<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">84006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.84006</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>High-resolution structures with bound Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> map the metal import pathway in an Nramp transporter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-296965"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>Shamayeeta</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7906-0572</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-296967"><name><surname>Berry</surname><given-names>Samuel P</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-296968"><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>Eric A</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-296969"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Casey H</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="pa1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-296970"><name><surname>Shekhar</surname><given-names>Mrinal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-296971"><name><surname>Singharoy</surname><given-names>Abhishek</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-228585"><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>Rachelle</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-054X</contrib-id><email>gaudet@mcb.harvard.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03vek6s52</institution-id><institution>Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Cambridge</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03efmqc40</institution-id><institution>School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Tempe</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05a0ya142</institution-id><institution>Broad Institute</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Cambridge</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Maduke</surname><given-names>Merritt</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00f54p054</institution-id><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Swartz</surname><given-names>Kenton J</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01cwqze88</institution-id><institution>National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><fn fn-type="present-address" id="pa1"><label>†</label><p>Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, United States</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>11</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><elocation-id>e84006</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-10-07"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2023-04-06"><day>06</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint at .</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2022-09-09"><day>09</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.08.507188"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2023, Ray et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Ray et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-84006-v2.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-84006-figures-v2.pdf"/><abstract><p>Transporters of the Nramp (Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein) family import divalent transition metal ions into cells of most organisms. By supporting metal homeostasis, Nramps prevent diseases and disorders related to metal insufficiency or overload. Previous studies revealed that Nramps take on a LeuT fold and identified the metal-binding site. We present high-resolution structures of <italic>Deinococcus radiodurans</italic> (Dra)Nramp in three stable conformations of the transport cycle revealing that global conformational changes are supported by distinct coordination geometries of its physiological substrate, Mn<sup>2+</sup>, across conformations, and by conserved networks of polar residues lining the inner and outer gates. In addition, a high-resolution Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structure highlights differences in how Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup> are coordinated by DraNramp. Complementary metal binding studies using isothermal titration calorimetry with a series of mutated DraNramp proteins indicate that the thermodynamic landscape for binding and transporting physiological metals like Mn<sup>2+</sup> is different and more robust to perturbation than for transporting the toxic Cd<sup>2+</sup> metal. Overall, the affinity measurements and high-resolution structural information on metal substrate binding provide a foundation for understanding the substrate selectivity of essential metal ion transporters like Nramps.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>Deinococcus radiodurans</kwd><kwd>transition metal ion transport</kwd><kwd>Nramp transporters</kwd><kwd>x-ray crystallography</kwd><kwd>isothermal titration calorimetry</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd><italic>E. coli</italic></kwd><kwd>Other</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000057</institution-id><institution>National Institute of General Medical Sciences</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01GM120996</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>Rachelle</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001</institution-id><institution>National Science Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>MCB-1942763</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Singharoy</surname><given-names>Abhishek</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001</institution-id><institution>National Science Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>1764269</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Berry</surname><given-names>Samuel P</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Structures of a transition metal transporter spanning the entire Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle reveal distinct coordination geometries and dynamic polar networks that enable Mn<sup>2+</sup> import, and a Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structure helps explain how Cd<sup>2+</sup> behaves differently as a substrate.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Transition metal ions like Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Fe<sup>2+</sup> are essential for various metabolic processes in all living cells and are usually required in low intracellular concentrations for optimal activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Andrews, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>). Excess or deficiency of transition metal ions leads to diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Bleackley and Macgillivray, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Nies and Grass, 2009</xref>). For example, Fe<sup>2+</sup> deficiency causes anemia and neurodegenerative diseases, whereas Fe<sup>2+</sup> overload increases the risk of cancer by generating toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mutations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Ekiz et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Jung et al., 2015</xref>). Mn<sup>2+</sup> overload in the brain is linked to neurological disorders and deficiency causes metabolic defects and impairs growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Budinger et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Pittman, 2005</xref>). Other transitions metals, like Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Hg<sup>2+</sup>, are toxic and their accumulation affects health by disrupting the physiological levels of essential metals or displacing them in enzyme active sites, thus inhibiting the proteins, or changing their activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Andrews, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Lin et al., 2009</xref>). Cells and organisms have evolved strategies to maintain metal ion homeostasis via highly regulated transport and storage processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Bleackley and Macgillivray, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cellier and Gros, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Nies and Grass, 2009</xref>).</p><p>Natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (Nramps) are ubiquitous importers of Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup> across cellular membranes into the cytosol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cellier and Gros, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Nevo and Nelson, 2006</xref>). In humans, Nramp1 extrudes essential metals from phagosomes of macrophages to aid in killing engulfed pathogens, and Nramp2 (DMT1) is expressed at low levels in the endosomes of all nucleated cells and imports Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Fe<sup>2+</sup> into the cytosol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Pujol-Giménez et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Skamene et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Vidal et al., 1993</xref>). Plant and fungal Nramps aid in Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup> uptake and trafficking, and bacterial Nramps are involved in the acquisition of Mn<sup>2+</sup>, an essential nutrient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>). In addition to the physiological substrates Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup>, Nramps can also transport toxic metals like Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Hg<sup>2+</sup> but exclude the abundant alkaline earth metals like Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>).</p><p>Recent bacterial Nramp structures reveal a LeuT fold, three stable conformations (outward-open, occluded, and inward-open), and identify the metal-binding site residues, including conserved aspartate, asparagine, and methionine residues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2017</xref>). The metal-binding methionine is essential to select against alkaline earth metals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>). This finding is corroborated by the fact that a bacterial Nramp homolog which lacks a metal-binding methionine, NRMT (Nramp-related Mg<sup>2+</sup> transporter), can transport Mg<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Ramanadane et al., 2022</xref>). However, little is known about whether the canonical Nramps can mechanistically distinguish between their physiological substrates (Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup>) from non-essential ones like Cd<sup>2+</sup> within their broad spectrum of transition metal substrates. Functional studies on <italic>Deinococcus radiodurans</italic> (Dra)Nramp revealed that Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> transport differ in their dependence on pH, proton flux, and membrane potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>). However, we lack high-resolution structural information on binding of different metals to explain these differences.</p><p>We present high-resolution structures of DraNramp in three conformations in both Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound and metal-free states, providing the first molecular map of the entire Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle. The structures along with molecular simulations reveal that Nramps achieve alternate access during transport by adopting distinct Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination spheres in different conformations. These different conformations are also supported by dynamic rearrangements of key polar-residue networks that gate the inner and outer vestibules. This Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle also informs on the transport of Fe<sup>2+</sup>, the other common physiological Nramp substrate, because Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup> have similar coordination preferences and chemical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Davidsson et al., 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Kawabata, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). Comparisons with an additional high-resolution structure of DraNramp bound to a non-physiological substrate, Cd<sup>2+</sup>, and complementary binding and transport measurements and mutational analyses, suggest that Nramps can distinguish physiological from toxic substrates through thermodynamic differences in the conformational landscape of the transport cycle.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>DraNramp transports a mostly dehydrated Mn<sup>2+</sup> ion</title><p>To visualize how the metal substrate is coordinated in Nramps, we determined crystal structures of DraNramp using lipid-mesophase based techniques (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1a</xref>). We obtained a structure of wildtype (WT) DraNramp in an occluded state bound to Mn<sup>2+</sup> at 2.38 Å by soaking crystals with Mn<sup>2+</sup> (WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A–B</xref>). We resolved a comparable structure using co-crystallization with Mn<sup>2+</sup> and the inward-locking mutation A47W (A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1b</xref>; Cα RMSD=0.47 Å; all pairwise RMSD values listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1c</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>). The similarity of both structures, including a nearly identical Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A</xref>), suggests that the observations we make based on these two structures are robust. Both structures superimpose best with the published occluded metal-free G45R structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>). Although the inner vestibule is occluded in both structures, WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> differ in their TM1a position, with WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> nearly identical to G45R whereas the A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> TM1a is displaced within the inner vestibule, likely to accommodate the bulky tryptophan sidechain. Therefore, we generally used the WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> structure for analysis of the occluded state. As in the metal-free G45R, the Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound occluded structures have a completely sealed outer vestibule and a partially closed inner vestibule, with the Mn<sup>2+</sup> occluded from bulk solvent (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>The occluded structure of DraNramp reveals a largely dehydrated Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Cartoon representation of WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> in an occluded state. Anomalous signal confirmed the presence of Mn<sup>2+</sup> in both the orthosteric metal-binding site and an additional site at the mouth of the external vestibule (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A</xref>) which is less conserved across the Nramp family (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3</xref>). TM1 and TM6 are labeled. (<bold>B</bold>) Detail of the orthosteric metal-binding site of WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> where D56, N59, M230, and the pseudo-symmetrically related carbonyls of A53 and A227 coordinate the Mn<sup>2+</sup> ion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1B</xref>). A water molecule completes the six-ligand coordination sphere. Coordinating residues are shown as sticks, and coordinating distances are indicated in Å. (<bold>C</bold>) ITC measurement of the affinity of WT DraNramp for Mn<sup>2+</sup>. Top graph shows heat absorbed upon injection of Mn<sup>2+</sup> solution to the protein solution. Bottom graph shows the fit of the integrated and corrected heat to a binding isotherm. The data show an endothermic mode of binding and fits best with a two-site sequential binding model. The figure shows one of three measurements and the average K<sub>d</sub> values ± SEM (K<sub>d1</sub>=190±30 µM, K<sub>d2</sub>=1970±520 µM; see Appendix 1). Based on ITC experiments comparing Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding to WT or DraNramp constructs with mutations at the external site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2A</xref>), we assigned K<sub>d1</sub> to the orthosteric site. In all figures, unless otherwise noted, TMs 1, 5, 6, and 10 are pale yellow, TMs 2, 7, and 11 gray, TMs 3, 4, 8, and 9 light blue, and Mn<sup>2+</sup> atoms are magenta spheres.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Multiple sequence alignment of 6172 Nramp homologs.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig1-data1-v2.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata2"><label>Figure 1—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Nramp homologs built with RAxML-NG.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig1-data2-v2.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata3"><label>Figure 1—source data 3.</label><caption><title>Raw data of metal ion uptake into proteoliposomes measured at four ΔΨ values for each DraNramp construct.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig1-data3-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Structure of Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding at the orthosteric and external sites of DraNramp.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) 2F<sub>o</sub>-F<sub>c</sub> (gray mesh; 1σ) and peaks from anomalous difference Fourier (magenta mesh; 4.5σ) maps calculated from the WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> structures, respectively show Mn<sup>2+</sup> bound at two sites, the orthosteric site (top) and an external site coordinated by D296 and D369 near the N-termini of EH2 and TM10, respectively (bottom). (<bold>B</bold>) Topology diagram showing the secondary structure organization of DraNramp with its characteristic LeuT fold, where TMs 1–5 and 6–10 form two pseudosymmetric inverted repeats. One intracellular helix, IH, and two extracellular helices, EH1 and EH2, connect TMs 2–3, 5–6, and 7–8, respectively. Black spheres indicate A53 in TM1a and A227 in TM6a, the two Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordinating backbone carbonyls in the occluded state of DraNramp, one in each inverted repeat. Mn<sup>2+</sup> is shown as magenta sphere.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig1-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Affinity of Mn<sup>2+</sup> for the orthosteric and external sites of DraNramp and transport activity of external-site variants.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) ITC measurements of Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding to A47W (which behaves like WT) and WT (reproduced here from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> for comparison) which fit best to a two-site sequential binding model, and D296A and D369A (constructs with point mutations to either of the external site aspartates), which were fit using a one-site model with a fixed n=1 (and did not fit with a two-site model). The resulting K<sub>d</sub> values for D296A and D369A are more similar to K<sub>d1</sub> of WT, indicating that the orthosteric site has higher Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding affinity compared to the external site. The figure shows one of 2–3 measurements and the average K<sub>d</sub> values ± SEM (see Appendix 1). (<bold>B</bold>) Initial metal uptake rates for DraNramp mutants at membrane potentials ranging from ΔΨ=0 to −120 mV (n=3; each data point is represented in the scatter plots and the black bars are the mean values). The metal ion concentration was 750 μM, and the pH was 7 on both sides of the membrane. D296A and D369A moderately reduced the initial transport rate at high membrane potentials. The overall trends are similar for both metals. Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport showed higher voltage dependence than Cd<sup>2+</sup> transport. Corresponding time traces are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s4">Figure 1—figure supplement 4</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig1-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>The external metal-binding site in DraNramp is somewhat conserved in clade A homologs, but poorly conserved across all Nramps.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) External site architecture in the G223W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (outward-open), WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (occluded), M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> (inward-open) structures showing positions of D296 and D369 across conformations, illustrating that the two residues are farther apart in the outward-open structure and cannot bind metal. Metal-coordinating distances are listed in Å. (<bold>B</bold>) A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree illustrating evolutionary divergence of the Nramp family into several major clades for prokaryotes (clades <bold>A</bold>, <bold>B and C</bold>) and eukaryotes. (<bold>C</bold>) Frequencies of acidic and other polar amino acids in the loop regions surrounding D296 (left; loop preceding EH2) and D369 (right; loop preceding TM10) across phylogenetic clades, based on the sequence alignment used to build the tree in panel B (bacterial clade A, DraNramp numbering; bacterial clade B, <italic>Bacteroides fragilis</italic> MntH numbering; bacterial clade C, ScaDMT numbering; eukaryotic clade, human Nramp2 numbering). Across all clades, these two external loops have a high concentration of acidic amino acids. However, the exact positions of acidic residues observed in DraNramp—296 and 369 (arrowheads)—are not highly conserved except 369 in bacterial clades A and B, which is an aspartate, asparagine, or glutamate in most sequences (92.1% and 87.8% in clades A and B, respectively) (<bold>D</bold>) APBS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Jurrus et al., 2018</xref>)-generated electrostatic surface potential of the outward-open structure viewed from the extracellular side illustrates that D296 and D369 contribute to a funnel of negative charge leading into the orthosteric binding site.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig1-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title>Representative time traces of metal ion uptake into proteoliposomes (n=2–3) measured at four ΔΨ values for each DraNramp construct.</title><p>(<bold>A, B</bold>) Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<bold>A</bold>) and Cd<sup>2+</sup> (<bold>B</bold>) uptake for WT and mutant DraNramp constructs. (<bold>C</bold>) Representative time traces of Mn<sup>2+</sup> (left) and Cd<sup>2+</sup> (right) uptake (n=3) shows that no metal was imported into control liposomes. The initial metal uptake rates calculated from these time traces are in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s4">Figure 5—figure supplement 4F</xref>. The source data for all plots are provided as <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata3">Figure 1—source data 3</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig1-figsupp4-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table1" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><title>Data collection and refinement statistics for four new DraNramp structures.</title></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="top">StructureConformationBound metal ion substratePDB ID</th><th align="left" valign="top">WT<sub>soak</sub>Occluded none8E5V</th><th align="left" valign="top">WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>OccludedMn<sup>2+</sup>8E60</th><th align="left" valign="top">M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>Inward openMn<sup>2+</sup>8E6I</th><th align="left" valign="top">WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>Inward openCd<sup>2+</sup>8E6M</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><bold>Data Collection</bold></td><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Beamline</td><td align="left" valign="top">GMCA 23IDB</td><td align="left" valign="top">GMCA 23IDB</td><td align="left" valign="top">GMCA 23IDB</td><td align="left" valign="top">NECAT 24IDC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Wavelength (Å)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.033</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.033</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.033</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.984</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Resolution range (Å)</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="top">41.23–2.36 (2.44–2.36)</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="top">41.28–2.38 (2.46–2.38)</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="top">45.32–2.52 (2.61–2.52)</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="top">45.54–2.48 (2.57–2.48)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Space group</td><td align="left" valign="top">P 2 21 21</td><td align="left" valign="top">P 2 21 21</td><td align="left" valign="top">P 2 21 21</td><td align="left" valign="top">P 2 21 21</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Unit cell (<italic>a, b, c</italic>)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">58.95, 71.04, 98.77</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">59.08, 71.10, 98.75</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">58.67, 71.35, 98.59</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">59.14, 71.37, 99.05</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Unit cell (α, β, γ)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">90, 90, 90</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">90, 90, 90</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">90, 90, 90</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">90, 90, 90</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Number of crystals</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Total reflections</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">58744 (5928)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">57472 (5733)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">146077 (14913)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">76829 (7275)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Unique reflections</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">17477 (1718)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">16468 (1646)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">14548 (1427)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">15351 (1507)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Redundancy</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3.4 (3.4)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3.5 (3.5)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">10.0 (10.4)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">5.0 (4.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Completeness (%)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">98.71 (98.85)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">95.11 (96.92)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">99.90 (99.79)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">99.03 (99.47)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Mean <italic>I/σ (I</italic>)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">8.89 (0.97)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">8.92 (0.89)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">8.47 (0.75)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">9.90 (1.12)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Wilson <italic>B</italic>-factor</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">49.97</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">50.55</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">54.29</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">49.52</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>R</italic><sub>merge</sub></td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.106 (1.292)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.109 (1.241)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.269 (2.475)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.158 (1.626)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>R</italic><sub>meas</sub></td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.127 (1.511)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.127 (1.447)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.284 (2.603)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.178 (1.831)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>R</italic><sub>pim</sub></td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.067 (0.759)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.063 (0.722)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.090 (0.800)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.078 (0.816)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">CC1/2</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.99 (0.37)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.99 (0.39)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.98 (0.34)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.99 (0.34)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><bold>Refinement</bold></td><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Resolution range (Å)</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="top">41.23–2.36 (2.44–2.36)</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="top">41.28–2.38 (2.46–2.38)</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="top">45.32–2.52 (2.61–2.52)</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="top">45.54–2.48 (2.57–2.48)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">No. reflections</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">17441 (1714)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">16438 (1636)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">14547 (1425)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">15291 (1507)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">No. reflections in <italic>R</italic><sub>free</sub></td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1743 (171)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1642 (164)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1454 (143)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1530 (151)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>R</italic><sub>work</sub></td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.217 (0.340)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.207 (0.316)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.225 (0.313)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.202 (0.319)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>R</italic><sub>free</sub></td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.245 (0.350)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.259 (0.358)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.266 (0.349)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.250 (0.354)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Number of atoms</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3449</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3385</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3451</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3321</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Protein</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2945</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2933</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2934</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2905</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Ligand</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">443</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">405</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">448</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">362</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Water</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">61</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">47</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">69</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">54</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Protein Residues</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">392</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">393</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">392</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">388</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Ramachandran plot</td><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Favored (%)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">98.46</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">98.47</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">98.21</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">98.96</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Allowed (%)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.54</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.53</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.79</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.04</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Outliers (%)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Rotamer outliers (%)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.33</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.00</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.01</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.01</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Clashscore</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">8.25</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">8.97</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">7.15</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">5.57</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">RMS (bonds)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.002</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.002</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.002</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">RMS (angles)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.43</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.46</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.43</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Average <italic>B</italic>-factor</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">65.12</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">64.98</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">66.61</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">64.82</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Protein</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">63.36</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">63.23</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">65.04</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">62.68</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Ligand</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">77.99</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">78.48</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">77.70</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">83.11</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">Water</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">56.34</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">58.24</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">61.33</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">57.45</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top">No. of TLS groups</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">8</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">3</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>Values in parentheses are for highest-resolution shell. Data for M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> merge reflections from three crystals. Data for the other structures were obtained from a single crystal. See <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1a</xref> for details on soaking or co-crystallization procedures for bound metal ion substrates.