<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">94342</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.94342</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="version">10.7554/eLife.94342.4</article-id><article-version article-version-type="publication-state">version of record</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Neuroscience</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The potassium channel subunit K<sub>V</sub>1.8 (<italic>Kcna10</italic>) is essential for the distinctive outwardly rectifying conductances of type I and II vestibular hair cells</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Hannah R</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-5798</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>Anna</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6259-0294</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>Ruth Anne</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-2051</contrib-id><email>eatock@uchicago.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/024mw5h28</institution-id><institution>Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/02mpq6x41</institution-id><institution>Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Illinois at Chicago</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>King</surname><given-names>Andrew J</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/052gg0110</institution-id><institution>University of Oxford</institution></institution-wrap><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>King</surname><given-names>Andrew J</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/052gg0110</institution-id><institution>University of Oxford</institution></institution-wrap><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>03</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>RP94342</elocation-id><history><date date-type="sent-for-review" iso-8601-date="2023-11-22"><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2023-11-22"><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.21.563853"/></event><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a reviewed preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-01-10"><day>10</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94342.1"/></event><event><event-desc>The reviewed preprint was revised.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-09-04"><day>04</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94342.2"/></event><event><event-desc>The reviewed preprint was revised.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-09-24"><day>24</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94342.3"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2024, Martin et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Martin et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-94342-v1.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-94342-figures-v1.pdf"/><abstract><p>In amniotes, head motions and tilt are detected by two types of vestibular hair cells (HCs) with strikingly different morphology and physiology. Mature type I HCs express a large and very unusual potassium conductance, g<sub>K,L</sub>, which activates negative to resting potential, confers very negative resting potentials and low input resistances, and enhances an unusual non-quantal transmission from type I cells onto their calyceal afferent terminals. Following clues pointing to K<sub>V</sub>1.8 (<italic>Kcna10</italic>) in the Shaker K channel family as a candidate g<sub>K,L</sub> subunit, we compared whole-cell voltage-dependent currents from utricular HCs of K<sub>V</sub>1.8-null mice and littermate controls. We found that K<sub>V</sub>1.8 is necessary not just for g<sub>K,L</sub> but also for fast-inactivating and delayed rectifier currents in type II HCs, which activate positive to resting potential. The distinct properties of the three K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent conductances may reflect different mixing with other K<sub>V</sub> subunits that are reported to be differentially expressed in type I and II HCs. In K<sub>V</sub>1.8-null HCs of both types, residual outwardly rectifying conductances include K<sub>V</sub>7 (<italic>Knq</italic>) channels. Current clamp records show that in both HC types, K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent conductances increase the speed and damping of voltage responses. Features that speed up vestibular receptor potentials and non-quantal afferent transmission may have helped stabilize locomotion as tetrapods moved from water to land.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>hair cell</kwd><kwd>potassium channel</kwd><kwd>vestibular</kwd><kwd>inner ear</kwd><kwd>utricle</kwd><kwd>voltage gated</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>Mouse</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000055</institution-id><institution>National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01 DC012347</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>Anna</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>Ruth Anne</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001</institution-id><institution>National Science Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>Graduate Research Fellowship Program</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Hannah R</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>A striking and consequential conductance in vestibular type I hair cells is finally shown to depend on a little-known Shaker subunit that contributes to conventional conductances in other hair cells.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>publishing-route</meta-name><meta-value>prc</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>The receptor potentials of hair cells (HCs) are strongly shaped by large outwardly rectifying K<sup>+</sup> conductances that are differentially expressed according to HC type. Here, we report that a specific voltage-gated K<sup>+</sup> (K<sub>V</sub>) channel subunit participates in very different K<sub>V</sub> channels dominating the membrane conductances of type I and II HCs in amniote vestibular organs.</p><p>Type I HCs occur only in amniote vestibular organs. Their most distinctive features are that they are enveloped by a calyceal afferent terminal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib81">Wersall, 1956</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Lysakowski and Goldberg, 2004</xref>) and that they express g<sub>K,L</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Correia and Lang, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Rennie and Correia, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996a</xref>): a large non-inactivating conductance with an activation range from –100 to –60 mV, far more negative than other ‘low-voltage-activated’ K<sub>V</sub> channels. HCs are known for their large outwardly rectifying K<sup>+</sup> conductances, which repolarize membrane voltage following a mechanically evoked perturbation and in some cases contribute to sharp electrical tuning of the HC membrane. g<sub>K,L</sub> is unusually large and unusually negatively activated, and therefore strongly attenuates and speeds up the receptor potentials of type I HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Correia et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996b</xref>). In addition, g<sub>K,L</sub> augments non-quantal transmission from type I HC to afferent calyx by providing open channels for K<sup>+</sup> flow into the synaptic cleft (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Contini et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Contini et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Contini et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Govindaraju et al., 2023</xref>), increasing the speed and linearity of the transmitted signal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Songer and Eatock, 2013</xref>).</p><p>Type II HCs have compact afferent synaptic contacts (boutons) where the receptor potential drives quantal release of glutamate. They have fast-inactivating (A-type, g<sub>A</sub>) and delayed rectifier (g<sub>DR</sub>) conductances that are opened by depolarization above resting potential (<italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub>).</p><p>The unusual properties of g<sub>K,L</sub> have long attracted curiosity about its molecular nature. g<sub>K,L</sub> has been proposed to include ‘M-like’ K<sub>V</sub> channels in the K<sub>V</sub>7 and/or erg channel families (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Kharkovets et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Holt et al., 2007</xref>). The K<sub>V</sub>7.4 subunit was of particular interest because it contributes to the low-voltage-activated conductance, g<sub>K,n</sub>, in cochlear outer HCs, but was eventually eliminated as a g<sub>K,L</sub> subunit by experiments on K<sub>V</sub>7.4-null mice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib75">Spitzmaul et al., 2013</xref>).</p><p>Several observations suggested the K<sub>V</sub>1.8 (KCNA10) subunit as an alternative candidate for g<sub>K,L</sub>. K<sub>V</sub>1.8 is highly expressed in vestibular sensory epithelia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Carlisle et al., 2012</xref>), particularly HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Lee et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Scheffer et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>), with slight expression elsewhere (skeletal muscle, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Lee et al., 2013</xref>; kidney, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib84">Yao et al., 2002</xref>). <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> mice show absent or delayed vestibular-evoked potentials, the synchronized activity of afferent nerve fibers sensitive to fast linear head motions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Lee et al., 2013</xref>). Unique among K<sub>V</sub>1 channels, K<sub>V</sub>1.8 has a cyclic nucleotide-binding domain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Lang et al., 2000</xref>) with the potential to explain g<sub>K,L</sub>’s known cGMP dependence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Behrend et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Chen and Eatock, 2000</xref>).</p><p>Our comparison of whole-cell currents and immunohistochemistry in type I HCs from <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> mouse utricles showed that K<sub>V</sub>1.8 expression is necessary for g<sub>K,L</sub>. More surprisingly, K<sub>V</sub>1.8 expression is also required for A-type and delayed rectifier conductances of type II HCs. In both HC types, eliminating the K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent major conductances revealed a smaller delayed rectifier conductance involving K<sub>V</sub>7 channels. Thus, the distinctive outward rectifiers that produce such different receptor potentials in type I and II HCs both include K<sub>V</sub>1.8 and K<sub>V</sub>7 channels.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><p>We compared whole-cell voltage-activated K<sup>+</sup> currents in type I and II HCs from homozygous knockout (<italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup>) animals and their wildtype (<italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup>) or heterozygote (<italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup>) littermates. We immunolocalized K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits in the utricular epithelium and pharmacologically characterized the residual K<sup>+</sup> currents of <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> animals. Current clamp experiments demonstrated the impact of K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent currents on passive membrane properties.</p><p>We recorded from three utricular zones: lateral extrastriola (LES), striola, and medial extrastriola (MES); striolar and extrastriolar zones have many structural and functional differences and give rise to afferents with different physiology (reviewed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Goldberg, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Eatock and Songer, 2011</xref>). Recordings are from 412 type I and II HCs (53% LES, 30% MES, 17% striola) from mice between postnatal day (P) 5 and P370. We recorded from such a wide age range to test for developmental or senescent changes in the impact of the null mutation. Above P18, we did not see substantial changes in K<sub>V</sub> channel properties, as reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">González-Garrido et al., 2021</xref>).</p><p><italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> animals appeared to be healthy and to develop and age normally, as reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Lee et al., 2013</xref>), and HCs were healthy (see Methods for criteria).</p><sec id="s2-1"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 is necessary for g<sub>K,L</sub> in type I HCs</title><p>The large low-voltage-activated conductance, g<sub>K,L</sub>, in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type I HCs produces distinctive whole-cell current responses to voltage steps, as highlighted by our standard type I voltage protocol (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). From a holding potential within the g<sub>K,L</sub> activation range (here –74 mV), the cell is hyperpolarized to –124 mV, negative to <italic>E</italic><sub>K</sub> and the activation range, producing a large inward current through open g<sub>K,L</sub> channels that rapidly decays as the channels deactivate. We use the large transient inward current as a hallmark of g<sub>K,L</sub>. The hyperpolarization closes all g<sub>K,L</sub> channels, and then the activation function is probed with a series of depolarizing steps, obtaining the maximum conductance from the peak tail current at –44 mV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). We detected no difference between the Boltzmann parameters of g<sub>K,L</sub> <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves from <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> type I HCs.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title><italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I hair cells (HCs) lacked g<sub>K,L</sub>, the dominant conductance in mature <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,++/––</sup> type I HCs.