<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub" publication-format="electronic">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">62071</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.62071</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Neuroscience</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Neurovascular coupling and bilateral connectivity during NREM and REM sleep</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-203776"><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>Kevin L</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3044-7079</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-203777"><name><surname>Gheres</surname><given-names>Kyle W</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-9023</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-203778"><name><surname>Proctor</surname><given-names>Elizabeth A</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7627-2198</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-188999"><name><surname>Drew</surname><given-names>Patrick J</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7483-7378</contrib-id><email>PJD17@PSU.EDU</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">University Park</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Center for Neural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">University Park</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Graduate Program in Molecular, Cellular, and Integrative Biosciences, The Pennsylvania State University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">University Park</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">University Park</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Hershey</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Hershey</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Peyrache</surname><given-names>Adrien</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>McGill University</institution><country>Canada</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Colgin</surname><given-names>Laura L</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution>University of Texas at Austin</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date date-type="publication" publication-format="electronic"><day>29</day><month>10</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e62071</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-08-12"><day>12</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-10-28"><day>28</day><month>10</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2020, Turner et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Turner et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-62071-v3.pdf"/><related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="ra1" related-article-type="commentary" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.64597"/><abstract><p>To understand how arousal state impacts cerebral hemodynamics and neurovascular coupling, we monitored neural activity, behavior, and hemodynamic signals in un-anesthetized, head-fixed mice. Mice frequently fell asleep during imaging, and these sleep events were interspersed with periods of wake. During both NREM and REM sleep, mice showed large increases in cerebral blood volume ([HbT]) and arteriole diameter relative to the awake state, two to five times larger than those evoked by sensory stimulation. During NREM, the amplitude of bilateral low-frequency oscillations in [HbT] increased markedly, and coherency between neural activity and hemodynamic signals was higher than the awake resting and REM states. Bilateral correlations in neural activity and [HbT] were highest during NREM, and lowest in the awake state. Hemodynamic signals in the cortex are strongly modulated by arousal state, and changes during sleep are substantially larger than sensory-evoked responses.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>neurovascular coupling</kwd><kwd>sleep</kwd><kwd>optical imaging</kwd><kwd>electrophysiology</kwd><kwd>2-photon microscopy</kwd><kwd>arousal state</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>Mouse</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01NS078168</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Drew</surname><given-names>Patrick J</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01NS079737</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Drew</surname><given-names>Patrick J</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Sleep-related hemodynamic signals are much larger than those in the awake brain, so it is crucial to monitor the arousal state during studies of spontaneous activity.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Sleep is a ubiquitous state in animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Anafi et al., 2019</xref>) that is controlled by an ensemble of nuclei and their brain-wide interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Pace-Schott and Hobson, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Sakai, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Saper et al., 2010</xref>). In mammals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cirelli, 2009</xref>), sleep is broadly comprised of two stages: non-rapid eye movement (NREM or slow-wave sleep) and rapid eye movement (REM or paradoxical sleep) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib99">Weber and Dan, 2016</xref>). Each of these states is associated with distinct patterns of electrical activity in the brain. During NREM sleep, there are broad-band increases in the local field potential (LFP) power in the cortex that are modulated at &lt;1 Hz (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Amzica and Steriade, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Datta and Maclean, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Saper and Fuller, 2017</xref>). During REM sleep, gamma band power (nominally 30–100 Hz) is elevated in the cortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Cantero et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Le Van Quyen et al., 2010</xref>). In the hippocampus, REM sleep is also associated with a marked increase in power in the theta band (nominally 4–10 Hz) in rodents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Montgomery et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib87">Sullivan et al., 2014</xref>).</p><p>While the dynamics of neural activity in the cortex and other brain structures during sleep are well characterized, the cerebrovascular manifestations of sleep are less clear. Pioneering studies using positron-emission tomography (PET) or <sup>133</sup>Xenon in humans have suggested that cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism is reduced during NREM sleep as compared with those during awake levels, and increased above said levels during REM sleep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Braun et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib91">Townsend et al., 1973</xref>), though the temporal and spatial resolutions of these techniques are poor. The degree to which CBF changes during the different sleep states appears dependent upon brain region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Madsen et al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Maquet and Phillips, 1998</xref>), complicating the interpretation of functional connectivity studies looking at correlations between brain regions where subjects may be transitioning among arousal states (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Gu et al., 2019</xref>). Several fMRI studies have shown significant alterations in hemodynamic signals and functional connectivity during NREM sleep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Boly et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Dang-Vu et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Fukunaga et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Horovitz et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Larson-Prior et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Mitra et al., 2015</xref>), suggesting that the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal changes during sleep. Because BOLD signals are generated by a complicated interplay of cerebral metabolism and changes in blood flow and volume (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Kim and Ogawa, 2012</xref>), the vascular basis of these changes and their relation to neural activity are not well understood. Although functional ultrasound measures indicate cerebral blood volume rises during sleep (likely due to arterial dilation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Mateo et al., 2017</xref>) and is correlated with hippocampal theta and gamma band power (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bergel et al., 2018</xref>), the relationship of cortical vascular changes to local cortical neural activity is unknown.</p><p>Understanding the vascular basis of hemodynamic signals during sleep is relevant to many aspects of brain health and function. First, BOLD signal changes during sleep are associated with movement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Fultz et al., 2019</xref>), and the movement of CSF is thought to play an important role in maintaining brain health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Simon and Iliff, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib89">Tarasoff-Conway et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib101">Xie et al., 2013</xref>). Elucidating the vascular changes associated with these fluid movements would help resolve the actual drivers of fluid movement. Secondly, there is accumulating evidence that arousal state transitions drive large hemodynamic changes, both in animals performing tasks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cardoso et al., 2019</xref>), and in humans and animals undergoing ‘resting-state’ studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Chang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Liu, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Liu et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Tagliazucchi and Laufs, 2014</xref>). If the hemodynamic signals during the periods of altered arousal are large or correlated enough, the activity during the sleep states could dominate the functional connectivity signal. Complicating mechanistic studies in mice is the fact that head-fixed mice do not close their eyes during NREM and REM sleep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib102">Yüzgeç et al., 2018</xref>), meaning that without careful monitoring or a task it is possible that many studies examining ‘resting-state’ correlations in head-fixed mice were compounded by sleep.</p><p>Here we measured behavior, neural activity, blood volume and arteriole dilations from head-fixed mice during the awake state and NREM and REM sleep. We found that arteriole dilations and blood volume changes during NREM and REM sleep could be two to five times larger than those occurring in the awake animal. The correlations between neural activity and hemodynamic signals was greatly increased during NREM sleep, and the functional connectivity between interhemispheric regions of somatosensory cortex also increased.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><p>We used intrinsic optical signal (IOS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Huo et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>) (14 mice, nine males) and 2-photon microscopy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Drew et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Echagarruga et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Shih et al., 2012a</xref>) (six mice, two males) in concert with electrophysiology to measure neural activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Buzsáki et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Harris et al., 2016</xref>) from the whisker representation of somatosensory cortex and the CA1 region of the hippocampus in un-anesthetized, head-fixed C57BL6/J mice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>) during the light cycle. After mice were habituated to head-fixation, data was acquired from each mouse for 5–7 days. We obtained 357.2 total hours of data from these mice (mean: 23 ± 5.1 hr per mouse from IOS mice <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>), 5.8 ± 2.0 hr per mouse from 2-photon imaged mice (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>). All experiments were performed during the animal’s light cycle. We tracked whisker position (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Kleinfeld and Deschênes, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">O'Connor et al., 2010</xref>), body movement, and nuchal muscle EMG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Datta and Maclean, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib95">Veasey et al., 2000</xref>), as spontaneous ‘fidgeting’ behaviors drive a substantial portion of neural activity and hemodynamic signals in the awake mouse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Drew et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Musall et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Stringer et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>), and these measures can be used to determine the arousal state of the animal. We recorded neural activity differentially across stereotrodes from the whisker representation of the somatosensory cortex and the hippocampus to reject non-local electrical signals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Buzsáki et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Kajikawa and Schroeder, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Nicholson and Freeman, 1975</xref>). For IOS data, we used a bootstrap aggregation random forest to determine the arousal state from these behavioral measures and hippocampal and cortical LFPs (see Materials and methods), categorizing every non-overlapping five second interval into one of three categories: rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM, or rfc-REM, where ‘rfc’ denotes the arousal state assigned via an automated random forest classifier. rfc-Awake periods were further characterized into <italic>awake rest</italic> (defined as periods lasting longer than 10 s that lack whisker and body movement), <italic>awake whisking</italic> (defined as bouts of whisking lasting between 2 and 5 s in duration), and <italic>awake stimulation</italic> (directed air puffs to contralateral whiskers). Each of these three awake behaviors were manually identified in rfc-Awake data to exclude transitional arousal states. Periods of <italic>contiguous NREM</italic> sleep and <italic>contiguous REM</italic> sleep were defined as events lasting at least 30 s and 60 s, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>). The 2-photon microscopy data was manually scored in a fashion similar to rfc-IOS data (Manual(m)-Awake, m-NREM, m-REM) and then further subdivided into awake rest, awake whisking, contiguous NREM, and contiguous REM (no whisker was stimulation presented during 2-photon experiments) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>). As awake behaviors can be much shorter in duration than NREM and REM events, we used different durations when categorizing each arousal state. We chose the specific durations for each arousal state based on the typical minimum duration of each event, allowing us to catch the neural and vascular dynamics of each behavior. All reported values are mean ± standard deviation, unless otherwise indicated.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Sleep drives large changes in cerebral blood volume.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic of IOS experimental setup. The brain is illuminated with 530 nm LEDs, and changes in reflected light captured by a CCD camera mounted above the head. Other cameras track the whiskers (illuminated by 660 nm LEDs beneath the animal), the eye (illuminated by 780 nm LEDs), and changes in animal behavior. A piezo sensor to record changes in body motion is located beneath the animal, which rests head-fixed in a cylindrical tube. Tubes direct air to the distal part of the whiskers (but not the face), and do not interfere with volitional whisking. (<bold>B</bold>) Schematic showing the locations of the bilateral thinned-skull windows and recording electrodes. Each electrode consists of two Teflon-coated tungsten wires (~100 µm tip spacing), while the EMG electrode consists of two stainless-steel wires with several mm of insulation stripped off each end, inserted into adjacent nuchal muscles. (<bold>C</bold>) Left: Diagram showing hippocampal CA1 recording site. Right: Diagram of somatosensory cortex recording site. Adapted from Figure (52) (left) and Figure (42) (right) of The Mouse Brain in Stereotactic Coordinates, 3rd Edition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Franklin and Paxinos, 2007</xref>). (<bold>D</bold>) Average neural and hemodynamic responses to contralateral whisker stimulation (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres, 110 ± 70 stimulations per animal). Top: average normalized change in LFP power (∆P/P) in the somatosensory cortex in response to contralateral whisker stimulation. Bottom: mean change in total hemoglobin (∆[HbT]) within the ROI. Shaded regions indicate ± 1 standard deviation. (<bold>E-J</bold>) Example showing the hemodynamic and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM and awake states. (<bold>E</bold>) Plot of nuchal muscle EMG power and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>F</bold>) Plot of the whisker position and heart rate (<bold>G</bold>) Changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROIs. Inset shows images of the two windows and respective ROIs. (<bold>H,I</bold>) Normalized left and right vibrissae cortex LFP power (∆P/P). (<bold>J</bold>) Normalized CA1 LFP power.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Localization of electrodes and hemodynamic regions of interest.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Image of a cortical window showing cortical vasculature. (<bold>B</bold>) Peak pixel-wise cross-correlation (1–2 s lag) between gamma band power [30–100 Hz] and pixel reflectance during the first 60 min of data. (<bold>C</bold>) Same as (<bold>B</bold>) For multi-unit activity (300–3000 Hz). The peak cross-correlation was used to localize a 1 mm diameter region of interest (ROI). (<bold>D</bold>) Histological example of a coronal section stained with cytochrome oxidase (CO). Small holes in the slice indicate the location of cortical stereotrodes in the vibrissa barrel cortex. Adapted from Figure (39) of The Mouse Brain in Stereotactic Coordinates, 3rd Edition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Franklin and Paxinos, 2007</xref>). (<bold>E</bold>) Histological example of a coronal section stained with CO. Electrode path is visible and terminates in the CA1 region of hippocampus. Adapted from Figure (52) of The Mouse Brain in Stereotactic Coordinates, 3rd Edition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Franklin and Paxinos, 2007</xref>).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp1-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Whisker stimulation causes increases in neural activity and blood volume.</title><p>Comparisons between contralateral, ipsilateral, and auditory whisker stimulation and the corresponding changes in vibrissa cortical MUA/LFP, hippocampal MUA/LFP, and hemodynamic changes (reflectance/[HbT]) (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). (<bold>A–C</bold>) Contralateral whisker stimulation caused large increases in vibrissa cortical MUA power (78.1 ± 66.7%) in comparison to ipsilateral (30.8 ± 37.5%) and auditory (13.7 ± 16.8%) stimulation. (<bold>D–F</bold>) LFP gamma band power increased (110.4 ± 96.7%) in comparison to ipsilateral (36.8 ± 32.8%) and auditory stimulation (17.4 ± 15.7%). (<bold>G–I</bold>) All three forms of stimulation caused relatively similar changes in hippocampal MUA power (contralateral: 60.1 ± 34.3%, ipsilateral: 57 ± 33.4%, auditory: 42 ± 41.8%) and in (<bold>J–R</bold>) LFP gamma band power (contralateral: 32.5 ± 17.2%, ipsilateral: 28 ± 14.3%, auditory: 18.6 ± 8.1%). Contralateral whisker stimulation caused increases in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] (16.8 ± 5.1 µM corresponding to a −2.4 ± 0.7% reflectance) larger than those from ipsilateral (9 ± 3.5 µM, −1.3 ± 0.5%) and auditory (4.8 ± 2.3 µM, −0.7 ± 0.3%) stimulation.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp2-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>﻿Volitional whisking causes increases in neural activity and hemodynamics.</title><p>Changes in vibrissa cortical MUA/LFP, hippocampal MUA/LFP, and blood volume during whisking events of various durations (0.5–2 s, 2–5 s, &gt; 5 s) (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). (<bold>A–C</bold>) Extended whisking caused larger increases in vibrissa cortical MUA power (16.5 ± 10.8%) in comparison to moderate (9.7 ± 7%) and brief (5 ± 4.8%) durations. (<bold>D–F</bold>) LFP gamma band power was higher during extended whisking (19.2 ± 18.9%) in comparison to moderate (15.1 ± 16.3%) and brief (6.7 ± 9.2%) durations. (<bold>G–I</bold>) Whisking drives increases in hippocampal MUA power (brief: 5.1 ± 5%, moderate: 12 ± 7.7%, extended: 16.9 ± 10.1%) and in (<bold>J–R</bold>) LFP gamma band power (brief: 5.7 ± 11.7%, moderate: 13.9 ± 14.3%, extended: 18.4 ± 14.9%). Extended whisking caused increases in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] (12.1 ± 5.6 µM corresponding to a −1.7 ± 0.8% reflectance) that were larger than those seen in moderate (7.1 ± 3.3 µM, −1 ± 0.5%) and brief (2.5 ± 1.4 µM, −0.4 ± 0.2%) duration whisking events.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp3-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title>﻿Amplitude of hemodynamic oscillations is largest during NREM and REM sleep.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) The peak-to-peak amplitude of ∆[HbT] oscillations during awake rest (32.3 ± 4.4 µM) were significantly smaller than those during contiguous NREM (87.3 ± 9.9 µM, GLME, p&lt;9 × 10<sup>−32</sup>) and contiguous REM (142.1 ± 20.7 µM, GLME, p&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>−53</sup>) sleep. (<bold>B</bold>) Mean peak ∆[HbT] of individual awake resting events (17 ± 3.2 µM) were significantly smaller than the peaks during contiguous NREM (69.8 ± 10.7 µM, GLME, p&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>−37</sup>) and contiguous REM (107.7 ± 13.3 µM, GLME, p&lt;3.5 × 10<sup>−55</sup>) sleep (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). (<bold>C</bold>) Peak-to-peak amplitude of ∆D/D oscillations during awake rest (16.6 ± 4 µM) were significantly smaller by those during contiguous NREM (38 ± 15.8%, GLME, p&lt;3.6 × 10<sup>−10</sup>) and contiguous REM (59.9 ± 15 µM, GLME, p&lt;3.3 × 10<sup>−16</sup>) sleep. (<bold>D</bold>) Mean peak ∆D/D of individual awake resting events (7.4 ± 2.6 µM) were significantly smaller than the peaks during contiguous NREM (26.4 ± 10.1 µM, GLME, p&lt;1.9 × 10<sup>−14</sup>) and contiguous REM (49.9 ± 9.1 µM, GLME, p&lt;2 × 10<sup>−24</sup>) sleep (awake rest: n = 6 mice, 29 arterioles, contiguous NREM: n = 6 mice, 21 arterioles, contiguous REM: n = 5 mice, 10 arterioles). *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp4-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s5" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 5.</label><caption><title>﻿Sleep drives hemodynamic fluctuations larger than awake behaviors.</title><p>Examples showing the hemodynamic and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM and awake states. (<bold>A</bold>) Plot of nuchal muscle EMG power and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>B</bold>) Plot of the whisker position and heart rate. (<bold>C</bold>) Changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROIs over the putative vibrissa cortex. (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized left vibrissae cortex LFP power (∆P/P). (<bold>E</bold>), Normalized right vibrissae cortex LFP power. (<bold>F</bold>) Normalized CA1 LFP power.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp5-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s6" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 6.</label><caption><title>﻿Sleep drives hemodynamic fluctuations larger than awake behaviors.</title><p>Examples showing the hemodynamic and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM and awake states. (<bold>A</bold>) Plot of nuchal muscle EMG power and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>B</bold>) Plot of the whisker position and heart rate. (<bold>C</bold>) Changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROIs over the putative vibrissa cortex. (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized left vibrissae cortex LFP power (∆P/P). (<bold>E</bold>) Normalized right vibrissae cortex LFP power. (<bold>F</bold>) Normalized CA1 LFP power.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp6-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s7" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 7.</label><caption><title>﻿Sleep drives hemodynamic fluctuations larger than awake behaviors.</title><p>Examples showing the hemodynamic and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM and awake states. (<bold>A</bold>) Plot of nuchal muscle EMG power and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>B</bold>) Plot of the whisker position and heart rate. (<bold>C</bold>) Changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROIs over the putative vibrissa cortex. (<bold>D</bold>), Normalized left vibrissae cortex LFP power (∆P/P). (<bold>E</bold>), Normalized right vibrissae cortex LFP power. (<bold>F</bold>), Normalized CA1 LFP power.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp7-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s8" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 8.</label><caption><title>﻿Sleep drives hemodynamic fluctuations larger than awake behaviors.</title><p>Examples showing the hemodynamic and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM and awake states. (<bold>A</bold>) Plot of nuchal muscle EMG power and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>B</bold>) Plot of the whisker position and heart rate. (<bold>C</bold>), Changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROIs over the putative vibrissa cortex. (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized left vibrissae cortex LFP power (∆P/P). (<bold>E</bold>) Normalized right vibrissae cortex LFP power. (<bold>F</bold>) Normalized CA1 LFP power.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp8-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s9" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 9.</label><caption><title>﻿Correction of slow drifts in reflectance during IOS imaging.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Image of bilateral hemispheres during IOS imaging with localized left, right ROIs as well as a region over the central cement that is used to correct a slow exponential drift in the camera’s sensitivity. The drift in reflectance of the cement (orange) is fit with an exponential (purple) and is used to correct the drifts in the lateral ROIs. (<bold>B</bold>) Raw pixel reflectance from the left hemisphere ROI. The exponential drift is clearly visible prior to correction. (<bold>C</bold>) Raw pixel reflectance from the right hemisphere ROI. (<bold>D</bold>) The exponential drift from the cement ROI is inverted and normalized to correct pixel reflectance in each hemisphere. (<bold>E</bold>) Original (red) vs. corrected (purple) pixel reflectance for the left hemisphere ROI. (<bold>F</bold>) Original (blue) vs. corrected (purple) pixel reflectance for the right hemisphere ROI.