<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub" publication-format="electronic">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">58162</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.58162</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Developmental Biology</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>A transient role of the ciliary gene <italic>Inpp5e</italic> in controlling direct versus indirect neurogenesis in cortical development</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-185294"><name><surname>Hasenpusch-Theil</surname><given-names>Kerstin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-185295"><name><surname>Laclef</surname><given-names>Christine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="pa1">†</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-185296"><name><surname>Colligan</surname><given-names>Matt</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-8915</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-185297"><name><surname>Fitzgerald</surname><given-names>Eamon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-185298"><name><surname>Howe</surname><given-names>Katherine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-185299"><name><surname>Carroll</surname><given-names>Emily</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-185300"><name><surname>Abrams</surname><given-names>Shaun R</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-30100"><name><surname>Reiter</surname><given-names>Jeremy F</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con8"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-185307"><name><surname>Schneider-Maunoury</surname><given-names>Sylvie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con9"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-98794"><name><surname>Theil</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-8309</contrib-id><email>thomas.theil@ed.ac.uk</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con10"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Edinburgh</named-content></addr-line><country>United Kingdom</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain, University of Edinburgh</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Edinburgh</named-content></addr-line><country>United Kingdom</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR7622, INSERM U1156, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (IBPS) - Developmental Biology Unit</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Paris</named-content></addr-line><country>France</country></aff><aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Chan Zuckerberg Biohub</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">San Francisco</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Tissir</surname><given-names>Fadel</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Universite' Catholique de Louvain</institution><country>Belgium</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Bronner</surname><given-names>Marianne E</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution>California Institute of Technology</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><fn fn-type="present-address" id="pa1"><label>†</label><p>Sorbonne Université, Institut du Fer à Moulin INSERM U1270, Paris, France</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date date-type="publication" publication-format="electronic"><day>25</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e58162</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-04-22"><day>22</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-08-24"><day>24</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2020, Hasenpusch-Theil et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Hasenpusch-Theil et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-58162-v2.pdf"/><abstract><p>During the development of the cerebral cortex, neurons are generated directly from radial glial cells or indirectly via basal progenitors. The balance between these division modes determines the number and types of neurons formed in the cortex thereby affecting cortical functioning. Here, we investigate the role of primary cilia in controlling the decision between forming neurons directly or indirectly. We show that a mutation in the ciliary gene <italic>Inpp5e</italic> leads to a transient increase in direct neurogenesis and subsequently to an overproduction of layer V neurons in newborn mice. Loss of <italic>Inpp5e</italic> also affects ciliary structure coinciding with reduced Gli3 repressor levels. Genetically restoring Gli3 repressor rescues the decreased indirect neurogenesis in <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants. Overall, our analyses reveal how primary cilia determine neuronal subtype composition of the cortex by controlling direct versus indirect neurogenesis. These findings have implications for understanding cortical malformations in ciliopathies with <italic>INPP5E</italic> mutations.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>Inpp5e</kwd><kwd>Gli3</kwd><kwd>primary cilium</kwd><kwd>neurogenesis</kwd><kwd>cortex</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>Mouse</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268</institution-id><institution>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>BB/P00122X/1</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Theil</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000098</institution-id><institution>NIH Clinical Center</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01GM095941</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Reiter</surname><given-names>Jeremy F</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution>The Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>SFARI 529085</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Theil</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Primary-cilia-mediated processing of the Gli3 transcription factor enables the formation of subtypes of projection neurons in appropriate numbers during the development of the cerebral cortex.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Building a functional cerebral cortex which confers humans with their unique cognitive capabilities requires controlling the proliferation of neural progenitor cells and the timing and modes of neurogenic cell divisions. Varying the timing and modes of neurogenesis affects neuronal numbers and subtype composition of the cortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Florio and Huttner, 2014</xref>). In the developing murine cortex, radial glial cells (RGCs) represent the major neural stem cell type. Residing in the ventricular zone, they express Pax6 and undergo interkinetic nuclear migration dividing at the ventricular surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Götz et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Warren et al., 1999</xref>). Initially, RGCs go through rounds of symmetric proliferative divisions to produce two RGCs increasing the progenitor pool but switch to asymmetric divisions at the beginning of cortical neurogenesis. RGCs generate neurons in two ways, either directly or indirectly via the production of basal progenitors (BPs) that settle in the subventricular zone (SVZ) and express the Tbr2 transcription factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Englund et al., 2005</xref>). In the mouse, the majority of BPs divide once to produce two neurons, whereas the remainders undergo one additional round of symmetric proliferative division before differentiating into two neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Haubensak et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Miyata, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Noctor et al., 2004</xref>). In this way, BPs increase neuron output per RGC and have therefore been implicated in the evolutionary expansion of the mammalian cerebral cortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Martínez-Cerdeño et al., 2006</xref>). Thus, the balance between direct and indirect neurogenesis is an important factor in generating appropriate neuron numbers and types.</p><p>The mechanisms that fine tune this balance and thereby adjust the numbers and types of neurons produced in the cortex have only recently been investigated. Mitotic spindle orientation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Postiglione et al., 2011</xref>) and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Gladwyn-Ng et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Laguesse et al., 2015</xref>) are contributing factors to control the generation of basal progenitors. In addition, levels of Slit/Robo and Notch/Delta signaling were shown to be evolutionarily conserved factors that determine the predominant mode of neurogenesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cárdenas et al., 2018</xref>). Moreover, feedback signals from postmitotic neurons control the fate of radial glial daughter cells involving the release of Neurotrophin-3 and Fgf9 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Parthasarathy et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Seuntjens et al., 2009</xref>) as well as the activation of a Notch-dependent signaling pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Wang et al., 2016</xref>). These studies highlight the importance of cell-cell signaling in controlling the cell lineage of cortical progenitors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Silva et al., 2019</xref>) and emphasize the necessity of studying the cellular mechanisms by which these signals control the decision by RGCs to undergo direct or indirect neurogenesis.</p><p>Given the importance of cell-cell signaling, it is likely that the primary cilium, a signaling hub in embryogenesis in general and in neural development in particular (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Valente et al., 2014</xref>), plays key roles in determining the balance between direct versus indirect neurogenesis. The cilium is a subcellular protrusion that predominately emanates from the apical surface of RGCs projecting into the ventricular lumen. The phenotypes of several mouse lines mutant for ciliary genes underline the importance of the primary cilium in forebrain development but these mutants often suffer from severe patterning defects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Ashique et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Besse et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willaredt et al., 2008</xref>) which make elucidating ciliary roles in determining the lineage of cortical progenitors difficult. To address how cilia control cortical progenitor development, we investigated corticogenesis in a mouse mutant for the ciliary gene <italic>Inpp5e</italic>.</p><p><italic>INPP5E</italic> is mutated in Joubert syndrome (JS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bielas et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jacoby et al., 2009</xref>), a ciliopathy characterized by cerebellar defects in which a subset of patients also shows malformations of the cerebral cortex including heterotopias, polymicrogyria and agenesis of the corpus callosum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Valente et al., 2014</xref>). <italic>Inpp5e</italic> encodes Inositol polyphosphate 5 phosphatase E, an enzyme that is localized in the ciliary membrane and that hydrolyses the phosphatidylinositol polyphosphates PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> and PI(3,4,5)P<sub>3</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bielas et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jacoby et al., 2009</xref>). In this way, it controls the inositol phosphate composition of the ciliary membrane and thereby regulates the activity of several signaling pathways and cilia stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bielas et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Chávez et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jacoby et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Plotnikova et al., 2015</xref>). In contrast to <italic>Inpp5e</italic>’s extensively studied biochemical and cellular roles, little is known how these diverse functions are employed at the tissue level to control RGC lineage.</p><p>Here, we show that loss of <italic>Inpp5e</italic> function results in an increase in neuron formation at the expense of basal progenitor production in the E12.5 cortex and in an overproduction of Ctip2+ layer V neurons in newborn mutants. Moreover, RGC cilia show unusual membranous structures and/or abnormal numbers of microtubule doublets affecting the signaling capabilities of the cilium. The levels of Gli3 repressor (Gli3R), a critical regulator of cortical stem cell development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Hasenpusch-Theil et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Wang et al., 2011</xref>), is reduced and re-introducing Gli3R rescues the decreased formation of basal progenitors. Taken together, these findings implicate <italic>Inpp5e</italic> and the primary cilium in controlling the decision of RGCs to either undergo direct neurogenesis or to form basal progenitors, thereby governing the neuronal subtype composition of the cerebral cortex.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title><italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos show mild telencephalic patterning defects</title><p>Controlling the balance between direct and indirect neurogenesis in the developing cerebral cortex is mediated by cell-cell signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cárdenas et al., 2018</xref>) and hence may involve the primary cilium. To investigate potential ciliary roles, we started characterizing cortical stem cell development in embryos mutant for the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> gene which has a prominent role in ciliary signaling and stability. Mutations in ciliary genes have previously been found to result in telencephalon patterning defects, most notably in a ventralization of the dorsal telencephalon and/or in defects at the corticoseptal (CSB) and pallial/subpallial boundaries (PSPB) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Ashique et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Besse et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willaredt et al., 2008</xref>). Therefore, we first considered the possibility that such early patterning defects may be present in <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant embryos and could affect cortical stem cell development. In situ hybridization and immunofluorescence analyses of E12.5 control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos revealed no obvious effect on the expression of dorsal and ventral telencephalic markers at the corticoseptal boundary (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–F</xref>). In contrast, the pallial/subpallial boundary was not well defined with a few scattered Pax6+ and <italic>Dlx2</italic> expressing cells on the wrong side of the boundary, that is in the subpallium and pallium, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1G–L</xref>). Moreover, the hippocampal anlage appeared smaller and disorganized with low level and diffuse expression of cortical hem markers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2</xref>), consistent with known roles of Wnt/β-catenin and Bmp signaling in hippocampal development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Galceran et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Lee et al., 2000</xref>). In contrast, progenitors in the neocortical ventricular zone of <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant mice expressed the progenitor markers <italic>Emx1</italic>, <italic>Lhx2</italic>, <italic>Pax6</italic> and <italic>Ngn2,</italic> though the levels of Pax6 protein expression appeared reduced in the medial neocortex suggestive of a steeper lateral to medial Pax6 expression gradient in mutant embryos. These expression patterns were maintained in E14.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos but revealed an area in the very caudal/dorsal telencephalon where the neocortex was folded (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3</xref>). These folds became more prominent at more caudal levels and were also present in the hippocampal anlage. Taken together, these findings indicate that <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants have mild patterning defects affecting the integrity of the PSPB, hippocampal development and the caudal-most neocortex while the rostral neocortex shows no gross malformation or mispatterning and can therefore be analyzed for effects of the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation on direct and indirect neurogenesis.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title><italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls direct vs indirect neurogenesis in the lateral neocortex</title><p>Based upon these findings, we started analyzing the proliferation and differentiation of RGCs in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos in the rostrolateral and rostromedial neocortex to avoid the regionalization defects described above. As a first step, we determined the proportion of RGCs, basal progenitors and neurons in these regions in E12.5 embryos. Double immunofluorescence for PCNA which labels all progenitor cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Hall et al., 1990</xref>) and the radial glial marker Pax6 did not reveal differences in the proportions of RGCs at both medial and lateral levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A–D</xref>). In contrast, the proportion of Tbr2+ basal progenitors was reduced laterally but not medially (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E–H</xref>). This decrease coincided with an increase in Tbr1+ neurons specifically in the lateral neocortex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1I–L</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Increased neuron formation in the dorsolateral telencephalon of E12.5 <italic>Inpp5</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–D</bold>) Pax6/PCNA double immunofluorescence staining revealed the proportion of apical radial glial cells which remained unaltered in the mutant. The boxes in (<bold>A</bold>) indicate the regions in the medial (<bold>m</bold>) and lateral (<bold>l</bold>) telencephalon at which cell counts were performed. (<bold>E–H</bold>) Reduced proportions of basal progenitors in the lateral telencephalon as revealed by staining for Tbr2 and PCNA. (<bold>I–L</bold>) Tbr1 immunostaining showed that the proportion of neurons is increased in the lateral telencephalon. (<bold>A–J</bold>) The insets labelled with ’ and ” are representative magnifications of medial and lateral levels, respectively. All statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); unpaired t-tests; n = 4 except for (<bold>H</bold>) with n = 5; *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01. Scale bar: 100 μm (<bold>A</bold>) and 50 μm (<bold>A’</bold>). ctx: cortex; LGE: lateral ganglionic eminence.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Formation of the telencephalic boundaries in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–F</bold>) Formation of the corticoseptal boundary. Expression of the dorsal marker gene <italic>Pax6</italic> (<bold>A, B, D, E</bold>) and of the ventral marker gene <italic>Dlx2</italic> (<bold>C, F</bold>) remain restricted to the cortex and septum, respectively, with a sharp expression boundary between both tissues. (<bold>G–L</bold>) Formation of the pallial/subpallial boundary. While there is a sharp expression boundary between cortex and lateral ganglionic eminence (LGE) in wild-type embryos (<bold>G–I</bold>), scattered Pax6 and <italic>Dlx2-</italic>expressing cells (arrows in J and K) are found in the mutant LGE and cortex, respectively, while the <italic>Dbx1</italic> expression domain characteristic of the ventral pallium (VP) is fuzzier (<bold>L</bold>). CGE: caudal ganglionic eminence; ctx: cortex; MGE: medial ganglionic eminence; sep: septum; th: thalamus. Scale bars: 200 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig1-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Wnt/β-catenin and Bmp signaling in the dorsomedial telencephalon of E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A, B, E, F</bold>) Reduced Wnt/β-catenin signaling in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. (<bold>A, E</bold>) <italic>Wnt2b</italic> expression is confined to the cortical hem (<bold>h</bold>) while there are only few scattered Wnt2b expressing cells in the mutant. (<bold>B, F</bold>) Graded expression of the Wnt target gene <italic>Axin2</italic> in the dorsal midline is reduced in mutant embryos. (<bold>C, D, G, H</bold>) Roof plate (rp) expression of <italic>Bmp4</italic> and its target gene <italic>Msx1</italic> are reduced in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. Scale bar: 100 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig1-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Expression of cortical progenitor markers in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–J</bold>) Dorsal marker gene expression at patterning stages (E12.5). <italic>Emx1</italic>, <italic>Lhx2</italic>, <italic>Pax6</italic> and <italic>Ngn2</italic> are still expressed in the developing neocortex of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos though the <italic>Lhx2</italic> medial to lateral (<bold>B, C, G, H</bold>) and the <italic>Pax6</italic>/<italic>Ngn2</italic> lateral to medial (<bold>D, E, I, J</bold>) expression gradients are flatter. (<bold>K–T</bold>) Neocortical progenitors express <italic>Lhx2</italic>, <italic>Pax6</italic> and <italic>Ngn2</italic> in E14.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. Note the folding of the neocortex at caudal levels which occurs with 100% penetrance (arrows in <bold>P</bold>, <bold>R and T</bold>). CGE: caudal ganglionic eminence; ctx: cortex; MGE: medial ganglionic eminence; LGE: lateral ganglionic eminence; pt: prethalamus; sep: septum; th: thalamus. Scale bars: 200 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig1-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>To determine whether these alterations are maintained at a later developmental stage, we repeated this investigation in E14.5 embryos. This analysis revealed no significant differences in the proportion of Pax6+ RGCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A–D</xref>). Similarly, there was no alteration in the proportion of Tbr2+ basal progenitors in lateral neocortex; however, their proportion was reduced medially (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E–H</xref>). To label cortical projection neurons, we used double immunofluorescence for Tbr1 and Ctip2 which allowed us to distinguish between Tbr1+Ctip2+ and Tbr1-Ctip2+ neurons. Quantifying these subpopulations showed no effect on the formation of Tbr1+ Ctip2+ neurons in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. In contrast, the proportion of Tbr1- Ctip2+ neurons was reduced medially but increased in the lateral neocortex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2I–N</xref>). Taken together with our E12.5 analyses, these findings show that in the lateral neocortex of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> an increase in the proportion of Tbr1+ neurons at E12.5 is followed by an augmented fraction of Tbr1- Ctip2+ neurons at E14.5, whereas the proportion of basal progenitors recovered after an initial down-regulation.</p><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Proportions of radial glial cells, basal progenitors and neurons in the neocortex of E14.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–D</bold>) The proportion of radial glial cells remains unaffected by the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation as revealed by Pax6/PCNA double immunofluorescence. The boxes in A indicate the regions in the medial (<bold>m</bold>) and lateral (<bold>l</bold>) telencephalon at which cell counts were performed. (<bold>E–H</bold>) Tbr2/PCNA double staining showed a reduced proportion of basal progenitors in the <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> medial but not lateral neocortex. (<bold>I–N</bold>) The proportion of Tbr1+Ctip2+ neurons is not significantly altered (<bold>I–L</bold>), whereas the proportion of Tbr1-Ctip2+ neurons is decreased and increased in the medial and lateral neocortex, respectively. Arrows in (<bold>I and J</bold>) label Tbr1-Ctip2+ neurons and arrowheads Tbr1+Ctip2+ neurons. (<bold>A–J</bold>) The insets labeled with ’ and ” are representative magnifications of medial and lateral levels, respectively. All statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); Unpaired t-tests (<bold>C, D, H, K–N</bold>) and Mann Whitney test (<bold>G</bold>); n = 4; *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01. Scale bars: 100 μm (<bold>A</bold>) and 50 μm (<bold>A’, E’ and I’</bold>). ctx: cortex; LGE: lateral ganglionic eminence.