</title><p>Representative voltage-evoked currents in (<bold>A</bold>) a P22 <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> type I HC and (<bold>B</bold>) a P29 <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HC. (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>Arrow,</italic> transient inward current that is a hallmark of g<sub>K,L</sub>. <italic>Arrowheads,</italic> tail currents, magnified in <italic>insets</italic>. For steps positive to the midpoint voltage, tail currents are very large. As a result, K<sup>+</sup> accumulation in the calyceal cleft reduces driving force on K<sup>+</sup>, causing currents to decay rapidly, as seen in A (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Lim et al., 2011</xref>). Note that the voltage protocol (top) in B extends to more positive voltages. (<bold>C</bold>) Activation (<italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic>) curves from tail currents in A and B; symbols, data; curves, Boltzmann fits (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ1">Equation 1</xref>). (<bold>D</bold>) Fit parameters from mice &gt;P12 show big effect of <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> and no difference between <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup>. (<bold>D.1</bold>), Tukey’s test: +/+ vs –/–, p&lt;1E-9; +/– vs –/–, p&lt;1E-9. (<bold>D.2</bold>), Tukey’s test: +/+ vs –/–, p=9.4E-4. (<bold>D.3</bold>), Tukey’s test: +/+ vs –/–, p&lt;1E-9; +/– vs –/–, p&lt;1E-9. <italic>Asterisks</italic>: ***p &lt; 0.001; and ****p &lt; 0.0001. <italic>Line,</italic> median; <italic>Box,</italic> interquartile range; <italic>Whiskers</italic>, outliers. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> for statistics.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Developmental changes in type I hair cell (HC) K<sub>V</sub> conductances.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Parameters from Boltzmann fits of tail <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> relations for type I HCs plotted against age. (<bold>B</bold>) Conductance density is similar in young (P5–P10) type I HCs that lack g<sub>K,L</sub>. g<sub>K,L</sub> is defined here as having a <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> negative to –55 mV. <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> <italic>with</italic> g<sub>K,L</sub>, 17 ± 5 nS/pF (19); <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> <italic>without</italic> g<sub>K,L</sub>, 3.7 ± 0.4 nS/pF (22); <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup>, 1.8 ± 0.4 nS/pF (13). <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> <italic>with</italic> g<sub>K,L</sub> vs <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup>: p = 0.007, KWA, g 1.0. <italic>Asterisks:</italic> **p &lt; 0.01. <italic>Line,</italic> median; <italic>Box,</italic> interquartile range; <italic>Whiskers</italic>, outliers.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig1-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table1" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><title>Type I hair cell K<sub>V</sub> activation voltage dependence.</title><p>Mean ± SEM (number of cells). g is effect size, Hedge’s g. KWA is Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="middle">Zone</th><th align="left" valign="middle">Kcna10</th><th align="left" valign="middle">Tail <italic>V</italic><sub>1/2</sub>, mV<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table1fn1">*</xref></th><th align="left" valign="middle">Tail <italic>S</italic>, mV<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table1fn2"><sup>†</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="middle">Tail g<sub>max</sub>, nS<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table1fn3"><sup>‡</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="middle">Tail g<sub>max</sub>/<italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub>, nS/pF<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table1fn4"><sup>§</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="middle">Age (median, range)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="3">Extrastriola</td><td align="left" valign="middle">+/+</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">–85 ± 2 (12)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">4.3 ± 0.4 (12)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">270 ± 40 (11)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">47 ± 8 (11)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">22, 14–287</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="plus" valign="middle">+/–</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">–83 ± 1 (40)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">5.2 ± 0.3 (40)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">210 ± 20 (40)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">37 ± 4 (40)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">19, 13–259</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">–/–</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">–40.2 ± 0.9 (26)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">5.7 ± 0.3 (26)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">5.4 ± 0.3 (26)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">1.11 ± 0.08 (26)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">45, 14–277</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="3">Striola</td><td align="left" valign="middle">+/+</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">–87 ± 3 (6)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">4.3 ± 0.3 (6)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">310 ± 70 (6)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">41 ± 7 (6)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">40, 15–59</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="plus" valign="middle">+/–</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">–88 ± 2 (3)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">4.7 ± 0.9 (3)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">270 ± 60 (3)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">44 ± 6 (3)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">19, 14–20</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">–/–</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">–38 ± 1 (13)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">6.2 ± 0.4 (13)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">6.5 ± 0.6 (13)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">1.5 ± 0.1 (13)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">202, 14–370</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table1fn1"><label>*</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 7.7; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 6.8.</p></fn><fn id="table1fn2"><label>†</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p = 8.4E−4, g 1.2.</p></fn><fn id="table1fn3"><label>‡</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 3.7; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 2.1.</p></fn><fn id="table1fn4"><label>§</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 3.6; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 2.0.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>For a similar voltage protocol, <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>) produced no inward transient current at the step from holding potential to –124 mV and much smaller depolarization-activated currents during the iterated steps, even at much more positive potentials. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref> compares the conductance–voltage (<italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic>, activation) curves fit to tail currents (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ1">Equation 1</xref>; see insets in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A, B</xref>): the maximal conductance (g<sub>max</sub>) of the <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> HC was over 10-fold smaller (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C.1</xref>), and the curve was positively shifted by &gt;40 mV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C.2</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref> shows the <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> Boltzmann fit parameters for type I HCs from mice &gt;P12, an age at which type I HCs normally express g<sub>K,L</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Rüsch et al., 1998</xref>).</p><p>In type I HCs from <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+,–</sup> mice, the <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> parameters of outwardly rectifying currents transitioned over the first 15–20 postnatal days from values for a conventional delayed rectifier, activating positive to resting potential, to g<sub>K,L</sub> values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A</xref>), as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Rüsch et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Géléoc et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>). Between P5 and P10, some type I HCs have not yet acquired the physiologically defined conductance, g<sub>K,L</sub>. No effects of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 deletion were seen in the delayed rectifier currents of immature type I HCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1B</xref>), showing that they were not immature forms of the K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent g<sub>K,L</sub> channels.</p><p><italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs had a much smaller residual delayed rectifier that activated positive to resting potential, with <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> ~–40 mV and g<sub>max</sub> density of 1.3 nS/pF. No additional K<sup>+</sup> conductance activated up to +40 mV, and <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> parameters did not change much with age from P5 to P370. We characterize this K<sub>V</sub>1.8-independent delayed rectifier later. A much larger non-g<sub>K,L</sub> delayed rectifier conductance (g<sub>DR,I</sub>) was reported in our earlier publication on mouse utricular type I HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Rüsch et al., 1998</xref>). This current was identified as that remaining after ‘blocking’ g<sub>K,L</sub> with 20 mM external Ba<sup>2+</sup>. Our new data suggest that there is no large non-g<sub>K,L</sub> conductance, and that instead high Ba<sup>2+</sup> positively shifted the apparent voltage dependence of g<sub>K,L</sub>.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 strongly affects type I passive properties and responses to current steps</title><p>While the cells of <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> epithelia appeared healthy, type I HCs had smaller membrane capacitances (<italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub>): 4–5 pF in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs, ~20% smaller than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> type I HCs (~6 pF) and ~30% smaller than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> type I HCs (6–7 pF; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). While <italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub> scales with surface area, the lack of change in soma sizes by deletion of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1b</xref>) suggests that surface area was not different. Instead, <italic>C</italic> may be higher in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> cells because of g<sub>K,L</sub> for two reasons. First, highly expressed trans-membrane proteins (see discussion of g<sub>K,L</sub> channel density in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Chen and Eatock, 2000</xref>) can affect membrane thickness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Mitra et al., 2004</xref>), which is inversely proportional to specific <italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub>. Second, resistive current through g<sub>K,L</sub> could contaminate estimations of capacitive current, which is calculated from the decay time constant of transient current evoked by a small voltage step negative to –90 mV, where we measured <italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub> (see Methods).</p><table-wrap id="table2" position="float"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><title>Type I hair cell passive membrane properties in the extrastriola (ES) and striola (S).</title><p>Mean ± SEM (number of cells). g is effect size, Hedge’s g. KWA is Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Zone</th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Kcna10</italic></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub>, mV<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn1">*</xref>, <xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn2">†</xref></sup></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>R</italic><sub>input</sub>, MΩ<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn3"><sup>‡</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math id="inf1"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mpadded width="0"><mml:mphantom><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mphantom></mml:mpadded></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>, ms<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn4"><sup><sub>§</sub></sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub>, pF<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn5"><sup>¶</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Age (median, range)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">ES</td><td align="left" valign="middle">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–84 ± 3 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">44 ± 6 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.24 ± 0.03 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">6.1 ± 0.4 (13)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">20, 14–287</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–88.0 ± 0.7 (28)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">55 ± 5 (24)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.32 ± 0.03 (23)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">5.8 ± 0.2 (44)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">21, 16–29</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–63 ± 2 (15)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">1400 ± 100 (15)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">6.4 ± 0.6 (15)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">5.0 ± 0.2 (27)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">45, 14–202</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">S</td><td align="left" valign="middle">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–87 ± 2 (4)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">50 ± 8 (4)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.30 ± 0.04 (4)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">7.4 ± 0.7 (7)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">43, 40–59</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–87 ± 3 (3)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">38 ± 8 (2)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.21 ± 0.01 (2)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">5.9 ± 0.6 (3)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">19, 19–20</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–74 ± 5 (5)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">1000 ± 300 (4)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">4.2 ± 1.0 (4)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">4.4 ± 0.2 (14)</td><td align="left" valign="middle">202, 24–370</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table2fn1"><label>*</label><p>Striolar –/– vs ES –/–: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.006, g 1.2; striolar –/– vs striolar +/+,+/–: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.005, g 1.7.