<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">83883</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.83883</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Developmental Biology</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Genetics and Genomics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Urotensin II-related peptides, Urp1 and Urp2, control zebrafish spine morphology</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-294456"><name><surname>Bearce</surname><given-names>Elizabeth A</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-294457"><name><surname>Irons</surname><given-names>Zoe H</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-294458"><name><surname>O'Hara-Smith</surname><given-names>Johnathan R</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-294459"><name><surname>Kuhns</surname><given-names>Colin J</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-294460"><name><surname>Fisher</surname><given-names>Sophie I</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-294461"><name><surname>Crow</surname><given-names>William E</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-3076</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-161674"><name><surname>Grimes</surname><given-names>Daniel T</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-1887</contrib-id><email>dtgrimes@uoregon.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/0293rh119</institution-id><institution>Institute of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University of Oregon</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Eugene</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Bronner</surname><given-names>Marianne E</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05dxps055</institution-id><institution>California Institute of Technology</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Bronner</surname><given-names>Marianne E</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05dxps055</institution-id><institution>California Institute of Technology</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>01</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e83883</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-10-02"><day>02</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-11-24"><day>24</day><month>11</month><year>2022</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint at .</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2022-08-15"><day>15</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.13.503856"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2022, Bearce et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Bearce et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-83883-v2.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-83883-figures-v2.pdf"/><abstract><p>The spine provides structure and support to the body, yet how it develops its characteristic morphology as the organism grows is little understood. This is underscored by the commonality of conditions in which the spine curves abnormally such as scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis. Understanding the origin of these spinal curves has been challenging in part due to the lack of appropriate animal models. Recently, zebrafish have emerged as promising tools with which to understand the origin of spinal curves. Using zebrafish, we demonstrate that the urotensin II-related peptides (URPs), Urp1 and Urp2, are essential for maintaining spine morphology. Urp1 and Urp2 are 10-amino acid cyclic peptides expressed by neurons lining the central canal of the spinal cord. Upon combined genetic loss of Urp1 and Urp2, adolescent-onset planar curves manifested in the caudal region of the spine. Highly similar curves were caused by mutation of Uts2r3, an URP receptor. Quantitative comparisons revealed that urotensin-associated curves were distinct from other zebrafish spinal curve mutants in curve position and direction. Last, we found that the Reissner fiber, a proteinaceous thread that sits in the central canal and has been implicated in the control of spine morphology, breaks down prior to curve formation in mutants with perturbed cilia motility but was unaffected by loss of Uts2r3. This suggests a Reissner fiber-independent mechanism of curvature in urotensin-deficient mutants. Overall, our results show that Urp1 and Urp2 control zebrafish spine morphology and establish new animal models of spine deformity.</p></abstract><abstract abstract-type="plain-language-summary"><title>eLife digest</title><p>The backbone, or spine, is an integral part of the human body, providing support to our torsos so that we can sit, stand, bend and twist. If this structure does not form correctly, it can lead to pain, neurologic problems, and mobility issues. The spine normally has curves, but these can become deformed for many reasons, including genetic and muscular factors. There are also cases in which the cause of a spine distortion is unknown, such as in scoliosis (where the spine twists to the side), lordosis (where the lower part of the spine curves excessively), and kyphosis (where the upper part of the spine shows extreme curvature).</p><p>The structure of the spine is laid out during embryonic development and maintained throughout life. Experiments in zebrafish have shown that a crucial element in preserving the shape of the spine is the flow of cerebrospinal fluid or CSF. Propelled by the movement of little ‘hairs’ at the surface of specialized cells, this liquid runs through our central nervous system along a cavity lined with neurons. These nerve cells produce Urp1 and Urp2, two short molecules (or peptides) built from the same components as proteins. In zebrafish embryos, lowering the levels of these peptides had previously been shown to cause early body deformities. But what role, if any, do Urp1 and Urp2 play in maintaining the shape of the spine in adult zebrafish?</p><p>Bearce et al. set out to answer this question. First, they generated mutant zebrafish which did not carry either Urp1, Urp2 or both peptides. Contrary to previous findings, all three of these mutants developed normally as embryos. Once they were adults, zebrafish lacking Urp1 exhibited normal spines, while those lacking Urp2 had slightly deformed curves. However, zebrafish lacking both peptides had prominent curves in the tail-region of their spines, somewhat akin to lordosis in humans. This indicates that both peptides are necessary for adult spine structure, but work in a semi-redundant manner. Interestingly, the defects observed first appeared in adolescent fish and gradually worsened as they grew; many forms of human spinal abnormalities follow a similar trajectory.</p><p>Bearce et al. also tested the role of the protein Uts2r3, a receptor for peptides which belong to the urotensin family (such as Urp1 and Urp2). Fish lacking this protein showed normal spine structure as embryos, but distorted spinal curves as adults, suggesting that Urp1 and Urp2 might control spine morphology by signaling via the Uts2r3 receptor.</p><p>Together, Bearce et al.’s observations show that disturbing urotensin signaling leads to a lordosis-like condition in adult zebrafish, with evident deformities in the tail-region of the spine. Considering the broad similarities in structures between the zebrafish and the human spine, these results point to a possible involvement of urotensin signaling in spine distortion in humans. More studies using zebrafish will likely provide further insights into the principles that control the shape of the spine and what goes wrong when it breaks down.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>zebrafish</kwd><kwd>urotensin II-related peptide</kwd><kwd>scoliosis</kwd><kwd>lordosis</kwd><kwd>cilia</kwd><kwd>reissner fiber</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>Zebrafish</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R00AR70905</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Grimes</surname><given-names>Daniel T</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>F32AR078002</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Bearce</surname><given-names>Elizabeth A</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>F31HD105435</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Irons</surname><given-names>Zoe H</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R35GM142949</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Grimes</surname><given-names>Daniel T</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Urp1 and Urp2 peptides, expressed in CSF-contacting neurons in the spinal canal, prevent abnormal curvature of the zebrafish spine.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Understanding how the shape of organisms is acquired is a central goal of developmental biology. The chordate body axis forms during embryonic development, when it is based around the rod-like notochord (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Stemple, 2005</xref>). Later, the vertebrate axis comprises a column of repeating vertebrae which grows during juvenile and adolescent phases and is then maintained during adult life for up to several decades in some species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Bagnat and Gray, 2020</xref>). While a great deal has been learned about how the body axis emerges during embryogenesis, less is known about how spine morphology is maintained during growth and adulthood.</p><p>A breakdown of spine morphology occurs in scoliosis, lordosis, and kyphosis. Scoliosis is medically defined as lateral curvatures of the spine greater than 10° (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cheng et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Mesiti, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Wise et al., 2008</xref>) and can be caused by congenital defects of vertebral patterning or as a secondary consequence of neuromuscular disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Pourquié, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Wishart and Kivlehan, 2021</xref>). However, most cases of scoliosis are idiopathic in nature, with no known etiology: approximately 3% of children are afflicted by idiopathic scoliosis, which most often onsets during adolescence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cheng et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Labrom et al., 2021</xref>). By contrast, kyphosis and lordosis occur when there is excessive curvature of the thoracic and lumbar regions of the vertebral column, respectively, resulting in a hunched upper back (kyphosis) or a concave lower back (lordosis) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Ogura et al., 2021</xref>) without vertebral structural defects. Since these categories of curves can co-occur, there are likely to be overlapping as well as distinct causes.</p><p>A challenge to understanding the origin of spinal curvature has been the dearth of suitable animal models recapitulating disease states. Recently, teleost fishes, in particular zebrafish (<italic>Danio rerio</italic>), have emerged as prominent animal models of spinal deformity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Bagnat and Gray, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bearce and Grimes, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Boswell and Ciruna, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Gorman and Breden, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Roy, 2021</xref>). Using zebrafish, it was found that motile cilia-generated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow is essential for maintaining body and spine morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Grimes et al., 2016</xref>). Mutants with defective motile cilia failed to undergo axial straightening during embryogenesis and so developed a misshapen early embryonic body axis called ‘curly tail down’ (CTD; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Brand et al., 1996</xref>). If rescued during this early stage, mutants went on to develop three-dimensional spinal curves that recapitulated some features of idiopathic scoliosis, including adolescent-stage onset in the absence of vertebral patterning defects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Grimes et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Marie-Hardy et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Wang et al., 2022</xref>). Precisely how motile cilia and CSF flow maintain spine morphology during growth is not understood, but it is known that during early larval stages cilia motility is essential for the assembly of the Reissner fiber (RF), an extracellular thread-like structure composed predominantly of the large glycoprotein SCOspondin (encoded by <italic>sspo</italic>) which sits in the CSF in brain ventricles and the central canal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Rodríguez et al., 1998</xref>). Zebrafish <italic>sspo</italic> mutants exhibited CTD as embryos while hypomorphic mutants which can survive beyond embryonic stages also manifested spinal curves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Rose et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Troutwine et al., 2020</xref>).</p><p>The URPs, Urp1 and Urp2, may also function downstream of motile cilia in the central canal. Urp1 and Urp2 are 10-amino acid cyclic peptides previously linked to heart disease and mental illness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Sugo et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Konno et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Nobata et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Parmentier et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Quan et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Tostivint et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Vaudry et al., 2010</xref>). In zebrafish, Urp1 and Urp2 are expressed in CSF-contacting neurons (CSF-cNs), flow sensory neurons in the central canal, and their expression is increased by motile cilia function and the RF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Quan et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>). Morpholino knockdown of Urp1/Urp2 results in embryonic CTD phenotypes while addition of Urp1/Urp2 peptides can rescue the CTD of cilia motility- and RF-deficient mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>). This suggested that Urp1 and Urp2 act downstream of cilia motility to promote early axial straightening (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Grimes, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>).</p><p>Here, we set out to address whether Urp1 and Urp2 function beyond embryogenesis in maintaining body and spine morphology during growth and adulthood. By generating zebrafish mutants lacking Urp1 and Urp2 peptides, we found that they are essential, in a semi-redundant fashion, for adult spine morphology. Loss of Urp1 and Urp2 together led to the onset of spinal curves during adolescent stages and, by adulthood, resulted in planar curves in the caudal region of the spine that occurred without vertebral patterning defects or significant structural malformations. A similar phenotype was present upon mutation of the urotensin receptor (UT) gene, <italic>uts2r3</italic>, suggesting that Urp1 and Urp2 signal via Uts2r3 to maintain spine morphology. Urotensin-associated curves were quantitatively distinct from the curves displayed by <italic>cfap298</italic> mutants, which lack cilia motility, and <italic>pkd2l1</italic> mutants in which a CSF-cN-localized ion channel is mutated, suggestive of overlapping but distinct roles of these components. Moreover, RF breakdown preceded curve formation in <italic>cfap298</italic> mutants while RF structure was maintained before and after curves appeared in <italic>uts2r3</italic> mutants. Overall, this demonstrates that Urp1 and Urp2 peptides control the morphology of the zebrafish spine. We suggest that urotensin-deficient zebrafish model human spinal deformities and will be important tools for deciphering how the spine is maintained and how this process goes wrong in disease.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Urp1 and Urp2 peptides are dispensable for embryonic axial straightening</title><p>To determine whether Urp1 and Urp2 are required for spine morphology, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to generate zebrafish mutant lines. Urp1 and Urp2 are encoded by 5-exon genes with the final exon coding for the 10-amino acid peptides that are released by cleavage from the pro-domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A–B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–B</xref>). We used pairs of guide RNAs to induce deletions across the genetic region coding for the peptides (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2A–B</xref>). We refer to the resulting mutant lines as <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> because they lack the peptide coding sequence. In addition, mRNA quantitation revealed downregulation of <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> in their respective mutant backgrounds, indicating transcript decay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2E</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>Urp1 and Urp2 are dispensable for axial straightening.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> are 5-exon genes (gray boxes). The final exon codes for the 10-amino acid peptides produced after cleavage from the prodomain at a dibasic site (KR). Pairs of gRNAs were used to induce deletions of Urp1 and Urp2 peptide coding sequences, resulting in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants, respectively. SP – signal peptide. (<bold>B</bold>) Urp1 and Urp2 peptide sequences with identical hexacyclic regions. (<bold>C</bold>) Zebrafish posterior axial straightening, the morphogenetic process which straightens the embryonic body. (<bold>D</bold>) Fluorescence in situ hybridization based on hybridization chain reaction analysis of <italic>pkd2l1</italic>, <italic>urp1,</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> expression in the central canal at 28 hpf. <italic>pkd2l1</italic> expression marks CSF-cNs. <italic>urp1</italic> expression is restricted to ventral CSF-cNs while <italic>urp2</italic> is expressed in all CSF-cNs. Both <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> are expressed in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutants, though comparison of expression between samples was non-quantitative. (<bold>i</bold>) Shows the zebrafish trunk with the yolk stalk labeled (*). (ii) Shows zoomed regions taken at the rostro-caudal level at the end of the yolk stalk. Scale bars: 150 µm (<bold>i</bold>), 10 µm (ii). (<bold>E</bold>) Lateral views of 28–30 hpf germline mutants (<bold>i</bold>) and crispants (ii). The <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants are maternal zygotic (MZ) mutants. Sibling (sib) and Cas9-only injected embryos served as controls. All embryos were incubated at 28°C, which is a restrictive temperature for <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic>. (<bold>F</bold>) Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> mRNA expression levels in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutants at 28 hpf. n&gt;3 biologically independent samples. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Two-tailed student’s <italic>t</italic> test used to calculate p-values. (<bold>G</bold>) Schematic of crispant generation and body curve analysis. (<bold>H</bold>) Quantitation of crispant body curves where bars represent mean ± s.d. for at least three independent clutches and injection mixes. The total number of embryos analyzed is given. *p&lt;0.0001, student’s <italic>t</italic> test applied. UI – uninjected.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Raw data for qRT-PCR and crispant body angle measurements.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Urotensin family peptides.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Successive rounds of genome duplications (*) and divergence converted an ancient urotensin protein (U) into the urotensin II (UII) and urotensin II-related (URP) proteins, some of which have subsequently been lost. (<bold>B</bold>) The UII and URP proteins in zebrafish and human are 8–12 amino acid peptides with a fully conserved hexacyclic region of sequence CFWKYC.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig1-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Generation of <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A–B</bold>) Pairs of guide RNAs (gRNAs) were used to delete genomic regions coding for the Urp1 and Urp2 peptides. The <italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic> (<italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic>) allele encodes a 279 bp deletion and 1 base pair insertion that removes a portion of intron 4–5 and the coding part of exon 5 including the entire region coding for the Urp1 peptide. The <italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup></italic> (<italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic>) allele encodes a 61 base pair deletion which removes the region coding for the Urp2 peptide. Red arrows show the location of gRNA sites (1–4) used to generate crispants. Green arrows show the location of PCR primers used to amplify regions around gRNA sites. (<bold>C–D</bold>) T7E1 assays show significant mutagenesis at <italic>urp1</italic> (<bold>C</bold>) and <italic>urp2</italic> (<bold>D</bold>) loci in crispant embryos. Embryos were injected with Cas9 only (−) or Cas9 plus gRNAs 1–4 (+) then, at 1 dpf, DNA was extracted and regions amplified using the indicated primer pairs. PCR product from crispant embryos showed wider bands, indicating insertion-deletion (indel) mutations, as well as deletion bands (white arrow head), indicating large deletions between two gRNA sites. After PCR, product was purified and subjected to digestion with T7E1, which cleaves heteroduplex DNA. Little or no cleavage was observed in Cas9 only injected embryos, but significant digestion was found in Cas9 + gRNA injected embryos (dashed lines), indicating that indels had been created. Small amounts of T7E1 digestion products in Cas9 only embryos were likely due to the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms between chromosomes. (<bold>E</bold>) Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> mRNA expression levels in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> single and double mutants at 28 hpf. n&gt;3 biologically independent samples. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Two-tailed student’s <italic>t</italic> test was used to calculate p-values. (<bold>F</bold>) Quantitation of crispant body curves where bars represent mean ± s.d. for at least three independent clutches and injection mixes. The total number of embryos analyzed is given. *p&lt;0.001, student’s <italic>t</italic> test applied. UI – uninjected. <italic>cfap – cfap298</italic>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig1-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Generation of <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic of zebrafish SCOspondin protein showing domain architecture based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Troutwine et al., 2020</xref>. VWD – von Willebrand factor type D domain; C8 – C8 domain; TIL – trypsin inhibitor like cysteine rich domain; LDLrA – low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain; TSP1 – thrombospondin type 1 domain; FA58C – coagulation factor 5/8 C-terminal domain. In <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutants, a genomic deletion results in a frame shift mutation at Valine 147 resulting in an early premature truncation codon. (<bold>B</bold>) The <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutant line harbors a large deletion and a downstream small deletion which disrupt exons 4 and 5 causing the early truncation of Sspo.