<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">79582</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.79582</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Cell Biology</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Developmental Biology</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Hypoxia controls plasma membrane targeting of polarity proteins by dynamic turnover of PI4P and PI(4,5)P2</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" id="author-277076"><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Juan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" id="author-277077"><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-22641"><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>Gerald R</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6660-3272</contrib-id><email>ghammond@pitt.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-277078"><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-0798</contrib-id><email>yhong@pitt.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01an3r305</institution-id><institution>Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Pittsburgh</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Knust</surname><given-names>Elisabeth</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05b8d3w18</institution-id><institution>Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics</institution></institution-wrap><country>Germany</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Ron</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/013meh722</institution-id><institution>University of Cambridge</institution></institution-wrap><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><fn fn-type="con" id="equal-contrib1"><label>†</label><p>These authors contributed equally to this work</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>09</day><month>06</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e79582</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-04-20"><day>20</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-06-06"><day>06</day><month>06</month><year>2022</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint at bioRxiv.</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2022-01-09"><day>09</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.07.475384"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2022, Lu, Dong et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Lu, Dong et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-79582-v2.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-79582-figures-v2.pdf"/><abstract><p>Phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P) and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate (PIP2) are key phosphoinositides that determine the identity of the plasma membrane (PM) and regulate numerous key biological events there. To date, mechanisms regulating the homeostasis and dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 in response to various physiological conditions and stresses remain to be fully elucidated. Here, we report that hypoxia in <italic>Drosophila</italic> induces acute and reversible depletion of PM PI4P and PIP2 that severely disrupts the electrostatic PM targeting of multiple polybasic polarity proteins. Genetically encoded ATP sensors confirmed that hypoxia induces acute and reversible reduction of cellular ATP levels which showed a strong real-time correlation with the levels of PM PI4P and PIP2 in cultured cells. By combining genetic manipulations with quantitative imaging assays we showed that PI4KIIIα, as well as Rbo/EFR3 and TTC7 that are essential for targeting PI4KIIIα to PM, are required for maintaining the homeostasis and dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 under normoxia and hypoxia. Our results revealed that in cells challenged by energetic stresses triggered by hypoxia, ATP inhibition and possibly ischemia, dramatic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 could have profound impact on many cellular processes including electrostatic PM targeting of numerous polybasic proteins.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>PI4P</kwd><kwd>PI(4,5)P2</kwd><kwd>PI4KIIIα</kwd><kwd>hypoxia</kwd><kwd>electrostatic membrane targeting</kwd><kwd>polarity</kwd><kwd><italic>Drosophila</italic></kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd><italic>D. melanogaster</italic></kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000057</institution-id><institution>National Institute of General Medical Sciences</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01GM121534</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000057</institution-id><institution>National Institute of General Medical Sciences</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01GM086423</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000057</institution-id><institution>National Institute of General Medical Sciences</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R35GM119412</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>Gerald R</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000057</institution-id><institution>National Institute of General Medical Sciences</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R21RR024869</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>When challenged by energetic stresses triggered by hypoxia and ATP inhibition, plasma membrane PI4P and PIP2 in cells undergo dramatic turnovers that have profound impact on many cellular processes including electrostatic PM targeting of numerous polybasic proteins.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>The inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (PM) is the most negatively charged membrane surface due to its enrichment of phospholipids including phosphatidylserine and phosphoinositides (PPIns) PI4P (phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) 4-phosphate) and PIP2 (PtdIns 4,5-biphosphate (PI(4,5)P2)). The unique combination of PI4P and PIP2 is crucial to determine the PM identity by regulating many key biological events in the PM including cell signaling, endocytosis, and channel activation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Hammond et al., 2012</xref>). Moreover, for proteins with positively charged domains/surfaces, electrostatic binding to the PM is a fundamental mechanism underlying the regulation of their subcellular localization and biological activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">McLaughlin and Murray, 2005</xref>). One typical example can be found in polarity proteins that play essential and conserved roles in regulating various types of cell polarity such as apical-basal polarity in epithelial cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Bailey and Prehoda, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Dong et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Hong, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Lu et al., 2021</xref>). Recent discoveries from our group showed that multiple polarity proteins such as Lgl, aPKC, and Dlg contain positively charged polybasic motifs that electrostatically bind the negatively charged inner surface of PM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Dong et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Lu et al., 2021</xref>), and such electrostatic PM targeting has now emerged as a mechanism essential for regulating their subcellular localization and biological activities in cell polarity.</p><p>While mechanisms regulating the interaction between polybasic motifs and PM have been relatively well studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Bailey and Prehoda, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Dong et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Hong, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Lu et al., 2021</xref>), much less is known how the homeostasis and turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 may impact the electrostatic PM targeting. Although sophisticated mechanisms exist to maintain the steady state levels of PM PI4P and PIP2 under normal conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Chen et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Dickson et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Wang et al., 2019</xref>), our previous live imaging experiments in <italic>Drosophila</italic> showed a striking phenomenon that hypoxia induces acute and reversible loss of PM localization of polybasic polarity proteins Lgl, aPKC, and Dlg in epithelial cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Dong et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Lu et al., 2021</xref>), likely through reducing intracellular ATP levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>). Our previous studies also showed that PM PIP2 could be reversibly depleted under hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>), suggesting that a potential connection from hypoxia to ATP inhibition to PM phospholipids depletion to loss of electrostatic PM targeting of polybasic proteins. However, to date how PM PI4P levels are regulated under hypoxia is unknown. Even less is known about the mechanisms through which hypoxia and ATP inhibition impact PM PI4P and PIP2 levels, and consequently the electrostatic PM targeting of numerous proteins.</p><p>In this report, we carried out quantitative live imaging experiments in <italic>Drosophila</italic> and cultured mammalian cells using multiple genetically encoded sensors to show that acute hypoxia induces dramatic but reversible depletion of PM PI4P and PIP2, accompanied by concurrent loss of PM localization of polybasic polarity protein Lgl. Using genetically encoded ATP sensors, we also confirmed a real-time correlation between the intracellular ATP levels and PM levels of PI4P and PIP2 in cultured cells. We further identified that PI4KIIIα (PtdIns-4 kinase IIIα) and its PM targeting machinery are required for the proper dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 under hypoxia and ATP inhibition, as well as for properly restoring the post-hypoxia electrostatic PM targeting of Lgl. Our studies reveal a potential regulatory mechanism that dynamically controls PM PI4P and PIP2 levels in response to hypoxia and ATP inhibition. Our results suggest that genetic deficiencies in regulating such dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 could have profound impact on cell physiology including polarity, when cells are challenged by energetic stresses triggered by hypoxia, ischemia and ATP inhibition.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Hypoxia triggers acute and reversible loss of PM PI4P and PIP2</title><p>Based on a serendipitous observation that PM targeting of polybasic polarity protein Lgl appeared to be sensitive to hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>), we previously established custom live imaging assays (see below) to demonstrate that all three polybasic polarity proteins, Lgl, aPKC, and Dlg, showed acute and reversible loss of PM targeting under 30–60 min of hypoxia (0.5% O<sub>2</sub>) in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicle and embryonic epithelial cells in vivo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Dong et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Lu et al., 2021</xref>). Since PM PIP2 also appeared to be transiently depleted under hypoxia in such assays (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>), we decided to systematically investigate how hypoxia impacts the PM PI4P and PIP2 levels in vivo. We used follicular epithelial cells of <italic>Drosophila</italic> ovaries as the primary system as they are well established for ex vivo live imaging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Prasad and Montell, 2007</xref>) and for genetic manipulations such as RNAi knock-down.</p><p>We generated transgenic flies that ubiquitously express the PI4P sensor P4M × 2::GFP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Sohn et al., 2018</xref>) as well as PIP2 sensors PLCδ-PH::GFP and PLCδ-PH::RFP (hereafter referred as PLC-PH::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP, respectively) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Wills et al., 2018</xref>). Consistent with PI4P being mostly enriched at both PM and membranes of intracellular compartments such as endosomes and Golgi, P4M × 2::GFP can be seen in both PM and intracellular puncta in follicle epithelial cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). To investigate hypoxia-induced turnover of PI4P and PIP2, ovaries dissected from flies expressing both P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP were mounted and imaged in custom micro chambers that can be flushed with either 0.5% O<sub>2</sub>/99.5% N<sub>2</sub> gas mixture for hypoxia or normal air for reoxygenation. Within ~60 minutes of hypoxia, both PI4P and PIP2 sensors were gradually lost from PM, with PM PLC-PH::RFP diminished faster than PI4P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig1video1">Figure 1—video 1</xref>). Once the imaging chamber was reoxygenated by flushing with normal air, both sensors rapidly recovered to the PM within ~10 min. At single-cell level, recovery of PM P4M × 2::GFP clearly and consistently preceded the PLC-PH::RFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig1video1">Figure 1—video 1</xref>). Image quantification (see Materials and methods) further confirmed such differences in turnover dynamics between PM P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A’</xref>). The faster depletion under hypoxia and delayed replenishment during reoxygenation of PM PIP2 suggest that PIP2 depletion likely involves its conversion to PI4P and its resynthesis depends on the recovery of PM PI4P.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Hypoxia induces acute and reversible loss of P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP from the PM in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicle cells.</title><p>(<bold>A–C</bold>) Representative frames showing follicle cells coexpressing P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP (<bold>A</bold>) or P4M × 2::GFP and Lgl::RFP (<bold>B</bold>) or PLC-PH::GFP and Lgl::RFP (<bold>C</bold>) undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. In A, at 1:04:00, asterisks (*) highlight cells that had already recovered P4M × 2::GFP but not PLC-PH::RFP. (<bold>A’–C’</bold>) Quantification of PM localizations of P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP (A’, n=18, 18, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata1">Figure 1—source data 1</xref>) or P4M × 2::GFP and Lgl::RFP (B’, n=20, 20, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata2">Figure 1—source data 2</xref>) or PLC-PH::GFP and Lgl::RFP (C’, n=20, 20, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata3">Figure 1—source data 3</xref>) during hypoxia and reoxygenation. PM Index: ratio of mean intensity of PM and cytosolic signals, normalized by the average value of the first three frames. Time stamp in <italic>hr:min:sec</italic> format. Scale bars: 5 µm.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Hypoxia induces acute and reversible loss of PM PI4P and PIP2 in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicle cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata2"><label>Figure 1—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Hypoxia induces acute and reversible loss of PM PIP2 and Lgl in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicle cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig1-data2-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata3"><label>Figure 1—source data 3.</label><caption><title>Hypoxia induces acute and reversible loss of PM PI4P and Lgl in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicle cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig1-data3-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig1-video1.mp4" id="fig1video1"><label>Figure 1—video 1.</label><caption><title>Acute and reversible loss of PM localization of P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP under hypoxia in follicle cells.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig1-video2.mp4" id="fig1video2"><label>Figure 1—video 2.</label><caption><title>Acute and reversible loss of PM localization of PLC-PH::GFP and Lgl::mCherry under hypoxia in follicle cells.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig1-video3.mp4" id="fig1video3"><label>Figure 1—video 3.</label><caption><title>Acute and reversible loss of PM localization of P4M × 2::GFP and Lgl::mCherry under hypoxia in follicle cells.</title></caption></media></fig-group><p>In addition, under hypoxia the disappearance of P4M × 2::GFP intracellular puncta always preceded the depletion of PM P4M × 2::GFP. PM PI4P showed a transient increase at early phase of hypoxia likely due to depletion of intracellular PI4P leading to increased amounts of free P4M × 2::GFP sensor that binds PM PI4P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A and A’</xref>). Under reoxygenation, PM P4M × 2::GFP consistently recovered before the appearance of intracellular P4M × 2::GFP puncta, although the latter became brighter after recovery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig1video1">Figure 1—video 1</xref>). Such early depletion of intracellular PI4P pool under hypoxia and its delayed replenishment under reoxygenation suggest that cells appear to prioritize the maintenance of PM PI4P pool to the intracellular pool of PI4P under energetic stress such as hypoxia.</p><p>Finally, we investigated how electrostatic PM targeting of Lgl, a polybasic polarity protein carrying a typical polybasic motif (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>), correlates with hypoxia-induced turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2. Quantitative live imaging of follicle epithelial cells expressing endogenous Lgl::RFP together with PLC-PH::GFP or P4M × 2::GFP showed that under hypoxia the loss of PM Lgl::RFP preceded PIP2 and PI4P, while under reoxygenation PM recovery of Lgl::RFP lagged behind both (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B, C</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig1video2 fig1video3">Figure 1—videos 2; 3</xref>). Such results are consistent with previous studies that electrostatic PM targeting of Lgl relies on both PIP2 and PI4P, although PIP2 appears to contribute more to the PM targeting of Lgl (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>). Note that in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref> Lgl::RFP recovery appears lower than in wild type, possibly due to the titration of PIP2 by PLC-PH::GFP expression.</p><p>Overall, our quantitatively live imaging data showed for the first time at high subcellular and temporal resolutions that hypoxia triggered a dramatic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 in vivo, which directly impacts the electrostatic PM targeting under hypoxia and reoxygenation.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>PI4KIIIα regulates the dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 under hypoxia</title><p>The seven species of PPIns including PI4P and PIP2 are synthesized and interconverted by several dozens of PPIn kinases and phosphatases, many of which are conserved in <italic>Drosophila</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Balakrishnan et al., 2015</xref>). We carried out a targeted RNAi screen to identify which PPIn kinases and phosphatases may be required for regulating the hypoxia-triggered dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2, using PM Lgl::GFP as a quick readout (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>). By imaging mosaic follicle epithelia containing both wild type and marked RNAi-expressing cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>), we eliminated the variability of each individual hypoxia imaging assay, making it possible to consistently and quantitatively detect even subtle phenotypes in RNAi cells. Among the candidates we identified is PtdIns-4 kinases IIIα (PI4KIIIα), one of the PI4K enzymes that phosphorylate PI to PI4P. Among them, PI4KIIIα is primarily responsible for the biosynthesis of PI4P in the PM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Nakatsu et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Tan et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Yan et al., 2011</xref>), while PI4KIIα and PI4KIIIβ (encoded by <italic>four-wheel drive</italic> or <italic>fwd</italic> in <italic>Drosophila</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Brill et al., 2000</xref>]) are responsible for the synthesis of PI4P in endosomes and Golgi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Baba et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Burgess et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Ketel et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Tóth et al., 2006</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>PI4KIIIα regulates PM PI4P and PIP2 homeostasis and dynamic turnover under hypoxia/reoxygenation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Representative frames showing follicle cells expressing P4M::GFP and PLC-PH::GFP undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells are labeled by RFP. (<bold>A’</bold>) PM localization of P4M::GFP (n=24, 23, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig2sdata1">Figure 2—source data 1</xref>) and PLC-PH::GFP (n=24, 24, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig2sdata2">Figure 2—source data 2</xref>) quantified in boundaries between wild type (WT) cells and between PI4KIIIα-RNAi (RNAi) cell. (<bold>B</bold>) Kymographs showing the persistent P4M::GFP puncta in both wild type and RNAi cells after hypoxia. White arrowheads point to puncta in RNAi cells at onset of hypoxia. Kymograph made by the maximum projection of 250 pixel wide line reslice of the time-lapse movie. (<bold>C</bold>) Kymograph showing the transient PLC-PH::GFP puncta (white arrowhead) in RNAi cells only. Kymograph made by the maximum projection of 300pixel wide line reslice of the time-lapse movie. Time stamp in <italic>hr:min:sec</italic> format. Scale bars: 5 µm.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata1"><label>Figure 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>PI4KIIIα regulates PM PI4P homeostasis and dynamic turnover under hypoxia/reoxygenation.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata2"><label>Figure 2—source data 2.</label><caption><title>PI4KIIIα regulates PM PIP2 homeostasis and dynamic turnover under hypoxia/reoxygenation.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig2-data2-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig2-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig2-video1.mp4" id="fig2video1"><label>Figure 2—video 1.