<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub" publication-format="electronic">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">63036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.63036</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Developmental Biology</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Neuroscience</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Targeted molecular profiling of rare olfactory sensory neurons identifies fate, wiring, and functional determinants</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" id="author-210764"><name><surname>Arguello</surname><given-names>J Roman</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-6023</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib2">‡</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" id="author-58977"><name><surname>Abuin</surname><given-names>Liliane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib2">‡</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" id="author-210766"><name><surname>Armida</surname><given-names>Jan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" id="author-210767"><name><surname>Mika</surname><given-names>Kaan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-210765"><name><surname>Chai</surname><given-names>Phing Chian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-2411"><name><surname>Benton</surname><given-names>Richard</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4305-8301</contrib-id><email>Richard.Benton@unil.ch</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Center for Integrative Genomics Faculty of Biology and Medicine University of Lausanne</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Lausanne</named-content></addr-line><country>Switzerland</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Ecology and Evolution Faculty of Biology and Medicine University of Lausanne</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Lausanne</named-content></addr-line><country>Switzerland</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Lausanne</named-content></addr-line><country>Switzerland</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Ramaswami</surname><given-names>Mani</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Trinity College Dublin</institution><country>Ireland</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Banerjee</surname><given-names>Utpal</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution>University of California, Los Angeles</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><fn fn-type="con" id="equal-contrib1"><label>†</label><p>These authors also contributed equally to this work</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="equal-contrib2"><label>‡</label><p>These authors also contributed equally to this work</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date date-type="publication" publication-format="electronic"><day>05</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e63036</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-09-11"><day>11</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2021-03-04"><day>04</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2021, Arguello et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Arguello et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-63036-v2.pdf"/><abstract><p>Determining the molecular properties of neurons is essential to understand their development, function and evolution. Using Targeted DamID (TaDa), we characterize RNA polymerase II occupancy and chromatin accessibility in selected <italic>Ionotropic receptor</italic> (<italic>Ir</italic>)-expressing olfactory sensory neurons in <italic>Drosophila</italic>. Although individual populations represent a minute fraction of cells, TaDa is sufficiently sensitive and specific to identify the expected receptor genes. Unique <italic>Ir</italic> expression is not consistently associated with differences in chromatin accessibility, but rather to distinct transcription factor profiles. Genes that are heterogeneously expressed across populations are enriched for neurodevelopmental factors, and we identify functions for the POU-domain protein Pdm3 as a genetic switch of Ir neuron fate, and the atypical cadherin Flamingo in segregation of neurons into discrete glomeruli. Together this study reveals the effectiveness of TaDa in profiling rare neural populations, identifies new roles for a transcription factor and a neuronal guidance molecule, and provides valuable datasets for future exploration.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>olfaction</kwd><kwd>neuron</kwd><kwd>transcriptomics</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd><italic>D. melanogaster</italic></kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004784</institution-id><institution>Novartis Foundation for Medical-Biological Research</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>12A14</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Arguello</surname><given-names>J Roman</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011199</institution-id><institution>FP7 Ideas: European Research Council</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>615094</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Benton</surname><given-names>Richard</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010663</institution-id><institution>H2020 European Research Council</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>833548</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Benton</surname><given-names>Richard</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711</institution-id><institution>Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>310030B 185377</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Benton</surname><given-names>Richard</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund6"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711</institution-id><institution>Swiss National Science Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>PP00P3 176956</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Arguello</surname><given-names>J Roman</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Targeted expression of molecular probes for gene expression and chromatin accessibility in subpopulations of neurons in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> olfactory system identifies genes required for their development and function.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Nervous systems are composed of vast numbers of neuron classes with specific structural and functional characteristics. Determining the molecular basis of these properties is essential to understand their emergence during development and contribution to neural circuit activity, as well as to appreciate how neurons exhibit plasticity over both short and evolutionary timescales.</p><p>The olfactory system of adult <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic> is a powerful model to identify and link molecular features of neurons to their anatomy and physiology. The <italic>Drosophila</italic> nose (antenna) contains ~50 classes of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), which develop from sensory organ precursor cells specified in the larval antennal imaginal disc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Barish and Volkan, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Jefferis and Hummel, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib103">Yan et al., 2020</xref>). Each OSN is characterized by the expression of a unique olfactory receptor (or, occasionally, receptors), of the Odorant Receptor (OR) or Ionotropic Receptor (IR) families. These proteins function – together with broadly expressed, family-specific co-receptors – to define neuronal odor-response properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Benton, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Gomez-Diaz et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Robertson, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Rytz et al., 2013</xref>). Moreover, the axons of all neurons expressing the same receptor(s) converge to a discrete and stereotyped glomerulus within the primary olfactory center (antennal lobe) in the brain, where they synapse with both local interneurons (LNs) and projection neurons (PNs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Brochtrup and Hummel, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Hong and Luo, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Jefferis and Hummel, 2006</xref>). While the unique properties of individual OSN classes are assumed to reflect distinct patterns of gene expression, it is unclear how many molecular differences exist between sensory neuron populations, which types of genes (beyond receptors) distinguish OSN classes, and whether gene expression differences reflect population-specific chromatin architecture.</p><p>Exploration of the molecular properties of specific neuron types has been revolutionized by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib92">Svensson et al., 2018</xref>). However, the peripheral olfactory system of <italic>Drosophila</italic> poses several challenges to cell isolation: OSNs are very small (~2–3 μm soma diameter) and up to four neurons are tightly embedded under sensory sensilla (a porous cuticular hair that houses the neurons’ dendrites) along with several support cells that seal each neuronal cluster from neighboring sensilla (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Shanbhag et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Shanbhag et al., 2000</xref>). Furthermore, each OSN class represents only a very small fraction of cells of the whole antenna, as few as 5–10 neurons of a total of ~3000 cells (both neuronal and non-neuronal) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Grabe et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Shanbhag et al., 1999</xref>). Recent work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Li et al., 2020</xref>) – discussed below – successfully profiled RNA levels in OSNs at a mid-developmental time-point (42–48 hr after puparium formation [APF]), before these cells become encased in the mature cuticle. In addition, a preprint describing successful transcriptomic profiling of single nuclei of adult OSNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">McLaughlin et al., 2020</xref>) will also be considered later.</p><p>In this work, we used the Targeted-DNA adenine methyltransferase identification (TaDa) method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Southall et al., 2013</xref>) to characterize the molecular profile of specific populations of OSNs. TaDa entails expression of an RNA polymerase II subunit (RpII15, hereafter PolII) fused to the <italic>E. coli</italic> DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam). This complex (or, as control, Dam alone) is expressed within a specific cell population (‘targeted’) under the regulation of a cell type-specific promoter using the Gal4/UAS system. When bound to DNA, Dam:PolII methylates adenine within GATC motifs; enrichment of methylation at genes compared to free Dam control samples provides a measure of PolII occupancy, which is correlated with genes’ transcriptional activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Southall et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). In addition to indicating PolII occupancy within a given cell type, TaDa datasets can also provide information on chromatin accessibility (CATaDa) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Aughey et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). Analysis of the methylation patterns across the genome generated by untethered Dam is assumed to reflect the openness of chromatin, analogous to – and in good agreement with – ATAC-seq datasets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Aughey et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Buenrostro et al., 2013</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Targeted DamID of OSN populations.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic of the principles of Targeted DamID (TaDa) and Chromatin accessibility TaDa (CATaDa). TaDa reports on the enrichment of GATC methylation (Me; blue lines) by a Dam:PolII fusion (top) relative to Dam alone (bottom), thereby identifying PolII-transcribed genes. In CATaDa, analysis of methylation patterns of free Dam provides information on chromatin accessibility. (<bold>B</bold>) Immunofluorescence for IR64a and IR8a on antennal sections of animals expressing in Ir64a neurons either Dam:PolII (<italic>Ir64a-Gal4/+;UAS-LT3-Dam:RpII15/+</italic>) or Dam alone (<italic>Ir64a-Gal4/+;UAS-LT3-Dam/+</italic>). The approximate field of view shown is indicated by the green box on the antennal schematic on the left. The merged fluorescent channels are overlaid on a bright-field background to reveal anatomical landmarks. The arrowheads point to IR64a that is localized in the neuron sensory endings within the sensillar hairs. Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>C</bold>) Immunofluorescence for GFP and the neuropil marker nc82 on whole-mount brains of animals expressing in Ir64a neurons a CD8:GFP reporter together with Dam:PolII (<italic>Ir64a-Gal4/+;UAS-LT3-Dam:RpII15/UAS-mCD8:GFP</italic>) or free Dam (<italic>Ir64a-Gal4/+;UAS-LT3-Dam/UAS-mCD8:GFP</italic>). Two focal planes are shown to reveal the two glomeruli (DC4 and DP1m) innervated by Ir64a neurons. Background fluorescence in the GFP channel was slightly higher across the brain in the Dam-alone samples. Scale bar = 20 µm. (<bold>D</bold>) Illustration of raw sequence read data underlying the TaDa analyses. Bar heights indicate the read coverage of methylated GATC fragments mapping to the <italic>Ir64a</italic> gene (transcribed left-to-right, as indicated by the arrowhead; blue lines under the gene model indicate the position of GATC motifs). The precise transcription start site of <italic>Ir64a</italic> is unknown. For each of three replicate experiments, the top row is the Dam:PolII sample, which has higher read counts compared to the Dam-alone sample below. The y-axes (range 0–1000) indicate the read depth. (<bold>E</bold>) Top: comparisons among the seven Ir neuron datasets of the raw sequence reads mapping to the <italic>Ir64a</italic> gene for the Dam:PolII and Dam samples (a single representative replicate is shown for each). Genotypes are of the form shown in (<bold>B</bold>), except for Ir75a and Ir75c neuron populations where third chromosome <italic>Ir-Gal4</italic> driver transgenes were used. Only the Ir64a population displays a higher read count for Dam:PolII samples compared to Dam-alone samples. The y-axes (range 0–1000) indicates the read depth. Bottom: heatmap representation of the occupancy scores (OSs) following data normalization and statistical analyses (based on data across the full gene body (see Materials and methods); color scale on the right) for <italic>Ir64a</italic> calculated across triplicates for each of the seven neuron populations. (<bold>F</bold>) OS heatmap for the seven target <italic>Ir</italic> genes, as well as the main <italic>Ir</italic> co-receptor genes, in the seven Ir neuron populations. OSs and FDR values associated with each <italic>Ir</italic> gene within the corresponding neuron population are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp5">Supplementary file 5</xref>. (<bold>G</bold>) OS heatmap of diverse positive- and negative-control genes in the seven Ir neuron populations (i.e. with known or expected expression/lack of expression). Abbreviations are defined in the main text. See also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref> and DamID_files.zip (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada/-/tree/main/DamID_analyses">https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada/-/tree/main/DamID_analyses</ext-link>) for data.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title><italic>Ir</italic> gene Occupancy Scores across Ir populations.</title><p>Heatmap of OSs for <italic>Ir</italic> genes across the seven Ir neuron populations. Information on individual genes displaying significant OSs in one or more populations is shown with colored bars to the left (key is at the bottom). See also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp4">Supplementary files 4</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp5">5</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig1-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title><italic>Or</italic> gene Occupancy Scores across Ir populations.</title><p>Heatmap of OSs for <italic>Or</italic> genes across the seven Ir neuron populations. Information on individual genes displaying significant OSs in one or more populations is shown with colored bars to the left (key is at the bottom). See also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp4">Supplementary files 4</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp5">5</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig1-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title><italic>Gr</italic> gene Occupancy Scores across Ir populations.</title><p>Heatmap of OSs for <italic>Gr</italic> genes across the seven Ir neuron populations. Information on individual genes displaying significant OSs in one or more populations is shown with colored bars to the left (key is at the bottom). See also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp4">Supplementary files 4</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp5">5</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig1-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title><italic>Obp</italic> gene Occupancy Scores across Ir populations.</title><p>Heatmap of OSs for <italic>Obp</italic> genes across the seven Ir neuron populations. Information on individual genes displaying significant OSs in one or more populations is shown with colored bars to the left (key is at the bottom). See also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp4">Supplementary files 4</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp5">5</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig1-figsupp4-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>The selectivity of expression of Dam:PolII or Dam avoids the requirement for cell isolation prior to genomic DNA extraction. Previous applications of TaDa in <italic>Drosophila</italic> have profiled relatively abundant cell populations in the central brain, intestine and male germline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Doupé et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Southall et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib95">Tamirisa et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib102">Widmer et al., 2018</xref>). Although OSN classes can be effectively labeled using transgenes containing promoters for the corresponding receptor genes, it was unclear whether TaDa would be sufficiently sensitive to measure transcriptional activity from an individual population of sensory neurons within the antenna. We therefore set out to profile several classes of IR-expressing OSNs to test the approach and identify novel factors that distinguish the properties of these evolutionarily closely related neuronal subtypes.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Targeted DamID of OSN populations</title><p>To test the feasibility of TaDa for profiling <italic>Drosophila</italic> OSNs, we first focused on the Ir64a population, which comprises ~16 neurons that are housed in sensilla in the sacculus (a chamber within the antenna), where they detect acidic odors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Ai et al., 2010</xref>). We first verified that <italic>Ir64a promoter-Gal4</italic> (hereafter, <italic>Ir64a-Gal4</italic>) induction of Dam or Dam:PolII did not impact the expression or localization of the IR64a receptor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>) or the projection of these neurons to the antennal lobe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>). We proceeded to collect triplicate samples of ~2000 adult antennae and processed these for TaDa (see Materials and methods). This experimental design is expected to integrate PolII occupancy patterns from the mid-pupal stage (when <italic>Ir</italic>-Gal4 expression initiates) to adults. We therefore anticipated identifying genes that are differentially expressed both during the second half of OSN development and in mature antennae. As a positive control, we first examined the mapping of reads of methylated DNA fragments to the <italic>Ir64a</italic> gene. Dam:PolII consistently accessed this gene region at higher levels than Dam alone, particularly near the 5’ end of the locus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>), consistent with previously described genome-wide PolII occupancy patterns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Southall et al., 2013</xref>).</p><p>We extended the TaDa approach using drivers to target six additional individual OSN classes, including all acid-sensing Ir populations (Ir31a, Ir75a, Ir75b, Ir75c, Ir84a) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Grosjean et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Silbering et al., 2011</xref>), as well as the hygrosensory Ir40a neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Enjin et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Knecht et al., 2016</xref>); these populations range from ~8 to ~25 cells per antenna (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Knecht et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>). Reproducibility among all triplicate datasets (average <italic>r<sup>2</sup></italic> = 0.85) was consistent with previous TaDa studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Southall et al., 2013</xref>). As expected, the enrichment of Dam:PolII access to the <italic>Ir64a</italic> gene was specific to the Ir64a neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>). We quantified ‘PollI occupancy scores’ (OSs) by calculating the log<sub>2</sub> ratio of the normalized number of reads from the Dam:PolII samples compared to the normalized number of reads in control Dam samples across the entire gene body. In Ir64a neurons, the <italic>Ir64a</italic> gene OS was significantly positive (OS = 0.20; False Discovery Rate (FDR) = 4.26e-10), while it was not significantly different from zero in the other six neuron populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>, bottom).</p><p>Similarly, OSs for other <italic>Ir</italic> genes were significantly positive in the corresponding neuronal population, but not in those in which the receptors are not expressed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>). We noted two exceptions: first, in Ir31a neurons, <italic>Ir40a</italic> had a positive OS (0.12; FDR = 1.93e-13), although it was much lower than that of <italic>Ir31a</italic> (OS = 0.41; FDR = 2.67e-6) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>). Second, the <italic>Ir75a</italic>, <italic>Ir75b</italic>, and <italic>Ir75c</italic> genes had positive OSs in all three of the corresponding neuron populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>). As the proteins they encode (and the corresponding <italic>Ir-Gal4</italic> drivers) are expressed in discrete neuron populations, this latter result is most likely due to these tandemly clustered genes having overlapping transcription units (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>).</p><p>To further examine the specificity of TaDa in reporting on neuron population-specific gene expression, we plotted OSs for all members of the <italic>Ir</italic> repertoire, as well as <italic>Or</italic> and <italic>Gustatory receptor</italic> (<italic>Gr</italic>) families. The vast majority of these genes are expressed only in other antennal sensory neuron populations, distinct chemosensory organs and/or life stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Chen and Dahanukar, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Joseph and Carlson, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Sánchez-Alcañiz et al., 2018</xref>). Concordantly, only very few genes show significant OSs in any of the seven populations of Ir neurons analyzed by TaDa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplements 1</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">3</xref>). Two prominent examples are <italic>Ir8a</italic> and <italic>Ir25a</italic>, which encode co-receptors for subsets of tuning IRs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Abuin et al., 2011</xref>). <italic>Ir8a</italic> has a significant OS in all Ir populations except for Ir40a neurons, which is consistent with the selective expression and function of IR8a in acid-sensing OSNs but not hygrosensory neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Abuin et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>). IR25a is broadly expressed in most antennal neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Abuin et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Benton et al., 2009</xref>) – although it may have a role in only a subset of these – which is reflected in a significant OS for <italic>Ir25a</italic> in all seven populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>). IR40a is co-expressed with another receptor, IR93a (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Enjin et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Knecht et al., 2016</xref>), although Ir40a neurons display significant occupancy of <italic>Ir93a</italic>, several other Ir populations also have, unexpectedly, a significant OS for this gene (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1</xref>). TaDa signals of real transcription of <italic>Ir93a</italic> may be confounded by an intronic <italic>Doc</italic> transposable element.</p><p>Of the other chemosensory receptor genes displaying unexpected significant OSs in these Ir neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplements 1</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">3</xref>), many are located in the introns of other genes (e.g. <italic>Ir47a</italic>, within the <italic>slowpoke 2</italic> locus, which encodes a nervous-system expressed potassium channel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Budelli et al., 2016</xref>]), or have overlapping transcripts with other genes (e.g. <italic>Gr2a</italic>, which overlaps with <italic>futsch</italic>, a gene encoding a neuronal microtubule-binding protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Hummel et al., 2000</xref>]). In these cases, calculation of a specific OS for the chemosensory genes is impossible, and we suspect that the OS reflects transcription of the non-receptor gene. A similar issue might affect receptor genes that are in very close proximity to (though not overlapping with) other genes, given that TaDa signals depend upon GATC genomic distributions and not transcript boundaries.</p><p>Olfactory receptors have lower transcript levels in the antenna compared to other classes of genes with broader neuronal or non-neuronal expression patterns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Menuz et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Shiao et al., 2015</xref>). We extended the examination of the TaDa datasets to other genes that are known to be expressed (or not expressed) in the analyzed Ir neuron populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>). Two broadly-expressed neuronal genes, <italic>elav</italic> and <italic>nSyb</italic>, display significant OSs across populations, as does <italic>pebbled</italic> (<italic>peb</italic>), a molecular marker for OSNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib93">Sweeney et al., 2007</xref>). By contrast, <italic>oaz</italic>, a broad marker of PNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Hong et al., 2009</xref>), is not significantly occupied. Many of the most highly expressed genes in the antenna are those encoding Odorant Binding Proteins (OBPs), which are thought to be transcribed exclusively in non-neuronal cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Larter et al., 2016</xref>), often at &gt;10 fold higher levels than olfactory receptor genes, as determined by bulk RNA-seq (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Menuz et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Shiao et al., 2015</xref>). (This idea was challenged recently by the OSN snRNA-seq analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">McLaughlin et al., 2020</xref>], which will be considered further in the Discussion). Two of these, <italic>Obp59a</italic> and <italic>Obp84a</italic> are expressed in sensilla housing Ir neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Larter et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Sun et al., 2018a</xref>), but neither of these genes displays significant OSs in any neuron population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>). Such absence of occupancy is true for the <italic>Obp</italic> repertoire as a whole (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s4">Figure 1—figure supplement 4</xref>). Similarly, markers for other support cell types, such as <italic>nompA</italic> (thecogen cell) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Chung et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Larter et al., 2016</xref>), and the glial marker <italic>repo</italic> are not significantly occupied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>).