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig1-figsupp9-v3.tif"/></fig></fig-group><sec id="s2-1"><title>Sleep drives larger fluctuations than awake behaviors</title><p>We first examined how arousal state affected hemodynamic signals using intrinsic optical signal imaging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Huo et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Sirotin and Das, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib94">Vazquez et al., 2014</xref>), which detects changes in total hemoglobin [HbT] from changes in reflectance. Periods of awake rest without whisking or stimulation were set as the zero baseline (see Methods). Increases in blood volume (vasodilation) cause decreases in reflectance, which are converted into hemoglobin changes (∆[HbT]) using the Beer-Lambert law (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Ma et al., 2016</xref>). These hemodynamic measurements were done bilaterally through a polished and reinforced thinned-skull window (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Drew et al., 2010a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Shih et al., 2012b</xref>) encompassing the whisker-related section of the somatosensory cortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Petersen, 2007</xref>). The LFP was recorded from the vibrissa cortex within the window (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B,C</xref>) to provide a direct measurement of neural activity from whisker-related portions of somatosensory cortex from both hemispheres (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>). To assist in arousal state classification, we also recorded the CA1 hippocampal LFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B,C</xref>), nuchal muscle electromyography (EMG), motion of the whiskers, body motion, and heart rate. Hemodynamic measurements were taken from a region of interest within a 1 mm diameter circle centered on the pixels that showed the highest cross-correlation between reflectance and gamma band power (1–2 s lag) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>) during the first 15–60 min of data (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–C</xref>). This period contains not just rest, but also whisking and some whisker stimulation. This differs from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>, where only resting periods, lack whisking and stimulation, were used to define the ROI. These pixels corresponded to a region putatively within the vibrissa cortex and were consistent across imaging days. This is consistent with the hemodynamic point-spread function having full-width at half-max of several hundred microns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib94">Vazquez et al., 2014</xref>) and the hyperemic response being conducted over several hundred microns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Rungta et al., 2018</xref>). The spatial scale of the measured hemodynamic signal is very close to that measured by the electrodes.</p><p>At the beginning of each day’s imaging session, we stimulated the vibrissae on either side with a brief puff of air, which drove canonical neural and vascular responses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>). Consistent with previous work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>), gamma band power in the somatosensory cortex (30–100 Hz) increased by 78.1 ± 66.7%, followed by a 16.8 ± 5.1 µM increase in [HbT] (corresponding to a −2.4 ± 0.7% decrease in reflectance, ∆R/R, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2</xref>). Volitional, awake whisking led to an increase in gamma band power and [HbT] that increased with the duration of the whisking event. Brief (0.5–2 s), moderate (2–5 s), and extended (&gt;5 s) whisking events lead to an increase of 5 ± 4.8%, 9.7 ± 7%, and 16.5 ± 10.8% in gamma band power in the somatosensory cortex. These changes led to an increase in [HbT] of 2.5 ± 1.4 µM, 7.1 ± 3.3 µM, 12.1 ± 5.6 µM respectively (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3</xref>).</p><p>In comparison to the sensory-evoked responses, we found much larger changes in [HbT] associated with sleep. NREM sleep is characterized by low EMG activity, lack of whisker and body movement, and pronounced power in the low-frequency bands of the cortical LFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E–J</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="video1">Videos 1</xref>–<xref ref-type="video" rid="video3">3</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Scammell et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib97">Vyazovskiy and Harris, 2013</xref>). REM sleep is characterized by neck muscle atonia, sporadic whisker movement, and increased theta band power in the hippocampus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E–J</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Hobson and Pace-Schott, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib98">Walker and Stickgold, 2004</xref>). During contiguous NREM sleep, we observed large oscillations in total hemoglobin, up to 87.3 ± 9.9 µM [HbT] in peak-to-peak amplitude, compared to 32.3 ± 4.4 µM during awake rest (generalized linear mixed-effects (GLME), p&lt;9 × 10<sup>−32</sup>). During contiguous REM bouts, there was a prolonged (&gt;30 s) increase of [HbT] of up to 107.7 ± 13.3 µM, greatly surpassing the maximum of 17 ± 3.2 µM during awake rest (GLME, p&lt;3.5 × 10<sup>−55</sup>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s4">Figure 1—figure supplement 4A,B</xref>). Examples of sleep-related changes in blood volume are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E–J</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1—figure supplement 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s6">Figure 1—figure supplement 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s7">Figure 1—figure supplement 7</xref>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s8">Figure 1—figure supplement 8</xref>. Note that as previously observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib102">Yüzgeç et al., 2018</xref>), the eyes of the mouse are open during both REM and NREM sleep states (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>). These results show that sleep in head-fixed mice is associated with large increase in blood volume, particularly during REM sleep.</p><media id="video1" mime-subtype="mp4" mimetype="video" xlink:href="elife-62071-video1.mp4"><label>Video 1.</label><caption><title>Arousal and associated changes in neural activity and hemodynamics in the awake state.</title><p>Whisker motion, IOS reflectance, and eye camera activity are shown alongside measurements of neural activity and hemodynamics. The awake state shows a large amount of whisker motion and elevations in heart rate. The eye is open. High-frequency neural activity increases and low-frequency activity decreases during whisking events, with corresponding decreases in reflectance. An increase in blood volume/[HbT] corresponds to a decrease in pixel reflectance, as more light is absorbed by the increase in hemoglobin.</p></caption></media><media id="video2" mime-subtype="mp4" mimetype="video" xlink:href="elife-62071-video2.mp4"><label>Video 2.</label><caption><title>Arousal and associated changes in neural activity and hemodynamics during NREM sleep.</title><p>Whisker motion, IOS reflectance, and eye camera activity are shown alongside measurements of neural activity and hemodynamics. The NREM state shows little whisker motion and a lower heart rate. The eye is still open. Low-frequency (delta band) cortical neural activity is elevated, and there are large changes in reflectance.</p></caption></media><media id="video3" mime-subtype="mp4" mimetype="video" xlink:href="elife-62071-video3.mp4"><label>Video 3.</label><caption><title>Arousal and associated changes in neural activity and hemodynamics during REM sleep.</title><p>Whisker motion, IOS reflectance, and eye camera activity are shown alongside measurements of neural activity and hemodynamics. The transition into the REM state shows an increase in whisker motion and an increase heart rate, similar to the awake state. The eye remains open. The neural activity in the hippocampal theta band and upper frequencies of cortical neural activity increase while [HbT] increases substantially.</p></caption></media></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Mice regularly enter into NREM and REM sleep during head-fixation</title><p>We then asked how often head-fixed mice sleep, and how the probability of sleep changes over time from the start of head-fixation. A hypnogram for a single mouse over 6 days with 5 s resolution is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>. The white lines denote brief breaks in recording while data is saved. From this example, it is clear that the mouse has many periods of NREM and REM sleep interspersed with awake. Periods of REM sleep canonically follow NREM sleep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Saper et al., 2010</xref>). REM periods are typically followed by awakening, though REM sleep can be followed by NREM periods. The mean percentage of each classified state is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>, and the breakdown for individual animals in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>. We noted no clear difference in (rfc-)Awake:NREM:REM sleep ratios between males and females, so they were pooled for other analyses. Plotting the probability of finding the mouse in each of the states as a function of time throughout the imaging session (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>) shows that as time goes by the mouse is more likely to be asleep. As awake mice typically whisk every ~10 s, we quantified the probability that the mouse had fallen asleep after a given period lacking whisking and body movement (‘Rest’) across all animals. We found that during only ~50% of ‘resting’ events lasting 10–15 s were the mice awake for the whole event, and with longer ‘resting’ events showing even lower probability of wakefulness (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>). This result is reminiscent of studies in humans showing the probability of being awake falls rapidly with time during a resting-state fMRI scan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Tagliazucchi and Laufs, 2014</xref>), though human sleep/wake behavior is much less fragmented than in the mouse, and the transition times are correspondingly longer. EMG activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>) was much lower during sleep than the awake state (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1A</xref>: rfc-NREM: p&lt;3.2 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, rfc-REM: p&lt;1.7 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, GLME), though the amount of whisking (quantified as the variance in the whisker angle) was much smaller during rfc-REM and rfc-NREM sleep than during the awake state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1B</xref>: rfc-NREM: p&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, rfc-REM: p&lt;0.003, GLME). The heart rate was quantified by finding the peak in the intrinsic signal power spectrum between 5–15 Hz (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Huo et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Huo et al., 2015b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>). Heart rate was lowest during rfc-NREM sleep (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2H</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1C</xref>: rfc-NREM: p&lt;1.8 × 10<sup>−13</sup>, rfc-REM: p&lt;0.004, GLME), though heart rate during contiguous REM was comparable to heart rate in the awake, resting mouse, and the heart rate was elevated during awake whisking (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2I</xref>, Awake Whisk: p&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>−10</sup>, contiguous NREM: p&lt;3.8 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, contiguous REM: p&lt;0.0009, GLME). These observations demonstrate the prevalence of sleep in ‘resting-state’ data in head-fixed mice and show how unimodal measures, such as whisker movement or heart rate alone, are insufficient to detect these sleep states.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Mice rapidly and repeatedly transition between wake and sleep during head-fixation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Hypnogram showing the arousal states for a single mouse over six days. The hypnogram has a resolution of 5 s. White denotes breaks in data acquisition for saving of data. Note the rapid and frequent transitions between rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM and rfc-REM. (<bold>B-I</bold>) n = 14 mice. (<bold>B</bold>) Average percentage of the time spent in each arousal state. (<bold>C</bold>) Ternary plot showing each individual animal’s percentage in each arousal state. (<bold>D</bold>) Average probability of an animal being classified in a given arousal state as a function of time since the start of the session. Mice are progressively more likely to sleep and to be in REM sleep the longer they have been head-fixed <bold>E</bold>, Average probability of the animal being awake as a function of the duration of the period without movement. Mice are more likely to be asleep the longer they go without moving their whiskers or body. (<bold>F</bold>) Probability distribution of the mean EMG power during individual arousal states (5 s resolution) taken from all animals. (<bold>G</bold>) Probability distribution of variance in the whisker angle during individual arousal states (5 s resolution) taken from all animals. (<bold>H</bold>) Probability distribution of the mean heart rate for each arousal state. (<bold>I</bold>) Mean heart rate during different arousal states. Circles represent individual mice and diamonds represent population averages ± 1 standard deviation. *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig2-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>﻿Behavioral measurements demarcate transitions between arousal states.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Power in rfc-Awake electromyograph (EMG) recordings (1.3 ± 1.3 from the nuchal muscles were substantially smaller during rfc-NREM sleep (0.25 ± 2), GLME, p&lt;3.2 × 10<sup>−12</sup>) and during rfc-REM sleep (0.05 ± 1.6, GLME, p&lt;1.7 × 10<sup>−21</sup>) in comparison to the rfc-Awake state. (<bold>B</bold>) Variance in the whisker angle during rfc-NREM (2.4 ± 1.5 deg<sup>2</sup>, GLME, p&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>−12</sup>) was significantly less than that of the awake state (25.7 ± 9 deg<sup>2</sup>). Whisker angle variance during rfc-REM (18.6 ± 7.3 deg<sup>2</sup>, GLME, p&lt;0.003), though statistically different, was much more similar to the awake state due to mice sporadically moving their whiskers during rfc-REM sleep, analogous to rapid-eye movement seen in humans. (<bold>C</bold>) Heart rate during the rfc-Awake state was 7.5 ± 0.7 Hz. During rfc-NREM sleep, the heart rate dropped to 6.1 ± 0.6 Hz (GLME, p&lt;1.8 × 10<sup>−13</sup>), and was elevated slightly during rfc-REM to 7.1 ± 0.5 Hz (GLME, p&lt;0.004) (n = 14 mice). *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig2-figsupp1-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>﻿Random forest model validation.</title><p>All data from the first and last day of imaging from each animal was manually scored as rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM, or rfc-REM. Alternating 15 min periods of data from these two days were divided into two discrete sets: one for model training, the other is held back for model validation beyond the out-of-bag error obtained from the training data set. A confusion matrix containing each IOS animal’s (n = 14) random forest model predictions of the held back, second data set compared to its manual scores are presented in (<bold>A</bold>). The total model accuracy across all 14 animals was 91.3%, with the most accurate predictions coming from the most prevalent classification class (rfc-Awake), followed by rfc-NREM and then rfc-REM.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig2-figsupp2-v3.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Sleep drives arteriole dilatations much larger than those seen in the awake brain</title><p>The intrinsic optical signal contains contributions from arteries, veins, and capillaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Huo et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Huo et al., 2015b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib103">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>), so to better understand how arterioles changes contribute to the signal, we used two-photon microscopy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Shih et al., 2012a</xref>) to image pial and penetrating arterioles (25 and 4 arterioles respectively, from six mice) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). We recorded hippocampal and cortical LFP contralateral to the imaging window (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B,C</xref>). Two-photon imaging in awake mice has shown that sensory stimulation and locomotion drive dilations of arteries of approximately 20% above the baseline diameter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Drew et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Echagarruga et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Gao and Drew, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Huo et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Huo et al., 2015b</xref>) and whisking drives dilations of 5–10% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Drew et al., 2020</xref>). We observed a similar dilation with spontaneous whisking as a function of whisking duration. Brief (0.5–2 s), moderate (2–5 s), and extended (&gt;5 s) whisking events led to an increase in vessel diameter of 0.8 ± 0.9%, 8.3 ± 4.9%, and 10.9 ± 4.3% respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1</xref>). Examples of sleep-related changes in arteriole diameter is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3E–I</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s4">Figure 3—figure supplement 4</xref>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s5">Figure 3—figure supplement 5</xref>. In comparison to the awake state, arteriole diameter during NREM sleep follows a low-frequency dilation/constriction with peak dilations that can exceed those seen during moderate whisking (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>). During REM sleep, the arterioles slowly dilate over tens of seconds, and can reach peak dilations in excess of 50% of the baseline diameter during periods of awake rest. The dilation amplitudes during NREM and REM sleep dwarf those seen in the awake animals. Penetrating arterioles had similar sleep-wake dynamics as the pial arterioles (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2</xref> vs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3</xref>) and were combined into a single group for all analysis. These results show that both NREM and REM sleep cause pronounced cortical arteriole dilations. Contiguous NREM was associated with peak-to-peak diameter changes of 38 ± 15.8%, compared to 16.6 ± 4% seen during awake rest (GLME, p&lt;3.6 × 10<sup>−10</sup>). Contiguous REM drove a prolonged ramp-up to peak dilation of 49.9 ± 9.1% compared to a peak dilation of 7.4 ± 2.6% during the awake resting baseline (GLME, p&lt;2 × 10<sup>−24</sup>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s4">Figure 1—figure supplement 4C,D</xref>). These large dilations were followed by a pronounced and rapid constriction upon waking.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Sleep drives arteriole dilatations larger than those seen in the awake brain.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic of two-photon experimental setup. (<bold>B</bold>) Schematic of thinned-skull window and electrode recording sites. (<bold>C</bold>) Left: Diagram showing hippocampal CA1 recording site. Right: Diagram of vibrissae cortex recording site. Adapted from Figure (52) (left) and Figure (42) (right) of The Mouse Brain in Stereotactic Coordinates, 3rd Edition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Franklin and Paxinos, 2007</xref>). (<bold>D</bold>) Average response to awake volitional whisking (n = 6 mice, 29 arterioles). Top: Example showing a single arteriole’s diameter during rest and during a brief whisking event. Bottom: average change in arteriole diameter ∆D/D (%) during brief (2–5 s long) whisking events. Shaded regions indicate ±1 standard deviation. (<bold>E-I</bold>) Example showing the vascular and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM and awake states. (<bold>E</bold>) Nuchal muscle activity through normalized EMG and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>F</bold>) Whisker position. (<bold>G</bold>) Changes in arteriole diameter ∆D/D (%). (<bold>H</bold>) Normalized vibrissae cortical LFP. (<bold>I</bold>) Normalized CA1 LFP power.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig3-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>﻿| Volitional whisking causes arteriole dilation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Brief awake whisking events (0.5–2 s) spurred a small dilation 0.8 ± 0.9%. (<bold>B</bold>) Moderate length awake whisking events (2–5 s) lead to a more robust dilation (8.3 ± 4.9%). (<bold>C</bold>) Extended awake whisking events (&gt;5 s) produced the largest dilations (10.9 ± 4.3%, n = 29 arterioles).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig3-figsupp1-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Arteriole dilatations during sleep are larger than those during the awake state.</title><p>Example showing the vascular and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM, and awake states. Arterial diameters were imaged using two-photon microscopy. (<bold>A</bold>) Nuchal muscle activity through normalized EMG and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>B</bold>) Whisker position. (<bold>C</bold>) Changes in arteriole diameter ∆D/D (%) in the putative vibrissa cortex. (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized LFP power from the left hemisphere stereotrode located in the left vibrissa cortex. (<bold>E</bold>) Normalized LFP power from the stereotrode in left CA1.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig3-figsupp2-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Arteriole dilatations during sleep are larger than those during the awake state.</title><p>Example showing the vascular and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM, and awake states. Arterial diameters were imaged using two-photon microscopy. (<bold>A</bold>) Nuchal muscle activity through normalized EMG and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>B</bold>) Whisker position. (<bold>C</bold>) Changes in arteriole diameter ∆D/D (%) in the putative vibrissa cortex. (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized LFP power from the left hemisphere stereotrode located in the left vibrissa cortex. (<bold>E</bold>) Normalized LFP power from the stereotrode in left CA1.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig3-figsupp3-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title>Arteriole dilatations during sleep are larger than those during the awake state.</title><p>Example showing the vascular and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM, and awake states. Arterial diameters were imaged using two-photon microscopy. (<bold>A</bold>) Nuchal muscle activity through normalized EMG and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>B</bold>) Whisker position. (<bold>C</bold>) Changes in arteriole diameter ∆D/D (%) in the putative vibrissa cortex. (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized LFP power from the left hemisphere stereotrode located in the left vibrissa cortex. (<bold>E</bold>) Normalized LFP power from the stereotrode in left CA1.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig3-figsupp4-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s5" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 5.</label><caption><title>Arteriole dilatations during sleep are larger than those during the awake state.</title><p>Example showing the vascular and neural changes accompanying transitions among the NREM, REM and awake states. Arterial diameters were imaged using two-photon microscopy. (<bold>A</bold>) Nuchal muscle activity through normalized EMG and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. (<bold>B</bold>) Whisker position. (<bold>C</bold>) Changes in arteriole diameter ∆D/D (%) in the putative vibrissa cortex. (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized LFP power from the left hemisphere stereotrode located in the left vibrissa cortex. (<bold>E</bold>) Normalized LFP power from the stereotrode in left CA1.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig3-figsupp5-v3.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Hemodynamic changes associated with transitions between arousal states</title><p>To quantify the dynamics of sleep-related changes in blood volume and arteriole diameter, we looked at the dynamics of these signals, as well as LFP and EMG signals, aligned to the arousal state transition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>). We used transitions between two arousal states, where time in each arousal state was at least 30 s in duration. Mammals will typically progress through the Awake-NREM-REM-Awake pattern of the sleep cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Saper et al., 2010</xref>), even if the awake periods between the end of a REM event and the initiation of the subsequent NREM period are very brief. The transition from the rfc-Awake state into rfc-NREM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>) shows an increase in total hemoglobin from the baseline of very low [HbT] in the awake state, up to 30 µM over the course of 30 s. During this time, the EMG power decreases with similar temporal dynamics. The LFP power in the vibrissa cortex shows increased power in the delta band [1–4 Hz] of around 300%. The transition from rfc-NREM into the rfc-Awake state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C</xref>) was largely a temporally reversed version of the awake to NREM transition, where [HbT], LFP, and EMG signals all quickly return to baseline values as the animal wakes up. During the transition from rfc-NREM to rfc-REM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>) there was a slow increase in total hemoglobin from 45 µM up to 75 µM. During the NREM-REM transition, the muscles become atonic and the EMG power decreased even more. The theta band [4–10 Hz] power in the hippocampal LFP increased by approximately 300%. The transition from rfc-REM into the rfc-Awake state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E</xref>) was the largest in terms of the magnitude of the total hemoglobin change, as the large blood volume increase seen during REM rapidly reverses (within seconds) as the animal wakes up. Transitions from awake to REM, as well as REM to NREM are possible, but are much less common, and did not occur often enough to quantify reliably. The amplitude and temporal dynamics of ∆[HbT] transitions between each arousal state were consistent across imaging days (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Vasodilation tracks transitions between arousal states.