</label><caption><title>PM P4M::GFP in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig2-video2.mp4" id="fig2video2"><label>Figure 2—video 2.</label><caption><title>PM PLC-PH::GFP in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media></fig-group><p>Under normal (i.e. normoxia) conditions, <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells showed a moderate reduction of PM PI4P and increased intracellular PI4P puncta (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>). Under hypoxia, in both RNAi and wild-type cells PI4P intracellular puncta disappeared prior to the loss PM PI4P which showed similar depletion rates in two cell types (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig2video1">Figure 2—video 1</xref>). Under reoxygenation, compared to wild-type cells, the recovery of PM PI4P in RNAi cells was significantly delayed while intracellular puncta showed much faster recovery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A and B</xref>).</p><p>In contrast to P4M × 2::GFP, levels of PM PLC-PH::GFP in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells were similar to the wild-type cells, suggesting a robust PM PIP2 homeostasis mechanism that compensates well the modest reduction of PI4P under normal conditions (consistent with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Hammond and Burke, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Sohn et al., 2018</xref>]). However, once challenged by hypoxia, <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells showed much accelerated loss of PM PLC-PH::GFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A, C</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig2video2">Figure 2—video 2</xref>). Strikingly, under reoxygenation PLC-PH::GFP in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells first formed transient but prominent intracellular puncta which were not seen in wild-type cells, and these puncta rapidly disappeared at the onset of PM PIP2 recovery which was strongly delayed compared to wild-type cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A and C</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig2video2">Figure 2—video 2</xref>).</p><p>In summary, our data support that PI4KIIIα is required for the efficient replenishment of PM PI4P and PIP2 after their hypoxia-triggered depletion. During reoxygenation, PI4KIIIα knock-down cells showed delayed PM PI4P recovery but enhanced replenishment of intracellular PI4P pool, although the latter could be due to increased amount of free P4M × 2::GFP sensors when PM P4P recovery was delayed. In addition, knocking down PI4KIIIα accelerates the depletion of PM PIP2 but not PI4P under hypoxia, suggesting an increased conversion of PIP2 to PI4P during depletion.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>PI4KIIα and FWD contribute to both PM and intracellular PI4P and PIP2 hemostasis and dynamic turnover</title><p>We then investigated how other two PI4K enzymes, PI4KIIα and FWD, contribute to the dynamic turnover of PI4P of PM and intracellular pools. Since neither <italic>PI4KIIα</italic> nor <italic>fwd</italic> null mutants are lethal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Brill et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Burgess et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Polevoy et al., 2009</xref>) and single RNAi knock-down against each showed no obvious phenotypes, we used newly published multi-RNAi tools <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Qiao et al., 2018</xref> to generate fly stocks simultaneously expressing multiple dsRNAs targeting either both <italic>PI4KIIα</italic> and <italic>fwd</italic> (‘<bold><italic>PI4K-2KD’</italic></bold>), or all three PI4Ks (‘<bold><italic>PI4K-3KD</italic></bold>’). While <italic>PI4K-2KD</italic> cells showed no discernable phenotypes under either normoxia or hypoxia in our hypoxia assays (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1</xref>), <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells showed severely reduced PM P4M × 2::GFP and dramatically increased intracellular P4M × 2::GFP puncta (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A, B</xref>); the latter could be due to more P4M × 2::GFP sensors being bound to the intracellular PI4P pool when PM PI4P is low (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Sohn et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Wills et al., 2018</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>PM PI4P and PIP2 show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation in <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> RNAi cells.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Representative frames showing follicle cells expressing P4M × 2::GFP or PLC-PH::GFP undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells are labeled by RFP. (<bold>A’</bold>) PM localization of P4M × 2::GFP (n=10, 5, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata1">Figure 3—source data 1</xref>) and PLC-PH::GFP (n=14, 15, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata2">Figure 3—source data 2</xref>) quantified in boundaries between wild type (WT) cells and between <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> (RNAi) cell during hypoxia and regoxygenation. (<bold>B</bold>) Strong reduction of PM P4M × 2::GFP (n=20, 17, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata3">Figure 3—source data 3</xref>) but not PLC-PH::GFP (n=20, 20, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata4">Figure 3—source data 4</xref>) in <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> follicle cells. Time stamp in hr:min:sec format. Scale bars: 5µm.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title>PI4P showed accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation in PI4K-3KD RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata2"><label>Figure 3—source data 2.</label><caption><title>PIP2 showed accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation in PI4K-3KD RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-data2-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata3"><label>Figure 3—source data 3.</label><caption><title>Reduction of PM PI4P in PI4K-3KD RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-data3-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata4"><label>Figure 3—source data 4.</label><caption><title>PM PI4P unchanged in PI4K-3KD RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-data4-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata5"><label>Figure 3—source data 5.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM PI4P under hypoxia and reoxygenation in PI4K-2KD cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-data5-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata6"><label>Figure 3—source data 6.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM PIP2 under hypoxia and reoxygenation in PI4K-2KD cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-data6-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata7"><label>Figure 3—source data 7.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM Lgl under hypoxia and reoxygenation in PI4K-2KD cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-data7-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM P4M::GFP, PLC-PH::GFP and Lgl::GFP under hypoxia and reoxygenation in PI4K-2KD cells is similar to wild type cells.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Representative frames showing follicle cells expressing P4M::GFP, PLC-PH::GFP or Lgl::GFP undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. <italic>PI4K-2KD RNAi</italic> cells are labeled by RFP. (<bold>A’</bold>) PM localization of P4M::GFP (n=10,10, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata5">Figure 3—source data 5</xref>), PLC-PH::GFP (n=14,19, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata6">Figure 3—source data 6</xref>) and Lgl::GFP (n=15,17, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata7">Figure 3—source data 7</xref>) quantified in boundaries between wild type (WT) cells and between PI4KIIIα-RNAi (RNAi) cells. Scale bars: 5µm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-video1.mp4" id="fig3video1"><label>Figure 3—video 1.</label><caption><title>PM P4M × 2::GFP in <italic>PI4K-3KD-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig3-video2.mp4" id="fig3video2"><label>Figure 3—video 2.</label><caption><title>PM PLC-PH::GFP in <italic>PI4K-3KD-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media></fig-group><p>Similar to <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells, <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells under hypoxia first showed reduction of intracellular P4M × 2::GFP puncta and transient increase of PM P4M × 2::GFP, followed by accelerated depletion of PM P4M × 2::GFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig3video1">Figure 3—video 1</xref>). Under reoxygenation, <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells only showed recovery of P4M × 2::GFP in intracellular puncta but not in PM, suggesting that <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells are severely deficient in acute resynthesis of PM PI4P after its hypoxia-induced depletion.</p><p>Remarkably, PM PLC-PH::GFP levels showed no reduction in <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells under normal conditions, despite of the severe loss of PM PI4P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A, B</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig3video2">Figure 3—video 2</xref>). Similar to <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells, in <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells PM PLC-PH::GFP showed accelerated loss under hypoxia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>), and formed transient intracellular puncta during reoxygenation. Despite the apparent absence of PM PI4P recovery in <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells, PM PLC-PH::GFP still recovered under reoxygenation, although the recovery was much delayed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig3video2">Figure 3—video 2</xref>).</p><p>Our data support that PI4KIIα and/or FWD contribute significantly to the maintenance of PM PI4P under normoxic conditions and to the replenishment of PM PI4P after hypoxia-triggered depletion. The data also suggest that an apparently PM PI4P-independent mechanism maintains the homeostatic level of PM PIP2 under normal conditions and sustains its recovery after hypoxia-triggered depletion. However, rapid replenishment of PM PI4P is clearly required for the efficient recovery of PM PIP2 after hypoxia-triggered depletion.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>PI4Ks regulate the electrostatic PM targeting and retargeting of Lgl::GFP</title><p>To investigate how electrostatic PM targeting is affected by the disruptions of PM PI4P and PIP2 turnover, we imaged the PM targeting of Lgl::GFP in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> and <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells undergoing hypoxia. In <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells, we found that Lgl::GFP essentially phenocopied the behavior of PLC-PH::GFP. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>, under normoxic conditions PM Lgl::GFP levels in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> were similar to wild-type cells, but Lgl::GFP showed accelerated loss from PM under hypoxia and severely delayed recovery to PM during reoxygenation. In addition. Lgl::GFP also formed transient intracellular puncta prior to the onset of its PM recovery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig4video1">Figure 4—video 1</xref>). Such data are consistent with previous studies that electrostatic PM targeting of Lgl::GFP is more PIP2-dependent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>PI4Ks regulate the PM localization of Lgl::GFP under hypoxia and reoxygenation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Representative frames showing Lgl::GFP PM localization during hypoxia and reoxygenation. RNAi cells are labeled by RFP. Yellow arrowheads: transient Lgl::GFP puncta (only few highlighted). *: RNAi cells that failed to recover Lgl::GFP to PM. (<bold>A’</bold>) (TOP) PM localization of Lgl::GFP quantified in boundaries between wild type (WT) cells (n=23), between <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> (RNAi) cells (n=24) and between WT and RNAi (WT-RNAi) cells (n=24). (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig4sdata1">Figure 4—source data 1</xref>). (BOTTOM). PM localization of Lgl::GFP quantified in boundaries between wild-type (WT) cells (n=20), between <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> (RNAi) cells (n=10) and between cells failed recovery (RNAi*) (n=10). (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig4sdata2">Figure 4—source data 2</xref>). (<bold>B</bold>) Kymograph highlights the transient Lgl::GFP puncta (arrowheads). Each kymograph was made by reslicing the movie with the maximum projection of a 150 or 250-pixel wide line (yellow bands in A). Time stamp in <italic>hr:min:sec</italic> format. Scale bars: 5 µm.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM Lgl under hypoxia and reoxygenation in PI4K-IIIα-RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata2"><label>Figure 4—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM Lgl under hypoxia and reoxygenation in PI4K-3KD cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig4-data2-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig4-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig4-video1.mp4" id="fig4video1"><label>Figure 4—video 1.</label><caption><title>PM Lgl::GFP in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig4-video2.mp4" id="fig4video2"><label>Figure 4—video 2.</label><caption><title>PM Lgl::GFP in <italic>PI4K-3KD-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media></fig-group><p>In <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells, PM Lgl::GFP also showed accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig4video2">Figure 4—video 2</xref>). Unlike PLC-PH::GFP, Lgl::GFP only formed few very transient puncta prior to the onset of PM recovery under reoxygenation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>). However, in half (113/219) of <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells PM Lgl::GFP was already partially diffused under normal conditions (asterisked in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>), and in these cells Lgl::GFP also failed to recover to PM during reoxygenation. Even in <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells with normal PM Lgl::GFP, a third (36/106) failed to recover during reoxygenation. Such data suggest that the electrostatic PM targeting becomes much less resilient in PI4K-3KD cells, especially when cells are challenged by energetic stresses such as hypoxia.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>PM localization of PI4KIIIα is required for the dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2</title><p>Unlike PI4KIIα and FWD, which localize to intracellular membranes, PI4KIIIα is primarily PM localized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Baskin et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Nakatsu et al., 2012</xref>). We thus investigated how subcellular localization to PI4KIIIα affects the hypoxia-induced dynamic turnover of PM PI4P. The PM localization of yeast PI4KIIIα (‘Stt4p’) requires EFR3, YPP1and Sfk1 (mammalian TTC7 and TMEM150A, respectively) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Chung et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hammond et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Nakatsu et al., 2012</xref>). All three proteins are conserved in <italic>Drosophila</italic>, including EFR3 homologue Rbo (‘Rolling blackout’) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Huang et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Vijayakrishnan et al., 2009</xref>), dYPP1/dTTC7 (CG8325) and dTMEM150A (“dTMEM”, CG7990 and CG4025), (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Liu et al., 2018</xref>). Consistent with that EFR3 is a peripheral membrane protein and that its PM targeting appears to be independent of PI4P/PIP2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Nakatsu et al., 2012</xref>), in follicle epithelial cells Rbo::GFP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Huang et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Vijayakrishnan et al., 2009</xref>) showed exclusive PM localization that was highly resistant to hypoxia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig5video1">Figure 5—video 1</xref>). <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> cells essentially phenocopied <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells in terms of the dynamic turnover of PM PI4P, PIP2 and Lgl::GFP under hypoxia, with one exception that under reoxygenation Lgl::GFP did not form transient puncta prior to PM recovery, even though PLC-PH::GFP still formed transient and prominent puncta in <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> cells prior to the onset of the recovery of PM PLC-PH::GFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A, C and D</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig5video2 fig5video3 fig5video4">Figure 5—videos 2–4</xref>). The reason for such difference between Lgl::GFP and PLC-PH::GFP in <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> cells is unclear.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Rbo regulates the homeostasis and dynamic turnover of PI4P, PIP2 and Lgl under hypoxia/reoxygenation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Representative frames follicle cells expressing P4M × 2::GFP or PLC-PH::GFP or Lgl::GFP undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> cells are labeled by RFP. Time stamp in <italic>min:sec</italic> format. (<bold>A’</bold>) PM localization of P4M::GFP (n=10, 10, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5sdata1">Figure 5—source data 1</xref>), PLC-PH::GFP (n=20, 20, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5sdata2">Figure 5—source data 2</xref>) and Lgl::GFP (n=20, 20, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5sdata3">Figure 5—source data 3</xref>) in A quantified in wild type (WT) and <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> (RNAi) cells. (<bold>B</bold>) Kymograph highlights the earlier onset of P4M::GFP puncta in post-hypoxia RNAi cells. White arrowheads point to the onset of puncta in post-hypoxia RNAi and WT cells. (<bold>C</bold>) Kymograph highlights the transient PLC-PH::GFP puncta (white arrowheads) seen only in post-hypoxia RNAi cells. (<bold>D</bold>) Kymograph showing the absence of Lgl::GFP puncta in post-hypoxia RNAi cells. Scale bars: 5µm.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata1"><label>Figure 5—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM PI4P under hypoxia and reoxygenation in rbo-RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata2"><label>Figure 5—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM PIP2 under hypoxia and reoxygenation in rbo-RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-data2-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata3"><label>Figure 5—source data 3.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM Lgl under hypoxia and reoxygenation in rbo-RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-data3-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata4"><label>Figure 5—source data 4.</label><caption><title>PM localization of Rbo is resistant to hypoxia.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-data4-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>PM localization of Rbo is resistant to hypoxia.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) PM localization of Rbo::GFP persisted under hypoxia, regardless of the transient loss of PM PIP2. (<bold>B</bold>) Quantification of PM Rbo::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP under hypoxia (105 min) and reoxygenation (550 sec). n=22. (<bold>C</bold>) Lack of Rbo::GFP expression in <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> follicle cells (labeled by the expression of nuclear RFP) Scale bars: 5 µm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-video1.mp4" id="fig5video1"><label>Figure 5—video 1.</label><caption><title>PM localization of <italic>rbo::GFP</italic> is resistant to hypoxia.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-video2.mp4" id="fig5video2"><label>Figure 5—video 2.</label><caption><title>PM P4M × 2::GFP in <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-video3.mp4" id="fig5video3"><label>Figure 5—video 3.</label><caption><title>PM PLC-PH::GFP in <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig5-video4.mp4" id="fig5video4"><label>Figure 5—video 4.</label><caption><title>PM Lgl::GFP in Rbo<italic>-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media></fig-group><p>YPP1/TTC7 helps to link PI4KIIIα to Rbo/EFR3 and enhances the PM targeting of PI4KIIIα in cultured cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Nakatsu et al., 2012</xref>). Consistently, <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> cells showed similar albeit milder phenotypes in hypoxia-triggered turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 as well as the PM targeting and retargeting of Lgl (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig6video1 fig6video2 fig6video3">Figure 6—videos 1–3</xref>). Interestingly, <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> cells also showed reduced PM Rbo::GFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>), suggesting that TTC7 enhances the PM targeting of Rbo and that phenotypes in <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> cells could be partially due to the reduction of PM Rbo. Although at present we do not have the tools to directly examine the PI4KIIIα localization in <italic>rbo-</italic> or <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> cells, our data strongly support a scenario where PM localization of PI4KIIIα is essential for the efficient recovery of PM PI4P and PIP2 after hypoxia-triggered depletion.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>YPP1/TTC7 regulates the homeostasis and dynamic turnover of PI4P, PIP2 and Lgl in cells undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Representative frames follicle cells expressing P4M × 2::GFP or PLC-PH::GFP or Lgl::GFP undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> cells are labeled by RFP. Time stamp in <italic>min:sec</italic> format. (<bold>A’</bold>) PM localization changes of P4M × 2::GFP (n=10, 10, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6sdata1">Figure 6—source data 1</xref>), PLC-PH::GFP (n=20, 20, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6sdata2">Figure 6—source data 2</xref>) and Lgl::GFP (n=20, 20, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6sdata3">Figure 6—source data 3</xref>) in A quantified in wild type (WT) and <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> (RNAi) cells.