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn2"><label>†</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 2.3; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 3.4.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn3"><label>‡</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 3.1; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 3.9.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn4"><label>§†</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 2.7; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 3.4.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn5"><label>¶‡</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p = 3E−7, g 1.5; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p = 1.3E−4, g 1.0; +/–vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.048, g 0.6.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>Basolateral conductances help set the resting potential and passive membrane properties that regulate the time course and gain of voltage responses to small currents. To examine the effect of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 on these properties, we switched to current clamp mode and measured resting potential (<italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub>), input resistance (<italic>R</italic><sub>in</sub>, equivalent to voltage gain for small current steps, Δ<italic>V</italic>/Δ<italic>I</italic>), and membrane time constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="inf2"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>). In <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs, <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub> was much less negative (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A.1</xref>), <italic>R</italic><sub>in</sub> was greater by ~20-fold (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A.2</xref>), and membrane charging times were commensurately longer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A.3</xref>).</p><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title><italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I hair cells (HCs) had much longer membrane charging times and higher input resistances (voltage gains) than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type I HCs.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) g<sub>K,L</sub> strongly affects passive membrane properties: (<bold>A.1</bold>) <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub>, Tukey’s test p&lt;1E-9, (<bold>A.2</bold>) <italic>R</italic><sub>in</sub>, input resistance, Tukey’s test p&lt;1E-9, and (<bold>A.3</bold>) membrane time constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf3"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>, Tukey’s test p&lt;1E-9. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> for all statistics. (<bold>B</bold>) Current clamp responses to the same scale from (<bold>B.1</bold>) <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> and (<bold>B.2</bold>) <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I cells, both P29. <italic>Filled arrowhead (B.2),</italic> sag indicating <italic>I</italic><sub>H</sub> activation. <italic>Open arrowhead</italic>, Depolarization rapidly decays as <italic>I</italic><sub>DR</sub> activates. (<bold>B.3</bold>) First 6 ms of voltage responses to 170 pA injection, normalized to steady-state value; <italic>curves</italic>, double-exponential fits (<italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf4"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 μs and 2.4 ms) and single-exponential fits (<italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf5"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 ms). <italic>Asterisks,</italic> ****p &lt; 0.0001. <italic>Line,</italic> median; <italic>Box,</italic> interquartile range; <italic>Whiskers</italic>, outliers.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig2-v1.tif"/></fig><p>The differences between the voltage responses of <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs are expected from the known impact of g<sub>K,L</sub> on <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub> and <italic>R</italic><sub>in</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Correia and Lang, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Ricci et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Songer and Eatock, 2013</xref>). The large K<sup>+</sup>-selective conductance at <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub> holds <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub> close to <italic>E</italic><sub>K</sub> (K<sup>+</sup> equilibrium potential) and minimizes gain (Δ<italic>V</italic>/Δ<italic>I</italic>), such that voltage-gated conductances are negligibly affected by the input current and the cell produces approximately linear, static responses to iterated current steps. For <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs, with their less negative <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub> and larger <italic>R</italic><sub>in</sub>, positive current steps evoked a fast initial depolarization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B.2</xref>), activating residual delayed rectifiers and repolarizing the membrane toward <italic>E</italic><sub>K</sub>. Negative current steps evoked an initial hyperpolarization followed by a slowly repolarizing ‘sag’ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B.2</xref>) as the HCN1 channels open (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Horwitz et al., 2011</xref>).</p><p>Overall, comparison of the <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> responses shows that with K<sub>V</sub>1.8 (g<sub>K,L</sub>), the voltage response of the type I HC is smaller but better reproduces the time course of the input current.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 is necessary for both inactivating and non-inactivating K<sub>V</sub> currents in type II HCs</title><p>Type II HCs also express K<sub>V</sub>1.8 mRNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>). Although their outwardly rectifying conductances (g<sub>A</sub> and g<sub>DR</sub>) differ substantially in voltage dependence and size from g<sub>K,L</sub>, both conductances were strongly affected by the null mutation: g<sub>A</sub> was eliminated and the delayed rectifier was substantially smaller. Below we describe g<sub>A</sub> and g<sub>DR</sub> in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type II HCs and the residual outward-rectifying current in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs.</p><p><bold><italic>Kcna10</italic></bold><sup><bold><italic>+/+,+/–</italic></bold></sup> <bold><italic>type II HCs</italic></bold>. Most (81/84) <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type II HCs expressed a rapidly activating, rapidly inactivating A-type conductance (g<sub>A</sub>). We define A current as the outwardly rectifying current that inactivates by over 30% within 200 ms. g<sub>A</sub> was more prominent in extrastriolar zones, as reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Holt et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib80">Weng and Correia, 1999</xref>).</p><p>We compared the activation and inactivation time course and inactivation prominence for 200 ms steps from –124 to ~30 mV. Outward currents fit with <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ3">Equation 3</xref> yielded fast inactivation time constants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="inf6"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>) of ~30 ms in LES (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A.2</xref>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf7"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> was faster in LES than in MES or striola (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A.3</xref>) and fast inactivation was a larger fraction of the total inactivation in LES than striola (~0.5 vs 0.3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A.4</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title><italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II hair cells (HCs) in all zones of the sensory epithelium lacked the major rapidly inactivating conductance, g<sub>A</sub>, and had less delayed rectifier conductance.</title><p>Activation and inactivation varied with epithelial zone and genotype. (<bold>A</bold>) g<sub>A</sub> inactivation time course varied across zones. (<bold>A.1</bold>) Zones of the utricular epithelium: lateral extrastriola (LES), medial extrastriola (MES), and striola (S). (<bold>A.2</bold>) Normalized currents evoked by steps from –124 to +30 mV with overlaid fits of <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ3">Equation 3</xref>. (<bold>A.3</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf8"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> was faster in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (n=45) than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (n=43) HCs (KWA, p=0.027), and faster in LES (n=56) than MES (n=23, KWA, p=0.002) or S (n=9, KWA, p=2E-4). Point label is number of cells. Brackets show post hoc pairwise comparisons between two zones (vertical brackets) and horizontal brackets compare two genotypes; see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> for statistics on kinetics. (<bold>A.4</bold>) Fast inactivation was a greater fraction of total inactivation in LES (n=58) than striola (n=10, Tukey’s test p=0.0041). (<bold>B</bold>) Exemplars; ages, <italic>left to right</italic>, P312, P53, P287, P49, P40, P154. (<bold>C</bold>) % inactivation at 30 mV was much lower in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> (n=37) than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (n=47, Tukey’s HSD, p&lt;1E-9) and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (n=44, Tukey’s HSD, p&lt;1E-9). % inactivation was lower in striola (n=16) than LES (n=77, Tukey’s HSD, p=3E-5) and MES (n=36, Tukey’s HSD, p=0.0011). 2-way ANOVA detected interaction between zone and genotype, p=0.026 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). (<bold>D</bold>) Exemplar currents and <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves from LES type II HCs show a copy number effect. (<bold>D.1</bold>) Exemplar currents evoked by steps from –124 to +30 mV fit with <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ3">Equation 3</xref>. (<bold>D.2</bold>) Averaged peak and steady-state conductance–voltage data points from LES cells (+/+, <italic>n</italic>=37; –/–, <italic>n</italic>=20) were fit with Boltzmann equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ1">Equation 1</xref>) and normalized by g<sub>max</sub> in (<bold>D.3</bold>). <italic>Asterisks</italic>: *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001; and ****p &lt; 0.0001. <italic>Error bars,</italic> SEM. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> for statistics on voltage dependence.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig3-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>For type II hair cells (HCs) older than P12, K<sub>V</sub> conductance activation and inactivation differed across zones and genotypes.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) In <italic>Kcna10<sup>+/+</sup></italic> and <italic>Kcna10<sup>+/–</sup></italic> HCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf11"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> at 30 mV was faster in LES (n=56) than MES (n=23, KWA p=0.002) or S (n=9, KWA p=2E-4). <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf12"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> was faster in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (n=45) than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (n=43, KWA p=0.027, see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). (<bold>B</bold>) Fast inactivation was a larger fraction of total inactivation in LES (n=56) than striola (n=9, Tukey’s p=0.0041). (<bold>C</bold>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf13"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> at 30 mV was slower in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> (n=53) than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (n=49, KWA p=0.0048) and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (n=59, KWA p=2E-7), and slower in S (n=16) than LES (n=75, KWA p=6E-4) and MES (n=33, KWA p=0.02). (<bold>D</bold>) Percent inactivation at 30 mV was lower in S (n=20) than LES (n=99, 2-way ANOVA Tukey’s p&lt;0.0001) and MES (n=42, 2-way ANOVA Tukey’s p=0.001), and lower in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> (n=43) than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (n=58, 2-way ANOVA Tukey’s p=0.0048 and &lt;0.0001) and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (n=60, 2-way ANOVA Tukey’s p&lt;0.0001). Interaction between Zone and Genotype was significant (p=0.026). <italic>Asterisks</italic>: *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001; and ****p &lt; 0.0001. <italic>Line,</italic> median; <italic>Box,</italic> interquartile range; <italic>Whiskers</italic>, outliers.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig3-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>For type II hair cells (HCs) older than P12, K<sub>V</sub> conductances were stable.</title><p>(<bold>A–C</bold>) Parameters from Boltzmann fits of peak <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> relations and (<bold>D</bold>) % inactivation at +30 mV plotted against age from all zones. Overlaid curves are smoothing cubic β-splines. Note the seven extrastriolar Kcna10<sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs with % inactivation &gt;30%.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig3-figsupp2-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>A minority of extrastriolar <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II hair cells (HCs) had a very small fast-inactivating outward rectifier current.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) All extrastriolar Kcna10<sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type II HCs inactivated by &gt;30%. Most mature (&gt;P12) extrastriolar Kcna10<sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs inactivated by &lt;30% but some inactivated by &gt;30% (7/30, 23%) because they had fast inactivation (<bold>B</bold>). (<bold>B</bold>) Exemplar residual fast inactivation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="inf14"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> = 10 ms at +30 mV). For the seven cells in this group, <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf15"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> = 30 ± 6 ms, amplitude of fast inactivation = 310 ± 70 pA; activation peak <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> = –15 ± 2 mV and slope factor = 12.4 ± 0.9 mV. These parameters are similar to g<sub>A</sub> but for the much smaller conductance (one-way ANOVAs).