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig1-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>We first assessed <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants for embryonic phenotypes. A previous morpholino-based knockdown study concluded that Urp1 and Urp2 are required for axial straightening, the process by which the ventrally curved zebrafish embryo straightens as the trunk elongates and detaches from the yolk (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>). Urp1/Urp2 morphants failed to undergo straightening and therefore displayed CTD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>). Surprisingly, both <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants underwent normal axial straightening and did not exhibit CTD (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1Ei</xref>). By contrast, we observed CTD in both <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants that lack cilia motility in the central canal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bearce et al., 2022</xref>) and <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutants in which the RF constituent SCOspondin is mutated, as expected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1Ei</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3A–B</xref>). Notably, <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutants maintained <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> expression in CSF-cNs, central canal neurons marked by <italic>pkd2l1</italic> expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>). However, <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> transcripts were quantitatively reduced in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>). We reasoned that the absence of CTD in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants might reflect redundancy, since Urp1 and Urp2 peptides are highly similar, with identical hexacyclic regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–B</xref>). Alternatively, maternally derived <italic>urp1</italic> and/or <italic>urp2</italic> transcripts may function to prevent phenotypes from manifesting. However, maternal zygotic <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants also exhibited linear body axes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1Ei</xref>), ruling out redundant or maternal gene product function. This demonstrates that Urp1 and Urp2 peptide-null mutants undergo axial straightening.</p><p>To confirm this finding, we performed additional Urp1 and Urp2 loss-of-function experiments. By injecting four guide RNAs (gRNAs) along with Cas9 into wild-type embryos at the one-cell stage, we generated mosaic mutants, called crispants, that were then assessed for body shape phenotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>). In positive control experiments, <italic>cfap298</italic> and <italic>sspo</italic> crispants exhibited robust CTD, phenocopying germline <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1Eii</xref>). Quantitation of body curvature revealed that crispant generation was highly efficient, with CTD penetrance being close to 100% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1H</xref>). By contrast, <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> single and double crispants exhibited straight body axes that were not different to uninjected embryos or embryos injected with Cas9 only (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1Eii and H</xref>). Using T7 endonuclease assays, we confirmed that high levels of insertion-deletion mutations were generated at gRNA sites in crispants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2C–D</xref>). We used the AB genetic background for the majority of our work, but we also generated and phenotyped <italic>urp1;urp2</italic> double crispants on WIK and TU backgrounds to test for potential background effects. Normal axial straightening upon mutation of <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> was also observed on these backgrounds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2F</xref>). Overall, crispant results confirmed germline mutant findings. We conclude that Urp1 and Urp2 peptides are dispensable for axial straightening in embryonic zebrafish.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Urp1 and Urp2 function semi-redundantly to maintain spine morphology</title><p>Next, we determined the impact of Urp1 and Urp2 loss on adult spine morphology. Outwardly, <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutant adults at 3 months post fertilization (mpf) appeared normal whereas <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants exhibited minor body dysmorphologies and kinked tails (n=72 for <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants and n=92 for <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1A</xref>). To assess spine morphology directly, we imaged bone by X-ray microcomputed tomography (µCT). Three-dimensional reconstitutions of µCT data from 3 mpf fish showed that <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants indeed exhibited overtly normal skeletal morphology (n=7) while <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants showed slight sagittal curves (n=4; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig2video1 fig2video2 fig2video3">Figure 2—videos 1–3</xref>). By contrast to these absent or mild deformities in single mutants, <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants exhibited prominent curves, with significant dorsal-ventral Cobb angles, a measure of deviation from straightness, especially in the caudal region of the spine (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B and D–F</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplements 1A</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">2A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig2video1 fig2video2 fig2video3 fig2video4">Figure 2—videos 1–4</xref>). These data indicate that Urp1 and Urp2 are essential for adult spine morphology, and that they function in a semi-redundant fashion in this context.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Urp1 and Urp2 are required for proper adult spine morphology.</title><p>(<bold>A–C</bold>) Lateral views of microcomputed tomography reconstitutions of wild-type (<bold>A</bold>), <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> (<bold>B</bold>) and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> (<bold>C</bold>) mutants at 3 mpf. (<bold>D</bold>) Cobb angle measurements for individual fish in the sagittal plane for <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants. Circles represent angles for individual curves. (<bold>E-E’</bold>) Total Cobb angles with each circle representing an individual fish. The mean ± s.d. is shown. (<bold>G’</bold>) is the data from G parsed for sex. p-Values are given from two-tailed unpaired student’s <italic>t</italic> tests. (<bold>F</bold>) The position of curve apex is plotted and shows that most curves are in caudal vertebrae. n=9 and 8 for <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants, respectively.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata1"><label>Figure 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Raw data from spinal curve phenotypic measurements.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Phenotyping spinal curves.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Lateral views of adult zebrafish. (<bold>B</bold>) Cobb angles were measured from lateral views of microcomputed tomography reconstitutions. Right angles are assigned parallel to the rostral and caudal face of the first and last displaced vertebra, respectively, and the external angle is taken at their intersection. The angle was assigned to its most displaced apex vertebra (cyan asterisk) in heat map representations. Note that displaced vertebrae do not always demonstrate an easily identifiable wedge in intervertebral space, as is typical in human data. In these cases, the first or last vertebrae of the curve is designated as ‘least parallel’ to the local orientation of the spine. (<bold>C</bold>) The position of curve apex is plotted for <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants and <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup>;urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> triple mutants (triple) alongside <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants for comparison. See also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>. (<bold>D</bold>) Cobb angle measurements for individual fish in the sagittal plane for <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup>;urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants. Circles represent angles for individual curves. (<bold>E</bold>) Total Cobb angles with each circle representing an individual fish. The mean ± s.d. is shown. p-Values are given from two-tailed unpaired student’s <italic>t</italic> tests.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2s1sdata1"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Raw data from spinal curve phenotypic measurements.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-figsupp1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Spinal curves in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic>, <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic>, <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup>,</italic> and <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants degenerate with age.</title><p>(<bold>A–B</bold>) Lateral views of microcomputed tomography reconstituted skeletons at 3 mpf (<bold>A</bold>) and 12 mpf (<bold>B</bold>) show curves worsen with age. All fish shown are female. Scale bar: 10 mm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Generation of <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants.</title><p>The <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> allele was generated with a single-guide RNA which induced a deletion of 534 base pairs, resulting in an in-frame 178 amino acid deletion that removes around half the protein including transmembrane regions.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-video1.mp4" id="fig2video1"><label>Figure 2—video 1.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 3-mpf wild-type male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary. The adult zebrafish spine comprised 4 Weberian vertebrae (largely obscured by the Weberian apparatus), 10 abdominal or precaudal vertebrae, 15 caudal vertebrae, and 3–4 caudal fin vertebrae. The centra exhibit an aspect ratio of approximately one, with ends aligned perpendicular to the long axis.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-video2.mp4" id="fig2video2"><label>Figure 2—video 2.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 3-mpf <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-video3.mp4" id="fig2video3"><label>Figure 2—video 3.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 3-mpf <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary. Mutants demonstrate a slight caudal curve and a hook in the caudal fin vertebrae.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-video4.mp4" id="fig2video4"><label>Figure 2—video 4.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 3-mpf <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic>;<italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary. Mutants exhibited planar dorsal-ventral curves in the caudal vertebrae.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-video5.mp4" id="fig2video5"><label>Figure 2—video 5.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 12-mpf wild-type male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-video6.mp4" id="fig2video6"><label>Figure 2—video 6.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 12-mpf <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-video7.mp4" id="fig2video7"><label>Figure 2—video 7.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 12-mpf <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig2-video8.mp4" id="fig2video8"><label>Figure 2—video 8.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 3-mpf <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary. Mutants exhibited planar dorsal-ventral curves in the caudal vertebrae.</p></caption></media></fig-group><p>To assess the long-term maintenance of spine morphology in Urp1- and Urp2-deficient conditions, we aged <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> single mutants to 12 mpf then performed µCT. At this later time point, <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants exhibited mild kyphosis-like curves though <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants were more severe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2B</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig2video5 fig2video6 fig2video7">Figure 2—videos 5–7</xref>). These degenerative phenotypes demonstrate that Urp1 and Urp2 are essential for maintenance of spine morphology throughout adulthood and aging, and suggest that Urp2 plays a larger role than Urp1.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Urp1 and Urp2 signal through the Uts2r3 receptor to control spine morphology</title><p>Urp1 and Urp2 peptides engage G-protein-coupled receptors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ames et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Chatenet et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Elshourbagy et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Labarrère et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Liu et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Nothacker et al., 1999</xref>). While a single urotensin II receptor (UT) gene is found in humans and has recently been linked to abnormal spinal curvature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Dai et al., 2021</xref>), the zebrafish genome encodes five such receptors. One of those, Uts2r3, was previously implicated in spine morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>). To systematically compare the effects of Uts2r3 receptor mutation with loss of Urp1 and Urp2, we generated a <italic>uts2r3</italic> mutant line harboring a 178-amino acid deletion after the third amino acid, significantly disrupting the protein (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s3">Figure 2—figure supplement 3</xref>). Like <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants, these <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants underwent normal axial straightening as embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1Ei</xref>) and went on to exhibit spinal curves as adults (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1A</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig2video8">Figure 2—video 8</xref>). Cobb angle measurements showed that <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants and <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants were similar, though curves in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants were slightly more severe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D–E</xref>). Like <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants, <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants showed mostly caudally located curves, especially in the most rostral of the caudal vertebrae (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>). Thus, although we cannot rule out minor roles for other UT receptors, these data suggest that Urp1 and Urp2 control spine morphology largely by signaling through Uts2r3.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Urotensin pathway mutants display adolescent-onset spinal curves in the absence of structural vertebral defects</title><p>Next, we determined whether urotensin pathway mutants recapitulated any signs of disease present in patients. Several types of human spinal curves onset during adolescent growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cheng et al., 2015</xref>). To discern the stage of onset of curves in urotensin pathway mutants, we monitored <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutant cohorts as they grew. Subtle curves first became apparent between 9 and 11 days pf (dpf), corresponding to a standard length between 3.9±0.7 mm and 5.9±0.4 mm (mean ± s.d.; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A–B</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig3video1">Figure 3—video 1</xref>), a stage when adolescents were rapidly growing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>). By 13 dpf (standard length 6.2±0.3 mm), curves were evident in all <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants and progressively worsened up to 17 dpf (8.3±0.4 mm) when we ended this analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A–B</xref>). At 1 mpf, we assessed <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants by µCT and found variability in curve position and amplitude (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>). Notably, at this stage, five of seven mutants exhibited a significant curve in the pre-caudal vertebrae, in addition to a caudal curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1Ai-Bii</xref>). Since pre-caudal curves were rare in mutants at 3 mpf (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B and F</xref>), this suggested that curve location is dynamic and that pre-caudal curves form then resolve or shift in some mutants as they grow to adulthood.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title><italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants exhibit adolescent-onset spinal curves without significant structural vertebral defects.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Lateral views of control fish and age-matched <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants. Arrows point to forming body curves. (<bold>B</bold>) Traces of body shape every 2 days for 5 fish per time point from 3 to 17 dpf. (<bold>C</bold>) Growth curves for control and <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants were indistinguishable. Arrow shows time of curve onset. Mean ± s.d. is plotted. (<bold>D</bold>) Microcomputed tomography (µCT) reconstitutions of spines at 1 mpf with heads, fins, and ribs digitally removed. Scale bar: 1 mm. (<bold>E</bold>) µCT reconstitutions of three pre-caudal and two caudal vertebrae including frontal and lateral views of the highlighted vertebra. No major structural defects such as fusions were observed in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants. (<bold>F</bold>) Vertebral body rostral-caudal length (L<sub>1</sub>/L<sub>2</sub>) and dorsal-ventral height (H<sub>1</sub>/H<sub>2</sub>) aspect ratios for six vertebrae of wild type (n=4) and <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants (n=4). Length aspect ratios were significantly more variable in mutants, but height aspect ratios were unchanged (p<italic>=</italic>0.022 and 0.745, respectively, Bartlett’s test for equal variances). (<bold>G</bold>) Calcein staining revealed well-structured vertebrae forming in control (standard length 5.7 mm) and <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutant (standard length 5.7 mm) fish. n&gt;30 fish per condition.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Raw data from larval growth measurements and vertebral quantitation.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Spinal curves are variable in 1 mpf <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants.</title><p>(<bold>Ai-Bi</bold>) Dorsal and lateral views of microcomputed tomography (µCT) reconstitutions of wild type and <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants at 1 mpf. (<bold>Aii-Bii</bold>) Lateral views of additional examples of µCT reconstitutions. The position of curve apex is variable, with 5 of 7 <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants exhibiting pre-caudal curves. Note that dorsal fins were digitally dissected for clarity. Scale bars: 1 mm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig3-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig3-video1.mp4" id="fig3video1"><label>Figure 3—video 1.</label><caption><title>Time course of juvenile development in wild-type and <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic>;<italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> siblings.</title><p>Fish were imaged every other day over a 2.5-week period.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig3-video2.mp4" id="fig3video2"><label>Figure 3—video 2.</label><caption><title>Vertebral reconstitutions from wild-type, <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic>;<italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> adults.</title><p>Alternating vertebrae are shown at 25% transparency to highlight subtle vertebral shape defects, including a reduced length and slight changes to length aspect ratios.</p></caption></media></fig-group><p>Next, we assessed whether spinal curves in urotensin pathway mutants were caused by congenital defects of vertebral patterning or structure. Staining of juveniles with the vital dye calcein revealed no defects in vertebral patterning or spacing in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants at 10 dpf (4.5–6 mm standard length [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>]) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3G</xref>). We then assessed µCT data from 3 mpf fish and quantified vertebral body shape for vertebrae 11–16, where curves occurred in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2F</xref>). Vertebral body length and height aspect ratios were 1.00±0.007 (mean ± s.d.) and 0.99±0.007, respectively, for wild type (n=4; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>). By contrast, <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants exhibited more variable vertebral length aspect ratios (0.97±0.03, p=0.022; Bartlett’s test for equal variances, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>). Vertebral height aspect ratios in mutants (1.00±0.006) were not significantly different to controls (p=0.745, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>). These data are consistent with subtle vertebral shape defects at the points of curvature in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants. However, we do not observe vertebral fusions or missing or transformed appendages, suggesting that vertebral defects do not underlie spinal curves; instead, small changes in vertebral shape are likely due to the presence of curves themselves rather than causative of curves in the first place. This is similar to what occurs in non-congenital forms of human scoliosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cheng et al., 2015</xref>).