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic of each data type. (<bold>B</bold>) Transition from periods classified as rfc-Awake into periods classified as rfc-NREM. Top: Average change in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROI and normalized change in EMG power. Shaded regions indicate ± 1 standard deviation (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). (<bold>C</bold>) Transition from periods classified as rfc-NREM into periods classified as rfc-Awake. (<bold>D</bold>) Transition from periods classified as rfc-NREM into periods classified as rfc-REM. (<bold>E</bold>) Transitions from periods classified as rfc-REM into periods classified as rfc-Awake. (<bold>F</bold>) Mean arteriole diameter during the transition of NREM into REM (n = 5 mice, 8 arterioles). (<bold>G</bold>) Mean arteriole diameter during the transition from REM into Awake (n = 5 mice, 8 arterioles). Note that the EMG scales are different across conditions.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig4-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>﻿Transitional changes in hemodynamics are consistent across each day.</title><p>Average change in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] for different days for various behavioral state transitions. Each colored line indicates a unique day of imaging (n = 14 mice). (<bold>A</bold>) Transition from rfc-Awake to rfc-NREM. (<bold>B</bold>) Transition from rfc-NREM to rfc-Awake. (<bold>C</bold>) Transition from rfc-NREM to rfc-REM. (<bold>D</bold>) Transitions from rfc-REM to rfc-Awake.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig4-figsupp1-v3.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>When looking at single arterioles during the transition from NREM to REM, arterioles will on average go from an approximate 20% dilation, up to approximately 40% dilation after a minute or so in REM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4F</xref>). Upon waking from REM, arterioles constrict back to the baseline diameter within a few seconds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4G</xref>). When the arterial diameter and ∆[HbT] are plotted together, they show very similar temporal dynamics during the NREM to REM transition and during the REM to awake transition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4F,G</xref>). The close match in dynamics suggests that arteriole dilations are a significant driver of the blood volume changes during sleep, as is seen in the awake brain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Huo et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Rungta et al., 2018</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Cortical hemodynamic signals increase during NREM and REM sleep</title><p>We quantitatively compared hemodynamic signals during different arousal states. For this quantification, we used awake resting events ≥ 10 s in duration, awake whisking events 2–5 s in duration, brief stimulations of the whiskers, contiguous NREM sleep events ≥ 30 s in duration, and contiguous REM sleep events ≥ 60 s in duration. The average ∆[HbT] during each day’s awake resting condition was set as zero (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). Awake whisking events between 2 and 5 s in duration caused a slight increase in [HbT] of 3.1 ± 2.5 µM (GLME, p&lt;0.11). The increase caused by whisking and fidgeting, which are the primary drivers of resting-state neural and hemodynamic signals in the awake mouse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Drew et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Drew et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Musall et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Stringer et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>), were dwarfed by those that occurred during contiguous NREM sleep (32.2 ± 11.2 µM, GLME, p&lt;1 × 10<sup>−34</sup>) and during contiguous REM sleep (77.1 ± 11.9 µM, GLME, p&lt;1 × 10<sup>−76</sup>). These sleep-driven changes were much larger than sensory-evoked changes generated by contralateral whisker stimulation (12.9 ± 5.6 µM, GLME, p&lt;4.9 × 10<sup>−10</sup>). The probability distribution of ∆[HbT] during each arousal state is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>. There was a clear and pronounced separation in the hemodynamic signals between the sleep and awake states, as well as between contiguous NREM and REM sleep. However, the increases in [HbT] during sleep were smaller than those caused by the vasodilator isoflurane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Flynn et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Gao et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1</xref>), showing the vessels are not maximally dilated during sleep.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Increases in blood volume and arterial diameter during NREM and REM sleep.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Average change in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROI. Circles represent individual hemispheres of each mouse, diamonds represent population averages, with error bar showing ±1 standard deviation (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). (<bold>B</bold>) Average change in peak arteriole diameter ∆D/D (%) (n = 6 mice, 29 arterioles for whisking; n = 6 mice, 21 arterioles for contiguous NREM; n = 5 mice, 10 arterioles for contiguous REM). (<bold>C</bold>) Average change in volumetric flux (∆Q/Q, %) measured with laser Doppler flowmetry during different arousal states (n = 8 mice). (<bold>D</bold>) Probability distribution of ∆[HbT] during each arousal state. (<bold>E</bold>) Probability distribution of ∆D/D (%) during each arousal state. (<bold>F</bold>) Probability distribution of ∆Q/Q (%) during each arousal state. *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig5-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>﻿Isoflurane drives larger vasodilations than sleep.</title><p>Example showing the blood volume and neural changes accompanying transitions between NREM and awake states followed by administration of isoflurane. Isoflurane is a potent vasodilator and causes the cortical vasculature to reach a maximum or near-maximum saturation in blood volume. (<bold>A</bold>) Plot of nuchal muscle EMG power and body motion via a pressure sensor located beneath the mouse. Large oscillations in EMG are due to heavy breathing during anesthesia. (<bold>B</bold>) Plot of the whisker position and heart rate. (<bold>C</bold>) Changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROIs over the putative vibrissa cortex. Inset shows images of the two windows and respective ROIs. (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized left vibrissae cortex LFP power (∆P/P). (<bold>E</bold>) Normalized right vibrissae cortex LFP power. (<bold>F</bold>) Normalized CA1 LFP power. (<bold>G</bold>) Average change in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] within the ROI during different arousal states. Circles represent individual hemispheres of each mouse and diamonds represent population averages, with error bar showing ±1 standard deviation (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres; Isoflurane: n = 9, 18 hemispheres). *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig5-figsupp1-v3.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>The average dilation of arterioles during each arousal state followed the same trend as the ∆[HbT] data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>). Awake whisking events spurred an average diameter increase of 4.2 ± 3.2% (GLME, p&lt;0.0006, n = 6 mice, 29 arterioles), with contiguous NREM sleep dilating 9.4 ± 9.3% (GLME, p&lt;8.7 × 10<sup>−19</sup>, n = 6 mice, 21 arterioles) and contiguous REM sleep reaching dilations of 32.7 ± 8.6% (GLME, p&lt;5 × 10<sup>−34</sup>, n = 5 mice, 10 arterioles). The probability distribution of arteriole ∆D/D during each arousal state with data taken from all animal’s events is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E</xref> Recordings of changes in blood flow measured using laser Doppler flowmetry (∆Q/Q) followed the same trend (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref>) (n = 8 mice, one mouse was excluded due to a weak signal), with the largest flow increases during sleep. Awake volitional whisking events caused negligible increases of 0.4 ± 2.6% (GLME, ﻿ p&lt;0.91). Flow changes were more prominent during contiguous NREM sleep, 14.4 ± 9.1% (GLME, p&lt;0.0004), and even more-so during contiguous REM sleep, 28.3 ± 12.8% (GLME, p&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>). The probability distribution of ∆Q/Q during each arousal state with data taken from all animal’s events is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5F</xref>. These measurements of blood volume, arteriole diameter, and flow all show a consistent and pronounced trend of vasodilation in the somatosensory cortex during sleep which far surpassed those seen during volitional behaviors and sensory-evoked stimulation in the awake animal.</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Neurovascular coupling is strongest during NREM sleep</title><p>It has previously been shown that neurovascular coupling is similar across awake arousal states (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>) and that both spontaneous and sensory-evoked hemodynamics are most strongly correlated with gamma band power and multi-unit average (MUA – a measure of local spiking activity) in the absence of overt stimulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Mateo et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Schölvinck et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Shmuel and Leopold, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>). To see if these relationships held true for neurovascular coupling in other arousal states, we looked at the relationship between the power in different frequency bands of the LFP or multi-unit activity and ∆[HbT] during periods of contiguous NREM and REM sleep. Correlations between the MUA and ∆[HbT] as well as the LFP and ∆[HbT] during awake rest showed a peak correlation of 0.24 ± 0.06 for the MUA and 0.16 ± 0.04 for the gamma band, consistent with previous work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Mateo et al., 2017</xref>). The hemodynamic response lagged the MUA by 1.16 ± 0.12 s and the gamma band power by 1.15 ± 0.13 s, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1</xref>). The peak cross-correlation during contiguous NREM sleep was nearly double that of awake rest: MUA: 0.44 ± 0.06 (GLME, p&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>−23</sup> compared with awake rest); gamma band: 0.3 ± 0.05 (GLME, p&lt;8 × 10<sup>−23</sup> compared with awake rest). During NREM, there were similar dynamics in the lag of the hemodynamic response to the MUA as during awake rest (1.28 ± 0.11 s, GLME, p&lt;0.08) and for the gamma band power (1.26 ± 0.12 s, GLME, p&lt;0.15) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>). The peak cross-correlations during contiguous REM sleep were significantly higher than those during awake rest for the MUA (0.32 ± 0.07, GLME, p&lt;4.8 × 10<sup>−7</sup>), but not for gamma band power (0.15 ± 0.05; GLME, p&lt;0.22). During REM there was a slight, but significant increase in the lag of the hemodynamic response to the MUA (1.49 ± 0.49 s, GLME, p&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>−5</sup>) and for the gamma band power (1.4 ± 0.47 s; GLME, p&lt;0.0016) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6C</xref>). However, the distribution of correlations across frequencies differed across states. In addition to a highly correlated gamma band, the correlations during contiguous NREM extended down into the beta band [13–30 Hz]. These results show that the correlation between neural activity and cerebral blood volume change markedly across states, though the hemodynamic lag differences are of order a few hundred milliseconds. We found weak to negative correlations for frequencies below 30 Hz in the awake state and during contiguous REM. In contrast, there were strong positive correlations between lower frequencies of LFP power and the [HbT] in contiguous NREM sleep. This suggests that the positive correlations between lower frequencies of the LFP and vasodilation seen in some studies may be due to the inclusion of NREM sleep in the ‘resting-state’.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Neurovascular coupling is strongest during NREM sleep.</title><p>Cross-correlation between neural activity and changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] during different arousal states, averaged across hemispheres. MUA power [300–3000 Hz] (top) and the LFP [1–100 Hz] (bottom) were consistently correlated with hemodynamics to varying degrees. (<bold>A</bold>) Awake rest. (<bold>B</bold>) Contiguous NREM sleep. (<bold>C</bold>) Contiguous REM sleep. Shaded regions indicate ±1 standard deviation (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig6-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Neurovascular coupling dynamics change with arousal state.</title><p>Cross-correlation between neural activity and changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] during different arousal states, averaged across hemispheres. MUA power [300–3000 Hz] and the LFP gamma band [30–100 Hz] were consistently correlated with hemodynamics to varying degrees, dependent on arousal state. (<bold>A</bold>) Peak cross-correlation between MUA and ∆[HbT]. (<bold>B</bold>) Time-to-peak of the cross-correlation between MUA and ∆[HbT]. (<bold>C</bold>) Peak cross-correlation between gamma band and ∆[HbT]. (<bold>D</bold>) Time-to-peak of the cross-correlation between gamma band and ∆[HbT]. Error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig6-figsupp1-v3.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title>Neural and hemodynamic correlations across hemispheres increase during sleep</title><p>We then explored how the correlations and coherency of left and right hemisphere [HbT] and gamma band power were affected by arousal state. When quantifying signals in the frequency domain, the lowest resolvable frequency will be the inverse of the event duration. Because there were very few periods of awake rest greater than 10 s in duration (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>), the lowest frequency for resting periods we could characterize was 0.1 Hz (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Mitra and Pesaran, 1999</xref>). We thus examined all 15 min periods from our data without whisker stimulation that had at least 12 min (&gt;80%) of rfc-Awake arousal state classifications as <italic>alert</italic>, as an extension of the awake resting and awake whisking arousal state into the lower frequencies. We also examined all 15 min periods without whisker stimulation that had at least 12 min (&gt;80%) of rfc-NREM or rfc-REM arousal state classifications as <italic>asleep</italic> to extrapolate the contiguous NREM/REM arousal states into the lower frequencies. Note that the <italic>asleep</italic> condition contains some awake state and transitions, which may explain the lower power in the gamma band envelope above 0.1 Hz than the pure REM and NREM conditions. Lastly, we took every 15 min period without whisker stimulation, regardless of random forest classified arousal state, as <italic>all data</italic>, which has an arousal state distribution similar to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref> and is more representative of the type of data obtained if behavioral monitoring and arousal state classification were not used.</p><p>The power spectrum of ∆[HbT], normalized to the peak power in the resting condition, is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7D</xref> (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1E,F</xref>). For [HbT], there was substantially more power in the lower frequencies for nearly all arousal states. The lower power of the ∆[HbT] power spectra at higher frequencies were consistent with the lowpass nature of the hemodynamic response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Drew, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Silva et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">de Zwart et al., 2005</xref>). We examined the power in two frequency bands, 0.1 Hz (the ‘vasomotion’ frequency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Mateo et al., 2017</xref>), and the ultra-low 0.01 Hz band. The power at 0.1 Hz was highest during contiguous NREM (awake rest: 0.9 ± 0.1 (A.U.); contiguous NREM: 6.7 ± 3.4, GLME vs. awake rest, p&lt;7.6 × 10<sup>−19</sup>), and was also higher during contiguous REM than during awake rest (contiguous REM: 4.1 ± 2.6, GLME vs. awake rest, p&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>−7</sup>). Extending into the ultra-low frequencies, power in the ∆[HbT] signal at 0.01 Hz was significantly higher in the asleep state than the alert state (176.2 ± 98.9 vs. 36.5 ± 28.6, GLME, p&lt;5.3 × 10<sup>−10</sup>). Similar low-frequency dominated power spectra were seen in the diameters of arterioles, with the power at 0.1 Hz during contiguous NREM (4.5 ± 3.9, GLME, p&lt;2.3 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) and contiguous REM (5.1 ± 5.7, GLME, p&lt;2.7 × 10<sup>−7</sup>) also exceeding those seen during awake rest (0.9 ± 0.1). There was not enough single arteriole data that met the inclusion criteria for the asleep condition for 0.01 Hz (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7G</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1I,J</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>Correlations in neural activity and blood volume between hemispheres increase during sleep.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Mean gamma band power spectral density during different arousal states. (<bold>B</bold>) Mean coherence (between hemispheres) in the changes in the envelope (≤1 Hz) of gamma band power [30–100 Hz] between left and right vibrissa cortex during different arousal states. (<bold>C</bold>) Average gamma band power Pearson’s correlation coefficient between left and right vibrissa cortex during different arousal states. Circles represent individual mice and diamonds represent population averages ± 1 standard deviation. (<bold>D-F</bold>) Same as in <bold>A-C</bold> except for the changes in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT]. MoC2 between the left and right somatosensory cortex for gamma band power and ∆[HbT] during each arousal state exceeded the 95% confidence level for all frequencies below 1 Hz. (<bold>A-F</bold>) n = 14 mice (n*two hemispheres in <bold>A,D</bold>) for all arousal states except Alert: n = 12 mice, Asleep: n = 13 mice. (<bold>G</bold>) Mean arteriole ∆D/D power spectral density during different arousal states (Rest: n = 6 mice, 29 arterioles, NREM: n = 6 mice, 21 arterioles, REM: n = 5 mice, 10 arterioles, Awake: n = 6 mice, 27 arterioles, All data: n = 6 mice, 29 arterioles). *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig7-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Arousal state dependence of low-frequency neural power and coherence<sup>2</sup>.</title><p>Spectral power and MoC2 at 0.1 or 0.01 Hz during different arousal states. (<bold>A–H</bold>) n = 14 mice (n*two hemispheres in <bold>A,B,E,F</bold>) for all arousal states except Alert: n = 12 mice, Asleep: n = 13 mice. (<bold>A–D</bold>) Gamma band power. (<bold>E–H</bold>) ∆[HbT]. (<bold>I,J</bold>) Spectral power at 0.1 or 0.01 Hz during different arousal states for arteriole ∆D/D (Rest: n = 6 mice, 29 arterioles, NREM: n = 6 mice, 21 arterioles, REM: n = 5 mice, 10 arterioles, Awake: n = 6 mice, 27 arterioles, All data: n = 6 mice, 29 arterioles). Circles represent individual hemispheres of each mouse (<bold>A–H</bold>) or individual arterioles (<bold>I,J</bold>) and diamonds represent population averages, with error bar showing ±1 standard deviation. Data is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">5</xref>. *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig7-figsupp1-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Correlations in neural activity between hemispheres increase during sleep.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Mean delta band power spectral density during different arousal states. (<bold>B</bold>) Mean coherence (between hemispheres) in the changes in the envelope (≤1 Hz) of delta band power [1–4 Hz] between left and right vibrissa cortex during different arousal states. (<bold>C</bold>) Average delta band power Pearson’s correlation coefficient between left and right vibrissa cortex during different arousal states. Circles represent individual mice and diamonds represent population averages ± 1 standard deviation. (<bold>D–F</bold>) Same as in (A–C) except for the theta band power [4–10 Hz]. (<bold>G–I</bold>) Same as in (<bold>A–C</bold>) except for the alpha band power [10–13 Hz]. (<bold>J–L</bold>) Same as in (<bold>A–C</bold>) except for the beta band power [13–30 Hz]. MoC2 between the left and right somatosensory cortex for each LFP band during each arousal state exceeded the 95% confidence level for all envelope frequencies below 1 Hz. (<bold>A–L</bold>) n = 14 mice (n*two hemispheres in <bold>A,D,G,J</bold>) for all arousal states except Alert: n = 12 mice, Asleep: n = 13 mice. Data is presented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>. *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig7-figsupp2-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Arousal state dependence of low-frequency neural power and coherence.</title><p>Spectral power and MoC2 at 0.1 or 0.01 Hz for different arousal states. (<bold>A–P</bold>) n = 14 mice (n*two hemispheres in <bold>A,B,E,F,I,J,M,N</bold>) for all arousal states except Alert: n = 12 mice, Asleep: n = 13 mice. (<bold>A–D</bold>) Delta band power. (<bold>E–H</bold>) Theta band power. (<bold>I–L</bold>) Alpha band power. (<bold>M–P</bold>) Beta band power. Circles represent individual hemispheres of each mouse and diamonds represent population averages, with error bar showing ±1 standard deviation. Data is presented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>. *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig7-figsupp3-v3.tif"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table1" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><title>Spectral power in gamma band, ∆[HbT], and arteriole diameter (∆D/D) at 0.1 Hz.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="bottom">Spectral Power at 0.1 Hz</th><th valign="bottom">Awake Rest</th><th valign="bottom">Cont. NREM</th><th valign="bottom">Cont. REM</th><th valign="bottom">Alert</th><th valign="bottom">Asleep</th><th valign="bottom">All Data</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Gamma band Power (a.u.)</td><td>0.9 ± 0.1</td><td valign="bottom">13.3 ± 37.4 <break/>(p&lt;0.01)</td><td valign="bottom">12.8 ± 23.4 <break/>(p&lt;0.02)</td><td valign="bottom">1.3 ± 0.8 <break/>(p&lt;0.93)</td><td valign="bottom">6.2 ± 8 <break/>(p&lt;0.29)</td><td valign="bottom">3.6 ± 2.5 <break/>(p&lt;0.58)</td></tr><tr><td>∆[HbT] Power (a.u.)</td><td>0.9 ± 0.1</td><td valign="bottom">6.7 ± 3.4 <break/>(p&lt;7.6 × 10<sup>−19</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">4.1 ± 2.6 <break/>(p&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>−7</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">2.2 ± 1.3 <break/>(p&lt;0.03)</td><td valign="bottom">4.7 ± 2.3 <break/>(p&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>−9</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">3.8 ± 1.6 <break/>(p&lt;1.3 × 10<sup>−6</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td>∆D/D Power (a.u.)</td><td>0.9 ± 0.1</td><td valign="bottom">4.5 ± 3.9 <break/>(p&lt;2.7 × 10<sup>−10</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">3.8 ± 3.7 <break/>(p&lt;2.1 × 10<sup>−5</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">3.4 ± 2.1 <break/>(p&lt;9.3 × 10<sup>−7</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom">3.4 ± 1.9 <break/>(p&lt;5.8 × 10<sup>−7</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>Mean ± 1 standard deviation. p-values as a comparison to ‘Rest’. Shaded region indicates insufficient data for that arousal state.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" position="float"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><title>Spectral power in gamma band, ∆[HbT], and arteriole diameter (∆D/D) at 0.01 Hz.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="bottom">Spectral Power at 0.01 Hz</th><th valign="bottom">Alert</th><th valign="bottom">Asleep</th><th valign="bottom">All Data d</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Gamma band Power (a.u.)</td><td>5 ± 3.2</td><td valign="bottom">34 ± 51 <break/>(p&lt;0.001)</td><td valign="bottom">21.7 ± 20.6 <break/>(p&lt;0.06)</td></tr><tr><td>∆[HbT] Power (a.u.)</td><td>36.5 ± 28.6</td><td valign="bottom">176.2 ± 98.9 <break/>(p&lt;5.3 × 10<sup>−10</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">128.9 ± 63.8 <break/>(p&lt;7.9 × 10<sup>−6</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td>∆D/D Power (a.u.)</td><td>34.9 ± 25</td><td valign="bottom"/><td valign="bottom">45.6 ± 33.6 <break/>(p&lt;0.06)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>Mean ± 1 standard deviation. p-values as a comparison to ‘Alert’. Shaded region indicates insufficient data for that arousal state.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>Previous functional imaging studies have observed marked increases in hemodynamic activity and functional connectivity between brain regions during periods of sleep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Boly et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Dang-Vu et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Fukunaga et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Horovitz et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Larson-Prior et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Mitra et al., 2015</xref>), but how these hemodynamic changes relate to neural activity was unknown.</p><p>We then looked at gamma band power, which of all neural signals is most closely related to hemodynamic changes in the awake brain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Echagarruga et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Mateo et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Schölvinck et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>). The fluctuations in the gamma band power had substantial power at all frequencies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A,B</xref>), consistent with previous recordings in primates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Leopold et al., 2003</xref>). Fluctuations in the gamma band power envelope at frequencies near 0.1 Hz have been proposed to drive vasomotion and underly functional connectivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Mateo et al., 2017</xref>), and lower frequency fluctuations in the envelope (in the ~0.01 Hz range) could underly changes in connectivity at these frequencies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Chang and Glover, 2010</xref>). The power in the gamma band envelope at 0.1 Hz was substantially higher during sleep (awake rest: 0.9 ± 0.1; contiguous NREM sleep: 13.3 ± 37.4, GLME, p&lt;0.01; contiguous REM Sleep: 12.8 ± 23.4, GLME, p&lt;0.02). All power normalized by the peak in the power spectrum during rest. There was a similar increase in the gamma band power fluctuations at 0.01 Hz during sleep relative to the awake condition (alert: 5 ± 3.2; asleep: 34 ± 51, GLME, p&lt;0.001). During sleep, the modulations of gamma band power at 0.1 and 0.01 Hz were much larger than during the awake state.