<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-mathml3.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub" publication-format="electronic">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">72458</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.72458</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Microbiology and Infectious Disease</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>An intestinally secreted host factor promotes microsporidia invasion of <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-263952"><name><surname>Tamim El Jarkass</surname><given-names>Hala</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0118-5978</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-247111"><name><surname>Mok</surname><given-names>Calvin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-141004"><name><surname>Schertzberg</surname><given-names>Michael R</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-247112"><name><surname>Fraser</surname><given-names>Andrew G</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9939-6014</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-54396"><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>Emily R</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2422-0473</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-238644"><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>Aaron W</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7612-5342</contrib-id><email>aaron.reinke@utoronto.ca</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03dbr7087</institution-id><institution>Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Toronto</named-content></addr-line><country>Canada</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03dbr7087</institution-id><institution>The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Toronto</named-content></addr-line><country>Canada</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/0168r3w48</institution-id><institution>Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">La Jolla</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Lourido</surname><given-names>Sebastian</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04vqm6w82</institution-id><institution>Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Sengupta</surname><given-names>Piali</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05abbep66</institution-id><institution>Brandeis University</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date date-type="publication" publication-format="electronic"><day>07</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e72458</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-07-23"><day>23</day><month>07</month><year>2021</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-01-06"><day>06</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint at bioRxiv.</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2021-12-13"><day>13</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.12.452088"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2022, Tamim El Jarkass et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tamim El Jarkass et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-72458-v4.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-72458-figures-v4.pdf"/><abstract><p>Microsporidia are ubiquitous obligate intracellular pathogens of animals. These parasites often infect hosts through an oral route, but little is known about the function of host intestinal proteins that facilitate microsporidia invasion. To identify such factors necessary for infection by <italic>Nematocida parisii</italic>, a natural microsporidian pathogen of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>, we performed a forward genetic screen to identify mutant animals that have a Fitness Advantage with <italic>Nematocida</italic> (Fawn). We isolated four <italic>fawn</italic> mutants that are resistant to <italic>Nematocida</italic> infection and contain mutations in <italic>T14E8.4</italic>, which we renamed <italic>aaim-1</italic> (Antibacterial and Aids invasion by Microsporidia). Expression of AAIM-1 in the intestine of <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals restores <italic>N. parisii</italic> infectivity and this rescue of infectivity is dependent upon AAIM-1 secretion. <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores in <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals are improperly oriented in the intestinal lumen, leading to reduced levels of parasite invasion. Conversely, <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants display both increased colonization and susceptibility to the bacterial pathogen <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and overexpression of<italic>aaim-1</italic> reduces <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> colonization. Competitive fitness assays show that <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants are favored in the presence of <italic>N. parisii</italic> but disadvantaged on <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> compared to wild-type animals. Together, this work demonstrates how microsporidia exploits a secreted protein to promote host invasion. Our results also suggest evolutionary trade-offs may exist to optimizing host defense against multiple classes of pathogens.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>microsporidia</kwd><kwd>parasite invasion</kwd><kwd>evolutionary trade-offs</kwd><kwd><italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic></kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd><italic>C. elegans</italic></kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024</institution-id><institution>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>400784</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>Aaron W</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000879</institution-id><institution>Alfred P. Sloan Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>FG2019-12040</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>Aaron W</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>AG052622</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>Emily R</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>GM114139</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>Emily R</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>A forward genetic screen in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> identifies a secreted host protein that ensures proper microsporidia spore orientation, resulting in efficient invasion of intestinal cells.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Microsporidia are a large group of obligate intracellular parasites that infect most types of animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Murareanu et al., 2021b</xref>). These ubiquitous parasites possess the smallest known eukaryotic genomes and are extremely reliant on their host as a result of the loss of many genes involved in metabolism and energy production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Corradi, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Wadi and Reinke, 2020</xref>). Microsporidia can have a large impact on the evolution of their hosts, as infection often leads to a reduction in host offspring and the effect of this selective pressure has resulted in resistant animals within a population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Balla et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Routtu and Ebert, 2015</xref>). Microsporidia are currently a major threat to many commercially important species such as honeybees and shrimp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Martín-Hernández et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Jaroenlak et al., 2018</xref>). Many species also infect humans and infections in immunocompromised individuals can result in lethality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Stentiford et al., 2016</xref>). Despite their ubiquitous nature, effective treatment strategies are currently lacking for these poorly understood parasites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Han and Weiss, 2018</xref>).</p><p>Microsporidia infection begins with invasion of host cells. Microsporidia possess fascinating invasion machinery, a unique structure known as the polar tube (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Han et al., 2020</xref>). This apparatus, resembling a long thread, is often coiled within a dormant spore. However, once inside of a host, and in proximity to the tissue of interest, the polar tube rapidly emerges or ‘fires’, releasing the infectious material (the sporoplasm) which is deposited intracellularly either through direct injection, or through the internalization of the sporoplasm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Han et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Tamim El Jarkass and Reinke, 2020</xref>).</p><p>A number of microsporidia proteins have been demonstrated to play important roles during invasion by insect- and human-infecting species of microsporidia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Han et al., 2020</xref>). For example, spore wall proteins can interact with host cells through the recognition of sulfated glycosaminoglycans, heparin binding motifs, integrins, and proteins on the cell surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Hayman et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Hayman et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Southern et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Li et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Wu et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Chen et al., 2017</xref>). In <italic>Encephalitozoon</italic> species, polar tube proteins (PTP) can mediate interactions with the host. For instance, O-linked mannosylation on PTP1 has been demonstrated to bind mannose binding receptors, whereas PTP4 interacts with the transferrin receptor (Trf1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Tamim El Jarkass and Reinke, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Xu et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Xu et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Han et al., 2017</xref>). Additionally, the sporoplasm surface protein, EhSSP1, binds to an unknown receptor on the cell surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Han et al., 2019</xref>). These proteins on the spore, polar tube, and sporoplasm have all been shown to promote microsporidia adhesion or invasion of host cells in culture systems, but the role of these proteins during animal infection is unclear.</p><p>The nematode <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> is infected in its natural habitat by several species of microsporidia, and frequently by <italic>Nematocida parisii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Luallen et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Troemel et al., 2008</xref>). This species infects the intestinal cells of <italic>C. elegans,</italic> which possess similarity to those of mammalian cells, making this animal both a relevant tissue and model to study these infections in vivo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Troemel et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Troemel, 2011</xref>). Infection of <italic>C. elegans</italic> by <italic>N. parisii</italic> begins when spores are consumed by the worm, where they then pass through the pharynx into the intestinal lumen and fire, depositing sporoplasms inside of intestinal cells. Within 72 hr, the sporoplasm will divide into meronts, which differentiate into spores, that then exit the animal, completing the parasite’s life cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Balla et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). Infection with <italic>N. parisii</italic> leads to reduced fecundity and premature mortality in <italic>C. elegans</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Troemel et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Balla et al., 2016</xref>). Several mutants have been shown to affect proliferation and spore exit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Botts et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Szumowski et al., 2014</xref>). Immunity that can either prevent infection or clear the pathogen once infected has also been described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Balla et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Balla et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Reddy et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Tecle et al., 2021</xref>). In contrast, very little is known about how <italic>N. parisii</italic> invades <italic>C. elegans</italic> intestinal cells. Almost all the microsporidia proteins known to facilitate invasion of host cells are not conserved in <italic>N. parisii</italic> and although host invasion factors described in other species are present in <italic>C. elegans</italic>, there is no evidence that they are being used by microsporidia during invasion of <italic>C. elegans</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Tamim El Jarkass and Reinke, 2020</xref>).</p><p>To understand how microsporidia invade animal cells, we performed a forward genetic screen to identify host factors that promote infection. We identified a novel, nematode-specific protein, AAIM-1, whose loss of function confers resistance to <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection. This protein is expressed in intestinal cells, secreted into the intestinal lumen, and is necessary to ensure proper spore orientation during intestinal cell invasion. In addition, we show that AAIM-1 limits bacterial colonization of pathogenic <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>. Strikingly, AAIM-1 plays opposing roles on host fitness in the face of pathogenesis. The utilization of a host factor critical for bacterial defense reflects a clever strategy to ensuring microsporidia’s reproductive success.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>A forward genetic screen identifies <italic>aaim-1</italic> as being necessary for <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection</title><p>To identify host factors needed for infection by microsporidia, we carried out a forward genetic screen using a <italic>C. elegans</italic> model of <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection. We took advantage of the previously described phenotypes of <italic>C. elegans</italic> displaying reduced fitness when infected with <italic>N. parisii,</italic> including reduced progeny production and stunted development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Balla et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Luallen et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Murareanu et al., 2021a</xref>). We mutagenized animals and subjected their F2 progeny to <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection. After infecting populations for five subsequent generations, we selected individual worms containing embryos, indicating increased fitness in the presence of infection (see Materials and methods). We identified four independent isolates that when exposed to <italic>N. parisii</italic> reproducibly had higher fractions of animals containing embryos compared to wild type (N2). We named these isolates Fitness Advantage With <italic>Nematocida</italic> (<italic>fawn</italic> 1–4) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1a</xref>).</p><p>As <italic>C. elegans</italic> that are less infected with <italic>N. parisii</italic> produce more progeny, we hypothesised that these <italic>fawn</italic> mutants would be resistant to <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). To determine this, we grew the three isolates with the strongest phenotype, <italic>fawn</italic> 1–3, in the presence and absence of <italic>N. parisii</italic>, and stained each population of worms with the chitin binding dye, Direct-yellow 96 (DY96), at 72 hr post infection (hpi). DY96 allows for the visualization of chitinous microsporidia spores as well as worm embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1a</xref>). In the absence of infection, there is no difference in the fraction of <italic>fawn-2</italic> and <italic>fawn-3</italic> animals developing into adults containing embryos (gravid adults), although <italic>fawn-1</italic> has a modest defect. In comparison, all three <italic>fawn</italic> isolates generate significantly more gravid adults than N2 animals in the presence of infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1b</xref>). We next examined the fraction of animals in each strain containing intracellular microsporidia spores and observed that all three <italic>fawn</italic> isolates display significantly fewer numbers of spore-containing worms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1c</xref>). These results suggest that <italic>fawn</italic> mutants are missing an important factor for efficient microsporidia infection.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Mutations in <italic>aaim-1</italic> result in resistance to <italic>N</italic>. <italic>parisii</italic> infection.</title><p>(a-c, and e) L1 stage wild-type (N2) and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutant animals were infected with either a high dose (a, b, and e) or a very lose dose (<bold>c</bold>) of <italic>N. parisii</italic>, fixed at 72 hr, and stained with direct-yellow 96 (DY96). (<bold>a</bold>) Representative images stained with DY96, which stains <italic>C. elegans</italic> embryos and microsporidia spores. Scale bars, 100 μm. (<bold>b and e</bold>) Graph displays percentage of gravid worms. (<bold>c</bold>) Percentage of worms that contain newly formed <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores. (<bold>d</bold>) Schematic depicting the nature and location of the different <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles. Boxes represent exons, and connecting lines represent introns. Arrows depict point mutations, and the solid red lines depict deletions. <italic>fawn-2 (kea28</italic>) has a 2.2 kb deletion and <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) has a 2.3 kb deletion. <italic>fawn-1 (kea89</italic>) carries a C127T, Q43Stop mutation, <italic>fawn-3 (kea91</italic>) carries a G221A splice site mutation and <italic>fawn-4 (kea103</italic>) carries a C1286T, A429V mutation in <italic>aaim-1</italic>. (b,c, and e) Data is from three independent replicates of at least 90 worms each. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc. Significance defined as: * p &lt; 0.05, ** p &lt; 0.01, *** p &lt; 0.001, **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Mutations in <italic>aaim-1</italic> result in resistance to <italic>N.</italic> <italic>parisii</italic> infection.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig1-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig1-v4.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Mapping and validation of <italic>aaim-1</italic> as the gene associated with resistance to <italic>N.</italic> <italic>parisii</italic>.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) N2 or <italic>fawn</italic> animals were infected with a medium-3 dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores on 6-cm plates, fixed at 72 hr, and stained with direct-yellow 96 (DY96). Graph displays percentage of gravid worms. Data is from three independent replicates of 66–300 worms each. (<bold>b</bold>) F2 recombinants between the mapping strain VC20019 and either N2, <italic>fawn-1</italic>, <italic>fawn-2</italic>, or <italic>fawn-3</italic> were infected with a medium-2 dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic>. Two rounds of selection were performed (see Materials and methods). The percentage of sequencing reads mapping to the reference strain VC20019 are depicted on the Y-axis, and the linkage groups are depicted on the X-axis. Sequencing of MIPs resulted in capturing the identity of the genome at 89 distinct regions which are represented as points by their location along the X-axis coordinates. A significantly diminished percentage of VC20019 indicates an enrichment of non-mapping genomic sequence in that region. (<bold>c</bold>) Schematic representing the location and nature of the different <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles. Boxes represent exons, and connecting lines represent introns. Arrows represent point mutations and solid red lines represent large deletions. <italic>fawn-2 (kea28</italic>) has a 2.2 kb deletion and <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) has a 2.3 kb deletion. <italic>aaim-1 (ok295</italic>) possesses a large deletion overlapping two different genes, <italic>aaim-1</italic> and <italic>dop-3</italic>, the boundaries of which are unclear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Styer et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10"><italic>C. elegans</italic> Deletion Mutant Consortium, 2012</xref>). (<bold>d</bold>) L1 stage N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutant animals were infected with a high dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic>, fixed at 72 hr, and stained with direct-yellow 96 (DY96). Graph displays percentage of gravid worms. Data are from three independent replicates of at least 100 worms each. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via one-way Anova with post hoc. Significance defined as ** p &lt; 0.01, **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1s1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Mapping and validation of <italic>aaim-1</italic> as the gene associated with resistance to <italic>N</italic>. <italic>parisii</italic>.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig1-figsupp1-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig1-figsupp1-v4.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>To identify the causal mutations underlying the Fawn phenotype, we used a combination of whole-genome sequencing and genetic mapping. We generated F2 recombinants and performed two rounds of infection with microsporidia, selecting for gravid animals. After each round, we used molecular inversion probes to determine the region of the genome linked to the causal mutation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Mok et al., 2017</xref>). This revealed strong signatures of selection on the left arm of chromosome X in all three <italic>fawn</italic> isolates and absent in N2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1b</xref>). Analysis of whole genome sequencing showed that all four <italic>fawn</italic> isolates contained different alleles of <italic>T14E8.4</italic>, which we named <italic>aaim-1</italic> (Antibacterial and Aids Invasion by Microsporidia-1) for reasons described below (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1d</xref>). We validated the role of <italic>aaim-1</italic> in resistance to infection using several additional alleles: an independent allele <italic>aaim-1</italic> (<italic>ok295</italic>), carrying a large gene deletion in both <italic>aaim-1</italic> and <italic>dop-3,</italic> and a CRISPR-Cas9 derived allele, <italic>aaim-1 (kea22),</italic> that contains a large gene deletion. Both of these alleles displayed a fitness advantage when infected with <italic>N. parisii</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1d and e</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1c, d</xref>). These data demonstrate that <italic>aaim-1</italic> is the causative gene underlying the <italic>fawn</italic> 1–4 infection phenotypes. In subsequent experiments we utilized both <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>), and <italic>fawn-3 (kea28),</italic> carrying a 2.2 kb deletion in <italic>aaim-1,</italic> which was outcrossed to N2 six times [hereafter referred to as <italic>aaim-1 (kea28</italic>)].