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>Anomalous difference Fourier maps confirmed presence of Mn<sup>2+</sup> at the canonical, orthosteric Nramp metal-binding site between the unwound regions of TM1 and TM6 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1d</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A</xref>). In WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, the Mn<sup>2+</sup> is coordinated by conserved residues D56, N59, and M230, and backbone carbonyls of A53 and A227 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1e</xref>). A53 and A227 are pseudosymmetrically related in the inverted repeats of the LeuT fold of DraNramp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1B</xref>). The coordination sphere is completed by a water bridging Mn<sup>2+</sup> with Q378, a residue previously proposed to directly coordinate Mn<sup>2+</sup> in the occluded state (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>). This yields a coordination number of 6, typical for Mn<sup>2+</sup>, and a largely dehydrated metal-binding site with a distorted octahedral Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination geometry (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1f</xref>), as often observed in other Mn<sup>2+</sup>-protein complexes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Barber-Zucker et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Couñago et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Dudev and Lim, 2014</xref>).</p><p>At the mouth of the outer vestibule, an additional Mn<sup>2+</sup> bridges D296 and D369 at the N termini of extracellular helix 2 (EH2) and TM10, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A</xref>). We denote this site as the ‘external site’ and the canonical substrate-binding site as the ‘orthosteric site’. Corroborating the structures, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) measurements reveal an endothermic mode of binding and are best fitted with a two-site model for WT (K<sub>d1</sub>=190±30 µM, K<sub>d2</sub>=1970±520 µM; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>) and A47W (K<sub>d1</sub>=125±5 µM, K<sub>d2</sub>=2450±650 µM; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2A</xref>; all K<sub>d</sub> values are in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1g</xref>; see Appendix 1 for a description of our ITC data analyses). To determine the affinity of the orthosteric site, we mutated the external-site aspartates. The D296A and D369A substitutions have little impact on Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2B</xref>). The D296A and D369A variants each bind one Mn<sup>2+</sup> with K<sub>d</sub>=370±30 µM and 420±30 µM respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2A</xref>), which is closest to K<sub>d1</sub> of WT. Hence, the affinity for Mn<sup>2+</sup> at the orthosteric site is higher than at the external site. A metal ion is present at the external site in all inward-open and occluded metal-bound DraNramp structures, but not outward-open structures, as opening the outer vestibule separates D296 and D369 and disrupts the site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3A</xref>). D296 and D369 are not conserved across Nramps, but they are more conserved within bacterial clade A, and there is a general abundance of acidic residues in the corresponding loop regions across all clades (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3B–C</xref>). At present, our results provide little evidence of a biological role for this previously unidentified external site; perhaps the concentration of acidic residues at the mouth of the outer vestibule (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3D</xref>) provides electrostatic attraction for metal cations.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Snapshots of the complete Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle by DraNramp</title><p>We also determined high-resolution DraNramp structures in metal-free occluded (WT) and Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound inward-open (M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>) states and re-refined a Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound outward-open conformation (G223W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1a and b</xref>). Along with the published structures of outward-open metal-free G223W and inward-open metal-free ‘Patch’ (which has a patch of mutations in intracellular loops) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>), these new structures allow us to map the entire Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle to three major conformations, each in Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound and metal-free states (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A–B</xref>). By ordering and comparing these six structures, we outline a molecular mechanism by which metal substrate binds, induces conformational change, and is released.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Structures in new conformations complete the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle by DraNramp.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic of the conformational states that DraNramp traverses to import Mn<sup>2+</sup>. The mobile and stationary parts are pale yellow and light blue, respectively. (<bold>B</bold>) Corresponding structures of DraNramp, showing TMs 1 and 6 in green, TMs 5 and 10 in pale yellow, and TMs 2, 7, and 11 gray. Stationary TMs 3, 4, 8, and 9 are omitted to highlight the key motions in the mobile parts. Mn<sup>2+</sup> ions are magenta. Black arrows indicate the key motions in TMs 1a and 6a detailed in panel (<bold>C</bold>), and TMs 5 and 10 detailed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1</xref>. Full structures and the electron density for TMs 1 and 6 are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2</xref>. (<bold>C</bold>) Pairwise superpositions of whole Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures highlight the motions of TMs 1 and 6. Conformations are indicated at the bottom. The distance between residues 46 and 240 in TMs 1a and 6b, indicated for the green structures, increases from 5.9 Å to 13.8 Å from outward open to inward open. The large angular motions of TM1a and TM6b are also indicated. (<bold>D</bold>) Plots of B-factor by residue for the TM1 region (residues 40–70) and the TM6 region. The B-factors are highest for the inward-open state in which the interaction between TMs 1a and 6b (both in the inner leaflet) is broken.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Pairwise superpositions of Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures highlighting the motions of TMs 5 and 10.</title><p>Conformations are indicated at the bottom. The angular motions of TMs 5 and 10 across conformations are indicated by black arrows. All TMs other than TMs 5 and 10 are made transparent. The helices colored as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig2-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Structures of different conformational states of the DraNramp Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Crystal structures of each state of DraNramp. TMs 1 and 6 are colored green, TMs 5 and 10 are colored pale yellow, TMs 2, 7, and 11 in gray and TMs 3, 4, 8, and 9 are light blue. The Mn<sup>2+</sup> ion in the orthosteric site, when present, is shown as a magenta sphere. (<bold>B</bold>) Corresponding 2F<sub>o</sub>-F<sub>c</sub> maps contoured at 1σ for TMs 1 and 6 of each structure illustrated in A.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig2-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>TMs 1, 5, 6, and 10 move the most as the Mn<sup>2+</sup>-binding site accessibility switches from outward to inward across the conformations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B–C</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1</xref>), as also highlighted in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2017</xref>). As Mn<sup>2+</sup> binds to the outward-open state, TM10 tilts toward TM1b, the upper half of TM5 toward TM7, and TM6a toward TM11 to seal the outer vestibule and yield an occluded state. The lower half of TM5 also moves away from TM1a, allowing it to swing upward to open the inner vestibule in the following transition. This swing of TM1a is the only noteworthy difference between the Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound occluded and inward-open states, allowing release of the Mn<sup>2+</sup> into the inner vestibule. TM1a swings to a similar angle in the new inward-open M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> as in the previous low-resolution inward-open metal-free structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>), and structures of the homologous <italic>Eggerthella lenta</italic> Nramp-related magnesium transporter (EleNRMT), LeuT, and serotonin transporter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Coleman et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Krishnamurthy and Gouaux, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Ramanadane et al., 2022</xref>). Thus, most of the structural reorganization in Nramps occurs in the shift from outward open to occluded. The three metal-free DraNramp conformations are similar to their corresponding Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures, suggesting that once Mn<sup>2+</sup> is released, the conformational transitions are reversed, including passing through an occluded metal-free intermediate, to reach the outward-open metal-free conformation ready to accept Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A–B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplements 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">2A</xref>).</p><p>The substrate-binding TM1 and TM6 are well-resolved in our structures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2B</xref>) and pairwise superpositions reveal how their motions contribute to the conformational changes across the transport cycle (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>). TM6a tilts 22° and the unwound region of TM6 becomes more helical as it moves toward the Mn<sup>2+</sup> to close the outer gate. The central unwound regions of TM1 and TM6 are closest in the occluded state, resulting in an almost dehydrated Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere. Finally, the inner vestibule opens when TM1a tilts upward by 32°, increasing the distance between TM1a and TM6b by ~8 Å (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>). TM6b is largely static relative to the protein core, although in the inward-open structure it has high B-factors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>), indicating that the interaction with TM1a stabilizes TM6b to close the inner vestibule.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Different conformations have distinct Mn<sup>2+</sup> coordinations</title><p>Our Nramp structures provide snapshots of the complete Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere geometries in each conformation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Two new structures of DraNramp point-mutants reveal the coordination of Mn<sup>2+</sup> in the inward-open state: M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (Cα RMSD of 0.42 Å). The Mn<sup>2+</sup> is in the same location of the orthosteric site as in the occluded state, as confirmed by anomalous diffraction for D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1d</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1</xref>). As in the occluded state, the Mn<sup>2+</sup> binds D56, N59, and the A227 carbonyl, with a water replacing M230 in M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1e</xref>). However, with TM1a displaced, the A53 carbonyl no longer coordinates Mn<sup>2+</sup>; instead, the Y54 carbonyl approaches Mn<sup>2+</sup> at a longer distance of 3.1 Å. Two more waters, one bound to Q378 and another from the inner vestibule, complete a seven-coordination sphere resembling a pentagonal bipyramidal geometry with substantial distortion (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1f</xref>). Seven coordination is infrequent but found in Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordinating proteins like MntR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Chen and He, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Glasfeld et al., 2003</xref>). Our inward-open structures provide the first evidence that Y54 participates in the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Coordination sphere changes across the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle of DraNramp.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Structures of the orthosteric metal-binding site in six conformations reveal the differences in coordination geometry and illustrate that the bound Mn<sup>2+</sup> is more hydrated in the outward-open and inward-open states than the occluded state. In the occluded structure of metal-free WT DraNramp a density we have assigned as water replaces Mn<sup>2+</sup>. Y54 in TM1a progressively moves to open the inner vestibule in the transition from outward to inward open, shown by black curved arrows. (<bold>B</bold>) TM1 and TM6 from a superposition of the three Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures in panel a illustrate the swing of the Y54 sidechain as sticks. The view is rotated 180° along the vertical axis from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>. (<bold>C</bold>) Initial Mn<sup>2+</sup> uptake rates for DraNramp variants Y54A and Y54F at membrane potentials ranging from ΔΨ=0 to −120 mV (n=2–3; each data point is on the scatter plot and black bars are the mean values). The Mn<sup>2+</sup> concentration was 750 μM, and the pH was 7 on both sides of the membrane. Y54A nearly abolishes transport whereas Y54F has near-wildtype initial transport rates. Corresponding time traces are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s4">Figure 1—figure supplement 4</xref>. (<bold>D</bold>) ITC measurements of G223W (left; one-site binding model with fixed n=1) and M230A (right; two-site sequential binding model) binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup>. One isotherm is shown of two measured, and the listed K<sub>d</sub> values are the average ± SEM (see Appendix 1 for ITC analysis).</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Structure and Mn<sup>2+</sup>-binding site architecture of D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Cartoon representation of the inward-open structure of D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, which is nearly identical to the M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> inward-open structure (Cα RMSD of 0.38 Å). (<bold>B</bold>) Coordination sphere of the orthosteric Mn<sup>2+</sup> ion in the D296A structure is nearly the same as in M230A Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound structure except for the sulfur of M230 replacing a water seen in M230A. We do not observe a bound water to complete the coordination sphere of D296A, likely because the resolution of the structure is lower (2.52 Å for M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> vs. 3.12 Å for D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), otherwise the structures are analogous. The peak from the anomalous difference Fourier map (magenta mesh; 4.5σ) calculated from a D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> crystal confirms a bound Mn<sup>2+</sup> in this inward-open state. (<bold>C</bold>) 2F<sub>o</sub>-F<sub>c</sub> map (gray mesh; 1σ) of the orthosteric site of D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig3-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>2F<sub>o</sub>-F<sub>c</sub> maps (gray mesh; 1σ) of the Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere at the orthosteric site across different conformations of the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle of DraNramp.</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig3-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Sequence logos highlighting that Y54 in TM1a is 80% conserved in all Nramps (3762 sequences), 100% conserved in bacterial clades A and C, but replaced by a phenylalanine in clade B.</title><p>Eukaryotic Nramps have either tyrosine or phenylalanine at the corresponding position. Residue coloring is based on the ‘chemistry’ coloring scheme of WebLogo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Crooks et al., 2004</xref>). Clades are as defined in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3B</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig3-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>The new occluded and inward-open Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures have a monodentate coordination of D56 with Mn<sup>2+</sup>. For consistency, we reinterpreted the outward-open G223W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> map (PDB ID: 6BU5) with a monodentate coordination of D56 with Mn<sup>2+</sup> instead of previously modeled bidentate interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>); the local and global model statistics are very similar to the original structure (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1e</xref>). Re-refined G223W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> has six Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordinating ligands: D56, N59, M230, carbonyl of A53 and two waters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1e</xref>); the overall geometry resembles a distorted octahedron as in the occluded structure (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1f</xref>). The coordination spheres in all conformations of the transport cycle are well defined as confirmed by the 2F<sub>o</sub>-F<sub>c</sub> maps of the closeup snapshots of their Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound orthosteric site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1C</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2</xref>).</p><p>Comparing the three Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound conformations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>), the carbonyls of A53 in TM1a and A227 in TM6b alternately coordinate Mn<sup>2+</sup> in the outward- and inward-open structures respectively, and both residues interact with Mn<sup>2+</sup> in the occluded structure. The pseudosymmetrically related A53 and A227 may thus act as hinges altering the Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere as TM1 and TM6 move in turn to open the gates during Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport. Furthermore, as DraNramp switches from outward- to inward-open, Y54 progressively swings downward, acting as a gate in concert with TM1a’s upward swing to open the inner vestibule and allow metal release (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A–B</xref>). Our inward-open structures also suggest that the Y54 carbonyl may participate in Mn<sup>2+</sup> release through interaction with the metal ion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). All 3796 Nramp sequences in our alignment have either a tyrosine or a phenylalanine at this position and Y54 is completely conserved among bacterial clades A (including DraNramp) and C, while the position is 40% and 100% phenylalanine among eukaryotes and bacterial clade B, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3</xref>). To evaluate the significance of Y54 in Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport, we purified and reconstituted into proteoliposomes the Y54A and Y54F variants. While Y54F has near-wildtype Mn<sup>2+</sup>-transport activity, Y54A nearly eliminates Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>), indicating that an aromatic ring is essential for the gating motion required for transport.</p><p>We also measured the Mn<sup>2+</sup>-binding affinity of the constructs that yielded inward- or outward- open structures, M230A and G223W, respectively. Mn<sup>2+</sup> is present at the external site in the inward-open M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3A</xref>), and consistently, the ITC data fit a two-site model (K<sub>d1</sub>=215±65 µM assigned to the orthosteric site, K<sub>d2</sub>=4600±1300 µM for the external site; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref> and Appendix 1). The ITC data for G223W with Mn<sup>2+</sup> fits only in a one-site model (K<sub>d</sub>=440±15 µM; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>), which we assign to the orthosteric site because the opening of the outer vestibule displaces TM10, disrupting the external site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3A</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding does not significantly alter the three main DraNramp conformations</title><p>To compare the metal-bound states to analogous metal-free states of the transport cycle, we determined two metal-free occluded structures of wildtype DraNramp at a higher resolution than the previously reported G45R structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>), which we refer to as WT (2.38 Å; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1b</xref>) and WT<sub>soak</sub> (2.36 Å; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The crystal used for WT<sub>soak</sub> was mock-soaked (with no metal in the soaking solution). WT and WT<sub>soak</sub> are nearly identical, confirming that the soaking process does not influence the conformational state. We analyzed WT<sub>soak</sub>, unless otherwise noted. In WT<sub>soak</sub>, we observed density but no anomalous signal at the orthosteric site and modeled a water molecule at the position where Mn<sup>2+</sup> sits in the occluded state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). WT<sub>soak</sub> is nearly identical to WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, indicating that the occluded conformation is unchanged by the presence of metal ion substrate, and the metal-binding site is instead filled by ordered water molecules.</p><p>We used previously reported inward-open ‘Patch’ and outward-open G223W metal-free structures for analysis of the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2B</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">3A</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>). These structures, resolved at lower resolution than the ones described here, have no density at the orthosteric site. This is consistent with a more flexible organization of a metal-binding site open to bulk aqueous solvent. In contrast, metal-free WT has a more ordered orthosteric site, suggesting a stable occluded intermediate in the switch from inward- to outward-open.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Polar networks latch the gates to achieve alternating access</title><p>Vestibules providing access to the orthosteric site from the extracellular or intracellular side alternately open from the motions of DraNramp’s TMs 1, 5, 6, and 10, which form the outer and inner gates during Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bozzi et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>). To pinpoint protein features that enable these motions, we used our Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures to identify interaction networks with the following attributes: (i) they contain conserved polar residues from at least one of the four mobile helices; (ii) they line the gates; and (iii) they rearrange between the three resolved protein conformations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Networks of polar residues lining the outer and inner vestibules rearrange through the conformational transitions needed for Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) The Cα positions of residues in the Q378 (orange) and T228 (pink) networks lining the outer gate, R244 (cyan) and Q89 (blue) networks within the inner gate, and the H232 (orange) network coordinating with the proton pathway, are mapped on the occluded WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> structure. Metal-binding and proton pathway residues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>) are represented as brown spheres. (<bold>B</bold>) The Q378 network forms as TM10 moves when DraNramp transitions from outward-open to occluded to close the outer vestibule. Water-mediated interactions form between Q378, D56, and T130. The other D56 carbonyl interacts directly with Mn<sup>2+</sup>. TM1 is transparent. (<bold>C</bold>) The T228 network forms with N275, N82, and T228 coordinating a water as TM6a moves to close the outer vestibule. TM1 is transparent. (<bold>D</bold>) In the R244 network, interactions between R244, E176, and D263 break as TM5 moves in the transition from outward-open to occluded state to initiate the opening of the inner vestibule. (<bold>E</bold>) In the Q89 network, Y54, Q89, and H237 rearrange from occluded to inward-open state as TM1a swings up to allow for metal release. (<bold>F</bold>) H232, which abuts the orthosteric Mn<sup>2+</sup>-binding site, interacts with E134 and T130 through waters conserved in all conformations. In the M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> structure, H232 flips and is replaced by a water, retaining the interaction with T130 but breaking the connection with E134, suggesting that M230 helps stably position H232. TM8 is transparent. In panels c-e, TMs 3, 4, 8, and 9 are omitted to better visualize the interactions. The illustrated structures are indicated on the figure.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig4-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Sequence logos showing conservation of polar residues important for opening and closing the gates during Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport (highlighted in black boxes).</title><p>The alignment contains 3762 Nramp sequences, including 1055 bacterial clade A Nramps. Most residues that are less conserved in all Nramps are completely conserved in clade A to which DraNramp belongs. Residue coloring is based on the WebLogo scheme for amino acid chemistry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Crooks et al., 2004</xref>).</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig4-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Structural stability of gating residue networks of the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle.</title><p>(<bold>A–D</bold>) Time-course analyses of MD simulations starting in each of the three major conformations, showing replicates in different shades. (<bold>A</bold>) RMSD, calculated over all Cα atoms relative to the starting structure. Because some simulations experience substantial conformational changes after the first 250 ns (dashed line), we focused on this initial range for subsequent analyses. (<bold>B–C</bold>) Plots of the minimum distance between T228 and N275 (<bold>B</bold>) and T130 and Q378 (<bold>C</bold>) in the outer vestibule show that these interactions are stable in the inward-occluded and inward-open simulations but do not form in the outward-open simulations. (<bold>D</bold>) Likewise, simulations show that E176 and R244, located in the inner vestibule on TM5 and TM7, respectively, stably interact in the outward-open conformation, but not the occluded or inward-open conformations. (<bold>E–F</bold>) Representative 50% contour maps of water density calculated from a simulation starting the occluded conformation. (<bold>E</bold>) The water bridging T130, Q378 and D56 persists throughout most of the simulation, as do (<bold>F</bold>) the waters coordinated by H232 and T130 and H232 and E134, suggesting that all these waters-mediated interactions are robust. (<bold>G</bold>) A water is coordinated by H232 and T130 in 40–60% of frames across all simulations. A water is also coordinated by H232 and E134 but less frequently, in 2–40% of frames.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig4-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>The H232 rotamer is fixed in the outward-open state but dynamic in the occluded and inward-open states.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) H232 takes on rotamer 1 in all structures, except in the M230A structure where it takes on rotamer 2. (<bold>B</bold>) Time-course analyses of the χ<sub>1</sub> and χ<sub>2</sub> angles of the H232 sidechain during the MD simulations starting in each of the three major conformations, showing replicates in different shades. Interestingly, the simulations in the occluded state show H232 rapidly switching to rotamer 2 and primarily occupying the rotamer 2 state throughout the simulation. In contrast, H232 is fixed in rotamer 1 throughout the outward-open simulation and shows the most flexibility in the inward-open state. (<bold>C</bold>) Distribution of H232 rotamer states across each MD simulation.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig4-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Two networks seal the outer gate. In the occluded and inward-open conformations, Q378 interacts with two waters, one coordinating the orthosteric Mn<sup>2+</sup> and the other interacting with D56 and the carbonyl of T130. This network is disrupted in the outward-open conformation as Q378 and the rest of TM10 swing outward to open the outer vestibule (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>). In the second network, T228, N275, and N82 interact via a water in the occluded and inward-open states, but not in the outward-open state, where the extended unwound region of TM6a positions T228 farther from the orthosteric site and N275 and N82 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C</xref>). This T228 network helps rearrange TM6a, closing the outer vestibule in the occluded state and generating a nearly dehydrated Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). As the inner gate opens to release Mn<sup>2+</sup>, both networks persist, ensuring that the outer gate remains closed in the inward-open conformation.</p><p>All six residues in the Q378 and T228 networks are completely conserved across bacterial clade A and highly conserved across all Nramps (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>). To investigate the robustness of these networks, we performed duplicates of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations starting in each of the three conformations and confirmed that within the first 250 ns of these simulations, the T228 and Q378 networks persist in simulations of the occluded and inward-open states and remain broken in simulations starting in the outward-open state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s2">Figure 4—figure supplement 2A–C</xref>). This includes the coordinated waters, for example the water at the center of the Q378 network is present in more than 50% of the frames in occluded-state simulations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s2">Figure 4—figure supplement 2E</xref>). In line with the X-ray snapshots and simulation outcomes and highlighting their key function in the conformational cycle of Nramps, mutations of any of the six residues across these networks reduces Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport by DraNramp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bozzi et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>).</p><p>The inner vestibule is gated by rearrangements of residues in two other polar networks, namely those of R244 and Q89 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D–E</xref>). In the outward-open state, R244 forms an ion pair with E176 and interacts with the TM1a backbone, as does D263, keeping TM1a and TM5 close and the inner gate closed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bozzi et al., 2020</xref>). In the occluded state, the E176-R244 interaction breaks and TM5 moves away from TM6b, creating space for TM1a to swing up and open the inner vestibule in the inward-open state. Accordingly, the E176–R244 ion pair is stable in MD simulations of the outward-open state, while these residues are &gt;10 Å apart in simulations of the occluded and inward-open states (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s2">Figure 4—figure supplement 2D</xref>). Supporting the importance of the R244 network, E176 is 100% and R244 is 85% conserved across all Nramps (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>) and mutation of either residue reduces Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport by DraNramp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bozzi et al., 2020</xref>).</p><p>In the Q89 network, Q89 hydrogen-bonds with Y54 and H237 to seal the inner gate in the outward-open (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bozzi et al., 2020</xref>) and occluded states (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E</xref>). In the inward-open structure, the Q89–H237 hydrogen bond is broken and a rearranged Y54–Q89 hydrogen bond buttresses the opening of the inner vestibule (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E</xref>). As discussed above, Y54 is conserved and important for Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport by DraNramp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1C</xref>). Similarly, Q89 and H237 are conserved (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>), and mutations to either residue impair Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport in a cell-based assay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bozzi et al., 2020</xref>). Cysteine accessibility measurements showed that mutations to Q89 or H237 render the outer vestibule solvent-inaccessible (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bozzi et al., 2020</xref>), indicating that disrupting the Q89 network likely prevents closing of the inner gate.