</p><p>To quantify the relationship of neural activity or [HbT] between the left and right hemispheres, we looked at the magnitude of the coherence squared (MoC2) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Tables 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">4</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1C,D</xref>). We used MoC2 because it tells us the amount of variance explained in one signal by the other for any given frequency, making MoC2 equivalent to the R<sup>2</sup> between two signals at any given frequency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Drew et al., 2020</xref>). The MoC2 between left and right hemisphere gamma band power at 0.1 Hz was relatively low. In the 0.01 Hz frequency band, left-right somatosensory cortex gamma band power MoC2 was higher. Interestingly, for all conditions, the MoC2 for the gamma band power was substantially lower than the MoC2 of [HbT] in the same frequency band (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Tables 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">4</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" position="float"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><title>Magnitude of Coherence<sup>2</sup> of bilateral gamma band and bilateral ∆[HbT] at 0.1 Hz.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="bottom">Coherence<sup>2</sup> at 0.1 Hz</th><th valign="bottom">Awake Rest</th><th valign="bottom">Cont. NREM</th><th valign="bottom">Cont. REM</th><th valign="bottom">Alert</th><th valign="bottom">Asleep</th><th valign="bottom">All Data</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Gamma band (Coherence<sup>2</sup>)</td><td>0.08 ± 0.06</td><td valign="bottom">0.26 ± 0.14 <break/>(p&lt;4.8 × 10<sup>−8</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.16 ± 0.1 <break/>(p&lt;0.006)</td><td valign="bottom">0.13 ± 0.08 <break/>(p&lt;0.04)</td><td valign="bottom">0.2 ± 0.11 <break/>(p&lt;0.0002)</td><td valign="bottom">0.19 ± 0.09 <break/>(p&lt;0.0004)</td></tr><tr><td>∆[HbT] (Coherence<sup>2</sup>)</td><td>0.61 ± 0.11</td><td valign="bottom">0.86 ± 0.05 <break/>(p&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>−16</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.77 ± 0.08 <break/>(p&lt;5.7 × 10<sup>−10</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.69 ± 0.14 <break/>(p&lt;0.002)</td><td valign="bottom">0.82 ± 0.07 <break/>(p&lt;2.9 × 10<sup>−13</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.78 ± 0.06 <break/>(p&lt;2.6 × 10<sup>−10</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>Mean ± 1 standard deviation. p-values as a comparison to ‘Rest’.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" position="float"><label>Table 4.</label><caption><title>Magnitude of Coherence<sup>2</sup> of bilateral gamma band and bilateral ∆[HbT] at 0.01 Hz.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="bottom">Coherence<sup>2</sup> at 0.01 Hz</th><th valign="bottom">Alert</th><th valign="bottom">Asleep</th><th valign="bottom">All Data</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Gamma band (Coherence<sup>2</sup>)</td><td>0.38 ± 0.27</td><td valign="bottom">0.69 ± 0.18 <break/>(p&lt;7.2 × 10<sup>−6</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.61 ± 0.21 <break/>(p&lt;0.0002)</td></tr><tr><td>∆[HbT] Power (Coherence<sup>2</sup>)</td><td>0.82 ± 0.15</td><td valign="bottom">0.97 ± 0.02 <break/>(p&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>−5</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.95 ± 0.03 <break/>(p&lt;7.5 × 10<sup>−5</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>Mean ± 1 standard deviation. p-values as a comparison to ‘Alert’.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The MoC2 between left and right cortical somatosensory cortex ∆[HbT] was uniformly high (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7E</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Tables 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">4</xref>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1G,H</xref>), though it was higher during contiguous NREM sleep (0.86 ± 0.05, GLME, p&lt;1.2 × 10<sup>−16</sup>) and contiguous REM sleep (0.77 ± 0.08, GLME, p&lt;5.7 × 10<sup>−10</sup>) as compared to awake rest (0.61 ± 0.11). low-frequency ∆[HbT] MoC2 during the asleep state reached near-unity at 0.01 Hz (0.97 ± 0.02, GLME, p&lt;1.5 × 10<sup>−5</sup>), continuously surpassing those seen during the alert state (0.82 ± 0.15). To compare these results to functional connectivity measures, we evaluated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between bilateral ∆[HbT] during each arousal state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7F</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The correlation between the left and right hemisphere ∆[HbT] was 0.74 ± 0.06 during the awake resting condition. They were elevated during awake whisking 2–5 s in duration (0.82 ± 0.09, GLME, p&lt;4.8 × 10<sup>−8</sup>), during periods of contiguous NREM (0.9 ± 0.03, GLME, p&lt;9.8 × 10<sup>−20</sup>) and contiguous REM (0.91 ± 0.03, GLME, p&lt;1.4 × 10<sup>−21</sup>). These correlations, however, were not fully explained by the correlations in underlying neural activity, which were much lower. This may be explained by a lower signal-to-noise ratio for neural signals. The correlation coefficients for the envelope of bilateral gamma band power [30–100 Hz] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) were relatively small during rest (0.16 ± 0.07), and were not significantly elevated during awake whisking (0.15 ± 0.05, GLME, p&lt;0.47) or during contiguous REM sleep (0.21 ± 0.13, GLME, p&lt;0.11). However, correlations in gamma band power doubled during contiguous NREM sleep (0.3 ± 0.12, GLME, p&lt;6.6 × 10<sup>−7</sup>). Analysis of the cross-hemisphere delta band [1–4 Hz], theta band [4–10 Hz], alpha band [10–13 Hz], and beta band [13–30 Hz] power showed similar trends as the gamma band, with elevated power, MoC2, and Pearson’s correlations during contiguous NREM/REM sleep compared to awake rest (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s2">Figure 7—figure supplement 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s3">Figure 7—figure supplement 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>). The exception was the delta band, where the sleeping MoC2 and Pearson’s correlations were not statistically different than those during rest. These results show large changes in gamma band power during sleep, but relatively low cross-hemisphere correlations in neural activity. In contrast, the correlation coefficients for the left and right ∆[HbT] were uniformly high (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), and significantly elevated by awake whisking. Contiguous NREM and REM sleep substantially elevated the ∆[HbT] correlations.</p><table-wrap id="table5" position="float"><label>Table 5.</label><caption><title>Pearson’s correlation coefficients of bilateral gamma band and bilateral ∆[HbT].</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="bottom">Pearson’s Correlation Coef.</th><th valign="bottom">Awake Rest</th><th valign="bottom">Whisking</th><th valign="bottom">Cont. NREM</th><th valign="bottom">Cont. REM</th><th valign="bottom">Alert</th><th valign="bottom">Asleep</th><th valign="bottom">All Data</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Gamma band (R)</td><td>0.16 ± 0.07</td><td valign="bottom">0.15 ± 0.05 <break/>(p&lt;0.47)</td><td valign="bottom">0.3 ± 0.12 <break/>(p&lt;6.1 × 10<sup>−7</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.21 ± 0.13 <break/>(p&lt;0.11)</td><td valign="bottom">0.26 ± 0.1 <break/>(p&lt;0.0004)</td><td valign="bottom">0.35 ± 0.14 <break/>(p&lt;4.7 × 10<sup>−10</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.33 ± 0.11 <break/>(p&lt;8.5 × 10<sup>−9</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td>∆[HbT] (R)</td><td>0.74 ± 0.06</td><td valign="bottom">0.82 ± 0.09 <break/>(p&lt;3 × 10<sup>−8</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.9 ± 0.03 <break/>(p&lt;3.6 × 10<sup>−20</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.91 ± 0.03 <break/>(p&lt;4.9 × 10<sup>−22</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.87 ± 0.07 <break/>(p&lt;7.9 × 10<sup>−15</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.96 ± 0.02 <break/>(p&lt;8.1 × 10<sup>−28</sup>)</td><td valign="bottom">0.93 ± 0.02 <break/>(p&lt;1.1 × 10<sup>−24</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>Mean ± 1 standard deviation. p-values as a comparison to ‘Rest’.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>All and all, these result show that sleep enhances the already strong cross-hemisphere coherency and correlation in ∆[HbT]. The increases in ∆[HbT] during sleep are larger than those during whisking/fidgeting behavior, which are the primary drivers of spontaneous hemodynamic signals in the awake mouse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Drew et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Drew et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>). Sleep increases the cross-hemisphere correlations and coherency of the LFP envelope as well, but the neural correlations are substantially lower than the hemodynamic correlations.</p></sec><sec id="s2-8"><title>Impact of arousal state on total blood volume and neural-vascular coherence</title><p>To understand how well we can determine the arousal state (Awake/NREM/REM) from the changes in hemodynamic measurements (∆[HbT] or ∆D/D), we plotted the probability that the animals were in a given arousal state for a given amount of ∆[HbT] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A</xref>) or ∆D/D (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8B</xref>). Using only [HbT], the strength of the coupling between spontaneous neural activity and changes in blood volume is relevant to resting-state fMRI. Many studies have looked into this coupling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Ma et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Mateo et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Schölvinck et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Shmuel and Leopold, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>) but the measured strength of this coupling varies from study to study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Drew et al., 2020</xref>). One possible contribution to the varying strength of the coupling observed between neural and hemodynamic signals could be changes in the arousal state. When solely looking at changes in arteriole diameter (∆D/D), the variability in arteriole diameter during NREM sleep make it difficult to deduce arousal state. Fluctuations in arteriole diameter during NREM may appear similar to volitional whisking events, which occur every 10–15 s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Drew et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig8" position="float"><label>Figure 8.</label><caption><title>Influence of arousal state on vascular correlations to ongoing neural activity.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Probability of being in a given arousal state as a function of mean ∆[HbT]. As ∆[HbT] increases, so does the probability that the animal is asleep. Temporal resolution is 5 s, ∆[HbT] bins have a 1 µM resolution. (<bold>B</bold>) Probability of being in a given arousal state as a function of mean ∆D/D. As ∆D/D increases, the probability that the animal is asleep is not well defined until reaching very large vasodilation. Temporal resolution is 5 s, ∆D/D bins are 1% resolution. (<bold>C</bold>) MoC2 between the envelope (≤1 Hz) of gamma band power and ∆[HbT] during each arousal state. Three additional states of <italic>alert, asleep,</italic> and <italic>all data</italic> are included to extend into the ultra-low frequencies. n = 14 mice. Alert arousal state n = 12; Asleep arousal state n = 13; All data arousal state n = 14. (<bold>D</bold>) Relationship between the gamma band power and ∆[HbT] during each arousal state. 5 s resolution. (<bold>E</bold>) Schematic demonstrating the observed relationship between ∆[HbT] and gamma band power during each arousal state.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig8-v3.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig8s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 8—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>﻿Arousal state dependence of low-frequency neural-hemo coherence.</title><p>Coherence between LFP and changes total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] evaluated at 0.1 and 0.01 Hz. (<bold>A</bold>) Mean MoC2 between the envelope (≤1 Hz) of delta band power [1–4 Hz] and ∆[HbT] in a single cortical hemisphere during different arousal states at 0.1 (<bold>B</bold>) and 0.01 (<bold>C</bold>) Hz. (<bold>D–F</bold>) Same as in (<bold>A–C</bold>) except for theta band power [4–10 Hz]. (<bold>G–I</bold>) Same as in (<bold>A–C</bold>) except for alpha band power [10–13 Hz]. (<bold>J–L</bold>) Same as in (<bold>A–C</bold>) except for beta band power [13–30 Hz]. (<bold>M–O</bold>) Same as in (<bold>A–C</bold>) except for gamma band power [30–100 Hz]. (<bold>A–O</bold>) n = 14 mice (n*two hemispheres) for all arousal states except Alert: n = 12 mice, Asleep: n = 13 mice. Data is presented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>. *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001 GLME.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-62071-fig8-figsupp1-v3.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>The coherence between [HbT] and the gamma band power in various arousal states is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8C</xref> (other LFP bands are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8s1">Figure 8—figure supplement 1</xref>). Coherence at lower frequencies was highest in contiguous NREM sleep and for all data, and lowest during awake rest and during contiguous REM sleep. It may seem puzzling that the coherence is higher when taking all the data together than for any individual subset, but this can be explained by a restriction of range effect when grouping by arousal state. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D</xref>, we show the ∆[HbT] versus the power in the gamma band for all of our ‘rfc’ data including stimulation. When all the data is considered together, it is clear that there was a robust relationship between neural activity and blood volume. However, as the level of neural activity and [HbT] were different across the arousal states, within any given state this relationship may not be so strong, again due to a restriction of range effect. All in all, we would like to emphasize the observation that correlations between ongoing neural activity and hemodynamic signals appear to be lowest during the awake state and highest during sleep (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8e</xref>) and is most prominent in the lower frequencies.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Using optical imaging and electrophysiology in head-fixed mice, we found that sleep was associated with large increases in blood volume and arterial dilation in the somatosensory cortex. These vasodilations and increases in cerebral blood volume were very large, up to five times the size of those evoked by sensory stimulation or fidgeting behaviors like whisking. We found that the correlation and coherence between neural activity and blood volume were substantially stronger during NREM sleep than during any other arousal state, as were bilateral correlations and coherency. Because, at least under our imaging conditions, mice frequently and rapidly enter into sleep, the hemodynamic signals due to sleep will dominate over any awake signals due to the very large changes in neural activity and blood volume in the sleeping cortex. The net effect is that, without careful monitoring of arousal state, sleep-related hemodynamics and neural activity will dominate any ‘resting-state’ study in the un-anesthetized mouse.</p><p>We note that care should be taken in interpreting these results. The sleep patterns and depth may be altered by head-fixation. We only imaged cortical blood volume changes, and other areas of the brain may have different patterns of vasodilation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Braun et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib91">Townsend et al., 1973</xref>). We used electrophysiology to assay neural activity as it is used in humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Buzsáki et al., 2012</xref>), and calcium indicators buffer intracellular calcium, can cause epilepsy, and do not report the majority of spikes even under optimal imaging conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">McMahon and Jackson, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Steinmetz et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Theis et al., 2016</xref>). The activity of interneurons that express neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) can drive vasodilation without causing detectable changes in the LFP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Echagarruga et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Krawchuk et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Lee et al., 2020</xref>), so the overall neural activity captured in the LFP may not reflect the activity of neurons that drive hemodynamic responses. We note there may be a difference in sleep-state identification with local LFP recordings when compared with conventional EEG, which sum electrical signals over a larger area. Previous studies in rats have shown discrete regions of cortex going into periods of ‘localized sleep’ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib96">Vyazovskiy et al., 2011</xref>), and in some cases, slow-wave oscillations can be seen during REM sleep in the cortex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Funk et al., 2016</xref>), either of which may reduce the accuracy of our arousal state classifications. We noted no arousal state discrepancies between left and right somatosensory cortices during manual sleep scoring, however, this does not exclude localized sleep in other cortical regions. The spatial resolution of IOS and our electrodes are of order 100 µm, and any vascular or neural changes on smaller spatial scales would be ‘blurred’, potentially resulting in lower estimates of neurovascular coupling strength. Additionally, as hemoglobin is the major absorber of both visible and infrared light in the brain, and changes in the level of hemoglobin can cause decreases in florescence signals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Haiss et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Shen et al., 2012</xref>), sleep-related vasodilations attenuate signals from calcium indicators in neurons when visualized with either 1- or 2-photon methods. As there are multiple pathways by which neurons (and astrocytes) communicate with the vasculature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Attwell et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Drew, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Iadecola, 2017</xref>), it is likely that multiple mechanisms underly the vasodilation we observed during sleep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Özbay et al., 2018</xref>).</p><p>There are several implications for our work. First, it shows that it is critical to monitor arousal state, particularly in head-fixed mice, as they frequently fall asleep. Arousal state cannot be detected by simple monitoring of the face/eyes, as mice can sleep with their eyes open (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib102">Yüzgeç et al., 2018</xref>), and thus requires additional methods such as a combination of EMG/LFP/whisker tracking. If an animal falls asleep, this will result in larger neurovascular and bilateral correlations than in the awake state. There has been some disagreement as to how well hemodynamic signals track neural activity in the absence of any sensory stimulation (the ‘resting-state’) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Drew et al., 2020</xref>). With a few exceptions (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>), these studies did not carefully monitor arousal state, and it could be that studies finding higher neurovascular correlations have episodes of sleep in them. Similar issues have been noted for human resting-state fMRI studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Tagliazucchi and Laufs, 2014</xref>) and with non-human primates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cardoso et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Chang et al., 2016</xref>), so this is likely a ubiquitous problem with any experiment where the subject is unmotivated to stay awake. On a more fundamental level, these results show that the vasodilation seen in the awake brain is smaller than the hemodynamic changes seen during sleep. This vasodilation during sleep may serve to circulate cerebrospinal fluid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Aldea et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Fultz et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Kedarasetti et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib93">van Veluw et al., 2020</xref>) or some other physiological role.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th>Reagent type <break/>(species) or <break/>resource</th><th>Designation</th><th>Source or <break/>reference</th><th>Identifiers</th><th>Additional <break/>information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Strain, strain background (<italic>M. musculus</italic>)</td><td>Strain: C57BL6/J</td><td>Jackson Laboratory</td><td>Stock No: 000664</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Chemical compound, drug</td><td>Fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran 150 kDa</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>Stock No: FD150S</td><td>100 µL, 5% (weight/volume)</td></tr><tr><td>Software, algorithm</td><td>Data analysis software</td><td>MathWorks</td><td>MATLAB 2019a</td><td><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/KL-Turner/Turner_Gheres_Proctor_Drew_eLife2020">https://github.com/KL-Turner/Turner_Gheres_Proctor_Drew_eLife2020</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib92">Turner et al., 2020</xref></td></tr><tr><td>Software, algorithm</td><td>IOS and 2PLSM data acquisition software</td><td>National Instruments</td><td>LabVIEW 2018</td><td><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/LabVIEW-DAQ">https://github.com/DrewLab/LabVIEW-DAQ</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Drew, 2020</xref></td></tr><tr><td>Software, algorithm</td><td>2PLSM data acquisition software</td><td>Sutter Instrument</td><td>MSCAN 2015</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>PFA-coated tungsten microwires</td><td>A-M Systems</td><td>Stock No: #795500</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>PFA-coated 7-strand stainless-steel microwires</td><td>A-M Systems</td><td>Stock No: #793200</td><td/></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title>Animal procedures</title><p>This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All procedures were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Pennsylvania State University (protocol # 201042827). All data was acquired from 20 C57BL6/J mice (#000664, Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) comprised of 11 males and nine females between the ages of 3 and 8 months of age. Of these 20 animals, 14 were used in IOS experiments and six were used in two-photon experiments. Any animals that were excluded from a specific analysis are noted. Mice were given food and water ad libitum and housed on a 12 hr light/dark cycle, remaining individually housed after surgery and throughout the duration of experiments. All experiments were performed during the animal’s light cycle. Sample sizes are consistent with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Drew et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Huo et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>). The experimenters were not blind to the conditions of the experiments, data, or analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Surgery</title><sec id="s4-2-1"><title>Electrode, EMG, and window implantation procedure for intrinsic optical signal (IOS) imaging experiments</title><p>Mice were anesthetized under isoflurane (5% induction, 2% maintenance) vaporized in oxygen during all surgical procedures. The incision site on the scalp was sterilized with betadine and 70% ethanol, followed by the resection of the skin and connective tissue. A custom-machined titanium head bar for head-fixation (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/Mouse-Head-Fixation">https://github.com/DrewLab/Mouse-Head-Fixation</ext-link>) was adhered atop the occipital bone of the skull with cyanoacrylate glue (Vibra-Tite 32402, ND Industries, Clawson, MI) posterior to the lambda cranial suture. A self-tapping 3/32’ #000 screw (J.I. Morris, Oxford, MA) was implanted into the center of each frontal bone. The neural recordings were grounded to one of the frontal screws with a stainless-steel wire (#792800, A-M Systems, Sequim, WA). Two ~ 4 mm x ~ 2 mm polished and reinforced thinned-skull windows (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Drew et al., 2010a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Shih et al., 2012b</xref>) were bilaterally implanted caudal to the bregma cranial suture above the left and right somatosensory cortices. For each window, the skull was thinned and then sequentially polished with 3F and 4F grit. A PFA-coated tungsten stereotrode (#795500, AM systems, Sequim, WA) was inserted ~700 μm below the pia into the whisker representation of somatosensory cortex (~2 mm caudal,~3–3.5 mm lateral from bregma) at 45﻿° from the horizontal along the rostrocaudal axis. A third tungsten stereotrode was implanted ~1500 μm below the pia into the CA1 region of the left hippocampus (~2.5 mm caudal, 4–4.5 mm lateral from bregma) at 45° from the vertical along the mediolateral axis. Each electrode was positioned using a ﻿micromanipulator (MP285, Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA) through a small hole made at the edge of the thinned area for the vibrissa electrodes, and slightly caudal the thinned area for the left hemisphere hippocampal electrode. Each hole was sealed with cyanoacrylate glue, and a #0 coverslip (#72198, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) was placed atop the thinned portion of the window. The skin above the neck was resected and a pair of PFA-coated 7-strand stainless-steel wires (#793200, AM systems, Sequim, WA) were inserted into each nuchal muscle for EMG recording. The skin was then re-attached to the edge of the occipital bone (VetBond, 3M, St. Paul, MN). Dental cement (Ortho-Jet, Lang Dental, Wheeling, IL) was used to seal the edges of the window and provide structural rigidity to the electrodes, screws, and head bar.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2-2"><title>Electrode, EMG, and window implantation procedure for two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM) experiments</title><p>As described above, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and a titanium head bar was implanted, along with two frontal screws and ground wire. A third self-tapping 3/32’ #000 screw was implanted into the left parietal bone. Instead of bilateral polished and reinforced thinned-skull windows, a single ~4 mm x ~ 5 mm window above the right hemisphere somatosensory cortex is implanted following thinning and polishing. There are no electrodes implanted under the window, as their illumination by the laser causes heating. Tungsten stereotrodes were implanted into the left hemisphere vibrissa cortex and left hemisphere hippocampus in a fashion similar to above. Stainless-steel EMG wires are implanted into the nuchal muscle, and the entire area sealed with dental cement. Following surgery, animals were given 2–3 days to recover before habituation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Histology</title><p>At the conclusion of the experiments, animals were deeply anesthetized under 5% isoflurane for several minutes and transcardially perfused with heparinized saline, followed by 4% ﻿paraformaldehyde. Fiduciary marks were made at the corner of each cranial window. The extracted brains were put in a solution of 4% PFA/30% sucrose for several days before being coronally section (~90 μm per section) with a freezing microtome. Cytochrome oxidase (CO) staining was performed (c2506, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to allow visualization of the whisker barrels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Adams et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Drew and Feldman, 2009</xref>) and the hippocampal layers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1D,E</xref>). All histological schematics (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>) as well as histological overlays (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1D,E</xref>) were adapted from the mouse brain in stereotactic coordinates, 3<sup>rd</sup> Edition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Franklin and Paxinos, 2007</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Physiological data acquisition</title><p>All IOS and 2PLSM experiments were performed in sound-dampening boxes. IOS data were acquired with a custom LabVIEW program (v18.0, National Instruments, Austin, TX). 