</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> is expressed in the pharynx and intestine, and secretion is important for function</title><p>AAIM-1 is a poorly characterized protein that does not possess any known or conserved domains. Homologs of the protein exist in both free-living and parasitic nematodes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1</xref>). To further characterize the role of AAIM-1 during <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection, we generated transgenic extrachromosomal lines of <italic>C. elegans</italic> carrying a reporter transgene of GFP under control of the <italic>aaim-1</italic> promoter. GFP fluorescence was observed in the terminal bulb of the pharynx as well as the posterior of the intestine throughout development (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2a</xref>). Embryos and L1 animals display additional expression in the arcade cells of the pharynx (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2a</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2a</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>AAIM-1 is secreted from intestinal cells.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Wild-type worms containing an extrachromosomal array expressing GFP from the <italic>aaim-1</italic> promoter and mCherry (labelled in magenta) in the pharyngeal muscles were imaged at the embryo, L1, L3, L4, and adult stage. Embryo, L1, and L3 animals were imaged at 40 x, scale bar 20 μm and L4 and adult animals were imaged at 20 x, scale bar 50 μm. L1 to L4 animals are oriented anterior to posterior and the adult animal is oriented posterior to anterior from left to right. Schematic made with <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://biorender.com/">Biorender.com</ext-link> (<bold>b</bold>) N2, <italic>aaim-1, and aaim-1</italic> expressing extrachromosomal arrays were infected with a medium-2 dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic>. Graph displays percentage of gravid worms. Data is from three independent replicates of at least 90 worms each. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc. Significance defined as **** p &lt; 0.0001 (<bold>c</bold>) Intestines (denoted by dashed lines) of 72 hr post-L1 adults were dissected and stained using anti-Flag (magenta) and DAPI (blue). Images taken at 40 x, scale bar 20 μm.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata1"><label>Figure 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>AAIM-1 is secreted from intestinal cells.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig2-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig2-v4.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>AAIM-1 is conserved in both free-living and parasitic nematodes.</title><p>Phylogenetic tree of AAIM-1 homologs. Bootstrap values are shown at the nodes.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig2-figsupp1-v4.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> is expressed in arcade cells and presence of C-terminal 3 x Flag tag does not disrupt AAIM-1 function.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) N2 containing an extrachromosomal array expressing GFP from the <italic>aaim-1</italic> promoter and mCherry (labelled in magenta) in the pharyngeal muscles were imaged at the L1 stage at 40 x. Scale bar 20 μm. Arrow indicates terminal bulb, and asterisks represent arcade cells. (<bold>b</bold>) N2, <italic>aaim-1,</italic> and <italic>aaim-1</italic> expressing extrachromosomal arrays of wild-type or 3 x Flag tagged constructs were infected with a medium-2 dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic>, fixed at 72 hr, and stained with direct-yellow 96 (DY96). Graph displays percentage of gravid worms. Data is from three independent replicates of at least 100 worms each. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc. Significance defined as **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2s2sdata1"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> is expressed in arcade cells and presence of C-terminal 3 x Flag tag does not disrupt AAIM-1 function.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig2-figsupp2-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig2-figsupp2-v4.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>The first 17 amino acids of AAIM-1 are predicted to encode a signal peptide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Almagro Armenteros et al., 2019</xref>). This suggests that AAIM-1 may be secreted into the pharyngeal and intestinal lumen, the extracellular space through which <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores pass before invading intestinal cells. To test which tissues AAIM-1 functions in and if secretion is important for function, we generated a series of transgenic worms expressing extrachromosomal arrays (Key resources table, Appendix 1). First, we generated transgenic <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) animals expressing AAIM-1 tagged on the C-terminus with a 3 x Flag epitope. Transgenic animals expressing AAIM-1 under its native promoter complement the ability of <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) animals to develop into adults in the presence of a high amount of <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2b</xref>). A construct expressing GFP or GFP::3xFlag does not influence this phenotype nor does the presence of the epitope tag impair the ability of AAIM-1 to rescue the mutant phenotype (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2b</xref>). We next generated a signal peptide mutant allele of AAIM-1 missing the first 17 amino acids (<italic>SPΔaaim-1),</italic> which is unable to complement the <italic>aaim-1 N. parisii</italic> infection phenotype. In contrast, AAIM-1 expressed from an intestinal-specific promoter (<italic>spp-5</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Reinke et al., 2017</xref>) can rescue the infection phenotype of <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2b</xref>).</p><p>To determine where AAIM-1 localizes, we dissected the intestines from transgenic worms and performed immunofluorescence using anti-Flag antibodies. We were unable to detect expression of AAIM-1::3xFlag when expressed from its endogenous promoter. However, we observed protein expression in the intestinal cells of animals expressing AAIM-1::3xFlag from a strong, intestinal specific-promoter or when the signal peptide was removed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2c</xref>). We did not observe AAIM-1::3xFlag localized in the extracellular space of the intestinal lumen, possibly due to rapid turnover of intestinal contents or due to loss from dissection of the intestines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">McGhee and Ghafouri, 2007</xref>). The increased expression in the signal peptide mutant suggests an accumulation of protein that is unable to be secreted. Taken together, these data demonstrate that AAIM-1 is secreted and acts within the intestinal lumen to promote <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>AAIM-1 is only necessary for microsporidia infection at the earliest larval stage</title><p><italic>N. parisii</italic> infection of <italic>C. elegans</italic> can occur throughout development, but several forms of immunity toward microsporidia have been shown to be developmentally regulated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Balla et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). To determine if <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutant animals display developmentally restricted resistance to infection, we infected <italic>fawn</italic> 1–3 at the L1 and L3 stage. For these experiments, we took advantage of another intestinal-infecting species of microsporidia, <italic>Nematocida ausubeli</italic>, which has a more severe effect on <italic>C. elegans</italic> fecundity, allowing us to determine fitness defects after the L1 stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Balla et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Balla et al., 2016</xref>). <italic>fawn</italic> isolates are resistant to <italic>N. ausubeli</italic> as seen by an increase in the fraction of gravid adults in the population after exposure to a medium dose of <italic>N. ausubeli</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3a</xref>). When we initiated infections at the L3 stage of growth, <italic>fawn</italic> isolates do not have increased resistance, and instead exhibit wild-type levels of susceptibility (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3b</xref>). To rule out the possibility that this L1 restricted phenotype was the result of exposure to sodium hypochlorite treatment, which we used to synchronize worms, we exposed embryos that were naturally laid by adults within a 2-hr window to <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection. Animals synchronized in this manner still display a robust resistance to <italic>N. parisii</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1c</xref>). Thus, resistance to infection in <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants is developmentally restricted and AAIM-1 is utilized by several species of microsporidia.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants are resistant to microsporidia at the earliest larval stage due to spore misfiring.</title><p>(<bold>a–b</bold>) N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants were infected with a medium dose of <italic>N. ausubeli</italic> at either the L1 stage for 72 hr (<bold>a</bold>) or a high dose of <italic>N. ausubeli</italic> at the L3 stage for 48 hr (<bold>b</bold>) Graph displays percentage of gravid worms. (<bold>c–f</bold>) N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals were infected with a medium-3 dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic> for 45 min at L1 (<bold>c–e</bold>) or L3 (<bold>f–h</bold>), fixed, and then stained with DY96 and an <italic>N. parisii</italic> 18 S RNA fish probe. The number of spores per animal (<bold>c,f</bold>), the percentage of spores fired (<bold>d,g</bold>), and the number of sporoplasm per worm (<bold>e,h</bold>) are displayed. Data is from three independent replicates of at least 100 worms each (<bold>a–b</bold>) or 20–30 worms each (<bold>c–h</bold>). (<bold>a–h</bold>) Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-values determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc. Significance defined as: * p &lt; 0.05, ** p &lt; 0.01, *** p &lt; 0.001, **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants are resistant to microsporidia at the earliest larval stage due to spore misfiring.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig3-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig3-v4.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants do not clear <italic>N. parisii</italic> and developmentally restricted <italic>N. parisii</italic> invasion defect is not due to a feeding defect.</title><p>(<bold>a–b</bold>) N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants were infected at either the L1 stage (<bold>a</bold>) or the L3 stage (<bold>b</bold>) with a medium-1 dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores for 3 hr. Animals were then washed to remove spores and re-plated for an additional 21 hr. Worms were fixed at both the 3-hr and 24-hr timepoints and stained with an <italic>N. parisii</italic> 18 S RNA fish probe. Worms containing either sporoplasm or meronts were counted as infected. (<bold>c</bold>) N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> adults were allowed to lay embryos on plates. Adults were removed and a low dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic> was added to the plate. Animals were fixed at 72 hr and stained with direct-yellow 96 (DY96). Graph displays percentage of gravid worms. (<bold>d</bold>) N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants were fed fluorescent beads for 3 hr. Quantification of percentage of worm with bead fluorescence. Data is from three independent replicates of at least 100 worms each (<bold>a–c</bold>) or 20–30 worms each (<bold>d</bold>). Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc. Significance defined as * p &lt; 0.05, ** p &lt; 0.01, *** p &lt; 0.001, **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s1sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants do not clear <italic>N</italic>. <italic>parisii</italic> and developmentally restricted <italic>N. parisii</italic> invasion defect is not due to a feeding defect.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig3-figsupp1-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig3-figsupp1-v4.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Invasion defects in <italic>aaim-1</italic> only occur at the L1 stage of development and a mutation in <italic>aaim-1</italic> does not alter the width of the intestinal lumen.</title><p>(<bold>a–f</bold>) N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals were infected for 3 hr at L1 (<bold>a–c</bold>) or L3 (<bold>d-f</bold>), fixed, and then stained with DY96 and an <italic>N. parisii</italic> 18 S RNA fish probe. The number of spores per animal (<bold>a,d</bold>) the percentage of spores fired (<bold>b,e</bold>) and the number of sporoplasm per worm (<bold>c,f</bold>) are displayed. (<bold>g,h</bold>) The width of the intestinal lumen was measured in L1 (<bold>g</bold>) or L3 (<bold>h</bold>) wild-type or <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals. (<bold>a–h</bold>) Data is from three independent replicates of 15–30 worms each. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc (<bold>a–f</bold>) or Unpaired Student’s t-test (<bold>g,h</bold>). Significance defined as **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s2sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Invasion defects in <italic>aaim-1</italic> only occur at the L1 stage of development and a mutation in <italic>aaim-1</italic> does not alter the width of the intestinal lumen.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig3-figsupp2-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig3-figsupp2-v4.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>AAIM-1 is needed for efficient invasion of intestinal cells</title><p>Resistance to infection could be the result of a block in invasion, proliferation, or through the destruction of the parasite. To test the mechanism of resistance in <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants, we performed pulse-chase infection assays at the L1 and L3 stage of development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Balla et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). Here, we treated animals with a medium-1 dose (as defined in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>) of <italic>N. parisii</italic> for 3 hr, washed away any un-ingested spores, and then replated the animals in the absence of spores for an additional 21 hr. We then used an 18 S RNA Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) probe to detect <italic>N. parisii</italic> sporoplasms, which is the earliest stage of microsporidia invasion. In our <italic>fawn</italic> 1–3 isolates, we detect less invasion at 3 hpi compared to N2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1a</xref>). However, there was no reduction in the number of infected animals between 3 hpi and 21 hpi, indicating that pathogen clearance was not occurring. This defect in invasion was not present at the L3 stage, providing further support that resistance is restricted to the L1 stage in <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1b</xref>). A reduction in invasion could be due to a feeding defect, leading to a reduction in spore consumption. To test rates of consumption, we measured the intestinal accumulation of fluorescent beads. We find that <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles displayed wild-type levels of bead accumulation, unlike the feeding defective strain <italic>eat-2 (ad465</italic>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1d</xref>).</p><p>For <italic>N. parisii</italic> to invade host cells, spores must first enter the intestinal lumen and fire their polar tube (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). To test if <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants have defects in spore entry or spore firing, we infected animals for either 45 min or 3 hr, at the L1 and L3 stages. We then fixed and stained animals with both an <italic>N. parisii</italic> 18 S RNA FISH probe and DY96 and quantified the number of spores present in the intestinal lumen of animals. Here, <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals infected for 45 min or 3 hr at L1 or L3 contained similar amounts of spores as N2 animals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3c and f</xref>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2a,d</xref>). The percentage of fired spores present within these animals is also not significantly different at either developmental stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3d and g</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2b,e</xref>). We then counted the number of sporoplasms per animal and observed significantly fewer invasion events in <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutant animals infected at L1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3e</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2c</xref>). In contrast, the number of sporoplasms in L3 stage <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles are similar to that observed in the N2 strain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3h</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2f</xref>). These results demonstrate that the <italic>N. parisii</italic> invasion defect in <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants is not caused by differences in spore firing or accumulation. Instead, these results suggest that spores are misfiring, leading to unsuccessful parasite invasion.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>AAIM-1 plays a role in promoting proper spore orientation</title><p>To determine how AAIM-1 promotes <italic>N. parisii</italic> invasion, we further examined the invasion process. We pre-stained spores with calcofluor white (CFW) and assessed their orientation relative to the intestinal apical membrane using the apical membrane marker PGP-1::GFP in L1 worms infected for 45 min (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4a</xref>). In N2 animals, 32.4% of spores are angled relative to the apical membrane. In contrast, spores in an <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutant were angled 14.3% of the time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4b</xref>). Several host factors that promote microsporidia invasion cause adherence to host cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Tamim El Jarkass and Reinke, 2020</xref>). To determine if AAIM-1 influences the location of spores relative to intestinal cells in <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants, we measured the perpendicular distance from the center of a parallel spore to the apical membrane of the intestine. Surprisingly, parallel spores in <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles were significantly closer to the apical membrane (0.29 μm) than those in N2 (0.34 μm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4c</xref>). In agreement with resistance being developmentally restricted, <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants display wild-type spore orientations and distances from the membrane when infections were initiated at the L3 stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4d and e</xref>). The width of the intestinal lumen at the L1 stage does not differ significantly between N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants, however, L3 animals generally possess wider intestinal lumens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2g,h</xref>). Thus, taken together these results suggest that AAIM-1 plays a distinct role in the intestinal lumen at L1 to promote proper spore orientation, through maintaining an appropriate distance and angle to the apical membrane, resulting in successful invasion.</p><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Spores in <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants display improper orientation and distance to the apical intestinal membrane.</title><p>(<bold>a–e</bold>) PGP-1::GFP and <italic>aaim-1(kea22);</italic> PGP-1::GFP animals were infected with a very high dose of calcofluor white (CFW) pre-stained <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores for 45 min at either the L1 stage (<bold>a–c</bold>) or the L3 stage (<bold>d-e</bold>). (<bold>a</bold>) Representative images of live animals containing stained spores (blue) relative to the apical intestinal membrane (GFP). Arrow indicates an example of an angled spore and asterisks indicate parallel spores. Images taken at 63 x, scale bar 20 μm. (<bold>b, d</bold>) Percentage of angled spores. Data is from three independent replicates of at least 90 spores each. (<bold>c, e</bold>) Distance from the center of each spore to the intestinal apical membrane. Data is from three independent replicates of at least 25 spores each. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via unpaired Student’s t-test. Significance defined as ** p &lt; 0.01, *** p &lt; 0.001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Spores in <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants display improper orientation and distance to the apical intestinal membrane.