(<bold>B and C</bold>) Reduction of PM RBO::GFP in <italic>ttc7-1-RNAi</italic> cells (n=24, 24, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6sdata4">Figure 6—source data 4</xref>). Scale bars: 5µm.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata1"><label>Figure 6—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM PI4P under hypoxia and reoxygenation in ttc7-RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig6-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata2"><label>Figure 6—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM PIP2 under hypoxia and reoxygenation in ttc7-RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig6-data2-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata3"><label>Figure 6—source data 3.</label><caption><title>Dynamic turnover of PM Lgl under hypoxia and reoxygenation in ttc7-RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig6-data3-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata4"><label>Figure 6—source data 4.</label><caption><title>Reduction of Rbo::GFP in ttc7-RNAi cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig6-data4-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig6-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig6-video1.mp4" id="fig6video1"><label>Figure 6—video 1.</label><caption><title>PM P4M × 2::GFP in <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> cells show loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig6-video2.mp4" id="fig6video2"><label>Figure 6—video 2.</label><caption><title>PM PLC-PH::GFP in <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig6-video3.mp4" id="fig6video3"><label>Figure 6—video 3.</label><caption><title>PM Lgl::GFP in <italic>ttc7-RNAi</italic> cells show accelerated loss under hypoxia and delayed recovery under reoxygenation.</title></caption></media></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Acute ATP inhibition induces dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 in HEK293 cells</title><p>How does hypoxia trigger the acute depletion of PM PI4P and PIP2? We showed previously that direct ATP inhibition by antimycin (AM) in follicle cells also induced loss of PM Lgl::GFP in follicle and embryonic epithelial cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>), suggesting that the acute depletion of PM PI4P and PIP2 could be triggered by hypoxia-induced ATP inhibition. We first tested this hypothesis using a genetically encoded ATP sensor AT[NL], which is a FRET-based ratiometric ATP sensor that recently became available and validated in <italic>Drosophila</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Imamura et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Kioka et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Tsuyama et al., 2017</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A</xref>, live imaging of follicle cells expressing AT[NL] confirmed an acute and reversible reduction of intracellular ATP levels under hypoxia and reoxygenation. Because AT[NL] is not suitable for imaging together with our current PI4P and PIP2 sensors, we also tested an intensimetric ATP sensor MaLionR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Arai et al., 2018</xref>) in HEK293 cells. Under hypoxia, HEK293 cells showed acute and reversible reduction of ATP levels as measured by MaLionR intensity changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1B</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig7video1">Figure 7—video 1</xref>), as well as reversible depletions of PM P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::GFP which correlate with MaLionR intensity changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1C</xref>).</p><p>We then subjected HEK293 cells to acute ATP inhibition by the treatment of 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) and AM, followed by washout to allow ATP recovery. Upon adding 2-DG and AM, MaLionR brightness dropped rapidly within 10–20 min and plateaued afterward (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A, B</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig7video2 fig7video3">Figure 7—videos 2; 3</xref>). In general, P4M × 2::GFP or PLC-PH::GFP began gradually lost from PM at the onset of the ATP drop and became completely cytosolic within ~40–60 min of ATP inhibition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A, B</xref>). While the reduction of ATP as measured by MaLionR brightness was rather uniform across cells, ATP recovery after the washout of 2-DG and AM was slightly asynchronous across the cells. In general, the recovery of PM PI4P always preceded the detectable increase of MaLionR brightness (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig7video2">Figure 7—video 2</xref>), while PM PIP2 recovery was concurrent with MaLionR brightness increase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig7video3">Figure 7—video 3</xref>). In some cells PM PI4P recovery appeared up to ten minutes ahead of MaLionR increase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>). Given that MaLionR appears to have a dynamic range between ~50 µM and 2 mM of ATP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Arai et al., 2018</xref>), such data support that initial replenishment of PM PI4P could start under very low intracellular ATP levels.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>ATP inhibition induces acute and reversible loss of P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP from the PM in HEK293 cells.</title><p>(<bold>A, B</bold>) Representative cells showing the PM localization of P4M × 2::GFP (<bold>A</bold>) or PLC-PH::GFP (<bold>B</bold>) and MaLionR ATP sensor during ATP inhibition and subsequent washout with low-glucose medium.(<bold>A</bold>) Top cell: P4M × 2::GFP recovery on PM was immediately followed by ATP sensor brightness increase (n=9). Bottom cell: measurable ATP increase lagged well behind the PM recovery of P4M × 2::GFP (n=6). Intracellular P4M × 2::GFP puncta were overexposed but excluded from quantification. (<bold>A’</bold>) Normalized quantification of PM localization of P4M × 2::GFP and MaLionR intensity (n=15, 19 cells, respectively). <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata1">Figure 7—source data 1</xref>. (<bold>B</bold>) Top cell: synchronous PLC-PH::GFP recovery and ATP senor brightness increase (n=13). Bottom cell: PLC-PH::GFP PM recovery slightly preceded the detectable ATP increase (n=12). (<bold>B’</bold>) Normalized quantification of PM localization of PLC-PH::GFP (green) and MaLionR intensity (red) in ATP inhibition cells (solid dots, n=13) or serum-free medium treated cells (blank diamonds, n=12 cells) <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata2">Figure 7—source data 2</xref>. (<bold>C</bold>) A representative cell showing the PM localization of P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP during ATP inhibition and subsequent washout. (<bold>C’</bold>) Quantification of PM P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::GFP (n=13 cells) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata3">Figure 7—source data 3</xref>). (<bold>D</bold>) Normalized PM localization index of P4M × 2::GFP, PLC-PH::RFP and cyto index of MaLionR sensor in cells treated with ATP inhibition followed by washout with buffer containing DMSO or Wortmannin (WM, 20 µm). (n=48, all samples). <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata4 fig7sdata5">Figure 7—source data 4; 5</xref>. Scale bars: 10 µm.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata1"><label>Figure 7—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Correlation between ATP inhibition PM PI4P turnovery in HEK293 cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata2"><label>Figure 7—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Correlation between ATP inhibition PM PIP2 turnovery in HEK293 cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-data2-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata3"><label>Figure 7—source data 3.</label><caption><title>ATP inhibition induces acute and reversible loss of PM PI4P and PIP2 in HEK293 cells.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-data3-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata4"><label>Figure 7—source data 4.</label><caption><title>Wortmannin inhibits PM PI4P recovery post ATP inhibition.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-data4-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata5"><label>Figure 7—source data 5.</label><caption><title>Post-inhibition recovery of ATP was not delayed by wortmannin treatment.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-data5-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata6"><label>Figure 7—source data 6.</label><caption><title>Acute and reversible reduction of intracellular ATP in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicle cells undery hypoxia.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-data6-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata7"><label>Figure 7—source data 7.</label><caption><title>Acute and reversible reduction of intracellular ATP in HEK203 cells undery hypoxia.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-data7-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Real-time monitoring of intracellular ATP changes in follicular cells and HEK293 cells undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Heat map of the (uncalibrated) FRET ratio of AT[NL] (an ATeam FRET-based ATP sensor) in follicular cells of a dissected ovary undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation ex vivo. (<bold>A’</bold>) Quantification of FRET ratios in A. Dashed lines are the mean FRET ratios measured at different spots (white circles in A) over the time. Thick red line: average of the all measurements. (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata6">Figure 7—source data 6</xref>). (<bold>B</bold>) A representative HEK293 cell expressing GFP and MaLionR ATP sensor undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. (<bold>B’</bold>) Quantification of GFP and MaLionR intensities in HEK293 cells undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation (n=12). GFP served as a negative control that did not show intensity changes under hypoxia and reoxygenation. (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata7">Figure 7—source data 7</xref>) (<bold>C</bold>) Representative HEK293 cells expressing MaLionR and P4M × 2 GFP or PLC-PH::GFP undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. Time stamp in min:sec format. Scale bars: 10 µm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Wortmannin inhibits PM PI4P recovery after ATP inhibition.</title><p>Representative cells showing the PM localization of P4M × 2:GFP and PLC-PH::RFP during ATP inhibition and washout with DMSO or wortmannin (WM). Scale bar: 10 µm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-video1.mp4" id="fig7video1"><label>Figure 7—video 1.</label><caption><title>HEK293 cells expressing GFP and MaLionR ATP sensor undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-video2.mp4" id="fig7video2"><label>Figure 7—video 2.</label><caption><title>HEK293 cells expressing P4M × 2::GFP and MaLionR undergoing acute and transient ATP inhibition.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-video3.mp4" id="fig7video3"><label>Figure 7—video 3.</label><caption><title>HEK293 cells expressing PLC-PH::GFP and MaLionR undergoing acute and transient ATP inhibition.</title></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-79582-fig7-video4.mp4" id="fig7video4"><label>Figure 7—video 4.</label><caption><title>HEK293 cells expressing P4M × 2::GFP and PLC-PH::RFP undergoing acute and transient ATP inhibition.</title></caption></media></fig-group><p>Similar to the results from hypoxia assays in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicle cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>), in HEK293 cells under ATP inhibition the depletion of PM P4M × 2::GFP consistently lagged behind the loss of PM PLC-PH::GFP, while after drug washout PM P4M × 2::GFP recovery consistently preceded the recovery of PM PLC-PH::GFP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig7video4">Figure 7—video 4</xref>). We also investigated whether PI4KIIIα is required for the post-ATP inhibition recovery of PM PI4P in HEK293 cells. After ATP inhibition, we washed out drugs with medium containing 20 µM wortmannin (WM) which specifically inhibits PI4KIIIα/β isoforms but not PI4KIIα/β (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Balla and Balla, 2006</xref>). Washout with WM caused no discernable delay in ATP recovery as measured by MaLionR brightness (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7D</xref>), but strongly delayed PM recovery of PI4P, and to much less degree PIP2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7D</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s2">Figure 7—figure supplement 2</xref>). Such results are consistent with the <italic>Drosophila</italic> RNAi results that PI4KIIIα is required for the efficient PM recovery of PI4P and PIP2 after hypoxia-triggered depletion.</p><p>In summary, ATP inhibition in human cultured cells also triggers acute and reversible depletion of PM PI4P and PIP2 similar to the dynamic turnover of PI4P and PIP2 in cells undergoing hypoxia. For reasons unknown, our efforts of making a transgenic MaLionR sensor in <italic>Drosophila</italic> was unsuccessful, limiting our ATP assays to HEK293 at present. However, our data strongly support that intracellular ATP levels directly dictate the homeostasis and turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 in both <italic>Drosophila</italic> and human cultured cells.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><sec id="s3-1"><title>Dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 trigged by hypoxia and ATP inhibition</title><p>We would speculate that the reduction of intracellular ATP levels, through either hypoxia or drug inhibition, triggers acute loss of PM PI4P and PIP2 by two possible mechanisms. PI4P and PIP2 could be maintained at slow turnover rates on the PM, but reduction of ATP activates a specific cellular response to acutely deplete PM PI4P and PIP2. Alternatively, a more parsimonious mechanism would be that PM PI4P and PIP2 are constantly under fast turnover, which requires high activity of PI and PIP kinases. ATP reduction, which directly inhibits the activity of these kinases, pivots the equilibrium to the dephosphorylation process which converts the PIP2 to PI4P and PI4P to PI.</p><p>Consistent with the critical role of PI4P in maintaining PM identity and its biological activity, our data revealed that cells undergoing hypoxia/ATP inhibition consistently prioritize the maintenance and recovery of PM PI4P over the intracellular PI4P pool in a PI4KIIIα-dependent manner. However, while PI4KIIIα is well characterized for its essential role in generating the PI4P on the PM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Balla, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Nakatsu et al., 2012</xref>), K<sub>m</sub>ATP values of PI4KIIIα (500–700 µM) and PI4KIIβ(Fwd) (~400 µM) are about one or two orders higher than that of PI4KIIα (10–50 µM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Balla and Balla, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Carpenter and Cantley, 1990</xref>). Such K<sub>m</sub>ATP differences would suggest that, in contrast to our results, the intracellular PI4P pool should deplete more slowly and recover more quickly than the PM PI4P in cells undergoing hypoxia/ATP inhibition, as PI4KIIIα would be the first PI4K to lose activity under hypoxia and the last to become active under reoxygenation.</p><p>One possible reason behind such a discrepancy could be that K<sub>m</sub>ATP of PI4KIIIα was measured decades ago using purified PI4KIIIα enzymes from tissues such as bovine brains and uterus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Carpenter and Cantley, 1990</xref>). Recent data showed that PI4KIIIα forms a highly ordered multi-protein membrane targeting complex essential for its activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Lees et al., 2017</xref>). It is thus possible that PI4KIIIα in the complex may have much lower K<sub>m</sub>ATP in vivo, and/or has dramatically increased enzymatic activity to produce sufficient PI4P at the PM even when ATP levels are much lower than the measured K<sub>m</sub>. Alternatively, the K<sub>m</sub>ATP of PI4KIIIα is indeed high and our live imaging results actually highlight a prioritized transfer of PI4P from the intracellular pool to maintain or replenish the PM PI4P levels. Phosphatidylinositol (PI) is abundant on intracellular membranes, but not the PM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Pemberton et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Zewe et al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, during the early phase of reoxygenation when intracellular ATP levels are low, PI4P is first synthesized at the intracellular pool by PI4KIIα but is immediately transferred to the PM. Only after the full replenishment of PM PI4P is the intracellular PI4P pool filled. Supporting this transfer PI4P from intracellular pools to PM pools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Dickson et al., 2014</xref>), our data show loss of PM PI4P recovery in PI4K-3KD cells, in which the maintenance of intracellular pool of PI4P is supposedly impaired.</p><p>Out data are consistent with the view that in wild type cells under hypoxia/ATP inhibition, PM PIP2 depletes and recovers through direct inter-conversion with PI4P on the PM. Interestingly, in both <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> and <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells, PM recovery of PIP2 is preceded with transient intracellular PIP2-positive puncta which were not seen in recovering wild-type cells. It is possible that in the absence or delay of PM PI4P recovery, enzymes such as PIP5K are instead electrostatically recruited to the intracellular PI4P-positive puncta (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Dong et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Fairn et al., 2009</xref>) to convert PI4P to PIP2. It is unclear, however, in PI4K knock down cells whether the delayed PM PIP2 recovery originates from the PIP2 generated in these puncta. Additional sensors are necessary to confirm the co-localization of PI4P and PIP2 on these transient puncta. Notably, MEF cells from PI4KIIIα knock-out mice also showed increased PIP2-positive intracellular vesicles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Dong et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Nakatsu et al., 2012</xref>).</p><p>The existence of intracellular P4M × 2::GFP puncta in <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> cells suggest that the knock down of <italic>PI4KIIα</italic> and <italic>fwd</italic> is unlikely complete, but the severe reduction of PM PI4P confirms the knock down is strong enough to greatly enhance the defects in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> cells. Such partial knock-down by <italic>PI4K-3KD</italic> is actually necessary for our imaging assays, as completely blocking PI4P synthesis is cell lethal. It is striking that PM PIP2 is well maintained in the near absence of PM PI4P in PI4K-3KD cells. Synthetic biology-based evidence suggested that PIP5K can be sufficient to make PIP2 from PI in <italic>E. coli</italic> by phosphorylating both its fourth and fifth positions in the absence of PI4Ks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Botero et al., 2019</xref>), and it is possible that similar pathway maintains the steady state PM PIP2 levels in PI4K-3KD cells. Nonetheless, our imaging experiments showed that PI4K activity is essential for cells to maintain PM PIP2 levels when cells are subject to hypoxia. In this regard, our study of PI4K-compromised cells repeatedly revealed deficiencies in PI4P/PIP2 turnover and electrostatic PM targeting that can only be observed when cells are subject to energetic stress conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s3-2"><title>PM targeting of PI4KIIIα is crucial for maintaining and replenishing the PM PI4P</title><p>PM targeting of PI4KIIIα strictly depends on its formation of an obligate superassembly with TTC7 (YPP1), FAM126 (Hycin) and EFR3 (Rbo) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Lees et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Wu et al., 2014</xref>). A recent study also showed that RNAi knock-downs of PI4KIIIα, TTC7 and Rbo yielded similar phenotypes in <italic>Drosophila</italic> wing discs, such as moderately reduced PM PI4P but no obvious changes of PM PIP2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Basu et al., 2020</xref>). Same RNAi knock-downs in <italic>Drosophila</italic> photoreceptors also showed similar phenotypes such as reduced PI4P levels and impaired light response, although PIP2 levels also appear to be reduced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Balakrishnan et al., 2018</xref>). Moreover, our data showed that knocking down TTC7 also reduced PM localization of Rbo, supporting that components in PI4KIIIα complex may act interdependently for proper PM targeting in vivo.</p><p>The hypoxia-resistant PM localization of Rbo/dEFR3 suggests that under hypoxia/ATP inhibition PI4KIIIα maintains its PM localization, which should be essential for its role in recovering the PM PI4P. The core complex of PI4KIIIα/TTC7/FAM126 forms a collective basic surface that electrostatically binds to the acidic inner leaflet of the PM which could be sensitive to the loss of PM PI4P and PIP2. However, TTC7 also interacts with the C-terminus of EFR3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Chung et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Lees et al., 2017</xref>). PM targeting of yeast EFR3 requires a basic patch that interacts with general acidic phospholipids but is not disrupted by the loss of PM PI4P and PIP2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Wu et al., 2014</xref>). Mammalian EFR3 contains an additional N-terminal Cys-rich palmitoylation site that is also required for the PM targeting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Nakatsu et al., 2012</xref>). Such dual and PI4P/PIP2-independent mechanisms are supported by the hypoxia-resistant PM localization of Rbo as we observed. Future studies will be needed to directly investigate the PM targeting of PI4KIIIα, TTC7 and FAM126 in vivo under hypoxia/ATP inhibition.