2PLSM data were acquired with ﻿Sutter MCS software (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA) and a custom LabVIEW program designed to synchronize with the Sutter MCS software. Both custom LabVIEW programs are available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/LabVIEW-DAQ">https://github.com/DrewLab/LabVIEW-DAQ</ext-link>.</p><sec id="s4-4-1"><title>Habituation</title><p>Mice were gradually acclimated to being head-fixed over the course of three habituation sessions of increasing duration. During the initial habituation session (15–30 min in duration), animals were not exposed to any whisker stimulation and the efficacy of the cortical, hippocampal, and EMG electrodes was determined. If the electrical recordings were patent and the mouse tolerated head-fixation, animals were habituated for two more sessions of 60 and 120 min. During these subsequent sessions, the whiskers were stimulated with directed air puffs. Following habituation, IOS animals were run for six imaging sessions lasting of 3–5 hr, and 2PLSM animals were run for up to six imaging sessions depending on the quality of the thinned-skull window.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4-2"><title>Intrinsic optical signal (IOS) imaging</title><p>Mice were briefly (&lt;1 min) anesthetized with 5% isoflurane and transferred to the head-fixation apparatus with the body being supported by a clear plastic tube. Animals were given 30 min to wake up prior to data collection to allow recovery from isoflurane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Shirey et al., 2015</xref>). Changes in total blood volume were measured by illuminating each cranial window with two collimated and filtered 530 ﻿±5 nm LEDs (FB530-10 and M530L3, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ). The 530 nm wavelength is an isosbestic point in which oxy- and deoxy- hemoglobin absorb the light equally. We use the changes in the amount of light reflected from the surface of the brain as a measurement of total hemoglobin concentration. The reflected light is imaged with a Dalsa 1M60 Pantera CCD camera (Phase One, Cambridge, MA) positioned above the mouse’s head. The magnification of the lens (VZM 300i, Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ) allows simultaneous collection of data from both the left and right cranial windows. The light entering the camera (green) was filtered using a mounted filter (#46540, Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ) to remove the red light used in whisker tracking. Images for tracking changes in total hemoglobin (256 × 256 pixels, 15 µm per pixel, 12-bit resolution) were acquired at 30 frames/second (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Huo et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-4-3"><title>Two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM)</title><p>Mice were briefly (&lt;1 min) anesthetized with 5% isoflurane and retro-orbitally injected with 100 µL of 5% (weight/volume) fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran (FITC) (FD150S, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) dissolved in sterile saline. Mice were then head-fixed in a similar set-up as during IOS experiments and given 30 min to wake up prior to data collection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Shirey et al., 2015</xref>). Imaging was done on a Sutter Movable Objective Microscope with a CFI75 LWD 16X W objective (Nikon, Melville, NY) and a MaiTai HP Ti:Sapphire laser (﻿Spectra-Physics, Santa Clara, CA) tuned to 800 nm. Individual pial (n = 25) and penetrating (n = 4) arterioles were imaged (five frames/second) in 16 min intervals with a power of 10–20 mW (measured exiting the objective). All arterioles measured were in somatosensory cortex and in or near the whisker vibrissa representation.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4-4"><title>Electrophysiology</title><p>Neural activity was recorded simultaneously in both IOS and 2PLSM as the differential potentials between the two leads of either the PFA-coated tungsten microwires ﻿(#795500, A-M Systems, Sequim, WA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Huo et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">Winder et al., 2017</xref>) for cortical and hippocampal stereotrodes. EMG activity was identically recorded with PFA-coated 7-strand stainless-steel microwires (#793200, A-M systems, Sequim, WA). Stereotrode tungsten microwires were threaded through polyimide tubing (#822200, A-M Systems, Sequim, WA) giving an interelectrode spacing of ~100 ﻿µm. The tungsten microwires were crimped to gold pin connectors, with impedances typically between 70 and 120 ﻿kΩ at 1 kHz. EMG stainless-steel microwires were fabricated in a similar fashion, but with an interelectrode spacing of several mm. Each signal was amplified and hardware bandpass filtered between 0.1 Hz and 10 kHz (DAM80, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) and then digitized at 20 kHz (PCIe-6341 for IOS experiments, PCIe-6321 and PCIe-6353 for 2PLSM experiments, National Instruments, Austin, TX).</p></sec><sec id="s4-4-5"><title>Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF)</title><p>In a subset of IOS animals (n = 8, one animal excluded) a laser Doppler probe (OxyLab LDF, Oxford Optronix, Abingdon, United Kingdom) was aligned above the right hemisphere barrel cortex to record changes in bulk flow and was digitized at 20 kHz.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4-6"><title>Whisker stimulation</title><p>Mice were stimulated with brief (0.1 s), randomized puffs of air (10 PSI via an air regulator, Wilkerson R03-02-000, Grainger, Lake Forest, IL) to either the left vibrissae, right vibrissae, or an auditory control (with 1:1:1 ratio) every 30 s for the first ~60 min of imaging. The stimuli were directed to the distal ends of the whiskers, parallel to the face so as to avoid stimulating other parts of the body/face. Each stimulus was controlled with a solenoid actuator valve (2V025 ¼, Sizto Tech Corporation, Palo Alto, CA). Only mice undergoing IOS imaging underwent whisker stimulation.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4-7"><title>Behavioral measurements</title><p>In both IOS and 2PLSM experiments, the right vibrissae were diffusely illuminated from below by either a 625 nm light (#66–833, Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ) during IOS experiments, or with a 780 nm LED (M780L3, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ) during 2PLSM experiments. In both experimental setups, a Basler ace acA640-120gm ﻿camera (Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ) with a 18 mm DG Series FFL lens (#54–857, Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ) acquired images of the whiskers (30 × 350 pixels) at a nominal rate of 150 frames/second. The image was narrow enough to only show the whiskers as dark lines on a bright background, with the average whisker angle being estimated using the Radon transform (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/Whisker-Tracking">https://github.com/DrewLab/Whisker-Tracking</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Drew et al., 2010b</xref>). In addition to whisker tracking, animal motion inside the tube was measured using a pressure sensor ﻿(Flexiforce A201, Tekscan, Boston, MA) was amplified ﻿(Model 440, Brownlee Precision (NeuroPhase), Santa Clara, CA for IOS experiments, Model SR560, Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, CA for 2PLSM experiments) and digitized at 20 kHz by the same acquisition device(s) previously described for the electrophysiology data. For both whisker acceleration and pressure sensor data, a threshold was manually set to establish when the animal behaved. ﻿A webcam (LifeCam Cinema, Microsoft, Redmond WA for IOS experiments, ELP 2.8 mm wide angle IR LED Infrared USB camera for 2PLSM experiments) was used to monitor the animal’s behavior during data acquisition via a real-time video stream in the LabVIEW data acquisition program. A Basler ace acA640-120gm ﻿camera (Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ) with a 75 mm DG Series FFL Lens (#54–691, Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ) acquired an image of the eye (200 × 200 pixels) at a nominal rate of 30 frames/second during IOS experiments. The eye was illuminated with a 780 nm LED (M780L3, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Data analysis</title><p>Data analysis was conducted with code written by KLT, KWG, and PJD (MathWorks, MATLAB 2019b, Natick, MA).</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Alignment of region of interest (ROI) over whisker vibrissa cortex in IOS data</title><p>To focus on blood volume changes in the whisker representation of somatosensory cortex, a 1 mm diameter circle was manually placed over the thinned-skull window’s region of pixels that were most correlated to that hemisphere’s gamma band power during the first 15–60 min of data of each imaging session (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt, xcorr) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–C</xref>). For each hemisphere (n = 28) this region was typically located in the most caudal, lateral corner of the window consistent with the anatomical location of vibrissa cortex and implantation site of the stereotrode, which remained consistent across all days of imaging. The location of the circular ROI and electrode was verified histologically through the alignment of the electrode path and fiduciary marks with respect to the layer IV CO stain. The reflectance in the circular ROI of pixels was averaged together. To correct a slow drift in the CCD camera’s sensitivity to light over several hours, a two-exponent function (MATLAB function(s): fit) was fit to the slow drift of a region of interest over the cement. The profile of this exponential function was then used to remove the slow exponential drift of the mean pixel reflectance over time (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s9">Figure 1—figure supplement 9</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Two-photon laser scanning microscopy imaging processing</title><p>Individual stack frames from 2PLSM were corrected for x-y motion artifacts and aligned with a rigid registration algorithm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Drew et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Gao et al., 2015</xref>). Imaging periods with excessive z-plane motion artifacts were excluded from analysis. A rectangular box was manually drawn around a straight, evenly-illuminated segment of the vessel and the pixel intensity was averaged along the long axis and used to calculate the vessel’s diameter from the full-width at half-maximum (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/Surface-Vessel-FWHM-Diameter">https://github.com/DrewLab/Surface-Vessel-FWHM-Diameter</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Drew et al., 2011</xref>). The diameter of penetrating arterioles was calculated using the thresholding in Radon space (TiRS) algorithm (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/Thresholding_in_Radon_Space">https://github.com/DrewLab/Thresholding_in_Radon_Space</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Gao and Drew, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Gao et al., 2015</xref>) .</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Whisker motion quantification</title><p>Images of the mouse’s vibrissae were converted into a relative position (angle) by applying the Radon transform (MATLAB function(s): radon). The peaks of the sinogram corresponded to the position and the angle of the whiskers in the image. The average whisker angle was extracted as the angle of the sinogram with the largest variance in the position dimension (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/Whisker-Tracking">https://github.com/DrewLab/Whisker-Tracking</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Drew et al., 2010b</xref>). Vibrissae angles in dropped camera frames were filled with linear interpolation between the nearest valid points (MATLAB function(s): interp1). Whisker angle was lowpass filtered (&lt;20 Hz) using a second-order Butterworth filter and then resampled down to 30 Hz (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt, resample). To identify periods of whisking, whisker acceleration was obtained from the second derivative of the position and binarized with an empirically chosen acceleration threshold for a whisking event. Acceleration events that occurred within 0.1 s of each other were linked and considered as a single whisking bout.</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Movement quantification</title><p>Movement data from the pressure sensor was digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;20 Hz) using a second-order Butterworth filter and then resampled down to 30 Hz (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt, resample). To identify movement events, the force sensor data was binarized in a similar fashion to that of the whisker acceleration by setting an empirically defined threshold.</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title>Heart rate detection</title><p>During IOS experiments, the heart rate was detected through the time-frequency spectrogram (3.33 s window, 1 s step size, [2,3] tapers) of the hemodynamic signal (Chronux toolbox, version 2.12 v03). The heart rate was identified as the frequency with the maximum spectral power in the 5–15 Hz band. This signal was then averaged between the two hemispheres, and digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;2 Hz) using a third-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s): butter, filtfilt).</p></sec><sec id="s4-11"><title>Neural data and spectrograms</title><p>Neural signals (cortical, hippocampal) were subdivided into six frequency bands as follows: delta [1–4 Hz], theta [4–10 Hz], alpha [10–13 Hz], beta [13–30 Hz], gamma [30–100 Hz], and multi-unit activity (MUA) [300–3000 Hz]. Each neural signal was digitally bandpass filtered from the raw data using a third-order Butterworth filter. The data was then squared and lowpass filtered (&lt;10 Hz) using a third-order Butterworth filter, and resampled down to 30 Hz (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt, resample). Several sets of time-frequency spectrograms with varying characteristics were calculated for each neural signal to be utilized in different analysis (Chronux toolbox, version 2.12 v03, function: mtspecgramc). A 5 s window with 1/5 s step size and [5,9] tapers, a 1 s window with 1/10 s step size and [1,1] tapers, and a 1 s window with 1/30 s step size and [5,9] tapers. All time-frequency spectrograms had the same passband of 1 to 100 Hz to encompass the local field potential (LFP).</p></sec><sec id="s4-12"><title>Electromyography (EMG)</title><p>Electrical activity from the nuchal (neck) muscles was digitally bandpass filtered (300 Hz – 3 kHz) using a third-order Butterworth filter. The signal was then squared and convolved with a Gaussian kernel with a 0.5 s standard deviation, log transformed, and resampled down to 30 Hz (MATLAB function(s) butter, zp2sos, filtfilt, gausswin, log10, conv, resample).</p></sec><sec id="s4-13"><title>Laser Doppler flow velocimetry (LDF)</title><p>Microvascular perfusion data was resampled down to 30 Hz and digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;1 Hz) using a fourth-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s) butter, zp2sos, filtfilt, resample).</p></sec><sec id="s4-14"><title>Establishment of awake rest and baseline</title><p>In order to establish a resting baseline and exclude any drowsy or sleeping data, long periods of <italic>true awake</italic> (typically &gt;1 min) were manually identified during each day’s imaging session. Resting events of 5 s or greater were taken from these <italic>true awake</italic> periods and were defined by an absence of whisker stimulation, whisker movement, or detectable body movement for both IOS and 2-photon experiments. Only data from these pre-screened periods of clear wakefulness were used in subsequent baseline calculation as well as in the awake rest and awake whisking arousal state comparisons in subsequent analysis. Periods of rest from <italic>true awake</italic> were thus identified from each imaging session and averaged across time, giving a single baseline value per day for the hemodynamic reflectance signal (IOS or 2P), neural signals, EMG, LFD (if present), and neural spectrograms. ﻿For IOS experiments, the baseline reflectance of each day was used to convert changes in reflectance into changes in total hemoglobin (∆[HbT]) using the Beer-Lambert law (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Ma et al., 2016</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-15"><title>Sleep scoring methodology</title><p>The data was divided into 5 s bins and classified as rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM, or rfc-REM using a random forest classification model. The model consisted of a ‘bagging’ (bootstrap aggregation) of 128 decision trees where each tree is grown with an independent bootstrapped replica of the input data (MATLAB function(s): TreeBagger). 128 trees were chosen as sufficient where the out-of-bag-error asymptotes as a function of the number of total trees. The model used the largest mean cortical LFP power from the two hemispheres in the delta band power [1–4 Hz], beta band power [13–30 Hz], and gamma band power [30–99 Hz]. The mean hippocampal theta band power [4–10 Hz], the mean normalized EMG power, the mean heart rate, and the total number of binarized whisking events were also included. To train the random forest classification models, all of the data from the first (session 1) and last (session 6) was manually scored 5 s at a time as either rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM, or rfc-REM based on the known behavioral and electrophysiology characteristics of the various sleep states. For example, an increase in cortical delta band power with a low heart rate and little whisker motion is associated with NREM sleep, while an increase in hippocampal theta band power with a low EMG muscle tone is associated with REM sleep. Half of the manually scored data (1/6 of the total amount) was used to train the random forest classification model, with the other half being used to further validate the model’s accuracy (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2</xref>). The rfc-Awake class from the random forest classification model will include all awake resting data, whisking behavior, as well as all of the ‘drowsy’ data where the animals was transitioning between states that did not clearly fall into the NREM or REM categories. For these reasons, quantifications of awake rest, awake whisking, and awake stimulation were taken from manually verified periods of wakefulness (a subset of rfc-Awake) to reduce contamination.</p><p>For data to be classified as either a contiguous NREM or REM sleep epoch, it requires 6 consecutive 5 s bins (30 s) for contiguous NREM or 12 consecutive 5 s bins (60 s) for contiguous REM. This filter ensures that only very clear NREM and REM sleep events make it into the final data sets that are used in the relevant analysis. It also provides a minimum length for each event for analysis that require for all data to be the same length (such as cross-correlations, coherence, and power spectra). To prevent REM events of several minutes in duration from occasionally being broken up into multiple separate events, up to 10 s of data in-between rfc-REM classifications were linked after model scoring. While the majority of contiguous NREM/REM epochs occurred in the absence of whisker stimulation, the epochs that did occur in the presence of whisker stimulation were excluded from these contiguous sleep categories. As the total duration of the 2-photon data was substantially less than that of IOS experiments, it was all manually scored. In our experience, the mice tended to sleep less during 2-photon imaging than during IOS, likely because of the high-frequency noise from the scan mirrors and the lack of illumination (mice are nocturnal) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Peirson et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Pilorz et al., 2016</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-16"><title>Sleep model accuracy validation</title><p>The out-of-bag error during random forest classification model training provides an initial estimate on the model’s classification accuracy, where <italic>out-of-bag</italic> refers to the mean classification error using training data from the trees that do not contain the data in their bootstrap sample (MATLAB function(s): oobError). The out-of-bag error of each model’s training data is then compared to the mean out-of-bag error from 100 randomly shuffled training data sets, which is analogous to random chance. A table of each animal’s out-of-bag error and randomly shuffled out-of-bag error can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>. The mean out-of-bag error across all animal models was 7.1 ± 1.4% and the mean error across the 100 randomly shuffled data sets across all animals was 36.1 ± 10.6%. Each model was then evaluated on a second, unseen data set composed of the alternating 15 min periods that were manually scored but not used in model training. The model’s scores were then compared to the manual scores combined across all IOS animals are summarized in a confusion matrix (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2</xref>) (MATLAB function(s): confusionchart). Across all animals, the overall accuracy was 91.3%.</p></sec><sec id="s4-17"><title>Distribution of arousal state classifications</title><p>A hypnogram for each IOS animal (representative animal, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>) was generated to visualize the frequency and duration of sleeping events throughout each imaging session, as well as pick up any on discrepancies between manual and model scoring. The percentage each animal spent in each of the three model’s classification states (‘rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM, rfc-REM) was averaged across IOS animals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>) and is shown ratiometrically for individual animals in a ternary plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>). The probability distribution of heart rate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>), whisker variance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G</xref>), and EMG power (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2H</xref>) during each classification was evaluated by taking the mean (or variance for whisker angle) of each 5 s bin and combining the data from all animals, with no within animal averaging. rfc-NREM and rfc-REM were compared to the rfc-Awake classification to evaluate statistical significance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1</xref>) by averaging the data (heart rate, whisker variance, EMG) first within animals, and then across animals. Error bars show the standard deviation (n = 14 mice).</p></sec><sec id="s4-18"><title>Determination of awake probability</title><p>The probability of a mouse being in a given arousal state as a function of imaging time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>) was evaluated by concatenating all 5 s sleep scores. The probability of an animal being in a given arousal state was then averaged across each IOS animal’s data set (consisting of 6 imaging sessions of bilateral imaging), and fit with a single exponential fit (MATLAB function(s): fit) for rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM, and rfc-REM. These three exponentials were then averaged across all 14 animals. Because the recording did not start until 30 min after the start of head-fixation, the animal’s probability of being awake at ‘time 0’ was not 100%. The probability of an animal being asleep as a function of the duration of quiescence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>) was done by binning the individual event to the appropriate 5 s bin (a 7.5 s quiescent event falls in the 5–10 s bin). The approximate time and duration of each individual event was shifted in time to the corresponding sleep scoring bin(s). If any of the bins contain a score of rfc-NREM or rfc-REM, then the individual event is considered asleep. The number of rfc-Awake events in each time increment is divided by the total number of events for each animal, fit with a single exponential (MATLAB function(s): fit), and averaged across animals.</p></sec><sec id="s4-19"><title>Mean heart rate during different states</title><p>The mean heart rate during each arousal state was taken during awake resting events (≥10 s), moderate awake whisking events (2–5 s in duration), contiguous NREM sleep events (≥30 s), and contiguous REM sleep events (≥60 s). All awake resting periods and awake whisking events were taken from data at least 5 s after a whisker stimulus, with the mean value of the whisking heart rate taken between the initiation of the whisk (time 0) through 5 s. All awake resting events and awake whisking events occurred within the manually defined <italic>true awake</italic> periods outlined previously in the <italic>Establishment of awake rest and baseline</italic> section to exclude drowsy behavior. All arousal state events were averaged within their individual time series. All arousal state events were then averaged within animals before being averaged across animals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2I</xref>). Error bars show the standard deviation.</p></sec><sec id="s4-20"><title>Arousal state transitions</title><p>Transitions from rfc-Awake to rfc-NREM, rfc-Awake to rfc-NREM, rfc-NREM to rfc-REM, and rfc-REM to rfc-Awake (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A–D</xref>) were taken by averaging all the events within an animal that had six consecutive ‘rfc’ arousal state scores (30 s) of one arousal state of interest followed by six consecutive scores of the other. Hemodynamic (∆[HbT]), normalized EMG, normalized cortical LFP, and normalized hippocampal LFP data from each arousal state transition was extracted at the corresponding time indices and averaged together within animals. Bilateral hemodynamic data and bilateral cortical LFP data from the cortical hemispheres was averaged together into one value (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). Cortical and hippocampal LFP spectrograms used were those with parameters of 1 s window, 1/10 s step size, and [5,9] tapers. Hemodynamic ([HbT]) data was digitally lowpass (&lt;1 Hz) filtered using a fourth-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt). Transitions from each animal were averaged together, error bars for the hemodynamic and EMG show standard deviation. Due to the limited amount of REM sleep data from 2-photon mice, NREM to REM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E</xref>) and REM to Awake (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4F</xref>) for 2-photon data (n = 5 mice, eight arterioles) was taken as the 30 s prior and 30 s post each valid contiguous REM event. Arteriole transitions were smoothed with a 10th-order one-dimensional median filter (MATLAB function(s): medfilt1).