<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">91988</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.91988</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="version">10.7554/eLife.91988.3</article-id><article-version article-version-type="publication-state">version of record</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Developmental Biology</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Extramacrochaetae regulates Notch signaling in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye through non-apoptotic caspase activity</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nair</surname><given-names>Sudershana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>Nicholas E</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4250-3488</contrib-id><email>nebaker@uci.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="pa1">†</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="pa2">‡</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05cf8a891</institution-id><institution>Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Bronx</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05cf8a891</institution-id><institution>Department of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Bronx</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05cf8a891</institution-id><institution>Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Bronx</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Knust</surname><given-names>Elisabeth</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05b8d3w18</institution-id><institution>Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics</institution></institution-wrap><country>Germany</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Banerjee</surname><given-names>Utpal</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/046rm7j60</institution-id><institution>University of California, Los Angeles</institution></institution-wrap><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><fn fn-type="present-address" id="pa1"><label>†</label><p>Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, United States</p></fn><fn fn-type="present-address" id="pa2"><label>‡</label><p>Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, United States</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>20</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><elocation-id>RP91988</elocation-id><history><date date-type="sent-for-review" iso-8601-date="2023-09-07"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2023-10-04"><day>04</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.04.560841"/></event><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a reviewed preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2023-12-27"><day>27</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91988.1"/></event><event><event-desc>The reviewed preprint was revised.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-10-24"><day>24</day><month>10</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91988.2"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2023, Nair and Baker</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Nair and Baker</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-91988-v2.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-91988-figures-v2.pdf"/><abstract><p>Many cell fate decisions are determined transcriptionally. Accordingly, some fate specification is prevented by Inhibitor of DNA-binding (Id) proteins that interfere with DNA binding by master regulatory transcription factors. We show that the <italic>Drosophila</italic> Id protein Extra macrochaetae (Emc) also affects developmental decisions by regulating caspase activity. Emc, which prevents proneural bHLH transcription factors from specifying neural cell fate, also prevents homodimerization of another bHLH protein, Daughterless (Da), and thereby maintains expression of the <italic>Death-Associated Inhibitor of Apoptosis</italic> (<italic>diap1</italic>) gene. Accordingly, we found that multiple effects of <italic>emc</italic> mutations on cell growth and on eye development were all caused by activation of caspases. These effects included acceleration of the morphogenetic furrow, failure of R7 photoreceptor cell specification, and delayed differentiation of non-neuronal cone cells. Within <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones, Notch signaling was elevated in the morphogenetic furrow, increasing morphogenetic furrow speed. This was associated with caspase-dependent increase in levels of Delta protein, the transmembrane ligand for Notch. Posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, elevated Delta cis-inhibited Notch signaling that was required for R7 specification and cone cell differentiation. Growth inhibition of <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones in wing imaginal discs also depended on caspases. Thus, <italic>emc</italic> mutations reveal the importance of restraining caspase activity even in non-apoptotic cells to prevent abnormal development, in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye through effects on Notch signaling.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>extramacrochaetae</kwd><kwd>ID protein</kwd><kwd>caspase</kwd><kwd>non-apoptotic caspase</kwd><kwd>Delta</kwd><kwd><italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd><italic>D. melanogaster</italic></kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>GM047892</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>Nicholas E</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>EY028990</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>Nicholas E</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>A member of the Inhibitor of DNA-binding (Id) gene family, best known as negative regulators of tissue-specific master regulatory bHLH transcription factors, also suppresses non-apoptotic caspase activities.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>publishing-route</meta-name><meta-value>prc</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Inhibitor of DNA-binding proteins (Id proteins), which are HLH proteins lacking basic DNA-binding sequences, form inactive heterodimers with proneural bHLH proteins, preventing DNA binding and transcriptional regulation of target genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Benezra et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Cabrera et al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Ellis, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Ellis et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Garrell and Modolell, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Norton, 2000</xref>). Accordingly, mutations in Id protein genes, of which there are four in mammals and one in <italic>Drosophila</italic>, permit enhanced proneural bHLH function, deregulating neurogenesis at many developmental stages and in many tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Ling et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Oproescu et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Roschger and Cabrele, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib87">Wang and Baker, 2015a</xref>).</p><p>Is this the only mechanism of Id protein function? Not all Id gene mutant phenotypes resemble gain of proneural gene function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Ling et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib87">Wang and Baker, 2015a</xref>). The sole <italic>Drosophila</italic> Id protein gene <italic>extra macrochaetae</italic> (<italic>emc</italic>) is required for normal growth of imaginal discs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Alonso and Garcia-Bellido, 1988</xref>). Imaginal discs are larval progenitors of adult tissues and remain proliferative and undifferentiated until late in the final larval instar; no proneural gene is active in these proliferating cells. A second example is that <italic>emc</italic> is required for ovarian follicle cell development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Adam and Montell, 2004</xref>), which does not depend on proneural bHLH genes. In <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye development, <italic>emc</italic> is required for the specification of the R7 photoreceptor cells and the non-neuronal cone cells, neither of which depends on any known proneural bHLH gene, and also restrains the rate at which the morphogenetic furrow, a wave of fate specification that traverses across the eye imaginal disc as retinal patterning and differentiation begin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Brown et al., 1995</xref>).</p><p>Insights into how Emc acts independently of proneural genes have emerged from several studies. Regarding the proper proliferation of imaginal disc cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Alonso and Garcia-Bellido, 1988</xref>), independence of imaginal disc growth from proneural bHLH genes is confirmed by the lack of requirement for <italic>da</italic>, the only E protein in <italic>Drosophila</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Andrade-Zapata and Baonza, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>). E proteins are ubiquitously expressed bHLH proteins that are heterodimer partners for proneural bHLH proteins. Proneural bHLH proteins cannot function without Da, so normal growth of <italic>da</italic> mutant cells implies independence from all Da heterodimer partners. Instead, it is ectopic Da activity that causes poor growth in <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells, because normal growth is restored in <italic>emc da</italic> double mutant cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>). Elevated Da levels activate transcription of <italic>expanded</italic> (<italic>ex</italic>), a component of the Salvador–Warts–Hippo (SWH) tumor suppressor pathway, to inhibit growth of imaginal disc cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Wang and Baker, 2015b</xref>).</p><p>In the course of these studies, we noticed that <italic>ex</italic> mutations affected the number of sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells in the thorax (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Wang and Baker, 2015b</xref>). This was due to activity of Yorkie (Yki), the target of SHW signals, in the <italic>ex</italic> mutant cells. Yki in turn increased transcription of a direct Yki target gene, <italic>Death-Associated Inhibitor of Apoptosis 1</italic> (<italic>diap1</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Wang and Baker, 2019</xref>). Diap1 is a ubiquitin ligase that prevents accumulation of a processed form of Dronc, an apical caspase in <italic>Drosophila</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Hawkins et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Meier et al., 2000</xref>). Caspases are proteases that drive apoptosis by cleaving cellular substrates. They are expressed as inactive zymogens that are then activated by signals (initiator caspases) or by cleavage by caspases (effector caspases) in a feed-forward process that is expected to kill cells rapidly once a threshold of caspase activity has been crossed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Fuchs and Steller, 2011</xref>). Caspases can also mediate non-apoptotic processes. What differentiates apoptotic from non-apoptotic outcomes is uncertain, as the same caspase cascade of initiator and effector caspases seems to be involved in both (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Aram et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Baena-Lopez et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Colon-Plaza and Su, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Kanuka et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Kuranaga and Miura, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Nakajima and Kuranaga, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Su, 2020</xref>). In <italic>ex</italic> mutants, the increased <italic>diap1</italic> transcription does not affect cell death much but does cause an increase in <italic>wg</italic> signaling activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Wang and Baker, 2019</xref>). Wg signaling promotes SOP cell determination in the thorax, and it has been shown previously that Wg signaling is antagonized by caspases, through a mechanism that is non-apoptotic but whose direct target is not yet certain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Baker, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Kanuka et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Wang and Baker, 2019</xref>).</p><p>Since <italic>emc</italic> mutations elevate <italic>ex</italic> expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Wang and Baker, 2015b</xref>), we wondered whether <italic>emc</italic> also changes Diap1 levels and affects caspase activities. Increased <italic>ex</italic> expression would be expected to reduce transcription of the <italic>diap1</italic> gene and potentially increase caspase activity, the opposite of what occurs in <italic>ex</italic> mutants. Remarkably, we found that caspase activity was responsible for all the aspects of the <italic>emc</italic> phenotype that we tested. This included reduced growth of imaginal disc cells, accelerated morphogenetic furrow progression, and loss of R7 and cone cells fates in the eye. The effects on eye development all reflected caspase-dependent expression of the Notch ligand Delta, which is known to contribute to morphogenetic furrow progression, and to R7 and cone cell fate specification. Thus, caspase-dependent non-apoptotic signaling underlies multiple roles of <italic>emc</italic> that are independent of proneural bHLH proteins.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Caspase activity causes growth defects in <italic>emc</italic> mutants</title><p>To determine the contribution of caspases to growth inhibition in <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells, we used the Flippase (FLP)/FLP Recombinase Target (FRT) system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib92">Xu and Rubin, 1993</xref>) to generate clones of <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells that were unable to activate caspases normally. We achieved this by homozygously deleting the linked <italic>reaper</italic> (<italic>rpr</italic>), <italic>head involution defective</italic> (<italic>hid</italic>), and <italic>grim</italic> genes using <italic>Df(3L)H99</italic>. Rpr, Hid, and Grim proteins promote Diap1 degradation in response to apoptotic stimuli and allow activation of initiator caspases such as <italic>dronc</italic> to start apoptosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib96">Yoo et al., 2002</xref>). By removing all three pro-apoptotic proteins, <italic>Df(3L)H99</italic> affects both apoptotic and non-apoptotic caspase functions in <italic>Drosophila</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Tapadia and Gautam, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib91">White et al., 1994</xref>). Thus, clones of <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> mutant cells should be defective for caspase activation. In addition, we also made clones of <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells also mutated for <italic>dronc</italic>, which encodes the main initiator caspase in <italic>Drosophila</italic> that is necessary for most developmental apoptosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Hawkins et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Meier et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Quinn et al., 2000</xref>). Dronc contributes to non-apoptotic caspase functions as well, so <italic>emc dronc</italic> mutant cells should also show reduced non-apoptotic and well as apoptotic caspase functions.</p><p>In comparison to neutral clones, which grew equivalently to their twin-spot controls, <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones showed greatly reduced growth in eye or wing imaginal discs, as described previously (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A–D</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Andrade-Zapata and Baonza, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Alonso and Garcia-Bellido, 1988</xref>). In contrast, <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones that were also mutant for <italic>dronc</italic> (<italic>dronc<sup>i29</sup></italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib93">Xu et al., 2005</xref>), or <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones that lacked the <italic>rpr</italic>, <italic>grim</italic>, and <italic>hid</italic> genes, grew more like their twin-spot controls in both eye and wing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E–H</xref>). Statistically, growth of <italic>emc</italic> clones also deleted for the <italic>rpr</italic>, <italic>hid</italic>, and <italic>grim</italic> genes was not distinguishable from the wild-type, and similarly for <italic>emc</italic> clones also mutated for <italic>dronc</italic> (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1N</xref> for quantification). Neither homozygosity for <italic>dronc</italic>, nor deletion of <italic>rpr</italic>, <italic>grim</italic>, and <italic>hid</italic>, significantly affected growth of otherwise wild-type imaginal disc clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1I–L</xref>).</p><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title><italic>Df(3L)H99</italic> recues growth defect of <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones.</title><p>(<bold>A–L</bold>) Control and mutant clones in eye and wing imaginal disc were induced at the end of first instar and are associated with sibling twin-spot clones marked by two copies of the GFP marker (brighter gray) that serves as internal control for growth. Clones are labeled by the absence of GFP. (<bold>M</bold>) <italic>emc H99</italic> clones induced in the Minute background (<bold>N</bold>) Quantification of the ratio of clone size to twin-spot measured in wing imaginal discs. Geometrical means ± SEM are shown. After log-transformation of clone/twin-spot ratios to ensure normality, one-way ANOVA rejected the null hypothesis that these results are the same (p = 5.72 × 10<sup>−8</sup>). The Holm correction for multiple comparison was used to identify significant differences between all pairs of samples. *** denotes highly significant difference from the FRT80 control (p &lt; 0.001), NS denotes no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05). Whereas the clone/twin-spot ratio for <italic>emc</italic> homozygous clones was significantly different from the FRT80 control (p = 5.72 × 10<sup>−6</sup>), this was not true for any of the other genotypes (<italic>H99</italic>, p = 0.79; <italic>dronc</italic>, p = 0.906; <italic>emc H99</italic>, p = 0.92; <italic>emc dronc</italic>, p = 0.345). The clone/twin-spot ratio for <italic>emc</italic> homozygous clones was also significantly different from that for <italic>emc H99</italic> or <italic>emc dronc</italic> (p = 4.12 × 10<sup>−6</sup> and p = 0.0177, respectively), whereas <italic>emc H99</italic> and <italic>emc dronc</italic> did not differ significantly from <italic>H99</italic> or <italic>dronc</italic> clones (p = 1 and p = 0.136, respectively). Source data for (<bold>N</bold>) are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata1">Figure 1—source data 1</xref>. Genotypes: (<bold>A, C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B, D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP]FRT80</italic>, (<bold>E, G</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;dronc<sup>i29</sup>emc<sup>AP6</sup> FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80</italic>, (<bold>F, H</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80</italic>, (<bold>I, K</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;dronc<sup>i29</sup> FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80</italic>, (<bold>J, L</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;;Df(3L)H99FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80</italic>, (<bold>M</bold>) <italic>ywhsF; emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 10 for each genotype.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Clone size source data for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1N</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig1-v2.tif"/></fig><p>Previous studies of <italic>emc</italic> phenotypes have often used Minute genetic backgrounds (i.e. heterozygosity for mutations in <italic>Rp</italic> genes) to retard growth and enhance the size of the <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009</xref>). When <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones were induced in the <italic>M(3)67C</italic> background, the clones took over almost the entire disc, leaving only a few <italic>M(3)67C</italic> heterozygous cells remaining (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1M</xref>). The growth advantage of <italic>emc dronc</italic> clones was not so marked.