<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub" publication-format="electronic">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">61350</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.61350</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Structural basis for the reaction cycle of DASS dicarboxylate transporters</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-199734"><name><surname>Sauer</surname><given-names>David B</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9291-4640</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund9"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund10"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-199735"><name><surname>Trebesch</surname><given-names>Noah</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5536-4862</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund11"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-199736"><name><surname>Marden</surname><given-names>Jennifer J</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-199737"><name><surname>Cocco</surname><given-names>Nicolette</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund12"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-199738"><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Jinmei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-199739"><name><surname>Koide</surname><given-names>Akiko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-199740"><name><surname>Koide</surname><given-names>Shohei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-199741"><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname><given-names>Emad</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8434-1010</contrib-id><email>emad@illinois.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund5"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund15"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund14"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund6"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund13"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con8"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-37406"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Da-Neng</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-4699</contrib-id><email>Da-Neng.Wang@med.nyu.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund7"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund8"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con9"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New York</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New York</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>NIH Center for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Department of Biochemistry, and Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Urbana</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New York</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New York</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New York</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Maduke</surname><given-names>Merritt</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Aldrich</surname><given-names>Richard W</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution>The University of Texas at Austin</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date date-type="publication" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e61350</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-07-23"><day>23</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-08-31"><day>31</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2020, Sauer et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Sauer et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-61350-v2.pdf"/><related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="ra1" related-article-type="commentary" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.62925"/><abstract><p>Citrate, α-ketoglutarate and succinate are TCA cycle intermediates that also play essential roles in metabolic signaling and cellular regulation. These di- and tricarboxylates are imported into the cell by the divalent anion sodium symporter (DASS) family of plasma membrane transporters, which contains both cotransporters and exchangers. While DASS proteins transport substrates via an elevator mechanism, to date structures are only available for a single DASS cotransporter protein in a substrate-bound, inward-facing state. We report multiple cryo-EM and X-ray structures in four different states, including three hitherto unseen states, along with molecular dynamics simulations, of both a cotransporter and an exchanger. Comparison of these outward- and inward-facing structures reveal how the transport domain translates and rotates within the framework of the scaffold domain through the transport cycle. Additionally, we propose that DASS transporters ensure substrate coupling by a charge-compensation mechanism, and by structural changes upon substrate release.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>membrane transport</kwd><kwd>membrane protein structure</kwd><kwd>cryo-EM</kwd><kwd>X-ray crystallography</kwd><kwd><italic>Vibrio cholerae</italic></kwd><kwd><italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic></kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd><italic>E. coli</italic></kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01NS108151</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Da-Neng</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01GM121994</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Da-Neng</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01DK099023</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Da-Neng</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>U54GM095315</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Da-Neng</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund5"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>P41GM104601</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname><given-names>Emad</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund6"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01GM067887</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname><given-names>Emad</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund7"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution>TESS Research Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Da-Neng</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund8"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001454</institution-id><institution>American Epilepsy Society</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>AES2017SD3</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Da-Neng</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund9"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000048</institution-id><institution>American Cancer Society</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>129844-PF-17-135-01-TBE</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Sauer</surname><given-names>David B</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund10"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000005</institution-id><institution>Department of Defense</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>W81XWH-16-1-0153</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Sauer</surname><given-names>David B</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund11"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001</institution-id><institution>National Science Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>1746047</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Trebesch</surname><given-names>Noah</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund12"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>T32GM088118</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Cocco</surname><given-names>Nicolette</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund13"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution>XSEDE</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>TG-MCA06N060</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname><given-names>Emad</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund14"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01GM123455</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname><given-names>Emad</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund15"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution>Blue Waters</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname><given-names>Emad</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Structures of multiple states of two dicarboxylate transporters explain the conformational changes needed for substrate import.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Citrate and dicarboxylates such as α-ketoglutarate (αKG), succinate and malate are intermediates of the TCA cycle. Furthermore, these molecules play essential roles in metabolic signaling and cellular regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib91">Tannahill et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Mills et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Huergo and Dixon, 2015</xref>). In particular, citrate acts as a precursor of fatty acid synthesis and allosterically regulates both fatty acid synthesis and glycolysis. Citrate is also used to synthesize acetyl-CoA for histone acetylation and is therefore essential for the regulation of DNA transcription and replication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib99">Wellen et al., 2009</xref>). Similarly, cytoplasmic αKG and succinate are important in controlling cell fate. Naive embryonic stem cells that exhibit an elevated αKG-to-succinate ratio maintain pluripotency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Carey et al., 2015</xref>). In contrast, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells with p53-deficiency have a lowed αKG-to-succinate ratio, and increasing the cellular concentration of αKG leads to a phenotype similar to that of tumor suppression by p53 restoration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Morris et al., 2019</xref>).</p><p>Mammalian cells import di- and tricarboxylates from the bloodstream via the Na<sup>+</sup>-dependent citrate transporter (NaCT) and the Na<sup>+</sup>-dependent dicarboxylate transporters 1 and 3 (NaDC1 and NaDC3). These plasma membrane proteins belong to the solute carrier 13 (SLC13) gene family (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Markovich and Murer, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bergeron et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Pajor, 2014</xref>). Loss-of-function mutations in the human NaCT transporter cause a type of encephalopathy (SLC13A5 Deficiency) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib92">Thevenon et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Hardies et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Klotz et al., 2016</xref>). In contrast, knocking out NaCT in mice leads to protection from obesity and insulin resistance, while mutations in the homologous fly gene extends their lifespan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Birkenfeld et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Rogina et al., 2000</xref>). Variants in the dicarboxylate transporter NaDC3 cause acute reversible leukoencephalopathy, with accumulation of αKG in the cerebrospinal fluid and urine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Dewulf et al., 2019</xref>). These central roles of SLC13 proteins in cell metabolism and signaling make them particularly attractive targets for treating obesity, diabetes, cancer and epilepsy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Huard et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Pajor et al., 2016</xref>).</p><p>The mammalian SLC13 proteins are members of the larger divalent-anion sodium symporter (DASS) family (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Markovich and Murer, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bergeron et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Pajor, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Prakash et al., 2003</xref>). DASS proteins typically have a molecular weight of 45–65 kDa and form obligate homodimers. The majority of DASS proteins are Na<sup>+</sup>-coupled cotransporters with a transport stoichiometry of one substrate to 2–4 Na<sup>+</sup> ions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1a</xref>). However, other DASS members are exchangers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Pos et al., 1998</xref>), typically exchanging succinate for other dicarboxylates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1b</xref>). While sequence analysis strongly suggests a shared fold (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Lolkema and Slotboom, 1998</xref>), these two groups separate into distinct clades on a phylogenetic tree and are thereby named DASS-C and DASS-E for cotransporter/symporter and exchanger/antiporter, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1c</xref>).</p><p>All available DASS structures are of the Na<sup>+</sup>-driven dicarboxylate transporter VcINDY from <italic>Vibrio cholerae</italic>, in an inward-facing (C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S) state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1d–f</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mancusso et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Nie et al., 2017</xref>). Each protomer consists of a scaffold and a transport domain. In the transport domain, the two carboxylate moieties of the bound substrate are coordinated by two conserved Ser-Asn-Thr (SNT) motifs, which also form part of the Na<sup>+</sup>-binding sites Na1 and Na2. Structural information, along with cross-linking and computer modeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mancusso et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Mulligan et al., 2016</xref>), indicates that DASS proteins operate in an elevator-type transport mechanism (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Reyes et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Drew and Boudker, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Garaeva and Slotboom, 2020</xref>). However, without the structure of an outward-facing (C<sub>o</sub>) conformation structure, a detailed description of the changes between the C<sub>o</sub> and C<sub>i</sub> conformations for DASS proteins remains lacking. How DASS exchangers translocate the substrates across the membrane is completely unknown.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Structure determination of the Na<sup>+</sup>-dependent dicarboxylate cotransporter VcINDY in a C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> state.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) The basic conformations and kinetic states of a DASS transporter: outward-facing (C<sub>o</sub>) and inward-facing (C<sub>i</sub>) conformations, with or without substrate (<bold>S</bold>) bound. DASS proteins form a dimer, and each protomer translocates the substrate across the membrane via an elevator-like movement of the transport domain. The scaffold and the transport domains are colored in green and pink, respectively. (<bold>b</bold>) The 3.15 Å cryo-EM map of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab84 complex in nanodiscs, showing the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> state. (<bold>c</bold>) The 3.16 Å cryo-EM map of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> in amphipol, showing the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> state. (<bold>d</bold>) The 3.92 Å X-ray structure of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-TTP (terephthalate) in detergent, showing the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state. The scaffold and the transport domains are colored in green and pink, respectively.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>The DASS family consists of two distinct clades of cotransporters (DASS-C) and exchangers (DASS-E).</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Reaction cycle of cotransporters. (<bold>b</bold>) Reaction cycle of exchangers. (<bold>c</bold>) Phylogenetic tree. The amino acid sequence identity within the cotransporters and exchangers are 34.9% and 35.9%, respectively, whereas the identity between the two groups is 15.9%. The protein names are: LaINDY, succinate/dicarboxylate transporter from <italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic>; AtDiT2, glutamate/malate translocator from <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>; SoDiT2, glutamate/malate translocator from <italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic>; AtDiT1, a-ketoglutarate/malate translocator from <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>, a-ketoglutarate/malate translocator (SoDiT1) from <italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic>; CitT, the citrate transporter from <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>; TtdT, the L-tartrate/succinate antiporter from <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>; c5038 from <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>; VcINDY, sodium-dependent dicarboxylate transporter from <italic>Vibrio cholerae</italic>; SdcF and SdcL, sodium-dependent dicarboxylate transporters from <italic>Bacillus licheniformis</italic>; SdcS, sodium-dependent dicarboxylate transporter from <italic>Staphyloccocus aureus</italic>; NaDC1, the human sodium-dependent dicarboxylate transporter-1 (SLC13A2); NaDC3, human sodium-dependent dicarboxylate transporter-3 (SLC13A3); NaCT, the human sodium-dependent citrate transporter (SLC13A5); DmINDY, citrate/a-ketoglutarate transporter from <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic> (<italic>I’m not dead yet</italic>); SUT1, the human sulphate transporter-1 (SLC13A4); NaSi1, human sodium-dependent inorganic sulphate transporter-1 (SLC13A1). (<bold>d</bold>) Amino acid sequence alignment of DASS-E and DASS-C transporters, shown around the two SNT motifs (indicated with ***) that are involved in substrate binding. The two positively-charged residues in DASS-E that substitutes Na<sup>+</sup> ions in DASS-C are also indicated. (<bold>e</bold>) Previously-determined crystal structure of VcINDY in complex with Na<sup>+</sup> and succinate, in the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state (PBD ID: 5UL7). Each protomer consists of a scaffold domain and a transporter domain. f, VcINDY substrate binding site with bound succinate and two Na<sup>+</sup> ions.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig1-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>The VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> structure determined by cryo-EM is in the C<sub>i</sub> state.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Fab screening using phase display technology. T5 = VcINDY in 100 mM NaCl; T6 = VcINDY in 100 mM NaCl with 2 mM succinate; Empty = empty nanodiscs. Clones #76, #78 and #83 were identical, whereas #93 was mixture of two Fabs. Fab84 (indicated by a *), which has the highest signal for the succinate bound state of VcINDY, was used for structure determination. (<bold>b</bold>) Preparative size-exclusion chromatography trace of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> in nanodiscs, in complex with Fab84, on a Superose 6 Increase column. The nanodiscs were reconstituted using membrane scaffold protein MSP2N2. (<bold>c</bold>) SDS-PAGE of VcINDY in reconstituted nanodiscs, in complex with Fab. (<bold>d</bold>) Cryo-EM micrograph of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab84 in nanodiscs. (<bold>e</bold>) 2D classes of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab84 in nanodiscs. (<bold>f</bold>) Cryo-EM micrograph of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> in amphipol. (<bold>g</bold>) 2D classes of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> particles in amphipol. (<bold>h</bold>) 3D map of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab viewed from within the membrane plane, colored by local resolution. (<bold>i</bold>) Preparative size-exclusion chromatography trace of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> in amphipol on a Superdex 200 10/300 column. (<bold>j</bold>) SDS-PAGE of VcINDY in amphipol. (<bold>k</bold>) 3D map of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> in amphipol viewed from within the membrane plane, colored by local resolution.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig1-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Furthermore, it is not known how the transporter couples substrate binding and release to the C<sub>o</sub> to C<sub>i</sub> interconversion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Stein, 1986</xref>). Studies on multiple DASS-C cotransporters using transport kinetics, electrophysiology and chemical cross-linking have shown that these proteins sequentially bind sodium and then substrate, with this order being reversed during the release process (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Wright et al., 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib102">Yao and Pajor, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Hall and Pajor, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Pajor et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Mulligan et al., 2014</xref>). The arrangement of the observed substrate and Na<sup>+</sup>-sites in the known VcINDY C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state is also consistent with such a mechanism. However, it is unclear how Na<sup>+</sup> slippage is avoided, namely, how the transporter undergoes interconversion between the apo C<sub>i</sub> and C<sub>o</sub> states only, and between the fully loaded C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S and C<sub>o</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S states, but not between the Na<sup>+</sup>-only loaded C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> and C<sub>o</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> states. This information is essential to understanding the mechanism of SLC13 family disease mutations and the design of drugs to manipulate di- and tricarboxylate import. For the DASS-E exchangers, which we hypothesize follow a typical antiport kinetic mechanism (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1b</xref>), it is even less clear how they translocate the substrates across the membrane.</p><p>We aimed to characterize the structural basis of the entire transport cycle of the DASS family using a combination of single particle cryo-EM, X-ray crystallography, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and transport activity assays.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Structure determination of multiple states</title><p>The only structurally characterized DASS transporter, VcINDY, has exclusively been observed in a C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1e</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mancusso et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Nie et al., 2017</xref>). To obtain the structure of a DASS protein in a substrate-free, Na<sup>+</sup>-bound state, we purified VcINDY in 100 mM Na<sup>+</sup>, but in the absence of a substrate, for single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). The total mass of a VcINDY dimer is only 96 kDa, and almost that entire mass is embedded in the membrane. This posed a challenge for single-particle analysis, and therefore we used two separate strategies for cryo-EM sample preparation. The first was to increase the effective particle mass using a synthetic antibody fragment (Fab). Using VcINDY reconstituted in lipid nanodiscs, we screened for Fabs using phage display technology (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Fellouse et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Miller et al., 2012</xref>). In this way we identified Fab84, which was subsequently overexpressed, purified, and mixed with VcINDY in nanodiscs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2b and c</xref>). The VcINDY-Fab84 structure was determined to 3.15 Å resolution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1b</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2d,e and h</xref>, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). In a parallel approach, we used amphipol polymer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Huynh et al., 2018</xref>) to preserve the transporter protein (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1c</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2f,g &amp; k</xref>, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), which allowed data collection on particularly thin ice to maximize signal-to-noise. This VcINDY structure in amphipol, without Fab, was determined to 3.16 Å resolution. Both maps are at a sufficiently high resolution and quality to allow direct model building, and the structures are nearly identical (r.m.s.d. 0.750 Å). Finally, to obtain clear density of substrate in the binding site of VcINDY, we crystallized the protein in complex with sodium and terephthalate, and solved the X-ray structure to 3.92 Å resolution by molecular replacement (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1d</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). With two carboxylate moieties at approximately the same distance as those of native substrates, we hypothesized the terephthalate would bind within the VcINDY binding site, while its large benzene ring would provide stronger electron density than succinate, fumarate, or malate.</p><table-wrap id="table1" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><title>Cryo-EM data collection and structure determination of VcINDY and LaINDY.