</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig3-figsupp3-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table3" position="float"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><title>Type II hair cell K<sub>V</sub> currents: activation and inactivation time course at +30 mV.</title><p>Mean ± SEM. g is effect size, Hedge’s g. KWA is Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Zone</th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Kcna10</italic></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math id="inf9"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> at 30 mV, ms<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn1">*</xref>, <xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn2">†</xref></sup></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math id="inf10"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> at 30 mV, ms <xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn3"><sup>‡</sup></xref><sup>,</sup> <xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn4"><sup>§</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Fast inactivation prominence<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn5"><sup>¶</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Inactivation %<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn6"><sup>**</sup></xref><sup>,<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn7">††</xref></sup></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>N</italic> cells</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Age (median, range)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">LES</td><td align="left" valign="middle">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="middle">2.11 ± 0.09</td><td align="left" valign="middle">23 ± 3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.46 ± 0.03</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">45 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">30</td><td align="left" valign="middle">46, 14–312</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="plus" valign="middle">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">1.64 ± 0.09</td><td align="left" valign="middle">15 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.53 ± 0.03</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">51 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">27</td><td align="left" valign="middle">29, 13–280</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">4.4 ± 0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">NA</td><td align="left" valign="middle">NA</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">25 ± 3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">21</td><td align="left" valign="middle">128, 15–355</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">MES</td><td align="left" valign="middle">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="middle">2.8 ± 0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">50 ± 10</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.40 ± 0.04</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">42 ± 3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">9</td><td align="left" valign="middle">94, 22–296</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="plus" valign="middle">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">2.2 ± 0.2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">90 ± 60</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.42 ± 0.03</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">47 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">15</td><td align="left" valign="middle">24, 13–52</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">10 ± 7</td><td align="left" valign="middle">NA</td><td align="left" valign="middle">NA</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">29 ± 5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">10</td><td align="left" valign="middle">84, 28–355</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">Striola</td><td align="left" valign="middle">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="middle">2.7 ± 0.3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">50 ± 10</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.31 ± 0.07</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">39 ± 3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">45, 40–287</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="plus" valign="middle">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">2.9 ± 0.4</td><td align="left" valign="middle">300 ± 200</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.3 ± 0.06</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">28 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">19, 14–30</td></tr><tr><td align="char" char="." valign="middle">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">7 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">NA</td><td align="left" valign="middle">NA</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="middle">22 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">6</td><td align="left" valign="middle">202, 29–298</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table3fn1"><label>*</label><p>–/– vs +/+: KWA, p = 0.0048, g 0.6; –/– vs +/–: KWA, p = 2.3E−7, g 0.6.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn2"><label>†</label><p>Striola vs LES: KWA, p = 5.7E−4, g 1.0.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn3"><label>‡</label><p>+/– vs +/+: KWA, p = 0.027, g 0.2.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn4"><label>§</label><p>LES vs MES: KWA, p = 0.0018, g 0.3; LES vs Striola: KWA, p = 1.9E−4, g 0.8.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn5"><label>¶</label><p>LES vs Striola: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.0041, g 0.7.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn6"><label>**</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.7; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.8.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn7"><label>††</label><p>Striola vs LES: two-way ANOVA, p = 3.4E−5, g 0.9; Striola vs MES: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.0011, g 1.0; interaction between genotype and zone: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.026.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>To show voltage dependence of activation, we generated <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves for peak currents (sum of A-current and delayed rectifier) and steady-state currents measured at 200 ms, after g<sub>A</sub> has mostly inactivated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D.2</xref>). <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> HCs had smaller currents than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> HCs, reflecting a smaller g<sub>DR</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>) and faster fast inactivation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A.3</xref>). As discussed later, these effects may relate to effects of the <italic>Kcna10</italic> gene dosage on the relative numbers of different K<sub>V</sub>1.8 heteromers.</p><p>For <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> HCs, the voltage dependence as summarized by <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> and slope factor (<italic>S</italic>) was similar. Relative to g<sub>SS</sub>, g<sub>Peak</sub> had a more positive <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> (~–21 vs ~–26) and greater <italic>S</italic> (~12 vs ~9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Because g<sub>Peak</sub> includes channels with and without fast inactivation, the shallower g<sub>Peak</sub>–<italic>V</italic> curve may reflect a more heterogeneous channel population. Only g<sub>Peak</sub> showed zonal variation, with more positive <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> in LES than striola (~–20 vs ~–24 mV, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). We later suggest that variable subunit composition may drive zonal variation in g<sub>Peak</sub>.</p><table-wrap id="table4" position="float"><label>Table 4.</label><caption><title>Type II hair cell K<sub>V</sub> currents: activation voltage dependence.</title><p>Mean ± SEM. g is effect size, Hedge’s g. KWA is Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Zone</th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>Kcna10</italic></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Peak <italic>V</italic><sub>1/2</sub>, mV<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn1">*</xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn1">*</xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Peak <italic>S</italic>, mV<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn2"><sup>†</sup></xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn2"><sup>†</sup></xref>, <xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn3"><sup>‡</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">A-type g<sub>max</sub>/<italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub>, nS/pF<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn4"><sup>§</sup></xref> <xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn4"><sup>§</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">SS <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub>, mV<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn5"><sup>¶</sup></xref> <xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn5"><sup>¶</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">SS <italic>S</italic>, mV<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn6">**</xref><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn6">**</xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">SS g<sub>max</sub>/<italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub>, nS/pF <xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn7"><sup>††</sup></xref> <sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table4fn8">‡ ‡</xref></sup></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>N</italic> cells</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Age (median, range)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">LES</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–19.8 ± 0.6</td><td align="left" valign="middle">11.8 ± 0.4</td><td align="left" valign="middle">4.0 ± 0.3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–25.0 ± 0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">8.7 ± 0.3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">7.1 ± 0.8</td><td align="left" valign="middle">37</td><td align="left" valign="middle">46, 14–312</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–19.8 ± 0.8</td><td align="left" valign="middle">12.8 ± 0.4</td><td align="left" valign="middle">3.8 ± 0.3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–26.8 ± 0.8</td><td align="left" valign="middle">8.7 ± 0.3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">4.9 ±0.4</td><td align="left" valign="middle">35</td><td align="left" valign="middle">29, 13–280</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–18 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">11.7 ± 0.4</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.37 ± 0.05</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–19 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">12.1 ± 0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">1.8 ±0.2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">20</td><td align="left" valign="middle">128, 15–355</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">MES</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–22 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">11 ± 0.7</td><td align="left" valign="middle">4.1 ± 0.7</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–26 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">8.3 ± 0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">9 ±1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">11</td><td align="left" valign="middle">94, 22–296</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–21 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">11.8 ± 0.4</td><td align="left" valign="middle">3.6 ± 0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–27 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">9.0 ± 0.3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">5.9 ±0.7</td><td align="left" valign="middle">16</td><td align="left" valign="middle">24, 13–52</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–19 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">10.8 ± 0.6</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.6 ± 0.1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–20 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">10.7 ± 0.7</td><td align="left" valign="middle">2.5 ±0.3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">15</td><td align="left" valign="middle">84, 28–355</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">Striola</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–24 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">9.6 ± 0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">5 ± 1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–26.6 ± 0.9</td><td align="left" valign="middle">8.2 ± 0.4</td><td align="left" valign="middle">12 ±1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">7</td><td align="left" valign="middle">45, 40–287</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–25 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">9.4 ± 0.4</td><td align="left" valign="middle">2.6 ± 0.6</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–28 ± 2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">8.2 ± 0.3</td><td align="left" valign="middle">10±2</td><td align="left" valign="middle">6</td><td align="left" valign="middle">19, 14–30</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–21.3 ± 0.9</td><td align="left" valign="middle">10.3 ± 0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">0.7 ± 0.1</td><td align="left" valign="middle">–21.7 ± 0.8</td><td align="left" valign="middle">10.5 ± 0.6</td><td align="left" valign="middle">3.9±0.5</td><td align="left" valign="middle">8</td><td align="left" valign="middle">202, 29–298</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table4fn1"><label>*</label><p>Striola vs LES: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.00116, g 0.9.</p></fn><fn id="table4fn2"><label>†</label><p>Striola vs MES: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.016, g 0.8; Striola vs LES: two-way ANOVA, p = 7.5E−6, g 1.2.</p></fn><fn id="table4fn3"><label>‡</label><p>–/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p = 0.036, g 0.5.</p></fn><fn id="table4fn4"><label>§</label><p>–/– vs +/+: Welch ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 2.3; –/– vs +/–: Welch ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 2.3.</p></fn><fn id="table4fn5"><label>¶</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.4; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.6.</p></fn><fn id="table4fn6"><label>**</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.4; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p = 4.5E−7, g 1.1.