</p><p>These results indicate that the growth disadvantage of <italic>emc</italic> mutant imaginal disc clones is mostly attributable to cell death genes. Preventing caspase activation, either by mutating the main initiator caspase, or by preventing Diap1 turnover, partially or completed restored normal growth. Our data did not support a previous suggestion that <italic>dronc</italic> was required for normal wing disc growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Verghese et al., 2012</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Emc regulates furrow progression through non-apoptotic caspase activity</title><p><italic>Emc</italic> mutations have multiple effects on the eye imaginal disc, although only a few aspects of retinal differentiation depend on proneural bHLH genes. The proneural gene <italic>atonal</italic> is required, along with <italic>da</italic>, for the specification of R8 photoreceptor precursors in the morphogenetic furrow that initiate each ommatidial cluster in the larval eye disc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Brown et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Jarman et al., 1994</xref>). Later, during pupal development, proneural genes of the Achaete-Scute gene Complex (AS-C), along with <italic>da</italic>, are required for the specification of the interommatidial bristles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Cadigan et al., 2002</xref>). All the other cell types develop independently of proneural bHLH genes, and most of them develop independently of <italic>da</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Brown et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Jiménez and Campos-Ortega, 1987</xref>).</p><p>In <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones, retinal differentiation begins precociously, associated with more rapid transit of the morphogenetic furrow across the disc (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A, B</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Brown et al., 1995</xref>). In contrast, we found that 75% of the time, the morphogenetic furrow progressed normally through <italic>emc dronc</italic> double mutant clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref>). Eye discs containing <italic>emcDf(3L)H99</italic> double mutant clones always appeared completely normal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D</xref>). Control <italic>dronc</italic> and <italic>Df(3L)H99</italic> mutant clones that lacked <italic>emc</italic> mutations also showed normal furrow progression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1A, B</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Morphogenetic furrow progression is affected by cell death pathways.</title><p>In all panels, the differentiating neurons are marked by Elav (in blue), and mutant cells are identiﬁed by the absence of GFP expression (in green). (<bold>A</bold>) The wave of retinal differentiation from posterior to anterior (right to left), marked here by Senseless expression in R8 photoreceptor cells (red) is normal in FRT80 control clones. (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>emc</italic> null clones lacking GFP show acceleration of retinal differentiation illustrated by yellow arrows (premature differentiation can also continue into wild-type regions ahead of such clones). In addition, ectopic neural differentiation also occurs sporadically anterior to the morphogenetic furrow, and unassociated with it (magenta arrows). (<bold>C</bold>) In contrast, retinal differentiation proceeds at the same pace in <italic>emc dronc</italic> double mutant clones as in nearby wild-type regions in 75% of the eye discs. (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>emc H99</italic> double mutants show a stronger suppression of the acceleration of retinal differentiation (compare panel B). Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;dronc<sup>i29</sup>emc<sup>AP6</sup> FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic> (<italic>n</italic> = 12), (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 8 for each genotype.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Morphogenetic furrow progression in <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells.</title><p>In eye imaginal discs, normal furrow progression was observed in (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>dronc<sup>−/−</sup></italic> and (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>Df(3L)H99</italic> homozygous clones, indicated by Senseless and Elav staining. Homozygous mutant clones of <italic>emc<sup>−/−</sup></italic> (<bold>C</bold>) lacking GFP expression have no Emc staining (yellow arrowhead) and higher Da (red arrowhead). At the morphogenetic furrow as shown by yellow arrow, Emc expression goes down and Da goes up. Similar results were observed in (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>dronc<sup>−/−</sup> emc<sup>−/−</sup></italic> clones and (<bold>E</bold>) <italic>emc<sup>−/−</sup> Df(3L) H99<sup>−/−</sup></italic> clones confirm that these are <italic>emc</italic> null clones. Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;dronc<sup>i29</sup>FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF; Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;dronc<sup>i29</sup>emc<sup>AP6</sup> FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>E</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 4 for each genotype.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig2-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>In addition, <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones also exhibit sporadic ectopic differentiation of neurons anterior to the morphogenetic furrow, which do not take photoreceptor cell fate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A, B</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Brown et al., 1995</xref>). This was likewise absent from <italic>emc dronc</italic> and <italic>emcDf(3L)H99</italic> double mutant clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C, D</xref>).</p><p>The overall pattern of retinal differentiation revealed by labeling for Senseless, which is specific for R8 photoreceptor cells in the retina, and Elav, which labels all neuronal photoreceptor cells, appeared so normal in these genotypes that we deemed it necessary to confirm that the supposedly <italic>emc dronc</italic> mutant and <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> mutant clones were indeed mutated for <italic>emc</italic>. This was confirmed by lack of staining by an antibody against Emc protein, similar to plain <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones that did affect the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1C–E</xref>). We also found that <italic>emc dronc</italic> and <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones upregulated Da protein expression to a comparable degree to plain <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1C–E</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>). This further confirmed the absence of <italic>emc</italic> function from <italic>emc dronc</italic> mutant and <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> genotypes, and also showed that cell death pathways were not required for the regulation of Da protein levels by <italic>emc</italic>.</p><p>We have previously concluded that <italic>diap1</italic> transcription is reduced in <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones, and in Da-overexpressing cells, due to Yki inhibition downstream of <italic>ex</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Wang and Baker, 2015b</xref>). In eye imaginal discs, Diap1 protein was normally present uniformly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). Diap1 protein levels were cell-autonomously reduced in <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, compared to <italic>emc</italic>/+ cells in the same eye discs, and shown and quantified in (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B, E</xref>). A comparable reduction was also seen in <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones, compared to <italic>emc</italic>/+ <italic>Df(3L)H99</italic>/+ cells in the same eye discs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C, E</xref>). There was also no difference in Diap1 levels between <italic>Df(3L)H99</italic> homozygous clones and <italic>Df(3L)H99/+ </italic>cells in the same eye discs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D, E</xref>). These data suggest emc affects Diap1 protein levels, whereas rpr, grim, and hid affect Diap1 protein activity. A caveat is that Diap1 levels in mutant clones were not compared directly to wild-type cells, none of which were present in the same eye discs, and that <italic>Df(3L)H99</italic> might affect Diap1 protein levels dominantly. Interestingly, we did not detect <italic>emc</italic>-dependent changes in Diap1 levels in wing discs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1B</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Diap1 expression in <italic>emc</italic> clones.</title><p>In mosaic eye discs with (<bold>A</bold>) FRT80 clones, there is no difference in Diap1 levels within and outside the clone. However, both (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones and (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>emc H99</italic> clones show reduced Diap1 levels posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, compared to the heterozygous background. (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>H99</italic> clones showed similar Diap1 levels, compared to the heterozygous background. (<bold>E</bold>) Quantification of Diap1 levels in different clone genotypes, compared to the background levels outside the clones. Means ± SEM are shown. Note that our experiments did not generate mosaics of wild-type and Df(3L)H99/+ cells for direct comparison of these genotypes. Statistical significance calculated by two-way ANOVA (****p ≤ 0.0001). Source data for (<bold>E</bold>) are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata1">Figure 3—source data 1</xref>. Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF; Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 6 for each genotype.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Anti-Diap1 labeling source data for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3E</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig3-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>DIAP1 staining in wing disc clones.</title><p>In wing discs of emc clones (<bold>B</bold>) we did not detect changes in Diap1 levels in comparison to control clones (<bold>A</bold>). Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig3-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Apoptosis and furrow progression.</title><p>Representative images of eye imaginal discs stained for senseless. (<bold>A</bold>) In GMR-DIAP1 eye disc mutant for emc furrow progression is normal and is marked by Senseless staining. Similarly, in GMR-p35 eye disc mutant for emc also show normal furrow progression (<bold>B</bold>). Representative images of eye imaginal discs with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining. (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF/GMR-DIAP1;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF/GMR-p35;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 4 for each genotype.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig3-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Emc clones show no caspase activity beyond the morphogenetic furrow.</title><p>In <italic>pie<sup>EB3</sup></italic> homozygous clones, furrow progression occurs at normal speed marked by Senseless staining in R8 photoreceptors (<bold>A</bold>). In GMR-p35 eye disc mutant for emc show lack of Dcp1staining (<bold>B</bold>). In <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones posterior to morphogenetic furrow show lack of Dcp1 staining (<bold>D</bold>) in comparison to FRT80 clones (<bold>C</bold>). Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF/+; pie<sup>EB3</sup>FRT40/FRT40Alz</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF/GMR-p35;;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>E</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L</italic>)<italic>H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 4 for each genotype.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig3-figsupp3-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>To test the role of Diap1 in the eye directly, <italic>diap1</italic> was over-expressed in the posterior eye by transcription under GMR-Gal4 control. This rescued morphogenetic furrow speed to normal in <italic>emc</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2B</xref>). We also saw restoration of morphogenetic furrow speed in <italic>emc</italic> clones that expressed Baculovirus P35 under GMR-Gal4 control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2A</xref>). Baculovirus P35 encodes a caspase pseudo-substrate that inhibits all <italic>Drosophila</italic> caspases except Dronc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Hawkins et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Hay et al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Meier et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib94">Xue and Horvitz, 1995</xref>). The <italic>emc</italic> clones expressing p35 also lacked cell death (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3B</xref>). The restoration of morphogenetic furrow speed by Diap1, a Dronc antagonist, as well as by the caspase inhibitor P35, suggest that the effect of morphogenetic furrow acceleration in <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones is due to the caspase cascade.</p><p>To test whether reduced Diap1 expression promoted apoptosis and thereby accelerated the morphogenetic furrow, we assessed apoptosis levels by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) of eye discs containing mutant clones. We found almost no cell death posterior to the furrow in <italic>emc</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2D</xref>), and cell death in <italic>emc</italic> clones anterior to the furrow was comparable to controls and less than that of cells surrounding the clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2C, D</xref>). Some cell death is expected outside <italic>emc</italic> or control clones, as these cells have the <italic>M</italic> background that is itself associated with an increase in apoptosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Coelho et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Kale et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Li and Baker, 2007</xref>). Similar to TUNEL, we found no cell death in <italic>emc</italic> clones posterior the furrow with Dcp1 staining (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3D</xref>). To test whether apoptosis in the eye disc would be sufficient to promote morphogenetic furrow progression, we generated mosaic clones for a <italic>pineapple eye</italic> (<italic>pie</italic>) mutation. These <italic>pie</italic> mutant cells have an elevated rate of apoptosis in imaginal discs, but not sufficient to prevent <italic>pie</italic> homozygous clones surviving late into larval and even adult life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Shi et al., 2003</xref>). The rate of morphogenetic furrow progression was unaffected in eye discs containing <italic>pie</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3A</xref>). Because no excess cell death was detected in <italic>emc</italic> clones, and cell death was insufficient to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow in otherwise wild-type eye discs, <italic>emc</italic> clones might be affected by a non-apoptotic caspase activity.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Wingless and Dpp signaling are unaffected by <italic>emc</italic></title><p>To understand how caspases could affect the speed of the morphogenetic furrow, we analyzed pathways known to contribute. Hedgehog (Hh) and Decapentaplegic (Dpp) signaling drive this differentiation wave, along with a contribution from Notch signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Baonza and Freeman, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Borod and Heberlein, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Fu and Baker, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Heberlein et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Ma et al., 1993</xref>). A negative regulator of morphogenetic furrow progression is Wingless (Wg), which is expressed at the dorsal and ventral eye disc margins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Lee and Treisman, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Maurel-Zaffran and Treisman, 2000</xref>).</p><p>Because we found that <italic>ex</italic> mutations affected thoracic bristle patterning through a caspase-dependent non-apoptotic effect on Wg signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Wang and Baker, 2019</xref>), we looked first to see whether <italic>emc</italic> mutations reduced Wg signaling in the eye. We used Frizzled-3 RFP (Fz3-RFP) as a reporter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Sato et al., 1999</xref>). In control eye discs, the Fz3-RFP recapitulates the pattern of endogenous Wg signaling activity at the wing margins (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Treisman and Rubin, 1995</xref>). Frizzled-3 RFP expression was not changed in <italic>emc</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>). We then used a mutation in <italic>naked cuticle</italic> (<italic>nkd</italic>), encoding a negative feedback regulator of Wg signaling, to modulate Wg signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Chang et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib97">Zeng et al., 2000</xref>). If the morphogenetic furrow was accelerated in <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones due to reduced Wg signaling, more normal development should occur in <italic>emc nkd</italic> clones. The morphogenetic furrow was still accelerated in <italic>emc nkd</italic> clones, however (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>). These results provided no evidence that Wg signaling was the relevant <italic>emc</italic> target in the eye.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Wingless and Dpp signaling are not caspase targets.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) No reduction in the Wg signaling reporter Fz3-RFP was detectable in emc clones. See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1</xref> for Fz3-RFP expression in the wild-type. (<bold>B</bold>) Retinal differentiation is accelerated in <italic>emc nkd<sup>3</sup></italic> double mutant clones like in <italic>emc</italic> clones. Senseless expression in R8 photoreceptor cells and Elav staining in differentiating photoreceptors are shown. (<bold>C</bold>) p-Mad accumulates around the morphogenetic furrow in eye discs containing control clones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Firth et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib85">Vrailas and Moses, 2006</xref>). (<bold>E</bold>) Except for the advanced progression, p-Mad levels were unchanged in <italic>emc</italic> clones. Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>Fz3-RFP/+; emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>nkd<sup>3</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 8 for each genotype.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig4-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig4s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Fz3-RFP/+ eye disc showing RFP and Elav staining.</title><p><italic>N</italic> = 3.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig4-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>We also examined Dpp signaling, since ectopic Dpp signaling is sufficient to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Pignoni and Zipursky, 1997</xref>). The pattern of pMad, a readout of Dpp signaling, was identical in <italic>emc</italic> mutant and control clones spanning the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C, D</xref>). Thus, Dpp signaling did not seem altered by <italic>emc</italic> mutants either.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Hedgehog pathway</title><p>Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is a key mover of the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Heberlein et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Ma et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Treisman, 2013</xref>). Elevated Hh signaling is sufficient to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Heberlein et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Ma and Moses, 1995</xref>). Notably, it has been suggested previously that <italic>emc</italic> mutations affect the morphogenetic furrow by activating Hedgehog signaling, because <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells accumulate Ci protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Spratford and Kumar, 2013</xref>). Full-length Ci protein (Ci155) is targeted to the proteosome by Cul1 for processing into a transcriptional repressor protein Ci75 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Aza-Blanc et al., 1997</xref>). By inhibiting this processing, Hh prevents repression of target genes by Ci75 and promotes transcriptional activation downstream of Ci155. Accordingly, Ci155 accumulation is a feature of cells receiving Hh signals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Motzny and Holmgren, 1995</xref>).