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig2-v2.tif"/></fig><p>To address the defective cellular processes underlying these neurogenesis defects in <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants, we first investigated programmed cell death and found few apoptotic cells in the control and mutant cortex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1</xref>). Next, we measured proliferation rates of cortical progenitors and performed double immunofluorescence for PCNA and pHH3 which labels mitotic RGCs located at the ventricular surface and dividing basal progenitors in abventricular positions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2</xref>). This analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the E12.5 and E14.5 lateral neocortex of control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. The proportion of mitotic apical and basal progenitors, however, was reduced in the E12.5 medial neocortex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2</xref>). Interestingly, this decrease in the fraction of mitotic basal progenitors precedes the reduced proportion of basal progenitors in the E14.5 medial neocortex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E–H</xref>).</p><p>The cell cycle represents another key regulator of neuronal differentiation and a mutation in <italic>Kif3a</italic> affects ciliogenesis and the cell cycle in the developing neocortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Wilson et al., 2012</xref>). To investigate the possibility of altered cell cycle kinetics, we used a BrdU/IdU double labeling strategy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Martynoga et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Nowakowski et al., 1989</xref>) to determine S phase length and total cell cycle length in RGCs and found no statistically significant changes in these parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3</xref>).</p><p>Finally, the increased neuron production could also be explained by an increase in direct neurogenesis at the expense of basal progenitor cell formation. To test this possibility, we gave BrdU to E11.5 pregnant mice 24 hr before dissecting the embryos. We then used BrdU immunostaining in conjunction with Tbr1 and Tbr2 to identify the neurons and basal progenitors formed in the lateral neocortex within the 24 hr time period. This analysis showed that the proportion of Tbr1+ neurons compared to the total number of BrdU+ cells increased while the Tbr2+ proportion decreased in <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Since the cell cycle of basal progenitors is longer than 24 hr (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Arai et al., 2011</xref>), the 24 hr interval used in our cell cycle exit experiment was too short for newly formed basal progenitors to undergo one additional round of the cell cycle and as the BrdU label would have been diluted with a further round of division, this analysis supports our hypothesis that direct neurogenesis became more prevalent in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>RGCs.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Increased neurogenesis at the expense of basal progenitor formation in the E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutant lateral telencephalon.</title><p>Immunohistochemistry on sections of E12.5 control (<bold>A, D</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (<bold>B, E</bold>) that were treated with BrdU 24 hr earlier. (<bold>A–C</bold>) Tbr2/BrdU double labeling showed that less basal progenitors formed from the BrdU-labeled progenitor cohort in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. (<bold>D–F</bold>) The proportion of newly formed Tbr1+ neurons was increased in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. The arrows in D and E label Tbr1<sup>+</sup>BrdU<sup>+</sup> cells. All statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); unpaired t tests; n = 4; *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01. Scale bar: 50 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Apoptosis in the developing forebrain of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–F</bold>) Immunofluorescence staining for Cleaved Caspase three revealing apoptic cells. (<bold>A, B</bold>) Programmed cell death was detected in the midline roof plate (rp) but hardly in the developing neocortex of E12.5 control (<bold>A</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (<bold>B</bold>). (<bold>C–F</bold>) In E14.5 embryos, very few apoptotic cells were identified in the neocortex while apoptosis is widespread in the trigeminal ganglion (TG) (<bold>E, F</bold>). ctx: cortex. Scale bars: (<bold>A</bold>): 100 μm, (<bold>C</bold>): 25`0 μm, (<bold>D</bold>) 500 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig3-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Proportion of mitotic progenitors in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–H</bold>) Proportions of mitotic progenitors in E12.5 control (<bold>A, E</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (<bold>B, F</bold>) as revealed by pHH3 (mitotic cells) and PCNA (all progenitor cells) double immunofluorescence. Note the reduction in mitotic basal progenitors in the <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> medial neocortex (<bold>A, B, D</bold>). (<bold>I–P</bold>) The proportions of apical and basal progenitors is not significantly different in E14.5 control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. In all panels, radial glia cells divide at the ventricular surface, whereas mitotic basal progenitors locate in abventricular positions. All statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); unpaired t-tests (<bold>C, G, K, L, P</bold>) and Mann Whitney tests (<bold>D, H, O</bold>); n = 4; *p&lt;0.05. Scale bar: 50 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig3-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Cell cycle of cortical progenitors in E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic illustrating the BrdU/IdU double labeling strategy to measure S phase (T<sub>S</sub>) and total cell cycle length (T<sub>C</sub>). 90 min after an initial IdU administration, pregnant females received an intraperitoneal BrdU injection. Embryos are harvested 30 min later. (<bold>B, C</bold>) Double immunofluorescence to detect IdU+ and BrdU+ progenitors. (<bold>D</bold>) Quantification showing no significant change in T<sub>S</sub> and T<sub>C</sub>. Statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); unpaired t-tests; n = 4; *p&lt;0.05. Scale bar: 50 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig3-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Cortical malformations in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos</title><p>Next, we investigated the consequences of this increase in direct neurogenesis on cortical size and layer formation. Since <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> newborn pups die perinatally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bielas et al., 2009</xref>), we focused our analysis on E18.5 embryos. The mutant lacked obvious olfactory bulbs, as revealed by whole mounts of control and mutant brains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>). To gain insights into the overall histology of the mutant forebrain, we stained coronal sections with DAPI. This analysis showed that most of the mutant cortex was thinner except for the rostrolateral level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s2">Figure 4—figure supplement 2</xref>). In addition, the hippocampus was malformed with a smaller dentate gyrus. Investigating the expression of markers characteristic of the entire hippocampus (<italic>Nrp2</italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Galceran et al., 2000</xref>), the CA1 field (Scip1; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Frantz et al., 1994</xref>) and the dentate gyrus (Prox1; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Oliver et al., 1993</xref>) showed that these hippocampal structures were present but were severely reduced in size and disorganized in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s3">Figure 4—figure supplement 3</xref>). In addition, the corpus callosum, the major axon tract connecting the two cerebral hemispheres, was smaller. We confirmed this effect by staining callosal axons and surrounding glial cells that guide these axons to the contralateral hemisphere with L1 and GFAP, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s4">Figure 4—figure supplement 4</xref>).</p><p>After characterizing the gross morphology of the <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> cortex, we next investigated whether the increased neuron formation in E12.5 mutant embryos led to changes in the neuronal subtype composition of the E18.5 cortex. To this end, we used immunofluorescence labeling for Tbr1 and Ctip2 to analyze the formation of layer VI and V neurons, respectively, whereas Satb2 served as a layer II-IV marker (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Inspecting these immunostainings at low magnification showed that Tbr1+, Ctip2+ and Satb2+ neurons occupied their correct relative laminar positions in <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A–F</xref>) except for neuronal heterotopias which were present in all mutant brains, although their number and position varied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>). These immunostainings also revealed a medial shift in the position of the rhinal fissure, a sulcus that is conserved across mammalian species and separates neocortex from the paleocortical piriform cortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Ariens-Kapers et al., 1936</xref>). This shift was more marked caudally and suggests a dramatic expansion of the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant piriform cortex at the expense of neocortex at caudal most levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D–F</xref>). Using the Tbr1/Ctip2 and Satb2 stainings, we determined the proportions of deep and superficial layer neurons, respectively. Because of the expanded piriform cortex in <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants, we limited this investigation to the unaffected rostral neocortex. In the rostrolateral neocortex, we found the proportion of Tbr1+ neurons to be reduced (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4G,H,M</xref>). This reduction coincided with an increased proportion of Ctip2+ layer V neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4I,J,N</xref>) while the Satb2 population was unchanged (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4K,L,O</xref>). In contrast, the rostromedial neocortex did not show any differences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4P–X</xref>). Thus, the increase in direct neurogenesis in the lateral neocortex during earlier development concurs with a change in the proportions of E18.5 Tbr1+ and Ctip2+ deep layer neurons.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Increased formation of layer V neurons in E18.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A–F</bold>) Coronal sections immunostained for the deep layer markers Tbr1 (layer VI) and Ctip2 (layer V) and for the upper layer marker Satb2 (layers II-IV); there is no obvious defect in layering in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos except for the formation of a heterotopia (asterisk in D). At caudal levels, the cortex becomes thinner and the rhinal fissure is shifted medially as indicated by the arrows. (<bold>G–O</bold>) Formation of cortical neurons at rostrolateral levels. The proportion of Tbr1+layer VI neurons is decreased with a concomitant increase in Ctip2+layer V neurons. (<bold>P–X</bold>) Portion of cortical neurons at rostromedial levels. Immunolabeling with cortical layer markers revealed no significant difference. Note that due to the thinner cortex, the position of layer VI Tbr1+ (<bold>Q</bold>) and layer V Ctip2+ neurons (<bold>J, S</bold>) appears to be shifted to more superficial positions; however, the relative order of these layers remains unaffected. All statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); unpaired t-tests (<bold>M–O, X</bold>); Mann Whitney tests (<bold>V, W</bold>); n = 4; **p&lt;0.01. Scale bars: 500 μm (<bold>A</bold>) and 100 μm (<bold>G</bold>). CC: corpus callosum; ctx: cortex; sep: septum; str: striatum.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig4-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Whole mount preparations of E18.5 brains.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Control. (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> brain. Note the absence of obvious protrusions of the olfactory bulbs (ob) in the mutant. Ctx: cortex. Scale bar: 1 mm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig4-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Forebrain malformations in E18.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–F</bold>) Coronal sections through the forebrain of E18.5 control (<bold>A–C</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (<bold>D–F</bold>) embryos. The asterisk in (<bold>D</bold>) demarcates a heterotopia in the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant. Note that the mutant lateral neocortex is thinner at most levels but not rostrolaterally (<bold>D– F</bold>). The lines in (<bold>A</bold>) indicate where cortical thickness was measured at medial (m) and lateral (l) levels. (<bold>G, H</bold>) Quantification of cortical thickness. CC: corpus callosum; ctx: cortex; hip: hippocampus; sep: septum; str: striatum; th: thalamus. Scale bar: 500 μm. Statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); Two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak multiple comparisons test; n = 4; *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.005; ***p&lt;0.001.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig4-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Hippocampus formation in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–F</bold>) Hippocampal marker gene expression in E18.5 control (<bold>A–C</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (<bold>D–F</bold>). Expression of <italic>Nrp2</italic> labels the whole hippocampal formation (<bold>A</bold>), while <italic>Scip1</italic> is expressed in CA1 and in the neocortex (<bold>B</bold>). Prox1 expression is confined to the dentate gyrus (DG) (<bold>C</bold>). In <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos, these hippocampal markers are expressed but their expression domains are severely reduced or disorganized (<bold>D–F</bold>).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig4-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title>Formation of the corpus callosum in E18.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A, B</bold>) Coronal section through the telencephalon stained with L1 and GFAP to reveal the corpus callosum (CC) and glial cells, respectively. The corpus callosum was smaller in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos while the glial wedge (GW), the induseum griseum glia (IGG) and the midline zipper glia (MZG) occupied their correct position surrounding the corpus callosum. (<bold>C</bold>) Quantification of corpus callosum thickness. Statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); Mann-Whitney test; n = 4; *p&lt;0.05. Scale bar: 250 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig4-figsupp4-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>A mutation in the ciliary gene <italic>Tctn2</italic> leads to increased telencephalic neurogenesis</title><p>To start to unravel the mechanisms by which <italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls cortical stem cell development, we first analyzed whether the increased early neurogenesis is restricted to <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutants or is observed in another mutant affecting cilia. To this end, we focused on the <italic>Tectonic</italic> 2 (<italic>TCTN2</italic>) gene which is crucial for ciliary transition zone architecture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Shi et al., 2017</xref>) and which, like <italic>INPP5E</italic>, is mutated in Joubert Syndrome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2011</xref>). Interestingly, E12.5 <italic>Tctn2</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutant embryos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Reiter and Skarnes, 2006</xref>) also showed an increased proportion of Tbr1+ projection neurons and a concomitant decrease in Tbr2+ basal progenitors in the dorsolateral telencephalon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Due to embryonic lethality, however, we were not able to investigate the formation of cortical neurons at later stages.</p><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Increased generation of cortical neurons in the lateral neocortex of E12.5 <italic>Tctn2</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–C</bold>) Double immunofluorescence for PCNA and Tbr2 revealed a significantly decreased proportion of basal progenitors. (<bold>D–F</bold>) The portion of Tbr1<sup>+</sup> cortical neurons was increased. All statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); unpaired t tests; n = 4; **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001. Scale bar: 50 μm. bv: blood vessel.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig5-v2.tif"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Ciliary defects in the forebrain of E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos</title><p>Our findings in the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> and <italic>Tctn2</italic> mutants suggested a role for cilia in cortical progenitor cells to control early neurogenesis. Therefore, we examined the presence and the structure of primary cilia in the developing forebrain of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. We first analyzed the presence of the small GTPase Arl13b, enriched in ciliary membranes, and of γ-Tubulin (γTub), a component of basal bodies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Caspary et al., 2007</xref>). We found no major difference in the number or the apical localization of cilia in control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> neuroepithelial cells in the E12.5 telencephalon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A,B</xref>) or diencephalon (data not shown).</p><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Ciliary defects in E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> forebrain.</title><p>(<bold>A–B</bold>) Immunohistochemistry for Arl13b and γ-Tubulin (γTUB) on E12.5 brain cryosections showed an accumulation of ciliary axonemes and basal bodies, respectively, at the apical border of radial glial cells facing the ventricules in both control (<bold>A</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (<bold>B</bold>) embryos without any gross difference. Scale bars: 10 μm. (<bold>C–E</bold>) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on E12.5 control (<bold>C</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (<bold>D, E</bold>) brains highlighted the presence of primary cilia projecting from the apical surface of radial glial cells in both control (<bold>A</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (<bold>B</bold>) embryos. However, SEM also revealed the presence of abnormal cilia in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos having a spherical shape (arrows in D and E) or aberrant lateral buddings (arrowheads in D and E). Scale bars: 2 μm. (<bold>F–L</bold>) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis on E12.5 brains showed longitudinal sections of primary cilia in control (<bold>F</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (<bold>G–L</bold>) embryos. In control primary cilia, the axoneme appeared as an extension of the basal body (bb, black arrowheards) (<bold>F–H</bold>). In addition to cilia with normal morphology, abnormal cilia were identified in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos thanks to the presence of a basal body apparently correctly docked to the apical membrane. Abnormal cilia lacked an axoneme (<bold>I, J, L</bold>) or showed unusual membranous structures, such as budding (<bold>G, K</bold>) or internal (<bold>I, K, L</bold>) vesicles (arrows) or undulating peripheral membranes (<bold>I</bold>). Note that tight junctions (white arrowheads in F and G) appeared normal in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (<bold>G</bold>) and control (<bold>F</bold>) embryos, suggesting that apico-basal polarity of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>radial glial cells was not compromised. Scale bars: 200 nm. (<bold>M–Q</bold>) TEM images showing transverse sections of the axoneme (<bold>M, O, P</bold>) and the basal body (<bold>N, Q</bold>) in control (<bold>M, N</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (<bold>O–Q</bold>) embryos with no major difference in the basal bodies between control (<bold>N</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (<bold>Q</bold>) embryos. However, transverse section of primary cilia in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> brains revealed the presence of normal axonemes composed of nine correctly organized doublets of microtubules on some radial glial cells (<bold>O</bold>), while others harbored an abnormal axoneme containing a lower number of microtubule doublets (<bold>P</bold>). Scale bars: 50 nm. (<bold>R</bold>) Graph showing the number of normal versus abnormal cilia (cil.) found on TEM images from control (n = 3) or <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> (n = 3) embryos. cc: counted cilia.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig6-v2.tif"/></fig><p>To gain insights into the fine structure of these primary cilia, we performed electron microscopy analyses. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) provided an observation of the cilia protruding into the telencephalic ventricles. In control embryos, almost all RGCs had a single, ~1 μm long primary cilium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6C</xref>), as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Besse et al., 2011</xref>). Some <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutant cells also displayed an apparently normal cilium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6D,E</xref>), whereas other cells harbored abnormal cilia, either with a lateral blob (arrowhead in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6D,E</xref>) or as a short and bloated cilium-like protrusion (arrows in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6D,E</xref>).</p><p>Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) confirmed the presence of abnormal cilia in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. Cilia were recognized by basal bodies anchored to the apical membrane in both control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>RGCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6F–L,N,Q</xref>). However, in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> cells, some cilia lacked the axoneme and showed unusual membranous structures that resemble budding vesicles emerging from the lateral surface of the cilium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6G,K</xref>), internal vesicles (arrows in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6I,K,L</xref>), or undulating peripheral membranes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6I</xref>), indicating an <italic>Inpp5e</italic>-dependent defect in ciliary membrane morphology. Transverse sections revealed the presence of cilia with apparently normal 9+0 axonemes, as well as cilia containing abnormal numbers of microtubule doublets in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6O,P</xref>). To quantify these ciliary defects, we counted the number of normal versus abnormal cilia on TEM images obtained from control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos, and found an increase in abnormal cilia in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> compared to control embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6R</xref>). Taken together, a significant number of abnormal primary cilia were found at the apical end of E12.5 RGCs in the forebrain of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. These abnormalities are consistent with a role of <italic>Inpp5e</italic> in maintaining cilia stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jacoby et al., 2009</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Restoring Gli3 repressor ratio rescues cortical malformations in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos</title><p>Primary cilia play a crucial role in Shh signaling by controlling the proteolytic cleavage of full-length Gli3 (Gli3FL) into the Gli3 repressor form (Gli3R) in the absence of Shh and by converting Gli3FL into the transcriptional activator Gli3A in the presence of Shh. Moreover, the dorsal telencephalon predominately forms Gli3R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Fotaki et al., 2006</xref>) and mice that can only produce Gli3R have no obvious defect in cortical development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Besse et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bose, 2002</xref>). In addition, we recently showed that Gli3 has a prominent role in RGCs controlling the switch from symmetric proliferative to asymmetric neurogenic cell division (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Hasenpusch-Theil et al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, we hypothesized that alterations in Gli3 processing caused by abnormal cilia function underlies the increased direct neurogenesis and the cortical malformations in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. In situ hybridization showed that <italic>Gli3</italic> mRNA expression might be slightly reduced but the overall expression pattern in the telencephalon remains unaffected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1</xref>). We next investigated the formation of Gli3FL and Gli3R in the E12.5 dorsal telencephalon of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos using western blots. This analysis revealed no change in the levels of Gli3FL but a significant decrease inGli3R which resulted in a reduced Gli3R to Gli3FL ratio in the mutant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A–D</xref>) suggesting that the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation affects Gli3 processing.