<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">64351</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.64351</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Neuroscience</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Drp1 is required for AgRP neuronal activity and feeding</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-212674"><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Sungho</given-names></name><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="true">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-4042</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-212675"><name><surname>Yoon</surname><given-names>Nal Ae</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-7601"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Zhong-Wu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-212678"><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Jae Eun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-7606"><name><surname>Horvath</surname><given-names>Tamas L</given-names></name><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="true">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-4602</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-212676"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Jung Dae</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-212677"><name><surname>Diano</surname><given-names>Sabrina</given-names></name><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="true">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-2617</contrib-id><email>sabrina.diano@columbia.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University Irving Medical Center</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New York</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New Haven</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Program in Integrative Cell Signaling and Neurobiology of Metabolism, Yale University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New Haven</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New York</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">New Haven</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Palmiter</surname><given-names>Richard D</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Kaeberlein</surname><given-names>Matt</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution>University of Washington</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date date-type="publication" publication-format="electronic"><day>09</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e64351</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-10-26"><day>26</day><month>10</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2021-02-27"><day>27</day><month>02</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2021, Jin et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Jin et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-64351-v3.pdf"/><abstract><p>The hypothalamic orexigenic Agouti-related peptide (AgRP)-expressing neurons are crucial for the regulation of whole-body energy homeostasis. Here, we show that fasting-induced AgRP neuronal activation is associated with dynamin-related peptide 1 (DRP1)-mediated mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial fatty acid utilization in AgRP neurons. In line with this, mice lacking <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in adult AgRP neurons (Drp1 cKO) show decreased fasting- or ghrelin-induced AgRP neuronal activity and feeding and exhibited a significant decrease in body weight, fat mass, and feeding accompanied by a significant increase in energy expenditure. In support of the role for mitochondrial fission and fatty acids oxidation, Drp1 cKO mice showed attenuated palmitic acid-induced mitochondrial respiration. Altogether, our data revealed that mitochondrial dynamics and fatty acids oxidation in hypothalamic AgRP neurons is a critical mechanism for AgRP neuronal function and body-weight regulation.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>AgRP</kwd><kwd>feeding</kwd><kwd>metabolism</kwd><kwd>mitochondria</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>Mouse</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000062</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>DK097566</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Diano</surname><given-names>Sabrina</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000062</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>DK107293</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Diano</surname><given-names>Sabrina</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000062</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>DK120321</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Diano</surname><given-names>Sabrina</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>NIH R01 AG052005</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Horvath</surname><given-names>Tamas L</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund5"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>NIH R01 DK126447</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Horvath</surname><given-names>Tamas L</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Mitochondrial fission, associated with fatty acids oxidation, is fundamental for AgRP neuronal activity during negative energy balance and in regulating fasting- and/or ghrelin-induced feeding.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec sec-type="intro" id="s1"><title>Introduction</title><p>The central nervous system (CNS) regulates whole-body energy metabolism through multiple neuronal networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Diano, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Myers and Olson, 2012</xref>). The hypothalamus has been considered a key area of the brain in regulating metabolism via the ability of hypothalamic neurons to sense, integrate, and respond to fluctuating metabolic signals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Coll and Yeo, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Sandoval et al., 2009</xref>). The hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (ARC) contains two distinct neuronal subpopulations that produce either orexigenic neuropeptides agouti-related peptide (AgRP) and neuropeptide-Y (NPY), or anorexigenic neuropeptides including alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH) derived from proopiomelanocortin (POMC) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Batterham et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Ollmann et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Roh et al., 2016</xref>). The anatomical location of the hypothalamic ARC allows these neurons to rapidly respond to fluctuations of numerous circulating metabolic signals, including nutrients and hormones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Gao and Horvath, 2007</xref>). However, the intracellular mechanisms underlying their ability to sense circulating signals, and, specifically nutrients, remain to be elucidated.</p><p>Mitochondria are the main powerhouse of the cell by producing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Mattson et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Picard et al., 2016</xref>). Neurons rely on mitochondrial electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation to meet their high energy demands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Bélanger et al., 2011</xref>). In addition, mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles able to change their morphology and location according to the needs of the cell (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Chan, 2006</xref>). The ability of mitochondria to change their morphological characteristics in response to the metabolic state to match with the needs of the cells occurs through fusion and fission events, process defined as mitochondrial dynamics. Mitochondrial morphological changes are associated with several proteins, including mitofusin 1 and 2 (MFN1 and MFN2) in the mitochondrial outer membrane and optic atrophy-1 (OPA1) in the mitochondrial inner membrane for mitochondrial fusion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Kasahara and Scorrano, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Youle and van der Bliek, 2012</xref>), whereas mitochondrial fission is regulated by the activity of the dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1, a mechanochemical protein encoded by the <italic>Dnm1l</italic> gene), which is recruited to the mitochondrial outer membrane to interact with mitochondrial fission factor (Mff) and mitochondrial fission 1 (Fis1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Losón et al., 2013</xref>).</p><p>Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that NPY/AgRP neuronal activation is associated with changes in mitochondrial morphology and density during fasting or after ghrelin administration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Andrews et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Coppola et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Dietrich et al., 2013</xref>), suggesting that changes in mitochondrial dynamics play a role in the regulation of neuronal activation of these neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Nasrallah and Horvath, 2014</xref>). In addition, we found that high-fat-diet-induced inactivation of NPY/AgRP neurons is associated with mitochondrial dynamics leaning towards mitochondrial fusion in this neuronal population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Dietrich et al., 2013</xref>). In the present study we interrogated the relevance of mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons in relation to fuel availability.</p></sec><sec sec-type="results" id="s2"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Fasting induces mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons</title><p>Recent studies have demonstrated that hypothalamic mitochondrial dynamics play a critical role in regulating nutrient sensing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Dietrich et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Santoro et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Schneeberger et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Toda et al., 2016</xref>). Using electron microscopy, we observed that compared to feeding (0.174 ± 0.007 µm<sup>2</sup>, p&lt;0.0001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1a,c</xref>), fasting resulted in a significant decrease in mitochondrial size (0.130 ± 0.005 µm<sup>2</sup>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1b,c</xref>) in AgRP neurons together with a significant increase in mitochondrial density (0.551 ± 0.032 mitochondria/µm<sup>2</sup> of cytosol in fasting vs 0.423 ± 0.026 mitochondria/µm<sup>2</sup> of cytosol in feeding; p=0.0031; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1d</xref>). This was associated with a decrease in mitochondrial aspect ratio (AR; the ratio between the major and minor axis of the ellipse equivalent to the mitochondrion which is indicative of mitochondrial morphological change; 1.629 ± 0.020 in fasting vs 1.769 ± 0.049 in feeding; p=0.0064; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1e</xref>). However, total mitochondrial coverage in the cytosol (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1f</xref>) in AgRP neurons was not altered between fed (7.237 ± 0.461% of cytosol) and fasted mice (6.830 ± 0.363% of cytosol; p=0.4853). These observations indicate that food deprivation promotes mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons, consistent with our prior published work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Dietrich et al., 2013</xref>).</p><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Fasting induces mitochondrial fission and activation of DRP1 in AgRP neurons.</title><p>(<bold>a and b</bold>) Representative electron micrographs showing mitochondria (asterisks) in an AgRP neuron of 5-month-old fed (<bold>a</bold>) and the fasted male mouse (<bold>b</bold>). Scale bar represents 500 nm. (<bold>c–f</bold>) Cumulative probability distribution of cross-sectional mitochondria area and average mitochondrial area (<bold>c</bold>), mitochondrial density (<bold>d</bold>), aspect ratio and a cumulative probability distribution of mitochondrial aspect ratio (<bold>e</bold>), and mitochondrial coverage (<bold>f</bold>) in AgRP neurons from fed and fasted male mice (fed mice, n = 779 mitochondria/39 AgRP neurons/4 mice; fasted mice, n = 1559 mitochondria/47 AgRP neurons/6 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. ns = not significant. (<bold>g–k</bold>) Real-time PCR data showing relative mRNA levels of <italic>Agrp</italic> (<bold>g</bold>), <italic>Npy</italic> (<bold>h</bold>), <italic>Pomc</italic> (<bold>i</bold>), <italic>Nr5a1</italic> (<bold>j</bold>), and <italic>Dnm1l</italic> (<bold>k</bold>) in total lysate of hypothalami (Input) and isolated RNA bound to the ribosomes of the hypothalamic AgRP neurons (IP) from 3-month-old fed or fasted mice (n = 5/group). Three animals were pooled for each n. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001; ****p&lt;0.0001 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. (<bold>l–q</bold>) Representative micrographs showing immunostaining for phosphorylated DRP1 (at serine 616; pDRP1; green, <bold>l and m</bold>) and tdTomato (red, representing AgRP, <bold>n and o</bold>) and merged (<bold>p and q</bold>) in the hypothalamic ARC of 5-month-old fed and fasted male mice. Scale bar represents 100 µm. 3V = third ventricle; ARC = arcuate nucleus; ME = median eminence. (<bold>r</bold>) Graph showing the percentage of AgRP neurons immunopositive for pDRP1 (n = 6 mice/group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p&lt;0.01 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. (<bold>s</bold>) Graph showing no difference in total AgRP cell number between fed and fasted male mice (n = 6 mice/group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. p=0.4711 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Fasting induces mitochondrial fission and activation of DRP1 in AgRP neurons.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig1-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig1-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Fasting induces significant upregulation of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> mRNA in AgRP neurons</title><p>We next performed transcriptomic analysis of AgRP neurons using ribosomal tagging strategy to analyze AgRP neuron-specific mRNA expression levels in fed and fasted conditions using <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; RiboTag mice. We observed that compared to fed state (1.036 ± 0.132, n = 5), fasting resulted in a significant increase in <italic>Agrp</italic> mRNA transcript in the input RNAs (5.248 ± 1.176, n = 5; p=0.00741, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1g</xref>). Compared to the input RNAs, <italic>Agrp</italic> and <italic>Npy</italic> mRNA transcripts were enriched by 27- and 56-fold in the immunoprecipitated RNAs (IP), respectively, in fasted <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; RiboTag mice (<italic>Agrp</italic> = input = 5.248 ± 1.176, n = 5; IP = 143.998 ± 22.651, n = 5; p=0.0003, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1g</xref>; <italic>Npy =</italic> input = 2.680 ± 0.996, n = 5; IP = 151.286 ± 51.683, n = 5; p=0.0207, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1h</xref>). Conversely, a significant decrease of <italic>Pomc</italic> mRNA transcript in the IP RNAs was found in fed <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; RiboTag mice (0.203 ± 0.093, n = 5; p=0.0031, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1i</xref>) compared to the input RNAs (1.062 ± 0.184, n = 5). Moreover, marginal expression of <italic>Nr5a1</italic>, encoding steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1, highly restricted to the VMH), was detected in the input (fed = 1.175 ± 0.309, n = 5; fasted = 1.537 ± 0.246, n = 5, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1j</xref>) and the IP RNAs (fed = 0.846 ± 0.293, n = 5; fasted = 1.826 ± 0.376, n = 5; p=0.074, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1j</xref>). The <italic>Agrp</italic> IP/input ratio (27.439, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1g</xref>), <italic>Npy</italic> IP/input ratio (56.45, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1h</xref>) and enrichment were high, while <italic>Pomc</italic> (IP/input ratio, 0.191, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1i</xref>) and <italic>Nr5a1</italic>(IP/input ratio, 0.72, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1i</xref>) were de-enriched, validating the arcuate AgRP neuronal isolation protocol. In support of our mitochondrial morphology data, quantitative real time-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed that <italic>Dnm1l</italic> mRNA transcript (fed = 0.873 ± 0.337, n = 5; fasted = 2.095 ± 0.335, n = 5; p=0.0329, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1k</xref>) was significantly upregulated in AgRP neurons of fasted mice compared to fed mice.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Fasting induces significant activation of DRP1 protein in AgRP neurons</title><p>Mitochondria fission is mediated by DRP1, which is recruited to the outer membrane of mitochondria to promote mitochondrial fragmentation in a GTPase-dependent manner followed by its phosphorylation at serine 616 site (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Liesa et al., 2009</xref>). To examine whether food deprivation is associated with changes in activated Ser616 phosphorylation of DRP1 (pDRP1) levels, we assessed the distribution of pDRP1 immunoreactivity in AgRP neurons in fed and fasted mice. We found that percent of AgRP neurons expressing pDRP1 was significantly increased in fasting (49.2 ± 7.228% of AgRP neurons, n = 6; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1m,o,q,r</xref>) compared to the fed condition (22.33 ± 3.921% of AgRP neurons, n = 6, p=0.0085, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1l,n</xref>,p,r). No changes in AgRP cell number were observed between fed (152.2 ± 11.14; n = 5; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1s</xref>) and fasted mice (160.8 ± 4.028, n = 6; p=0.4527, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1s</xref>). These data suggest that activation of AgRP neurons in fasting state is closely associated with increased DRP1 activation and, thus, mitochondrial fission, suggesting that DRP1-mediated mitochondrial dynamics may play a role in the regulation of AgRP neuronal activity in fasting state.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Fasting triggers mitochondrial β-oxidation in the hypothalamic neurons</title><p>The hypothalamus is a key region in the control of energy metabolism via the ability of hypothalamic neurons to respond to numerous metabolic signals, including nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Jin and Diano, 2018</xref>). It has been proposed that hypothalamic availability of free fatty acids controls food intake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Lam et al., 2005</xref>) and AgRP function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Andrews et al., 2008</xref>). To investigate the effect of fatty acids on mitochondrial β-oxidation in hypothalamic neurons, we assessed palmitic acid (PA)-induced mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate in primary hypothalamic neuronal cell cultures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Fasting-induced β-oxidation in the hypothalamic neurons.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Graphs showing oxygen consumption rate (OCR) under 2.5 mM glucose incubation with or without palmitate-BSA (200 μM) and with or without etomoxir (40 μM) in primary hypothalamic neuronal culture (n = 6–8/group) from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>-Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice. Cultures were treated with tamoxifen (TMX). (<bold>b</bold>) Graph showing the quantification of OCR showed in panel (<bold>a</bold>) in primary hypothalamic neuronal culture. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; ***p&lt;0.001; ****p&lt;0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. (<bold>c</bold>) Graphs showing OCR under low glucose (0.5 mM) with or without palmitate-BSA (200 μM) and with or without etomoxir (40 μM) in primary hypothalamic neuronal culture (n = 6–8/group). (<bold>d</bold>) Graph showing the quantification of OCR shown in panel <bold>c</bold> in primary hypothalamic neuronal culture. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***p&lt;0.001; ****p&lt;0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata1"><label>Figure 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Fasting-induced oxidation in the hypothalamic neurons.