</p><p>We confirmed that <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells contain higher levels of Ci155, as reported previously (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Spratford and Kumar, 2013</xref>). Ci155 was elevated in <italic>emc dronc</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>) but reduced to wild-type levels in <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1</xref>). Thus, Ci155 levels did not correlate perfectly with behavior of the morphogenetic furrow.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Ci expression and function in <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Ci is elevated within <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells (yellow arrows). This was also true posterior to the morphogenetic furrow (orange arrow). (<bold>B</bold>) Higher Ci was also seen in <italic>emc dronc</italic> mutant cells, even when the morphogenetic furrow progressed normally, as indicated by Elav staining. (<bold>C</bold>) Ci levels were completely normal in <italic>emc H99</italic> clones. (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>emc</italic> and <italic>ci</italic> double mutant clones lacking GFP shows accelerated retinal differentiation (blue arrow). Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;dronc<sup>i29</sup>emc<sup>AP6</sup> FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] ci<sup>+</sup> M(3)67C FRT80;ci[94]/ci[94]</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 8 for each genotype except (<bold>D</bold>) which has <italic>n</italic> = 3.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig5-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Ci155 levels when cell death pathways are blocked.</title><p>Representative image of eye imaginal disc in <italic>emc H99</italic> clones in the non-Minute background, showing similar areas inside and outside clones. Genotype: <italic>ywhsF; emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 4.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig5-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Patched staining in emc mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT8</italic>.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig5-figsupp2-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>We noticed that Ci155 levels were elevated in <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones in the posterior, differentiating eye disc, as well as in and ahead of the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). This is significant, because Ci155 is not affected by Hh-dependent Cul1 processing posterior to the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Baker et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Ou et al., 2002</xref>). Ci155 accumulation posterior to the furrow suggests a Hh-independent mechanism.</p><p>To test whether Ci155 accumulation in <italic>emc</italic> clones indicates elevated Hh target signaling, we looked at the transmembrane receptor Patched (Ptc) which is a transcriptional target of Hh signaling, acting in a negative feedback loop (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Hepker et al., 1997</xref>). We saw no changes in Ptc protein levels in either <italic>emc</italic> or <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones compared to controls, questioning the notion that Hh signaling was altered by <italic>emc</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2</xref>).</p><p>To test functionally whether Ci155 is responsible for accelerating the furrow in <italic>emc</italic> clones, we generated <italic>emc ci</italic> double mutant clones. To achieve this, a genomic transgene that rescues <italic>ci<sup>94</sup></italic> flies to adulthood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Little et al., 2020</xref>), was introduced into chromosome arm 3L where it is linked to the wild-type <italic>emc</italic> locus, so that mitotic recombination in the <italic>ci<sup>94</sup></italic> null background leads to <italic>emc ci</italic> double mutant clones. For unknown reasons, <italic>emc ci</italic> double mutant clones were small and difficult to obtain, even in the Minute background. Eye differentiation was still accelerated in those <italic>emc ci</italic> double mutant clones we found that spanned the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>). The unexplained synergistic growth effects in particular could be consistent with interactions between <italic>emc</italic> and Hh signaling, but <italic>emc</italic> must regulate the speed of the morphogenetic furrow through at least one other target besides Ci in order to explain the furrow acceleration observed in <italic>emc ci</italic> double mutant clones.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Delta expression is a target of caspases</title><p>The remaining signaling pathway that contributes to morphogenetic furrow movement is Notch. Specifically, only cells where Notch signaling is active are competent to initiate retinal differentiation in response to Dpp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Baonza and Freeman, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Fu and Baker, 2003</xref>). Accordingly, ectopic expression of Delta, the transmembrane ligand for Notch, is sufficient to accelerate retinal differentiation anterior to the morphogenetic furrow by expanding the effective range of Dpp signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Baonza and Freeman, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Li and Baker, 2001</xref>).</p><p>To test whether <italic>emc</italic> restrains Notch, we examined the bHLH proteins of the E(spl)-C, widely characterized targets of the Notch pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Bray, 2006</xref>). We used mAb323 to detect up to ﬁve E(spl) bHLH proteins with Notch-dependent expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Jennings et al., 1994</xref>). E(spl) protein expression, and hence Notch signaling, was higher in the morphogenetic furrow in <italic>emc</italic> clones than in wild-type cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref>). In contrast, E(spl) protein expression was normal in <italic>emc dronc</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>).</p><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Notch activity and function in emc mutant clones.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) E(spl), an important N target for lateral inhibition, is elevated in the morphogenetic furrow region of <italic>emc</italic> clones (yellow arrows). (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>emc dronc</italic> clones have normal levels of E(spl) protein. (<bold>C</bold>) Senseless staining shows a neurogenic phenotype in <italic>psn</italic> mutant clones, due to reduced Notch signaling. Morphogenetic furrow progression is unaffected. (<bold>D</bold>) A neurogenic phenotype was also observed in <italic>emc psn</italic> clones, along with normal furrow progression. (<bold>E</bold>) <italic>Su(H)</italic> mutant clones identified by absence of GFP labeling show a strong neurogenic phenotype as well as advanced retinal differentiation (orange arrow) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Li and Baker, 2001</xref>). The cell-autonomous effect results in a discontinuity at the borders of <italic>Su(H)</italic> clones, where differentiation outside the clones lags that within clones (orange arrow) Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF; dronc<sup>i29</sup>emc<sup>AP6</sup> FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF/+;psn<sup>V1</sup> FRT80/[Ubi-GFP]M(3)67CFRT80</italic>, (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF/+; emc<sup>AP6</sup> psn<sup>V1</sup> FRT80/[Ubi-GFP]M(3)67CFRT80</italic>, (<bold>E</bold>) <italic>ywhsF; Su(H)<sup>D47</sup></italic>FRT40/FRT40<italic>[UbiGFP]</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 6 for each genotype.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig6-v2.tif"/></fig><p>To test whether elevated Notch signaling was required to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow in <italic>emc</italic> mutants, we examined <italic>emc psn</italic> double mutant clones. Presenilin (Psn) is the enzymatic component of γ-secretase that releases the intracellular domain of Notch during active Notch signaling, and the <italic>psn</italic> gene is linked to <italic>emc</italic>. Loss of <italic>psn</italic> function leads to a Notch loss of function phenotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Struhl and Greenwald, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib95">Ye et al., 1999</xref>). Accordingly, <italic>psn</italic> clones lead to a neurogenic phenotype in the eye, without affecting the progression of the morphogenetic furrow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6C</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Li and Baker, 2001</xref>). The position of the morphogenetic furrow was also not affected in <italic>emc psn</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6D</xref>). Thus, the furrow was not accelerated in <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones also defective for Notch signaling.</p><p>These two results together indicated that <italic>emc</italic> mutants promoted Notch signaling in the morphogenetic furrow, acting through caspase signaling on a step prior to γ-secretase cleavage of the intracellular domain of Notch. Accordingly, we decided to check Delta (Dl) protein levels. We found that Dl protein levels were significantly and consistently elevated cell-autonomously throughout <italic>emc</italic> clones, both posterior and anterior to the furrow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B, E</xref>). This included the region just ahead of the morphogenetic furrow that lacks Delta expression in normal development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Baker and Yu, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Parks et al., 1995</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B</xref>). In contrast, levels of Dl protein in <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones were similar to those of wild-type controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A, D, E</xref>). Levels in <italic>emc dronc clones</italic> were also similar to wild-type on average, although some clones seemed to show an increase, smaller than in <italic>emc</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A, C, E</xref>). This indicated that Dl protein is a target of caspases, directly or indirectly. The Delta protein sequence contains multiple predicted caspase target sites, as do many proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Wang et al., 2014</xref>). Only one candidate site lies in the intracellular domain, where it would potentially be accessible to caspases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1</xref>). Truncation of the Dl intracellular domain is usually associated with loss of Dl function, not stabilization and enhanced function, however (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Daskalaki et al., 2011</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>Caspases regulate Delta levels.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Normal levels of Delta protein are seen in FRT80 clones as compared to elevated Delta levels in (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>emc</italic> clones (arrowheads) whereas that phenotype is reversed in (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>emc H99</italic> clones. However, as seen in (<bold>C</bold>), some <italic>dronc emc</italic> clones show intermediate Delta levels, although most resemble wild type. (<bold>E</bold>) Quantification of Delta levels in different clone genotypes, compared to the background levels outside the clones. Means ± SEM are shown. Significance was determined using one-way Anova with Tukey’s post hoc test. (**p ≤ 0.01, ****p ≤ 0.0001). Source data for (<bold>E</bold>) are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata1">Figure 7—source data 1</xref>. Genotypes: (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;dronc<sup>i29</sup>emc<sup>AP6</sup> FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 7 for each genotype.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata1"><label>Figure 7—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Anti-Dl labeling source data for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7E</xref>.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig7-data1-v2.xlsx"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig7-v2.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Potential caspase sites predicted in the Delta protein.</title><p>Like many proteins, Delta has multiple potential caspase cleavage sites, here predicted suing Cascleave 2.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Wang et al., 2014</xref>). None are high-confidence predictions and only one is in the intracellular domain where caspase access is plausible (position 675, predicted score 0.647). The intracellular domain is required for Delta signaling. Cleavage at position 675 would remove the main ubiquitylation site required for signaling, as well as the binding site for <italic>mindbomb</italic>, so is not anticipated to enhance signaling activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Daskalaki et al., 2011</xref>).</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig7-figsupp1-v2.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Because Dl activates Notch signaling cell non-autonomously, we wondered whether the effect of emc mutant clones was cell-autonomous. We note that, in all the experiments reported here, and in all the previous studies of emc mutant clones affecting morphogenetic furrow movement, the morphogenetic furrow is maintained as a continuous groove across the eye disc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Brown et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Spratford and Kumar, 2013</xref>). That is, the advanced front of retinal differentiation within emc clones is always smoothly continuous with the normal morphogenetic furrow outside the clones, implying a progressive gradual increase in morphogenetic furrow speed near the lateral edges of emc mutant clones (e.g. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4B, D</xref>—<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">6A</xref>). Clones of <italic>Su(H)</italic> null mutants, which act cell-autonomously, provide a contrasting example. Complete loss of <italic>Su(H)</italic> accelerates the morphogenetic furrow due to loss of default Su(H) repression of Notch targets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Li and Baker, 2001</xref>). The boundaries of <italic>Su(H)</italic> null clones exhibit a clear discontinuity between the rates of differentiation within and outside the clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6E</xref>). This difference between <italic>Su(H)</italic> and emc mutant clones is consistent with the idea that emc affects morphogenetic furrow progression differently from <italic>Su(H)</italic>.</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Specific ommatidial cell fates are regulated by caspases in <italic>emc</italic> mutants</title><p>Because the general pattern of neurogenesis revealed by pan-neuronal anti-Elav staining appeared so normal in <italic>emc dronc</italic> and <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C, D</xref>), we examined whether effects of <italic>emc</italic> on particular retinal cell fates was caspase dependent. Emc is also required for R7 differentiation and for timely onset of cone cell differentiation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009</xref>), two cell fate decisions that also depend on Notch signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Cooper and Bray, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Flores et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Tomlinson and Struhl, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Treisman, 2013</xref>). These cell fates are normally independent of <italic>da</italic>, but like imaginal disc cell growth and morphogenetic furrow progression, ectopic <italic>da</italic> activity perturbs them in <italic>emc</italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Brown et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Reddy Onteddu et al., 2024</xref>).</p><p>Clones of <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells lack R7 photoreceptor cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8A, B</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009</xref>). R7 differentiation was restored to 90% of ommatidia in <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8C</xref>). As shown before, <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones delayed cone cell differentiation by two to three columns (corresponding to a delay of 3–6 hr) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8D, E</xref>). We found no delay in cone cell differentiation in most <italic>emc Df(3L)H99</italic> clones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8F</xref>). These results indicated that caspase activity contributes to the R7 and cone cell differentiation defects that are also characteristic of <italic>emc</italic> mutants.</p><fig id="fig8" position="float"><label>Figure 8.</label><caption><title>Caspases contribute to R7 photoreceptor and cone cell defects in <italic>emc</italic> mutants.</title><p>In all panels, <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells are marked by the absence of GFP expression (in green) and photoreceptor neurons are marked by Elav in blue. (<bold>A</bold>) Runt (in red) is expressed in R7 and R8 (yellow arrowhead) photoreceptor cells inside and outside the clone in FRT80 controls. (<bold>B</bold>) Inside <italic>emc</italic> clone, Runt expression is lost from R7 cells, while expression in R8 cells remains unaffected (orange arrowhead). (<bold>C</bold>) However, inside the <italic>emc H99</italic> clones, Runt is expressed in both R7 and R8 cells. (<bold>D</bold>) Cut (in red) is expressed in cone cells in FRT80 controls. (<bold>E</bold>) Inside <italic>emc</italic> clones, cut is delayed. (<bold>F</bold>) However, inside the <italic>emc H99</italic> clones, cut staining is not delayed. Genotypes: (<bold>A, D</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>B, E</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup>FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, (<bold>C, F</bold>) <italic>ywhsF;emc<sup>AP6</sup> Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80</italic>. <italic>N</italic> = 4 for each genotype.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig8-v2.tif"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>The Id proteins are important regulators of differentiation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Ling et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Massari and Murre, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Roschger and Cabrele, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Singh et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib87">Wang and Baker, 2015a</xref>). They are well known to antagonize proneural basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Benezra et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Cabrera et al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Ellis, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Ellis et al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Garrell and Modolell, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Norton, 2000</xref>). It has been uncertain whether this is their only function, as in <italic>Drosophila</italic> it is clear that <italic>emc</italic> mutations affect processes that are independent of proneural genes.</p><p>One other known effect of <italic>emc</italic> is that it restrains the <italic>Drosophila</italic> E protein Da. Da is expressed ubiquitously and is the obligate heterodimer partner of proneural bHLH proteins in neurogenesis. In undifferentiated progenitor cells, most or all Da is thought to be sequestered in inactive heterodimers with Emc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Li and Baker, 2018</xref>). In <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells, Da levels rise and become functional, potentially as homodimers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>). Multiple aspects of <italic>emc</italic> mutants, including poor growth, speed of morphogenetic furrow progression, and R7 photoreceptor and cone cells fates, depend on this ectopic <italic>da</italic> activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Reddy Onteddu et al., 2024</xref>).