</p><p>H232 (TM6b) is conserved across all Nramps (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>), highlighting its importance. H232 sits below the orthosteric site and forms a network conserved across all conformations, with water-mediated hydrogen bonds to E134 (involved in proton transfer to the salt-bridge residues in TMs 3 and 9) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2017</xref>) and T130 in TM3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4F</xref>). Waters occupy these two sites in MD simulations in all states, especially the water coordinated between H232 and T130 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s2">Figure 4—figure supplement 2F–G</xref>). However, in M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> H232 flips to interact with the G330 carbonyl (TM8; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4F</xref>), suggesting that it may transiently move during the conformational cycle. Indeed, while the H232 sidechain rotamer is stable in MD simulations of the outward-open state, it explores other rotamers in simulations of the occluded and inward-open states (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s3">Figure 4—figure supplement 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Unlike Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding, Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding to DraNramp is exothermic</title><p>Nramps transport divalent transition metals quite promiscuously, including both physiological (Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup>) and non-physiological substrates (Cd<sup>2+</sup>, Zn<sup>2+</sup>, Co<sup>2+</sup>, Ni<sup>2+</sup>, Pb<sup>2+</sup>), but select against alkaline earth metals (Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">I Bannon et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Illing et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Sacher et al., 2001</xref>). DraNramp transports Cd<sup>2+</sup> well, but without concomitant proton flux and with weaker voltage dependence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1A</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>). To better understand the underlying mechanistic differences, we compared the binding, transport, and structures of DraNramp with Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup>.</p><p>In contrast to endothermic binding of Mn<sup>2+</sup>, ITC measurements show exothermic binding of Cd<sup>2+</sup> to WT DraNramp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1B</xref>; see Appendix 1 for details of the ITC analyses). Like for Mn<sup>2+</sup>, the Cd<sup>2+</sup> isotherm fits best in a two-site model (K<sub>d1</sub>=55±15 µM, K<sub>d2</sub>=220±20 µM). Both D296A and D369A—containing mutations at the external metal-binding site—showed exothermic binding but fit best in a one-site model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). Based on their affinity (K<sub>d</sub>=120±1 µM for D296A and K<sub>d</sub>=70±10 µM for D369A), we conclude that the orthosteric site has higher affinity toward Cd<sup>2+</sup> than the external site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A–B</xref>). Both the orthosteric and external site shows higher affinity toward Cd<sup>2+</sup> than Mn<sup>2+</sup>. The affinities are comparable at the orthosteric site, in low micromolar range for both metals (K<sub>d</sub> of 190±30 µM for Mn<sup>2+</sup> vs. 55±15 µM for Cd<sup>2+</sup>), whereas the external site has a much higher affinity toward Cd<sup>2+</sup> (K<sub>d</sub> of 1970±520 µM for Mn<sup>2+</sup> vs. 220±20 µM for Cd<sup>2+</sup>). Consistent with its inability to transport Mg<sup>2+</sup>, a representative alkaline earth metal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>), DraNramp does not bind Mg<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). These are the first ITC measurements comparing the binding of different metals to an Nramp transporter and they show clear differences in the binding mode and affinity of different substrates toward DraNramp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplements 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3">3</xref>). In contrast to DraNramp, previous ITC studies showed endothermic binding of Cd<sup>2+</sup> to the <italic>Staphylococcus capitis</italic> Nramp homolog (ScaDMT) with 29 µM affinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2014</xref>). However, in the absence of ITC data with other metals, it is not known whether ScaDMT also shows differences in the mode and affinity of binding to different metals like DraNramp.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>DraNramp binds differently to Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup>.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) ITC measurements show that DraNramp binds Mn<sup>2+</sup> in an endothermic mode, Cd<sup>2+</sup> in an exothermic mode and does not bind Mg<sup>2+</sup> (6 mM metal). ITC was performed with DraNramp in which the external site is mutated (D296A) to analyze binding at the orthosteric site. One isotherm is shown of 2 or 3 measured. These isotherms were fit using a one-site model with fixed n=1, and the listed K<sub>d</sub> values are the average ± SEM (see Appendix 1 for ITC analysis). (<bold>B</bold>) Schematic showing the ITC-measured K<sub>d</sub> values of various DraNramp constructs for Mn<sup>2+</sup> (top) and Cd<sup>2+</sup> (bottom). WT DraNramp binds Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> at the same two sites, with the external-site affinity ~10-fold higher and the orthosteric-site affinity ~threefold higher for Cd<sup>2+</sup> than Mn<sup>2+</sup>. The M230A mutation eliminates binding of Cd<sup>2+</sup> but not Mn<sup>2+</sup> at the orthosteric site. The D369A mutation eliminates binding of either metal at the external site. A variant with mutations at both the orthosteric and external sites, M230A-D369A, does not bind Cd<sup>2+</sup> but maintains orthosteric site binding for Mn<sup>2+</sup>. For all ITC data, the K<sub>d</sub> values were computed while fixing the number of sites (<bold>n</bold>) to 1 or 2 and assigned to the external or orthosteric site based on knowledge of the crystal structures and mutational analysis (Appendix 1; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1g</xref>). ITC traces are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3">Figure 5—figure supplement 3</xref>. (<bold>C</bold>) Comparison of the inward-open state bound to Mn<sup>2+</sup> (M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>; top) and Cd<sup>2+</sup> (WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>; bottom) shows differences in coordination geometry at the orthosteric site. D56 is oriented differently and does not directly coordinate Cd<sup>2+</sup>. Cd<sup>2+</sup> coordinates N59, M230, carbonyls of A227 and Y54, and two waters, for a total of six ligands compared to seven for Mn<sup>2+</sup>. Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> are magenta and brown spheres, respectively. Of note, we use M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> here because soaking of WT crystals with Cd<sup>2+</sup> yielded an inward-open WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1C</xref>) whereas soaking the same kind of crystals with Mn<sup>2+</sup> yielded an occluded WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata1"><label>Figure 5—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Source files (Origin files) of ITC experiments of magnesium binding to each DraNramp construct.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig5-data1-v2.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig5-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Analysis of Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding to DraNramp reveal differences.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Proteoliposome-based assay with WT DraNramp showed higher voltage dependence for Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport compared to Cd<sup>2+</sup>, with substantial transport of only Cd<sup>2+</sup> at 0 mV. The concentration of metal used in this assay was 750 µM. (<bold>B</bold>) ITC measurements of WT, D296A, and D369A constructs of DraNramp binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup>. All Cd<sup>2+</sup> isotherms show an exothermic mode of binding and are fit using a two-site sequential binding model (K<sub>d1</sub>=55±15 µM, K<sub>d2</sub>=220±20 µM) for WT, and one-site model with fixed n=1 for both D296A and D369A. By comparing ITC results from binding of Cd<sup>2+</sup> to these constructs, we assigned a lower affinity (K<sub>d2</sub>) to the external site. One isotherm is shown of 2 or 3 measured, and the listed K<sub>d</sub> values are the average ± SEM (see Appendix 1 for ITC analysis). (<bold>C</bold>) Cartoon representation of WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>, with Cd<sup>2+</sup> ions as brown spheres. The positions of TM1 and TM6, especially the upward swing of TM1a, confirms the inward-open conformation. (<bold>D</bold>) Peaks from the anomalous difference Fourier map (brown mesh; 3.5σ) and electron density from the 2F<sub>o</sub>-F<sub>c</sub> map (gray mesh; 1σ) from WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> show that Cd<sup>2+</sup> binds at both the external and orthosteric sites.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig5-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>ITC measurements comparing the affinity for Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> of DraNramp constructs with mutations at metal-binding sites.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) M230A mutation at the orthosteric site impacts Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding more than Mn<sup>2+</sup>. (<bold>B</bold>) D56A mutation leads to weaker binding compared to WT for both metals at both binding sites. (<bold>C–F</bold>) DraNramp constructs with double mutations, one at each metal binding site (M230A or D56A and D296A or D369A), show similar binding behavior, retaining binding of Mn<sup>2+</sup> at the orthosteric site, but no Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding. All Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding isotherms are endothermic and exothermic, respectively. One isotherm is shown of 2 or 3 measured, and the listed K<sub>d</sub> values are the average ± SEM (see Appendix 1 for ITC analysis).</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig5-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>ITC measurements comparing Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding affinity of the conformation-locking mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) In the G223W outward-locked construct, the orthosteric site is intact but the external-site ligands are far apart because of the opening of the extracellular vestibule (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3A</xref>). Mn<sup>2+</sup> binds at the orthosteric site in G223W, but Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding is impaired. (<bold>B</bold>) The A47W inward-locked occluded construct binds both Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2</sup>, with two-site sequential binding and one-site binding models yielding the best fits, respectively. (<bold>C–D</bold>) Double mutants of A47W with either D296A (<bold>C</bold>) or D369A (<bold>D</bold>) retain Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding but not Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding, indicating that Cd<sup>2+</sup> binds only at the external site and not the orthosteric site of the A47W construct, whereas Mn<sup>2+</sup> binds at both binding sites. All Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup>-binding isotherms are endothermic and exothermic, respectively. One isotherm is shown of 2 or 3 measured, and the listed K<sub>d</sub> values are the average ± SEM (see Appendix 1 for ITC analysis).</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig5-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title>Comparison of the gating networks in the inward-open Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures.</title><p>(<bold>A–E</bold>) Structural comparisons of the five networks of polar residues with Mn<sup>2+</sup> (top; M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> or D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> as indicated) or Cd<sup>2+</sup> (WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>; bottom) bound at the orthosteric site. Inward-open conformations of Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> structures show identical arrangement of residues for the Q89 (<bold>A</bold>), T228 (<bold>B</bold>), and R244 (<bold>C</bold>) networks. In the outer-gate Q378 network (<bold>D</bold>), D56 does not coordinate the Cd<sup>2+</sup> directly, but instead coordinates a water that interacts with Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Q378. Due to its reorientation, D56 does not hydrogen-bond to T130. The H232 network (<bold>E</bold>) is conserved except that the interaction between E134 and D56 takes a different orientation in the Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structure. Some of the top (Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound) panels are reproduced from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> for ease of comparison. (<bold>F</bold>) Initial metal uptake rates for DraNramp variants at different membrane potential (ΔΨ=0 to −120 mV; n=2–3; each data point is represented in the scatter plots and black bars are the mean values). The metal ion concentration was 750 μM, and the pH 7 on both sides of the membrane. Y54A, H232A, H237A, and Q89A strongly reduced the initial transport rate, whereas Y54F only moderately reduced it. The overall trends are similar for both metals. Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport showed higher voltage dependence compared to Cd<sup>2+</sup>. Mn<sup>2+</sup> data from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> are replotted here for ease of comparison. Corresponding time traces are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s4">Figure 1—figure supplement 4</xref>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig5-figsupp4-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title>A Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structure helps explain functional differences</title><p>To understand the differences in binding and transport of Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup>, we determined a 2.5 Å Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structure by soaking WT DraNramp crystals with 2 mM Cd<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). In agreement with the ITC data, WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> shows Cd<sup>2+</sup> ions at both the external and orthosteric sites as confirmed by anomalous signal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1C–D</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1d</xref>). The higher affinity for Cd<sup>2+</sup> than Mn<sup>2+</sup> at the external site suggests that local geometry favors non-physiological Cd<sup>2+</sup> over the physiological substrate Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3A</xref>). The low affinity of this site for Mn<sup>2+</sup>, compared to Cd<sup>2+</sup>, is consistent with the idea that this external site plays a role in general electrostatic attraction of substrate to the orthosteric site, rather than as a finely tuned binding site specific for Mn<sup>2+</sup>.</p><p>Interestingly, WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> is inward open (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1C</xref>), although both mocked-soaked and Mn<sup>2+</sup>-soaked crystals under otherwise equivalent conditions yielded occluded structures (WT<sub>soak</sub> and WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, respectively; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">3</xref>). The larger ionic radius of Cd<sup>2+</sup> (~0.95 Å) compared to Mn<sup>2+</sup> (~0.82 Å) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Kumarevel et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Vashishtha et al., 2016</xref>) and different preferred coordination geometry may increase the stability of the inward-open state with Cd<sup>2+</sup> bound. Compared with the inward-open M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, D56 adopts a different rotamer in WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> and does not coordinate the Cd<sup>2+</sup> bound at the orthosteric site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref>). The rest of the coordination sphere is similar and includes N59, M230, the A227 carbonyl, the Y54 carbonyl, a water that coordinates Q378 and another water from inner vestibule. Cd<sup>2+</sup> has six coordinating ligands, and the distortion from ideal octahedral geometry is more pronounced compared to Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1f</xref>). The coordination distances are larger for Cd<sup>2+</sup> than for Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1e</xref>), as seen in other proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Begg et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib91">Yokoyama et al., 2012</xref>) and consistent with its larger ionic radius and distinct charge distribution. Cd<sup>2+</sup> is a soft metal, likely explaining why it retains coordination by the softer sulfur ligand of M230 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Cammack and Hughes, 2008</xref>) but not the hard oxygen of D56, although D56 can still provide favorable electrostatics.</p></sec><sec id="s2-8"><title>Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding is prone to perturbations and favors the inward-open state</title><p>ITC data analysis of different DraNramp variants highlights additional differences between Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding and how their binding affects the conformational preferences of DraNramp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplements 2</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3">3</xref>). A general observation is that, at the orthosteric site, Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding are entropy- and enthalpy-driven, respectively, and entropy contributions (-TΔS) are smaller for Cd<sup>2+</sup> than Mn<sup>2+</sup> (Appendix 1), suggesting that Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding conformationally constrains the protein more, leads to less solvent release, or both (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Ferrante and Gorski, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Olsson et al., 2008</xref>).</p><p>ITC with the orthosteric-site mutants, M230A and D56A, shows metal-specific behavior. For M230A, Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding fits with a two-site model and Cd<sup>2+</sup> fits only with a one-site model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2</xref>, Appendix 1). M230 is thus a crucial ligand for Cd<sup>2+</sup> but not Mn<sup>2+</sup>, which is further reflected in the transport behavior where M230A affects Cd<sup>2+</sup> transport drastically but has negligible effect on Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>). Data for D56A fit better with a two-site model with both metals, although D56A does not transport either metal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>). This suggests that D56 is more important for catalyzing transport than for substrate binding. Data for variants with an additional mutation at the external site (D56A-D296A, D56A-D369A, M230A-D296A, and M230A-D369A) fit only with a one-site model for Mn<sup>2+</sup>-binding isotherms, which we assigned as binding to the orthosteric site. However, all four double mutants showed complete loss of Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding, which is expected for ones with M230A—which eliminates Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding at the orthosteric site on its own, as we have also shown previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>)—but more surprising for double mutants with D56A. Thus, binding of the preferred physiological Mn<sup>2+</sup> substrate at the orthosteric site is more robust to perturbations than binding of Cd<sup>2+</sup>, a toxic metal.</p><p>The conformation-locking mutants—A47W, which is outward-closed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>) and crystallized in an occluded state, and outward-open G223W (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>)—also show different behavior with Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3">Figure 5—figure supplement 3</xref>). ITC with Mn<sup>2+</sup> agrees with the structural data, with two-site fit for A47W (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2A</xref>), and one-site fit for A47W-D296A, A47W-D369A, and G223W (assigned to the orthosteric site). However, with Cd<sup>2+</sup>, the ITC data for A47W fit best with a one-site model and we observed no binding with A47W-D296A, A47W-D369A, and G223W, indicating that there is no significant affinity for Cd<sup>2+</sup> at the orthosteric site of A47W and G223W. This is consistent with our inability to obtain Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures in conformations other than inward-open, despite trying both co-crystallization and soaking with A47W and G223W. These data suggest that Cd<sup>2+</sup> has highest affinity for the inward-open state and low affinity for other states, in agreement with the fact that soaking of WT crystals (which yielded the metal-free occluded WT<sub>soak</sub> structure) produced an inward-open Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structure.</p></sec><sec id="s2-9"><title>Gating network differences in the Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structure are restricted to D56</title><p>To better understand the Cd<sup>2+</sup> transport mechanism given that its binding at the orthosteric site seems less optimal and robust than Mn<sup>2+</sup>, we compared the gating networks described above for the inward-open Mn<sup>2+</sup>- and Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures. The Q89, T228, and R244 networks are essentially identical in the inward-open state, regardless of whether Mn<sup>2+</sup> or Cd<sup>2+</sup> is bound (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s4">Figure 5—figure supplement 4A–C</xref>).</p><p>The other two networks, both of which involve D56, have some differences. In the Q378 network gating the outer vestibule, D56 does not coordinate Cd<sup>2+</sup> but does interact with the conserved water that connects the metal ion with Q378 in all outward-closed structures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s4">Figure 5—figure supplement 4D</xref>). This preserves a connection to both Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Q378 to close the outer gate. Most of the H232 network is similar in the Mn<sup>2+</sup>- and Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures, except for the orientation of D56 relative to E134 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s4">Figure 5—figure supplement 4E</xref>).</p><p>Mutations of several residues in these polar networks reduced transport in proteoliposome-based assays (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s4">Figure 5—figure supplement 4F</xref>), corroborating results from cell-based assays (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Bozzi et al., 2020</xref>). Y54A, H237A, and H232A mutations cause the largest decreases, Q89A causes a moderate decrease, and Y54F is similar to WT. Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> follow similar trends although with less voltage dependence for Cd<sup>2+</sup> than Mn<sup>2+</sup>. These results support the idea that although Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> bind differently at the orthosteric site, the flexibility of the D56 sidechain enables the networks of polar residues that gate the outer and inner vestibules to engage and enable transport of both metals at similar rates.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Our high-resolution structures in different conformations and analysis of substrate-binding affinities reveal a molecular map of the Mn<sup>2+</sup> import pathway in DraNramp (<xref ref-type="video" rid="video1">Video 1</xref>). Binding of the Mn<sup>2+</sup> substrate at the orthosteric site takes on different coordination geometries through the three main conformational states in the transport cycle, all of which deviate substantially from ideal, consistent with the moderate binding affinities we measured. We identified several networks of polar interactions that gate both the outer and inner vestibules. Structures of DraNramp bound to Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> and corresponding analyses of substrate binding demonstrate that the orthosteric site shows similar affinity for physiological (Mn<sup>2+</sup>) and toxic (Cd<sup>2+</sup>) substrates, but Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding is less robust to various perturbations.</p><media mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" xlink:href="elife-84006-video1.mp4" id="video1"><label>Video 1.</label><caption><title>Conformational rearrangement and distinct coordination geometry adopted by DraNramp during Mn<sup>2+</sup> import.</title><p>The global conformational changes are highlighted first, with cartoon representations of each of the six structures in the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle starting from the outward-open Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound conformation rotating through the occluded Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound, inward-open Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound, and then the metal-free states transitioning back to outward-open Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound form. The second set of scenes then focusses on the orthosteric site, cycling through the structures in the same order to illustrate the distinct coordination geometries of the bound Mn<sup>2+</sup>, and the corresponding positions of its interacting ligands (protein residues and water) in the metal-free states.</p></caption></media><p>Our structures of one Nramp homolog, DraNramp, in all conformations of the transport cycle provide an opportunity to update the overview of the conformational cycle, focusing on the polar interaction networks that gate the outer and inner vestibules (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref>). The structures also provide the first molecular view of how local changes in the coordination spheres and the global conformational transitions coordinate to facilitate Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport. Starting in the outward-open state, Mn<sup>2+</sup> entry into the outer vestibule and binding at the orthosteric site triggers the transition to the occluded state by two major rearrangements: (i) closing of the outer gate as the T228 and Q378 networks form and support the reorientation of TM6a and TM10, respectively, and (ii) partial opening of the inner gate through motion of TM5 and breaking of the R244 network. TM6a and TM10 approach the orthosteric site and directly (A227 in TM6a) or indirectly (Q378 in TM10 through a conserved water) coordinate Mn<sup>2+</sup> and restrict solvent access from the extracellular side in the occluded structure. A227 replaces a water of the outward-open Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere, thus retaining a six-coordination geometry in both conformations. Mn<sup>2+</sup> prefers octahedral (six) coordination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Chen and He, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Dudev et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Dudev and Lim, 2014</xref>) as in the outward-open and occluded structures, although we observed distortions (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1f</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>A structure-guided model of the conformational cycle and thermodynamic landscape of metal transport by Nramps.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) After Mn<sup>2+</sup> enters through the outer vestibule between TM6a and TM10 in the outward-open state, a bulk conformation change closes the outer gate. The occluded conformation arises though rearrangements of TM6a and TM10 facilitated by formation of the T228 and Q378 networks, respectively. The inner gate partially opens in the occluded state as the R244 network breaks and TM5 moves. To achieve the inward-open conformation, disruption of the Q89 network frees TM1a to swing up to fully open the inner vestibule for Mn<sup>2+</sup> release into the cytosol. (<bold>B</bold>) Our data indicate that the most stable Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound state is the occluded state, and the three main states are readily accessible to facilitate transport. In contrast, Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding stabilizes the inward-open state.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig6-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Comparison of coordination spheres of different Mn<sup>2+</sup>-binding proteins: MntR, a Mn<sup>2+</sup> regulator (PDB ID: 1ON1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Glasfeld et al., 2003</xref>); PsaA, the solute-binding protein domain of Mn<sup>2+</sup>-transporting ATP-binding cassette transporter (PDB ID: 3ZTT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Couñago et al., 2014</xref>); and the DraNramp WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> occluded structure (this work).</title><p>In all structures, Mn<sup>2+</sup> binds in an octahedral coordination. The geometry is more distorted (RMS<sub>angle</sub>=25°) and bond distances are longer in DraNramp, perhaps to enable Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport and the associated protein dynamics. In comparison, the geometry is close to ideal (RMS<sub>angle</sub>=8°) and bond distances shorter in MntR, where Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding, but not transport, is essential for regulating downstream signaling.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-fig6-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>The inward-open state is achieved when TM1a swings up, rupturing the Q89 network and opening the inner gate. The coordination sphere changes again as a water from the open inner vestibule replaces A53 from TM1a. The TM1a swing introduces Y54 as a long-range seventh ligand. The seven-coordination of Mn<sup>2+</sup> in the inward-open structure is less favored and more distorted, which may facilitate Mn<sup>2+</sup> release as a solvated ion in the cytosol. In contrast, the more favorable six-coordination in the outward-open and occluded structures could help energize the global conformational changes. Our metal-free structures indicate that after Mn<sup>2+</sup> release to the cytosol, the protein resets to the outward-open state through the same occluded state. The residues in the gating networks are highly conserved, suggesting that their role is conserved across the Nramp family.</p><p>Compared to other proteins that bind Mn<sup>2+</sup> but are not metal transporters, like the Mn<sup>2+</sup> regulator MntR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Glasfeld et al., 2003</xref>) and PsaA, the solute-binding protein (SBP) domain of an ATP-binding cassette transporter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Couñago et al., 2014</xref>), we observe longer Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordinating bond lengths for DraNramp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1</xref>). Typical manganese-oxygen bonding distances are 2.1–2.5 Å, although ‘weak interactions’ (2.6–3.2 Å) are occasionally part of a Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Harding, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Harding, 2001</xref>). Metal-sulfur bonding distances are longer owing to the greater van der Waals radius of sulfur (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Rulísek and Vondrásek, 1998</xref>). The non-ideal metal-ligand bonding distances and angles we observe in DraNramp may allow it to avoid getting trapped in an energy minimum and thus keep moving through the conformational transitions required to transport Mn<sup>2+</sup>.</p><p>While the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport mechanism and associated conformational changes in DraNramp differ appreciably from other LeuT-fold transporters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>), the presence of key residues defining the extracellular and intracellular gates is a common theme (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Coleman et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Coleman et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Faham et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Krishnamurthy and Gouaux, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Krishnamurthy et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Perez et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Shimamura et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib87">Watanabe et al., 2010</xref>). Comparing the gating networks described for these transporters with DraNramp, the positions and nature of the gating networks are generally not conserved, but two common themes emerge. First, opening (or closing) a particular vestibule often involves a pair of changes, as in the DraNramp intracellular vestibule (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref>). Such paired changes have been associated with ‘thin’ and ‘thick’ gates in Mhp1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Simmons et al., 2014</xref>) and LeuT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Krishnamurthy and Gouaux, 2012</xref>), that is, gates based on sidechain and helix motions, respectively. Second, some gating residue positions are shared, but the networks are not, indicating that different families have evolved analogous networks to stabilize equivalent conformations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Coleman et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Krishnamurthy and Gouaux, 2012</xref>).</p><p>The accumulated DraNramp structures also provide clues as to the thermodynamic landscape of the transport process (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>). Interestingly, both metal-free and Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound WT DraNramp crystallized in the occluded conformation, whereas the open conformations were achieved through conformation-locking (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>) or mutations of functionally important residues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>). This occluded state more closely resembles an inward-open conformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>) and is an important intermediate in the Mn<sup>2+</sup> transport cycle, with both local changes in coordination geometry and global changes in protein conformation in comparison to the outward-open state. Physiologically, we naïvely expect outward-open, rather than occluded, to be the preferred substrate-free conformation. However, the occluded or inward-open states of other LeuT-fold importers are also more stable, with changes in environmental conditions or the presence of substrate stabilizing specific states and lowering barriers to conformational transitions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Del Alamo et al., 2022</xref>). For example, SGLT1 and DraNramp require a negative membrane potential to transport substrates and this negative membrane potential stabilizes the outward-open state of SGLT1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Loo et al., 1998</xref>). Overall, our DraNramp structures suggest that the occluded state is most stable (at least in the absence of a membrane potential). The occluded and inward-open states may be energetically similar as relatively small perturbations yielded inward-open structures (M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>). Furthermore, our previous cysteine accessibility data indicate that the energy barriers between states are low enough for the protein to readily sample the outward- and inward-open states in cell membranes in the absence or presence of metal substrate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>).