</p></sec><sec id="s4-21"><title>Mean ∆[HbT] during different arousal states</title><p>The mean change in total hemoglobin in each cortical hemisphere (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>) during each arousal state was taken for awake resting events (≥10 s), awake whisking events (2–5 s in duration), awake whisker stimulation, contiguous NREM sleep events (≥30 s), and contiguous REM sleep events (≥60 s). Awake resting and awake whisking events were required to be at least 5 s after a whisker stimulus, with the mean value of the whisking behavior taken between the initiation of the whisk (time 0) through 5 s and contralateral stimuli taken as the mean for 1–2 s after the stimulus. Awake resting, awake whisking, and awake whisker stimuli events occurred within the manually defined <italic>true awake</italic> periods outlined previously in the <italic>Establishment of awake rest and baseline</italic> section to exclude drowsy periods. Each arousal state event was digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;1 Hz) with a fourth-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt) and then averaged within their individual time series. The mean of the 2 s of data prior to the onset of whisking/stimulation were subtracted from whisking events. All arousal state events were then averaged within animals before being averaged across animals. Error bars show the standard deviation. The histograms showing the probability distribution of mean change in total hemoglobin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>) is for all data (30 Hz resolution) from each individual arousal state event from all animals, with no averaging between arousal states within or across animals.</p></sec><sec id="s4-22"><title>Mean arteriole diameter during different arousal states</title><p>The mean vessel diameter in each arteriole (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>) during each arousal state was taken during awake rest events (≥10 s), awake whisking events (2–5 s in duration), contiguous NREM sleep events (≥30 s), and contiguous REM sleep events (≥60 s). Awake resting and awake whisking events occurred at least 5 s after a whisker stimulus, with the mean value of the whisking diameter taken between the initiation of the whisk (time 0) through 5 s. Awake resting and awake whisking events occurred within the manually defined <italic>true awake</italic> periods outlined previously in the <italic>Establishment of awake rest and baseline</italic> section to exclude drowsy behavior. All arousal state events were digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;1 Hz) with a fourth-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt) and then the mean value was taken within their individual time series. All arousal state events were then averaged within individual arterioles before being averaged across all arterioles from all animals combined. Error bars show the standard deviation. The histograms showing the probability distribution of arteriole diameter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E</xref>) is taken from all arterioles (5 Hz resolution) with no averaging between arousal states within or across arterioles.</p></sec><sec id="s4-23"><title>Mean laser Doppler flow velocimetry during different arousal states</title><p>The mean LDF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref>) during each arousal state was taken during awake resting events (≥10 s), awake whisking events (2–5 s in duration), contiguous NREM sleep events (≥30 s), and contiguous REM sleep events (≥60 s). Awake resting and awake whisking events occurred at least 5 s after a whisker stimulus, with the mean value of the whisking flow taken between the initiation of the whisk (time 0) through 5 s. Awake resting and awake whisking events occurred within the manually defined <italic>true awake</italic> periods outlined previously in the <italic>Establishment of awake rest and baseline</italic> section to exclude drowsy behavior. All arousal state events were digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;1 Hz) with a fourth-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt) and then averaged within their individual time series. All arousal state events were then averaged within animals before being averaged across animals. Error bars show the standard deviation (n = 8 mice, one mouse excluded due to poor signal). The histograms showing the probability distribution of mean change in flow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5F</xref>) is for all data (30 Hz resolution) from each individual arousal state event from all animals, with no averaging between arousal states within or across animals.</p></sec><sec id="s4-24"><title>Cross-correlations during different arousal states</title><p>The cross-correlation between multi-unit activity (MUA) and change in total hemoglobin ∆[HbT] in each cortical hemisphere during each arousal state was taken during awake resting events (≥10 s), contiguous NREM sleep events (≥30 s), and contiguous REM sleep events (≥60 s). Awake resting events occurred at least 5 s after a whisker stimulus and occurred within the manually defined <italic>true awake</italic> periods outlined previously in the <italic>Establishment of awake rest and baseline</italic> section to exclude drowsy behavior. All arousal state events’ MUA and ∆[HbT] data were mean-subtracted and digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;1 Hz) with a fourth-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt) and then truncated to the minimum arousal state length so that all events were the same length. Cross-correlation analysis was run for each arousal state (MATLAB function(s): xcorr) with a ± 5 s lag time and averaged across arousal state events within each animal hemisphere and then across all animal hemispheres (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres). The cross-correlation between LFP and ∆[HbT] was taken as the cross-correlation between an ∆[HbT] event and each frequency band of the cortical spectrogram with parameters of 1 s window, 1/30 s step size, and [1,1] tapers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The resulting cross-correlation matrices (lag time x frequency) were then averaged across all arousal state events within each hemisphere and then across all hemispheres.</p></sec><sec id="s4-25"><title>Power spectra and coherence of neural and hemodynamic signals</title><p>The coherence between left and right hemisphere [HbT], envelopes of each LFP band (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma), or within-hemisphere [HbT] and the power in an LFP band during each state was taken during awake resting events (≥10 s), contiguous NREM sleep events (≥30 s), contiguous REM sleep events (≥60 s), alert data (15 min), asleep data (15 min), and all data (15 min). Awake resting events occurred at least 5 s after a whisker stimulus and occurred within the manually defined <italic>true awake</italic> periods outlined previously in the <italic>Establishment of awake rest and baseline</italic> section. All arousal state events were mean-subtracted and digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;1 Hz) with a fourth-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt) and then truncated to the minimum arousal state length. Coherence analysis was run for each data type during each arousal state (tapers [3,5], pad = 1, Chronux toolbox, version 2.12 v03, function: coherencyc) and averaged across animals. Error bars show the standard deviation. Power spectrum analysis was run for each data type as well as arteriole diameter during each arousal state in each cortical hemisphere (tapers [3,5], pad = 1, Chronux toolbox, version 2.12 v03, function: mtspectrumc) and averaged across animals. For <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, neural power spectra were normalized by the peak of the power spectrum in the resting state for each hemisphere before averaging across hemispheres. This normalization accounts for any variation in impedance across electrodes. Data was padded to the second next highest power of 2. Error bars show the standard deviation (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres for IOS, n = 6 mice for 2PLSM).</p></sec><sec id="s4-26"><title>Pearson’s correlation coefficients during different arousal states</title><p>The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between bilateral cortical changes in total hemoglobin, bilateral envelopes of each discrete LFP band (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) during each arousal state was taken during awake resting events (≥10 s), awake whisking events (2–5 s in duration), contiguous NREM sleep events (≥30 s), contiguous REM sleep events (≥60 s), alert data (15 min), asleep data (15 min), and all data (15 min). Awake resting and whisking events occurred at least 5 s after a whisker stimulus, with the correlation value of the whisking behavior taken between the initiation of the whisk to 5 s later. All resting events and whisking events occurred within the manually defined <italic>true awake</italic> periods outlined previously in the <italic>Establishment of awake rest and baseline</italic> section. All arousal state events for each bilateral data type were mean-subtracted and digitally lowpass filtered (&lt;1 Hz) with a fourth-order Butterworth filter (MATLAB function(s): butter, zp2sos, filtfilt) and then take the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (MATLAB function(s): corrcoef) within each time series. All correlation coefficients for each bilateral data type during each arousal state were then averaged within animals and then averaged across animals. Error bars show the standard deviation.</p></sec><sec id="s4-27"><title>Probability of sleep as a function of hemodynamics</title><p>The probability of an arousal state classification with respect to [HbT] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A</xref>) or arteriole diameter (∆D/D) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8B</xref>) was determined by taking the mean of each 5 s epoch and binning the value into a histogram (1 μM ∆[HbT] or 1% ∆D/D). Each of the three arousal state classifications (rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM, rfc-REM for IOS, manual versions for 2PLSM) corresponding to each bin was summed over the total number of counts per bin to create a probability curve. Each curve was then smoothed with a 10-point median filter (MATLAB function(s): medfilt1). All 5 s bins were weighted equally with no grouping or averaging within animals (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres for IOS, n = 6 mice for 2PLSM).</p></sec><sec id="s4-28"><title>[HbT]-Gamma relationship</title><p>The mean gamma band power (∆P/P) and ∆[HbT] in each cortical hemisphere during each arousal state classification (rfc-Awake, rfc-NREM, rfc-REM) was taken from all IOS animals. A 2D histogram (MATLAB function(s): histogram2) was made comparing the mean gamma band power (∆P/P) vs. the mean ∆[HbT] of each individual classification (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D</xref>) to highlight the clusters of each arousal state class.</p></sec><sec id="s4-29"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>All statistical comparisons were evaluated using generalized linear mixed-effects models (MATLAB function(s): fitglme). The arousal state was treated as a fixed effect, the mouse identity as a random effect, and mouse identity:hemisphere/arteriole combination treated as an interaction. For example, the formula for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>: 'HbT ~1 + ArousalState + (1|Mouse) + (1|Mouse:Hemisphere)' evaluates the mean changes in [HbT] (n = 14 mice, 28 hemispheres) of each arousal state (fixed effects) with the mouse (random effect) and an interaction between the mouse and hemisphere (left vs. right hemispheres are not fully independent). Each arousal state was compared to either the ‘rfc-Awake’, ‘awake rest’, or ‘alert’ condition as the intercept term, depending on the analysis.</p></sec></sec></body><back><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank X Liu, A Shih, A Winder, and N Zhang for comments and discussion on the manuscript and F Bahari for advice on electromyography. This work was supported by NIH grants R01NS078168 and R01NS079737 to PJD.</p></ack><sec id="s5" sec-type="additional-information"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Resources, Software, Methodology, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other" id="fn1"><p>Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All procedures were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Pennsylvania State University (protocol # 201042827).</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec id="s6" sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>Supplemental tables.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="docx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-62071-supp1-v3.docx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="transrepform"><label>Transparent reporting form</label><media mime-subtype="docx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-62071-transrepform-v3.docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec id="s7" sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data availability</title><p>Source data and code for generation of all figures can be found here: Code repository location:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/Turner_Gheres_Proctor_Drew_eLife2020">https://github.com/DrewLab/Turner_Gheres_Proctor_Drew_eLife2020</ext-link> (copy archived at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:rev:a8318fc5cb29b88504fe72f5d3d80867bd9791f2/">https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:rev:a8318fc5cb29b88504fe72f5d3d80867bd9791f2/</ext-link>) Data repository location: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6hdr7sqz5">https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6hdr7sqz5</ext-link>.</p><p>The following dataset was generated:</p><p><element-citation id="dataset1" publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gheres</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Proctor</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><data-title>Neurovascular coupling and bilateral connectivity during NREM and REM sleep</data-title><source>Dryad Digital Repository</source><pub-id assigning-authority="Dryad" pub-id-type="doi">10.5061/dryad.6hdr7sqz5</pub-id></element-citation></p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Winder</surname> <given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Blinder</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>The pial vasculature of the mouse develops according to a sensory-independent program</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-27910-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aldea</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Weller</surname> <given-names>RO</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilcock</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Carare</surname> <given-names>RO</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Cerebrovascular smooth muscle cells as the drivers of intramural periarterial drainage of the brain</article-title><source>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnagi.2019.00001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30740048</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amzica</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Steriade</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Electrophysiological correlates of sleep Delta waves</article-title><source>Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology</source><volume>107</volume><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00051-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9751278</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anafi</surname> <given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kayser</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Raizen</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Exploring phylogeny to find the function of sleep</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>109</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41583-018-0098-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30573905</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Attwell</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Buchan</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Charpak</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lauritzen</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Macvicar</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Newman</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>468</volume><fpage>232</fpage><lpage>243</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature09613</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21068832</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bergel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Deffieux</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Demené</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanter</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Local hippocampal fast gamma rhythms precede brain-wide hyperemic patterns during spontaneous rodent REM sleep</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>5364</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-07752-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30560939</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boly</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Perlbarg</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Marrelec</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Schabus</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Laureys</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Doyon</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Pélégrini-Issac</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Maquet</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Benali</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Hierarchical clustering of brain activity during human nonrapid eye movement sleep</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>109</volume><fpage>5856</fpage><lpage>5861</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1111133109</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22451917</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Balkin</surname> <given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wesenten</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Carson</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Varga</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Selbie</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Belenky</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Herscovitch</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Regional cerebral blood flow throughout the sleep-wake cycle an H2(15)O PET study</article-title><source>Brain</source><volume>120</volume><fpage>1173</fpage><lpage>1197</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/brain/120.7.1173</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9236630</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buzsáki</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Anastassiou</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>The origin of extracellular fields and currents--EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>407</fpage><lpage>420</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn3241</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22595786</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cantero</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Atienza</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Madsen</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Stickgold</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Gamma EEG dynamics in neocortex and Hippocampus during human wakefulness and sleep</article-title><source>NeuroImage</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>1271</fpage><lpage>1280</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15219599</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cardoso</surname> <given-names>MMB</given-names></name><name><surname>Lima</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sirotin</surname> <given-names>YB</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Task-related hemodynamic responses are modulated by reward and task engagement</article-title><source>PLOS Biology</source><volume>17</volume><elocation-id>e3000080</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.3000080</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31002659</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Leopold</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Schölvinck</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandelkow</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Picchioni</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>FQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Turchi</surname> <given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Duyn</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Tracking brain arousal fluctuations with fMRI</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>113</volume><fpage>4518</fpage><lpage>4523</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1520613113</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27051064</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Glover</surname> <given-names>GH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI</article-title><source>NeuroImage</source><volume>50</volume><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>98</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20006716</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cirelli</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>The genetic and molecular regulation of sleep: from fruit flies to humans</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>549</fpage><lpage>560</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn2683</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19617891</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dang-Vu</surname> <given-names>TT</given-names></name><name><surname>Schabus</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Desseilles</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Albouy</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Boly</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Darsaud</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gais</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rauchs</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sterpenich</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Vandewalle</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Carrier</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Moonen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Balteau</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Degueldre</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Luxen</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Maquet</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Spontaneous neural activity during human slow wave sleep</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>105</volume><fpage>15160</fpage><lpage>15165</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0801819105</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18815373</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Maclean</surname> <given-names>RR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Neurobiological mechanisms for the regulation of mammalian sleep-wake behavior: reinterpretation of historical evidence and inclusion of contemporary cellular and molecular evidence</article-title><source>Neuroscience &amp; Biobehavioral Reviews</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>775</fpage><lpage>824</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17445891</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Zwart</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>van Gelderen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Kellman</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukunaga</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Koretsky</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Frank</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Duyn</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Temporal dynamics of the BOLD fMRI impulse response</article-title><source>NeuroImage</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>667</fpage><lpage>677</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Shih</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Driscoll</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Knutsen</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Blinder</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Davalos</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Akassoglou</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleinfeld</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010a</year><article-title>Chronic optical access through a polished and reinforced thinned skull</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>981</fpage><lpage>984</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.1530</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20966916</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Blinder</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cauwenberghs</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Shih</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleinfeld</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010b</year><article-title>Rapid determination of particle velocity from space-time images using the radon transform</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Neuroscience</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10827-009-0159-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19459038</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Shih</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleinfeld</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Fluctuating and sensory-induced vasodynamics in rodent cortex extend arteriole capacity</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>108</volume><fpage>8473</fpage><lpage>8478</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1100428108</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21536897</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Vascular and neural basis of the BOLD signal</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Neurobiology</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>69</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.conb.2019.06.