</p><p>It was noticed, in the context of imaginal disc cell growth, that <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells experience <italic>da</italic>-dependent over-expression of the <italic>ex</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib88">Wang and Baker, 2015b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib89">Wang and Baker, 2018</xref>). Although most study of <italic>ex</italic> has focused on its role in growth control through the SWH pathway, <italic>ex</italic> was shown to influence patterning through Yki-dependent transcription of <italic>diap1</italic>, an important regulator of cell death pathways. This was in the developing thorax, where <italic>ex</italic> mutations affect bristle patterning through <italic>diap1</italic> and a non-apoptotic effect of caspases on Wg signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib90">Wang and Baker, 2019</xref>). This observation led us to explore whether aspects of the <italic>emc</italic> phenotype could reflect reduced <italic>diap1</italic> expression and elevated caspase activity.</p><p>Remarkably, we found that all four features of the <italic>emc</italic> phenotype we examined depended on the caspase-mediated cell death pathway. The normal growth of imaginal disc cells, normal speed of the morphogenetic furrow, specification of R7 photoreceptor cells, and timing of non-neuronal cone cell development were all restored when caspase activation was prevented, which was achieved by inactivating the initiator caspase Dronc, deleting the proapoptotic <italic>rpr</italic>, <italic>grim</italic>, and <italic>hid</italic> genes, over-expressing <italic>diap1</italic>, or over-expressing baculovirus p35. These appeared to be non-apoptotic effects because no elevation in apoptosis was apparent in <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells, because generating apoptosis by another means did not mimic the effects, and because the effects were mediated by elevate Dl protein expression in cells that were not apoptotic. They appeared to be effects of caspase activity because they depended in part on <italic>dronc</italic>, an initiator caspase that cleaves and activates effector caspases, because they were suppressed by baculovirus p35, a caspase inhibitor that is a caspase pseudo-substrate, and because they were suppressed by Diap1, a ubiquitin ligase that targets caspases for degradation. The effects may depend on the full caspase cascade because sensitivity to p35 indicates that caspases other than Dronc are necessary, and because mutating <italic>dronc</italic> alone gave lesser degrees of rescue than deleting <italic>rpr</italic>, <italic>grim</italic>, and <italic>hid</italic>. This is consistent with many other studies that describe the pathways for apoptotic and non-apoptotic caspase functions as similar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Aram et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Baena-Lopez et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Colon-Plaza and Su, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Kanuka et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Kuranaga and Miura, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Nakajima and Kuranaga, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Su, 2020</xref>).</p><p>Whereas non-apoptotic caspase activity promotes Wg signaling during specification of thoracic bristles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Kanuka et al., 2005</xref>), in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye the non-apoptotic caspase target was Notch signaling, due to elevated Delta protein levels. We do not know whether Delta is the direct caspase target. Dl protein levels could also be elevated through other mechanisms, for example through elevated <italic>Dl</italic> gene transcription, or through proteins that affect Dl protein stability.</p><p>Notably, <italic>emc</italic> mutations accelerate the morphogenetic furrow by enhancing Notch signaling, potentially non-autonomously, but inhibit R7 and cone cell differentiation through cell-autonomously reduced N signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Reddy Onteddu et al., 2024</xref>). These contrasts may be explained through the dual functions of the Notch ligand Delta in trans-activation and in cis-inhibition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Bray, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Jacobsen et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Li and Baker, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Micchelli et al., 1997</xref>). The eye disc region ahead of the morphogenetic furrow lacks Delta expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Baker and Yu, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Parks et al., 1995</xref>). Ectopic Dl expression here is sufficient to activate N non-autonomously and drive morphogenetic furrow progression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Baonza and Freeman, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Li and Baker, 2001</xref>). Within the R7 equivalence group, Delta is expressed early in R1 and R6 photoreceptor precursors, protecting them from N activation through cis-inhibition, and establishing the distinction between R1,6 and R7 precursor cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Miller et al., 2009</xref>). Ectopic Dl expression posterior to the morphogenetic furrow has cis-inhibitory effect. Elevated Dl levels within <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones may render potential R7 and cone cell precursors cell-autonomously resistant to N activation, as normally seen in R1/6 precursor cells.</p><p>A previous study suggested that <italic>emc</italic> mutations might affect Hh signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Spratford and Kumar, 2013</xref>). Our data point much more clearly to an effect on Notch signaling. Although the Hh target Ci155 accumulates in <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells, increased Hh signaling is not the only possible cause. Ci155 is cytoplasmic, and thought to be only a precursor for a labile nuclear activator molecule (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Ohlmeyer and Kalderon, 1998</xref>). Preventing activation and nuclear translocation of Ci155 by mutating the kinase <italic>fused</italic> also leads to Ci155 accumulation, but inactivates Hh signaling, showing that Ci155 levels and Hh activity can be separated. Presumably Ci155 accumulates in <italic>fu</italic> mutants because it is more stable than its activated derivative (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Ohlmeyer and Kalderon, 1998</xref>). Significantly, <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells have been reported to over-express the <italic>fused</italic> antagonist <italic>su(fu)</italic>, providing a potential alternative explanation of Ci155 accumulation in <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Spratford and Kumar, 2013</xref>). Analyzing <italic>emc ci</italic> double mutant cells suggested that <italic>ci</italic> was not essential to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow in <italic>emc</italic> mutant clones.</p><p>Here, we show that multiple effects of <italic>emc</italic> mutations that occur independently of proneural bHLH genes, due to the loss of restraint on <italic>da</italic> function in <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells, are caused by caspase-dependent non-apoptotic processes that result from reduced expression of Diap1 protein (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). Caspase-dependent non-apoptotic processes have previously been shown to affect Wg activity in the developing notum, although the direct target remains to be identified. Here we show that in eye development, Notch signaling is the target. Expression of Dl protein is increased in a caspase-dependent manner, which leads either to Notch activation or to Notch inhibition, depending on whether Delta acts through trans-activation or cis-inhibition. Our results show that, in addition to contributing to normal development, non-apoptotic caspase activities contribute to mutant phenotypes. In the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye, multiple aspects of the <italic>emc</italic> phenotype result from caspase-dependent changes in Notch signaling, one of the major cell–cell signaling pathways that contributes to many, many cell fate decisions, and other, unidentified caspase-dependent events affect the growth of <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells in undifferentiated imaginal discs.</p><fig id="fig9" position="float"><label>Figure 9.</label><caption><title>Model of <italic>emc</italic> effects on <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye development.</title><p>Loss of <italic>emc</italic> allows Da protein to form homodimers and activate <italic>ex</italic> transcription, increasing Salvador–Warts–Hippo (SWH) pathway activity. SWH activity reduces DIAP1 expression, thereby derepressing caspase activity. In the eye, non-apoptotic caspase activity increases expression of the Notch ligand Delta. Elevated Delta expression accelerates morphogenetic furrow progression, while cis-inhibiting Notch signaling posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, inhibiting R7 cell specification and cone cell differentiation. In wild-type cells, most Da is likely heterodimerized with either a proneural protein or with Emc protein, and there is no role of caspases in Dl expression.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-91988-fig9-v2.tif"/></fig><p>Da protein binds to and potentially regulates hundreds of genes throughout the <italic>Drosophila</italic> genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Li et al., 2008</xref>). Accordingly, Da activity in <italic>emc</italic> mutant cells might be expected to lead to non-specific and pleiotropic effects. It is therefore remarkable that multiple aspects of proneural bHLH-independent <italic>emc</italic> mutant phenotypes have a simple common basis in elevated caspase activity.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Reagent type (species) or resource</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Designation</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Source or reference</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Identifiers</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Gene (<italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">emc</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GenBank</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FBgn0000575</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">emc [AP6]</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7947322">7947322</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FBal0051626</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">dronc [i29]</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15800001">15800001</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FBal0190283</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Df(3L)H99</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8171319">8171319</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FBab0022359</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">nkd[3]</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2081466">2081466</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FBal0013025</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PBac{y+ w + ci+}VK33</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">This paper</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">psn[v1]</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bloomington <italic>Drosophila</italic> Stock Center</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FBal0316340 BDSC: 63237</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Fz3-RFP</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21869817">21869817</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">pie[eB3]</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1634999">1634999</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FBal0032439</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Genetic reagent (<italic>D. melanogaster</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Su(H)Δ47</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1617730">1617730</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">FBal0103950</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Emc (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Y.N. Jan</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:8000)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Da (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3802198">3802198</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:200)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GFP (Rat monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Nacalai Tesque</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #GF090R RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_2314545">AB_2314545</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:50)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">GFP (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Invitrogen</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #A-11122 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_221569">AB_221569</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:500)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">β-Gal (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #40-1a RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_528100">AB_528100</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:100)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">β-Gal (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cappel (MP Biomedicals)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #55976 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_2313707">AB_2313707</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:100)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Runt (Guinea pig polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9683745">9683745</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:500)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">E(spl)bHLH mAb323 (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1618155">1618155</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:50)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Senseless (Guinea pig polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10975525">10975525</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:500)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cleaved <italic>Drosophila</italic> Dcp-1 (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cell Signaling Technology</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #9578 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_2721060">AB_2721060</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:100)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">DIAP1 (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12021769">12021769</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:50)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">phospho-Smad1/5 (Rabbit monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cell Signaling Technology</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #9516 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_491015">AB_491015</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:100)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Delta (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #C594.9B RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_528194">AB_528194</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:2000)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cut (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #2B10 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_528186">AB_528186</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:50)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Ptc (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #Apa 1 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_528441">AB_528441</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:40)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Elav (Rat monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #7E8A10 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_528218">AB_528218</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:50)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Elav (Mouse monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #9F8A9 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_528217">AB_528217</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:100)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Ci (Rat monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #2A1 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_2109711">AB_2109711</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:10)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cy2, Cy3, and Cy5</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Jackson ImmunoResearch</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:200)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Alexa 555 (Guinea pig polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Invitrogen</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #A-21435 RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID:AB_2535856">AB_2535856</ext-link></td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">(1:500)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Recombinant DNA reagent</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">genomic Ci</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33084577">33084577</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Commercial assay or kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ApopTag Red in situ apoptosis detection kit</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Millipore Sigma</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat #S7165</td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Software</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cascleave 2.0</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">PMID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24149049">24149049</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom"/><td align="left" valign="bottom"/></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title><italic>Drosophila</italic> strains</title><p>The following stocks were employed in this study and were maintained at 25°C unless otherwise stated – <italic>hsflp;emc<sup>AP6</sup> FRT80/TM6B</italic>, <italic>hsflp;dronc<sup>i29</sup>FRT80/TM6B, hsflp;dronc<sup>i29</sup>emc<sup>AP6</sup></italic>, <italic>hsflp;Df(3L)H99/TM3</italic>, <italic>hsflp;Df(3L)H99 emc <sup>AP6</sup>/TM3</italic>, <italic>Ubi-GFP M(3)67C FRT80</italic>, <italic>FRT42 M(2)56F Ubi-GFP</italic>, <italic>FRT82 M(3)95A Ubi-GFP</italic>, <italic>hsflp; Ubi-GFPFRT80</italic>, <italic>hsflp</italic>; <italic>Su(H)<sup>Δ47</sup>FRT40</italic>, <italic>pie<sup>eB3</sup> FRT40</italic>, <italic>psn[v1]FRT80/TM6B, Fz3-RFP</italic>;D/TM6B (kind gift from Yu Kimata, University of Cambridge). We obtained genomic Ci construct from Kalderon lab and used BestGene Inc to target the transgene to the third chromosome and then recombined these flies to generate <italic>hsflp;ci+M(3)67Calz FRT80/TM6B;ci94/y+spa</italic>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Mosaic analysis</title><p>Mosaic clones were obtained using FLP/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Golic, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib92">Xu and Rubin, 1993</xref>). For non-Minute genotypes, larvae were subjected to heat shock for 30 minutes at 37°C, 60 ± 12 hr after egg laying. For Minute genotypes, heat shock was performed 84 ± 12 hr after egg laying for 50 minutes. Larvae were dissected 72 hr after heat shock. All flies were maintained at 25°C unless otherwise stated.