</p><p>In contrast to WT DraNramp, ScaDMT was crystallized in an inward-open state, although its TM1a was deleted from the protein construct (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2014</xref>). This deletion would prevent inner vestibule closure, and thus likely affects its energetically preferred conformation. In the case of the <italic>Eremococcus coleocola</italic> Nramp homolog (EcoDMT), both substrate-free and inhibitor-bound conformations are outward open (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Manatschal et al., 2019</xref>), suggesting that the outward-open state is its most stable state. Of note, EcoDMT was crystallized in detergent, whereas the DraNramp structures were obtained in a monoolein lipid bilayer environment. Further studies will be needed to determine to what extent the thermodynamic landscape we begin to outline here for DraNramp is conserved in other Nramp homologs.</p><p>Previous metal selectivity studies indicate that Nramps import different substrates with distinct mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Bozzi and Gaudet, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Ehrnstorfer et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Nevo and Nelson, 2006</xref>). These differences correlate with chemical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Irving and Williams, 1953</xref>) and preferred coordination chemistry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Ma et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Singh et al., 2020</xref>) of these transition metals as observed in other transition metal binding proteins like the Psa permease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Begg et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Couñago et al., 2014</xref>), and cation diffusion facilitators (CDFs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Barber-Zucker et al., 2017</xref>). That WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> retains the M230 sulfur as a coordinating ligand but excludes the D56 carboxylate can be rationalized by the fact that Cd<sup>2+</sup> is a softer metal than Mn<sup>2+</sup>. This difference in coordination likely alters the pKa of nearby residues and water molecules to perturb the proton pathway such that DraNramp co-transports protons with Mn<sup>2+</sup> but not Cd<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>), although our structures do not yet fully elucidate this mechanistic difference. Moreover, owing to its larger radius, Cd<sup>2+</sup> tends to form weaker complexes than Mn<sup>2+</sup> with comparable coordination numbers in complexes dominated by harder ligands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Rulísek and Vondrásek, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Singh et al., 2020</xref>). The architecture of the orthosteric site in DraNramp appears to facilitate six- or seven-coordinated metal complexes, and thus most Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound DraNramp conformations will be less stable than the Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound states. Our ITC data also indicate that binding of the toxic Cd<sup>2+</sup> to DraNramp is less robust to perturbations compared to its physiological substrate Mn<sup>2+</sup>. Furthermore, Cd<sup>2+</sup> only binds well to the inward-open state, and its binding is exothermic rather than endothermic for Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). The crystallographic data similarly suggest that inward-open is the most stable Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound state (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>), based on the following observations: (i) soaking crystals of occluded WT yielded inward-occluded WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>, (ii) co-crystallization efforts yielded no other Cd<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures, and (iii) soaking Cd<sup>2+</sup> into crystals of outward-locked G223W yielded very poor diffraction and no structures.</p><p>Overall, our data show that the orthosteric metal-binding site of DraNramp, conserved across all Nramps, is best suited to the physiological substrate Mn<sup>2+</sup> (and likely the similar ion Fe<sup>2+</sup>). The distinct interactions of Nramps with Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> could be leveraged for the design of therapies for metal toxicity and prevention strategies for toxic metal accumulation in crops. These results also lay a foundation for future studies of how metal ion transporters like Nramps evolve their substrate selectivity, for example in response to different environmental conditions. Finally, the first complete set of structures with the same homolog, both in substrate-free and substrate-bound states, suggest a substrate-specific thermodynamic landscape of the transport cycle and provide a framework for future experiments and simulations to fully define this landscape, and for comparisons to other LeuT-fold transporters.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Reagent type (species) or resource</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Designation</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Source or reference</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Identifiers</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gene (<italic>Deinococcus radiodurans</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DraNramp</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genomic DNA</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Uniprot: Q9RTP8</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">C41(DE3)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Lucigen</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="bottom">60442–1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemically competent cells</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Strain, strain background (<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DH5α</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Invitrogen</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="bottom">18265–017</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemically competent cells</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pET21a</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Novagen</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="bottom">69740–3</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Vector backbone for cloning DraNramp</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">n-Dodecyl-β-D-Maltopyranoside</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Anatrace</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">D310S</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">1% for solubilizing membrane, 0.03% used in wash buffer</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">n-Decyl-β-D-Maltopyranoside</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Anatrace</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">D322S</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">0.1% used in exchange buffer</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Lauryl maltose neopentyl glycol</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Anatrace</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.anatrace.com/Products/Detergents/NG-CLASS/NG310">NG310</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">0.01% in elution buffer, 0.003% used in SEC buffer</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Monoolein</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Anatrace</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.anatrace.com/Products/Specialty-Detergents-Products/LCP/LCP18">LCP18</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">1:1.5 (protein: monoolein) for LCP crystallization</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Fura-2 Pentapotassium Salt, cell impermeant</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Life Technologies</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.lifetechnologies.com/order/catalog/product/F1200">F-1200</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">5 mM mixed with in proteoliposome</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1'-rac-glycerol) (POPG)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Avanti Polar Lipids</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">850457 C</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">lipid mixture (3 POPE: 1 POPG) and protein in 400:1 ratio for proteoliposome preparation</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Avanti Polar Lipids</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">840757 C</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">lipid mixture (3 POPE: 1 POPG) and protein in 400:1 ratio for proteoliposome preparation</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Valinomycin</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma-Aldrich</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">V0627</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Creates membrane potential by transporting K<sup>+</sup> in proteoliposome assay</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Ni Sepharose High Performance Resin</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cytiva</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="bottom">95055–838</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">IMAC resin</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Superdex 200 10/300 GL</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cytiva</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="bottom">89497–272</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">SEC column</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay, kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PD-10 Desalting Column</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cytiva</td><td align="char" char="ndash" valign="bottom">95017–001</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Buffer exchange</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">XDS</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20124692/">20124692</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_015652">SCR_015652</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Data Porcessing</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PHASER</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19461840/">19461840</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_014219">SCR_014219</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Model Builiding</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PHENIX</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22505256/">22505256</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_014224">SCR_014224</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Refinement</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">coot</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20383002/">20383002</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_014222">SCR_014222</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Refinement and model building</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PyMOL</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Schrödinger</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_000305">SCR_000305</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Figure making</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">HMMER</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">hmmer.org</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_005305">SCR_005305</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Collected sequences with jackhmmer and aligned with hmmalign</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">MUSCLE</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15318951/">15318951</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_011812">SCR_011812</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Aligning sequences</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RAxML-NG</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31070718/">31070718</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_022066">SCR_022066</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Tree building</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PropKa</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26596171/">26596171</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">Identifying protonation states</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">CHARMM-GUI</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25130509/">25130509</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">Building MD system</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NAMD</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20675161/">20675161</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_014894">SCR_014894</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Running MD simulations</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">mdtraj</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26488642/">26488642</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom">Analyzing MD data</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software, algorithm</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">VMD</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8744570/">8744570</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:SCR_001820">SCR_001820</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Analyzing MD data</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title>Cloning and protein expression vectors</title><p>The DraNramp WT and mutant constructs were cloned into pET21a-N8H (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>). Primer sequences for the mutations are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1h</xref>. All constructs used for crystallization had a truncation of 31 residues at the N-terminus (ΔN31, which does not impair metal transport), except for A47W which was full-length and transport deficient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bozzi et al., 2016b</xref>). For proteoliposome-based transport assays, the full-length versions of each construct were used. For ITC, full-length DraNramp constructs were cloned into pET21-NStrep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>) to avoid background signal from metals (Mn<sup>2+</sup>, Cd<sup>2+</sup>) binding to the His-tag. All mutations were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using the Quikchange mutagenesis protocol (Stratagene) and confirmed by Sanger DNA sequencing.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Protein expression</title><p>Protein expression was performed as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>). Briefly, transformed <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> C41(DE3) (Lucigen) were induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside and cultured at 18 °C for 16 hr. Cell pellets from 10 L of culture were harvested and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Protein purification for crystallography</title><p>Cells were thawed and resuspended in 50 mL load buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, 55 mM imidazole pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol) supplemented with 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM benzamidine, 0.3 mg/mL DNAse I and 0.3 mg/mL lysozyme and lysed by sonication on ice (six cycles of 45 s with a Branson Sonifier 450 under duty cycle of 65% and output 10). Lysates were cleared by centrifuging for 20 min at 20,000 rpm (Beckman JA-20) and membranes pelleted from the supernatant by ultracentrifugation at 45,000 rpm (Beckman type 45Ti) for 70 min. Membranes were homogenized in 70 mL load buffer using a glass Potter-Elvehjem grinder, solubilized for 1 hr in 1% (w/v) n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside (DDM), then ultracentrifuged at 35,000 (Beckman type 45Ti) for 35 min to remove insoluble debris. Pre-equilibrated Ni-Sepharose beads (2 mL; GE Healthcare) were incubated with the supernatant for 90 min at 4 °C, then washed with 20 column volumes (CV) of each of the following buffers sequentially (i) load buffer containing 0.03% DDM, (ii) load buffer containing 0.5% lauryl maltose neopentyl glycol (LMNG), and (iii) load buffer containing 0.1% LMNG. Protein was eluted in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, 450 mM imidazole pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 0.01% LMNG, concentrated to &lt;0.5 mL in a 50 kDa molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) centrifugal concentrator (EMD Millipore), and purified by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a Superdex S200 10/300 (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with SEC buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.003% LMNG). Peak protein fractions enriched in DraNramp were combined, concentrated to ~25–40 mg/mL using a 50 kDa MWCO centrifugal concentrator, aliquoted and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C. Purifications of each protein construct were performed at least twice and resulted in similar data.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Purification of DraNramp for ITC</title><p>To purify protein for ITC, harvested cells expressing strep-tagged DraNramp from 10 L of culture were resuspended in 50 mL of buffer W (100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl), and membranes were isolated, homogenized and solubilized in 1% DDM as above. The supernatant was incubated with Strep-Tactin Superflow resin (3 mL; IBA) pre-equilibrated with buffer W+0.03% DDM and washed with the following buffers sequentially: (i) 1 CV buffer W+0.03% DDM, (ii) 2 CV buffer W+0.5% LMNG and (iii) 2 CV buffer W+0.1% LMNG. Protein was eluted with 3 CV buffer W+0.01% LMNG+2.5 mM desthiobiotin. The eluted protein was concentrated up to 2.5 mL using a 50 kDa MWCO centrifugal concentrator and buffer-exchanged into 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and 0.003% LMNG using disposable PD-10 desalting columns (GE healthcare). Protein was concentrated to ∼2.5 mg/mL a 50 kDa MWCO centrifugal concentrator and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C. Purifications of each protein construct were performed at least twice and resulted in similar data.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>DraNramp crystallization</title><p>Crystallization of all constructs was performed using lipidic cubic phase (LCP). Protein was mixed with monoolein in 1:1.5 volume ratio using the syringe reconstitution method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>). The protein bolus (60 nL) and 720 nL precipitant were dispensed onto custom-made 96 well glass sandwich plates using an NT8 drop-setting robot (Formulatrix). Metal-free crystals (WT) and metal supplemented (5 mM MnCl<sub>2</sub>) co-crystals (A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>) were grown in different precipitant conditions (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1a</xref>), harvested within 7–10 days (after reaching their optimal size of 30–40 μm rods) using mesh loops (MiTeGen) and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to data collection. Some structures (WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>, WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, WT<sub>soak</sub>) were obtained by soaking WT DraNramp crystals grown in metal-free precipitant (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1a</xref>) for 7–10 days: The glass covering the wells was broken without disturbing the bolus and 2 μl soak solution (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1a</xref>) were added before resealing with a fresh siliconized glass coverslip, incubating overnight (16–18 hr), then harvesting and flash freezing for data collection.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>X-ray diffraction data collection and processing</title><p>Diffraction data for structure determination and refinement were collected at beamlines 24-ID-C or 23-ID-B of the Advanced Photon Source at wavelengths of 0.984 Å or 1.033 Å, respectively. We used anomalous signals to confirm the presence of metals (Mn<sup>2+</sup> or Cd<sup>2+</sup>) in the binding site. For D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, the same data we used for structure refinement and collected at 1.033 Å, 0.984 Å, respectively, provided strong anomalous signal in the metal-binding sites. For WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>, we were able to collect data at 1.904 Å (near the low-energy boundary for the beamline), to maximize the anomalous signal. Locations of the crystals in the mesh loops were identified by grid scanning with a 20 μm beam at 10% transmission followed by data collection with a 10 μm beam at 15% transmission. Data were indexed in XDS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Kabsch, 2010</xref>) and scaled in CCP4 AIMLESS (Version 7.0) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Evans and Murshudov, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Winn et al., 2011</xref>). For datasets collected from several crystals, data from each crystal were independently indexed and integrated, then combined during scaling using CCP4 AIMLESS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Evans and Murshudov, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Winn et al., 2011</xref>) to obtain complete datasets. The resolution cut-off of each structure was defined based on CC1/2 values of 0.3 and above (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Karplus and Diederichs, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Karplus and Diederichs, 2015</xref>). Initial phases for all structures were determined by molecular replacement in PHENIX (Version 1.17.1–3660) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Liebschner et al., 2019</xref>) using an occluded structure of DraNramp (PDB ID 6C3I chain A) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Bozzi et al., 2019b</xref>) as search model. Data statistics are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1b and d</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Model building, refinement, and analysis</title><p>Models were built in COOT (Version 7.0) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Emsley et al., 2010</xref>) and refined in PHENIX (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Liebschner et al., 2019</xref>), with macrocycles including reciprocal space, TLS groups, and individual B-factor refinement, and optimization of the X-ray/stereochemistry and X-ray/ADP weights. For WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>, ‘anomalous group refinement’ was used to improve the fit to density of the Cd<sup>2+</sup> ions, with Cd<sup>2+</sup> as an ‘anomalous group’ with the reference f’ and f” values suggested by phenix.form.factor (–0.462 and 2.132, respectively). Ligand restraints for monoolein and spermidine were generated in Phenix.elbow with automatic geometry optimization. All structures contain one protein molecule in the asymmetric unit. The final structures span from residues 45–48 to residues 433–436, except that residues 240–249 and 240–247 were not modeled in D296•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>, respectively, because of lack of interpretable electron density map. Model refinement statistics are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1b and d</xref>. Pairwise RMSD for all structures are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1c</xref>. Anomalous difference Fourier maps for Mn<sup>2+</sup> (D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>) and Cd<sup>2+</sup> (WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>) were generated in phenix.maps using a high-resolution cutoff of 3.5–4.5 Å. Polder maps omitting the metal ions were generated in phenix.polder to appropriately define the coordination sphere for Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> in all structures. All software were provided by SBGrid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Morin et al., 2013</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Metal binding measurements using ITC</title><p>ITC experiments were performed using MicroCal iTC200 (GE Healthcare) to determine the affinity and thermodynamic parameters of binding of divalent metals (Mn<sup>2+</sup>, Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>) to DraNramp (WT and its mutants) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Leavitt and Freire, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib89">Wiseman et al., 1989</xref>). All protein and metal solutions were prepared in ITC buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and 0.003% LMNG). The sample cell containing 25 μM protein was titrated with 20 2 μL injections of 6 mM metal, with an interval of 120 s between each successive 5 s injection, with a 750 rpm stirring rate at 25 °C. To nullify the heat of dilution, the data from titration of a metal solution into ITC buffer (‘buffer blank’ runs) were subtracted from the metal-protein titration curves prior to model fitting. Data were fitted and analyzed as detailed in Appendix 1. Briefly, as per best practice when <italic>c</italic> values (association constant × molar protein concentration) are below 1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Picollo et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Tellinghuisen, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Turnbull and Daranas, 2003</xref>), all the data reported for each construct are fitted fixing the number of sites (one-site binding model with fixed n=1 or sequential binding model with fixed n=2). The binding stoichiometry was selected based the model fits and knowledge from the crystal structures and mutational analysis. Data were fitted with Origin 7 software. The mean K<sub>d</sub> values ± SEM from 2 to 3 repeats (from independent protein purifications) for each sample are reported in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1g</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Proteoliposome-based in vitro transport assays</title><p>Protein purification, liposome preparation, and metal transport assays were performed as described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bozzi et al., 2016a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Bozzi et al., 2019a</xref>). Purifications of each protein construct were performed at least twice and resulted in similar data. For each construct, the presented data originates from two to three batches of reconstituted liposomes, each from an independent protein purification, represented as scatter plots of each data point and the corresponding mean.</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title>Sequence alignments</title><p>We used 92 Nramp sequences from Pfam (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">El-Gebali et al., 2019</xref>) to build a seed alignment using MUSCLE (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Edgar, 2004</xref>). We collected 15,451 sequences from Uniprot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Bateman et al., 2021</xref>) using HMMER (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Potter et al., 2018</xref>). We used HMMER’s hmmalign, with a hidden Markov model profile from the seed alignment as an input, to align all 15,451 sequences. We applied filters to retain sequences 400–600 residues in length and sequences with under 90% pairwise sequence identity, respectively. The final alignment contains 6712 sequences and is well aligned at biologically relevant residues (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata1">Figure 1—source data 1</xref>). A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was generated via RAxML-NG <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Kozlov et al., 2019</xref> using the LG substitution model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Le and Gascuel, 2008</xref>), with the likeliest final tree selected from 10 parallel optimization trials (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata2">Figure 1—source data 2</xref>). The canonical Nramp clade in this tree was identified based on conservation of the ‘DPGN’ and ‘MPH’ motifs in transmembrane helices 1 and 6, respectively, and contained 3796 sequences. The Nramp-related magnesium transporters were used to root the canonical Nramp phylogeny. Sequence analysis was done with Biopython (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Cock et al., 2009</xref>) and sequence logos were generated with logomaker (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Tareen and Kinney, 2020</xref>) using a ‘chemistry’ color scheme inspired by WebLogo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Crooks et al., 2004</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-11"><title>Molecular dynamics simulation</title><p>Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were initialized from three high-resolution structures of DraNramp: the outward-open G223W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> structure (6BU5) with Mn<sup>2+</sup> removed and W223 mutated back to the native glycine residue in silico, the inward-open WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> structure with Cd<sup>2+</sup> removed, and the inward-occluded WT structure. Crystallographic waters were retained, and protonation states of key titratable residues were selected with PROPKA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Olsson et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Søndergaard et al., 2011</xref>) assuming a pH of 5.0 for residues exposed to external solvent and a pH of 7.0 for residues exposed to cytosol, a condition under which DraNramp exhibits high activity. All structures were oriented in the membrane with the PPM web server and membrane systems were prepared with CHARMM-GUI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Jo et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Lee et al., 2016</xref>). A POPC membrane of surface area 99×99 Å was constructed in the XY plane around the protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Wu et al., 2014</xref>), the system was solvated in a 100×100×100 Å<sup>3</sup> rectangular box using TIP3 waters and electronically neutralized using potassium and chlorine ions at an overall concentration of 150 mM. The overall system size was approximately 103,000 atoms.</p><p>All-atom simulations were run using GPU-accelerated NAMD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Phillips et al., 2008</xref>) and the CHARMM36m forcefield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Huang et al., 2017</xref>). Prior to simulation, the energy of each system was minimized for 10,000 steps using a conjugate gradient and line search algorithm native to NAMD. To improve simulation stability, the system was initially equilibrated using an NVT-ensemble with harmonic restraints placed on protein and lipid heavy atoms. The harmonic restraints were then incrementally relaxed over a period of 675 ps according to established CHARMM-GUI protocols (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Lee et al., 2016</xref>). The system was then simulated at a constant pressure, utilizing the Langevin piston method to maintain 1 atm at 303.15 K, from anywhere between 617 and 1176 ns depending on the starting conformation. Simulations were performed using periodic boundary conditions and a time step of 3.0 fs with all bonds to hydrogens being constrained. Large integration timesteps were enabled by employing hydrogen mass repartitioning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Hopkins et al., 2015</xref>). Long-range electrostatic interactions were calculated using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method with nonbonded interactions being cut off at 12 Å. Each simulation was performed in duplicate resulting in approximately 2 µs of total sampling for each system. Simulations are summarized in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1i</xref>.</p><p>RMSD, residue distance, and dihedral analyses were performed using mdtraj version 1.9.8 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">McGibbon et al., 2015</xref>). For distance analysis, the minimum interatomic distances were identified between the specified residues across each frame. For water analysis, simulations were centered and wrapped in VMD and a Tcl script was used to produce water density maps. Contour maps of these densities were then visualized in PyMOL. Water occupancies of sites coordinated by specific residues were also calculated in an alignment-agnostic manner by determining for each frame in each simulation whether a water was present within 2.5 Å of both specified residues. Distinct rotamers were identified from dihedrals using spectral clustering as implemented in scikit-learn version 1.0.</p></sec><sec id="s4-12"><title>Data availability</title><p>Atomic coordinates and structure factors for the crystal structures reported in this work have been deposited to the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers 8E5S (WT), 8E5V (WT<sub>soak</sub>), 8E60 (WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), 8E6H (A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), 8E6I (M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), 8E6L (D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), 8E6M (WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>), and 8E6N (re-refined G223W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>). Corresponding X-ray diffraction images have been deposited to the SBGrid Data Bank under the respective accession numbers 962 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/962), 963 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/963), 964 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/ 964), 966 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/966), 967 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/967), 968 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/968), 969 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/969), and previously deposited 564 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/564). The multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree have been provided as <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata1">Figure 1—source data 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata2">Figure 1—source data 2</xref>, respectively. All liposome-based transport data are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata3">Figure 1—source data 3</xref>. Code for analysis of molecular dynamics data, as well as the raw data plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s2">Figure 4—figure supplement 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s3">Figure 4—figure supplement 3</xref>, can be found at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/samberry19/nramp-md">https://github.com/samberry19/nramp-md</ext-link> (MIT license). Raw molecular dynamics trajectory files are available on Dryad (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tx95x6b2b">https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tx95x6b2b</ext-link>). Source files (origin files) of all ITC experiments are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app1table1sdata1">Appendix 1—table 1—source data 1</xref> (Mn<sup>2+</sup> isotherms), <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app1table2sdata1">Appendix 1—table 2—source data 1</xref> (Cd<sup>2+</sup> isotherms) and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5sdata1">Figure 5—source data 1</xref>(Mg<sup>2+</sup> isotherms).