</p><p>Additionally, we parsed our phenotypic data for sex since spinal curves often show sex bias in severity in humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cheng et al., 2015</xref>), something which has been recapitulated in some zebrafish spinal curve mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Marie-Hardy et al., 2021</xref>). However, in both <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants, we found no significant differences in curve penetrance or severity between males and females (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E’</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Urotensin-deficient mutants are phenotypically distinct from <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants</title><p>We next compared the phenotypes of urotensin pathway mutants to other mutant lines that exhibit spinal curves. The <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> line harbors a temperature-sensitive mutation in <italic>cfap298</italic>, a gene required for cilia motility in several organisms including humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Austin-Tse et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bearce et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Jaffe et al., 2016</xref>). <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants exhibit reduced cilia motility in the central canal and, if the resulting CTD is embryonically rescued by temperature shifts, develop adolescent-onset spinal curves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Grimes et al., 2016</xref>). These curves were argued to model an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)-like condition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A–B</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig4video1">Figure 4—video 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Grimes et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Marie-Hardy et al., 2021</xref>). Importantly, both <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> transcripts were significantly downregulated in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>) suggesting that spinal curves in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> might be the result of reduced Urp1/Urp2 expression. To systematically compare <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants with urotensin-deficient mutants, we raised cohorts of <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants, <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants, and temperature-shift-rescued <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants alongside one another in the same aquatics facility after backcrossing all lines to the AB strain for multiple generations. At 3 mpf, we performed µCT scanning and three-dimensional reconstitutions. First, we calculated dorso-ventral Cobb angles, which revealed that <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants were more severely curved (average total Cobb angle: 260.4±32.7°) than either <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants (197.5±38.9°) or <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants (146.1±47.4°) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1D–E</xref>). Second, <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants showed prominent dorsal-ventral curves in the pre-caudal as well as caudal vertebrae, a distinct pattern compared with the predominantly caudal curves in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A–C</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1C</xref>). Third, <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants exhibited significant lateral curvature of the spine, often with spinal twisting, a hallmark of AIS-like curves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4Fi–Fii</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>). By contrast, <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants showed planar curves, with very minor or no lateral deviations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4Fi–Fii</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>). These results demonstrated that cilia motility mutants and urotensin-deficient mutants exhibit distinct spinal curve phenotypes. As such, the causes of spinal curves in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants can only be partially explained by reduced Urp1/Urp2 expression.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title><italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants and <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants are phenotypically distinct.</title><p>(<bold>A–D</bold>) Lateral views of microcomputed tomography (µCT) reconstitutions of wild-type (<bold>A</bold>), <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants (<bold>B</bold>), <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants (<bold>C</bold>), and <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup>;urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> triple mutants (<bold>D</bold>). All fish shown are female. Scale bar: 10 mm. (<bold>E</bold>) Total Cobb angles with each circle representing an individual fish. The mean ± s.d. is shown. p-Values are given from two-tailed unpaired student’s <italic>t</italic> tests. U — <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants; C — <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants; UC — <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup>;urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> triple mutants. (<bold>Fi</bold>) Dorsal views of µCT reconstitutions with ribs and fins removed. Scale bar: 5 mm. (<bold>Fii</bold>) Quantitation of degree of lateral curvature for wild type (n=5) and <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> (n=8), <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> (n=3), <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> (n=3), and <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup>;urp1<sup>∆P</sup>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> (n=6) mutants. y-axis is the arbitrary units.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Raw data for quantition of spinal phenotypes.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig4-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Analysis of lateral curvature.</title><p>Dorsal views of microcomputed tomography reconstituted spines from wild type and mutants at 3 mpf. Asterisks refer to spines shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4Fi</xref>. Scale bar: 5 mm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig4-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig4-video1.mp4" id="fig4video1"><label>Figure 4—video 1.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 3-mpf <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary. Mutants develop severe three-dimensional spinal curves in precaudal and caudal vertebrae.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig4-video2.mp4" id="fig4video2"><label>Figure 4—video 2.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 3-mpf <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup>;urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig4-video3.mp4" id="fig4video3"><label>Figure 4—video 3.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 3-mpf <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary.</p></caption></media><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig4-video4.mp4" id="fig4video4"><label>Figure 4—video 4.</label><caption><title>Three-dimensional reconstitution of a 12-mpf <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> male zebrafish.</title><p>Scans were performed using an 18-µm voxel resolution. Surface reconstructions were performed using a threshold of 3200, scales were digitally removed where necessary.</p></caption></media></fig-group><p>To further explore the relationship between cilia motility and urotensin peptides, we generated adult <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup>;urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> triple mutants that were embryonically rescued by temperature shifts. Triple mutants exhibited significant curves, similar to <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> single mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D–E</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1C–E</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig4video2">Figure 4—video 2</xref>; average total Cobb angle: 284.4±33.5°). The curves of triple mutants were three-dimensional in nature, with both dorso-ventral and medio-lateral deviations, as well as incidences of spinal torsion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4Fi–Fii</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>); curves were present in both pre-caudal and caudal vertebrae, as opposed to being more restricted to caudal vertebrae in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1C</xref>). Overall, this suggests that motile cilia contribute to urotensin-dependent and urotensin-independent pathways controlling spine morphology.</p><p>Pkd2l1 is a polycystin family ion channel expressed in CSF-cNs, the same cell type which expresses Urp1 and Urp2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Quan et al., 2015</xref>). Pkd2l1 is responsible for flow-induced Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling in CSF-cNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Böhm et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Sternberg et al., 2018</xref>). While <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants exhibited normal early axis development, they went on to develop mild kyphosis-like curves upon aging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Sternberg et al., 2018</xref>), a result we recapitulated after raising <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants on the same genetic background and under the same conditions as urotensin-deficient mutants for direct comparison (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2A–B</xref>). Notably, <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants showed very subtle curves in the pre-caudal vertebrae and absence of lateral deviation at 12 mpf but no obvious curves of any kind at 3 mpf (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2A-B</xref>, <xref ref-type="video" rid="fig4video3 fig4video4">Figure 4—videos 3–4</xref>). This mild kyphosis-like phenotype was therefore also highly distinct from <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants.</p><p>Overall, our phenotypic data show that <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants develop adolescent-onset curves without significant vertebral structural defects or sex bias. Coupled to the consistently caudal location of curves at 3 mpf as well as the lack of lateral deviation, we suggest that urotensin pathway mutants most closely reflect a lordosis-like condition. In agreement, urotensin mutants were phenotypically distinct from established AIS-like (<italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic>) and kyphosis-like (<italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic>) models.</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>RF breakdown precedes AIS-like curves in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants</title><p>Given the links between motile cilia, the RF and <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D and F</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>) as well as the requirement for proper RF assembly to prevent spinal curves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Rose et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Troutwine et al., 2020</xref>), we assessed Sspo, the major component of the RF, in spinal curve mutants. To visualize Sspo localization, we used the <italic>sspo-GFP<sup>ut24</sup></italic> line in which GFP coding sequence is fused to the endogenous <italic>sspo</italic> locus, producing Sspo-GFP protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Troutwine et al., 2020</xref>). First, we assessed Sspo localization in the central canal of <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants at 28 hr pf (hpf). In sibling controls, Sspo localized into an RF throughout the central canal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). By contrast, <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants raised at restrictive temperatures, which exhibited reduced central canal cilia motility and CTD (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bearce et al., 2022</xref>), lacked RF. Instead, Sspo was diffusely localized in the central canal in these mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>), in agreement with previous work showing that cilia motility is required for RF assembly in embryos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2018</xref>).</p><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Reissner fiber (RF) breakdown in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants but not urotensin-deficient mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A–F</bold>) Grayscale maximal intensity projection of Sspo-GFP localization in the central canal in 28 hpf embryos (<bold>A–C</bold>) and 12 dpf adolescents (<bold>D–F</bold>). RF is denoted by arrow heads in D and F. Arrows point to structures along the central canal that become GFP-positive in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants. Scale bar: 10 µm. (<bold>G</bold>) Schematic of temperature shift experiment in which <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants are initially raised at permissive temperatures before being shifted to restrictive temperatures at 6 dpf, then imaged at 12 dpf. (<bold>H–I</bold>) Lateral views of <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> (<bold>H</bold>) and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> (<bold>I</bold>) mutants at 12 dpf when Sspo-GFP imaging took place. The white box in H shows the location imaged in <bold>D–F</bold>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-83883-fig5-v2.tif"/></fig><p>Next, we took advantage of the temperature-sensitive nature of the <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutation to determine whether RF is also disrupted at later timepoints, during adolescent stages when true spinal curves begin to develop. To do so, we initially raised <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants at permissive temperatures, allowing RF to correctly form and embryos to fully straighten. At 6 dpf, we transitioned larvae to restrictive temperatures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5G</xref>), which led to the appearance of curves by 11–14 dpf (standard length 6.5±0.2 mm), then assessed Sspo localization at 12 dpf. As in embryos, Sspo localized into a defined RF in the central canal in sibling controls (arrow head in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>) but was diffuse in temperature upshifted <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants, both in mutants that had yet to develop curves and those exhibiting subtle curves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5H</xref>). This demonstrates (1) that cilia motility is not only required for the initial formation of the RF but also for its maintenance; and (2) breakdown of the RF precedes curve onset in cilia motility-deficient mutants. This supports a model in which continued cilia motility maintains the RF structure, and loss of the RF causes AIS-like curves to develop in cilia motility mutants.</p></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title>The RF remains intact in Uts2r3-deficient mutants both before and after curve formation</title><p>Next, we imaged Sspo-GFP localization in the central canal of <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants to determine whether RF breakdown could be causative in urotensin-associated spinal curves. In agreement with that lack of axial straightening phenotype in <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutant embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1Ei</xref>), we found that Sspo localized normally into the RF in the central canal at 28 hpf in <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref>). At 12 dpf, as spinal curves were beginning to manifest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5I</xref>), Sspo still formed an intact RF in <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants (arrow head in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5F</xref>). The fact that RF is present in <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants as curves form suggests that urotensin-associated curves are not caused by defective RF formation. This result coheres with the distinct spinal phenotypes exhibited by <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants.</p><p>While imaging Sspo-GFP at 12 dpf, we noted that in both <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants, large central canal cells with the appearance of CSF-cNs became GFP-positive (arrows in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E–F</xref>), something we rarely observed in control fish (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>). Indeed, the GFP-positive central canal cells in <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> give the effect of making the RF appear comparatively smaller/dimmer (compare RF in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5F</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>). We suggest that CSF-cNs may endocytose Sspo-GFP monomers in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants where the RF has broken down and in <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants where RF is likely to be making increasing numbers of contacts with CSF-cNs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Orts-Del’Immagine et al., 2020</xref>) owing to the onset of spinal curves.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Urotensin II (UII) is a cyclic peptide that was first identified from the teleost urophysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Pearson et al., 1980</xref>) and subsequently found to exist in amphibians (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Conlon et al., 1992</xref>) and mammals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Coulouarn et al., 1998</xref>). A highly similar peptide, called URP was then isolated from the brains of rodents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Sugo et al., 2003</xref>). UII and URP both signal via the UT, a G-protein-coupled receptor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Ames et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Liu et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Mori et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Nothacker et al., 1999</xref>). UIIs, URPs, and UTs have been linked to cardiovascular function and inflammation, but their roles in the development of morphology are little understood.</p><p>In this study, we discovered a role for two of the URPs, Urp1 and Urp2, in zebrafish spine morphology. To do so, we generated <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants that lacked the genetic region coding for the Urp1 and Urp2 peptides, respectively, then phenotyped skeletal morphology by µCT. This revealed that Urp1 and Urp2 function semi-redundantly to control spine morphology, with double mutants, as well as Uts2r3 receptor mutants, developing spinal curves in the caudal region during adolescent growth. By contrast, single <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants developed more subtle curves that nevertheless worsened with age. The lack of major vertebral defects, the location and direction of the curves coupled with phenotypic differences compared with mutants that model AIS and kyphosis, suggested that urotensin-deficient mutants model a lordosis-like condition.</p><p>The RF, a long proteinaceous thread-like structure which sits in the central canal and is mostly made from SCOspondin (encoded by <italic>sspo</italic>), has been implicated in controlling body axis and spine morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Rose et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Troutwine et al., 2020</xref>). We find that RF breaks down prior to curve formation in the cilia motility <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutant. Given other studies linking presence of the RF with a linear body axis, this strongly suggests that RF breakdown is a major factor driving spinal curves in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants. By contrast, Uts2r3-deficient mutants exhibited an intact RF, demonstrating that curves are not formed by RF breakdown in urotensin pathway mutants and nor do the presence of curves significantly disrupt RF structure. This coheres with a model in which urotensin signals act downstream of RF function in controlling spine morphology. Similarly, <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> expression are known to be controlled by RF function during embryonic phases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Rose et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>).</p><p>Intriguingly, motile cilia mutants and <italic>sspo</italic> mutants exhibit three-dimensional spinal curves, with dorso-ventral and medio-lateral curvature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Grimes et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Rose et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Troutwine et al., 2020</xref>). By contrast, we find that urotensin-deficient mutants exhibit largely planar curves, only in the dorso-ventral direction, thereby potentially uncoupling two systems controlling posture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Picton et al., 2021</xref>). Urp1 and Urp2 are expressed in CSF-cNs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Quan et al., 2015</xref>), a cell type which consists of both dorsal and ventral subpopulations. While Urp1 and Urp2 are co-expressed in ventral CSF-cNs, only Urp2 is expressed in dorsal CSF-cNs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Quan et al., 2015</xref>). It is therefore tempting to speculate that dorso-ventral spine shape is mediated specifically by ventral CSF-cNs which express higher amounts of Urp1/Urp2 peptides, resulting in dorso-ventral curves in urotensin-deficient mutants. This also suggests, as above, that while Urp1/Urp2 expression is in part controlled by upstream cilia motility and RF function, decreased urotensin signaling cannot account fully for the spinal curve phenotypes that occur upon loss of cilia motility or the RF. Indeed, the RF is required for both dorsal <italic>and</italic> ventral CSF-cN function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Orts-Del’Immagine et al., 2020</xref>), which may explain why dorso-ventral and medio-lateral curves occur when RF is disrupted either by cilia motility mutations or mutations to SCOspondin. This scenario is further complicated by the finding that increased <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> expression occurs upon mutation of <italic>rpgrip1l</italic>, a gene encoding a component of the ciliary transition zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Vesque et al., 2019</xref> — preprint). As such, various cilia-dependent signals likely control the precise levels of Urp1/Urp2 peptides, and controlling those levels appears critical for maintaining the shape of the spine.</p><p>In addition to exhibiting phenotypic differences in terms of curve direction compared with cilia motility and RF mutants, urotensin-deficient mutants also showed gradual worsening of spinal phenotypes upon aging. <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants exhibited no obvious phenotypes at 3 mpf but by 12 mpf showed abnormal curves, while <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> showed mild curves at 3 mpf and more severe deformity at 12 mpf. This implies that Urp1/Urp2 function throughout adulthood and aging to maintain spine morphology. Since double mutants were more severe at 3 mpf than either single mutant, partial redundancy between Urp1 and Urp2 appears to occur while overall dose likely sets how early phenotypes manifest. In contrast to this long-term role for urotensin peptides, temperature-shift experiments in which motile cilia were inactivated after 34 dpf showed no role for motile cilia beyond this stage in maintaining the spine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Grimes et al., 2016</xref>). It is worth noting, however, that this result does not preclude a role for CSF flow or the RF during long-term spine morphostasis because it has not been determined if motile cilia are required for CSF flow or RF formation in adult fish.