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="bottom"/><th valign="bottom">VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab84</th><th valign="bottom">VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup></th><th valign="bottom">LaINDY-apo</th><th valign="bottom">LaINDY-Malate</th><th valign="bottom">LaINDY-αKG</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="bottom">EMDB</td><td valign="bottom">EMD-21928</td><td valign="bottom">EMD-21904</td><td valign="bottom">EMD-21902</td><td valign="bottom">EMD-21903</td><td valign="bottom">EMD-21905</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">PDB</td><td valign="bottom">6WW5</td><td valign="bottom">6WU3</td><td valign="bottom">6WU1</td><td valign="bottom">6WU2</td><td valign="bottom">6WU4</td></tr><tr><th colspan="6" valign="bottom">Data collection</th></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Microscope</td><td valign="bottom">Arctica-PNCC</td><td valign="bottom">Arctica-PNCC</td><td valign="bottom">Krios-NYUSoM</td><td valign="bottom">Krios-PNCC</td><td valign="bottom">Arctica-NYUSoM</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Magnification</td><td valign="bottom">36,000</td><td valign="bottom">36,000</td><td valign="bottom">130,000</td><td valign="bottom">81,000</td><td valign="bottom">36,000</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Voltage (kV)</td><td valign="bottom">200</td><td valign="bottom">200</td><td valign="bottom">300</td><td valign="bottom">300</td><td valign="bottom">200</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Frames</td><td valign="bottom">826</td><td valign="bottom">1670</td><td valign="bottom">3122</td><td valign="bottom">3255</td><td valign="bottom">1665</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Electron dose (e<sup>-</sup>/Å<sup>2</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">44</td><td valign="bottom">40</td><td valign="bottom">75.05</td><td valign="bottom">50</td><td valign="bottom">46.13</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Defocus range (μm)</td><td valign="bottom">0.1–1.5</td><td valign="bottom">1.0–2.5</td><td valign="bottom">1.5–2.0</td><td valign="bottom">0.8–2.5</td><td valign="bottom">1.5–3.0</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Collection mode</td><td valign="bottom">Counting</td><td valign="bottom">Super-resolution</td><td valign="bottom">Counting</td><td valign="bottom">Super-resolution</td><td valign="bottom">Super-resolution</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Effective pixel size (Å)</td><td valign="bottom">1.142</td><td valign="bottom">0.571</td><td valign="bottom">1.048</td><td valign="bottom">0.5295</td><td valign="bottom">0.5575</td></tr><tr><th colspan="6" valign="bottom">Data processing</th></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Initial number of particles</td><td valign="bottom">369,769</td><td valign="bottom">1,072,408</td><td valign="bottom">3,285,813</td><td valign="bottom">1,680,542</td><td valign="bottom">1,564,796</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Final number of particles</td><td valign="bottom">92,239</td><td valign="bottom">192,836</td><td valign="bottom">278,663</td><td valign="bottom">277,286</td><td valign="bottom">64,216</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Symmetry imposed</td><td valign="bottom">C2</td><td valign="bottom">C2</td><td valign="bottom">C2</td><td valign="bottom">C2</td><td valign="bottom">C2</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">B-factor sharpening</td><td valign="bottom">119.25</td><td valign="bottom">136.57</td><td valign="bottom">140.25</td><td valign="bottom">176.17</td><td valign="bottom">36.71</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Map resolution* (Å)</td><td valign="bottom">3.15</td><td valign="bottom">3.16</td><td valign="bottom">3.09</td><td valign="bottom">3.36</td><td valign="bottom">3.71</td></tr><tr><th colspan="6" valign="bottom">Model refinement</th></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Non-hydrogen atoms</td><td valign="bottom">13,382</td><td valign="bottom">6674</td><td valign="bottom">7708</td><td valign="bottom">7592</td><td valign="bottom">7520</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Protein residues</td><td valign="bottom">1764</td><td valign="bottom">890</td><td valign="bottom">978</td><td valign="bottom">978</td><td valign="bottom">978</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Ligands</td><td valign="bottom">6</td><td valign="bottom">0</td><td valign="bottom">24</td><td valign="bottom">10</td><td valign="bottom">0</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Mean B factor</td><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Protein</td><td valign="bottom">28.00</td><td valign="bottom">75.89</td><td valign="bottom">10.76</td><td valign="bottom">11.21</td><td valign="bottom">95.96</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Ligands</td><td valign="bottom">35.87</td><td valign="bottom">-</td><td valign="bottom">61.19</td><td valign="bottom">58.04</td><td valign="bottom">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">RMS deviations</td><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Bond lengths (Å)</td><td valign="bottom">0.013</td><td valign="bottom">0.008</td><td valign="bottom">0.007</td><td valign="bottom">0.010</td><td valign="bottom">0.010</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Bond angles (°)</td><td valign="bottom">0.947</td><td valign="bottom">0.602</td><td valign="bottom">0.605</td><td valign="bottom">0.689</td><td valign="bottom">0.677</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Molprobity score</td><td valign="bottom">2.41</td><td valign="bottom">2.58</td><td valign="bottom">2.08</td><td valign="bottom">1.84</td><td valign="bottom">2.14</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Clash score</td><td valign="bottom">15.44</td><td valign="bottom">8.95</td><td valign="bottom">6.26</td><td valign="bottom">6.48</td><td valign="bottom">9.97</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Poor rotamers (%)</td><td valign="bottom">1.52</td><td valign="bottom">6.27</td><td valign="bottom">2.78</td><td valign="bottom">0.76</td><td valign="bottom">0.00</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Ramachandran plot</td><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Favored (%)</td><td valign="bottom">88.87</td><td valign="bottom">91.65</td><td valign="bottom">94.15</td><td valign="bottom">91.99</td><td valign="bottom">86.86</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Allowed (%)</td><td valign="bottom">10.56</td><td valign="bottom">8.35</td><td valign="bottom">5.44</td><td valign="bottom">7.80</td><td valign="bottom">12.73</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Outliers (%)</td><td valign="bottom">0.57</td><td valign="bottom">0.00</td><td valign="bottom">0.41</td><td valign="bottom">0.21</td><td valign="bottom">0.41</td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom">Model Resolution†</td><td valign="bottom">3.5</td><td valign="bottom">3.5</td><td valign="bottom">3.3</td><td valign="bottom">3.6</td><td valign="bottom">3.7</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p><sup>*</sup>Resolution determined by Gold-Standard FSC threshold of 0.143 for corrected masked map.</p><p><sup>†</sup>Resolution determined by FSC threshold of 0.5 for sharpened map.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" position="float"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><title>X-ray crystallography data collection and structure determination of VcINDY and LaINDY.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="top"/><th valign="top">VcINDY-TTP</th><th valign="top">LaINDY-Malate-αKG</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top">PDB</td><td valign="top">6WTX</td><td valign="top">6WTW</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Data collection</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Space group</td><td valign="top">P2<sub>1</sub></td><td valign="top">P2<sub>1</sub></td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Cell dimensions</td><td valign="top">a = 108.458 Å, b = 103.062 Å, c = 174.446 Å, <break/>β = 95.848°</td><td valign="top">a = 91.328 Å, b = 76.609 Å, c = 96.946 Å, <break/>β = 90.485°</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Resolution (Å)</td><td valign="top">50.0–3.90</td><td valign="top">50.0–2.86</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">R<sub>sym</sub>(%)*</td><td valign="top">11.2 (100.4)</td><td valign="top">15.1 (67.2)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">I/σ(I)</td><td valign="top">13.3 (2.46)</td><td valign="top">16.0 (1.48)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">No. reflections</td><td valign="top">145,036</td><td valign="top">192,243</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Unique reflections</td><td valign="top">33,199</td><td valign="top">30,640</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Completeness (%)</td><td valign="top">97.4 (98.0)</td><td valign="top">99.4 (93.5)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Redundancy</td><td valign="top">4.4 (4.3)</td><td valign="top">6.3 (5.1)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">CC<sub>1/2</sub></td><td valign="top">0.962 (0.814)</td><td valign="top">0.966 (0.800)</td></tr><tr><th colspan="3" valign="top">Model refinement</th></tr><tr><td valign="top">Resolution (Å)</td><td valign="top">3.92</td><td valign="top">2.86</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">No. reflections</td><td valign="top">28,636</td><td valign="top">30,628</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">R<sub>work</sub>/R<sub>free</sub> (%)†</td><td valign="top">29.0/30.8</td><td valign="top">22.0/27.5</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Non-hydrogen atoms</td><td valign="top">13,428</td><td valign="top">7504</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Protein residues</td><td valign="top">1780</td><td valign="top">978</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Mean B factor</td><td colspan="2" valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Protein</td><td valign="top">5.64</td><td valign="top">73.46</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Ligands</td><td valign="top">5.92</td><td valign="top">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">RMS deviations</td><td colspan="2" valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Bond lengths (Å)</td><td valign="top">0.006</td><td valign="top">0.006</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Bond angles (°)</td><td valign="top">1.17</td><td valign="top">0.94</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Molprobity score</td><td valign="top">2.16</td><td valign="top">1.90</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Clash score</td><td valign="top">9.92</td><td valign="top">9.94</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Poor rotamers (%)</td><td valign="top">1.42</td><td valign="top">0.0</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Ramachandran Plot</td><td colspan="2" valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Favored (%)</td><td valign="top">90.74</td><td valign="top">94.46</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Allowed (%)</td><td valign="top">6.89</td><td valign="top">4.11</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Outliers (%)</td><td valign="top">2.37</td><td valign="top">1.44</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p><sup>*</sup>Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.</p><p><sup>†</sup>Ten percent of the data were used in the R<sub>free</sub> calculation.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>To obtain the structure of a DASS protein in its C<sub>o</sub> conformation, we screened various VcINDY homologs and chose a DASS-E protein from <italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic> (LaINDY) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1c</xref>). To characterize the function of LaINDY we performed in vivo complementation and transport assays. LaINDY was able to support aerobic growth on αKG as the sole carbon source for an <italic>E. coli</italic> strain in which the only aerobically expressed αKG transporter was knocked out (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Baba et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1a</xref>). <italic>E. coli</italic> transformed with LaINDY accumulated radioactive succinate from an external solution, likely in exchange for endogenous internal dicarboxylates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1b</xref>). Subsequent addition of excess external succinate or αKG reduced the amount of internalized radioactive succinate due to LaINDY-facilitated dicarboxylate exchange (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2a</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Structure determination of the dicarboxylate exchanger LaINDY in C<sub>o</sub> and C<sub>o</sub>-S states.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Whole-cell transport activity measurements of LaINDY in <italic>E. coli</italic> (N = 3). [<sup>3</sup>H]succinate was imported into <italic>E. coli</italic> whole cells, driven by the outward gradient of endogenous dicarboxylate such as succinate. When a high concentration of non-radioactive succinate or αKG was added to the external buffer at 90 s (blue arrow), [<sup>3</sup>H]succinate was exported by LaINDY in exchange for cold succinate or αKG. (<bold>b</bold>) The 3.09 Å cryo-EM map of the dicarboxylate exchanger LaINDY, showing the apo C<sub>o</sub> state. (<bold>c</bold>) The 3.36 Å cryo-EM map of LaINDY-malate, showing the C<sub>o</sub>-S state. (<bold>d</bold>) The 3.71 Å cryo-EM map of LaINDY-αKG, showing the C<sub>o</sub>-S state. In (<bold>b – d</bold>), the cryo-EM samples were prepared in amphipol. (<bold>e</bold>) The 2.86 Å X-ray structure of LaINDY-malate-αKG, showing the C<sub>o</sub>-S state.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>LaINDY is tentatively identified as an exchanger, and its structure is in the outward-facing, apo C<sub>o</sub> state and substrate-bound C<sub>o</sub>-S state.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) <italic>E. coli</italic> strain JW2571 complementation with a LaINDY-containing plasmid, grown in minimal media with aKG as the sole carbon source (N = 3). In the JW2571 strain, the only endogenous αKG transporter under aerobic conditions KgtP was knocked out. (<bold>b</bold>) Whole cell succinate uptake assay of LaINDY in <italic>E. coli</italic> using radioactive succinate (N = 3). (<bold>c</bold>) SDS-PAGE of purified LaINDY in amphipol. (<bold>d</bold>) Preparative size-exclusion chromatography trace of LaINDY in amphipol on a Superdex 200 10/300 column. (<bold>e</bold>) Molecular mass measurements of detergent-purified LaINDY using multiangle dynamic light scattering. (<bold>f</bold>) Thermostabilization of detergent-purified LaINDY in various potential substrates and substrate-analogs. (<bold>g</bold>) Cryo-EM micrograph of LaINDY preserved in amphipol. (<bold>h</bold>) 2D classes of LaINDY particles. 3D maps colored by local resolution of (<bold>i</bold>) apo LaINDY in amphipol (<bold>j</bold>) LaINDY-malate in amphipol and (<bold>k</bold>) LaINDY-aKG in amphipol.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig2-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Accuracy of structure determination by cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography.</title><p>Exemplary cryo-EM densities showing the quality of the chain tracing and cryo-EM map Fourier shell coefficient of (<bold>a</bold>) VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab map in nanodiscs, indicating 3.15 Å global map resolution (<bold>b</bold>) VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> map in amphipol, indicating 3.16 Å global map resolution (<bold>c</bold>) apo LaINDY map in amphipol, indicating a 3.09 Å global map resolution (<bold>d</bold>) LaINDY-malate map, indicating 3.36 Å global map resolution (<bold>e</bold>) LaINDY-aKG map, indicating 3.71 Å global map resolution. (<bold>f</bold>) Exemplary electron densities showing the quality of the chain tracing of VcINDY-TTP X-ray map at 3.92 Å resolution. (<bold>g</bold>) Exemplary electron densities showing the quality of the chain tracing of LaINDY-malate-aKG X-ray map at 2.86 Å resolution. Notably, in <bold>a – g</bold>, the same two transmembrane a-helices are chosen to show the quality of the chain tracing for all the seven structures reported here. (<bold>h</bold>) Violin plot showing distribution of C<sub>a</sub>-C distances in the seven cryo-EM and X-ray structures reported here, along with the published 2.8 Å VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-citrate X-ray structure (PDB ID: 5UL9). Measured values in X-ray structures are colored in green, and values in cryo-EM structures in orange. The C<sub>a</sub>-C distances measured by cryo-EM are typically smaller than those by X-ray crystallography. The ideal C<sub>a</sub>-C distance measured is 1.525 Å, determined by X-ray crystallography of peptide crystals. (<bold>i</bold>) Resolution dependence of the distribution of the median C<sub>a</sub>-C distance for single particle cryo-EM structures in the PDB. (<bold>j</bold>) Resolution dependence of the distribution of the median C<sub>a</sub>-C distance for X-ray structures in the PDB. The discrepancy in C<sub>a</sub>-C distance between the cryo-EM and X-ray structures is independent of resolution. For i and j, all recent protein structures in the PDB with a resolution better than 4.0 Å, 2045 by single particle cryo-EM and 64,676 by X-ray, were included in the analysis.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig2-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Like other DASS proteins, purified LaINDY formed a dimer in detergent solution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1d &amp; e</xref>). Observing that the VcINDY structures were nearly identical in amphipol and nanodiscs, we surmised that amphipol was suitable for structure determination of another DASS protein, LaINDY. The LaINDY map obtained in this way was at 3.09 Å resolution, allowing for direct model building (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2b</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1g–i</xref>, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Notably, the LaINDY structure was in an outward-facing C<sub>o</sub> state.</p><p>Next, we attempted to determine the structure of LaINDY in its substrate-bound state. To identify substrates suitable for structure determination of such a complex, we examined the thermostability and monodispersity of LaINDY at elevated temperatures in the presence of various potential substrates and substrate analogs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1f</xref>). Following identification of malate and αKG as stabilizers, we determined cryo-EM maps of LaINDY in complex with each to 3.36 Å and 3.71 Å, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2c &amp; d</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1j &amp; k</xref>, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). We also solved a 2.85 Å X-ray structure of LaINDY in the presence of both malate and αKG (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2e</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), using the LaINDY-αKG cryo-EM structure as the search model for molecular replacement. As with the apo LaINDY structure, all three LaINDY complex structures were in an outward-facing C<sub>o</sub>-S state.</p><p>The LaINDY and VcINDY maps were all of sufficient quality to build side chains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2a–g</xref>), though side-chain rotamers were not always clear at these resolutions. However, we recognized that the significance of comparing structures would be dependent upon the models’ accuracy. This accuracy is a concern particularly as two structural methods and multiple instruments were used. We therefore used the models’ C<sub>α</sub> to C bond lengths as an internal benchmark, as we expect this bond to be insensitive to variations in amino acid sequence, secondary structure, or local environment. The C<sub>α</sub> – C bond lengths in our cryo-EM structures, as well as those in the PDB, were typically smaller than the ideal and those determined by X-ray crystallography (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2h–j</xref>). This discrepancy was systematic and independent of map resolution, suggesting it is not the result of microscope calibration errors. Still, the cryo-EM models’ accuracy are sufficient to allow us to interpret the observed side chain movements of 1–2 Å.</p><p>Finally, to characterize the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition of a DASS protein, we used a custom biased MD simulation protocol (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1a</xref> and Supplementary Note) to drive LaINDY to a C<sub>i</sub>-S target model suggested by LaINDY’s internal inverted repeat topological symmetry (<xref ref-type="video" rid="video1">Video 1</xref> and Supplementary Note). We bookended this induced transition with unbiased MD simulations of LaINDY’s C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states (<xref ref-type="video" rid="video2">Video 2</xref>), which enabled us to characterize LaINDY’s equilibrium structural dynamics.</p><media id="video1" mime-subtype="mp4" mimetype="video" xlink:href="elife-61350-video1.mp4"><label>Video 1.</label><caption><title>Approach used to generate and characterize the approximate LaINDY C<sub>i</sub>-S target model used by the custom biased molecular dynamics simulation protocol to induce the structural transition.</title><p>In this approach, the approximate target model suggested by LaINDY’s internal inverted repeat topological symmetry was generated by rotating the original C<sub>o</sub>-S state 180° about a membrane-parallel axis. Next, the rigid-body domain transformations needed to structurally align the original state’s inverted repeats with those of the approximate target model were identified and quantified. This information formed the foundation for the simulation protocol used to induce a transition between the C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states of LaINDY. See Materials and methods for details.</p></caption></media><media id="video2" mime-subtype="mp4" mimetype="video" xlink:href="elife-61350-video2.mp4"><label>Video 2.</label><caption><title>Molecular dynamics simulation of LaINDY.</title><p>All stages of the simulation are shown (370 ns), including the unbiased simulation of the C<sub>o</sub>-S state (100 ns), the induced transition to the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target (100 ns), and the unbiased simulation of the C<sub>i</sub>-S state (100 ns). Transport domains are shown in light pink; scaffold domain in green; helices H4c, H6b, and H9c in purple; bound succinate in dark pink; and lipid phosphorous atoms in gray. Structural alignment was performed using the scaffold domain’s center of mass along the membrane-normal axis and using the transport domains’ centers of mass along the membrane-parallel axes.</p></caption></media><p>Along with the previous VcINDY structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mancusso et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Nie et al., 2017</xref>), the newly determined structures of the C<sub>o</sub> and C<sub>i</sub> conformations in apo and substrate bound states, along with the MD simulations of the C<sub>o</sub> to C<sub>i</sub> transition, allow us to examine the reaction cycle of DASS transporters. We will begin by describing the outward-facing apo state of LaINDY, and subsequently characterize the structural changes associated with substrate binding to the C<sub>o</sub> state, the C<sub>o</sub> to C<sub>i</sub> transition that carries substrate across the membrane and, finally, substrate release into the cytosol (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1a</xref>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1a and b</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>LaINDY is in a C<sub>o</sub> state</title><p>The 3.09 Å cryo-EM map of LaINDY determined in the absence of substrate shows the transporter in its C<sub>o</sub> apo state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3a and b</xref>). In agreement with LaINDY’s apparent mass in detergent solution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1e</xref>), the map shows a transporter dimer. Each protomer consists of a scaffold domain and a transport domain. The transmembrane topology and domain organization of LaINDY resemble that of VcINDY (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mancusso et al., 2012</xref>), with the scaffold domain being formed by transmembrane α-helices TMs 1–4 and 7–9, while the transport domain consists of TMs 5, 6, 10 and 11, as well as the helix hairpins HP<sub>in</sub> and HP<sub>out</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3a-c</xref>). However, for both hairpins, a bend is found in the second helix, at Val163 in HP<sub>in</sub>b and Ala404 in HP<sub>out</sub>b. Another new structural feature of LaINDY is an extrusion near the dimer interface into the periplasmic space formed by a sequence insertion between TM3 and TM4.</p><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Structure of LaINDY and its structural homology to VcINDY.</title><p>The 3.09 Å C<sub>o</sub> structure of apo LaINDY dimer determined by cryo-EM as viewed from (<bold>a</bold>) within the membrane plane and (<bold>b</bold>) the periplasm. (<bold>c</bold>) Topology of LaINDY. Unique to LaINDY is an extrusion near the dimer interface into the periplasmic space, formed by a sequence insertion between TM3 and TM4. The two hinge loop regions between the scaffold and the transport domain, L4-HP<sub>in</sub> and L9-HP<sub>out</sub>, are colored red. Structural alignment of LaINDY (blue) and VcINDY (PDB ID: 5UL9, green) between (<bold>d</bold>) the scaffold domains and (<bold>e</bold>) the transport domains. (<bold>f</bold>) Overlay of the LaINDY-apo structure (blue) with its three substrate-bound structures, LaINDY-malate cryo-EM structure (pale blue), LaINDY-αKG cryo-EM structure (aquamarine) and LaINDY-malate-αKG X-ray structure (teal).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig3-v2.tif"/></fig><p>The scaffold and transport domains are linked via two horizontal helices and two loops near the membrane surface, H4c and L4-HP<sub>in</sub> on the cytosolic side and H9c and L9-HP<sub>out</sub> on the extracellular side (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3c</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4a</xref>). A third linker is formed by a cytoplasmic helix between TM6 and TM7 (H6b), where the equivalent region in VcINDY exists as a long loop (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4b</xref>). The domain interface is largely formed by branched or short hydrophobic residues, with only two hydrogen bonds. This results in a smooth domain interface, similar to that observed in the elevator transporter Glt<sub>Ph</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Reyes et al., 2009</xref>).</p><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>The transport domains of DASS proteins are cradled by helical arms.</title><p>The transport and scaffold domains of (<bold>a</bold>) LaINDY and (<bold>b</bold>) VcINDY are shown in surface presentation, with the arm helices H4c, H6b, and H9c shown as blue cylinders, loop L6-7 as a blue wire, and the connecting loops L4-HPin and L9-HPout as red wires.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig4-v2.tif"/></fig><p>While LaINDY’s topology is similar to that of VcINDY, the relative domain positions are different. The transport domain is oriented toward the extracellular side with its substrate binding site facing the periplasm, yielding a C<sub>o</sub> conformation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3a</xref>). The individual LaINDY and VcINDY domains exhibit strong structural homology, with backbone r.m.s.d.s of 2.897 Å and 2.044 Å for the scaffold and transport domains, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3d and e</xref>). Compared with VcINDY, the transport domain in LaINDY is repositioned by 13.0 Å towards the periplasm with a 37.4° rotation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The domains’ structural conservation and relative positions agree with the notion that DASS proteins operate via a rigid-body, elevator-type movement of the transport domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1a</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>LaINDY has Na<sup>+</sup> surrogate side-chains near the substrate binding site</title><p>The structures of LaINDY determined in malate, αKG and in the malate/αKG mixture are in an outward-facing, substrate-bound (C<sub>o</sub>-S) state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2e</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1j &amp; k</xref>). The architecture of the LaINDY binding site is similar to that of VcINDY. Notably, within the binding site, density corresponding to substrate is seen in the X-ray omit map of LaINDY-malate-αKG, and in the LaINDY-αKG cryo-EM difference map, in a similar mode to substrate binding in VcINDY (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1e &amp; f</xref>). All three C<sub>o</sub>-S structures are not only similar to each other but, importantly, also to the LaINDY C<sub>o</sub> apo structure, with pairwise r.m.s.d.s of 0.41–0.52 Å (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3f</xref>), indicating that substrate binding introduces little conformational change.