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig2-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig2-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Percentage of tdTomato-expressing AgRP neurons and cell viability after 4-hydroxytamoxifen treatment in hypothalamic neuronal cell cultures.</title><p>(<bold>a–c</bold>) Representative micrographs showing fluorescent reporter gene tdTomato (red, representing AgRP neurons, <bold>a</bold>) and nuclei staining with DAPI (blue, <bold>b</bold>) and merged (<bold>c</bold>) in the primary hypothalamic neuronal cultures derived from a <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice. Once cultured neurons were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (2 μM) for tdTomato expression. Scale bar in <bold>a</bold> (for <bold>b</bold> and <bold>c</bold>) represents 20 µm. (<bold>d</bold>) Graph showing quantification of the percentage of tdTomato positive cells among DAPI-stained cells in the primary hypothalamic neuronal cultures (n = 8/group). (<bold>e</bold>) Graph showing the percentage quantification of the trypan blue cell viability assay in primary hypothalamic neuronal cells (n = 4/group) following either vehicle (ethanol) or 4-hydroxytamoxifen (2 μM) treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test was used for statistical significance.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2s1sdata1"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Tomatoes expressing AgRP neurons and cell viability.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig2-figsupp1-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig2-figsupp1-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig></fig-group><p>First, we analyzed the percentage of tdTomato-expressing AgRP neurons in the cultures and found that about 15% of cells expressed tdTomato (14.75 ± 1.704%; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1a–d</xref>). Next, we assessed the effect of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (to induce tdTomato expression) on neuronal cell viability by trypan blue staining method. Treatment of 2 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen showed no significant difference in the percentage of cell viability compared to vehicle-treated primary hypothalamic neuronal cultures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1e</xref>).</p><p>A significant difference in PA-induced mitochondrial maximal oxygen consumption rate was observed in primary hypothalamic neurons according to the amount of glucose present in the culture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). In high glucose concentration, the rate of PA-induced oxygen consumption was significantly lower (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2a,b</xref>) compared to that measured in low glucose (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2c,d</xref>). Furthermore, under both high and low glucose conditions, a significant decrease in maximal oxygen consumption rate was observed by the addition of the etomoxir, inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT1), transporter of fatty acids into the mitochondria.</p><p>Together, these data suggest that similar to fasting state, when glucose levels are low, hypothalamic neurons utilize fatty acids, such as palmitate, as substrates for mitochondrial respiration.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Inducible deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons</title><p>Next, to investigate the physiological functions of DRP1 in adult AgRP neurons, we generated mice with selective and inducible deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1a</xref>). <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice (kindly provided by Dr. Joel Elmquist at UTSW; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Wang et al., 2014</xref>) were crossed with <italic>Dnm1l</italic> floxed mice (<italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup></italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Kageyama et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Santoro et al., 2017</xref>). As control groups, <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice were injected with tamoxifen and <italic>Dnm1l <sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato were mice injected with corn oil. <italic>Dnm1l <sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice, referred to here as Drp1 conditional knockout mice (Drp1 cKO mice) were injected with tamoxifen to induce mature-onset deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons. To validate our animal model, we analyzed and found limited pDRP1 expression in the AgRP neurons of fasted Drp1 cKO mice (14.15 ± 0.926% of AgRP neurons, n = 4; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1b–h</xref>) compared to fasted <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice (used as control to visualize AgRP neurons; 52.39 ± 3.71% of AgRP neurons, n = 4, p&lt;0.0001, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1b–h</xref>) by immunohistochemistry analysis. No difference in AgRP cell numbers was found between control (150.3 ± 4.423 neurons, n = 4) and Drp1 cKO mice (146 ± 3.082 neurons, n = 4, p=0.4605, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1i</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> attenuates fasting-induced mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons</title><p>Next, we analyzed mitochondrial morphological changes in AgRP neurons of Drp1 cKO male mice in fed and fasted states. No differences in mitochondrial size (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3a–c</xref>), density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3d</xref>), aspect ratio (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3e</xref>), and coverage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3f</xref>) were observed between fed and fasted Drp1 cKO male mice, indicating that selective deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons prevents fasted-induced mitochondrial fission.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons affects fasting-induced mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial respiration.</title><p>(<bold>a and b</bold>) Representative electron micrographs showing mitochondria (asterisks) in an AgRP neuron of the 5-month-old fed Drp1 cKO (<bold>a</bold>) and the fasted Drp1 cKO male mice (<bold>b</bold>). Scale bar represents 500 nm. (<bold>c–f</bold>) Cumulative probability distribution of cross-sectional mitochondria area and average mitochondrial area (<bold>c</bold>), mitochondrial density (<bold>d</bold>), aspect ratio and a cumulative probability distribution of mitochondrial aspect ratio (<bold>e</bold>), and mitochondrial coverage (<bold>f</bold>) in AgRP neurons from fed Drp1 cKO (n = 720 mitochondria/32 AgRP neurons/4 mice) and fasted Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 746 mitochondria/35 AgRP neurons/4 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test was used for statistical significance. ns = not significant. (<bold>g and h</bold>) Graphs showing OCR (<bold>g</bold>) and its quantification (<bold>h</bold>) under 2.5 mM glucose incubation with or without palmitate-BSA (200 µM) and with or without etomoxir (40 µM) in primary hypothalamic neuronal culture of control (<italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato treated with vehicle) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 6–8/group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons was used for statistical significance. (<bold>i and j</bold>) Graphs showing OCR (<bold>i</bold>) and its quantification (<bold>j</bold>) under low glucose (0.5 mM) incubation with or without palmitate-BSA (200 µM) and with or without etomoxir (40 µM) in primary hypothalamic neuronal culture of control (<italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato treated with vehicle) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 6–8/group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons was used for statistical significance.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l </italic>in AgRP neurons affects fasting-induced mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial respiration.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig3-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig3-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Generation of AgRP neurons-specific <italic>Dnm1l</italic> deleted mice.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Schematic showing <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup></italic> and <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> constructs and the strategy used to generate AgRP neurons-specific <italic>Dnm1l</italic> deleted mice. First, we generated <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice harboring inducible tdTomato floxed by stop codon and then we crossed them with <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup></italic> mice. (<bold>b–g</bold>) Representative micrographs showing immunostaining for phosphorylated DRP1 (at serine 616; pDRP1; green, <bold>b and c</bold>) and fluorescent reporter gene tdTomato (red, representing AgRP, <bold>d and e</bold>) and merged (<bold>f and g</bold>) in the hypothalamic ARC of a fasted control (<bold>b, d, and f</bold>) and a fasted Drp1 cKO male mouse (<bold>c, e, and g</bold>). Scale bar represents 100 µm. 3V = third ventricle; ARC = arcuate nucleus; ME = median eminence. (<bold>h</bold>) Graph showing the percentage of pDRP1 expression in AgRP neurons of fasted control (n = 4 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 4 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ****p&lt;0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-tests. (<bold>i</bold>) Graph showing no difference in total AgRP cell number between fasted control (n = 4 mice) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 4 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. p=0.4605 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. ns = not significant.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s1sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Generation of AgRP neuron-specific <italic>Dnm1l</italic>-deleted mice.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig3-figsupp1-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig3-figsupp1-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Percentage of tdTomato-expressing AgRP neurons and cell viability and <italic>Dnm1l</italic> deletion induced by 4-hydroxytamoxifen in hypothalamic neuronal cell cultures.</title><p>(<bold>a–c</bold>) Representative micrographs showing fluorescent reporter gene tdTomato (red, representing AgRP neurons, <bold>a</bold>) and nuclei staining with DAPI (blue, <bold>b</bold>) and merged (<bold>c</bold>) in the primary hypothalamic neuronal cultures derived from a <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice. Once cultured neurons were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (2 μM) for tdTomato expression. Bar scale in <bold>a</bold> (for <bold>b</bold> and <bold>c</bold>) represents 20 µm. (<bold>d</bold>) Graph showing quantification of the percentage of tdTomato positive cells among DAPI-stained cells in the primary hypothalamic neuronal cultures (n = 7/group). Please note that no significant difference was observed between the percentage of tdTomato positive cells in this group (from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>;Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice) and the tdTomato positive cells derived from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1d</xref> (p=0.9883 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test). (<bold>e</bold>) Graph showing the percentage quantification of the trypan blue cell viability assay in primary hypothalamic neuronal cells from Drp1 cKO mice (n = 4/group) following either vehicle (ethanol) or 4-hydroxytamoxifen (2 μM) treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test was used for statistical significance. (<bold>f</bold>) Real-time PCR data showing relative mRNA levels of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in the primary hypothalamic neuronal cell cultures from control (n = 3/group) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 4/group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s2sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Source data for Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig3-figsupp2-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig3-figsupp2-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons attenuates mitochondrial functions</title><p>First, similar to control-derived cultures, about 15% of cells were tdTomato positive (Drp1 cKO, 14.70 ± 2.901%; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2a–d</xref>). No significant difference was observed between the percentage of tdTomato positive cells in this group (from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>;Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice) and the percentage of tdTomato positive cells derived from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1d</xref> (p=0.9883 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test).</p><p>We then assessed the effect of 4-hydroxytamoxifen on primary hypothalamic neuronal cell viability. Total viable cell number was measured by trypan blue staining method. Similar to primary hypothalamic neuronal cells isolated from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1e</xref>), primary hypothalamic neuronal cells isolated from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice showed no significant difference in the percentage of cell viability when treated either with 2 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen or vehicle (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2e</xref>). Furthermore, a significant reduction of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> mRNA expression was observed in primary hypothalamic neuronal cell cultures treated with 2 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen derived from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice (0.4512 ± 0.2134, n = 4; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2f</xref>) compared to primary hypothalamic neuronal cell cultures treated with 2 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen derived from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice (1.037 ± 0.1825, n = 3, p=0.0493, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2f</xref>).</p><p>We then determined PA-induced mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate in primary hypothalamic neuronal cell cultures from Drp1 cKO mice. Contrary to control mice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), no difference in PA-induced maximal oxygen consumption rate was observed in high (2.5 mM) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3g,h</xref>) or low glucose (0.5 mM) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3i,j</xref>). In addition, no effects induced by etomoxir incubation were observed in primary hypothalamic neurons derived from Drp1 cKO mice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3g–j</xref>), indicating that DRP1 in the hypothalamic AgRP neurons plays an essential role in regulating PA-induced mitochondrial respiration.</p></sec><sec id="s2-8"><title>Inducible and selective deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons decreases neuronal activation and projection of AgRP neurons in the hypothalamus</title><p>To assess the effect of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> deletion on AgRP neuronal activation, we then performed and analyzed immunostaining for Fos in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus of Drp1 cKO male mice and controls in fasting state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4a–f</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>). Compared to fasted controls (bregma −1.70 mm: 37.0 ± 2.95% of AgRP neurons, n = 6, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4a,c,e,g</xref>; bregma −1.46 mm: 40.6 ± 2.71% of AgRP neurons, n = 5, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4g</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1a–c</xref>; bregma −2.06 mm: 36.4 ± 3.97% of AgRP neurons, n = 6; total 39.14 ± 2.925% of AgRP neurons, n = 6, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4g</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1g–i</xref>), fasted Drp1 cKO male mice showed a significant decrease in immunoreactivity for Fos in AgRP neurons (bregma −1.70 mm: 25.1 ± 3.83% of AgRP neurons, n = 5, p=0.0336, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4b,d,f,g</xref>; bregma −1.46 mm: 22.6 ± 4.15% of AgRP neurons, n = 4, p=0.0069, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4g</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1d–f</xref>; bregma −2.06 mm: 21.6 ± 4.82% of AgRP neurons, n = 4, p=0.0455; total, 24.2 ± 3.58% of AgRP neurons, n = 6, p=0.0097, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4g</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1j–l</xref>). No changes in AgRP cell number were observed between control (bregma −1.46 mm, 136.2 ± 10.71 counts, n = 5; bregma −1.70 mm, 142.3 ± 7.89 counts, n = 6; bregma −2.06 mm, 142.7 ± 8.841 counts, n = 6) and Drp1 cKO male mice (bregma −1.46 mm, 147.5 ± 1.50 counts, n = 4, p=0.3858; bregma −1.70 mm, 154.0 ± 3.48 counts, n = 5, p=0.2397; bregma −2.06 mm, 148.0 ± 3.89 counts, n = 4, p=0.6395; total, 150.833 ± 2.753 counts, n = 5, p=0.3467, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4h</xref>). In agreement with reduced AgRP neuronal activation, a significant reduction in overnight fasting-induced food intake was observed in Drp1 cKO mice (5.155 ± 0.294 g, n = 11, p=0.005) compared to controls (6.391 ± 0.290 g, n = 11, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4i</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title><italic>Dnm1l</italic> deficiency in AgRP neurons affects neuronal activation of the hypothalamic AgRP neurons.</title><p>(<bold>a–f</bold>) Immunostaining for Fos (green, <bold>a and b</bold>) and tdTomato (red, representing AgRP, <bold>c and d</bold>) and merged (<bold>e and f</bold>) in the hypothalamic ARC (bregma −1.70 mm) of a fasted male control (<bold>a, c, and e</bold>) and a Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>b, d, and f</bold>) at 5 months of age. (<bold>g</bold>) Graph showing the percentage of Fos-positive AgRP neurons in the three bregma coordinates (bregma −1.46 mm, −1.70 mm, and −2.06 mm) corresponding to anterior, medial, and posterior ARC of fasted control (n = 5–6 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 4–5 mice) at 5 months of age. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. (<bold>h</bold>) Graph showing the number of AgRP neurons in the three bregma coordinates (bregma −1.46 mm, −1.70 mm, and −2.06 mm) corresponding to anterior, medial, and posterior ARC of control (n = 5–6 mice) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 4–5 mice) at 5 months of age. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. (<bold>i</bold>) Graph showing food intake in male control (n = 11 mice) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 11 mice) at 4 months of age after overnight fasting (16 hr, 18.00–10.00). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; ***p&lt;0.001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. 3V = third ventricle; ME = median eminence; ARC = arcuate nucleus.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>Dmn1l </italic>deficiency in AgRP neurons affects neuronal activation of the hypothalmic AgRP neurons.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig4-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig4-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig4s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Inducible and selective deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons decreases neuronal activation in the ARC.</title><p>(<bold>a–f</bold>) Immunostaining for Fos (green, <bold>a and f</bold>) and tdTomato (red, representing AgRP, <bold>b and e</bold>) and merged (<bold>c and d</bold>) in the hypothalamic ARC (bregma −1.46 mm) of a fasted male control (<bold>a–c</bold>) and a Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>d–f</bold>) at 5 months of age after overnight fasting (16 hr, 18.00–10.00). (<bold>g–l</bold>) Immunostaining for Fos (green, <bold>g and l</bold>) and tdTomato (red, representing AgRP, <bold>h and k</bold>) and merged (<bold>i and j</bold>) in the hypothalamic ARC (bregma −2.06 mm) of a fasted male control (<bold>g–i</bold>) and a Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>j–l</bold>) at 5 months of age after overnight fasting (16 hr, 18.00–10.00). 3V = third ventricle; ME = median eminence; ARC = arcuate nucleus.