</p></fn><fn id="table4fn7"><label>††</label><p>–/– vs +/+: Welch ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.6; –/– vs +/–: Welch ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.3; +/+vs +/–: Welch ANOVA, p = 0.007, g 1.6.</p></fn><fn id="table4fn8"><label>‡ ‡</label><p>Striola vs LES: one-way ANOVA, p = 0.001, g (0.9); Striola vs MES: one-way ANOVA, p = 0.01, g 0.8.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p><bold><italic>Kcna10</italic></bold><sup><bold><italic>–/–</italic></bold></sup> <bold><italic>type II HCs</italic></bold>. Kcna10<sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs from all zones were missing g<sub>A</sub> and 30–50% of g<sub>DR</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B–D</xref>). The residual delayed rectifier (1.3 nS/pF) had a more positive <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> than g<sub>DR</sub> in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> HCs (~–20 vs ~–26 mV, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D.2</xref>). We refer to the K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent delayed rectifier component as g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>1.8) and to the residual, K<sub>V</sub>1.8-independent delayed rectifier component as g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>v</sub>7) because, as we show later, it includes K<sub>V</sub>7 channels.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2</xref> shows the development of K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent and -independent K<sub>V</sub> currents in type II HCs with age from P5 to over P300. In <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type II HCs, g<sub>A</sub> was present at all ages with a higher % inactivation after P18 than at P5–P10 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2A.4</xref>). g<sub>Peak</sub> did not change much above P12 except for a compression of conductance density from P13 to P370 (partial correlation coefficient = –0.4, p = 2E−5, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2A.3</xref>).</p><p>We saw small rapidly inactivating outward currents in a minority of <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs (23%, 7/30), all &gt;P12 and extrastriolar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3</xref>). These currents overlapped with g<sub>A</sub> in percent inactivation, inactivation kinetics, and activation voltage dependence but were very small. As discussed later, we suspect that these currents flow through homomers of inactivating K<sub>V</sub> subunits that in control HCs join with K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits and confer inactivation on the heteromeric conductance.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 affects type II passive properties and responses to current steps</title><p>In type II HCs, absence of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 did not change <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A.1</xref>) because g<sub>A</sub> and g<sub>DR</sub> both activate positive to rest, but significantly increased <italic>R</italic><sub>in</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf16"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A.2 and A.3</xref>).</p><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title><italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II hair cells (HCs) had larger, slower voltage responses and more electrical resonance.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Passive membrane properties near resting membrane potential: (<bold>A.1</bold>) Resting potential. <italic>R</italic><sub>input</sub> (<bold>A.2</bold>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf17"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>A.3</bold>) were obtained from single-exponential fits to voltage responses &lt;15 mV. <italic>R</italic><sub>input</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf18"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> were higher in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> (n=13) than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (n=22, KWA p=0.015; p=0.016) and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (n=33, KWA p=0.002; p=0.008; see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). (<bold>B</bold>) Exemplar voltage responses to iterated current steps (<italic>bottom</italic>) illustrate key changes in gain and resonance with K<sub>V</sub>1.8 knockout. (<bold>B.1</bold>) <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> type II HC (P24, LES) and (<bold>B.2</bold>) <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HC (P53, LES). <italic>Arrowheads,</italic> depolarizing transients. (<bold>C</bold>) Range of resonance illustrated for <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs (<italic>left, pink curves fit to</italic> <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ5">Equation 5</xref>) and controls (<italic>right, blue fits</italic>). (<bold>C.1</bold>) <italic>Resonant frequencies, left to right:</italic> 19.6, 18.4, 34.4, and 0.3 Hz. Leftmost cell resonated spontaneously (before step). (<bold>C.2</bold>) Tuning quality (<italic>Q</italic><sub>e</sub>; <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ6">Equation 6</xref>) was higher for <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> (n=26) type II HCs (KWA: p = 0.0064 vs <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup>, n=23; p = 7E-8 vs <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup>, n=45). (<bold>D</bold>) <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs had higher, slower peaks and much slower rebound potentials in response to large (170 pA) current steps. (<bold>D.1</bold>) Normalized to show initial depolarizing transient (<italic>filled circles</italic>, times of peaks; <italic>horizontal arrows</italic>, peak width at half-maximum). (<bold>D.2</bold>) Longer time scale to highlight how null mutation reduced post-transient rebound. (<bold>E</bold>) In <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> HCs (n=19), depolarizing transients evoked by a +90 pA step were slower to peak (<bold>E.1</bold>) than in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (n=19, 2-way ANOVA Tukey’s p&lt;1E-9) and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (n=34, 2-way ANOVA Tukey’s p&lt;1E-9) and (<bold>E.2</bold>) larger than in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (n=19, KWA p=0.006) and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (n=34, KWA p=2E-4). <italic>Asterisks</italic>: *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001; and ****p &lt; 0.0001. <italic>Line,</italic> median; <italic>Box,</italic> interquartile range; <italic>Whiskers</italic>, outliers.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig4-v1.tif"/></fig><table-wrap id="table5" position="float"><label>Table 5.</label><caption><title>Type II hair cell passive membrane properties in the extrastriola (ES) and striola (S).</title><p>Mean ± SEM (number of cells). g is effect size, Hedge’s g. KWA is Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA. Peak height and time were measured from responses to 170 pA input from rest.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Zone</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Kcna10</th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub>, mV</th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>R</italic><sub>input</sub>, GΩ<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table5fn1">*</xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math id="inf19"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>, ms<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table5fn2"><sup>†</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Peak height, mV<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table5fn3"><sup>‡</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Peak time, ms<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table5fn4"><sup>§</sup></xref></th><th align="left" valign="bottom"><italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub>, pF</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Age (median, range)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">ES</td><td align="center" valign="bottom">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–71 ± 2 (19)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">1.4 ± 0.2 (16)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">11 ± 3 (16)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–20 ± 2 (15)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2.5 ± 0.2 (15)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">4.7 ± 0.2 (50)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">45, 16–312</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="bottom">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–71 ± 2 (34)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">1.2 ± 0.1 (27)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">9 ± 1 (27)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–20 ± 1 (30)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2.44 ± 0.08 (30)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">4.6 ± 0.1 (52)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">27, 13–280</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="bottom">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–76 ± 2 (9)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">2.3 ± 0.3 (7)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">16 ± 3 (7)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2 ± 6 (7)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">3.6 ± 0.3 (7)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">4.6 ± 0.2 (35)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">53, 15–154</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">S</td><td align="center" valign="bottom">+/+</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–73.1 ± 1.0 (6)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">1.4 ± 0.1 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">9 ± 1 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–20 ± 2 (5)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2.7 ± 0.1 (5)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">4.6 ± 0.2 (7)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">45, 40–224</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="bottom">+/–</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–71 ± 3 (5)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">1.4 ± 0.3 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">7 ± 2 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–20 ± 2 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2.3 ± 0.1 (6)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">4.8 ± 0.2 (6)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">19, 19–30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="bottom">–/–</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">–68 ± 2 (6)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">3.0 ± 0.7 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">26 ± 10 (6)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">2 ± 7 (4)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">4 ± 1 (4)</td><td align="char" char="plusmn" valign="bottom">4.4 ± 0.3 (7)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="bottom">178, 29–298</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table5fn1"><label>*</label><p>–/– vs +/+: KWA, p = 0.015, g 1.2; –/– vs +/–: KWA, p = 0.002, g 1.5.</p></fn><fn id="table5fn2"><label>†</label><p>–/– vs +/+: KWA, p = 0.016, g 0.7; –/– vs +/–: KWA, p = 0.008, g 1.2.</p></fn><fn id="table5fn3"><label>‡</label><p>–/– vs +/+: KWA, p = 0.006, g 2.1; –/– vs +/–: KWA, p = 2E−4, g 2.6.</p></fn><fn id="table5fn4"><label>§</label><p>–/– vs +/+: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.3; –/– vs +/–: two-way ANOVA, p &lt; 1E−9, g 1.9.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>Positive current steps evoked an initial depolarizing transient in both <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs, but the detailed time course differed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>). Both transient and steady-state responses were larger in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup>, consistent with their larger <italic>R</italic><sub>in</sub> values.</p><p>Absence of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 increased the incidence of sharp electrical resonance in type II HCs. Electrical resonance, which manifests as ringing responses to current steps, can support receptor potential tuning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Ashmore, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Fettiplace, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Hudspeth and Lewis, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Ramanathan and Fuchs, 2002</xref>). Larger <italic>R</italic><sub>in</sub> values made <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs more prone to electrical resonance; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C.1</xref> shows a striking example. Median resonance quality (<italic>Q</italic><sub>e</sub>, sharpness of tuning) was greater in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> (1.33, n=26) than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> (0.66, <italic>n</italic> = 23) or <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> (0.59, <italic>n</italic> = 44) type II HCs.</p><p>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 affected the time course of the initial peak in response to much larger current injections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D, E</xref>). Fast activation of g<sub>A</sub> in control type II HCs rapidly repolarizes the membrane and then inactivates, allowing the constant input current to progressively depolarize the cell, producing a slow rebound (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D.2</xref>). This behavior has the potential to counter mechanotranduction adaptation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Vollrath and Eatock, 2003</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 immunolocalized to basolateral membranes of both type I and II HCs</title><p>If K<sub>V</sub>1.8 is a pore-forming subunit in the K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent conductances g<sub>K,L</sub>, g<sub>A</sub>, and g<sub>DR</sub>, it should localize to HC membranes. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> compares K<sub>V</sub>1.8 immunoreactivity in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> utricles, showing specific immunoreactivity along the basolateral membranes of both HC types in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> utricles. To identify HC type and localize the HC membrane, we used antibodies against K<sub>V</sub>7.4 (KCNQ4), an ion channel densely expressed in the calyceal ‘inner-face’ membrane next to the synaptic cleft (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Lysakowski et al., 2011</xref>), producing a cup-like stain around type I HCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). K<sub>V</sub>1.8 immunoreactivity was present in HC membrane apposing K<sub>V</sub>7.4-stained calyx inner face in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> utricles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A.1 and A.2</xref>) and not in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> utricles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A.3</xref>).