</p><p>In contrast to the similarity at the substrate binding site, major differences between LaINDY and VcINDY are seen at the cation binding sites. At the Na1 site of VcINDY (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1f</xref>), an arginine (Arg159) is found in LaINDY, stabilized by a salt bridge with Glu146 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5a</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1a &amp; c</xref>). Similarly, a histidine (His392) in LaINDY is located at the equivalent of the VcINDY Na2 site, with another histidine (His401) located 4 Å on its extracellular side. Indeed, these residues are conserved in DASS exchangers but absent in cotransporters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1c</xref>). Furthermore, the cation binding sites are more completely enclosed by the surrounding loops in LaINDY compared to VcINDY, facilitated by DASS exchanger specific insertions in the HP<sub>in</sub> and HP<sub>out</sub> and L10ab regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1d</xref>). Based on these well enclosed and sterically occupied cation binding sites, it is unlikely that sodium ions bind to LaINDY as Na1 and Na2 do in VcINDY. Rather, we hypothesize these two positively-charged residues in exchangers act as permanent surrogates of the Na<sup>+</sup> ions in cotransporters. Such Na<sup>+</sup> ion substitutions have previously been observed in other transporters, which makes their substrate transport independent of sodium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Shaffer et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Kalayil et al., 2013</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>LaINDY rigidity when binding substrate.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) The side chain of Arg159 in LaINDY is found at the location equivalent to the Na1 site in VcINDY, while His392 is found in the Na2 site. Both Arg159 and His392 are conserved in DASS exchangers but absent in cotransporters. These two positively-charged residues in exchangers are hypothesized to act as permanent surrogates of the Na<sup>+</sup> ions in cotransporters. (<bold>b</bold>) Time series of the r.m.s.d. (of C<sub>α</sub> and heavy side-chain atoms) of the binding site and the substrate (i.e., succinate) of apo LaINDY (protomers A<sub>apo</sub> and B<sub>apo</sub>) and substrate-bound LaINDY (protomers B<sub>1</sub>, A<sub>2</sub>, and B<sub>2</sub>). R.m.s.d. values were calculated by comparing the frames of the MD simulations with the X-ray crystal structure after overlaying the helices of the transport domain. The succinate is well ordered during the transition but exhibits increased mobility in the C<sub>o</sub> and C<sub>i</sub> conformations, corresponding to substrate binding and release.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig5-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Charged residues in the binding site of LaINDY act equivalently to Na<sup>+</sup> in VcINDY.</title><p>LaINDY structures showing Arg159 and His392 occupying sites equivalent to the Na1 and Na2 sites of VcINDY. (<bold>a</bold>) At the equivalent of Na1, Arg159 forms an ion pair with Glu146. (<bold>b</bold>) Time series from MD simulations of LaINDY showing that both Arg159 and Glu146 remain at the same locations within the transport domain during the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S state transition. (<bold>c</bold>) At the equivalent of the Na2 site, His392 interacts with another histidine, His401. (<bold>d</bold>) Time series from MD simulations of LaINDY showing that both His392 and His401 remain at the same general locations within the transport domain during the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S state transition. (<bold>e</bold>) Substrate-binding site in the LaINDY-malate-aKG X-ray structure superimposed with a substrate omit map. Because both types of the substrates were present in the crystals, the crystal structure corresponds to a superimposition of both molecules. Therefore, the omit density corresponds to the two shared carboxylate moieties of both molecules. A malate molecule is placed in the densities to illustrate the spatial relationship. (<bold>f</bold>) Substrate- and Na<sup>+</sup>-binding sites in VcINDY-TPP X-ray structure superimposed with a TTP and Na<sup>+</sup> omit map.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig5-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>The transport domain moves as a rigid body within the scaffold domain’s arms</title><p>The structure determination of LaINDY and VcINDY in multiple states provides an opportunity to characterize conformational changes of a DASS protein during the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition. MD simulations of succinate-bound LaINDY revealed how the transition between its C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states is realized. The transition consists of a 39° rigid-body rotation and an 8.3 Å translation of the transport domain relative to the scaffold domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1b–d</xref> and <xref ref-type="video" rid="video2">Video 2</xref>). The two ‘arm’ helices, H4c and H9c, are fixed in space with respect to the scaffold domain and cradle the transport domain during the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6c–e</xref> and <xref ref-type="video" rid="video3">Video 3</xref>). Such arm rigidity agrees with the conserved salt bridge, between Arg122 and Glu283, and bulky-residue interactions at the elbows connecting H4c and H9c to the scaffold domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6a &amp; b</xref>). The importance of the Arg122 to Glu283 salt bridge is also consistent with recent observations in NaCT, where transport activity was abolished by mutations of the equivalent arginine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Khamaysi et al., 2020</xref>), probably by disrupting the conserved salt bridge between H4c and TM7. In contrast to the rigidity at the elbows, flexibility of the hinge loops L4-HP<sub>in</sub> and L9-HP<sub>out</sub> at the other end of the arm helices allows transport domain movement (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). During the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition the angle between the arm helices and the hairpin helices changes by approximately 30° at both hinges (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6f</xref>), allowing the overall rotation and translation of the transport domain.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Structural changes during the LaINDY C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Bulky residues pack around the elbow preceding the H9c arm of LaINDY. In LaINDY structural interactions among five conserved bulky residues at the junction between the N-terminus of H4c and the core of the scaffold domain make the TM4b – H4c angle rigid. (<bold>b</bold>) A conserved salt bridge is formed between Arg122 of arm H4c and Glu283 of TM7 in the scaffold domain. This salt bridge helps to keep the angle between TM9b and H9c rigid. (<bold>c</bold>) Representative MD structure from the simulation of the LaINDY C<sub>o</sub>-S state. (<bold>d</bold>) Representative MD structure from the simulation of the LaINDY C<sub>i</sub>-S state. Between the C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states, the angles at TM4b – H4c and at TM9b – H9c stay rigid, while the angles at L4-HP<sub>in</sub> and at L9- HP<sub>out</sub> change. The change in orientation of HP<sub>in</sub>a to H4c and HP<sub>out</sub>a to H9c accompany the translation and rotation of the transport domain within the framework formed by H4c and H9c and the rest of the scaffold domain. Time series from MD simulations of LaINDY (protomers B<sub>1</sub>, A<sub>2</sub>, and B<sub>2</sub>) showing the structural change at (<bold>e</bold>) the elbow and (<bold>f</bold>) hinge regions. During the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition, while the angles at the two elbows are both rigid, the angle of HP<sub>in</sub>a relative to H4c and HP<sub>out</sub>a relative to H9c changed by 27° and 33°, respectively.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig6-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Molecular dynamics simulations of LaINDY.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Schematic of all stages of the molecular dynamics (MD) simulations performed. See Materials and methods for details on each stage, see (<bold>b</bold>) for a legend of the component colors, and see above (<bold>c</bold>) for a legend of the background colors of the simulation stage labels. (<bold>b</bold>) Schematic of the collective variables <italic>z</italic> and <italic>θ</italic> used in the custom biased MD simulation protocol. See Materials and methods for detailed definitions of the collective variables. (<bold>c</bold>) Time series of the collective variable <italic>z</italic>. See (<bold>b</bold>) for a schematic definition of <italic>z</italic>, and see Materials and methods for a detailed definition. In this and all subsequent time series, data are shown for protomers B<sub>1</sub>, A<sub>2</sub>, and B<sub>2</sub>, (see the inset legend). Individual simulation stages are separated by solid vertical lines, and background colors indicate different types of simulations (see the legend above the plots). (<bold>d</bold>) Time series of the collective variable <italic>θ</italic>. See (<bold>b</bold>) for a schematic definition of <italic>θ</italic>, and see Materials and methods for a detailed definition. (<bold>e</bold>) Time series of the r.m.s.d. of the first inverted topological repeat of LaINDY with reference to the second repeat from the crystal structure. Common helix C<sub>α</sub> atoms found by a structure-based sequence alignment were used to define the repeats. (<bold>f</bold>) Time series of the r.m.s.d. of the second repeat of LaINDY with reference to the first repeat from the crystal structure. (<bold>g</bold>) Time series of the distance between the centers of mass of the heavy atoms of succinate and the C<sub>α</sub> atoms of the binding site. All residues found within 5 Å of succinate during the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition were used in the definition of the binding site (i.e., P154-T160, N199, T203, T208-V215, A396-A400, A435, Y440-A445, and I447). (<bold>h</bold>) Time series of the r.m.s.d. of Asn156 with reference to the crystal structure. Structural alignment was performed on all helix C<sub>α</sub> atoms of the transport domain, and r.m.s.d. was measured on the C<sub>α</sub> atom and heavy side chain atoms. (<bold>i</bold>) C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states of membrane-embedded LaINDY generated by MD simulations. Transport domains are shown in light pink, the scaffold domain in green, helices H4c, H6b, and H9c in purple, bound succinate in dark pink, and lipid phosphorous atoms in gray. These structures are highlighted as representative of the ensembles generated by the unbiased MD simulations of the C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states because their protomers have the most concurrently representative values of <italic>z</italic> and <italic>θ</italic>. (<bold>j</bold>) Water accessibility profiles for the C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states of LaINDY, with the position of membrane (gray) and bound succinate (dark pink) highlighted (see inset legends). (<bold>k</bold>) Structural comparisons of the inverted topological repeats of LaINDY in various states. When being highlighted, repeat 1 is shown in teal, and repeat 2 is shown in purple. When used for reference, the repeats are shown in gray, as is the entire structure of LaINDY. (<bold>l</bold>) Structural comparison of the two main conformations of Asn156 observed during the MD simulations and the two associated binding depths of succinate (dark pink) with reference to the X-ray crystal structure (gray).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig6-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><media id="video3" mime-subtype="mp4" mimetype="video" xlink:href="elife-61350-video3.mp4"><label>Video 3.</label><caption><title>Structural dynamics of the connections between the transport and scaffold domains during the LaINDY C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition.</title><p>Transport domains are shown in transparent light pink; scaffold domain in transparent green; helices H4c, H6b, and H9c in transparent purple; bound succinate in dark pink; lipid phosphorous atoms in gray; helices TM4b and H4c in cyan; helix HP<sub>in</sub>a in dark green; helices TM9b and H9c in light orange; and helix HP<sub>out</sub>a in dark orange. Structural alignment was performed using the scaffold domain’s center of mass along the membrane-normal axis and using the transport domains' centers of mass along the membrane-parallel axes.</p></caption></media><p>Despite the large domain movements of LaINDY during MD simulations of the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition, succinate stably binds without significant changes within the binding site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5b</xref>), though the depth of substrate binding correlates with the orientation of Asn156 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1g,h &amp; l</xref>). Furthermore, the conformations and interactions of the Na<sup>+</sup> surrogate side chains, Arg159 and His392, are generally stable through the conformational transition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1b &amp; d</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Substrate release from VcINDY causes significant structural changes</title><p>The two cryo-EM structures of VcINDY are in a substrate-free, inward-facing (C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>) state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1b &amp; c</xref>) and provide an opportunity to describe the conformational changes that occur upon substrate release. The C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> VcINDY structures are very similar to each other, with an r.m.s.d of 0.75 Å (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1b</xref>). However, compared with the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S structures, the substrate-free structures display local changes throughout the protein.</p><p>At the substrate binding site of both cryo-EM VcINDY structures, Pro422 at the N-terminus of TM10b in the substrate free structures moved by up to 1.5 Å (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7a</xref>). Concurrently, on the cytoplasmic surface, His432 at the C-terminus of the same helix is rotated by 73° (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1a</xref>). This movement of His432 causes a steric clash with its neighbor, Tyr178 of TM5a, inducing a rotation in that side chain by 41°. One helix turn away, the side chain of Arg175 moves closer to Glu437 of TM11, forming a salt bridge. These rearrangements lead to movements of HP<sub>in</sub>a, HP<sub>in</sub>b and TM5a by 1.4 Å toward the scaffold domain. Supporting the importance of these interactions, human NaCT’s transport activity is abolished when the equivalent of Glu437 is mutated to histidine, resulting in SLC13A5 Deficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Hardies et al., 2015</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>Substrate release-induced conformational changes in the C<sub>i</sub> state of VcINDY.</title><p>The cryo-EM structure of VcINDY in a C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> state, determined in amphipol (dark green), is superimposed on the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state X-ray structure (grey). Amino acids of the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> states are labeled without and with an apostrophe, respectively. (<bold>a</bold>) At the substrate-binding site Pro422 at the N-terminus of TM10b moves closer to the center in the substrate free structures by 1.5 Å. Concurrently, at the C-terminus of the same helix on the cytoplasmic surface His432 is rotated by 73°. This movement of His432 causes a steric clash with its neighbor, Tyr178, inducing a rotation in that side chain by 41°. These rearrangements lead to movements of HP<sub>in</sub>a, HP<sub>in</sub>b and TM5a by up to 1.4 Å toward the scaffold domain. (<bold>b</bold>) On the extracellular surface, the C-terminus of HP<sub>out</sub>b unwinds by one turn and the entire loop connecting HP<sub>out</sub>b and TM10a, from Val392 to Pro400, extrudes toward the lateral edge of the protein. As a result, the conserved salt bridge between Glu394 and Lys337 of TM9b breaks, and Phe396 moves away from its contact with H9c. The last four residues at the C-terminus of the protein, Leu459 to Gln462, move closer to the protein surface and the side chain of Trp461 inserts between TM6, TM10a and TM11, packing against another aromatic residue, Phe220.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig7-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Lipid and Fab binding of VcINDY, and its conformational changes between C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> states.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Overlay of the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> VcINDY amphipol structure (dark green) and with C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state (grey), viewed from the (<bold>b</bold>) membrane plane and, (<bold>c</bold>) cytoplasmic side. Superimposition of C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> (dark green) and C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab (light green) structures with C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state (grey), viewed from the periplasmic side. The epitope of Fab84 includes the loop connecting HP<sub>out</sub>b and TM10a, and consequently partially restrains its movement. (<bold>d</bold>) Interaction between VcINDY and Fab in the VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab map, determined in lipid nanodiscs. VcINDY is shown as cartoon and Fab84 in ribbon. (<bold>e</bold>) Lipid density in the VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab map.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-61350-fig7-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Comparison of the previous C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mancusso et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Nie et al., 2017</xref>) and amphipol preserved C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> VcINDY structures also revealed prominent changes on the periplasmic surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7b</xref> and <xref ref-type="video" rid="video4">Video 4</xref>). The loop connecting HP<sub>out</sub>b and TM10a, from Ala395 to Pro400, has moved on the periplasmic surface. The C-terminus of HP<sub>out</sub>b also unwinds by one turn (Val392 – Glu394) in the amphipol structure. As a result, the conserved salt bridge between Glu394 with Lys337 of H9b from the scaffold domain breaks, and Phe396 moves away from its contact with H9c. Such structural changes agree with observations of human NaCT mutations, at positions equivalent to Pro400 and Val401 in VcINDY, which abolish transport and cause SLC13A5 Deficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib92">Thevenon et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Klotz et al., 2016</xref>). Finally, the side chain of Trp461 is inserted between TM6, TM10a and TM11, packing against another conserved aromatic residue, Phe220. Notably, when bound to Fab84, the loop connecting HP<sub>out</sub>b and TM10a in VcINDY is midway between the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> structures. This agrees with Fab84’s epitope covering the periplasmic surface of VcINDY and binding both apo and substrate-bound states (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1c &amp; d</xref>). Also, a complete lipid molecule from the periplasmic leaflet was found at the interface between the transport and scaffold domains, interacting with TM1, TM2 and HP<sub>out</sub>a, and therefore may be involved in regulating conformational changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1e</xref>).</p><media id="video4" mime-subtype="mp4" mimetype="video" xlink:href="elife-61350-video4.mp4"><label>Video 4.</label><caption><title>Linear interpolation of VcINDY between C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> states.</title><p>Morph of VcINDY between C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> states by linear interpolation.</p></caption></media></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>In this work, we report cryo-EM and X-ray structures of two DASS proteins in four states as well as MD simulations of the C<sub>o</sub>-S to C<sub>i</sub>-S transition. Of these structures, the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>, C<sub>o</sub>, and C<sub>o</sub>-S are previously un-observed states of the DASS transport cycle. Together with the previously published structures of VcINDY in its C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state, these results give us a much clearer understanding of the structural basis of transport. The gallery of structures allows us to more completely characterize the reaction cycle of DASS transporters. Thereby, we advance the elevator mechanism of the family from a conceptual model into an atomic description of the transport domain’s movement within the framework of the scaffold domain.</p><p>The structures of LaINDY that we have determined represent the first outward-facing structures of any DASS family protein. These structures generally agree with a previous model of VcINDY in its C<sub>o</sub> conformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Mulligan et al., 2016</xref>), proposed based on the inverted-topology structural repeat and cross-linking distance constraints, with an r.m.s.d of 3.7 Å for the backbone atoms. As noted, the occupation of the Na1 and Na2 sites by conserved basic residues, and absence of any other apparent sodium densities, suggest LaINDY is a DASS exchanger. This is supported by its phylogeny and ability to catalyze succinate-dicarboxylate exchange. However, further experiments, preferably in reconstituted proteoliposomes, will be needed to examine the sodium and proton dependence of transport, and confirm strict substrate coupling in the exchange reaction.</p><p>Comparison of the outward-facing and the inward-facing structures, along with MD simulation results, immediately suggests how a DASS protein operates through an elevator-type movement of the transport domain within each protomer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6c &amp; d</xref>). The transport domain moves within the framework formed by the two horizontal α-helix arms on opposing membrane surfaces during the reaction cycle, alternating the substrate binding site between the two sides of the membrane. This mechanism is similar to that proposed for the glutamate transporter Glt<sub>Ph</sub>, although the two arms of Glt<sub>Ph</sub> are not on the membrane surface but rather transmembrane helices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Reyes et al., 2009</xref>).</p><p>Analyzing the various conformations also enables us to suggest how substrate binding leads to transporter conformational changes while preventing slippage, or unproductive C<sub>o</sub> to C<sub>i</sub> transitions. In this regard, DASS cotransporters and exchangers appear to employ both unique and shared mechanisms.</p><p>Previous experimental data support that Na<sup>+</sup>-driven DASS cotransporters operate via an ordered sequence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Wright et al., 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib102">Yao and Pajor, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Hall and Pajor, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Pajor et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Mulligan et al., 2014</xref>), namely, Na<sup>+</sup> binding induces substrate binding, while substrate release precedes Na<sup>+</sup> release. For VcINDY, we have now observed that substrate release in the cytoplasm induces conformational changes as the transporter transitions between the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> states. Specifically, substrate release leads to an unwinding of the C-terminus of TM11, loop movements, and side chain rotations, resulting in significant changes in local helix packing and protein compactness (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). This is distinguished from Glt<sub>Ph</sub> and homologs in which one or two hairpin gates directly pack against the scaffold domain and block unproductive conformational changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Reyes et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Garaeva et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Arkhipova et al., 2020</xref>).</p><p>In contrast, the exchanger LaINDY exhibits no major conformational changes between the apo and substrate-bound outward-facing states. As two positively-charged residues are found to occupy the cation binding sites, we propose that the DASS exchangers limit slippage, or unproductive conformational changes, via a charge compensation mechanism. In the apo state, where the binding sites have a net positive charge, the hydrophobic surface of the scaffold domain would be an electrostatic barrier to the movement of the transport domain. Only when divalent substrate binds and the net charge is neutralized can the transporter freely exchange between the C<sub>i</sub> and C<sub>o</sub> conformations, ensuring a one-to-one stoichiometric exchange of substrates.</p><p>In addition to the noted substrate-release induced conformational changes, charge compensation is also essential to avoid slippage, ensuring Na<sup>+</sup>-substrate coupling in DASS cotransporters. In fact, the Na<sup>+</sup> ions at the Na1 and Na2 sites in cotransporters can be regarded as equivalent to the cationic side chains of exchangers, though Na<sup>+</sup> reversibly binds. In cotransporters, the charge compensation model predicts that the transporter can only transition between C<sub>o</sub> and C<sub>i</sub> conformations when the transport domain is either fully-loaded or fully-unloaded. Such a mechanism ensures tightly coupled import of Na<sup>+</sup> and substrate in cotransporters, while the reversible binding of Na<sup>+</sup> allows for the concentration of the divalent substrate against its electrochemical gradient. Similar charge compensation mechanisms have been proposed for the citrate transporter CitS and the glutamate transporter EAAC1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Lolkema and Slotboom, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Grewer et al., 2012</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="top">Reagent type <break/>(species) or resource</th><th valign="top">Designation</th><th valign="top">Source or reference</th><th valign="top">Identifiers</th><th valign="top">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top">Gene (<italic>Lactococcus acidophilus</italic>)</td><td valign="top">LaINDY</td><td valign="top">ENA</td><td valign="top">AAV42769.1</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Gene (Vibrio cholorea)</td><td valign="top">VcINDY</td><td valign="top">ENA</td><td valign="top">AAF95939.1</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Strain, strain background (<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>)</td><td valign="top">BL21(DE3)</td><td valign="top">Sigma-Aldrich</td><td valign="top">CMC0014</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Strain, strain background (<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>)</td><td valign="top">JW2571</td><td valign="top">Keio collection</td><td valign="top">JW2571</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Strain, strain background (<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>)</td><td valign="top">55244</td><td valign="top">ATCC</td><td valign="top">27C7</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td valign="top">pET-LaINDY (plasmid)</td><td valign="top">This study</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">See Materials and methods. <break/>To obtain the plasmid, contact the D.N. Wang Lab.