we used a holding voltage of –80 mV, a short 20ms pre-pulse to –120 mV, and a 30-ms pulse to voltages ranging from –100 to –20 mV in steps of 5 mV at a rate of once per 3 s. P/4 leak subtraction was used to reduce leak currents. The peaks of the resulting Na<sub>V</sub> currents were measured. Conductance was calculated using the equation: <italic>G</italic> = <italic>I</italic>/(<italic>V</italic> – <italic>V</italic><sub>Na</sub>), normalized, and plotted as a function of voltage. To measure inactivation, we started at a holding voltage of –120 mV to bring the channels fully into the closed state (about 1 min). We then pulsed to –12 mV while reducing the holding voltage from –120 to +30 mV in steps of 5 mV at a rate of once per 5 s. The peaks of the resulting Na<sub>V</sub> currents were measured, normalized, and plotted as a function of voltage. To quantify these biophysical properties, we fit the activation and inactivation curves to the following Boltzmann equations:<disp-formula id="equ1"><alternatives><mml:math id="m1"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math><tex-math id="t1">\begin{document}$$\displaystyle G/Gmax=1-\frac{1}{1+e^{(v-v_{1/2}/sf )} }\, (activation)\, I/Imax=\frac{1}{1+e^{(v-v_{1/2}/sf)}}\,(inactivation) $$\end{document}</tex-math></alternatives></disp-formula></p><p><italic>V</italic><sub>1/2</sub> is the voltage where half-maximal peak conductance (or current) was observed, and <italic>sf</italic> is the slope factor.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2-4"><title>Ex vivo electrophysiology</title><p>Mice aged P18–P59 were anesthetized with isoflurane prior to harvesting the brain. Dissected brains were immediately placed in cutting solution (4°C) containing 87 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, 25 mM glucose, 75 mM sucrose, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 0.5 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, and 7 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub> that is bubbled with 5% CO<sub>2</sub>/95% O<sub>2</sub>. Coronal slices were prepared from the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) at a thickness of 250 µm and placed in a holding chamber warmed to 33°C for 30 min. Slices were then allowed to recover at room temperature until recording. Recordings were performed at 31–33°C in a solution containing 125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 1 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 25 mM NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, 1.25 mM NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, and 25 mM glucose that is bubbled with 5% CO<sub>2</sub>/95% O<sub>2</sub>. Osmolarity of the recording solution was adjusted to approximately 309 mOsm.</p><p>Neurons were identified using differential interference contrast optics for conventional visually guided whole-cell recordings. For current-clamp experiments, pipettes were pulled from Schott 8250 glass, with a tip resistance of 3–4 MΩ, and filled with a K-gluconate-based internal solution containing 113 mM K-gluconate, 9 mM HEPES, 4.5 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.1 mM EGTA, 14 mM Tris<sub>2</sub>-phosphocreatine, 4 mM Na<sub>2</sub>-ATP, 0.3 mM Tris-GTP; 290 mOsm; pH 7.2–7.25. All data were corrected for measured junction potentials of 12 mV.</p><p>All electrophysiology data were acquired through custom protocols generated in IgorPro (Wavemetrics) via Multiclamp 700A or 700B amplifiers (Molecular Devices). AP waveform measurements were acquired at 50 kHz and low-pass Bessel filtered at 20 kHz for all experiments except for data presented in Figure 6 (acquired at 10 kHz and filtered at 3 kHz). Pipette capacitance was compensated in all current-clamp recordings to 50% of the fast capacitance measured after membrane seals were established in voltage clamp. The bridge was balanced, and series resistance was kept &lt;18 MΩ in all recordings. Any cells with input resistance changes exceeding ±15% were omitted from the dataset. A quartz electrode holder (Sutter Instrument) was used to collect all recordings to minimize physical drift of recording electrodes.</p><p>All recordings were made from medial PFC layer 5b, thick-tufted pyramidal tract (PT) neurons. Pyramidal neuron identity was confirmed by assessing membrane responses to hyperpolarizing current (–400 pA, 120 ms), with PT neurons defined as those that exhibit membrane depolarization overshoot that peaks within 90 ms of current step offset (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Clarkson et al., 2017</xref>). AP threshold, AIS d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> and peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> measurements were determined from either the first AP or all APs within a spike train evoked by a stimulus. AP threshold was defined as the membrane potential (<italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub>) when the AP velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) exceeds 15 V/s. Somatic peak (V/s) was defined as the max value in the first derivative (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) of an AP. AIS max (V/s) was defined as the trough or saddle point in the second derivative (d<sup>2</sup><italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic><sup>2</sup>) that occurs during the depolarizing phase of an AP before the somatic peak (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Favero et al., 2018</xref>). AIS inflection point was defined as the peak of the second derivative (d<sup>2</sup><italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic><sup>2</sup>) that occurs prior to the AIS max or somatic peak. Frequency was defined as the spike number in a train elicited per second (spikes/s or Hz). Afterhyperpolarization was defined as the minimum voltage between two spikes in a train.</p><p>Spike trains were evoked by injecting current (250–350 pA, 10 s or 300 ms duration) in the presence or absence of 200 nM GNE-4076. In recovery experiments, neurons were held at –12 mV for 30 s (voltage clamp) to depolarize cells, activate Na<sub>V</sub> channels, and expose the ASC binding pocket to maximize GNE-4076 onboarding and Na<sub>V</sub> inhibition. The interstimulus interval given during the recovery period was as follows: 2 s, ~20–30 s duration; 5 s, ~30–45 s duration; 15 s, ~60–90 s duration; 30 s, ~120–180 s duration; and 60 s, ~60–240 s duration. In experiments mimicking cellular activity, a post-synaptic potential train was randomly generated using a Poisson probability distribution function for 60 s with a frequency of 50 Hz and amplitude standard deviation of 200 pA.</p><p>For nucleated patch voltage-clamp experiments, recordings were made at 31–33°C in a solution containing 125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 1 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 25 mM NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, 1.25 mM NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 15 mM glucose, 4 mM TEA, 1 mM 4-AP, and 10 µM nifedipine, with or without 200 nM GNE-4076, (bubbled with 5% CO<sub>2</sub>/95% O<sub>2</sub>). A Cs-methanesulfonate-based recording solution was used: 110 mM CsMeSO<sub>3</sub>, 40 mM HEPES, 1 mM KCl, 4 mM NaCl, 4 mM Mg-ATP, 10 mM Na-phosphocreatine, 0.4 mM Na<sub>2</sub>-GTP, and 0.1 mM EGTA; 290 mOsm; pH 7.2–7.25. Whole-cell recordings were established before withdrawing pipettes from the slice, pulling a region of the somatic membrane with the pipette. Neurons were held to –80 mV and stepped to –12 mV every 2 s, 5–10 times. Then neurons were held to –12 mV for 10 s to onboard GNE-4076, then returned to –80 mV and probed for Na<sub>V</sub> recovery with steps to –12 mV every 2 s. Leak currents were subtracted with a P/8 protocol using steps from –80 to –90 mV. All data were corrected for measured junction potentials of 12 mV.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2-5"><title>Compartmental modeling</title><p>A compartmental model was constructed within the NEURON environment to simulate a layer 5 pyramidal neuron as described before (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hallermann et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Quinn et al., 2024</xref>). This model is available at ModelDB (2019342, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://modeldb.science/2019342">https://modeldb.science/2019342</ext-link>). A multi-compartmental model, originally developed by the Blue Brain Project, was implemented to reflect the morphology detailed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Ramaswamy and Markram, 2015</xref> and electrophysiological features were adjusted to reflect empirically obtained data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hallermann et al., 2012</xref>). We modified the model by replacing the aggregated sodium conductances (NaT and NaP) with distinct Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 channels to match empirically observed distributions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>). Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 channels were distributed throughout the cell with equal levels in the soma and 20 µm of the proximal dendrites. Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was solely expressed in dendrites more distal to the soma, inferred based on AP-evoked sodium imaging observations in <italic>Scn2a<sup>+/−</sup></italic> conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Nelson et al., 2024</xref>). The two axonal compartments were subdivided into an AIS and distal axon. Within the AIS, Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 were distributed with increased Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 in the proximal AIS and increased Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in the distal AIS to recapitulate the channel distribution as previously observed empirically (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>). Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was not included in the distal AIS or axon where only Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 is present, including an enriched region to model a node of Ranvier. To simulate blocking of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, each channel’s density was globally reduced in 10% increments from 100% to 0%. Both Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 channels were represented using the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Hodgkin and Huxley, 1952</xref>). Parameter optimization for both channels was conducted using an evolutionary algorithm from BluePyOpt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Van Geit et al., 2016</xref>) and adapted for use with the computational resources at the National Energy Research Computing Center similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Ladd et al., 2022</xref>.</p><p>To validate parameter sensitivity, we constructed multiple variations of our model with different distributions of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in the AIS. The crossover point at which the Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 distribution curves intersect was shifted distally in increments of 3.75 µm to make five variations of the AIS with increasing density of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2. With the wildtype crossover point located 15 µm distal to the soma, the five right-shifted variations have crossover points at 18.75, 22.5, 26.25, 30, and 33.75 µm, respectively. Two variations of the AIS with increased Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 density were created by shifting the crossover point proximally in 3.75 µm increments to 11.25 and 7.5 µm. To see how our model would behave with different AIS sodium channel distributions, we varied the ratio of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2: Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 density in the whole cell to test different conditions at each AIS crossover point and measured the resulting threshold, AIS peak, and somatic peak of the phase plane plot. Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 percentage was decreased from 90% to 0% in 10% increments as Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 percentage was concurrently increased from 10% to 100% in 10% increments. The Na<sub>V</sub>1.2: Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 ratio of 100%:0% did not produce any APs and was therefore not included in the analysis. In instances where the somatic portion of the phase plane was not a true peak that consisted of adjacent values less than a local maxima, the prominence was estimated by taking the index of the second derivative value closest to zero and calculating the d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> value at that index.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Quantification and statistical analysis</title><p>Data are reported as absolute values or the absolute difference from baseline (delta, Δ). For Δ values, data were normalized either to the initial 500 ms of the stimulus (Figures 2 and 3) or baseline spiking (Figures 4 and 5). Time course graphs are represented as a mean ± standard error. Summary graphs are represented with box plots showing the median, quartiles, and 90% tails or with violin plots. All summary graphs overlay individual datapoints and represent recordings from single cells (reported <italic>n</italic>) for all electrophysiology experiments. Data were obtained from 5 to 9 animals (both sexes) per condition, which are standard group sample sizes used in the field. Group sizes were determined based on sample sizes previously used for similar studies. Power analysis was not required for this study. No attrition applies to our study, and all data collected is included. Analysis was performed blind to genotype ± drug. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 10 (GraphPad Software). Quantified mean ± standard error and statistical test used is noted in figure legends. Significance was set at an alpha value of 0.05, and ‘ns’ indicates no significance.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s3-1"><title>Aryl sulfonamides selectively bind and inhibit Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms containing the YW motif</title><p>ASCs exhibit high affinity for an extracellular region within voltage sensing domain IV (VSD IV) of select Na<sub>V</sub> channels with a conserved tyrosine–tryptophan (YW) motif (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A and B</xref>). This YW motif found on Na<sub>V</sub>1.2, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, and Na<sub>V</sub>1.7 allows for ASC stabilization following channel inactivation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). By contrast, an SR motif present in Na<sub>V</sub>1.1 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.3 limits binding appreciably (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>). Thus, we hypothesized that converting either Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 or Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 channels from those that contain the YW motif to those that contain an SR motif would alter ASC binding to those channels significantly.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>The YW motif on Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 increases activity-dependent GNE-4076 potency and subsequent channel inhibition.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic depicting the fourth voltage sensing domain (VSD-IV) of Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms. The six transmembrane spanning regions have high sequence homology among different Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms, while linker regions display more sequence divergence. Orange box highlights extracellular S1–S2 loop where aryl sulfonamide compounds (ASCs) are stabilized by a tyrosine–tryptophan (YW) motif. (<bold>B</bold>) Amino acid sequence within the S1–S2 loop of various Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms. <italic>Scn2a</italic> (Na<sub>V</sub>1.2) and <italic>Scn8a</italic> (Na<sub>V</sub>1.6) are the predominant channels expressed in mature, prefrontal pyramidal cells. Both isoforms share a conserved YW sequence that increases ASC potency. Knock-in mutations of <italic>Scn2a</italic> and <italic>Scn8a</italic> were generated by substituting the YW motif with a serine–arginine (SR) sequence present in <italic>Scn1a</italic> and <italic>Scn3a</italic>. (<bold>C</bold>) Example Na<sub>V</sub> current traces (pA) of cells expressing either YW wildtype channels or SR knock-in mutant chimeras in the presence of 1 μM GNE-4076. To activate exogenously expressed Na<sub>V</sub> channels, cells were held at –80 mV and stepped to –12 mV for 20 ms. GNE-4076 onboarding was performed by holding cells at –12 mV for 10 s. (<bold>D</bold>) Dose–response curves for exogenously expressed <italic>Scn2a</italic> (HEK cells) or <italic>Scn8a</italic> (ND7/LoNa<sub>V</sub>) in immortalized cell lines. IC<sub>50</sub> was measured for both YW wildtype channels and SR knock-in mutant chimeras (<italic>Scn2a<sup>YW/YW</sup></italic>, <italic>n</italic> = 6; <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>, <italic>n</italic> = 7; <italic>Scn8a<sup>YW/YW</sup></italic>, <italic>n</italic> = 8; <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>, <italic>n</italic> = 6). YW→SR knock-in mutations reduced GNE-4076 potency by about 400- to 500-fold relative to wildtype channels. Circles represent normalized mean Na<sub>V</sub> current amplitude ± SEM. (<bold>E</bold>) Activation and steady-state inactivation curves for both YW wildtype channels and SR knock-in mutant chimeras. <italic>Scn2a</italic> or <italic>Scn8a</italic> YW→SR mutations alter the efficacy of GNE-4076 while having minor effects on biophysical properties of either isoform. Circles represent mean normalized Na<sub>V</sub> current amplitude ± SEM. Unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test with Welch’s correction. No significance detected between wildtype and mutant channels for both V1/2 of activation or inactivation. (<bold>F</bold>) Example current amplitude response graphs for Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 (red) and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (blue) expressed in HEK cells. Cells were perfused with increasing concentrations of GNE-4076 throughout the recording. Individual current response recordings from HEK cells expressing <italic>Scn2a</italic> were robust (3.2 nA), and recordings were reproducible for both YW wildtype channels (red) and SR knock-in mutant chimeras (transparent red). Current responses from cells expressing <italic>Scn8a</italic> were variable, with only a few cells exhibiting channel conductance (400 pA). In select cells expressing <italic>Scn8a</italic>, current amplitude (blue) also decreases substantially with 30 nM GNE-4076 and completely with 1 μM. (<bold>G</bold>) Transgenic mouse lines generated with the YW→SR knock-in mutation present on both <italic>ScnXa</italic> alleles. <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> mice were crossed with <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> mice to generate a dual <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> knock-in mouse. (<bold>H</bold>) Overview of the various transgenic (or wildtype) mouse lines used throughout this study. Application of 200 nM GNE-4076 selectively inhibits Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms only containing the YW motif. (<bold>I</bold>) Nucleated patch experiments from prefrontal pyramidal cells performed in wildtype or dual <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> knock-in cells in the presence of 200 nM GNE-4076. Baseline conductance was measured by depolarizing cells from –80 to –12 mV every 2 s for 10 pulses. Na<sub>V</sub> channels were inactivated by holding the nucleated patch at –12 mV for 10 s. Test pulses were again acquired during recovery similar to baseline pulses. (<bold>J</bold>) Summary graph of normalized current amplitude from nucleated patch experiments in (<bold>I</bold>). Baseline and recovery test pulses were acquired for at least 20 s before and 25 s after the channel inactivation step. Solid line represents normalized mean Na<sub>V</sub> current amplitude ± SEM. Graph also includes wildtype, no drug control nucleated patch experiments (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 4; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 4; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 4).</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Dual knock-in mutants (<italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>) hyperpolarize action potential (AP) threshold without impairing peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Summary data for threshold (mV) with or without bath application of GNE-4076. Data was collected from age-matched groups (without GNE-4076) or analyzed from baseline data presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells (wildtype no drug at p25, <italic>n</italic> = 6; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> no drug at p25, <italic>n</italic> = 8; wildtype no drug from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <italic>n</italic> = 12; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076 from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <italic>n</italic> = 11; wildtype + GNE-4076 from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <italic>n</italic> = 11). One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01. (<bold>B</bold>) Summary data for peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> (V/s) with or without bath application of GNE-4076. Data was collected from age-matched groups (without GNE-4076) or analyzed from baseline data presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. n.s.:not significant.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1s1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1-figure supplement 1</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig1-figsupp1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig1-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>To test for the effects of this motif substitution, we first examined currents generated by wildtype and YW→SR mutated channels expressed in immortalized cell lines (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>). HEK cells were primarily used for most experiments. But due to the known low transfection efficiency of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in HEK cells, a subset of experiments was performed using an ND7/23 cell line engineered to lack most native Na<sub>V</sub> conductance (ND7/LoNa<sub>V</sub>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Vanoye et al., 2024</xref>). Both Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 wildtype channels expressed in cell lines were inhibited markedly by 1 μM GNE-4076 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>). By contrast, SR knock-in mutants continued to flux sodium in the presence of 1 μM GNE-4076. Dose–response curves revealed an IC<sub>50</sub> of 5.1 nM for wildtype Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 that increases 365-fold to 1861 nM for mutant SR channels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>). For Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 channels, GNE-4076 IC<sub>50</sub> increased 475-fold from 184 nM to 87 μM with the SR mutant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>). To assess whether SR mutations affect channel gating properties in the absence of GNE-4076 binding, steady-state activation and inactivation curves were assessed for wildtype or mutant channels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>). Consistent with prior work studying a similar mutation in Na<sub>V</sub>1.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>), the YW to SR mutation had no effect on slope factor for both voltage-dependent activation or inactivation for either Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 or Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>); however, both voltage-dependent activation and inactivation hyperpolarized by approximately 2 mV for Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, but not Na<sub>V</sub>1.2.