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>Re-introducing a single copy of the Gli3 repressor rescues the neurogenesis defect in E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A–D</bold>) Gli3 western blot on E12.5 dorsal telencephalic tissue revealed the Gli3 full length (FL) and repressor (<bold>R</bold>) forms (<bold>A</bold>). While Gli3FL levels are not affected (<bold>B</bold>), levels of Gli3R (<bold>C</bold>) and the Gli3R/Gli3FL ratio (<bold>D</bold>) are decreased in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. An unpaired t-test was used to evaluate levels of Gli3FL and Gli3R and the Gli3R/Gli3FL ratio in four control and four<italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos derived from four different litters. (<bold>E–L</bold>) Formation of basal progenitors and neurons in the neocortex of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos. In the lateral neocortex of E12.5 embryos, there is no significant difference in the proportions of Tbr1+ neurons (<bold>E, G, I, K</bold>) and basal progenitor cells (<bold>F, H, J, L</bold>) between control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos. Note the three bulges of the ventral telencephalon in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos (<bold>J</bold>). Boxes indicate the regions where cell counts were performed. All statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); unpaired t-tests (n = 5) (<bold>B–D</bold>) and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (<bold>K, L</bold>); *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001. Scale bars: 250 μm (<bold>E</bold>), and 50 μm (<bold>E’</bold>). bv: blood vessel; ctx: cortex.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig7-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title><italic>Gli3</italic> mRNA expression in Inpp5e mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A, B</bold>) <italic>Gli3</italic> in situ hybridization showing <italic>Gli3</italic> mRNA expression in the cortex (ctx) and lateral ganglionic eminence (LGE) of control (<bold>A</bold>) and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (<bold>B</bold>).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig7-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Rescue of eye development in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–C</bold>) Side views of the heads of E12.5 embryos with the indicated genotype. <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos lack the eye completely or only form a small remnant, whereas eye formation is not affected in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos. Scale bar: 1 mm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig7-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Rescue of corpus callosum formation in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos.</title><p>(<bold>A–B</bold>) Coronal section through the telencephalon stained with L1 and GFAP to reveal the corpus callosum (CC) and glial cells, respectively. There is no significant difference in the size of the corpus callosum between control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos; the glial wedge (GW), the induseum griseum glia (IGG) and the midline zipper glia (MZG) are formed in their correct position. (<bold>C</bold>) Quantification of corpus callosum thickness. Statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); Mann Whitney tests; n = 4; Scale bar: 250 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig7-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>The next set of experiments aimed to clarify a role for the reduced Gli3 processing. To this end, we restored Gli3R levels by crossing <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants with <italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> mice that can only produce Gli3R in a cilia-independent manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Besse et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bose, 2002</xref>). Overall inspection of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos revealed restored eye formation, whereas <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos either completely lacked eyes or showed microphthalmia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jacoby et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s2">Figure 7—figure supplement 2</xref>). Moreover, the overall morphology of the telencephalon is much improved in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos as compared to <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. In E18.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup><italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> mutants, the corpus callosum has a thickness indistinguishable from that of control embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s3">Figure 7—figure supplement 3</xref>). In E12.5 and E14.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos, the neocortex lacks the undulations of the VZ present in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (data not shown) and the morphology of the hippocampal anlage is more akin to that in wild-type embryos but it is still smaller and less bulged (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7E,G,I</xref>).</p><p>We also determined the proportions of basal progenitors and Tbr1+ neurons at E12.5 which were decreased and increased, respectively, in the lateral neocortex of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. While these changes were still present in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> littermate embryos, there was no statistically significant difference between control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7E–L</xref>). This finding indicates that the neurogenesis phenotype of E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutants is rescued by a single copy of the Gli3<sup>Δ699</sup> allele. We next investigated the formation of basal progenitors and of cortical projection neurons in E14.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos. The proportion of Tbr1+Ctip2+ neurons was not affected in the medial neocortex of E14.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos. In contrast, the proportion of Tbr1-Ctip2+ neurons was reduced as in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A,C,E,I,J</xref>). Similarly, the proportions of basal progenitors in the medial <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup><italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> neocortex was slightly improved compared to <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos but significantly smaller than in control embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8B,D,F,K</xref>). As re-introducing a single Gli3<sup>Δ699</sup> allele does not completely rescue the <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> neurogenesis phenotype, we generated <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos homozygous for the <italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699</sup> allele. Interestingly, the morphology of the dorsal telencephalon including the hippocampal formation was indistinguishable between control and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/Δ699</sup> embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A,B,G,H</xref>) and the formation of Tbr1-Ctip2+ neurons and Tbr2+ basal progenitors were not affected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8G,H,J,K</xref>). Taken together, these findings indicate that re-introducing a single copy of the <italic>Gli3R</italic> allele into the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant background leads to a partial rescue of cortical neurogenesis in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos, whereas two copies are required for a full rescue.</p><fig id="fig8" position="float"><label>Figure 8.</label><caption><title>Two copies of the <italic>Gli3</italic> repressor allele are required to rescue the neurogenesis defects in E14.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A–H</bold>) Proportions of neurons (<bold>A, C, E, G</bold>) and basal progenitors (<bold>B D, F, H</bold>) in the medial neocortex of control, <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>, <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>Δ699/+</sup> and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>Δ699/Δ699</sup> embryos. (<bold>A, C, E, G, J</bold>) The formation of Tbr1-Ctip2+ projection neurons is rescued after re-introducing two copies of the <italic>Gli3</italic> repressor allele. (<bold>B, D, F, H, K</bold>) The proportion of basal progenitors is slightly increased in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos but a full rescue is only achieved in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>Δ699/Δ699</sup> embryos. Boxes indicate the regions where cell counts were performed. All statistical data are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals (CI); one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (<bold>I, J, K</bold>); *p&lt;0.05; ***p&lt;0.001. Scale bars: 250 μm (<bold>A, B</bold>), 50 μm (<bold>A’, B’</bold>). bv: blood vessel; ctx: cortex.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig8-v2.tif"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Generating a functional cerebral cortex requires a finely tuned balance between direct and indirect neurogenesis to form subtypes of cortical projection neurons in appropriate numbers. Here, we show that the ciliary mouse mutants <italic>Inpp5e</italic> and <italic>Tctn2</italic> present with a transient increase in neurons forming directly from radial glia progenitors in the lateral neocortex at the expense of basal progenitor formation. This increase in neurogenesis results in augmented formation of Ctip2+ layer V neurons in the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant cortex. Our studies also revealed that the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation interfered with the stability of the RGC primary cilium and its signaling functions, leading to a reduction in the Gli3R levels. Since re-introducing Gli3R in an <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant background restored the decreased formation of normal proportions of basal progenitors and neurons, our findings implicate a novel role for primary cilia in controlling the signaling events that direct the decision of RGCs to undergo either direct or indirect neurogenesis.</p><sec id="s3-1"><title>Primary cilia affect the decision between direct and indirect neurogenesis</title><p>RGCs in the developing mouse neocortex have the potential to undergo symmetric proliferative or asymmetric cell divisions with the latter division mode producing neurons in a direct manner or indirectly via basal progenitors. Balancing out these division modes is important not only to determine final neuronal output and cortical size but also the types of cortical projection neurons and, hence, subtype composition of the adult neocortex. In the E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic> and <italic>Tctn2</italic> mouse mutants, we identified an increased formation of neurons in the lateral neocortex. Based on our cell cycle exit experiment, additional neurons are formed from RGCs at the expense of basal progenitors. Given the cell cycle length of basal progenitors of &gt;24 hr (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Arai et al., 2011</xref>), it is unlikely that new born basal progenitors would have undergone an additional round of cell division to produce two neurons within the time frame of this experiment. Such an extra division would also have diluted the BrdU label. We therefore conclude that the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation caused RGCs to preferentially produce neurons directly. Moreover, neurogenesis defects only became obvious at E14.5 in the medial neocortex. This delay might reflect the neurogenic gradient in the neocortex or might be related to specific gene expression changes such as reduced Pax6 expression in medial neocortical progenitors.</p><p>Interestingly, the increase in direct neurogenesis led to an increased proportion of Ctip2+ deep layer V neurons in the E18.5 neocortex but did not coincide with a reduced proportion of upper layer neurons. This effect could be explained in several mutually non-exclusive ways. First, neurons born at E12.5 initially express both Ctip2 and Tbr1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) and later down-regulate Ctip2. <italic>Inpp5e</italic> could therefore affect the signaling that controls this downregulation. Secondly, the proportions of basal progenitors and neurons were normalized in E14.5 mutants. Since basal progenitors are a main source of upper layer neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Arnold et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Vasistha et al., 2015</xref>), this normalization would account for the sufficient numbers of Satb2+ upper layer neurons. Newly formed projection neurons signal back to RGCs via Jag1, Fgf9 and Neurotrophin 3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Parthasarathy et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Seuntjens et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Wang et al., 2016</xref>) to control the sequential production of deep and upper layer neurons and of glia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Silva et al., 2019</xref>). <italic>Inpp5e</italic> might affect these signals by controlling cilia stability and/or levels of PI(3,4,5)P<sub>3</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bielas et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jacoby et al., 2009</xref>) that acts as a second messenger in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Regardless of the exact mechanism, our findings suggest a novel, spatially and temporally restricted role for <italic>Inpp5e</italic> in controlling the decision between direct and indirect neurogenesis. This function differs from those described for other cilia mutants. Conditional inactivation of <italic>Ift88</italic> and <italic>Kif3a</italic> leads to a larger cortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Foerster et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Wilson et al., 2012</xref>) with a modest increase in BP production in the absence of a delay in neurogenesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Foerster et al., 2017</xref>) while <italic>Rpgrip1l</italic> mutants have reduced numbers of both basal progenitors and neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Postel et al., 2019</xref>). These findings highlight the multiple and varied roles cilia play in cortical development.</p></sec><sec id="s3-2"><title><italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls direct/indirect neurogenesis through Gli3 processing</title><p>Our study also shed lights into the mechanisms by which <italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls the decision between direct and indirect neurogenesis. Most notably, the Gli3R level and Gli3R/Gli3FL ratio are decreased in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. While the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation does not lead to an up-regulation of Shh signaling in the dorsal telencephalon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Magnani et al., 2015</xref>), re-introducing a single or two copies of Gli3R in an <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant background partially and fully restores the neurogenesis defects, respectively. This rescue indicates that reduced levels of Gli3R rather than the reduction in the Gli3R/Gli3FL ratio are responsible for the prevalence of direct neurogenesis in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. This idea is consistent with the findings that (i) <italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/Δ699</sup> embryos that cannot produce Gli3FL and Gli3A show no obvious phenotype in cortical development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Besse et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bose, 2002</xref>), (ii) dorsal telencephalic patterning defects in <italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Xt/Xt</sup> mutants are not rescued in <italic>Shh</italic><sup>-/-</sup>/<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>XtXt</sup> double mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Rallu et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Rash and Grove, 2007</xref>), (iii) Shh promotes the generation of olfactory bulb interneurons and cortical oligodendrocytes and neurogenesis in the subventricular zone by reducing Gli3R rather than by promoting Gli activator function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Petrova et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Wang et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>). In addition, there is also a dramatic rescue of eye development and the rescue also extends to other malformations of the <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> forebrain, including the corpus callosum, the hippocampus and the expansion of the piriform cortex, structures that are also affected in <italic>Gli3</italic> null and hypomorphic mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Amaniti et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Johnson, 1967</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Magnani et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Theil et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Wiegering et al., 2019</xref>). Taken together, these findings support the idea that <italic>Inpp5e</italic> and the primary cilium control key processes in cortical development by regulating the formation of Gli3R.</p><p>Our analyses support several mutually non-exclusive mechanisms how the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation impacts on Gli3 processing. First, our electron microscopy study revealed severe structural abnormalities in large proportions of cilia. The Inpp5e phosphatase hydrolyses PI(3,4,5)P<sub>3</sub>, which is essential for the effective activation of the serine threonine kinase Akt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Kisseleva et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Plotnikova et al., 2015</xref>). Following PI(3,4,5)P<sub>3</sub> binding, Akt translocates to the membrane and becomes phosphorylated at T308 by phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (Pdk1) and at S473 by mammalian target of rapamycin complex (mTORC2) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Yu and Cui, 2016</xref>). Consistent with the loss of <italic>Inpp5e</italic> function and a resulting increase in PI(3,4,5)P<sub>3</sub>, western blot analysis revealed elevated pAkt<sup>S473</sup> levels (data not shown). Increased phosphorylation at this site has been implicated in inhibiting cilia assembly and promoting cilia disassembly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Mao et al., 2019</xref>) and could hence explain the structural defects of RGC <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> cilia. Secondly, <italic>Inpp5e</italic> could control Gli3 processing through its effect on the transition zone (TZ). It is required for TZ molecular organization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Dyson et al., 2017</xref>) and its substrate PI(4,5)P2 plays a role in TZ maturation in <italic>Drosophila</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Gupta et al., 2018</xref>). This model is further supported by our finding that a mouse mutant for the TZ protein Tctn2 phenocopies the <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> neurogenesis defect. In turn, several mouse mutants defective for TZ proteins are required for Inpp5e localization to cilia and show microphthalmia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Sang et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Yee et al., 2015</xref>). Tctn proteins are also required for Gli3 processing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Sang et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Thomas et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Wang et al., 2017</xref>) and the TZ protein Rpgrip1l controls the activity of the proteasome at the basal body responsible for proteolytic cleavage of Gli3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Gerhardt et al., 2015</xref>). Taken together, these findings indicate that <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation might affect the ability of RGCs to switch to indirect neurogenesis through defects in cilia stability and/or the integrity of the ciliary transition zone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>).</p><fig id="fig9" position="float"><label>Figure 9.</label><caption><title>Model for <italic>Inpp5e</italic>’s role in controlling direct vs indirect neurogenesis in the developing cortex.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) A fine-tuned balance between direct and indirect neurogenesis is required to produce cortical neurons in appropriate numbers. The structure of a primary cilium and the ciliary localization of the Inpp5e protein are schematically indicated. (<bold>B</bold>) The <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation affects the axoneme (shaded microtubules) and ciliary morphology and may compromise the transition zone as indicated by the grayish colour (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Dyson et al., 2017</xref>). Gli3R levels are reduced and there is a shift towarddirect neurogenesis. (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>Tctn2</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos have morphologically abnormal cilia, a defective axoneme and transition zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2011</xref>), lack ciliary Inpp5e protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2015</xref>) and phenocopy the neurogenesis defect of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutants. (<bold>D</bold>) Introducing Gli3R in an <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant background restores Gli3 levels and the balance between direct and indirect neurogenesis. BB: basal body; BP: basal progenitor; PC: primary cilium; RGC: radial glial cell; TZ: transition zone.