</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td valign="top">pET-VcINDY (plasmid)</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mancusso et al., 2012</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td valign="top">pFab101 (plasmid)</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Miller et al., 2012</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody (synthetic monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">Fab84</td><td valign="top">This study</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">See Materials and methods <break/>(3:1 molar ratio Fab:VcINDY). To obtain the Fab plasmid, contact the S. Koide Lab or the D.N. Wang Lab.</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">Amphipol</td><td valign="top">Anatrace</td><td valign="top">PMAL-C8</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">cryoSPARC</td><td valign="top">Structura Biotechnology</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_016501">SCR_016501</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">Chimera</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Pettersen et al., 2004</xref></td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_004097">SCR_004097</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">PyMOL</td><td valign="top">Schrodinger</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_000305">SCR_000305</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">COOT</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Emsley and Cowtan, 2004</xref></td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_014222">SCR_014222</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">PHENIX</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Adams et al., 2010</xref></td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_014224">SCR_014224</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">Prism</td><td valign="top">GraphPad Software</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_002798">SCR_002798</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Others</td><td valign="top">QuantiAuFoil R1.2/1.3</td><td valign="top">Quantifoil</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title>LaINDY transport activity assays in whole cells</title><p>As a target seed VcINDY was nominated to the cloning core of the New York Consortium of Membrane Protein Structure for the cloning of its homologs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Love et al., 2010</xref>). The homologous protein from <italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic> (Uniprot: Q5FKK5_LACAC, LaINDY) was found to give the highest expression levels in <italic>E. coli</italic> BL21 DE3 cells when transformed with pET-LaINDY. The transport activity of LaINDY was characterized in <italic>E. coli</italic> whole cells following a published protocol with minor modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Pos et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Kim and Unden, 2007</xref>). <italic>E. coli</italic> BL21 DE3 cells were transformed with a modified pET vector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Love et al., 2010</xref>) encoding N-terminal 10x His-tagged LaINDY (pET-LaINDY) and grown at 37°C until cells reached OD<sub>595</sub> of 0.7. Cells were induced with IPTG and growth was continued for 3 hr. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended at OD<sub>595</sub> = 10 in 10 mM NaCl, 100 mM choline chloride, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5. Cells were kept on ice until needed, and warmed to 30°C five mins prior to transport assay. The uptake reaction was initiated by addition of reaction buffer 10 mM NaCl, 100 mM choline chloride, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 μM <sup>3</sup>H-succinate to the cell suspension at 1:10 (reaction buffer:cells) volumetric ratio. For the exchange reaction, 10 mM succinate or 10 mM α-ketoglutarate (αKG) was added 90 s after initiation of the uptake reaction. Aliquots were collected at fixed time points, with the reaction terminated by collecting the cells on pre-wetted 0.45 mm nitrocellulose filters mounted on a Hoeffer vacuum manifold and immediately washing with 4 mL ice cold 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.5. The filters were incubated for 10 mins in scintillation fluid before measuring radioactivity using a Wallac 1450 Microbeta Plus liquid scintillation counter (Shelton, CT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Law et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Law et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Law et al., 2009</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title><italic>E. coli</italic> growth assays with LaINDY complementation</title><p>The <italic>E. coli</italic> strain JW2571 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Baba et al., 2006</xref>), in which the only endogenous αKG transporter under aerobic conditions KgtP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Seol and Shatkin, 1991</xref>) was knocked out, was transformed with a pGEM-5Zf(+) vector encoding LaINDY. Transformed cells were grown in LB broth with ampicillin to an OD<sub>595</sub> ~0.8, then diluted to an OD<sub>595</sub> of 0.1. Dilute cells were inoculated into eM9 media supplemented with 50 mM αKG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Rhie et al., 2014</xref>), and cell growth monitored using a Tecan SPECTRAFluor Plus microplate reader (Männedorf, Switzerland) incubated at 37°C.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>LaINDY expression and purification</title><p>LaINDY was expressed by autoinduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib89">Studier and Moffatt, 1986</xref>) at 25°C overnight in the <italic>E. coli</italic> strain BL21 DE3 transformed with the pET-LaINDY plasmid. Cells were harvested and lysed in a buffer of 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl, 10 mM Imidazole. Ligand, either 10 mM Na<sup>+</sup> αKG or 10 mM Na<sup>+</sup> DL-malate, was added to the lysis buffer and all subsequent purification steps. Membranes were resuspended in a buffer of 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM Imidazole, and solubilized in 1.2% dodecyl-maltoside (DDM), and protein was purified on a Ni<sup>2+</sup>-NTA affinity column. The decahistidine tag was removed by overnight digestion at 25°C with TEV protease, followed by preparative size exclusion chromatography (SEC) in a buffer containing 25 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 20% glycerol, and 0.075% DDM.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Thermostabilization assay</title><p>A theremostability assay was used to search for compounds that stabilized LaINDY (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Auer et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Mancusso et al., 2011</xref>). Size exclusion chromatography purified LaINDY was dialyzed into a buffer of 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.15% DM. Aliquots of 100 mg LaINDY were incubated with 100 mM test compounds at 42°C for 2 hr, and subsequently injected onto a Shodex KW804 analytical SEC column (Thomson, Clear Brook, VA) on HPLC (Shimadzu, Columbia, MA) in a buffer containing 200 mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, 50 mM Tris 7.5, 3 mM NaN<sub>3</sub>, and 0.05% DDM. The height of the SEC peak for the 4°C control was used as a reference for normalization.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Multi-angle dynamic light scattering</title><p>Purified LaINDY sample (50 μL) was injected onto a Shodex KW803 analytical SEC column on a Waters HPLC (Milford, MA) and eluted with the buffer containing 0.05% DDM at a rate of 0.5 mL/min. The mass of the LaINDY protein was determined using a Wyatt miniDAWN TREOS three angle-static light scattering detector (Santa Barbara, CA), a Wyatt Optilab rEX refractive index detector and a Waters 2489 UV absorbance detector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Slotboom et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib98">Waight et al., 2010</xref>). The differential refractive index (<italic>d</italic>n/<italic>d</italic>c) for DDM, 0.128 mL/g, was calculated using the refractive index detector. The size of the protein–detergent conjugate was deconvoluted following the published method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Kendrick et al., 2001</xref>), in which contributions from co-purifying lipids were not distinguished from those of the detergent.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>VcINDY expression and purification</title><p>Expression and purification of VcINDY was carried out according to our previous protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mancusso et al., 2012</xref>). Briefly, <italic>E. coli</italic> BL21-AI cells (Invitrogen) were transformed with a modified pET vector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Love et al., 2010</xref>) encoding N-terminal 10x His tagged VcINDY. Cells were grown at 30°C until OD<sub>595</sub> reached 0.8, protein expression occurred at 19°C following IPTG induction, and cells were harvested 16 hr post-induction. Cell membranes were solubilized in 1.2% DDM and the protein was purified on a Ni<sup>2+</sup>-NTA column. VcINDY was further purified by SEC in buffer containing 25 mM Tris pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Na<sup>+</sup>-succinate, 5% glycerol and 0.075% DDM unless otherwise indicated.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Nanodisc reconstitution</title><p>SEC purified His-tagged VcINDY protein was reconstituted into MSP2N2 nanodiscs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Grinkova et al., 2010</xref>) at a molar ratio of VcINDY: MSP: lipids of 1 (9 mM): 8 (72 mM): 277 (2.5 mM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bayburt and Sligar, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Schuler et al., 2013</xref>). <italic>E coli</italic> polar lipids in chloroform (Avanti) were vacuum-dried and rehydrated in nanodisc buffer containing 20 mM Tris pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.1 mM TCEP to a concentration of 20 mg/mL. VcINDY, lipids and MSP2N2 protein were mixed in the nanodisc buffer to a final volume of 500 mL. Subsequently, 600 mg of Bio-Beads were added and incubated at 4° C overnight. The Bio-Beads were then removed and the solution was filtered through a 0.2 mm centrifugal filter. The nanodiscs containing VcINDY were purified by Ni<sup>2+</sup>-NTA chromatography. The sample was incubated with a 1:4 molar ratio of Fab84 for 1 hr at 4°C before SEC.</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Fab development</title><p>The plasmid pFab101, a modified pFab007 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Miller et al., 2012</xref>) which includes a N31T mutation in the VH region, was used as the template to construct a Fab phage-display library termed NYC1 containing 1.1 × 10<sup>11</sup> sequences, following a previously described design (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Miller et al., 2012</xref>). Fab library sorting was performed as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Fellouse et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Dominik and Kossiakoff, 2015</xref>) with minor modifications. In each round, phage solution was prepared in 50 mM Tris HCl buffer pH 7.5 containing 100 mM NaCl, 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1 mM TCEP with or without 2 mM succinate, and was first incubated with streptavidin-coated magnetic beads harboring biotinylated nanodisc that did not contain an embedded protein (‘empty’ nanodisc). The supernatant of this reaction was incubated with 100 nM VcINDY embedded in biotinylated nanodisc, and phages bound to the VcINDY-nanodisc complex were captured using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. A total of four rounds of library sorting were performed. Enriched clones were individually tested using phage ELISA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Fellouse et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Sidhu et al., 2000</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Fab expression and purification</title><p>Target Fab84 was subcloned into the Fab expression vector Ptac_Fab_accept_tagless (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Burioni et al., 1998</xref>). After rigidification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Bailey et al., 2018</xref>), the subsequent Fab-containing plasmid was transformed into <italic>E. coli</italic> 55244 cells. Cells were grown in TGB media at 30°C for 22 hr and harvested. Fab84 protein was purified by injection onto a Protein G column (GE healthcare) and eluted with 100 mM glycine-pH 2.7. Protein was collected in 1 mL fractions containing 2 M Tris pH 8. Fractions containing protein were dialyzed against 50 mM sodium acetate pH 5.3 before purification using a Resource S column (GE healthcare).</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title>Amphipol exchange</title><p>After nickel column purification PMAL-C8 (Anatrace, Maumee, OH) was added to the detergent-purified transporter protein at a 1:5 protein:amphipol weight ratio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Huynh et al., 2018</xref>). The mixture was incubated at 4° C overnight with nutating. To remove detergent, Bio-Beads were incubated with sample at a 1:100 detergent:Bio-Beads weight ratio for 2 hr at 4°C with gentle agitation. The Bio-Beads were then removed by centrifugation at 4,500 rpm and the sample was further purified by SEC in buffer containing 25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl and 0.1 mM TCEP.</p></sec><sec id="s4-11"><title>Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection</title><p>All cryo-EM grids were prepared by applying 3 mL of protein at ~3 mg/mL to a glow-discharged QuantiAuFoil R1.2/1.3 300-mesh grid (Quantifoil) and blotted for 2.5 to 4 s under 100% humidity at 4°C before plunging into liquid ethane using a Mark IV Vitrobot (FEI).</p><p>Cryo-EM data of apo LaINDY were acquired on a Titan Krios microscope with a K2 direct electron detector (Gatan), using a GIF-Quantum energy filter with a 15 eV slit width. Leginon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Suloway et al., 2005</xref>) was used for ice thickness targeting and automated data collection. Each micrograph was dose-fractioned over 50 frames, with an accumulated dose of 75 e<sup>-</sup>/Å<sup>2</sup>.</p><p>Cryo-EM data of LaINDY-malate were acquired on a Titan Krios microscope with a K2 direct electron detector, using a GIF-Quantum energy filter with a 20 eV slit width. SerialEM was used for automated data collection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Schorb et al., 2019</xref>). Each micrograph was dose-fractioned over 60 frames, with an accumulated dose of 50 e<sup>-</sup>/Å<sup>2</sup>.</p><p>Cryo-EM data of LaINDY-αKG were acquired on a Talos Arctica microscope with a K3 direct electron detector. Leginon was used for ice thickness targeting and automated data collection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Rice et al., 2018</xref>). Each micrograph was dose-fractioned over 56 frames, with an accumulated dose of 46 e<sup>-</sup>/Å<sup>2</sup>.</p><p>Cryo-EM data of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab84 in nanodiscs were acquired on a Talos Arctica microscope with a K2 direct electron detector. SerialEM was used for automated data collection. Each micrograph was dose-fractioned over 50 frames, with an accumulated dose of 44 e<sup>-</sup>/Å<sup>2</sup>.</p><p>Cryo-EM data of VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> in amphipol were acquired on a Talos Arctica microscope with a K2 direct electron detector. SerialEM was used for automated data collection. Each micrograph was dose-fractioned over 48 frames, with an accumulated dose of 40 e<sup>-</sup>/Å<sup>2</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-12"><title>Cryo-EM image processing</title><p>Motion correction, CTF estimation, particle picking, 2D classification, <italic>ab initio</italic> model generation, heterogenous and non-uniform refinement, and per particle CTF refinement were all performed with cryoSPARC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Punjani et al., 2017</xref>). Each dataset was processed using the same protocol, except as noted. All maps were sharpened using Auto-sharpen Map in Phenix (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Adams et al., 2010</xref>).</p><p>Micrographs underwent motion correction and the CTF estimated, and those with an overall resolution worse than 8 Å excluded from subsequent steps. An ellipse-based particle picker identified particles used to generate initial 2D classes. These classes were used for template-based particle picking. Template identified particles were extracted and subjected to 2D classification. A subset of well resolved 2D classes were used for the initial <italic>ab initio</italic> model building, while all picked particles were subsequent used for heterogeneous 3D refinement. After multiple rounds of 3D classification (<italic>ab initio</italic> model generation and heterogeneous 3D refinement with two or more classes), a single class was selected for non-uniform 3D refinement, resulting in the final map.</p><p>For the VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab84 sample in nanodiscs, refinement of an initial 3.36 Å map indicated oblique views were rare in the particle set. Projections of this map were therefore used as templates for an additional round of particle picking, with subsequent 3D classification, per particle CTF refinement and non-uniform 3D refinement.</p></sec><sec id="s4-13"><title>LaINDY crystallization and X-ray diffraction data collection</title><p>LaINDY protein purified in NG and αKG was concentrated to 2 mg/mL using a centrifugal filtration device and crystallized at 18°C using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method by mixing equal volumes of concentrated protein and well solution of 30% Jeffamine ED-2001, 100 mM HEPES pH 6.8. Crystal quality was improved by the addition of 10 mM malic acid prior to size exclusion chromatography. Crystals were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen with crystallization solution serving as cryoprotectant. Crystals were of the P2<sub>1</sub> space group with unit cell dimensions of a = 91.3 Å, b = 76.6 Å, c = 96.9 Å, β = 90.5° and contained two molecules in the asymmetric unit, which form a single transporter dimer. Data were collected at the Advanced Light Source beamline 5.0.2. Diffraction data were processed and scaled in HKL2000 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Otwinowski and Minor, 1997</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-14"><title>VcINDY crystallization and X-ray diffraction data collection</title><p>VcINDY purified in DM was incubated with 10 mM sodium terephthalate (TTP) on ice for 30 min prior to crystallization with a protein concentration of 4 mg/mL at 4°C by hanging-drop vapor diffusion. Crystals were grown in 30% PEG 550, 50 mM NaCl and 100 mM Tris pH 8.0, and were subsequently frozen in liquid nitrogen with the crystallization solution serving as the cryoprotectant. X-ray data were collected at the Advanced Light Source Beamline 5.0.2. Data processing and scaling were performed using HKL2000. Crystals were of space group P2<sub>1</sub> with unit cell dimensions around a = 108 Å, b = 103 Å, c = 174 Å, β = 96°, and contained four molecules per asymmetric unit.</p></sec><sec id="s4-15"><title>Model building and refinement</title><p>Cryo-EM models were built in Coot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Emsley and Cowtan, 2004</xref>) and refined in Phenix real space refine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Adams et al., 2010</xref>). The LaINDY-apo model was manually built, and subsequently used as an initial model for the LaINDY-malate and LaINDY-αKG structures. VcINDY models were built using the VcINDY X-ray structure (PDB: 5UL9), with sodium and citrate removed, as an initial model. The Fab was rebuilt from an initial model of a homologous X-ray structure (PDB: 5EII) with the variable loops removed. In both VcINDY and LaINDY maps some discontinuous densities could be attributed to the aliphatic chains of lipids, detergents, or amphipols and were modeled as alkanes for simplicity.</p><p>The LaINDY X-ray structure was determined by molecular replacement using the LaINDY-apo cryo-EM model as a starting model, followed by model building in Coot and refinement in Phenix.</p><p>The VcINDY-TTP X-ray structure was determined by molecular replacement using the structure of VcINDY (PDB ID: 5UL9), with sodium and citrate removed, as the initial search model. The model was refined using group B-factors, and NCS, secondary structure and reference model restraints.</p></sec><sec id="s4-16"><title>Phylogenetic tree and sequence conservation</title><p>DASS family orthologs were aligned in Promals3D (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Pei et al., 2008</xref>), including VcINDY (PDB ID: 5UL9) and CitS (PDB ID: 5A1S) as structural models. As a non-member of the DASS family, CitS was used as the outgroup when calculating distances using FastTree (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Price et al., 2009</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-17"><title>Bond length analysis</title><p>The distance between C<sub>α</sub> and C carbons was calculated using a custom Biopython script (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cock et al., 2009</xref>). Median C<sub>α</sub> to C distances were calculated for 2045 single particle cryo-EM and 64,676 X-ray structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank between 2013 and 2020, containing only L-type polypeptides, and resolved to at least 4 Å.</p></sec><sec id="s4-18"><title>System preparation</title><p>Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation systems of the C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>o</sub> states of LaINDY were constructed from its X-ray crystal structure. Succinate was added to the X-ray crystal structure of LaINDY by aligning the cryo-EM structure of LaINDY with α-ketoglutarate bound and mutating the α-ketoglutarate into succinate. Force field parameters for succinate were determined using the online <sc>CGenFF</sc> interface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib95">Vanommeslaeghe and MacKerell, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib94">Vanommeslaeghe et al., 2012</xref>). The protonation states of the titratable residues of LaINDY were determined using PROPKA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib87">Søndergaard et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Olsson et al., 2011</xref>). Two independent POPE (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine) membranes were prepared using the <sc>Membrane Builder</sc> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib101">Wu et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Jo et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Jo et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Lee et al., 2019</xref>) tool of CHARMM-GUI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jo et al., 2008</xref>). The orientation of LaINDY in the membrane was determined by aligning the protein’s symmetry axis with the membrane-normal axis, and the insertion depth in the membrane was determined by applying the <sc>PPM (Positioning of Proteins in Membrane) Server</sc> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Lomize et al., 2012</xref>) to a model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Mulligan et al., 2016</xref>) of the C<sub>o</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state of VcINDY. Once the membrane and protein were combined, all lipids within 1 Å of the protein were removed from the systems. Water was added to the systems using the VMD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Humphrey et al., 1996</xref>) <sc>Solvate</sc> plugin. The systems were neutralized with Cl<sup>−</sup>, and 0.15 M NaCl was added to the systems using the VMD <sc>Autoionize</sc> plugin.</p></sec><sec id="s4-19"><title>Simulation parameters</title><p>All simulations were performed with NAMD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Phillips et al., 2005</xref>) using the CHARMM36m (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Huang et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Klauda et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib93">Vanommeslaeghe et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib103">Yu et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Jorgensen et al., 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib96">Venable et al., 2013</xref>) force field at a constant temperature of 310 K and a constant pressure of 1 atm. Constant temperature was maintained using Langevin dynamics for all non-hydrogen atoms with a damping coefficient of 1 ps<sup>−1</sup>. Constant pressure was maintained using a Nosé-Hoover Langevin piston (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Martyna et al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Feller et al., 1995</xref>) with a period of 100 fs and a damping time scale of 50 fs. The cut-off distance for both electrostatic and van der Waals interactions was set to 12 Å, and a switching function was applied at 10 Å. Periodic boundary conditions were applied in all simulations, and long-range electrostatic interactions were calculated using the particle mesh Ewald method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Darden et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Essmann et al., 1995</xref>) with a grid point density of 1 Å<sup>−1</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-20"><title>Simulations performed</title><p>After building the systems, harmonic restraints were applied to the constituent atoms of the protein, membrane, and bound succinate (i.e., only the bulk water and ions were left unrestrained). A force constant of 1.0 kcal/mol/Å<sup>2</sup> was used, and an integration time step of 1 fs was used. Three thousand steps of conjugate gradient energy minimization were performed, after which the systems were simulated with MD for 1 ns. The restraints on the membrane were then released, and the systems were minimized for three thousand steps and then simulated for 10 ns. Next, the restraints on the protein and bound succinate were released, and the systems were minimized for three thousand steps and then simulated for 10 ns. With initial equilibration complete, the integration time step was changed to 2 fs, and an additional 100 ns of unbiased equilibrium simulation was performed for each system to sample the dynamics of the C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>o</sub> states of LaINDY.</p><p>Biases were then applied with the goal of inducing a transition from the C<sub>o</sub>-S state to an approximate target model of the C<sub>i</sub>-S state. These biases and the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target are described in the ‘Biasing Protocol’ section below. To simplify comparison between the transitions sampled by the two unique protomers of LaINDY and between independent trials of the simulation, a 10 ns transition was first induced to a convenient reference C<sub>o</sub>-S state: the X-ray crystal structure. The system was then restrained at this reference C<sub>o</sub>-S state for 10 ns to allow the membrane and aqueous environment to equilibrate around this new protein state. Next, a 100 ns transition to the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target was induced, and the system was subsequently restrained at the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target for 50 ns again to allow the environment to equilibrate around the new protein state. Finally, all restraints were released, and a 100 ns unbiased equilibrium simulation was performed to examine the stability of and to sample the dynamics of the newly generated model of the C<sub>i</sub>-S state of LaINDY. See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1a</xref> for a graphical overview of the simulations performed.