</p><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Type I and II hair cell (HC) basolateral membranes show specific immunoreactivity to Kv1.8 antibody (magenta).</title><p>Antibodies for K<sub>V</sub>7.4 (A, green) and calretinin (B, cyan) were used as counterstains for calyx membrane (Kv7.4), type II HC cytoplasm (calretinin) and cytoplasm of striolar calyx-only afferents (calretinin). (<bold>A</bold>) <italic>Left</italic>, Cartoon showing K<sub>V</sub>7.4 on the calyx inner face membrane (CIF) and K<sub>V</sub>1.8 on the type I HC membrane. SC, supporting cell nuclei. <italic>A.1–3</italic>, Adult mouse utricle sections. K<sub>V</sub>7.4 antibody labeled calyces on two K<sub>V</sub>1.8-positive type I HCs (<bold><italic>A.1</italic></bold>), four K<sub>V</sub>1.8-positive type I HCs (<bold><italic>A.2</italic></bold>), and two K<sub>V</sub>1.8-negative type I HCs from a <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> mouse (<bold><italic>A.3</italic></bold>). (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>Left</italic>, Cartoon showing cytoplasmic calretinin stain in calyx-only striolar afferents and most type II HCs, and K<sub>V</sub>1.8 on membranes of both HC types. In wildtype utricles, K<sub>V</sub>1.8 immunolocalized to basolateral membranes of type I and II HCs (extrastriola, <bold><italic>B.1</italic></bold>). K<sub>V</sub>1.8 immunolocalized to type I HCs (striola, <bold><italic>B.2</italic></bold>). Staining of supporting cell (SC) membranes by Kv1.8 antibody was non-specific, as it was present in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> tissue (striola, <bold><italic>B.3</italic></bold> and <bold><italic>B.4</italic></bold>). All scale bars 5 µm.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig5-v1.tif"/></fig><p>In other experiments, we used antibodies against calretinin (CALB2), a cytosolic calcium-binding protein expressed by many type II HCs and also by striolar calyx-only afferents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Desai et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Lysakowski et al., 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>). An HC is type II if it is calretinin-positive (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B.1</xref>) or if it lacks a K<sub>V</sub>7.4- or calretinin-positive calyceal cup (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A.2 and B.3</xref>, rightmost cells). HC identification was confirmed with established morphological indicators: for example, type II HCs tend to have basolateral processes (feet) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Pujol et al., 2014</xref>) and, in the extrastriola, more apical nuclei than type I HCs.</p><p>Previously, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Carlisle et al., 2012</xref> reported K<sub>V</sub>1.8-like immunoreactivity in many cell types in the inner ear. In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Lee et al., 2013</xref> found that gene expression reporters indicated expression only in HCs and some supporting cells. Here, comparison of control and null tissue showed selective expression of HC membranes, and that some supporting cell staining is non-specific.</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.4 may also contribute to g<sub>A</sub></title><p>Results with the K<sub>V</sub>1.8 knockout suggest that type II HCs have an inactivating K<sub>V</sub>1 conductance that includes K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits. K<sub>V</sub>1.8, like most K<sub>V</sub>1 subunits, does not show fast inactivation as a heterologously expressed homomer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Lang et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Ranjan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierich et al., 2020</xref>), nor do the K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent channels in type I HCs, as we show, and in cochlear inner HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierich et al., 2020</xref>). K<sub>V</sub>1 subunits without intrinsic inactivation can produce rapidly inactivating currents by associating with K<sub>V</sub>β1 or K<sub>V</sub>β3 subunits. K<sub>V</sub>β1 (<italic>Kcnb1</italic>) is present in type II HCs alongside K<sub>V</sub>β2 (<italic>Kcnb2</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jan et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>), which does not confer rapid inactivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Dwenger et al., 2022</xref>).</p><p>Another possibility is that in type II HCs, K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits heteromultimerize with K<sub>V</sub>1.4 subunits—the only K<sub>V</sub>1 subunits which, when expressed as a homomer, have complete N-type (fast) inactivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib77">Stühmer et al., 1989</xref>). Multiple observations support this possibility. K<sub>V</sub>1.4 has been linked to g<sub>A</sub> in pigeon type II HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Correia et al., 2008</xref>) and is the second-most abundant K<sub>V</sub>1 transcript in mammalian vestibular HCs, after K<sub>V</sub>1.8 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Scheffer et al., 2015</xref>). K<sub>V</sub>1.4 is expressed in type II HCs but not type I HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>), and is not found in striolar HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jan et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>), where even in type II HCs, inactivation is slower and less extensive (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>).</p><p>Functional heteromers form between K<sub>V</sub>1.4 and other K<sub>V</sub>1.x and/or K<sub>V</sub>β1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Imbrici et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Correia et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Al Sabi et al., 2011</xref>). Although K<sub>V</sub>1.4 and K<sub>V</sub>1.8 heteromers have not been studied directly, g<sub>A</sub>’s inactivation time course (<inline-formula><mml:math id="inf20"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> of ~30 ms +30 mV, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>) and voltage dependence (<italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> –41 mV, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>) are consistent with these other K<sub>V</sub>1.4-containing heteromers.</p><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Inactivation curve of g<sub>A</sub> in extrastriolar type II hair cells (HCs).</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Modified voltage protocol measured accumulated steady-state inactivation at the tail potential. 100 μM ZD7288 in bath prevented contamination by HCN current. (<bold>B</bold>) Voltage dependence of g<sub>A</sub>’s steady-state inactivation (<italic>h</italic><sub>∞</sub> curve) and peak activation are consistent with K<sub>V</sub>1.4 heteromers. <italic>Curves</italic>, Boltzmann fits (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ1">Equation 1</xref>). <italic>Average fit parameters</italic> from <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type II HCs, P40–P210, median P94. Inactivation: <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub>, –42 ± 2 mV (<italic>n</italic> = 11); <italic>S</italic>, 11 ± 1 mV. Activation: <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub>, –23 ± 1 mV (<italic>n</italic> = 11); <italic>S</italic>, 11.2 ± 0.4 mV.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig6-v1.tif"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title>K<sub>V</sub>7 channels contribute a small delayed rectifier in type I and II HCs</title><p>In <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> HCs, absence of <italic>I</italic><sub>K,L</sub> and <italic>I</italic><sub>A</sub> revealed smaller delayed rectifier K<sup>+</sup> currents that, unlike <italic>I</italic><sub>K,L</sub>, activated positive to resting potential and, unlike <italic>I</italic><sub>A</sub>, lacked fast inactivation. Candidate channels include members of the K<sub>V</sub>7 (KCNQ, M-current) family, which have been identified previously in rodent vestibular HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Kharkovets et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Rennie et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Scheffer et al., 2015</xref>).</p><p>We tested for K<sub>V</sub>7 contributions in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs, <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs, and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type II HCs of multiple ages by applying XE991 at 10 µM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>), a dose selective for K<sub>V</sub>7 channels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Brown et al., 2002</xref>) and close to the IC<sub>50</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Alexander et al., 2019</xref>). In <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> HCs of both types, 10 µM XE991 blocked about half of the residual K<sub>V</sub> conductance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B.1</xref>), consistent with K<sub>V</sub>7 channels conducting most or all of the non-K<sub>V</sub>1.8 delayed rectifier current. In all tested HCs (P8–355, median P224), the XE991-sensitive conductance did not inactivate substantially within 200 ms at any voltage, consistent with K<sub>V</sub>7.2, 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5 currents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib79">Wang, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Kubisch et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Schroeder et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Jensen et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib83">Xu et al., 2007</xref>). We refer to this component as g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>7). The voltage dependence and g<sub>max</sub> density (g<sub>max</sub>/<italic>C</italic><sub>m</sub>) of g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>7) were comparable across HC types and genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B.2–4</xref>). Although K<sub>V</sub>7.4 was not detectable in HCs during immunostaining (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), K<sub>V</sub>7.4 has been shown in type I HCs with immunogold labeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Kharkovets et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>).</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>A K<sub>V</sub>7-selective blocker, XE991, reduced residual delayed rectifier currents in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I and II hair cells (HCs).</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) XE991 (10 μM) partly blocked similar delayed rectifier currents in type I and II <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> HCs and a type II <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> HC. (<bold>B</bold>) Properties of XE991-sensitive conductance, <sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>7). (<bold>B.1</bold>) % Block of steady-state current. (<bold>B.2</bold>) Mean tail <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves for <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs (<italic>n</italic> = 8), <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs (9), and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> type II HCs (5); shading is ± SEM. (<bold>B.3</bold>) <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> was less negative in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> type II than <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HC (p = 0.01, KWA). (<bold>B.4</bold>) Conductance density was similar in all groups (ANOVA), non-significant at 0.4 power (<italic>left</italic>), 0.2 power (<italic>right</italic>). <italic>Asterisks</italic>: *p &lt; 0.05 and ***p &lt; 0.001. <italic>Line,</italic> median; <italic>Box,</italic> interquartile range; <italic>Whiskers</italic>, outliers.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig7-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>A minority of striolar <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I hair cells (HCs) had a small low-voltage-activated outward rectifier current in addition to a more positively activating outward rectifier.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Low-voltage-activated current from one cell was isolated by subtraction with 10 μM XE991 (P39), indicating that it was carried by K<sub>V</sub>7 channels. Deactivation of XE991-sensitive current evoked by step from –64 to –124 mV (<italic>arrow</italic>) was fit with exponential decay (<inline-formula><mml:math id="inf21"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> = 21 ms). (<bold>B</bold>) XE991-sensitive tail <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curve of the XE991-blocked conductance (<italic>A</italic>) was fit with a sum of two Boltzmann equations: G(<italic>V</italic>) = <italic>A</italic><sub>1</sub>/(1 + exp((<italic>V</italic><sub>half,1</sub> – <italic>V</italic>)/<italic>S</italic><sub>1</sub>)) + <italic>A</italic><sub>2</sub>/(1 + exp((<italic>V</italic><sub>half,2</sub> – <italic>V</italic>)/<italic>S</italic><sub>2</sub>)). (<bold>C</bold>) The low-voltage-activated <italic>V</italic><sub>half,1</sub> component was only seen in striolar <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs, and even there in the minority: 5/23; 22%; P6–P370. It was always seen together with a more positively activating outward rectifier. Average Boltzmann parameters (n=5, including <italic>B</italic>): <italic>A</italic><sub>1</sub>/(<italic>A</italic><sub>1</sub> + <italic>A</italic><sub>2</sub>) = 0.15 ± 0.04, <italic>V</italic><sub>half,1</sub> = –106 ± 5 mV, <italic>S</italic><sub>1</sub> = 3.8 ± 0.8 mV, <italic>V</italic><sub>half,2</sub> = –41±1 mV, <italic>S</italic><sub>2</sub> = 7 ± 1 mV. Ages: P11, 39, 202, 202, 202. No extrastriolar type I HCs (0/45; P6–277) had a double activation tail <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curve.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig7-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>No difference was detected in H (HCN) and Kir (fast inward rectifier) currents between <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> hair cells (HCs), consistent with a specific involvement of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 in <italic>Kcna10</italic> expression.