</p><p>While the study of zebrafish spinal curve mutants holds great promise for understanding the basic science of spine morphology, it will also be important for the field to grapple with the question of how closely zebrafish spinal deformity mutants truly recapitulate human spinal curve diseases. The spines of humans and zebrafish are broadly similar, and it has been suggested that spinal loads are comparable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Gorman and Breden, 2009</xref>). Moreover, zebrafish spines, like human spines, seem predisposed to curvature, with high levels of scoliosis-like curves naturally developing with age (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bearce and Grimes, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Gorman and Breden, 2009</xref>). The overall shape of the zebrafish spine is also similar to human, with a natural kyphotic curve in the pre-caudal (rib-bearing) vertebrae and a compensatory, albeit very minor, lordotic curve in the most anterior caudal vertebrae. However, these curves are not as pronounced as in humans. Moreover, zebrafish also exhibit some fish-specific structures such as the Weberian apparatus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Dietrich et al., 2021</xref>). Nevertheless, zebrafish cilia motility mutants appear to model several features of AIS including the three-dimensional nature of curves, lack of vertebral patterning defects or significant vertebral structural malformations, adolescent-onset and, in some cases, sex bias (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Grimes et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Marie-Hardy et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Wang et al., 2022</xref>). The curves of <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants display some of these features as well but, importantly, are not three-dimensional. Instead, urotensin pathway-deficient mutants display primarily planar curves, with little or no lateral deviation. This is more similar to what occurs in hyper-kyphosis and hyper-lordosis in humans, when natural curves are accentuated. Given this planarity, and since curves are mostly present in the caudal vertebrae, we suggest that <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants model some aspects of lordosis and so refer to this phenotype as lordosis-like. However, we note that human lumbar vertebrae and zebrafish caudal vertebrae are structurally distinct (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Boswell and Ciruna, 2017</xref>), and humans have a significant natural lordotic curve that allows for an efficient upright walking gait, whereas zebrafish do not. Thus, urotensin-deficient mutants recapitulate some aspects of lordosis but clearly cannot mimic human-specific aspects of hyper-lordotic curves.</p><p>A surprising finding from our work was that Urp1 and Urp2 peptides are genetically dispensable for embryonic axial straightening. This interpretation is challenged by morpholino knockdown of Urp1/Urp2, which does result in failure of axial straightening in some individuals, resulting in a CTD phenotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>). One possibility is that the CTD of morphants results from morpholino off-target effects. However, this seems unlikely for three reasons: (1) adding exogenous Urp1/Urp2 peptides to the central canal can rescue the CTD phenotype of cilia motility- and RF-deficient mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>), suggesting the involvement of Urp1/Urp2 in axial straightening, at least in gain-of-function experiments; (2) since motile cilia and the RF are required for both axial straightening during embryogenesis and for the maintenance of spine morphology during adolescence, it seems parsimonious that Urp1/Urp2 peptides would also function across these two life stages; and (3) <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> transcript levels are reduced in motile cilia and RF mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>), suggestive of a link between Urp1 and Urp2 upregulation and axial straightening.</p><p>Nevertheless, the lack of CTD in our mutants, in which the Urp1 and Urp2 peptide coding sequences were entirely removed, is clear: single, double, and maternal-zygotic <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants all underwent normal axial straightening. This strongly argues that Urp1 and Urp2 are dispensable for straightening. Since the deletions were induced toward the end of the protein, it does leave open the possibility that the pro-domain sequences are required for straightening. However, this seems unlikely for three reasons: (1) <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants showed <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> transcript downregulation, respectively, in addition to deletion of the peptide coding regions; (2) <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> single and double crispants, in which gRNAs targeted several regions of the gene, also showed normal straightening; and (3) exogenous addition of Urp1 and Urp2 peptides, without pro-domains, rescued CTD of a cilia motility and RF mutant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Lu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>), suggesting that it is the peptide itself and not some other region which is functional.</p><p>One possibility is that genetic compensation explains the mutant/morphant phenotypic differences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Rossi et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Sztal and Stainier, 2020</xref>). In this putative scenario, a feedback response in the cell buffers otherwise harmful mutations, preventing their effects from manifesting phenotypically. A recently discovered compensation mechanism is transcriptional adaptation in which mutant mRNA is decayed and the products of that decay are, via a sequence-dependent mechanism, recruited to genes with similar sequences where they promote transcriptional upregulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">El-Brolosy et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Ma et al., 2019</xref>). The upregulation of adapting genes then masks phenotypes in mutants but not morphants. We did find slight upregulation of <italic>urp2</italic> in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2E</xref>), which may indicate transcriptional adaptation, although this alone cannot explain the lack of CTD phenotypes in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants because <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants also lacked CTD. It will be informative in the future to determine whether other urotensin II-encoding peptides (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–B</xref>) are able to compensate, during embryonic phases, for loss of <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> or if other factors explain the mutant/morphant discrepancies.</p><p>While we were in the final stages of preparing this manuscript, a study was released which made several complementary findings, also concluding that Urp1 and Urp2 function redundantly to maintain spine shape (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Gaillard et al., 2022</xref> — preprint). Importantly, and in agreement with our work, Gaillard and colleagues observed no embryonic axial defects upon genetic loss of Urp1 and Urp2. Moreover, they found that other urotensin II-encoding genes were not upregulated in <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> mutants, arguing against phenotypic masking by genetic compensation. Our findings and those of Gaillard and colleagues together therefore strongly argue that Urp1 and Urp2 are not essential for axial straightening during embryogenesis but are instead required for the maintenance of the body axis during growth and adulthood. As such, other mechanisms, currently unknown, likely operate downstream of cilia motility and RF function to mediate embryonic axial straightening.</p><p>Future efforts will be required to discern which tissues respond to Urp1/Urp2 signals during the control of spine morphology. During embryonic stages, Uts2r3 is expressed in dorsal muscle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>), but it remains unclear how Urp1/Urp2 peptides released by CSF-cNs could signal to effect muscle during adolescent stages. Moreover, based on single-cell RNA-sequencing gene expression atlases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Farnsworth et al., 2020</xref>), <italic>uts2r3</italic> is expressed in several other cell types in addition to muscle. Tissue-specific ablations and rescue experiments should be used to untangle precisely where Uts2r3-dependent Urp1/Urp2 signaling occurs to control spine morphology. It will also be critical to determine the timing of action of urotensin signaling. While we observe phenotypes first appearing between 9 and 11 dpf in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants, it is possible that the underlying defect in mutants is caused by an earlier event which only phenotypically manifests later. One candidate is subtle disruptions to the notochord, which may later result in spinal curves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Bagwell et al., 2020</xref>). On the other hand, our experiments in which we aged <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> single mutants argue that Urp1 and Urp2 peptides function throughout life, and not only during early growth, to maintain spine morphology.</p><p>Another major question is whether the function of urotensin signaling in spine morphology is conserved in other species, and whether our findings are directly relevant to humans. These questions will require future work to answer, but two recent studies shed some light on these matters. First, in the frog <italic>Xenopus laevis</italic>, disruption of Utr4<italic>,</italic> a counterpart of Uts2r3, causes abnormal curvature of the body axis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Alejevski et al., 2021</xref>). Second, a human genetics study reported that rare mutations in UTS2R are significantly associated with spinal curvature, being discovered within AIS patient cohorts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Dai et al., 2021</xref>). Thus, a deeper understanding of the role of urotensin signaling in maintaining spine shape will not only provide insight into principles of morphogenesis but potentially also human disease.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Zebrafish</title><p>AB, TU, and WIK strains of <italic>D. rerio</italic> were used. Zebrafish lines generated were <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic>, <italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic> (called <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic>), <italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup></italic> (called <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic>), <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> as well as previously published lines: <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Jaffe et al., 2016</xref>), <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Sternberg et al., 2018</xref>), and <italic>sspo-gfp<sup>ut24</sup></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Troutwine et al., 2020</xref>). Experiments were undertaken in accordance with research guidelines of the International Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and approved by the University of Oregon Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol number 21–45). All zebrafish strains and other materials are available upon request.</p><p>Generation and genotyping of mutant lines <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic>, <italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic>, <italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup>,</italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> were generated using CRISPR/Cas9. gRNA oligos were designed using CRISPRscan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Moreno-Mateos et al., 2015</xref>). gRNA templates (IDT) were assembled by annealing and extension with Bottom strand ultramer_1 (Key resource table) using Taq Polymerase (NEB, M0273) with cycling parameters of 95°C (3 min), 95°C (30 s), 45°C (30 s), 72°C (30 s), and 72<sup>o</sup>C (10 min) with 30 cycles of the middle three steps. PCR product was purified (Zymo DNA Clean and Concentrator Kit, D4013) and then used for in vitro RNA synthesis using a MEGAshortscript T7 Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher, AM1354). Synthesized gRNAs were purified (Zymo RNA Clean and Concentrator Kit, R1013), then 150 pg along with 320 pg/nl Cas9 (IDT, 1081058) were injected into one-cell stage fertilized eggs. The mosaic mutant fish resulting from these injections (F<sub>0</sub> fish) were raised and outcrossed to AB wild-types, and DNA was extracted from the resulting F<sub>1</sub> embryos. Mutant alleles were screened by PCR coupled with restriction enzyme digestion and/or Sanger sequencing (GeneWiz). Embryos from F<sub>1</sub> clutches harboring mutations were raised to adulthood and outcrossed to AB wild-types to generate F<sub>2</sub> families which were screened for mutations and raised. The nature of mutations was identified by sequencing DNA extracted from adult fin clips of F<sub>2</sub> heterozygous fish using CRISP-ID to deconvolute (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dehairs et al., 2016</xref>) and confirmed by sequencing DNA of F<sub>3</sub> homozygous embryos.</p><p><italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic> mutants contain a 279 bp deletion and 1 bp insertion that were genotyped by PCR amplification with <italic>urp1_geno_1</italic> and <italic>urp1_geno_2</italic> primers which generate a 460 bp band from wild-type DNA and a 184 bp band from mutant DNA. <italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup></italic> mutants harbor a 61 bp deletion and were genotyped by PCR amplification with <italic>urp2</italic>_<italic>geno_1</italic> and <italic>urp2_geno_2</italic> primers followed by gel electrophoresis to distinguish the 283 bp wild-type band and the 226 bp mutant band. <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants contain a 534 bp deletion and were also genotyped by PCR, using <italic>uts2r3_geno_1</italic> and <italic>uts2r3_geno_2</italic>, in which wild-type sequence led to an 832 bp band and mutant sequence a 298 bp band.</p><p>The nature of the <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> mutation was determined by whole genome sequencing. DNA was extracted from mutant embryos using a phenol/chloroform procedure. Libraries were prepared using the FS DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina sequencing (NEB, E7805). DNA was digested into 150 bp fragments, and paired-end sequencing was performed using a NovaSeq 6000 Sequencing System. Trimmomatic (version 0.36; ILLUMNIACLIP: TruSeq3-PE-2.fa:2:30:10:1:true LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDINGWINDOW:5:20 MINLEN:42 AVGQUAL:30) was used to remove Illumina adaptor sequences from paired-end reads. Illumina short-read sequences were then aligned to the GRCz11 reference sequence of chromosome 24 using BWA-MEM (version 0.7.01). SAMtools (version 1.8) was used to sort and index reads. Aligned reads in BAM format were analyzed in IGV (version 2.13.1). Mutants were routinely genotyped by PCR amplification with oligos <italic>sspo_geno_1</italic> and <italic>sspo_geno_2</italic>, followed by BsaI-HFv2 (NEB, R2733) restriction digestion to produce 300 bp and 99 bp bands from wild-type DNA and a protected 399 bp band from mutant DNA.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Generation of somatic mosaic F<sub>0</sub> mutants (crispants)</title><p>Four gRNA oligos per gene for <italic>cfap298</italic>, <italic>sspo</italic>, <italic>urp1</italic>, and <italic>urp2</italic> were chosen from a look-up table (Key resource appendix; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref>). gRNAs were synthesized from oligos in multiplex. After being pooled at 10 µM, oligos were annealed and extended with Bottom strand ultramer_2 using Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Mastermix (NEB, M0531) with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB, M05030) using incubations: 98<sup>o</sup>C (2 min), 50°C (10 min), and 72<sup>o</sup>C (10 min). Assembled oligos were purified and used as templates for in vitro RNA synthesis, as described in ‘Generation and genotyping of mutant lines’ section. For mutagenesis, 1000 pg of gRNAs along with 1600 pg/nl Cas9 (IDT, 1081058) were injected into one-cell-stage embryos. To assess rates of mutagenesis, DNA was extracted from 1 dpf crispants and subjected to T7 endonuclease I assays (NEB, E3321).</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Quantitation of body curvature at 1–2 dpf</title><p>Zebrafish larvae at 28–30 hpf were imaged using a Leica S9i stereomicroscope with integrated 10-megapixel camera. Body angles were calculated using ImageJ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Schindelin et al., 2012</xref>) as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bearce et al., 2022</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR)</title><p>RNA was extracted using a Zymo Direct-Zol RNA Miniprep kit (Zymo Research, R2051). cDNA was prepared from 25 ng of RNA using oligoDT primers in a 20 µl reaction using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher, 4368814). qRT-PCR reactions were performed in real time using 5 µl PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (ThermoFisher, A25741), 0.8 µl of 10 µM forward and reverse primers, 1.4 µl of nuclease-free water, and 2 µl of diluted cDNA. PCR was performed using a QuantStudio Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with cycling parameters: 50°C (2 min), 95°C (10 min) then 40 cycles of 95°C (15 s), and 60°C (1 min). Each reaction was performed in quadruplicate. Quantitation was relative to <italic>rpl13</italic> and used the ∆∆C<sub>T</sub> relative quantitation method in which fold changes are calculated as 2<sup>−∆∆CT</sup>. The efficiency of amplification was verified to be close to 100% with a standard curve of RNA dilutions.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Calcein staining</title><p>Larvae were incubated in water containing 0.2% calcein (Sigma-Aldrich, C0875) for 10 min then rinsed two to three times in water (5 min per rinse). Larvae were immobilized with 0.005% tricaine, mounted in 0.8% low melt agarose, and imaged with a Leica THUNDER stereoscope.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Multiplex fluorescent in situ hybridization chain reaction (in situ HCR)</title><p>Embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) then serially dehydrated to 100% methanol, and stored at –20°C. Embryos were rehydrated, washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20, incubated in hybridization buffer (Molecular Instruments), then incubated in 2 pmol of probes at 37°C overnight in a total volume of 500 µl of hybridization buffer. Embryos were washed in wash buffer (Molecular Instruments), washed twice in 5× SSCT (sodium chloride sodium citrate with 0.1% tween-20), and then incubated in amplification buffer (Molecular Instruments) for 1 hr. RNA hairpins designed to bind either <italic>pkd2l1</italic>, <italic>urp1,</italic> or <italic>urp2</italic> were prepared by heating 10 pmol of each to 95°C for 90 s then snap-cooled in the dark for 30 min. Embryos were then incubated overnight in 500 µl of amplification buffer containing 30 pmol hairpins at room temperature in the dark. Embryos were washed five times in 5× SSCT, stored at 4<sup>o</sup>C, and then mounted for confocal microscopy. Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM880 using either a ×20 air or ×40 water objective. Acquisition settings were derived using wild type embryos and then applied to all embryos. Images were exported to IMARIS 9.5.0 (Oxford Instruments). A Gaussian filter of width 0.42 µm (×20) or 0.21 µm (×40), and a rolling ball background subtraction of 10 µm was applied.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>X-ray microcomputed tomography</title><p>Scans were performed using a vivaCT 80 (Scanco Medical) at 18.5-µm voxel resolution (for 3 mpf and 12 mpf fish) or 10-µm voxel resolution (1 mpf fish) as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bearce et al., 2022</xref>). Digital dissections of the spinal column were performed in 3D Slicer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Kikinis et al., 2013</xref>) using the Segmentation Editor. A threshold of 3200 was used to mask 1 mm tube (Draw Tube function) around the spine in the axial slice view, beginning between the otic vesicles rostral to the first vertebrae and ending at the split of the tail. The center of the tube was set at the narrowest ‘hollow”’ within the lumen of centra.</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Quantitation of lateral spine curvature</title><p>Quantitation of lateral spine curvature was performed in ImageJ by orienting isolated spine images in a dorsal view with heads to the left and with the otic vesicles and first Weberian vertebrae parallel to the x-axis. Landmarks were assigned to the narrowest point of each centrum rostral to caudal; where maximum projection resulted in hidden or overlapping vertebrae, the appropriate number of points was added in closest approximation. The y-value from each landmark was subtracted from the point rostral to it, resulting in a map of local deflections where positive values indicate rightward displacement, and negative values indicate leftward displacement.</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Live imaging of SCOspondin-GFP</title><p>Embryos (28 hpf) and larvae (12 dpf) were anesthetized in tricaine until touch response was abolished and then embedded in 0.8% low-melt agarose laced with tricaine in inverted imaging chambers (14 mm #1.5 coverslips, VWR cat no. 10810–054). In larvae, care was taken to align the posterior body close to the coverslip to the RF within the working distance of the objective. A Nikon Ti2 inverted microscope equipped with Plan Apo ×40 and ×60 WI DIC (1.2 NA) objectives, a Yokogawa Spinning Disk and pco.edge sCMOS camera were used to capture 512×256 images in time series. Exposure time varied with age (100 ms–300 ms) as Sspo-GFP brightened in intensity over time; exposure, camera settings, and laser power were kept constant between age-matched individuals. Images were cropped, rotated, and intensity-adjusted in ImageJ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Schindelin et al., 2012</xref>).</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Funding acquisition, Validation, Methodology</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Validation, Investigation</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Investigation</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Investigation</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other"><p>Experiments were undertaken in accordance with research guidelines of the International Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and approved by the University of Oregon Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (# AUP-21-45).</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-83883-mdarchecklist1-v2.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file.</p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Judy Peirce, Tim Mason, and the Aquatics Facility for zebrafish husbandry, the GC3F Biological Imaging Facility, and the X-Ray Imaging Core, all at the University of Oregon. We thank Claire Wyart, John Postlethwait, and Ryan Gray for sharing zebrafish lines, Zac Bush for help with genome sequencing, Mike Harms and Ron Kwon for discussions, and Katie Fisher for proof reading. Funding: This study was supported by a National Institutes of Health grants R00AR70905 and R35GM142949 (to DTG), F32AR078002 (to EAB), F31HD105435 and T32HD007348 (to ZHI).