</p><p>The transition to the C<sub>i</sub>-S state was first induced without any biases applied to the bound succinate. A successful transition was sampled by protomer B, but succinate spontaneously unbound during the early stages of the transition sampled by protomer A. To increase sampling, an additional trial of this transition was performed with biases applied to the bound succinate (see ‘Biasing Protocol’). Throughout this article, data from the simulation without biases applied to succinate are labeled ‘protomer B<sub>1</sub>.’ Data from the simulation with biases applied to succinate are labeled ‘protomer A<sub>2</sub>’ and ‘protomer B<sub>2</sub>.’.</p></sec><sec id="s4-21"><title>Biasing protocol</title><p>In transporters with an inverted repeat topology, it has been shown that the C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states can be generated from each other by swapping the conformations of the transporter’s repeats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Forrest et al., 2011</xref>). The internal symmetry in these transporters means that the fundamental global structural differences between their C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states can be observed simply by rotating one state 180° about any axis in the plane of the membrane. When this approach is applied to LaINDY, it is immediately apparent that the fundamental global differences between the C<sub>o</sub>-S X-ray crystal structure and the newly generated approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target model are: (1) the orientation of the transport domains relative to the scaffold domain and (2) the position of the transport domains relative to the scaffold domain along the membrane-normal axis. To describe these differences quantitatively and to induce a transition to the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target, the <sc>Collective Variables</sc> (<sc>Colvars</sc>) module (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Fiorin et al., 2013</xref>) in NAMD was used.</p><p>In the <sc>Colvars</sc> module, collective variables are mathematical functions used to describe collective properties of interest of selections of atoms within a system, and transitions are induced by applying moving harmonic potentials to the collective variables. In this case, one collective variable was defined for each of the fundamental global differences observed between the C<sub>o</sub>-S state and approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target. Specifically, for the orientations of the transport domains, spinAngle collective variables were used, and distanceZ collective variables were used for the positions of the transport domains relative to the scaffold domain along the membrane-normal axis. Helix C<sub>α</sub> atoms of the transport domains and transmembrane helix C<sub>α</sub> atoms of the scaffold domain were used in the definitions of these collective variables. Schematic depictions of these collective variables are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1b</xref>.</p><p>To determine the rotation axis used in the definition of the spinAngle collective variables, the rotation matrix needed to structurally align the transport domains of the C<sub>o</sub>-S state with the transport domains of the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target was calculated using the measure fit command of VMD. Importantly, the order option was used to allow the first repeat of the C<sub>o</sub>-S state to be compared to the second repeat of the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target at the same time that the second repeat of the C<sub>o</sub>-S state was compared to the first repeat of the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target. This calculation also determined the change in angle (i.e., amount of spin about the spin axis) that was needed to induce the transition to the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target. To induce the transition to the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target using biased MD simulations, moving harmonic restraints with a force constant of 8 kcal/mol/(°)<sup>2</sup> were applied to the spinAngle collective variables.</p><p>Calculating the change in the distanceZ collective variables required to induce the transition to the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target was straightforward, as the approach used to generate the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target simply changes the direction of the displacement along the membrane-normal axis of the transport domains relative to the scaffold domain without affecting its magnitude. Moving harmonic restraints with a force constant of 80 kcal/mol/Å<sup>2</sup> were applied to the distanceZ collective variables. <xref ref-type="video" rid="video1">Video 1</xref> demonstrates how the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target was generated, and it shows the VMD-based quantification (described above) of the global structural differences between the C<sub>o</sub>-S state and the approximate C<sub>i</sub>-S target used to define the spinAngle and distanceZ collective variables.</p><p>In addition to the spinAngle and distanceZ collective variables, harmonic restraints were applied to up to two additional collective variables during the induced transition. First, the orientation of the scaffold domain was restrained to prevent the overall orientation of LaINDY from changing. Specifically, orientation collective variables were used on the scaffold domains (defined as above), and harmonic restraints with a force constant of 100,000 kcal/mol were applied to them. Second, in one trial of the transition (see ‘Simulations Performed’), succinate was restrained to the binding sites of the transport domains using distance collective variables. One distance collective variable per succinate was defined using the non-hydrogen atoms of the succinate and the C<sub>α</sub> atoms of the residues that were consistently closest to the bound succinate during the unbiased simulations of the C<sub>o</sub>-S state of LaINDY (i.e., Pro154-Arg159, Thr208-Pro212, Ala396-Thr399, and Asn442-Pro444). A half-harmonic restraint centered at 2.0 Å and with a force constant of 1.0 kcal/mol/Å<sup>2</sup> was applied to these collective variables.</p></sec><sec id="s4-22"><title>Data and code availability</title><p>Cryo-EM maps and models have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank and EMDB database, respectively, for VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup> in amphipol (6WU3, EMD-21904), VcINDY-Na<sup>+</sup>-Fab84 in nanodisc (6WW5, EMD-21928), LaINDY-apo (6WU1, EMD-21902), LaINDY-αKG (6WU4, EMD-21905), and LaINDY-malate (6WU2, EMD-21903). X-ray derived models and diffraction data have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank for LaINDY-malate-αKG (6WTW) and VcINDY-TTP (6WTX). Coordinates of representative LaINDY structures from MD simulations of the C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states have been made publicly available on Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3965996). Bond length analysis code is available at <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Sauer, 2020</xref>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DavidBSauer/bond_length_analysis">https://github.com/DavidBSauer/bond_length_analysis</ext-link> (copy archived at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/elifesciences-publications/bond_length_analysis">https://github.com/elifesciences-publications/bond_length_analysis</ext-link>).</p></sec></sec></body><back><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was financially supported by the NIH (R01NS108151, R01GM121994 and R01DK099023 to DNW; U54GM095315 to WA Hendrickson; P41GM104601, R01GM067887 and R01GM123455 to ET), the TESS Research Foundation and the American Epilepsy Society (to DNW). DBS was supported by the American Cancer Society Postdoctoral Fellowship (129844-PF-17-135-01-TBE) and Department of Defense Horizon Award (W81XWH-16-1-0153). NT was supported by a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (1746047). NC was supported by an NIH Predoctoral Training Grant (T32-GM088118). VcINDY homologs were cloned by B Kloss at the New York Consortium of Membrane Protein Structures. We thank the following colleagues for reagent, technical assistance, and helpful discussions: JP Armache, JG Belasco, N Coudray, T Hattori, J Jiang, NK Karpowich, M Lopez Redondo, Z Liu, R Mancusso, AB Rejto and SG Sligar. We are also grateful to the staff at the following facilities for assistance in screening and data collection in cryo-EM and X-ray diffraction: the NYU Cryo-EM Facility, the Pacific Northwest Center for Cryo-EM, Advanced Light Source Beamline 5.0.2 at the Berkeley National Laboratory, beamlines AMX and FMX at NSLS-II and 19-BM and 19-ID at the Advanced Photon Source. EM data processing used computing resources at the HPC Facility of NYULMC, and we were assisted by A Siavosh-Haghighi and M Costantino. MD simulations were performed using supercomputing allocations from Blue Waters and XSEDE (TG-MCA06N060) to ET. Blue Waters is supported by the NSF (OCI-0725070 and ACI-1238993), the State of Illinois and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. XSEDE is supported by the NSF (ACI-1548562).</p></ack><sec id="s5" sec-type="additional-information"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con8"><p>Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con9"><p>Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec id="s6" sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="transrepform"><label>Transparent reporting form</label><media mime-subtype="pdf" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-61350-transrepform-v2.pdf"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec id="s7" sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data availability</title><p>Cryo-EM maps and models have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank and EMDB database, respectively, for VcINDY-Na+ in amphipol (6WU3, EMD-21904), VcINDY-Na+-Fab84 in nanodisc (6WW5, EMD-21928), LaINDY-apo (6WU1, EMD-21902), LaINDY-aKG (6WU4, EMD-21905), and LaINDY-malate (6WU2, EMD-21903). X-ray derived models and diffraction data have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank for LaINDY-malate-aKG (6WTW) and VcINDY-TTP (6WTX). Coordinates of representative LaINDY structures from MD simulations of the Co-S and Ci-S states have been made publicly available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3965996). Bond length analysis code is available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DavidBSauer/bond_length_analysis">https://github.com/DavidBSauer/bond_length_analysis</ext-link> (copy archived at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/elifesciences-publications/bond_length_analysis">https://github.com/elifesciences-publications/bond_length_analysis</ext-link>).</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names></name><name><surname>Afonine</surname> <given-names>PV</given-names></name><name><surname>Bunkóczi</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>VB</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>IW</given-names></name><name><surname>Echols</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Headd</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hung</surname> <given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapral</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Grosse-Kunstleve</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name><name><surname>McCoy</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Moriarty</surname> <given-names>NW</given-names></name><name><surname>Oeffner</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Read</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Terwilliger</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Zwart</surname> <given-names>PH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>213</fpage><lpage>221</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0907444909052925</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20124702</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arkhipova</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Guskov</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Slotboom</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Structural ensemble of a glutamate transporter homologue in lipid nanodisc environment</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>998</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-020-14834-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32081874</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Auer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lemieux</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Villa</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>XD</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>High-yield expression and functional analysis of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> glycerol-3-phosphate transporter</article-title><source>Biochemistry</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>6628</fpage><lpage>6635</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi010138+</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11380257</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baba</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ara</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hasegawa</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Takai</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Okumura</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Baba</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Datsenko</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomita</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wanner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name><name><surname>Mori</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Construction of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection</article-title><source>Molecular Systems Biology</source><volume>2</volume><elocation-id>2006</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/msb4100050</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16738554</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bailey</surname> <given-names>LJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sheehy</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Dominik</surname> <given-names>PK</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>WG</given-names></name><name><surname>Rui</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jaskolowski</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Deneka</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kossiakoff</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Locking the elbow: improved antibody Fab fragments as chaperones for structure determination</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Biology</source><volume>430</volume><fpage>337</fpage><lpage>347</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29273204</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bayburt</surname> <given-names>TH</given-names></name><name><surname>Sligar</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Membrane protein assembly into nanodiscs</article-title><source>FEBS Letters</source><volume>584</volume><fpage>1721</fpage><lpage>1727</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.024</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19836392</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bergeron</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Clémençon</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Hediger</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Markovich</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>SLC13 family of Na⁺-coupled di- and tri-carboxylate/sulfate transporters</article-title><source>Molecular Aspects of Medicine</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>299</fpage><lpage>312</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23506872</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Birkenfeld</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Guebre-Egziabher</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Alves</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Jurczak</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Jornayvaz</surname> <given-names>FR</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Hsiao</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Martin-Montalvo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fischer-Rosinsky</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Spranger</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Pfeiffer</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Jordan</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Fromm</surname> <given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>König</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lieske</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Carmean</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Frederick</surname> <given-names>DW</given-names></name><name><surname>Weismann</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Knauf</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Irusta</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>De Cabo</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Helfand</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Samuel</surname> <given-names>VT</given-names></name><name><surname>Shulman</surname> <given-names>GI</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Deletion of the mammalian INDY homolog mimics aspects of dietary restriction and protects against adiposity and insulin resistance in mice</article-title><source>Cell Metabolism</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>184</fpage><lpage>195</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmet.2011.06.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21803289</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burioni</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Plaisant</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Bugli</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Delli Carri</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Clementi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fadda</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>A vector for the expression of recombinant monoclonal Fab fragments in bacteria</article-title><source>Journal of Immunological Methods</source><volume>217</volume><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0022-1759(98)00102-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9776589</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carey</surname> <given-names>BW</given-names></name><name><surname>Finley</surname> <given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Cross</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Allis</surname> <given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Intracellular α-ketoglutarate maintains the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>518</volume><fpage>413</fpage><lpage>416</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature13981</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25487152</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cock</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Antao</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Dalke</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Friedberg</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamelryck</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kauff</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilczynski</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>de Hoon</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1422</fpage><lpage>1423</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19304878</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darden</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>York</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedersen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>Particle mesh Ewald - an N.log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems</article-title><source>The Journal of Chemical Physics</source><volume>98</volume><fpage>10089</fpage><lpage>10092</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.464397</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dewulf</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Wiame</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Dorboz</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Elmaleh-Bergès</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Imbard</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dumitriu</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Rak</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Bourillon</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Helaers</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Malla</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Renaldo</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Boespflug-Tanguy</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Vincent</surname> <given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>Benoist</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Wevers</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Schlessinger</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Schaftingen</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Nassogne</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Schiff</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>SLC13A3 variants cause acute reversible leukoencephalopathy and α-ketoglutarate accumulation</article-title><source>Annals of Neurology</source><volume>85</volume><fpage>385</fpage><lpage>395</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ana.25412</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30635937</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dominik</surname> <given-names>PK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kossiakoff</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Phage display selections for affinity reagents to membrane proteins in nanodiscs</article-title><source>Methods in Enzymology</source><volume>557</volume><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/bs.mie.2014.12.032</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25950967</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Boudker</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Shared molecular mechanisms of membrane transporters</article-title><source>Annual Review of Biochemistry</source><volume>85</volume><fpage>543</fpage><lpage>572</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014520</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27023848</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Emsley</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cowtan</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography</source><volume>60</volume><fpage>2126</fpage><lpage>2132</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0907444904019158</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15572765</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Essmann</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Perera</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Berkowitz</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Darden</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedersen</surname> <given-names>LG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>A smooth particle mesh Ewald method</article-title><source>The Journal of Chemical Physics</source><volume>103</volume><fpage>8577</fpage><lpage>8593</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.470117</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feller</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Pastor</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name><name><surname>Brooks</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method</article-title><source>The Journal of Chemical Physics</source><volume>103</volume><fpage>4613</fpage><lpage>4621</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.470648</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fellouse</surname> <given-names>FA</given-names></name><name><surname>Esaki</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Birtalan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Raptis</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Cancasci</surname> <given-names>VJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Jhurani</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Vasser</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wiesmann</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kossiakoff</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sidhu</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>High-throughput generation of synthetic antibodies from highly functional minimalist phage-displayed libraries</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Biology</source><volume>373</volume><fpage>924</fpage><lpage>940</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2007.08.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17825836</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fiorin</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Hénin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Using collective variables to drive molecular dynamics simulations</article-title><source>Molecular Physics</source><volume>111</volume><fpage>3345</fpage><lpage>3362</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00268976.2013.813594</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forrest</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names></name><name><surname>Krämer</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Ziegler</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>The structural basis of secondary active transport mechanisms</article-title><source>Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics</source><volume>1807</volume><fpage>167</fpage><lpage>188</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.10.