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig4-figsupp1-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig></fig-group><p>Furthermore, we analyzed AgRP immunoreactive fibers in one of the major target areas of the hypothalamus, the PVN, of fasted Drp1 cKO male mice and controls. We observed that compared to controls, a significant decrease in the PVN AgRP fluorescent intensity (bregma −0.70 mm: control = 1.000 ± 0.1175, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 0.4372 ± 0.0864, n = 4, p=0.0084, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5a–c</xref>; bregma −0.82 mm: control = 1.000 ± 0.03906, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 0.3182 ± 0.032222, n = 4, p&lt;0.0001, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5e–g</xref>; bregma −0.94 mm: control = 1.000 ± 0.1158, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 0.6318 ± 0.06872, n = 4, p=0.0340, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5i–k</xref>; bregma −1.06 mm: control = 1.000 ± 0.1267, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 0.5641 ± 0.04275, n = 4, p=0.0173, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5m–o</xref>) and particle number (bregma −0.70 mm: control = 885.25 ± 36.16 counts, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 673 ± 42.15, n = 4, p=0.0087, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5d</xref>; bregma −0.82 mm: control = 899.5 ± 22.15 counts, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 777.6 ± 14.84, n = 4, p=0.0038, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5h</xref>, bregma −0.94 mm: control = 965.6 ± 25.88 counts, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 821.4 ± 24.35, n = 4, p=0.0067, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5l</xref>; bregma −1.06 mm: control = 979 ± 11.64 counts, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 848.5 ± 18.79, n = 4, p=0.0010, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5p</xref>) were observed. Similar results were also observed in the PVN of fasted Drp1 cKO female mice compared to controls (data not shown).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>AgRP-selective <italic>Dnm1l</italic> deficiency affects AgRP projections within the hypothalamic PVN.</title><p>(<bold>a and b</bold>) Immunostaining for AgRP (green) in the PVN (bregma −0.70 mm) of a fasted male control (<bold>a</bold>) and a fasted Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>b</bold>) at 5 months of age. (<bold>c and d</bold>) Graphs showing the quantification of relative intensity (<bold>c</bold>) and particle number (<bold>d</bold>) of AgRP fibers in the PVN (bregma −0.70 mm) of fasted male control and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 4 mice). (<bold>e and f</bold>) Immunostaining for AgRP (green) in the PVN (bregma −0.82 mm) of a fasted male control (<bold>e</bold>) and a fasted Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>f</bold>). (<bold>g and h</bold>) Graphs showing the quantification of relative intensity (<bold>g</bold>) and particle number (<bold>h</bold>) of AgRP fibers in the PVN (bregma −0.82 mm) of fasted male control and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 4 mice). (<bold>i and j</bold>) Immunostaining for AgRP (green) in the PVN (bregma −0.94 mm) of a fasted male control (<bold>i</bold>) and a fasted Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>j</bold>). (<bold>k and l</bold>) Graphs showing the quantification of relative intensity (<bold>k</bold>) and particle number (<bold>l</bold>) of AgRP fibers in the PVN (bregma −0.94 mm) of fasted male control and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 4 mice). (<bold>m and n</bold>) Immunostaining for AgRP in the PVN (bregma −1.06 mm) of a fasted control (<bold>m</bold>) and a fasted Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>n</bold>). (<bold>o and p</bold>) Graphs showing the quantification of relative intensity (<bold>o</bold>) and particle number (<bold>p</bold>) of AgRP fibers in the PVN (bregma −1.06 mm) of fasted control and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 4 mice). Scale bar represents 100 µm (<bold>a, e, i, and m</bold>). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01; ****p&lt;0.0001 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. 3V = third ventricle; PVN = paraventricular hypothalamus.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata1"><label>Figure 5—source data 1.</label><caption><title>AgRP-selective <italic>Dnm1l</italic> deficiency affects AgRP projections within the hypothalmic PVN.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig5-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig5-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons affects hypothalamic POMC neurons.</title><p>(<bold>a–f</bold>) Representative micrographs of hypothalamic sections showing immunostaining for POMC (green, <bold>a and b</bold>), Fos (red, <bold>c and d</bold>), and merged (<bold>e and f</bold>) in the hypothalamic ARC of a 5-month-old fed control (<bold>a, c, and e</bold>) and a 5-month-old fed Drp1 cKO male mouse (<bold>b, d, and f</bold>). (<bold>g</bold>) Graph showing the percentage of Fos positive POMC neurons in 5-month-old fed control (n = 4 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 4 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p&lt;0.01 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. (<bold>h</bold>) Graph showing no difference in total POMC cell number between 5-month-old fed control (n = 4 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 4 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. p=0.4951 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. (<bold>i and j</bold>) Representative micrographs of hypothalamic sections showing immunostaining for α-MSH fibers in a fasted control (<bold>i</bold>) and a fasted Drp1 cKO male mouse (<bold>j</bold>). Dashed lines delineate the PVN. Squared area represents the region used for analyses. (<bold>k and l</bold>) Graphs showing quantification of relative intensity (<bold>k</bold>) and particle number (<bold>l</bold>) of α-MSH fibers in hypothalamic PVN of fasted control (n = 4 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 5 mice). (<bold>m and n</bold>) Representative micrographs of hypothalamic sections showing immunostaining for Fos from fasted control (<bold>m</bold>) and Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>n</bold>). (<bold>o</bold>) Graph showing quantification of Fos expression in hypothalamic PVN neurons of fasted control (n = 4 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 5 mice). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. Scale bar represents 100 µm (<bold>a, d, and g</bold>). Scale bar in high magnification image represents 20 µm (<bold>a</bold>). 3V = third ventricle; PVN = paraventricular hypothalamus; ME = median eminence.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s1sdata1"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Deletion of Dnm1l in AgRP neurons affects hypothalamic POMC neurons.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig5-figsupp1-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig5-figsupp1-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig5s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons does not alter gene expression levels of <italic>Agrp</italic> and <italic>Pomc</italic> in the hypothalamic ARC.</title><p>(<bold>a–c</bold>) Quantitative real-time PCR data showing relative mRNA levels of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> (<bold>a</bold>), <italic>Agrp</italic> (<bold>b</bold>), and <italic>Pomc</italic> (<bold>c</bold>) in total lysate of hypothalami (Input) and isolated RNA bound to the ribosomes of the hypothalamic AgRP neurons (IP) from 3-month-old fasted control and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 5/group). Three animals were pooled for each n. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ****p&lt;0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s2sdata1"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Source data for Figure 5—figure supplement 2.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig5-figsupp2-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig5-figsupp2-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-9"><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons affects POMC and paraventricular neuronal activation</title><p>Next, we analyzed immunostaining for Fos in POMC neurons of Drp1 cKO male mice and their controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1</xref>). A significant increase in POMC cells immunoreactive for Fos was observed in Drp1 cKO mice (33.683 ± 2.050% of POMC neurons, n = 4, p=0.0032) compared to controls (22.169 ± 1.297% of POMC neurons, n = 4, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1a–g</xref>). No changes in POMC cell number were observed between control and Drp1 cKO mice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1h</xref>).</p><p>We then analyzed α-MSH fiber immunostaining in the PVN of fasted Drp1 cKO male mice and their controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1i,j</xref>). Significant increases in relative intensity (control = 1.000 ± 0.164 counts, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 6.195 ± 0.494, n = 5, p&lt;0.0001, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1k</xref>) and particle number (control = 157.625 ± 13.488 counts, n = 4; Drp1 cKO mice = 393.400 ± 19.290 counts, n = 5, p&lt;0.0001, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1l</xref>) of α-MSH fibers were observed in the PVN of Drp1 cKO mice compared to their controls.</p><p>In agreement with a reduced AgRP and an increased POMC neuronal activation, we observed a significant increase in Fos immunopositive cells in the PVN of fasted Drp1 cKO mice (72.600 ± 9.092 counts, n = 5, p=0.0028) compared to their controls (22.750 ± 4.535 counts, n = 4, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1m–o</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-10"><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons does not alter gene expression levels of <italic>Agrp</italic> and <italic>Pomc</italic> in the hypothalamic ARC</title><p>To assess whether deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons had any effect on <italic>Agrp</italic> and <italic>Pomc</italic> mRNA levels in arcuate nucleus, we next performed transcriptomic analysis of AgRP neurons using fasted control and Drp1 cKO Ribotag mice. Quantitative real time-PCR analyses revealed that <italic>Dnm1l</italic> mRNA transcript (fasted control = 4.488 ± 0.685, n = 5; fasted Drp1 cKO = 1.361 ± 0.294, n = 5; p=0.00301, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2a</xref>) was significantly downregulated in AgRP neurons of fasted Drp1 cKO mice compared to fasted control mice, validating the arcuate AgRP neuronal isolation protocol and the mouse model for conditional deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons. However, no significant differences in <italic>Agrp</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2b</xref>) and <italic>Pomc</italic> mRNA levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2c</xref>) in the arcuate nucleus were observed between fasted controls and Drp1 cKO mice.</p></sec><sec id="s2-11"><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons alters energy metabolism</title><p>To determine the physiological outcome of AgRP-specific <italic>Dnm1l</italic> deletion, we assessed the metabolic phenotype of male and female Drp1 cKO mice and their controls. Before starting tamoxifen (TMX) injections at 5 weeks of age, no significant differences in body weight were observed between controls and Drp1 cKO mice in male (body weight = <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-TMX = 18.533 ± 0.390, n = 18; <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup>-</italic>TMX = 18.176 ± 0.512, n = 17; <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-Corn oil = 18.830 ± 0.308, n = 10; p=0.8649 for <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-TMX versus <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup>-</italic>TMX; p=0.9289 for <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-TMX versus <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-Corn oil; p=0.7045 for <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup>-</italic>TMX versus <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-Corn oil, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6a</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons affects metabolic phenotype in male mice.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Graph showing body weight of <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice injected with tamoxifen (n = 18 mice), <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice injected with corn oil (n = 10 mice) as control groups, and <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice injected with tamoxifen (n = 17 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001 for <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-TMX versus <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup>-</italic>TMX; <sup>#</sup>p&lt;0.05; <sup>##</sup>p&lt;0.01; <sup>###</sup>p&lt;0.001 for <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-Corn oil versus <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>-TMX by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. (<bold>b and c</bold>) Graphs showing fat mass (<bold>b</bold>) and lean mass (<bold>c</bold>) of control mice (n = 20 mice) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 22 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p&lt;0.01; ****p&lt;0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. (<bold>d and e</bold>) Graphs showing cumulative 24 hr food intake in 4-month-old control (n = 14) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 18) (<bold>d</bold>), and results of food intake as total in the 24 hr cycle and in the dark and light phases of the cycle (e; average of 3 days). Gray area represents dark phases. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; ****p&lt;0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. (<bold>f–l</bold>) Graphs showing locomotor activity (<bold>f</bold>), energy expenditure (<bold>g–i</bold>), consumed O<sub>2</sub> (<bold>j</bold>), produced CO<sub>2</sub> (<bold>k</bold>), and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (<bold>l</bold>) in 4-month-old control (n = 14) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 18). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; ***p&lt;0.001; ****p&lt;0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. p=0.8980 by linear regression analysis (<bold>i</bold>). *p&lt;0.05 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test (<bold>j–k</bold>).</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata1"><label>Figure 6—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons affects metabolic phenotype in male mice.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig6-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig6-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Selective <italic>Dnm1l</italic> deletion in AgRP neurons affects metabolic phenotype in female mice.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Graphs showing body weight of control mice injected with tamoxifen (n = 20 mice) as control groups, and Drp1 cKO mice injected with tamoxifen (n = 22 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. (<bold>b and c</bold>) Graph showing fat mass (<bold>b</bold>), and lean mass (<bold>c</bold>) of control mice (n = 11 mice) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 10 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. ns = not significant. (<bold>d</bold>) Graphs showing 24 hr food intake (average of 3 days) in 4-month-old female control (n = 13) and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 14) and results of food intake as total in the 24 hr cycle and in the dark and light phases of the cycle. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; ***p&lt;0.001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. (<bold>e–k</bold>) Graphs showing energy expenditure (<bold>e–g</bold>), locomotor activity (<bold>h</bold>), consumed O<sub>2</sub> (<bold>i</bold>), produced CO<sub>2</sub> (<bold>j</bold>), and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (<bold>k</bold>) in 4-month-old control (n = 13) and Drp1 cKO female mice (n = 14). Gray area represents dark phases (<bold>e</bold>). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons (<bold>f and h</bold>). p=0.1224 by linear regression analysis (<bold>g</bold>). *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test (<bold>i and j</bold>).</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6s1sdata1"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Selective <italic>Dnm1l </italic>deletion in AgRP neurons affects metabolic phenotype in female mice.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig6-figsupp1-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig6-figsupp1-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig6s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons results in increased BAT and core body temperature.</title><p>(<bold>a and b</bold>) Representative infrared thermography images showing the temperature of the surface overlying BAT in control (<bold>a</bold>) and Drp1 cKO male mouse (<bold>b</bold>). (<bold>c</bold>) Graph showing quantification of BAT temperature of the control (n = 8 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 8 mice) at 4 months of age. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***p&lt;0.001 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-tests. (<bold>d</bold>) Graph showing rectal temperature in 4-month-old control (n = 8 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 7 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-tests. (<bold>e</bold>) Graph showing rectal temperature of 4-month-old control (n = 9 mice) and Drp1 cKO female mice (n = 7 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-tests.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6s2sdata1"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons results in increased BAT and core body temperature.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig6-figsupp2-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig6-figsupp2-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig></fig-group><p>A significant decrease in body weight of Drp1 cKO male mice compared to controls was observed 3 weeks after the start of TMX treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6a</xref>) and was maintained through the end of the study when the mice were 20 weeks old (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6a</xref>; n = 17 per group).</p><p>The decrease in body weight of Drp1 cKO male mice was associated with a significant reduction in fat mass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6b</xref>; n = 22, p&lt;0.0001) while no significant difference in lean mass was observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6c</xref>; n = 22, p=0.3421) compared to control mice.</p><p>Drp1 cKO mice showed significantly lower food intake compared to controls (control = 4.181 ± 0.124 g, n = 14; Drp1 cKO mice = 3.366 ± 0.139 g, n = 18, p&lt;0.0001, total in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6d,e</xref>), due to a significant reduction of food intake during the dark period (control = 2.937 ± 0.137 g, n = 14; Drp1 cKO mice = 2.471 ± 0.120 g, n = 18, p=0.0236, dark in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6e</xref>). A significant increase in locomotor activity was observed in Drp1 cKO mice compared to controls (control = 50122.750 ± 5919.799 beam-break counts, n = 14; Drp1 cKO mice = 108400.917 ± 17432.685 beam-break counts, n = 18, p=0.0008, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6f</xref>), which was due to a significant increase during the dark period (control = 35556.429 ± 4272.846 counts, n = 14; Drp1 cKO mice = 80081.806 ± 13085.949 counts, n = 18, p=0.0136, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6f</xref>).