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31336326</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Winder</surname> <given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Twitches, blinks, and fidgets: important generators of ongoing neural activity</article-title><source>The Neuroscientist</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>298</fpage><lpage>313</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1073858418805427</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30311838</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mateo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleinfeld</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Ultra-slow oscillations in fMRI and Resting-State connectivity: neuronal and vascular contributions and technical confounds</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>107</volume><fpage>782</fpage><lpage>804</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32791040</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="software"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><data-title>LabVIEW-DAQ VIs and Hardware</data-title><source>GitHub</source><version designator="VI">VI</version><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DrewLab/LabVIEW-DAQ">https://github.com/DrewLab/LabVIEW-DAQ</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Feldman</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Intrinsic signal imaging of deprivation-induced contraction of whisker representations in rat somatosensory cortex</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>348</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhn085</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18515797</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Echagarruga</surname> <given-names>CT</given-names></name><name><surname>Gheres</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Norwood</surname> <given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>nNOS-expressing interneurons control basal and behaviorally evoked arterial dilation in somatosensory cortex of mice</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e60533</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.60533</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33016877</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Flynn</surname> <given-names>NM</given-names></name><name><surname>Buljubasic</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Bosnjak</surname> <given-names>ZJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kampine</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1992">1992</year><article-title>Isoflurane produces endothelium-independent relaxation in canine middle cerebral arteries</article-title><source>Anesthesiology</source><volume>76</volume><fpage>461</fpage><lpage>467</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00000542-199203000-00021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1539859</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franklin</surname> <given-names>KBJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Paxinos</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><source>The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates</source><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukunaga</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Horovitz</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>van Gelderen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>de Zwart</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Jansma</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ikonomidou</surname> <given-names>VN</given-names></name><name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Deckers</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Leopold</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Duyn</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Large-amplitude, spatially correlated fluctuations in BOLD fMRI signals during extended rest and early sleep stages</article-title><source>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>979</fpage><lpage>992</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mri.2006.04.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16997067</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fultz</surname> <given-names>NE</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonmassar</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Setsompop</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Stickgold</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names></name><name><surname>Polimeni</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>LD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Coupled electrophysiological, Hemodynamic, and cerebrospinal fluid oscillations in human sleep</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>366</volume><fpage>628</fpage><lpage>631</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aax5440</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31672896</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Funk</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Honjoh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>AV</given-names></name><name><surname>Cirelli</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Tononi</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Local slow waves in superficial layers of primary cortical Areas during REM sleep</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>396</fpage><lpage>403</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.062</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26804554</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y-R</given-names></name><name><surname>Greene</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Mechanical restriction of intracortical vessel dilation by brain tissue sculpts the hemodynamic response</article-title><source>NeuroImage</source><volume>115</volume><fpage>162</fpage><lpage>176</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.054</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>YR</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Determination of vessel cross-sectional area by thresholding in radon space</article-title><source>Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow &amp; Metabolism</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>1180</fpage><lpage>1187</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/jcbfm.2014.67</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24736890</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>YR</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Effects of voluntary locomotion and calcitonin Gene-Related peptide on the dynamics of single dural vessels in awake mice</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>36</volume><fpage>2503</fpage><lpage>2516</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3665-15.2016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26911696</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Arousal contributions to Resting-State fMRI connectivity and dynamics</article-title><source>Frontiers in Neuroscience</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnins.2019.01190</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haiss</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Jolivet</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyss</surname> <given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Reichold</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Braham</surname> <given-names>NB</given-names></name><name><surname>Scheffold</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Krafft</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Improved in vivo two-photon imaging after blood replacement by perfluorocarbon</article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>587</volume><fpage>3153</fpage><lpage>3158</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169474</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19403621</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Quiroga</surname> <given-names>RQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Freeman</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Improving data quality in neuronal population recordings</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>1165</fpage><lpage>1174</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.4365</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27571195</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hobson</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Pace-Schott</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>The cognitive neuroscience of sleep: neuronal systems, consciousness and learning</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>679</fpage><lpage>693</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn915</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12209117</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horovitz</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukunaga</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>de Zwart</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>van Gelderen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Fulton</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Balkin</surname> <given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Duyn</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Low frequency BOLD fluctuations during resting wakefulness and light sleep: a simultaneous EEG-fMRI study</article-title><source>Human Brain Mapping</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>671</fpage><lpage>682</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hbm.20428</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17598166</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>BX</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Neurovascular coupling and decoupling in the cortex during voluntary locomotion</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>10975</fpage><lpage>10981</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1369-14.2014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25122897</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>BX</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>YR</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015a</year><article-title>Quantitative separation of arterial and venous cerebral blood volume increases during voluntary locomotion</article-title><source>NeuroImage</source><volume>105</volume><fpage>369</fpage><lpage>379</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25467301</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>BX</given-names></name><name><surname>Greene</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015b</year><article-title>Venous cerebral blood volume increase during voluntary locomotion reflects cardiovascular changes</article-title><source>NeuroImage</source><volume>118</volume><fpage>301</fpage><lpage>312</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26057593</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iadecola</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>The neurovascular unit coming of age: a journey through neurovascular coupling in health and disease</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>96</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28957666</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kajikawa</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Schroeder</surname> <given-names>CE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>How local is the local field potential?</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>847</fpage><lpage>858</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22153379</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kedarasetti</surname> <given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Echagarruga</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Gluckman</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Costanzo</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Functional hyperemia drives fluid exchange in the paravascular space</article-title><source>Fluids and Barriers of the CNS</source><volume>17</volume><elocation-id>52</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12987-020-00214-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32819402</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogawa</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Biophysical and physiological origins of blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI signals</article-title><source>Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow &amp; Metabolism</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>1188</fpage><lpage>1206</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/jcbfm.2012.23</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22395207</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kleinfeld</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Deschênes</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Neuronal basis for object location in the vibrissa scanning sensorimotor system</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>455</fpage><lpage>468</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22078505</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krawchuk</surname> <given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruff</surname> <given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Vazquez</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Optogenetic assessment of VIP, PV, SOM and NOS inhibitory neuron activity and cerebral blood flow regulation in mouse somato-sensory cortex</article-title><source>Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow &amp; Metabolism</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>1427</fpage><lpage>1440</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0271678X19870105</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31418628</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Larson-Prior</surname> <given-names>LJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Zempel</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Nolan</surname> <given-names>TS</given-names></name><name><surname>Prior</surname> <given-names>FW</given-names></name><name><surname>Snyder</surname> <given-names>AZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Raichle</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Cortical network functional connectivity in the descent to sleep</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>106</volume><fpage>4489</fpage><lpage>4494</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0900924106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19255447</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Le Van Quyen</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Staba</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Bragin</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dickson</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Valderrama</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fried</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Engel</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Large-scale microelectrode recordings of high-frequency gamma oscillations in human cortex during sleep</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>7770</fpage><lpage>7782</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5049-09.2010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20534826</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Boorman</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Glendenning</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Christmas</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharp</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Redgrave</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Shabir</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Bracci</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Berwick</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Howarth</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Key aspects of neurovascular control mediated by specific populations of inhibitory cortical interneurons</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>2452</fpage><lpage>2464</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhz251</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31746324</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leopold</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Murayama</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Logothetis</surname> <given-names>NK</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Very slow activity fluctuations in monkey visual cortex: implications for functional brain imaging</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>422</fpage><lpage>433</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/13.4.422</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12631571</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>TT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Noise contributions to the fMRI signal: an overview</article-title><source>NeuroImage</source><volume>143</volume><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>151</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27612646</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>de Zwart</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Schölvinck</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>FQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Leopold</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Duyn</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Subcortical evidence for a contribution of arousal to fMRI studies of brain activity</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-017-02815-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Shaik</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kozberg</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Portes</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Timerman</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Hillman</surname> <given-names>EMC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Resting-state hemodynamics are spatiotemporally coupled to synchronized and symmetric neural activity in excitatory neurons</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>113</volume><fpage>E8463</fpage><lpage>E8471</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1525369113</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Madsen</surname> <given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Holm</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vorstrup</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Friberg</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lassen</surname> <given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wildschiødtz</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1991">1991</year><article-title>Human regional cerebral blood flow during rapid-eye-movement sleep</article-title><source>Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow &amp; Metabolism</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>502</fpage><lpage>507</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/jcbfm.1991.94</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2016359</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maquet</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Functional brain imaging of human sleep</article-title><source>Journal of Sleep Research</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>42</fpage><lpage>47</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2869.7.s1.7.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9682193</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mateo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Knutsen</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Shih</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleinfeld</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Entrainment of arteriole vasomotor fluctuations by neural activity is a basis of Blood-Oxygenation-Level-Dependent &quot;Resting-State&quot; Connectivity</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>96</volume><fpage>936</fpage><lpage>948</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29107517</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McMahon</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>An inconvenient truth: calcium sensors are calcium buffers</article-title><source>Trends in Neurosciences</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>880</fpage><lpage>884</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tins.2018.09.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30287084</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mitra</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Snyder</surname> <given-names>AZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Tagliazucchi</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Laufs</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Raichle</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Propagated infra-slow intrinsic brain activity reorganizes across wake and slow wave sleep</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>4</volume><elocation-id>e10781</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.10781</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26551562</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mitra</surname> <given-names>PP</given-names></name><name><surname>Pesaran</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data</article-title><source>Biophysical Journal</source><volume>76</volume><fpage>691</fpage><lpage>708</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77236-X</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9929474</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Montgomery</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sirota</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Buzsáki</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Theta and gamma coordination of hippocampal networks during waking and rapid eye movement sleep</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>6731</fpage><lpage>6741</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1227-08.2008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18579747</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Musall</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaufman</surname> <given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Juavinett</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Gluf</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Churchland</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>1677</fpage><lpage>1686</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41593-019-0502-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31551604</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nicholson</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Freeman</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1975">1975</year><article-title>Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>356</fpage><lpage>368</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.1975.38.2.356</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">805215</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O'Connor</surname> <given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Clack</surname> <given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Komiyama</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>EW</given-names></name><name><surname>Svoboda</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Vibrissa-based object localization in head-fixed mice</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>1947</fpage><lpage>1967</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3762-09.2010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20130203</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Özbay</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Picchioni</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandelkow</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Moehlman</surname> <given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chappel-Farley</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>van Gelderen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>de Zwart</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Duyn</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Contribution of systemic vascular effects to fMRI activity in white matter</article-title><source>NeuroImage</source><volume>176</volume><fpage>541</fpage><lpage>549</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.045</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29704614</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pace-Schott</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names></name><name><surname>Hobson</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>The neurobiology of sleep: genetics, cellular physiology and subcortical networks</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>591</fpage><lpage>605</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn895</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12154361</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peirson</surname> <given-names>SN</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Pothecary</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Benson</surname> <given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Fisk</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Light and the laboratory mouse</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience Methods</source><volume>300</volume><fpage>26</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.04.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28414048</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>The functional organization of the barrel cortex</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>56</volume><fpage>339</fpage><lpage>355</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17964250</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pilorz</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Tam</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Hughes</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pothecary</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Jagannath</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hankins</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Bannerman</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lightman</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Vyazovskiy</surname> <given-names>VV</given-names></name><name><surname>Nolan</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Foster</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names></name><name><surname>Peirson</surname> <given-names>SN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Melanopsin regulates both Sleep-Promoting and Arousal-Promoting responses to light</article-title><source>PLOS Biology</source><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>e1002482</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.1002482</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27276063</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rungta</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaigneau</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Osmanski</surname> <given-names>BF</given-names></name><name><surname>Charpak</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Vascular compartmentalization of functional hyperemia from the synapse to the pia</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>99</volume><fpage>362</fpage><lpage>375</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29937277</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sakai</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>What single‐unit recording studies tell Us about the basic mechanisms of sleep and wakefulness</article-title><source>European Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>52</volume><fpage>3507</fpage><lpage>3530</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejn.14485</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saper</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Fuller</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedersen</surname> <given-names>NP</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Scammell</surname> <given-names>TE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Sleep state switching</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>68</volume><fpage>1023</fpage><lpage>1042</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.032</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21172606</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saper</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Fuller</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Wake-sleep circuitry: an overview</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Neurobiology</source><volume>44</volume><fpage>186</fpage><lpage>192</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.conb.2017.03.