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-fig9-v2.tif"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3-3"><title>Implications for Joubert syndrome</title><p>In humans, hypomorphic <italic>INPP5E</italic> mutations contribute to Joubert Syndrome (JS), a ciliopathy characterized by cerebellar malformations and concomitant ataxia and breathing abnormalities. In addition, a subset of JS patients exhibit cortical abnormalities including polymicrogyria, neuronal heterotopias and agenesis of the corpus callosum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Poretti et al., 2011</xref>). Strikingly, the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mouse mutant also shows several of these abnormalities. In the caudal telencephalon, the otherwise lissencephalic cortex formed folds reminiscent of the polymicrogyria in JS patients. In addition, the mutant formed leptomeningeal heterotopias with 100% penetrance, but their number and location varied. Mutations in ciliary genes were previously associated with heterotopia formation in humans and mice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Magnani et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Uzquiano et al., 2019</xref>). Mice carrying mutations in the <italic>Eml1</italic> gene encoding a microtubule-associated protein show subcortical heterotopias due to a mispositioning of RGCs and impaired primary cilia formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Uzquiano et al., 2019</xref>). Finally, the corpus callosum is thinner but callosal axons project to the contralateral cerebral hemisphere in <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants. This phenotype is milder compared to that of other mouse mutants with altered cilia that show complete agenesis of the corpus callosum with callosal axons forming Probst bundles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Benadiba et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Laclef et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Putoux et al., 2019</xref>). Unlike these other ciliary mutants, the corticoseptal boundary which plays a crucial role in positioning guidepost cells that control midline crossing of callosal axons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Magnani et al., 2014</xref>) is not obviously affected in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos. Instead, the thinner corpus callosum is likely to be the result of reduced size of the caudal neocortex. Despite these differences, however, re-introducing Gli3R into the cilia mutant background restores callosal development in both groups of mutants suggesting that cilia control two independent steps in corpus callosum formation by regulating Gli3 processing. Thus, the <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> mutant recapitulates cortical abnormalities in JS patients and starts to help unravelling the pathomechanisms underlying these defects.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="top">Reagent type <break/>(species) or <break/>resource</th><th valign="top">Designation</th><th valign="top">Source or <break/>reference</th><th valign="top">Identifiers</th><th valign="top">Additional <break/>information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>)</td><td valign="top">Inpp5e<sup>delta</sup> <break/>(Inpp5e<sup>tm1.2Sch</sup>)</td><td valign="top">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19668215/">19668215</ext-link></td><td valign="top">MGI:4360187</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>)</td><td valign="top">Gli3<sup>delta699</sup> <break/>(Gli3<sup>tm1Urt</sup>)</td><td valign="top">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11978771/">11978771</ext-link></td><td valign="top">MGI:2182576</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>Mus musculus</italic>)</td><td valign="top">Tctn2<sup>delta</sup> <break/>(Tctn2<sup>tm1.1Reit</sup>)</td><td valign="top">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21725307/">21725307</ext-link></td><td valign="top">MGI:5292130</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Arl13b <break/>(clone N295B/66) <break/>(Mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab Facility</td><td valign="top">Cat# 75–287 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_11000053">AB_11000053</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:1500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-BrdU (Rat monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam</td><td valign="top">Cat# ab6326 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_305426">AB_305426</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:50)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-BrdU/IdU (B44) (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">BD Biosciences</td><td valign="top">Cat# 347580 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2313824">AB_2313824</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Cleaved-Caspase3 (Asp175) (5A1E) (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Cell Signaling Technology</td><td valign="top">Cat# 9664 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2070042">AB_2070042</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Ctip2 (Rat monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam</td><td valign="top">Cat# ab18465 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2064130">AB_2064130</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-GFAP (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Agilent</td><td valign="top">Cat# Z0334 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_10013382">AB_10013382</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-L1, clone 324 (Rat monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">Millipore</td><td valign="top">Cat# MAB5272 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2133200">AB_2133200</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Pax6 (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Biolegend</td><td valign="top">Cat# 901301 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2565003">AB_2565003</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:400)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-PCNA (PC10) (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam</td><td valign="top">Cat# ab29 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_303394">AB_303394</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Prox1 (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Reliatech</td><td valign="top">Cat# 102-PA32 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_10013821">AB_10013821</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-pHH3 (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Millipore</td><td valign="top">Cat# 06–570 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_310177">AB_310177</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Satb2 (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam</td><td valign="top">Cat# ab51502 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_882455">AB_882455</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:200)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Tbr1 (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam</td><td valign="top">Cat# ab31940 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2200219">AB_2200219</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:400)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Tbr2 (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam</td><td valign="top">Cat# ab23345 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_778267">AB_778267</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti−γTUB, (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Sigma Aldrich</td><td valign="top">Cat# <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/sab4503045?lang=en&amp;region=GB">SAB4503045</ext-link> RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_10747615">AB_10747615</ext-link> <break/></td><td valign="top">IF (1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-mouse Cy2 secondary (Donkey polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs</td><td valign="top">Cat# 715-225-151 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2340827">AB_2340827</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-rabbit Cy3 secondary (Donkey polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs</td><td valign="top">Cat# 711-165-152</td><td valign="top">IF (1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-rat Cy3 secondary (Goat polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs</td><td valign="top">Cat# 711-165-152 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2307443">AB_2307443</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 secondary (Goat polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Molecular Probes (now: Invitrogen)</td><td valign="top">Cat# A-11008 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_143165">AB_143165</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:200)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-rat Alexa Fluor 647 secondary (Goat polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Molecular Probes <break/>(now: Invitrogen)</td><td valign="top">Cat# A-21247 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_141778">AB_141778</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:200)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Biotinylated swine anti-rabbit IgG</td><td valign="top">Dako</td><td valign="top">Cat# E0431</td><td valign="top">IF (1:400)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Streptavidin, Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate antibody</td><td valign="top">Molecular Probes <break/>(now: Invitrogen)</td><td valign="top">Cat# S32354 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2315383">AB_2315383</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Streptavidin, Alexa Fluor 568 conjugate antibody</td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Cat# S-11226 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2315774">AB_2315774</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG</td><td valign="top">Dako <break/>(now: Agilent)</td><td valign="top">Cat# E0432 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2313609">AB_2313609</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:400)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-h/m Gli3 (Goat polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">R and D Systems</td><td valign="top">Cat# AF3690 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2232499">AB_2232499</ext-link></td><td valign="top">WB (1:500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-β-Actin (clone AC-15) (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam</td><td valign="top">Cat# ab6276 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2223210">AB_2223210</ext-link></td><td valign="top">WB (1:15,000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">IRDye 680RD Donkey anti-Goat IgG</td><td valign="top">LI-COR Biosciences</td><td valign="top">Cat# 926–68074 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_10956736">AB_10956736</ext-link></td><td valign="top">WB (1:15,000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">IRDye 800CW Donkey anti-Mouse IgG</td><td valign="top">LI-COR Biosciences</td><td valign="top">Cat# 925–32212 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2716622">AB_2716622</ext-link></td><td valign="top">WB (1:15,000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Commercial assay or kit</td><td valign="top">VECTASTAIN Elite ABC-Peroxidase Kit <break/></td><td valign="top">Vector Laboratories</td><td valign="top">Cat# PK-6100 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2336819">AB_2336819</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">IdU 5-Iodo-2′-deoxyuridine</td><td valign="top">Sigma Aldrich</td><td valign="top">Cat# I7125</td><td valign="top">(10 mg/ml)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">BrdU 5-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine</td><td valign="top">Sigma Aldrich</td><td valign="top">Cat# B5002</td><td valign="top">(10 mg/ml)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">Fiji</td><td valign="top">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22743772/">22743772</ext-link>?</td><td valign="top">PRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_002285">SCR_002285</ext-link></td><td valign="top"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://imagej.net/Fiji">http://imagej.net/Fiji</ext-link></td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">Image Studio Lite</td><td valign="top">Li-Cor</td><td valign="top">4.0</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">GraphPad Prism</td><td valign="top">GraphPad Software</td><td valign="top">8.4.2 (679)</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">Adobe Photoshop</td><td valign="top">Adobe Inc</td><td valign="top">12.1</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Other</td><td valign="top">DAPI <break/>(4',6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole, Dihydrochloride)</td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Cat# D1306 <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/AB_2629482">AB_2629482</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IF (1:2000)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title>Mice</title><p>All experimental work was carried out in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and UK Home Office guidelines. All protocols were reviewed and approved by the named veterinary surgeons of the College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, the University of Edinburgh, prior to the commencement of experimental work. <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ</sup> (<italic>Inpp5</italic>e<sup>delta</sup>), <italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699</sup> (<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>delta699</sup>) and <italic>Tctn2</italic><sup>Δ</sup> (<italic>Tctn2</italic><sup>tm1.1Reit</sup>) mouse lines have been described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bose, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jacoby et al., 2009</xref>). <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/+</sup> mice were interbred to generate <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos; exencephalic <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos which made up ca. 25% of homozygous mutant embryos were excluded from the analyses. Wild-type and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/+</sup> litter mate embryos served as controls. <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/Δ699</sup> embryos were obtained from inter-crosses of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/+</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> mice using wild-type, <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/+</sup> and <italic>Gli3</italic><sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos as controls. Embryonic (E) day 0.5 was assumed to start at midday of the day of vaginal plug discovery. Transgenic animals and embryos from both sexes were genotyped as described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bose, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jacoby et al., 2009</xref>). For each marker and each stage, three to eight embryos were analyzed.</p><p>For measuring cell cycle lengths, pregnant females were intraperitoneally injected with a single dose of IdU (Sigma-Aldrich) (10mg/ml) at E12.5, followed by an injection of BrdU (Sigma-Aldrich) (10 mg/ml) 90 min later. Embryos were harvested 30 min after the second injection. For cell cycle exit analyses, BrdU was injected peritoneally into E11.5 pregnant females and embryos were harvested 24 hr later.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization</title><p>For immunohistochemistry, embryos were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde, incubated in 30% sucrose at +4°C for 24 hr, embedded in 30% sucrose/OCT mixture (1:1) and frozen on dry ice. Immunofluorescence staining was performed on 12 to 14 μm cryostat sections as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Theil, 2005</xref>) with antibodies against Arl13b (mouse) (Neuromab 75–287; 1:1500), rat anti-BrdU (1:50, Abcam #ab6326), mouse anti-BrdU/IdU (B44) (1:50, BD Biosciences #347580), rabbit anti-Cleaved Caspase 3 (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology, #9664), rat anti-Ctip2 (1:1000, Abcam #ab18465), rabbit anti-GFAP (1:1000, Agilent/Dako #Z 0334), rat anti-L1, clone 324 (1:1000, Millipore #MAB5272), rabbit anti-Pax6 (1:400, Biolegend #901301), mouse anti-PCNA (1:500, Abcam #ab29), rabbit anti-Prox1 (1:1000, RELIA<italic>Tech</italic> #102-PA32). rabbit anti-pHH3 (1:100, Millipore #06–570), mouse anti-Satb2 (1:200, Abcam #ab51502), rabbit anti-Tbr1 (1:400, Abcam #ab31940), rabbit anti-Tbr2 (1:1000, Abcam #ab23345) and rabbit anti-γTUB (Sigma-Aldrich SAB4503045; 1:100). Primary antibodies for immunohistochemistry were detected with Alexa- or Cy2/3-conjugated fluorescent secondary antibodies. The Cleaved Caspase three and Tbr1 signals were amplified using biotinylated secondary IgG antibody (swine anti-rabbit IgG) (1:400, Dako) followed by Alexa Fluor 488 (1:100, Invitrogen) or 568 Streptavidin (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific). For counter staining DAPI (1:2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used. Prox1 protein was detected non-fluorescently using biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1: 400,Agilent (Dako)) followed by avidin-HRP and DAB detection using Vectastain Elite ABC peroxidase kit (Vector laboratories) as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Magnani et al., 2010</xref>).</p><p>In situ hybridization on 12 μm serial paraffin sections were performed as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Theil, 2005</xref>) using antisense RNA probes for <italic>Axin2</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Lustig et al., 2002</xref>), <italic>Bmp4</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Jones et al., 1991</xref>), <italic>Dbx1</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Yun et al., 2001</xref>), <italic>Dlx2</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bulfone et al., 1993</xref>), <italic>Emx1</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Simeone et al., 1992</xref>), <italic>Gli3</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Hui et al., 1994</xref>), <italic>Lhx2</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Liem et al., 1997</xref>), <italic>Msx1</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hill et al., 1989</xref>), <italic>Ngn2</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Gradwohl et al., 1996</xref>), <italic>Nrp2</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Galceran et al., 2000</xref>), <italic>Pax6</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Walther and Gruss, 1991</xref>), <italic>Scip1</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Frantz et al., 1994</xref>), <italic>Wnt2b</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Grove et al., 1998</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Western blot</title><p>Protein was extracted from the dorsal telencephalon of E12.5 wild-type and <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos (n = 4 samples per genotype) as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Magnani et al., 2010</xref>). 10 μg protein lysates were subjected to gel electrophoresis on a 3–8% NuPAGE Tris-Acetate gel (Life Technologies), and protein was transferred to a Immobilon-FL membrane (Millipore), which was incubated with goat anti-h/m Gli3 (1:500, R and D Systems #AF3690) and mouse anti-β-Actin antibody (1:15000, Abcam #ab6276). After incubating with donkey anti-goat IgG IRDye680RD (1:15000, LI-COR Biosciences) and donkey anti-mouse IgG IRDye800CW secondary antibodies (1:15000, Life Technologies), signal was detected using LI-COR’s Odyssey Infrared Imaging System with Odyssey Software. Values for protein signal intensity were obtained using Image Studio Lite Version4.0. Gli3 repressor and full-length protein levels and the Gli3 repressor/full length were compared between wild-type and mutant tissue using an unpaired t-test.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Scanning and transmission electron microscopy</title><p>TEM and SEM image acquisition were performed in the Cochin Imaging Facility and on the IBPS EM Facility, respectively. For scanning electron microscopy, embryos were dissected in 1.22x PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed overnight with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.61x PBS (pH 7.4) at 4°C. Heads were then sectioned to separate the dorsal and ventral parts of the telencephalon, exposing their ventricular surfaces. Head samples were washed several times in 1.22x PBS and postfixed for 15 min in 1.22x PBS containing 1% OsO4. Fixed samples were washed several times in ultrapure water, dehydrated with a graded series of ethanol and prepared for scanning electron microscopy using the critical point procedure (CPD7501, Polaron). Their surfaces were coated with a 20 nm gold layer using a gold spattering device (Scancoat Six, Edwards). Samples were observed under a Cambridge S260 scanning electron microscope at 10 keV.</p><p>For transmission electron microscopy tissues were fixed for 1 hr with 3% glutaraldehyde, post-fixed in 1.22x PBS containing 1% OsO4, then dehydrated with a graded ethanol series. After 10 min in a 1:2 mixture of propane:epoxy resin, tissues were embedded in gelatin capsules with freshly prepared epoxy resin and polymerized at 60°C for 24 hr. Sections (80 nm) obtained using an ultramicrotome (Reichert Ultracut S) were stained with uranyl acetate and Reynold’s lead citrate and observed with a Philips CM10 transmission electron microscope.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Statistical analyses</title><p>Data were analyzed using GraphPadPrism eight software with n = 3–8 embryos for all analyses. Shapiro-Wilk normality tests informed whether to use t-tests for normally distributed data and Mann Whitney tests for data which did not pass the normality test. Cortical thickness was analyzed using a two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. A fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the quantification of normal and abnormal cilia. The Gli3 rescue experiments were evaluated with one way ANOVAS followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. A single asterisk indicates significance of p&lt;0.05, two asterisks indicate significance of p&lt;0.01 and three asterisks of p&lt;0.001. Due to morphological changes blinding was not possible and scores were validated by a second independent observer. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>-table 1 provides a summary of test statistics.</p></sec></sec></body><back><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are grateful to Drs Thomas Becker, Christos Gkogkas, John Mason, Pleasantine Mill, and David Price for critical comments on the manuscript, and Stéphane Schurmans for the <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/+</sup> mouse line. We also thank Dr Michaël Trichet (electron microscopy platform of the IBPS-Sorbonne Universités Paris 6) and Dr Alain Schmitt (electron microscopy platform of the Institut Cochin CNRS-UMR 8104) for their help with scanning and transmission electron microscopy analyses, respectively. This work was supported by a grants from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P00122X/1) and from the Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain (SFARI −529085) to TT and from NIH R01GM095941 to JFR.</p></ack><sec id="s5" sec-type="additional-information"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con8"><p>Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con9"><p>Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con10"><p>Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other"><p>Animal experimentation: All experimental work was carried out in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and UK Home Office guidelines under the project license numer P53864D41. All protocols were reviewed and approved by the named veterinary surgeons of the College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, the University of Edinburgh, prior to the commencement of experimental work.</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec id="s6" sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>Summary of statistical tests.