</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alejevski</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Leemans</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaillard</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Leistenschneider</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>de Flori</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bougerol</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Mével</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Herrel</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fini</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Pézeron</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tostivint</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Conserved role of the urotensin II receptor 4 signalling pathway to control body straightness in a tetrapod</article-title><source>Open Biology</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>210065</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsob.210065</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34375549</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ames</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarau</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chambers</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Willette</surname><given-names>RN</given-names></name><name><surname>Aiyar</surname><given-names>NV</given-names></name><name><surname>Romanic</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Louden</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Foley</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sauermelch</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>Coatney</surname><given-names>RW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ao</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Disa</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Holmes</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Stadel</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>WS</given-names></name><name><surname>Glover</surname><given-names>GI</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>McNulty</surname><given-names>DE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellis</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Elshourbagy</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Shabon</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Trill</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hay</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohlstein</surname><given-names>EH</given-names></name><name><surname>Bergsma</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Douglas</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Human urotensin-II is a potent vasoconstrictor and agonist for the orphan receptor GPR14</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>401</volume><fpage>282</fpage><lpage>286</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/45809</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10499587</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Austin-Tse</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Halbritter</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zariwala</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Gilberti</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gee</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Hellman</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Pathak</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Panizzi</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Patel-King</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Tritschler</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Bower</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>O’Toole</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Porath</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Hurd</surname><given-names>TW</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaki</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Diaz</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kohl</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lovric</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hwang</surname><given-names>D-Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Braun</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Schueler</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Airik</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Otto</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Leigh</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Noone</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name><name><surname>Carson</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Pittman</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferkol</surname><given-names>TW</given-names></name><name><surname>Atkinson</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Olivier</surname><given-names>KN</given-names></name><name><surname>Sagel</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Dell</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosenfeld</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Milla</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Loges</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name><name><surname>Omran</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Porter</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>King</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Knowles</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Drummond</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hildebrandt</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Zebrafish ciliopathy screen plus human mutational analysis identifies c21orf59 and CCDC65 defects as causing primary ciliary dyskinesia</article-title><source>American Journal of Human Genetics</source><volume>93</volume><fpage>672</fpage><lpage>686</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.08.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24094744</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bagnat</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gray</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Development of a straight vertebrate body axis</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>147</volume><elocation-id>dev175794</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.175794</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33023886</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bagwell</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Norman</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellis</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Peskin</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Hwang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ge</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>SV</given-names></name><name><surname>McMenamin</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Stainier</surname><given-names>DY</given-names></name><name><surname>Bagnat</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Notochord vacuoles absorb compressive bone growth during zebrafish spine formation</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e51221</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.51221</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31995030</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bearce</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Grimes</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>On being the right shape: roles for motile cilia and cerebrospinal fluid flow in body and spine morphology</article-title><source>Seminars in Cell &amp; Developmental Biology</source><volume>110</volume><fpage>104</fpage><lpage>112</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.07.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32693941</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bearce</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Irons</surname><given-names>ZH</given-names></name><name><surname>Craig</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuhns</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sabazali</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Farnsworth</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Grimes</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Daw1 regulates the timely onset of cilia motility during development</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>149</volume><elocation-id>dev200017</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.200017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35708608</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Böhm</surname><given-names>UL</given-names></name><name><surname>Prendergast</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Djenoune</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Nunes Figueiredo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomez</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Stokes</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaiser</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Suster</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kawakami</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Charpentier</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Concordet</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Rio</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Del Bene</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyart</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>CSF-contacting neurons regulate locomotion by relaying mechanical stimuli to spinal circuits</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>10866</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms10866</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26946992</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boswell</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ciruna</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Understanding idiopathic scoliosis: a new zebrafish school of thought</article-title><source>Trends in Genetics</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>183</fpage><lpage>196</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2017.01.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28174019</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brand</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Heisenberg</surname><given-names>CP</given-names></name><name><surname>Warga</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Pelegri</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Karlstrom</surname><given-names>RO</given-names></name><name><surname>Beuchle</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Picker</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Furutani-Seiki</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>van Eeden</surname><given-names>FJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Granato</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Haffter</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammerschmidt</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kane</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelsh</surname><given-names>RN</given-names></name><name><surname>Mullins</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Odenthal</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nüsslein-Volhard</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996</year><article-title>Mutations affecting development of the midline and general body shape during zebrafish embryogenesis</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>123</volume><fpage>129</fpage><lpage>142</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.123.1.129</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9007235</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cantaut-Belarif</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Sternberg</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Thouvenin</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyart</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bardet</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>The reissner fiber in the cerebrospinal fluid controls morphogenesis of the body axis</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>2479</fpage><lpage>2486</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.079</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cantaut-Belarif</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Orts Del’Immagine</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Penru</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pézeron</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyart</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bardet</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Adrenergic activation modulates the signal from the reissner fiber to cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons during development</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e59469</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.59469</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chatenet</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubessy</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Leprince</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Boularan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlier</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ségalas-Milazzo</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Guilhaudis</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Oulyadi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Davoust</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Scalbert</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Pfeiffer</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Renard</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Tonon</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Lihrmann</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Pacaud</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaudry</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Structure-activity relationships and structural conformation of a novel urotensin II-related peptide</article-title><source>Peptides</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1819</fpage><lpage>1830</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.peptides.2004.04.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15476952</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Castelein</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>WC</given-names></name><name><surname>Danielsson</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobbs</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Grivas</surname><given-names>TB</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurnett</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Luk</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreau</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Newton</surname><given-names>PO</given-names></name><name><surname>Stokes</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Weinstein</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Burwell</surname><given-names>RG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis</article-title><source>Nature Reviews. Disease Primers</source><volume>1</volume><elocation-id>15030</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrdp.2015.30</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27188385</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Conlon</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>O’Harte</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>DD</given-names></name><name><surname>Tonon</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaudry</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1992">1992</year><article-title>Isolation and primary structure of urotensin II from the brain of a tetrapod, the frog rana ridibunda</article-title><source>Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</source><volume>188</volume><fpage>578</fpage><lpage>583</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0006-291x(92)91095-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1445302</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coulouarn</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lihrmann</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Jegou</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Anouar</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tostivint</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Beauvillain</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Conlon</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bern</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaudry</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Cloning of the cdna encoding the urotensin II precursor in frog and human reveals intense expression of the urotensin II gene in motoneurons of the spinal cord</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>95</volume><fpage>15803</fpage><lpage>15808</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.95.26.15803</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9861051</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Qiu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>JCY</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Novel mutations in UTS2R are associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the chinese population</article-title><source>Spine</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>E288</fpage><lpage>E293</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/BRS.0000000000003786</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33156271</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dehairs</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Talebi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Cherifi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Swinnen</surname><given-names>JV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>CRISP-ID: decoding CRISPR mediated indels by sanger sequencing</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>28973</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep28973</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27363488</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dietrich</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiedler</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurzyukova</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>López-Delgado</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>McGowan</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Geurtzen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammond</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Busse</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Knopf</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Skeletal biology and disease modeling in zebrafish</article-title><source>Journal of Bone and Mineral Research</source><volume>36</volume><fpage>436</fpage><lpage>458</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jbmr.4256</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33484578</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>El-Brolosy</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kontarakis</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Rossi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuenne</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Günther</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukuda</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kikhi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Boezio</surname><given-names>GLM</given-names></name><name><surname>Takacs</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukuda</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerri</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Giraldez</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Stainier</surname><given-names>DYR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Genetic compensation triggered by mutant mRNA degradation</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>568</volume><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>197</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-019-1064-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30944477</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elshourbagy</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Douglas</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Shabon</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Harrison</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Duddy</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sechler</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Ao</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Maleeff</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Naselsky</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Disa</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Aiyar</surname><given-names>NV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Molecular and pharmacological characterization of genes encoding urotensin-II peptides and their cognate G-protein-coupled receptors from the mouse and monkey</article-title><source>British Journal of Pharmacology</source><volume>136</volume><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.bjp.0704671</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11976263</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farnsworth</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Saunders</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>A single-cell transcriptome atlas for zebrafish development</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>459</volume><fpage>100</fpage><lpage>108</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.11.