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28577468</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scammell</surname> <given-names>TE</given-names></name><name><surname>Arrigoni</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Lipton</surname> <given-names>JO</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Neural circuitry of wakefulness and sleep</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>93</volume><fpage>747</fpage><lpage>765</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28231463</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schölvinck</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Maier</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>FQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Duyn</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Leopold</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>107</volume><fpage>10238</fpage><lpage>10243</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0913110107</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20439733</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Chhatbar</surname> <given-names>PY</given-names></name><name><surname>O'Herron</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Kara</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>An artery-specific fluorescent dye for studying neurovascular coupling</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>273</fpage><lpage>276</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.1857</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22266543</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shih</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Driscoll</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishimura</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Schaffer</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleinfeld</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012a</year><article-title>Two-photon microscopy as a tool to study blood flow and neurovascular coupling in the rodent brain</article-title><source>Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow &amp; Metabolism</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>1277</fpage><lpage>1309</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/jcbfm.2011.196</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22293983</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib79"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shih</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Mateo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleinfeld</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012b</year><article-title>A polished and reinforced Thinned-skull window for Long-term imaging of the mouse brain</article-title><source>Journal of Visualized Experiments</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>6</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3791/3742</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib80"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shirey</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kudlik</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names></name><name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>BX</given-names></name><name><surname>Greene</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Brief anesthesia, but not voluntary locomotion, significantly alters cortical temperature</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>114</volume><fpage>309</fpage><lpage>322</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00046.2015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25972579</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib81"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shmuel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Leopold</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Neuronal correlates of spontaneous fluctuations in fMRI signals in monkey visual cortex: implications for functional connectivity at rest</article-title><source>Human Brain Mapping</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>751</fpage><lpage>761</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hbm.20580</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18465799</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib82"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Koretsky</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Duyn</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Functional MRI impulse response for BOLD and CBV contrast in rat somatosensory cortex</article-title><source>Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>1110</fpage><lpage>1118</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mrm.21246</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17534912</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib83"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simon</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Iliff</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Regulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in neurodegenerative, neurovascular and neuroinflammatory disease</article-title><source>Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease</source><volume>1862</volume><fpage>442</fpage><lpage>451</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.10.014</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib84"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sirotin</surname> <given-names>YB</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>457</volume><fpage>475</fpage><lpage>479</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature07664</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19158795</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib85"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steinmetz</surname> <given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Buetfering</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lecoq</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>EAK</given-names></name><name><surname>Coen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Ollerenshaw</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Valley</surname> <given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>de Vries</surname> <given-names>SEJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Garrett</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Groblewski</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Manavi</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Miles</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Griffin</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Larkin</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Roll</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Cross</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>TV</given-names></name><name><surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Pendergraft</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Daigle</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tasic</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Waters</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Olsen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Margolis</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Hausser</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Carandini</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Aberrant cortical activity in multiple GCaMP6-Expressing transgenic mouse lines</article-title><source>Eneuro</source><volume>4</volume><elocation-id>ENEURO.0207-17.2017</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/ENEURO.0207-17.2017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28932809</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib86"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stringer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pachitariu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Steinmetz</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Carandini</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>364</volume><elocation-id>eaav7893</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aav7893</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31000656</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib87"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizuseki</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Sorgi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Buzsáki</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Comparison of sleep spindles and theta oscillations in the Hippocampus</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>662</fpage><lpage>674</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0552-13.2014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24403164</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib88"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tagliazucchi</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Laufs</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Decoding wakefulness levels from typical fMRI resting-state data reveals reliable drifts between wakefulness and sleep</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>82</volume><fpage>695</fpage><lpage>708</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24811386</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib89"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tarasoff-Conway</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Carare</surname> <given-names>RO</given-names></name><name><surname>Osorio</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Glodzik</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Fieremans</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Axel</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Rusinek</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicholson</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zlokovic</surname> <given-names>BV</given-names></name><name><surname>Frangione</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Blennow</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ménard</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zetterberg</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wisniewski</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>de Leon</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Clearance systems in the brain-implications for alzheimer disease</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neurology</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>457</fpage><lpage>470</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26195256</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib90"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Theis</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Berens</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Froudarakis</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Reimer</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Román Rosón</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Baden</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Euler</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tolias</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bethge</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Benchmarking spike rate inference in population calcium imaging</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>90</volume><fpage>471</fpage><lpage>482</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27151639</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib91"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Townsend</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Prinz</surname> <given-names>PN</given-names></name><name><surname>Obrist</surname> <given-names>WD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1973">1973</year><article-title>Human cerebral blood flow during sleep and waking</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Physiology</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>620</fpage><lpage>625</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jappl.1973.35.5.620</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">4358783</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib92"><element-citation publication-type="software"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Gheres</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Proctor</surname> <given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><data-title>Neurovascular coupling and bilateral connectivity during NREM and REM sleep</data-title><source>GitHub</source><version designator="2.6">2.6</version><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/KL-Turner/Turner_Gheres_Proctor_Drew_eLife2020">https://github.com/KL-Turner/Turner_Gheres_Proctor_Drew_eLife2020</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib93"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Veluw</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Calvo-Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Arbel-Ornath</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Snyder</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Frosch</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Greenberg</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bacskai</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Vasomotion as a driving force for paravascular clearance in the awake mouse brain</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>105</volume><fpage>549</fpage><lpage>561</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.033</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31810839</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib94"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vazquez</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukuda</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Crowley</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Neural and hemodynamic responses elicited by forelimb- and photo-stimulation in channelrhodopsin-2 mice: insights into the hemodynamic point spread function</article-title><source>Cerebral Cortex</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>2908</fpage><lpage>2919</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bht147</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23761666</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib95"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Veasey</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Valladares</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Fenik</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapfhamer</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanford</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Benington</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bucan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>An automated system for recording and analysis of sleep in mice</article-title><source>Sleep</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/sleep/23.8.1c</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib96"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vyazovskiy</surname> <given-names>VV</given-names></name><name><surname>Olcese</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanlon</surname> <given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Nir</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Cirelli</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Tononi</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Local sleep in awake rats</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>472</volume><fpage>443</fpage><lpage>447</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature10009</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib97"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vyazovskiy</surname> <given-names>VV</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Sleep and the single neuron: the role of global slow oscillations in individual cell rest</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>443</fpage><lpage>451</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn3494</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23635871</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib98"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Stickgold</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Sleep-dependent learning and memory consolidation</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>44</volume><fpage>121</fpage><lpage>133</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15450165</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib99"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Dan</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Circuit-based interrogation of sleep control</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>538</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature19773</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27708309</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib100"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Winder</surname> <given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Echagarruga</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Weak correlations between hemodynamic signals and ongoing neural activity during the resting state</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>1761</fpage><lpage>1769</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41593-017-0007-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29184204</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib101"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Thiyagarajan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>O'Donnell</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Christensen</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicholson</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Iliff</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Takano</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Deane</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Nedergaard</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>342</volume><fpage>373</fpage><lpage>377</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1241224</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24136970</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib102"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yüzgeç</surname> <given-names>Ö</given-names></name><name><surname>Prsa</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zimmermann</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Pupil size coupling to cortical states protects the stability of deep sleep via parasympathetic modulation</article-title><source>Current Biology : CB</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>392</fpage><lpage>400</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.049</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29358069</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib103"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Roche</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gheres</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaigneau</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kedarasetti</surname> <given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Haselden</surname> <given-names>WD</given-names></name><name><surname>Charpak</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Cerebral oxygenation during locomotion is modulated by respiration</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>5515</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-13523-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31797933</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.62071.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Peyrache</surname><given-names>Adrien</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>McGill University</institution><country>Canada</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>Aniruddha</given-names> </name><role>Reviewer</role><aff><institution>Columbia</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text><p>In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.</p></boxed-text><p><bold>Acceptance summary:</bold></p><p>This paper combines state-of-the-art techniques to reveal how vascular dynamics and neurovascular coupling are modulated across arousal states. During sleep, cerebral blood flow and its correlation with neuronal activity increase at much higher levels than during wakefulness and sensory stimulation. This study stresses out the importance of carefully monitoring brain states when measuring cerebral blood flow in relation to behaviour and sensory processing.</p><p><bold>Decision letter after peer review:</bold></p><p>Thank you for submitting your article &quot;Neurovascular coupling and bilateral connectivity during NREM and REM sleep&quot; for consideration by <italic>eLife</italic>. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Laura Colgin as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Aniruddha Das (Reviewer #2).</p><p>The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.</p><p>We would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). Specifically, we are asking editors to accept without delay manuscripts, like yours, that they judge can stand as <italic>eLife</italic> papers without additional data, even if they feel that they would make the manuscript stronger. Thus the revisions requested below only address clarity and presentation.</p><p>The present study reports important findings which shed new light on the physiological basis of brain hemodynamic response. The authors address how hemodynamic measurements are affected by arousal states. Specifically, they show that sleep cycles moving between wakefulness and different sleep stages lead to changes in hemodynamic measurements that are much higher, sometime many-fold, relative to the changes driven by sensory stimulation. These results will be of great interest for researchers in the field of sleep and arousal, neurovascular coupling, fMRI, and the large community of systems neuroscientists performing head-fixed experiments. All three reviewers have expressed enthusiasm about the quality of the study and have, overall, only minor comments regarding the manuscript.</p><p>1) Mouse NREM sleep is usually assessed via a more global measure, e.g. EEG, rather than stereotrodes. The use of LFP based measures opens the possibility of detecting local arousal states in awake animals (e.g. Vyazovskiy et al., 2011). The authors should comment on how this may affect their results.</p><p>2) The authors should justify why different segment durations were used to quantify wake, NREM, and REM hemodynamics (10 s, 30 s, 60 s) in the &quot;Cortical hemodynamic signals increase during NREM and REM sleep.&quot;</p><p>3) Figure 6 lacks accompanying statistics in the text.</p><p>4) The authors should clarify how they computed average LFP power in Figure 7A of LFP power.</p><p>5) Some of the statements about the weakness of neurovascular coupling in the awake state seem overstated, as there can be robust local coupling in the awake state that is not spatially coherent enough to lead to an easily detected correlation with a relatively macroscopic signal such as the 1mm (HbT). The authors should perhaps tone down these statements or justify more clearly their conclusion.</p><p>6) The sentence in subsection “Sleep drives larger fluctuations than awake behaviors” regarding hemodynamic measurements should be clarified.</p><p>7) Previous works on the topic should be properly cited and discussed.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.62071.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The present study reports important findings which shed new light on the physiological basis of brain hemodynamic response. The authors address how hemodynamic measurements are affected by arousal states. Specifically, they show that sleep cycles moving between wakefulness and different sleep stages lead to changes in hemodynamic measurements that are much higher, sometime many-fold, relative to the changes driven by sensory stimulation. These results will be of great interest for researchers in the field of sleep and arousal, neurovascular coupling, fMRI, and the large community of systems neuroscientists performing head-fixed experiments. All three reviewers have expressed enthusiasm about the quality of the study and have, overall, only minor comments regarding the manuscript. Some of these comments are summarized below, more detailed comments can be found in the reviewers' details reports.</p><p>1) Mouse NREM sleep is usually assessed via a more global measure, e.g. EEG, rather than stereotrodes. The use of LFP based measures opens the possibility of detecting local arousal states in awake animals (e.g. Vyazovskiy et al., 2011). The authors should comment on how this may affect their results.</p></disp-quote><p>Discussion and citation added – see Discussion, paragraph two.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>2) The authors should justify why different segment durations were used to quantify wake, NREM, and REM hemodynamics (10 s, 30 s, 60 s) in the &quot;Cortical hemodynamic signals increase during NREM and REM sleep.&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Further explanation added in the first paragraph of the Results section.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>3) Figure 6 lacks accompanying statistics in the text.</p></disp-quote><p>Stats for Figure 6 peak and time-to-peak added for MUA/γ-band power of LFP. We have also added a new figure supplement to Figure 6 with the statistics.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>4) The authors should clarify how they computed average LFP power in Figure 7A of LFP power.</p></disp-quote><p>Clarification added – see subsection “Power spectra and coherence of neural and hemodynamic signals” in the Materials and methods.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>5) Some of the statements about the weakness of neurovascular coupling in the awake state seem overstated, as there can be robust local coupling in the awake state that is not spatially coherent enough to lead to an easily detected correlation with a relatively macroscopic signal such as the 1mm (HbT). The authors should perhaps tone down these statements or justify more clearly their conclusion.</p></disp-quote><p>We have clarified this in the Discussion, paragraph two.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>6) The sentence in subsection “Sleep drives larger fluctuations than awake behaviors” regarding hemodynamic measurements should be clarified.</p></disp-quote><p>Added clarification regarding hemodynamic measures and ROI placement with respect to Winder et al., 2017.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>7) Previous works on the topic should be properly cited and discussed.</p></disp-quote><p>Added comment and citation for Funk et al., 2016, as well as additional clarification with respect to Bergel et al., 2018 – see Introduction paragraph two and Discussion paragraph two.</p></body></sub-article></article>