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-58162-supp1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="transrepform"><label>Transparent reporting form</label><media mime-subtype="docx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-58162-transrepform-v2.docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec id="s7" sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data availability</title><p>All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amaniti</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Saisana</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Magnani</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Expansion of the piriform cortex contributes to corticothalamic pathfinding defects in Gli3 conditional mutants</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>460</fpage><lpage>471</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bht244</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24014668</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arai</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Pulvers</surname> <given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Haffner</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schilling</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Nüsslein</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Calegari</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Huttner</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Neural stem and progenitor cells shorten S-phase on commitment to neuron production</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>2</volume><elocation-id>154</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms1155</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21224845</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ariens-Kapers</surname> <given-names>CU</given-names></name><name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>GC</given-names></name><name><surname>Crosby</surname> <given-names>EC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1936">1936</year><source>The Comparative Anatomy of the Nervous System of the Vertebrates Including Man</source><publisher-name>New York Macmillan</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arnold</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheung</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Era</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishikawa</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bikoff</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names></name><name><surname>Molnár</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Groszer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>The T-box transcription factor eomes/Tbr2 regulates neurogenesis in the cortical subventricular zone</article-title><source>Genes &amp; Development</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>2479</fpage><lpage>2484</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.475408</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18794345</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashique</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Choe</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Karlen</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>May</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Phamluong</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Solloway</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ericson</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>The Rfx4 transcription factor modulates shh signaling by regional control of ciliogenesis</article-title><source>Science Signaling</source><volume>2</volume><elocation-id>ra70</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/scisignal.2000602</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19887680</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benadiba</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Magnani</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Niquille</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Morlé</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Valloton</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Nawabi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ait-Lounis</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Otsmane</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Reith</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hornung</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Lebrand</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Durand</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>The ciliogenic transcription factor RFX3 regulates early midline distribution of guidepost neurons required for corpus callosum development</article-title><source>PLOS Genetics</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>e1002606</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1002606</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22479201</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Besse</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Neti</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Anselme</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerhardt</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Rüther</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Laclef</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schneider-Maunoury</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Primary cilia control telencephalic patterning and morphogenesis via Gli3 proteolytic processing</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>138</volume><fpage>2079</fpage><lpage>2088</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.059808</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21490064</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bielas</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Silhavy</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Brancati</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Kisseleva</surname> <given-names>MV</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Gazali</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Sztriha</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bayoumi</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaki</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdel-Aleem</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosti</surname> <given-names>RO</given-names></name><name><surname>Kayserili</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Swistun</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertini</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Boltshauser</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Fazzi</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Travaglini</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Field</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Gayral</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacoby</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Schurmans</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Dallapiccola</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Majerus</surname> <given-names>PW</given-names></name><name><surname>Valente</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gleeson</surname> <given-names>JG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Mutations in INPP5E, encoding inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase E, link phosphatidyl inositol signaling to the ciliopathies</article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>1032</fpage><lpage>1036</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.423</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19668216</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bose</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Pallister-Hall syndrome phenotype in mice mutant for Gli3</article-title><source>Human Molecular Genetics</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>1129</fpage><lpage>1135</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/11.9.1129</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bulfone</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Puelles</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Porteus</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Frohman</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>GR</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubenstein</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>Spatially restricted expression of Dlx-1, Dlx-2 (Tes-1), Gbx-2, and wnt- 3 in the embryonic day 12.5 mouse forebrain defines potential transverse and longitudinal segmental boundaries</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>3155</fpage><lpage>3172</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-07-03155.1993</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cárdenas</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Villalba</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>de Juan Romero</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Picó</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kyrousi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Tzika</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Tessier-Lavigne</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Drukker</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Cappello</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Borrell</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Evolution of cortical neurogenesis in amniotes controlled by robo signaling levels</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>174</volume><fpage>590</fpage><lpage>606</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29961574</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caspary</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Larkins</surname> <given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>KV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>The graded response to sonic hedgehog depends on cilia architecture</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>767</fpage><lpage>778</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.004</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chávez</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ena</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Sande</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>de Kerchove d’Exaerde</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Schurmans</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Schiffmann</surname> <given-names>SN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Modulation of ciliary phosphoinositide content regulates trafficking and sonic hedgehog signaling output</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>338</fpage><lpage>350</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.016</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dyson</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Conduit</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Feeney</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hakim</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>DiTommaso</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Fulcher</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sriratana</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramm</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Horan</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurung</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wicking</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Smyth</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>INPP5E regulates phosphoinositide-dependent cilia transition zone function</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>216</volume><fpage>247</fpage><lpage>263</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201511055</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27998989</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Englund</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Fink</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lau</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pham</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Daza</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Bulfone</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kowalczyk</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hevner</surname> <given-names>RF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial Glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>247</fpage><lpage>251</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-04.2005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15634788</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Florio</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Huttner</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>141</volume><fpage>2182</fpage><lpage>2194</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.090571</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24866113</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foerster</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Daclin</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Asm</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Faucourt</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Boletta</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Genovesio</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Spassky</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>mTORC1 signaling and primary cilia are required for brain ventricle morphogenesis</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>144</volume><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.138271</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27993979</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fotaki</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaki</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Abnormal positioning of diencephalic cell types in neocortical tissue in the dorsal telencephalon of mice lacking functional Gli3</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>9282</fpage><lpage>9292</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2673-06.2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16957084</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frantz</surname> <given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Bohner</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Akers</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>McConnell</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Regulation of the POU domain gene SCIP during cerebral cortical development</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>472</fpage><lpage>485</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-02-00472.1994</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7905511</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Galceran</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyashita-Lin</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Devaney</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubenstein</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Grosschedl</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Hippocampus development and generation of dentate gyrus granule cells is regulated by LEF1</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>127</volume><fpage>469</fpage><lpage>482</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10631168</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garcia-Gonzalo</surname> <given-names>FR</given-names></name><name><surname>Corbit</surname> <given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Sirerol-Piquer</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramaswami</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Otto</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Noriega</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name><name><surname>Seol</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Bennett</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Josifova</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>García-Verdugo</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Katsanis</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Hildebrandt</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Reiter</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>A transition zone complex regulates mammalian ciliogenesis and ciliary membrane composition</article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>776</fpage><lpage>784</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.891</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21725307</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garcia-Gonzalo</surname> <given-names>FR</given-names></name><name><surname>Phua</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Roberson</surname> <given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Abedin</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Schurmans</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Inoue</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Reiter</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Phosphoinositides regulate ciliary protein trafficking to modulate hedgehog signaling</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>400</fpage><lpage>409</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26305592</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gerhardt</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lier</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Burmühl</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Struchtrup</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Deutschmann</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Vetter</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Leu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Reeg</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Grune</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Rüther</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>The transition zone protein Rpgrip1l regulates proteasomal activity at the primary cilium</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>210</volume><fpage>1027</fpage><lpage>1045</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201408060</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gladwyn-Ng</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Cordón-Barris</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Alfano</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Creppe</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Couderc</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Morelli</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Thelen</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>America</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Bessières</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Encha-Razavi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonnière</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>IK</given-names></name><name><surname>Flamand</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Vanderhaeghen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Thiry</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lecuit</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Stress-induced unfolded protein response contributes to zika virus-associated microcephaly</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41593-017-0038-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29230053</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Götz</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Stoykova</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gruss</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Pax6 controls radial Glia differentiation in the cerebral cortex</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>1031</fpage><lpage>1044</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80621-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9856459</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gradwohl</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Fode</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Guillemot</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996</year><article-title>Restricted expression of a novel murine atonal-related bHLH protein in undifferentiated neural precursors</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>180</volume><fpage>227</fpage><lpage>241</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/dbio.1996.0297</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8948587</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grove</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Tole</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Limon</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yip</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ragsdale</surname> <given-names>CW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>The hem of the embryonic cerebral cortex is defined by the expression of multiple wnt genes and is compromised in Gli3-deficient mice</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>125</volume><fpage>2315</fpage><lpage>2325</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9584130</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fabian</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Brill</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate regulates cilium transition zone maturation in <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic></article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>131</volume><elocation-id>jcs218297</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.218297</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30054387</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Levison</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Woods</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kellock</surname> <given-names>DB</given-names></name><name><surname>Watkins</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Barnes</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gillett</surname> <given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Camplejohn</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Dover</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1990">1990</year><article-title>Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunolocalization in paraffin sections: an index of cell proliferation with evidence of deregulated expression in some neoplasms</article-title><source>The Journal of Pathology</source><volume>162</volume><fpage>285</fpage><lpage>294</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/path.1711620403</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1981239</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hasenpusch-Theil</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>West</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelman</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kozic</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Horrocks</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>McMahon</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Gli3 controls the onset of cortical neurogenesis by regulating the radial glial cell cycle through <italic>Cdk6</italic> expression</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>145</volume><elocation-id>dev163147</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.163147</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haubensak</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Attardo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Denk</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Huttner</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Neurons arise in the basal neuroepithelium of the early mammalian telencephalon: a major site of neurogenesis</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>101</volume><fpage>3196</fpage><lpage>3201</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0308600100</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14963232</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names></name><name><surname>Rees</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Sime</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Justice</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Copeland</surname> <given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Davidson</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1989">1989</year><article-title>A new family of mouse homeo box-containing genes: molecular structure, chromosomal location, and developmental expression of Hox-7.1</article-title><source>Genes &amp; Development</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>26</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.3.1.26</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2565278</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hui</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Slusarski</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Platt</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Holmgren</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Joyner</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Expression of three mouse homologs of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> segment polarity gene cubitus interruptus, gli, Gli-2, and Gli-3, in ectoderm- and mesoderm-derived tissues suggests multiple roles during postimplantation development</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>162</volume><fpage>402</fpage><lpage>413</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/dbio.1994.1097</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8150204</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jacoby</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Gayral</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hampshire</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayub</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Blockmans</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pernot</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kisseleva</surname> <given-names>MV</given-names></name><name><surname>Compère</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Schiffmann</surname> <given-names>SN</given-names></name><name><surname>Gergely</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Riley</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Pérez-Morga</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Woods</surname> <given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Schurmans</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>INPP5E mutations cause primary cilium signaling defects, ciliary instability and ciliopathies in human and