</p><table-wrap id="table2" position="float"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><title>Voltage dependence of activation and inactivation for wildtype and mutant Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms, related to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub> channel</th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>V</italic> ½ of activation (mV)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Slope factor</th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>V</italic> ½ of inactivation (mV)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Slope factor</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn2a<sup>YW/YW</sup></italic> or wildtype Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 (<italic>n</italic> = 6)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–20.1</sc> ± <sc>2.6</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>6.6</sc> ± <sc>0.5</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–68.3</sc> ± <sc>1.8</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>6.9</sc> ± <sc>0.3</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> or mutant Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 (<italic>n</italic> = 7)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–18.7</sc> ± <sc>2.1</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>6.4</sc> ± <sc>0.6</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–68.1</sc> ± <sc>0.8</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>7.1</sc> ± <sc>0.5</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn8a<sup>YW/YW</sup></italic> or wildtype Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<italic>n</italic> = 8)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–23.9</sc> ± <sc>2.3</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>6.7</sc> ± <sc>0.4</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–74.6</sc> ± <sc>3.3</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>6.9</sc> ± <sc>0.5</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> or mutant Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<italic>n</italic> = 6)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–26.1</sc> ± <sc>3.2</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>6.5</sc> ± <sc>0.4</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–71.9</sc> ± <sc>1.2</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>7.0</sc> ± <sc>0.3</sc></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>While GNE-4076 binds potently to either Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D, F</xref>) or Na<sub>V</sub>1.7 expressed in HEK cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Roecker et al., 2017</xref>), its affinity was lower for Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 expressed in ND7/LoNa<sub>V</sub> cells. To test if this was due to reductions in affinity imposed by the ND7/23 cell line, we examined current in the few HEK cells in which Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 current could be measured (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>). While peak currents were small (400 pA vs. 3.2 nA for Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 transfected using identical protocols), we found that 30 nM GNE-4076 exhibited strong block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>), but due to limitations in expression efficiency in HEK cells, we were unable to collect full dose–response curves to determine IC<sub>50</sub>.</p><p>Results in heterologous expression systems indicate that YW→SR substitution reduces GNE-4076-binding affinity markedly. Given these results, we constructed transgenic mice containing the YW→SR mutation. Two distinct lines, termed <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> and <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>, were generated by mutating both alleles of each sodium channel gene (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>). SR/SR mutations were validated by PCR (see Methods), and mice were bred to be homozygous for the mutations. Comparisons were then made between wildtype mice, mice with YW→SR mutations into Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 or Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 alone (<italic>2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> or <italic>8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>, respectively), or YW→SR mutations in both Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 (dual <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>). In principle, one could determine a concentration of GNE-4076 in which native channels are blocked potently, sparing SR variant channels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1H</xref>). Thus, these mice should enable selective, acute manipulations of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2- and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6-dependent aspects of neuronal excitability using a chemical genetics approach.</p><p>Given the disparate binding results in heterologous cell lines, we first tested the effects of a dose that should potently block WT channels but not affect SR variant channels to verify that native channels behave similarly to those expressed in HEK cells. Neocortical pyramidal cell somata are thought to express similar levels of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 on their membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Spratt et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>). Thus, excised patches from this region can provide insight into the block of both isoforms. Acute coronal slices containing mPFC were prepared from WT or <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> mice, and nucleated patches were excised from layer 5 pyramidal cells. After establishing a stable baseline of Na<sub>V</sub>-mediated current evoked from a holding voltage of –80 mV, a value comparable to the resting membrane potential studied in later current-clamp experiments, cells were pulsed to –12 mV for 10 s to achieve near-complete block of NaV isoforms, then returned to –80 mV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1I</xref>). In untreated WT conditions, currents recovered to near-baseline levels within 5 s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1J</xref>). A similar quick recovery was observed in cells from <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> mice in the presence of 200 nM GNE-4076. By contrast, WT neurons exposed to the same dosing were inhibited markedly, with no appreciable recovery within 25 s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1I, J</xref>). Taken together, these results show that the YW to SR mutation reduces ASC binding and inhibition of Na<sub>V</sub> chimeras both in immortalized cell lines and pyramidal neurons.</p><p>We also asked whether neuronal AP properties were affected by these mutations in <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> mice by assessing both threshold and peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> in the absence of GNE-4076 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1</xref>). Compared to wildtype cells, there were no detectable changes to peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> in <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1B</xref>). However, the AP threshold was hyperpolarized in <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> neurons, likely due to small changes in the voltage dependence of activation observed for heterologously expressed Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Application with GNE-4076 in either wildtype or <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> neurons had no further effect on threshold or peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> compared to controls recording in the absence of GNE-4076, suggesting minimal drug binding occurs without marked depolarization or spiking activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" position="float"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><title>Neuronal action potential (AP) firing properties at baseline, related to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4</xref>.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub> channel</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Threshold (mV)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> (V/s)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Spike #</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Last AHP</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">No drug control (<italic>n</italic> = 12)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>–42.53</sc> ± <sc>0.61</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>555.82</sc> ± <sc>17.57</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>5.83</sc> ± 0.41</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–49.47</sc> ± <sc>0.43</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Wildtype (<italic>n</italic> = 11)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>–42.41</sc> ± <sc>0.83</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>554.42</sc> ± <sc>14.5</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>5.36</sc> ± 0.36</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–50.04</sc> ± <sc>0.71</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> (<italic>n</italic> = 10)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>–44.87</sc> ± <sc>0.47</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>545.11</sc> ± <sc>12.89</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>5.09</sc> ± 0.16</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–51.39</sc> ± <sc>0.5</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> (<italic>n</italic> = 11)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>–42.3</sc> ± <sc>0.76</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>520.05</sc> ± <sc>13.51</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>6.09</sc> ± 0.32</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–49.31</sc> ± <sc>0.84</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> (<italic>n</italic> = 11)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><sc>–43.87</sc> ± <sc>0.65</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>517.36</sc> ± <sc>21.83</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>5.18</sc> ± 0.55</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–50.46</sc> ± <sc>0.74</sc></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3-2"><title>Differential roles for Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 in AP initiation and somatic excitability</title><p>Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 are differentially distributed in neuronal arbors and are thought to contribute to different aspects of AP initiation and propagation. In mature neocortical pyramidal cells, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 is enriched in the distal AIS, the site where APs initiate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Katz et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Royeck et al., 2008</xref>). Following initiation, APs forward propagate along the axon via Na<sub>V</sub>1.6-enriched nodes of Ranvier, but also backpropagate into the soma through a region enriched with a mix of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>). Several studies have sought to identify specific roles for each isoform by conditional deletion of either isoform (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Katz et al., 2018</xref>). Unfortunately, in such conditions, the residual isoform compensates for loss to some degree, making interpretation of individual isoform roles difficult. We therefore leveraged ASC-based blocks to study acute, differential inhibition of Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms to better understand the individual roles of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in AP excitability.</p><p>Changes to the AP waveform were visualized with phase plane plots, which plot membrane voltage versus membrane voltage velocity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1A</xref>). Within phase plots, spike threshold appears as a sudden deviation from rest and is defined as the voltage at which voltage velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) first exceeds 15 V/s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1A</xref>, right). Following spike threshold, a neuron’s voltage transits through two components of Na<sub>V</sub> recruitment, first in the AIS and then in the soma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Baranauskas et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Kole and Stuart, 2008</xref>). These result in characteristic ‘humps’ in the depolarizing aspect of the phase plot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Shu et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Yu et al., 2008</xref>). Thus, these different components of the phase plot can aid one’s understanding of effects on specific components of Na<sub>V</sub>-mediated excitability.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Global <italic>Scn2a</italic>, <italic>Scn8a</italic>, or dual loss in compartmental models distinctly impacts key action potential (AP) properties.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 are equally expressed in soma and proximal dendrites. Expression pattern is more distinct in other regions with Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 enriched in the distal axon initial segment (AIS), axon, and nodes of Ranvier, whereas Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 is found exclusively in the proximal AIS and distal dendrites. (<bold>B</bold>) Compartmental model representing changes to phase plots when Na<sub>V</sub> isoform expression is reduced from 100% (warmer colors) to 0% (in 10% increments) based on known localization across distinct neuronal localities. Lower Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 expression depolarized spike threshold and decreased both AIS and somatic AP velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>). Reduced Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 expression largely impacts backpropagation and somatic AP velocity. (<bold>C</bold>) Empirical observations of phase plot following near-complete channel block with ASCs. Darker trace represents phase plot taken at baseline prior to –12 mV hold for 30 s (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). Colored traces represent recovery phase plots at different times post –12 mV hold for 30 s with warmer colors depicting more time lapsed and increased channel recovery.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Compartmental model sensitivity analysis.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) To assess model sensitivity, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 distribution is shifted throughout the axon initial segment (AIS). The AIS crossover point is adjusted from baseline with Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 extended into the proximal AIS (left 2) or Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 extended into the distal AIS (right 2 and 5). (<bold>B</bold>) Heat maps for action potential (AP) threshold and peak somatic d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> at different AIS crossover points. Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 ratios are also varied along the <italic>y</italic>-axis. (<bold>C</bold>) Example phase plane traces at different AIS crossover positions. Each AIS crossover position shows individual plots based on the different Na<sub>V</sub> ratios. Increased Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 density consistently depolarized AP threshold, while d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> peaks are randomly altered at the different density ratios. Scale bars are unique to each AIS crossover position.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig2-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>To provide a priori predictions of potential ASC-based effects on excitability, we constructed a compartmental model in which each channel’s density could be modulated. Channels were distributed based on predictions from empirical anatomical and physiological studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Nelson et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Katz et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Kole et al., 2008</xref>). Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 was enriched in the distal AIS, Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was enriched in the proximal AIS, both channels were expressed at equal levels in the soma and the first 20 µm of dendrite closest to the soma, and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was expressed exclusively in all other dendrites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>). Within this model, each channel’s density was modulated in 10% increments, from 100 to 0% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>).</p><p>In WT conditions (100% density of both channels), models generated APs with a threshold and AP kinetics comparable to empirical baseline observations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B, C</xref>). Within this model, reducing Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 or Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 density had clear, dissociable effects. Progressive reduction of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 produced a progressive depolarization of AP threshold and a corresponding decrement in d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> throughout the entire rising phase of the AP. Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 reduction, by contrast, had no effect on AP threshold or the initial velocity of the AP initiated in the distal AIS. Instead, components of the AP related to backpropagation and recruitment of somatic Na<sub>V</sub> channels were impaired only, with a decrement in peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> and peak AP membrane potential. To validate the accuracy of the parameters used in our model, we also performed sensitivity analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1</xref>). Here, we adjusted the crossover point of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 within the AIS as well as varied the density ratio of both channels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1A, B</xref>). Increasing the Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 ratio to 100% consistently hyperpolarized AP threshold across all AIS crossover positions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1B, C</xref>). However, d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> was highly variable and random when either the AIS crossover point is shifted or Na<sub>V</sub> ratios are altered.</p><p>While these models provide clues to the differential roles of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, we needed to design an experimental strategy that increased the overall degree of Na<sub>V</sub> blockade using ASCs in mice where either Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 or Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was mutated to be insensitive to 200 nM GNE-4076 binding (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1G</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">3A</xref>). Since it is nearly impossible to achieve full block with ASCs under physiological firing, we developed a hybrid current- and voltage-clamp experiment to study the effects of more complete isoform blockade (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). In this protocol, neurons were held to –80 mV in current clamp with constant bias current (if necessary), and baseline APs were elicited with brief somatic current injection (300 ms, amplitude adjusted to evoke ~4–5 APs). We then promoted Na<sub>V</sub> activation and inactivation by voltage-clamping neurons to –12 mV for 30 s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). Following voltage-clamp, neurons were returned to current-clamp with the same bias current as used in baseline conditions. We then evoked APs, first at an interstimulus interval of 2 s, then at successively increasing intervals of 5–60 s, allowing for somewhat consistent sampling on a log-base timescale that aligns well with both channel recovery from inactivation and recovery from GNE-4076 block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D, F</xref>). For clarity and simplicity, we will describe studies based on which channel is inhibited rather than which channel was rendered insensitive to GNE-4076. For example, a study in the <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic>/<italic>Scn8a<sup>+/+</sup></italic> animal is a case where Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 can be blocked.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Recovery of action potential (AP) firing properties is greatly diminished following dual Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 inhibition compared to selective block of individual channels.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Protocol used to characterize recovery of AP firing properties. Baseline spiking is determined by injecting current for 300 ms to elicit five to six APs. To promote Na<sub>V</sub> inactivation and maximal GNE-4076 onboarding, neurons are held at –12 mV in voltage-clamp for 30 s. Recovery of AP firing is evaluated by injecting the same current stimulus defined during baseline spiking with an inter-stimulus interval starting at 2 s, followed by 5, 15, 30, and 60 s. (<bold>B</bold>) Overlaid waveform of first AP at baseline or 18 s post GNE-4076 onboarding for all conditions (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 12; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 10; <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR.</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11). (<bold>C</bold>) Overlaid phase plane of AP traces at baseline (100% transparency) or 18 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (20% transparency) for each condition in (<bold>B</bold>). Plots represent the AP velocity by taking the first derivative (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>, <italic>y</italic>-axis) versus the membrane potential (mV, <italic>x</italic>-axis). Colors are matched to conditions represented in (<bold>B</bold>). (<bold>D</bold>) Recovery of AP threshold (<italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub>) represented as a delta value for individual cells plotted against time post GNE-4076 onboarding (log-scale). For Δ <italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub>, the baseline value is subtracted from individual timepoints throughout the recovery phase (Δ mV = recovery timepoint – baseline). Colors are matched to conditions represented in (<bold>B</bold>). Gray shaded bar represents recovery between 12 and 20 s. (<bold>E</bold>) Summary data for Δ <italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub> at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (time period represented as gray bar in (<bold>D</bold>)). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. ****p &lt; 0.0001. (<bold>F</bold>) Recovery of AP peak velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) represented as a delta value for individual cells plotted against time post GNE-4076 onboarding (log-scale). For Δ d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>, the baseline value is subtracted from individual time points throughout the recovery phase (Δ V/s = recovery timepoint – baseline). Colors are matched to conditions represented in (<bold>B</bold>). Gray shaded bar represents recovery between 12 and 20 s. (<bold>G</bold>) Summary data for Δ d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (time period represented as gray bar in (<bold>F</bold>)). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Depolarization across the axon initial segment (AIS) compartment is mediated by distinct Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic depicting different phases of an action potential (AP), including AP velocity (first derivative; d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> or V/s) and acceleration (second derivative; d<sup>2</sup><italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic><sup>2</sup> or V/s<sup>2</sup>). APs can be divided based on depolarization or repolarization phases, which largely depends on the opening of various voltage-gated ion channels. During cellular depolarization, two components exist that largely account for voltage change detected at either the AIS or soma, which are easily discerned by two humps present on a phase plane plot. The AIS component can further be separated into the AIS max or inflection point defined as the trough or peak of the second derivative and likely represents voltage change at distinct AIS regions like the proximal or distal AIS, respectively. (<bold>B</bold>) Example traces of first and second derivatives for all genotypes at baseline or 18 s post recovery. AIS inflection point (light green) is defined as corresponding d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> when acceleration (d<sup>2</sup><italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic><sup>2</sup>) peaks during the AIS component. AIS max point (dark green) is defined as corresponding d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> when acceleration plateaus (visualized as a trough of d<sup>2</sup><italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic><sup>2</sup>) during AIS component. (<bold>C</bold>) Summary data for Δ AIS inflection point (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (represented as light green bar in (<bold>B</bold>)). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 12; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11). One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. ****p &lt; 0.0001. (<bold>D</bold>) Recovery of AIS max velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) represented as a delta value for individual cells plotted against time post GNE-4076 onboarding (log-scale). For Δ d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>, the baseline value is subtracted from individual time points throughout the recovery phase (Δ V/s = recovery timepoint − baseline). Gray shaded bar represents recovery between 12 and 20 s. (<bold>E</bold>) Summary data for Δ AIS max velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (represented as gray bar in (<bold>D</bold>) or dark green bar in (<bold>B</bold>)). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s1sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3- figure supplement 1</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig3-figsupp1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig3-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Recovery of action potential (AP) firing properties represented as absolute values.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Recovery of AP threshold (<italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub>) represented as absolute values for individual cells (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 12; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11) plotted against time post GNE-4076 onboarding (log-scale). Colors are matched to conditions represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>. Gray shaded bar represents recovery between 12 and 20 s. (<bold>B</bold>) Summary data for <italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub> at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (time period represented as gray bar in (<bold>A</bold>)). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001. (<bold>C</bold>) Recovery of AP peak velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) represented as absolute values for individual cells plotted against time post GNE-4076 onboarding (log-scale). Colors are matched to conditions represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>. Gray shaded bar represents recovery between 12 and 20 s. (<bold>D</bold>) Summary data for peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (time period represented as gray bar in (<bold>C</bold>)). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001. (<bold>E</bold>) Recovery of axon initial segment (AIS) max velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) represented as absolute values for individual cells plotted against time post GNE-4076 onboarding (log-scale). Colors are matched to conditions represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>. Gray shaded bar represents recovery between 12 and 20 s. (<bold>F</bold>) Summary data for AIS max velocity (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>) at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (time period represented as gray bar in (<bold>E</bold>)). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s2sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3-figure supplement 2</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig3-figsupp2-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig3-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Empirical data at various time points post –12 mV hold reveals that recovery from ASC-dependent block increases channel availability from approximately 0–10% to about 90–95% of the baseline spike when more time has elapsed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2C</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">3B, C</xref>). This recovery in available channels mimics changes observed to phase plots in compartmental models based on overall channel expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>).</p><p>We then focused our analysis on the recovery of threshed or peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> across all genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). In untreated WT cells, AP threshold following voltage-clamp recovered to baseline values immediately (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C, D</xref>). By contrast, peak somatic d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> recovered more slowly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C, F</xref>), likely reflecting recovery from slow inactivation of channels in the perisomatic region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Colbert et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Park et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Toib et al., 1998</xref>). Peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> recovered to within 87.12 ± 0.86% by 12–20 s of voltage-clamp offset (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F, G</xref>). Subsequent recovery of the residual peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> was slower, taking another 15–30 s to recover the next 5% of peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>). Identical results were observed in <italic>Scn8a</italic>/<italic>2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> cells treated with 200 nM GNE-4076, suggesting that any effect observed in single knock-in recordings will be due to block of GNE-4076 sensitive channels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B–G</xref>). We therefore focused on the 12–20 s after voltage-clamp offset for subsequent analysis, as it is a period in which most channel-intrinsic recovery has occurred, but also a period in which we would still expect significant block from GNE-4076.</p><p>When individual channel isoforms were blocked more completely with voltage steps to –12 mV, dramatic changes in AP threshold and peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> were observed. When Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 was blocked, threshold depolarized by 5.8 ± 0.7 mV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3E</xref>). When Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was blocked instead, threshold was unaffected (∆ <italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub>: –0.1 ± 0.2). Thus, AP threshold and AP initiation appear to be initiated in an Na<sub>V</sub>1.6-rich region in control conditions; but when Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 is inhibited, APs can occur at more depolarized potentials, likely mediated predominately by Na<sub>V</sub>1.2.</p><p>To examine these relative contributions further, we analyzed the rising phase of APs more closely (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1A</xref>). As described above, the first component of the rising phase of the AP reflects recruitment of Na<sub>V</sub> channels localized to the AIS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1A</xref>, middle). Based on changes in voltage acceleration (second derivative) within this period, the AIS component can be further divided into initiation and AIS backpropagation components (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Favero et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1A</xref>, right). These periods were divided based on a time point during the AIS phase where voltage acceleration first peaked (AIS inflection point) or afterwards decreased, creating a trough in an acceleration versus time graph (AIS max; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1B</xref>). The d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> at the AIS inflection point was affected only by Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1C</xref>), whereas the d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> at the trough was affected by block of either isoform (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1D, E</xref>). This reinforces the model where APs are initiated via the Na<sub>V</sub>1.6-enriched distal AIS, and where the depolarization produced by these distally localized channels recruits Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 in the more proximal AIS. Absolute values are also reported for threshold, peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>, and AIS max for all recorded cells in recovery experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2A–F</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3-3"><title>Acute block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 increases pyramidal cell AP output</title><p>Previously, we showed that conditional knockout of <italic>Scn2a</italic> increased AP output (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>). We hypothesized that this was due to the lack of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 in dendrites. When they are absent from this compartment, the dendrite does not depolarize as effectively, leading to a corresponding decrease in the recruitment of dendrite-localized potassium channels (K<sub>V</sub>). Consequently, neurons repolarize less between APs, making it easier to evoke the next AP in the Na<sub>V</sub>1.6-enriched AIS.</p><p>Though this hypothesis was supported by compartmental modeling demonstrating that acute block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 mirrored empirical observations, we could not eliminate the possibility that some form of cellular compensation occurred in the weeks between conditional knockout induction and acute slice experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Miralles and Patel, 2022</xref>). Therefore, we leveraged GNE-4076 to test the effects of acute Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>), eliminating the possibility of genetic or post-translational compensation. We further compared this manipulation to block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 or both isoforms by examining overall AP output from protocols described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>.</p><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Acute inhibition of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 increases action potential (AP) excitability.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) AP train over 300 ms at baseline (black) or 18 s post GNE-4076 onboarding (color) for all conditions (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 12; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 10; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11; <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR.</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11). Dashed line represents <italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub> of last afterhyperpolarization (AHP). (<bold>B</bold>) Summary data for Δ spike number at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding. Violin plots show median. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ****p &lt; 0.0001. (<bold>C</bold>) Summary data for Δ last AHP at 12–20 s post GNE-4076 onboarding. Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig4-v2.tif"/></fig><p>Remarkably, acute Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 block mirrored conditional knockout and was the only condition in which AP output increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>) and was associated with a depolarization in afterhyperpolarization voltage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C</xref>). In contrast, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 block decreased AP output, as did block of both channels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>). This indicates that blocking Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 alone can increase AP output, independent of compensatory changes to other channels that may occur with genetic manipulations.</p></sec><sec id="s3-4"><title>Activity-dependent effects of ASCs on Na<sub>V</sub> channels and subsequent inhibition alter AP properties and firing rate</title><p>During physiological activity, non-selective pharmacological inhibition of Na<sub>V</sub> channels in neurons greatly reduces cellular excitability and AP firing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Tukker et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Thouta et al., 2022</xref>). ASCs are unique in that they require prolonged bursts of activity or even neuronal hyperexcitability to stabilize more channels in the inactivated state (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Goodchild et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Johnson et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Johnson et al., 2022</xref>). In contrast to the data presented above, where we observe near-complete block immediately following prolonged depolarization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2C</xref>, absolute values), neurons experiencing physiological levels of activity likely never reach high percentages of channel blockade. Thus, in normal spiking neurons, ASCs would therefore be predicted to exhibit use dependence, progressively blocking channels in proportion to a neuron’s activity rate.</p><p>To test this concept, we generated prolonged periods of activity in current-clamp by injecting 300 pA into the somatic pipette for 10 s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A and B</xref>). Drug-naive WT neurons responded to somatic current injection with repetitive spiking at a rate of 14.7 ± 0.5 Hz. Neurons fired at a steady state after the first second, with stable AP threshold and instantaneous AP frequency (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref>). Spiking characteristics were identical in <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> cells treated with GNE-4076, indicating that, at 200 nM, neurons are insensitive to GNE-4076 when the YW→SR motif substitution is present (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C, D</xref>). However, in WT neurons treated with GNE-4076, threshold continued to depolarize after the first second, with corresponding decrements in instantaneous frequency and peak AP d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> throughout the stimulus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C, D</xref>). This demonstrates that GNE-4076 suppresses firing of neurons with a baseline firing rate of ~15 Hz (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Activity-dependent onboarding of GNE-4076 to Na<sub>V</sub> channels alters action potential (AP) firing properties in layer 5b, thick-tufted excitatory neurons.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Representative AP firing response to 300 pA current injection for 10 s in wildtype or <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> cells with or without 200 nM GNE-4076. (<bold>B</bold>) Phase plane of AP traces shown in (<bold>A</bold>). Plots represent AP velocity by taking the first derivative (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>, <italic>y</italic>-axis) versus the membrane potential (mV, <italic>x</italic>-axis). To represent changes with phase plane relative to time, a rainbow color spectrum is used with warmer colors representing more time lapsed. (<bold>C</bold>) Delta threshold (Δ mV), delta peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> (Δ V/s), and delta instantaneous firing frequency (Δ Hz) binned in 1-s increments normalized to the initial 500 ms of current injection (binned time – initial 500 ms). Circles represent mean Δ value ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. (<bold>D</bold>) Summary data for the final sec in (<bold>C</bold>). Delta values are normalized to the initial 500 ms of the stimulus (binned time – initial 500 ms). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 12; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12). One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata1"><label>Figure 5—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig5-v2.tif"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" position="float"><label>Table 4.</label><caption><title>Action potential (AP) firing properties of first spike in 10 s AP train, related to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figures 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">6</xref>.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Na<sub>V</sub> channel</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Threshold (mV)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> (V/s)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Wildtype, no drug (<italic>n</italic> = 12)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–43.1</sc> ± <sc>0.4</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>549.1</sc> ± <sc>8.8</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Wildtype + GNE-4076 (<italic>n</italic> = 12)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–41.7</sc> ± <sc>0.7</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>541.0</sc> ± <sc>12.5</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076 (<italic>n</italic> = 12)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–43.7</sc> ± <sc>0.4</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>561.3</sc> ± <sc>14.5</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076 (<italic>n</italic> = 12)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–40.7</sc> ± <sc>0.4</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>500.7</sc> ± <sc>12.5</sc></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076 (<italic>n</italic> = 11)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>–43.3</sc> ± <sc>0.5</sc></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><sc>542.9</sc> ± <sc>11.6</sc></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>We then repeated experiments described above for single mutated channels—where APs were generated with somatic depolarization over 10 s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A, B</xref>). In cases where Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 alone could be inhibited, AP threshold depolarized in response to GNE-4076 as much as in WT cases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6C, D</xref>). Furthermore, AP frequency and peak somatic AP d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> were reduced to levels observed in WT cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6C, D</xref>). In cases where Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 alone could be inhibited, changes in AP threshold and instantaneous frequency were no different than <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> conditions. Indeed, the only change in AP properties was a decrease in peak AP d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6D</xref>). This suggests that AP threshold and instantaneous frequency are more sensitive to Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 antagonism, whereas peak somatic d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> can be affected by antagonism of either isoform. Absolute values are also reported for threshold, peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>, and instantaneous frequency for all recorded cells in prolonged activity burst experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1A</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Selective inhibition of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 depolarizes action potential (AP) threshold markedly, while blocking both Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 reduces AP velocity.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Representative AP firing response to 300 pA current injection for 10 s in <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> or <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> cells with 200 nM GNE-4076 to selectively inhibit Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 or NaV1.2, respectively. (<bold>B</bold>) Phase plane of AP traces shown in (<bold>A</bold>). Plots represent AP velocity by taking the first derivative (d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic>, <italic>y</italic>-axis) versus the membrane potential (mV, <italic>x</italic>-axis). To represent changes with phase plane relative to time, a rainbow color spectrum is used with warmer colors representing more time lapsed. (<bold>C</bold>) Delta threshold (Δ mV), delta peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> (Δ V/s), and delta instantaneous firing frequency (Δ Hz) binned in 1-s increments normalized to the initial 500ms of current injection (binned time – initial 500 ms). Circles represent mean Δ value ± SEM. Average Δ value ± SEM for <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076 and wildtype + GNE-4076 from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref> are represented. (<bold>D</bold>) Summary data for the final sec in (<bold>C</bold>). Delta values are normalized to the initial 500 ms of the stimulus (binned time – initial 500 ms). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells (<italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11). One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata1"><label>Figure 6—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig6-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig6-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Absolute values for activity-dependent onboarding of GNE-4076.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Absolute values for threshold (mV), peak d<italic>V</italic>/d<italic>t</italic> (V/s), and instantaneous firing frequency (Hz) binned in 1-s increments. Circles represent mean absolute value ± SEM (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 12; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 11). Two-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6s1sdata1"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6-figure supplement 1</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig6-figsupp1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig6-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s3-5"><title>Leveraging use-dependent, isoform-selective Na<sub>V</sub> pharmacology as anticonvulsants</title><p>Epilepsy is often associated with aberrant, excessive excitability in neocortical networks, whether from direct hyperexcitability in pyramidal cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Lopez-Santiago et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Sanders et al., 2018</xref>) or disinhibition of pyramidal cells via alterations in inhibitory networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Favero et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Tran et al., 2020</xref>). Several use-dependent Na<sub>V</sub> antagonists with structures similar to GNE-4076 are being developed, exhibiting differential selectivity for Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Goodchild et al., 2024</xref>). Use dependence may have advantages as anti-epileptics. In theory, they would have minimal effect on neurotypical network activity unless such networks were hyperactive enough to promote drug binding. This may occur preferentially in seizure states. But given the results above demonstrating that block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 can have different effects on overall AP output, it is critical to determine how block of either channel affects overall activity in seizure-like conditions.</p><p>To test this, we mimicked synaptic input by repeatedly injecting a 60-s-long somatic current composed of Poisson-distributed EPSC and IPSC-like waveforms designed to elicit ~10 Hz spiking in baseline conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>). Following this baseline, the PSC-like train was repeated, imposed upon a 400-pA standing current injection to increase spiking to ~30 Hz (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C</xref>), mimicking spike rates commonly observed during cortical seizure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Neckelmann et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Timofeev and Steriade, 2004</xref>). After this seizure-like event, cells were returned to baseline voltages, and recovery was assessed with four more repetitions of the 60 s PSC stimulus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A–C</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>GNE-4076 onboarding following seizure-like activity continually impacts neuronal firing into recovery.