</p><p>The difference in body weight and composition were also associated with significantly increased energy expenditure (control = 303.329 ± 5.760, n = 14; Drp1 cKO mice = 337.096 ± 7.218, n = 18, p&lt;0.0001, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6g–i</xref>), increased O<sub>2</sub> consumption (control = 1245.16 ± 29.94, n = 14; Drp1 cKO mice = 1345.19 ± 31.46, n = 18, p=0.0318, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6j</xref>) and CO<sub>2</sub> production (control = 1140.4 ± 28.18, n = 14; Drp1 cKO mice = 1248.44 ± 27.15, n = 18, p=0.0105, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6k</xref>) in Drp1 cKO mice compared to control mice, while no significant differences in the respiration exchange rate (RER) were observed between Drp1 cKO mice (0.8734 ± 0.00852, n = 18, p=0.3133) and control mice (0.8855 ± 0.007676, n = 14, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6l</xref>). Similar to males, female Drp1 cKO mice showed significant differences in body weight and composition, feeding, energy expenditure, O<sub>2</sub> consumption, CO<sub>2</sub> production, and locomotor activity compared to controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-12"><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons results in increased brown adipose tissue thermogenesis</title><p>BAT thermogenesis is a critical component of the homeostatic energy balance to maintain body temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Morrison and Madden, 2014</xref>). We then examined whether deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons affects body temperature. We found that BAT temperature was significantly increased in Drp1 cKO mice compared to control mice (control = 33.388 ± 0.223°C, n = 8; Drp1 cKO mice = 35.038 ± 0.318°C, n = 8, p=0.0008, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s2">Figure 6—figure supplement 2a–c</xref>). Rectal temperature was also significantly increased in Drp1 cKO mice (37.300 ± 0.105°C, n = 8) compared to controls (36.654 ± 0.226°C, n = 8; p=0.0283, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s2">Figure 6—figure supplement 2d</xref>). Similar to males, the rectal temperature of female Drp1 cKO mice (37.181 ± 0.085°C, n = 7) was significantly greater than that of female controls (36.652 ± 0.142°C, n = 9; p=0.0102; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s2">Figure 6—figure supplement 2e</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-13"><title>Ghrelin-induced hyperphagia and AgRP activation are dependent on DRP1</title><p>Ghrelin, a gut-derived hormone secreted during food deprivation, promotes feeding behavior through NPY/AgRP neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Andrews et al., 2008</xref>). We found a significant decrease in Fos immunoreactivity in AgRP neurons of ghrelin-treated Drp1 cKO mice (30.22 ± 4.652% of AgRP neurons, n = 5, p=0.0001) compared to controls (75.35 ± 3.464% of AgRP neurons, n = 4, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7a–g</xref>). No difference in the number of AgRP neurons in the ARC was observed between the two groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7h</xref>). In agreement with that, ghrelin-induced hyperphagia was not observed in Drp1 cKO mice compared to controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7i</xref>). Next, we performed patch-clamp whole-cell electrophysiological recordings in slices from Drp1 cKO mice and controls. Consistent with the Fos results, ghrelin significantly increased membrane potential (resting = −46.644 ± 0.502 mV, n = 20; ghrelin = −43.757 ± 0.678 mV, n = 20, p=0.0102; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7j,l</xref>) and relative firing activity (resting = 100.000 ± 14.584, n = 22; ghrelin = 186.894 ± 20.266, n = 22, p=0.0041; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7k,l</xref>) of AgRP neurons in control mice, while ghrelin-induced excitation of AgRP neurons was significantly attenuated in Drp1 cKO mice compared to controls (membrane potential, resting = −46.104 ± 0.577 mV, n = 19; ghrelin = −45.677 ± 0.644 mV, n = 19, p=0.9962, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7j,l</xref>; relative firing activity, resting = 100.000 ± 15.106, n = 20; ghrelin = 119.985 ± 16.502, n = 20, p=0.9644, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7k,l</xref>). Of note, no differences in the total (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1a</xref>) and active form of ghrelin levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1b</xref>) were observed between male control and Drp1 cKO mice in either fed or fasted states. Together, these data suggest that DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fission plays a critical role in regulating ghrelin-triggered AgRP neuronal activity and hyperphagia.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons attenuates ghrelin-induced neuronal activation and feeding.</title><p>(<bold>a–f</bold>) Immunostaining for Fos (green, <bold>a and b</bold>) and tdTomato (red, representing AgRP, <bold>c and d</bold>) and merged (<bold>e and f</bold>) in the ARC of a ghrelin-injected male control (<bold>a, c, and e</bold>) and a Drp1 cKO mouse (<bold>b, d, and f</bold>) at 5 months of age. (<bold>g</bold>) Graph showing the percentage of Fos expression in AgRP neurons of ghrelin-injected control and Drp1 cKO mice (n = 4–5 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***p&lt;0.001 by two-tailed Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. (<bold>h</bold>) Graph showing the number of AgRP neurons of ghrelin-injected control and Drp1 cKO mice in the hypothalamic ARC (n = 4–5 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. (<bold>i</bold>) Food intake in 4-month-old control and Drp1 cKO female mice at 5 months of age (n = 7–9 mice/group) after either saline or ghrelin injection. *p&lt;0.05; **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001; ****p&lt;0.0001; Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons was performed. (<bold>j</bold>) Graph showing the membrane potential in AgRP neurons of 9–11-week-old control (n = 20 cells/10 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 19 cells/10 mice) in response to ghrelin. *p&lt;0.05; Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons was performed. (<bold>k</bold>) Graph showing normalized firing rate in AgRP neurons of 9–11-week-old control (n = 20 cells/10 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 19 cells/10 mice) in response to ghrelin. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p&lt;0.01 for artificial CSF-treated control versus ghrelin-treated control; *p&lt;0.05 for ghrelin-treated control versus washed out control by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. (<bold>l</bold>) Representative tracers of AgRP neurons from a control and a Drp1 cKO mouse in response to ghrelin. Scale bar represents 100 µm. Scale bar in high magnification image represents 20 µm. 3V = third ventricle; ME = median eminence.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata1"><label>Figure 7—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l </italic>in AgRP neurons attentuates ghrelin in induced neuronal activation and feeding.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig7-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig7-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Ghrelin levels in male mice.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Graph showing serum total ghrelin levels of 5-month-old control male (n = 7 mice) and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 6 mice) on fed and fasted states. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p&lt;0.05 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. ns = not significant. (<bold>b</bold>) Graph showing serum active ghrelin levels of 5-month-old control male (n = 6), and Drp1 cKO male mice (n = 6) on fed and fasted states. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p&lt;0.01; ***p&lt;0.001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. ns = not significant.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7s1sdata1"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Ghrelin levels in male mice.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-64351-fig7-figsupp1-data1-v3.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife-64351-fig7-figsupp1-v3.tif" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff"/></fig></fig-group></sec></sec><sec sec-type="discussion" id="s3"><title>Discussion</title><p>Our findings revealed a crucial role of mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons in the regulation of hypothalamic feeding control. First, we found that activated AgRP neurons have decreased mitochondrial size accompanied by an increase in mitochondria number suggesting a mitochondrial fission process. In agreement with this, we found that <italic>Dnm1l</italic> mRNA levels and DRP1 activation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Liesa et al., 2009</xref>) are significantly increased in AgRP neurons of fasted mice compared to fed mice. These data were associated with a significant increase in FA-induced mitochondrial respiration in primary hypothalamic neuronal cells when low glucose levels (similar to fasting) were present compared to higher glucose levels. To determine the physiological relevance of mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons, we generated a mouse model for conditional deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons (Drp1 cKO mice). We found that Drp1 cKO mice, in which fasting did not induce mitochondrial fission and changes in mitochondrial function, had significant decreases in body weight, composition, and feeding that were accompanied by increases in locomotion and energy expenditure. Finally, Drp1 cKO mice also showed attenuated ghrelin-induced hyperphagia and neuronal activity of AgRP neurons. Altogether, these data revealed that DRP1-driven mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons is an adaptive process enabling these neurons to respond to the changing metabolic environment.</p><p>Mitochondria are energy-producing organelles fundamental in support of cellular functions. Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles able not only to move within the cell to sites where their function is required, but also to fuse (mitochondrial fusion) and divide (mitochondrial fission) in order to maintain proper cellular function.</p><p>Mitochondrial fusion and fission are highly regulated processes. Several proteins are involved in these events, including MFN1 and MFN2 and OPA1 for mitochondrial fusion, and Fis1, Mff, and DRP1 for mitochondrial fission (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Pozo Devoto and Falzone, 2017</xref>). Mitochondrial dynamics through fusion and fission processes are also important in maintaining mitochondrial quality control in order to maintain optimal mitochondrial bioenergetic functions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Twig et al., 2008</xref>). Our data indicate that mitochondrial dynamics and specifically mitochondrial fission play an important role in sensing changes of nutrients availability in AgRP neurons. First, we observed that incubation of primary hypothalamic neurons with palmitic acid induced a significant increase in mitochondrial respiration when glucose levels were low, mimicking fasting. Fasting induced increased AgRP neuronal activation and increased mitochondrial fission. However, when DRP1-induced mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons was abolished, palmitic acid-induced mitochondrial respiration was diminished. In association with these, ghrelin-triggered changes in membrane potential and firing frequency of AgRP neurons were significantly attenuated in Drp1 cKO mice, leading to failure in inducing hyperphagia. In line with our results, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Dietrich et al., 2013</xref> have shown that in mice with AgRP-selective deletion of <italic>Mfn1</italic> and <italic>Mfn2</italic>, mediators of mitochondrial fusion process, neuronal firing frequency was impaired in diet-induced obesity mice. The impairment of AgRP neuronal activation was reversed by increasing intracellular ATP levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Dietrich et al., 2013</xref>), indicating that the impaired AgRP neuronal firing frequency is likely due to low intracellular ATP levels. In addition to these functions, changes in shape and size of mitochondria may also affect the ability of a cell to distribute its mitochondrial population to specific subcellular locations. This function is especially important in highly polarized cells, such as neurons. Future studies assessing mitochondrial dynamics with changes in mitochondrial subcellular distribution will address this point.</p><p>In addition to mitochondria, DRP1 has been also shown to enable peroxisomal fission. Peroxisomes are single-membrane organelles that similar to mitochondria catalyze the breakdown of long chain fatty acids through beta-oxidation and regulate the maintenance of redox homeostasis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Smith and Aitchison, 2013</xref>). Because of these shared properties and metabolic pathways, we cannot exclude a possible involvement of peroxisomes in the phenotype observed in our mice. Further studies are warranted to address this issue.</p><p>Overall, our data unmask that mitochondrial fission in hypothalamic AgRP neurons is a fundamental mechanism that allows these neurons to sense and respond to changes in circulating signals, including hormones such as ghrelin and nutrients such as glucose and palmitic acid, in the regulation of feeding and energy metabolism.</p></sec><sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s4"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="top">Reagent type <break/>(species) or resource</th><th valign="top">Designation</th><th valign="top">Source or reference</th><th valign="top">Identifiers</th><th valign="top">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top">Strain, strain background <break/>(<italic>M. musculus</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic></td><td valign="top">Wang et al., 2013</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Strain, strain background <break/>(<italic>M. musculus</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Ai14(Rosa-CAG-LSL-tdTmoato)</italic></td><td valign="top">The Jackson Laboratory</td><td valign="top">Stock No: #007914</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Strain, strain background <break/>(<italic>M. musculus</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Dnm1l</italic> floxed mouse</td><td valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Kageyama et al., 2014</xref></td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Strain, strain background <break/>(<italic>M. musculus</italic>)</td><td valign="top"><italic>Rpl22</italic> floxed mouse</td><td valign="top">The Jackson Laboratory</td><td valign="top">Stock No #029977</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Biological sample (<italic>M. musculus</italic>)</td><td valign="top">Primary hypothalamic neuronal cells</td><td valign="top">This paper</td><td valign="top"/><td valign="top">Freshly isolated from <italic>M. musculus</italic> in S. Diano Lab.</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-HA antibody (Mouse monoclonal) antibody</td><td valign="top">Biolegend</td><td valign="top">Cat# 901513, <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2565335">AB_2565335</ext-link></td><td valign="top">Immunoprecipitation <break/>(5 µl/sample)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-phosphorylated DRP1 (Ser-616) antibody (Rabbit monoclonal antibody)</td><td valign="top">Cell Signaling Technology</td><td valign="top">Cat# 4494, <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_11178659">AB_11178659</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Fos antibody (Rabbit polyclonal) antibody</td><td valign="top">Santa Cruz Biotechnology</td><td valign="top">Cat# sc-52, <break/>RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2106783">AB_2106783</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:2000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-POMC (Rabbit polyclonal) antibody</td><td valign="top">Phoenix Pharmaceuticals</td><td valign="top">Cat# H-029–30, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2307442">AB_2307442</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:2000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-AgRP (Rabbit polyclonal) antibody</td><td valign="top">Phoenix Pharmaceuticals</td><td valign="top">Cat# H-003–57, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2313909">AB_2313909</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-Melanocyte Stimulating Hormone (Sheep polyclonal) antibody</td><td valign="top">Millipore Sigma</td><td valign="top">Cat#: ab5087, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_91683">AB_91683</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (donkey polyclonal antibody)</td><td valign="top">Life Technologies</td><td valign="top">Cat# A21206, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2535792">AB_2535792</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Anti-sheep Alexa Fluor 488 (donkey polyclonal antibody)</td><td valign="top">Life Technologies</td><td valign="top">Cat# A11015, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_141362">AB_141362</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:1000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Alexa Fluor 594 anti-goat IgG (donkey polyclonal antibody)</td><td valign="top">Life Technologies</td><td valign="top">Cat# A11058, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2534105">AB_2534105</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:500)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Antibody</td><td valign="top">Biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (goat polyclonal antibody)</td><td valign="top">Vector Laboratories</td><td valign="top">Cat# BA-1000, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2313606">AB_2313606</ext-link></td><td valign="top">IHC (1:250)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Peptide, recombinant protein</td><td valign="top">Streptavidin-conjugated Alexa Fluor 488</td><td valign="top">Life Technologies</td><td valign="top">Cat# A21370</td><td valign="top">IHC (1:2000)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Sequence-based reagent</td><td valign="top"><italic>Dnm1l</italic></td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Assay ID Mm01342903_m1</td><td valign="top">TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (FAM)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Sequence-based reagent</td><td valign="top"><italic>Agrp</italic></td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Assay ID Mm00475829_g1</td><td valign="top">TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (FAM)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Sequence-based reagent</td><td valign="top"><italic>Npy</italic></td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Assay ID Mm01410146_m1</td><td valign="top">TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (FAM)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Sequence-based reagent</td><td valign="top"><italic>Pomc</italic></td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Assay ID Mm00435874_m1</td><td valign="top">TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (FAM)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Sequence-based reagent</td><td valign="top"><italic>Nr5a1</italic></td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Assay ID Mm00446826_m1</td><td valign="top">TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (FAM)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Sequenced-based reagent</td><td valign="top"><italic>Actb</italic></td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Assay ID Mm02619580_g1</td><td valign="top">TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (FAM)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Sequenced-based reagent</td><td valign="top"><italic>Rn18s</italic></td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Assay ID Mm04277571_s1</td><td valign="top">TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (FAM)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Peptide, recombinant protein</td><td valign="top">Ghrelin</td><td valign="top">ProSpec</td><td valign="top">Cat# HOR-297-B</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Commercial assay or kit</td><td valign="top">Ghrelin ELISA kit</td><td valign="top">Millipore Sigma</td><td valign="top">Cat# EZRGRT-91K</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Commercial assay or kit</td><td valign="top">Rat/Mouse Total Ghrelin ELISA kit</td><td valign="top">Millipore Sigma</td><td valign="top">Cat# EZRGRT-90K</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">4-hydroxytamoxifen</td><td valign="top">Sigma-Aldrich</td><td valign="top">Cat# H7904</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">Seahorse XF Palmitate-BSA FAO substrate</td><td valign="top">Agilent Technologies</td><td valign="top">Cat# 1102720–100</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">Oligomycin</td><td valign="top">Sigma-Aldrich</td><td valign="top">Cat# 495455</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">Carbonyl cyanide-p-(triﬂuoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone</td><td valign="top">Sigma-Aldrich</td><td valign="top">Cat# C2920</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">Antimycin A</td><td valign="top">Sigma-Aldrich</td><td valign="top">Cat# A8674</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">Rotenone</td><td valign="top">Sigma-Aldrich</td><td valign="top">Cat# R8875</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td valign="top">Avidin–biotin–peroxidase</td><td valign="top">Vector Laboratories</td><td valign="top">ABC Elite kit</td><td valign="top">IHC (1:250)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">FLIR Tools</td><td valign="top">FLIR Thermal Imaging System</td><td valign="top">FLIR C2</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">AxoGraph</td><td valign="top">AxoGraph Scientific</td><td valign="top">AxoGraph X</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">KaleidaGraph</td><td valign="top">Synergy Software</td><td valign="top">KaleidaGraph v4.5.4</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">Leading Analysis Software</td><td valign="top">WaveMetrics</td><td valign="top">Igor Pro</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Software, algorithm</td><td valign="top">Prism software</td><td valign="top">GraphPad Software</td><td valign="top">Prism 7.01 software</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Other</td><td valign="top">Standard chow diet</td><td valign="top">Harlan Teklad</td><td valign="top">2018; 18% calories from fat</td><td valign="top"/></tr><tr><td valign="top">Other</td><td valign="top">DAPI</td><td valign="top">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td valign="top">Cat# P36962</td><td valign="top"/></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title>Animals</title><p>All animal care and experimental procedures done in this study were approved by the Yale University (protocol # 10670) and the Columbia University (protocols # AC-AABI0565 and AC-AABH9564) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. All mice were housed in a temperature-controlled environment (22–24°C) with a 12 hr light and 12 hr dark (19.00–07.00 hr) photoperiod. Animals were provided standard chow diet (SD) (2018; 18% calories from fat; Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI, USA) and water ad libitum unless otherwise stated. All fasted mice were food deprived for 16 hr (18.00–10.00 hr) prior to the experiment. All mice studied were of the same (mixed) background.