</p></sec><sec id="s3-3"><title>Hypoxia/ATP inhibition-trigged PM PI4P and PIP2 turnover impacts the electrostatic targeting of polybasic proteins</title><p>While previous studies showed that genetically reducing PM PIP2 levels disrupts the PM localization of several polarity proteins including Lgl, it is difficult to conclude whether such loss of PM targeting is the direct consequence PIP2 reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Claret et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Gervais et al., 2008</xref>). In this study, we are able to quantitatively and qualitatively demonstrate that in cells undergoing hypoxia-reoxygenation the acute and reversible loss of PM targeting of Lgl directly correlates with the turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2. Consistent with the idea that Lgl appears to depend more on PIP2 for its PM targeting, Lgl closely follows the dynamic turnover and relocation of PIP2 during hypoxia and reoxygenation. In particular, ectopic and transient puncta of Lgl::GFP seen in <italic>PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> or PI4K-3KD cells under reoxygenation appear to be strikingly similar to PIP2-positive puncta in these cells, although due to the limited array of biosensors we have not been able to directly confirm the co-localization of Lgl::GFP and PIP2 in these transient puncta. Additional genetically encoded biosensors for PI4P and PIP2 (e.g. P4M × 2::iRFP and PLC-PH::iRFP) are in development for such experiments.</p><p>It is notable that in <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> cells, Lgl::GFP formed very few transient puncta prior to PM recovery during reoxygenation, even though PLC-PH::GFP showed plenty of prominent puncta. The reason for such difference between Lgl::GFP and PLC-PH::GFP in <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> cells is unclear, though likely derives from the requirement of polybasic motif proteins for additional anionic lipids at the plasma membrane, specifically high molar fractions of phosphatidylserine in addition to lower concentrations of polyanionic phosphoinositides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Yeung et al., 2008</xref>).</p><p>In summary, our study revealed an acute and reversible loss of PI4P and PIP2 from PM under hypoxia/ATP inhibition in both <italic>Drosophila</italic> and human cultured cells. Such dynamic turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2 explains the dramatic loss of the PM targeting of polybasic polarity proteins such as Lgl under hypoxia. How cells meticulously maintain steady state PM PI4P and PIP2 levels under normal physiological conditions has been extensively studied; our studies highlight the importance of understanding mechanisms controlling this homeostasis and dynamics of phosphoinositides under energetic stresses triggered by hypoxia, ATP inhibition and ischemia, and the critical role of the interplay between polarity proteins and PM phosphoinositides in controlling cell polarity under normal and disease conditions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Reagent type (species) or resource</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Designation</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Source or reference</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Identifiers</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>ubi-P4M::GFP</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">See “Materials and methods”</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>ubi-P4M × 2::GFP</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">See “Materials and methods”</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>ubi-PLC-PH::GFP</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">See “Materials and methods”</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>ubi-PLC-PH::RFP</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">See “Materials and methods”</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent(<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>y[1] M{RFP[3xP3.PB] GFP[E.3xP3]=vas int.Dm}ZH-2A w[*]; PBac{y[+]-attP-9A}VK00022</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:24868; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_24868">BDSC_24868</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>y[1] w[*] P{y[+t7.7]=nos-phiC31\int.NLS}X; PBac{y[+]-attP-3B}VK00040</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35568; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35568">BDSC_35568</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>PI4K-2KD</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">See “Materials and methods”</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>PI4K-3KD</italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">See “Materials and methods”</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-AT1.03NL1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DGRC#117,011 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Tsuyama et al., 2017</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DGRC#117,011</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Cy2-Gal4</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gift from David Bilder <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Queenan et al., 1997</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>rbo::GFP</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gift from Kendal Broadie <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Huang et al., 2004</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>lgl::mCherry</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>lgl::GFP</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35256; FLYB:FBst0035256; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35256">BDSC_35256</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FlyBase symbol: P{TRiP.GL00144}attP2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Rbo-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Vienna <italic>Drosophila</italic> Resource Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">VDRC:v47751; FLYB:Bst0467525</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FlyBase symbol: P{GD14013}v47751</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-ttc7-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Vienna <italic>Drosophila</italic> Resource Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">VDRC:v35881; FLYB: FBst0461391</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FlyBase symbol: P{GD13893}v35881</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Plc21C-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:33719; FBst0033719 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_33719">BDSC_33719</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-pis-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:55602; FBst0055602; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_55602">BDSC_55602</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38242; FBst0038242; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38242">BDSC_38242</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-synj-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:44420; FBst0044420; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_44420">BDSC_44420</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-rdgβ-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:44523; FBst0044523; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_44523">BDSC_44523</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-INPP5E-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:41701; FBst0041701; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_41701">BDSC_41701</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG5026-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:42759; FBst0042759; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_42759">BDSC_42759</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pten-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:33643; FBst0033643; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_33643">BDSC_33643</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3k21B-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:36810; FBst0036810; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_36810">BDSC_36810</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-fwd-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35257; FBst0035257; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35257">BDSC_35257</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-mtm-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:31552; FBst0031552; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31552">BDSC_31552</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PIP4K-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35660; FBst0035660; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35660">BDSC_35660</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35643; FBst0035643; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35643">BDSC_35643</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-INPP5E-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:34037; FBst0034037; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_34037">BDSC_34037</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG3632-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38341; FBst0038341; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38341">BDSC_38341</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-mtm-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38339; FBst0038339; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38339">BDSC_38339</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PIP4K-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35338; FBst0035338; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35338">BDSC_35338</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-INPP5E-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:34037; FBst0034037; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_34037">BDSC_34037</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG3632-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38341; FBst0038341; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38341">BDSC_38341</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-mtm-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38339; FBst0038339; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38339">BDSC_38339</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PIP4K-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35338; FBst0035338; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35338">BDSC_35338</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-FIG4-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38291; FBst0038291; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38291">BDSC_38291</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG5026-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38309; FBst0038309; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38309">BDSC_38309</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PI4KIIα-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35278; FBst0035278; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35278">BDSC_35278</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-norpA-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:31113; FBst0031113; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31113">BDSC_31113</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-sktl-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:27715; FBst0027715; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_27715">BDSC_27715</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-fwd-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:29396; FBst0029396; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_29396">BDSC_29396</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG6707-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:28316; FBst0028316; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_28316">BDSC_28316</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-synj-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:34378; FBst0034378; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_34378">BDSC_34378</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-pis-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:29383; FBst0029383; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_29383">BDSC_29383</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-sl-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:32385; FBst0032385; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_32385">BDSC_32385</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG42271-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:29411; FBst0029411; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_29411">BDSC_29411</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Plc21C-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:31270; FBst0031270; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31270">BDSC_31270</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K92E-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35798; FBst0035798; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35798">BDSC_35798</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K59F-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:33384; FBst0033384; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_33384">BDSC_33384</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-sl-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35604; FBst0035604; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35604">BDSC_35604</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG9784-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:34723; FBst0034723; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_34723">BDSC_34723</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K68D-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:34621; FBst0034621; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_34621">BDSC_34621</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Ocrl-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:34722; FBst0034722; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_34722">BDSC_34722</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-sktl-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35198; FBst0035198; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35198">BDSC_35198</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pten-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:25841; FBst0025841; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_25841">BDSC_25841</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG33981,fab1-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35793; FBst0035793; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35793">BDSC_35793</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Plc21C-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:32438; FBst0032438; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_32438">BDSC_32438</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-rdgB-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:28796; FBst0028796; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_28796">BDSC_28796</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG3530-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:25864; FBst0025864; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_25864">BDSC_25864</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Synj-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:27489; FBst0027489; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_27489">BDSC_27489</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K68D-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:31252; FBst0031252; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31252">BDSC_31252</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pten-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:25967; FBst0025967; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_25967">BDSC_25967</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K92E-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:27690; FBst0027690; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_27690">BDSC_27690</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-norpA-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:31197; FBst0031197; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31197">BDSC_31197</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-fwd-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:31187; FBst0031187; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31187">BDSC_31187</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Plc21C-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:31269; FBst0031269; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_31269">BDSC_31269</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-sl-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:32906; FBst0032906; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_32906">BDSC_32906</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG3530-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38340; FBst0038340; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38340">BDSC_38340</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-CG5026-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:57020; FBst0057020; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_57020">BDSC_57020</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PIP4K-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:65891; FBst0065891; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_65891">BDSC_65891</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Sac1-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:56013; FBst0056013; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_56013">BDSC_56013</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K59F-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:64011; FBst0064011; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_64011">BDSC_64011</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K68D-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:35265; FBst0035265; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_35265">BDSC_35265</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-PIP5K59B-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:62855; FBst0062855; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_62855">BDSC_62855</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K93E-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:61182; FBst0061182; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_61182">BDSC_61182</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-mtm-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:57298; FBst0057298; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_57298">BDSC_57298</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K21B-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:38991; FBst0038991; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_38991">BDSC_38991</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-Pi3K59F-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:36056; FBst0036056; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_36056">BDSC_36056</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>UAS-FIG4-RNAi</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BDSC:58063; FBst0058063; RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:BDSC_5806335265">BDSC_5806335265</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cell line (<italic>Homo-sapiens</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">HEK293</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ATCC</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">CRL-1573</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">P4M::GFP (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hammond et al., 2014</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">P4M × 2::GFP (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hammond et al., 2014</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PLC-PH::GFP (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hammond et al., 2014</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pGU (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Lu et al., 2021</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">MaLionR (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Addgene</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Addgene #113908</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pNP (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Qiao et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pNP-fwd-KD (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pNP-PI4KII-KD (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pNP-PI4KIIIα-KD (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pNP-PI4K-2KD (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pNP-PI4K-3KD (plasmid)</td><td align="left" valign="top">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay or kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Plasmid midi kid</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Qiagen</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#12,143</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Commercial assay or kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Plasmid mini kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Thermo Scientific</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#K0503</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Commercial assay or kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gel extraction</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Thermo Scientific</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#K0692</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Halocarbon oil</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Halocarbon 95 oil</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#9002-83-9</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">X-treme Gene 9 DNA transfection reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#6365787001</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Fluorescent PM dye</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ThermoFisher</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ThermoFisher, Cat#C10046</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2-Deoxy-D-glucose</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#D8375</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antimycin A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat#A8674</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Membrane dye</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Invitrogen CellMask</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat# C10046</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Wortmannin</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat# 19545-26-7</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Fiji (ImageJ)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://imagej.net/Fiji">https://imagej.net/Fiji</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://imagej.net/Fiji">https://imagej.net/Fiji</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GraphPad Prism 8.0</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GraphPad Software</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.graphpad.com/">http://www.graphpad.com/</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Other</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">air-permeable membrane</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">YSI Inc</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">YSI Membrane Model #5,793</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">YSI Inc, Yellow Springs, OH</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title>Fly stocks</title><p>Flies of carrying transgenic <italic>ubi-P4M::GFP</italic>, <italic>ubi-P4M × 2::GFP, ubi-PLC-PH::GFP and ubi-PLC-PH::RFP</italic> alleles were generated by <italic>phiC31</italic>-mediated integration protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Huang et al., 2009</xref>). <italic>attP<sup>VK00022</sup></italic> (BL#24868) and <italic>attP<sup>VK00040</sup></italic> (BL#35568) stocks were used to integrate the above constructs to the 2nd chromosome and 3rd chromosome, respectively.