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Clonal growth measurements</title><p>Clone and twin-spot areas were measured by tracing in ImageJ. To quantify the growth effects of various genotypes, the sum of clone areas per wing disc was divided by the sum of twin-spot areas in the same wing disc. This avoids any subjectivity in identifying individual clones and assigning them to individual twin spots. Clone/twin-spot ratios were log-transformed to ensure normality before statistical analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Immunohistochemistry and histology</title><p>Unless otherwise noted, preparation of eye and wing imaginal discs for immunostaining and confocal imaging were performed as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Baker et al., 2014</xref>). Antibodies from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB): anti-Ptc (mouse, 1:40), anti-Elav (mouse, 1:100), anti-Elav (rat, 1:50), anti-Cut (mouse, 1:50), anti-Delta C594.9B (mouse, 1:2000), anti-βGal (mouse, 1:100), mouse anti-βGal (1:100, DSHB 40-1a), and anti-Ci (rat, 1:10). Other antibodies: anti-phospho-Smad1/5 (rabbit, 1:100, Cell Signaling), anti-DIAP1 (rabbit, 1:50) (gift from Hyun Don Ryoo, NYU), anti-Dcp1 (rabbit, 1:100, Cell Signaling), anti-Sens (guinea pig, a gift from Hugo Bellen used at 1:500), anti-Da (mouse, 1:200), rabbit anti-Emc (1:8000), anti-GFP (rat, 1:50 from Nacalai Tesque # GF090R), rabbit anti-GFP (1:500), rabbit anti-β-Galactosidase (1:100, Cappel), E(spl)bHLH (1:50,mAb323), and guinea pig anti-runt (1:500). Secondary antibodies conjugated with Cy2, Cy3, and Cy5 dyes (1:200) were from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories and Alexa 555 (1:500). Multi-labelling images were sequentially scanned with Leica SP8 confocal microscopes and were projected and processed with ImageJ. All images were assembled into ﬁgure format using Adobe Illustrator 2020.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Quantifying immunofluorescence</title><p>Anti-DIAP1 and anti-Dl labeling were quantified within clones using the average density measurement in ImageJ and normalized to control regions in the same tissue. For anti-DIAP1 labeling, in particular, we lack any measurement of any non-specific background labeling that may occur. Differences in Diap1 levels between genotypes may be underestimated if a component of the labeling is non-specific.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>TUNEL assay</title><p>For labeling dead cells with TUNEL assay, ApopTag Red In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (Cat #S7165) was used according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, dissected eye discs were fixed for 20 min at room temperature followed by three washes with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then the samples were incubated in equilibration buffer for 1 min followed by incubation in reaction buffer (TdT enzyme; ratio 7:3) at 37°C for 1 hr. TdT reaction mix was replaced with stop buffer (diluted 1:34 in dH<sub>2</sub>O) and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Samples were washed three times with 1× PBS, 5 min per wash; and incubated with anti-digoxigenin antibody solution (diluted 31:34 in blocking solution) for 30 min at room temperature. The samples were then washed three times in 1× PBS, 5 min per wash. For the subsequent antibody staining, the samples were blocked in PBST (1× PBS + 0.5% Triton-X) for 30 min, and incubated with primary antibodies in PBST overnight at 4°C. The samples were next washed with PBST and incubated for 2 hr with secondary antibodies in PBST, and then again washed with PBST, followed by PBS wash and samples were mounted in mounting media.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7. The statistical tests used are described in the figure legends. Statistical significance is shown as follows: n.s., p &gt; 0.05; *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001; ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Prediction of caspase cleavage sites</title><p>Caspase cleavage sites were predicted for Delta using Cascleave 2.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib86">Wang et al., 2014</xref>). Cascleave 2.0 was set to a medium stringency threshold for prediction of cleavage sites.</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Materials availability</title><p>All new materials generated in this project are available from the corresponding author.</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-91988-mdarchecklist1-v2.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">7</xref>.</p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Y Kimata, D Kalderon, H Bellen, HD Ryoo, and Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies and <italic>Drosophila</italic> strains, and Tao Wang for statistical advice. We thank C Khan, A Kumar, J Secombe, and A Jenny for comments on the manuscript. Confocal microscopy was performed at the Analytical Imaging Facility, Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The Leica SP8 microscope was acquired through NIH SIG 1S10 OD023591. Supported by grants from the NIH (GM047892 and EY028990).</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adam</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Montell</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>A role for extra macrochaetae downstream of Notch in follicle cell differentiation</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>131</volume><fpage>5971</fpage><lpage>5980</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.01442</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15539491</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alonso</surname><given-names>LAG</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia-Bellido</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1988">1988</year><article-title>Extramacrochaetae, a trans-acting gene of the achaete-scute complex of <italic>Drosophila</italic> involved in cell communication</article-title><source>Roux’s Archives of Developmental Biology</source><volume>197</volume><fpage>328</fpage><lpage>338</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00375952</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrade-Zapata</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Baonza</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>The bHLH factors extramacrochaetae and daughterless control cell cycle in <italic>Drosophila</italic> imaginal discs through the transcriptional regulation of the Cdc25 phosphatase string</article-title><source>PLOS Genetics</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e1004233</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1004233</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24651265</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aram</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Yacobi-Sharon</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Arama</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>CDPs: caspase-dependent non-lethal cellular processes</article-title><source>Cell Death and Differentiation</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>1307</fpage><lpage>1310</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/cdd.2017.111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28695898</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aza-Blanc</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramírez-Weber</surname><given-names>FA</given-names></name><name><surname>Laget</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwartz</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kornberg</surname><given-names>TB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Proteolysis that is inhibited by hedgehog targets Cubitus interruptus protein to the nucleus and converts it to a repressor</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>89</volume><fpage>1043</fpage><lpage>1053</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80292-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9215627</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baena-Lopez</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Arthurton</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Galasso</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Non-apoptotic Caspase regulation of stem cell properties</article-title><source>Seminars in Cell &amp; Developmental Biology</source><volume>82</volume><fpage>118</fpage><lpage>126</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.10.034</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29102718</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1988">1988</year><article-title>Transcription of the segment-polarity gene wingless in the imaginal discs of <italic>Drosophila</italic>, and the phenotype of a pupal-lethal wg mutation</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>102</volume><fpage>489</fpage><lpage>497</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.102.3.489</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3181031</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>The R8-photoreceptor equivalence group in <italic>Drosophila</italic>: fate choice precedes regulated Delta transcription and is independent of Notch gene dose</article-title><source>Mechanisms of Development</source><volume>74</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0925-4773(98)00054-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9651468</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Firth</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Regulation of Hh signal transduction as <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye differentiation progresses</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>335</volume><fpage>356</fpage><lpage>366</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19761763</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Quiquand</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruggiero</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Eye development</article-title><source>Methods</source><volume>68</volume><fpage>252</fpage><lpage>259</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.04.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24784530</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baonza</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Freeman</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Notch signalling and the initiation of neural development in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>128</volume><fpage>3889</fpage><lpage>3898</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.128.20.3889</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11641214</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benezra</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lockshon</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Weintraub</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1990">1990</year><article-title>The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(90)90214-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2156629</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>The HLH protein Extramacrochaetae is required for R7 cell and cone cell fates in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>327</volume><fpage>288</fpage><lpage>300</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.11.037</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19118542</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>A network of broadly expressed HLH genes regulates tissue-specific cell fates</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>147</volume><fpage>881</fpage><lpage>892</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.055</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22078884</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>The role of the bHLH protein hairy in morphogenetic furrow progression in the developing <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>e47503</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0047503</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23118874</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Borod</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name><name><surname>Heberlein</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Mutual regulation of decapentaplegic and hedgehog during the initiation of differentiation in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> retina</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>197</volume><fpage>187</fpage><lpage>197</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/dbio.1998.8888</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9630745</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex</article-title><source>Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>678</fpage><lpage>689</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrm2009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16921404</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Notch signalling in context</article-title><source>Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>722</fpage><lpage>735</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrm.2016.94</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27507209</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>NL</given-names></name><name><surname>Sattler</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Paddock</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Carroll</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>Hairy and emc negatively regulate morphogenetic furrow progression in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>80</volume><fpage>879</fpage><lpage>887</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(95)90291-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7697718</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>NL</given-names></name><name><surname>Paddock</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Sattler</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cronmiller</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomas</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Carroll</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996</year><article-title>daughterless is required for <italic>Drosophila</italic> photoreceptor cell determination, eye morphogenesis, and cell cycle progression</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>179</volume><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>78</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/dbio.1996.0241</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8873754</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cabrera</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name><name><surname>Alonso</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Huikeshoven</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Regulation of scute function by extramacrochaete in vitro and in vivo</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>120</volume><fpage>3595</fpage><lpage>3603</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.120.12.3595</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7821225</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cadigan</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Jou</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Nusse</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Wingless blocks bristle formation and morphogenetic furrow progression in the eye through repression of Daughterless</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>129</volume><fpage>3393</fpage><lpage>3402</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.129.14.3393</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12091309</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>MV</given-names></name><name><surname>Barolo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cadigan</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Regulation of the feedback antagonist naked cuticle by Wingless signaling</article-title><source>Developmental Biology</source><volume>321</volume><fpage>446</fpage><lpage>454</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.05.551</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18585374</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coelho</surname><given-names>CMA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolevski</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Bunn</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Walker</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Dahanukar</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Leevers</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Growth and cell survival are unevenly impaired in pixie mutant wing discs</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>132</volume><fpage>5411</fpage><lpage>5424</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.02148</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16291791</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Colon-Plaza</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>TT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Non-apoptotic role of apoptotic caspases in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> nervous system</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>839358</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcell.2022.839358</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35223857</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>MTD</given-names></name><name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>R7 photoreceptor specification requires Notch activity</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>1507</fpage><lpage>1510</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00826-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daskalaki</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Shalaby</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kux</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsoumpekos</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsibidis</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Muskavitch</surname><given-names>MAT</given-names></name><name><surname>Delidakis</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Distinct intracellular motifs of Delta mediate its ubiquitylation and activation by Mindbomb1 and Neuralized</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>195</volume><fpage>1017</fpage><lpage>1031</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201105166</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22162135</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ellis</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name><name><surname>Spann</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Posakony</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1990">1990</year><article-title>extramacrochaetae, a negative regulator of sensory organ development in <italic>Drosophila</italic>, defines a new class of helix-loop-helix proteins</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(90)90212-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1690604</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ellis</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Embryonic expression and function of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> helix-loop-helix gene, extramacrochaetae</article-title><source>Mechanisms of Development</source><volume>47</volume><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0925-4773(94)90096-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7947322</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Firth</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Cell cycle arrest by a gradient of Dpp signaling during <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye development</article-title><source>BMC Developmental Biology</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>28</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-213X-10-28</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20214806</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Flores</surname><given-names>GV</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagaraj</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Noll</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Banerjee</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Combinatorial signaling in the specification of unique cell fates</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>103</volume><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00106-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11051549</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Deciphering synergistic and redundant roles of Hedgehog, Decapentaplegic and Delta that drive the wave of differentiation in <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye development</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>130</volume><fpage>5229</fpage><lpage>5239</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.00764</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12954721</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fuchs</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Steller</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Programmed cell death in animal development and disease</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>147</volume><fpage>742</fpage><lpage>758</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.033</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22078876</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garrell</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Modolell</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1990">1990</year><article-title>The <italic>Drosophila</italic> extramacrochaetae locus, an