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Stimulation protocol and example firing trace of cell injected with fluctuating post-synaptic potentials (PSPs) randomly generated using a Poisson probability distribution function for 60 s. PSPs were continuously applied to acquire baseline activity, seizure-like activity, and recovery activity. During seizure-like activity, a 400-pA step was applied in addition to the PSP. Recovery was continuously recorded for up to 4 min post seizure-like activity. (<bold>B</bold>) Zoomed-in example traces for all genotypes at the Baseline → Seizure transition, Seizure → Recovery transition, and start of 3–4 min recovery period (highlighted in (<bold>A</bold>)). Solid horizontal black bar represents membrane potential (<italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub>) of –12 mV. Tick marks above traces represent detected spikes defined as a change in <italic>V</italic><sub>m</sub> of 15 V/s or greater. (<bold>C</bold>) Threshold (mV) or instantaneous firing frequency (Hz) binned in 5-s increments for all genotypes in (<bold>B</bold>). Solid lines represent mean value ± SEM. Timescale on <italic>x</italic>-axis mirrors activity presented in (<bold>A</bold>). (<bold>D</bold>) Summary of threshold data for the final 5 s of seizure-like activity or entire 3–4 min recovery time point in (<bold>C</bold>). Delta values are normalized to baseline activity (either at final 5 s or entire period). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 7; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 7–8; <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 6). One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001. (<bold>E</bold>) Summary of instantaneous frequency data for the final 5 s of seizure-like activity or entire 3–4 min recovery time point in (<bold>C</bold>). Delta values are normalized to baseline activity (either at final 5 s or entire period). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells. One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata1"><label>Figure 7—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig7-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig7-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>GNE-4076 onboarding during baseline post-synaptic potential (PSP) activity.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Changes to baseline activity prior to seizure-like activity (Zoom-in of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C</xref>). Absolute values for both threshold (mV) and instantaneous firing frequency (Hz) are binned in 5-s increments for all genotypes in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B</xref>. (<bold>B</bold>) Summary of threshold or instantaneous frequency data for the final 5 s of baseline activity in (<bold>A</bold>). Delta values are normalized to the initial 5 s of baseline activity (final − initial 5 s). Box plots show median and 90% tails. Circles represent individual cells (wildtype no drug, <italic>n</italic> = 7; wildtype + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 8; <italic>Scn2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; <italic>Scn8a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 12; <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> + GNE-4076, <italic>n</italic> = 6). One-way ANOVA, Holm–Šídák multiple comparisons test. *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7s1sdata1"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Data values for each experiment described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7-figure supplement 1</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig7-figsupp1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-fig7-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>In the presence of 200 nM GNE-4076, baseline firing rates were mostly stable across all conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A</xref>). Wildtype, no drug and <italic>Scn8a/2a<sup>SR/SR</sup></italic> conditions observed no change in firing rate, while dual or selective Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 blockade saw a slight decrease by 60 s of postsynaptic activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1B</xref>). Interestingly, we did see a slight increase in baseline firing by 60 s when Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was selectively targeted (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, B</xref>), further highlighting a paradoxical shift to hyperactive neurons when Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 availability decreases. By contrast, a slight depolarization in AP threshold was observed at baseline when both channels were sensitive to GNE-4076 (e.g., WT plus drug) and to a lesser extent with selective block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, B</xref>). Given that this dose can completely block both Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in HEK cells, a small amount of drug block was expected at baseline.</p><p>Seizure-like activity induction depolarized AP threshold markedly in all genotypes, and threshold depolarization persisted into the recovery phase for all neurons experiencing Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 or dual inhibition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C, D</xref>). Seizure-like activity increased spike rate across all genotypes at the onset of seizure-like activity induction (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C, E</xref>). All cells exhibited some degree of AP accommodation during this stimulus, including drug-naive controls and cases where both Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 were insensitive to GNE-4076 block. WT cells exposed to GNE-4076 accommodated markedly, returning to baseline firing rates at the end of the seizure-like stimulus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C, E</xref>). A less dramatic effect was noted when Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 was blocked alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7E</xref>). By contrast, cells where Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 could be blocked alone were not appreciably different than untreated controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7E</xref>). Furthermore, some cells that remained hyperactive with selective Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 block compared to control cells throughout the recovery phase. Together, these data suggest that use-dependent pharmacology that targets Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 may be most beneficial if designed for higher potency at Na<sub>V</sub>1.6.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Here, we combined genetic and pharmacological strategies to transiently, selectively, and reversibly inhibit either Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 or Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 function using activity-dependent ASCs, which bind channels in the inactivated state. We show that acute blockade of either isoform has opposing effects on neuronal output: inhibition of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 decreases AP output, whereas Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 increases AP output. Given this, we found that the block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 rather than Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was more effective at tempering spiking activity in cells driven to seizure-like levels of AP output. This suggests that pharmacology tuned to preferentially block Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 over Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 in a use-dependent manner may be useful as an anti-epileptic.</p><sec id="s4-1"><title>Functional implications of differential compartmental Na<sub>V</sub> isoform expression</title><p>Electrophysiological recordings of AP propagation delays between somatic and axonal recordings demonstrate that APs initiate ~35–50 µm from the soma, in the distal AIS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Shu et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Palmer and Stuart, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Baranauskas et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>). This region is enriched with Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Tian et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Royeck et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Lorincz and Nusser, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Akin et al., 2015</xref>). Consistent with this, we find that inhibition of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 alone alters AP initiation, with an increase in AP threshold and a decrease in total AP number from block of this isoform. Following distal AIS AP initiation, APs sequentially propagate across different neuronal compartments to influence local excitability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Shu et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Palmer and Stuart, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Baranauskas et al., 2013</xref>). Forward propagation was not examined here, but prior reports demonstrate that it is supported almost exclusively by Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in nodes of Ranvier and boutons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Tian et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Caldwell et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Kaplan et al., 2001</xref>). By contrast, backpropagation through the proximal AIS and soma recruits a mix of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.2.</p><p>Prior work has suggested that Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 channels localized to the proximal AIS are critical for backpropagation, with modeling suggesting that APs would fail to effectively backpropagate into the soma in the absence of proximal AIS Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 channels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hu et al., 2009</xref>). While some efforts have been made to test this empirically with conditional <italic>Scn2a</italic> knockout, such experiments are imperfect, as Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 redistributes in the AIS of cells that lack Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>). Here, we were able to test the role of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 in backpropagation without compensatory effects, using acute pharmacological inhibition. Backpropagation failures were not observed, consistent with results from conditional <italic>Scn2a</italic> knockout (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>). However, we did observe a reduction in the velocity at which the AIS component of the AP depolarized when Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 was blocked selectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1B, C</xref>). This suggests that proximal AIS-localized Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 does aid in boosting backpropagating APs as they transit from the distal AIS to the soma. Nevertheless, Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 channels are still dispensable for recruitment of somatic Na<sub>V</sub> channels, at least in mouse mPFC layer 5b pyramidal cells. Whether similar effects are observed in other cells, including those with larger somata that may be more difficult to depolarize in the absence of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2, remains to be tested.</p><p>Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 expression in pyramidal cell dendrites appears to have two roles in neuronal excitability. Intuitively, these channels provide local inward current that boosts dendritic excitability, leading to a recruitment of voltage-gated calcium channels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Spratt et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Nelson et al., 2024</xref>). But this depolarization also appears to be critical for the recruitment of dendritically localized voltage-gated potassium channels that contribute to AP repolarization and net membrane potential between spikes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Spratt et al., 2021</xref>). Indeed, conditional knockout of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 paradoxically increases AP output, and we suggested previously that this was due in large part to loss of interactions between dendritic Na<sub>V</sub> channels and K<sub>V</sub> channels. But given observed changes in Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 function as well as potential for other compensatory changes in non-Na<sub>V</sub> ion channels, it was difficult to ascribe hyperexcitability purely to the loss of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 alone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Miralles and Patel, 2022</xref>). Here, we showed that identical increases in excitability—associated with depolarization of membrane potential between APs—could be observed with acute Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 block. This indicates that such effects can be due purely to the interplay between dendritic Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and K<sub>V</sub> channels, and that modifications to potassium channel distribution or function are not necessary for such effects.</p><p>Similar to Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 conditional knockout, where Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 is upregulated, knockout of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 results in an increase in Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 expression, at least in the AIS. In pyramidal cells from mice constitutively lacking Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 occupies the entirety of the AIS rather than just the region proximal to the soma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Ye et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Katz et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Royeck et al., 2008</xref>). Thus, it has not been possible to evaluate the role of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in its normal distribution using genetic manipulations. Here, we find that acute Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 block reduces AP output with a concomitant increase in AP threshold. This contrasted markedly with block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2, which had no effect on threshold. Of note, this distinction can be leveraged to assess the specificity of other Na<sub>V</sub>-targeting pharmacology that has been suggested to have specificity at select isoforms, as any change in threshold indicates that drugs are interacting with Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Ye et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Filipis et al., 2023</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>ASC pharmacology for suppression of neuronal hyperexcitability</title><p>Epilepsy can arise from genetic and non-genetic factors, often with unexplained etiology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Lindy et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Deng et al., 2014</xref>). Seizure onset is broadly classified as an electrical imbalance of cellular and network activity that favors hyperexcitability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Agbo et al., 2023</xref>), whether it be cell intrinsic, synaptic, or due to complex network effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Greenfield, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Yin et al., 2013</xref>). Thus, seizure suppression can be targeted at multiple levels. Nevertheless, proper dosing can be difficult, as one aims to provide drug concentrations that temper excess activity but limit side effects like sedation associated with elevated drug concentrations.</p><p>For genetically defined sodium channelopathies, attention has been directed to neuronal cell types that express each isoform (e.g., <italic>SCN1A</italic>: Na<sub>V</sub>1.1, <italic>SCN2A</italic>: Na<sub>V</sub>1.2, and <italic>SCN8A</italic>: Na<sub>V</sub>1.6) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Encinas et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Menezes et al., 2020</xref>). Seizures resulting from <italic>SCN1A</italic> loss of function limit inhibitory neuron excitability, thereby disinhibiting excitatory pyramidal cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Favero et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Tran et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Strzelczyk and Schubert-Bast, 2022</xref>). <italic>SCN2A</italic> gain-of-function results in hyperexcitability in pyramidal cells, especially in early development when Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 channels are the sole isoform expressed in the AIS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Jenkins and Bender, 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Gazina et al., 2015</xref>). Later in development, <italic>SCN8A</italic>-encoded Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 channels are expressed more ubiquitously in the AIS of most cell classes, supporting AP initiation in both excitatory and inhibitory cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Favero et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Lopez-Santiago et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Akin et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Boiko et al., 2003</xref>).</p><p>With these cellular distributions and mechanisms of action, guidelines have emerged for treatment. For <italic>SCN1A</italic> loss-of-function, sodium channel blocking anti-epileptics are typically contraindicated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Kalume et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Oakley et al., 2013</xref>). This is because currently prescribed sodium channel blockers are non-selective, with little preference for Na<sub>V</sub>1.1, 1.2, or 1.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Bai et al., 2022</xref>). Thus, further blocking of the remaining Na<sub>V</sub>1.1 leads to even more disinhibition of excitatory cells before any beneficial effects of blocking Na<sub>V</sub> channels in excitatory cells are realized. Similarly, nonspecific sodium channel blockers are contraindicated for <italic>SCN2A</italic> loss-of-function seizures, as they tend to increase seizure severity. Instead, non-selective Na<sub>V</sub> inhibitors are useful when channel gain-of-function affects excitatory cells, as is the case for both <italic>SCN2A</italic> and <italic>SCN8A</italic> gain-of-function cases.</p><p>ASCs may be useful within each of these domains, as their chemistry can be adjusted to bias binding to specific isoforms in an activity-dependent manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ahuja et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Goodchild et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Johnson et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Johnson et al., 2022</xref>). Indeed, compounds similar to those used here that inhibit both Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (but not other Na<sub>V</sub> channels) are effective at suppressing chemoconvulsant-induced seizures in ex vivo models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Goodchild et al., 2024</xref>). This parallels our observations, where excess activity was dampened most effectively by dual block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C</xref>). This effect appears due in large part to the block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6, since, ultimately, this is the isoform responsible for AP initiation. Consistent with this, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6-preferring ASCs show promise in protecting from chemoconvulsant-induced seizures in vivo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Johnson et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Johnson et al., 2022</xref>). Similar to our results, Johnson et al. also show that a selective ASC for Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 (NBI-921352) preferentially targets cortical pyramidal cells, unlike carbamazepine that non-selectively targets many Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms leading to impaired interneuron activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Johnson et al., 2022</xref>). In fact, drug therapies using agents like carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and phenytoin that have little to no selectivity for Na<sub>V</sub> isoforms can have adverse effects in certain situations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Agbo et al., 2023</xref>). Thus, it may be that preferential block of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 would be beneficial in multiple sodium channelopathy conditions, including those associated with channel loss, since network hyperexcitability is ultimately dictated by Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 function in the AIS of excitatory neurons after the first months of life.</p><p>Beyond selectivity, there may also be advantages to ASC activity-dependent properties. The ASC-binding pocket is hidden from drug in a channel’s closed state. This feature, combined with on- and off-rate kinetics, results in an accumulation of block primarily for highly active neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">7</xref>). Similar to on-demand, closed-loop electrical or optogenetic approaches for seizure intervention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Krook-Magnuson et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Nagaraj et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Ledri et al., 2023</xref>), ASCs are essentially biased to suppress prolonged, high-frequency activity, including the type of activity commonly observed during seizures. In this study, our focus centered mainly on seizure-like activity across individual neurons. Future studies can extend this approach to examining networks ex vivo and systems in vivo.</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf2"><p>Is an employee of Genentech</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con8"><p>Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con9"><p>Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con10"><p>Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con11"><p>Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other"><p>This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animal procedures were in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines in accordance with the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and was approved by UCSF (protocol # AN194060).</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-105696-mdarchecklist1-v2.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>Figure source data files contain the numerical data used to generate the figures.</p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Drs. JP Johnson, Natali Minassian, Fiona Scott, and members of the Bender Lab for extensive discussions related to this work. This work was supported by NIH grants K00 MH134674 (JDG), MH125978 and MH126960 (KJB), by the Hartwell Foundation through an Individual Biomedical Research Award (RBS) and by FamiliesSCN2A through an Action Potential award (RBS).