</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf2"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>Additional tables with methodological details and results from data analyses.</title><p>(a) Construct, precipitant, and soaking solutions used for each structure. (b) Data collection and refinement statistics for the four supporting new DraNramp structures. (c) Cα RMSD in Å for all DraNramp structure pairs (number of aligned residues in parentheses). (d) Data collection statistics for anomalous maps. (e) Distances to metal (Å) for coordinating atoms at the orthosteric site. (f) Coordination number and geometry of metal ions in the orthosteric site. (g) Binding affinity of metals to various DraNramp constructs. (h) Primers for Mutagenesis (5’ to 3’ sequence). (i) Summary of molecular dynamics simulations.</p></caption><media xlink:href="elife-84006-supp1-v2.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-84006-mdarchecklist1-v2.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>Atomic coordinates and structure factors for the crystal structures reported in this work have been deposited to the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers 8E5S (WT), 8E5V (WTsoak), 8E60 (WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), 8E6H (A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), 8E6I (M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), 8E6L (D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>), 8E6M (WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>), and 8E6N (re-refined G223W•Mn<sup>2+</sup>). Corresponding X-ray diffraction images have been deposited to the SBGrid Data Bank under the respective accession numbers 962 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/962), 963 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/963), 964 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/ 964), 966 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/966), 967 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/967), 968 (doi:10.15785/ SBGRID/968), 969 (doi:10.15785/SBGRID/969), and previously deposited 564 (doi:10.15785/ SBGRID/564). The multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree have been provided as Figure 1-source data 1 and Figure 1-source data 2, respectively. All liposome-based transport data are provided in Figure 1-source data 3. Code for analysis of molecular dynamics data, as well as the raw data plotted in Figure 4-figure supplement 2 and Figure 4-figure supplement 3, can be found at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/samberry19/nramp-md">https://github.com/samberry19/nramp-md</ext-link> (MIT license). Raw molecular dynamics trajectory files are available on Dryad (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tx95x6b2b">https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tx95x6b2b</ext-link>). Source files (origin files) of all ITC experiments are provided in Appendix 1-table 1-source data 1 (Mn<sup>2+</sup> isotherms), Appendix 1-table 2-source data 1 (Cd<sup>2+</sup> isotherms) and Figure 5-source data 1 (Mg<sup>2+</sup> isotherms).</p><p>The following datasets were generated:</p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset1"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Berry</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Shekhar</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Singharoy</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>Molecular dynamics simulations in: High-resolution structures with bound Mn2+ and Cd2+ map the metal import pathway in an Nramp transporter</data-title><source>Dryad Digital Repository</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5061/dryad.tx95x6b2b</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset2"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-ray structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter WT in an occluded state</data-title><source>RCSB Protein Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8E5S">8E5S</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset3"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-ray structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter WTsoak in an occluded state</data-title><source>RCSB Protein Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8E5V">8E5V</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset4"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-ray structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter WT in an occluded, manganese-bound state</data-title><source>RCSB Protein Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8E60">8E60</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset5"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-ray structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter A47W mutant in an occluded, manganese-bound state</data-title><source>RCSB Protein Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8E6H">8E6H</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset6"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-ray structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter M230A mutant in an inward-open, manganese-bound state</data-title><source>RCSB Protein Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8E6I">8E6I</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset7"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-ray structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter D296A mutant in an inward-open, manganese-bound state</data-title><source>RCSB Protein Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8E6L">8E6L</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset8"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-ray structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter WT in an inward-open, cadmium-bound state</data-title><source>RCSB Protein Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8E6M">8E6M</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset9"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-ray structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter G223W mutant in an outward-open, manganese-bound state</data-title><source>RCSB Protein Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8E6N">8E6N</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset10"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-Ray Diffraction data from WT Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter from Deinococcus radiodurans, source of 8E5S structure</data-title><source>SBGrid Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15785/SBGRID/962</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset11"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-Ray Diffraction data from WTsoak Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter from Deinococcus radiodurans, source of 8E5V structure</data-title><source>SBGrid Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15785/SBGRID/963</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset12"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-Ray Diffraction data from Manganese-bound WT Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter from Deinococcus radiodurans, source of 8E60 structure</data-title><source>SBGrid Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15785/SBGRID/964</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset13"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-Ray Diffraction data from Mn-bound A47W mutant Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter from Deinococcus radiodurans, source of 8E6H structure</data-title><source>SBGrid Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15785/SBGRID/966</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset14"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-Ray Diffraction data from Mn-bound M230A mutant Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter from Deinococcus radiodurans, source of 8E6I structure</data-title><source>SBGrid Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15785/SBGRID/967</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset15"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-Ray Diffraction data from Mn-bound D296A mutant Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter from Deinococcus radiodurans, source of 8E6L structure</data-title><source>SBGrid Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15785/SBGRID/968</pub-id></element-citation></p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset16"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><data-title>X-Ray Diffraction data from Cadmium-bound WT Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter from Deinococcus radiodurans, source of 8E6M structure</data-title><source>SBGrid Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15785/SBGRID/969</pub-id></element-citation></p><p>The following previously published dataset was used:</p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="references" id="dataset17"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bozzi</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicoludis</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><data-title>X-Ray Diffraction data from Deinococcus radiodurans Nramp/MntH divalent transition metal transporter in the outward-open, mangan, source of 6BU5 structure</data-title><source>SBGrid Data Bank</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15785/SBGRID/564</pub-id></element-citation></p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Arghya Deb for discussions of metal coordination chemistry, and previous and current members of the Gaudet lab for discussions and assistance, particularly Gerardo Zavala and Edward Lee for contributions to preliminary molecular dynamics analyses, and José Velilla for help with crystal soaking and fishing prior to data collection. This work was funded by NIGMS grant R01GM120996 (RG), a National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER award MCB-1942763 (AS), AstraZenaca and ASU-Mayo Foundation (EW), and the NSF-Simons Center for Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Biology at Harvard (award number 1764269) and the Harvard Quantitative Biology Initiative (SB). Diffraction data reported in this study were collected at NE-CAT beamline 24IDC and GM/CA beamline 23IDB in the Advanced Photon Source. NE-CAT is funded by NIGMS grant P30 GM124165 and GM/CA is funded by the National Cancer Institute (ACB-12002) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (AGM-12006, P30GM138396). The Eiger 16 M detector at GM/CA-XSD is funded by NIH grant S10 OD012289. The Advanced Photon Source is a U.S. Department of Energy Facility operated by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The molecular simulations used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) supported by NSF (ACI-1548562), and Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, supported by the Office of Science, Department of Energy (DE-AC05-00OR22725).</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrews</surname><given-names>NC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Metal transporters and disease</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Chemical Biology</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>181</fpage><lpage>186</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00307-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12039002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barber-Zucker</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Shaanan</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Zarivach</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Transition metal binding selectivity in proteins and its correlation with the phylogenomic classification of the cation diffusion facilitator protein family</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>16381</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-16777-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29180655</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bateman</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Orchard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Magrane</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Agivetova</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Alpi</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Bowler-Barnett</surname><given-names>EH</given-names></name><name><surname>Britto</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Bursteinas</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Bye-A-Jee</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Coetzee</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Cukura</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Da Silva</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Denny</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Dogan</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ebenezer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro</surname><given-names>LG</given-names></name><name><surname>Garmiri</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Georghiou</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Gonzales</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hatton-Ellis</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Hussein</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ignatchenko</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Insana</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishtiaq</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Jokinen</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Joshi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Jyothi</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lock</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopez</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Luciani</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lussi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>MacDougall</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Madeira</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahmoudy</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Menchi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Moulang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nightingale</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Pundir</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Raj</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rice</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopez</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Saidi</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Sampson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Sawford</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Speretta</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Tyagi</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Vasudev</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Volynkin</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Warner</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Watkins</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaru</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Zellner</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Bridge</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Poux</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Redaschi</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Aimo</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Argoud-Puy</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Auchincloss</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Axelsen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Bansal</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Baratin</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Blatter</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bolleman</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Boutet</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Breuza</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Casals-Casas</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>de Castro</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Echioukh</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Coudert</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Cuche</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Doche</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Dornevil</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Estreicher</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Famiglietti</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Feuermann</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gasteiger</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Gehant</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerritsen</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Gos</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gruaz-Gumowski</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Hinz</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Hulo</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hyka-Nouspikel</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Jungo</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Keller</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kerhornou</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lara</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Mercier</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lieberherr</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lombardot</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Masson</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Morgat</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Neto</surname><given-names>TB</given-names></name><name><surname>Paesano</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedruzzi</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Pilbout</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pourcel</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Pozzato</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Pruess</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rivoire</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sigrist</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sonesson</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Stutz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sundaram</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tognolli</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Verbregue</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Arighi</surname><given-names>CN</given-names></name><name><surname>Arminski</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Garavelli</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Laiho</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>McGarvey</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Natale</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ross</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Vinayaka</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yeh</surname><given-names>LS</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruch</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Teodoro</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>49</volume><fpage>D480</fpage><lpage>D489</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkaa1100</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33237286</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Begg</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Eijkelkamp</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Couñago</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Morey</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Maher</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ong</surname><given-names>C-LY</given-names></name><name><surname>McEwan</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Kobe</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>O’Mara</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Paton</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>McDevitt</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Dysregulation of transition metal ion homeostasis is the molecular basis for cadmium toxicity in Streptococcus pneumoniae</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>6418</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms7418</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25731976</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bleackley</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Macgillivray</surname><given-names>RTA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Transition metal homeostasis: from yeast to human disease</article-title><source>Biometals</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>785</fpage><lpage>809</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10534-011-9451-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21479832</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bozzi</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Bane</surname><given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Weihofen</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name><name><surname>McCabe</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Singharoy</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chipot</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulten</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016a</year><article-title>Conserved methionine dictates substrate preference in nramp-family divalent metal transporters</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>113</volume><fpage>10310</fpage><lpage>10315</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1607734113</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27573840</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bozzi</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Bane</surname><given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Weihofen</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name><name><surname>Singharoy</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Guillen</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Ploegh</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulten</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016b</year><article-title>Crystal structure and conformational change mechanism of a bacterial nramp-family divalent metal transporter</article-title><source>Structure</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>2102</fpage><lpage>2114</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.str.2016.09.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27839948</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bozzi</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Bane</surname><given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Zimanyi</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019a</year><article-title>Unique structural features in an nramp metal transporter impart substrate-specific proton cotransport and a kinetic bias to favor import</article-title><source>The Journal of General Physiology</source><volume>151</volume><fpage>1413</fpage><lpage>1429</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1085/jgp.201912428</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31619456</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bozzi</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Zimanyi</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicoludis</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>BK</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019b</year><article-title>Structures in multiple conformations reveal distinct transition metal and proton pathways in an Nramp transporter</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>e41124</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.41124</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30714568</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bozzi</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>McCabe</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Barnett</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Transmembrane helix 6b links proton and metal release pathways and drives conformational change in an nramp-family transition metal transporter</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>295</volume><fpage>1212</fpage><lpage>1224</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.RA119.011336</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31882536</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bozzi</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudet</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Molecular mechanism of nramp-family transition metal transport</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Biology</source><volume>433</volume><elocation-id>166991</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166991</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33865868</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Budinger</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Barral</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Soo</surname><given-names>AKS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurian</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The role of manganese dysregulation in neurological disease: emerging evidence</article-title><source>The Lancet. Neurology</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>956</fpage><lpage>968</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00238-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34687639</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="confproc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cammack</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Hughes</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Considerations for the Specification of Enzyme Assays Involving Metal Ions</article-title><conf-name>Proceedings of the 3rd Beilstein ESCEC Symposium “Experimental Standard Conditions Of Enzyme Characterization.”</conf-name><conf-loc>Rüdesheim, Germany</conf-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cellier</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gros</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><source>The NRAMP Family</source><publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Selective recognition of metal ions by metalloregulatory proteins</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Chemical Biology</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>214</fpage><lpage>221</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.12.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18258210</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cock</surname><given-names>PJA</given-names></name><name><surname>Antao</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Chapman</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cox</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Dalke</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Friedberg</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamelryck</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kauff</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilczynski</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>de Hoon</surname><given-names>MJL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Biopython: freely available python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1422</fpage><lpage>1423</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19304878</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coleman</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Green</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouaux</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>X-Ray structures and mechanism of the human serotonin transporter</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>532</volume><fpage>334</fpage><lpage>339</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature17629</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27049939</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coleman</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoshioka</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Tajkhorshid</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouaux</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Serotonin transporter-ibogaine complexes illuminate mechanisms of inhibition and transport</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>569</volume><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-019-1135-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31019304</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Couñago</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ween</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Begg</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Bajaj</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zuegg</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>O’Mara</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>McEwan</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Paton</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kobe</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>McDevitt</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Imperfect coordination chemistry facilitates metal ion release in the PSA permease</article-title><source>Nature Chemical Biology</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>41</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nchembio.1382</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24212134</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crooks</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Hon</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Chandonia</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Brenner</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Weblogo: a sequence logo generator</article-title><source>Genome Research</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>1188</fpage><lpage>1190</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.849004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15173120</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davidsson</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lönnerdal</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sandström</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Kunz</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Keen</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1989">1989</year><article-title>Identification of transferrin as the major plasma carrier protein for manganese introduced orally or intravenously or after in vitro addition in the rat</article-title><source>The Journal of Nutrition</source><volume>119</volume><fpage>1461</fpage><lpage>1464</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jn/119.10.1461</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2585137</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Del Alamo</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Meiler</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mchaourab</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Principles of alternating access in leut-fold transporters: commonalities and divergences</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Biology</source><volume>434</volume><elocation-id>167746</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167746</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35843285</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dudev</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dudev</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Factors governing the metal coordination number in metal complexes from cambridge structural database analyses</article-title><source>The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B</source><volume>110</volume><fpage>1889</fpage><lpage>1895</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jp054975n</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16471760</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dudev</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Competition among metal ions for protein binding sites: determinants of metal ion selectivity in proteins</article-title><source>Chemical Reviews</source><volume>114</volume><fpage>538</fpage><lpage>556</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/cr4004665</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24040963</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edgar</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity</article-title><source>BMC Bioinformatics</source><volume>5</volume><elocation-id>113</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-5-113</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15318951</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ehrnstorfer</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Geertsma</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Pardon</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Steyaert</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dutzler</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Crystal structure of a SLC11 (NRAMP) transporter reveals the basis for transition-metal ion transport</article-title><source>Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>990</fpage><lpage>996</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nsmb.2904</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25326704</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ehrnstorfer</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Manatschal</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Arnold</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name><name><surname>Laederach</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dutzler</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Structural and mechanistic basis of proton-coupled metal ion transport in the SLC11/NRAMP family</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>14033</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms14033</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28059071</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekiz</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Agaoglu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Karakas</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurel</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Yalcin</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>The effect of iron deficiency anemia on the function of the immune system</article-title><source>The Hematology Journal</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>579</fpage><lpage>583</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.thj.6200574</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15692603</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>El-Gebali</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mistry</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bateman</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eddy</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Luciani</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Potter</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Qureshi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Salazar</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Smart</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sonnhammer</surname><given-names>ELL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirsh</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Paladin</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Piovesan</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Tosatto</surname><given-names>SCE</given-names></name><name><surname>Finn</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>The pfam protein families database in 2019</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>47</volume><fpage>D427</fpage><lpage>D432</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gky995</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30357350</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Emsley</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lohkamp</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>WG</given-names></name><name><surname>Cowtan</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Features and development of coot</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>486</fpage><lpage>501</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0907444910007493</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20383002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name><name><surname>Murshudov</surname><given-names>GN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>How good are my data and what is the resolution?