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Hyperpolarizing voltage steps evoked <italic>I</italic><sub>Kir</sub> and <italic>I</italic><sub>HCN</sub> in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–,–/–</sup> type I and II HCs. (<bold><italic>A.1</italic></bold>) <italic>Arrows</italic>, deactivation of g<sub>K,L</sub>. (<bold><italic>A.2–A.4</italic></bold>) <italic>Bracket,</italic> the sum of <italic>I</italic><sub>H</sub> and <italic>I</italic><sub>Kir</sub> were measured as total inward current after 250 ms at –124 mV. (<bold>B</bold>) Summed <italic>I</italic><sub>KIR</sub> and <italic>I</italic><sub>H</sub> density was smaller in striola than extrastriola (type I HC KWA, p=4E-9; type II HC 2-way ANOVA Tukey’s p=0.006, see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1c</xref>). Data labels are number of cells. (<bold>C</bold>) Inward currents seen at the onset of hyperpolarization, including <italic>I</italic><sub>Kir</sub>, were larger in type II HCs than type I. Magnification of boxed in inset from the extrastriolar cells in A.2–A.4. <italic>Open arrowhead</italic>, activation of fast inward rectifier, <italic>I</italic><sub>Kir</sub>; <italic>filled arrowhead</italic>, slower activation of <italic>I</italic><sub>HCN</sub>. <italic>Asterisks</italic>: **p &lt; 0.01 and ****p &lt; 0.0001. <italic>Line,</italic> median; <italic>Box,</italic> interquartile range; <italic>Whiskers</italic>, outliers.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-94342-fig7-figsupp2-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>These results are consistent with similar K<sub>V</sub>7 channels contributing a relatively small delayed rectifier in both HC types. In addition, the similarity of XE991-sensitive currents of <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> and <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs indicates that knocking out K<sub>V</sub>1.8 did not cause general effects on ion channel expression. We did not test XE991 on <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type I HCs because g<sub>K,L</sub> runs down in ruptured patch recordings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Chen and Eatock, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>), which could contaminate the XE991-sensitive conductance obtained by subtraction.</p><p>In one striolar <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HC, XE991 also blocked a small conductance that activated negative to rest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, B</xref>). This conductance (<italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> ~ = –100 mV, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1C</xref>) was detected only in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs from the striola (5/23 vs 0/45 extrastriolar). The <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf22"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> were similar to values reported for K<sub>V</sub>7.4 channels in cochlear HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Wong et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierich et al., 2020</xref>). This very negatively activating K<sub>V</sub>7 conductance coexisted with the larger more positively activating K<sub>V</sub>7 conductance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1C</xref>) and was too small (&lt;0.5 nS/pF) to contribute significantly to g<sub>K,L</sub> (~10–100 nS/pF, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-8"><title>Other channels</title><p>While our data are consistent with K<sub>V</sub>1.8- and K<sub>V</sub>7-containing channels carrying most of the outward-rectifying current in mouse utricular HCs, there is evidence in other preparations for additional channels, including K<sub>V</sub>11 (KCNH, Erg) channels in rat utricular type I HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>) and BK (KCNMA1) channels in rat utricle and rat and turtle semicircular canal HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Schweizer et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Contini et al., 2020</xref>).</p><p>BK is expressed in mouse utricular HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jan et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>). However, Ca<sup>2+</sup>-dependent currents have not been observed in mouse utricular HCs, and we found little to no effect of the BK-channel blocker iberiotoxin at a dose (100 nM) well beyond the IC<sub>50</sub>: percent blocked at –30 mV was 2 ± 6% (3 <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs); 1 ± 5% (5 <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type II HCs); 7% and 14% (2 <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs). We also did not see N-shaped <italic>I</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves typical of many Ca<sup>2+</sup>-dependent K<sup>+</sup> currents. In our ruptured-patch recordings, Ca<sup>2+</sup>-dependent BK currents and erg channels may have been eliminated by wash-out of the HCs’ small Ca<sub>V</sub> currents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Bao et al., 2003</xref>) or cytoplasmic second messengers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>).</p><p>To check whether the constitutive K<sub>V</sub>1.8 knockout has strong non-specific effects on channel trafficking, we examined the summed HCN and fast inward rectifier currents (<italic>I</italic><sub>H</sub> and <italic>I</italic><sub>Kir</sub>) at –124 mV, and found them similar across genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s2">Figure 7—figure supplement 2</xref>). The g<sub>K,L</sub> knockout allowed identification of zonal differences in <italic>I</italic><sub>H</sub> and <italic>I</italic><sub>Kir</sub> in type I HCs, previously examined in type II HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Masetto and Correia, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Levin and Holt, 2012</xref>). In type I HCs from both control and null utricles, <italic>I</italic><sub>H</sub> and <italic>I</italic><sub>Kir</sub> were less prevalent in striola than extrastriola, and, when present, the combined inward current was smaller (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s2">Figure 7—figure supplement 2</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>We have shown that constitutive knockout of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 eliminated g<sub>K,L</sub> in type I HCs, and g<sub>A</sub> and much of g<sub>DR</sub> in type II HCs. K<sub>V</sub>1.8 immunolocalized specifically to the basolateral membranes of type I and II HCs. We conclude that K<sub>V</sub>1.8 is a pore-forming subunit of g<sub>K,L</sub>, g<sub>A</sub>, and part of g<sub>DR</sub> [g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>1.8)]. We suggest that fast inactivation of g<sub>A</sub> may arise from heteromultimerization of non-inactivating K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits and inactivating K<sub>V</sub>1.4 subunits. Finally, we showed that a substantial component of the residual delayed rectifier current in both type I and II HCs comprises K<sub>V</sub>7 channels.</p><p>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 is expressed in HCs from mammalian cochlea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierich et al., 2020</xref>), avian utricle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Scheibinger et al., 2022</xref>), and zebrafish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Erickson and Nicolson, 2015</xref>). Our work suggests that in anamniotes, which lack type I cells and g<sub>K,L</sub>, K<sub>V</sub>1.8 contributes to g<sub>A</sub> and g<sub>DR</sub>, which are widespread in vertebrate HCs (reviewed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Meredith and Rennie, 2016</xref>). K<sub>V</sub>1.8 expression has not been detected in rodent brain but is reported in the pacemaker nucleus of weakly electric fish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Smith et al., 2018</xref>).</p><sec id="s3-1"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits may form homomultimers to produce g<sub>K,L</sub> in type I HCs</title><p>Recent single-cell expression studies on mouse utricles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jan et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>) have detected just one K<sub>V</sub>1 subunit, K<sub>V</sub>1.8, in mouse type I HCs. Given that K<sub>V</sub>1.8 can only form multimers with K<sub>V</sub>1 family members, and given that g<sub>K,L</sub> channels are present at very high density (~150 per μm<sup>2</sup> in rat type I, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Chen and Eatock, 2000</xref>), it stands to reason that most or all of the channels are K<sub>V</sub>1.8 homomers. Other evidence is consistent with this proposal. g<sub>K,L</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996a</xref>) and heterologously expressed K<sub>V</sub>1.8 homomers in oocytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Lang et al., 2000</xref>) are non-inactivating and blocked by millimolar Ba<sup>2+</sup> and 4-aminopyridine and &gt;10 mM tetraethyl ammonium. Unlike channels with K<sub>V</sub>1.1, K<sub>V</sub>1.2, and K<sub>V</sub>1.6 subunits, g<sub>K,L</sub> is not sensitive to 10 nM α-dendrotoxin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996a</xref>). g<sub>K,L</sub> and heterologously expressed K<sub>V</sub>1.8 channels have similar single-channel conductances (~20 pS for g<sub>K,L</sub> at positive potentials, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Chen and Eatock, 2000</xref>; 11 pS in oocytes, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Lang et al., 2000</xref>). g<sub>K,L</sub> is inhibited—or positively voltage-shifted—by cGMP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Behrend et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Chen and Eatock, 2000</xref>), presumably via the C-terminal cyclic nucleotide-binding domain of K<sub>V</sub>1.8.</p><p>A major novel property of g<sub>K,L</sub> is that it activates 30–60 mV negative to type II K<sub>V</sub>1.8 conductances and most other low-voltage-activated K<sub>V</sub> channels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Ranjan et al., 2019</xref>). The very negative activation range is a striking difference between g<sub>K,L</sub> and known homomeric K<sub>V</sub>1.8 channels. Heterologously expressed homomeric K<sub>V</sub>1.8 channels have an activation <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> of –10 to 0 mV (<italic>X. laevis</italic> oocytes, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Lang et al., 2000</xref>; Chinese hamster ovary cells, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierich et al., 2020</xref>). In cochlear inner HCs, currents attributed to K<sub>V</sub>1.8 (by subtraction of other candidates) have a near-zero activation <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> (–4 mV, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierich et al., 2020</xref>).</p><p>Possible factors in the unusually negative voltage dependence of g<sub>K,L</sub> include:</p><p>(1) <italic>Elevation of extracellular K<sup>+</sup></italic> by the enveloping calyceal terminal, unique to type I HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Lim et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Contini et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Spaiardi et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Govindaraju et al., 2023</xref>). High K<sup>+</sup> increases conductance though g<sub>K,L</sub> channels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Contini et al., 2020</xref>), perhaps through K<sup>+</sup>-mediated relief of C-type inactivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">López-Barneo et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Baukrowitz and Yellen, 1995</xref>). We note, however, that g<sub>K,L</sub> is open at rest even in neonatal mouse utricles cultured without innervation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Rüsch et al., 1998</xref>) and persists in dissociated type I HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Chen and Eatock, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>).</p><p>(2) <italic>The high density of g</italic><sub><italic>K,L</italic></sub> (~50 nS/pF in striolar <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> HCs) implies close packing of channels, possibly represented by particles (12–14 nm) seen in freeze-fracture electron microscopy of the type I HC membrane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Gulley and Bagger-Sjöbäck, 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib72">Sousa et al., 2009</xref>). Such close channel packing might hyperpolarize in situ voltage dependence of g<sub>K,L</sub>, as proposed for K<sub>V</sub>7.4 channels in outer HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Perez-Flores et al., 2020</xref>). Type I HC-specific partners that may facilitate this close packing include ADAM11 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>), which clusters presynaptic K<sub>V</sub>1.1 and K<sub>V</sub>1.2 to enable ephaptic coupling at a cerebellar synapse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Kole et al., 2015</xref>).</p><p>(3) <italic>Modulation by accessory subunits</italic>. Type I HCs express K<sub>V</sub>β1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>), an accessory subunit that can confer fast inactivation and hyperpolarize activation <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> by ~10 mV. K<sub>V</sub>β1 might interact with K<sub>V</sub>1.8 to shift voltage dependence negatively. Arguments against this possibility include that g<sub>K,L</sub> lacks fast inactivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Hurley et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Spaiardi et al., 2017</xref>) and that cochlear inner HCs co-express K<sub>V</sub>1.8 and K<sub>V</sub>β1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Liu et al., 2018</xref>) but their K<sub>V</sub>1.8 conductance has a near-0 <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierich et al., 2020</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3-2"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits may combine with different subunits to produce g<sub>A</sub> and K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent g<sub>DR</sub> in type II HCs</title><p>The K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent conductances of type II HCs vary in their fast and slow inactivation. In not showing fast inactivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Lang et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Ranjan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Dierich et al., 2020</xref>), heterologously expressed K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits resemble most other K<sub>V</sub>1 family subunits, with the exception of K<sub>V</sub>1.4 (for comprehensive review, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Ranjan et al., 2019</xref>). K<sub>V</sub>1.4 is a good candidate to provide fast inactivation based on immunolocalization and voltage dependence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figures 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">6</xref>). We suggest that g<sub>A</sub> and g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>1.8) are K<sub>V</sub>1.8-containing channels that may include a variable number of K<sub>V</sub>1.4 subunits and K<sub>V</sub>β2 and K<sub>V</sub>β1 accessory subunits.