</p><p>Electrophysiological experiments indicate that antennal OSNs are cholinergic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Kazama and Wilson, 2008</xref>). In line with this functional property, genes encoding the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (<italic>VAChT</italic>) and choline acetyltransferase (<italic>ChAT</italic>) have significant OSs in all populations, while glutamatergic and GABAergic neuron markers (vesicular glutamate transporter (<italic>VGlut</italic>) and glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (<italic>Gad1</italic>)) do not (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>). We note, however, that a GABA receptor subunit (encoded by <italic>GABA-B-R2</italic>) – which is heterogeneously expressed and mediates population-specific presynaptic gain control in different Or OSNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Root et al., 2008</xref>) – displays significant, but variable, OSs in different Ir populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>). Finally, of the multiple neuropeptides detected in the antennal lobe by proteomics, only one, short neuropeptide F (sNPF), originates from OSNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Carlsson et al., 2010</xref>), where it has a role in glomerular-specific presynaptic facilitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Root et al., 2011</xref>). Consistently, we observe significant (and heterogeneous) OSs for <italic>sNPF</italic>, but not for genes encoding neuropeptides whose presence in the antennal lobe derives from expression in central neurons (e.g. Tachykinin [Tk], Myoinhibiting peptide [Mip]) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Carlsson et al., 2010</xref>).</p><p>Together, these results indicate that TaDa is sufficiently sensitive and specific to detect PolII occupancy at transcriptionallyactive genes in very small populations of neurons embedded within the cellularly-complex antennal tissue.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Global analysis of TaDa datasets</title><p>We next surveyed OSs at a genome-wide level, to characterize patterns of transcriptional activity in different Ir neuron populations. The number of genes significantly occupied by PolII ranged from 3603 to 4775 across the seven datasets, representing 20–27% of all genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary files 1</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp3">3</xref>). To investigate patterns of similarity in global OSs among these populations, we carried out hierarchical clustering of the mean OSs for all genes in the genome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>). This analysis revealed an interesting correspondence in the clustering of OSs with the phylogeny of the corresponding receptor genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>): neurons expressing the most recently duplicated receptor genes, <italic>Ir75b</italic> and <italic>Ir75c</italic>, were clustered together. The next most similar neuron population expresses <italic>Ir75a</italic>, which is the likely ancestral member of this tandem gene array (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>). Ir40a and Ir64a neurons clustered together away from the other acid-sensing populations, possibly reflecting the development of these neurons within the sacculus, rather than in sensilla located on the antennal surface.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Global analyses of TaDa datasets.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Bar plot summarizing the number of genes in the genome that have significantly positive OSs within each Ir neuron population, and the number of significantly occupied genes that are unique to a given neuron population. See also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary files 1</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp3">3</xref>. (<bold>B</bold>) Hierarchical clustering (arbitrary units, a.u.) of the seven Ir neuron populations based upon the OSs of all genes. All nodes had approximately unbiased support values of 100% except for the one denoted with 60%. (<bold>C–G</bold>) Heatmaps displaying the hierarchical clustering of OSs for the genes encoding (<bold>C</bold>) neuropeptides, (<bold>D</bold>) GPCRs, (<bold>E</bold>) ion channels, (<bold>F</bold>) neuron projection guidance molecules, and (<bold>G</bold>) transcription factors. For each population, the total number of genes with a significant OS, and the number of those that are unique to a given population, are shown below (see also <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp6">Supplementary files 6</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp20">20</xref>) which list, for each category: (i) all analyzed genes, (ii) significantly occupied genes, and (iii) population-specific occupied genes.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Heterogeneous expression of Engrailed in Ir neuron populations.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) OS heatmap of <italic>en</italic> in the seven Ir neuron populations. (<bold>B</bold>) Immunofluorescence for En (magenta) and GFP (green) on antennal sections of animals in which the indicated Ir neuron populations are labeled with a CD8:GFP reporter. Genotypes are of the form: <italic>Irxx-Gal4/+;UAS-mCD8:GFP/+</italic> or, for Ir75a and Ir75c neurons, <italic>UAS-mCD8:GFP/+;Irxx-Gal4/+</italic>. Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>C</bold>) Density plots for En immunofluorescence signals (arbitrary units, a.u.) quantified from Ir neuron nuclei. Most signals from Ir75a, Ir75b, Ir75c, and Ir84a neuron nuclei fall within the range of background signals; Ir31a, Ir40a, and Ir64a neuron nuclei have consistently higher levels of immunofluorescence. n = sample size; <italic>p</italic>- value based on one-sided Wilcoxon tests, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig2-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Beyond the unique patterns of sensory receptor expression, little is known about the nature or neural specificity of other signaling pathways in OSNs. To gain insight into these properties, we examined the occupancy of genes encoding putative neuropeptides, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and ion channels (excluding chemosensory receptors) in the seven Ir populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C–E</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp6">Supplementary files 6</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp14">14</xref>). We observed that each Ir neuron population displays PolII occupancy of a distinct combination of 3–9 neuropeptide genes (out of 49 in the genome), 18–31 GPCR genes (out of 111), and 29–47 ion channel genes (out of 149). There were, however, only a few cases of genes that are unique to a single neuronal population (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp8">Supplementary files 8</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp11">11</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp14">14</xref>).</p><p>OSNs are also distinguished by their morphological properties, notably their projections to discrete glomeruli within the antennal lobe. Genetic studies have identified several secreted and transmembrane proteins that play roles in different steps of the neuronal guidance process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Brochtrup and Hummel, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Hong and Luo, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Jefferis and Hummel, 2006</xref>), but our understanding remains incomplete and many key molecules likely remain to be discovered. Although our TaDa experiments profile the latter stages of OSN development – after glomerular targeting has occurred (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Jefferis and Hummel, 2006</xref>) – the expression of known OSN axon guidance genes persists into adult stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Barish et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Menuz et al., 2014</xref>). We therefore reasoned our datasets could permit surveying of the potential complexity and neuron-type specificity of the molecular machinery underlying this process. We examined OSs of ~268 genes encoding molecules with known or implicated roles in neuron projection guidance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp15">Supplementary files 15</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp17">17</xref>). While each neuron population had a unique combination of many dozens of PolII-occupied genes, individual datasets had very few or no unique genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp17">Supplementary file 17</xref>). These observations suggest that different OSN populations depend upon specific combinations of largelyoverlapping sets of guidance factors.</p><p>The expression of both chemosensory receptors and guidance molecules depends upon regulatory networks of transcription factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Barish and Volkan, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Jafari et al., 2012</xref>). We therefore assessed global patterns of PolII occupancy of the set of 754 predicted <italic>Drosophila</italic> transcription factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Pfreundt et al., 2010</xref>) across the seven Ir populations. Half of these genes (379/754) displayed significant occupancy in at least one population of Ir neurons, with individual OSN classes having 190–286 occupied transcription factor genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp18">Supplementary files 18</xref>–<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp20">20</xref>). There was considerable variation in Dam:PolII occupancy of transcription factor genes across the neuron populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G</xref>), consistent with each neuronal subtype possessing a unique and complex gene regulatory network to support its specific differentiation properties. Here, Ir31a neurons stood out (45 uniquely occupied genes); the reasons for this are unclear, as the biology of this sensory pathway is poorly understood. By contrast, Ir75a neurons had a single uniquely occupied transcription factor gene (<italic>pou domain motif 3</italic> (<italic>pdm3</italic>), investigated further below).</p><p>Many of the transcription factors with known functions in OSN development are broadly-expressed across OSNs, such as Acj6, Fer1, and Onecut (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Clyne et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Jafari et al., 2012</xref>); consistently, these genes display positive OSs in all seven neuron populations (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp19">Supplementary file 19</xref>). One exception is Engrailed (En), which is expressed and required in a subset of OSNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Chou et al., 2010b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib87">Song et al., 2012</xref>). In our TaDa datasets, we observed that <italic>en</italic> displays significant OSs in Ir31a, Ir40a, and Ir64a populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1A</xref>), concordant with the robust detection of En protein in only these three Ir neuron classes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1B–C</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Comparative chromatin accessibility in OSNs</title><p>We next performed CATaDa analysis through investigation of the Dam-alone datasets, by using these to generate chromatin accessibility maps similar to ATAC-seq and FAIRE-seq (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Aughey et al., 2018</xref>). Genome-wide visualization of the peaks of methylated sequences across the genome (see Materials and methods) revealed heterogeneous patterns of chromatin accessibility, with the expected overall decrease in open chromatin toward the heterochromatic centromeric regions of the chromosome arms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>).</p><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>CATaDa reveals global similarity in chromatin accessibility at <italic>Ir</italic> genes across Ir neuron populations.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Comparison of chromatin accessibility peak locations (q &lt; 0.05) over the <italic>D. melanogaster</italic> genome for two example neuron populations, Ir75c and Ir40a. The y-axis represents the fold enrichment for the peak summit against random Poisson distribution of the small local region (1000 bp). 2L/3L and 2R/3R refer to left and right arms of chromosomes 2/3; ‘c’ at the end of each arm indicates the centromeric (heterochromatic) end of the arm (the Y chromosome is mainly heterochromatic). (<bold>B</bold>) Plots of <italic>Ir</italic> gene exons are shown in black, and UTRs in white; exons of flanking genes are shown in gray. The arrowheads indicate the direction of <italic>Ir</italic> transcription. The minimal defined regulatory sequences to recapitulate <italic>Ir</italic> expression are indicated with blue bars (color-coordinated with the arrowheads for <italic>Ir75a</italic>, <italic>Ir75b</italic>, and <italic>Ir75c</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Silbering et al., 2011</xref>). The y-axis scale shows the CATaDa accessibility at the genomic region with the RPGC normalization method. The red bars are the significant peaks with q &lt; 0.05. In the <italic>Ir75a/Ir75b/Ir75c</italic> genomic region, the arrows mark significant peaks that are unique to the corresponding Ir neuron populations and which are contained within known regulatory regions of these <italic>Ir</italic> genes. In the <italic>Ir64a</italic> genomic region, the arrows mark significant peaks observed in both Ir64a and Ir40a neurons. Note that the smooth boundaries around peaks of Dam-accessible regions are visual artifacts of the analysis; they do not reflect the resolution of CATaDa, which is discrete at the GATC motifs.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig3-v2.tif"/></fig><p>To examine chromatin accessibility patterns at a gene level, we focused on CATaDa signals at the <italic>Ir</italic> loci that distinguish different populations – that is, the seven tuning <italic>Ir</italic> genes and <italic>Ir8a</italic> – whose cell type-specific transcriptional activity is well-established (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Abuin et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Benton et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>). For each gene, peaks were present at the presumed promoter region, as well as in upstream regions, which may represent enhancers. Comparisons across neuron populations revealed that peak distribution was similar across all eight genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). This observation indicates that neuron-specific differences in <italic>Ir</italic> gene transcription are not due to overt differences in promoter and enhancer accessibility. However, we noted the presence of peaks upstream of <italic>Ir75a</italic> and <italic>Ir75c</italic> that are unique to their respective neuron populations (q-value &lt;0.05). These peaks lie within regions corresponding to those that, when cloned into reporter transgenes, are sufficient to recapitulate receptor expression patterns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Ai et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Silbering et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). Such peaks may therefore reflect enhancers that are accessible/functional only in these Ir neuron populations. Peaks were also identified upstream of <italic>Ir64a</italic> in both Ir64a neurons and Ir40a neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). This observation suggests that these sacculus neuron populations share chromatin accessibility in this region but that other factors (e.g. <italic>trans</italic>-acting proteins) are required to determine the cell type-specific transcription of <italic>Ir64a</italic>.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Identifying genes displaying differential expression in Ir populations</title><p>The analyses of genes encoding chemosensory receptors, transcription factors and other categories of proteins demonstrate the use of TaDa OSs to identify potential developmental and functional determinants that are expressed within specific OSN populations. While differences in OS for a given gene across populations may suggest heterogeneous expression levels, we sought to test formally for PolII occupancy differences between populations. We implemented a different analysis method that uses variation in read-depth along the gene body in the triplicate paired Dam-alone/Dam:PolII TaDa datasets (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref> and Materials and methods). We identified candidates that had at least two GATC motifs for which the excess of Dam:PolII read-depth compared to the Dam-alone read-depth significantly varied in the same direction between two or more neuron populations (see Materials and methods). With this criterion, 1694 genes exhibited significant variation across the seven populations, indicating that only a relatively small proportion of genes (~8%) differ among these neuron types. This number is likely to be an overestimate as it includes overlapping and/or intronic genes that, as described above, cannot be parsed further using TaDa data. Importantly, this subset encompasses all of the expected <italic>Ir</italic> genes (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>). To examine how each individual Ir neuron dataset varied in comparison to the six others, we also quantified significant differences between each pair of neuron populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>). Despite the methodological differences with the TaDa analysis that produces OSs, the proportion of genes contributing to the total number of pairwise difference approximates the clustering of global OSs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>). For example, comparisons among the closely clustered Ir75a, Ir75b, and Ir75c neuron datasets result in very few of the total differences (0.4–1.7%). Conversely, slightly more than half (51%) of the total differences in the Ir84a neuron dataset arise from comparisons with the distantly clustered Ir40a neuron dataset.</p><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Differentially occupied genes across Ir populations.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic illustrating the identification of a differentially occupied gene between two Ir populations by using variation in read depth at GATC motifs (see Materials and methods). In this example, occupancy of ‘<italic>gene X</italic>’ is compared between Ir64a neurons and Ir31a neurons. At GATC motifs (black bars), a test is applied to determine if significant variation exists in the relative read depths (in triplicate Dam:PolII versus Dam-alone experiments) between these two neuron populations. Fictive data for two GATC motifs are depicted: for both, the relative read depth in the Dam:PolII experiments (compared to the Dam-alone experiments) is greater in the Ir64a neurons. (<bold>B</bold>) Stacked bar plots of the numbers of genes in the genome that are differentially occupied among Ir neuron populations based on pairwise tests (see Materials and methods). The colors indicate the proportions of genes emerging from comparisons with the six other neuron populations. The figures above the bars are the total numbers of genes from all pairwise comparisons; note that a given gene may be counted multiple times. (<bold>C</bold>) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the 1694 differentially occupied genes, showing the top ten over-represented GO terms. The x-axis represents the number of genes annotated to a particular GO term in the input subset. The value indicated by the colored bar is the probability of observing at least the same number of genes associated to that GO term compared to what would have occurred by chance. (<bold>D</bold>) Ranking of the 1694 differentially occupied genes ordered by the number of GATC motifs contributing to their between-neuron differences (uncorrected for gene length). (<bold>E</bold>) OS heatmaps (calculated as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">2</xref>) of <italic>pdm3</italic> and <italic>fmi</italic> in the seven Ir neuron populations.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Candidate genes for pairwise differential occupancy based on the Wald Test with DESeq2.</title><p>21 Bed-formatted files (representing all possible pairwise comparisons between the seven datasets) containing statistics and annotations.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="zip" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig4-data1-v2.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata2"><label>Figure 4—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Candidate genes for differential occupancy based on the Likelihood Ratio Test within DESeq2.</title><p>One file contains the list of genes, the other contains the list of GATC fragments and the associated annotations and statistics.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="zip" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig4-data2-v2.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata3"><label>Figure 4—source data 3.</label><caption><title>Number of GATC motifs within candidate differentially expressed genes contributing to significant differences.</title><p>Values correspond to those plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig4-data3-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig4-v2.tif"/></fig><p>We investigated the general characteristics of the 1694 differentially occupied genes by performing Gene Ontology analyses, finding highly significant enrichment in neuron, neural development, and signaling categories (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C</xref>). This enrichment is consistent with these genes underlying the known unique anatomical and physiological properties of these neuron classes, and indicates that our comparative TaDa approach would be valuable in identifying candidates that contribute functionally to these properties.</p><p>To establish a priority list for follow-up experiments, we ordered the 1694 genes by the total number of differentially occupied GATC motifs, reasoning that this would highlight those displaying differential occupancy along a broad region of the gene body (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>). While this ‘ranking’ is biased toward longer genes (which on average will have more GATC motifs), we emphasize that this does not exclude interest in genes with fewer GATC motifs; for example, <italic>Ir</italic> genes are distributed widely in this list (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>). We subsequently focused on experimental validation of the top-ranked transcription factor gene, <italic>pdm3</italic>, and the top-ranked gene encoding a neuron guidance molecule, <italic>flamingo</italic> (<italic>fmi</italic>; also known as <italic>starry night</italic> (<italic>stan</italic>), <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://flybase.org/reports/FBgn0024836">flybase.org/reports/FBgn0024836</ext-link>), as described below.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Pdm3 acts as a genetic switch to distinguish Ir75a and Ir75b neuron fate</title><p>The robust signal displayed by <italic>pdm3</italic> for between-population differences is consistent with this gene having a significant OS only in Ir75a neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E</xref>). Notably, from the global survey, <italic>pdm3</italic> is the sole transcription factor gene that is uniquely occupied in this neuron population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp20">Supplementary file 20</xref>). Pdm3 is a nervous-system enriched transcription factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Brown et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Chen et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib96">Tichy et al., 2008</xref>), although its precise in vivo binding specificity is unknown. In another olfactory organ, the maxillary palp, Pdm3 is expressed in multiple classes of Or neurons and functions in controlling receptor expression and axon guidance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib96">Tichy et al., 2008</xref>), but its role in Ir neurons is unknown. Using Pdm3 antibodies, we first analyzed protein expression in antennae in which we co-labeled each of the Ir populations with the driver lines used in the TaDa experiments. Only Ir75a neurons displayed robust nuclear Pdm3 immunofluorescence, although a subset of Ir40a neurons had above-background signals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A–B</xref>).</p><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Heterogeneous expression and function of Pdm3 in Ir neurons.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Immunofluorescence for Pdm3 and GFP on antennal sections of animals in which the indicated Ir neuron populations are labeled with a CD8:GFP reporter. Genotypes are of the form: <italic>Irxx-Gal4/+;UAS-mCD8:GFP/+</italic> or, for Ir75a and Ir75c neurons, <italic>UAS-mCD8:GFP/+;Irxx-Gal4/+</italic>. Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>B</bold>) Density plots for Pdm3 immunofluorescence signals (arbitrary units, a.u.) quantified from Ir neuron nuclei (each represented by a vertical line) in the genotypes in (<bold>A</bold>) and from background signals pooled across genotypes (see Materials and methods). Ir75a neuron nuclei have the highest levels of immunofluorescence. n = sample size; <italic>p</italic>-value based on one-sided Wilcoxon tests, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. (<bold>C</bold>) Immunofluorescence or RNA FISH for the indicated IRs on whole-mount antennae (or antennal sections for IR40a and IR64a, due to poor antibody penetration of whole-mount tissue) of control animals (<italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;+/CyO</italic>) or two independent <italic>pdm3</italic> RNAi lines (<italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;;UAS-pdm3<sup>JF02312</sup>/+</italic> (RNAi#1) and <italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup>/+</italic> (RNAi#2)). Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>D</bold>) Quantification of neuron number for the indicated Ir neuron populations for the genotypes shown in (<bold>C</bold>). In this and other panels, boxplots show the median, first and third quartile of the data, overlaid with individual data points. Comparisons to controls are shown for each neuron type (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test and <italic>p</italic>-values adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni method, **p&lt;0.001; NS p&gt;0.05). Sample sizes are shown below the plot. Ir40a and Ir64a OSN population sizes could not be quantified because the sections visualized necessarily contain a variable number of neurons; similarly, we could not confidently count Ir84a neuron number because of the weak signal. Nevertheless, when visualized blindly, the control and RNAi genotypes were not distinguishable for any of these neuron populations (assessing the phenotype in antennae of at least 10 animals from two independent genetic crosses).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig5-v2.tif"/></fig><p>To examine the role of <italic>pdm3</italic> in Ir neurons we performed transgenic RNA interference (RNAi) using <italic>peb-Gal4</italic>. This driver is expressed broadly in OSNs from soon after their terminal divisions (~16 hr APF) throughout the initiation of olfactory receptor expression (~40–48 hr APF) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Li et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib93">Sweeney et al., 2007</xref>). <italic>peb-Gal4</italic>-driven pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup> (<italic>peb&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic>) led to loss of most IR75a expression, with the remaining detectable neurons expressing very low levels of this receptor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C–D</xref>). By contrast, robust expression of all other Irs was maintained (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C–D</xref>). We noted, however, that the number of cells expressing IR75b increased in <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> antennae (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>). These observations suggest that Pdm3 functions (directly or indirectly) to promote IR75a expression and repress IR75b expression.</p><p>The novel IR75b-expressing cells in <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> antennae are mainly located in the proximal region of the antenna near the sacculus, where Ir75a neurons are normally found (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref>). This distribution suggested that loss of Pdm3 results in a switch of receptor expression from IR75a to IR75b. We investigated this possibility by examining the activity of transcriptional reporters for these receptors, encompassing minimal regulatory DNA sequences fused to <italic>CD4:tdGFP</italic> (hereafter, <italic>GFP</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>). Both <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> and <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> transgenes are faithfully expressed in IR75a and IR75b protein-expressing neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B–C</xref>). In <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> antennae <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> expression is greatly diminished, while <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> is expressed in many ectopic cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B–D</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Pdm3 is required to distinguish Ir75a and Ir75b neuron fate.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Immunofluorescence for IR75a and IR75b on whole-mount antennae of control (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>,<italic>UAS-Dcr-2/+</italic>) and <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>,<italic>UAS-Dcr-2/+;UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup>/+</italic>) animals. Scale bar = 10 µm. The schematics on the right summarize the distribution of labeled neurons. (<bold>B</bold>) Immunofluorescence for GFP and IR75a on whole-mount antennae of control (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>,<italic>UAS-Dcr-2/+;Ir75a-GFP/+</italic>) and <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>,<italic>UAS-Dcr-2/+;Ir75a-GFP/UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup></italic>) animals. Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>C</bold>) Immunofluorescence for GFP and IR75b on whole-mount antennae of control (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>,<italic>UAS-Dcr-2/+;Ir75b-GFP/+</italic>) and <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>,<italic>UAS-Dcr-2/+;Ir75b-GFP/UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup></italic>) animals. Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>D</bold>) Quantification of the number of neurons that express <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> or <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> in the genotypes shown in (<bold>B–C</bold>). Comparisons to the controls are shown (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test and <italic>p</italic>-values adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni method, **p&lt;0.001). The increase in number of <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> labeled neurons in <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> is lower than the increase in IR75b-expressing neurons, potentially because the transgenic reporter is not fully faithful in this genetic background. (<bold>E</bold>) Immunofluorescence for nc82 and GFP on whole-mount antennal lobes of control and <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> animals. Genotypes are as in (<bold>B–C</bold>). Scale bar = 20 µm. Quantification of phenotypes are shown on the right. (<bold>F</bold>) Quantification of the number of Ir75a and Ir75b neurons in animals (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>,<italic>UAS-Dcr-2/+;pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup>/+;UAS-Gal80<sup>ts</sup>/+</italic>) in which <italic>peb-Gal4</italic>-driven <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> is continuously suppressed (19°C, the permissive temperature for the Gal4 inhibitor Gal80<sup>ts</sup>), continuously allowed (29°C, the restrictive temperature for Gal80<sup>ts</sup>) or induced only in adults (19°C → 29°C temperature shift after eclosion). Comparisons between conditions are shown for each neuron type (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, **p&lt;0.001, NS p&gt;0.05). (<bold>G</bold>) Immunofluorescence for IR75a and IR75b on whole-mount antennae of the genotypes shown in (<bold>F</bold>). Single optical sections are shown, to reveal the weak co-expression of IR75a and IR75b in a subset of cells (arrowheads). Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>H</bold>) Quantification of the number of neurons that co-express IR75a and IR75b. Comparisons to the controls are shown (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, **p&lt;0.001, NS p&gt;0.05). (<bold>I</bold>) Immunofluorescence for nc82 and GFP on whole-mount antennal lobes of <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> animals (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>,<italic>UAS-Dcr-2/+;UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup>/Ir75b-GFP;UAS-Gal80<sup>ts</sup>/+</italic>) in which RNAi is allowed throughout development (29°C) or limited only to adults (19°C → 29°C temperature shift after eclosion). Quantification of glomerular labeling pattern by the <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> reporter is shown on the right of each image.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig6-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Phenotypic analysis of Ir75a and Ir75b neurons with late developmental induction of <italic>pdm3</italic> RNAi.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Quantification of the number of Ir75a and Ir75b neurons in control (<italic>Ir8a-Gal4</italic>/+) and <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> (<italic>Ir8a-Gal4</italic>/<italic>UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup></italic>) animals. Comparisons to the control are shown for each neuron type (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test, **p&lt;0.001, NS p&gt;0.05). Although the number of IR75a-expressing cells was unchanged compared to controls, receptor protein levels were lower in several cells (see (<bold>B</bold>)). (<bold>B</bold>) Immunofluorescence for IR75a and IR75b on whole-mount antennae of control and <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> animals (genotypes as in (<bold>A</bold>)). Single optical sections are shown, to reveal the weak co-expression of IR75a and IR75b in a subset of cells (arrowheads). Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>C</bold>) Quantification of the number of neurons that co-express IR75a and IR75b. Comparison to the control is shown (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test). (<bold>D</bold>) Immunofluorescence for nc82 and GFP on whole-mount antennal lobes of <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> animals. Genotypes: <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> control (<italic>Ir75a-GFP/+;Ir8a-Gal4/+</italic>)<italic>, Ir75a-GFP pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> (<italic>Ir75a-GFP/UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup>;Ir8a-Gal4/+</italic>), <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> control (<italic>Ir75b-GFP/+;Ir8a-Gal4/+</italic>), <italic>Ir75b-GFP pdm3<sup>RNAi#2</sup></italic> (<italic>Ir75b-GFP/UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup>;Ir8a-Gal4/+</italic>). Scale bar = 20 µm. Quantification of projection pattern phenotypes are shown on the right. In contrast to observations with adult-only <italic>pdm3</italic> RNAi driven by <italic>peb-Gal4</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6I</xref>), we did not detect labeling of DP1l in these experiments. This difference is likely to reflect the weaker RNAi induced by <italic>Ir8a-Gal4</italic> (and/or the absence of <italic>UAS-Dcr-2</italic> in these genotypes), as is apparent from the quantification of Ir75a and Ir75b neuron numbers (compare panel (<bold>A</bold>) with <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6F</xref>).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig6-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>We further used these <italic>Ir-GFP</italic> transgenes to examine the glomerular projection of Ir75a and Ir75b neurons in <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> animals. In controls, <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> and <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> label exclusively the DP1l and DL2d glomeruli, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6E</xref>), concordant with previous analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Silbering et al., 2011</xref>). In <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> animals the <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> DP1l signal is almost completely lost (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6E</xref>), consistent with the reduction in reporter expression in antennae. By contrast, the <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> signal in the DL2d glomerulus is greatly intensified, and the glomerulus is enlarged (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6E</xref>), presumably reflecting the increased number of Ir75b neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6C–D</xref>). The simplest interpretation of these observations is that in the absence of Pdm3, Ir75a neurons adopt Ir75b neuron fate including both receptor identity and glomerular innervation pattern.</p><p>While OSN fate is established in early pupae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Barish and Volkan, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Jefferis and Hummel, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib103">Yan et al., 2020</xref>), the expression of Pdm3 in Ir75a neurons in adult antennae (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A–B</xref>) suggests that it has a persistent role in these cells. To test this idea, we used a temperature-sensitive repressor of Gal4 (Gal80<sup>ts</sup>; active at 19°C, inactive at 29°C) to temporally control the onset of <italic>peb</italic>&gt;<italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic>. In control conditions, when we continuously suppressed (19°C) or permitted (29°C) <italic>peb</italic>&gt;<italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic>, we reproduced our initial observations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6F</xref>, compare to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>). When <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> was induced only in adults (through a 19°C to 29°C temperature shift after eclosion) the same increase in Ir75b expression and decrease in Ir75a expression was observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6F</xref>). Notably, we detected several cells expressing both IR75b and IR75a, which are never observed in non-RNAi antennae (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6G–H</xref>). These observations indicate that Pdm3 has a persistent role in mature Ir75a neurons to repress <italic>Ir75b</italic> expression and promote <italic>Ir75a</italic> expression. Qualitatively similar, although much weaker, changes in receptor expression were observed when we drove <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> using <italic>Ir8a-Gal4 </italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Abuin et al., 2011</xref>), which is active only from the second half of pupal development (~48 hr APF) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1</xref>). The ectopic expression of <italic>Ir75b</italic> in Ir75a OSNs was confirmed by examining the projection of <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic>-expressing neurons: in adult-only <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> animals – but not in control pan-developmental <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup> – Ir75b-GFP</italic> signal was detected both in DL2d and DP1l neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6I</xref>). This observation is consistent with late loss of <italic>pdm3</italic> leading to misexpression of <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> in Ir75a neurons after they have targeted to DP1l.</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Dynamic, heterogeneous expression of Fmi in OSNs</title><p><italic>fmi</italic> attracted our attention both for its heterogeneous occupancy across Ir neuron populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D–E</xref>), and because this gene encodes an atypical cadherin – comprising an extracellular cadherin-like domain and a GPCR-like domain – with diverse roles in axonal and dendritic targeting in other regions of the nervous system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Berger-Müller and Suzuki, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Chen and Clandinin, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Gao et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Lee et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Matsubara et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Schwabe et al., 2013</xref>). To characterize the endogenous expression of Fmi in the olfactory system, we used an antibody to profile protein levels in OSNs. We first examined antennae from mid-pupal stages (48 hr APF) but observed only trace levels of immunoreactivity across OSN soma (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A</xref>). At 24 hr APF, this signal was slightly stronger, but much more prominent in the OSN axons as they left the antenna (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A</xref>), suggesting that this protein is predominantly transported to the axonal compartment of these neurons. Indeed, Fmi protein was strongly detected in the OSN axons as they enter the antennal lobe at 24 hr APF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>). Fmi was still robustly expressed at 48 hr APF as OSNs coalesced onto individual glomeruli with broad, but slightly heterogeneous, expression in glomeruli across the antennal lobe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>). Subsequently, Fmi levels began to decrease to undetectable levels in some glomeruli in the adult stage, while persisting in others (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B</xref>). Most of these glomeruli are innervated by Or neurons, but we could detect Fmi in DL2d (Ir75b) and DL2v (Ir75c), but not the neighboring DP1l (Ir75a) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B</xref>), in partial concordance with the TaDa data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>Expression analysis of Fmi in OSNs.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Immunofluorescence for Fmi and the ubiquitously-expressed neuronal cadherin (CadN) on whole-mount antennal lobes of wild-type (<italic>w<sup>1118</sup></italic>) animals of the indicated age. Three optical sections are shown to reveal the morphology of most glomeruli. Bottom row: Fmi-positive glomeruli were identified in adult antennal lobes based upon their stereotyped position and morphology. Dorsal-ventral (D-V) and medial-lateral (M-L) axes are indicated. The arrowheads point to the soma of Fmi-expressing LNs that are detectable from 48 hr APF. Scale bar = 20 μm. (<bold>B</bold>) Histogram of frequency of detectable Fmi immunoreactivity in individual glomeruli of the adult antennal lobe (n = 14 antennal lobes). (<bold>C</bold>) Immunofluorescence for Fmi and CadN on whole-mount antennal lobes of control (<italic>1081-Gal4/+;449-Gal4/UAS-Dcr-2</italic>) and <italic>LN&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> (<italic>1081-Gal4/UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup>;449-Gal4/UAS-Dcr-2</italic>) 48 hr APF animals. Open and filled arrowheads highlight adjacent glomeruli with low and high levels, respectively, of Fmi immunoreactivity. Scale bar = 20 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig7-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Characterization of Fmi expression in antennae and local interneurons.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Immunofluorescence for Fmi and Elav on whole-mount antennae of control animals (<italic>w;Ir8a-Gal4,UAS-RedStinger/CyO</italic>; note the RedStinger reporter is not shown in these images) at 24 and 48 hr APF. Partial optical stacks are shown. The arrowhead points to the antennal nerve. Scale bar = 20 μm. (<bold>B</bold>) Immunofluorescence for Fmi and Elav on whole-mount antennal lobes of 48 hr APF control (<italic>w<sup>1118</sup></italic>) animals. A partial optical stack is shown, revealing expression of Elav in the Fmi-positive soma adjacent to the antennal lobe. Scale bar = 20 μm. (<bold>C</bold>) Immunofluorescence for Fmi, GFP, and CadN on a whole-mount antennal lobe of a 48 hr APF animal in which Fmi-expressing LNs are labeled with the combined <italic>449</italic>-Gal4 and <italic>1081</italic>-Gal4 drivers (<italic>1081-Gal4/+;449-Gal4/UAS-mCD8:GFP</italic>), which were identified by screening a panel of LN drivers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Liou et al., 2018</xref>). A partial optical stack is shown. We distinguish two types of Fmi-positive neurons: 100% of strongly expressing neurons (n = 194, seven brains) are GFP-positive; 75% of weakly expressing neurons (e.g. the neuron indicated by the arrowhead) are GFP-positive (n = 213, seven brains). Note the drivers are expressed in several additional Fmi-negative cells. Scale bar = 20 μm. (<bold>D</bold>) Immunofluorescence for Fmi and CadN on whole-mount antennal lobes of 48 hr APF animals with OSN<italic>&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup>/+</italic>) or pan-neuronal&gt;<italic>fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> (<italic>elav-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup>/+;</italic>). In OSN<italic>&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> animals the remaining, relatively homogeneous glomerular signal is derived from its expression in LNs (soma labeled with an arrowhead); we cannot rule out that the homogeneity is a secondary consequence of the glomerular segregation defects. Pan-neuronal&gt;<italic>fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> is semi-lethal, but we recovered a few adult escapers in which all Fmi immunoreactivity in the antennal lobe is lost. Scale bar = 20 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig7-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>From later developmental stages (~48 hr APF), Fmi was also detected in a group of ~16 cells located on the antero-dorsal region of the antennal lobe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>). These cells are likely to be LNs, based upon their expression of Elav (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1B</xref>) and presence of stained processes that innervate the antennal lobe but do not project to higher olfactory centers. Numerous LN subtypes exist, and these often have broad innervation patterns across many glomeruli (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Chou et al., 2010a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Liou et al., 2018</xref>). To examine the specific contribution of OSNs to the Fmi immunoreactivity observed in the antennal lobe, we depleted Fmi in LNs by RNAi using a combination of Gal4 drivers (<italic>1081</italic> Gal4 and <italic>449</italic> Gal4 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Liou et al., 2018</xref>]) that cover the vast majority of these interneurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1C</xref>). At mid-pupal development (48 hr APF), differential glomerular expression of Fmi was much more marked compared to control animals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C</xref>). Although we could not confidently define all glomerular identities at this earlier developmental stage, prior to full maturation of the antennal lobe, Fmi protein levels did not appear to correspond precisely with the TaDa OSs (e.g. the VL2a glomerulus, innervated by Ir84a neurons, was not devoid of Fmi signal). This observation suggests that Fmi is dynamically expressed in different populations of OSNs during development. We note that the protein observed at 48 hr APF must be due to transcription of <italic>fmi</italic> at an earlier time point than captured by our TaDa analysis. It is also possible that different post-transcriptional regulation within OSN populations contributes to lack of strict correlation between transcript and protein levels with these cells, as noted in other tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Liu et al., 2016</xref>). Nevertheless, this analysis reveals developmentally dynamic and population-specific control of Fmi expression in OSNs.</p></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title>Fmi is required for segregation of OSNs into distinct glomeruli</title><p>To determine the function of Fmi in the developing olfactory system, we induced <italic>fmi</italic> RNAi in developing antennal tissue first using a constitutive driver (<italic>ey-Flp,act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Chai et al., 2019</xref>]), which should deplete Fmi expression from the earliest stages of development, and examined adult brains stained with the general neuropil marker nc82 (Bruchpilot). The antennal lobes of these animals showed fully penetrant, severe morphological defects: the stereotyped glomerular boundaries observed in the lobes of control animals were mostly lacking, with only a few, large glomerulus-like subregions detected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A</xref>). This phenotype was reproduced with an independent RNAi line that targets a distinct region of the coding sequence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig8" position="float"><label>Figure 8.</label><caption><title>Fmi is required in OSNs for glomerular segregation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Immunofluorescence for nc82 on whole-mount antennal lobes of control (<italic>w;ey-Flp/+;act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4/+</italic>), <italic>fmi<sup>RNAi#</sup></italic><sup>1</sup> (<italic>w;ey-Flp/UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup>;act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4/+</italic>) and <italic>fmi<sup>RNAi#</sup></italic><sup>2</sup> (<italic>w;ey-Flp/+;act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4/UAS-fmi<sup>JF02047</sup></italic>) animals. Three optical sections are shown. Scale bar = 20 μm. Quantification of wild-type or defective antennal lobe glomerular architectures are shown on the right; the n for each phenotypic category are indicated on the plots. (<bold>B</bold>) Immunofluorescence for nc82 and GFP on whole-mount antennal lobes of control and <italic>fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> animals. Genotypes: <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> (<italic>w;ey-Flp,Ir75a-GFP/</italic>[<italic>+</italic> or <italic>UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup></italic>]<italic>;act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4/+</italic>), <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> (<italic>w;ey-Flp,Ir75b-GFP/</italic>[<italic>+</italic> or <italic>UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup></italic>]<italic>;act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4/+</italic>), <italic>Ir75c-GFP</italic> (<italic>w;ey-Flp,Ir75c-GFP/</italic>[<italic>+</italic> or <italic>UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup></italic>]<italic>;act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4/+</italic>). Scale bar = 20 μm. (<bold>C</bold>) Immunofluorescence for nc82, GFP, RFP (detects Tomato (Tom)) on whole-mount antennal lobes of control and <italic>fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> animals. Genotypes: <italic>w;Ir75a-GFP,Ir75b-Tom/</italic>[<italic>+</italic> or <italic>UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup></italic>]<italic>;ey-FLP,act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4/Ir75b-RFP</italic> (top panels) and <italic>eyFlp,act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4</italic>/[<italic>+</italic> or <italic>UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup></italic>];<italic>Ir31a-Tom,Ir84a-GFP/+</italic> (bottom panels). Scale bar = 20 μm. Quantification of wild-type or defective targeting phenotypes are shown on the right, as indicated in the key at the top-right. (<bold>D</bold>) Immunofluorescence for CadN on whole-mount antennal lobes of control (<italic>peb-Gal4</italic>), OSN<italic>&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4/+;UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup>/+;UAS-Dcr-2/+</italic>), LN<italic>&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> (<italic>1081-Gal4/UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup>;449-Gal4/UAS-Dcr-2)</italic>, PN<italic>&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> (<italic>GH146-Gal4/+;UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup>/+</italic>) animals. Scale bar = 20 μm. (<bold>E</bold>) Immunofluorescence for nc82 and GFP on whole-mount antennal lobes of <italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;Ir75b-GFP/tub-Gal80<sup>ts</sup>;UAS-fmi<sup>JF02047</sup>/+</italic> animals in which Gal4-driven RNAi was suppressed until shifting from the permissive to restrictive temperature (19°C → 29°C) for Gal80<sup>ts</sup> at the indicated time points. Scale bar = 20 μm. (<bold>F</bold>) Immunofluorescence for GFP, Fmi and CadN on whole-mount pupal antennal lobes (24 hr APF) of control (<italic>peb-Gal4/+;;UAS-mCD8::GFP/+</italic>) and OSN<italic>&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi#1</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4/+;UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup>/+;UAS-mCD8::GFP/+</italic>) animals. The merged channels are shown on the right. The dorsolateral (DL) and ventromedial (VM) bundles of OSN axons are indicated. Scale bar = 20 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig8-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig8s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 8—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Fmi does not act in OSNs with known genetic and physical interaction partners.</title><p>Representative images of nc82 immunofluorescence on whole-mount antennal lobes (three optical sections) of animals of the following genotypes (top-to-bottom; other loss-of-function alleles or RNAi lines tested, but not shown, for certain genes are also listed): control (<italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+</italic>), <italic>frizzled<sup>-/-</sup></italic> (<italic>fz<sup>P21</sup>/fz<sup>KD4a</sup></italic>; also tested <italic>fz<sup>P21</sup>/fz<sup>H51</sup></italic>), <italic>dishevelled<sup>-/-</sup></italic> (<italic>dsh<sup>1</sup></italic>), <italic>frazzled<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2;Ir75b-GFP/+;fra<sup>JF01457</sup>/+</italic>; also tested <italic>fra<sup>HMS01147</sup></italic> and <italic>fra<sup>JF01231</sup></italic>), <italic>golden goal<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2;Ir75b-GFP</italic>/<italic>gogo<sup>GD3616</sup></italic>; also tested <italic>gogo<sup>HMC05937</sup></italic>), <italic>espinas<sup>-/-</sup></italic> (<italic>esn<sup>KO6</sup></italic>), <italic>Gα<sub>q</sub><sup>RNAi</sup></italic> (<italic>peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;Gαq<sup>dsRNA.UAS.1f1</sup>/+</italic>; also tested <italic>Gαq<sup>GL01048</sup></italic> and <italic>Gαq<sup>JF01209</sup></italic>). The <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> reporter present in some of the genotypes is not shown in these images, but was indistinguishable from controls. Scale bar = 20 μm.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-63036-fig8-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>We further examined this phenotype by visualizing the projection patterns of specific classes of OSNs labeled by receptor promoter-driven fluorescent reporters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8B–C</xref>). Neurons labeled by <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic>, <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic>, or <italic>Ir75c-GFP</italic> were no longer constrained to discrete glomeruli (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8B</xref>), although the mistargeting was relatively mild within the antennal lobe as a whole. The limited defects of individual neuron populations suggests that the lack of Fmi does not disrupt long-range targeting properties of OSNs, but rather impacts local segregation of OSNs. Consistently, double labeling of neurons that normally project to adjacent glomeruli (<italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> and <italic>Ir75b-Tomato</italic> (<italic>Tom</italic>); <italic>Ir84a-GFP</italic> and <italic>Ir31a-Tom</italic>) revealed frequent overlap between these normally-segregated populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8C</xref>).</p><p>The constitutive driver is expressed broadly across the antennal disc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Chai et al., 2019</xref>). The observed phenotypes could therefore potentially be due to a requirement for Fmi in disc development rather than in OSNs. To limit <italic>fmi</italic> RNAi to OSNs, we used <italic>peb-Gal4</italic>, which produced an equally strong defect in antennal lobe glomerular segregation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D</xref>). In these animals, the LN-expressed Fmi was still detectable but, in contrast to the expression in OSNs, Fmi was apparently homogeneously distributed across antennal lobe glomeruli (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1D</xref>). This LN source of Fmi does not appear to contribute to glomerulus formation as <italic>LN&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> animals did not exhibit antennal lobe morphological defects (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D</xref>). Similarly, when we targeted <italic>fmi</italic> to the synaptic partners of OSNs, the PNs – which pre-pattern the glomerular organization of the antennal lobe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Jefferis and Hummel, 2006</xref>) – using the <italic>GH146</italic> driver, antennal lobe morphology appeared normal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D</xref>). The absence of defects is consistent with the lack of detectable expression of Fmi in these second-order neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>). Together, these results indicate that Fmi functions principally, if not exclusively, within OSNs for correct glomerulus formation.</p><p>To understand the genesis of this defect during OSN development we used Gal80<sup>ts</sup> to temporally-control the onset of <italic>peb</italic>&gt;<italic>fmi<sup>RNAi</sup></italic>. When animals were shifted from 19°C to 29°C at 10 hr APF (prior to initial expression of <italic>peb-Gal4</italic>), all animals displayed antennal lobe morphological defects of varying degrees, and <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic>-labeled neurons did not coalesce to a discrete glomerular unit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8E</xref>). When shifted at 20 hr APF, the severity of the phenotype was diminished (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8E</xref>). When shifted at 40 hr APF, the antennal lobe and Ir75b neuron targeting were indistinguishable from controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8E</xref>). These experiments indicate an early developmental function for Fmi.</p><p>We examined this early requirement in more detail by imaging OSN axons as they invade the antennal lobe. During 20–25 hr APF, pioneer OSNs reach the antennal lobe in a unique bundle that separates into ventromedial and dorsolateral bundles, which project around the lobe’s border (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Hong and Luo, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Joo et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8F</xref>). In <italic>peb&gt;fmi<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> animals, OSNs reach the antennal lobe, but bundle organization is highly disrupted, with subsets of axons apparently defasciculating prematurely in the central area of the lobe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8F</xref>).