</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>1204</fpage><lpage>1214</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0907444913000061</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23793146</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faham</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Watanabe</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Besserer</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name><name><surname>Cascio</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Specht</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirayama</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Abramson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>The crystal structure of a sodium galactose transporter reveals mechanistic insights into na+/sugar symport</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>321</volume><fpage>810</fpage><lpage>814</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1160406</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18599740</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferrante</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gorski</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Enthalpy-Entropy compensation and cooperativity as thermodynamic epiphenomena of structural flexibility in ligand-receptor interactions</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Biology</source><volume>417</volume><fpage>454</fpage><lpage>467</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.057</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22342886</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Glasfeld</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Guedon</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Helmann</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Brennan</surname><given-names>RG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Structure of the manganese-bound manganese transport regulator of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic></article-title><source>Nature Structural Biology</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>652</fpage><lpage>657</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nsb951</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12847518</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harding</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>The geometry of metal-ligand interactions relevant to proteins. II. angles at the metal atom, additional weak metal-donor interactions</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography</source><volume>56</volume><fpage>857</fpage><lpage>867</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/s0907444900005849</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10930832</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harding</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Geometry of metal-ligand interactions in proteins</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>401</fpage><lpage>411</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/s0907444900019168</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11223517</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hopkins</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Grand</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Walker</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Roitberg</surname><given-names>AE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Long-time-step molecular dynamics through hydrogen mass repartitioning</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>1864</fpage><lpage>1874</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ct5010406</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26574392</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Rauscher</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nawrocki</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Ran</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Feig</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>de Groot</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name><name><surname>Grubmüller</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>MacKerell</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.4067</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27819658</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>I Bannon</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Portnoy</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Olivi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lees</surname><given-names>PSJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Culotta</surname><given-names>VC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bressler</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Uptake of lead and iron by divalent metal transporter 1 in yeast and mammalian cells</article-title><source>Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</source><volume>295</volume><fpage>978</fpage><lpage>984</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0006-291x(02)00756-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12127992</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Illing</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Shawki</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Cunningham</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Mackenzie</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Substrate profile and metal-ion selectivity of human divalent metal-ion transporter-1</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>287</volume><fpage>30485</fpage><lpage>30496</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M112.364208</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22736759</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Irving</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>RJP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1953">1953</year><article-title>637. the stability of transition-metal complexes</article-title><source>Journal of the Chemical Society</source><elocation-id>3192</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/jr9530003192</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Iyer</surname><given-names>VG</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Chemistry</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>1859</fpage><lpage>1865</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.20945</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18351591</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jung</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mertens</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Brüne</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Macrophage iron homeostasis and polarization in the context of cancer</article-title><source>Immunobiology</source><volume>220</volume><fpage>295</fpage><lpage>304</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.imbio.2014.09.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25260218</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jurrus</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Engel</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Star</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Monson</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Brandi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Felberg</surname><given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>Brookes</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Liles</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Chun</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Gohara</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name><name><surname>Dolinsky</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Konecny</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Koes</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Nielsen</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Head-Gordon</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Geng</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Krasny</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>G-W</given-names></name><name><surname>Holst</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>McCammon</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite</article-title><source>Protein Science</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>112</fpage><lpage>128</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/pro.3280</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28836357</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kabsch</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>XDS</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>125</fpage><lpage>132</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0907444909047337</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20124692</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karplus</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Diederichs</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Linking crystallographic model and data quality</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>336</volume><fpage>1030</fpage><lpage>1033</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1218231</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22628654</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karplus</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Diederichs</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Assessing and maximizing data quality in macromolecular crystallography</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Structural Biology</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>60</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sbi.2015.07.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26209821</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kawabata</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Transferrin and transferrin receptors update</article-title><source>Free Radical Biology &amp; Medicine</source><volume>133</volume><fpage>46</fpage><lpage>54</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.06.037</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29969719</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kozlov</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Darriba</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Flouri</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Morel</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Stamatakis</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wren</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>4453</fpage><lpage>4455</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31070718</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krishnamurthy</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Piscitelli</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouaux</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Unlocking the molecular secrets of sodium-coupled transporters</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>459</volume><fpage>347</fpage><lpage>355</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature08143</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19458710</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krishnamurthy</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouaux</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>X-ray structures of leut in substrate-free outward-open and apo inward-open states</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>481</volume><fpage>469</fpage><lpage>474</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature10737</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22230955</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumarevel</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizuno</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>PKR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Characterization of the metal ion binding site in the anti-terminator protein, hutp, of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic></article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>5494</fpage><lpage>5502</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gki868</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16192572</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Le</surname><given-names>SQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Gascuel</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>An improved general amino acid replacement matrix</article-title><source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1307</fpage><lpage>1320</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msn067</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18367465</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leavitt</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Freire</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Direct measurement of protein binding energetics by isothermal titration calorimetry</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Structural Biology</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>560</fpage><lpage>566</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00248-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11785756</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Swails</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Yeom</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Eastman</surname><given-names>PK</given-names></name><name><surname>Lemkul</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Buckner</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Jo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pande</surname><given-names>VS</given-names></name><name><surname>Case</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Brooks</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>MacKerell</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Klauda</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>CHARMM-gui input generator for namd, gromacs, amber, openmm, and CHARMM/openmm simulations using the charmm36 additive force field</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>405</fpage><lpage>413</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00935</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26631602</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liebschner</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Afonine</surname><given-names>PV</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Bunkóczi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>VB</given-names></name><name><surname>Croll</surname><given-names>TI</given-names></name><name><surname>Hintze</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Hung</surname><given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Jain</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>McCoy</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Moriarty</surname><given-names>NW</given-names></name><name><surname>Oeffner</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Poon</surname><given-names>BK</given-names></name><name><surname>Prisant</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Read</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Sammito</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Sobolev</surname><given-names>OV</given-names></name><name><surname>Stockwell</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Terwilliger</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Urzhumtsev</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Videau</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Adams</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Macromolecular structure determination using x-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in phenix</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology</source><volume>75</volume><fpage>861</fpage><lpage>877</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S2059798319011471</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31588918</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernández-Robledo</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cellier</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>Vasta</surname><given-names>GR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Metals and membrane metal transporters in biological systems: the role (S) of Nramp in host-parasite interactions</article-title><source>J Argent Chem Soc</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>210</fpage><lpage>225</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Barker</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Knutson</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Iron and manganese transport in mammalian systems</article-title><source>Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Cell Research</source><volume>1868</volume><elocation-id>118890</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118890</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33091506</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Loo</surname><given-names>DD</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirayama</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Gallardo</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lam</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Turk</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Conformational changes couple Na<sup>+</sup> and glucose transport</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>95</volume><fpage>7789</fpage><lpage>7794</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.95.13.7789</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9636229</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacobsen</surname><given-names>FE</given-names></name><name><surname>Giedroc</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Metal transporters and metal sensors: how coordination chemistry controls bacterial metal homeostasis</article-title><source>Chemical Reviews</source><volume>109</volume><elocation-id>4644</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/cr900077w</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manatschal</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pujol-Giménez</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Poirier</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Reymond</surname><given-names>J-L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hediger</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Dutzler</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Mechanistic basis of the inhibition of SLC11/NRAMP-mediated metal ion transport by bis-isothiourea substituted compounds</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>8</volume><elocation-id>e51913</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.51913</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31804182</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McGibbon</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Beauchamp</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Harrigan</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Swails</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernández</surname><given-names>CX</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwantes</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>L-P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lane</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Pande</surname><given-names>VS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>MDTraj: A modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories</article-title><source>Biophysical Journal</source><volume>109</volume><fpage>1528</fpage><lpage>1532</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26488642</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morin</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eisenbraun</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Key</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanschagrin</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Timony</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ottaviano</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sliz</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Collaboration gets the most out of software</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>2</volume><elocation-id>e01456</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01456</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24040512</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nevo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>The NRAMP family of metal-ion transporters</article-title><source>Biochimica et Biophysica Acta</source><volume>1763</volume><fpage>609</fpage><lpage>620</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.05.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16908340</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nies</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Grass</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Transition metal homeostasis</article-title><source>EcoSal Plus</source><volume>3</volume><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/ecosalplus.5.4.4.3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26443772</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olsson</surname><given-names>TSG</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Pitt</surname><given-names>WR</given-names></name><name><surname>Ladbury</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>The thermodynamics of protein-ligand interaction and solvation: insights for ligand design</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Biology</source><volume>384</volume><fpage>1002</fpage><lpage>1017</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.073</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18930735</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olsson</surname><given-names>MHM</given-names></name><name><surname>Søndergaard</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Rostkowski</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pka predictions</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>525</fpage><lpage>537</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ct100578z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26596171</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perez</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Koshy</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yildiz</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Ziegler</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Alternating-Access mechanism in conformationally asymmetric trimers of the betaine transporter BetP</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>490</volume><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>130</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11403</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22940865</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="confproc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Stone</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulten</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Adapting a message-driven parallel application to GPU-accelerated clusters</article-title><conf-name>SC - International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis</conf-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/SC.2008.5214716</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Picollo</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Malvezzi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Houtman</surname><given-names>JCD</given-names></name><name><surname>Accardi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Basis of substrate binding and conservation of selectivity in the CLC family of channels and transporters</article-title><source>Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>1294</fpage><lpage>1301</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nsmb.1704</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19898476</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pittman</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Managing the manganese: molecular mechanisms of manganese transport and homeostasis</article-title><source>The New Phytologist</source><volume>167</volume><fpage>733</fpage><lpage>742</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01453.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16101910</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Potter</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Luciani</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eddy</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopez</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Finn</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>HMMER web server: 2018 update</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Research</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>W200</fpage><lpage>W204</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gky448</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29905871</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pujol-Giménez</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hediger</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Gyimesi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>A novel proton transfer mechanism in the SLC11 family of divalent metal ion transporters</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>6194</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-06446-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28754960</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramanadane</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Straub</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Dutzler</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Manatschal</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Structural and functional properties of a magnesium transporter of the SLC11/NRAMP family</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>e74589</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.74589</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35001872</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rulísek</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Vondrásek</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Coordination geometries of selected transition metal ions (Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+) in metalloproteins</article-title><source>Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry</source><volume>71</volume><fpage>115</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0162-0134(98)10042-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9833317</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sacher</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Properties of the mammalian and yeast metal-ion transporters DCT1 and Smf1p expressed in <italic>Xenopus laevis</italic> oocytes</article-title><source>The Journal of Experimental Biology</source><volume>204</volume><fpage>1053</fpage><lpage>1061</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jeb.204.6.1053</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11222124</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shimamura</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Weyand</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Beckstein</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Rutherford</surname><given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Hadden</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharples</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Sansom</surname><given-names>MSP</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwata</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Henderson</surname><given-names>PJF</given-names></name><name><surname>Cameron</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Molecular basis of alternating access membrane transport by the sodium-hydantoin transporter mhp1</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>328</volume><fpage>470</fpage><lpage>473</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1186303</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20413494</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simmons</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Jackson</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Brueckner</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Patching</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>Beckstein</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Ivanova</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Geng</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Weyand</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Drew</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lanigan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharples</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sansom</surname><given-names>MSP</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwata</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Fishwick</surname><given-names>CWG</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Cameron</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Henderson</surname><given-names>PJF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Molecular mechanism of ligand recognition by membrane transport protein, mhp1</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>1831</fpage><lpage>1844</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15252/embj.201387557</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24952894</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib79"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nanda Srivastva</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><chapter-title>Stability and applications of coordination compounds</chapter-title><source>Stability and Applications of Coordination</source><publisher-name>InTechOpen</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/intechopen.83186</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib80"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skamene</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Schurr</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Gros</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Infection genomics: nramp1 as a major determinant of natural resistance to intracellular infections</article-title><source>Annual Review of Medicine</source><volume>49</volume><fpage>275</fpage><lpage>287</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.med.49.1.275</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9509263</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib81"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Søndergaard</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Olsson</surname><given-names>MHM</given-names></name><name><surname>Rostkowski</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Improved treatment of ligands and coupling effects in empirical calculation and rationalization of pKa values</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>2284</fpage><lpage>2295</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ct200133y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26606496</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib82"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tareen</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kinney</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Logomaker: beautiful sequence logos in python</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>36</volume><fpage>2272</fpage><lpage>2274</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btz921</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31821414</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib83"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tellinghuisen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Isothermal titration calorimetry at very low c</article-title><source>Analytical Biochemistry</source><volume>373</volume><fpage>395</fpage><lpage>397</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ab.2007.08.039</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17920027</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib84"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turnbull</surname><given-names>WB</given-names></name><name><surname>Daranas</surname><given-names>AH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>On the value of C: can low affinity systems be studied by isothermal titration calorimetry?