</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agbo</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>ZG</given-names></name><name><surname>Magaji</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name><name><surname>Mutalub</surname><given-names>YB</given-names></name><name><surname>Mshelia</surname><given-names>PP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mhya</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Therapeutic efficacy of voltage-gated sodium channel inhibitors in epilepsy</article-title><source>Acta Epileptologica</source><volume>5</volume><elocation-id>16</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s42494-023-00127-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40217485</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahuja</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mukund</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Khakh</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ho</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Shriver</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Coons</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tam</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Brillantes</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sampang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Mortara</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Bowman</surname><given-names>KK</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name><name><surname>Estevez</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Verschoof</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Grimwood</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Dehnhardt</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrez</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Focken</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutherlin</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Safina</surname><given-names>BS</given-names></name><name><surname>Starovasnik</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ortwine</surname><given-names>DF</given-names></name><name><surname>Franke</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hackos</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Koth</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Payandeh</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Structural basis of Nav1.7 inhibition by an isoform-selective small-molecule antagonist</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>350</volume><elocation-id>aac5464</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aac5464</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26680203</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akin</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Solé</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Dib-Hajj</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Waxman</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>Tamkun</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Preferential targeting of Nav1.6 voltage-gated Na+ Channels to the axon initial segment during development</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e0124397</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0124397</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25874799</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>YF</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Molecular mechanisms of topiramate and its clinical value in epilepsy</article-title><source>Seizure</source><volume>98</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.seizure.2022.03.024</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35421622</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baranauskas</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>David</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Fleidervish</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Spatial mismatch between the Na+ flux and spike initiation in axon initial segment</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>110</volume><fpage>4051</fpage><lpage>4056</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1215125110</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23341597</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boiko</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Wart</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Caldwell</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Levinson</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Trimmer</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Matthews</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Functional specialization of the axon initial segment by isoform-specific sodium channel targeting</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>2306</fpage><lpage>2313</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02306.2003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12657689</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bosmans</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Rash</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Diochot</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lazdunski</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Escoubas</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Tytgat</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Four novel tarantula toxins as selective modulators of voltage-gated sodium channel subtypes</article-title><source>Molecular Pharmacology</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>419</fpage><lpage>429</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1124/mol.105.015941</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16267209</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caldwell</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Schaller</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lasher</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Peles</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Levinson</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Sodium channel Na(v)1.6 is localized at nodes of ranvier, dendrites, and synapses</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>5616</fpage><lpage>5620</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.090034797</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10779552</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Catterall</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldin</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Waxman</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>International union of pharmacology</article-title><source>Pharmacological Reviews</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>397</fpage><lpage>409</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1124/pr.57.4.4</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clarkson</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Liptak</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Gee</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sohal</surname><given-names>VS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>D3 receptors regulate excitability in a unique class of prefrontal pyramidal cells</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>37</volume><fpage>5846</fpage><lpage>5860</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0310-17.2017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28522735</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Colbert</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Magee</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoffman</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnston</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Slow recovery from inactivation of Na+ channels underlies the activity-dependent attenuation of dendritic action potentials in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>6512</fpage><lpage>6521</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-17-06512.1997</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9254663</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cong</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ran</surname><given-names>FA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cox</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Barretto</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Habib</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Hsu</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Marraffini</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>339</volume><fpage>819</fpage><lpage>823</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1231143</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Lera Ruiz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kraus</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Voltage-gated sodium channels: structure, function, pharmacology, and clinical indications</article-title><source>Journal of Medicinal Chemistry</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>7093</fpage><lpage>7118</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jm501981g</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25927480</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>The molecular biology of genetic-based epilepsies</article-title><source>Molecular Neurobiology</source><volume>49</volume><fpage>352</fpage><lpage>367</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12035-013-8523-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23934645</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Dourado</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Reese</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shields</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Stark</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Maksymetz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaminker</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Jung</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Foreman</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ngu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Roose-Girma</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tam</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lardell</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Orrhult</surname><given-names>LS</given-names></name><name><surname>Karila</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Allard</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hackos</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Nav1.7 is essential for nociceptor action potentials in the mouse in a manner independent of endogenous opioids</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>111</volume><fpage>2642</fpage><lpage>2659</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2023.05.024</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37352856</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Denomme</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Lukowski</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hull</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Jameson</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Bouza</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Narayan</surname><given-names>ARH</given-names></name><name><surname>Isom</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>The voltage-gated sodium channel inhibitor, 4,9-anhydrotetrodotoxin, blocks human Nav1.1 in addition to Nav1.6</article-title><source>Neuroscience Letters</source><volume>724</volume><elocation-id>134853</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134853</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Encinas</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Watkins</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Longoria</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammer</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Variable patterns of mutation density among NaV1.1, NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 point to channel-specific functional differences associated with childhood epilepsy</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>15</volume><elocation-id>e0238121</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0238121</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32845893</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Favero</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sotuyo</surname><given-names>NP</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopez</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kearney</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldberg</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>A transient developmental window of fast-spiking interneuron dysfunction in a mouse model of dravet syndrome</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>7912</fpage><lpage>7927</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0193-18.2018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30104343</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Filipis</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Blömer</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Montnach</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Loussouarn</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>De Waard</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Canepari</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Nav1.2 and BK channel interaction shapes the action potential in the axon initial segment</article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>601</volume><fpage>1957</fpage><lpage>1979</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/JP283801</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36946031</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fleidervish</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Lasser-Ross</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Gutnick</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ross</surname><given-names>WN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Na+ imaging reveals little difference in action potential-evoked Na+ influx between axon and soma</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>852</fpage><lpage>860</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.2574</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20543843</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gazina</surname><given-names>EV</given-names></name><name><surname>Leaw</surname><given-names>BTW</given-names></name><name><surname>Richards</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wimmer</surname><given-names>VC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>TH</given-names></name><name><surname>Aumann</surname><given-names>TD</given-names></name><name><surname>Featherby</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Churilov</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>VE</given-names></name><name><surname>Reid</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrou</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>“Neonatal” Nav1.2 reduces neuronal excitability and affects seizure susceptibility and behaviour</article-title><source>Human Molecular Genetics</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>1457</fpage><lpage>1468</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/ddu562</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25378553</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goodchild</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Shuart</surname><given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Parrish</surname><given-names>RR</given-names></name><name><surname>Soriano</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Thouta</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mezeyova</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Waldbrook</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Focken</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghovanloo</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruben</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Empfield</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Molecular pharmacology of selective Na(V)1.6 and Dual Na(V)1.6/Na(V)1.2 channel inhibitors that suppress excitatory neuronal activity ex vivo</article-title><source>ACS Chemical Neuroscience</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>1169</fpage><lpage>1184</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00757</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Greenfield</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Molecular mechanisms of antiseizure drug activity at GABAA receptors</article-title><source>Seizure</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>589</fpage><lpage>600</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.seizure.2013.04.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23683707</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hallermann</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>de Kock</surname><given-names>CPJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Stuart</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kole</surname><given-names>MHP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>State and location dependence of action potential metabolic cost in cortical pyramidal neurons</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>1007</fpage><lpage>1014</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.3132</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22660478</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hindson</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ness</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Masquelier</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Belgrader</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Heredia</surname><given-names>NJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Makarewicz</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bright</surname><given-names>IJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lucero</surname><given-names>MY</given-names></name><name><surname>Hiddessen</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Legler</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitano</surname><given-names>TK</given-names></name><name><surname>Hodel</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Petersen</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyatt</surname><given-names>PW</given-names></name><name><surname>Steenblock</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Shah</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name><name><surname>Bousse</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Troup</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Mellen</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wittmann</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Erndt</surname><given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Cauley</surname><given-names>TH</given-names></name><name><surname>Koehler</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>So</surname><given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Dube</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Montesclaros</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Stumbo</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Hodges</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Romine</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Milanovich</surname><given-names>FP</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname><given-names>HE</given-names></name><name><surname>Regan</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Karlin-Neumann</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hindson</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Saxonov</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Colston</surname><given-names>BW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number</article-title><source>Analytical Chemistry</source><volume>83</volume><fpage>8604</fpage><lpage>8610</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac202028g</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22035192</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hodgkin</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Huxley</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1952">1952</year><article-title>A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve</article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>117</volume><fpage>500</fpage><lpage>544</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12991237</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsu</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Weinstein</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ran</surname><given-names>FA</given-names></name><name><surname>Konermann</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Agarwala</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Fine</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Shalem</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Cradick</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Marraffini</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases</article-title><source>Nature Biotechnology</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>827</fpage><lpage>832</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.2647</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23873081</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Distinct contributions of Na(v)1.6 and Na(v)1.2 in action potential initiation and backpropagation</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>996</fpage><lpage>1002</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.2359</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19633666</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jenkins</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year><article-title>Axon initial segment structure and function in health and disease</article-title><source>Physiological Reviews</source><volume>105</volume><fpage>765</fpage><lpage>801</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/physrev.00030.2024</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39480263</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Focken</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Khakh</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tari</surname><given-names>PK</given-names></name><name><surname>Dube</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodchild</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrez</surname><given-names>J-C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bankar</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Bogucki</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Burford</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Chowdhury</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>de Boer</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Decker</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Dehnhardt</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Grimwood</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hasan</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hussainkhel</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindgren</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lofstrand</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Mezeyova</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Namdari</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Nelkenbrecher</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shuart</surname><given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Sojo</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Taron</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Waldbrook</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Weeratunge</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wesolowski</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoo</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zenova</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Cutts</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sherrington</surname><given-names>RP</given-names></name><name><surname>Pimstone</surname><given-names>SN</given-names></name><name><surname>Winquist</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Empfield</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>NBI-921352, a first-in-class, Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 selective, sodium channel inhibitor that prevents seizures in <italic>Scn8a</italic> gain-of-function mice, and wild-type mice and rats</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e72468</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.72468</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35234610</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>JP</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Focken</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Karimi Tari</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Dube</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodchild</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrez</surname><given-names>J-C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bankar</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Burford</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Chowdhury</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Christabel</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>de