</p><p>PI4K-3KD was generated using pNP plasmid based on the published protocol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Qiao et al., 2018</xref>. The pNP vector was cut with Nhe I and EcoR I and ligated with annealed oligo-dimmer o to generate pNP-fwd-KD, pNP-PI4KII-KD, and pNP-PI4KIIIα-KD. Primers used for annealing oligo-dimmer were listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp2">Supplementary file 2</xref>:</p><p>The pNP-fwd-KD was digested with Spe I and ligated with the shortest fragment cut by Spe I and Xba I from pNP-PI4KIIα-KD to make pNP-PI4K-2KD. To make pNP-PI4K-3KD, pNP-PI4KIIIα-KD was digested with Spe I and ligated with the shortest fragment cut by Spe I and Xba I from pNP-PI4K-2KD. pNP-PI4K-2KD and pNP-PI4K-3KD were used to generate transgenic stocks with the standard protocol.</p><p>UAS-AT1.03NL1(DGRC#117011) was used to express the <italic>Drosophila</italic>-optimized ATeam ATP sensor ‘AT[NL]’ in follicle cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Tsuyama et al., 2017</xref>). <italic>cy2-Gal4</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Queenan et al., 1997</xref>) was a gift from David Bilder, UC Berkeley. <italic>rbo::GFP</italic> was a gift from Kendal Broadie, Vanderbilt University (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Huang et al., 2004</xref>).</p><p><italic>w; lgl::mCherry</italic> and <italic>w; lgl::GFP</italic> knock-in stock were previously published (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>).</p><p><italic>Drosophila</italic> cultures and genetic crosses are carried out at 25 °C.</p><p>Additional stocks used were: <italic>UAS-PI4KIIIα-RNAi</italic> (BL#35256), <italic>UAS-Rbo-RNAi</italic> (VDRC#47751), <italic>UAS-ttc7-RNAi</italic> (VDRC#35881).</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Molecular cloning</title><p>Mammalian constructs of P4M::GFP, P4M × 2::GFP, and PLC-PH::GFP were as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hammond et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Hammond et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Várnai and Balla, 1998</xref>). DNA fragments encoding PLC-PH::GFP, P4M::GFP and P4M × 2::GFP were inserted into pGU vector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Lu et al., 2021</xref>) which contains a ubiquitin promoter. MaLionR ATP sensor was obtained from Addgene (#113908) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Arai et al., 2018</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Generation of RNAi mutant clones in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicle epithelia</title><p>Follicle cells containing over-expressing or RNAi clones were generated by heat-shocking 3 days old (after eclosion) young females of the correct genotype at 37 °C for 15–30 min and ovaries were dissected 3 days later.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Live imaging and hypoxia treatment in <italic>Drosophila</italic> epithelial cells</title><p>Ovaries from adult females of 2 days old were dissected in halocarbon oil (#95) and were imaged according to previously published protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dong et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Huang et al., 2011</xref>). To ensure sufficient air exchange to samples during the imaging session, dissected ovaries were mounted in halocarbon oil on an air-permeable membrane (YSI Membrane Model #5793, YSI Inc, Yellow Springs, OH) sealed by vacuum grease on a custom-made plastic slide over a 10 × 10 mm<sup>2</sup> cut-through window. The slide was then mounted in a custom made air-tight micro chamber (~5 cm<sup>3</sup>) for live imaging under confocal microscope. Oxygen levels inside the chamber were controlled by flow of either air or custom O<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> gas mixture at the rate of approximately 1–5 cc/s. Images were captured at room temperature (25 °C) on an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope (60 x Uplan FL N oil objective, NA = 1.3) by Olympus FV10-ASW software, or on a Nikon A1 confocal microscope (Plan Fluo 60 x oil objective, NA = 1.3) by NIS-Elements AR software.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Cell culture and imaging</title><p>HEK293 cells were cultured in glass bottom dishes (In Vitro Scientific) and were transfected with DNA using X-treme Gene 9 DNA transfection reagent (Sigma Cat# 6365787001). After 24–40 hr of transfection cells were mounted and imaged on a Nikon A1 confocal microscope (Plan Fluo 40 x oil objective, NA = 1.3) by NIS-Elements AR software. For images to be used for quantification, parameters were carefully adjusted to ensure no or minimum overexposure. In addition, when necessary, a fluorescent PM dye (CellMask DeepRed Plasma Membrane Stain, ThermoFisher, Cat#C10046) was added to the cell culture prior to live imaging to help in visualizing the PM for later quantifications.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Hypoxia and ATP inhibition experiments in HEK293 cells</title><p>HEK293 cells one day after transfection were imaged live in temperature control chamber at 37 °C. For hypoxia and ATP inhibition experiments, cells were starved in glucose-free medium six hours prior to live imaging. Hypoxia treatment was carried out using a custom designed culture dish lid which seals the 35-mm glass-bottom culture dish but allows gas to be flushed in and out the sealed dish chamber through two small built-in nozzles. Prior to the sealing, medium inside dish was reduced to ~200 µl and was covered by an air permeable membrane to prevent evaporation. Oxygen levels inside the chamber were controlled by flow of either air or custom O<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> gas mixture at the rate of approximately 0.1 cc/s. ATP inhibition was initiated by adding equal volume of serum containing 2-DG and antimycin to the final concentrations of 10 mM and 2 µM, respectively. After the end of inhibition, drugs were washout by replacing with normal media. For wortmannin inhibition experiment, wortmannin was added to the washout media to final concentration of 10 µM.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Image processing and quantification</title><p>Time-lapse movies were first stabilized by HyperStackReg plug-in in ImageJ. Images or movies containing excessively noisy channels were denoised by PureDenoise plugin in ImageJ prior to quantification. PM localization of GFP or RFP in images or movies was measured in Image J by custom macro scripts. For <italic>Drosophila</italic> samples, ROIs approximately 20–40 µm<sup>2</sup> were drawn across selected cell junctions in the first frame of the movie. Custom macros were used to automatically generate PM masks by threshold-segmentation using the mean pixel value of the ROI.</p><p>For HEK293 cells, PM masks were generated by an à trous waveleta decomposition method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hammond et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Olivo-Marin, 2002</xref>) base on the channel that either contains PM-localized proteins or fluorescent PM dyes. Cytosol masks were generated by segmentation using threshold based on the mean pixel value of the ROI. Cells expressing all transfected fluorescent proteins were selected for measurement. For each cell, one ROI was drawn to cover part of cell that contains PM and cytoplasm.</p><p>Due to the use of computer generated PM and cytosol masks, the exact shape of the ROI was not critical, except that PM segments in contact with neighboring expressing cells were avoided. Nuclei and intracellular puncta were also avoided. Custom macros were used to automatically measure PM and cytosolic intensities of each fluorescent protein in each cell marked by ROI in the sample image. Background was auto-detected by the macro based on the minimal pixel value of the whole image.</p><p>The PM localization index for each fluorescent protein was auto-calculated by the macro as the ratio of [PM - background]/[cytosol - background]. In live imaging experiments, “Normalized PM Index” was calculated by normalizing (PM Index –1) over the period of recording against the (PM Index –1) at 0 min. Data were further processed in Excel, visualized and analyzed in Graphpad Prism.</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-79582-mdarchecklist1-v2.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>Candidate RNAi screen on regulators controlling hypoxia-induced acute and reversible loss of PM Lgl.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-79582-supp1-v2.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp2"><label>Supplementary file 2.</label><caption><title>Primers used in this study.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-79582-supp2-v2.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.</p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are grateful to Drs Kendal Broadie, David Bilder and Tadashi Uemura for reagents and fly stocks, Kriti Sanghi for technical assistances, anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, Dr Simon Watkins and University of Pittsburgh Medical School Center for Biologic Imaging for generous imaging and microscopy support, Bloomington and Kyoto Stock Centers for fly stocks, and Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) for antibodies. Funding: This work was supported by grants NIH- NCRR R21RR024869 (Y H), NIH-NIGMS R01GM086423 and R01GM121534 (Y H), NIH 1R35GM119412-01 (G R H). University of Pittsburgh Medical School Center for Biologic Imaging is supported by grant 1S10OD019973-01 from NIH.</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arai</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kriszt</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Harada</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Looi</surname><given-names>L-S</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuda</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wongso</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Suo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishiura</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tseng</surname><given-names>Y-H</given-names></name><name><surname>Raghunath</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ito</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsuboi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitaguchi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>RGB-Color Intensiometric Indicators to Visualize Spatiotemporal Dynamics of ATP in Single Cells</article-title><source>Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English)</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>10873</fpage><lpage>10878</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/anie.201804304</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29952110</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baba</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Toth</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sengupta</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate controls Rab7 and PLEKHM1 membrane cycling during autophagosome-lysosome fusion</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>38</volume><elocation-id>e100312</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15252/embj.2018100312</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31368593</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bailey</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Prehoda</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Establishment of Par-Polarized Cortical Domains via Phosphoregulated Membrane Motifs</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>199</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2015.09.016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26481050</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balakrishnan</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Basu</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Raghu</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Phosphoinositide signalling in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Biochimica et Biophysica Acta</source><volume>1851</volume><fpage>770</fpage><lpage>784</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.10.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25449646</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balakrishnan</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Basu</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Shinde</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Thakur</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Jaiswal</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Raghu</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Regulation of PI4P levels by PI4KIIIα during G-protein-coupled PLC signaling in <italic>Drosophila</italic> photoreceptors</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>131</volume><elocation-id>jcs217257</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.217257</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29980590</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases: old enzymes with emerging functions</article-title><source>Trends in Cell Biology</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>351</fpage><lpage>361</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tcb.2006.05.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16793271</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Phosphoinositides: tiny lipids with giant impact on cell regulation</article-title><source>Physiological Reviews</source><volume>93</volume><fpage>1019</fpage><lpage>1137</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/physrev.00028.2012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23899561</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baskin</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Christiano</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Oh</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Schauder</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gazzerro</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Messa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Baldassari</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Assereto</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Biancheri</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Zara</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Minetti</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Raimondi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Simons</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Walther</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinisch</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>De Camilli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>The leukodystrophy protein FAM126A (hyccin) regulates PtdIns(4)P synthesis at the plasma membrane</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>132</fpage><lpage>138</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb3271</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26571211</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basu</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Balakrishnan</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Janardan</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Raghu</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>A PI4KIIIα protein complex is required for cell viability during <italic>Drosophila</italic> wing development</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>462</volume><fpage>208</fpage><lpage>222</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2020.03.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32194035</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Botero</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chiaroni-Clarke</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Simon</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> as a platform for the study of phosphoinositide biology</article-title><source>Science Advances</source><volume>5</volume><elocation-id>eaat4872</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.aat4872</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brill</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hime</surname><given-names>GR</given-names></name><name><surname>Scharer-Schuksz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fuller</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>A phospholipid kinase regulates actin organization and intercellular bridge formation during germline cytokinesis</article-title><source>Development (Cambridge, England)</source><volume>127</volume><fpage>3855</fpage><lpage>3864</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.127.17.3855</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10934029</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burgess</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Del Bel</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>C-IJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Barylko</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Polevoy</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Rollins</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Albanesi</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Krämer</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Brill</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Type II phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase regulates trafficking of secretory granule proteins in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Development (Cambridge, England)</source><volume>139</volume><fpage>3040</fpage><lpage>3050</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.077644</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22791894</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carpenter</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantley</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1990">1990</year><article-title>Phosphoinositide kinases</article-title><source>Biochemistry</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>11147</fpage><lpage>11156</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi00503a001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2176895</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y-J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>C-L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>W-R</given-names></name><name><surname>Liou</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>RASSF4 controls SOCE and ER-PM junctions through regulation of PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub></article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>216</volume><fpage>2011</fpage><lpage>2025</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201606047</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28600435</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakatsu</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Baskin</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>De Camilli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Plasticity of PI4KIIIα interactions at the plasma membrane</article-title><source>EMBO Reports</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>312</fpage><lpage>320</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15252/embr.201439151</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25608530</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Claret</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jouette</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Benoit</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Legent</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Guichet</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>PI(4,5)P2 produced by the PI4P5K SKTL controls apical size by tethering PAR-3 in <italic>Drosophila</italic> epithelial cells</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>1071</fpage><lpage>1079</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.056</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24768049</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dickson</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Hille</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Golgi and plasma membrane pools of PI(4)P contribute to plasma membrane PI(4,5)P2 and maintenance of KCNQ2/3 ion channel current</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>111</volume><fpage>E2281</fpage><lpage>E2290</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1407133111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24843134</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Austin</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Celotto</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>WZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Palladino</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>GRV</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>A conserved polybasic domain mediates plasma membrane targeting of Lgl and its regulation by hypoxia</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>211</volume><fpage>273</fpage><lpage>286</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201503067</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26483556</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Saheki</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Swarup</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lucast</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Harper</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>De Camilli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Endosome-ER Contacts Control Actin Nucleation and Retromer Function through VAP-Dependent Regulation of PI4P</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>166</volume><fpage>408</fpage><lpage>423</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.037</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27419871</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lettieri</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>GR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>A polybasic domain in aPKC mediates Par6-dependent control of membrane targeting and kinase activity</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>219</volume><elocation-id>e201903031</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201903031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32580209</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fairn</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogata</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Botelho</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Stahl</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name><name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>De Camilli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Wodak</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Grinstein</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>An electrostatic switch displaces phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinases from the membrane during phagocytosis</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>187</volume><fpage>701</fpage><lpage>714</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.200909025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19951917</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gervais</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Claret</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Januschke</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Roth</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Guichet</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>PIP5K-dependent production of PIP2 sustains microtubule organization to establish polarized transport in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> oocyte</article-title><source>Development (Cambridge, England)</source><volume>135</volume><fpage>3829</fpage><lpage>3838</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.029009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18948416</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>GRV</given-names></name><name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name><name><surname>Holdich</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Koteci</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Irvine</surname><given-names>RF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>PI4P and PI(4,5)P2 are essential but independent lipid determinants of membrane identity</article-title><source>Science (New York, N.Y.)