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21029721</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garaeva</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Guskov</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Slotboom</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Paulino</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>A one-gate elevator mechanism for the human neutral amino acid transporter ASCT2</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>3427</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-11363-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31366933</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garaeva</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Slotboom</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Elevator-type mechanisms of membrane transport</article-title><source>Biochemical Society Transactions</source><volume>48</volume><fpage>1227</fpage><lpage>1241</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1042/BST20200290</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32369548</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grewer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Mwaura</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Albers</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwartz</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gameiro</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Charge compensation mechanism of a Na<sup>+</sup>-coupled, secondary active glutamate transporter</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>287</volume><fpage>26921</fpage><lpage>26931</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M112.364059</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22707712</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grinkova</surname> <given-names>YV</given-names></name><name><surname>Denisov</surname> <given-names>IG</given-names></name><name><surname>Sligar</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Engineering extended membrane scaffold proteins for self-assembly of soluble nanoscale lipid bilayers</article-title><source>Protein Engineering Design and Selection</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>843</fpage><lpage>848</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/protein/gzq060</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20817758</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Pajor</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Functional characterization of a Na<sup>+</sup>-coupled dicarboxylate carrier protein from <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic></article-title><source>Journal of Bacteriology</source><volume>187</volume><fpage>5189</fpage><lpage>5194</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.187.15.5189-5194.2005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16030212</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hardies</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>de Kovel</surname> <given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Weckhuysen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Asselbergh</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Geuens</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Deconinck</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Azmi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>May</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Brilstra</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Barisic</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Craiu</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Lal</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Thiele</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Schubert</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>van 't Slot</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Nürnberg</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Balling</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Timmerman</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Lerche</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Maudsley</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Helbig</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Suls</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Koeleman</surname> <given-names>BP</given-names></name><name><surname>De Jonghe</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><collab>autosomal recessive working group of the EuroEPINOMICS RES Consortium</collab></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Recessive mutations in SLC13A5 result in a loss of citrate transport and cause neonatal epilepsy, developmental delay and teeth hypoplasia</article-title><source>Brain</source><volume>138</volume><fpage>3238</fpage><lpage>3250</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/brain/awv263</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26384929</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Rauscher</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nawrocki</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Ran</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Feig</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>de Groot</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name><name><surname>Grubmüller</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>MacKerell</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.4067</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27819658</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huard</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabral</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Futatsugi</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gorgoglione</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lanba</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Vera</surname> <given-names>NB</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Vernochet</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Riccardi</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolford</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Pirman</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Niosi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Aspnes</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Herr</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Genung</surname> <given-names>NE</given-names></name><name><surname>Magee</surname> <given-names>TV</given-names></name><name><surname>Uccello</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Loria</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Di</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gosset</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hepworth</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Rolph</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Pfefferkorn</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Erion</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Discovery and characterization of novel inhibitors of the sodium-coupled citrate transporter (NaCT or SLC13A5)</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>5</volume><elocation-id>17391</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep17391</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26620127</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huergo</surname> <given-names>LF</given-names></name><name><surname>Dixon</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>The emergence of 2-oxoglutarate as a master regulator metabolite</article-title><source>Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews</source><volume>79</volume><fpage>419</fpage><lpage>435</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MMBR.00038-15</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26424716</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Humphrey</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Dalke</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulten</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996</year><article-title>VMD: visual molecular dynamics</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Graphics</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huynh</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Abuladze</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsirulnikov</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kao</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Newman</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Azimov</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Pushkin</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>ZH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurtz</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>CryoEM structure of the human SLC4A4 sodium-coupled acid-base transporter NBCe1</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>900</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-03271-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29500354</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jo</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Automated builder and database of protein/membrane complexes for molecular dynamics simulations</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>2</volume><elocation-id>e880</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0000880</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17849009</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jo</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Iyer</surname> <given-names>VG</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Chemistry</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>1859</fpage><lpage>1865</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.20945</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18351591</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jo</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Klauda</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder for mixed bilayers and its application to yeast membranes</article-title><source>Biophysical Journal</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>50</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jorgensen</surname> <given-names>WL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chandrasekhar</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Madura</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Impey</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1983">1983</year><article-title>Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water</article-title><source>The Journal of Chemical Physics</source><volume>79</volume><fpage>926</fpage><lpage>935</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.445869</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kalayil</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulze</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kühlbrandt</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Arginine oscillation explains Na<sup>+</sup> independence in the substrate/product antiporter CaiT</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>110</volume><fpage>17296</fpage><lpage>17301</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1309071110</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24101465</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kendrick</surname> <given-names>BS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kerwin</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>BS</given-names></name><name><surname>Philo</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Online size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography light scattering and differential refractometry methods to determine degree of polymer conjugation to proteins and protein-protein or protein-ligand association states</article-title><source>Analytical Biochemistry</source><volume>299</volume><fpage>136</fpage><lpage>146</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/abio.2001.5411</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11730335</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khamaysi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Aharon</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Eini-Rider</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohana</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>A dynamic anchor domain in slc13 transporters controls metabolite transport</article-title><source>Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>295</volume><fpage>8155</fpage><lpage>8163</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.RA119.010911</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32152229</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>OB</given-names></name><name><surname>Unden</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>The L-tartrate/succinate antiporter TtdT (YgjE) of L-tartrate fermentation in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title><source>Journal of Bacteriology</source><volume>189</volume><fpage>1597</fpage><lpage>1603</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.01402-06</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17172328</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klauda</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Venable</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Freites</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>O'Connor</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Tobias</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mondragon-Ramirez</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Vorobyov</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>MacKerell</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Pastor</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types</article-title><source>The Journal of Physical Chemistry B</source><volume>114</volume><fpage>7830</fpage><lpage>7843</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jp101759q</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20496934</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klotz</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Porter</surname> <given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Colas</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schlessinger</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Pajor</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Mutations in the Na<sup>+</sup>/Citrate cotransporter NaCT (SLC13A5) in pediatric patients with epilepsy and developmental delay</article-title><source>Molecular Medicine</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>310</fpage><lpage>321</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2119/molmed.2016.00077</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Law</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Soudant</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Maloney</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Kinetic evidence is consistent with the rocker-switch mechanism of membrane transport by GlpT</article-title><source>Biochemistry</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>12190</fpage><lpage>12197</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi701383g</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17915951</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Law</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Almqvist</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernstein</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Goetz</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Soudant</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Laaksonen</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hovmöller</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Salt-bridge dynamics control substrate-induced conformational change in the membrane transporter GlpT</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Biology</source><volume>378</volume><fpage>828</fpage><lpage>839</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18395745</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Law</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Enkavi</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Structural basis of substrate selectivity in the glycerol-3-phosphate: phosphate antiporter GlpT</article-title><source>Biophysical Journal</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>1346</fpage><lpage>1353</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.026</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Ståhle</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kern</surname> <given-names>NR</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Valvano</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Holst</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Knirel</surname> <given-names>YA</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Jo</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Klauda</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Widmalm</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder for complex biological membrane simulations with glycolipids and lipoglycans</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>775</fpage><lpage>786</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01066</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30525595</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lolkema</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Slotboom</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Hydropathy profile alignment: a tool to search for structural homologues of membrane proteins</article-title><source>FEMS Microbiology Reviews</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>305</fpage><lpage>322</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6976.1998.tb00372.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9862124</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lolkema</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Slotboom</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Structure and elevator mechanism of the Na<sup>+</sup>-citrate transporter CitS</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Structural Biology</source><volume>45</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27776291</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lomize</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Pogozheva</surname> <given-names>ID</given-names></name><name><surname>Joo</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Mosberg</surname> <given-names>HI</given-names></name><name><surname>Lomize</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>D370</fpage><lpage>D376</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkr703</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Love</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mancia</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Shapiro</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Punta</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rost</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Girvin</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hunt</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Szyperski</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouaux</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>MacKinnon</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>McDermott</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Honig</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Inouye</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Montelione</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Hendrickson</surname> <given-names>WA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>The New York Consortium on Membrane Protein Structure (NYCOMPS): a high-throughput platform for structural genomics of integral membrane proteins</article-title><source>Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>191</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10969-010-9094-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20690043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mancusso</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Karpowich</surname> <given-names>NK</given-names></name><name><surname>Czyzewski</surname> <given-names>BK</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Simple screening method for improving membrane protein thermostability</article-title><source>Methods</source><volume>55</volume><fpage>324</fpage><lpage>329</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.07.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21840396</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mancusso</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Gregorio</surname> <given-names>GG</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Structure and mechanism of a bacterial sodium-dependent dicarboxylate transporter</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>491</volume><fpage>622</fpage><lpage>626</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11542</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23086149</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Markovich</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Murer</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>The SLC13 gene family of sodium sulphate/carboxylate cotransporters</article-title><source>Pflugers Archiv European Journal of Physiology</source><volume>447</volume><fpage>594</fpage><lpage>602</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00424-003-1128-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12915942</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martyna</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Tobias</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms</article-title><source>The Journal of Chemical Physics</source><volume>101</volume><fpage>4177</fpage><lpage>4189</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.467468</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>KR</given-names></name><name><surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Fitzsimmons</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoder</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Jay</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sidhu</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>EJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>T cell receptor-like recognition of tumor <italic>in vivo</italic> by synthetic antibody fragment</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>e43746</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0043746</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22916301</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mills</surname> <given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Pierce</surname> <given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Jedrychowski</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Garrity</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Winther</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vidoni</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoneshiro</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Spinelli</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>GZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kazak</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Banks</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Haigis</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kajimura</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Gygi</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Clish</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Chouchani</surname> <given-names>ET</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Accumulation of succinate controls activation of adipose tissue thermogenesis</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>560</volume><fpage>102</fpage><lpage>106</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-018-0353-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30022159</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moradi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Enkavi</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Atomic-level characterization of transport cycle thermodynamics in the glycerol-3-phosphate:phosphate antiporter</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>8393</fpage><lpage>8403</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms9393</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26417850</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moradi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Mechanistic picture for conformational transition of a membrane transporter at atomic resolution</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>110</volume><fpage>18916</fpage><lpage>18921</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1313202110</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24191018</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moradi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Computational recipe for efficient description of large-scale conformational changes in biomolecular systems</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>2866</fpage><lpage>2880</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ct5002285</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25018675</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morris</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Yashinskie</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Koche</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Chandwani</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Baslan</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Marinkovic</surname> <given-names>ZS</given-names></name><name><surname>Sánchez-Rivera</surname> <given-names>FJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Leach</surname> <given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Carmona-Fontaine</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Finley</surname> <given-names>LWS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lowe</surname> <given-names>SW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>α-Ketoglutarate links p53 to cell fate during tumour suppression</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>573</volume><fpage>595</fpage><lpage>599</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-019-1577-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31534224</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mulligan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Fitzgerald</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Mindell</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Functional characterization of a Na<sup>+</sup>-dependent dicarboxylate transporter from <italic>Vibrio cholerae</italic></article-title><source>The Journal of General Physiology</source><volume>143</volume><fpage>745</fpage><lpage>759</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1085/jgp.201311141</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24821967</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mulligan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Fenollar-Ferrer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Fitzgerald</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Vergara-Jaque</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaufmann</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Forrest</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names></name><name><surname>Mindell</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>The bacterial dicarboxylate transporter VcINDY uses a two-domain elevator-type mechanism</article-title><source>Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>256</fpage><lpage>263</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nsmb.3166</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26828963</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nie</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Stark</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Symersky</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Structure and function of the divalent anion/Na<sup>+</sup> symporter from <italic>Vibrio cholerae</italic> and a humanized variant</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>15009</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms15009</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olsson</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Søndergaard</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Rostkowski</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>525</fpage><lpage>537</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ct100578z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26596171</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Otwinowski</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Minor</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode</article-title><source>Methods in Enzymology</source><volume>276</volume><fpage>307</fpage><lpage>326</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27754618</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pajor</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>NN</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Functional characterization of SdcF from <italic>Bacillus licheniformis</italic>, a homolog of the SLC13 Na<sup>+</sup>/dicarboxylate transporters</article-title><source>The Journal of Membrane Biology</source><volume>246</volume><fpage>705</fpage><lpage>715</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00232-013-9590-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23979173</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pajor</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Sodium-coupled dicarboxylate and citrate transporters from the SLC13 