Boer</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Dehnhardt</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Grimwood</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hussainkhel</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Khakh</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindgren</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lofstrand</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Mezeyova</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nelkenbrecher</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shuart</surname><given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Sojo</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Waldbrook</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wesolowski</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zenova</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>FL</given-names></name><name><surname>Cutts</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sherrington</surname><given-names>RP</given-names></name><name><surname>Winquist</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Empfield</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>The contribution of Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 to the efficacy of voltage-gated sodium channel inhibitors in wild type and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 gain-of-function (GOF) mouse seizure control</article-title><source>British Journal of Pharmacology</source><volume>181</volume><fpage>3993</fpage><lpage>4011</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/bph.16481</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38922847</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kalume</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Westenbroek</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheah</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>FH</given-names></name><name><surname>Oakley</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Scheuer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Catterall</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Sudden unexpected death in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome</article-title><source>The Journal of Clinical Investigation</source><volume>123</volume><fpage>1798</fpage><lpage>1808</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1172/JCI66220</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23524966</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaplan</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Ullian</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Isom</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Levinson</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Barres</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Differential control of clustering of the sodium channels Na(v)1.2 and Na(v)1.6 at developing CNS nodes of Ranvier</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>119</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00266-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11343648</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katz</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Stoler</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Scheller</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Khrapunsky</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Goebbels</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kirchhoff</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Gutnick</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolf</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Fleidervish</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Role of sodium channel subtype in action potential generation by neocortical pyramidal neurons</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>115</volume><fpage>E7184</fpage><lpage>E7192</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1720493115</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29991598</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kole</surname><given-names>MHP</given-names></name><name><surname>Ilschner</surname><given-names>SU</given-names></name><name><surname>Kampa</surname><given-names>BM</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruben</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Stuart</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Action potential generation requires a high sodium channel density in the axon initial segment</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>178</fpage><lpage>186</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn2040</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18204443</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kole</surname><given-names>MHP</given-names></name><name><surname>Stuart</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Is action potential threshold lowest in the axon?</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>1253</fpage><lpage>1255</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.2203</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18836442</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krook-Magnuson</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Armstrong</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Oijala</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Soltesz</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>On-demand optogenetic control of spontaneous seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>4</volume><elocation-id>1376</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms2376</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23340416</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ladd</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>KG</given-names></name><name><surname>Balewski</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bouchard</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ben-Shalom</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Scaling and benchmarking an evolutionary algorithm for constructing biophysical neuronal models</article-title><source>Frontiers in Neuroinformatics</source><volume>16</volume><elocation-id>882552</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fninf.2022.882552</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35784184</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ledri</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Andersson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wickham</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kokaia</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Optogenetics for controlling seizure circuits for translational approaches</article-title><source>Neurobiology of Disease</source><volume>184</volume><elocation-id>106234</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106234</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37479090</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindy</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Stosser</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Butler</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Downtain-Pickersgill</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Shanmugham</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Retterer</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Brandt</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>McKnight</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Diagnostic outcomes for genetic testing of 70 genes in 8565 patients with epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorders</article-title><source>Epilepsia</source><volume>59</volume><fpage>1062</fpage><lpage>1071</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/epi.14074</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29655203</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lopez-Santiago</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wagnon</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hull</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Frasier</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>O’Malley</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Meisler</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Isom</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Neuronal hyperexcitability in a mouse model of <italic>SCN8A</italic> epileptic encephalopathy</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>114</volume><fpage>2383</fpage><lpage>2388</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1616821114</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28193882</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lorincz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Nusser</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Cell-type-dependent molecular composition of the axon initial segment</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>14329</fpage><lpage>14340</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4833-08.2008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19118165</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mali</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Esvelt</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Aach</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Guell</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>DiCarlo</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Norville</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Church</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>339</volume><fpage>823</fpage><lpage>826</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1232033</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meeks</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mennerick</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Action potential initiation and propagation in CA3 pyramidal axons</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>3460</fpage><lpage>3472</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.01288.2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17314237</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menezes</surname><given-names>LFS</given-names></name><name><surname>Sabiá Júnior</surname><given-names>EF</given-names></name><name><surname>Tibery</surname><given-names>DV</given-names></name><name><surname>Carneiro</surname><given-names>LDA</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwartz</surname><given-names>EF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Epilepsy-related voltage-gated sodium channelopathies: a review</article-title><source>Frontiers in Pharmacology</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>1276</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphar.2020.01276</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33013363</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miralles</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>It takes two to tango: channel interplay leads to paradoxical hyperexcitability in a loss-of-function epilepsy variant</article-title><source>Epilepsy Currents</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/15357597211057966</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35233206</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nagaraj</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>ST</given-names></name><name><surname>Krook-Magnuson</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Soltesz</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Benquet</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Irazoqui</surname><given-names>PP</given-names></name><name><surname>Netoff</surname><given-names>TI</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Future of seizure prediction and intervention: closing the loop</article-title><source>Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>194</fpage><lpage>206</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/WNP.0000000000000139</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26035672</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neckelmann</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Amzica</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Steriade</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Spike-wave complexes and fast components of cortically generated seizures: III synchronizing mechanisms</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>80</volume><fpage>1480</fpage><lpage>1494</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1480</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9744953</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Catalfio</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gupta</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Min</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Caballero-Florán</surname><given-names>RN</given-names></name><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Elvira</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Derderian</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Kyoung</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahagun</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanders</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Jenkins</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Physical and functional convergence of the autism risk genes Scn2a and Ank2 in neocortical pyramidal cell dendrites</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>112</volume><fpage>1133</fpage><lpage>1149</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2024.01.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38290518</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oakley</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheah</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Scheuer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Catterall</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Synergistic GABA-enhancing therapy against seizures in a mouse model of dravet syndrome</article-title><source>The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics</source><volume>345</volume><fpage>215</fpage><lpage>224</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1124/jpet.113.203331</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23424217</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Palmer</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Stuart</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Site of action potential initiation in layer 5 pyramidal neurons</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>1854</fpage><lpage>1863</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4812-05.2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16467534</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>YY</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnston</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Gray</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Slowly inactivating component of Na+ current in peri-somatic region of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>109</volume><fpage>1378</fpage><lpage>1390</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00435.2012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23236005</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quinn</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fenton</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Brusel</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Muruganandam</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Peleg</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Giladi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Haitin</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lerche</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Bassan</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ben-Shalom</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubinstein</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Complex biophysical changes and reduced neuronal firing in an SCN8A variant associated with developmental delay and epilepsy</article-title><source>Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Basis of Disease</source><volume>1870</volume><elocation-id>167127</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167127</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38519006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ragsdale</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Avoli</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Sodium channels as molecular targets for antiepileptic drugs</article-title><source>Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>16</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0165-0173(97)00054-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9600622</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramaswamy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Markram</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Anatomy and physiology of the thick-tufted layer 5 pyramidal neuron</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>233</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fncel.2015.00233</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26167146</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roecker</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Egbertson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>KLG</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomez</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kraus</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Koser</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Urban</surname><given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Clements</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Panigel</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Daley</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Finger</surname><given-names>EN</given-names></name><name><surname>Majercak</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Santarelli</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Gregan</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Cato</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Filzen</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Jovanovska</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y-H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Joyce</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Sherer</surname><given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Coleman</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Houghton</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Layton</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Discovery of selective, orally bioavailable, N-linked arylsulfonamide Na<sub>v</sub>1.7 inhibitors with pain efficacy in mice</article-title><source>Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>2087</fpage><lpage>2093</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.03.085</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28389149</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Royeck</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Horstmann</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Remy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Reitze</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Yaari</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Beck</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Role of axonal NaV1.6 sodium channels in action potential initiation of CA1 pyramidal neurons</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>100</volume><fpage>2361</fpage><lpage>2380</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.90332.2008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18650312</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanders</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Cottrell</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Moller</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>FF</given-names></name><name><surname>Auldridge</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernier</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Catterall</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>WK</given-names></name><name><surname>Empfield</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hipp</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Khwaja</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Kiskinis</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Lal</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Malhotra</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Millichap</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Otis</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrou</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pitt</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Schust</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Tjernagel</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Spiro</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Progress in understanding and treating SCN2A-mediated disorders</article-title><source>Trends in Neurosciences</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>442</fpage><lpage>456</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tins.2018.03.