</source><volume>337</volume><fpage>727</fpage><lpage>730</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1222483</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22722250</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>GRV</given-names></name><name><surname>Machner</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>A novel probe for phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate reveals multiple pools beyond the Golgi</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>205</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>126</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201312072</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24711504</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>GRV</given-names></name><name><surname>Burke</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Novel roles of phosphoinositides in signaling, lipid transport, and disease</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Cell Biology</source><volume>63</volume><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31972475</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>APKC: the Kinase that Phosphorylates Cell Polarity</article-title><source>F1000Research</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>F1000 Faculty Rev-903</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12688/f1000research.14427.1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29983916</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>F-D</given-names></name><name><surname>Matthies</surname><given-names>HJG</given-names></name><name><surname>Speese</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Broadie</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Rolling blackout, a newly identified PIP2-DAG pathway lipase required for <italic>Drosophila</italic> phototransduction</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>1070</fpage><lpage>1078</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn1313</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15361878</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Watson</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>From the Cover: Directed, efficient, and versatile modifications of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> genome by genomic engineering</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>106</volume><fpage>8284</fpage><lpage>8289</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0900641106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19429710</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y-J</given-names></name><name><surname>Austin</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Devor</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Roegiers</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Differential regulation of adherens junction dynamics during apical-basal polarization</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>124</volume><fpage>4001</fpage><lpage>4013</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.086694</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22159415</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Imamura</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Nhat</surname><given-names>KPH</given-names></name><name><surname>Togawa</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Saito</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Iino</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kato-Yamada</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagai</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Noji</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Visualization of ATP levels inside single living cells with fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based genetically encoded indicators</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>106</volume><fpage>15651</fpage><lpage>15656</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0904764106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19720993</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ketel</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Krauss</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicot</surname><given-names>A-S</given-names></name><name><surname>Puchkov</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wieffer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Subramanian</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Schultz</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Laporte</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Haucke</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>A phosphoinositide conversion mechanism for exit from endosomes</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>529</volume><fpage>408</fpage><lpage>412</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature16516</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26760201</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kioka</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujikawa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsukamoto</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Imamura</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakano</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Higo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamazaki</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuzaki</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Takafuji</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Asanuma</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Asakura</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Minamino</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Shintani</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoshida</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Noji</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitakaze</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Komuro</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Asano</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Takashima</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Evaluation of intramitochondrial ATP levels identifies G0/G1 switch gene 2 as a positive regulator of oxidative phosphorylation</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>111</volume><fpage>273</fpage><lpage>278</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1318547111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24344269</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lees</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Oh</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Schauder</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Baskin</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobbs</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Notarangelo</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name><name><surname>De Camilli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Walz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinisch</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Architecture of the human PI4KIIIα lipid kinase complex</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>114</volume><fpage>13720</fpage><lpage>13725</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1718471115</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29229838</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Bollepalli</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>SV</given-names></name><name><surname>Asteriti</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Brill</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hardie</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Genetic dissection of the phosphoinositide cycle in <italic>Drosophila</italic> photoreceptors</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>131</volume><elocation-id>jcs214478</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.214478</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29567856</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Electrostatic plasma membrane targeting contributes to Dlg function in cell polarity and tumorigenesis</article-title><source>Development (Cambridge, England)</source><volume>148</volume><elocation-id>dev196956</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.196956</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33688074</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McLaughlin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Murray</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Plasma membrane phosphoinositide organization by protein electrostatics</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>438</volume><fpage>605</fpage><lpage>611</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature04398</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16319880</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakatsu</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Baskin</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanner</surname><given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Shui</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name><name><surname>Pirruccello</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ingolia</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name><name><surname>Wenk</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>De Camilli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>PtdIns4P synthesis by PI4KIIIα at the plasma membrane and its impact on plasma membrane identity</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>199</volume><fpage>1003</fpage><lpage>1016</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201206095</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23229899</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olivo-Marin</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Extraction of spots in biological images using multiscale products</article-title><source>Pattern Recognition</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>1989</fpage><lpage>1996</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0031-3203(01)00127-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pemberton</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Humpolickova</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Eisenreichova</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sengupta</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Toth</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Boura</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Defining the subcellular distribution and metabolic channeling of phosphatidylinositol</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>219</volume><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201906130</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32211894</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Polevoy</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>H-C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Szentpetery</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldbach</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Steinbach</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Brill</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Dual roles for the <italic>Drosophila</italic> PI 4-kinase four wheel drive in localizing Rab11 during cytokinesis</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>187</volume><fpage>847</fpage><lpage>858</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.200908107</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19995935</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prasad</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Montell</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Cellular and molecular mechanisms of border cell migration analyzed using time-lapse live-cell imaging</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>997</fpage><lpage>1005</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17543870</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiao</surname><given-names>H-H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>R-G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L-P</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>J-Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>J-Q</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>An efficient and multiple target transgenic RNAi technique with low toxicity in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>4160</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-06537-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30297884</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Queenan</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghabrial</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Schüpbach</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Ectopic activation of torpedo/Egfr, a <italic>Drosophila</italic> receptor tyrosine kinase, dorsalizes both the eggshell and the embryo</article-title><source>Development (Cambridge, England)</source><volume>124</volume><fpage>3871</fpage><lpage>3880</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.124.19.3871</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9367443</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sohn</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Korzeniowski</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zewe</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Wills</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>GRV</given-names></name><name><surname>Humpolickova</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Vrzal</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Chalupska</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Veverka</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Fairn</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Boura</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> controls plasma membrane PI4P and PS levels via ORP5/8 recruitment to ER-PM contact sites</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>217</volume><fpage>1797</fpage><lpage>1813</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201710095</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29472386</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Oh</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Burgess</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hipfner</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Brill</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>PI4KIIIα is required for cortical integrity and cell polarity during <italic>Drosophila</italic> oogenesis</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>127</volume><fpage>954</fpage><lpage>966</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.129031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24413170</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tóth</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Knight</surname><given-names>ZA</given-names></name><name><surname>Shokat</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIIbeta regulates the transport of ceramide between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>281</volume><fpage>36369</fpage><lpage>36377</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M604935200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17003043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsuyama</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsubouchi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Usui</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Imamura</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Uemura</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Mitochondrial dysfunction induces dendritic loss via eIF2α phosphorylation</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>216</volume><fpage>815</fpage><lpage>834</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201604065</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28209644</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Várnai</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Balla</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Visualization of phosphoinositides that bind pleckstrin homology domains: calcium- and agonist-induced dynamic changes and relationship to myo-[3H]inositol-labeled phosphoinositide pools</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>143</volume><fpage>501</fpage><lpage>510</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.143.2.501</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9786958</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vijayakrishnan</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Woodruff</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Broadie</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Rolling blackout is required for bulk endocytosis in non-neuronal cells and neuronal synapses</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>122</volume><fpage>114</fpage><lpage>125</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.036673</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19066280</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name><name><surname>Paddock</surname><given-names>MN</given-names></name><name><surname>Lundquist</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Mashadova</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Amadiume</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bumpus</surname><given-names>TW</given-names></name><name><surname>Hodakoski</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hopkins</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name><name><surname>Fine</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hill</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Baskin</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Dow</surname><given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantley</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>PIP4Ks Suppress Insulin Signaling through a Catalytic-Independent Mechanism</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>1991</fpage><lpage>2001</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.070</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31091439</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wills</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Goulden</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>GRV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Genetically encoded lipid biosensors</article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>1526</fpage><lpage>1532</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.E17-12-0738</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29953345</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Chi</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Baskin</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lucast</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Burd</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>De Camilli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinisch</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Structural insights into assembly and regulation of the plasma membrane phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase complex</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>19</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2013.11.