family</article-title><source>Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology</source><volume>466</volume><fpage>119</fpage><lpage>130</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00424-013-1369-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24114175</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pajor</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>de Oliveira</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Huard</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shanmugasundaram</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Erion</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Molecular basis for inhibition of the Na<sup>+</sup>/Citrate transporter NaCT (SLC13A5) by dicarboxylate inhibitors</article-title><source>Molecular Pharmacology</source><volume>90</volume><fpage>755</fpage><lpage>765</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1124/mol.116.105049</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27683012</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pei</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>BH</given-names></name><name><surname>Grishin</surname> <given-names>NV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>36</volume><fpage>2295</fpage><lpage>2300</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkn072</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18287115</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pettersen</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names></name><name><surname>Goddard</surname> <given-names>TD</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Couch</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Greenblatt</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrin</surname> <given-names>TE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Chemistry</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1605</fpage><lpage>1612</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.20084</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15264254</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Gumbart</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Villa</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Chipot</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Skeel</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalé</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulten</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Chemistry</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>1781</fpage><lpage>1802</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.20289</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16222654</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pos</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Dimroth</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Bott</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>The <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> citrate carrier CitT: a member of a novel eubacterial transporter family related to the 2-oxoglutarate/malate translocator from spinach chloroplasts</article-title><source>Journal of Bacteriology</source><volume>180</volume><fpage>4160</fpage><lpage>4165</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.180.16.4160-4165.1998</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9696764</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prakash</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Singhi</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Saier</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>The ion transporter superfamily</article-title><source>Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes</source><volume>1618</volume><fpage>79</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.10.010</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name><name><surname>Dehal</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Arkin</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix</article-title><source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>1641</fpage><lpage>1650</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msp077</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19377059</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Punjani</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubinstein</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Fleet</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Brubaker</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>290</fpage><lpage>296</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.4169</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28165473</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reyes</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginter</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Boudker</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Transport mechanism of a bacterial homologue of glutamate transporters</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>462</volume><fpage>880</fpage><lpage>885</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature08616</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19924125</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rhie</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoon</surname> <given-names>HE</given-names></name><name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Zedler</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Unden</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>OB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>A Na<sup>+</sup>-coupled C4-dicarboxylate transporter (Asuc_0304) and aerobic growth of <italic>Actinobacillus succinogenes</italic> on C4-dicarboxylates</article-title><source>Microbiology</source><volume>160</volume><fpage>1533</fpage><lpage>1544</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.076786-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24742960</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rice</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Noble</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Eng</surname> <given-names>ET</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>LY</given-names></name><name><surname>Carragher</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Potter</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Routine determination of ice thickness for cryo-EM grids</article-title><source>Journal of Structural Biology</source><volume>204</volume><fpage>38</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jsb.2018.06.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29981485</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib79"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rogina</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Reenan</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Nilsen</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Helfand</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Extended life-span conferred by cotransporter gene mutations in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Science</source><volume>290</volume><fpage>2137</fpage><lpage>2140</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.290.5499.2137</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11118146</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib80"><element-citation publication-type="software"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sauer</surname> <given-names>DB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><data-title>bond_length_analysis</data-title><source>GitHub</source><version designator="b15e58a">b15e58a</version><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DavidBSauer/bond_length_analysis">https://github.com/DavidBSauer/bond_length_analysis</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib81"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schorb</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Haberbosch</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Hagen</surname> <given-names>WJH</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwab</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Mastronarde</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Software tools for automated transmission electron microscopy</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>471</fpage><lpage>477</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41592-019-0396-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31086343</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib82"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schuler</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Denisov</surname> <given-names>IG</given-names></name><name><surname>Sligar</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Nanodiscs as a new tool to examine lipid-protein interactions</article-title><source>Methods in Molecular Biology</source><volume>974</volume><fpage>415</fpage><lpage>433</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-62703-275-9_18</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23404286</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib83"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seol</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Shatkin</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1991">1991</year><article-title><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> kgtP encodes an alpha-ketoglutarate transporter</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>88</volume><fpage>3802</fpage><lpage>3806</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.88.9.3802</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2053984</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib84"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaffer</surname> <given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Goehring</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Shankaranarayanan</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouaux</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Structure and mechanism of a Na<sup>+</sup>-independent amino acid transporter</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>325</volume><fpage>1010</fpage><lpage>1014</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1176088</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19608859</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib85"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sidhu</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lowman</surname> <given-names>HB</given-names></name><name><surname>Cunningham</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wells</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides</article-title><source>Methods in Enzymology</source><volume>328</volume><fpage>333</fpage><lpage>363</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0076-6879(00)28406-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11075354</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib86"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Slotboom</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Duurkens</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Olieman</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Erkens</surname> <given-names>GB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Static light scattering to characterize membrane proteins in detergent solution</article-title><source>Methods</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.06.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18625320</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib87"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Søndergaard</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Olsson</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Rostkowski</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Improved treatment of ligands and coupling effects in empirical calculation and rationalization of pKa values</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>2284</fpage><lpage>2295</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ct200133y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26606496</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib88"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stein</surname> <given-names>WD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1986">1986</year><source>Transport and Diffusion Across Cell Membranes</source><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-664660-3.X5001-7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib89"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Studier</surname> <given-names>FW</given-names></name><name><surname>Moffatt</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1986">1986</year><article-title>Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Biology</source><volume>189</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>130</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0022-2836(86)90385-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3537305</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib90"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suloway</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pulokas</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Fellmann</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Guerra</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Quispe</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Stagg</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Potter</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Carragher</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Automated molecular microscopy: the new leginon system</article-title><source>Journal of Structural Biology</source><volume>151</volume><fpage>41</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jsb.2005.03.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15890530</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib91"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tannahill</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names></name><name><surname>Curtis</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Adamik</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Palsson-McDermott</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>McGettrick</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Goel</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Frezza</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernard</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Foley</surname> <given-names>NH</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gardet</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Jany</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Corr</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Haneklaus</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Caffrey</surname> <given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Pierce</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Walmsley</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Beasley</surname> <given-names>FC</given-names></name><name><surname>Cummins</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Nizet</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Whyte</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>CT</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Masters</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Gottlieb</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>VP</given-names></name><name><surname>Clish</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Auron</surname> <given-names>PE</given-names></name><name><surname>Xavier</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>O'Neill</surname> <given-names>LA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>496</volume><fpage>238</fpage><lpage>242</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11986</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23535595</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib92"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thevenon</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Milh</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Feillet</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>St-Onge</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Duffourd</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Jugé</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Roubertie</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Héron</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Mignot</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Raffo</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Isidor</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahlen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanlaville</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Villeneuve</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Darmency-Stamboul</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Toutain</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lefebvre</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chouchane</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Huet</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Lafon</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>de Saint Martin</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesca</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>El Chehadeh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Thauvin-Robinet</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Masurel-Paulet</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Odent</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Villard</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Philippe</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Faivre</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Rivière</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Mutations in SLC13A5 cause autosomal-recessive epileptic encephalopathy with seizure onset in the first days of life</article-title><source>The American Journal of Human Genetics</source><volume>95</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24995870</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib93"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vanommeslaeghe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hatcher</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Acharya</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kundu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Shim</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Darian</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Guvench</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Vorobyov</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Mackerell</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Chemistry</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>671</fpage><lpage>690</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.21367</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19575467</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib94"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vanommeslaeghe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Raman</surname> <given-names>EP</given-names></name><name><surname>MacKerell</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Automation of the CHARMM general force field (CGenFF) II: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling</source><volume>52</volume><fpage>3155</fpage><lpage>3168</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ci3003649</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23145473</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib95"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vanommeslaeghe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>MacKerell</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Automation of the CHARMM general force field (CGenFF) I: bond perception and atom typing</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling</source><volume>52</volume><fpage>3144</fpage><lpage>3154</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ci300363c</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib96"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Venable</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Gawrisch</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Roux</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Pastor</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Simulations of anionic lipid membranes: development of interaction-specific ion parameters and validation using NMR data</article-title><source>The Journal of Physical Chemistry B</source><volume>117</volume><fpage>10183</fpage><lpage>10192</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jp401512z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23924441</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib97"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vergara-Jaque</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fenollar-Ferrer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaufmann</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Forrest</surname> <given-names>LR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Repeat-swap homology modeling of secondary active transporters: updated protocol and prediction of elevator-type mechanisms</article-title><source>Frontiers in Pharmacology</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>183</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphar.2015.00183</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26388773</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib98"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Waight</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Love</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Structure and mechanism of a pentameric formate channel</article-title><source>Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nsmb.1740</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20010838</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib99"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wellen</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names></name><name><surname>Hatzivassiliou</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sachdeva</surname> <given-names>UM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bui</surname> <given-names>TV</given-names></name><name><surname>Cross</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>324</volume><fpage>1076</fpage><lpage>1080</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1164097</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19461003</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib100"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirayama</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaunitz</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Kippen</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1983">1983</year><article-title>Kinetics of sodium succinate cotransport across renal brush-border membranes</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>258</volume><fpage>5456</fpage><lpage>5462</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6853527</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib101"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Jo</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rui</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Dávila-Contreras</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Monje-Galvan</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Venable</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Klauda</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Chemistry</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>1997</fpage><lpage>2004</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.23702</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25130509</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib102"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Pajor</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>The transport properties of the human renal Na<sup>+</sup>-dicarboxylate cotransporter under voltage-clamp conditions</article-title><source>American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology</source><volume>279</volume><fpage>F54</fpage><lpage>F64</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajprenal.2000.279.1.F54</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10894787</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib103"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Vanommeslaeghe</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>MacKerell</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Extension of the CHARMM general force field to sulfonyl-containing compounds and its utility in biomolecular simulations</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Chemistry</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>2451</fpage><lpage>2468</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.23067</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22821581</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list><app-group><app id="appendix-1"><title>Appendix 1</title><sec id="s8" sec-type="appendix"><title>Supplementary Note</title><boxed-text><sec id="s9"><title>Molecular Dynamics Simulations</title><p>Using MD, we simulated the unbiased equilibrium dynamics of the C<sub>o</sub>-S state of LaINDY, we induced a transition to an approximate target model of the C<sub>i</sub>-S state using a custom biased MD simulation protocol, and we simulated the equilibrium dynamics of the new putative C<sub>i</sub>-S state (<xref ref-type="video" rid="video2">Video 2</xref>). In the custom biased MD simulation protocol, biases were applied to collective variables representing the displacement <italic>z</italic> and orientation <italic>θ</italic> of the transport domains of LaINDY relative to its scaffold domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1b</xref>). From the ensembles generated by the unbiased equilibrium MD simulations of the C<sub>o</sub>-S and putative C<sub>i</sub>-S states, we selected as representative the structures with the most representative values of <italic>z</italic> and <italic>θ</italic> concurrently in both protomers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1i</xref>). Water accessibility profiles of these structures demonstrate that the new state is definitively a C<sub>i</sub>-S state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1j</xref>), and <italic>z</italic> and <italic>θ</italic> time series indicate that the new C<sub>i</sub>-S state is stable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1c&amp;d</xref>).</p><p>To generate a model of a transporter’s missing state based on its internal inverted repeat topological symmetry, standard procedure is to apply homology modeling using the two repeats as structural templates for each other (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib97">Vergara-Jaque et al., 2015</xref>). To generate our model of the C<sub>i</sub>-S state of LaINDY, we instead used a novel MD-based approach that only indirectly drives a swap of the conformations of LaINDY’s inverted repeats (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1e,f &amp;k</xref>), and we favor this approach for several reasons. Most importantly, the model is generated in the presence of its natural membrane environment, and confirmation of its stability in this environment via MD is built in to the approach. This approach also enables the transporter dynamics to be assessed before, after, and during the transition between states, and it lays the groundwork needed to apply an advanced array of MD-based techniques to characterize detailed structural and thermodynamic properties of the transition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Moradi and Tajkhorshid, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Moradi and Tajkhorshid, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Moradi et al., 2015</xref>).