mouse</article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>1027</fpage><lpage>1031</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.427</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19668215</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1967">1967</year><article-title>Extra-toes: a new mutant gene causing multiple abnormalities in the mouse</article-title><source>Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>543</fpage><lpage>581</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6049666</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lyons</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hogan</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1991">1991</year><article-title>Involvement of bone morphogenetic Protein-4 (BMP-4) and Vgr-1 in morphogenesis and neurogenesis in the mouse</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>111</volume><fpage>531</fpage><lpage>542</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1893873</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kisseleva</surname> <given-names>MV</given-names></name><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Majerus</surname> <given-names>PW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Phosphoinositide-specific inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase IV inhibits akt/protein kinase B phosphorylation and leads to apoptotic cell death</article-title><source>Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>277</volume><fpage>6266</fpage><lpage>6272</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M105969200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11706019</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Laclef</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Anselme</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Besse</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Catala</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Palmyre</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Baas</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Paschaki</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedraza</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Métin</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Durand</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Schneider-Maunoury</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>The role of primary cilia in corpus callosum formation is mediated by production of the Gli3 repressor</article-title><source>Human Molecular Genetics</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>4997</fpage><lpage>5014</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/ddv221</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26071364</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Laguesse</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Creppe</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Nedialkova</surname> <given-names>DD</given-names></name><name><surname>Prévot</surname> <given-names>PP</given-names></name><name><surname>Borgs</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Huysseune</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Franco</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Duysens</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Krusy</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Thelen</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Thiry</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Close</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Chariot</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Malgrange</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Leidel</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Godin</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>A dynamic unfolded protein response contributes to the control of cortical neurogenesis</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>553</fpage><lpage>567</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2015.11.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26651292</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Tole</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Grove</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>McMahon</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>A local Wnt-3a signal is required for development of the mammalian Hippocampus</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>127</volume><fpage>457</fpage><lpage>467</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10631167</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liem</surname> <given-names>KF</given-names></name><name><surname>Tremml</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Jessell</surname> <given-names>TM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>A role for the roof plate and its resident TGFβ-Related proteins in neuronal patterning in the dorsal spinal cord</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>91</volume><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>138</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80015-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lustig</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Jerchow</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sachs</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiler</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pietsch</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Karsten</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>van de Wetering</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Clevers</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Schlag</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Birchmeier</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Behrens</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Negative feedback loop of wnt signaling through upregulation of conductin/axin2 in colorectal and liver tumors</article-title><source>Molecular and Cellular Biology</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>1184</fpage><lpage>1193</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MCB.22.4.1184-1193.2002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11809809</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magnani</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Hasenpusch-Theil</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Campagnoni</surname> <given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>The Gli3 hypomorphic mutation pdn causes selective impairment in the growth, patterning, and axon guidance capability of the lateral ganglionic eminence</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>13883</fpage><lpage>13894</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3650-10.2010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20943929</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magnani</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Hasenpusch-Theil</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Benadiba</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Basson</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lebrand</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Gli3 controls corpus callosum formation by positioning midline guideposts during telencephalic patterning</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>186</fpage><lpage>198</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhs303</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magnani</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Morlé</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hasenpusch-Theil</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Paschaki</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacoby</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Schurmans</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Durand</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>The ciliogenic transcription factor Rfx3 is required for the formation of the thalamocortical tract by regulating the patterning of prethalamus and ventral telencephalon</article-title><source>Human Molecular Genetics</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>2578</fpage><lpage>2593</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/ddv021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25631876</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Neddylation inhibitor MLN4924 suppresses cilia formation by modulating AKT1</article-title><source>Protein &amp; Cell</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>726</fpage><lpage>744</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13238-019-0614-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30850948</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martínez-Cerdeño</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Noctor</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kriegstein</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>The role of intermediate progenitor cells in the evolutionary expansion of the cerebral cortex</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>i152</fpage><lpage>i161</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhk017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16766701</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martynoga</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Morrison</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Foxg1 is required for specification of ventral telencephalon and region-specific regulation of dorsal telencephalic precursor proliferation and apoptosis</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>283</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.04.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15893304</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miyata</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Asymmetric production of surface-dividing and non-surface-dividing cortical progenitor cells</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>131</volume><fpage>3133</fpage><lpage>3145</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.01173</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noctor</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Martínez-Cerdeño</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Ivic</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Kriegstein</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>136</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn1172</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nowakowski</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewin</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1989">1989</year><article-title>Bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemical determination of the lengths of the cell cycle and the DNA-synthetic phase for an anatomically defined population</article-title><source>Journal of Neurocytology</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>311</fpage><lpage>318</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01190834</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliver</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sosa-Pineda</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Geisendorf</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Spana</surname> <given-names>EP</given-names></name><name><surname>Doe</surname> <given-names>CQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Gruss</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>Prox 1, a prospero-related homeobox gene expressed during mouse development</article-title><source>Mechanisms of Development</source><volume>44</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0925-4773(93)90012-M</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7908825</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parthasarathy</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Srivatsa</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nityanandam</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tarabykin</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Ntf3 acts downstream of Sip1 in cortical postmitotic neurons to control progenitor cell fate through feedback signaling</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>141</volume><fpage>3324</fpage><lpage>3330</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.114173</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25085976</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petrova</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>ADR</given-names></name><name><surname>Joyner</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Titration of GLI3 repressor activity by sonic hedgehog signaling is critical for maintaining multiple adult neural stem cell and astrocyte functions</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>17490</fpage><lpage>17505</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2042-13.2013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Plotnikova</surname> <given-names>OV</given-names></name><name><surname>Seo</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cottle</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Conduit</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hakim</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Dyson</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Smyth</surname> <given-names>IM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>INPP5E interacts with AURKA, linking phosphoinositide signaling to primary cilium stability</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>128</volume><fpage>364</fpage><lpage>372</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.161323</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poretti</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Huisman</surname> <given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Scheer</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Boltshauser</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Joubert syndrome and related disorders: spectrum of neuroimaging findings in 75 patients</article-title><source>American Journal of Neuroradiology</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>1459</fpage><lpage>1463</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3174/ajnr.A2517</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21680654</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Postel</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Karam</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Pézeron</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Schneider-Maunoury</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Clément</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>A multiscale mathematical model of cell dynamics during neurogenesis in the mouse cerebral cortex</article-title><source>BMC Bioinformatics</source><volume>20</volume><elocation-id>470</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12859-019-3018-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31521111</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Postiglione</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Jüschke</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Haas</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Charalambous</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Knoblich</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Mouse inscuteable induces apical-basal spindle orientation to facilitate intermediate progenitor generation in the developing neocortex</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>269</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22017987</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Putoux</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Baas</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Paschaki</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Morlé</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Maire</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Attié-Bitach</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Durand</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Altered GLI3 and FGF8 signaling underlies acrocallosal syndrome phenotypes in <italic>Kif7</italic> depleted mice</article-title><source>Human Molecular Genetics</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>877</fpage><lpage>887</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/ddy392</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rallu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Machold</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaiano</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Corbin</surname> <given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>McMahon</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Fishell</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Dorsoventral patterning is established in the telencephalon of mutants lacking both Gli3 and hedgehog signaling</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>129</volume><fpage>4963</fpage><lpage>4974</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12397105</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rash</surname> <given-names>BG</given-names></name><name><surname>Grove</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Patterning the dorsal telencephalon: a role for sonic hedgehog?</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>11595</fpage><lpage>11603</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3204-07.2007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17959802</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reiter</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Skarnes</surname> <given-names>WC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Tectonic, a novel regulator of the hedgehog pathway required for both activation and inhibition</article-title><source>Genes &amp; Development</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.1363606</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16357211</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Corbit</surname> <given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Giles</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Brauer</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Otto</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Baye</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Scales</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwong</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Huntzicker</surname> <given-names>EG</given-names></name><name><surname>Sfakianos</surname> <given-names>MK</given-names></name><name><surname>Sandoval</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Bazan</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Kulkarni</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia-Gonzalo</surname> <given-names>FR</given-names></name><name><surname>Seol</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>O'Toole</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Held</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Reutter</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lane</surname> <given-names>WS</given-names></name><name><surname>Rafiq</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Noor</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ansar</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Devi</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Sheffield</surname> <given-names>VC</given-names></name><name><surname>Slusarski</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Vincent</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Doherty</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hildebrandt</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Reiter</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>PK</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Mapping the NPHP-JBTS-MKS protein network reveals ciliopathy disease genes and pathways</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>145</volume><fpage>513</fpage><lpage>528</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21565611</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seuntjens</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Nityanandam</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Miquelajauregui</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Debruyn</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Stryjewska</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Goebbels</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nave</surname> <given-names>K-A</given-names></name><name><surname>Huylebroeck</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Tarabykin</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Sip1 regulates sequential fate decisions by feedback signaling from postmitotic neurons to progenitors</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>1373</fpage><lpage>1380</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.2409</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Van De Weghe</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>McGorty</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Pazour</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Doherty</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Reiter</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Super-resolution microscopy reveals that disruption of ciliary transition-zone architecture causes Joubert syndrome</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>1178</fpage><lpage>1188</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb3599</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28846093</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Peyre</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Cell migration promotes dynamic cellular interactions to control cerebral cortex morphogenesis</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>318</fpage><lpage>329</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41583-019-0148-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30874623</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simeone</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gulisano</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Acampora</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Stornaiuolo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rambaldi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Boncinelli</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1992">1992</year><article-title>Two vertebrate homeobox genes related to the <italic>Drosophila</italic> empty spiracles gene are expressed in the embryonic cerebral cortex</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>2541</fpage><lpage>2550</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05319.