</article-title><source>Journal of the American Chemical Society</source><volume>125</volume><fpage>14859</fpage><lpage>14866</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ja036166s</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14640663</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib85"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vashishtha</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Konigsberg</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Different divalent cations alter the kinetics and fidelity of DNA polymerases</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>291</volume><fpage>20869</fpage><lpage>20875</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.R116.742494</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27462081</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib86"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vidal</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Malo</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Vogan</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Skamene</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Gros</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>Natural resistance to infection with intracellular parasites: isolation of a candidate for bcg</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>73</volume><fpage>469</fpage><lpage>485</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(93)90135-d</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8490962</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib87"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watanabe</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Choe</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaptal</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosenberg</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Grabe</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Abramson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>The mechanism of sodium and substrate release from the binding pocket of vsglt</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>468</volume><fpage>988</fpage><lpage>991</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature09580</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21131949</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib88"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Winn</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ballard</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Cowtan</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Dodson</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Emsley</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name><name><surname>Keegan</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Krissinel</surname><given-names>EB</given-names></name><name><surname>Leslie</surname><given-names>AGW</given-names></name><name><surname>McCoy</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>McNicholas</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Murshudov</surname><given-names>GN</given-names></name><name><surname>Pannu</surname><given-names>NS</given-names></name><name><surname>Potterton</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Powell</surname><given-names>HR</given-names></name><name><surname>Read</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Vagin</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments</article-title><source>Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography</source><volume>67</volume><fpage>235</fpage><lpage>242</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0907444910045749</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21460441</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib89"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wiseman</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Williston</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Brandts</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>LN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1989">1989</year><article-title>Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter</article-title><source>Analytical Biochemistry</source><volume>179</volume><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>137</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0003-2697(89)90213-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2757186</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib90"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Jo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rui</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Dávila-Contreras</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Monje-Galvan</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Venable</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Klauda</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>CHARMM-GUI membrane builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations</article-title><source>Journal of Computational Chemistry</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>1997</fpage><lpage>2004</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcc.23702</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib91"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yokoyama</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsuruta</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Akao</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujii</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Crystal structure of Helicobacter pylori neutrophil-activating protein with a di-nuclear ferroxidase center in a zinc or cadmium-bound form</article-title><source>Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications</source><volume>422</volume><fpage>745</fpage><lpage>750</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.073</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22618234</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list><app-group><app id="appendix-1"><title>Appendix 1</title><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8"><title>ITC analysis</title><p>In this appendix, we describe our choices of models to fit our ITC isotherms. Based on the isotherm shapes and preliminary fits, the <italic>c</italic> values (association constant × molar protein concentration) for all isotherms are below 1. Curve-fitting is most robust for 5&lt;<italic>c</italic> &lt; 500, a range which generally allows to fit binding site stoichiometry (<italic>n</italic>) in addition to the dissociation constant, K<sub>d</sub>, (or association constant, K<sub>a</sub>) and the enthalpy of association (ΔH) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Turnbull and Daranas, 2003</xref>). The combination of low metal ion binding affinity and the achievable protein amounts and concentration for DraNramp makes it impractical to achieve a higher <italic>c</italic> value. However, previous studies have demonstrated that data with <italic>c</italic>&lt;1 can still provide useful information on K<sub>d</sub> values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Picollo et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Tellinghuisen, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Turnbull and Daranas, 2003</xref>), Hence, as recommended in those studies, we fit the isotherms with either a one-site model with a fixed n=1, or a two-site sequential binding model (fixed n=2; <xref ref-type="table" rid="app1table2 app1table1">Appendix 1—tables 1 and 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="app1fig1">Appendix 1—figure 1</xref>). The assumptions inherent to fixing n are that we have accurately determined the concentrations of metal ion ligand and protein, but fixing n has little impact on the resulting K<sub>d</sub> value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Tellinghuisen, 2008</xref>). We then used the quality of fit and information from our crystal structures, mutational data to select the most appropriate fit to interpret each ITC isotherm dataset. Below we justify our choice of model for pairs of protein construct and metal ion ligand:</p><table-wrap id="app1table1" position="float"><label>Appendix 1—table 1.</label><caption><title>ITC analysis of all Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding isotherms, with chosen model and values shaded.</title><p><supplementary-material id="app1table1sdata1"><label>Appendix 1—table 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Source files (Origin files) of ITC experiments of manganese binding to each DraNramp construct.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-84006-app1-table1-data1-v2.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="2">Protein construct</th><th align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="8">Two-site sequential binding model (fixed n=2)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="4">One-site fit with fixed n=<bold>1</bold></th></tr><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">K<sub>d1</sub>(µM)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔH<sub>1</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">-TΔS<sub>1</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔG<sub>1</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">K<sub>d2</sub>(µM)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔH<sub>2</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">-TΔS<sub>2</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔG<sub>2</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">K<sub>d</sub>(µM)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔH(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">-TΔS(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔG(kcal/mol)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="4">WT</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">220</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">3.2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–8.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">961</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">5.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–9.2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.8</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">650</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">8.8</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–13.1</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–4.3</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">125</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">5.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–11.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">2700</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">17.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–20.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">380</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">12.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–16.9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–4.3</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">220</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–12.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">2250</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">13.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–17.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.4</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">500</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">15.4</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–19.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–4.2</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>190±30</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>5.6±1.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>10.6±1.4</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>5.1±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>1970±520</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>12.1±3.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>15.7±3.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.0±0.3</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>510±80</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>12.3±1.9</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">–<bold>16.5±1.8</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">–<bold>4.2±0.03</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">A47W</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">130</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">6.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–11.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">3100</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">20.6</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–23.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.2</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">380</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">13.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–18.1</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–4.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">120</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">6.2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–11.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">1800</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">11.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–14.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.5</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">300</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">11.9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–16.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–4.7</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>125±5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>6.2±0.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>11.3±0.0</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>5.0±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>2450±650</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>16±4.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>19.3±4.4</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>3.3±0.1</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>340±40</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>12.7±0.8</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">–<bold>17.3±0.7</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">–<bold>4.6±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">D56A</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">305</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">2.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–7.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">4800</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">20.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–23.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.1</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">2200</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">16.3</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–19.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–3.3</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">140</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">1.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–6.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">2700</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">22.6</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–25.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.3</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">2500</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">22.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–26.2</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–3.6</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>230±80</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>2.1±0.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>6.9±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.8±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>3800±1,100</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>21.5±1.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>24.7±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>3.2±0.1</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>2350±150</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>19.4±3</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">–<bold>22.9±3.3</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">–<bold>3.4±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">M230A</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">280</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–7.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">3300</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">14.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–18.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.2</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">1500</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">13.3</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–16.9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–3.6</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">150</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">2.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">5800</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">29.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–33.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.2</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">970</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">12.5</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–16.3</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–3.8</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>215±65</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>2.9±0.05</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>7.8±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.9±0.2</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>4600±1,300</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>22.4±7.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>25.6±7.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>3.2±0</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>1240±270</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>12.9±0.4</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">–<bold>16.6±0.3</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">–<bold>3.7±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">G223W</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">460</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">5.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–10.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.3</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">430</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–7.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.4</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>440±15</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>4.4±1.4</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>8.7±1.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.3±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="4">D296A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="4" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">430</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">8.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–13.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">320</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">9.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–14.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.8</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">370</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">10.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–14.6</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>370±30</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>9.5±0.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>14.1±0.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.6±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="4">D369A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="4" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">390</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">9.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–14</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">480</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">8.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–13.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">380</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">8.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–12.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>420±30</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>8.9±0.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>13.4±0.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.5±0</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">A47W-D296A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">300</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">6.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–10.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.6</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">210</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">13.2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–17.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.3</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>255±45</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>9.6±3.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>14.1±3.4</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.4±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">A47W-D369A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">210</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">7.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–12.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">400</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">6.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–11.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.6</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>300±95</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>7±0.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>11.8±0.7</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.8±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">D56A-D296A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">170</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">5.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–10.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.1</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">330</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">4.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–9.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.7</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>250±80</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>5.0±0.2</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>9.9±0.4</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.9±0.2</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">D56A-D369A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">280</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">4.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–9.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.6</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">145</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–8.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.9</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>210±70</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>4.4±0.4</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>9.2±0.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.7±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">M230A-D296A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">320</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">7.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–11.6</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">140</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">3.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–8.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.2</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>230±90</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>5.4±1.7</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>10.2±1.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>4.8±0.3</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">M230A-D369A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">750</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">11.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–15.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.9</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">790</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">7.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–11.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-4</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>770±20</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>9.7±1.8</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>13.6±1.7</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–<bold>3.9±0.05</bold></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="app1table2" position="float"><label>Appendix 1—table 2.</label><caption><title>ITC analysis of all Cd<sup>2+</sup>-binding isotherms, with chosen model and values shaded.</title><p><supplementary-material id="app1table2sdata1"><label>Appendix 1—table 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Source files (Origin files) of ITC experiments of cadmium binding to each DraNramp construct.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-84006-app1-table2-data1-v2.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="2">Protein construct</th><th align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="8">Two-site sequential binding model (fixed n=2)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="4">One-site fit with fixed n=1</th></tr><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">K<sub>d1</sub>(µM)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔH<sub>1</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">-TΔS<sub>1</sub> (kcal mol<sup>–1</sup>)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">K<sub>d1</sub>(µM)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔH<sub>1</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔH<sub>2</sub> (kcal mol<sup>–1</sup>)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">K<sub>d1</sub>(µM)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔH<sub>1</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">K<sub>d</sub>(µM)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">K<sub>d1</sub>(µM)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔH<sub>1</sub>(kcal/mol)</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">ΔG (kcal mol<sup>–1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="4">WT</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">85</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–0.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">260</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–2.6</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">105</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–2.3</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–2.9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.2</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">50</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–0.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.6</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">220</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–0.6</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.7</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">105</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">-9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">3.5</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">30</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–2.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–2.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">180</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–0.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-5</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">115</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–7.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">2.1</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.5</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>55±15</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–4.0±0.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–1.6±0.6</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–5.6±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>220±20</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–3.8±0.6</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–1.0±0.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–4.8±0.1</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>110±3</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>6±2</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–2.8±1.9</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–5.4±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">A47W</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">220</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–4.4</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–0.2</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–4.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">130</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">0.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="app1table2fn1"><sup>*</sup></xref></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">-5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">165</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–0.2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-5</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">140</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–1.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">-5</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>150±10</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–4.0±0.7</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–0.9±0.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–5.0±0.0</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">D56A</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">100</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–6.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">0.6</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">3000</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–11.2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">7.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.5</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">190</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–9.2</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">4.1</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.1</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">55</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–1.2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">1500</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–6.2</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">2.3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">130</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–6.9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">1.5</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.4</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>80±20</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–5.3±0.8</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–0.6±0.9</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–5.6±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>2250±750</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–8.7±2.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>5.0±0.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–3.7±0.1</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>160±30</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–8.0±1</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–2.8±1.3</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–5.2±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">M230A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">142</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–6.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">0.9</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.2</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">182</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–1.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.8</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>160±20</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–4.6±1.5</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–0.4±0.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–5.0±0.2</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">G223W</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="12">No Binding</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">D296A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3" colspan="8">Did not fit</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">122</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–1.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–6.8</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8">120</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.7</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–1.5</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.2</td></tr><tr><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>120±1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–3.6±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–1.6±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–6.0±0.8</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="3">D369A</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">100</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–1.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–3.5</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.1</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">5350</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">2.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="app1table2fn1">*</xref></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.9</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–3.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">80</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–1.4</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–4.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">90</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–2.5</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–2.6</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">–5.7</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">4850</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="app1table2fn1"><sup>*</sup></xref></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">-8</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">-3</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">60</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–2.1</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–3.8</td><td style="author-callout-style-b8">–5.9</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>95±5</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–5.3±0.8</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–3.1±0.4</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–5.4±0.1</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>5100±250</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>3.9±1.0</bold><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="app1table2fn1">*</xref></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–6.9±1.0</bold></td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom"><bold>–3.0±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>70±10</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–1.7±0.3</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–3.9±0.1</bold></td><td style="author-callout-style-b8"><bold>–5.7±0.1</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">A47W-D296A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="12">No Binding</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">A47W-D369A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="12">No Binding</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">D56A-D296A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="12">No Binding</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">D56A-D369A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="12">No Binding</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">M230A-D296A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="12">No Binding</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">M230A-D369A</td><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="12">No Binding</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="app1table2fn1"><label>*</label><p>Positive values of ΔH corresponding to an exothermic mode of Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding to protein indicates inappropriate fit</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-1"><title>WT binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> crystal structure revealed two Mn<sup>2+</sup> ions bound at distinct sites, and the overall fit of the ITC data is better for the two-site sequential binding model than the one-site model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="app1fig1">Appendix 1—figure 1A</xref>), with the two K<sub>d</sub> values differing by ~20 fold. Based on ITC of the constructs with mutations of the external site (D296A and D236A; see below), we assigned the higher affinity K<sub>d1</sub> to the orthosteric site (190±30 µM) and the lower affinity K<sub>d2</sub> to the external site (1970±520 µM).