</p><p>Because the structure of VcINDY’s C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state has been determined, it also would have been possible to generate a model of the C<sub>i</sub>-S state of LaINDY using homology modeling with VcINDY as a template. We favor our MD-based approach over this second homology modeling-based approach for the same reasons listed in the previous paragraph. That said, it would have been possible to use information from the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state of VcINDY, rather than information from LaINDY’s inverted repeats, to generate C<sub>i</sub>-S targets for the biased MD simulations. Within the collective variable space, the targets suggested by LaINDY’s inverted repeats are −4.16 Å for <italic>z</italic> and −19.5° for <italic>θ</italic>, and the targets suggested by VcINDY’s C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state are −8.34 Å for <italic>z</italic> and −22.1° for <italic>θ</italic>. Both sets of targets are reasonable, but we ultimately chose to use the targets provided by the inverted repeats because LaINDY and VcINDY, while homologous, are different proteins. The stability of the LaINDY C<sub>i</sub>-S model at the <italic>z</italic> and <italic>θ</italic> targets (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1c&amp;d</xref>) and the accessibility of bound succinate from the cytosol (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1j</xref>) demonstrate the quality of the inverted repeat-based model, but we cannot comment on what the results would have been if the VcINDY-based targets had been used instead.</p><p>The biased MD simulations we have performed are a powerful tool for assessing LaINDY’s dynamics during the transition between its C<sub>o</sub>-S and C<sub>i</sub>-S states, but they also have limitations. Importantly, the pathway taken through the collective variable space during the transition has not been optimized in these simulations. As such, we restricted analyses of our biased MD simulations to the global structural differences between the end states and the internal dynamics of the transport domains, which this work suggests move as rigid bodies relative to the scaffold domain. Because restraints were applied to succinate in simulation trials A<sub>2</sub> and B<sub>2</sub>, the internal structural dynamics of the transport domains could have been perturbed in these simulations, but we suggest that this did not happen because of the consistency of the data from these trials with the data from simulation trial B<sub>1</sub>, in which no restraints were applied to succinate. Additionally, the biased MD simulations we have performed cannot be used to generate free energy profiles associated with the transitions, also limiting the kinds of analyses we were able to perform. To overcome these limitations and expand on this work, an advanced array of MD-based techniques would need to be applied to the transition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Moradi and Tajkhorshid, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Moradi and Tajkhorshid, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Moradi et al., 2015</xref>). We again note that the biased MD simulations we have performed lay the groundwork needed to apply these advanced MD-based techniques.</p></sec></boxed-text></sec></app></app-group></back><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.61350.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Maduke</surname><given-names>Merritt</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name><surname>Dutzler</surname><given-names>Raimund</given-names> </name><role>Reviewer</role><aff><institution>University of Zürich</institution><country>Switzerland</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Hai</given-names> </name><role>Reviewer</role><aff><institution/></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text><p>In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.</p></boxed-text><p><bold>Acceptance summary:</bold></p><p>This manuscript makes an important contribution to the membrane-transporter field by presenting high-resolution structures of four different conformational states of the divalent anion sodium symporter (DASS) family. They authors complement their structural studies with molecular dynamics simulations. Overall, the results present a rational framework for understanding the mechanism of the transport cycle.</p><p><bold>Decision letter after peer review:</bold></p><p>Thank you for submitting your article &quot;Structural basis for the reaction cycle of DASS dicarboxylate transporters&quot; for consideration by <italic>eLife</italic>. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by Merritt Maduke as the Reviewing Editor and Richard Aldrich as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Raimund Dutzler (Reviewer #1); Hai Lin (Reviewer #2).</p><p>The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.</p><p>We would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). Specifically, we are asking editors to accept without delay manuscripts, like yours, that they judge can stand as <italic>eLife</italic> papers without additional data, even if they feel that they would make the manuscript stronger. Thus the revisions requested below only address clarity and presentation.</p><p>Summary:</p><p>In this study, the authors describe multiple hitherto unseen structures of prokaryotic transporters from the divalent anion sodium symporter (DASS) family, including a new structure of VcINDY, which is the model DASS co-transporter, in its Na<sup>+</sup>-only-bound state, and multiple structures of LaINDY, which is an antiporter. The VcIndy structures (in this manuscript and those published previously) adopt inward-facing conformations. To obtain information of unknown states on the transport cycle, the authors turned to the homologous protein LaINDY, which allowed structure determination of outward- facing conformations in presence and absence of substrate. Due to the homology of the proteins, the structures provide general models of the opposite endpoints during transport by the alternate access mechanism. To provide further insight into the trajectory of conformations connecting both states, the authors used molecular-dynamics simulations by combining the novel structure of the outward-facing state of LaINDY and a model of the inward-facing state that was constructed based on geometrical considerations and knowledge of the VcINDY structure. By the combination of experimental data and computer simulations, the authors propose a charge-compensation mechanism, together with specific protein conformational changes, to explain the substrate coupling. Overall, this well-written manuscript reveals new insights into the transport cycle of DASS transporters and will be of interest to other researchers.</p><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>1) The manuscript describes the transport mechanism of LaINDY as a coupled exchanger based on cellular uptake studies. On basis do you exclude a potential mechanism as uncoupled dicarboxylate transporter or even proton-coupled symporter? In the subsection “Structure determination of multiple states”, the authors present convincing data that LaINDY is capable of transporting succinate and αKG using both growth assays and cell-based transport assays. However, these transport data do not explicitly demonstrate that an exchange reaction is occurring as the authors state. The data closest to showing that exchange is occurring is Figure 2A where the addition of cold substrate induced efflux of accumulated radiolabelled succinate. However, this type of efflux of labelled substrate would also be observed for a symporter in this assay, which is basically a classical cold-chase assay. The phylogenetic data certainly suggest that LaINDY is an exchanger, but these transport assays are not conclusive. Perhaps the authors could address the need for more detailed mechanistic dissection of LaINDY to address this issue.</p><p>2) The authors have compared the bond-length distribution of Cα-C bonds between different structures and found the mean of the distribution to be somewhat shorter in their cryo-EM structures (except for the LaINDY-apo structure which was collected on a different microscope). Could this be due to the inaccuracy of the calibration of the microscope and the detector? In any case, it should be emphasized that although all datasets are all of high quality and clearly permit interpretation of sidechain density, the exact sidechain conformation cannot be unambiguously assigned at this resolution (which is a common problem of many membrane protein structures).</p><p>3) In the computer simulation of the transition between the outward-facing and inward-facing state of LaINDY, the authors have applied the following procedure: They started their simulations with the X-ray structure of the outward facing conformation of LaINDY and applied a bias potential towards a model of the inward-facing state of the same protein that was constructed by a protocol that exploits the inverted repeat architecture of the transporter subunit. Although this approach is generally elegant, would a homology model of the inward-facing state of LaINDY generated based on the inward-facing conformation of VcINDY as template, provide a more accurate description of such state? Please comment on the difference between the two models of inward-facing conformations.</p><p>4) Please discuss whether you have you spotted potential metastable intermediates or larger barriers of the transporter on the way between the two extreme states.</p><p>5) The use of biased MD is justified, as the time scale of the transport is way beyond what can be currently achieved. Nevertheless, the authors should remind the readers that the biases and restraints imposed in the simulations might have biased the results toward the proposed transport routes.</p><p>6) It would be of interest to see whether the conformation of LaINDY will change if the mutations are made to either/both of the Arg159/Glu146 and His392/His401 pairs in the equivalent Na-sites.</p><p>7) Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Clones #76, 78 and 83 are said to be identical, but have different A450 readings for Na<sup>+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> + succinate states in Figure 1—figure supplement 2. If they are identical, how this is possible, especially as #78 has a higher value for T5 than T6, whereas #76 and #83 have the opposite pattern?</p><p>8) Subsection “Structure determination of multiple states” and Figure 2. The authors convincingly showed that succinate can be transported by LaINDY, but they observe little/no succinate-induced stabilisation. Is 10 mM substrate not sufficient to stabilise the protein? Or do the authors anticipate a low binding affinity for succinate under these conditions?</p><p>9) Subsection “Structure determination of multiple states”. Please explain the use of terephthalate instead of succinate in this X-ray structure. Is there a rationale for this?</p><p>10) The authors identify the &quot;LaINDY handle&quot;, but do not mention it again. Do the authors think it is mechanistically significant?</p><p>11) Subsection “LaINDY has Na<sup>+</sup> surrogate side-chains near the substrate binding site”. The authors only mention charged residue surrogates for Na1 and Na2, but VcINDY requires 3 Na<sup>+</sup> ions. Does LaINDY offer up any clues as to the location of the 3rd Na<sup>+</sup> site? There is 10 mM Na<sup>+</sup> in the reaction buffer in the transport assay. Is it certain that LaINDY (or other DASS exchangers) is Na<sup>+</sup>-independent?</p><p>12) Subsection “Substrate release from VcINDY causes significant structural changes”. The authors compare the previous detergent-solubilised VcINDY structures that have Na<sup>+</sup> and succinate bound to the amphipol solubilised VcINDY with Na<sup>+</sup> only bound and highlight prominent changes to periplasmic surface. Are the authors suggesting that these changes are due to the substrate bound state of the protein? If so, is it not possible that these changes are merely due to a detergent vs. amphipol effect?</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.61350.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>1) The manuscript describes the transport mechanism of LaINDY as a coupled exchanger based on cellular uptake studies. On basis do you exclude a potential mechanism as uncoupled dicarboxylate transporter or even proton-coupled symporter? In the subsection “Structure determination of multiple states”, the authors present convincing data that LaINDY is capable of transporting succinate and αKG using both growth assays and cell-based transport assays. However, these transport data do not explicitly demonstrate that an exchange reaction is occurring as the authors state. The data closest to showing that exchange is occurring is Figure 2A where the addition of cold substrate induced efflux of accumulated radiolabelled succinate. However, this type of efflux of labelled substrate would also be observed for a symporter in this assay, which is basically a classical cold-chase assay. The phylogenetic data certainly suggest that LaINDY is an exchanger, but these transport assays are not conclusive. Perhaps the authors could address the need for more detailed mechanistic dissection of LaINDY to address this issue.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with the reviewers that our description of LaINDY as an exchanger is not certain. And the reviewers rightly point out that demonstration of exchange is non-trivial, as cotransporters can catalyze similar reactions. As the reviewers suggested, we have now clarified this point in the Discussion and emphasized that further experiments in reconstituted proteoliposomes are needed (Discussion, second paragraph).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>2) The authors have compared the bond-length distribution of Cα-C bonds between different structures and found the mean of the distribution to be somewhat shorter in their cryo-EM structures (except for the LaINDY-apo structure which was collected on a different microscope). Could this be due to the inaccuracy of the calibration of the microscope and the detector? In any case, it should be emphasized that although all datasets are all of high quality and clearly permit interpretation of sidechain density, the exact sidechain conformation cannot be unambiguously assigned at this resolution (which is a common problem of many membrane protein structures).</p></disp-quote><p>The reviewers have pinpointed the exact reason we did the Cα-C bond length calculation, to ensure microscope and camera calibration did not affect our conclusions. However, we have come to think that the observed discrepancy in bond length between X-ray and cryo-EM is not due to inaccuracy in microscope calibration, as the cryo-EM bond lengths are <italic>systematically</italic> smaller than X-ray and ideal, both in our structures and PDB depositions. If microscope calibration were an issue, we would expect the direction of this error to be random, changing the variance of the distribution but not of the mean value of structures’ bond lengths.</p><p>We thank the reviewers for pointing out that this length difference is small and does not affect the scientific conclusions drawn from our structures. We have emphasized this in the subsection “Structure determination of multiple states”.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>3) In the computer simulation of the transition between the outward-facing and inward-facing state of LaINDY, the authors have applied the following procedure: They started their simulations with the X-ray structure of the outward facing conformation of LaINDY and applied a bias potential towards a model of the inward-facing state of the same protein that was constructed by a protocol that exploits the inverted repeat architecture of the transporter subunit. Although this approach is generally elegant, would a homology model of the inward-facing state of LaINDY generated based on the inward-facing conformation of VcINDY as template, provide a more accurate description of such state? Please comment on the difference between the two models of inward-facing conformations.</p></disp-quote><p>We appreciate the reviewers for bring up this possibility. In the second paragraph of the subsection “Molecular Dynamics Simulations”, we discuss why we favor generating a model of the inward facing state of LaINDY using our biased MD-based approach over using a homology modeling-based approach applied to the inverted repeats of LaINDY. For the same reasons, we favor using our biased MD-based approach over a homology modeling-based approach applied to the inward facing state of VcINDY. Namely, our model is generated in the presence of a membrane environment, and confirmation of its stability in this environment via MD is built in to the approach. This approach also enables the transporter dynamics to be assessed before, after, and during the transition between states.</p><p>It would have been possible to use information from the inward facing state of VcINDY, rather than information from LaINDY’s inverted repeats, to generate inward facing targets for the biased MD simulations. Within the collective variable space used in our approach, the targets suggested by LaINDY’s inverted repeats are -4.16 Å for <italic>z</italic> and -19.5° for <italic>θ</italic>, and the targets suggested by VcINDY’s inward facing state are -8.34 Å for <italic>z</italic> and -22.1° for <italic>θ</italic>. Both sets of targets are reasonable, but we ultimately chose to use the information provided by the inverted repeats because LaINDY and VcINDY, while homologous, are different proteins. The stability of our inward facing LaINDY model at the <italic>z</italic> and <italic>θ</italic> targets (Figure 6—figure supplement 1C and D) and the accessibility of bound succinate from the cytosol (Figure 6—figure supplement 1J) demonstrate the quality of the inverted repeat-based model.</p><p>In our manuscript, this issue is now addressed in the newly added third paragraph of the subsection “Molecular Dynamics Simulations”.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>4) Please discuss whether you have you spotted potential metastable intermediates or larger barriers of the transporter on the way between the two extreme states.</p></disp-quote><p>A free energy profile is used to identify free energy barriers and potential metastable intermediate states along a transition, but the biased MD simulations we have performed do not generate such a profile. From our simulations, we are able to generate the work profiles required to induce the transitions. The presence of features in such profiles is sometimes used to propose the potential existence of barriers in a free energy profile, but there are no such features present in the work profiles associated with our induced transitions. While the biased MD simulations lay the groundwork needed to apply the advanced array of MD-based techniques needed to obtain a free energy profile, these techniques are quite computationally expensive and are beyond the scope of this work.</p><p>In our manuscript, this is now addressed in the newly added last paragraph of the subsection “Molecular Dynamics Simulations”.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>5) The use of biased MD is justified, as the time scale of the transport is way beyond what can be currently achieved. Nevertheless, the authors should remind the readers that the biases and restraints imposed in the simulations might have biased the results toward the proposed transport routes.</p></disp-quote><p>In our biased MD simulations, the pathway taken through the collective variable space has not been optimized, and we take care in this work not to perform analyses that rely on this pathway. Rather, we restrict our analyses to the global structural differences between the end states and the internal dynamics of the transport domains, which this work suggests move as rigid bodies relative to the scaffold domain. The internal structural dynamics of the transport domains could have been affected by the restraints placed on succinate in simulation trials A<sub>2</sub> and B<sub>2</sub>, but the consistency of the data from these trials with the data from trial B<sub>1</sub>, in which no restraints were placed on succinate, suggest that these restraints did not affect the transport domains’ internal dynamics.</p><p>In our manuscript, this point is now addressed in the newly added last paragraph of the subsection “Molecular Dynamics Simulations”.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>6) It would be of interest to see whether the conformation of LaINDY will change if the mutations are made to either/both of the Arg159/Glu146 and His392/His401 pairs in the equivalent Na-sites.</p></disp-quote><p>We absolutely agree that an interrogation of the residues which occupy the Na1 and Na2 sites would be interesting. We are very interested in pursuing such a study in the future. However, such a set of experiments is beyond the scope of the current study.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>7) Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Clones #76, 78 and 83 are said to be identical, but have different A450 readings for Na<sup>+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> + succinate states in Figure 1—figure supplement 2. If they are identical, how this is possible, especially as #78 has a higher value for T5 than T6, whereas #76 and #83 have the opposite pattern?</p></disp-quote><p>We than the reviewers for pointing out these potentially confusing results. This type of ELISA screening is only semi-quantitative and primarily used to identify binding-positive clones. In this particular case, the signals were weaker than typical. Consequently, the signals for these 76, 78 and 83 phage samples show the level of variation of this assay under the conditions used. To minimize potential confusion, we have updated a sentence in the figure legend, &quot;Fab84 (indicated by a *), which has a higher affinity for the succinate bound state of VcINDY, was used for structure determination.&quot; to &quot;Fab84 (indicated by a *), which has the highest signal for the succinate bound state of VcINDY, was used for structure determination.&quot;</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>8) Subsection “Structure determination of multiple states” and Figure 2. The authors convincingly showed that succinate can be transported by LaINDY, but they observe little/no succinate-induced stabilisation. Is 10 mM substrate not sufficient to stabilise the protein? Or do the authors anticipate a low binding affinity for succinate under these conditions?</p></disp-quote><p>We appreciate the reviewer’s attention to detail in the differences between substrate transport and small molecule binding and thermostabilization. We have previously observed concentration dependent stabilization effects in other transporters. At certain concentrations, a substrate can even thermodynamically destabilize the protein. There are a number of possible mechanisms, including binding affinity and the conformation of the protein in detergent solubilization, but a detailed examination is beyond the scope of this study. Therefore, here we simply use the thermostability assay to identify small molecules which stabilize LaINDY for structural studies.</p><p>We selected succinate for the transport assays for two reasons. Succinate is often the most common dicarboxylate in the cytoplasm. Its export has previously been shown to be central to the physiological role of other DASS exchangers in bacteria, and therefore we hypothesized it would be a substrate of LaINDY. Also, as the simplest C4 dicarboxylate, we expected succinate would bind and be transported by LaINDY, even if not the optimal substrate.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>9) Subsection “Structure determination of multiple states”. Please explain the use of terephthalate instead of succinate in this X-ray structure. Is there a rationale for this?</p></disp-quote><p>Terephthalate is a synthetic dicarboxylate we hypothesized would act as a substrate surrogate for VcINDY, with two carboxylate moieties at approximately the same distance as those in succinate. We expected its larger planar benzene ring would allow us to unambiguously resolve the molecule within the VcINDY binding site. This is particularly relevant as the VcINDY X-ray structures to-date are all of modest resolution. These hypotheses of TTP binding and electron scattering proved correct in the determined structure. This has been explicitly stated in the subsection “Structure determination of multiple states”.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>10) The authors identify the &quot;LaINDY handle&quot;, but do not mention it again. Do the authors think it is mechanistically significant?</p></disp-quote><p>While this structural feature is visually distinct in the LaINDY structure, there is no evidence it has any significance to the transporter’s function. We have therefore removed the “LaINDY handle” name.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>11) Subsection “LaINDY has Na<sup>+</sup> surrogate side-chains near the substrate binding site”. The authors only mention charged residue surrogates for Na1 and Na2, but VcINDY requires 3 Na<sup>+</sup> ions. Does LaINDY offer up any clues as to the location of the 3rd Na<sup>+</sup> site? There is 10 mM Na<sup>+</sup> in the reaction buffer in the transport assay. Is it certain that LaINDY (or other DASS exchangers) is Na<sup>+</sup>-independent?</p></disp-quote><p>The reviewers made an important point. Examining the LaINDY maps, we do not see any unmodeled densities which could be assigned as sodium with confidence. Therefore, they do not offer any guidance to the Na<sup>+</sup> sites in VcINDY. As noted previously in point 1, we have not examined the sodium dependence of LaINDY. We have clarified these points in the second paragraph of the Discussion.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>12) Subsection “Substrate release from VcINDY causes significant structural changes”. The authors compare the previous detergent-solubilised VcINDY structures that have Na<sup>+</sup> and succinate bound to the amphipol solubilised VcINDY with Na<sup>+</sup> only bound and highlight prominent changes to periplasmic surface. Are the authors suggesting that these changes are due to the substrate bound state of the protein? If so, is it not possible that these changes are merely due to a detergent vs. amphipol effect?</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewers for pointing out this important technical issue. However, it is unlikely that the differences in the new VcINDY C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> structures, versus the previously described C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S structures, are the results of amphipol or detergent effects. Notably, we determined two VcINDY C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> structures, in amphipol and in lipid nanodiscs. The structural features between these new cryo-EM structures are generally very consistent. Therefore, the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> structural features are not likely the result of amphipol effects. This has been clarified in the subsection “Substrate release from VcINDY causes significant structural changes”.</p><p>For C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S state, all the X-ray structures of VcINDY determined in detergent are essentially the same. However, it is fair to note that all of these structures were determined in the same detergent and crystallized in similar conditions with similar lattice contacts.</p><p>Therefore, while we cannot absolutely rule-out artifacts in the previous detergent-based X-ray structures, we are confident in the consistent structural differences between the C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup> and C<sub>i</sub>-Na<sup>+</sup>-S states.</p></body></sub-article></article>