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig4-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig4-v4.tif"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>AAIM-1 inhibits intestinal colonization by <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic></title><p>Interestingly, <italic>aaim-1</italic> has been shown to be upregulated by a variety of different fungal and bacterial pathogens, including <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Engelmann et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Head et al., 2017</xref>) Using our transcriptional reporter strain, we sought to confirm this and determine if microsporidia infection could also induce <italic>aaim-1</italic> transcription. N2 animals carrying a transcriptional reporter (p<italic>aaim-1</italic>::GFP::3xFlag) were exposed to <italic>N. parisii, P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14, or <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1, and the levels of GFP quantified when grown on these pathogens for 72 hr from the L1 stage, or for 24 hr from the L4 stage. Infection by either <italic>N. parisii</italic> or <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14 resulted in the upregulation of <italic>aaim-1</italic> as detected by an increase in the GFP signal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5a</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1f</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> is upregulated by <italic>N</italic>. <italic>parisii and P. auerginosa</italic> and <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals are susceptible to infection by <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Expression of p<italic>aaim-</italic>1::GFP::3xFlag in response to infection with either PA14 or <italic>N. parisii</italic> for either 72 hr from L1 or 24 hr from L4. Data is from three independent replicates of at least 18–25 worms each. Every point represents a single worm. Percentage GFP was measured as the percentage of the animal containing GFP via FIJI. (<bold>b</bold>) L4 stage N2, <italic>aaim-1,</italic> and <italic>pmk-1 (km25</italic>) animals were plated on full lawns of <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14::DsRed and the percentage of animals alive was counted over the course of 96 hr. TD<sub>50</sub>: N2 48 hr, aaim-1 (<italic>kea28</italic>) 44 hr, <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) 33 hr, and <italic>pmk-1 (km25</italic>) 28 hr. Three independent replicates were carried out, and a representative replicate is displayed. At least 37 worms were quantified per strain. p-Values determined via Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Significance defined as * p &lt; 0.05, ** p &lt; 0.01. (<bold>c–e</bold>) N2, <italic>aaim-1,</italic> or <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals with different extrachromosomal arrays were plated on PA14::DsRed at either the L1 stage (<bold>d</bold>) or L4 stage (<bold>c,e</bold>) for 48 hr. Bacterial burden was measured as the percentage of the animal containing PA14::DsRed. Data is from three independent replicates of 20–30 worms each. Every point represents a single worm. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via two-way (<bold>a</bold>) or one-way ANOVA(c-e) with post hoc. Significance defined as * p &lt; 0.05, ** p &lt; 0.01, *** p &lt; 0.001, **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata1"><label>Figure 5—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> is upregulated by <italic>N</italic>. <italic>parisii and P. auerginosa</italic> and <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals are susceptible to infection by <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig5-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig5-v4.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Susceptibility to <italic>P</italic>. <italic>aeruginosa</italic> PA14 appears at L4.</title><p>(<bold>a,b</bold>) Additional replicates of survival assays of animals grown on full lawns of PA14::DsRed as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5a</xref>. (<bold>a</bold>) TD<sub>50</sub>: N2 51 hr, aaim-1 (<italic>kea28</italic>) 46 hr, <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) 38 hr, and <italic>pmk-1 (km25</italic>) 25 hr. (<bold>b</bold>) TD<sub>50</sub>: N2 43 hr, aaim-1 (<italic>kea28</italic>) 30 hr, <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) 32 hr, and <italic>pmk-1 (km25</italic>) 20 hr. (<bold>c</bold>) Relative survival of mutants to N2 as calculated by mean strain TD<sub>50</sub>/mean N2 TD<sub>50</sub>. (<bold>d-e</bold>) N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants were grown on PA14::DsRed 48 hr post L1 (<bold>d</bold>) or 24 hr post L4 (<bold>e</bold>). Data is from three independent replicates of 20–30 worms each. Every point represents a single worm. Bacterial burden was measured as the percentage of the animal containing PA14::DsRed via FIJI. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. (<bold>f</bold>) p<italic>aaim-1</italic>::GFP::3xFlag were exposed to either PA14 or <italic>N. parisii</italic> 72 hr post L1 or 24 hr post L4. Animals were imaged at 45.5 x, scale bar 500 μm. p-Values determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc. Significance defined as ** p &lt; 0.01, **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s1sdata1"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Susceptibility to <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14 appears at L4.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig5-figsupp1-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig5-figsupp1-v4.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>A mutation in <italic>aaim-1</italic> does not influence <italic>C. elegans</italic> defense against <italic>S. aureus</italic> or lifespan.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) L4 stage N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> were plated on full lawns of <italic>S. aureus</italic> NCTC8325 and the percentage of animals alive was counted over the course of 120 hr. Three independent replicates are displayed. At least 40 worms were quantified per strain. (<bold>b</bold>) N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants were grown on <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1 for 1 month, and survival measured as number of animals responsive to touch. The number of animals quantified, as well as those censored are denoted on the graph. Three independent survival assays are displayed. p-Values determined via Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Significance defined as **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s2sdata1"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>A mutation in <italic>aaim-1</italic> does not influence <italic>C. elegans</italic> defense against <italic>S. aureus</italic> or lifespan.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig5-figsupp2-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig5-figsupp2-v4.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Previously, an <italic>aaim-1</italic> deletion strain, RB563 (<italic>ok295),</italic> was shown to display reduced survival on lawns of <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Styer et al., 2008</xref>). The enhanced susceptibility previously reported was attributed to <italic>dop-3,</italic> which is also partially deleted in RB563 (<italic>ok295</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Styer et al., 2008</xref>). To determine if <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants are susceptible to pathogenic bacterial infection, we assayed the survival of L4 stage worms in <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14 slow killing assays. A mutant in the p38 MAPK pathway (<italic>pmk-1</italic>) was used as control for susceptibility to PA14 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Kim et al., 2002</xref>). We observed reduced survival in <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles, although not to the same extent as the <italic>pmk-1</italic> mutant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5b</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1a-c</xref>). In contrast to significant susceptibility to the Gram-negative <italic>P. aeruginosa, aaim-1</italic> mutants do not display enhanced susceptibility to the Gram-positive bacterium <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> NCTC8325, suggesting specificity of AAIM-1 to PA14 infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2a</xref>).</p><p>Lethality in slow killing assays is a result of <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> accumulation within the intestinal lumen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Tan et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Kirienko et al., 2014</xref>). To investigate if <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles displayed higher levels of bacterial burden, animals were grown on lawns of PA14::DsRed at the L1 or L4 stage for 48 hr. <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutant alleles exposed as L4s, but not L1s, displayed higher bacterial burden relative to N2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5c</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1d,e</xref>). To test if intestinal expression of <italic>aaim-1</italic> was sufficient to limit bacterial colonization, transgenic <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) overexpressing AAIM-1::3xFlag from the endogenous or an intestinal-specific promoter were exposed to lawns of PA14::DsRed. When grown for 48 hr at the L1 or L4 stage, bacterial burden was significantly reduced, relative to N2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5d and e</xref>). These results indicate that AAIM-1 plays a role in limiting bacterial colonization, and its loss results in reduced survival due to hyper-colonization of the intestinal lumen.</p></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title>Fitness of <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals is dependent upon microbial environment</title><p>To investigate how <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles can influence population structure, we set up competitive fitness assays. A <italic>C. elegans</italic> strain with a fluorescent marker (RFP::ZNFX-1) was co-plated with N2 or <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants on <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1, <italic>N. parisii</italic> or <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14. Animals were grown for 8 days, such that the population was composed of adult F1s and developing F2s. On <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1, there is equal representation of N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants in the population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6a</xref>). This is consistent with <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants not having a developmental delay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1b</xref>) or a decrease in longevity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2b</xref>). In contrast, growth on <italic>N. parisii</italic> resulted in <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles outcompeting the N2 strain. Conversely, <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants on <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14 did significantly worse, being underrepresented in the population compared to N2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6a</xref>). Interestingly, wild isolates of <italic>C. elegans</italic> do not carry any obvious loss of function alleles of <italic>aaim-1</italic> suggesting that natural conditions have selected for its retention (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Cook et al., 2017</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles display enhanced fitness on <italic>N</italic>. <italic>parisii</italic>, but reduced fitness on <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Competitive fitness assays performed with a fluorescently marked strain (RFP::ZNFX1) mixed with either N2 or <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants. These mixed populations of animals were plated at the L1 stage on either <italic>E. coli</italic>, a medium-2 dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic>, or on <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>. After 8 days, the fraction of animals that did not display fluorescent germ granules was counted. Data is from three independent replicates of 20–270 worms each. (<bold>b,c</bold>) L1 stage N2 and <italic>aaim-1</italic> animals were either uninfected or infected with a maximal dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic>. These infected and uninfected population of animals were then washed and placed on either <italic>E. coli</italic> or PA14::DsRed. After 69 hr, animals were fixed and stained with DY96. Data is from three independent replicates of 60–150 worms each. (<bold>b</bold>) Graph displays percentage of gravid adults. (<bold>c</bold>) Quantified amount of either <italic>N. parisii</italic> (DY96) or <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> (PA14::DsRed). Twelve to 30 worms were quantified per replicate. Mean ± SEM represented by horizontal bars. p-Values determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc. Significance defined as ** p &lt; 0.01, *** p &lt; 0.001, **** p &lt; 0.0001.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata1"><label>Figure 6—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles display enhanced fitness on <italic>N</italic>. <italic>parisii</italic>, but reduced fitness on <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig6-data1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig6-v4.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>List of naturally occurring <italic>aaim-1(T14E8.4)</italic> variants in wild isolates of <italic>C.</italic> <italic>elegans</italic>.</title><p>This table represents a list of <italic>aaim-1</italic> coding variants found to naturally occur in wild isolates of <italic>C. elegans</italic> gnerated by the CeNDR variant browser (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Cook et al., 2017</xref>). The reference allele (REF) as well as the alternate variant (ALT) and the allele frequecy (AF) are displayed for various sites (POS) across <italic>aaim-1</italic>. The nature (effect) and impact of these variants are depicted as well as the nucleotide changes (nt_change) and the corresponding amino acid change (aa_change). <italic>aaim-1</italic> does not possess any variants predicted to have a high impact, implying that there are no obvious loss of function alleles and that its retention in the wild is advantageous.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6s1sdata1"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Editable version of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1</xref>.</title></caption><media mime-subtype="pdf" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig6-figsupp1-data1-v4.pdf"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig6-figsupp1-v4.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Given the opposing fates of <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants on <italic>N. parisii</italic> and <italic>P. aeruginosa,</italic> we investigated the effects of co-infection. Animals were infected with a maximal dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic> for 3 hr, prior to placement on lawns of PA14. For infections with a single pathogen, we observed similar results as before whereby <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants have increased fitness in the presence of <italic>N. parisii</italic> and display lower levels of parasite burden but have increased bacterial accumulation when grown on PA14. In the presence of both pathogens, populations of <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants display fewer gravid adults and increased amounts of <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6b and c</xref>). These results suggests that coinfection with <italic>N. parisii</italic> and <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> has synergistically negative effects on the fitness of <italic>C. elegans</italic>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>To identify host factors needed for microsporidia infection, we isolated mutants from a forward genetic screen that have a fitness advantage when challenged with <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection. This screen identified mutants in the poorly understood protein AAIM-1 (previously T14E8.4). Here, we demonstrate that this protein both promotes microsporidia invasion and limits colonization by pathogenic bacteria. Although we were unable to visualize the localization of secreted AAIM-1, our genetic and infection experiments strongly suggest that this protein acts in the intestinal lumen where both microsporidia invasion and bacterial colonization take place. The key role that AAIM-1 plays in immunity is further exemplified by its transcriptional regulation in response to infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>Secreted AAIM-1 functions in the intestinal lumen to limit bacterial colonization but is exploited by microsporidia to ensure successful invasion of intestinal cells.</title><p>AAIM-1 is secreted from intestinal cells, where the protein limits bacterial colonization in the lumen. Additionally, AAIM-1 is parasitized by <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores to ensure successful orientation and firing during intestinal cell invasion. Infection by either of these two pathogens results in the upregulation of AAIM-1. Figure made with <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://biorender.com/">Biorender.com</ext-link>.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="tiff" mimetype="image" xlink:href="elife-72458-fig7-v4.tif"/></fig><p>The processes by which microsporidia invade host cells are poorly understood. We show that <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores are often angled in wild-type <italic>C. elegans</italic>, suggesting that successful invasion requires a particular spore orientation. In the absence of AAIM-1, spores are more often parallel to the intestinal lumen, where spores may fire without the successful deposition of the sporoplasm inside an intestinal cell. In contrast to previously described host and microsporidia proteins involved in invasion, AAIM-1 does not appear to be involved in promoting adhesion to the surface of host cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Han et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Tamim El Jarkass and Reinke, 2020</xref>). Instead, AAIM-1 ensures an adequate distance of spores from the intestinal membrane, possibly allowing spores to be able to properly orient themselves to ensure successful host cell invasion. <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores are ~2.2 μm long by ~0.8 μm wide and the average width of the intestinal lumen at the L1 stage is ~0.6 μm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>). Therefore, at the L1 stage spores may not be able to move freely, but at the L3 stage, where AAIM-1 is not needed for invasion, there is less of a constraint on spore movement as the luminal width increases to ~1.3 μm. Alternatively, the developmentally restricted role of AAIM-1 could be due stage-specific expression of other factors that work along with AAIM-1 to promote microsporidia invasion. Together, our results highlight the power of studying microsporidia invasion in the context of a whole animal model.</p><p>Several lines of evidence suggest that AAIM-1 plays a role in protecting animals against <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>. First, <italic>aaim-1</italic> is upregulated in the intestine in response to PA14 exposure. Second, overexpression of AAIM-1 significantly decreases PA14 burden in the intestine. Third, loss of <italic>aaim-1</italic> leads to enhanced susceptibility and increased PA14 colonization. Fourth, competition assays show reduced reproductive fitness of <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants on PA14. The survival phenotype of <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants (~78% survival compared to wild type) is modest compared to loss of the p38 MAPK pathway (~51% survival compared to wild type). However, in competitive fitness assays, <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants are ~60% less represented than wild type in the F2 generation. Taken together, our data suggests that in addition to promoting microsporidia invasion, AAIM-1, at least in part, limits bacterial colonization and decreases susceptibility to <italic>P. aeruginosa.</italic></p><p><italic>C. elegans</italic> employs a variety of proteins to protect against bacterial infection. Many of these proteins belong to several classes of antimicrobial effectors used to eliminate and prevent colonization by pathogenic bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierking et al., 2016</xref>), are upregulated upon infection, and predicted to be secreted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Suh and Hutter, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Gallotta et al., 2020</xref>). One class of secreted proteins that is known to have immune functions and prevent bacterial adherence are the mucins. These large, glycosylated secreted proteins are upregulated during <italic>C. elegans</italic> infection and their knockdown alters susceptibility to <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> infection. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Strzyz, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hoffman et al., 2020</xref>) AAIM-1 has many predicted mucin-like O-glycosylation sites on serine and threonine residues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Steentoft et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jensen et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Tran and Ten Hagen, 2013</xref>). Thus, one possibility is that AAIM-1 may be functionally analogous to mucins, preventing the adhesion of microbes to the surface of intestinal cells. As AAIM-1 does not contain any known or conserved domains, further work will be necessary to determine its exact biochemical function.</p><p><italic>C. elegans</italic> lives in a microbially dense environment containing a wide variety pathogens that <italic>C. elegans</italic> has evolved immunity towards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Schulenburg and Félix, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Samuel et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Sinha et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Ashe et al., 2013</xref>). Although loss of <italic>aaim-1</italic> provides a fitness advantage to <italic>C. elegans</italic> when grown in the presence of microsporidia, obvious loss of function alleles are not present in wild isolates sequenced thus far. Additionally, <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants do not have observable defects when grown on non-pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic>. This is in contrast to mutations in <italic>pals-22</italic> or <italic>lin-35</italic>, which negatively regulate the transcriptional response to infection and provide resistance to microsporidia infection when mutated, but at the cost of reduced reproductive fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Reddy et al., 2017</xref>). Loss of <italic>aaim-1</italic> disadvantages <italic>C. elegans</italic> when grown on <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>, but not <italic>S. aureus,</italic> suggesting AAIM-1 does not broadly promote resistance to all bacterial pathogens. These findings demonstrate that there is a trade-off in host defense between microsporidia and some pathogenic bacteria. The opposing functions of <italic>aaim-1</italic> with different pathogens adds to the limited set of known examples of trade-offs that constrain the evolution of host defense to multiple biotic threats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Toor and Best, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Thaler et al., 1999</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Strain maintenance</title><p><italic>C. elegans</italic> strains were grown at 21°C on nematode growth media (NGM) plates seeded with 10 x saturated <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> OP50-1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). Strains used in this study are listed in the key resources table (Appendix 1). For all infection assays, 15–20 L4 staged animals were picked onto 10-cm seeded NGM plates 4 days prior to sodium hypchlorite/1 M NaOH treatment. After 4 days, heavily populated non-starved plates were washed off with 1 ml M9, treated twice with 1 ml of sodium hypochlorite/1 M NaOH solution, and washed three times in 1 ml M9. Embryos were then resuspended in 5 ml of M9 and left to rock overnight at 21 °C. L1s were used in subsequent experiments no later than 20 hr after bleach treatment. All centrifugation steps with live animals/embryos were performed in microcentrifuge tubes at 845 x g for 30 s.