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Generation of experimental mice with inducible deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> specifically in AgRP neurons</title><p>We used the inducible Cre/loxP technology to generate mice in which DRP1 was selectively ablated in AgRP neurons (Drp1 cKO mice). First, mice expressing a tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase (<italic>CreER<sup>T2</sup></italic>) in cells expressing AgRP (<italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Wang et al., 2014</xref>) were crossed with Rosa26-lox-stop-lox-tdTomato (<italic>Ai14</italic>; cre-recombinase-dependent expression) mice (Ai14 reporter mice; stock #007914; The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) to label AgRP-expressing cells. <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup>; Rosa26-lox-stop-lox</italic>-tdTomato (<italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato) mice have AgRP-expressing cells with the expression of tdTomato by tamoxifen administration. No observation of AgRP-tdTomato expression was found in the absence of tamoxifen administration, indicating that recombination was strictly dependent upon tamoxifen-induced Cre recombinase activation. The mice with <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato were then crossed with mice harboring conditional alleles <italic>Dnm1l</italic> floxed (<italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup></italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Kageyama et al., 2014</xref>) to generated mice with inducible deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> specifically in AgRP neurons (Drp1 cKO mice).</p><p><italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice injected with corn oil and <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice injected with tamoxifen (TMX) were used as controls. <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with tamoxifen (0.10 mg/g BW for every 3 days with five times fasting) starting at 5 weeks of age to induce mature-onset deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons of Drp1 cKO mice, and <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice were injected with tamoxifen and <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato were mice injected with corn oil as control groups. Because we found no differences between these two control groups, the majority of the experiments were performed using <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato and <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice injected with tamoxifen (to label AgRP neurons with tdTomato expression) as a control and Drp1 cKO group, unless otherwise stated.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Ribotag assays</title><p>We performed transcriptomic profiling by using ribosomal tagging strategy to analyze AgRP neurons-specific mRNA expression in vivo. To avoid the potential disadvantage that the embryonic POMC-expressing progenitor neurons differentiate into AgRP-expressing neurons, we crossed <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic> mice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Wang et al., 2014</xref>) with <italic>Rpl22</italic> floxed (RiboTag, #029977, The Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) mice to eventually generate <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; RiboTag mice, expressing a hemagglutinin A (HA)-tagged ribosomal protein in the AgRP neurons upon tamoxifen injection. Eleven- to twelve-week-old mice (1 month after the last tamoxifen injection) were used. After mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and decapitated, the brains were rapidly dissected out. To carefully collect the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (ARC), brain tissues were sectioned in two-millimeter thick coronal sections containing mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) in a brain matrix. The MBH ARC samples were collected under a stereomicroscope according to the brain atlas for appropriate regions and preventing differences in tissue weight. Three animals were pooled for each N. The MBH ARC samples from <italic>Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; RiboTag mice were homogenized by supplemented homogenization buffer (HB-S: 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 100 mM KCl, 12 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, and 1 % NP-40 supplemented with 1 mM DTT, 1 mg/ml heparin, 100 µg/ml cycloheximide, 200 U/ml RNasin Ribonuclease inhibitor, and protease inhibitor cocktail). Samples were then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. Then, 50 µl of each supernatant was transferred to a new tube serving as input fraction (containing all mRNAs). To isolate polyribosomes, we performed immunoprecipitation of ribosome-bound mRNAs in AgRP neurons. by utilizing anti-HA antibody (5 µl/sample; Cat#901513, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA).</p><p>RNA was extracted using Qiagen RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (Cat# 74034, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer. cDNA was synthesized using High Capacity cDNA Reverse transcription Kit (Cat# 4368814, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). qRT-PCR experiment was performed by Taqman Gene Expression Assay primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in triplicates using LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). All genes were normalized to <italic>Actb</italic> or <italic>Rn18s</italic>. The 2(-Delta Delta C(t)) method was used to analyze the relative quantification of gene expression. The following primers were utilized: <italic>Dnm1l</italic>, Mm01342903_m1; <italic>Agrp</italic>, Mm00475829_g1; <italic>Npy</italic>, Mm01410146_m1; <italic>Pomc</italic>, Mm00435874_m1; <italic>Nr5a1</italic>, Mm00446826_m1; <italic>Actb</italic>, Mm02619580_g1; <italic>Rn18s</italic>, Mm04277571_s1.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Metabolic assays</title><p>Four-month-old mice were acclimated in metabolic chambers (TSE System-Core Metabolic Phenotyping Center, Yale University) for 3 days before the start of the recordings. Mice were continuously recorded for 2 days, with the following measurements taken every 30 min: food intake, locomotor activity (in the x-, y-, and z-axes), and gas exchange (O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>; The TSE LabMaster System, Chesterfield, MO, USA). Energy expenditure was calculated according to the manufacturer's guidelines (PhenoMaster Software, TSE System, Chesterfield, MO, USA). The respiratory quotient was estimated by calculating the ratio of CO<sub>2</sub> production to O<sub>2</sub> consumption. Values were adjusted by body weight to the power of 0.75 (kg−0.75) where mentioned. Body composition was measured in vivo by MRI (EchoMRI, Echo Medical Systems, Houston, TX, USA) monthly at 10:00 AM. Body core temperature was measured at 10:00 AM using a thermocouple rectal probe and thermometer (Physitemp instruments, Clifton, NJ, USA). Rectal temperature was measured for repeated three times, and the average was calculated. The temperature of the surface overlying BAT was measured using infrared thermography images (FLIR C2, FLIR Thermal Imaging System, Arlington, VA, USA). The infrared thermography images were taken at least three times and analyzed using FLIR Tools (FLIR Thermal Imaging System, Arlington, VA, USA).</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Phosphorylated-DRP1 immunostaining</title><p>Five-month-old mice were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline containing heparin (10 mg/l), followed by fresh fixative of 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M PB, pH 7.4) as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Andrews et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Diano et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Toda et al., 2016</xref>). Brains were post-fixed overnight at 4°C and sliced to a thickness of 50 μm using a vibratome (#11000, PELCO easySlicer, TED PELLA Inc, Redding, CA, USA) and coronal brain sections containing the ARC were selected under the stereomicroscope (Stemi DV4, Carl Zeiss Microimaging Inc, Thornwood, NY, USA). After several washes with 0.1 M PB, brain sections were preincubated with 0.2% triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and 2% normal goat serum in 0.1 M PB for 30 min to permeabilize tissue and cells. Brain sections were incubated with rabbit anti-phosphorylated-DRP1 (Ser-616) antibody (diluted 1:500 in 0.1 M PB, #4494, Cell Signaling, Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) overnight at room temperature (RT). The following day, brain sections were washed and incubated with a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (diluted 1:200 in 0.1M PB, BA-1000, Vector Laboratories, Inc, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 2 hr at RT. Sections were then washed and incubated in streptavidin-conjugated Alexa Fluor 488 (diluted 1:2000 in 0.1 M PB, A21370, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 2 hr at RT. No staining was performed to visualize AgRP neurons since mice were expressing tdTomato in this neuronal population, which is per se fluorescent. After several washes with 0.1 M PB, brain sections were mounted on glass slides and coverslipped with a drop of Vectashield mounting medium (H-1000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The coverslip was sealed with nail polish to prevent drying and movement under the microscope. All slides were stored in the dark at 4°C.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Fos immunostaining</title><p>Five-month-old mice were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused as described above. Immunofluorescent staining was performed using rabbit anti-Fos antibody (diluted 1:2000 in 0.1 M PB, sc-52, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) overnight at RT. The following day, brain sections were washed and incubated with a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (diluted 1:200 in 0.1M PB, BA-1000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 2 hr at RT. Sections were then washed and incubated in streptavidin-conjugated Alexa Fluor 488 (diluted 1:2000 in 0.1 M PB, A21370, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 2 hr at RT. No staining was performed to visualize AgRP neurons since mice were expressing tdTomato in this neuronal population, which is per se fluorescent. For double-label immunohistochemistry of Fos and POMC neurons, sections were processed using goat anti-Fos antibody (diluted 1:2000 in 0.1 M PB, sc-52-G, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) overnight at RT. The following day, brain sections were washed and incubated with a Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-goat IgG secondary antibody (diluted 1:500 in 0.1M PB, A11058, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 2 hr at RT. Brain sections were then incubated with rabbit anti-POMC antibody (diluted 1:2000 in 0.1 M PB, H-029–30, Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Burlingame, CA, USA). The following day, sections were washed and incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (diluted 1:500 in 0.1 M PB, A21206, Life Technologies) for 2 hr at RT. After several washes with 0.1 M PB, brain sections were mounted on glass slides and coverslipped with a drop of vectashield mounting medium (H-1000, Vector Laboratories, Inc, Burlingame, CA, USA) and analyzed with a fluorescence microscope.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>AgRP and α-MSH fiber immunostaining</title><p>Five-month-old mice were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused as described above. Brain sections containing the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) were selected under the stereomicroscope. Immunofluorescence staining was performed using rabbit anti-AgRP antibody (diluted 1:1000 in 0.1 M PB, H-003–57, Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc) and sheep anti-α-MSH antibody (diluted 1:1000 in 0.1 M PB, ab5087, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) overnight at RT. The following day, brain sections were washed and incubated with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (diluted 1:1000 in 0.1M PB, A21206, Life Technologies) and anti-sheep Alexa Fluor 488 (diluted 1:1000 in 0.1M PB, A11015, Life technologies) for 2 hr at RT. After several washes with 0.1 M PB, brain sections were mounted on glass slides, coverslipped with a drop of vectashield mounting medium, and analyzed with a fluorescence microscope.</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Fluorescent image capture and analyses</title><p>Five-month-old mice were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused as described above. Fluorescent images were captured with Fluorescence Microscope (Model BZ-X710, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). For all immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses, coronal brain sections were anatomically matched (ARC: between −1.46 and −2.06 mm from bregma, PVN: −0.70 and −1.06 mm from bregma) with the mouse brain atlas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Franklin and Paxinos, 2019</xref>). Both sides of the bilateral brain region (ARC and PVN) were analyzed per mouse. For each mouse, three hypothalamic level-matched per mouse were used to quantify Fos immunoreactive cells in all AgRP and POMC immunostained cells observed in the ARC. The number of immunostained cells was counted manually using ImageJ software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Schneider et al., 2012</xref>) by an unbiased observer. For area measurements and particle counting, region of interest (ROI) within fluorescence images was manually selected with the mouse brain atlas for ARC, DMH, and PVN, and was then measured by ImageJ software as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Jin et al., 2016</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Hypothalamic primary neuronal cell culture</title><p>Eight to ten neonatal (0–1 day old) pups were used for hypothalamic primary neuronal cell culture. For control culture, we used either <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice which neuronal cultures were treated with vehicle (ethanol) or <italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice which neuronal cultures were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (2 μM). Hypothalamic primary neuronal cultures from Drp1 cKO mice (<italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice) were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (2 μM). In brief, we carefully removed the MBH of the brain and placed it onto a small culture dish that contains a small volume of Hibernate-A Medium (Cat# A1247501, Gibco-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The tissues dissociated to single cells after digestion with 6 ml of Hibernate-A Medium containing 2.5% of Trypsin-EDTA for 15 min at 37°C. Suspended cells were filtered (40 μm) and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 rpm and the pellet was re-suspended and plated on XF96 cell culture microplates (Cat# 101085–004, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coated with poly-D-lysine (Cat# P6407, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) at a density of 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells per well, and they were cultured in Neurobasal medium (Cat# 21103049, Gibco-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 1% penicillin–streptomycin, 2% B-27 Supplement (Cat# 17504044, Gibco-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and GlutaMAX-I (Cat# 35050061, Gibco-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After 10 days in culture, primary neuronal cells isolated from control (<italic>Dnm1l<sup>+/+</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato) and Drp1 cKO mice were treated with 2 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen (H7904, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for expression of a CreER recombinase while the other control group (generated from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>; tdTomato mice) was treated with vehicle (ethanol) to assess the effect of 4-hydroxytamoxifen on cell viability. Primary neuronal cells were used for the measurement of mitochondria fatty acid oxidation 5 days later.</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title>Cell quantification in cultures</title><p>Cells were analyzed by capturing six to eight random fields per coverslip. For the quantitative analysis of cell number, tomato expressing cells in DAPI (Cat# p36962, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)-stained cultures were manually counted using Image J software. Cells were visualized using Fluorescence Microscope (Model BZ-X710, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). Five coverslips per group were counted within an experiment.</p></sec><sec id="s4-11"><title>Viability assay in cultures</title><p>Neuronal cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion assay in cultures maintained in each condition. The cultures were stained with 0.4% trypan blue (Cat# 302643, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min at room temperature and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). And then, 10 μL of suspended cells was loaded into each chamber of the hemocytometer. Counts were performed by triplicate by one analyst under a 40× objective according to the standard methodology. The non-stained (live) and Trypan blue-stained (dead) cell counts were counted and calculated in three randomly selected areas (0.2 mm<sup>2</sup>) in each well (n = 5 per treatment condition) to calculate the cell viability percentage.</p></sec><sec id="s4-12"><title>Measurement of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation assay</title><p>The fatty acid oxidation (FAO) was measured using a microfluorimetric Seahorse XF96 Analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer with minor modifications. Cells were starved with minimal substrate neurobasal-A medium (Cat# 10888022, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 24 hr. The minimal substrate medium included 1% B-27 Supplement (Cat# 17504044, Gibco-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 1 mM glutamine, 0.5 mM carnitine, and 2.5 or 0.5 mM of glucose. The day of the assay, 45 min prior to the assay, starved cells were washed and incubated with Seahorse XF Base medium Minimal DMEM (Cat# 102353–100, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) supplemented with 2.5 or 0.5 mM glucose and 0.5 mM carnitine in a non-CO<sub>2 </sub>37°C incubator. Fifteen minutes prior to the assay, 40 μM etomoxir was added to the cells to measure endogenous fatty acid uptake for FAO. Palmitate-BSA or BSA control (Seahorse XF Palmitate-BSA FAO substrate, Cat# 1102720–100, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were added to cells right before initiating the XF assay. During the assay, cells were exposed to compounds in the following order: 5 μM of oligomycin (Cat# 495455, Sigma), 10 μM of FCCP [carbonyl cyanide-p-(triﬂuoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone] (Cat# C2920, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), 10 μM of antimycin A (Cat# A8674, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and 5 μM of rotenone (Cat# R8875, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Wave 2.6.0 (Agilent Technologies software, Santa Clara, CA, USA) software was used to analyze the parameters.