</p><p>Fmi (and its mammalian homologs) have roles in multiple biological processes in the nervous system as well as in the establishment of epithelial planar cell polarity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Berger-Müller and Suzuki, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Keeler et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib94">Takeichi, 2007</xref>). Genetic and biochemical studies have identified a number of interaction partners of Fmi in different biological contexts. We tested mutations and/or multiple independent RNAi lines for several of these genes to determine whether they function with this cadherin in OSNs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8s1">Figure 8—figure supplement 1</xref>). Mutations in two core components of the planar cell polarity pathway, <italic>frizzled</italic> and <italic>dishevelled</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib98">Usui et al., 1999</xref>), had no apparent impact on antennal lobe formation. Similarly, loss of <italic>frazzled</italic> (encoding a Netrin homolog which function with Fmi in midline axon guidance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Organisti et al., 2015</xref>]), <italic>golden goal</italic> (with which Fmi collaborates in photoreceptor axon guidance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Hakeda-Suzuki et al., 2011</xref>]), or <italic>espinas</italic> (which encodes a LIM domain protein that binds Fmi intracellularly and functions in dendrite self-avoidance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Matsubara et al., 2011</xref>]) did not reproduce the <italic>fmi</italic> phenotype. Finally, although the intracellular signaling mechanism of Fmi is not well understood, the Fmi GPCR-domain has been suggested to act through the Gα<sub>q</sub> subunit to regulate dendrite growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib101">Wang et al., 2016</xref>); however, we found no evidence that this signaling mechanism operates in OSNs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8s1">Figure 8—figure supplement 1</xref>). These observations suggest that Fmi functions through other cellular mechanisms to control OSN axon segregation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Determination of the molecular composition of neurons is essential to understand the development and function of the nervous system. While scRNA sequencing is an undoubtedly powerful approach to address this challenge (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Croset et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Davie et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Li et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib97">Tosches et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib105">Zeisel et al., 2018</xref>), it requires often technically difficult cell isolation, and can be biased toward abundant cell types and highly expressed genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib89">Stegle et al., 2015</xref>). Moreover, it is unclear to what extent neurons change their expression properties during tissue dissection (as reported for other types of cell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib100">van den Brink et al., 2017</xref>]) or through inevitable loss of dendritic and axonal processes (where certain transcripts may be enriched [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Middleton et al., 2019</xref>]). Our study was initially motivated by the desire to test the TaDa method for targeted, genome-wide molecular profiling of very small populations of neurons that are tightly embedded within a highly heterogeneous tissue. Moreover, by applying TaDa to a set of functionallyrelated OSNs, we aimed to identify cell type-specific differences that would point toward mechanisms underlying the development and evolution of novel neuronal populations.</p><p>The unique olfactory receptor expression pattern of OSNs (and other chemosensory genes) offered several positive- and negative-control loci that allowed us to validate the specificity and sensitivity of TaDa. One caveat emerging from this analysis is that TaDa cannot easily discriminate PolII occupancy of interleaved genes, an issue that may be particularly pronounced in the relatively gene-dense genome of <italic>Drosophila</italic>. Nevertheless, our results indicate that this method could be effective in defining candidate receptors in neuronal classes for which a genetic driver is available. This possibility is of particular interest in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> gustatory system where many populations of neurons can be labeled and physiologically profiled (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Chen and Dahanukar, 2020</xref>), but incomplete knowledge of the combinatorial receptor expression properties that are characteristic of this sensory system hampers identification of the cognate sensory receptor(s) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Croset et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Lee et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Sánchez-Alcañiz et al., 2018</xref>).</p><p>Recent work described a scRNA-seq analysis of antennal OSNs at a mid-pupal stage (42–48 hr APF) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Li et al., 2020</xref>), and a preprint has reported pioneering RNA-seq profiling of single nuclei (snRNA-seq) of 24 hr APF and adult stage OSNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">McLaughlin et al., 2020</xref>). Together these RNA-seq studies identified transcriptional clusters for 26–34 types of OSNs (depending upon the stage); of these, 16 molecularly annotated classes (i.e., expressing specific receptors) could be recognized at all three developmental timepoints. Detailed comparison of these scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq data and our TaDa datasets is currently difficult, as there is only limited overlap of the identified sc/snRNA-seq clusters and the populations we analyzed by TaDa. Notably, the adult OSN snRNA-seq datasets clustered together neurons expressing <italic>Ir75a</italic>, <italic>Ir75b</italic> and <italic>Ir75c</italic> (as well as Or35a neurons). This highlights one advantage of our targeted approach in selectively distinguishing these Ir populations, which enabled our discovery of the Ir75a neuron-specific expression and function of Pdm3. It is important to appreciate that while the sc/snRNA-seq captures the transcriptional state during a relatively narrow developmental window, our TaDa experiments integrated PolII occupancy patterns at an OSN population level over several days from the initiation of <italic>Ir-Gal4</italic> expression at mid-pupal development. This difference in temporal profiling might explain, in part, the higher numbers of genes detected by TaDa (on average ~4000 per Ir population) compared to pupal OSN scRNA-seq (~1500 expressed genes per cell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Li et al., 2020</xref>]) and adult OSN snRNA-seq (~1100 genes per nucleus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">McLaughlin et al., 2020</xref>]). However, many other experimental and/or analytical differences in these methods are likely to impact such global numbers. At the level of individual genes, one intriguing difference between our studies is the broad neuronal expression of several <italic>Obp</italic>s in the snRNA-seq data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">McLaughlin et al., 2020</xref>) compared to the extremely sparse PolII occupancy of <italic>Obp</italic> genes in our TaDa datasets. All prior in situ RNA and protein expression analyses of OBPs in <italic>Drosophila</italic> and other insect species have recognized their expression in support cells but not in neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib91">Sun et al., 2018b</xref>). It is possible that the snRNA-seq analyses has higher sensitivity than in situ and TaDa analyses and therefore captured previously unappreciated neuronal expression. The function of these OBPs in OSNs is, however, unclear.</p><p>Genome-wide analysis of TaDa datasets from different Ir populations revealed an intriguing positive relationship between the similarity of global patterns of PolII occupancy between neuronal populations and the phylogenetic distance of the olfactory receptors they express, notably the tandem array of <italic>Ir75a</italic>, <italic>Ir75b</italic>, and <italic>Ir75c</italic> genes. Similar analysis of Or OSN populations is limited by the broad phylogenetic distribution of the ORs whose corresponding neuronal transcriptomes have been identified (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Li et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">McLaughlin et al., 2020</xref>). However, through examination of these data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Li et al., 2020</xref>), we identified two pairs of closely-related (though not tandemly-arranged) <italic>Or</italic> genes whose neuronal transcriptional profiles also cluster (<italic>Or42b</italic>/<italic>Or59b</italic> and <italic>Or9a</italic>/<italic>Or47a</italic>). The simplest interpretation of these observations is that neuronal populations expressing distinct, relatively-recent receptor gene duplicates derive from a common ancestral neuronal population (which may have originally co-expressed the duplicated receptors); these extant populations therefore retain correspondingly close proximity in their transcriptomic profile. The principle of OSN ‘sub-functionalization’ – which has not, to our knowledge, previously been recognized empirically – has interesting implications for understanding the evolution of novel olfactory pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Ramdya and Benton, 2010</xref>).</p><p>One advantage of the TaDa profiling method over scRNA-seq is that it can also provide information on chromatin state, which remains difficult to characterize through standard chromatin immunoprecipitation-based methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Ludwig and Bintu, 2019</xref>). We recognize that CATaDa provides only a relatively coarse-grained view of chromatin state (similar to ATAC-seq [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Aughey et al., 2018</xref>]), and variant approaches of TaDa (e.g. Dam fusions to chromatin-binding proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib99">van den Ameele et al., 2019</xref>]) are very likely to reveal finer-scale differences between populations. Nevertheless, our findings of globally similar chromatin accessibility at <italic>Ir</italic> genes across Ir populations are in-line with studies in the developing <italic>Drosophila</italic> embryo where chromatin accessibility is comparable between anterior and posterior region, despite substantial differences in patterns of gene transcription across this body axis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Haines and Eisen, 2018</xref>). Although we did identify a few regions of chromatin accessibility in receptor gene regulatory regions that are specific to their corresponding neuronal population, we suggest that the unique developmental properties of OSNs are driven, in larger part, by the particular combinations of TFs they express. Indeed, many of the differentially occupied genes between Ir populations encode known or predicted TFs. We validated the selective expression and function of Pdm3 in Ir75a neurons, revealing it to be a key factor – and potentially the sole transcription factor – that distinguishes the fate of closely related Ir75a and Ir75b neuron populations, encompassing both their receptor expression and glomerular targeting properties. Beyond this early developmental role, Pdm3 expression persists in Ir75a neurons into adulthood, and we showed it has an ongoing role to maintain <italic>Ir75b</italic> in a repressed state and promote <italic>Ir75a</italic> expression. Future identification of Pdm3 targets in these neurons will be necessary to determine whether it regulates these <italic>Ir</italic>s directly, and to identify other downstream genes that control the innervation of the corresponding neurons to distinct glomeruli.</p><p>Our TaDa datasets also suggest a rich diversity in the repertoires of signaling and neuronal morphogenesis molecules expressed in Ir neurons. Because of the temporal breadth of TaDa profiling, these proteins are likely to contribute to differences of these neurons in cilia/dendritic morphogenesis, axon targeting, sensory transduction, synapse formation/plasticity and/or neuromodulation. Our initial characterization of one of these, the atypical cadherin Fmi, reveal it to be a dynamically and heterogeneously expressed, axon-localized protein. Importantly, Fmi is not restricted to Ir neurons, but found throughout the peripheral olfactory system, concordant with the dramatic loss of glomerular architecture in the antennal lobe in the absence of this protein. We have delimited the role of Fmi specifically to OSNs as they first defasciculate and enter the antennal lobe. Differential expression of Fmi has been proposed to be important for its role in photoreceptor axon guidance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Chen and Clandinin, 2008</xref>). As Fmi is thought to function as a homophilic adhesion molecule (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib98">Usui et al., 1999</xref>), we speculate that heterogeneous Fmi-dependent adhesion between OSN populations enables them to segregate within the axon bundle and/or defasciculate at specific times and places, before local, instructive guidance cues direct them to particular locations within the antennal lobe. Unfortunately, the early requirement for Fmi and the inability to discern levels of Fmi in specific OSN populations within the bundle makes it difficult to assess the significance of the heterogeneous expression of this cadherin. We suspect that our pan-OSN <italic>fmi<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> has both direct effects on neurons that express higher levels of this protein, and indirect effects on those with low or absent Fmi expression. This important issue will require removal of Fmi by RNAi using by early drivers for specific populations of OSNs (which are as-yet unavailable) or clonal analysis of loss-of-function mutations of <italic>fmi</italic>. We have attempted to overexpress Fmi to assess the consequence of this alternative perturbation of Fmi levels on OSN axonal projections but this did not yield overt defects (data not shown). This negative result may simply reflect technical limitation in achieving adequate high-level Fmi overexpression, as reported in other systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Gao et al., 2000</xref>). An adhesion-dependent role for Fmi is consistent with the <italic>fmi</italic> phenotype most closelyresembling that of mutations in <italic>CadN</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Hummel and Zipursky, 2004</xref>). CadN is however homogeneously expressed across the antennal lobe, and also present in their PN synaptic partners (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Hummel and Zipursky, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib106">Zhu and Luo, 2004</xref>). Future cell typespecific expression and functional manipulation will be required to understand the special role of the atypical cadherin Fmi in correct segregation of OSNs axons to define discrete glomeruli.</p><p>Beyond further functional characterization of differentially occupied genes identified in this study, several future applications of TaDa (and CATaDa) in the olfactory system, and other sensory systems, can be envisaged. For example, temporal analysis of PolII occupancy could be refined by restricting Gal4 activity (with Gal80<sup>ts</sup>) to a particular developmental time-window. Mining of our TaDa datasets for population-specific genes may help to design novel OSN lineage-specific driver lines that are expressed earlier in development (of which few are currently known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Chai et al., 2019</xref>]) to profile gene expression patterns prior to onset of receptor expression. Finally, in adult flies, comparison of PolII occupancy patterns in a specific neuron population before, during and after odor exposure could provide insight into neural activity-regulated gene expression and its relevance for sensory adaptation and plasticity.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="top">Reagent type <break/>(species) or <break/>resource</th><th valign="top">Designation</th><th valign="top">Source or <break/>reference</th><th valign="top">Identifiers</th><th valign="top">Additional <break/>information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>w<sup>1118</sup></italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_3605">BDSC_3605</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir8a-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_41731">BDSC_41731</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster)</italic></td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir31a-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_41726">BDSC_41726</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir40a-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_41727">BDSC_41727</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir64a-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_41732">BDSC_41732</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir75a-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_41748">BDSC_41748</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir75b-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir75c-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir84a-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_41734">BDSC_41734</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>peb-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_80570">BDSC_80570</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>ey-Flp (II)</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_5576">BDSC_5576</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>ey-Flp (III)</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_5577">BDSC_5577</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4 (II)</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_3953">BDSC_3953</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>act&gt;stop&gt;Gal4 (III)</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_4780">BDSC_4780</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>GH146-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_30026">BDSC_30026</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>449-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Liou et al., 2018</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>1081-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Liou et al., 2018</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>elav-Gal4</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_458">BDSC_458</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>tub-Gal80<sup>ts</sup></italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <break/><italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_7018">BDSC_7018</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-Dcr-2 (X)</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_24648">BDSC_24648</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-Dcr-2 (II)</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_24650">BDSC_24650</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-Dcr-2 (III)</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_24651">BDSC_24651</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-LT3-Dam (III)</italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Southall et al., 2013</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-LT3-Dam:RpII15 (III)</italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Southall et al., 2013</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-mCD8:GFP</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_5130">BDSC_5130</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-RedStinger</italic></td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_8546">BDSC_8546</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir75b-CD4:tdGFP</italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-fmi<sup>KK100512</sup></italic> (RNAi #1)</td><td valign="top">Vienna <italic>Drosophila</italic> Resource Center</td><td valign="top">VDRC v107993</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-fmi<sup>JF02047</sup></italic> (RNAi #2)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_26022">BDSC_26022</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-fra<sup>HMS01147</sup></italic> (RNAi)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_40826">BDSC_40826</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-fra<sup>JF01231</sup></italic> (RNAi)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31469">BDSC_31469</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-fra<sup>JF01457</sup></italic> (RNAi)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31664">BDSC_31664</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-Gaq<sup>dsRNA.UAS.1f1</sup></italic> (RNAi)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_30735">BDSC_30735</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-Gaq<sup>JF01209</sup></italic> (RNAi)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31268">BDSC_31268</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-Gaq<sup>GL01048</sup></italic> (RNAi)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_36820">BDSC_36820</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-gogo<sup>GD3616</sup></italic> (RNAi)</td><td valign="top">Vienna <italic>Drosophila</italic> Resource Center</td><td valign="top">VDRC v43928</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-gogo<sup>HMC05937</sup></italic> (RNAi)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_65193">BDSC_65193</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-pdm3<sup>JF02312</sup></italic> (RNAi #1)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_26749">BDSC_26749</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>UAS-pdm3<sup>HMJ21205</sup></italic> (RNAi #2)</td><td valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_53887">BDSC_53887</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>dsh<sup>1</sup></italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Krasnow et al., 1995</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>esn<sup>KO6</sup></italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Matsubara et al., 2011</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent <break/>(<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>fz<sup>H51</sup></italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Jones et al., 1996</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>fz<sup>KD4a</sup></italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Adler et al., 1990</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>fz<sup>P21</sup></italic></td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Jones et al., 1996</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir31a-CD4:tdTom</italic></td><td valign="top">This work <break/></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir75a-CD4:tdGFP</italic></td><td valign="top">This work <break/></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir75b-CD4:tdTom</italic></td><td valign="top">This work <break/></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir75c-CD4:tdGFP</italic></td><td valign="top">This work <break/></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ir84a-CD4:tdGFP</italic></td><td valign="top">This work <break/></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-En (mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">DSHB 4D9</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_528224">AB_528224</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:100)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Pdm3 (guinea pig polyclonal)</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Chen et al., 2012</xref></td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2567243">AB_2567243</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:200)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Fmi (mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">DSHB #74</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2619583">AB_2619583</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:20)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-IR40a (guinea pig polyclonal)</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Silbering et al., 2011</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:200)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-IR64a (rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Ai et al., 2010</xref></td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2566854">AB_2566854</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-IR75a (rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref></td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2631091">AB_2631091</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:200)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-IR75b (guinea pig polyclonal)</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref></td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2631093">AB_2631093</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-IR75c (rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref></td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2631094">AB_2631094</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:200)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Bruchpilot (mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">DSHB nc82</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2314866">AB_2314866</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:10)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Cadherin-N (rat monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">DSHB Ex#8–2</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_528121">AB_528121</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:25)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Elav (rat monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">DSHB 7E8A10</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_528218">AB_528218</ext-link></td><td valign="top">(1:10)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-GFP (chicken polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam 13970</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:2000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-GFP (mouse monoclonal)</td><td valign="top">Invitrogen A11120</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-RFP (rabbit polyclonal)</td><td valign="top">Abcam 62341</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Alexa488 (goat anti-guinea pig)</td><td valign="top">Invitrogen A11073</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Alexa488 (goat anti-chicken)</td><td valign="top">Abcam 150169</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Cy3 (goat anti-rabbit)</td><td valign="top">Milan Analytica AG 111-165-144</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Cy3 (goat anti-mouse)</td><td valign="top">Milan Analytica AG 115-165-166</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Cy5 (donkey anti-rat)</td><td valign="top">Jackson ImmunoResearch 712-175-153</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:250)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-DIG-POD</td><td valign="top">Roche Diagnostics 11 207 733 910</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">(1:300)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software algorithm</td><td valign="top">Fiji</td><td valign="top">Fiji</td><td valign="top">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_002285">SCR_002285</ext-link></td><td valign="top"/></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title><italic>Drosophila</italic> culture</title><p>Flies were maintained on a standard wheat flour/yeast/fruit juice diet at 25°C in 12 hr light:12 hr dark conditions. Published mutant and transgenic <italic>D. melanogaster</italic> strains are described in the Key Resources Table. For the temporal control of <italic>pdm3</italic> RNAi with Gal80<sup>ts</sup>, animals of the desired genotype were cultivated continuously at 19°C or 29°C, or shifted from 19°C to 29°C after eclosion to permit induction of RNAi in adults; for all conditions, antennae or brains were dissection from 1-week-old flies. For the temporal control of <italic>fmi</italic> RNAi with Gal80<sup>ts</sup>, flies of the desired genotype were cultivated at 19°C; animals were staged by selecting white pupae (designated as 0 hr APF) and shifting these animals to 29°C after 10, 20, or 40 hr, to permit induction of RNAi at different time-points during pupal development. Unless otherwise indicated for specific experiments, antennae or brains were collected from both sexes.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Transgenic flies</title><p>New transgenes were constructed using standard molecular biological procedures and transgenesis was performed by BestGene Inc using the phiC31 site-specific integration system. <italic>Ir75a-CD4:tdGFP</italic> (<italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic>) was generated by subcloning the 5’ (7833 bp) and 3’ (1921 bp) genomic sequences from the <italic>Ir75a-Gal4</italic> transgene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Silbering et al., 2011</xref>) to flank <italic>CD4:tdGFP</italic> in <italic>pDESTHemmarG</italic> (Addgene 31221) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Han et al., 2011</xref>), and integrated into the attP40 landing site. <italic>Ir75c-CD4:tdGFP</italic> (<italic>Ir75c-GFP</italic>) was generated by subcloning the 5’ (3072 bp) and 3’ (2545 bp) genomic sequences from the <italic>Ir75c-Gal4</italic> transgene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>) to flank <italic>CD4:tdGFP</italic> in <italic>pDESTHemmarG</italic> and integrated into attP40. <italic>Ir75b-CD4:tdTom</italic> (<italic>Ir75b-Tom</italic>) was generated by cloning the 299 bp genomic sequence immediately upstream of the <italic>Ir75b</italic> start codon (as in the previously-described <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> transgene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Prieto-Godino et al., 2017</xref>]) into <italic>pDESTHemmarR</italic> (Addgene 31222) and integrated independently into attP5 and attP2 (on chromosome II and III, respectively). <italic>Ir31a-CD4:tdTom</italic> (<italic>Ir31a-Tom</italic>) was generated by cloning the 2000 bp genomic sequence immediately upstream of the <italic>Ir31a</italic> start codon, via Gateway recombination, into pDESTHemmarR, and integrated into attP2. <italic>Ir84a-CD4:tdGFP</italic> (<italic>Ir84a-GFP</italic>) was generated by cloning the 1964 bp genomic sequence immediately upstream of the <italic>Ir84a</italic> start codon, via Gateway recombination, into <italic>pDESTHemmarG</italic> and integrated into VK00027.