</p><p>Throughout the paper, L1 refers to the stage immediately post hatching or bleach synchronization, L3 refers to 24 hr and L4 refers to 48 hr post plating of bleach synchronized L1s at 21 °C. L3 and L4 stage animals were washed off plates in M9 +0.1% Tween-20, followed by an additional wash to remove residual bacteria before infection with microsporidia, or plating on PA14.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Forward genetic screen</title><p>6,000 L4 N2 hermaphrodites were mutagenized with a combination of 50 mM EMS and 85.4 mM ENU for 4 hr to achieve a large diversity of mutations within the genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Thompson et al., 2013</xref>) P0 animals were then split and placed onto 48 10-cm NGM plates, F1s bleached and resulting F2s pooled onto five separate plates. 180,000 L1 F2 animals were plated onto a 10-cm plate with 10 million <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores and 1 ml 10 x saturated OP50-1. Animals were grown for 72 hr, to select for animals that display a fitness advantage phenotype with respect to N2. Each population was bleached and grown in the absence of infection for one generation, in order to prevent the effects of intergenerational immunity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). Two more cycles of infection followed by growing worms in the absence of infection was performed. Populations of bleached L1s were then infected with either 20 or 40 million spores and grown for 76 hr. Worms were then washed into 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes and 1 ml of stain solution (1 x PBS/0.1% Tween-20/2.5 mg/ml DY96/1% SDS) was added. Samples were incubated with rotation for 3.5 hr and then washed three times with M9 +0.1% Tween-20. Individual worms that had embryos, but not spores, were picked to individual plates. Each of the four <italic>fawn</italic> strains was isolated from a different mutant pool.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Whole genome sequencing</title><p>N2 and <italic>fawn</italic> isolates were each grown on a 10-cm plate until all <italic>E. coli</italic> was consumed. Each strain was washed off with M9 and frozen at –80 °C. DNA was extracted using Gentra puregene Tissue Kit (QIAGEN). Samples were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000, using 100 base paired end reads.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>MIP-map</title><p>Molecular inversion probes were used to map the underlying causal mutations in <italic>fawn</italic> isolates as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Mok et al., 2017</xref>). Briefly, <italic>fawn</italic> hermaphrodites were crossed to males of the mapping strain DM7448 (VC20019 Ex[<italic>pmyo3::</italic>YFP<italic>])</italic> hereafter referred to as VC20019 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Mok et al., 2020</xref>). Next, 20 F1 hermaphrodite cross progeny, identified as those carrying <italic>pmyo3</italic>::YFP, were isolated and allowed to self. F2s were then bleached, and 2500 L1s were exposed to a medium-2 dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores representing the first round of selection. Two plates of 2500 F3 L1s were set up. The experimental plate was grown in the absence of infection for one generation, to negate intergenerational immunity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). A second plate of 2500 L1s was allowed to grow for 72 hr and then frozen in H<sub>2</sub>O at –80 °C, until used for genomic preparation. The selection and rest steps were repeated once more, and a second frozen sample of worms was taken at the end of the mapping experiment. This process was also performed for a cross between N2 hermaphrodites and males of the mapping strain VC20019, as a negative control to identify non-causal loci that may be selected for reasons other than resistance to infection. Two genomic preparations, corresponding to the two rounds of selection, were used as template for MIP capture, to generate multiplexed libraries for sequencing. An Illumina Mini-seq was used to generate sequencing data that was subjected to demultiplexing via R, and selection intervals were defined as those immediately adjacent to the region on the chromosome carrying the fewest proportion of reads corresponding to the mapping strain, VC20019. This interval was then used to scan for putative causal alleles, resulting in the identification of the four <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles in the four <italic>fawn</italic> isolates.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Identification of causal gene</title><p>Variants were identified using a BWA-GATK pipeline. Briefly, sequencing reads were checked for sequence quality using FastQC (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/">http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/</ext-link>) and bases lower than a quality threshold of 30 were trimmed off with Trimmomatic using a sliding window of 4 bases and minimum length of 36 bases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bolger et al., 2014</xref>). Reads were aligned to the <italic>C. elegans</italic> N2 reference genome (release W220) using BWA-mem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Li and Durbin, 2009</xref>). Alignments were sorted by coordinate order and duplicate reads removed using Picard (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Broad Institute, 2019</xref>). Prior to variant calling, reads were processed in Genome Analysis Tool Kit (GATK) v3.8.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">DePristo et al., 2011</xref>), to perform indel realignment and base quality score recalibration using known <italic>C. elegans</italic> variants from dbSNP, build 138 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/</ext-link>). GATK HaplotypeCaller was used to call variants, and results were filtered for a phred-scaled Qscore &gt;30 and to remove common variants found previously in multiple independent studies. Finally, Annovar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Wang et al., 2010</xref>) was used to obtain a list of annotated exonic variants for each sequenced strain.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Microsporidia infection assays</title><p><italic>N. parisii</italic> (ERTm1) and <italic>N. aususbeli</italic> (ERTm2) spores were prepared as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Willis et al., 2021</xref>). All infections were carried out on 6-cm NGM plates, unless otherwise specified by spore dose (see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>), or experimental method. 1000 bleach-synchronized L1s were added into a microcentrifuge tube containing 400 μl of 10 X <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1, and spores. After pipetting up and down, this mixture was top plated onto an unseeded 6-cm NGM plate, and left to dry in a clean cabinet, prior to incubation at 21 °C for 72 hr. Infections set up on 3.5-cm plates used 160 μl of 10 x <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1 and 400 L1s.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Infection of embryos hatched on plates</title><p>Twenty-five 72-hr-old synchronized animals of each strain were picked onto 3.5-cm unseeded NGM plates seeded with 16 μl of 10 x <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1. Plates were incubated at 21 °C for 2 hr. Adults were then picked off, and a mixture of 144 μl of 10 x <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1 and a low dose of <italic>N. parisii</italic> spores were added to each plate. Animals were fixed and stained after 72 hr.</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Pulse-chase infection assay</title><p>A total of 6000 bleach synchronized animals were exposed to a medium-1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1</xref>) or medium-3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) dose of spores, 10 μl of 10 x <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1 in a total volume of 400 μl made up with M9. To assay pathogen clearance 3 hpi, animals were washed off in 1 ml M9 +0.1% Tween-20, and split into two populations. The first half was fixed with acetone to represent initial infectious load, while the other half was washed twice in M9 +0.1% Tween-20 to remove residual spores in the supernatant and prevent additional infection from occurring. These washed worms were then plated on 6-cm unseeded NGM plates with 40 μl 10 x OP50-1, and 360 μl M9 and left to incubate at 21 °C for 21 additional hours before fixation.</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Spore localization and firing assays</title><p>Strains were infected as described for the pulse infection assays for either 45 min or 3 hr. Animals were then washed off plates, fixed, and stained with DY96 and an <italic>N. parisii</italic> 18 S RNA FISH probe. FISH<sup>+</sup> DY96<sup>+</sup> events represent unfired spores, FISH<sup>–</sup> DY96<sup>+</sup> events represent fired spores, and FISH<sup>+</sup> DY96<sup>-</sup> events represent sporoplasms. Percentage of fired spores is defined as the number of FISH<sup>–</sup> DY96<sup>+</sup> events over the total number of spores (DY96<sup>+</sup>).</p><p>To assess spore orientation, the localization of calcofluor white spores relative to the apical membrane of the intestine was measured in live anaesthetized animals using differential interference contrast microscopy. To determine if a spore was angled, straight lines were extended from both ends of the spore independently. If either of these two lines crossed the apical membrane, a spore was considered angled. If not, the spore was considered parallel. Distance of spores from the apical membrane was assessed by measuring perpendicular distance from the central edge of a parallel spore to the apical membrane. All measurements were performed with FIJI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Schindelin et al., 2012</xref>) using the angle tool or the straight line tool respectively, followed by the Analyze → measure option. Images in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4a</xref> were taken in N2 and <italic>aaim-1 (kea22)</italic> animals carrying PGP-1::GFP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Sato et al., 2007</xref>) to label the apical intestinal membrane, thus outlining the lumen.</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title>Intestinal lumen measurements</title><p>Measurements were performed on live anaesthetized worms used for spore localization assays (see above). The width of the lumen was determined by extending a straight line from the apical membrane on one end of the worm to that directly across on the other end, at the midpoint of the intestine, and the distance measured in FIJI, via the straight line tool followed by the Analyze → measure option.</p></sec><sec id="s4-11"><title>Fixation</title><p>Worms were washed off infection plates with 700 μl M9 +0.1% Tween-20 and washed once in 1 ml M9 +0.1% Tween-20. All microsporidia infected samples were fixed in 700 μl of acetone for 2 min at room temperature prior to staining. All <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> PA14::DsRed infected samples, as well as competitive fitness assays involving RFP::ZNFX-1 were fixed in 500 μl of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 min at room temperature prior to mounting on slides.</p></sec><sec id="s4-12"><title>Live imaging</title><p>Animals were mounted on 2% Agarose pads in 10 μl of 10–25 mM Sodium Azide. This technique was used for spore localization assays, transcriptional reporter imaging, and assessing PA14::DsRed colonization in transgenic animals.</p></sec><sec id="s4-13"><title>Chitin staining</title><p>The chitin binding dye Direct yellow 96 (DY96) was used to assess host fitness (gravidity) as well as parasite burden. A total of 500 μl of DY96 solution (1 x PBST, 0.1% SDS, 20 μg/ml DY96) was added to washed worm pellets and left to rock for 20–30 min at room temperature. Worms were then resuspended in 20 μl of EverBrite Mounting Medium (Biotium), and 10 μl mounted on glass slides for imaging.</p><p>To prestain spores prior to infection, 0.5 μl of calcofluor white solution (CFW) (Sigma- Aldrich 18909) was added per 50 μl of spores, pipetted up and down gently and left for 2 min at room temperature prior to infection.</p></sec><sec id="s4-14"><title>FISH staining</title><p>To quantify the number of sporoplasms in <italic>N. parisii</italic> infected animals, the MicroB FISH probe (<named-content content-type="sequence">ctctcggcactccttcctg</named-content>) labelling <italic>N. parisii</italic> 18 S RNA was used. Animals were fixed in acetone, washed twice in 1 ml PBST, and once in 1 ml of hybridization buffer (0.01% SDS, 900 mM NaCl, 20 mM TRIS pH 8.0). Samples were then incubated overnight in the dark at 46 °C with 100 μl of hybridization buffer containing 5 ng/μl of the MicroB FISH probe conjugated to Cal Fluor 610 (LGC Biosearch Technologies). Samples were then washed in 1 ml of wash buffer (Hybridization buffer + 5 mM EDTA), followed by incubation with 500 μl wash buffer at 46 °C in the dark. To visualize sporoplasms and spores simultaneously, the final incubation was replaced with 500 μl DY96 solution and incubated in the dark at room temperature prior to resuspension in 20 μl of EverBrite Mounting Medium (Biotium).</p></sec><sec id="s4-15"><title>Microscopy and image quantification</title><p>All imaging was performed using an Axio Imager.M2 (Zeiss), except for images of the transcriptional reporter in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1</xref>, which were generated using an Axio Zoom V.16 (Zeiss) at a magnification of 45.5 x. Images were captured via Zen software and quantified under identical exposure times per experiment. Gravidity is defined as the presence of at least one embryo per worm, and animals were considered infected by 72 hr if clumps of spores were visible in the body of animals as seen by DY96. FISH-stained animals were considered infected if at least one sporoplasm was visible in intestinal cells.</p><p>To quantify fluorescence within animals (pathogen burden, bead accumulation, and GFP), regions of interest were used to outline every individual worm from anterior to posterior, unless otherwise specified in the methods. Individual worm fluorescence from variable assays (GFP or DsRed) were subjected to the ‘threshold’ followed by ‘measure’ tools in FIJI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Schindelin et al., 2012</xref>). To assess PA14::DsRed burden in transgenic animals, regions of interest were generated from the beginning of the intestines (int1) to the posterior end of the worm to prevent the p<italic>myo2</italic>::mCherry co-injection marker signal from interfering with quantifications. When assessing pathogen burden in gravid animals stained with DY96, thresholding was used to quantify spore signal without including signal from embryos.</p></sec><sec id="s4-16"><title><italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> infection experiments</title><p>For all <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> assays, a single colony was picked into 3 ml of LB and grown overnight at 37 °C, 220 rpm for 16–18 hr. 10 μl (for 3.5-cm plate) or 50 μl (for 6-cm plate) of culture was spread onto slow killing (SK) plates to form a full lawn, except in the case of competitive fitness assays (see below). Seeded plates were placed at 37 °C for 24 hr, followed by 25 °C for 24 hr prior to use. Plates were seeded fresh prior to each experiment. To assess colonization, 1000 synchronized animals were grown on PA14::DsRed for either 24 or 48 hr at 25 °C. Animals were washed off with 1 ml M9 +0.1% Tween-20, and washed twice thereafter, prior to fixation.</p><p>To quantify survival of individual strains on PA14, 3.5-cm SK plates were seeded with 10 µl of PA14::DsRed,(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Dunn et al., 2006</xref>) to form full lawns. 60 L4s were picked onto each of three, 3.5- cm plates per strain, and 24 hr later, 30 animals from each were picked onto a new 3.5-cm plate. Survival was monitored from 24 hr post L4, three times per day. Survival was assessed based on response to touch. Carcasses were removed, and surviving animals were placed onto fresh 3.5-cm plates every 24 hr. Animals were grown at 25 °C for the duration of the experiment. Technical triplicate data was pooled to represent a single biological replicate. The experiment was carried out until no more worms had survived. Survival curves were generated via GraphPad Prism 9.0, and the Log rank (mantel-cox) test was used to generate P-values. TD<sub>50</sub> values were calculated as previously described,(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Styer et al., 2008</xref>) utilizing GraphPad Prism 9.0 and applying a non-linear regression analysis on survival curves.</p></sec><sec id="s4-17"><title><italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> infection experiments</title><p>3.5-cm tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates supplemented with 10 µg/ml nalidixic acid (Nal) and seeded with <italic>S. aureus</italic> NCTC8325 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Sifri et al., 2003</xref>) were utilized and survival quantified as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Powell and Ausubel, 2008</xref>). Briefly, a 1:10 dilution of an overnight <italic>S. aureus</italic> culture was utilized to seed 3.5-cm TSA + Nal plates, incubated at 37 °C for 3 hr and stored at 4 °C overnight. Thirty L4s were picked onto three TSA + Nal plates per strain, and survival quantified three times a day until all animals were dead. Animals were transferred to new seeded TSA + Nal plates every 24 hr. Survival was assessed based on response to touch. Technical triplicate data was pooled to represent a single biological replicate. Survival curves were generated via GraphPad Prism 9.0, and the Log rank (mantel-cox) test was used to generate p-values.</p></sec><sec id="s4-18"><title>Transgenic strain construction</title><p>N2 or <italic>aaim-1 (kea22)</italic> animals were injected with a 100 ng/μl injection mix composed of 50 ng/μl of template, 5 ng/μl of p<italic>myo2</italic>::mCherry, and 45 ng/μl of pBSK (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Ponchon et al., 2009</xref>). Three independent lines were generated for each injected construct.</p><p>Gateway BP cloning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Walhout et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hartley et al., 2000</xref>) was performed to insert AAIM-1 and GFP into pDONR221. Around the horn PCR, (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Moore and Prevelige, 2002</xref>) was used to insert a 3 x Flag sequence at the C-terminus of this construct. Gibson assembly was used to generate different tissue specific clones driving <italic>aaim-1</italic> expression. P<italic>aaim-1, aaim-1</italic> and p<italic>spp-5</italic> were cloned from N2 genomic DNA, <italic>pmyo2</italic> was cloned from pCFJ90 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Frøkjaer-Jensen et al., 2008</xref>). GFP and 3 x Flag sequences were cloned from pDD282 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Frøkjaer-Jensen et al., 2008</xref>). <italic>SPΔaaim-1</italic>was amplified from <italic>aaim-1</italic>::3xFlag in pDONR221 by omitting the first 17 amino acids, the putative secretion signal as predicted via SignalP 5.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Almagro Armenteros et al., 2019</xref>). All clones possessed an <italic>unc-54</italic> 3’ UTR. See key resources table for primer sequences (Appendix 1).</p></sec><sec id="s4-19"><title>CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis</title><p>To generate a deletion allele of <italic>aaim-1</italic> via CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis, steps were taken as described here (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Dickinson et al., 2015</xref>). Briefly, 2 crRNA’s were designed using CRISPOR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Concordet and Haeussler, 2018</xref>), (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Dokshin et al., 2018</xref>), near the start and stop sites of <italic>aaim-1</italic> and generated via IDT. A repair template was designed to contain 35 base pairs of homology upstream and downstream of the cut sites. <italic>Streptococcus pyogenes</italic> Cas9 3NLS (10 µg/µl) IDT and tracrRNA (IDT #1072532) were utilized. Reaction mixes were prepared as described previously. pRF4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Mello et al., 1991</xref>) was co-injected with the Cas9 ribonucleoprotein, and F1 rollers picked. Deletions were identified via PCR primers situated outside the cut sites.</p></sec><sec id="s4-20"><title>Bead-feeding assays</title><p>1,000 synchronized L1 animals were mixed with 0.2 μm green fluorescent polystyrene beads (Degradex Phosphorex) at a ratio of 25:1 in a final volume of 400 μl containing 10 μl of 10 x <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1, 16 μl of beads and up to 400 μl with M9. Animals were incubated with beads for 3 hr, washed off with M9 +0.1% Tween-20 and fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min at room temperature. Bead accumulation was measured as a percentage of the total animal exhibiting fluorescent signal, using FIJI.</p></sec><sec id="s4-21"><title>Lifespan assays</title><p>Lifespan assays were performed as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Amrit et al., 2014</xref>). In brief, 120 synchronized L4 animals were utilized per strain, with every 15 animals placed on a single 3.5-cm NGM plate (A total of 8 plates, with 15 animals each per strain). Animals were transferred to a new seeded 3.5-cm NGM plate every 2 days, for a total of 8 days (four transfers), ensuring no progeny were transferred alongside adults. After day 8, survival was quantified daily, on the same plate, via response to touch. Any animals that exhibited internal hatching, protruding intestines, or were found desiccated on the edges of the plate were censored. Survival curves were generated via GraphPad Prism 9, and the Log rank (mantel-cox) test was used to generate p values.