</p><fig id="app1fig1" position="float"><label>Appendix 1—figure 1.</label><caption><title>Comparison of one-site and two-site fit to ITC binding isotherms for each case where both types of fits gave results.</title><p>We show fits to a two-site sequential binding model (fixed n=2; left) or a one-site model with a fixed n=1 (right) for each case where both types of fits gave a result (<xref ref-type="table" rid="app1table1 app1table2">Appendix 1—tables 1 and 2</xref>). For constructs•ligand pairs WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<bold>A</bold>), A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<bold>B</bold>), M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<bold>C</bold>), and D56A•Cd<sup>2+</sup> (<bold>F</bold>), the two-site fit is better than the one-site fit, which corroborates findings from the crystal structures. For pairs WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> (<bold>E</bold>) and D56A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> (<bold>D</bold>), the fits are similar, and we used additional biochemical and structural information to select the most appropriate fit.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-84006-app1-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-2"><title>A47W binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> crystal structure revealed two Mn<sup>2+</sup> ions bound to the same sites as with WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup>, and the overall fit of the ITC data is better for the two-site sequential binding model than for the one-site model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="app1fig1">Appendix 1—figure 1B</xref>). The two K<sub>d</sub> values and the ITC data for the constructs with external-site mutations (A47W-D296A and A47W-D236A, both of which can only be fitted with a one-site model) are consistent with the K<sub>d</sub> assignments for WT, with the orthosteric site having higher affinity for Mn<sup>2+</sup> (K<sub>d1</sub>=125±5 µM) than the external site (K<sub>d2</sub>=2450±650 µM).</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-3"><title>M230A binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> crystal structure again revealed two bound Mn<sup>2+</sup>, and the overall fit of the ITC data is again better for the two-site sequential binding model than the one-site model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="app1fig1">Appendix 1—figure 1C</xref>). The two K<sub>d</sub> values and the ITC data for the constructs with external-site mutations (M230A-D296A and M230A-D236A, both of which only fit with a one-site model) are consistent with the K<sub>d</sub> assignments for WT, with the orthosteric site having higher affinity for Mn<sup>2+</sup> (K<sub>d1</sub>=215±65 µM) than the external site (K<sub>d2</sub>=4600±1300 µM).</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-4"><title>D56A binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The ITC data can be fitted using either the two-site sequential model or the one-site model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="app1fig1">Appendix 1—figure 1D</xref>). In contrast, the data for constructs with external-site mutations (D56A-D296A and D56A-D369A) only fit well using a one-site model. Hence, we selected the two-site sequential binding model to fit D56A binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup>, as it agrees best with the overall analysis, with the orthosteric site having higher affinity for Mn<sup>2+</sup> (K<sub>d1</sub>=230±80 µM) than the external site (K<sub>d2</sub>=3800±1100 µM).</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-5"><title>WT binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> crystal structure reveals two Cd<sup>2+</sup> ions bound at the same two distinct sites where Mn<sup>2+</sup> bound. Based on this observation we chose a two-site model rather than a one-site model to fit the ITC data, although the fits look similar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="app1fig1">Appendix 1—figure 1E</xref>). In contrast to Mn<sup>2+</sup> binding, the two K<sub>d</sub> values obtained using a two-site sequential binding model are more similar to each other (~4 fold difference). Based on ITC of the constructs with external-site mutations (D296A and D236A; see below), we assigned the higher affinity K<sub>d</sub> (K<sub>d1</sub>=55±15 µM) to the orthosteric site, and the lower affinity one to the external site (K<sub>d2</sub>=220±20 µM).</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-6"><title>A47W binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup></title><p>One-site model-based fits of the ITC data consistently yield better thermodynamic binding parameters; the two-site sequential binding model either does not fit or only fits with a positive ΔH which is inappropriate considering the observed exothermic binding. Furthermore, ITC measurements on the corresponding constructs with external-site mutations (A47W-D296A and A47W-D369A) showed no binding. Therefore, we chose the one-site model to fit the ITC data of A47W binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup> and we assigned the resulting K<sub>d</sub> value (150±10 µM) to the external site. We conclude that Cd<sup>2+</sup> does not bind to the A47W orthosteric site with measurable affinity.</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-7"><title>M230A binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The ITC data could only be fitted with the one-site model. The ITC measurements on the corresponding constructs with external-site mutations (M230A-D296A and M230A-D369A) showed no binding. We thus assigned the K<sub>d</sub> value obtained using the one-site model (160±20 µM) to the external site, and we conclude that Cd<sup>2+</sup> does not bind to the M230A orthosteric site with measurable affinity.</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-8"><title>D56A binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The ITC data fit better when using a two-site sequential binding model than a one-site model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="app1fig1">Appendix 1—figure 1F</xref>). The WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup> structure shows no direct interaction of D56 with Cd<sup>2+</sup>, suggesting that the D56A mutation may not completely impair Cd<sup>2+</sup> binding at the orthosteric site. We thus chose to use the two-site sequential binding model and assign higher affinity (K<sub>d1</sub>=80±20 µM) to the external site, and lower affinity (K<sub>d2</sub>=2250±750 µM) to the orthosteric site.</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-9"><title>G223W binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup></title><p>Consistent with the G223W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> crystal structure in which Mn<sup>2+</sup> is only bound at the orthosteric site, the ITC data could only be fitted with the one-site model. We assigned the resulting K<sub>d</sub> value (440±15 µM) to the orthosteric site.</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-10"><title>G223W binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The ITC data show no binding, which is consistent with our inability to obtain a crystal structure of G223W bound to Cd<sup>2+</sup>. This indicates that the outward-locked G223W does not bind Cd<sup>2+</sup> with measurable affinity at the orthosteric site.</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-11"><title>D296A binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup></title><p>Consistent with the D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> crystal structure in which Mn<sup>2+</sup> is bound at the orthosteric site but not at the external site, the ITC data could only be fitted with the one-site model. We assigned the resulting K<sub>d</sub> value (370±30 µM) to the orthosteric site.</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-12"><title>D296A binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The ITC data could only be fitted with the one-site model. We assigned the resulting K<sub>d</sub> value (120±10 µM) to the orthosteric site, because the D296A mutation removes an aspartate ligand at the external site.</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-13"><title>D369A binding to Mn<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The ITC data could only be fitted with the one-site model. We assigned the resulting K<sub>d</sub> value (420±30 µM) to the orthosteric site, because the D369A mutation removes an aspartate ligand at the external site.</p></sec><sec sec-type="appendix" id="s8-14"><title>D369A binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup></title><p>Fits of the ITC data using the one-site model consistently yielded better thermodynamic binding parameters; the two-site sequential binding model either resulted in no fit or in a fit with positive ΔH which is inappropriate considering the observed exothermic binding. We thus chose to fit the data with the one-site model, and we assigned the resulting K<sub>d</sub> value (70±10 µM) to the orthosteric site.</p></sec></sec></app></app-group></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.84006.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>Editor's evaluation</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Maduke</surname><given-names>Merritt</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00f54p054</institution-id><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><related-object id="sa0ro1" object-id-type="id" object-id="10.1101/2022.09.08.507188" link-type="continued-by" xlink:href="https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2022.09.08.507188"/></front-stub><body><p>This manuscript provides fundamental new insight into protein conformational transitions underlying the transport mechanism of Nramps, an important and widespread transporter family that facilitates the uptake and movement of essential transition metals. Eight new crystallographic structures of the prokaryotic homolog DraNramp in a variety of ligand-bound and conformational states, along with companion molecular dynamics simulations and metal binding and transport assays, provide compelling evidence supporting most of the conclusions. These findings will be of broad interest to scientists studying transport mechanisms and ligand recognition.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="decision-letter" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.84006.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Maduke</surname><given-names>Merritt</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00f54p054</institution-id><institution>Stanford University School of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name><surname>Dutzler</surname><given-names>Raimund</given-names></name><role>Reviewer</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/02crff812</institution-id><institution>University of Zurich</institution></institution-wrap><country>Switzerland</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text id="sa2-box1"><p>Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2022.09.08.507188">public reviews</ext-link> designed to be posted alongside <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.08.507188v1">the preprint</ext-link> for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.</p></boxed-text><p><bold>Decision letter after peer review:</bold></p><p>Thank you for submitting your article &quot;High-resolution structures with bound Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> map the metal import pathway in an Nramp transporter&quot; for consideration by <italic>eLife</italic>. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Richard Aldrich as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in the review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Raimund Dutzler (Reviewer #2).</p><p>The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this letter to help you prepare a revised submission. Overall, the reviewers are impressed with your data and analysis, However, they have raised some criticisms of the presentation of the ITC analysis and feel that the manuscript will benefit from extensive edits to clarify the interplay between structure and ITC.</p><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>1) Coordination chemistry: Although we are not quibbling with the your interpretation of the coordination chemistry overall, metal-ligand coordination bond lengths appear to be quite long for an Mn(II) complex, all 2.2 Å or greater and up to 2.7 Å. A statement as to how these first coordination shell metal-donor atom distances compare to protein systems that do not transport metals is needed. If the resolution of the structure prevents further insights into this, this should be stated as well. We understand that the resolution of a membrane protein is poor when compared to soluble metal binding proteins where distances can be interpreted with high precision, and we also recognize that these transport proteins provide comparably low-affinity binding sites where a perfect geometry might not be a prerequisite for transport but where proper coordination would still be required to capture the ion at concentrations reflecting their abundance in the environment. A few sentences that place these findings in some context for the non-expert could be quite useful.</p><p>2) Thermodynamics: It is well established that ITC binding curves like these cannot be used to determine the stoichiometry or extract a robust enthalpy of binding, since the metal binding is far too weak. We would like to see the results of simulations superimposed on the experimental data that illustrates the goodness of fit for 1:1 and 2:1 binding models. All the experimental Mn-binding isotherms look pretty much the same and yet give very different parameters (part of which much be due to an enforced stoichiometry). This is even unclear when applying a 1:1 binding model to different sets of data, for example, p. 10, line 207. Here it is stated there is a &quot;reduced affinity of M230A compered to wild-type.&quot; How robust is this conclusion? Here you might superimpose theoretical curves on the experimental data so readers can grasp for themselves the significance of this and many other conclusions. There are lots of places like this in the manuscript. In fact, the 1000 µM site is surely not well defined by the data. What binding models were used (and how) must be indicated in the figure and table legends at the very minimum.</p><p>We recognize the challenges in making ITC measurements with a membrane protein. We are simply requesting that you include a bit of clarification that could provide important context for conclusions they reach, for a general audience. How and why (on what basis) you used a particular binding model to analyze the data seems pretty important. If one is making claims that binding affinities differ by x-fold, this (ideally) should be readily apparent in how the data are presented.</p><p>Related to this point, we note that you do not really comment on the binding enthalpies, so why present the thermodynamics at all (Supp Tables 8 and 9), given that the resolved parameters are a bit soft?</p><p>3) The structural data are of very high quality, and the location of the metal ions in all conformations has been demonstrated with confidence. In contrast, and as a consequence of their lower electron density, the positions of interacting water molecules are much less well-defined. This is particularly the case for the water mediating the interaction between the bound ion and Q378 in occluded conformations, which is potentially masked by the electron-dense ion, and metal-coordinating waters in inward and outward-facing conformations. While the assumption concerning the role of these waters is reasonable, you should better document these features by providing closeups of the ion binding region with surrounding 2Fo-Fc in a supplementary figure. While done for the occluded conformation in Figure 1—figure supplement 1A, it would be helpful to include this also for other conformations. This does in no way question the conclusions nor does it decrease the impact of the study.</p><p>4) The observed difference in the structural preference of the protein in dependence on the binding of the metal ions Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd2+ are clearly interesting and the experiments suggesting a preferred binding of Cd2+ to the inward-facing conformation of DraNRAMP are intriguing. Nevertheless, we find the discussion on the evolution of Mn<sup>2+</sup> over Cd2+ selectivity in the SLC11 family somewhat exaggerated. In that respect, it is worth mentioning that endothermic Cd2+ binding with somewhat higher affinity than described here was reported for the related SLC11 transporter ScaDMT (Ehrnstofer, 2014).</p><p>5) The conformational preference of a transporter in detergent is likely a property of the individual protein that is influenced by its environment and does not necessarily extend to the entire family (e.g. the homologues ScaDMT and EcoDMT were found to preferably adopt inward- and outward-facing conformations, respectively). Thus, whereas the general mechanisms described here do likely extend to the entire family, this might not be the case for each mechanistic detail.</p><p>6) An issue discussed by reviewers is the unwieldy style of the manuscript. The writing is dense and details-saturated, sometimes obscuring the punchlines. We recognize that the sheer amount of work and data makes this unavoidable at some level and that many details are essential for understanding the detailed mechanism for transition metal ion transport within the SLC11 family (and for understanding how coupling and substrate coordination differ from other transporters with a LeuT fold). Nevertheless, even reviewers with LeuT-field expertise had to read this manuscript multiple times and even then remained confused on some points. Therefore, we recommend that you attempt to simplify, as this will be of benefit to experts and will broaden the potential readership. One approach would be to simplify the Figures and break them apart.</p><p>7) While the finding that WT and Mn<sup>2+</sup> bound Nramp are both occluded could imply that Mn<sup>2+</sup> does not affect the conformation, it could also be an artifact of crystallization. You soaked preformed crystals and it is possible that Mn<sup>2+</sup> shift the conformational preference but the Gibbs energy change is too small relative to lattice stability.</p><p>8) Related to point 7, Cd2+ stabilizes an inward-facing conformation. Wouldn't that be expected from the more physiological substrate such as Mn<sup>2+</sup>? That Is what you appear to suggest in your multiple figures for the binding and release of metals.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.84006.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Essential revisions:</p><p>1) Coordination chemistry: Although we are not quibbling with the your interpretation of the coordination chemistry overall, metal-ligand coordination bond lengths appear to be quite long for an Mn(II) complex, all 2.2 Å or greater and up to 2.7 Å. A statement as to how these first coordination shell metal-donor atom distances compare to protein systems that do not transport metals is needed. If the resolution of the structure prevents further insights into this, this should be stated as well. We understand that the resolution of a membrane protein is poor when compared to soluble metal binding proteins where distances can be interpreted with high precision, and we also recognize that these transport proteins provide comparably low-affinity binding sites where a perfect geometry might not be a prerequisite for transport but where proper coordination would still be required to capture the ion at concentrations reflecting their abundance in the environment. A few sentences that place these findings in some context for the non-expert could be quite useful.</p></disp-quote><p>As per the reviewers’ suggestion, we have now added a short paragraph in the Discussion section along with a figure (Figure 6—figure supplement 1) where we compare the metal-ligand coordination bond lengths and coordination geometry of DraNramp with other Mn<sup>2+</sup>-binding proteins that are not transporters, as stated below:</p><p>Lines (453-462; numbers refer to the manuscript document without tracked changes) –</p><p>“Compared to other proteins that bind Mn<sup>2+</sup> but are not metal transporters, like the Mn<sup>2+</sup> regulator MntR (Glasfeld et al., 2003) and PsaA, the solute-binding protein (SBP) domain of an ATP-binding cassette transporter (Counago et al., 2014), we observe longer Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordinating bond lengths for DraNramp (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Typical manganese-oxygen bonding distances are 2.1-2.5 Å, although ‘weak interactions’ (2.6-3.2 Å) are occasionally part of a Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere (Harding, 2000, 2001). Metal-sulfur bonding distances are longer owing to the greater van der Waals radius of sulfur (Rulisek and Vondrasek, 1998). The non-ideal metal-ligand bonding distances and angles we observe in DraNramp may allow it to avoid getting trapped in an energy minimum and thus keep moving through the conformational transitions required to transport Mn<sup>2+</sup>.”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>2) Thermodynamics: It is well established that ITC binding curves like these cannot be used to determine the stoichiometry or extract a robust enthalpy of binding, since the metal binding is far too weak. We would like to see the results of simulations superimposed on the experimental data that illustrates the goodness of fit for 1:1 and 2:1 binding models. All the experimental Mn-binding isotherms look pretty much the same and yet give very different parameters (part of which much be due to an enforced stoichiometry). This is even unclear when applying a 1:1 binding model to different sets of data, for example, p. 10, line 207. Here it is stated there is a &quot;reduced affinity of M230A compered to wild-type.&quot; How robust is this conclusion? Here you might superimpose theoretical curves on the experimental data so readers can grasp for themselves the significance of this and many other conclusions. There are lots of places like this in the manuscript. In fact, the 1000 µM site is surely not well defined by the data. What binding models were used (and how) must be indicated in the figure and table legends at the very minimum.</p><p>We recognize the challenges in making ITC measurements with a membrane protein. We are simply requesting that you include a bit of clarification that could provide important context for conclusions they reach, for a general audience. How and why (on what basis) you used a particular binding model to analyze the data seems pretty important. If one is making claims that binding affinities differ by x-fold, this (ideally) should be readily apparent in how the data are presented.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewers for this feedback, which prompted us to carefully reanalyze all our ITC data. We have added Appendix 1, in which we describe our analysis in detail. As the reviewers point out, because our <italic>c</italic> values are below 1, we fixed the stoichiometry (<italic>n</italic>). For each isotherm, we tested both a one-site model with fixed <italic>n</italic> = 1, and a two-site sequential binding model (i.e., fixed <italic>n</italic> = 2), and the resulting thermodynamic parameters are listed in Appendix-tables 1 and 2. Appendix 1-figure 1 includes a set of the comparative fits (one-site vs two-site). In Appendix 1 we also describe how we decided upon the binding stoichiometry for each construct, using the ITC results as well as information from the crystal structures and mutational analyses. We have updated the manuscript text, figures, legends, and tables accordingly.</p><p>We also added the following sentences in the Materials and methods section (lines 939-945):</p><p>“Data were fitted and analyzed as detailed in Appendix 1. Briefly, as per best practice when <italic>c</italic> values (association constant × molar protein concentration) are below 1 (Picollo, Malvezzi, Houtman, and Accardi, 2009; Tellinghuisen, 2008; Turnbull and Daranas, 2003), all the data reported for each construct are fitted fixing the number of sites (one-site binding model with fixed <italic>n</italic> = 1 or sequential binding model with fixed <italic>n</italic> = 2). The binding stoichiometry was selected based the model fits and knowledge from the crystal structures and mutational analysis.”</p><p>As suggested, we have removed many of the quantitative comparisons from the main text and instead focused on the overall picture of how the metal ion binding behavior differs between Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> and how that informs the conformational preferences and transport behavior. These main findings are illustrated in Figure 5 and supported by additional isotherms in Figure 5—figure supplements 1-3.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Related to this point, we note that you do not really comment on the binding enthalpies, so why present the thermodynamics at all (Supp Tables 8 and 9), given that the resolved parameters are a bit soft?</p></disp-quote><p>We briefly mention the overall trends in enthalpy and entropy for the Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> isotherms in lines 363-367. However, we removed the supplementary tables 8 and 9, and instead present the results of one-site and two-site fits in Appendix 1-tables 1 and 2 to support the model selection described in the Appendix 1.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>3) The structural data are of very high quality, and the location of the metal ions in all conformations has been demonstrated with confidence. In contrast, and as a consequence of their lower electron density, the positions of interacting water molecules are much less well-defined. This is particularly the case for the water mediating the interaction between the bound ion and Q378 in occluded conformations, which is potentially masked by the electron-dense ion, and metal-coordinating waters in inward and outward-facing conformations. While the assumption concerning the role of these waters is reasonable, you should better document these features by providing closeups of the ion binding region with surrounding 2Fo-Fc in a supplementary figure. While done for the occluded conformation in Figure 1—figure supplement 1A, it would be helpful to include this also for other conformations. This does in no way question the conclusions nor does it decrease the impact of the study.</p></disp-quote><p>2Fo-Fc maps of the Mn<sup>2+</sup>-coordination sphere at the orthosteric site for the inward-open (M230A in Figure 3—figure supplement 2 and D296A in Figure 3—figure supplement 1C), and outward-open (G223W, Figure 3—figure supplement 2) conformations have now been included.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>4) The observed difference in the structural preference of the protein in dependence on the binding of the metal ions Mn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd2+ are clearly interesting and the experiments suggesting a preferred binding of Cd2+ to the inward-facing conformation of DraNRAMP are intriguing. Nevertheless, we find the discussion on the evolution of Mn<sup>2+</sup> over Cd2+ selectivity in the SLC11 family somewhat exaggerated. In that respect, it is worth mentioning that endothermic Cd2+ binding with somewhat higher affinity than described here was reported for the related SLC11 transporter ScaDMT (Ehrnstofer, 2014).</p></disp-quote><p>We now include the following statement comparing our results to the published ITC results for ScaDMT binding to Cd<sup>2+</sup> and how that correlate to our current work (lines 326-333) –</p><p>“These are the first ITC measurements comparing the binding of different metals to an Nramp transporter and they show clear differences in the binding mode and affinity of different substrates towards DraNramp (Figure 5A, Figure 5—figure supplements 2 and 3). In contrast to DraNramp, previous ITC studies showed endothermic binding of Cd<sup>2+</sup> to the <italic>Staphylococcus capitis</italic> Nramp homolog (ScaDMT) with 29 µM affinity (Ehrnstorfer et al., 2014). However, in the absence of ITC data with other metals, it is not known whether ScaDMT also shows differences in the mode and affinity of binding to different metals like DraNramp.”</p><p>We also toned down the discussion on the evolution of selectivity.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>5) The conformational preference of a transporter in detergent is likely a property of the individual protein that is influenced by its environment and does not necessarily extend to the entire family (e.g. the homologues ScaDMT and EcoDMT were found to preferably adopt inward- and outward-facing conformations, respectively). Thus, whereas the general mechanisms described here do likely extend to the entire family, this might not be the case for each mechanistic detail.</p></disp-quote><p>The advantages of our results are that the experiments were performed with a single homolog, all structures were obtained in lipid mesophase-based crystals under similar conditions, and all ITC measurements were performed under the same (detergent-based) conditions. We can thus make comparisons across internally consistent datasets.</p><p>We agree with the reviewers that the mechanistic details may vary in different family members. We have added a discussion paragraph to describe the published ScaDMT and EcoDMT structures and their implications for how generalizable current data on Nramps are (lines 499-508):</p><p>“In contrast to WT DraNramp, ScaDMT was crystallized in an inward-open state, although its TM1a was deleted from the protein construct (Ehrnstorfer et al., 2014). This deletion would prevent inner vestibule closure, and thus likely affects its energetically preferred conformation. In the case of the <italic>Eremococcus coleocola</italic> Nramp homolog (EcoDMT), both substrate-free and inhibitor-bound conformations are outward open (Ehrnstorfer et al., 2017; Manatschal et al., 2019), suggesting that the outward-open state is its most stable state. Of note, EcoDMT was crystallized in detergent whereas the DraNramp structures were obtained in a monoolein lipid bilayer environment. Further studies will be needed to determine to what extent the thermodynamic landscape we begin to outline here for DraNramp is conserved in other Nramp homologs.”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>6) An issue discussed by reviewers is the unwieldy style of the manuscript. The writing is dense and details-saturated, sometimes obscuring the punchlines. We recognize that the sheer amount of work and data makes this unavoidable at some level and that many details are essential for understanding the detailed mechanism for transition metal ion transport within the SLC11 family (and for understanding how coupling and substrate coordination differ from other transporters with a LeuT fold). Nevertheless, even reviewers with LeuT-field expertise had to read this manuscript multiple times and even then remained confused on some points. Therefore, we recommend that you attempt to simplify, as this will be of benefit to experts and will broaden the potential readership. One approach would be to simplify the Figures and break them apart.</p></disp-quote><p>As suggested by the reviewers, we have made edits and deletions throughout the text to better define names, simplify the language, and limit details and jargon when possible. We reorganized several figures by breaking them apart so that each as a simpler message (especially the figure supplements of Figures 1, 3 and 5). To better highlight the punchlines of each result, we also removed many details from the main text which are otherwise evident from the Figures and Tables (e.g., many of the coordinating bond lengths and RMSD values). Similarly, while we expanded our description of our choices in the ITC data analyses in response to reviewer comments, we did so in a separate Appendix 1, to avoid cluttering the main text with additional details.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>7) While the finding that WT and Mn<sup>2+</sup> bound Nramp are both occluded could imply that Mn<sup>2+</sup> does not affect the conformation, it could also be an artifact of crystallization. You soaked preformed crystals and it is possible that Mn<sup>2+</sup> shift the conformational preference but the Gibbs energy change is too small relative to lattice stability.</p></disp-quote><p>We note that have two Mn<sup>2+</sup>-bound structures in an occluded conformation: WT•Mn<sup>2+</sup> from soaking and A47W•Mn<sup>2+</sup> from co-crystallization. We also know that the same crystal form allows an inward-open conformation, which we see from soaking Cd<sup>2+</sup> in WT•Cd<sup>2+</sup>, and from M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>. Still, we agree with the reviewers that we cannot rule out that the lattice (or other factors) influences the conformational preference. We believe our data suggest that there is only a small difference in energy between the occluded and inward-open state, and we now state so more explicitly in the discussion in lines 493-494:</p><p>“The occluded and inward-open states may be energetically similar as relatively small perturbations yielded inward-open structures (M230A•Mn<sup>2+</sup> and D296A•Mn<sup>2+</sup>).”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>8) Related to point 7, Cd2+ stabilizes an inward-facing conformation. Wouldn't that be expected from the more physiological substrate such as Mn<sup>2+</sup>? That Is what you appear to suggest in your multiple figures for the binding and release of metals.</p></disp-quote><p>As we describe in the discussion, these results are somewhat unexpected. However, as mentioned above and in the discussion, our data also suggest that the inward-open conformation is readily accessible in the Mn<sup>2+</sup> state. Furthermore, for a transporter, kinetics will matter as well, something we cannot fully address with our current data and will require future studies.</p></body></sub-article></article>