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29691040</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Duque</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Haider</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>McCormick</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Properties of action-potential initiation in neocortical pyramidal cells: evidence from whole cell axon recordings</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>746</fpage><lpage>760</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00922.2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17093120</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spratt</surname><given-names>PWE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ben-Shalom</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Keeshen</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Clarkson</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanders</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>The autism-associated gene Scn2a contributes to dendritic excitability and synaptic function in the prefrontal cortex</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>103</volume><fpage>673</fpage><lpage>685</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.037</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31230762</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spratt</surname><given-names>PWE</given-names></name><name><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>RPD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ben-Shalom</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahagun</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kyoung</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Keeshen</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanders</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Paradoxical hyperexcitability from Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 sodium channel loss in neocortical pyramidal cells</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>36</volume><elocation-id>109483</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109483</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34348157</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strzelczyk</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Schubert-Bast</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>A practical guide to the treatment of dravet syndrome with anti-seizure medication</article-title><source>CNS Drugs</source><volume>36</volume><fpage>217</fpage><lpage>237</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40263-022-00898-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35156171</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Potet</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Abramova</surname><given-names>TV</given-names></name><name><surname>DeKeyser</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghabra</surname><given-names>NF</given-names></name><name><surname>Vanoye</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Millichap</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>George</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Epilepsy-associated SCN2A (NaV1.2) variants exhibit diverse and complex functional properties</article-title><source>The Journal of General Physiology</source><volume>155</volume><elocation-id>e202313375</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1085/jgp.202313375</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37578743</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thouta</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Waldbrook</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahadevan</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Mezeyova</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Soriano</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Versi</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodchild</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Parrish</surname><given-names>RR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Pharmacological determination of the fractional block of Nav channels required to impair neuronal excitability and <italic>ex vivo</italic> seizures</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience</source><volume>16</volume><elocation-id>964691</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fncel.2022.964691</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36246527</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ke</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Molecular identity of axonal sodium channels in human cortical pyramidal cells</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>297</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fncel.2014.00297</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25294986</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Timofeev</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Steriade</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Neocortical seizures: initiation, development and cessation</article-title><source>Neuroscience</source><volume>123</volume><fpage>299</fpage><lpage>336</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.08.051</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14698741</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toib</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lyakhov</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Marom</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Interaction between duration of activity and time course of recovery from slow inactivation in mammalian brain Na+ channels</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>1893</fpage><lpage>1903</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-05-01893.1998</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9465014</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaiana</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakuci</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Somarowthu</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Goff</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldstein</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Murthy</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Muldoon</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldberg</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Interneuron desynchronization precedes seizures in a mouse model of dravet syndrome</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>2764</fpage><lpage>2775</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2370-19.2020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32102923</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tukker</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Vrolijk</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>van Kleef</surname><given-names>RGDM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sijm</surname><given-names>DTHM</given-names></name><name><surname>Westerink</surname><given-names>RHS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Mixture effects of tetrodotoxin (TTX) and drugs targeting voltage-gated sodium channels on spontaneous neuronal activity in vitro</article-title><source>Toxicology Letters</source><volume>373</volume><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.toxlet.2022.11.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36375636</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Geit</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Gevaert</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chindemi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Rössert</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Courcol</surname><given-names>J-D</given-names></name><name><surname>Muller</surname><given-names>EB</given-names></name><name><surname>Schürmann</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Segev</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Markram</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>BluePyOpt: leveraging open source software and cloud infrastructure to optimise model parameters in neuroscience</article-title><source>Frontiers in Neuroinformatics</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>17</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fninf.2016.00017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27375471</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vanoye</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Abramova</surname><given-names>TV</given-names></name><name><surname>DeKeyser</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghabra</surname><given-names>NF</given-names></name><name><surname>Oudin</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Burge</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Helbig</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>George</surname><given-names>AL</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>Molecular and cellular context influences SCN8A variant function</article-title><source>JCI Insight</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e177530</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1172/jci.insight.177530</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38771640</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Differential roles of Na<sub>V</sub>1.2 and Na<sub>V</sub>1.6 in regulating neuronal excitability at febrile temperature and distinct contributions to febrile seizures</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>753</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-17344-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29335582</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Makmor-Bakry</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Pathogenesis of epilepsy: challenges in animal models</article-title><source>Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences</source><volume>16</volume><elocation-id>1119</elocation-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>McCormick</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Cortical action potential backpropagation explains spike threshold variability and rapid-onset kinetics</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>7260</fpage><lpage>7272</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1613-08.2008</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Eaton</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name><name><surname>Que</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Olivero-Acosta</surname><given-names>MI</given-names></name><name><surname>Schaber</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Jayant</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Lanman</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Skarnes</surname><given-names>WC</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Severe deficiency of the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.2 elevates neuronal excitability in adult mice</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>36</volume><elocation-id>109495</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109495</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105696.3.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>eLife Assessment</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Huguenard</surname><given-names>John R</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00f54p054</institution-id><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="evidence-strength"><kwd>Compelling</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="claim-importance"><kwd>Important</kwd></kwd-group></front-stub><body><p>This manuscript presents a clever and powerful approach to examining differential roles of Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 channels in excitability of neocortical pyramidal neurons, by engineering mice in which a sulfonamide inhibitor of both channels has reduced affinity for one or the other channels. Overall, the results in the manuscript are <bold>compelling</bold> and give <bold>important</bold> information about differential roles of Nav1.6 and Nav1.2 channels. Activity-dependent inactivation of NaV1.6 was also found to attenuate seizure-like activity in cells, demonstrating the promise of activity-dependent NaV1.6-specific pharmacotherapy for epilepsy.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105696.3.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>Prior research indicates that NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 have different compartmental distributions, expression timelines in development, and roles in neuron function. The lack of subtype-specific tools to control Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 activity however has hampered efforts to define the role of each channel in neuronal behavior. The authors attempt to address the problem of subtype specificity here by using aryl sulfonamides (ASCs) to stabilize channels in the inactivated state in combination with mice carrying a mutation that renders NaV1.2 and/or NaV1.6 genetically resistant to the drug. Using this innovative approach, the authors find that action potential initiation is controlled by NaV1.6 while both NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 are involved in back-propagation of the action potential to the soma, corroborating previous findings. Additionally, NaV1.2 inhibition paradoxically increases firing rate, as has also been observed in genetic knockout models. Finally, the potential anticonvulsant properties of ASCs were tested. NaV1.6 inhibition but not NaV1.2 inhibition was found to decrease action potential firing in prefrontal cortex layer 5b pyramidal neurons in response to current injections designed to mimic inputs during seizure. This result is consistent with studies of loss-of-function Nav1.6 models and knockdown studies showing that these animals are resistant to certain seizure types. These results lend further support for the therapeutic promise of activity-dependent, NaV1.6-selective, inhibitors for epilepsy.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>(1) The chemogenetic approaches used to achieve selective inhibition of NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 are innovative and help to resolve long-standing questions regarding the role of Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 in neuronal electrogenesis.</p><p>(2) The experimental design is overall rigorous, with appropriate controls included.</p><p>(3) The assays to elucidate the effects of channel inactivation on typical and seizure-like activity were well selected.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>(1) As discussed in the revised manuscript, the fact that channels are only partially blocked by the ASC and that ASCs act in a use-dependent manner complicates the interpretation of the effects of NaV1.2 versus NaV1.6 on neuronal activity.</p><p>(2) The idea that use-dependent VGSC-acting drugs may be effective antiseizure medications is well established. Additional discussion of the existing, widely used, use-dependent VGSC drugs (e.g. Carbamazepine, Lamotrigine, Phenytoin) would improve the manuscript. Also, the idea that targeting NaV1.6 may be effective for seizures is established by studies using genetic models, knockdown, and partially selective pharmacology (e.g. NBI-921352). Additional discussion of how the results reported here are consistent with or differ from studies using these alternative approaches would improve the discussion.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105696.3.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The authors used a clever and powerful approach to explore how Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 channels, which are both present in neocortical pyramidal neurons, differentially control firing properties of the neurons. Overall, the approach worked very well, and the results show very interesting differences when one or the other channel is partially inhibited. The experimental data is solid and the experimental data is very nicely complemented by a computational model incorporating the different localization of the two types of sodium channels.</p><p>The revised manuscript has re-organized figures that make the results and interpretation easier to follow.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="author-comment" id="sa3"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.105696.3.sa3</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>Joshua D</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043mz5j54</institution-id><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Chenyu</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043mz5j54</institution-id><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>Ryan</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043mz5j54</institution-id><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Banks</surname><given-names>Emmie</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04gndp242</institution-id><institution>Genentech</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">South San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fenton</surname><given-names>Timothy</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05rrcem69</institution-id><institution>University of California, Davis</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Davis</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>DeKeyser</surname><given-names>Jean-Marc</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04fzwnh64</institution-id><institution>Northwestern Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Abramova</surname><given-names>Tatiana V</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04fzwnh64</institution-id><institution>Northwestern Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>George</surname><given-names>Alfred L</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04fzwnh64</institution-id><institution>Northwestern University</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ben-Shalom</surname><given-names>Roy</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05rrcem69</institution-id><institution>University of California, Davis</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Davis</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hackos</surname><given-names>David H</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04gndp242</institution-id><institution>Genentech</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">South San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>Kevin J</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/043mz5j54</institution-id><institution>University of California, San Francisco</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Public Reviews:</bold></p><p><bold>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</bold></p><p>Summary:</p><p>Prior research indicates that NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 have different compartmental distributions, expression timelines in development, and roles in neuron function. The lack of subtype-specific tools to control Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 activity however has hampered efforts to define the role of each channel in neuronal behavior. The authors attempt to address the problem of subtype specificity here by using aryl sulfonamides (ASCs) to stabilize channels in the inactivated state in combination with mice carrying a mutation that renders NaV1.2 and/or NaV1.6 genetically resistant to the drug. Using this innovative approach, the authors find that action potential initiation is controlled by NaV1.6 while both NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 are involved in backpropagation of the action potential to the soma, corroborating previous findings. Additionally, NaV1.2 inhibition paradoxically increases the firing rate, as has also been observed in genetic knockout models. Finally, the potential anticonvulsant properties of ASCs were tested. NaV1.6 inhibition but not NaV1.2 inhibition was found to decrease action potential firing in prefrontal cortex layer 5b pyramidal neurons in response to current injections designed to mimic inputs during seizure. This result is consistent with studies of loss-of-function Nav1.6 models and knockdown studies showing that these animals are resistant to certain seizure types. These results lend further support for the therapeutic promise of activity-dependent, NaV1.6-selective, inhibitors for epilepsy.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>(1) The chemogenetic approaches used to achieve selective inhibition of NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 are innovative and help resolve long-standing questions regarding the role of Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 in neuronal electrogenesis.</p><p>(2) The experimental design is overall rigorous, with appropriate controls included.</p><p>(3) The assays to elucidate the effects of channel inactivation on typical and seizure-like activity were well selected.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>(1) The potential impact of the YW-&gt;SR mutation in the voltage sensor does not appear to have been sufficiently assessed. The activation/inactivation curves in Figure 1E show differences in both activation and inactivation at physiologically relevant membrane voltages, which may be significant even though the V1/2 and slope factors are roughly similar.</p></disp-quote><p>We have performed new experiments testing how YW-&gt;SR mutations affect spiking on their own. The reviewer’s intuition was correct; the small changes in voltage-dependence in NaV1.6 identified in heterologous expression systems translated into a ~2 mV hyperpolarization in threshold in neurons.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) Additional discussion of the fact that channels are only partially blocked by the ASC and that ASCs act in a use-dependent manner would improve the manuscript and help readers interpret these results.</p></disp-quote><p>We have updated text extensively to address this concern. Details are found in the author suggestions below.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) NaV1.6 was described as being exclusively responsible for the change in action potential threshold, but when NaV1.6 alone was inactivated, the effect was significantly reduced from the condition in which both channels were inactivated (Figure 4E). Similarly, Figure 6C shows that blockade of both channels causes threshold depolarization prior to the seizure-like event, but selective inactivation of NaV1.6 does not. As NaV1.2 does not appear to be involved in action potential initiation and threshold change, what is the mechanism of this dissimilarity between the NaV1.6 inactivation and combined NaV1.6/ NaV1.2 inactivation?</p></disp-quote><p>We believe the dissimilarity is due to interactions between NaV1.2 and other channel classes (e.g., potassium channels) throughout the cell, including the somatodendritic domain. NaV1.6 that initiates APs, localized to the AIS, do not live in isolation, and AP threshold can be affected by the recent membrane potential history. Loss of NaV1.2-mediated depolarization in the dendrites begets less potassium channel-mediated repolarization, as described in Figure 4.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) The idea that use-dependent VGSC-acting drugs may be effective antiseizure medications is well established. Additional discussion or at least acknowledgement of the existing, widely used, use-dependent VGSC drugs should be included (e.g. Carbamazepine, Lamotrigine, Phenytoin). Also, the idea that targeting NaV1.6 may be effective for seizures is established by studies using genetic models, knockdown, and partially selective pharmacology (e.g. NBI-921352). Additional discussion of how the results reported here are consistent with or differ from studies using these alternative approaches would improve the discussion</p></disp-quote><p>We agree; the concept of use-dependent block as a means to treat seizure is not new, and we have updated the discussion to include commentary on other medications currently in use. What is new here is our ability to explore the role of NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 in electrogenesis with a level of drug selectivity that could not be achieved without the addition of the YW-&gt;SR mutations. This approach in itself will not be useful in the clinic, but it may help guide drug design in the future. One major interpretation of this work is that NaV1.6 block is more effective than NaV1.2 block in general, and may even be effective for non-SCN8A genetic conditions. This is indeed one of the reasons that we believe that drugs like NBI-921352, itself an aryl-sulfonamide, is being tested in seizure models.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</bold></p><p>The authors used a clever and powerful approach to explore how Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 channels, which are both present in neocortical pyramidal neurons, differentially control firing properties of the neurons. Overall, the approach worked very well, and the results show very interesting differences when one or the other channel is partially inhibited. The experimental data is solid and the experimental data is very nicely complemented by a computational model incorporating the different localization of the two types of sodium channels.</p><p>In my opinion the presentation and interpretation of the results could be improved by a more thorough discussion of the fact that only incomplete inhibition of the channels can be achieved by the inhibitor under physiological recording conditions and I thought the paper could be easier to digest if the figures were re-organized. However, the key results are well-documented.</p></disp-quote><p>This is a concern raised by multiple reviewers, and we thank you all for your help in improving the way in which we discuss the results. We have revised the manuscript extensively, moving figures around per your advice and the advice of R1 in their comments to authors.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #3 (Public review):</bold></p><p>Summary:</p><p>The authors used powerful and novel reagents to carefully assess the roles of the voltage gated sodium channel (NaV) isoforms in regulating the neural excitability of principal neurons of the cerebral cortex. Using this approach, they were able to confirm that two different isoforms, NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 have distinct roles in electrogenesis of neocortical pyramidal neurons.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>Development of very powerful transgenic mice in which NaV1.2 and/or NaV1.6 were modified to be insensitive to ASCs, a particular class of NaV blocker. This allowed them to test for roles of the two isoforms in an acute setting, without concerns of genetic or functional compensation that might result from a NaV channel knockout.</p><p>Careful biophysical analysis of ASC effects on different NaV isoforms.</p><p>Extensive and rigorous analysis of electrogenesis - action potential production - under conditions of blockade of either NaV1.2 or NaV1 or both.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>Some results are overstated in that the representative example records provided do not directly support the conclusions.</p></disp-quote><p>We have swapped out example records to better capture the median effect observed and to better capture our discussion of these results. Please see below, in recommendations for authors, for details.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Results from a computational model are provided to make predictions of outcomes, but the computational approach is highly underdeveloped.</p></disp-quote><p>Modeling has been elaborated upon extensively, with more detail in methods, a new sensitivity analysis supplemental figure, and a deposition into ModelDB. Please see below, in recommendations for authors, for details.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):</bold></p><p>Regarding the concern about the potential impact of the YWàSR mutation: All results in Figures 2-6 report only within-subject changes before and after drug-activating protocols. These results show that the drug has no effect on the mutant channel, but whether the mutant channel itself has any effect on neuronal properties is not clear. This deficiency could be rectified by reporting raw values for AP threshold, spike rate, etc. in the pre-drug condition and statistically analyzing the apparent differences in the activation/inactivation curves.