</p></sec><sec id="s4-22"><title>Immunofluorescence (IF)</title><p>IF was performed as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Crittenden and Kimble, 2009</xref>); however, all steps post-dissection were performed in microcentrifuge tubes, and intestines were pelleted on a mini tabletop microcentrifuge for a few seconds. Briefly, animals were dissected to extrude intestinal tissue. Two 25-mm gauge needles on syringes were used to create an incision near the head and/or tail of the animals. Dissections were performed in 5 μl of 10 mM levamisole on glass slides to encourage intestinal protrusion. Fixation, permeabilization and blocking was performed as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Crittenden and Kimble, 2009</xref>). Primary M2 anti-Flag antibody (Sigma F1804) was used at 1:250 overnight at 4 °C, and secondary goat anti-mouse Alexa fluor 594 (Thermo Fisher A32742) at 1:300 for 1 hr at room temperature. Animals were mounted in 20 μl of EverBrite Mounting Medium (Biotium) and placed on glass slides for imaging.</p></sec><sec id="s4-23"><title>Competitive fitness assays</title><p>N2 or <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants were grown together with RFP::Znfx1 YY1446 <italic>(gg634)</italic>, which labels the germ granules and can be observed in all developmental stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Wan et al., 2018</xref>). For <italic>N. parisii</italic> infections, 10-cm NGM plates were seeded with 1 ml of 10 x OP50-1 and a medium-2 dose of spores (no spores were used for uninfected plates). 10 L1s from each strain were picked onto lawns of spores and <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50-1 immediately after drying, and grown for 8 days at 21 °C, washed off with M9 +0.1% Tween-20, and fixed. For <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> infections, 3.5-cm SK plates were seeded with a single spot of 20 μl of PA14 in the center of the plate. 10 L1s of each strain were placed on plates and grown at 21 °C for 8 days and then washed off with M9 +0.1% Tween-20. The percentage of animals that did not display RFP germ granules (i.e. N2 or <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants) was determined by quantifying all animals on the plate, including F1 adults and L1/L2 stage F2 animals.</p></sec><sec id="s4-24"><title>Co- infections with <italic>N. parisii</italic> and <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic></title><p>Co-infection assays were performed by first pulse infecting co-infection and <italic>N. parisii</italic> single infection groups with a maximal dose of spores for 3 hr on unseeded 6-cm NGM plates as described above. PA14::DsRed single infections were pulsed with a volume of M9 to match that of the spores. Animals were then washed off in 1 ml of M9 +0.1% Tween-20, followed by two more washes, prior to placement on full lawns of PA14::DsRed on a 6-cm SK plates prepared as described above. <italic>N. parisii</italic> single infections were placed on a 6-cm NGM plate pre-seeded with 200 μl of 10 x OP50-1. Plates were incubated at 21 °C.</p></sec><sec id="s4-25"><title>Phylogenetic analysis</title><p>Homology between AAIM-1 and other proteins was determined with protein BLAST (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi">https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi</ext-link>) using default parameters. Sequences with an E-value of at least 10−5 were aligned using MUSCLE (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/</ext-link>) using default parameters. Phylogenetic tree of homologs was generated using RAxML BlackBox (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://raxml-ng.vital-it.ch/">https://raxml-ng.vital-it.ch/</ext-link>) using default parameters and 100 boot straps. Tree was visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/">http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/</ext-link>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-26"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>All data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0. One-way Anova with post hoc (Tukey test) was used for all experiments unless otherwise specified in figure legends. Statistical significance was defined as p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec id="s5" sec-type="additional-information"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf2"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Funding acquisition, Supervision</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec id="s6" sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>Spore doses utilized in this study.</title><p>The different species of microsporidia used in the study, and the varying doses (as defined in figure legends) are listed. Plate concentration refers to the number of spores occupied per cm<sup>2</sup> of either 3.5, 6, or 10 cm NGM plates (indicated by *, ** or *** in the ‘total spores on assay plate’ column). The total number of spores present on a single assay plate are listed for the various doses in millions of spores.</p></caption><media mime-subtype="xlsx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-supp1-v4.xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="transrepform"><label>Transparent reporting form</label><media mime-subtype="docx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife-72458-transrepform1-v4.docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec id="s7" sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data availability</title><p>All data generated during this study have been uploaded as source data files for each figure.</p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Ashley M Campbell, Alexandra R Willis<italic>,</italic> and Kristina Sztanko for providing helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant no. 400,784 and an Alfred P Sloan Research Fellowship FG2019-12040 (to AWR). This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.nih.gov/">http://www.nih.gov/</ext-link>) under R01 AG052622 and GM114139 to ERT. Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440) and we thank WormBase.</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almagro Armenteros</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsirigos</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Sønderby</surname><given-names>CK</given-names></name><name><surname>Petersen</surname><given-names>TN</given-names></name><name><surname>Winther</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Brunak</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>von Heijne</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Nielsen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks</article-title><source>Nature Biotechnology</source><volume>37</volume><fpage>420</fpage><lpage>423</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30778233</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amrit</surname><given-names>FRG</given-names></name><name><surname>Ratnappan</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Keith</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghazi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>The <italic>C. elegans</italic> lifespan assay toolkit</article-title><source>Methods</source><volume>68</volume><fpage>465</fpage><lpage>475</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.04.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24727064</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashe</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bélicard</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Pen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarkies</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Frézal</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lehrbach</surname><given-names>NJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Miska</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>A deletion polymorphism in the <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> RIG-I homolog disables viral RNA dicing and antiviral immunity</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>2</volume><elocation-id>e00994</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.00994</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24137537</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Andersen</surname><given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kruglyak</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>A wild <italic>C. elegans</italic> strain has enhanced epithelial immunity to a natural microsporidian parasite</article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e1004583</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1004583</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25680197</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Luallen</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bakowski</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Cell-to-cell spread of microsporidia causes <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> organs to form syncytia</article-title><source>Nature Microbiology</source><volume>1</volume><elocation-id>16144</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.144</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27782144</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lažetić</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Natural variation in the roles of <italic>C. elegans</italic> autophagy components during microsporidia infection</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>e0216011</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0216011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31013330</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolger</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lohse</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Usadel</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>2114</fpage><lpage>2120</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24695404</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Botts</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Probert</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Microsporidia intracellular development relies on myc interaction network transcription factors in the host</article-title><source>G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>2707</fpage><lpage>2716</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/g3.116.029983</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27402359</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="software"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Broad Institute</collab></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><data-title>Picard Toolkit</data-title><source>GitHub</source><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard">https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab><italic>C. elegans</italic> Deletion Mutant Consortium</collab></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Large-scale screening for targeted knockouts in the <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> genome</article-title><source>G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>1415</fpage><lpage>1425</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/g3.112.003830</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23173093</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>You</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>A novel spore wall protein from antonospora locustae (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) contributes to sporulation</article-title><source>The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>779</fpage><lpage>791</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jeu.12410</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28277606</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Concordet</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Haeussler</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>CRISPOR: intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>W242</fpage><lpage>W245</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gky354</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29762716</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cook</surname><given-names>DE</given-names></name><name><surname>Zdraljevic</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Roberts</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Andersen</surname><given-names>EC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>CeNDR, the <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> natural diversity resource</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>45</volume><fpage>D650</fpage><lpage>D657</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkw893</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27701074</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Corradi</surname><given-names>NM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Microsporidia: eukaryotic intracellular parasites shaped by gene loss and horizontal gene transfers</article-title><source>Annual Review of Microbiology</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>167</fpage><lpage>183</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104136</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26195306</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crittenden</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kimble</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Preparation and immunolabeling of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Cold Spring Harbor Protocols</source><volume>2009</volume><elocation-id>pdb.prot5216</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/pdb.prot5216</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20147168</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>DePristo</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Banks</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Poplin</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Garimella</surname><given-names>KV</given-names></name><name><surname>Maguire</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartl</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Philippakis</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>del Angel</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Rivas</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanna</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>McKenna</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fennell</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kernytsky</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sivachenko</surname><given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Cibulskis</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gabriel</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name><name><surname>Altshuler</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Daly</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data</article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>491</fpage><lpage>498</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.806</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21478889</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dickinson</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Pani</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Heppert</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Higgins</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldstein</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Streamlined genome engineering with a self-excising drug selection cassette</article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>200</volume><fpage>1035</fpage><lpage>1049</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.115.178335</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26044593</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dierking</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulenburg</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Antimicrobial effectors in the nematode <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>: an outgroup to the Arthropoda</article-title><source>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences</source><volume>371</volume><elocation-id>20150299</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2015.0299</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27160601</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dokshin</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghanta</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name><name><surname>Piscopo</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Mello</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Robust genome editing with short single-stranded and long, partially single-stranded DNA donors in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>210</volume><fpage>781</fpage><lpage>787</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.118.301532</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dunn</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Millikan</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Adin</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bose</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Stabb</surname><given-names>EV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>New rfp- and pES213-derived tools for analyzing symbiotic Vibrio fischeri reveal patterns of infection and lux expression in situ</article-title><source>Applied and Environmental Microbiology</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>802</fpage><lpage>810</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.72.1.802-810.2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16391121</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Engelmann</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Griffon</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tichit</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Montañana-Sanchis</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Waterston</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Hillier</surname><given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ewbank</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>A comprehensive analysis of gene expression changes provoked by bacterial and fungal infection in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>e19055</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0019055</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21602919</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frøkjaer-Jensen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Hopkins</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Newman</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Thummel</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Olesen</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Grunnet</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jorgensen</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Single-copy insertion of transgenes in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>1375</fpage><lpage>1383</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.248</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18953339</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gallotta</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Sandhu</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Peters</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Haslbeck</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jung</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Agilkaya</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Blersch</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Rödelsperger</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Röseler</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sommer</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>David</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Extracellular proteostasis prevents aggregation during pathogenic attack</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>584</volume><fpage>410</fpage><lpage>414</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-020-2461-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32641833</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Polonais</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yakubu</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Takvorian</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Cali</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Maier</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Levy</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanowitz</surname><given-names>HB</given-names></name><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Delbac</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiss</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>The role of microsporidian polar tube protein 4 (PTP4) in host cell infection</article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>e1006341</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1006341</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28426751</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiss</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Therapeutic targets for the treatment of microsporidiosis in humans</article-title><source>Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>903</fpage><lpage>915</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14728222.2018.1538360</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30336698</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tu</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomita</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Mayoral</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Horta</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiss</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Microsporidia interact with host cell mitochondria via voltage-dependent anion channels using sporoplasm surface protein 1</article-title><source>MBio</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e01944-19</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.01944-19</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31431557</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Takvorian</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiss</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Invasion of host cells by microsporidia</article-title><source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>172</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00172</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32132983</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hartley</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Temple</surname><given-names>GF</given-names></name><name><surname>Brasch</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination</article-title><source>Genome Research</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>1788</fpage><lpage>1795</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.143000</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11076863</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hayman</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayes</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name><name><surname>Amon</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nash</surname><given-names>TE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Developmental