</p></sec><sec id="s4-13"><title>Electrophysiology analysis</title><p>Electrophysiology analyses were performed as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Toda et al., 2016</xref>). Briefly, 11–12-week-old mice were used for recordings. After mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and decapitated, the brains were rapidly removed and immersed in an oxygenated cutting solution at 4°C containing (in mM): sucrose 220, KCl 2.5, NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> 1.23, NaHCO<sub>3</sub> 26, CaCl<sub>2</sub> 1, MgCl<sub>2</sub> 6, and glucose 10, pH (7.3) with NaOH. After being amputated to a small tissue block, coronal slices containing the hypothalamus (300 μm thick) were cut with a vibratome. After preparation, slices were stored in a holding chamber with an oxygenated (with 5% CO<sub>2</sub>% and 95% O<sub>2</sub>) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing (in mM): NaCl 124, KCl 3, CaCl<sub>2</sub> 2, MgCl<sub>2</sub> 2, NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> 1.23, NaHCO<sub>3</sub> 26, glucose 3, pH 7.4 with NaOH. The slices were eventually transferred to a recording chamber perfused continuously with aCSF at 33°C at a rate of 2 ml/min after at least a 1 hr recovery in the storage chamber. Perforated patch recording was performed in AgRP-Tomato neurons of the ARC under voltage and current clamp. The membrane and spontaneous action potential were recorded in AgRP neurons under zero current clamp condition. For ghrelin-induced AgRP neuronal activation, baseline activity was recorded for at least 15 min. Slices were then perfused with 10 nM ghrelin, diluted in aCSF for 3 min, followed by a washout (with no ghrelin). At the end of the perforated patch recordings, the membrane of every cell was ruptured and whole-cell patch recording measured to check current–voltage relationship. All data were sampled at 5 kHz, filtered at 2.4 kHz, and analyzed with an Apple Macintosh computer using AxoGraph X (AxoGraph Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA). Statistics and plotting were performed with KaleidaGraph (Synergy Software, Inc, Reading, PA, USA) and Igor Pro (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR, USA). The average firing rate was calculated in the last 2 min of each control period or treatment application. All the experiments were performed blindly to the electrophysiologist.</p></sec><sec id="s4-14"><title>Ghrelin administration</title><p>Individually housed 4-month-old mice were i.p. injected with either 0.9% saline (#0409-1966-12, Hospira Inc, Lake Forest, IL, USA) or ghrelin (10 nmol, HOR-297-B, ProSpec, Rehovot, Israel) at 9:00 AM. Immediately after injection, mice were returned to their home cages, which contained a pre-weighed amount of food. The remaining food was measured at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hr post-injection. For immunostaining, mice were injected with ghrelin at 9:00 AM and 1 hr later, mice were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused, and brains were dissected and sectioned (50 µm) using a vibratome. Brain sections were processed for Fos immunostaining. Fluorescent images were captured with a Fluorescence Microscope (BZ-X710, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). Fos/AgRP positive cells were counted using ImageJ software.</p></sec><sec id="s4-15"><title>Electron microscopy analysis</title><p>Mice (5 months old) were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline containing heparin (10 mg/l), followed by fresh fixative (4% paraformaldehyde, 15% picric acid, 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB). Brain coronal sections were immunostained with rabbit anti-RFP antibody (diluted 1:1000 in 0.1 M PB, 600-401-379, Rockland Immunochemicals, Limerick, PA, USA) for AgRP neurons. After several washes with 0.1 M PB, sections were incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (diluted 1:250 in 0.1 M PB, BA-1000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 2 hr at RT, and then rinsed in 0.1 M PB three times 10 min each time and incubated for 2 hr at RT with avidin–biotin–peroxidase (ABC; diluted 1:250 in 0.1 M PB; ABC Elite kit, Vector Laboratories). The immunoreaction was visualized with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Sections were then osmicated (1% osmium tetroxide) for 30 min, dehydrated through increasing ethanol concentrations (using 1% uranyl acetate in the 70% ethanol for 30 min), and flat-embedded in araldite between liquid release-coated slides (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). After capsule embedding, blocks were trimmed. Ribbons of serial ultrathin sections were collected on Formvar-coated single slot grids and examined using a Philips CM-10 electron microscope. Mitochondria morphology in AgRP neurons of fed and fasted mice were analyzed using ImageJ software as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Toda et al., 2016</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-16"><title>Measurement of circulating hormones</title><p>Five-month-old mice were deeply anesthetized and decapitated. The blood was collected into a capillary tube (Microvette, CB 300 Z, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) containing 0.2 mg 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzene-sulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Serum from blood samples was obtained by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min, and each circulating hormone was determined using a commercially available ELISA kit for total ghrelin (Rat/Mouse Total Ghrelin ELISA kit, EZRGRT-91K, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) and active ghrelin (Rat/Mouse Total Ghrelin ELISA kit, EZRGRT-90K, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). Serum samples and standards were analyzed in duplicate. All procedures were performed by following the manufacturer’s protocol.</p></sec><sec id="s4-17"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the effect of the genotype and treatment with the Prism 7.01 software (GraphPad Software). For repeated measures analysis, ANOVA was used when values over different times were analyzed. When only two groups were analyzed, statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student's <italic>t</italic>-test. A value of p&lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data is shown as mean ± SEM, unless otherwise stated.</p></sec></sec></body><back><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by NIH R01 DK097566, DK107293, and DK120321 to SD.</p></ack><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Resources</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Investigation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other"><p>Animal experimentation: All animal work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Committee of Columbia University (protocols # protocols # AC-AABI0565 and AC-AABH9564) and Yale University (protocol #10670).</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="transrepform"><label>Transparent reporting form</label><media xlink:href="elife-64351-transrepform-v3.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>ZB</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>ZW</given-names></name><name><surname>Walllingford</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Erion</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Borok</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Friedman</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Tschöp</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Shanabrough</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Cline</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Shulman</surname> <given-names>GI</given-names></name><name><surname>Coppola</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>XB</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name><name><surname>Diano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>UCP2 mediates ghrelin's action on NPY/AgRP neurons by lowering free radicals</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>454</volume><fpage>846</fpage><lpage>851</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature07181</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18668043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Batterham</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Cowley</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Small</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Herzog</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Dakin</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wren</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Brynes</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names></name><name><surname>Low</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghatei</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cone</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Bloom</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Gut hormone PYY(3-36) physiologically inhibits food intake</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>418</volume><fpage>650</fpage><lpage>654</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature00887</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12167864</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bélanger</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Allaman</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Magistretti</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Brain energy metabolism: focus on astrocyte-neuron metabolic cooperation</article-title><source>Cell Metabolism</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>724</fpage><lpage>738</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmet.2011.08.016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22152301</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Mitochondria: dynamic organelles in disease, aging, and development</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>125</volume><fpage>1241</fpage><lpage>1252</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16814712</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coll</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Yeo</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>The hypothalamus and metabolism: integrating signals to control energy and glucose homeostasis</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Pharmacology</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>970</fpage><lpage>976</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.coph.2013.09.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24075719</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coppola</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>ZW</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>ZB</given-names></name><name><surname>Paradis</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Friedman</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ricquier</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Richard</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>XB</given-names></name><name><surname>Diano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>A central thermogenic-like mechanism in feeding regulation: an interplay between arcuate nucleus T3 and UCP2</article-title><source>Cell Metabolism</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmet.2006.12.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17189204</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>ZW</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeong</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Dietrich</surname> <given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>HB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Suyama</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gyengesi</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Arbiser</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Belsham</surname> <given-names>DD</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarruf</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwartz</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Bennett</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Shanabrough</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mobbs</surname> <given-names>CV</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>XB</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Peroxisome proliferation-associated control of reactive oxygen species sets melanocortin tone and feeding in diet-induced obesity</article-title><source>Nature Medicine</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>1121</fpage><lpage>1127</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nm.2421</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21873987</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Role of reactive oxygen species in hypothalamic regulation of energy metabolism</article-title><source>Endocrinology and Metabolism</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3803/EnM.2013.28.1.3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24396642</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dietrich</surname> <given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>ZW</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Mitochondrial dynamics controlled by mitofusins regulate agrp neuronal activity and diet-induced obesity</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>155</volume><fpage>188</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24074868</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franklin</surname> <given-names>KBJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Paxinos</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><source>Paxino's and Franklin's the Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates: Compact</source><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Neurobiology of feeding and energy expenditure</article-title><source>Annual Review of Neuroscience</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>367</fpage><lpage>398</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094324</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17506645</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Hypothalamic TLR2 triggers sickness behavior via a microglia-neuronal Axis</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>29424</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep29424</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27405276</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Diano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Mitochondrial dynamics and hypothalamic regulation of metabolism</article-title><source>Endocrinology</source><volume>159</volume><fpage>3596</fpage><lpage>3604</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1210/en.2018-00667</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30203064</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kageyama</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoshijima</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Seo</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Bedja</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Sysa-Shah</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrabi</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Höke</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>VL</given-names></name><name><surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gabrielson</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kass</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Iijima</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sesaki</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Parkin-independent mitophagy requires Drp1 and maintains the integrity of mammalian heart and brain</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>2798</fpage><lpage>2813</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15252/embj.201488658</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25349190</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kasahara</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Scorrano</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Mitochondria: from cell death executioners to regulators of cell differentiation</article-title><source>Trends in Cell Biology</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>761</fpage><lpage>770</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tcb.2014.08.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25189346</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>TK</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwartz</surname> <given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Rossetti</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Hypothalamic sensing of fatty acids</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>579</fpage><lpage>584</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn1456</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15856066</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liesa</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Palacín</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zorzano</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Mitochondrial dynamics in mammalian health and disease</article-title><source>Physiological Reviews</source><volume>89</volume><fpage>799</fpage><lpage>845</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/physrev.00030.2008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19584314</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Losón</surname> <given-names>OC</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Fis1, mff, MiD49, and MiD51 mediate Drp1 recruitment in mitochondrial fission</article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>659</fpage><lpage>667</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.e12-10-0721</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23283981</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mattson</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Gleichmann</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Mitochondria in neuroplasticity and neurological disorders</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>60</volume><fpage>748</fpage><lpage>766</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19081372</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morrison</surname> <given-names>SF</given-names></name><name><surname>Madden</surname> <given-names>CJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Central nervous system regulation of Brown adipose tissue</article-title><source>Comprehensive Physiology</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>1677</fpage><lpage>1713</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cphy.c140013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25428857</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Central nervous system control of metabolism</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>491</volume><fpage>357</fpage><lpage>363</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11705</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23151578</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nasrallah</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Mitochondrial dynamics in the central regulation of metabolism</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Endocrinology</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>650</fpage><lpage>658</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrendo.2014.160</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25200564</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ollmann</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>BD</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>YK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kerns</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Gantz</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Barsh</surname> <given-names>GS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Antagonism of central melanocortin receptors in vitro and in vivo by agouti-related protein</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>278</volume><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>138</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.278.5335.135</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9311920</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Picard</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Burelle</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>The rise of mitochondria in medicine</article-title><source>Mitochondrion</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mito.2016.07.