antagonist of proneural genes that, like these genes, encodes a helix-loop-helix protein</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(90)90213-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1690605</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Golic</surname><given-names>KG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1991">1991</year><article-title>Site-specific recombination between homologous chromosomes in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Science</source><volume>252</volume><fpage>958</fpage><lpage>961</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.2035025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2035025</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hawkins</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoo</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Peterson</surname><given-names>EP</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Vernooy</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name><name><surname>Hay</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>The <italic>Drosophila</italic> caspase DRONC cleaves following glutamate or aspartate and is regulated by DIAP1, HID, and GRIM</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>275</volume><fpage>27084</fpage><lpage>27093</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M000869200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10825159</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hay</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolff</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubin</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Development</source><volume>120</volume><fpage>2121</fpage><lpage>2129</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.120.8.2121</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7925015</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heberlein</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolff</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubin</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>The TGF beta homolog dpp and the segment polarity gene hedgehog are required for propagation of a morphogenetic wave in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> retina</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>75</volume><fpage>913</fpage><lpage>926</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(93)90535-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8252627</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heberlein</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Luk</surname><given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Donohoe</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>Growth and differentiation in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye coordinated by hedgehog</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>373</volume><fpage>709</fpage><lpage>711</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/373709a0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7854455</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hepker</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>QT</given-names></name><name><surname>Motzny</surname><given-names>CK</given-names></name><name><surname>Holmgren</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Orenic</surname><given-names>TV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title><italic>Drosophila</italic> cubitus interruptus forms a negative feedback loop with patched and regulates expression of Hedgehog target genes</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>124</volume><fpage>549</fpage><lpage>558</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.124.2.549</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9053330</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jacobsen</surname><given-names>TL</given-names></name><name><surname>Brennan</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Arias</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Muskavitch</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Cis-interactions between Delta and Notch modulate neurogenic signalling in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Development</source><volume>125</volume><fpage>4531</fpage><lpage>4540</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.125.22.4531</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9778511</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jarman</surname><given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Grell</surname><given-names>EH</given-names></name><name><surname>Ackerman</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname><given-names>LY</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname><given-names>YN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Atonal is the proneural gene for <italic>Drosophila</italic> photoreceptors</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>369</volume><fpage>398</fpage><lpage>400</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/369398a0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8196767</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jennings</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Preiss</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Delidakis</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>The Notch signalling pathway is required for Enhancer of split bHLH protein expression during neurogenesis in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> embryo</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>120</volume><fpage>3537</fpage><lpage>3548</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.120.12.3537</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7821220</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiménez</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Campos-Ortega</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1987">1987</year><article-title>Genes in subdivision 1B of the <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic> X-chromosome and their influence on neural development</article-title><source>Journal of Neurogenetics</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>179</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3112354</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kale</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Apoptotic mechanisms during competition of ribosomal protein mutant cells: roles of the initiator caspases Dronc and Dream/Strica</article-title><source>Cell Death and Differentiation</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>1300</fpage><lpage>1312</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/cdd.2014.218</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25613379</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kanuka</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuranaga</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Takemoto</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hiratou</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Okano</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Miura</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title><italic>Drosophila</italic> caspase transduces Shaggy/GSK-3beta kinase activity in neural precursor development</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>3793</fpage><lpage>3806</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.emboj.7600822</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16222340</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuranaga</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Miura</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Nonapoptotic functions of caspases: caspases as regulatory molecules for immunity and cell-fate determination</article-title><source>Trends in Cell Biology</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tcb.2007.01.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17275304</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Treisman</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Regulators of the morphogenetic furrow</article-title><source>Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation</source><volume>37</volume><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-540-45398-7_3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25707067</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Proneural enhancement by Notch overcomes Suppressor-of-Hairless repressor function in the developing <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>330</fpage><lpage>338</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00093-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11267869</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>The roles of cis-inactivation by Notch ligands and of neuralized during eye and bristle patterning in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>BMC Developmental Biology</source><volume>4</volume><elocation-id>5</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-213X-4-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15113404</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Engulfment is required for cell competition</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>129</volume><fpage>1215</fpage><lpage>1225</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.054</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17574031</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>MacArthur</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bourgon</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Nix</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Pollard</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Iyer</surname><given-names>VN</given-names></name><name><surname>Hechmer</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Simirenko</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Stapleton</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Luengo Hendriks</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>HC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogawa</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Inwood</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Sementchenko</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Beaton</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Weiszmann</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Celniker</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Knowles</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name><name><surname>Gingeras</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Speed</surname><given-names>TP</given-names></name><name><surname>Eisen</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Biggin</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> blastoderm</article-title><source>PLOS Biology</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>e27</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.0060027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18271625</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Regulation of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> ID protein Extra macrochaetae by proneural dimerization partners</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>e33967</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.33967</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29687780</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ling</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>XH</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Id proteins: small molecules, mighty regulators</article-title><source>Current Topics in Developmental Biology</source><volume>110</volume><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>216</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-405943-6.00005-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25248477</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Little</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia-Garcia</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Sul</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalderon</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title><italic>Drosophila</italic> hedgehog can act as a morphogen in the absence of regulated Ci processing</article-title><source>eLife</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>e61083</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.61083</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33084577</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Beachy</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Moses</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>The segment polarity gene hedgehog is required for progression of the morphogenetic furrow in the developing <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>75</volume><fpage>927</fpage><lpage>938</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(93)90536-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8252628</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Moses</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>Wingless and patched are negative regulators of the morphogenetic furrow and can affect tissue polarity in the developing <italic>Drosophila</italic> compound eye</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>121</volume><fpage>2279</fpage><lpage>2289</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.121.8.2279</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7671795</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Massari</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Murre</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Helix-loop-helix proteins: regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms</article-title><source>Molecular and Cellular Biology</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>429</fpage><lpage>440</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MCB.20.2.429-440.2000</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10611221</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maurel-Zaffran</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Treisman</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>pannier acts upstream of wingless to direct dorsal eye disc development in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Development</source><volume>127</volume><fpage>1007</fpage><lpage>1016</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.127.5.1007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10662640</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meier</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Silke</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Leevers</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Evan</surname><given-names>GI</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>The <italic>Drosophila</italic> caspase DRONC is regulated by DIAP1</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>598</fpage><lpage>611</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/emboj/19.4.598</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10675329</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Micchelli</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Rulifson</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Blair</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of <italic>Drosophila</italic>: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>124</volume><fpage>1485</fpage><lpage>1495</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.124.8.1485</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9108365</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Lyons</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Herman</surname><given-names>TG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>cis-Inhibition of Notch by endogenous Delta biases the outcome of lateral inhibition</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>1378</fpage><lpage>1383</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.042</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19631544</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Motzny</surname><given-names>CK</given-names></name><name><surname>Holmgren</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>The <italic>Drosophila</italic> cubitus interruptus protein and its role in the wingless and hedgehog signal transduction pathways</article-title><source>Mechanisms of Development</source><volume>52</volume><fpage>137</fpage><lpage>150</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0925-4773(95)00397-j</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7577671</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakajima</surname><given-names>YI</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuranaga</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Caspase-dependent non-apoptotic processes in development</article-title><source>Cell Death and Differentiation</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>1422</fpage><lpage>1430</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/cdd.2017.36</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28524858</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Norton</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>ID helix-loop-helix proteins in cell growth, differentiation and tumorigenesis</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>113 (Pt 22)</volume><fpage>3897</fpage><lpage>3905</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.113.22.3897</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11058077</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohlmeyer</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalderon</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Hedgehog stimulates maturation of Cubitus interruptus into a labile transcriptional activator</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>396</volume><fpage>749</fpage><lpage>753</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/25533</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9874371</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oproescu</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Schuurmans</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>New insights into the intricacies of proneural gene regulation in the embryonic and adult cerebral cortex</article-title><source>Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience</source><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>642016</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnmol.2021.642016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33658912</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ou</surname><given-names>C-Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Y-F</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y-J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chien</surname><given-names>C-T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Distinct protein degradation mechanisms mediated by Cul1 and Cul3 controlling Ci stability in <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye development</article-title><source>Genes &amp; Development</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>2403</fpage><lpage>2414</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.1011402</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12231629</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parks</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>FR</given-names></name><name><surname>Muskavitch</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>Relationships between complex Delta expression and the specification of retinal cell fates during <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye development</article-title><source>Mechanisms of Development</source><volume>50</volume><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>216</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0925-4773(94)00336-l</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7619731</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pignoni</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Zipursky</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Induction of <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye development by decapentaplegic</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>124</volume><fpage>271</fpage><lpage>278</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.124.2.271</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9053304</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quinn</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Dorstyn</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Mills</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Colussi</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Coombe</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Abrams</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Richardson</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>An essential role for the caspase dronc in developmentally programmed cell death