expression of two spore wall proteins during maturation of the microsporidian Encephalitozoon intestinalis</article-title><source>Infection and Immunity</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>7057</fpage><lpage>7066</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.69.11.7057-7066.2001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11598081</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hayman</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Southern</surname><given-names>TR</given-names></name><name><surname>Nash</surname><given-names>TE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Role of sulfated glycans in adherence of the microsporidian Encephalitozoon intestinalis to host cells in vitro</article-title><source>Infection and Immunity</source><volume>73</volume><fpage>841</fpage><lpage>848</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.73.2.841-848.2005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15664924</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Head</surname><given-names>BP</given-names></name><name><surname>Olaitan</surname><given-names>AO</given-names></name><name><surname>Aballay</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Role of GATA transcription factor ELT-2 and p38 MAPK PMK-1 in recovery from acute <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> infection in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>Virulence</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>261</fpage><lpage>274</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/21505594.2016.1222334</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27600703</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoffman</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lalsiamthara</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Aballay</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Host mucin is exploited by <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> to provide monosaccharides required for a successful infection</article-title><source>MBio</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e00060-20</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.00060-20</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32127446</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaroenlak</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Boakye</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name><name><surname>Vanichviriyakit</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>BAP</given-names></name><name><surname>Sritunyalucksana</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Itsathitphaisarn</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Identification, characterization and heparin binding capacity of a spore-wall, virulence protein from the shrimp microsporidian, Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP)</article-title><source>Parasites &amp; Vectors</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>177</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13071-018-2758-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29530076</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolarich</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Packer</surname><given-names>NH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Mucin-type O-glycosylation--putting the pieces together</article-title><source>The FEBS Journal</source><volume>277</volume><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>94</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07429.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19919547</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Feinbaum</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Alloing</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Emerson</surname><given-names>FE</given-names></name><name><surname>Garsin</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Inoue</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka-Hino</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hisamoto</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsumoto</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ausubel</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>A conserved p38 MAP kinase pathway in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> innate immunity</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>297</volume><fpage>623</fpage><lpage>626</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1073759</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12142542</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirienko</surname><given-names>NV</given-names></name><name><surname>Cezairliyan</surname><given-names>BO</given-names></name><name><surname>Ausubel</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name><name><surname>Powell</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title><italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> PA14 pathogenesis in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Methods in Molecular Biology</source><volume>1149</volume><fpage>653</fpage><lpage>669</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-4939-0473-0_50</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24818940</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Durbin</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1754</fpage><lpage>1760</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19451168</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Identification of a novel spore wall protein (SWP26) from microsporidia Nosema bombycis</article-title><source>International Journal for Parasitology</source><volume>39</volume><fpage>391</fpage><lpage>398</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.08.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18854188</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luallen</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bakowski</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Characterization of microsporidia-induced developmental arrest and a transmembrane leucine-rich repeat protein in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e0124065</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0124065</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25874557</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luallen</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name><name><surname>Tong</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Botts</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Discovery of a Natural Microsporidian Pathogen with a Broad Tissue Tropism in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>12</volume><elocation-id>e1005724</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1005724</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27362540</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martín-Hernández</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Bartolomé</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Chejanovsky</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Conte</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Dalmon</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dussaubat</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>García-Palencia</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Meana</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinto</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Soroker</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Higes</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Nosema ceranae in Apis mellifera: a 12 years postdetection perspective</article-title><source>Environmental Microbiology</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>1302</fpage><lpage>1329</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.14103</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29575513</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McGhee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghafouri</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Bacterial residence time in the intestine of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Nematology</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>87</fpage><lpage>91</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1163/156854107779969718</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mello</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kramer</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Stinchcomb</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Ambros</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1991">1991</year><article-title>Efficient gene transfer in <italic>C. elegans</italic>: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>3959</fpage><lpage>3970</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1935914</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mok</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Au</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>OA</given-names></name><name><surname>Edgley</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Gevirtzman</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Yochem</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lowry</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Memar</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Wallenfang</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Rasoloson</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Bowerman</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Schnabel</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Seydoux</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Moerman</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name><name><surname>Waterston</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>MIP-MAP: High-Throughput Mapping of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> Temperature-Sensitive Mutants via Molecular Inversion Probes</article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>207</volume><fpage>447</fpage><lpage>463</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.117.300179</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28827289</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mok</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Belmarez</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Edgley</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Moerman</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name><name><surname>Waterston</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>PhenoMIP: High-Throughput Phenotyping of Diverse <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> Populations via Molecular Inversion Probes</article-title><source>G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>3977</fpage><lpage>3990</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/g3.120.401656</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32868407</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Prevelige</surname><given-names>PE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>A P22 scaffold protein mutation increases the robustness of head assembly in the presence of excess portal protein</article-title><source>Journal of Virology</source><volume>76</volume><fpage>10245</fpage><lpage>10255</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jvi.76.20.10245-10255.2002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12239300</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="preprint"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murareanu</surname><given-names>BM</given-names></name><name><surname>Knox</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021a</year><article-title>High-Ihroughput Small Molecule Screen Identifies Inhibitors of Microsporidia Invasion and Proliferation in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>bioRxiv</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/2021.09.06.459184</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murareanu</surname><given-names>BM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sukhdeo</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Qu</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021b</year><article-title>Generation of a microsporidia species attribute database and analysis of the extensive ecological and phenotypic diversity of microsporidia</article-title><source>MBio</source><volume>12</volume><elocation-id>e0149021</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.01490-21</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34182782</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ponchon</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Beauvais</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Nonin-Lecomte</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Dardel</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>A generic protocol for the expression and purification of recombinant RNA in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> using a tRNA scaffold</article-title><source>Nature Protocols</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>947</fpage><lpage>959</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2009.67</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19478810</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Powell</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Ausubel</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Models of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> infection by bacterial and fungal pathogens</article-title><source>Methods in Molecular Biology</source><volume>415</volume><fpage>403</fpage><lpage>427</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-59745-570-1_24</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18370168</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Dror</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Sowa</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Panek</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>An intracellular pathogen response pathway promotes proteostasis in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>3544</fpage><lpage>3553</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29103937</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Dror</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Underwood</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Osman</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Elder</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Desjardins</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cuomo</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Barkoulas</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Antagonistic paralogs control a switch between growth and pathogen resistance in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>15</volume><elocation-id>e1007528</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1007528</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30640956</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name><name><surname>Mak</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Bennett</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>In vivo mapping of tissue- and subcellular-specific proteomes in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Science Advances</source><volume>3</volume><elocation-id>e1602426</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.1602426</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Routtu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ebert</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Genetic architecture of resistance in Daphnia hosts against two species of host-specific parasites</article-title><source>Heredity</source><volume>114</volume><fpage>241</fpage><lpage>248</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/hdy.2014.97</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25335558</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samuel</surname><given-names>BS</given-names></name><name><surname>Rowedder</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Braendle</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruvkun</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title><italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> responses to bacteria from its natural habitats</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>113</volume><fpage>E3941</fpage><lpage>E3949</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1607183113</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27317746</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Mushiake</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeda</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozono</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Miki</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kubo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsuji</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Harada</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Harada</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>The Rab8 GTPase regulates apical protein localization in intestinal cells</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>448</volume><fpage>366</fpage><lpage>369</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature05929</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17597763</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schindelin</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Arganda-Carreras</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Frise</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaynig</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Longair</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pietzsch</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Preibisch</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rueden</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Saalfeld</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmid</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Tinevez</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartenstein</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Eliceiri</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomancak</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cardona</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>676</fpage><lpage>682</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22743772</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schulenburg</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>The natural biotic environment of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>206</volume><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>86</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.116.195511</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sifri</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Begun</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ausubel</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name><name><surname>Calderwood</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title><italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> as a model host for <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> pathogenesis</article-title><source>Infection and Immunity</source><volume>71</volume><fpage>2208</fpage><lpage>2217</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.71.4.2208-2217.2003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12654843</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sinha</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rae</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Iatsenko</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Sommer</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>System wide analysis of the evolution of innate immunity in the nematode model species <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> and Pristionchus pacificus</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>e44255</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0044255</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23028509</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Southern</surname><given-names>TR</given-names></name><name><surname>Jolly</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Lester</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayman</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>EnP1, a microsporidian spore wall protein that enables spores to adhere to and infect host cells in vitro</article-title><source>Eukaryotic Cell</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>1354</fpage><lpage>1362</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/EC.00113-07</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17557882</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steentoft</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Vakhrushev</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name><name><surname>Joshi</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Vester-Christensen</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Schjoldager</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lavrsen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Dabelsteen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedersen</surname><given-names>NB</given-names></name><name><surname>Marcos-Silva</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gupta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Bennett</surname><given-names>EP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandel</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Brunak</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wandall</surname><given-names>HH</given-names></name><name><surname>Levery</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name><name><surname>Clausen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Precision mapping of the human O-GalNAc glycoproteome through SimpleCell technology</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>1478</fpage><lpage>1488</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/emboj.2013.79</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23584533</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stentiford</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Becnel</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiss</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Keeling</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Didier</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>BP</given-names></name><name><surname>Bjornson</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kent</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Freeman</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>MJF</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Roesel</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Sokolova</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Snowden</surname><given-names>KF</given-names></name><name><surname>Solter</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Microsporidia - Emergent Pathogens in the Global Food Chain</article-title><source>Trends in Parasitology</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>336</fpage><lpage>348</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pt.2015.12.