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31782996</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fedorov</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Beichel</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalpathy-Cramer</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Finet</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Fillion-Robin</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Pujol</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bauer</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jennings</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Fennessy</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sonka</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Buatti</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Aylward</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>JV</given-names></name><name><surname>Pieper</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kikinis</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network</article-title><source>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>1323</fpage><lpage>1341</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22770690</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="preprint"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gaillard</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohamad</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Quan</surname><given-names>FB</given-names></name><name><surname>de Cian</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Mosiman</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Tostivint</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Pézeron</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Urp1 and Urp2 Act Redundantly to Maintain Spine Shape in Zebrafish Larvae</article-title><source>bioRxiv</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/2022.08.09.503396</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gorman</surname><given-names>KF</given-names></name><name><surname>Breden</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Idiopathic-type scoliosis is not exclusive to bipedalism</article-title><source>Medical Hypotheses</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>348</fpage><lpage>352</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mehy.2008.09.052</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19070438</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grimes</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name><name><surname>Boswell</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Morante</surname><given-names>NFC</given-names></name><name><surname>Henkelman</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Burdine</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ciruna</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>352</volume><fpage>1341</fpage><lpage>1344</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaf6419</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27284198</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grimes</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Developmental biology: go with the flow to keep the body straight</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>R101</fpage><lpage>R103</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30721676</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaffe</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Grimes</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name><name><surname>Schottenfeld-Roames</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Werner</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Ku</surname><given-names>TSJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Pelliccia</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Morante</surname><given-names>NFC</given-names></name><name><surname>Mitchell</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Burdine</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>C21orf59/kurly controls both cilia motility and polarization</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>1841</fpage><lpage>1849</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.069</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26904945</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kikinis</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Pieper</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Vosburgh</surname><given-names>KG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>3D slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support</article-title><source>Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>227</fpage><lpage>289</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-4614-7657-3_19</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Konno</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujii</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Imae</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaiya</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Mukuda</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyazato</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuda</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Uchiyama</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Urotensin II receptor (UTR) exists in hyaline chondrocytes: a study of peripheral distribution of UTR in the African clawed frog, <italic>Xenopus laevis</italic></article-title><source>General and Comparative Endocrinology</source><volume>185</volume><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.01.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23399967</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Labarrère</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Chatenet</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Leprince</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Marionneau</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Loirand</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tonon</surname><given-names>M-C</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubessy</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Scalbert</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Pfeiffer</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Renard</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Calas</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Pacaud</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaudry</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Structure-Activity relationships of human urotensin II and related analogues on rat aortic ring contraction</article-title><source>Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1475636031000093507</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12943190</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Labrom</surname><given-names>FR</given-names></name><name><surname>Izatt</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Claus</surname><given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Little</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 3D vertebral morphology, progression and nomenclature: a current concepts review</article-title><source>European Spine Journal</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>1823</fpage><lpage>1834</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-021-06842-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33866395</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Pong</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Howard</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Davidoff</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Austin</surname><given-names>CP</given-names></name><name><surname>McDonald</surname><given-names>TP</given-names></name><name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>George</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Caskey</surname><given-names>CT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Identification of urotensin II as the endogenous ligand for the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor GPR14</article-title><source>Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</source><volume>266</volume><fpage>174</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/bbrc.1999.1796</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10581185</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Shagirova</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Goggi</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Yeo</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Reissner fibre-induced urotensin signalling from cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons prevents scoliosis of the vertebrate spine</article-title><source>Biology Open</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>bio052027</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/bio.052027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32409296</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>PTC-bearing mRNA elicits a genetic compensation response via upf3a and COMPASS components</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>568</volume><fpage>259</fpage><lpage>263</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-019-1057-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30944473</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marie-Hardy</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantaut-Belarif</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Pietton</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Slimani</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Pascal-Moussellard</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The orthopedic characterization of cfap298tm304 mutants validate zebrafish to faithfully model human AIS</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>7392</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-86856-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33795825</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mesiti</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Scoliosis: an overview</article-title><source>Radiologic Technology</source><volume>93</volume><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34588279</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moreno-Mateos</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Vejnar</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Beaudoin</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandez</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mis</surname><given-names>EK</given-names></name><name><surname>Khokha</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name><name><surname>Giraldez</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>982</fpage><lpage>988</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3543</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26322839</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mori</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugo</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Abe</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimomura</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurihara</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitada</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kikuchi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shintani</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurokawa</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Onda</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishimura</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujino</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Urotensin II is the endogenous ligand of a G-protein-coupled orphan receptor, SENR (GPR14)</article-title><source>Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</source><volume>265</volume><fpage>123</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/bbrc.1999.1640</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10548501</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nobata</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Donald</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Balment</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Takei</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Potent cardiovascular effects of homologous urotensin II (UII) -related peptide and UII in unanesthetized eels after peripheral and central injections</article-title><source>American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology</source><volume>300</volume><fpage>R437</fpage><lpage>R446</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpregu.00629.2010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21123764</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nothacker</surname><given-names>HP</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>McNeill</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Saito</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Merten</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>O’Dowd</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Duckles</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Civelli</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Identification of the natural ligand of an orphan G-protein-coupled receptor involved in the regulation of vasoconstriction</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>1</volume><fpage>383</fpage><lpage>385</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/14081</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10559967</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ogura</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Dimar</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Djurasovic</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Carreon</surname><given-names>LY</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Etiology and treatment of cervical kyphosis: state of the art review-a narrative review</article-title><source>Journal of Spine Surgery</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>422</fpage><lpage>433</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21037/jss-21-54</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34734146</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Orts-Del’Immagine</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantaut-Belarif</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Thouvenin</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Roussel</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Baskaran</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Langui</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Koëth</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Bivas</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lejeune</surname><given-names>F-X</given-names></name><name><surname>Bardet</surname><given-names>P-L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyart</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Sensory neurons contacting the cerebrospinal fluid require the Reissner fiber to detect spinal curvature in vivo</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>827</fpage><lpage>839</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.071</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32084399</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parmentier</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hameury</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubessy</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Quan</surname><given-names>FB</given-names></name><name><surname>Habert</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Calas</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaudry</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Lihrmann</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Tostivint</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Occurrence of two distinct urotensin II-related peptides in zebrafish provides new insight into the evolutionary history of the urotensin II gene family</article-title><source>Endocrinology</source><volume>152</volume><fpage>2330</fpage><lpage>2341</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1210/en.2010-1500</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21447629</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pearson</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Shively</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>BR</given-names></name><name><surname>Geschwind</surname><given-names>II</given-names></name><name><surname>Barkley</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishioka</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bern</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1980">1980</year><article-title>Urotensin II: a somatostatin-like peptide in the caudal neurosecretory system of fishes</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>77</volume><fpage>5021</fpage><lpage>5024</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.77.8.5021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6107911</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Picton</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertuzzi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pallucchi</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Fontanel</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Dahlberg</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Björnfors</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Iacoviello</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Shearing</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name><name><surname>El Manira</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>A spinal organ of proprioception for integrated motor action feedback</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>109</volume><fpage>1188</fpage><lpage>1201</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33577748</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pourquié</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Vertebrate segmentation: from cyclic gene networks to scoliosis</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>145</volume><fpage>650</fpage><lpage>663</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21620133</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quan</surname><given-names>FB</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubessy</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Galant</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kenigfest</surname><given-names>NB</given-names></name><name><surname>Djenoune</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Leprince</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyart</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lihrmann</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Tostivint</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Comparative distribution and in vitro activities of the urotensin II-related peptides URP1 and URP2 in zebrafish: evidence for their colocalization in spinal cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e0119290</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0119290</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quan</surname><given-names>FB</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaillard</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Alejevski</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Pézeron</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tostivint</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Urotensin II-related peptide (urp) is expressed in motoneurons in zebrafish, but is dispensable for locomotion in larva</article-title><source>Peptides</source><volume>146</volume><elocation-id>170675</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.peptides.2021.170675</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robinson</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Thorvaldsdóttir</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Winckler</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Guttman</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lander</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Getz</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Mesirov</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Integrative genomics viewer</article-title><source>Nature Biotechnology</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.1754</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21221095</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodríguez</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodríguez</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hein</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>The subcommissural organ</article-title><source>Microscopy Research and Technique</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>98</fpage><lpage>123</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19980415)41:2&lt;98::AID-JEMT2&gt;3.0.CO;2-M</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9579598</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Pompili</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Henke</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Gennip</surname><given-names>JLM</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyer-Miner</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rana</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Gobron</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Nitz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ciruna</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>SCO-spondin defects and neuroinflammation are conserved mechanisms driving spinal deformity across genetic models of idiopathic scoliosis</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>2363</fpage><lpage>2373</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32386528</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rossi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kontarakis</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerri</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Nolte</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Hölper</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Krüger</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Stainier</surname><given-names>DYR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>524</volume><fpage>230</fpage><lpage>233</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature14580</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26168398</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: fishy tales of crooked spines</article-title><source>Trends in Genetics</source><volume>37</volume><fpage>612</fpage><lpage>615</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tig.2021.03.