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27423788</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pozo Devoto</surname> <given-names>VM</given-names></name><name><surname>Falzone</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Mitochondrial dynamics in Parkinson's disease: a role for α-synuclein?</article-title><source>Disease Models &amp; Mechanisms</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>1075</fpage><lpage>1087</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dmm.026294</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28883016</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roh</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Emerging role of the brain in the homeostatic regulation of energy and glucose metabolism</article-title><source>Experimental &amp; Molecular Medicine</source><volume>48</volume><elocation-id>e216</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/emm.2016.4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26964832</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sandoval</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Obici</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Seeley</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Targeting the CNS to treat type 2 diabetes</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Drug Discovery</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>386</fpage><lpage>398</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrd2874</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19404312</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Santoro</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Campolo</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sesaki</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Meli</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>ZW</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Diano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>DRP1 suppresses leptin and glucose sensing of POMC neurons</article-title><source>Cell Metabolism</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>647</fpage><lpage>660</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28190775</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneeberger</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Dietrich</surname> <given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Sebastián</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Imbernón</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Castaño</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Esteban</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Gonzalez-Franquesa</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodríguez</surname> <given-names>IC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bortolozzi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia-Roves</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomis</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Nogueiras</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvath</surname> <given-names>TL</given-names></name><name><surname>Zorzano</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Claret</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Mitofusin 2 in POMC neurons connects ER stress with leptin resistance and energy imbalance</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>155</volume><fpage>172</fpage><lpage>187</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24074867</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Rasband</surname> <given-names>WS</given-names></name><name><surname>Eliceiri</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>671</fpage><lpage>675</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2089</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22930834</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Aitchison</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Peroxisomes take shape</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>803</fpage><lpage>817</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrm3700</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24263361</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toda</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Impellizzeri</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Cuzzocrea</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>ZW</given-names></name><name><surname>Diano</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>UCP2 regulates mitochondrial fission and ventromedial nucleus control of glucose responsiveness</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>164</volume><fpage>872</fpage><lpage>883</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26919426</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Twig</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Hyde</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Shirihai</surname> <given-names>OS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Mitochondrial fusion, fission and autophagy as a quality control Axis: the bioenergetic view</article-title><source>Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics</source><volume>1777</volume><fpage>1092</fpage><lpage>1097</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.05.001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Uchida</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chuang</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborne-Lawrence</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names></name><name><surname>Mosher</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Berglund</surname> <given-names>ED</given-names></name><name><surname>Elmquist</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Zigman</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Arcuate AgRP neurons mediate orexigenic and glucoregulatory actions of ghrelin</article-title><source>Molecular Metabolism</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>64</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molmet.2013.10.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24567905</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Youle</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>van der Bliek</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>337</volume><fpage>1062</fpage><lpage>1065</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1219855</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22936770</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.64351.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Palmiter</surname><given-names>Richard D</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name><surname>Palmiter</surname><given-names>Richard D</given-names></name><role>Reviewer</role><aff><institution>Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text><p>In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.</p></boxed-text><p><bold>Acceptance summary:</bold></p><p>The importance of mitochondrial fission for normal physiological function was established in this paper. The authors selectively inactivated a key protein required for mitochondrial fission in AgRP neurons that are important for feeding and protection from starvation. This manipulation resulted in reduced activity of these neurons and a lean phenotype, clearly demonstrating that disruption of mitochondrial dynamics impacts the normal functions of these neurons.</p><p><bold>Decision letter after peer review:</bold></p><p>Thank you for submitting your article &quot;DRP1 is required for AgRP neuronal activity and feeding&quot; for consideration by <italic>eLife</italic>. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, including Richard D Palmiter as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Matt Kaeberlein as the Senior Editor.</p><p>The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.</p><p>As the editors have judged that your manuscript is of interest, but as described below that additional experiments are required before it is published, we would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). First, because many researchers have temporarily lost access to the labs, we will give authors as much time as they need to submit revised manuscripts. We are also offering, if you choose, to post the manuscript to bioRxiv (if it is not already there) along with this decision letter and a formal designation that the manuscript is &quot;in revision at <italic>eLife</italic>&quot;. Please let us know if you would like to pursue this option. (If your work is more suitable for medRxiv, you will need to post the preprint yourself, as the mechanisms for us to do so are still in development.)</p><p>The authors of this paper demonstrate that mitochondrial fission is important for normal AgRP neuron function. Mice lacking DRP1, a key enzyme mediating fission, in AgRP neurons have lower neuronal activity, respond less well to ghrelin, gain less weight than control mice and have reduced fatty acid metabolism. The authors provide a compelling set of data to substantiate their claims and describe their results clearly; however, a few issues need to be addressed.</p><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>1) The authors should provide more compelling evidence that energy expenditure (EE) is increased in mice lacking Drp1 in AgRP neurons because measuring EE per gram body weight when the weights of the mice differs can be misleading.</p><p>2) For the data in Figure 2, it is not clear to what extent AgRP neurons contribute to the difference fatty acid oxidation. Comparison of the data in Figure 2 (cultures from wild-type mice) with the data in Figure 3 (Drp1 cKO mice) are used to demonstrate the importance of Drp1 for fatty acid oxidation. This comparison is troublesome because they were done with primary cultures prepared and assayed at different times and the extent of Drp1 KO was not established. A better design would be to prepare cultures from the <italic>Agrp-CreERt::Dnml1(fl/fl)</italic> mice that were either treated with tamoxifen or not and then assayed for fatty acid oxidation at the same time.</p><p>3) The authors should at least discuss the possibility that Drp1 may affect other organelles, e.g., peroxisomes, that are involved in fatty acid oxidation.</p><p>4) The experiments in Figure 5, Supplementary Figure 2 and Figure 5—figure supplement 1, reveal significantly less AgRP staining in cell bodies and projections in the Drp1 cKO mice compared to controls and significantly more aMSH in cell bodies and projections. Is that because there is less <italic>Agrp</italic> mRNA and more <italic>Pomc</italic> mRNA in the cKO mice?</p><p>5) AgRP neurons are not a uniform population; there differences along rostral-caudal region, differences in gene expression and they projection axons to specific brain regions. The authors should take this into consideration when discussing their data or demonstrate uniformity of effect across the rostral-caudal axis.</p><p>Included below are the original reviews that provide further insight into issues that the reviewers considered need attention.</p><p><italic>Reviewer #1:</italic></p><p>AgRP neuron activation, which normally occurs in response to food deprivation, enhances food intake and decreases energy expenditure. So, reduced AgRP neuron activity is predicted to have the opposite effect as shown here. There is some concern that the energy expenditure (EE) was measured at 4 months when the mice were already about 2 g lighter than controls (Figure 6). Thus, expressing EE on a per gram basis (rather than per mouse) may artificially enhance the effect. It is easier to appreciate a difference in EE if measurements are made before there is a difference in body weight. Figure 6I appears to show EE per mouse/day as a function of body weight but no statistics are provided.</p><p>The Discussion largely reiterates the Abstract and Results without providing any insight into why mitochondrial fission is important for normal AgRP function. Some discussion of how mitochondrial fission might influence fatty acid metabolism and signaling pathways necessary for normal neuronal function would be appreciated. Does fission allow a more efficient distribution of mitochondria in critical regions of the cell?</p><p>Editorial suggestions:</p><p>Abstract: Are AgRP neurons crucial if mice can adapt to their loss?</p><p>Abstract: Why switch from DRP1 to Drp1 when referring to KO mice?</p><p>Abstract: Consider &quot;show decreased fasting-.…&quot; to use consistent past tense in this sentence</p><p>Abstract: Consider changing sentence to say &quot;neuronal function and body-weight regulation.&quot; Rather than behavior</p><p>Introduction: Consider: &quot;Previous studies from our laboratory have shown.&quot;</p><p>Introduction, last paragraph: Remove &quot;may&quot; because this sentence is already hedged by &quot;suggesting&quot;</p><p>Subsection “Fasting induces significant upregulation of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> mRNA in AgRP neurons”: Most authors use Cre rather than cre, as in Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</p><p>Subsection “Fasting induces significant upregulation of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> mRNA in AgRP neurons”: The labeling on the figure should say <italic>Dnm1l</italic>/<italic>Actb</italic>.</p><p>Subsection “Fasting induces significant activation of DRP1 protein in AgRP neurons”: Consider: &quot;We found that the percent of.…was significantly increased&quot;</p><p>Subsection “Fasting triggers mitochondrial β-oxidation in the hypothalamic neuro”: Consider: &quot;hypothalamic neurons respond to…&quot;</p><p>Subsection “Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons attenuates mitochondrial functions”: Define FA</p><p>Subsection “Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons attenuates mitochondrial functions”: “No difference in.….. rate was observed in.&quot; 2.5 mM and 0.5 mM (always leave spaces between numbers and units)</p><p>Subsection “Inducible and selective deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons decreases neuronal activation and projection of AgRP neurons in the hypothalamus” (and elsewhere including figures): There is only one Fos gene in mouse so no need to distinguish cellular c-Fos from viral v-Fos.</p><p>Subsection “Deletion of <italic>Dnm1l</italic> in AgRP neurons alters energy metabolism”: Consider &quot;was observed 3 weeks after the start of TMX treatment.&quot;</p><p>Discussion, end of first paragraph: It seems odd to include &quot;innate&quot; in this sentence because the word usually refers to behavior, not intracellular processes. It is not clear what &quot;every 3 days with 5 times fasting&quot; means. Every 3 days for 5 times is clear enough, but why fasting?</p><p>Subsection “Ribotag assays”, last paragraph and Figure 1G-K legend: Gene name should be <italic>Dnm1l</italic> (italics)</p><p>Subsection “Ribotag assays”, last paragraph: Gene names should be Actb (Italics)</p><p>Subsection “Hypothalamic primary neuronal cell culture: Consider &quot;In brief, we carefully removed the hypothalamus and placed it in a culture dish containing a small volume of.….&quot; Out of curiosity, what fraction of cells express tdTomato after this TMX treatment?</p><p>Subsection “Ghrelin administration”: &quot;Individually housed 4-month-old mice.…&quot;</p><p>Subsection “Electron microscopy analysis”: &quot;Mice (5 months old) were…&quot; To avoid starting a sentence with a number</p><p>Subsection “Measurement of circulating hormones” and throughout the figure legends: &quot;Five-month-old mice.…&quot; or &quot;4-month-old&quot;</p><p>Figure 1 legend: &quot;3-month-old fed or fasted mice&quot; add hyphens</p><p>Figure 6 legend: 4-month-old (add hyphens, singular)</p><p>Figure 3—figure supplement 1 legend: &quot;AgRP-neuron-specific, <italic>Dnm1l</italic> (italics) deleted mice&quot;</p><p><italic>Reviewer #2:</italic></p><p>In the manuscript entitled &quot;DRP1 is required for AgRP neuronal activity and feeding&quot;, Jin and co-authors provide evidence that, in mice, DRP1 in AgRP neurons plays an important role in the regulation of AgRP activation thereby contributing to the control of whole-body energy homeostasis. The authors show that during fasting, expression of phosphorylated, active DRP1 is increased in AgRP neurons resulting in the fragmentation of the mitochondrial network. However, upon cell type specific DRP1 deletion AgRP neurons are protected from fasting-induced fragmentation. In addition, DRP1 KO neurons present decreased neuronal activity in the fasted state as well as upon ghrelin treatment, concomitant with reduced AgRP-reactive projections within the hypothalamus. The metabolic consequences caused by these alterations lead to decreased fatty acids oxidation, reduced body weight, fat mass and food intake as well as increased energy expenditure. Given the broad interest in understanding how the CNS controls energy and glucose metabolism, the data are relevant and contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms implicated in this regulation. The manuscript is very well written and the data largely support the authors' conclusions.</p><p>However, a few points should be addressed to improve the current manuscript:</p><p>In Figure 2, authors specify that primary hypothalamic neurons were used for measuring β-oxidation upon treatment with different glucose concentrations. However, no data are provided for what contribution AgRP neurons make to these cultures. Hypothalamic neuronal culture purity should be verified via qPCR, western-blot or ICC to determine the proportion of AgRP neurons in the culture.</p><p>Results in Figure 3 show that mitochondrial respiration is affected in primary hypothalamic neurons upon AgRP-neuron restricted DRP1 deletion. Nevertheless, the authors do not provide any knock-out confirmation and efficiency for this in vitro model. Knock-out validation and knock-out efficiency should be provided. Moreover, in the Materials and methods section it is described that primary neurons were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen to induce the CreERT2-dependent deletion. However, the authors do not include any control group in the seahorse data. They should include a control group of primary neurons treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen to probe that the treatment itself does not have any detrimental effects for these primary cells.</p><p>In Figure 5, Supplementary Figure 2 and Figure 5—figure supplement 1, the authors investigate AgRP- and POMC- immunoreactive projections to several nuclei within the hypothalamus. However, the authors provide no controls to assess whether potentially changes in AgRP or α-MSH expression contribute to the changes in the projection density. Here, the reported reduction of AgRP fibers or the increase of α-MSH fibers can be caused, indeed, by an alteration in the innervation or because the expression of AgRP and α-MSH are reduced or increased, respectively. Therefore, the authors should test whether the expression of AgRP and POMC are changed between controls and DRP1 KO animals.</p><p>Finally, in Figure 7, IHC experiments where AgRP neurons are activated upon ghrelin treatment in control and DRP1 KO animals are shown. However, no baseline activation upon saline treatment is provided. This would be important to compare the activation upon Ghrelin treatment.</p><p><italic>Reviewer #3:</italic></p><p>The alternative hypothesis is that lack of DRP1 may impair peroxisome fission/function, and thus b-oxidation of fatty acids, a central function of peroxisomes, is not investigated or discussed in the paper. For this paper to be accepted, experiments either ruling out this possibility or adding it as an additional mechanism are necessary.</p><p>In the paper, the authors make two claims related to AgRP neurons: 1) that mitochondrial dynamics are important for their function, and 2) so is fatty acid oxidation. However, the assays presented in Figures 2 and 3 related to fatty acid oxidation use primary hypothalamic cell culture. As AgRP neurons make up a small fraction of the hypothalamus, claims in this regard should be tempered to prevent misinterpretation by the reader, and the two data sets should be presented together. Alternatively, additional testing using an <italic>Agrp</italic> neuron-specific or enriched primary culture would be acceptable.</p><p>For Figure 1G, although there is a clear (and expected) difference of <italic>Agrp</italic> transcript in your IP sample, I would have expected to see similar differences in your input sample. However, the y-axis range may be hiding these changes. Please split the y-axis so that we can see any differences in input samples for the <italic>Agrp</italic> transcript. Also, as many publications have found significant and reproducible differences in <italic>Agrp</italic> transcript without using the RiboTag approach, I would have expected the <italic>Agrp</italic> input samples' differences to be significant, even if we cannot see those differences as currently presented. As this data point serves as validation for the methodology of multiple parts of Figure 1, the lack of significance must be explained. If the authors used the same dissection methodology for the primary hypothalamic neurons culture assays (Figures 2 and 3), multiple assays in this paper are in question.