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>TaDa sample preparation</title><p>Antennae from ~2000 flies (~1–8 days old, mixed sexes) of the desired genotype were harvested by snap-freezing animals in a mini-sieve (Scienceware, Bel-Art Products) with liquid nitrogen, shaking flies to detach and collect appendages in a Petri dish under the sieve containing Triton X-100 (0.1%). Third antennal segments were selected under a binocular microscope by pipetting and transferred to a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. After brief rinsing in PBS to remove detergent, antennae (occupying a volume of ~50–70 μl) were resuspended in 50 µl PBS and homogenized manually with a blue pestle (Sigma Aldrich Z359947-100EA) for at least 2 min. Antennal fragments were rinsed off the pestle with 100 µl PBS and 40 μl EDTA (100 mM) and 20 μl RNase (12.5 μg/μl) (Qiagen 19101) were added to the antennal lysate, mixed and allowed to sit for 3–5 min. 20 μl Proteinase K (Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit 69504) and 200 µl Buffer AL were added, and mixed by gently pipetting up and down with a blue tip ~50 times, before incubation in a 56°C heat block for 30 min. The digested lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 s and the supernatant transferred to a new tube and allowed to cool before proceeding with DNA extraction.</p><p>Subsequent sample processing steps for TaDa – that is, <italic>DpnI</italic> treatment (which cuts at adenine-methylated GATC sites), DamID adaptor ligation, <italic>DpnII</italic> treatment (which cuts at non-methylated GATC sites, thereby digesting unmethylated DNA fragments), and PCR amplification and purification of methylated GATC fragments – were performed essentially as described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Marshall et al., 2016</xref>). PCR products were sonicated using a Covaris S220 to obtain ~300 bp average fragment size; DNA size and quality were verified by Qubit quantification. DamID adaptors were removed by <italic>Sau3AI</italic> digestion. Truseq Nano libraries were prepared at the Lausanne Genomic Technologies Facility and sequenced (SR 100 bp) on a HiSeq 2500.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>TaDa data analysis</title><p>To test for an enrichment of the genome occupancy of Dam:PolII relative to Dam alone, we used the ‘damidseq pipeline’ v1.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Marshall and Brand, 2015</xref>), with release 6 of the <italic>D. melanogaster</italic> genome as the reference. Within this pipeline, Bowtie v2.2.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Langmead and Salzberg, 2012</xref>) was implemented to align the Illumina sequence reads to the reference, and data processing called on SAMtools v1.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Li et al., 2009</xref>) and BEDTools v2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Quinlan and Hall, 2010</xref>). This pipeline outputs log2 ratio files in bedgraph format. We calculated Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient among triplicate datasets based on the bedgraph files, and also used them to generate a single averaged OSs file for each of the seven neuron population data sets. The files containing the averaged OSs were then inputted into the ‘polii.gene.call’ script (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/owenjm/polii.gene.call">https://github.com/owenjm/polii.gene.call</ext-link>; version 1.0.2, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Marshall and Brand, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Southall et al., 2013</xref>) for estimating an FDR for each gene’s OS. A file detailing the workflow and corresponding code is available on GitLab (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada">https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada</ext-link>).</p><p><italic>Ir</italic>, <italic>Or</italic>, <italic>Gr</italic>, and <italic>Obp</italic> genes analyzed are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp4">Supplementary file 4</xref>. The set of genes encoding putative neuropeptides, GPCRs, ion channels (excluding <italic>Ir</italic>s, <italic>Or</italic>s, and <italic>Gr</italic>s), and neuron projection guidance proteins were based on annotated searches of Flybase (FB2020_06) using the following terms: ‘neuropeptide’, ‘ion channel’, ‘GPCR’, ‘neuron projection guidance’ (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp6">Supplementary files 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp15">15</xref>). The set of genes encoding transcription factors was based on a custom filtered set from the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.flytf.org/">FlyTF.org</ext-link> database v2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Pfreundt et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp18">Supplementary file 18</xref>).</p><p>For testing the hypothesis that OSs are equal among datasets (neuron populations), we used DESeq2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Love et al., 2014</xref>). Unlike the DamID pipeline, this approach focused on individual GATC fragments within each gene. To quantify read coverage of each fragment, we used the same bam files that were outputted by the DamID pipeline (see above). We converted these to bed files using BEDTools v2 ‘bamToBed’ utility and calculated the coverage of GATC fragments using the Bedtools’ ‘coverage’ utility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Quinlan and Hall, 2010</xref>). The threshold for significant PolII occupancy within a dataset was a log<sub>2</sub> fold-change of 1.5 and an adjusted <italic>p</italic>-value of 0.05. Differential occupancy was tested over the full dataset using a Likelihood-ratio test, where the full model specified neuron populations and DamID condition (Dam:PolII vs. Dam-alone) as factors, and an interaction term (between DamID condition and cell population): ~ cell.pop + cond + cond:cell.pop. The reduced model removed the interaction term (~ cell.pop + cond). This analysis yielded the 1694 genes analyzed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C–D</xref>. We also carried out pairwise tests using a Wald test within DESeq2. Genes that were identified as candidates for differential expression were required to have ≥2 GATC fragments contributing to the difference (and to be significantly occupied by PolII).</p><p>Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses were performed on the subset of genes that showed differential occupancy using clusterProfiler (v3.10.1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib104">Yu et al., 2012</xref>). We compared these genes against the three independent, controlled vocabularies provided by GO Consortium that model Biological Processes, Cellular Component, and Molecular Function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Ashburner et al., 2000</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>CATaDa analysis</title><p>CATaDa was performed on the seven populations of neurons using the same sets of sequencing reads (i.e. Dam-alone data) acquired for the TaDa analysis. The bioinformatics pipeline followed the general concepts of a previously described pipeline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Aughey et al., 2018</xref>), but with modifications. For each neuron population, the genomic sequencing reads from all three biological replicates were aligned to release 6.21 of the <italic>D. melanogaster</italic> genome with ‘very-sensitive’ settings (Bowtie2 v2.3.0). Following pooling of aligned reads from the replicates (samtools v1.7) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Li et al., 2009</xref>), the chromatin accessibilities were represented as the coverage of reads per bin of 10 bases, scaled to 1× average genomic coverage (~142.57 Mb) and averaged over a sliding window of 100 bases using bamCoverage within the deepTools library (v3.1.3) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Ramírez et al., 2014</xref>). The chromatin accessibility profile was plotted on genome browser tracks with pyGenomeTracks (v2.1) within the deepTools library. Significantly accessible regions were identified with peak-caller (MACS2, v2.1.1.20160309) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Gaspar, 2018</xref>) at an FDR cutoff (q-value) of 0.05. The correlation clustering of peaks among all assayed neuron populations was analyzed using the multiBamSummary program within the deepTools library (v3.1.3) with the Pearson method and bin size of 3000 bases.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Histology</title><p>Immunofluorescence and RNA FISH on whole-mount antennae or antennal cryosections were performed as described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Saina and Benton, 2013</xref>). Immunofluorescence on whole-mount brains was performed essentially as described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Ostrovsky et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Silbering et al., 2011</xref>). Antibodies used are listed in the Key Resources Table. RNA probes for <italic>Ir31a</italic> and <italic>Ir84a</italic> were previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Benton et al., 2009</xref>).</p><p>Quantification of En and Pdm3 immunofluorescence signals in OSN soma nuclei (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1B–C</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A–B</xref>) was performed in Fiji (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Schindelin et al., 2012</xref>). In brief, regions-of-interest (ROIs) were manually defined using the GFP signal (which circumscribes the nucleus) in a single optical slice where the cross-section of a given nucleus has the largest area, followed by automated measurement of the average En or Pdm3 immunofluorescence signal within this ROI. Background fluorescence signals in the tissue were measured in the same way within equivalently sized, arbitrarily chosen ROIs that did not overlap with GFP signals or any other OSN nuclei (visualized with DAPI).</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>Preliminary experiments were used to assess variance and determine adequate sample sizes in advance of acquisition of the reported data; no statistical approaches were used to predetermine sample size. Details on specific statistical tests for individual experiments are provided in the corresponding figure legend. Unless stated otherwise, statistical significance thresholds were p&lt;0.05 and the tests performed were two-tailed. Measurements were taken from distinct samples, unless otherwise stated, along with a corresponding correction for multiple tests.</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Data availability</title><p>TaDa sequencing data and experimental information have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/</ext-link>) and are available under accession number E-MTAB-8935. Processed data and intermediate files, including the read coverage at GATC motifs, are available at GitLab (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada">https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada</ext-link>). Raw image data for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">5</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">8</xref>, and the figure supplements are available upon request.</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Code availability</title><p>A detailed workflow for the TaDa analyses and associated code and data files are available at GitLab (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada">https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Arguello, 2021</xref>; copy archived at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:415bd338b8e9a013b9100c089eddec6e2d0e240d;origin=https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada;visit=swh:1:snp:a5771ab1440aa2edf340161741ea864d018ffe8f;anchor=swh:1:rev:2c181d8e15257d2344f4a0187ec3cf3be3e4b583/">swh:1:rev:2c181d8e15257d2344f4a0187ec3cf3be3e4b583</ext-link>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title>Biological material availability</title><p>All unique biological materials generated in this work are available from the corresponding author upon request.</p></sec></sec></body><back><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Cheng-Ting Chien, Ya-Hui Chou, Fisun Hamaratoglu, Vladimir Katanaev, Liqun Luo, Tadashi Uemura, the Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537), the Vienna <italic>Drosophila</italic> Resource Center, and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (NICHD of the NIH, University of Iowa) for reagents. Sequencing was performed at the Lausanne Genomic Technologies Facility, and the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Vital-IT group provided computational resource support. We are grateful to Andrea Brand’s lab for assistance in establishing the antennal TaDa protocol, Tony Southall and Owen Marshall for advice on the DamID analysis pipeline, Simon Anders for suggestions on DESeq2 usage, Thomas Hummel for discussions on OSN axon guidance, and members of the Benton laboratory for comments on the manuscript. J.R.A. was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from the Novartis Foundation for medical-biological Research (12A14) and is currently supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation Assistant Professorship (PP00P3 176956). Research in R.B.’s laboratory was supported by the University of Lausanne, ERC Consolidator and Advanced Grants (615094 and 833548, respectively) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (310030B 185377)</p></ack><sec id="s5" sec-type="additional-information"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing - review and editing, Contributed Figures 1D–G, 2A–G, 4B–E, 5B, 7C, 8E, Figure 1—figure supplement 1–4, Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,C</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - review and editing, Contributed Figures 1B–C, 5A–C, 7C, 8A–E, Figure 2—figure supplement 1B–C, Figure 7—figure supplement 1B–C, Figure 8—figure supplement 1</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Resources, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - review and editing, Contributed Figures 7A–B, 8A–C, 8E–F, Figure 7—figure supplement 1D</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - review and editing, Contributed Figures 5C–D, 6, Figure 7—figure supplement 1A</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Resources, Software, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - review and editing, Contributed Figures 3, 4C</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec id="s6" sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>Full set of genes with significant OSs in Ir neuron populations.</title><p>OSs correspond to those summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp1-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp2"><label>Supplementary file 2.</label><caption><title>List of gene IDs only from <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp2-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp3"><label>Supplementary file 3.</label><caption><title>Genes with significant OSs unique to each Ir neuron population.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp3-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp4"><label>Supplementary file 4.</label><caption><title>Set of chemosensory receptor and <italic>Obp</italic> genes.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp4-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp5"><label>Supplementary file 5.</label><caption><title>Chemosensory receptor and <italic>Obp</italic> genes with significant OSs in Ir neuron populations.</title><p>Only significant OSs are listed. Values correspond to those plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplements 1</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s4">4</xref>. NA = not applicable (i.e. where there is non-significant occupancy for a given gene in a particular neuron population).</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp5-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp6"><label>Supplementary file 6.</label><caption><title>Set of neuropeptide genes.</title><p>Genes correspond to those in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp6-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp7"><label>Supplementary file 7.</label><caption><title>Neuropeptide genes with significant OSs in Ir neuron populations.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp7-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp8"><label>Supplementary file 8.</label><caption><title>Neuropeptide genes with significant OSs unique to each Ir neuron population.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp8-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp9"><label>Supplementary file 9.</label><caption><title>Set of G protein-coupled receptor genes.</title><p>Genes correspond to those in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp9-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp10"><label>Supplementary file 10.</label><caption><title>G protein-coupled receptor genes with significant OSs in Ir neuron populations.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp10-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp11"><label>Supplementary file 11.</label><caption><title>G protein-coupled receptor genes with significant OSs unique to each Ir neuron population.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp11-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp12"><label>Supplementary file 12.</label><caption><title>Set of ion channel genes.</title><p>Genes correspond to those in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp12-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp13"><label>Supplementary file 13.</label><caption><title>Ion channel genes with significant OSs in Ir neuron populations.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp13-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp14"><label>Supplementary file 14.</label><caption><title>Ion channel genes with significant OSs unique to each Ir neuron population.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp14-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp15"><label>Supplementary file 15.</label><caption><title>Set of neuron projection guidance molecule genes.</title><p>Genes correspond to those in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>. Note this list encompasses genes encoding molecules potentially directly or indirectly involved in neural guidance, and includes some neuronally-expressed transcription factors (such as <italic>pdm3</italic>, the unique marker of Ir75a neurons).</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp15-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp16"><label>Supplementary file 16.</label><caption><title>Neuron projection guidance molecule genes with significant OSs in Ir neuron populations.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp16-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp17"><label>Supplementary file 17.</label><caption><title>Neuron projection guidance molecule genes with significant OSs unique to each Ir neuron population.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp17-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp18"><label>Supplementary file 18.</label><caption><title>Filtered set of transcription factor genes.</title><p>Genes correspond to those in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp18-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp19"><label>Supplementary file 19.</label><caption><title>Transcription factor genes with significant OSs in Ir neuron populations.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp19-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp20"><label>Supplementary file 20.</label><caption><title>Transcription factor genes with significant OSs unique to each Ir neuron population.</title><p>IDs correspond to the counts displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2G</xref>.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="plain" mimetype="text" xlink:href="elife-63036-supp20-v2.txt"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="transrepform"><label>Transparent reporting form</label><media mime-subtype="docx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-63036-transrepform-v2.docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec id="s7" sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data availability</title><p>All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files, or in data repositories as specified in the corresponding methods section.</p><p>The following dataset was generated:</p><p><element-citation id="dataset1" publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arguello</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Abuin</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Armida</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mika</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Chai</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><data-title>Sequencing of methylated GATC DNA fragments (Targeted DamID) from seven olfactory neuron populations in Drosophila melanogaster</data-title><source>ArrayExpress</source><pub-id assigning-authority="EBI" pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-8935/">E-MTAB-8935</pub-id></element-citation></p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abuin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bargeton</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Ulbrich</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Isacoff</surname> <given-names>EY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kellenberger</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Functional architecture of olfactory ionotropic glutamate receptors</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.042</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21220098</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adler</surname> <given-names>PN</given-names></name><name><surname>Vinson</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Conover</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1990">1990</year><article-title>Molecular structure of <italic>frizzled</italic>, a <italic>Drosophila</italic> tissue polarity gene</article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>126</volume><fpage>401</fpage><lpage>416</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2174014</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ai</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Min</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Grosjean</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Leblanc</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bell</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Suh</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Acid sensing by the <italic>Drosophila</italic> olfactory system</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>468</volume><fpage>691</fpage><lpage>695</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature09537</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21085119</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="software"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arguello</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><data-title>IR-Tada</data-title><source>Software Heritage</source><version designator="swh:1:rev:2c181d8e15257d2344f4a0187ec3cf3be3e4b583">swh:1:rev:2c181d8e15257d2344f4a0187ec3cf3be3e4b583</version><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:415bd338b8e9a013b9100c089eddec6e2d0e240d;origin=https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada;visit=swh:1:snp:a5771ab1440aa2edf340161741ea864d018ffe8f;anchor=swh:1:rev:2c181d8e15257d2344f4a0187ec3cf3be3e4b583/">https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:415bd338b8e9a013b9100c089eddec6e2d0e240d;origin=https://gitlab.com/roman.arguello/ir_tada;visit=swh:1:snp:a5771ab1440aa2edf340161741ea864d018ffe8f;anchor=swh:1:rev:2c181d8e15257d2344f4a0187ec3cf3be3e4b583/</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashburner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ball</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Botstein</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Cherry</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Dolinski</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Dwight</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Eppig</surname> <given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Issel-Tarver</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Kasarskis</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Matese</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ringwald</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubin</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sherlock</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology</article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/75556</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10802651</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aughey</surname> <given-names>GN</given-names></name><name><surname>Estacio Gomez</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomson</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Southall</surname> <given-names>TD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>CATaDa reveals global remodelling of chromatin accessibility during stem cell differentiation in vivo</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>e32341</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.32341</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29481322</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barish</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nuss</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Strunilin</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mukherjee</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Volkan</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Combinations of DIPs and dprs control organization of olfactory receptor neuron terminals in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>PLOS Genetics</source><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>e1007560</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1007560</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30102700</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barish</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Volkan</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Mechanisms of olfactory receptor neuron specification in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>609</fpage><lpage>621</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/wdev.197</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Vannice</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomez-Diaz</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Vosshall</surname> <given-names>LB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Variant ionotropic glutamate receptors as chemosensory receptors in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>136</volume><fpage>149</fpage><lpage>162</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19135896</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Multigene family evolution: perspectives from insect chemoreceptors</article-title><source>Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>590</fpage><lpage>600</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26411616</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berger-Müller</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Seven-pass transmembrane cadherins: roles and emerging mechanisms in axonal and dendritic patterning</article-title><source>Molecular Neurobiology</source><volume>44</volume><fpage>313</fpage><lpage>320</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12035-011-8201-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21909747</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brochtrup</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hummel</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Olfactory map formation in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> brain: genetic specificity and neuronal variability</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Neurobiology</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.conb.2010.11.