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33858671</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schindelin</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Arganda-Carreras</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Frise</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaynig</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Longair</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pietzsch</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Preibisch</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rueden</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Saalfeld</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmid</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Tinevez</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartenstein</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Eliceiri</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomancak</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cardona</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>676</fpage><lpage>682</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22743772</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stemple</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Structure and function of the notochord: an essential organ for chordate development</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>132</volume><fpage>2503</fpage><lpage>2512</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.01812</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15890825</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sternberg</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Prendergast</surname><given-names>AE</given-names></name><name><surname>Brosse</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantaut-Belarif</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Thouvenin</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Orts-Del’Immagine</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Castillo</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Djenoune</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurisu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>McDearmid</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Bardet</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Boccara</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Okamoto</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Delmas</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyart</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Pkd2L1 is required for mechanoception in cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons and maintenance of spine curvature</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>3804</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-06225-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30228263</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugo</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Murakami</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimomura</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Harada</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Abe</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishibashi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitada</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyajima</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Mori</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujino</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Identification of urotensin II-related peptide as the urotensin II-immunoreactive molecule in the rat brain</article-title><source>Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</source><volume>310</volume><fpage>860</fpage><lpage>868</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.102</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14550283</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sztal</surname><given-names>TE</given-names></name><name><surname>Stainier</surname><given-names>DYR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Transcriptional adaptation: a mechanism underlying genetic robustness</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>147</volume><elocation-id>dev186452</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.186452</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32816903</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tostivint</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Joly</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lihrmann</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Parmentier</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lebon</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Morisson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Calas</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ekker</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaudry</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Comparative genomics provides evidence for close evolutionary relationships between the urotensin II and somatostatin gene families</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>103</volume><fpage>2237</fpage><lpage>2242</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0510700103</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16467151</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Troutwine</surname><given-names>BR</given-names></name><name><surname>Gontarz</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Konjikusic</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Minowa</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Monstad-Rios</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sepich</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>RY</given-names></name><name><surname>Solnica-Krezel</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gray</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>The Reissner fiber is highly dynamic in vivo and controls morphogenesis of the spine</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>2353</fpage><lpage>2362</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32386529</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vaudry</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Do Rego</surname><given-names>J-C</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Mevel</surname><given-names>J-C</given-names></name><name><surname>Chatenet</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Tostivint</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Fournier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tonon</surname><given-names>M-C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pelletier</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Conlon</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Leprince</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Urotensin II, from fish to human</article-title><source>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</source><volume>1200</volume><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05514.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20633133</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="preprint"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vesque</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Anselme</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Pezeron</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantaut-Belarif</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Eschstruth</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Djebar</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Ribeuz</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Jenett</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Khoury</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Véziers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Parmentier</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schneider-Maunoury</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Loss of the Reissner Fiber and Increased URP Neuropeptide Signaling Underlie Scoliosis in a Zebrafish Ciliopathy Mutant</article-title><source>bioRxiv</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/2019.12.19.882258</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Troutwine</surname><given-names>BR</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Gray</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>The axonemal dynein heavy chain 10 gene is essential for monocilia motility and spine alignment in zebrafish</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>482</volume><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2021.12.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34915022</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wise</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Shoemaker</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gordon</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Herring</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Understanding genetic factors in idiopathic scoliosis, a complex disease of childhood</article-title><source>Current Genomics</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/138920208783884874</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19424484</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wishart</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name><name><surname>Kivlehan</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Neuromuscular scoliosis</article-title><source>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>547</fpage><lpage>556</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pmr.2021.02.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34175013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lam</surname><given-names>II</given-names></name><name><surname>Clay</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Duong</surname><given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Deo</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Coughlin</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>A rapid method for directed gene knockout for screening in G0 zebrafish</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>112</fpage><lpage>125</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2018.06.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29974860</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Chong</surname><given-names>YL</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>DZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Cilia-driven cerebrospinal fluid flow directs expression of urotensin neuropeptides to straighten the vertebrate body axis</article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>50</volume><fpage>1666</fpage><lpage>1673</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41588-018-0260-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30420648</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list><app-group><app id="appendix-1"><title>Appendix 1</title><table-wrap id="app1keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Appendix 1—key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Reagent type (species) or resource</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Designation</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Source or reference</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Identifiers</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DNA Clean and Concentrator Kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Zymo Research</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: D4013</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RNA Clean and Concentrator Kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Zymo Research</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: R1016</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Zymo Research</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: R2050</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: K0691</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: 4387406</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">MEGAshortscript T7 Transcription Kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: AM1354</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">HiScribe T7 High Yield <break/>RNA Synthesis Kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England Biolabs</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: E2040</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FS DNA Library Prep <break/>Kit for Illumina</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England Biolabs</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: E7805</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">HCR-RNA FISH <break/>Hybridization Buffer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Molecular Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">T7 Endonuclease I</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England Biolabs</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: E3321</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">HCR-RNA FISH <break/>Amplification Buffer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Molecular Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AlexaFluor-647 Hairpins</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Molecular Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AlexaFluor-546 Hairpins</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Molecular Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AlexaFluor-488 Hairpins</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Molecular Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1</italic> HCR-RNA FISH probe</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Molecular Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">Project-specific design</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2</italic> HCR-RNA FISH probe</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Molecular Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">Project-specific design</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>pkd2l1</italic> HCR-RNA FISH probe</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Molecular Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">Project-specific design</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Taq Polymerase</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England Biolabs</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: M0273</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TURBO DNase</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: AM2238</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Phusion High-Fidelity <break/>DNA Polymerase</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England Biolabs</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: M0530</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Phusion High-Fidelity <break/>PCR Master Mix</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">New England Biolabs</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: M0531</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">SYBR Green PCR Master Mix</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Thermo Fisher Scientific</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat no: 4309155</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>Danio rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AB strain</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">University of Oregon</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">WIK strain</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">University of Oregon</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TU strain</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">University of Oregon</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Jaffe et al., 2016</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ZDB-FISH-150901–23024</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Sternberg et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ZDB-FISH-160811–9</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>sspo-GFP<sup>ut24</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Troutwine et al., 2020</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ZDB-FISH-190313–20</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>D. rerio</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s3">Figure 2—figure supplement 3</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">3D Slicer</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Fedorov et al., 2012</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">IMARIS 9.9</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Oxford Instruments</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NIS-Elements</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Nikon Instruments Inc</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ZEN Software</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Carl Zeiss AG</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">QuantStudio Design <break/>and Analysis Software</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Applied Biosystems</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Integrated Genome <break/>Viewer (version 2.13.1)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Robinson et al., 2011</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bottom strand ultramer_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Tail ultramer for generating singe gRNA oligos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AAAAGCACCGACTCG<break/>GTGCCACTTTTTC<break/>AAGTTGATAACGGACT<break/>AGCCTTATTTT<break/>AACTTGCTAT</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1_gRNA_1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_1 oligo for generating <italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">taatacgactcactataGGCGT<break/>TGGTCAGCCTGACAT<break/>gttttagagctagaa</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1_gRNA_2</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_2 oligo for generating <italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">taatacgactcactataGGG<break/>TCCTCTGTCCATCTCCG<break/>gttttagagctagaa</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_gRNA_1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_1 oligo for generating <italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">taatacgactcactataGGCA<break/>GATGGAGAAAGATTGA<break/>gttttagagctagaa</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_gRNA_2</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_2 oligo for generating <italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">taatacgactcactataGGC<break/>GTTTGCAGAAATCAGCG<break/>gttttagagctagaa</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>uts2r3_gRNA</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA oligo for generating <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">taatacgactcactataGGG<break/>TGAAGGGGAAGAGAAGA<break/>gttttagagctagaa</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>sspo_gRNA_1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_1 oligo for generating <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">taatacgactcactataGGT<break/>CCCCAGTGGTCCGCG<break/>GTgttttagagctagaa</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>sspo_gRNA_2</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_2 oligo for generating <italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> line</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">taatacgactcactataGGCAC<break/>AGTGTGTGAGACCAG<break/>gttttagagctagaa</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bottom strand ultramer_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Tail ultramer for generating multiplexed gRNA oligos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AAAAGCACCGACTCGG<break/>TGCCACTTTTTC<break/>AAGTTGATAA<break/>CGGACTAGCCTTATT<break/>TTAACTTGCTATTTC<break/>TAGCTCTAAAAC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp1_F0_gRNA_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_1 oligo for generating <italic>urp1</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACTAT<break/>AGGAAAGTGAAGAT<break/>CGCGGCCGTTTTAG<break/>AGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp1_F0_gRNA_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_2 oligo for generating <italic>urp1</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACT<break/>ATAGGACACGG<break/>CTCTGCC<break/>ACAACGTTTTAGA<break/>GCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp1_F0_gRNA_3</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_3 oligo for generating <italic>urp1</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACTA<break/>TAGGTTCAGAAGC<break/>TGGTAGCAGGTTTTA<break/>GAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp1_F0_gRNA_4</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_4 oligo for generating <italic>urp1</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACT<break/>ATAGGGAAAATAAAT<break/>AACATGGTGTTTTA<break/>GAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp2_F0_gRNA_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_1 oligo for generating <italic>urp2</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACTA<break/>TAGGTGACTGTCGC<break/>TTCAATCGGTTTTAG<break/>AGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp2_F0_gRNA_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_2 oligo for generating <italic>urp2</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACT<break/>ATAGGGACATTTCCT<break/>GACGGAGAGTTTTA<break/>GAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp2_F0_gRNA_3</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_3 oligo for generating <italic>urp2</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACTA<break/>TAGGTGGACACGA<break/>GGAGACCGAGTTTT<break/>AGAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp2_F0_gRNA_4</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_4 oligo for generating <italic>urp2</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACT<break/>ATAGGTCACCAGGTAG<break/>TGACGGAGTTTTAG<break/>AGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">sspo_F0_gRNA_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_1 oligo for generating <italic>sspo</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACT<break/>ATAGGTTCGTCCCC<break/>AGTGGTCCGGTTTT<break/>AGAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">sspo_F0_gRNA_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_2 oligo for generating <italic>sspo</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACT<break/>ATAGGAAACGG<break/>CCGTCAGTGTCGGT<break/>TTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">sspo_F0_gRNA_3</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_3 oligo for generating <italic>sspo</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCAC<break/>TATAGGTGTTGC<break/>AACACCAACCGGGT<break/>TTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">sspo_F0_gRNA_4</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_4 oligo for generating <italic>sspo</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACT<break/>ATAGGAGCCTAGACC<break/>TGCTCACGGTTTTA<break/>GAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">cfap298_F0_gRNA_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_1 oligo for generating <italic>cfap298</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCAC<break/>TATAGGTTCTCTT<break/>CAACACTACGGGT<break/>TTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">cfap298_F0_gRNA_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_2 oligo for generating <italic>cfap298</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCAC<break/>TATAGGGCTCC<break/>ACAATCTGATCATG<break/>TTTTAGAGCTA<break/>GAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">cfap298_F0_gRNA_3</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_3 oligo for generating <italic>cfap298</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCAC<break/>TATAGGCATTC<break/>TTATTGGATCATGG<break/>TTTTAGAGCTA<break/>GAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">cfap298_F0_gRNA_4</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Wu et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">gRNA_4 oligo for generating <italic>cfap298</italic> F0 embryos</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAATACGACTCACT<break/>ATAGGTCTCTGG<break/>CAGGTGCGCCCGTT<break/>TTAGAGCTAGAAATAGC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pkd2l1_geno_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Sternberg et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TGTGTGCTAGG<break/>ACTGTGGGG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pkd2l1_geno_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Sternberg et al., 2018</xref></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AGGGCAAGAGAA<break/>TGGCAAGACG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp1_geno_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GCACCCAAAAT<break/>CCAACGACT</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp1_geno_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1<sup>b1420</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TGTATGGGGAA<break/>AACAAAGGCA</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp2_geno_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TTGGGGTTGT<break/>AACAGGTAGTG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">urp2_geno_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2<sup>b1421</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AACAAGGAAGA<break/>CGCTGCAAG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">uts2r3_geno_1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ATGGATCCCC<break/>TGATGTCCTG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">uts2r3_geno_2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TCGAACTCTGC<break/>TCATCCCAG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>sspo_geno_1</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">CGCAAACACTT<break/>CCACTTCCA</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>sspo_geno_2</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>sspo<sup>b1446</sup></italic> genotyping oligo 2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TTGAAGCCAGATGT<break/>AAAGGATGAGTGT</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1_gRNA1+2_T7E1_F</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GACAGCGCAC<break/>CCTTAATTGT</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1_gRNA1+2_T7E1_R</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ACATTTAGCCTT<break/>AACAAGCACAA</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1_gRNA3+4_T7E1_F</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">CAGACAAGGG<break/>AACAGAGAGGA</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1_gRNA3+4_T7E1_R</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">CCACTGCTTTTA<break/>AATCATCCACC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_gRNA1_T7E1_F</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ATCTTAGAGG<break/>CGCATTGGTG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_gRNA1_T7E1_R</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GCATGAGGCG<break/>GTTTGTTTTG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_gRNA2+3_T7E1_F</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TGAAGCAACT<break/>GAGGAGCAAA</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_gRNA2+3_T7E1_R</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ACAGTACAGTT<break/>CAGCACACCT</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_gRNA4_T7E1_F</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TGACCTATACATC<break/>AAAGCCAAGG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_gRNA4_T7E1_R</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer to amplify genomic DNA for T7E1 assay in crispants</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">CCTGGGCTGA<break/>TCATACCTCT</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>rpl13_qPCR_F</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer for quantitative RT-PCR</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TAAGGACGGAG<break/>TGAACAACCA</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>rpl13_qPCR_R</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer for quantitative RT-PCR</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">CTTACGTCTGC<break/>GGATCTTTCTG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1_qPCR_F</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer for quantitative RT-PCR</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ACATTCTGG<break/>CTGTGGTTTG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp1_qPCR_R</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer for quantitative RT-PCR</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GTCCGTCTTCA<break/>ACCTCTGCTAC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_qPCR_F</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Forward primer for quantitative RT-PCR</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">AGAGGAAACA<break/>GCAATGGACG</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sequence-based reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>urp2_qPCR_R</italic></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This Study</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Reverse primer for quantitative RT-PCR</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">TGTTGGTTTTG<break/>GTTGACG</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></app></app-group></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.83883.