</p><p>Although the histological images presented in Figures 1, 4, 5, 7, Figure 3—figure supplement 1, Supplementary Figure 2, Figure 5—figure supplement 1 look reasonably convincing, AgRP neurons are spread rostral to caudal within the arcuate nucleus for nearly 2 mm, and conclusions based upon the sample size of 1 histological image out of the entirety of the arc can be misleading. Full stereology of the arcuate nucleus (at least six sections), and the PVN (at least four sections), is necessary to support these claims.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.64351.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>1) The authors should provide more compelling evidence that energy expenditure (EE) is increased in mice lacking Drp1 in AgRP neurons because measuring EE per gram body weight when the weights of the mice differs can be misleading.</p></disp-quote><p>Energy expenditure (EE) has been recalculated using the lean mass that was not different between control and knockout mice.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>2) For the data in Figure 2, it is not clear to what extent AgRP neurons contribute to the difference fatty acid oxidation. Comparison of the data in Figure 2 (cultures from wild-type mice) with the data in Figure 3 (Drp1 cKO mice) are used to demonstrate the importance of Drp1 for fatty acid oxidation. This comparison is troublesome because they were done with primary cultures prepared and assayed at different times and the extent of Drp1 KO was not established. A better design would be to prepare cultures from the Agrp-CreERt::Dnml1(fl/fl) mice that were either treated with tamoxifen or not and then assayed for fatty acid oxidation at the same time.</p></disp-quote><p>As suggested, we have now added in Figure 3 data from <italic>Agrp-CreERt::Dnml1<sup>fl/fl</sup></italic> mice treated with vehicle as control group. Our conclusion stands that DRP1 plays a role in PA oxidation.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>3) The authors should at least discuss the possibility that Drp1 may affect other organelles, e.g., peroxisomes, that are involved in fatty acid oxidation.</p></disp-quote><p>As suggested, we have now added a paragraph in the Discussion addressing this possibility:</p><p>“In addition to mitochondria, DRP1 has been also shown to enable peroxisomal fission. Peroxisomes are single-membrane organelles that similar to mitochondria catalyze the breakdown of long chain fatty acids through beta-oxidation and regulate the maintenance of redox homeostasis (Smith and Aitchison, 2013). Because of these shared properties and metabolic pathways, we cannot exclude a possible involvement of peroxisomes in the phenotype observed in our mice. Further studies are warranted to address this issue.”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>4) The experiments in Figure 5, Supplementary Figure 2 and Figure 5—figure supplement 1, reveal significantly less AgRP staining in cell bodies and projections in the Drp1 cKO mice compared to controls and significantly more aMSH in cell bodies and projections. Is that because there is less Agrp mRNA and more Pomc mRNA in the cKO mice?</p></disp-quote><p>We have now performed and added qPCR data from RiboTag mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 2B and C) and found no significant differences in AgRP and POMC mRNA levels between Drp1 cKO and control mice.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>5) AgRP neurons are not a uniform population; there differences along rostral-caudal region, differences in gene expression and they projection axons to specific brain regions. The authors should take this into consideration when discussing their data or demonstrate uniformity of effect across the rostral-caudal axis.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now added data in Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplement 1 and Figure 5 showing % Fos positive-AgRP neurons and AgRP projections to the PVN in different levels of the hypothalamus. We found significant differences at every level examined across the rostral-caudal axis of the hypothalamus.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Included below are the original reviews that provide further insight into issues that the reviewers considered need attention.</p><p>Reviewer #1:</p><p>AgRP neuron activation, which normally occurs in response to food deprivation, enhances food intake and decreases energy expenditure. So, reduced AgRP neuron activity is predicted to have the opposite effect as shown here. There is some concern that the energy expenditure (EE) was measured at 4 months when the mice were already about 2 g lighter than controls (Figure 6). Thus, expressing EE on a per gram basis (rather than per mouse) may artificially enhance the effect. It is easier to appreciate a difference in EE if measurements are made before there is a difference in body weight. Figure 6I appears to show EE per mouse/day as a function of body weight but no statistics are provided.</p></disp-quote><p>Energy expenditure (EE) has been recalculated using the lean mass that was not different between control and knockout mice.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The Discussion largely reiterates the Abstract and Results without providing any insight into why mitochondrial fission is important for normal AgRP function. Some discussion of how mitochondrial fission might influence fatty acid metabolism and signaling pathways necessary for normal neuronal function would be appreciated. Does fission allow a more efficient distribution of mitochondria in critical regions of the cell?</p></disp-quote><p>We have now added an additional paragraph discussing the potential role of mitochondrial dynamics in mitochondrial subcellular distribution:</p><p>“In addition to these functions, changes in shape and size of mitochondria may also affect the ability of a cell to distribute its mitochondrial population to specific subcellular locations. This function is especially important in highly polarized cells, such as neurons. Future studies assessing mitochondrial dynamics with changes in mitochondrial subcellular distribution will address this point.”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Editorial suggestions:</p><p>Abstract: Are AgRP neurons crucial if mice can adapt to their loss?</p></disp-quote><p>One could argue that they are so crucial that the brain has developed a mechanism to adapt to their loss.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Abstract: Why switch from DRP1 to Drp1 when referring to KO mice?</p></disp-quote><p>To indicate protein. However, we change it to Drp1 has we interfered with the gene.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Abstract: Consider &quot;show decreased fasting-.…&quot; to use consistent past tense in this sentence</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Abstract: Consider changing sentence to say &quot;neuronal function and body-weight regulation.&quot; Rather than behavior</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Introduction: Consider: &quot;Previous studies from our laboratory have shown.&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Introduction, last paragraph: Remove &quot;may&quot; because this sentence is already hedged by &quot;suggesting&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Fasting induces significant upregulation of Dnm1l mRNA in AgRP neurons”: Most authors use Cre rather than cre, as in Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Fasting induces significant upregulation of Dnm1l mRNA in AgRP neurons”: The labeling on the figure should say Dnm1l/Actb.</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Fasting induces significant activation of DRP1 protein in AgRP neurons”: Consider: &quot;We found that the percent of.…was significantly increased&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Fasting triggers mitochondrial β-oxidation in the hypothalamic neuro”: Consider: &quot;hypothalamic neurons respond to…&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Deletion of Dnm1l in AgRP neurons attenuates mitochondrial functions”: Define FA</p></disp-quote><p>We meant PA (Palmitic acid). FA has been now corrected to PA</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Deletion of Dnm1l in AgRP neurons attenuates mitochondrial functions”: “No difference in.….. rate was observed in...&quot; 2.5 mM and 0.5 mM (always leave spaces between numbers and units)</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Inducible and selective deletion of Dnm1l in AgRP neurons decreases neuronal activation and projection of AgRP neurons in the hypothalamus” (and elsewhere including figures): There is only one Fos gene in mouse so no need to distinguish cellular c-Fos from viral v-Fos.</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected to Fos now throughout the manuscript and figures.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Deletion of Dnm1l in AgRP neurons alters energy metabolism”: Consider &quot;was observed 3 weeks after the start of TMX treatment.&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Discussion, end of first paragraph: It seems odd to include &quot;innate&quot; in this sentence because the word usually refers to behavior, not intracellular processes.</p></disp-quote><p>“innate” has been removed.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>It is not clear what &quot;every 3 days with 5 times fasting&quot; means. Every 3 days for 5 times is clear enough, but why fasting?</p></disp-quote><p>We observed that tamoxifen-induced tdTomato expression selectively in AgRP neurons was not sufficient without fasting. We believe that fasting by increasing AgRP transcription and neuronal activity, promotes increased Cre recombinase induction.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Ribotag assays”, last paragraph and Figure 1G-K legend: Gene name should be Dnm1l (italics)</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Ribotag assays”, last paragraph: Gene names should be Actb (Italics)</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Hypothalamic primary neuronal cell culture: Consider &quot;In brief, we carefully removed the hypothalamus and placed it in a culture dish containing a small volume of.….&quot;</p><p>Out of curiosity, what fraction of cells express tdTomato after this TMX treatment?</p></disp-quote><p>These data are now shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1A-D</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Ghrelin administration”: &quot;Individually housed 4-month-old mice.…&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Electron microscopy analysis”: &quot;Mice (5 months old) were…&quot; To avoid starting a sentence with a number</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Subsection “Measurement of circulating hormones” and throughout the figure legends: &quot;Five-month-old mice.…&quot; or &quot;4-month-old&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Figure 1 legend: &quot;3-month-old fed or fasted mice&quot; add hyphens</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Figure 6 legend: 4-month-old (add hyphens, singular)</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Figure 3—figure supplement 1 legend: &quot;AgRP-neuron-specific, Dnm1l (italics) deleted mice&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Corrected as suggested</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer #2:</p><p>In the manuscript entitled &quot;DRP1 is required for AgRP neuronal activity and feeding&quot;, Jin and co-authors provide evidence that, in mice, DRP1 in AgRP neurons plays an important role in the regulation of AgRP activation thereby contributing to the control of whole-body energy homeostasis. The authors show that during fasting, expression of phosphorylated, active DRP1 is increased in AgRP neurons resulting in the fragmentation of the mitochondrial network. However, upon cell type specific DRP1 deletion AgRP neurons are protected from fasting-induced fragmentation. In addition, DRP1 KO neurons present decreased neuronal activity in the fasted state as well as upon ghrelin treatment, concomitant with reduced AgRP-reactive projections within the hypothalamus. The metabolic consequences caused by these alterations lead to decreased fatty acids oxidation, reduced body weight, fat mass and food intake as well as increased energy expenditure. Given the broad interest in understanding how the CNS controls energy and glucose metabolism, the data are relevant and contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms implicated in this regulation. The manuscript is very well written and the data largely support the authors' conclusions.</p><p>However, a few points should be addressed to improve the current manuscript:</p><p>In Figure 2, authors specify that primary hypothalamic neurons were used for measuring β-oxidation upon treatment with different glucose concentrations. However, no data are provided for what contribution AgRP neurons make to these cultures. Hypothalamic neuronal culture purity should be verified via qPCR, western-blot or ICC to determine the proportion of AgRP neurons in the culture.</p></disp-quote><p>These data are now shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1A-D.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Results in Figure 3 show that mitochondrial respiration is affected in primary hypothalamic neurons upon AgRP-neuron restricted DRP1 deletion. Nevertheless, the authors do not provide any knock-out confirmation and efficiency for this in vitro model. Knock-out validation and knock-out efficiency should be provided.</p></disp-quote><p>These data are now shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 2F.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Moreover, in the Materials and methods section it is described that primary neurons were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen to induce the CreERT2-dependent deletion. However, the authors do not include any control group in the seahorse data.</p></disp-quote><p>As suggested by this reviewer, we have now added in Figure 3G-J data from <italic>Agrp-CreERT2::Dnml1(fl/fl)</italic> mice treated with vehicle as control group. Our conclusion stands that DRP1 plays a role in FA oxidation.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>They should include a control group of primary neurons treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen to probe that the treatment itself does not have any detrimental effects for these primary cells.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now added these in Figure 2—figure supplement 1E and Figure 3—figure supplement 2E.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>In Figure 5, Supplementary Figure 2 and Figure 5—figure supplement 1, the authors investigate AgRP- and POMC- immunoreactive projections to several nuclei within the hypothalamus. However, the authors provide no controls to assess whether potentially changes in AgRP or α-MSH expression contribute to the changes in the projection density. Here, the reported reduction of AgRP fibers or the increase of α-MSH fibers can be caused, indeed, by an alteration in the innervation or because the expression of AgRP and α-MSH are reduced or increased, respectively. Therefore, the authors should test whether the expression of AgRP and POMC are changed between controls and DRP1 KO animals.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now performed qPCR analysis from RiboTag mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 2B and C) and found no significant differences in AgRP and POMC mRNA levels between Drp1 cKO and control mice.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Finally, in Figure 7, IHC experiments where AgRP neurons are activated upon ghrelin treatment in control and DRP1 KO animals are shown. However, no baseline activation upon saline treatment is provided. This would be important to compare the activation upon Ghrelin treatment.</p></disp-quote><p>In the present study, ghrelin was administrated in overnight fed mice at 9AM. Saline administration was not performed as in fed state Fos expression in AgRP neurons in very low if detected.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer #3:</p><p>The alternative hypothesis is that lack of DRP1 may impair peroxisome fission/function, and thus b-oxidation of fatty acids, a central function of peroxisomes, is not investigated or discussed in the paper. For this paper to be accepted, experiments either ruling out this possibility or adding it as an additional mechanism are necessary.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now added a paragraph in the Discussion on this possibility:</p><p>“In addition to mitochondria, DRP1 has been also shown to enable peroxisomal fission. Peroxisomes are single-membrane organelles that similar to mitochondria catalyze the breakdown of long chain fatty acids through beta-oxidation and regulate the maintenance of redox homeostasis (Smith and Aitchison, 2013). Because of these shared properties and metabolic pathways, we cannot exclude a possible involvement of peroxisomes in the phenotype observed in our mice. Further studies are warranted to address this issue.”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>In the paper, the authors make two claims related to AgRP neurons: 1) that mitochondrial dynamics are important for their function, and 2) so is fatty acid oxidation. However, the assays presented in Figures 2 and 3 related to fatty acid oxidation use primary hypothalamic cell culture. As AgRP neurons make up a small fraction of the hypothalamus, claims in this regard should be tempered to prevent misinterpretation by the reader, and the two data sets should be presented together. Alternatively, additional testing using an Agrp neuron-specific or enriched primary culture would be acceptable.</p></disp-quote><p>As also suggested by reviewer 2, we have now added in Figure 3 data from primary cultures treated with vehicle (as control group) derived from <italic>Dnm1l<sup>fl/fl</sup>; Agrp<sup>Cre:ERT2</sup></italic>;tdTomato mice. In addition, we have added data in Figure 2—figure supplement 1 and Figure 3—figure supplement 2 data showing that the 2 control cultures behave similarly.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>For Figure 1G, although there is a clear (and expected) difference of Agrp transcript in your IP sample, I would have expected to see similar differences in your input sample. However, the y-axis range may be hiding these changes. Please split the y-axis so that we can see any differences in input samples for the Agrp transcript. Also, as many publications have found significant and reproducible differences in Agrp transcript without using the RiboTag approach, I would have expected the Agrp input samples' differences to be significant, even if we cannot see those differences as currently presented.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now corrected the y axis to see the difference in input samples in Figure 1G and H.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>As this data point serves as validation for the methodology of multiple parts of Figure 1, the lack of significance must be explained. If the authors used the same dissection methodology for the primary hypothalamic neurons culture assays (Figures 2 and 3), multiple assays in this paper are in question.</p></disp-quote><p>We do see significant difference in the input samples which are now visible after changing the y axis. Furthermore, we did use different methods for dissection in the RiboTag experiment versus the primary hypothalamic neuronal culture experiments. We collected the arcuate nucleus of adult mice under a stereomicroscope for the RiboTag experiments, while for the primary hypothalamic neuronal culture assays, we collected the MBH (which did not contain only the arcuate) of pups.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Although the histological images presented in Figures 1, 4, 5, 7, Figure 3—figure supplement 1, Supplementary Figure 2 and Figure 5—figure supplement 1 look reasonably convincing, AgRP neurons are spread rostral to caudal within the arcuate nucleus for nearly 2 mm, and conclusions based upon the sample size of 1 histological image out of the entirety of the arc can be misleading. Full stereology of the arcuate nucleus (at least six sections), and the PVN (at least four sections), is necessary to support these claims.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now revised our analyses using sections at different levels of the rostral- caudal axis. See Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplement 1 and Figure 5.</p></body></sub-article></article>