in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>275</volume><fpage>40416</fpage><lpage>40424</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M002935200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10984473</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reddy Onteddu</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><article-title>The Id protein Extramacrochaetae restrains the E protein Daughterless to regulate Notch, Rap1, and Sevenless within the R7 equivalence group of the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</article-title><source>Biology Open</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>bio060124</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/bio.060124</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roschger</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabrele</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>The Id-protein family in developmental and cancer-associated pathways</article-title><source>Cell Communication and Signaling</source><volume>15</volume><elocation-id>7</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12964-016-0161-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28122577</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kojima</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ui-Tei</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyata</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Saigo</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Dfrizzled-3, a new <italic>Drosophila</italic> Wnt receptor, acting as an attenuator of Wingless signaling in wingless hypomorphic mutants</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>126</volume><fpage>4421</fpage><lpage>4430</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.126.20.4421</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10498678</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Stampas</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zapata</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>The pineapple eye gene is required for survival of <italic>Drosophila</italic> imaginal disc cells</article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>165</volume><fpage>1869</fpage><lpage>1879</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/165.4.1869</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14704172</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarkar</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Jakubison</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Gadomski</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Spradlin</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gudmundsson</surname><given-names>KO</given-names></name><name><surname>Keller</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Inhibitor of DNA binding proteins revealed as orchestrators of steady state, stress and malignant hematopoiesis</article-title><source>Frontiers in Immunology</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>934624</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fimmu.2022.934624</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spratford</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Extramacrochaetae imposes order on the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye by refining the activity of the Hedgehog signaling gradient</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>140</volume><fpage>1994</fpage><lpage>2004</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.088963</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23536565</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Struhl</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Greenwald</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Presenilin is required for activity and nuclear access of Notch in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>398</volume><fpage>522</fpage><lpage>525</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/19091</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10206646</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib79"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>TT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Non-apoptotic roles of apoptotic proteases: new tricks for an old dog</article-title><source>Open Biology</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>200130</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsob.200130</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32810419</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib80"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tapadia</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Gautam</surname><given-names>NK</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Non-apoptotic function of apoptotic proteins in the development of Malpighian tubules of <italic>Drosophila melanogaster</italic></article-title><source>Journal of Biosciences</source><volume>36</volume><fpage>531</fpage><lpage>544</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12038-011-9092-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21799264</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib81"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tomlinson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Struhl</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Delta/Notch and Boss/Sevenless signals act combinatorially to specify the <italic>Drosophila</italic> R7 photoreceptor</article-title><source>Molecular Cell</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>487</fpage><lpage>495</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00196-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11463374</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib82"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Treisman</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubin</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>wingless inhibits morphogenetic furrow movement in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye disc</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>121</volume><fpage>3519</fpage><lpage>3527</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.121.11.3519</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8582266</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib83"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Treisman</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Retinal differentiation in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Developmental Biology</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>545</fpage><lpage>557</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/wdev.100</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24014422</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib84"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Verghese</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bedi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kango-Singh</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Hippo signalling controls Dronc activity to regulate organ size in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Cell Death and Differentiation</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>1664</fpage><lpage>1676</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/cdd.2012.48</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22555454</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib85"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vrailas</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Moses</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Smoothened, thickveins and the genetic control of cell cycle and cell fate in the developing <italic>Drosophila</italic> eye</article-title><source>Mechanisms of Development</source><volume>123</volume><fpage>151</fpage><lpage>165</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mod.2005.11.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16412615</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib86"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>XM</given-names></name><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Akutsu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Whisstock</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Cascleave 2.0, a new approach for predicting caspase and granzyme cleavage targets</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btt603</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24149049</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib87"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015a</year><article-title>E proteins and id proteins: helix-loop-helix partners in development and disease</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>269</fpage><lpage>280</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2015.10.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26555048</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib88"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015b</year><article-title>Salvador-Warts-Hippo pathway in a developmental checkpoint monitoring helix-loop-helix proteins</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>191</fpage><lpage>202</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2014.12.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25579975</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib89"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Spatial regulation of expanded transcription in the <italic>Drosophila</italic> wing imaginal disc</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>e0201317</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0201317</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30063727</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib90"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>Salvador-Warts-Hippo pathway regulates sensory organ development via caspase-dependent nonapoptotic signaling</article-title><source>Cell Death &amp; Disease</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>669</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41419-019-1924-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31511495</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib91"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>White</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Grether</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Abrams</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Farrell</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Steller</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Genetic control of programmed cell death in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Science</source><volume>264</volume><fpage>677</fpage><lpage>683</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.8171319</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8171319</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib92"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubin</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult <italic>Drosophila</italic> tissues</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>117</volume><fpage>1223</fpage><lpage>1237</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.117.4.1223</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8404527</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib93"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Arcaro</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lackey</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Bergmann</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>The CARD-carrying caspase Dronc is essential for most, but not all, developmental cell death in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>Development</source><volume>132</volume><fpage>2125</fpage><lpage>2134</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.01790</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15800001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib94"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Horvitz</surname><given-names>HR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>Inhibition of the <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> cell-death protease CED-3 by a CED-3 cleavage site in baculovirus p35 protein</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>377</volume><fpage>248</fpage><lpage>251</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/377248a0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7675111</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib95"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lukinova</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fortini</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Neurogenic phenotypes and altered Notch processing in <italic>Drosophila</italic> Presenilin mutants</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>398</volume><fpage>525</fpage><lpage>529</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/19096</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10206647</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib96"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yoo</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Huh</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Muro</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Feldman</surname><given-names>RMR</given-names></name><name><surname>Clem</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>H-AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hay</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Hid, Rpr and Grim negatively regulate DIAP1 levels through distinct mechanisms</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>416</fpage><lpage>424</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb793</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12021767</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib97"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Wharton</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mack</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gadbaw</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Suyama</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>naked cuticle encodes an inducible antagonist of Wnt signalling</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>403</volume><fpage>789</fpage><lpage>795</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35001615</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10693810</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.91988.3.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>eLife Assessment</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Knust</surname><given-names>Elisabeth</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics</institution><country>Germany</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="evidence-strength"><kwd>Compelling</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="claim-importance"><kwd>Important</kwd></kwd-group></front-stub><body><p>This <bold>important</bold> work presents data showing that all non-proneural phenotypes of the Inhibitor of DNA binding (Id) protein Emc are mediated through inappropriate nonapoptotic caspase activity. Using the developing <italic>Drosophila</italic> retina as a model the authors show that Emc acts by transcriptionally regulating the <italic>Death-Associated Inhibitor of Apoptosis 1</italic> (<italic>diap1</italic>) gene, which impacts on Notch signaling by caspase-dependent increase of Delta protein. These are <bold>compelling</bold> findings, interesting for the caspase/apoptosis field as they add more non-apoptotic functions of caspases to the list, as well as for the Id field, which examines how Id proteins inhibit cell differentiation.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.91988.3.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>The extra macrochaetae (emc) gene encodes the only Inhibitor of DNA binding protein (Id protein) in <italic>Drosophila</italic>. Its best-known function is to inhibit proneural genes during development. However, the emc mutants also display non-proneural phenotypes. In this manuscript, the authors examined four non-proneural phenotypes of the emc mutants and reported that they are all caused by inappropriate non-apoptotic caspase activity. These non-neuronal phenotypes are: reduced growth of imaginal discs, increased speed of the morphogenetic furrow, and failure to specify R7 photoreceptor neurons and cone cells during eye development. Double mutants between emc and either H99 (which deletes the three pro-apoptotic genes reaper, grim, and hid) or the initiator caspase dronc suppress these mutant phenotypes of emc suggesting that the cell death pathway and caspase activity are mediating these emc phenotypes. In previous work, the authors have shown that emc mutations elevate the expression of ex which activates the SHW pathway (aka the Hippo pathway). One known function of the SHW pathway is to inhibit Yorkie which controls the transcription of the inhibitor of apoptosis, Diap1. Consistently, in emc clones the levels of Diap1 protein are reduced which might explain why caspase activity is increased in emc clones giving rise to the four non-neural phenotypes of emc mutants. However, this increased caspase activity is not causing ectopic apoptosis, hence the authors propose that this is non-apoptotic caspase activity. In the last part of the manuscript, the authors ruled out that Wg, Dpp, and Hh signaling are the target of caspases, but instead identified Notch signaling as the target of caspases, specifically the Notch ligand Delta. Protein levels of Delta are increased in emc clones in an H99- and dronc-dependent manner. The authors conclude that caspase-dependent non-apoptotic signaling underlies multiple roles of emc that are independent of proneural bHLH proteins.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>Overall, this is an interesting manuscript and the findings are intriguing. It adds to the growing number of non-apoptotic functions of apoptotic proteins and caspases in particular. The manuscript is well written and the data are usually convincingly presented.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>The authors have addressed all my concerns and questions.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.91988.3.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Id proteins are thought to function by binding and antagonizing basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors but new findings demonstrate roles for emc including in tissues where no proneural (<italic>Drosophila</italic> bHLH) genes are known to function. The authors propose a new mechanism for developmental regulation that entails restraining new/novel non-apoptotic functions of apoptotic caspases.</p><p>Specifically, the data suggest that loss of emc leads to reduced expression of diap1 and increased apoptotic caspase activity, which does not induce apoptosis but elevates Delta expression to increase N activity and cause developmental defects. Indeed, many of the phenotypes of emc mutant clones can be rescued by a chromosomal deficiency that reduces caspase activation or by mutations in the initiator caspase Dronc. A related manuscript that shows that loss of emc results in increased da, linked previously to diap1 expression, provides supporting data. There is increasing appreciation that apoptotic caspases have non-apoptotic roles. This study adds to the emerging field and should be of interest to the readers.</p><p>The revised manuscript addresses my concerns from the first round of review.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa3"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.91988.3.sa3</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #3 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The work extends earlier studies on the <italic>Drosophila</italic> Id protein EMC to uncover a potential pathway that explains several tissue-scale developmental abnormalities in emc mutants. It also describes a non-apoptotic role for caspases in cell biology.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The work adds to an emerging new set of functions for caspases beyond their canonical roles as cell death mediators. This novelty is a major strength as well as its reliance on genetic-based in vivo study. The study will be of interest to those who are curious about caspases in general.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>The authors did an adequate job in dealing with the limitations of the reviewed preprint. Although they could have done more, they chose not to for reasons they adequately defended.