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21112768</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Boley</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Eisman</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>May</surname> <given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Stoiber</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Duff</surname> <given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Booth</surname> <given-names>BW</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Cherbas</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Eads</surname> <given-names>BD</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Mockaitis</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Frise</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammonds</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Shenker</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sturgill</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Samsonova</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiszmann</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernandez</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bickel</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Carninci</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cherbas</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Gingeras</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoskins</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaufman</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliver</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrimon</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Graveley</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names></name><name><surname>Celniker</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Diversity and dynamics of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> transcriptome</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>512</volume><fpage>393</fpage><lpage>399</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature12962</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24670639</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Budelli</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Santi</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Salkoff</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>SLO2 channels are inhibited by all divalent cations that activate SLO1 K+ channels</article-title><source>Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>291</volume><fpage>7347</fpage><lpage>7356</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M115.709436</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26823461</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buenrostro</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Giresi</surname> <given-names>PG</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaba</surname> <given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Greenleaf</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>1213</fpage><lpage>1218</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2688</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24097267</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carlsson</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Diesner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Schachtner</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nässel</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Multiple neuropeptides in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> antennal lobe suggest complex modulatory circuits</article-title><source>The Journal of Comparative Neurology</source><volume>518</volume><fpage>3359</fpage><lpage>3380</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cne.22405</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20575072</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Cruchet</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wigger</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Sensory neuron lineage mapping and manipulation in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> olfactory system</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>643</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-08345-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30733440</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>CK</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>WY</given-names></name><name><surname>Chien</surname> <given-names>CT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>The POU-domain protein Pdm3 regulates axonal targeting of R neurons in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> ellipsoid body</article-title><source>Developmental Neurobiology</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>1422</fpage><lpage>1432</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/dneu.22003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22190420</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Clandinin</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>The cadherin Flamingo mediates level-dependent interactions that guide photoreceptor target choice in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>26</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18400160</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>YD</given-names></name><name><surname>Dahanukar</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Recent advances in the genetic basis of taste detection in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences</source><volume>77</volume><fpage>1087</fpage><lpage>1101</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00018-019-03320-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31598735</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>Y-H</given-names></name><name><surname>Spletter</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Yaksi</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Leong</surname> <given-names>JCS</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>RI</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010a</year><article-title>Diversity and wiring variability of olfactory local interneurons in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> antennal lobe</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>439</fpage><lpage>449</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.2489</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Beachy</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010b</year><article-title>Patterning axon targeting of olfactory receptor neurons by coupled hedgehog signaling at two distinct steps</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>142</volume><fpage>954</fpage><lpage>966</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20850015</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>YD</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kernan</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title><italic>nompA</italic> encodes a PNS-specific, ZP domain protein required to connect mechanosensory dendrites to sensory structures</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>415</fpage><lpage>428</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00215-X</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11239432</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clyne</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Certel</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>de Bruyne</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaslavsky</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>WA</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>The odor specificities of a subset of olfactory receptor neurons are governed by Acj6, a POU-domain transcription factor</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>339</fpage><lpage>347</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81094-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10069339</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Croset</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Schleyer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Arguello</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerber</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>A molecular and neuronal basis for amino acid sensing in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> larva</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>34871</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep34871</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Croset</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Treiber</surname> <given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Waddell</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Cellular diversity in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> midbrain revealed by single-cell transcriptomics</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>e34550</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.34550</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29671739</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davie</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Janssens</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Koldere</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>De Waegeneer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pech</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Kreft</surname> <given-names>Ł</given-names></name><name><surname>Aibar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Makhzami</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Christiaens</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Bravo González-Blas</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Poovathingal</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hulselmans</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Spanier</surname> <given-names>KI</given-names></name><name><surname>Moerman</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Vanspauwen</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Geurs</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Voet</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Lammertyn</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Thienpont</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Konstantinides</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiers</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Verstreken</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Aerts</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>A single-cell transcriptome atlas of the aging <italic>Drosophila</italic> brain</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>174</volume><fpage>982</fpage><lpage>998</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.057</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29909982</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doupé</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Marshall</surname> <given-names>OJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Dayton</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Brand</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrimon</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title><italic>Drosophila</italic> intestinal stem and progenitor cells are major sources and regulators of homeostatic niche signals</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>115</volume><fpage>12218</fpage><lpage>12223</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1719169115</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30404917</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Enjin</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaharieva</surname> <given-names>EE</given-names></name><name><surname>Frank</surname> <given-names>DD</given-names></name><name><surname>Mansourian</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Suh</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Gallio</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Stensmyr</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Humidity sensing in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>1352</fpage><lpage>1358</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.049</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27161501</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>FB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kohwi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Brenman</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname> <given-names>LY</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname> <given-names>YN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Control of dendritic field formation in <italic>Drosophila</italic>: the roles of flamingo and competition between homologous neurons</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>101</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00088-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11086986</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="preprint"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gaspar</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Improved peak-calling with MACS2</article-title><source>bioRxiv</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/496521</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gomez-Diaz</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia-Fernandez</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Alcorta</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>The two main olfactory receptor families in <italic>Drosophila</italic>, ORs and IRs: A Comparative Approach</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience</source><volume>12</volume><elocation-id>253</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fncel.2018.00253</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30214396</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grabe</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Baschwitz</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dweck</surname> <given-names>HKM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lavista-Llanos</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansson</surname> <given-names>BS</given-names></name><name><surname>Sachse</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Elucidating the neuronal architecture of olfactory glomeruli in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> Antennal Lobe</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>3401</fpage><lpage>3413</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.063</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27653699</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grosjean</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Rytz</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Farine</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Abuin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Cortot</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Jefferis</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>An olfactory receptor for food-derived odours promotes male courtship in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>478</volume><fpage>236</fpage><lpage>240</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature10428</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21964331</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haines</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Eisen</surname> <given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Patterns of chromatin accessibility along the anterior-posterior Axis in the early <italic>Drosophila</italic> embryo</article-title><source>PLOS Genetics</source><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>e1007367</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1007367</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29727464</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hakeda-Suzuki</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Berger-Müller</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomasi</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Usui</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Horiuchi</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names></name><name><surname>Uemura</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Golden goal collaborates with Flamingo in conferring synaptic-layer specificity in the visual system</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>314</fpage><lpage>323</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.2756</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21317905</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname> <given-names>LY</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname> <given-names>YN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Enhancer-driven membrane markers for analysis of nonautonomous mechanisms reveal neuron-glia interactions in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>108</volume><fpage>9673</fpage><lpage>9678</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1106386108</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21606367</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Potter</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Barsh</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurusu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zinn</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins instruct discrete dendrite targeting in an olfactory map</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>1542</fpage><lpage>1550</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn.2442</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19915565</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Genetic control of wiring specificity in the fly olfactory system</article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>196</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.113.154336</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24395823</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hummel</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Krukkert</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Roos</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Klämbt</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title><italic>Drosophila</italic> Futsch/22C10 is a MAP1B-like protein required for dendritic and axonal development</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>357</fpage><lpage>370</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81169-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10839355</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hummel</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Zipursky</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Afferent induction of olfactory glomeruli requires N-cadherin</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>42</volume><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00158-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15066266</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jafari</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Alkhori</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Schleiffer</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Brochtrup</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hummel</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Alenius</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Combinatorial activation and repression by seven transcription factors specify <italic>Drosophila</italic> odorant receptor expression</article-title><source>PLOS Biology</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e1001280</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.1001280</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22427741</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jefferis</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Hummel</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Wiring specificity in the olfactory system</article-title><source>Seminars in Cell &amp; Developmental Biology</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>50</fpage><lpage>65</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.12.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16439169</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Adler</surname> <given-names>PN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996</year><article-title>Molecular analysis of EMS-induced <italic>frizzled</italic> mutations in <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic></article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>142</volume><fpage>205</fpage><lpage>215</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8770598</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joo</surname> <given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sweeney</surname> <given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Linking cell fate, trajectory choice, and target selection: genetic analysis of Sema-2b in olfactory axon targeting</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>78</volume><fpage>673</fpage><lpage>686</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23719164</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joseph</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title><italic>Drosophila</italic> chemoreceptors: a molecular interface between the chemical world and the brain</article-title><source>Trends in Genetics</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>683</fpage><lpage>695</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2015.09.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26477743</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kazama</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>RI</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Homeostatic matching and nonlinear amplification at identified central synapses</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>401</fpage><lpage>413</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.030</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keeler</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Molumby</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiner</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Protocadherins branch out: multiple roles in dendrite development</article-title><source>Cell Adhesion &amp; Migration</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>214</fpage><lpage>226</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19336918.2014.1000069</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25869446</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knecht</surname> <given-names>ZA</given-names></name><name><surname>Silbering</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Budelli</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Bell</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Abuin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrer</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Samuel</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Garrity</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Distinct combinations of variant ionotropic glutamate receptors mediate thermosensation and hygrosensation in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>5</volume><elocation-id>e17879</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.17879</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27656904</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krasnow</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Adler</surname> <given-names>PN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title><italic>Dishevelled</italic> is a component of the <italic>frizzled</italic> signaling pathway in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Development</source><volume>121</volume><fpage>4095</fpage><lpage>4102</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8575310</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Langmead</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>357</fpage><lpage>359</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.1923</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22388286</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Larter</surname> <given-names>NK</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Organization and function of <italic>Drosophila</italic> odorant binding proteins</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>5</volume><elocation-id>e20242</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.20242</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27845621</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Clandinin</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Meinertzhagen</surname> <given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Zipursky</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>The protocadherin flamingo is required for axon target selection in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> visual system</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>557</fpage><lpage>563</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn1063</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12754514</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Poudel</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Thakur</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Montell</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Calcium taste avoidance in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29276056</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Handsaker</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Wysoker</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fennell</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Homer</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Marth</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Abecasis</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Durbin</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><collab>1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup</collab></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>2078</fpage><lpage>2079</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19505943</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Horns</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Luginbuhl</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Quake</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Classifying <italic>Drosophila</italic> olfactory projection neuron subtypes by single-cell RNA sequencing</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>171</volume><fpage>1206</fpage><lpage>1220</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29149607</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Horns</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Kebschull</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>McLaughlin</surname> <given-names>CN</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolluru</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Vacek</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Luginbuhl</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Quake</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Single-cell transcriptomes reveal diverse regulatory strategies for olfactory receptor expression and axon targeting</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>1189</fpage><lpage>1198</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.049</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32059767</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liou</surname> <given-names>NF</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>KT</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>TY</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>TH</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>YT</given-names></name><name><surname>Gohl</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Silies</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>YH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Diverse populations of local interneurons integrate into the <italic>Drosophila</italic> adult olfactory circuit</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>2232</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-04675-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29884811</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Beyer</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Aebersold</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>On the dependency of cellular protein levels on mRNA abundance</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>165</volume><fpage>535</fpage><lpage>550</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27104977</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Love</surname> <given-names>MI</given-names></name><name><surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Anders</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2</article-title><source>Genome Biology</source><volume>15</volume><elocation-id>550</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25516281</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ludwig</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Bintu</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Mapping chromatin modifications at the single cell level</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>146</volume><elocation-id>dev170217</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.170217</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31249006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marshall</surname> <given-names>OJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Southall</surname> <given-names>TD</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheetham</surname> <given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Brand</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Cell-type-specific profiling of protein-DNA interactions without cell isolation using targeted DamID with next-generation sequencing</article-title><source>Nature Protocols</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>1586</fpage><lpage>1598</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2016.084</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27490632</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marshall</surname> <given-names>OJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Brand</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>damidseq_pipeline: an automated pipeline for processing DamID sequencing datasets</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>3371</fpage><lpage>3373</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btv386</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26112292</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsubara</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Horiuchi</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimono</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Usui</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Uemura</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>The