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1352754</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Alvarez-Bolado</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Walter</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rüther</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Gli3 is required for emx gene expression during dorsal telencephalon development</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>126</volume><fpage>3561</fpage><lpage>3571</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10409502</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Gli3 is required for the specification and differentiation of preplate neurons</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>286</volume><fpage>559</fpage><lpage>571</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.033</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16168404</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Legendre</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Saunier</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bessières</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Alby</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonnière</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Toutain</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Loeuillet</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Szymanska</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Jossic</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaillard</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Yacoubi</surname> <given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Mougou-Zerelli</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>David</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Barthez</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ville</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Bole-Feysot</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Nitschke</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lyonnet</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Munnich</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Encha-Razavi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Cormier-Daire</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Thauvin-Robinet</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Vekemans</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Attié-Bitach</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>TCTN3 mutations cause Mohr-Majewski syndrome</article-title><source>The American Journal of Human Genetics</source><volume>91</volume><fpage>372</fpage><lpage>378</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22883145</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uzquiano</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Cifuentes-Diaz</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jabali</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Romero</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Houllier</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dingli</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Maillard</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Boland</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Deleuze</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Loew</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Mancini</surname> <given-names>GMS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bahi-Buisson</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Ladewig</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Francis</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Mutations in the heterotopia gene Eml1/EML1 severely disrupt the formation of primary cilia</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>1596</fpage><lpage>1611</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.096</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31390572</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Valente</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosti</surname> <given-names>RO</given-names></name><name><surname>Gibbs</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Gleeson</surname> <given-names>JG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Primary cilia in neurodevelopmental disorders</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neurology</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrneurol.2013.247</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24296655</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vasistha</surname> <given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>García-Moreno</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Arora</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheung</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Arnold</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Molnár</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Cortical and clonal contribution of Tbr2 expressing progenitors in the developing mouse brain</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>3290</fpage><lpage>3302</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhu125</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24927931</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walther</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Gruss</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1991">1991</year><article-title>Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>113</volume><fpage>1435</fpage><lpage>1449</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1687460</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Uchida</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Luu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahn</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Gli3 is required for maintenance and fate specification of cortical progenitors</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>6440</fpage><lpage>6448</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4892-10.2011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21525285</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kane</surname> <given-names>AW</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahn</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Gli3 repressor controls cell fates and cell adhesion for proper establishment of neurogenic niche</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1093</fpage><lpage>1104</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25127137</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Jossin</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Lien</surname> <given-names>WH</given-names></name><name><surname>Tissir</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Goffinet</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Feedback regulation of apical progenitor fate by immature neurons through Wnt7-Celsr3-Fzd3 signalling</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>10936</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms10936</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26939553</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Three tctn proteins are functionally conserved in the regulation of neural tube patterning and Gli3 processing but not ciliogenesis and hedgehog signaling in the mouse</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>430</volume><fpage>156</fpage><lpage>165</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28800946</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib79"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Warren</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Caric</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Pratt</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Clausen</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Asavaritikrai</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name><name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>The transcription factor, Pax6, is required for cell proliferation and differentiation in the developing cerebral cortex</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>627</fpage><lpage>635</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/9.6.627</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10498281</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib80"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wiegering</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Petzsch</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Köhrer</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Rüther</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerhardt</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>GLI3 repressor but not GLI3 activator is essential for mouse eye patterning and morphogenesis</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>450</volume><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>154</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.02.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30953627</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib81"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Willaredt</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hasenpusch-Theil</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gardner</surname> <given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitanovic</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirschfeld-Warneken</surname> <given-names>VC</given-names></name><name><surname>Gojak</surname> <given-names>CP</given-names></name><name><surname>Gorgas</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Spatz</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wölfl</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Theil</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tucker</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>A crucial role for primary cilia in cortical morphogenesis</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>12887</fpage><lpage>12900</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2084-08.2008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19036983</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib82"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>McConnell</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Primary cilia and Gli3 activity regulate cerebral cortical size</article-title><source>Developmental Neurobiology</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>1196</fpage><lpage>1212</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/dneu.20985</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21976438</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib83"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yee</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia-Gonzalo</surname> <given-names>FR</given-names></name><name><surname>Bowie</surname> <given-names>RV</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Ashrafi</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Blacque</surname> <given-names>OE</given-names></name><name><surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Reiter</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Conserved genetic interactions between ciliopathy complexes cooperatively support ciliogenesis and ciliary signaling</article-title><source>PLOS Genetics</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e1005627</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1005627</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26540106</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib84"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Proliferation, survival and metabolism: the role of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling in pluripotency and cell fate determination</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>143</volume><fpage>3050</fpage><lpage>3060</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.137075</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27578176</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib85"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yun</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Potter</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubenstein</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Gsh2 and Pax6 play complementary roles in dorsoventral patterning of the mammalian telencephalon</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>128</volume><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>205</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11124115</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib86"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>XG</given-names></name><name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhaduri</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsyporin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kriegstein</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubenstein</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Cortical neural stem cell lineage progression is regulated by extrinsic signaling molecule sonic hedgehog</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>4490</fpage><lpage>4504</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32234482</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.58162.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Tissir</surname><given-names>Fadel</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Universite' Catholique de Louvain</institution><country>Belgium</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name><surname>Tissir</surname><given-names>Fadel</given-names> </name><role>Reviewer</role><aff><institution>Universite' Catholique de Louvain</institution><country>Belgium</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text><p>In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.</p></boxed-text><p><bold>Acceptance summary:</bold></p><p>This study focuses on the role of Inpp5e, a protein essential for the integrity of primary cilia, in the development of the cerebral cortex. The authors find that mice mutant for Inpp5e have severe morphological defects in the primary cilium of cortical apical Radial Glia Cells, and this is linked to changes in the mode of neurogenesis, favoring direct neurogenesis against indirect neurogenesis via Intermediate Progenitor Cells (IPCs). This effect is nicely shown by studying the abundance of cells positive for marker proteins of IPCs and newborn neurons, as well as cell cycle exit. Intriguingly, this defect is transient during early stages of neurogenesis (circa E12.5), not observable at later stages, but has lasting effects on the abundance of neurons in deep cortical layers. Part of the same defects are found in mouse embryos mutant for Tctn2, another ciliary protein. Then the authors go on to investigate the signaling cascades affected in this mutant and leading to the changes in mode of neurogenesis, and find no changes in Erk but a significant increase in mTOR signaling. Finally, the authors focus on Shh signaling, a well known pathway tightly linked to the primary cilium. They find that the neurogenesis phenotype relates to impaired Gli3 processing and a loss of its repressive form Gli3R. Finally, the authors analyze Gli3D699 mutant mice, where Gli3R is produced independently from the primary cilium, in an Inpp5e mutant background, to show a dose-dependent rescue of the cortical phenotypes, and thus demonstrating that Inpp5e regulates the modes of cortical neurogenesis by regulating Gli3R levels.</p><p><bold>Decision letter after peer review:</bold></p><p>Thank you for sending your article entitled &quot;A transient role of primary cilia in controlling direct versus indirect neurogenesis in the developing cerebral cortex&quot; for peer review at <italic>eLife</italic>. Your article is being evaluated by three peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation is being overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Marianne Bronner as the Senior Editor.</p><p>Given the list of essential revisions, including new experiments, the editors and reviewers invite you to respond as soon as you can with an action plan for the completion of the additional work. We expect a revision plan that under normal circumstances can be accomplished within two months, although we understand that in reality revisions will take longer at the moment. We plan to share your responses with the reviewers and then advise further with a formal decision.</p><p>Summary:</p><p>This study focuses on the role of Inpp5e, a protein essential for the integrity of primary cilia, in the development of the cerebral cortex. The authors find that mice mutant for Inpp5e have severe morphological defects in the primary cilium of cortical apical Radial Glia Cells, and this is linked to changes in the mode of neurogenesis, favoring direct neurogenesis against indirect neurogenesis via Intermediate Progenitor Cells (IPCs). This effect is nicely shown by studying the abundance of cells positive for marker proteins of IPCs and newborn neurons, as well as cell cycle exit. Intriguingly, this defect is transient during early stages of neurogenesis (circa E12.5), not observable at later stages, but has lasting effects on the abundance of neurons in deep cortical layers. Part of the same defects are found in mouse embryos mutant for Tctn2, another ciliary protein. Then the authors go on to investigate the signaling cascades affected in this mutant and leading to the changes in mode of neurogenesis, and find no changes in Erk but a significant increase in mTOR signaling. Finally, the authors focus on Shh signaling, a well known pathway tightly linked to the primary cilium. They find that the neurogenesis phenotype relates to impaired Gli3 processing and a loss of its repressive form Gli3R. Finally, the authors analyze Gli3D699 mutant mice, where Gli3R is produced independently from the primary cilium, in an Inpp5e mutant background, to show a dose-dependent rescue of the cortical phenotypes, and thus demonstrating that Inpp5e regulates the modes of cortical neurogenesis by regulating Gli3R levels.</p><p>The study is nicely planned and performed. However, there are points that must be addressed before the manuscript is ready for publication. In particular:</p><p>1) Important clarifications need to be made with regards to the neurogenesis data. Images and illustrations should be reflective of the phenotypes described in the text, and a better discussion is required to reconcile conflicting data.</p><p>2) The mTOR/ERK part lacks key controls and is not central to the message of the paper. The section should be removed.</p><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>1) Signs of cortical distortions, suggestive of patterning defects are seen at the rostral part of the cortex (Figure 1B, F, G). Pax6 expression pattern (gradient) seems also affected in the mutant (decreased Pax6 medially). Please show a more representative image or explain/comment in the legend.</p><p>2) Subsection “<italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls direct vs indirect neurogenesis in the lateral neocortex”: The authors state: &quot;these findings show that initially Tbr1+ and later Ctip2+Tbr1- neurons were increasingly formed in the lateral neocortex of Inpp5e embryos&quot;. Is that specific to the mutant? It is also the case for control embryos but maybe at a different time point. Please rephrase the sentence.</p><p>3) The authors claim that there is an increased neuron production. This does not seem to be the case from Figure 2I, J.</p><p>4) Difficult to reconcile results of Figure 2I, J and Figure 3. Please comment and discuss.</p><p>5) How can authors conclude that there is no change in the size of the primary cilium from IHC Figure 6 A, B and subsection “Ciliary defects in the forebrain of E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos”? This is contradictory to SEM results Figure 6 C-E. Is IHC the best way to assess the size of cilia?</p><p>6) The patterning defect (see Supplementary Figure 10 C, D, G H) is such that it makes the results of neurogenesis difficult to interpret.</p><p>7) The abundance of IPCs is analyzed by stains against Tbr2/PCNA, and PH3 mitoses at basal position. A decrease in both is interpreted as a loss of IPCs, but in fact the authors find conflicting results in their mutant: loss of Tbr2+PCNA+ cells in the lateral cortex but not medial (Figure 1), and then loss of basal PH3 in medial cortex but not lateral (Figure 3—figure supplement 2).</p><p>8) Quantification of PCNA+ cells shows changes in the proportion that are Tbr2+. Importantly, 80% of PCNA+ were Pax6+, and 40% were Tbr2+, so a minimum of 20% of PCNA+ cells are co-expressing Pax6 and Tbr2. Contrary to these results, existing evidence in the field shows that the overlap in Pax6 and Tbr2 expression is really residual in mouse. Please comment on that.</p><p>9) Which neuron subpopulations are identified as Ctip2+/Tbr1+ and Ctip2+/Tbr1-?</p><p>10) Why increased direct neurogenesis diminishes the overall production of Tbr1 neurons (though higher at E12.5), but with no changes in intermediate and upper layer neurons? This is opposite from what was shown by Cardenas and colleagues in 2018, where forced direct neurogenesis in the early NCx increases deep layer neurons and diminishes upper layer neurons.</p><p>11) Subsection “Cortical malformations in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos” – &quot;This analysis showed that the mutant cortex was thinner laterally but not medially with a more pronounced reduction of the thickness at caudal levels (Figure 4—figure supplement 2).&quot; The data shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 2 contradict this description. In addition, DAPI images are very dark with any detail very difficult to see. These must be better visible, for example by showing in black and white.</p><p>12) For the entire Figure 7, pictures and quantification of all variables must include the results from simple lnpp5e mutants. Although these results are shown in earlier figures, they are key to assess the rescue effects of Gli3D699 in hetero and homozygosity, and so they must be presented again in this figure. One clear example of the importance of showing these results here is the phenotype shown (but not mentioned) in Figure 7I, where the dorsal cortex seems to be much shorter than in the control embryo (see the lateral end of the Tbr2+ region, inset box), plus there seem to be three basal ganglia. This is not mentioned as part of the phenotype in lnpp5e mutants. It this caused by this compound genotype?</p><p>13) Similar to the previous point, the analysis of Gli3 rescue must include littermates mutant only for, to show if the heterozygous expression of Gli3D699 rescues (or worsens) the deficit in Tbr1+Ctip2+, Tbr1-Ctip2+ and Tbr2+ cells in lnpp5e mutants.</p><p>14) Figure 7, panels Q and Q' are at different magnification than the rest of the figure. Pictures of Tbr1 and Ctip2 stains are at insufficient magnification to illustrate the dramatic differences described in the manuscript and quantified in panels P and S.</p><p>15) There is a part of the study focused on potential effects in Erk and mTOR signaling. While potentially interesting, this part is completely disconnected from the rest of the study (in fact all the data is in Supplementary Figures), and the authors decide to ignore in the rest of the manuscript, instead focus on Shh signaling. Thus, Erk and mTOR signaling analyses should be removed.</p><p>16) Given that other primary cilia mutants do not exhibit deficits in direct versus indirect neurogenesis, as discussed by the authors, they must change the title of their manuscript to indicate that it is Inpp5e that controls this process. Indeed, as also discussed by the authors, this protein plays multiple other roles in brain development (eye, hippocampus, corpus callosum), and thus it is likely to play other roles in cortical development that may contribute to regulate the mode and rate of neurogenesis, independent from the primary cilium.</p><p>17) Figure 1—figure supplement 1B,E – PSPB is not visible in KOs, and impossible to assess the existence of a phenotype in this area. These images must be re-framed to make this visible.</p><p>18) In Figure 1—figure supplement 3, the authors show some folds in VZ of NCx and hippocampal anlage. Whereas this is not the core of the main findings, the authors must disclose the penetrance and severity of this phenotype.</p><p>19) Throughout the manuscript, the authors need to provide the actual numbers for the means in each of their graphs. This could be in the text or figure legend, but in the current version, this data is not present.</p><p>20) Could the authors please provide higher magnification images for Figure 1A-J, Figure 2A-F?</p><p>21) Figure 3: could the authors indicate that this data is from lateral cortex in the actual figure?</p><p>22) In several figures, the cortex is clearly thinner (as the authors indicate in Figure 4—figure supplement 2). However, this seems to be much thinner than would be accounted for by a relatively small decrease in basal progenitor production. Apical progenitor production (S4) and progenitor cell cycle (S5) appears unaffected. Did the authors examine whether there was increased cell death or either progenitors or postmitotic neurons in the mutants?</p><p>23) In Figure 4P-U, the cortical layers from the controls and mutants are not aligned. Is this because the overall cortex is thinner and the images are aligned from the basal surface? Including DAPI for these sections would help here.</p><p>24) Is the data in Figure 5 from medial or lateral cortex?</p><p>25) Why did the authors switch to a parametric t-test for the western blots in Figure 7, S10, S11? Shouldn't a paired non-parametric test (ie: paired samples Wilcoxon) be used here? Also, the data should not be displayed as paired with the lines joining the control and KO samples.</p><p>26) For the experiments in S11, the authors show that pAkt/pS6 are elevated Inpp5e-/- mutants, consistent with increased mTOR activity. They attempt to rule this pathway out by showing that treatment with rapamycin for 24hours at E11.5 does not affect the basal progenitor phenotype in Inpp5e-/- mutants. However, the authors do not provide any data showing the effectiveness of their rapamycin treatment (ie, normalization of pAkt/pS6 to wildtype levels). I think they need to be very careful about their interpretation of these results without additional controls.</p><p>27) Do the authors have an explanation as to why the phenotypes are predominantly in lateral cortex at E12.5 and medial cortex at E14.5? This seems like something that should be mentioned in the discussion.</p><p>28) A model figure at the end would be very useful for explaining how loss of Inppe5 leads to reduced Gli3R levels and alterations in basal progenitor production.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.58162.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>1) Signs of cortical distortions, suggestive of patterning defects are seen at the rostral part of the cortex (Figure 1B, F, G). Pax6 expression pattern (gradient) seems also affected in the mutant (decreased Pax6 medially). Please show a more representative image or explain/comment in the legend.