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24360784</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Denef</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schüpbach</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title><italic>Drosophila</italic> PI4KIIIalpha is required in follicle cells for oocyte polarization and Hippo signaling</article-title><source>Development (Cambridge, England)</source><volume>138</volume><fpage>1697</fpage><lpage>1703</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.059279</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21429988</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yeung</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Gilbert</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Silvius</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapus</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Grinstein</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Membrane phosphatidylserine regulates surface charge and protein localization</article-title><source>Science (New York, N.Y.)</source><volume>319</volume><fpage>210</fpage><lpage>213</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1152066</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18187657</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zewe</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sangappa</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wills</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Goulden</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>GRV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Probing the subcellular distribution of phosphatidylinositol reveals a surprising lack at the plasma membrane</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>219</volume><elocation-id>e201906127</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201906127</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32211893</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.79582.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>Editor's evaluation</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Knust</surname><given-names>Elisabeth</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05b8d3w18</institution-id><institution>Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics</institution></institution-wrap><country>Germany</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The authors show that hypoxia leads to previously unappreciated effects on levels of plasma membrane PI4P and PIP2, which affects membrane targeting of proteins important for normal cellular physiology, including cell polarity. They provide insight into the identity of the PI4Ks that are responsible for regenerating plasma membrane PIP2 following return to normoxia. These findings are novel and provide multiple interesting insights for those studying phosphoinositide biology as well as cellular responses to hypoxic stress and recovery.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.79582.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Knust</surname><given-names>Elisabeth</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05b8d3w18</institution-id><institution>Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics</institution></institution-wrap><country>Germany</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text id="sa2-box1"><p>In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.</p></boxed-text><p>[Editors' note: this paper was reviewed by <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.reviewcommons.org/">Review Commons</ext-link>.]</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.79582.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><p>We would like to thank all three reviewers for their comprehensive and constructive comments. We are in particular grateful to reviewer#3 for the long and detailed suggestions on improving the manuscript text and figures. We have already incorporated most of these suggestions into the preliminary revision of manuscript. In addition to the changes already made in initial submission to <italic>eLife</italic>, in this submission:</p><p>1. We have successfully carried out hypoxia assays in live HEK293 cells as requested by the reviewers. Such results are presented in updated Figure 7—figure supplement 1B&amp;C. In Brief, we showed that hypoxia in HEK293 cells induced acute and reversible reduction of intracellular ATP as measured in real time by ATP sensor MaLionR, as well as depletion of PM PI4P and PIP2. Such results are fully consistent with our hypoxia assays in <italic>Drosophila</italic> tissues, further supporting the hypothesis that hypoxia triggers acute and reversible depletion of PM PI4P and PIP2 through ATP inhibition. We also added a new video (Figure 7 video-1) to show the changes of MaLionR sensor in HEK293 cells undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. Establishing hypoxia assay for imaging live HEK293 was more challenging than we expected, but we hope reviewers find the data in this manuscript satisfying.</p><p>2. We revised and streamlined the Discussion, making it ~200 words shorter and more concise.</p><p>3. We also reformatted the manuscript and added additional files such as raw data to meet <italic>eLife</italic> requirements.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer #1 (Evidence, reproducibility and clarity (Required)):</p><p>Summary:</p><p>This manuscript takes a closer look at how hypoxia affects the accumulation of PI4P and PI4,5P2 (PIP2) in the plasma membrane of <italic>Drosophila</italic> ovarian follicular epithelial cells and how ATP depletion similarly affects the localization of the same phospholipids in HEK293 cells. They demonstrate that hypoxia results in the reversible loss of plasma membrane (PM) association of both lipids, with PIP2 disappearing ahead of PI4P, and recovering more slowly than PI4P when oocytes are returned to normoxia. They also show that the intracellular vesicular pools of PI4P are depleted ahead of the PM pools and the PI4P recovery occurs first in PM, then in the vesicles. They show that the disappearance and recovery of the polarity protein Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) parallels that of PIP2 during hypoxia and subsequent normoxia, with a very slight delay. The authors then go on to show the RNAi knockdown of the PM enzyme (PI4KIIIa) that phosphorylates PIP delays the recovery of PI4P at the membrane, with recovery first occurring in the vesicular pools. This knockdown also delays the recovery of PIP2 and, as with recovery of PI4P, the recovery of PIP2 now occurs first in vesicular pools. Lgl recovery follows that of PI4P and PIP2 with RNAi knockdown of PI4KIIIa. The knockdown of all three of the enzymes that phosphorylate PIP to generate PI4P delays recovery of PI4P, PIP2 and Lgl at the membrane even more. The authors show that proteins required for the PM localization of PI4KIIIa have similar effects on the recovery of PM PI4P, PIP2 and Lgl (with delays and recovery of vesicular pools before PM pools). Independently, the authors show that ATP depletion in HEK293 cells result in similar reversible depletion of PI4P, PIP2 and Lgl from the PM. From these studies and their previous findings, the authors conclude that pools of PI4P and PIP2 are likely rapidly turned over in the membrane even during normoxia and that this rapid recovery is dependent on the PM localized enzyme that phosphorylates phosphoinositol.</p><p>Major comments:</p><p>Overall, the data are beautifully presented; it is quite helpful to have a video of each experimental treatment showing the corresponding response of all three molecules that are being monitored. Signal quantification over time is carefully documented. With the exception that a link between hypoxia and depletion of ATP has not been demonstrated here, the key conclusions are convincing. However, as pointed out below (in the significance section), some of the major points have already been published by this group. Their conclusion that hypoxia induces acute and reversible reduction of cellular ATP levels (which are then proposed to affect the activities of the enzymes required for PI4P and, consequently, PIP2 production) was not shown. They did demonstrate that acute depletion of ATP had the same consequences on PM phospholipids as acute hypoxia (in HEK293 cells). And, indeed, it makes sense that hypoxia could affect enzymes required for ATP synthesis, but the authors would have to show that acute hypoxia results in acute reduction in cellular ATP pools to make the links they suggest. This is something they should be able to do in the HEK293 cells now that they have their ATP sensor. Just to note, this group did show that hypoxia can reduce levels of ATP in <italic>Drosophila</italic> oocytes in their previous paper (Dong et al., 2015, Figure S3), but it is unclear if this is reversible and happens in the time frame of the experiments presented in this current manuscript.</p></disp-quote><p>We appreciate reviewer’s point on our previous studies on hypoxia and ATP inhibition. In <italic>Dong et al. 2015</italic> we biochemically measured ATP levels in embryos treated by hypoxia, but due to lack of ATP biosensors it was not possible then to show real time ATP level changes in cells undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation. Instead, we showed that direct ATP inhibition by antimycin treatment mimics the effect of hypoxia, supporting the hypothesis that hypoxia acts through ATP inhibition.</p><p>In the current manuscript, we are able to demonstrate for the first time that hypoxia triggered acute and reversible ATP level reduction in <italic>Drosophila</italic> follicular epithelial cells (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). Furthermore, we are able to show the close correlation of ATP and PM PI4P/PIP2 levels, and identified PI4KIIIa as one of the key enzymes in the process. In the finalized manuscript we also added data to show ATP level changes in HEK293 cells under hypoxia, as suggested by the reviewer (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>My suggestions are the following:</p><p>(1) The authors need to make it absolutely clear what was already known, including the following: (A) hypoxia reversibly affects PM pools of PI4P, PIP2, and Lgl (and other membrane associated proteins), (B) that hypoxia can affect ATP levels in <italic>Drosophila</italic> oocytes (although these previous studies do not show anything about the dynamics) and (C) that reducing ATP levels affects PM pools of PI4P, PIP2 and Lgl.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with reviewer and have revised the introduction (p3, second paragraph) to better summarize what we previously observed on hypoxia/ATP and PIP2 turnover. It should be noted though that our previous studies did not contain any data regarding PI4P changes under hypoxia or ATP inhibition, as the current manuscript is the first time we reported the making and use of PI4P sensor such as P4Mx2::GFP in <italic>Drosophila</italic>.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) They should demonstrate that acute hypoxia and return to normoxia has acute and reversible effects on cellular ATP levels – they now have the tools to do this, at least in HEK293 cells.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with reviewer and are happy that we are able to add this data to the final revision. Such experiments did require significantly modified setup for imaging live HEK293 cells with controlled hypoxia/reoxygenation and we had to spend more than a month to optimize the experiments. The data are presented in Figure 7—figure supplement 1C</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Minor comments:</p><p>The manuscript is too long and the discussion unnecessarily repeats everything already presented in the results. The authors should find a way to streamline the discussion.</p></disp-quote><p>We revised the final manuscript and make the discussion ~200 words shorter and more concise. Paragraphs rephrasing the results were removed.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>N values should be given for all figures and experiments, and the N=23/24 versus N=24/24 needs to be explained the first time it is used.</p></disp-quote><p>We have revised manuscript so all N values are clearly provided and easier to understand.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>There are a few mismatches in terms of plural nouns and singular verbs and vice versa sprinkled into the manuscript, so some careful editing would be useful.</p></disp-quote><p>We have revised the manuscript to eliminate such errors/typos, especially with the help of the generous and comprehensive list of by reviewer#3.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Significance:</p><p>I was initially quite excited about the novelty of their findings and the potential insight into the dynamics of PM pools of the two phospholipids that are critical to cell polarity and that play important signaling roles. However, at least a subset of their conclusions were either published in their earlier work or do not necessarily follow from what they have done in this manuscript. Their statement that hypoxia in <italic>Drosophila</italic> induces acute and reversible depletion of PM PI4P and PIP2 was presented in a previous publication (See Figure 8 of Dong et al., 2015).</p></disp-quote><p>We greatly appreciate reviewer’s comments on the significance of our discovery. Again all data regarding PI4P are new in this manuscript and have not been published before. We only published very preliminary data suggesting the reversible depletion of PIP2 and PIP3 (but not PI4P) under hypoxia (Dong et al., 2015). The current manuscript provides a comprehensive set of quantitative live imaging data with high spatial and temporal resolution that demonstrate for the first time the dynamic turnover of PM PI4P under hypoxia and ATP inhibition, the correlation between such turnovers of PM PI4P and PIP2, and the direct correlations between PI4P/PIP2 turnover and Lgl electrostatic PM targeting and intracellular ATP levels. In addition, studies on the role of PI4KIIIa complex in such process have not been done before.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>This manuscript would appeal to an audience interested in the mechanisms of cell polarity and phosphoinositide signaling.</p><p>I am a <italic>Drosophila</italic> developmental geneticist quite familiar with the topics that this paper addresses.</p><p>Reviewer #2 (Evidence, reproducibility and clarity (Required)):</p><p>Summary:</p><p>This manuscript describes the effect of hypoxia on the levels of PI4P and PI45P2 , two key PPIs that are enriched on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. These PPIs are synthesized by the sequential phosphorylation of π by a PI-4 kinase and subsequently a PI4P 5 kinases, both of which use ATP. The relevant PI-4 kinase at the plasma membrane, PI4KIIIa has been conclusively identified previously in mammalian cells by the DeCamilli lab (Nakatsu et.al JCB 2012) and its role in regulating the synthesis of PI4P and PI(4,5)P2 in two Drosophila cell types in vivo shown by two previous studies. Balakrishanan et.al J.Cell Sci 2018 (photoreceptors during PLC signalling) and Basu et.al Dev.Biol 2020 ( in multiple larval cell types ). PI4KIIIa has been shown to exist as a complex of the enzymatic polypeptide, EFR3 and TTC7. The studies by Nakatsu, Balakrishnan and Basu have shown the importance of the complex subunits is regulating PI4P and PI45P2 levels in cultured mammalian cells and <italic>Drosophila</italic> cell types in vivo.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank reviewer for pointing out the work of Balakrishanan <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://et.al/">et.al</ext-link> 2018. We have added a brief summary this reference to the Discussion in revised manuscript (p13, line 10-12)</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>In the present study, Lu et. al build on their previous work showing that the polarity protein Lgl undergoes hypoxia induced translocation. They show that hypoxia also induces loss of PI4P and PI45P2 at the plasma membrane in these cells correlated with loss of Lgl localization to the PM. The manuscript then goes on to establish the requirement of the PI4KIIIa complex in regulating Lgl localization as well as PI4P and PI45P2 levels at the plasma membrane during hypoxia and the subsequent recovery of these at the plasma membrane.</p><p>The strength of the manuscript is twofold.</p><p>(i) The work is done to a high technical standard and the investigators have carried out the measurements of LGL localization, PI4P and PI45P2 levels along with simultaneous measurements of ATP levels in vivo. The work would be strengthened further if the authors could show the level of depletion of PI4K isoforms or PI4KIIIa complex subunits units induced in ovarian tissue under their experimental conditions by the GAL4 drivers used in this study. This is not a persnickety detail as RNAi lines can have very different effectiveness in <italic>Drosophila</italic> ovarian tissue compared to other fly cell types. This point is, in particular, important in cases where an RNAi line is being used and the conclusion is a lack of impact on a phenotype being studied.</p></disp-quote><p>We are fully aware of the potential caveat of RNAi. In our previous publications we were able to validate RNAi knock-down efficiency against endogenously or ectopically expressed GFP-tagged target proteins (Dong et al., 2020; Dong et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2021) or endogenous proteins with available antibodies (Dong et al., 2015). It is regrettable that presently such reagents are not available for directly examining the level of RNAi knock-down for PI4KIIIa and PI4KIIa etc. We did show that <italic>rbo-RNAi</italic> efficiently knocked down the expression levels of Rbo::GFP (Figure5—figure supplement 1C). In current manuscript, we have been very careful to draw conclusions based on negative RNAi results.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(ii) A second strength is that the authors now illuminate a further in vivo cell type where the function of the PI4KIIIa complex in regulating PI4P and PI45P2 levels. This adds to the earlier work of Nakatsu, Balakrishnan and Basu.</p><p>A key difficulty with the current story is the lack of specificity of the phenotype they demonstrate under hypoxia. Of course, hypoxia is expected to deplete cellular ATP levels but PI4KIIIa is not the only enzyme that this lack of ATP will impact. There will be dozens or more other kinases, both protein and lipid kinases whose function will be impacted by the drop in ATP levels. Therefore, it is hard to attribute a specific/particular role to the PI4KIIIa complex under these conditions. The mislocalization of LGL::mCherry while correlated with PI4P and PI45P2 levels at the plasma membrane may be just that- a correlation. It is quite possible, indeed likely, that the mislocalization of LGL-mCherry under hypoxia conditions is due to the reduction of the activity of another lipid or protein kinase due to the drop in ATP levels due to hypoxia (PKC is a possibility too).</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with reviewer that PI4KIIIa almost certainly is only one of the enzymes that are involved in regulating the PM PI4P/PIP2 turnover triggered by hypoxia. This manuscript is our first effort to investigate the potential regulatory network underlying the hypoxia-triggered turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2, and it is our long term goal to identify more components in the regulatory network.</p><p>As to underlying mechanisms of the loss of PM Lgl under hypoxia, we previously showed that PM targeting of Lgl dependents on both PI4P and PIP2 and acute depletion of PI4P and PIP2 in cultured cells completely blocks the PM targeting of Lgl (Dong et al., 2015). Thus, although we cannot exclude contributions from other lipids, it is highly plausible that loss of PM PI4P and PIP2 triggered by hypoxia is the main driving force disrupting the electrostatic PM targeting of Lgl.</p><p>Lgl is phosphorylated by aPKC and such phosphorylation inhibits Lgl PM targeting by neutralizing the positive charges on Lgl’s polybasic motif (Dong et al., 2015, Bailey et al., 2015). Thus, potential inhibition of aPKC activity by hypoxia should not inhibit the PM targeting of Lgl. Consistently, we previously showed that <italic>aPKC</italic><sup>-/-</sup> mutant cells showed same acute and reversible loss of PM Lgl under hypoxia (Dong et al., 2015).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Minor comments:</p><p>The authors must reference all published work on the PI4KIIIa complex in the literature. Some of it is excluded in the present version</p></disp-quote><p>We apologize for the missing references and in the revised manuscript we have already added several additional references based on the suggestions of reviewer#1 and #3. In the finalized manuscript we had made our best effort to cover all the relevant studies.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The <italic>Drosophila</italic> work, particularly cell types used, etc are not accessible to people who are not fly experts. This should be done.</p></disp-quote><p>We added a sentence to the end of the first paragraph in Results to specifically highlight that all <italic>Drosophila</italic> studies were based on follicular epithelial cells from female ovary (p4, line 25-27).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Significance:</p><p>Adds to knowledge on the PI4KIIIa complex.</p><p>Builds on existing knowledge in the PI4KIIIa field and maybe also cell polarity field.</p><p>Reviewer #3 (Evidence, reproducibility and clarity (Required)):</p><p>Summary:</p><p>Phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs) are key determinants of membrane identity and regulate crucial cellular processes such as polarization, lipid transfer and membrane trafficking. Despite decades of study, surprisingly little is known about how levels of PIPs are regulated in response to cellular stress. Here, using <italic>Drosophila</italic> ovarian follicular epithelial cells and human HEK293 cells, the authors show that levels of plasma membrane (PM) PI4P and PIP2 decrease rapidly in response to hypoxia, resulting in loss of polybasic proteins from the PM. These effects are reversed in response to reoxygenation. Similarly, hypoxia leads to acute depletion of ATP levels, which also regenerate following reoxygenation. Using a combination of quantitative image analysis and genetic analysis, they show that PI4KIIIalpha and its binding partners Rbo/ EFR3 and TTC7 are needed to maintain PI4P and PIP2 at the PM under normal and hypoxic conditions, whereas the other two Drosophila π 4-kinases, Fwd/PI4KIIIbeta and PI4KII, play a less important role in PM PIP homeostasis. Their results suggest that manipulations with indirect effects on PIPs (hypoxia, ATP depletion, ischemia) can have a profound impact on electrostatic charge at the PM, as well as downstream processes that require PM PI4P and PIP2.