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="author-comment" id="sa4"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.91988.3.sa4</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>Nicholas E</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Albert Einstein College of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Bronx</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nair</surname><given-names>Sudershana</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>Albert Einstein College of Medicine</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Bronx</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #1 (Public Review):</bold></p><p>Summary:</p><p>The extra macrochaetae (emc) gene encodes the only Inhibitor of DNA binding protein (Id protein) in <italic>Drosophila</italic>. Its best-known function is to inhibit proneural genes during development. However, the emc mutants also display nonproneural phenotypes. In this manuscript, the authors examined four non-proneural phenotypes of the emc mutants and reported that they are all caused by inappropriate non-apoptotic caspase activity. These non-neuronal phenotypes are: reduced growth of imaginal discs, increased speed of the morphogenetic furrow, and failure to specify R7 photoreceptor neurons and cone cells during eye development. Double mutants between emc and either H99 (which deletes the three pro-apoptotic genes reaper, grim, and hid) or the initiator caspase dronc suppress these mutant phenotypes of emc suggesting that the cell death pathway and caspase activity are mediating these emc phenotypes. In previous work, the authors have shown that emc mutations elevate the expression of ex which activates the SHW pathway (aka the Hippo pathway). One known function of the SHW pathway is to inhibit Yorkie which controls the transcription of the inhibitor of apoptosis, Diap1. Consistently, in emc clones the levels of Diap1 protein are reduced which might explain why caspase activity is increased in emc clones giving rise to the four non-neural phenotypes of emc mutants.</p><p>However, this increased caspase activity is not causing ectopic apoptosis, hence the authors propose that this is nonapoptotic caspase activity. In the last part of the manuscript, the authors ruled out that Wg, Dpp, and Hh signaling are the target of caspases, but instead identified Notch signaling as the target of caspases, specifically the Notch ligand Delta. Protein levels of Delta are increased in emc clones in an H99- and dronc-dependent manner. The authors conclude that caspase-dependent non-apoptotic signaling underlies multiple roles of emc that are independent of proneural bHLH proteins.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>Overall, this is an interesting manuscript and the findings are intriguing. It adds to the growing number of non-apoptotic functions of apoptotic proteins and caspases in particular. The manuscript is well written and the data are usually convincingly presented.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>(1) One major concern I have is the observation by the authors in Figure 3C in which protein levels of Diap1 are still reduced in emc H99 double mutant clones. If Diap1 is still reduced in these clones, shouldn't caspases still be derepressed? Given that emc H99 double mutants rescue all emc phenotypes examined, the observation that Diap1 levels are still reduced in emc H99 clones is inconsistent with the authors' model. The authors need to address this inconsistency.</p></disp-quote><p>The effect of H99 emc clones on Diap1 protein levels is consistent with our conclusions. The reviewer’s concern probably relates to previous work that shows that RHG proteins act by antagonizing DIAP1, so that Diap1 is epistatic to RHG (PMID:10481910), and that RHG proteins affect DIAP1 protein levels, and in particular that HID promotes DIAP1 ubiquitylation leading to its destruction (PMID:12021767). First, epistasis means that in the absence of DIAP1, RHG levels do not affect cell survival. DIAP1 protein is not absent in emc/emc eye clones, however, it is reduced. It is not only possible but expected that RHG levels would affect survival when DIAP1 levels are only reduced. Secondly, we did not see a difference in DIAP1 levels between H99/H99 clones and H99/+ cells within the same specimen, suggesting that rpr, grim and hid might not affect DIAP1 levels. It is possible that Hid protein only affects DIAP1 levels when overexpressed, as in the aforementioned paper (PMID:12021767), and that physiological RHG levels affect DIAP1 activity. The H99 deficiency also eliminates Rpr and Grim, which may affect DIAP1 without ubiquitylating it. In our experiments, however, there are no cells completely wild type for the H99 region for comparison in the same specimen, so our results do not rule out the H99 deletion having a dominant effect on DIAP1 levels both inside and outside the clones. What our data clearly showed is that emc affected DIAP1 levels independently of any potential RHG effect, and we hypothesized this was through <italic>diap1</italic> transcription, because we showed previously that emc affects yki, a transcriptional regulator of the <italic>diap1</italic> gene, but we have not demonstrated transcriptional regulation of <italic>diap1</italic> directly in <italic>emc</italic> clones. We modified the manuscript to better delineate these issues (lines 275-284).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) Are Diap1 protein levels reduced in all emc clones, including clones anterior to the furrow? This is difficult to see in Figure 3B. it is also recommended to look in emc mosaic wing discs.</p></disp-quote><p>We now mention that DIAP1 levels were only reduced in <italic>emc</italic> clones posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, not anterior to the morphogenetic furrow or in <italic>emc</italic> clones in wing imaginal discs (lines 284-5) and Figure 3 supplement 1.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) The authors speculate that Delta may be a direct target of caspase cleavage (Figure 9B), but then rule it out for a good reason. However, I assume that the increased protein levels of Delta in emc clones (Figure 7) are the results of increased transcription. In that case, shouldn't caspases control the transcriptional machinery leading to Delta expression?</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for suggesting that caspases control the transcription of Dl. We added this possibility to the manuscript (lines 499-500). At one time there was a Dl-LacZ transcriptional reporter, which would have made it straightforward to assess Dl transcription in <italic>emc</italic> clones, but this strain does not seem to exist now. We have not attempted in situ hybridization to <italic>Dl</italic> transcripts in mosaic discs.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) How does caspase activity in emc clones cause reduced growth? Is this also mediated through Delta signaling?</p></disp-quote><p>We do not know what is the caspase target responsible for reduced growth in wing discs.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(5) Figure 1M: Is there a similar result with emc dronc mosaics?</p></disp-quote><p>The <italic>emc dronc</italic> clones do not show as dramatic a growth advantage in a Minute background. This is consistent with the smaller effect of emc dronc in the non-Minute background also (Figure 1N). We mention this in the revised paper (lines 232-3).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #2 (Public Review):</bold></p><p>Id proteins are thought to function by binding and antagonizing basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors but new findings demonstrate roles for emc including in tissues where no proneural (<italic>Drosophila</italic> bHLH) genes are known to function. The authors propose a new mechanism for developmental regulation that entails restraining new/novel non-apoptotic functions of apoptotic caspases.</p><p>Specifically, the data suggest that loss of emc leads to reduced expression of diap1 and increased apoptotic caspase activity, which does not induce apoptosis but elevates Delta expression to increase N activity and cause developmental defects. Indeed, many of the phenotypes of emc mutant clones can be rescued by a chromosomal deficiency that reduces caspase activation or by mutations in the initiator caspase Dronc. A related manuscript that shows that loss of emc results in increased da, linked previously to diap1 expression, provides supporting data. There is increasing appreciation that apoptotic caspases have non-apoptotic roles. This study adds to the emerging field and should be of interest to readers.</p><p>The data, for the most part, support the conclusions but I do have concerns about some of the data and the interpretations that should be addressed.</p><p><bold>Reviewer #3 (Public Review):</bold></p><p>The work extends earlier studies on the <italic>Drosophila</italic> Id protein EMC to uncover a potential pathway that explains several tissue-scale developmental abnormalities in emc mutants. It also describes a non-apoptotic role for caspases in cell biology.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The work adds to an emerging new set of functions for caspases beyond their canonical roles as cell death mediators. This novelty is a major strength as well as its reliance on genetic-based in vivo study. The study will be of interest to those who are curious about caspases in general.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>The manuscript relies on imaging experiments using genetic mosaic imaginal discs. It is for the most part a qualitative analysis, showing representative samples with a small number of mutant clones in each. Although the senior author has a long track record of using experiments like this to rigorously discover regulatory mechanisms in this system, it is straightforward in 2023 to use Fiji and other image analysis tools to measure fluorescence. Such measurements could be done for all replicate clones of a given genotype as well as genetic control sampling. These could be presented in plots that would not only provide quantitative and statistical measurements, but will be more reader- friendly to those who are not fly people.</p></disp-quote><p>We added quantification of anti-Delta and anti-Diap1 levels to the manuscript (Figures 3E and 7E). We agree that this facilitates statistical confirmation of the results and may be more accessible to non-experts. We do have concerns that these quantifications might be given too much weight. For example, we cannot measure the background level of anti-DIAP1 labeling by labeling <italic>diap1</italic> null mutant cells, because such cells do not survive. Although we measure ~20% reduction in <italic>emc</italic> clones in the eye disc, and none in the wing disc, both measures could be underestimates if some of the labeling is non-specific, as is very possible. We discuss this in the Methods (lines 166-9).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Likewise, more details are needed to describe how clone areas were measured in Figure 1. Did they measure each clone and its twin spot, and then calculate the area ratio for each clone and its paired twin spot? This would be the correct way to analyze the data, yielding many independent measurements of the ratio. And doing so would obviate the need to log transform the data which is inexplicable unless they were averaging clones and twins within a disc and making replicates. More explanation is needed and if they indeed averaged, then they need to calculate the ratios pairwise for each clone and twin.</p></disp-quote><p>We added details of clone size measurements and analysis to the methods (lines 141-6). Although it might be useful to compare individual clones and corresponding twin spots, the only rigorous way to associate individual clones with individual twin spots, or even to determine what is one clone and what is one twin spot, is to use recombination rates low enough that significantly less than one recombination occurs per disc. This would require many more dissections and we did not do this. We now clarify in the manuscript that the analysis is indeed based on the ratio of total area of clones and twin spots with replicates, and that Log-transformation is to improve the normality of the ratio data suitable for parametric significance testing, not because clones and twin spots were summed from each sample. We consulted with a statistician over this approach.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):</bold></p><p>Lines 319/320: &quot;Frizzled-3 RFP expression was not changed in in emc clones (Figure 4A)&quot;. This was actually not shown in Fig 4A (in fact this result was not shown at all). Fig 4A shows the result for emc nkd3 which the authors incorrectly assigned to Figure 4B (line 324).</p></disp-quote><p>We apologize for labeling Figure 4A and 4B incorrectly.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The title of Figure 6 is inaccurate. The title does not indicate what is shown in this figure. A more accurate title would be: Notch activity and function in emc mutant clones.</p></disp-quote><p>We provided a new title for Figure 6.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):</bold></p><p>There is no information on how reproducible the data is. How many discs were examined in each experiment and in how many technical or biological replicates? Can fluorescence signals be quantified within and outside the clones and presented to illustrate reproducibility and significance? This is especially needed for Fig 7, which shows key data that N ligand Delta is elevated in emc clones but dronc and H99 mutations rescue this phenotype. I can see that the Dl signal is brighter in the GFP- emc clone in Fig 7B but I can also see a brighter Dl signal in the small clone and perhaps also in the large clone in C. The difference between B and C could be simply disc-to-disc variation, which should be addressed with quantification and presentation of all data points.</p></disp-quote><p>We added the number of samples to each figure legend. We quantified the fluorescence signals for Figures 3 and 7. Quantification shows that the difference between 7B and 7C is highly significant, not disc to disc variation.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Fig 2B does not support the conclusion. It is supposed to show premature Sens expression and therefore abnormal morphogenetic furrow progression in emc clones. But the yellow arrow is pointing to GFP+ (wild type) cells and it is within this GFP+ region that most premature Sens expression is seen.</p></disp-quote><p>We relocated the arrows in Figure 2B to point precisely to the premature differentiation. When the morphogenetic furrow is accelerated in emc mutant, GFP – tissue, it does not stop when wild type, GFP+ tissue is encountered again, it continues at a normal pace. Accordingly, emc+ regions that are anterior to emc- regions can also experience accelerated differentiation (please see lines 594-8).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Fig 1 shows that while H99 deficiency restores the growth of emc clones to wild type level (Fig 1N), placing these in the Minute background made emc clones grow better than emc wild type but Minute neighbors (Fig 1M). The latter cells were nearly absent, suggesting elimination through cell competition. For the rest of the figures, some experiments are done in the Minute background (e.g., emc H99 clones in Fig 2D) while others are not in the Minute background (e.g., emc H99 clones in Fig 7D). Why the switch between backgrounds from experiment to experiment?</p></disp-quote><p>Figure 2D shows emc H99 clones in a Minute background so that it can be compared with panels 2A-C, which show clones of other genotypes in a Minute background. These clones almost take over the eye disc. In Figure 7D, it was important to show the Dl expression pattern in a substantial wild type region, which could only be shown using the non-Minute background. We have no indication that a Minute background changes the properties of the nonMinute clone, other than allowing its greater growth.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>The first 3 paragraphs of the Introduction are overly detailed and read more like a review article. These could be made more concise to focus on the founding data for this manuscript, which are the published findings that emc mutations elevate ex expression (line 129) and that ex mutants show elevated diap1 expression (line 125). These do not show up until the very end of the Introduction.</p></disp-quote><p>We shortened the Introduction to focus more rapidly on the topics relevant to these experiments.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>In several places, the space between the end of the sentence and the citation is missing (e.g., lines 57, 68, and 75).</p></disp-quote><p>The spacing of citations was fixed.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Line 247. 'morphogenetic furrow that found each ommatidia...' should use a word besides 'found.'</p></disp-quote><p>We corrected line 247.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #3 (Recommendations For The Authors):</bold></p><p>(1) The authors show that inhibiting caspases rescues the growth defect of emc clones. However, they did not find excessive TUNEL staining in emc clones that would explain why the clones would be so small - excessive cell death. How reliable was their tunel staining in being able to detect excessive apoptosis (only negative data was shown). Could they induce excessive cell death using radiation or some other means to ensure the assay is robust? If death is not occurring in emc clones, a deficiency worth addressing is that they do not discuss or explore how the caspases then inhibit clone growth. Is it expanded cell cycle times, or smaller cells?? And that phenotype does not fit with their end model of Delta being the only moderator of emc since it is not playing a significant role in tissue growth anterior to the furrow.One would assume using the commercial antibody against activated caspase would be another readout for emc clones and this would bolster their claim that excessive caspase activation occurs in the emc cells.</p></disp-quote><p>We have added Dcp1 staining in Figure 2 supplement 3 to show that TUNEL staining is reliable.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) Figure 3D has really large emc clones when GMR-Diap is present. But the large clones are anterior to the furrow where Diap would not be overexpressed. Is this just an unusual sample with a coincidentally big emc M+ clone? It speaks to my concerns about the qualitative nature of the data.</p></disp-quote><p>We replaced Figure 3D with an example of smaller clones. Nowhere have we suggested that GMR-DIAP1 affects clone size.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) Figure 9B is very speculative and not appropriate since the authors have zero data to support that cleavage mechanism. It is fit for the next paper if the idea is correct. The panel should be removed.</p></disp-quote><p>We did not intend Figure 9B to imply that we think Dl itself is the relevant target of non-apoptotic caspases. Since apparently we gave that impression, we removed this to a supplemental figure. We still think it is worth showing that Dl does not contain predicted caspase sites expected to activate signaling.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) Figure 9A could be made more clear. Their pathway represents the mutant cells in the mosaic disc. Why not also outline what you think is happening in the emc+ cells as well?</p></disp-quote><p>It is difficult to make a comparable diagram for normal cells, because none of this pathway happens in normal cells. We modified the figure legend to indicate this (lines 677-8).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(5) The one emc ci clone they show spanning the furrow has a very non-continuous furrow advance phenotype. This is unlike the emc clones where the furrow advance is graded about the clone. And it resembles the SuH clones they show. This result and the synergistic effect on clone sizes they mention need more discussion and thought put into it. It argues ci is doing something with respect to emc action. loss of ci might not rescue size and furrow advance but actually, it makes it worse! This is interesting and might suggest an inhibitory role for ci in emc or a parallel role for ci in mediating growth and progression that is redundant with emc.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree that aspects of the emc ci phenotype are not clear. We discuss this in the revised manuscript (lines 373-5).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(6) Related to point 7, it is a weak argument for non-autonomy that graded furrow advance in emc clones is evidence for emc acting nonautonomously through Delta. Its weakness is combined with its lack of significance relative to the other findings. It should be deleted as should the SuH data.</p></disp-quote><p>We agree that the evidence that emc affects morphogenetic furrow progression non-autonomously is not compelling and have revised the manuscript to soften this conclusion (lines 426-7). We do not want to remove this idea, because it does in fact have significance for other findings. Specifically, it supports the idea that the emc effect in the morphogenetic furrow is due to trans-activation by Delta, whereas the effect on R7 and cone cell differentiation is due to autonomous cis-inhibition. We think this is important to keep in the paper.</p></body></sub-article></article>