seven-pass transmembrane cadherin Flamingo controls dendritic self-avoidance via its binding to a LIM domain protein, Espinas, in <italic>Drosophila</italic> sensory neurons</article-title><source>Genes &amp; Development</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1982</fpage><lpage>1996</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.16531611</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21937715</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="preprint"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McLaughlin</surname> <given-names>CN</given-names></name><name><surname>Brbić</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Horns</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolluru</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kebschull</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Vacek</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Single-cell transcriptomes of developing and adult olfactory receptor neurons in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>bioRxiv</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/2020.10.08.332130</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menuz</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Larter</surname> <given-names>NK</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>An RNA-seq screen of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> antenna identifies a transporter necessary for ammonia detection</article-title><source>PLOS Genetics</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e1004810</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1004810</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25412082</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Middleton</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Eberwine</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Comprehensive catalog of dendritically localized mRNA isoforms from sub-cellular sequencing of single mouse neurons</article-title><source>BMC Biology</source><volume>17</volume><elocation-id>5</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12915-019-0630-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30678683</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Organisti</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hein</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Grunwald Kadow</surname> <given-names>IC</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Flamingo, a seven-pass transmembrane cadherin, cooperates with Netrin/Frazzled in <italic>Drosophila</italic> midline guidance</article-title><source>Genes to Cells</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>50</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gtc.12202</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25440577</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ostrovsky</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Cachero</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jefferis</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Clonal analysis of olfaction in <italic>Drosophila</italic>: immunochemistry and imaging of fly brains</article-title><source>Cold Spring Harbor Protocols</source><volume>2013</volume><elocation-id>pdb.prot071720</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/pdb.prot071720</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23547149</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pfreundt</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>James</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Tweedie</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Teichmann</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Adryan</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>FlyTF: improved annotation and enhanced functionality of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> transcription factor database</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>D443</fpage><lpage>D447</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkp910</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19884132</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prieto-Godino</surname> <given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Rytz</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Cruchet</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bargeton</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Abuin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Silbering</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruta</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Dal Peraro</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Evolution of acid-sensing olfactory circuits in drosophilids</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>93</volume><fpage>661</fpage><lpage>676</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.024</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28111079</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quinlan</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>IM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>841</fpage><lpage>842</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20110278</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramdya</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Evolving olfactory systems on the fly</article-title><source>Trends in Genetics</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>307</fpage><lpage>316</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2010.04.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20537755</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramírez</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Dündar</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Diehl</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Grüning</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Manke</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>42</volume><fpage>W187</fpage><lpage>W191</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gku365</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24799436</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Molecular evolution of the major arthropod chemoreceptor gene families</article-title><source>Annual Review of Entomology</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>227</fpage><lpage>242</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043322</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30312552</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Root</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Masuyama</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Green</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Enell</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>Nässel</surname> <given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>A presynaptic gain control mechanism fine-tunes olfactory behavior</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>59</volume><fpage>311</fpage><lpage>321</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18667158</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Root</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>KI</given-names></name><name><surname>Jafari</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Presynaptic facilitation by neuropeptide signaling mediates odor-driven food search</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>145</volume><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21458672</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rytz</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Croset</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Ionotropic receptors (IRs): chemosensory ionotropic glutamate receptors in <italic>Drosophila</italic> and beyond</article-title><source>Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>888</fpage><lpage>897</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.02.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23459169</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib79"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saina</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Visualizing olfactory receptor expression and localization in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Methods in Molecular Biology</source><volume>1003</volume><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>228</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-62703-377-0_16</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23585045</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib80"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sánchez-Alcañiz</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Silbering</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Croset</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Zappia</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sivasubramaniam</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Abuin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahai</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names></name><name><surname>Münch</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Steck</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Auer</surname> <given-names>TO</given-names></name><name><surname>Cruchet</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Neagu-Maier</surname> <given-names>GL</given-names></name><name><surname>Sprecher</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>Ribeiro</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yapici</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>An expression atlas of variant ionotropic glutamate receptors identifies a molecular basis of carbonation sensing</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>4252</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-06453-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30315166</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib81"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schindelin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Arganda-Carreras</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Frise</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaynig</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Longair</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pietzsch</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Preibisch</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rueden</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Saalfeld</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmid</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Tinevez</surname> <given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartenstein</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Eliceiri</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomancak</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cardona</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>676</fpage><lpage>682</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22743772</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib82"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schwabe</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Neuert</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Clandinin</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>A network of cadherin-mediated interactions polarizes growth cones to determine targeting specificity</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>154</volume><fpage>351</fpage><lpage>364</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23870124</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib83"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shanbhag</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Muller</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Steinbrecht</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Atlas of olfactory organs of <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic> 1. Types, external organization, innervation and distribution of olfactory sensilla</article-title><source>International Journal of Insect Morphology &amp; Embryology</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>377</fpage><lpage>397</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0020-7322(99)00039-2</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib84"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shanbhag</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Müller</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Steinbrecht</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Atlas of olfactory organs of <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic> 2. Internal organization and cellular architecture of olfactory sensilla</article-title><source>Arthropod Structure &amp; Development</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>229</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1467-8039(00)00028-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18088928</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib85"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shiao</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>WL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>MY</given-names></name><name><surname>Notredame</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kondo</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>WH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Expression divergence of chemosensory genes between <italic>Drosophila sechellia</italic> and its sibling species and its implications for host shift</article-title><source>Genome Biology and Evolution</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>2843</fpage><lpage>2858</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gbe/evv183</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26430061</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib86"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silbering</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Rytz</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Grosjean</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Abuin</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramdya</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Jefferis</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Complementary function and integrated wiring of the evolutionarily distinct <italic>Drosophila</italic> olfactory subsystems</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>13357</fpage><lpage>13375</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2360-11.2011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21940430</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib87"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>de Bivort</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Dan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kunes</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Determinants of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> odorant receptor pattern</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>363</fpage><lpage>376</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22340498</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib88"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Southall</surname> <given-names>TD</given-names></name><name><surname>Gold</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name><name><surname>Egger</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Davidson</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Caygill</surname> <given-names>EE</given-names></name><name><surname>Marshall</surname> <given-names>OJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Brand</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Cell-type-specific profiling of gene expression and chromatin binding without cell isolation: assaying RNA pol II occupancy in neural stem cells</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>101</fpage><lpage>112</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23792147</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib89"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stegle</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Teichmann</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Marioni</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Genetics</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrg3833</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25628217</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib90"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Larter</surname> <given-names>NK</given-names></name><name><surname>Chahda</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Rioux</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Gumaste</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018a</year><article-title>Humidity response depends on the small soluble protein Obp59a in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>e39249</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.39249</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30230472</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib91"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018b</year><article-title>The diverse small proteins called odorant-binding proteins</article-title><source>Open Biology</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>180208</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsob.180208</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30977439</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib92"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Svensson</surname> <given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Vento-Tormo</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Teichmann</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Exponential scaling of single-cell RNA-seq in the past decade</article-title><source>Nature Protocols</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>599</fpage><lpage>604</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2017.149</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib93"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sweeney</surname> <given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Couto</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Berdnik</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Dickson</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Komiyama</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Temporal target restriction of olfactory receptor neurons by Semaphorin-1a/PlexinA-mediated axon-axon interactions</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>53</volume><fpage>185</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17224402</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib94"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takeichi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>The cadherin superfamily in neuronal connections and interactions</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>11</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn2043</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17133224</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib95"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamirisa</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Papagiannouli</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Rempel</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ermakova</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Trost</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mundorf</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Brunel</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruhland</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Boutros</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lohmann</surname> <given-names>JU</given-names></name><name><surname>Lohmann</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Decoding the regulatory logic of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> male stem cell system</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>3072</fpage><lpage>3086</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30208329</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib96"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tichy</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>A new <italic>Drosophila</italic> POU gene, <italic>pdm3</italic>, acts in odor receptor expression and axon targeting of olfactory neurons</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>7121</fpage><lpage>7129</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-08.2008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18614681</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib97"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tosches</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamawaki</surname> <given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Naumann</surname> <given-names>RK</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacobi</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Tushev</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Laurent</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Evolution of pallium, Hippocampus, and cortical cell types revealed by single-cell transcriptomics in reptiles</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>360</volume><fpage>881</fpage><lpage>888</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aar4237</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29724907</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib98"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Usui</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Shima</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimada</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Burgess</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeichi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Uemura</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Flamingo, a seven-pass transmembrane cadherin, regulates planar cell polarity under the control of frizzled</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>98</volume><fpage>585</fpage><lpage>595</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80046-X</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10490098</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib99"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van den Ameele</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Krautz</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Brand</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>TaDa! Analysing cell type-specific chromatin in vivo with targeted DamID</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Neurobiology</source><volume>56</volume><fpage>160</fpage><lpage>166</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.conb.2019.01.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30844670</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib100"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van den Brink</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Sage</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Vértesy</surname> <given-names>Á</given-names></name><name><surname>Spanjaard</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Peterson-Maduro</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Baron</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Robin</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>van Oudenaarden</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Single-cell sequencing reveals dissociation-induced gene expression in tissue subpopulations</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>935</fpage><lpage>936</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.4437</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28960196</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib101"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Epithelial microRNA-9a regulates dendrite growth through Fmi-Gq signaling in <italic>Drosophila</italic> sensory neurons</article-title><source>Developmental Neurobiology</source><volume>76</volume><fpage>225</fpage><lpage>237</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/dneu.22309</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26016469</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib102"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Widmer</surname> <given-names>YF</given-names></name><name><surname>Bilican</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruggmann</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Sprecher</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Regulators of long-term memory revealed by mushroom body-specific gene expression profiling in <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic></article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>209</volume><fpage>1167</fpage><lpage>1181</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.118.301106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29925565</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib103"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Jafari</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pask</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinberg</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Desplan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Evolution, developmental expression and function of odorant receptors in insects</article-title><source>The Journal of Experimental Biology</source><volume>223</volume><elocation-id>jeb208215</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jeb.208215</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib104"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>LG</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>QY</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters</article-title><source>OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>284</fpage><lpage>287</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/omi.2011.0118</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22455463</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib105"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeisel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hochgerner</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Lönnerberg</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnsson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Memic</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>van der Zwan</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Häring</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Borm</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>La Manno</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Codeluppi</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Furlan</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Skene</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Hjerling-Leffler</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Arenas</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ernfors</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Marklund</surname> <given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Linnarsson</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>174</volume><fpage>999</fpage><lpage>1014</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib106"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Diverse functions of N-cadherin in dendritic and axonal terminal arborization of olfactory projection neurons</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>42</volume><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00142-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15066265</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.63036.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Ramaswami</surname><given-names>Mani</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Trinity College Dublin</institution><country>Ireland</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name><surname>Southall</surname><given-names>Tony D</given-names></name><role>Reviewer</role><aff><institution>Imperial College London</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text><p>In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.</p></boxed-text><p><bold>Acceptance summary:</bold></p><p>The work describes a novel and robust method to determine differentially expressed genes in specific classes of <italic>Drosophila</italic> olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) using the Targeted DamID technique. This is valuable as it provides an approach that can be used to profile transcriptions in cell types in the antenna that are difficult to isolate and purify. Through such an analysis and additional experiments to determine the function of some OSN-specific mRNAs, this study not only provides an important resource for the OSN field (especially for <italic>Drosophila</italic> and mosquito researchers) but also provides mechanistic insight into the determination of specific OSN classes, and how they are segregated into specific glomeruli.</p><p><bold>Decision letter after peer review:</bold></p><p>Thank you for submitting your article &quot;Targeted molecular profiling of rare cell populations identifies olfactory sensory neuron fate and wiring determinants&quot; for consideration by <italic>eLife</italic>. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Utpal Banerjee as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Tony D Southall (Reviewer #1).</p><p>The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.</p><p>We would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). Specifically, we are asking editors to accept without delay manuscripts, like yours, that they judge can stand as <italic>eLife</italic> papers without additional data, even if they feel that they would make the manuscript stronger. Thus the revisions requested below only address clarity and presentation.