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26796229</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strzyz</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Bend it like glycocalyx</article-title><source>Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology</source><volume>20</volume><elocation-id>388</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41580-019-0142-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31065078</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Styer</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Macosko</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Steele</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Bargmann</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name><name><surname>Aballay</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Innate immunity in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> is regulated by neurons expressing NPR-1/GPCR</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>322</volume><fpage>460</fpage><lpage>464</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1163673</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18801967</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suh</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hutter</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>A survey of putative secreted and transmembrane proteins encoded in the <italic>C. elegans</italic> genome</article-title><source>BMC Genomics</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>333</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-13-333</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22823938</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Szumowski</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Botts</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Popovich</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Smelkinson</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>The small GTPase RAB-11 directs polarized exocytosis of the intracellular pathogen N. parisii for fecal-oral transmission from <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>111</volume><fpage>8215</fpage><lpage>8220</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1400696111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24843160</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tamim El Jarkass</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>The ins and outs of host-microsporidia interactions during invasion, proliferation and exit</article-title><source>Cellular Microbiology</source><volume>22</volume><elocation-id>e13247</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cmi.13247</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32748538</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahajan-Miklos</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ausubel</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Killing of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> by <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> used to model mammalian bacterial pathogenesis</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>96</volume><fpage>715</fpage><lpage>720</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.96.2.715</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9892699</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tecle</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Chhan</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Franklin</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Underwood</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanna-Rose</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The purine nucleoside phosphorylase pnp-1 regulates epithelial cell resistance to infection in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>17</volume><elocation-id>e1009350</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1009350</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33878133</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thaler</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Fidantsef</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Duffey</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bostock</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Trade-offs in plant defense against pathogens and herbivores: a field demonstration of chemical elicitors of induced resistance</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Ecology</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1597</fpage><lpage>1609</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1020840900595</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Edgley</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Strasbourger</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Flibotte</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ewing</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Adair</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Au</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaudhry</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernando</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hutter</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kieffer</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lau</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Raymant</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Shendure</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>EH</given-names></name><name><surname>Hillier</surname><given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Moerman</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name><name><surname>Waterston</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>The million mutation project: a new approach to genetics in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Genome Research</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>1749</fpage><lpage>1762</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.157651.113</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23800452</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toor</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Best</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Evolution of host defense against multiple enemy populations</article-title><source>The American Naturalist</source><volume>187</volume><fpage>308</fpage><lpage>319</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/684682</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26913944</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name><name><surname>Ten Hagen</surname><given-names>KG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Mucin-type O-glycosylation during development</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>288</volume><fpage>6921</fpage><lpage>6929</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.R112.418558</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23329828</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Whiteman</surname><given-names>NK</given-names></name><name><surname>Barrière</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ausubel</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Microsporidia are natural intracellular parasites of the nematode <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>PLOS Biology</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>e2736-52</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.0060309</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19071962</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>New models of microsporidiosis: infections in Zebrafish, <italic>C. elegans</italic>, and honey bee</article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>e1001243</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1001243</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21379567</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wadi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Evolution of microsporidia: An extremely successful group of eukaryotic intracellular parasites</article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>16</volume><elocation-id>e1008276</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1008276</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32053705</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walhout</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Temple</surname><given-names>GF</given-names></name><name><surname>Brasch</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartley</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lorson</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>van den Heuvel</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vidal</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>GATEWAY recombinational cloning: application to the cloning of large numbers of open reading frames or ORFeomes</article-title><source>Methods in Enzymology</source><volume>328</volume><fpage>575</fpage><lpage>592</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0076-6879(00)28419-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11075367</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib79"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Fields</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name><name><surname>Spracklin</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Shukla</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kennedy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Spatiotemporal regulation of liquid-like condensates in epigenetic inheritance</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>557</volume><fpage>679</fpage><lpage>683</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-018-0132-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29769721</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib80"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hakonarson</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>38</volume><elocation-id>e164</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkq603</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20601685</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib81"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Willis</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Sukhdeo</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wadi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>El Jarkass</surname><given-names>HT</given-names></name><name><surname>Claycomb</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinke</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>A parental transcriptional response to microsporidia infection induces inherited immunity in offspring</article-title><source>Science Advances</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>eabf3114</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.abf3114</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33952520</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib82"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Proteomic analysis of spore wall proteins and identification of two spore wall proteins from Nosema bombycis (Microsporidia)</article-title><source>Proteomics</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>2447</fpage><lpage>2461</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/pmic.200700584</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18563739</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib83"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Takvorian</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cali</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiss</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Lectin binding of the major polar tube protein (PTP1) and its role in invasion</article-title><source>The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology</source><volume>50 Suppl</volume><fpage>600</fpage><lpage>601</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1550-7408.2003.tb00644.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14736177</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib84"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Takvorian</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Cali</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Orr</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiss</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Glycosylation of the major polar tube protein of Encephalitozoon hellem, a microsporidian parasite that infects humans</article-title><source>Infection and Immunity</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>6341</fpage><lpage>6350</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.72.11.6341-6350.2004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15501763</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib85"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sachse</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Prevost</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Luallen</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Troemel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>A large collection of novel nematode-infecting microsporidia and their diverse interactions with <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> and other related nematodes</article-title><source>PLOS Pathogens</source><volume>12</volume><elocation-id>e1006093</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1006093</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27942022</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list><app-group><app id="appendix-1"><title>Appendix 1</title><table-wrap id="app1keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Appendix 1—key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Reagent type (species) or resource</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Designation</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Source or reference</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Identifiers</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gene (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">a<italic>aim-1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>T14E8.4</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Wormbase ID:<break/> WBGene00043981</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Caenorhabditis</italic> genetic center (CGC)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">N2 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_007341">SCR_007341</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Wild-type, Bristol strain.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>fawn-1</italic> (AWR 05)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea89) X</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">C127T, Q43Stop</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>fawn-2</italic> (AWR 11)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea28) X</italic></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">2.2 kb deletion</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>fawn-3</italic> (AWR 17)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea91) X</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">G221A splice site mutation</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>fawn-4</italic> (AWR 03)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea103) X</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">C1286T, A429V</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DM7748</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Mok et al., 2020</xref> DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401656">10.1534/g3.120.401656</ext-link>.</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">VC20019 (Ex[<italic>Pmyo-3::YFP</italic>])</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Mapping strain</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">RB563</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Caenorhabditis</italic> genetic center (CGC)</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>aaim-1 (ok295) X</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Large gene deletion in <italic>aaim-1</italic> and neighbouring gene <italic>dop-3</italic></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">AWR 73</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea22) X</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">3 x outcrossed CRISPR-Cas9 generated deletion allele of <italic>aaim-1</italic>.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AWR 83</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea28</italic>) X</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">6 x outcrossed <italic>fawn-2 (kea28</italic>)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">DA465</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Caenorhabditis</italic> genetic center (CGC)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>eat-2 (ad465</italic>) <italic>II</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Feeding defective mutant.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AWR 131</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="top">N2 Ex[p<italic>myo2::mCherry::Unc54,</italic> p<italic>aaim-1::GFP::3xFlag::Unc54]</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1</italic> transcriptional reporter in N2 background with a pharyngeal mCherry co-injection marker.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">AWR 125</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>aaim-1(kea22</italic> Ex<italic>[</italic>p<italic>myo2::mCherry::Unc54,</italic> p<italic>aaim-1::GFP::3xFlag::Unc54]</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1</italic> transcriptional reporter in <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) mutant background with a pharyngeal mCherry co-injection marker.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">AWR 122</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1(kea22</italic> Ex<italic>[</italic>p<italic>myo3::mCherry::Unc54,</italic> p<italic>aaim-1::GFP::Unc54]</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1</italic> transcriptional reporter in <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) mutant background with a body wall muscle mCherry co-injection marker.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">AWR 115</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic> Ex<italic>[</italic>p<italic>myo2::mCherry::Unc54,</italic> p<italic>aaim-1::aaim-1::Unc54]</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1</italic> over expression in an <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) mutant background with a pharyngeal mCherry co-injection marker.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">AWR119</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic> Ex<italic>[</italic>p<italic>myo2::mCherry::Unc54,</italic> p<italic>aaim-1::aaim-1</italic>::3xFlag::<italic>Unc54]</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1::3xFlag</italic> over expression in an <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) mutant background with a pharyngeal mCherry co-injection marker.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">AWR 127</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic> Ex<italic>[</italic>p<italic>myo2::mCherry::Unc54,</italic> p<italic>aaim-1::SPΔ aaim-1::3xFlag::Unc54]</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Signal peptide mutant <italic>aaim-1::3xFlag</italic> over expression in an <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) mutant background with a pharyngeal mCherry co-injection marker.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">AWR129</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic> Ex<italic>[</italic>p<italic>myo2::mCherry::Unc54,</italic> p<italic>spp-5:: aaim-1::3xFlag::Unc54]</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Intestinal <italic>aaim-1::3xFlag</italic> over expression in an <italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) mutant background with a pharyngeal mCherry co-injection marker.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">YY1446</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Caenorhabditis</italic> genetic center (CGC)</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>znfx-1</italic>(<italic>gg634[</italic>HA::tagRFP::<italic>znfx-1</italic>]) <italic>II</italic>.</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RFP germ granules</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">GK288</td><td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Sato et al., 2007</xref> DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05929">10.1038/nature05929</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>unc-119(ed3</italic>); dkIs166[p<italic>opt-2</italic>::<italic>PGP-1::GFP</italic>, <italic>unc-119</italic>(+)]</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Apical intestinal membrane marker.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">KU25</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Caenorhabditis</italic> genetic center (CGC)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>pmk-1 (km25) IV</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">p38 Map kinase loss of function mutant.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">AWR182</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>aaim-1 (kea22) X;</italic> dkIs166[p<italic>opt-2</italic>::<italic>PGP-1::GFP</italic>, <italic>unc-119</italic>(+)] <italic>IV</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>aaim-1 (kea22</italic>) mutant allele crossed into GK288.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">OP50-1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Caenorhabditis</italic> genetic center (CGC)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">OP50-1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Uracil auxotroph. B strain. Streptomycin resistant.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5-alpha competent <italic>E. coli</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England Biolabs (NEB)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: C2987H</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>E. coli</italic> background in which transformations for molecular cloning were performed.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Nematocida parisii</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>N. parisii</italic> (ERTm1)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>N. parisii</italic> (ERTm1)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Nematode intestinal infecting species of microsporidia.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Nematocida ausubeli</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>N. ausubeli</italic> (ERTm2)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>N. ausubeli</italic> (ERTm2)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Nematode intestinal infecting species of microsporidia.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PA14::DsRed</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Dunn et al., 2006</xref> DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.72.1.802-810.2006">10.1128/AEM.72.1.802</ext-link><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.72.1.802-810.2006">–</ext-link><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.72.1.802-810.2006">810.2006</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PA14::DsRed</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DsRed labelled strain of PA14.