</p><p>Major Comments:</p><p>1. In general, the authors' conclusions are convincing. However, some of the results are less evident from the still images and graphs provided in the figures than from the videos that accompany the figures. Some suggested improvements are below.</p><p>2. No additional experiments are essential to support the claims of the paper, although some additional quantitation would be helpful to the reader, as detailed below.</p><p>3. Data and methods are generally presented in such a way that they can be reproduced, although some additional details would be helpful, as listed below.</p><p>4. Experiments were adequately replicated, and statistical analysis appears adequate.</p></disp-quote><p>We are extremely grateful to the generous efforts of the reviewer providing such a detailed list of suggested improvements. We have incorporated all the text revisions into the revised manuscript and revised the figures accordingly too.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Minor comments:</p><p>1. Although the data are generally quantified quite well, there are two instances in the first full paragraph on p. 5 where this is not the case. First, PM PI4P is described as &quot;oftentimes&quot; as showing a transient increase in the early phase of hypoxia. However, this is not quantified. How often did this occur among the samples examined? How large is the transient increase when it occurs (Figure 1A' error bars are not obvious on the colored background)? Second, the authors state that the P4Mx2-GFP puncta &quot;often&quot; became brighter after recovery. How often did this occur? No quantitation is provided.</p></disp-quote><p>Upon close inspection of the data, we conclude that during the early phase of hypoxia PM P4Mx2::GFP always showed an initial drop followed a transient increase. Thus we revised the sentence to delete “oftentimes”.</p><p>We did not specifically quantify the transient increase of the PM P4Mx2::GFP during the early phase of hypoxia since it is likely an artifact as discussed in the manuscript, making its quantification less meaningful.</p><p>As to the P4Mx2::GFP puncta, regretfully we do not have imaging tools that can accurately and automatically recognize/measure such puncta in our live recordings. We are actively developing such software using trainable Weka segmentation tool (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://imagej.net/plugins/tws/">https://imagej.net/plugins/tws/</ext-link>) and hopefully such puncta quantifications will be possible in our future experiments.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>2. The authors conclude that &quot;PI4KIIalpha and Fwd contribute significantly to the maintenance of PM PI4P&quot; (bottom of p. 7), yet they did not validate their RNAi knockdowns of these two genes, so they do not know whether it is one or both of these PI4Ks that contribute.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with reviewer that our RNAi knockdowns on PI4KIIa and Fwd are not sufficient to tell whether one or both contribute to the PM PI4P maintenance. We revised the sentence to “Our data support that PI4KIIα and/or FWD contribute significantly to the maintenance of PM PI4P…” (p7, line 33-34)</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>3. In Figure 4B, a subset of the cells &quot;show failed recovery of PM Lgl::GFP&quot;. However, some cells did recover. This average percentage of cells that recovered should be quantified, if possible.</p></disp-quote><p>Added numbers of PI4K-3KD cells that show normal or failed hypoxia response of Lgl::GFP and revised the sentences accordingly (p8, line20-23)</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>4. In Figure 7A, B, the bottom cell in each example lags behind the top cell in recovery of the MaLionR sensor. The frequency of observed cells in each class for 7A, B should be quantified.</p></disp-quote><p>Added n numbers of each cell class to Figure 7A, B legend.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>5. In most cases, prior studies were referenced appropriately. However, two previous studies in Drosophila showing the effects of Sktl/PIP2 reduction on localization of polybasic proteins Lgl, Baz/Par-3 and Par-1 were not cited (relevant to the first paragraph of the Introduction, p. 3): Gervais et al., Development (2008), Claret et al. Curr Biol (2014). In addition, two studies showing the importance of <italic>Drosophila</italic> PI4KIIIalpha in synthesizing PM PI4P and PIP2 were not cited (relevant to the description of this enzyme, top of p. 6): Yan et al., Development (2011), Tan et al., J Cell Sci (2014). Data showing fwd null mutants are not lethal (relevant to top of p. 7) were published in Brill et al., Development (2000).</p></disp-quote><p>We thank reviewer for suggesting additional references. We added <italic>Yan et al.</italic> and <italic>Tan et al.</italic> for referencing PI4PIIIa, and <italic>Brill et al.</italic> for referencing the original characterization of fwd. We discussed work from <italic>Gervais et al.</italic> and <italic>Claret et al.</italic> in the revised discussion (p6, line 11-16).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>6. For the most part, text and figures are clear and accurate. However, there are quite a few typos and grammatical mistakes, as well as instances of lack of clarity in the writing that should be addressed. In addition, there are a number of improvements to presentation of data that would make the figures easier to understand. These are listed below.</p><p>7. Suggestions to improve presentation of data and conclusions are below.</p></disp-quote><p>Again, we greatly appreciate such generous efforts from the reviewer and have incorporated all the text revisions into the revised manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Significance:</p><p>Overall, the authors do a nice job of showing that hypoxia leads to previously unappreciated effects on levels of PM PI4P and PIP2, resulting in loss of PM association of proteins important for normal cellular physiology. This finding is quite novel. Moreover, the authors provide insight into the identity of the PI4Ks that are responsible for regenerating PM PIP2 following return to normoxia. Their analysis of the dynamics of these changes provides multiple interesting insights, including the potential roles of intracellular pools of PI4P in replenishing PM PIP2 and the observation that intracellular accumulation of PIP2 is occasionally observed in association with the appearance of intracellular PI4P puncta, suggesting a novel route for PIP2 replenishment in response to hypoxic stress. Their results will provide the basis for future studies examining the cellular mechanisms involved. This study will be of interest to those studying phosphoinositide biology as well as cellular responses to hypoxic stress and recovery, such as occur during ischemia and reperfusion.</p><p>Reviewer expertise: <italic>Drosophila</italic> molecular genetics, cell biology, developmental biology, phosphoinositides, PIP pathway enzymes, PIP effectors</p><p>Referees cross-commenting</p><p>This session includes the comments of all reviewers.</p><p>Reviewer 3: I agree with reviewer #1 that the authors did not do a good job of clarifying what they and others had previously shown, and I must confess I didn't carefully examine their previous papers carefully enough before preparing my review. In fact, they previously showed that hypoxia affects localization of Dlg at the plasma membrane and that its recovery depends on PI4KIIIalpha and PIP2 (Lu et al., Development 2021). This is in addition to their previous data showing effects of hypoxia on Lgl (Dong et al., J Cell Biol 2015). Thus, less of the information in the current manuscript is novel than I thought when I initially read it.</p><p>I also agree with reviewer #2 that they need to do a better job of citing the relevant literature and considering the possibility that hypoxia and reduced levels of ATP might affect many different enzymes. In addition, as suggested by reviewer #1, it seems important</p><p>Reviewer 1: I agree with what Reviewer 3 is suggesting and with reviewer 2 that the authors should do a better job of citing all of the relevant literature. I also appreciate the detailed edits provided by Reviewer 3 – it was very generous of them to do this.</p><p>Reviewer 2: The points raised by reviewer 1 and 3 with regard to the citing or prior work (from the authors or other labs) also applies to their citing of literature on π and PI4K signalling. Here too citing or prior work has been less than satisfactory making it difficult to do this.</p></disp-quote><p>We want to thank all three reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments. We have revised the introduction to better summarize what we had observed in our previous studies. On the other hand, this manuscript presents a systematic study on the hypoxia-triggered turnover of PM PI4P and PIP2, the correlation between PI4P/PIP2 turnover and electrostatic PM targeting of Lgl, as well as a potential role of PI4KIIIa and its PM targeting mechanism in regulating the turnover of the PM PI4P and PIP2 under hypoxia. Although the latter by no means indicates that PI4KIIIa is the only enzyme in regulating such process, its characterization is the beginning for us to further identify additional enzymes and regulators in this hypoxia triggered phenomenon.</p><p>We have added additional references as suggested by the reviewers in the revised manuscript, and made our best efforts to have all relevant references cited.</p><p>Description of the revisions that have already been incorporated in the transferred manuscript</p><p>(Note: <italic>Current resubmission is formatted to meet eLife style. To avoid confusions, we kept the figure references etc as the same in the original manuscript</italic>)</p><p>We have incorporated nearly all of the suggestions from reviewer#3 into the current revision, with few exceptions as listed at the end of this letter. Below are point-to-point responses to selected suggestions involving data interpretation and comprehensive text revisions</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 5, first paragraph, line 2: replace &quot;oftentimes&quot; with &quot;often&quot; and provide quantitation (see above)</p></disp-quote><p>Deleted the “oftentimes”. Upon close inspection of our data we conclude that PI4P always showed transient increase of PM signal in early hypoxia.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 5, first paragraph, line 6: the claim of &quot;often&quot; should be quantified (see above)</p></disp-quote><p>Deleted the “often”. PI4P puncta actually were consistently brighter after recovering from hypoxia.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 5, second paragraph: the extent of recovery of Lgl is less when Lgl-RFP is coexpressed with PLC-PH-GFP, potentially due to titration of PIP2 by PLC-PH; the authors should comment on this</p></disp-quote><p>This is a good suggestion from the reviewer. Revised by adding to the end of paragraph: <italic>“Note that in Figure 1B Lgl::RFP recovery appears lower than in wild type, possibly due to the titration of PIP2 by PLC-PH::GFP expression.”</italic></p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 5, last line: the authors should provide information about the &quot;targeted RNAi screen&quot;; which genes were tested? did any others give relevant phenotypes? a table showing the results of the screen should be provided as supplementary information</p></disp-quote><p>Added Table S1 which summarizes the results of RNAi screen.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 11, first full paragraph, line 6: what about PI4KIIIbeta? is the KmATP for this enzyme known?</p></disp-quote><p>Based on literature, KmATP of PI4KIIIbeat is similar to PI4KIIIa’s (~400uM, Balla and Balla 2006). We added the PI4KIIIb KmATP value to the revised discussion (p11, line25)</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 11, last paragraph, line 2: what is meant by &quot;etc.&quot; is unclear; remove &quot;etc.&quot; and include specific information related to what was reported in the literature (with proper references)</p></disp-quote><p>Revised the sentence to “<italic>…that KmATP of PI4KIIIα was measured decades ago using purified PI4KIIIα enzymes from tissues such as bovine brains and uterus (Carpenter and Cantley, 1990)</italic>”. The reference (Carpenter and Cantley, 1990) is a review which contains details of biochemical characterizations of PI4K kinases from numerous publications.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 12, line 3: why do the authors claim that the intracellular pool of PI4P is first synthesized by PI4KIIalpha? what about PI4KIIIbeta? their results do not distinguish between these enzymes</p></disp-quote><p>We favor the hypothesis that PI4KIIa is responsible for synthesizing the intracellular pool of PI4P because the very low KmATP of PI4KIIa. PI4KIIIbeta has high KmATP similar to PI4KIIIa.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 12, last paragraph, lines 6-7: for the reader, please clarity the mechanism that was invoked to explain how PIP5K can make PIP2 from π in <italic>E. coli</italic> (Botero et al., 2019)</p></disp-quote><p>Revised the sentence to <italic>“PIP5K can be sufficient to make PIP2 from π in E. coli by phosphorylating its fourth and fifth positions (Botero et al., 2019) in the absence of PI4Ks</italic>”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 13, first paragraph, last line: cannot conclude that components of PI4KIIIalpha are &quot;highly interdependent&quot; without testing effect of knockdown of PI4KIIIalpha on Rbo and TTC7, etc.; instead, can conclude that the data are consistent with all of the components acting in the same process; also, delete &quot;the&quot; before &quot;proper&quot;</p></disp-quote><p>Revised the sentence to “<italic>.. supporting that components in PI4KIIIαa complex may act interdependently for the proper PM targeting</italic> in vivo<italic>.</italic>”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 14, second paragraph, lines 3-5: expand on this idea; what additional lipids could be important here? are there examples of other proteins that require these additional lipids?</p></disp-quote><p>We revise the sentence to “<italic>The reason for such difference between Lgl::GFP and PLC-PH::GFP in rbo-RNAi cells is unclear, though likely derives from the requirement of polybasic motif proteins for additional anionic lipids at the plasma membrane, specifically high mol fractions of phosphatidylserine in addition to lower concentrations of polyanionic phosphoinositides (Yeung et al., 2008).</italic> “</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 16, line 6: explain in brief what &quot;pNP plasmid&quot; is and how the multi-RNAi method works (what promoters drive expression of the shRNAs, how many shRNAs are included in the plasmid, etc.)</p></disp-quote><p>Added a section in Material and Methods to describe the details of the generation of pNP constructs and fly stocks.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 16, lines 8-3: appropriate references should be included for each stock where available</p></disp-quote><p>Added references to stocks cy2-Gal4, rbo::GFP and UAS-AT1.03NL1.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 16, line 11: explain what UAS-AT1.03NL1 is</p></disp-quote><p>Added: “<italic>UAS-AT1.03NL1(DGRC#117011) was used to express the Drosophila-optimized ATeam ATP sensor AT[NL] in follicle cells (Tsuyama et al., 2017)</italic>”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 16, lines 16-17: Gerry Hammond should not be listed as providing these constructs if he is a coauthor on the manuscript; appropriate references should be cited for these constructs</p></disp-quote><p>Revised the sentence to “<italic>Mammalian constructs of P4M::GFP, P4Mx2::GFP, and PLC-PH::GFP were as previously described (Hammond et al., 2014; Hammond et al., 2012; Várnai and Balla, 1998).</italic>”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 17, lines 3-4: sentence fragment &quot;Images were further&quot; is not complete</p></disp-quote><p>This was a typo, deleted.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 19, lines 5-6 from bottom: title doesn't accurately reflect that PI4P doesn't appear to recover in WT control; why is this the case? recovery was observed in other experiments</p></disp-quote><p>Live recording showed that PM PI4P did recover during reoxygenation (Figure 3A, Video S7). This particular recording in Figure 3A/Video S7 was a bit difficult for automatic quantification by our custom software due to that P4Mx2::GFP signal somehow was weak and noisy, resulting in less than “ideal” recovery curves.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>p. 22, line 16: fix typo in &quot;uncalibrated&quot;; spell out what &quot;AT[NL] sensor shows</p></disp-quote><p>Revised to “<italic>Heat map of the (uncalibrated) FRET ratio of ATeam ATP sensor AT[Nl] in follicle cells of a dissected ovary undergoing hypoxia and reoxygenation</italic> ex vivo”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer#3’s suggestions to improve the figures and videos:</p><p>- replace colored labels on black boxes with colored labels on white background (Figure 5A (left), Figure 5B-D (top), Figure 6A (left), Figure 7A-C (left), Figure S1A (left), Figure S1C (top), Figure S2A (left), Figure S4 (left))</p></disp-quote><p>We have revised the figures accordingly.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>- provide scale bars throughout (Figures2-7, S1-S4)</p></disp-quote><p>We have revised the figures accordingly.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>- provide vertical lines similar to those in Figure 4A' in all of the time-course graphs and/or making the background colors slightly darker (Figures2A', 3A', 5A', 6A'); also make the error bars darker (Figure 1A'-C', Figure 4, Figure 5A', Figure S2B)</p></disp-quote><p>We revised all backgrounds in charts to make them similar to Figure 4A’.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>- for consistency, label PM index graphs in Figure 4 and Figure S2 as Figure 4A' and Figure S2A'</p></disp-quote><p>We revised figures 4 and S2 accordingly.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>- why are some of the PM index graphs labeled &quot;PM index&quot; and others labeled &quot;PM index-1&quot; on the Y-axis? this should be explained or changed for consistency</p></disp-quote><p>The mixed use of “PM index” and “PM index-1” were relics due to different versions of software used throughout the project. We revised all graphs to make Y-axis “PM Index” label consistent.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>- &quot;blank diamonds&quot; described in figure legend for Figure 7B' are barely visible when printed</p></disp-quote><p>Revised Figure 7B’ by filling blank diamonds with grey color to increase their visibility.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>- Figure 7C is mislabeled (MaLionR label should be replaced with PLC-PH-RFP)</p></disp-quote><p>We corrected this error in revised Figure 7C.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>- in Figure S3A, it would help to know the size of the cells (i.e., how many were present in the area examined)</p></disp-quote><p>Revised the Figure S3A legend to clarify that each circle covers approximately three to four cells.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>- in Video S19, &quot;PLC-PH::RFP&quot; is mislabeled &quot;PLC-PH::GFP&quot; (both P4MX2 and PLC-PH are labeled GFP in the video)</p></disp-quote><p>We renamed the video file to correct this typo.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Description of analyses that authors prefer not to carry out</p></disp-quote><p>(Note: <italic>Current resubmission is formatted to meet eLife style. To avoid confusions we kept the figure references etc as the same in the original manuscript</italic>)</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer#2: The work would be strengthened further if the authors could show the level of depletion of PI4K isoforms or PI4KIIIa complex subunits units induced in ovarian tissue under their experimental conditions by the GAL4 drivers used in this study.</p></disp-quote><p>We are regretful that we are unable to directly evaluate the RNAi knock-down efficiency of several genes such as PI4KIIIa. We have nonetheless been careful to draw the conclusions in the manuscript in accordance with the potential caveat of RNAi experiments. We did directly show that rbo-RNAi directly knocked down the Rbo::GFP (Figure S1C). In addition, although we could not confirm the knock-down of ttc7-RNAi, we showed it can reduced level of Rbo::GFP, which is likely due to an effective knock-down of TTC7 (Figure 6B).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer #3:</p><p>p. 6, second full paragraph, lines 6 and 9: the callouts should be to Videos S5, not Video S4</p><p>p. 7, second paragraph, line 3: change name of Video S7 to S6, and call out Video S6 here</p><p>p. 7, third paragraph, line 2: change name of Video S8 to S7, and call out Video S7 here</p><p>p. 8, first paragraph, line 8: change name of Video S6 to S8, and call out Video S8 here</p><p>- Videos should be referred to in order (current Videos S7 and S8 should be renamed S6 and S7, and current Video S6 should be renamed S8)</p></disp-quote><p>We appreciate reviewer’s suggestion but decided to keep the videos in current order. Current resubmission is formatted to meet <italic>eLife</italic> style and each videos follow the main figures, which is easy for the readers to follow.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer #3: – replace pale colored boxes under labels for &quot;hypoxia&quot; and &quot;air&quot; with slightly darker boxes (Figure 1A-C, Figure 2A, Figure 3A, Figure 5A', Figure 6A', Figure S2B)</p></disp-quote><p>We tested many different combinations of colors and the current set appears to give the best contrast so far. We decided to keep the original color.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer #3- show single-color images in grayscale, which is easier to see on black and helpful for colorblind readers (applies to all figures except Figure S3); videos and merged still images should be shown in green and magenta for colorblind (not sure if channels in videos are difficult to change)</p></disp-quote><p>We converted Figure 1A to gray scale but found it visually inferior to the color version, as the gray images make the temporal differences between green and red channels much less pronounced. We have converted red channel in all videos to magenta color and also added text labels for each channel to reduce potential confusions since the manuscript contains total of nineteen video. Regrettably, to convert red channels in figures requires a very laborious process to recapture, recrop and recompose all the frames used in all figures. We hope that reviewer understand our decision to keep colors in figures unchanged.</p></body></sub-article></article>