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>Editor's evaluation</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bronner</surname><given-names>Marianne E</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05dxps055</institution-id><institution>California Institute of Technology</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>This is a beautifully executed study on the role of Urp signaling in spine morphogenesis in zebrafish. This work challenges the model that Urp1/ 2 controls the extension and straightening of the body axis of the zebrafish embryos, and thus makes a significant contribution to the literature.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.83883.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Bronner</surname><given-names>Marianne E</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05dxps055</institution-id><institution>California Institute of Technology</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text id="sa2-box1"><p>In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.</p></boxed-text><p>[Editors' note: this paper was reviewed by <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.reviewcommons.org/">Review Commons</ext-link>.]</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.83883.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><p>General Statements</p><p>We were immensely pleased that the reviewers considered our conclusions “well supported” and our study “beautifully executed”. Reviewers also recognized the significance of our work. Reviewer 1 stated that “building a model that describes one of these pathways will allow us to begin to test therapies to treat or prevent scoliosis” then noted that we “help to build a larger model of normal spine morphogenesis” and that this is “important”. Reviewer 2 called our work an “exciting advance in our understanding of one of the essential signaling pathways that help regulate body axis straightening and spine morphogenesis in zebrafish” and mentioned that our work “may also help to further our understanding of the etiology and pathophysiology of multiple forms of neuromuscular scoliosis in humans”. Reviewer 3 agreed, stating that our work “adds important information on the role of urotensin signaling in spine formation” and noted that it is timely: “findings are of special significance in the light of recent reports that mutations in UTS2R3 show association with spinal curvature in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis”.</p><p>We thank the three reviewers for reading our research and providing feedback. In all cases, we have incorporated their suggestions, and we believe this has made our manuscript much stronger. Indeed, reviewers had only a small number of “major points”, and all have now been addressed. We have also addressed all “minor points” raised by reviewers.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Major points</p><p>Reviewer 1</p><p>The key conclusions are well supported, see below for my two major issues.</p><p>1. Please don't call this lordosis. Lordosis or hyperlordosis effects lumbar vertebra. The curve in the lumbar region shifts body weight so that human gait is more efficient that in the great apes, or so the story goes. Zebrafish do not have lumbar vertebra equivalents or a natural curve in the caudal region. Similarly, fish do not have the equivalent vertebra to generate kyphosis, which is again a hyper flexion of a normal human spinal curve. Instead zebrafish have Weberian, precaudal and caudal vertebra. It would be so much more useful for the field if the authors used these terms and specified ranges, i.e. numbered vertebrae, that are effected so we can directly and accurately compare regions of defects between zebrafish mutants. It would help to make the point that the uts2r3 mutant has more caudally located curves than urp1/2 double mutants.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree with the reviewer and have made changes in line with their suggestions. For example, at the end of the abstract, we have changed “new animal models of lordosis-like curves” to “new animal models of spine deformity”; at the end of the Introduction, we say “mutants model human spinal deformity” rather than “mutants model a lordosis-like condition”.</p><p>We have also added a new paragraph to the Discussion about whether zebrafish can truly model scoliosis, lordosis and kyphosis which, among other points, mentions some of what the reviewer brought up about lumbar vs. caudal vertebral differences.</p><p>When we do mention lordosis (less often than previously) in the text, we are careful to say “lordosis-like” and we fully explain what we mean by this, including the aspects of the zebrafish phenotypes that are not lordosis-like. Last, when describing our phenotypes, we now use the appropriate names for zebrafish vertebrae, i.e., caudal rather than lumbar.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>2. The observation that urp1/2 double mutants have curves only in the D/V plane and almost completely lack side-to-side curves is noteworthy. Does the urp1-/-urp2-/- mutant uncouple two systems for posture? If this separate a DV from side-to-side postural control system, that would be very interesting. It is particularly important to describe how penetrant the phenotype is and how many times it was observed. See 9 minor comments. It would help the reader if the authors explicitly described the features that they see in the cfap298 mutant that constitute lateral curves and that are lacking in urp1/2 (e.g. in figure 4E).</p></disp-quote><p>To address this comment, we have supplied more data on the extent of lateral curvature in <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> and <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants and, in the new version, also <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> and <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup>;urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> triple mutants. These new data are:</p><p>New data showing the extent of lateral curvature in various mutant conditions (manuscript <italic>Figure 4Fi-Fii</italic>).</p><p>Additionally, in the interests of making all of our data available, we provide a supplementary figure showing all scans performed that were used to analyze lateral curvature where we also note the sex of the fish. See new <italic>Figure 4—figure supplement 1</italic>.</p><p>In agreement with our previous observations, <italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic> mutants indeed exhibit significantly more lateral curvature than <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> or <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants. Thus, these mutants may uncouple two systems for posture, as the reviewer suggests. We now note this possibility in the Discussion.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer 2</p><p>1. Need to show that the CRISPANT targeting was effective for mutagenesis at each loci screened in the work presented in Figure 1E.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now performed T7 endonuclease assays (as also suggested by Reviewer 3) to assess mutagenesis in crispants. These assays revealed significant insertion-deletion mutations at all gRNA targeting sites as well as cases of large deletions between sites.</p><p>New data demonstrating that <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> targeting was effective for mutagenesis (see also <italic>Figure 1—figure supplement 2C-D</italic>):</p><p>These data are referenced in the main text in the following way: “Using T7 endonuclease assays, we confirmed that high levels of insertion-deletion mutations were generated at gRNA sites in crispants (<italic>Figure 1—figure supplement 2C-D</italic>).”</p><p>Overall, the evidence we have that Urp1 and Urp2 peptides do not contribute to axial straightening is:</p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p><italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> single and double mutants (and maternal-zygotic mutants) show normal axial straightening. These mutants completely lack the coding region for the Urp1 and Urp2 peptides.</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> crispants with significant indels (as assessed by T7E1 assays) also showed normal straightening. By contrast, all other positive control crispants showed expected axial phenotypes.</p></list-item><list-item><p>A preprint produced independently of our work also generated <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> mutants and also reported lack of axial defects (Gaillard et al., 2022 – <italic>BioRxiv</italic>).</p></list-item></list><p>Thus, we conclude that Urp1 and Urp2 are dispensable for axial straightening in zebrafish. We devote several paragraphs in our Discussion to this somewhat unexpected finding.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer 3</p><p>1. The addition of the F0 crispant experiment to show that the pro-peptide of urp1/2 does not have a function and is responsible for the difference between the observed morpholino and the crispr phenotype was important. However, since no phenotype was observed in crispants it is important to add evidence of induced cuts for all guide RNAs used in the crispant experiment. These control experiments might have been done already. If not, they can easily be done in a short period of time by performance of T7 assays on injected fish and would not require additional reagents.</p></disp-quote><p>Please see response to Reviewer 2 above including Figure1-figure supplement 2. In summary, we have now performed the suggested T7 assays and they indicated that indels were indeed generated in <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> crispants (in the manuscript, now described in <italic>Figure 1—figure supplement 2C-D</italic>).</p><p>Overall, the evidence we have that Urp1 and Urp2 peptides do not contribute to axial straightening is:</p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p><italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> single and double mutants (and maternal-zygotic mutants) show normal axial straightening. These mutants completely lack the coding region for the Urp1 and Urp2 peptides.</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> crispants with significant indels (as assessed by T7E1 assays) also showed normal straightening. By contrast, all other positive control crispants showed expected axial phenotypes.</p></list-item><list-item><p>A preprint produced independently of our work also generated <italic>urp1</italic> and <italic>urp2</italic> mutants and also reported lack of axial defects (Gaillard et al., 2022 – <italic>BioRxiv</italic>).</p></list-item></list><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>2. The authors claim that there were no structural defects observed in urp1/2 double mutants. However, the hemal arch in figure 3 E seems to be deformed. This could be normal variance or a phenotype. This can be addressed by simple reinspection of the scans.</p></disp-quote><p>Reinspection of the scans shows no significant hemal arch defects in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants. We now explicitly state this in the text. We also note that we do not see significant vertebral defects such as fusions or hemivertebrae and nor do we see any patterning defects at 10 dpf based on calcein staining. Additionally, we have added vertebral body shape quantitation (length and height aspect ratios):</p><p>New data showing vertebral body shape quantitation (see also <italic>Figure 3F</italic>)</p><p>Since these structural changes are subtle, and we do not observe vertebral patterning changes based on calcein staining at earlier time points, we conclude that the vertebral structural changes are not causative in spinal curvature but rather are a consequence of the presence of curves.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Minor points</p><p>Reviewer 1</p><p>3. Supplementary FigS3B How to measure the Cobb Angle is unclear. Why is the first curve not counted? I count 3 curves. First a ventral displacement, then a dorsal to ventral return, then a sharp flex before the tail. How to measure Cobb angle might be easier to explain if the figure is expanded into steps. Identify the apical vertebra, then showing how the lines are drawn parallel to those vertebrae, then where the measured angle forms between the lines perpendicular to the drawn parallel lines.</p></disp-quote><p>We have now redrawn our schematic figure more thoroughly explained how Cobb angle is measured with the following figure and figure legend.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>5a. I think we (zebrafish biologists) need be explicit about what we mean with &quot;without vertebral defects.&quot; What do we count as defects? Vertebrae can be fused, bent, shortened or the growing edges can be slanted. In Figure 3E, and movie7, it is clear that the highlighted mutant vertebrae are shorter than WT. The growing ends of normal vertebra are perpendicular to the long axis of the vertebra. In the mutants the ends are slanted. Please define in the text what you consider a relevant vertebral defect, because these vertebrae have defects. Or are you only considering the calcein stained centra at 10dpf?</p></disp-quote><p>We have made textual edits to clearly state that we do not see vertebral fusions or missing appendages. We have also added vertebral body length and height aspect ratios to quantify vertebrae shape and find subtle changes in the variance of vertebral body length aspect ratios in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants (see <italic>Figure 3F</italic> in the new manuscript). Since these structural changes are subtle, and we do not observe vertebral patterning changes based on calcein staining at earlier time points, we conclude that the vertebral structural changes are not causative in spinal curvature but rather are a consequence of the presence of curves.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>5b. Do you want to base your patterning conclusion on primarily the calcein data as these are closer to the notochord patterning time window. Please anchor this conclusion to a specific time or standard length e.g. 10dpf/5.6mm.</p></disp-quote><p>We now note the time window when calcein was performed and provide the standard lengths of fish analyzed. As such, our conclusion about vertebral patterning is now anchored to the standard length, as the reviewer suggested:</p><p>“Staining of juveniles with the vital dye calcein revealed no defects in vertebral patterning or spacing in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants at 10 dpf (4.5-6 mm standard length [<italic>Figure 3C</italic>]) (<italic>Figure 3F</italic>).”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>6. &quot;At 30 dpf… several mutants exhibited a significant curve in the pre-caudal vertebrae, in addition to a caudal curve (Figure 3D and S3C). Since pre-caudal curves were rare in mutants at 3-months, this suggested that curve location is dynamic&quot;. The frequency of this observation is important. Does it effect all or a fraction of mutants? Can you provide some numbers to anchor these observations? Maybe fractions e.g.. 3 of 4 fish had precaudal curves at 30pdf, and 0 of 10 fish had precaudal curves by 3 mpf?</p></disp-quote><p>We have now analyzed more 1 mpf fish by µCT and we observe that 5 of 7 exhibit pre-caudal curves:</p><p>New data showing spinal curves are variable in 1 mpf <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants (see also <italic>Figure 3—figure supplement 1</italic>).</p><p>These data are also mentioned in our revised text. By contrast to the significant pre-caudal curves at 1 mpf, 3 mpf fish showed predominantly caudal curves (<italic>Figure 2F</italic>). Only 2 of 9 fish analyzed by µCT at 3 mpf were scored as exhibiting an “apex of curve” vertebrae in the precaudal vertebrae, and in both of those cases the curve was at the very end of the precaudals. This reinforces our conclusion that curve position is dynamic through growth.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>7. The description of the pkd2l1 mutant, instead of terming it kyphosis can you tell the reader the vertebra number at the peak of the curve. The authors say the pkd2l1 mutant is highly distinct from urp1/urp2-/-, but the reader needs to hear exactly what is distinct. For example, does this mutant have both lateral and D/V curves?</p></disp-quote><p>We have now scanned several <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutant fish include images of <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants at two different timepoints (3 mpf and 12 mpf; see new <italic>Figure 2—figure supplement 2</italic>). Our results agreed with those previously published for the <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutant line (Sternberg et al., 2018) but we believe it is important to include our data so readers can see side-by-side images of the various mutant conditions using the same skeleton visualization technique.</p><p>At 3 mpf, <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants essentially appeared wild-type but by 12 mpf they had developed very subtle D/V curves in the pre-caudal vertebrae. They do not exhibit M/L curves at either stage.</p><p>We called the phenotype displayed by <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants “kyphosis” to be in line with a previous publication describing these mutants (Sternberg et al., 2018). We have now added new wording in the Discussion about whether or not zebrafish can truly model kyphosis and lordosis, and we now make clear in our Results that the “mutants went on to develop very subtle kyphosis-like curves” rather than “is kyphosis”.</p><p>It is intriguing that <italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic> mutants do not exhibit any curves until much later in life than <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants. Inspired by this finding, we aged <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> single mutants and found that they go on to develop D/V curves by 12 mpf, with <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants being less severe than <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> mutants (<italic>Figure 2—figure supplement 2</italic>). To summarize all of our findings:</p><table-wrap id="sa2table1" position="float"><label>Author response table 1.</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th/><th>3-months</th><th>12-months</th><th>Position of curve</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">no curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">mild D/V curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">Mostly caudal</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">mild D/V curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">intermediate D/V curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">Mostly caudal</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">severe D/V curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">severe D/V curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">Mostly caudal</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">severe D/V curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">severe D/V curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">Mostly caudal</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>cfap298<sup>tm304</sup></italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">severe 3D curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">severe 3D curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">Caudal and pre-caudal</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>pkd2l1<sup>icm02</sup></italic></td><td align="left" valign="top">no curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">very mild D/V curves</td><td align="left" valign="top">Mostly pre-caudal</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Phenotypes in <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup></italic> and <italic>urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> single mutants upon aging shows: (1) Urp1 and Urp2 are not entirely redundant in long-term spine maintenance and (2) proper Urp1/Urp2 dose is essential. We have now included these new insights.</p><p>This is an interesting question. To address it, we imaged more <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutant spines and reconstructed views from dorsal aspect, including these in new <italic>Figure 4Fi and Figure 4—figure supplement 1</italic>. We also quantified the degree of lateral curvature (<italic>Figure 4Fii</italic>). The reviewer’s suggestion is correct – there are minimal side-to-side curves in <italic>uts2r3<sup>b1436</sup></italic> mutants, highly similar to what we found for <italic>urp1<sup>∆P</sup>;urp2<sup>∆P</sup></italic> double mutants.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>9. One finding that deserves more discussion is the observation that urp1/urp2 double mutants have almost no side-to-side defects and all the obvious bends are in the D/V plane. Does this uncouple two systems for posture? Please consider the following paper. It shows a proprioception system that maintains normal side-to-side posture. A spinal organ of proprioception for integrated motor action feedback.</p><p>Picton LD, Bertuzzi M, Pallucchi I, Fontanel P, Dahlberg E, Björnfors ER, Iacoviello F, Shearing PR, El Manira A. Neuron. 2021 Apr 7;109(7):1188-1201.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Feb 11. PMID: 33577748</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for pointing out this manuscript. We have now mentioned this potential “uncoupling” in our Discussion and included this citation.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer 2</p><p>1. Figure 3F: might be improved by making the images black and white and possibly inverted. It is not easy to clearly see the vertebrae as is.</p></disp-quote><p>Thanks for the suggestion, we made this change.</p></body></sub-article></article>