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NCTC 8325</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Sifri et al., 2003</xref> DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.71.4.2208-2217.2003">10.1128/IAI.71.4.2208–2217.2003</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NCTC 8325</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>S. aureus</italic> isolate used for <italic>C. elegans</italic> killing assays.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">M2 anti Flag (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: F1804 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_262044">AB_262044</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">IF (1:250)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Anti mouse Alexafluor 594 (Goat polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Thermo Fisher</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: A32742 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2762825">AB_2762825</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">IF (1:300)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer to amplify <italic>aaim-1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5’-<named-content content-type="sequence">ttaatttttttgctggtgagg</named-content>-3’</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Forward primer to generate <italic>SPΔaaim-1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5'-<named-content content-type="sequence">atgctaaaggatttcttgccgtg</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Forward primer to amplify p<italic>aaim-1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5'-<named-content content-type="sequence">ttagtttggaaatgcacaaaaaaactgatctct</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Reverse primer to amplify p<italic>aaim-1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5-<named-content content-type="sequence">cagtggacttctgcttattaaaatgacttc</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Forward primer to amplify p<italic>myo2</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">5'-<named-content content-type="sequence">cattttatatctgagtagtatcctttgctttaaatgtcc</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Reverse primer to amplify p<italic>myo2</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">5’- <named-content content-type="sequence">gcatttctgtgtctgacgat</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Forward primer to amplify p<italic>spp5</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">5’-<named-content content-type="sequence">aaagcaaaatatcattatttgggaaaatc</named-content>-3’</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Reverse primer to amplify p<italic>spp5</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">5’-<named-content content-type="sequence">tctgtaataaaataaattgaaatgaaacac</named-content>-3’</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Forward primer to amplify GFP from pDD282</td><td align="left" valign="top">5'-<named-content content-type="sequence">atgagtaaaggagaagaattgttcact</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Reverse primer to amplify GFP from pDD282</td><td align="left" valign="top">5'-<named-content content-type="sequence">ttacttgtagagctcgtccattccg</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward Ultramer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Forward ultramer to add a Gly Ala Gly Ser <bold>linker</bold> and <underline>3 x Flag</underline> with <italic>stop codon</italic> to C-Terminal end of constructs in <underline><bold>pDDONR221</bold></underline> via round the horn PCR.<sup>5</sup></td><td align="left" valign="top">5’-<named-content content-type="sequence">ggagccggatct<underline>gattataaagacgatgacgataagcgtgactacaaggacgacgacgaca agcgtgattacaaggatgacgatgacaagaga</underline>taa<underline>acccagctttcttgtacaaagttg</underline></named-content>-3’</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">MicroB FISH probe conjugated to Cal Fluor 610</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">LGC Biosearch Technologies</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">18 s RNA FISH probe</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5’-<named-content content-type="sequence">ctctcggcactccttcctg</named-content>-3’</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 tracrRNA 5 nmol</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: 1072532</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5’ sgRNA</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Guide RNA</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5'-<named-content content-type="sequence">aataaatggcataagttaag</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">3’ sgRNA</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Guide RNA</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5'-<named-content content-type="sequence">tttacaggcgtgtttcattg</named-content>-3'</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant protein</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Alt-R S.p. Cas9 Nuclease V3, 100 ug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated DNA technologies (IDT)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: 1081058</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant protein</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England Biolabs (NEB)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: M0530L</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DNA polymerase used for all molecular cloning steps.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pBSK</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Ponchon et al., 2009</xref> DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.67">10.1038/nprot.2009.67</ext-link>.</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pBSK RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:Addgene_67504">Addgene_67504</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Addgene ID: 67,504</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gateway pDONR221</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Invitrogen</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: 12536017</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pCFJ90</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Frøkjaer-Jensen et al., 2008</xref> DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.248">10.1038/ng.248</ext-link>.</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pCFJ90 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:Addgene_19327">Addgene_19327</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Addgene ID: 19,327</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pDD282</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Dickinson et al., 2015</xref> DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.178335">10.1534/genetics.115.178335</ext-link>.</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pDD282 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:Addgene_66823">Addgene_66823</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Addgene ID: 66,823</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay or kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England biolabs (NEB)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: 3E2621</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Kit used for Gibson assembly.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay or kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Monarch PCR and DNA Cleanup Kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England biolabs (NEB)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: T1030S</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PCR purification kit for amplicons used in downstream molecular cloning steps.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay or kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">QIAprep spin miniprep kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Qiagen</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: 27,106</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Kit used for extraction of DNA from bacterial clones.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Direct yellow 96</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma- Aldrich</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: S472409-1G</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chitin binding dye.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Calcofluor white</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma- Aldrich</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: 18,909</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chitin binding dye.</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">EverbriteMounting Medium</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Biotium</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: 23,002</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Mounting medium with DAPI</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FIJI</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Schindelin et al., 2012</xref> DOI: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019">10.1038/nmeth.2019</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_002285">SCR_002285</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Image analysis software</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GraphPad Pism 9.0</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GraphPad Pism 9.0</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_002798">SCR_002798</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Statistical analysis software</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Other</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">0.2 μm green fluorescent polystyrene beads</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Degradex Phosphorex</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#: 2,108B</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Fluorescent beads for bead feeding assays.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></app></app-group></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.72458.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>Editor's evaluation</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lourido</surname><given-names>Sebastian</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04vqm6w82</institution-id><institution>Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><related-object id="sa0ro1" link-type="continued-by" object-id="10.1101/2021.07.12.452088" object-id-type="id" xlink:href="https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2021.07.12.452088"/></front-stub><body><p>Host factors involved in microsporidia infection have not been characterized in any detail, despite their ubiquitous distribution as infectious agents of animals. Through genetics screens, this study identifies a gene required for microsporidia invasion of the <italic>C. elegans</italic> intestine. Decreased susceptibility to microsporidia comes at the cost of increased colonization and infection by certain bacterial species, suggesting a tradeoff between resistance to different classes of pathogens.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.72458.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Lourido</surname><given-names>Sebastian</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04vqm6w82</institution-id><institution>Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text id="box1"><p>Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2021.07.12.452088">public reviews</ext-link> designed to be posted alongside <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.15.452170v1">the preprint</ext-link> for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.</p></boxed-text><p><bold>Decision letter after peer review:</bold></p><p>Thank you for submitting your article &quot;An intestinally secreted host factor limits bacterial colonization but promotes microsporidia invasion of <italic>C. elegans</italic>&quot; for consideration by <italic>eLife</italic>. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Piali Sengupta as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.</p><p>The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.</p><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>Overall, the reviewers were highly enthusiasm about the discovery of a host factor necessary for infection with microsporidia, based on how little is known regarding these pathogens. The reviewers found the involvement of AAIM-1 in bacterial resistance less compelling, proposing the study remain centered on the role of the factor in relation to microsporidia. Considering that the molecular function of AAIM-1 remains poorly defined, the authors should also avoid language that too concretely defines the function of the factor. Essential revisions to the text are listed below, but no additional experimental data is required for publication.</p><p>(1) The authors should be more explicit about the modest effect of AAIM-1 disruption on resistance to bacterial infection. Discussion of tradeoffs between resistance to microsporidia and bacteria appear exaggerated based on the data presented. This includes modifying the title to reflect the weakness of the bacterial phenotype, e.g. &quot;An intestinally secreted host factor promotes microsporidia invasion of <italic>C. elegans</italic>.&quot;</p><p>(2) Given the lack of information about the molecular function of AAIM-1, the authors should consider models that account for the stage-specific effects of the factor, rather than very direct effects on invasion.</p><p><italic>Combined Recommendations for the authors:</italic></p><p>(1) Images supporting the proposed mechanism by which aaim-1 modulates the orientation and hence invasive potential of microsporidia in the <italic>C. elegans</italic> intestine should be better defined.</p><p>(2) Discuss or document developmental effects that may be associated with infection with microsporidia. Figure 1a. Infection with microsporidia appears to be causing larval developmental arrest. The worms seem to hardly grow beyond L1 body length (250 micrometers). A careful analysis of body length in infected N2 animals would show whether they are arrested in L1 or L1 +L2 larva stage. The developmental arrest can also be ascertained using markers for germline and vulva development. Both larval arrest and smaller brood size are indicators of caloric restriction and starvation. The starvation in presence of microsporidia can be ascertained or ruled out by using markers of lipid breakdown such as acs-2, loss of lipid droplets, etc. It is likely that AAIM- bypasses the microsporidia-induced developmental arrest, observing the bottom row of images in Figure 1A suggests that this is the case since aaim-1 mutants don't show arrest of body length. Similar observations have been reported for E. faecalis infection of <italic>C. elegans</italic> [Garsin, Science 2003; Dasgupta, Micropublication 2020]. Authors could test if aaim-1 can alleviate infection mediated or caloric restriction mediated arrest.</p><p>(3) Is there published literature to show that spore orientation is causative or correlated with the firing of polar tubes and invasion?</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.72458.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>Overall, the reviewers were highly enthusiasm about the discovery of a host factor necessary for infection with microsporidia, based on how little is known regarding these pathogens. The reviewers found the involvement of AAIM-1 in bacterial resistance less compelling, proposing the study remain centered on the role of the factor in relation to microsporidia. Considering that the molecular function of AAIM-1 remains poorly defined, the authors should also avoid language that too concretely defines the function of the factor. Essential revisions to the text are listed below, but no additional experimental data is required for publication.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewers for their comments. We address the involvement of AAIM-1 in bacterial resistance below.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(1) The authors should be more explicit about the modest effect of AAIM-1 disruption on resistance to bacterial infection. Discussion of tradeoffs between resistance to microsporidia and bacteria appear exaggerated based on the data presented. This includes modifying the title to reflect the weakness of the bacterial phenotype, e.g. &quot;An intestinally secreted host factor promotes microsporidia invasion of <italic>C. elegans</italic>.&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>We have changed the title to “An intestinally secreted host factor promotes microsporidia invasion of <italic>C. elegans</italic>“ to emphasize the role of AAIM-1 in microsporidia invasion and remove emphasis from the bacterial phenotype. We have also expanded upon our discussion in lines 324-333 describing how loss of AAIM-1 impacts the animal’s interactions with bacteria.</p><p>However, we feel that our previous draft provided several lines of evidence for the role of AAIM-1 in limiting <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> PA14 infection including (1) upregulation of <italic>aaim-1</italic> in the intestine in response to PA14 exposure (Figure 5a and S6f), (2) overexpression of AAIM-1 significantly decreasing PA14 burden in the intestine (Figure 5d and e), (3) loss of AAIM-1 leading to enhanced susceptibility and increased PA14 colonization (Figure 5b and c and S6a, b, and e), and (4) competition assays showing reduced reproductive fitness of <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants on PA14 (Figure 6a).</p><p>To quantify the effect of loss of AAIM-1 on PA14 susceptibility, we have now repeated the survival curves of N2 and two <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutant alleles in comparison to the well-characterized p38 MAP kinase mutant <italic>pmk-1(km25)</italic> as a positive control for increased susceptibility to infection (Figure 5b and S6a and b). To compare the decrease in survival between WT and mutant animals, we have calculated the TD<sub>50</sub> values of different strains (see figure legends of corresponding survival curves) and using these values have calculated the mutant strain’s relative survival (Figure S6c). This additional data demonstrates that <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants survive ~78% as well as WT whereas the pmk-1 mutants survive ~51% as well.</p><p>In response to a comment by reviewer 2, we have now also assessed the role of <italic>aaim-1</italic> in defence against another bacterial pathogen, <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>. We do not see a difference in survival between <italic>aaim-1</italic> alleles and N2, suggesting that AAIM-1 does not provide protection against all bacterial pathogens (Figure S7a).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) Given the lack of information about the molecular function of AAIM-1, the authors should consider models that account for the stage-specific effects of the factor, rather than very direct effects on invasion.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now modified the discussion in lines 319-321 to further discuss how AAIM-1 is functioning in a developmentally dependant fashion to promote microsporidia invasion.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Combined Recommendations for the authors:</p><p>(1) Images supporting the proposed mechanism by which aaim-1 modulates the orientation and hence invasive potential of microsporidia in the <italic>C. elegans</italic> intestine should be better defined.</p></disp-quote><p>To better visualize the orientation of microsporidia spores in the intestinal lumen, we acquired a fluorescently tagged strain of <italic>C. elegans</italic> (GK288) carrying PGP-1::GFP (Sato et al. 2007). PGP-1 localizes to the apical membrane, providing a clear outline of the intestinal lumen. We crossed this strain into <italic>aaim-1 (kea22)</italic> and infected the animals with calcofluor white (CFW) stained spores. We have now replaced our previous images of invasion with ones showing the orientation of CFW stained spores relative to the PGP-1::GFP intestinal lumen at 63x magnification (Figure 4a).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) Discuss or document developmental effects that may be associated with infection with microsporidia. Figure 1a. Infection with microsporidia appears to be causing larval developmental arrest. The worms seem to hardly grow beyond L1 body length (250 micrometers). A careful analysis of body length in infected N2 animals would show whether they are arrested in L1 or L1 +L2 larva stage. The developmental arrest can also be ascertained using markers for germline and vulva development. Both larval arrest and smaller brood size are indicators of caloric restriction and starvation. The starvation in presence of microsporidia can be ascertained or ruled out by using markers of lipid breakdown such as acs-2, loss of lipid droplets, etc. It is likely that AAIM- bypasses the microsporidia-induced developmental arrest, observing the bottom row of images in Figure 1A suggests that this is the case since aaim-1 mutants don't show arrest of body length. Similar observations have been reported for E. faecalis infection of <italic>C. elegans</italic> [Garsin, Science 2003; Dasgupta, Micropublication 2020]. Authors could test if aaim-1 can alleviate infection mediated or caloric restriction mediated arrest.</p></disp-quote><p>The impact of <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection on <italic>C. elegans</italic> development has been previously documented both from the Troemel lab (Luallen et al. <italic>PLOS One,</italic> 2015 and Balla et al. <italic>Nature Microbiology</italic>, 2016) and our own lab (Willis et al., <italic>Science Advances</italic>, 2021 and Murareanu et al., <italic>bioRxiv</italic>, 2021). In particular, Supplementary Figure 1 of Willis et al., <italic>Science Advances</italic>, 2021 provides convincing evidence that the extent of developmental delay caused by <italic>N. parisii</italic> is directly correlated with the level of <italic>N. parisii</italic> infection. Thus, we think that <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutants are resistant to the effects of microsporidia infection due to their being significantly less infected. We have now added an additional reference in line 97 and a sentence to the results in lines 105-106 to describe this previously published result.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) Is there published literature to show that spore orientation is causative or correlated with the firing of polar tubes and invasion?</p></disp-quote><p>To date, almost all studies of how microsporidia invade cells has focused on in vitro cell models. Our in vivo characterization is the first time to our knowledge, that spore orientation and angle have been investigated. Therefore, our finding that both these properties are altered in the <italic>aaim-1</italic> mutant background, which possesses reduced invasion, suggests that these two properties are correlated.</p></body></sub-article></article>