</p></disp-quote><p>Data in our original submission only included data in the presence of GNE-4076. We now present new data showing how the YWàSR mutation affects baseline activity of neurons. These data are in Supplemental Figure 1. Compared to wildtype (no drug control) neurons, we observe no change in peak dV/dt. However, threshold is hyperpolarized by approximately 2 mV in dual knockin neurons (median values: -57.4 mV for dual knockin and -55 mV for wildtype). This is consistent with measures from heterologously expressed channels, where we observed somewhat subtle shifts in voltage-dependence of inactivation and activation in NaV1.6 as a result of YWàSR incorporation.</p><p>In addition to these data, we also include the baseline dataset from Figure 3, where GNE-4076 is present throughout recording, and report that neither threshold nor peak dV/dt are influenced by the presence of GNE at baseline. This suggests that any drug binding at baseline (i.e., before firing APs via somatic current injection) is negligible, consistent with the concept that GNE-4076 has low affinity for the closed channel state.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Minor Comments:</p><p>While the single-cell response to &quot;seizure-like&quot; input aptly demonstrates the change in action potential threshold and firing rate induced by NaV1.6 inhibition, this component of the paper could be enhanced by a network-level assay that assesses the impact of this drug on an actual seizure-like event in acute slices or on seizure susceptibility in vivo.</p></disp-quote><p>This is an excellent thought, and the work near the end of this manuscript is an effort to mimic network-like activity in a controlled way in single cells. To expand this to bona fide seizure-like activity in acute slices or in vivo is something that we are considering for future studies. To do this properly requires extensive validation of dosing and seizure induction that will require several years’ effort.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Fig 1e caption says &quot;circles&quot; but the markers are squares</p></disp-quote><p>This has been corrected, thank you for catching it.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Color scheme in S2B is not intuitive to me</p></disp-quote><p>We’ve now updated the caption to better describe the color scheme used within.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Fig S2: graph or show change in threshold</p></disp-quote><p>Empirical threshold data are in main figure 3D. Changes in threshold related to modeling are now included in a new sensitivity analysis that is in a new Supplemental Figure 2.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Fig 3A example of NaV1.6 inhibition does not show change in AP threshold apparent in the aggregate data</p></disp-quote><p>We have updated the representative example to better illustrate the change in AP threshold for NaV1.6 inhibition.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>&quot;AP initiation is mediated exclusively by NaV1.6&quot; not corroborated by data; APs still occur when NaV1.6 is inhibited</p></disp-quote><p>This was an over-interpretation of our data, indeed. We have updated the language to be more accurate to the following: “AP threshold and AP initiation appears to be initiated in an NaV1.6-rich region in control conditions; when NaV1.6 is inhibited, APs can occur at more depolarized potentials, likely mediated predominately by NaV1.2.”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Fig S3C missing WT/Scn8aSR/SR significance marking. Chosen example makes it look like there is a small decrease.</p></disp-quote><p>Please note that there is no difference between these two conditions when in delta dV/dt for AIS inflection point (p = 0.4344).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):</bold></p><p>This manuscript presents a clever and powerful approach to examining differential roles of Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 channels in excitability of pyramidal cell excitability, by engineering mice in which a sulfonamide inhibitor of both channels has reduced affinity for one or the other. Overall, the results in the manuscript are interesting and give important information about differential roles of Nav1.6 and Nav1.2 channels.</p><p>The paper makes an important contribution to better understanding distinct roles of Nav1.2 and Nav1.6 channels. This improved understanding could help guide design of anti-seizure drugs targeted to sodium channels.</p><p>Having made it clear that I think this is an important and impressive piece of work for which the authors should be congratulated, I found reading and interpreting the manuscript a frustrating experience. I will be blunt about the ways in which I found the presentation and discussion to be frustrating and even annoying, in the spirit of frank feedback by one interested and appreciative reader that the authors can consider or reject as they wish.</p><p>From the start, I had the feeling that the authors were presenting and discussing the results in a sanitized &quot;never-mind-about the details&quot; fashion such as might be appropriate for a seminar to a general audience not interested in details, but not appropriate for a research paper.</p></disp-quote><p>Our intent certainly was not to frustrate or annoy readers. We are very grateful that you have provided these comments, which have certainly improved the manuscript, hopefully mitigating some of the frustration for future readers. We appreciate that there are complex drug and voltage effects occurring within these studies, and in an effort to distill these effects into digestible prose, we appear to have been too earnest. We have expanded on the requested topics below and please note that, for the aficionados, every figure displays individual data. Further, we have made a special effort to ensure that features of excitability are presented throughout the drug and manipulation timecourse, including time-points before and after periods subject to statistical comparison, so that the reader may draw their own conclusions.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>General:</p><p>There were two major ways in which I found the presentation and discussion frustrating and even annoying: First, not clearly discussing early in the presentation the fact that it is impossible to achieve complete inhibition with this agent during measurements of physiological firing and second, presenting so much of the effects as deltas of various parameters rather than showing effects on absolute values of the parameters.</p></disp-quote><p>Our response to the first issue will follow the next comment, as it relates to this statement. Regarding use of deltas and absolute values for changes in threshold and dV/dt across figures. Every cell has a unique AP threshold and peak dV/dt, and we found that displaying data zeroed to baseline values best illustrated the effects of GNE-4076. Without this, GNE-based effect could be buried within the cell-to-cell variability. This helped most when trying to make the case that threshold was unaffected in 2a/8a YWàSR knockin animals. We continue to believe that this is the best way to display the data in the primary figures, but to provide a more complete account, we now present absolute values in supplemental tables and supplemental figures.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The first issue, the incomplete inhibition by the agent, was the most annoying because the authors obviously thought a lot about this and even closed the paper by proposing this as a positive feature of this class of inhibitors, yet discussed it only piecemeal - and with most of the key experimental data in the Supplement. There are two fundamental characteristics of this (and other) sulfonamide inhibitors that complicate interpretation of experiments, especially when applied in a slice experiment: they only bind to the channel when the channel is depolarized, and even when the channel is depolarized for many seconds, bind very slowly to the channel.</p><p>That makes it almost impossible to know exactly what fraction of channels is being inhibited during measurements of firing. Obviously, the authors are well-aware of this issue and they allude to it and even make use of it in some of the protocols, but they never really discuss it in a very clear manner.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree that it is impossible to know the precise fraction of channels inhibited in acute slice preparations. But the reason for this is likely different than what has been interpreted by this reviewer. To state that ASMs “only bind to the channel when the channel is depolarized, and even when the channel is depolarized for many seconds, bind very slowly to the channel.” is not consistent with prior data on ASM–channel interactions. Clarification on these points may help the reviewer and a broader audience better understand the effects occurring here, and we appreciate being able to both address this concept here and by revising the manuscript.</p><p>First, ASMs bind activated channels and stabilize the inactivated state. It is correct that channels are more likely to enter these states when subject to voltage depolarization, but channel state is stochastic and can enter activated states near resting membrane potentials. The on-rate is fast enough that channels are blocked immediately in recordings in heterologous systems (Figure 1C). It is more likely that channel biophysical state stochasticity, along with drug concentration used herein, are likely dictating the rate at which channels accumulate block during repetitive spiking.</p><p>To address this in text, we have revised the 3rd paragraph of the introduction to better incorporate these ideas. This also helps with comments in the reviewer paragraph below.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The key experimental data on this is relegated to the Supplemental Figures. When the reader is first shown results of the effects of the inhibitor on firing in Fig 2, the presentation has been set up as if everything is perfect, and the inhibitor will be completely inhibiting either both or only one channel according to the mouse. With this presentation, it is then exceptionally striking that the cell in the middle panel of Fig 2A, labeled &quot;Nav1.2/1.6 Inhibited&quot; is firing action potentials very nicely even with both channels &quot;inhibited&quot;. For a reader not already aware that there is likely only partial inhibition of each channel, the reaction will be &quot;Huh? Shouldn't blocking both channels simply completely block excitability?&quot;. The authors do preface Fig 2 by a very brief allusion to the incomplete inhibition: &quot;In spiking neurons, ASCs would therefore be predicted to exhibit use-dependence, progressively blocking channels in proportion to a neuron's activity rate&quot; but this comes out of nowhere after the over-simplified picture of complete inhibition up to that point, and without any estimation of how much inhibition there is likely to be before activity, or how much induction of inhibition there is likely to be during the activity. Without this, interpreting the data in Fig 2 is basically impossible.</p><p>The key experimental data on this issue is really in Supplemental Figures 1-2 and Fig 4, and I found myself immediately ping-ponging back and forth between the Supplemental figures and the main text trying to understand what is going on with the partial inhibition. This was frustrating.</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for these suggestions; they help with readability appreciably. We have re-organized the figures presented in the manuscript and emphasized details about ASCs to ensure readers can discern between near-complete blockade of channels (Figures 1-4) and activity-dependent ASC onboarding (Figures 5-7). We now present near-complete block experiments <italic>first</italic>, detailing the current clamp-&gt; voltage clamp (-12 mV)-&gt; current clamp experiments. We incorporated Supp. Fig. 1 into main Figure 1 and moved Supp. Fig. 2 into main Fig. 2.</p><p>As the reviewer notes, there are clear time-dependent effects on channel function when stepping to -12 mV, independent of GNE-4076 block. As stated previously, “We therefore focused on the 12-20 sec after voltage-clamp offset for subsequent analysis, as it is a period in which most channel-intrinsic recovery has occurred, but also a period in which we would still expect significant block from GNE-4076.” We hope that reordering the manuscript as suggested and placing these results near the beginning will help with discerning between near-complete block and activity depending onboarding. By beginning with these experiments, which underscore that 100% block cannot be studied without “contamination” from native slow inactivation, we hope that the readers can better understand why data was done as presented.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>In my opinion, the paper would be greatly improved by a detailed discussion of the voltage- and time-dependence of the inhibitor at the very beginning of the paper. For me, reading and digesting the paper would have been far easier if Fig 1 included a discussion of the voltage- and time-dependence of inhibition, and next Figs were then Supplemental Figs 1-2, and main Fig 4. The key questions are: how much inhibition is there before a 10-s current injection from the resting potential, and how much additional inhibition is there produced during either the 10-s bout of firing or the &quot;on-boarding&quot; depolarization protocol, and how long does that additional inhibition last? The most direct information on that is in the plots in Fig. 4D and Fig 4F in combination with Supplemental Fig 1, which shows that the on-boarding depolarization reduces current to about 30% of current before on-boarding. This is so central to the interpretation of all the results that I think Supp Fig 1 should be in the main paper as the first piece of data in neurons.</p></disp-quote><p>We originally had the nucleated patch data in supplement due to space constraints in an already large figure 1. Based on your recommendation we have moved it to the main figure. We have also changed the ordering of the paper and related figures to present data as suggested. Hopefully this better guides readers through the questions you are raising above, which are addressed in the (now reordered) figures mentioned above.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Specific:</p><p>(1) Fig.1 I can find no information on the voltage protocol used to generate the dose-response curves. In the literature characterizing sulfonamide blockers, most protocols use very unphysiological strong, long depolarization to induce inhibition, usually with equally unphysiological short hyperpolarizations to produce recovery from inactivation. One assumes something like that was used here. Obviously, the protocol needs to be explained.</p></disp-quote><p>We updated the methods section to better describe the voltage protocol used to generate the dose response curves. In contrast to the literature characterizing sulfonamide blockers, we used pulses that closely mimic physiological activation from -80 mV (rest) to 0 mV (depolarized) for 20 msec. GNE-4076 was perfused onto cells at increasing concentrations throughout the experiment. At each successive dose, cells were held at 0 mV to allow adequate GNE-4076 onboarding.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) Supp Fig1. This shows the effect of depolarization to enhance inhibition, but not how much inhibition there was before the depolarization. Presumably, there were measurements during the application of drug? How much inhibition is there before the depolarization? Why does the time only go to 20-s, when the times in Figs 4 go to 10 minutes?</p></disp-quote><p>Nucleated patch recordings are notoriously difficult to maintain for long durations, especially when subjecting the patch to large voltage deflections. These recordings extend to 20s recovery periods because that is the duration for which we maintained all recordings, though some exhibited rather impressive longevity and allowed for several minutes of recording thereafter. Regardless, the goal here was to assess block within the 12-20 sec recovery window we utilized in current clamp recordings from intact neurons. This was achieved.</p><p>Please note that GNE-4076 was present throughout all recordings. This was in part due to time constraints, as we could not maintain patches long enough to also perform wash-in. The degree of inhibition can be inferred by comparing peak dV/dt and threshold of cells in the absence and presence of GNE-4076. These data are presented in a new Supplemental figure 1, showing no difference in threshold or peak dV/dt.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) Fig. 4. Similar question here - this is a very nice and informative figure, but we see only the delta in threshold and dv/dt, but how were the initial absolute values different in the drug compared to control?</p></disp-quote><p>These data are presented in a new Supplemental Figure 1, showing no difference in threshold or peak dV/dt.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) Fig 2. As far as I can tell, we have no idea how much inhibition there is at rest, before the current injection -what is the dv/dt in the drug compared to in the control? Were there experiments in which the current injections were delivered before and after applying drug? If not, at least it would be useful to see population data on dv/dt of the first spike in control and with drug.</p></disp-quote><p>These data are presented in a new Supplemental Figure 1, showing no difference in threshold or peak dV/dt.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(5). Fig. 2. Do the authors have any quantitative information on how much extra inhibition would be produced at 200 nM drug using physiological waveforms of firing?</p></disp-quote><p>These types of analyses are part of later figures using EPSC-like waveforms to evoke spiking.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>I was unconvinced that the changes in threshold and dv/dt during the firing in the drug necessarily represent time-dependent use-dependent effects of drug. Partial inhibition by TTX would probably produce greater progressive changes in spike shape and reduced ability to fire robustly.</p></disp-quote><p>TTX is not use-dependent, so it is a good contrast to GNE-4076. We experimented with a few cells at 2 and 10 nM TTX concentrations and found that concentrations required to mimic the block of spiking that occurs with 200 nM GNE-4076 in WT cells was associated with a marked use-independent elevation in AP threshold, with an inability to maintain ~10 Hz spiking rates with the baseline EPSC-like stimulation pattern. These effects are very different from those produced by GNE-4076, but were expected given the use-independence of TTX. We did not pursue this line of inquiry fully, so we present these data only as individual examples in the reviewer figure below:</p><fig id="sa3fig1" position="float"><label>Author response image 1.</label><caption><title>Data from Figure 6B, D, E are replicated here with individual lines of 2 nM and 10 nM TTX shown in dashed lines.</title><p>Note marked changes in threshold not observed with GNE-4076. TTX sourced from Alomone Labs.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-105696-sa3-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Minor:</p><p>p. 5 and elsewhere: it seems unnecessary to give values of threshold and dv/dt to three decimal places, especially when the precision is not better than a single decimal place.</p></disp-quote><p>We have reduced unnecessary precision throughout.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):</bold></p><p>The computational model is highly underdeveloped. Without more rigorous development the results of the computational model appear to provides little additional insight beyond that expected from the known axodendritic localizations of NaV 1.2 and 1.6. If the authors wish to use the computational results to make rigorous predictions, then this section needs to be either be expanded to be more complete and promoted to a regular figure, with full details of the model, and how it was evaluated for accuracy. Alternatively, this point regarding computational insight could be de-emphasized and or removed from the paper.</p><p>Modeling:</p><p>(1) I don't see any methods describing the precise model parameters that were used.</p></disp-quote><p>Apologies, this is a model that we have built and tested extensively over the years (PMID: 38290518, 35417922, 34348157, 31995133, 31230762, 28256214), though there have been some small updates over these works. We have deposited this model at ModelDB and provide data there regarding model construction (access #2019342).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) There appears to be no robustness test to assess whether the particular results/conclusions were unduly dependent on particular model construction decisions.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now generated a new supplemental figure 2 that explores the robustness of these observations to changes in NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 position within the AIS and changes in relative density of NaV1.2 and NaV1.6. As shown there, the model is tolerant to all but extreme, non-physiological manipulations to these parameters.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) Figure S2 does not really provide convincing evidence of a biologically relevant model. Probably the model itself needs to be redesigned to better replicate the biological response and be validated by testing parameter sensitivity.</p><p>a) All of the results in S2C show that there is a huge reduction in the first action potential (black?) followed by relatively little change in subsequent spikes. This is not seen in any of the models. The progressive changes in threshold as predicted by the model for dual and NaV1.6 block are not at all evident in the results of C, except perhaps for the the very first and the very last spikes.</p><p>b) The baseline action potential in B is different than the recorded action potentials. In particular, the somatic depolarization occurs much later and over a more extended time frame than the real neuron, and the phase plot shows an actual dip in depolarization at the transition to the somatic spike, which is not representative of naturally occurring action potentials.</p></disp-quote><p>To address both (a) and (b), please note that in empirical experiments there are two parallel processes occurring: block by GNE-4076 and channel recovery from inactivation. In the model we can isolate the effects of block to test that parameter fully and in isolation. This is something that we could never achieve biologically. The important take home here in both cases is to observe that with NaV1.6 block there is a change in threshold, whereas with NaV1.2 block there is none.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) The one finding that seems to be robust is that the changes in NaV1.2 have little effect on threshold.</p></disp-quote><p>Yes! This is a major take-home message from both the model and the use of these knockin mice in combination with GNE-4076. In mature pyramidal cells, NaV1.6 is the major determinant of AP threshold. And to editorialize on this observation, changes in threshold are a useful metric to test if other pharmacology are truly selective for NaV1.2 over NaV1.6. We note that phrixotoxin-3, which is described as NaV1.2 specific in multiple papers, was never tested for specificity over NaV1.6 in its original description, and we find that it fails this test in our hands.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Data presentation:</p><p>(1) The phase plots in Figure 3B (left and right) appear to be visually identical, and as such don't strongly support any particular conclusion.</p></disp-quote><p>We changed the representative example record (specifically for Fig. 3A-B) to more directly support the conclusions.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) It is unclear to me what is meant by AP speed (title of Figure 3 legend). Do the authors mean propagation speed along the axon, or perhaps the rate of action potential firing?</p></disp-quote><p>Apologies, we are referencing dV/dt when we mention AP speed. We updated AP speed to AP velocity throughout the manuscript.</p></body></sub-article></article>