</p></disp-quote><p>In the original manuscript, we very carefully described patterning defects before we start analysing cortical stem cell development. In brief, the hippocampal anlage is the most affected structure, probably due to reduced Wnt gene expression in the cortical hem, but this structure is not the focus of this study. The neocortex itself is undulated at E12.5 but has a smooth surface by E14.5 and shows a mild patterning defect at the pallial/subpallial boundary. It expresses the progenitor markers Emx1, Lhx2, Pax6 and Ngn2 with reduced Pax6 expression levels in the medial neocortex. We think that these mild patterning defects do not invalidate our analysis and that Figure 1B, F and J are representative of the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant telencephalon.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>2) Subsection “Inpp5e controls direct vs indirect neurogenesis in the lateral neocortex”: The authors state: &quot;these findings show that initially Tbr1+ and later Ctip2+Tbr1- neurons were increasingly formed in the lateral neocortex of Inpp5e embryos&quot;. Is that specific to the mutant? It is also the case for control embryos but maybe at a different time point. Please rephrase the sentence.</p></disp-quote><p>We rephrased the sentence making it clearer that in the lateral neocortex of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos we observed an increase in the formation of Tbr1+ neurons at E12.5 followed by an augmented generation of Ctip2+Tbr1- neurons at E14.5 (subsection “<italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls direct vs indirect neurogenesis in the lateral neocortex”).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>3) The authors claim that there is an increased neuron production. This does not seem to be the case from Figure 2I, J.</p></disp-quote><p>In our analysis of neuron formation at E14.5 (Figure 2I-N) we distinguish between two neuronal subpopulations, a Tbr1+/Ctip2+ and a Tbr1-/Ctip2+ population. We show that there is only an increase in the proportion of Tbr1-/ Ctip2+ population in the lateral neocortex which can be clearly seen in the high magnification insets (Figure 2I’, I’’, J’ and J’’). This might not be so obvious from the overview picture (Figure 2I and J) but one needs to consider that the mutant cortex is thinner and we counted cell proportions rather than absolute neuron numbers. To make our point clearer, we used arrows and arrowheads to indicate the different neuron populations in Figure 2I’, I’’, J’ and J’’. We also re-worded the sentence to make it clearer that proportions of neurons are affected (subsection “<italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls direct vs indirect neurogenesis in the lateral neocortex”).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>4) Difficult to reconcile results of Figure 2I, J and Figure 3. Please comment and discuss.</p></disp-quote><p>We think there is a misunderstanding. Figure 2I, J show the proportion of Tbr1+ and Ctip2+ neurons in E14.5 embryos while Figure 3 shows a cell cycle exit experiment in E12.5 embryos. Due to the different ages and types of experiments, these two figures are not directly comparable.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>5) How can authors conclude that there is no change in the size of the primary cilium from IHC Figure 6 A, B and subsection “Ciliary defects in the forebrain of E12.5 Inpp5e<sup>Δ/Δ</sup> embryos”? This is contradictory to SEM results Figure 6 C-E. Is IHC the best way to assess the size of cilia?</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with the reviewer that immunofluorescence does not allow us to measure the size of cilia and we have removed this formulation from the revised manuscript (subsection “Ciliary defects in the forebrain of E12.5 <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos”).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>6) The patterning defect (see Supplementary Figure 10 C, D, G H) is such that it makes the results of neurogenesis difficult to interpret.</p></disp-quote><p>This comment is very similar to point #1. As outlined above, we have carefully analysed patterning in the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant and think that the mild patterning defects do not interfere with our conclusion on neurogenesis defects in the neocortex. To this specific figure: in the dorsal telencephalon, the most obvious morphological difference in Figure 10 C, D, G, H is a malformation of the hippocampus which is not the focus of this paper. At the rostrocaudal levels we have been investigating the mutant, the neocortex is undulated at E12.5 but smoothens at E14.5 and is otherwise not severely affected. We think that this undulation does not prevent us from investigating the process of direct neurogenesis and the underlying mechanisms. Finally, this figure represents our analysis of Erk signalling but we have removed this analysis from the manuscript as suggested by other reviewers (see point 15).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>7) The abundance of IPCs is analyzed by stains against Tbr2/PCNA, and PH3 mitoses at basal position. A decrease in both is interpreted as a loss of IPCs, but in fact the authors find conflicting results in their mutant: loss of Tbr2+PCNA+ cells in the lateral cortex but not medial (Figure 1), and then loss of basal PH3 in medial cortex but not lateral (Figure 4—figure supplement 2).</p></disp-quote><p>Tbr2 and pHH3 antibodies label different groups of cells. Tbr2 labels all basal progenitors whereas pHH3 staining identifies mitotic basal progenitors. This different specificity makes it difficult to directly compare the two results but we interpret this finding that the E12.5 basal progenitors in the medial neocortex may have reduced proliferation rates. Indeed, the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutants show a reduction in the proportion of basal progenitors in the E14.5 medial neocortex and this reduction may at least partially be explained by the earlier lower proliferation rate. We included this consideration in subsection “<italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls direct vs indirect neurogenesis in the lateral neocortex” of the revised manuscript.</p><p>Finally, the reviewer alludes to different effects of the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutation on medial and lateral neocortex. We think there are several possible explanations. The phenotypes may follow the neurogenesis gradient with lateral parts of the neocortex being more advanced in basal progenitor and neuron formation. There is also a reduced Pax6 expression in the medial neocortex that is likely to affect neurogenesis. We have included this consideration in the Discussion section.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>8) Quantification of PCNA+ cells shows changes in the proportion that are Tbr2+. Importantly, 80% of PCNA+ were Pax6+, and 40% were Tbr2+, so a minimum of 20% of PCNA+ cells are co-expressing Pax6 and Tbr2. Contrary to these results, existing evidence in the field shows that the overlap in Pax6 and Tbr2 expression is really residual in mouse. Please comment on that.</p></disp-quote><p>Englund et al., reported that 11.5 +/- 1% of cells co-express Pax6 and Tbr2 in the E14.5 neocortex (Englund et al., 2005), i.e. not too far off the number the reviewer estimated from our Pax6/PCNA and Tbr2/PCNA staining. However, this estimate is derived indirectly from two separate stains and hence might not easily be comparable to a Pax6/Tbr2 double stain.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>9) Which neuron subpopulations are identified as Ctip2+/Tbr1+ and Ctip2+/Tbr1-?</p></disp-quote><p>We observed that in the E12.5 cortical plate almost all neurons co-express Ctip2 and Tbr1. This population is still present at E14.5 but there is an additional group of neurons which express Ctip2 only, i.e. are Tbr1-/ Ctip2+. Based on the time of their appearance the Tbr1+/Ctip2+ and Tbr1-/Ctip2+ neurons are likely to correspond to layer VI and layer V neurons, respectively, but we do not have definite proof for this. As identifying the fate of these neurons is not the main purpose of this manuscript, we prefer not to go deeper into this issue.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>10) Why increased direct neurogenesis diminishes the overall production of Tbr1 neurons (though higher at E12.5), but with no changes in intermediate and upper layer neurons? This is opposite from what was shown by Cardenas and colleagues in 2018, where forced direct neurogenesis in the early NCx increases deep layer neurons and diminishes upper layer neurons.</p></disp-quote><p>The reviewer is correct that there is no change in upper layer neuron formation despite the early increase in direct neurogenesis. In the original manuscript, we have already provided a couple of possible explanations. First, the number of basal progenitors has normalized by E14.5 when the majority of upper layer neurons are born. Secondly, there are feedback signals from newly born neurons to radial glial cells to control the sequential production of deep and upper layer neurons. In addition to Notch signalling as described in Cardenas, these signals include <italic>Fgf9</italic> and Neurotrophin 3. Inpp5e could influence this signalling by controlling cilia stability and/or levels of PIP3 which acts as a second messenger in receptor tyrosine kinase signalling. We think these considerations address the reviewer’s concern.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>11) Subsection “Cortical malformations in Inpp5e<sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos” – &quot;This analysis showed that the mutant cortex was thinner laterally but not medially with a more pronounced reduction of the thickness at caudal levels (Figure 4—figure supplement 2).&quot; The data shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 2 contradict this description. In addition, DAPI images are very dark with any detail very difficult to see. These must be better visible, for example by showing in black and white.</p></disp-quote><p>We are grateful for the reviewer to raise this point. We have amended the text to say that “most of the mutant cortex was thinner except for the rostrolateral level” (subsection “Cortical malformations in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos”). We have changed the colour of the DAPI staining to black and white (Figure 4—figure supplement 2).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>12) For the entire Figure 7, pictures and quantification of all variables must include the results from simple lnpp5e mutants. Although these results are shown in earlier figures, they are key to assess the rescue effects of Gli3D699 in hetero and homozygosity, and so they must be presented again in this figure. One clear example of the importance of showing these results here is the phenotype shown (but not mentioned) in Figure 7I, where the dorsal cortex seems to be much shorter than in the control embryo (see the lateral end of the Tbr2+ region, inset box), plus there seem to be three basal ganglia. This is not mentioned as part of the phenotype in lnpp5e mutants. It this caused by this compound genotype?</p></disp-quote><p>In the revised manuscript, we included the analysis of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>+/+</sup> littermates which we obtained from the Gli3 rescue crosses (Figure 7 and Figure 8). In these embryos, we observed a reduced proportion of basal progenitors and an increased fraction of cortical neurons as in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos derived from the mating of <italic>Inpp5e</italic> heterozygous animals. Moreover, our analysis revealed that the addition of a single Gli3<sup>Δ699</sup> allele slightly improved the formation of basal progenitors in the E14.5 medial neocortex compared to <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>∆/∆</sup> embryos but the proportion of basal progenitors was still significantly smaller than in control embryos. These findings support our conclusion that restoring the Gli3 repressor ratio rescues cortical malformations in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos.</p><p>Although the neocortex of <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> ; Gli3 <sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos appears shorter, we can clearly identify the neocortex based on the Tbr1 and Tbr2 staining. At this stage, the three bulges in the ventral telencephalon are specific to and appeared in all E12.5 Inpp5e <sup>Δ/Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>Δ699/+</sup> embryos we analysed; we did not note those in <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos. We will added this information to the legend for Figure 7.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>13) Similar to the previous point, the analysis of Gli3 rescue must include littermates mutant only for, to show if the heterozygous expression of Gli3D699 rescues (or worsens) the deficit in Tbr1+Ctip2+, Tbr1-Ctip2+ and Tbr2+ cells in lnpp5e mutants.</p></disp-quote><p>As outlined for the previous point, we analysed <italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup>;<italic>Gli3</italic><sup>+/+</sup> littermate embryos. The addition of a single Gli3<sup>Δ699</sup> allele rescued the formation of basal progenitors and Tbr1+ neurons in the lateral neocortex at E12.5 (Figure 7) and led to a slight improvement in the proportions basal progenitors in the E14.5 medial neocortex (Figure 8). The full restoration of basal progenitors and of Tbr1-Ctip2+ neurons in the E14.5 medial neocortex required two copies of the Gli3<sup>Δ699</sup> allele (Figure 8).</p><p>We will perform all analyses and quantifications (Tbr1/Ctip2 and Tbr2/PCNA) on E12.5 and E14.5 Inpp5e<sup>Δ / Δ</sup>;Gli3<sup>+/+</sup> littermates from the Gli3 rescue experiment as in Figure 7 of the original manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>14) Figure 7, panels Q and Q' are at different magnification than the rest of the figure. Pictures of Tbr1 and Ctip2 stains are at insufficient magnification to illustrate the dramatic differences described in the manuscript and quantified in panels P and S.</p></disp-quote><p>We have increased the magnifications of the insets of what is Figure 8 A’, C’, E’ and G’ in the revised manuscript. This and addition of arrows pointing at Ctip2+/Tbr1- neurons should better illustrate the differences in this population. We also ensured that the panels from the different genotypes have the same magnification.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>15) There is a part of the study focused on potential effects in Erk and mTOR signaling. While potentially interesting, this part is completely disconnected from the rest of the study (in fact all the data is in Supplementary Figures), and the authors decide to ignore in the rest of the manuscript, instead focus on Shh signaling. Thus, Erk and mTOR signaling analyses should be removed.</p></disp-quote><p>We have removed the Erk and mTOR analyses from the manuscript. We agree with the reviewers that the major focus of the manuscript is on Gli3 signalling and the manuscript makes better reading without the Erk and mTOR analyses which appear disconnected.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>16) Given that other primary cilia mutants do not exhibit deficits in direct versus indirect neurogenesis, as discussed by the authors, they must change the title of their manuscript to indicate that it is Inpp5e that controls this process. Indeed, as also discussed by the authors, this protein plays multiple other roles in brain development (eye, hippocampus, corpus callosum), and thus it is likely to play other roles in cortical development that may contribute to regulate the mode and rate of neurogenesis, independent from the primary cilium.</p></disp-quote><p>We have changed the title and made a corresponding change at the end of the Introduction. Mutations in ciliary genes can have a variety of effects on cortical development (see Discussion section), however, we not only found an increase in direct neurogenesis in the <italic>Inpp5e</italic> mutant but also in the <italic>Tctn2</italic> mutant. This suggests that <italic>Inpp5e</italic>‘s effect on direct neurogenesis is more general and might for example be obscured by more severe patterning defects in other ciliary mutants. Moreover, the other phenotypes mentioned by the reviewer (eye, hippocampus, corpus callosum) are also rescued by re-introducing Gli3R strongly suggesting that these phenotypes are also cilia dependent.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>17) Figure 1—figure supplement 1B,E – PSPB is not visible in KOs, and impossible to assess the existence of a phenotype in this area. These images must be re-framed to make this visible.</p></disp-quote><p>We think there must be a misunderstanding. Figure 1—figure supplement 1B, E focusses on the formation of the corticoseptal boundary not the PSPB as indicated in the figure legend. PSPB formation is analysed in Figure 1—figure supplement 1G-L with higher magnification insets clearly showing scattered Pax6+ and <italic>Dlx2</italic> expressing cells.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>18) In Figure 1—figure supplement 3, the authors show some folds in VZ of NCx and hippocampal anlage. Whereas this is not the core of the main findings, the authors must disclose the penetrance and severity of this phenotype.</p></disp-quote><p>We observed these folds which occur with 100% penetrance only at caudal positions, i.e. at the rostral/caudal level of the thalamus. Moreover, they become more prominent at more caudal levels. We have added this information in the revised manuscript (subsection “<italic>Inpp5e</italic><sup>Δ / Δ</sup> embryos show mild telencephalic patterning defects”) but we would like to emphasize that this interesting observation is not the main focus of the manuscript. Indeed, these folds complicate the analysis of neurogenesis defects in the caudal neocortex. For this reason, we have not included this region in our analysis.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>19) Throughout the manuscript, the authors need to provide the actual numbers for the means in each of their graphs. This could be in the text or figure legend, but in the current version, this data is not present.</p></disp-quote><p>In the originally submitted manuscript, we included an Excel file (Supplementary file 1) providing a summary of descriptive statistics of all tests used in this manuscript. We prefer this approach as it increases the readability of the main text but also provides the interested reader with much more information on statistical test results than we could include in the main text. We should have referred to this table in the original manuscript but have done this in the revised version at the end of the statistics paragraph (Materials and methods section). We will, however, follow the reviewer’s advice to include mean numbers in the main text if they prefer us to do so.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>20) Could the authors please provide higher magnification images for Figure 1A-J, Figure 2A-F?</p></disp-quote><p>In the revised manuscript we included representative higher magnification images for Figure 1 and Figure 2.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>21) Figure 3: could the authors indicate that this data is from lateral cortex in the actual figure?</p></disp-quote><p>We can confirm that this data is from lateral cortex and we have amended the figure legend correspondingly.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>22) In several figures, the cortex is clearly thinner (as the authors indicate in Figure 4—figure supplement 2). However, this seems to be much thinner than would be accounted for by a relatively small decrease in basal progenitor production. Apical progenitor production (S4) and progenitor cell cycle (S5) appears unaffected. Did the authors examine whether there was increased cell death or either progenitors or postmitotic neurons in the mutants?</p></disp-quote><p>We have examined cell death but found very few apoptotic cells in the cortex of both, control and mutant embryos. This new data is included in Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>23) In Figure 4P-U, the cortical layers from the controls and mutants are not aligned. Is this because the overall cortex is thinner and the images are aligned from the basal surface? Including DAPI for these sections would help here.</p></disp-quote><p>The reviewer is correct, the overall cortex is thinner at caudal levels (for quantification see Figure 4—figure supplement 2) and images in Figure 4P-U are aligned from the basal surface. We included this information already in the figure legend of the original manuscript. Unfortunately, the high power pictures were taken without the DAPI channel.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>24) Is the data in Figure 5 from medial or lateral cortex?</p></disp-quote><p>We can confirm that this data is from the lateral cortex, this information was added to the figure legend.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>25) Why did the authors switch to a parametric t-test for the western blots in Figure 7, S10, S11? Shouldn't a paired non-parametric test (ie: paired samples Wilcoxon) be used here? Also, the data should not be displayed as paired with the lines joining the control and KO samples.</p></disp-quote><p>We realized that the background normalisation of the Western blot using an automatic function of the LI-COR software was not adequate. The protein lysates are derived from single dorsal telencephali and therefore have a low protein concentration. As a consequence, we needed to load large volumes of the lysates which might have caused some smiling, especially for the Gli3R bands. To take this effect into account, we repeated the background normalisation by placing a user defined box into each lane. The original blot and how we evaluated the blot is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="respfig1">Author response image 1</xref>:</p><fig id="respfig1"><label>Author response image 1.</label><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-58162-resp-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><p>Testing the new data set for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) and for equal variance revealed that the data is normally distributed and that there is no significant difference in variance between the control and mutant data sets. For this reason, we used an unpaired t-test to statistically evaluate this analysis.To use the above approach consistently throughout the paper, we tested all our data sets for normal distribution and equal variance. To evaluate statistical significance, we used unpaired t-tests for normally distributed data showing equal variance and non-parametric tests otherwise. In this way, we employed statistical tests consistently throughout the paper. This procedure is added to the Material and methods section. We would like to emphasize that this did not change the outcomes except for a significantly reduced proportion of mitotic RGCs in the E12.5 medial neocortex (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A, C). which does not, however, affect our conclusions. Moreover, we have summarized all details of the statistical tests in Supplementary file 1.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>26) For the experiments in S11, the authors show that pAkt/pS6 are elevated Inpp5e-/- mutants, consistent with increased mTOR activity. They attempt to rule this pathway out by showing that treatment with rapamycin for 24 hours at E11.5 does not affect the basal progenitor phenotype in Inpp5e-/- mutants. However, the authors do not provide any data showing the effectiveness of their rapamycin treatment (ie, normalization of pAkt/pS6 to wildtype levels). I think they need to be very careful about their interpretation of these results without additional controls.</p></disp-quote><p>As suggested in the editor’s comments, we have removed the analysis of Akt and mTOR signalling in the revised manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>27) Do the authors have an explanation as to why the phenotypes are predominantly in lateral cortex at E12.5 and medial cortex at E14.5? This seems like something that should be mentioned in the discussion.</p></disp-quote><p>A similar issue was already raised under point #7 and, as outlined in more detail in our response to this point, this differential effect may be due to the lateral to medial gradient of neurogenesis and/or gene expression changes ( for example Pax6). We have included this consideration in the Discussion section.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>28) A model figure at the end would be very useful for explaining how loss of Inppe5 leads to reduced Gli3R levels and alterations in basal progenitor production.</p></disp-quote><p>We have included a model (Figure 9) summarizing our findings on the different mutants used in this manuscript. This new figure supports the discussion in subsection “<italic>Inpp5e</italic> controls direct/indirect neurogenesis through Gli3 processing” of how loss of <italic>Inpp5e</italic> functions leads to reduced Gli3 R levels and changes in direct and indirect neurogenesis.</p></body></sub-article></article>