</p><p>Summary:</p><p>Arguello et al. report comprehensive transcriptional (and chromatin accessibility states) profiles for individual classes of <italic>Drosophila</italic> olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), uncovered using the Targeted DamID technology. Seven individual IR-expressing OSN classes (Ir64a, Ir31a, Ir75a, Ir75b, Ir75c and Ir84a) were profiled by using IR-specific GAL4 drivers to control the expression of Dam (CATaDa) or Dam:Pol II (TaDa) which indicate chromatin accessibility and RNA polymerase II occupancy respectively. The data correlates well with what is already known about these OSNs and complement two other studies in Current biology and in BioRxiv, which use single-cell RNAseq to profile mRNA expression in individual OSNs. They describe differentially expressed transcription factors and cell surface molecules and follow up nicely with a functional analysis of the transcription factor <italic>pdm3</italic>, which is expressed specifically in Ir75a OSNs and the cell adhesion molecule fmi, expressed in most Ir expressing OSNs except for Ir75a and Ir84a. These studies show developmental functions consistent with their differential expression (documented in adults): most interesting that mutations in fmi are associated with disruption of glomerular organization for all coeloconic OSNs.</p><p>Overall, the study is of high technical quality and will be appreciated by a broad audience for its technical breakthrough and available datasets. Not only does this study provide an important resource for the OSN field (especially for <italic>Drosophila</italic> and mosquito researchers) but also provides mechanistic insight into the determination of specific OSN classes, and how they are segregated into specific glomeruli. Also, the successful application of Targeted DamID, in this context, emphasises its effectiveness for profiling small and difficult to access populations of cells in vivo.</p><p>There are however, several points that should addressed before publication.</p><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>Readers would benefit from detailed comparisons of the data presented here with adult OSN single cell profiling data from the Luo lab (McLaughlin et al., 2020) and a previous study published in Current Biology early 2020. While carefully comparing and contrasting these results with the Luo preprint, the authors should acknowledge and discuss inconsistencies such as expression of odorant binding proteins, which are presented as originating from support cells of olfactory sensilla (in this study) versus some being expressed by OSNs (McLaughlin et al. study). Also, the Discussion needs to be modified as the scRNAseq seems to be feasible for adult OSNs (McLaughlin et al. study).</p><p>The focus on Pdm3 and Fmi in the last part of the manuscript (Figures 5-7) does address the functional significance of their continued, heterogeneous expression in adult OSNs. Attempts to knockdown the expression of these genes in adult OSNs failed to yield significant phenotypes. In fact, the observed cell fate or wiring phenotypes require knocking down the genes in all OSNs at much earlier developmental stages (using <italic>peb-GAL4</italic>) than the time points when the datasets were generated. The Results and Discussion sections should be revised to clearly acknowledge that these experiments, though well designed and executed, do not connect to the TaDa datasets which pertain to adult expression (see also points 9 and 10). That said, the study is strong and interesting enough even with the first five figures.</p><p>The authors may consider revising the title to eliminate the focus on neuron fate and wiring given that the TaDa datasets are generated from adult OSNs but there is no obvious phenotype when knocking down Pdm3 and Fmi in adult OSNs.</p><p>Figure 1D and E: The DamID plots in Figure 1D and E look strange – why are there sloped boxes representing the data? Is this due to it representing the sequencing reads rather that the binned average per GATC fragment? Ideally, DamID data should only be displayed as the binned signal per GATC fragment (the regions between GATC sites), as this is the maximum resolution of the system.</p><p>It is not clear from the figure legend (Figure 1D and E) whether the read depth is normalised, and if so, how it was normalised.</p><p>The approximate positions of the GATC sites (would be good if they were exact) do not appear to always align with the distinct boundaries within the data, which would be at GATC sites.</p><p>Are there signature genes for each OSN class profiled other than the IRs themselves? Can these genes be statistically identified and provided as a list?</p><p>Figure 1—figure supplement 1 – it is very difficult to read the receptor names. Can the panels be rearranged (maybe by making the columns narrower), so that the receptor names are larger? How do the authors reconcile expression of ORs and GRs to be expressed in adult OSNs? One explanation by the authors is that these sensory receptor genes reside within introns or genomic regions that also have other genes known to express in neurons. Can the authors do an in situ hybridization to confirm that indeed some OR/GR genes are co-expressed with IRs?</p><p>Looking at the fmi mutant phenotype it seems like mostly the effect starts at 24 hours with defasciculated axons around future antennal lobe. A discussion of this should be added to the Discussion. Can the authors provide more discussion on how they envision Fmi working to regulate OSN projections in the antennal lobes?</p><p>It also seems like many of the OSNs analyzed in the coeloconic sensilla seem to have a defect. How do the authors reconcile this with the differential expression of fmi in IR expressing OSNs? It seems like the wiring of Ir84a and Ir75a OSNs also look affected even though they do not express fmi? is this non-autonomous? We note that reverse MARCM using regular fmi alleles could answer this. Or if RNAi needs to be used maybe a gal4 that is expressed early in Ir84a OSNs? In any event, this should be acknowledged as an issue remaining to be resolved.</p><p>Subsection “Targeted DamID of OSN populations”, the finding of low RNA PolymeraseII occupancy upstream of Ir93a versus high protein expression: Maybe a mention of TaDa not as effective for profiling low abundance gene expression?</p><p>In Figure 6E, it seems like early and wide spread knock down of <italic>pdm3</italic> results in Ir75a OSNs to be converted to Ir75b OSNs, which leads to an increased glomerular volume targeted by Ir75b OSNs. What happens to projection patterns in the experiment presented in 6G where RNAi knock down of <italic>pdm3</italic> is driven by <italic>Ir8aGAL4</italic>, which leads to OSNs that co-express Ir75a and Ir75b?</p><p>The representation of the CATaDa data in Figure 3 gives a false impression of the resolution of the data – it should be binned per GATC fragment.</p><p>Figure 5B – it would be good to see some statistical tests for these data.</p><p>Materials and methods (“TaDa sample preparation”): Should indicate the sex of the experimental flies.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.63036.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>Readers would benefit from detailed comparisons of the data presented here with adult OSN single cell profiling data from the Luo lab (McLaughlin et al., 2020) and a previous study published in Current Biology early 2020. While carefully comparing and contrasting these results with the Luo preprint, the authors should acknowledge and discuss inconsistencies such as expression of odorant binding proteins, which are presented as originating from support cells of olfactory sensilla (in this study) versus some being expressed by OSNs (McLaughlin et al. study). Also, the Discussion needs to be modified as the scRNAseq seems to be feasible for adult OSNs (McLaughlin et al. study).</p></disp-quote><p>We fully agree with the interest to compare TaDa and single cell/nucleus-RNA-seq data. The most relevant study is the adult OSN single-nucleus RNA-seq study from McLaughlin et al., but – as discussed already with the editor – the datasets for this preprint are not in the public domain at the time of revision, which limits our ability to extract detailed information from this work. We also note that the neuronal populations characterized by RNA-seq and by TaDa have only limited overlap, constraining direct comparison of cell types. While comparative assessment of TaDa and sc/nRNA-seq data will likely be most fruitful from equivalent classes of cells and developmental timepoints, in our revised manuscript we have expanded our Discussion comparing and contrasting general properties of the OSN gene expression profiles emerging from these different approaches. We further note that the snRNA-seq datasets led to clustering of neurons expressing <italic>Ir75a</italic>, <italic>Ir75b</italic> and <italic>Ir75c</italic> (as well as Or35a neurons), which highlights one advantage of our targeted approach in selectively distinguishing these cell populations. This was of particular importance in our study, as it led us to discover the specific expression and function of Pdm3 in Ir75a neurons. (Of course, future targeted sc/nRNA-seq of individual OSN classes is certainly conceivable).</p><p>Regarding the intriguing finding of OBP expression by McLaughlin et al., we have now analyzed the TaDa OSs for the entire OBP repertoire (new Figure 1—figure supplement 4), but we do not detect significant occupancy of these genes except in rare cases. For example, <italic>Obp19d</italic> (pan-neuronally expressed in McLaughlin et al.) is only occupied in Ir75b neurons in our TaDa datasets, and <italic>Obp56d</italic> (expressed in most neurons in McLaughlin et al.) is not occupied in any neuron. Our TaDa data are consistent with previous in situ RNA and protein expression analyses of OBPs (in <italic>Drosophila</italic> and many other insect species) which have reported expression in support cells but not in neurons (e.g., PMID 27845621). It is certainly possible that snRNA-seq is much more sensitive than either TaDa or in situ analysis of <italic>Obp</italic> expression. However, as extensive genetic analysis of <italic>Obp</italic>s has revealed little or no physiological phenotypic consequences (PMID 31651397), the functional significance of neuronal <italic>Obp</italic> expression remains unclear. We discuss these issues in the revised manuscript.</p><p>Finally, in Figure 2, we have also improved the presentation of OSs of sets of known/predicted ion channels, neuropeptides, GPCRs and axon guidance molecules, which were previously lumped together in the “cell surface and secreted protein” (CSSP) gene set. This aligns our TaDa data presentation somewhat better with the McLaughlin et al. analysis of channels and neuropeptide/neurotransmitter signaling systems (Figure 9 of that preprint). As most of these genes are broadly expressed across neuron populations, and because of the limited number of neuron types that we can directly compare between TaDa and RNA-seq data, we felt that in-depth comparison would not yield meaningful conclusions at this stage. However, we hope our more refined functional classifications will help in the future exploration of these data.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The focus on Pdm3 and Fmi in the last part of the manuscript (Figures 5-7) does address the functional significance of their continued, heterogeneous expression in adult OSNs. Attempts to knockdown the expression of these genes in adult OSNs failed to yield significant phenotypes. In fact, the observed cell fate or wiring phenotypes require knocking down the genes in all OSNs at much earlier developmental stages (using peb-GAL4) than the time points when the datasets were generated. The Results and Discussion sections should be revised to clearly acknowledge that these experiments, though well designed and executed, do not connect to the TaDa datasets which pertain to adult expression (see also points 9 and 10). That said, the study is strong and interesting enough even with the first five figures.</p></disp-quote><p>We acknowledge that the TaDa experimental design in this study captures gene expression profiles of OSNs in late developmental stages, but stress that although we harvested adult antennae, it is likely that the Dam methylation patterns reflect, at least in part, Dam:PolII occupancy from the mid-pupal stage when expression of this fusion protein is induced, rather than that of adult OSNs exclusively. (To our knowledge, it is unclear if Dam-dependent methylation is a permanent mark of occupancy or if it is turned over). We suspect that significant TaDa OSs represent both genes that are expressed and function primarily in mature OSNs (such as the <italic>Ir</italic>s) as well as those that act during development. Fmi is one such example, as the adult expression (detected by immunofluorescence) is very low (Figure 7A). Our more refined analysis of OSs of different gene classes illustrates that many other known or putative neuronal guidance molecules can be detected by TaDa (Figure 2F). These observations presumably reflect the persistent expression of such molecules, albeit at lower levels, in late developmental stages, and is consistent with previous bulk RNA-seq datasets of adult antennae (e.g., PMID 25412082, 30102700).</p><p>The transcription factor we functionally characterized in our work, Pdm3, has persistent protein expression in Ir75a neurons in adult stages (Figure 5A-B). Moreover, our new temporally-controlled RNAi experiments (described in detail below) strengthen our original claim that Pdm3 is continuously required in adult antennae to suppress Ir75b receptor expression in Ir75a neurons, in addition to its earlier role in distinguishing the fate of Ir75a and Ir75b neurons.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The authors may consider revising the title to eliminate the focus on neuron fate and wiring given that the TaDa datasets are generated from adult OSNs but there is no obvious phenotype when knocking down Pdm3 and Fmi in adult OSNs.</p></disp-quote><p>As described in the comment above, we believe our TaDa datasets are relevant for identifying genes with roles during development and/or in adult stages. To effectively encompass the scope of the analyses and functional follow-up in our work, we have revised the title to “Targeted molecular profiling of rare olfactory sensory neurons identifies fate, wiring and functional determinants”.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Figure 1D and E: The DamID plots in Figure 1D and E look strange – why are there sloped boxes representing the data? Is this due to it representing the sequencing reads rather that the binned average per GATC fragment? Ideally, DamID data should only be displayed as the binned signal per GATC fragment (the regions between GATC sites), as this is the maximum resolution of the system.</p></disp-quote><p>The reviewers are correct that this panel shows read depth and not binned averaged depth at GATC fragments. The presentation format in this panel was chosen to give a completely “raw” look of the dataset prior to processing.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>It is not clear from the figure legend (Figure 1D and E) whether the read depth is normalised, and if so, how it was normalised.</p></disp-quote><p>As described above, the data is raw and not normalized. We have added in Figure 1E a graphical element to clarify the workflow.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The approximate positions of the GATC sites (would be good if they were exact) do not appear to always align with the distinct boundaries within the data, which would be at GATC sites.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now added the exaction location of the GATC positions, which align well with the distinct boundaries.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Are there signature genes for each OSN class profiled other than the IRs themselves? Can these genes be statistically identified and provided as a list?</p></disp-quote><p>There are indeed signature genes for the neuron classes profiled; for example, amongst the transcription factor genes <italic>pdm3</italic> was the unique marker for Ir75a neurons, which is why we focused on it for functional analysis. We have now expanded our analysis and documentation of signature genes for various categories of molecules (ion channels, GPCRs, neuropeptides, neural guidance molecules, in addition to transcription factors and a genome-wide list). These data are summarized in Figure 2 and full lists are provided in the accompanying supplementary files. For particular functional categories there are generally (but not always) very few unique genes for a given neuron population; these will be interesting candidates for future in situ validation of expression and functional studies.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Figure 1—figure supplement 1 – it is very difficult to read the receptor names. Can the panels be rearranged (maybe by making the columns narrower), so that the receptor names are larger? How do the authors reconcile expression of ORs and GRs to be expressed in adult OSNs? One explanation by the authors is that these sensory receptor genes reside within introns or genomic regions that also have other genes known to express in neurons. Can the authors do an in situ hybridization to confirm that indeed some OR/GR genes are co-expressed with IRs?</p></disp-quote><p>To improve readability, we have now split this figure into three for each of the main receptor families, as well as adding an additional equivalent figure supplement for the <italic>Obp</italic> genes, as mentioned above. Furthermore, the color shading of these heatmaps have been unified with those in the main figures.</p><p>Regarding the <italic>Or</italic> and <italic>Gr</italic> genes displaying significant occupancy scores in certain Ir neuron populations (Figure 1—figure supplements 2-3), numerous previous studies (e.g., PMID 10943836, 16139208, 16139209, 11257221) have comprehensively surveyed expression of these genes using RNA (F)ISH and transgenic promoter reporter approaches. These analyses do not provide evidence for the expression of the occupied <italic>Or</italic>s or <italic>Gr</italic>s in the spatial domains of the antenna characteristic of Ir neurons and/or in neurons that target known “Ir glomeruli” in the antennal lobe. For example, <italic>Gr61a</italic> and <italic>Gr63a</italic> have significant occupancy in 4 or 5 Ir neuron populations, but their endogenous expression is clearly limited to the basiconic OSN population projecting to the V glomerulus (PMID 17167414, 17360684). Bulk RNA-seq analysis (PMID 25412082) or the snRNA-seq dataset of McLaughlin et al., also fail to offer evidence of <italic>Or</italic> or <italic>Gr</italic> transcripts in adult Ir neurons. Finally, we note that the obligate OR co-receptor gene <italic>Orco</italic> is not occupied in many of the populations in which other “tuning” <italic>Or</italic> genes have significant OSs, arguing that this occupancy is not likely to be functionally meaningful.</p><p>While we cannot rule out that there may be isolated examples of <italic>Or</italic> and <italic>Ir</italic> co-expression, we suggest that in the vast majority of cases, the significant OSs for <italic>Gr</italic>s and <italic>Or</italic>s is due to the inadequate resolution of TaDa to distinguish overlapping genes, as well as those that are tightly clustered in the genome (many sensory receptors are separated by only a few hundred bp from flanking non-receptor genes). We have added a comment on this latter point to the text.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Looking at the fmi mutant phenotype it seems like mostly the effect starts at 24 hours with defasciculated axons around future antennal lobe. A discussion of this should be added to the Discussion. Can the authors provide more discussion on how they envision Fmi working to regulate OSN projections in the antennal lobes?</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with the reviewers that the requirement for Fmi is likely to start early in development as, or even before, OSN axons start to invade the antennal lobe. While we do not want to speculate too far beyond the available data, we have added some additional discussion of the potential mechanism of action.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>It also seems like many of the OSNs analyzed in the coeloconic sensilla seem to have a defect. How do the authors reconcile this with the differential expression of fmi in IR expressing OSNs? It seems like the wiring of Ir84a and Ir75a OSNs also look affected even though they do not express fmi? is this non-autonomous? We note that reverse MARCM using regular fmi alleles could answer this. Or if RNAi needs to be used maybe a gal4 that is expressed early in Ir84a OSNs? In any event, this should be acknowledged as an issue remaining to be resolved.</p></disp-quote><p>These are all excellent points. Based upon its broad expression across the antennal lobe, we hypothesize that Fmi has a widespread role in these neurons, and that our pan-OSN RNAi has both direct effects on neurons that express higher levels of this protein, and indirect (non-autonomous) roles on those with lower or absent Fmi expression. In preliminary (standard) MARCM experiments, removing Fmi from subsets of neurons (covering several different OSN populations) did not lead to striking glomerular phenotypes, which suggests that Fmi must be removed from all neurons of a given population in order to observe the neuronal segregation phenotype observed with the pan-RNAi, perhaps because of compensation by other cell surface molecules. As such, reverse MARCM, for which we do not have the necessary lines, is unlikely to be more informative at this stage. We would also very much like to have driver lines for population-specific early RNAi, but such tools are not yet available. As we do not have publication-quality data to add to the manuscript in the short-term, we prefer to acknowledge these outstanding important issues and potential future solutions in the expanded discussion of the role of Fmi in OSN axon guidance.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Targeted DamID of OSN populations”, the finding of low RNA PolymeraseII occupancy upstream of Ir93a versus high protein expression: Maybe a mention of TaDa not as effective for profiling low abundance gene expression?</p></disp-quote><p>This comment prompted us to double-check the OS for <italic>Ir93a</italic>; this is in fact significant (albeit low) in Ir40a neurons, but there is also a significant OS in four other Ir neuron populations which do not express IR93 protein (as detected by our antibody) (Supplementary file 5). We suspect that bona fide transcription of <italic>Ir93a</italic> in Ir40a neurons is too low to be detected by TaDa, and that the significant OSs we detect across these five populations is artefactual, potentially reflecting the expression of a ∼5kb <italic>Doc</italic> transposable element (PMID: PMID: 7813908) in an intron.</p><p>We add that we do not know if Ir93a protein is highly expressed; we say it is “readily detected” but this could be because the antibody has extremely high-affinity. At present we cannot make any confident statement about the limits of sensitivity of TaDa, as this would require parallel profiling of the same tissue/developmental stage by TaDa and RNA-seq.</p><p>We have amended our discussion of Ir93a in the Results.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>In Figure 6E, it seems like early and wide spread knock down of pdm3 results in Ir75a OSNs to be converted to Ir75b OSNs, which leads to an increased glomerular volume targeted by Ir75b OSNs. What happens to projection patterns in the experiment presented in 6G where RNAi knock down of pdm3 is driven by Ir8aGAL4, which leads to OSNs that co-express Ir75a and Ir75b?</p></disp-quote><p>We have performed several additional <italic>pdm3</italic> RNAi experiments to address the temporal requirement of this transcription factor in Ir75a neurons.</p><p>We previously used <italic>Ir8a-Gal4</italic> to drive late pupal/adult RNAi, which led to a relatively mild phenotype (i.e., a slight increase in the number of OSNs expressing IR75b, no change in Ir75a neuron number) compared to the results with <italic>peb-Gal4</italic>. In new experiments, we temporally-restricted RNAi exclusively to the adult stage by combining <italic>peb-Gal4</italic> with the temperature-sensitive inhibitor <italic>Gal80<sup>ts</sup></italic>. Importantly, adult-only <italic>peb&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> animals exhibit increases and decreases in the number of neurons expressing Ir75b or Ir75a, respectively, that are similar to our observations with <italic>peb&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> throughout development (new Figure 6F, compared with Figure 5D). We also detect many neurons co-expressing IR75b and IR75a (Figure 6G-H), as observed (less frequently) in the original <italic>Ir8a&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> experiments. The ectopic expression of IR75b in Ir75a neurons in adult-only <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> was confirmed by visualizing <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic>: this reporter labels both the normal DL2d glomerulus and, ectopically, the DP1l (Ir75a) glomerulus (Figure 6I), consistent with misexpression of <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> in Ir75a neurons <italic>after</italic> they have targeted to DP1l. This phenotype contrasts with that of pan-developmental <italic>peb&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> (Figure 6E) where loss of <italic>pdm3</italic> also leads to a change in glomerular targeting of “Ir75a” neurons. These observations confirm and strengthen our original model in which Pdm3 has an early role in fate determination of Ir75a neurons (by preventing them from adopting the receptor expression profile and glomerular wiring properties of Ir75b neurons), and an ongoing role in adults to repress Ir75b expression.</p><p>In response to the reviewers’ specific question, we have also combined <italic>Ir8a&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> with the <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic> and <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> reporters. <italic>Ir75a-GFP</italic>-labelled axons can still be detected innervating the normal glomerular target (DP1l) (Figure 6—figure supplement 1D), consistent with the lack of effect of this late knock-down of <italic>pdm3</italic> on endogenous Ir75a expression (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A). <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic>-labelled axons display innervation only to DL2d. Although we had anticipated detecting some innervation of these neurons in DP1l (as in the experiments described above), there are two potential issues: (i) the <italic>Ir8a&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> phenotype (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A) is much weaker compared to <italic>peb&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic>, and (ii) ectopic <italic>Ir75b-GFP</italic> transgene expression in antennae is already milder than ectopic IR75b protein expression, even in <italic>peb&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> (Figure 6D). We suspect that any ectopic <italic>Ir75b</italic>-<italic>GFP</italic> reporter expression in Ir75a neurons in <italic>Ir8a&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> animals is simply too sparse and/or weak to give a detectable signal in the axon termini some distance away in the antennal lobe.</p><p>Given that we have achieved stronger and more temporally-restricted adult-only <italic>pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> with <italic>peb-Gal4</italic> and <italic>Gal80<sup>ts</sup></italic> (albeit across most/all OSNs), we have now moved all of the phenotypic data with <italic>Ir8a&gt;pdm3<sup>RNAi</sup></italic> to a figure supplement, and we mention the issue of the weaker RNAi phenotype in the accompanying figure legend.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The representation of the CATaDa data in Figure 3 gives a false impression of the resolution of the data – it should be binned per GATC fragment.</p></disp-quote><p>For the CATaDa analysis we originally used the published script (from PMID 29481322) but found that this produced severely reduced signals at all of the specific genes of interest for our study. For this reason, we implemented the pipeline as described in the Materials and methods. We did consider binning the bam files via a GATC coverage file, but smoothing and duplicate read removal are inevitable because at any occupied site, the cut GATC at the boundaries can only be amplified from one direction (the “sister” fragments going towards the opposite direction are too long to be PCR amplified in most cases or too short to be retained). This leads to an uneven build-up of reads at both GATC ends. In our representation, each bump is flanked by two GATC sites. We stress that we are not claiming higher resolution, but it is expected that the region between two cut GATCs in close proximity will have higher probability of occupancy than the areas beyond the GATCs, which would explain the tapering of the signal. Binning the data based on GATC fragments (which would require us to devise a new pipeline) would result in a sharp fall of signal at the boundaries and this, too, would not be a true representation of occupancy, nor would it reflect the raw read data. We now emphasize this issue in the figure legend and stress the limits of resolution of the CATaDa data. We hope the reviewers will find it acceptable to maintain the same analysis method in this study.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Figure 5B – it would be good to see some statistical tests for these data.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now added the results of statistical test to these data (as well as for the equivalent experiments in Figure 2—figure supplement 1C).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Materials and methods (TaDa sample preparation): Should indicate the sex of the experimental flies.</p></disp-quote><p>We indicate in the “<italic>Drosophila</italic> culture” section that mixed sexes were used in all experiments (unless indicated otherwise), and we now re-iterate this in the “TaDa sample preparation” section.</p></body></sub-article></article>