</p><p>K<sub>V</sub>1.4–K<sub>V</sub>1.8 heteromeric assembly could account for several related observations. The faster <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf23"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> in <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/–</sup> relative to <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+</sup> type II HCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A.3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1A.1</xref>) could reflect an increased ratio of K<sub>V</sub>1.4–K<sub>V</sub>1.8 subunits and therefore more N-terminal inactivation domains per heteromeric channel. Zonal variation in the extent and speed of N-type inactivation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>) might arise from differential expression of K<sub>V</sub>1.4. The small fast-inactivating conductance in ~20% of extrastriolar <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type II HCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3</xref>) might flow through K<sub>V</sub>1.4 homomers.</p><p>Fast inactivation may also receive contribution from K<sub>V</sub>β subunits. K<sub>V</sub>β1 is expressed in type II HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Jan et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>), and, together with K<sub>V</sub>1.4, has been linked to g<sub>A</sub> in pigeon vestibular HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Correia et al., 2008</xref>). K<sub>V</sub>β2, also expressed in type II HCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">McInturff et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Orvis et al., 2021</xref>), accelerates but does not confer fast inactivation.</p><p>We speculate that g<sub>A</sub> and g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>1.8) have different subunit composition: g<sub>A</sub> may include heteromers of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 with other subunits that confer rapid inactivation, while g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>1.8) may comprise homomeric K<sub>V</sub>1.8 channels, given that they do not have N-type inactivation.</p></sec><sec id="s3-3"><title>K<sub>V</sub>1.8 relevance for vestibular function</title><p>In both type I and II utricular HCs, K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent channels strongly shape receptor potentials in ways that promote temporal fidelity rather than electrical tuning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Lewis, 1988</xref>), consistent with the utricle’s role in driving reflexes that compensate for head motions as they occur. This effect is especially pronounced for type I HCs, where the current-step evoked voltage response reproduces the input with great speed and linearity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>g<sub>K,L</sub>dominates passive membrane properties in mature <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> type I HCs such that <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> type I HCs are expected to have receptor potentials with higher amplitudes but lower low-pass corner frequencies, closer to those of type II HCs and immature HCs of all types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Correia et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Rüsch and Eatock, 1996a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Songer and Eatock, 2013</xref>). In <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> epithelia, we expect the lack of a large basolateral conductance open at rest to reduce the speed and gain of non-quantal transmission, which depends on K<sup>+</sup> ion efflux from the type I HC to change electrical and K<sup>+</sup> potentials in the synaptic cleft (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Govindaraju et al., 2023</xref>). In HCs, K<sup>+</sup> enters the mechanosensitive channels of the hair bundle from the K<sup>+</sup>-rich apical endolymph and exits through basolateral potassium conductances into the more conventional low-K<sup>+</sup> perilymph. For the type I-calyx synapse, having in the HC a large, non-inactivating K<sup>+</sup> conductance open across the physiological range of potentials avoids channel gating time and allows for instantaneous changes in current into the cleft and fast afferent signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Pastras et al., 2023</xref>).</p><p>In contrast, mature type II HCs face smaller synaptic contacts and have K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent currents that are not substantially activated at resting potential. They do affect the time course and gain of type II HC responses to input currents, speeding up depolarizing transients, producing a repolarizing rebound during the step, and reducing resonance.</p><p>Type I and II vestibular HCs are closely related, such that adult type II HCs acquire type I-like properties upon deletion of the transcription factor <italic>Sox2</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib76">Stone et al., 2021</xref>). In normal development of the two cell types, the <italic>Kcna10</italic> gene generates biophysically distinct and functionally different ion channels, presenting a natural experiment in functional differentiation of sensory receptor cells.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><table-wrap id="keyresource" position="anchor"><label>Key resources table</label><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom">Reagent type (species) or resource</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Designation</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Source or reference</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Identifiers</th><th align="left" valign="bottom">Additional information</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Anti-Kv1.8 (Rabbit polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Alomone</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat# APC-157, lot# 0102, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2341039">AB_2341039</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">1:200 or 1:400</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Anti-calretinin (goat polyclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Millipore</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat# AB1550, lot# 9669, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_90764">AB_90764</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">1:600</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Antibody</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Anti-Kv7.4 (mouse IgG1 monoclonal)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">NeuroMab</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Cat# 2HK-65, RRID:<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://identifiers.org/RRID/RRID:AB_2131828">AB_2131828</ext-link></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">1:200</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Peptide, recombinant protein</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Iberiotoxin</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Alomone</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">STI-400</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">100 nM (water)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">XE991</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Sigma</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">X2254</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">100 µM (water)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Chemical compound, drug</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">ZD7288</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Tocris</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">APN18035-2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">100 µM (water)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom">Peptide, recombinant protein</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Bovine serum albumin</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Fisher</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">BP671</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">1 mg/ml (water)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4-1"><title>Preparation</title><p>All procedures for handling animals followed the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Chicago (Animal Care and Use Procedure #72360) and the Office of Animal Care and Institutional Biosafety at the University of Illinois Chicago (Protocol for Animal Use #17106). Most mice belonged to a transgenic line with a knockout allele of <italic>Kcna10</italic> (referred to here as <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup>). Our breeding colony was established with a generous gift of such animals from Sherry M. Jones and Thomas Friedman. These animals are described in their paper (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Lee et al., 2013</xref>). Briefly, the Texas A&amp;M Institute for Genomic Medicine generated the line on a C57BL/6;129SvEv mixed background by replacing Exon 3 of the <italic>Kcna10</italic> gene with an IRES-bGeo/Purocassette. Mice in our colony were raised on a 12:12 hr light–dark cycle with access to food and water ad libitum.</p><p>Semi-intact utricles were prepared from ~150 male and ~120 female mice, postnatal days (P) 5–375, for same-day recording. HC K<sub>V</sub> channel data were pooled across sexes as most results did not appear to differ by sex; an exception was that g<sub>K,L</sub> had a more negative <italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> in males (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1a</xref>), an effect not clearly related to age, copy number, or other properties of the activation curve.</p><p>Preparation, stimulation, and recording methods followed our previously described methods for the mouse utricle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib78">Vollrath and Eatock, 2003</xref>). Mice were anesthetized through isoflurane inhalation. After decapitation, each hemisphere was bathed in ice-cold, oxygenated Liebowitz-15 (L15) media. The temporal bone was removed, the labyrinth was cut to isolate the utricle, and the nerve was cut close to the utricle. The utricle was treated with proteinase XXIV (100 μg/ml, ~10 min, 22°C) to facilitate removal of the otoconia and attached gel layer and mounted beneath two glass rods affixed at one end to a coverslip.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Electrophysiology</title><p>We used the HEKA Multiclamp EPC10 with Patchmaster acquisition software, filtered by the integrated HEKA filters: a 6-pole Bessel filter at 10 kHz and a second 4-pole Bessel filter at 5 kHz, and sampled at 10–100 kHz. Recording electrodes were pulled (PC-100, Narishige) from soda lime glass (King’s Precision Glass R-6) wrapped in paraffin to reduce pipette capacitance. Internal solution contained (in mM) 135 KCl, 0.5 MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 3 MgATP, 5 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethane-sulfonic acid (HEPES), 5 ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA), 0.1 CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.1 Na-cAMP, 0.1 LiGTP, 5 Na<sub>2</sub>CreatinePO<sub>4</sub> adjusted to pH 7.25 and ~280 mmol/kg by adding ~30 mM KOH. External solution was Liebowitz-15 media supplemented with 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.40, 310 ± 10 mmol/kg). Recording temperature was 22–25°C. Pipette capacitance and membrane capacitance transients were subtracted during recordings with Patchmaster software. Series resistance (8–12 MΩ) was measured after rupture and compensated 60–80% with the amplifier, to final values of ~2 MΩ. Potentials are corrected for remaining (uncompensated) series resistance and liquid junction potential of ~+4 mV, calculated with LJPCalc software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Marino et al., 2014</xref>).</p><p><italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> HCs appeared healthy in that cells had resting potentials negative to –50 mV, cells lasted a long time (20–30 min) in ruptured patch recordings, membranes were not fragile, and extensive blebbing was not seen. Type I HCs with g<sub>K,L</sub> were transiently hyperpolarized to ~–90 mV to close g<sub>K,L</sub> enough to increase <italic>R</italic><sub>input</sub> above 100 MΩ, as needed to estimate series resistance and cell capacitance. The average resting potential, <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub>, was –87 mV ±1 (41), similar to the calculated <italic>E</italic><sub>K</sub> of –86.1 mV, which is not surprising given the large K<sup>+</sup> conductance of these cells. <italic>V</italic><sub>rest</sub> is likely more positive in vivo, where lower endolymphatic Ca<sup>2+</sup> increases standing inward current through MET channels.</p><p>Voltage protocols to characterize K<sub>V</sub> currents differed slightly for type I and II HCs. In standard protocols, the cell is held at a voltage near resting potential (–74 mV in type I and –64 mV in type II), then jumped to –124 mV for 200 ms in type I HCs in order to fully deactivate g<sub>K,L</sub> and 50 ms in type II HCs in order to remove baseline inactivation of g<sub>A</sub>. The subsequent iterated step depolarizations lasted 500 ms in type I HCs because g<sub>K,L</sub> activates slowly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Wong et al., 2004</xref>) and 200 ms in type II HCs, where K<sub>V</sub> conductances activate faster. The 50 ms tail voltage was near the reversal potential of HCN channels (–44 mV in mouse utricular HCs, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Rüsch et al., 1998</xref>) to avoid HCN current contamination.</p><p><italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> (activation) parameters for control type I cells may be expected to vary across experiments on semi-intact (as here), organotypically cultured and denervated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Rüsch et al., 1998</xref>), or dissociated-cell preparations, reflecting variation in retention of the calyx (Discussion) and voltage step durations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib82">Wong et al., 2004</xref>) which elevate K<sup>+</sup> concentration around the HC. Nevertheless, the values we obtained for type I and II HCs resemble values recorded elsewhere, including experiments in which extra care was taken to avoid extracellular K<sup>+</sup> accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib73">Spaiardi et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib74">Spaiardi et al., 2020</xref>). The effects of K<sup>+</sup> accumulation on g<sub>K,L</sub>’s steady-state activation curves are small because the operating range is centered on E and can be characterized with relatively small currents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Pharmacology</title><p>Drug-containing solutions were locally with BASI Bee Hive syringes at a final flow rate of 20 μl/min and a dead time of ~30 s. Global bath perfusion was paused during drug perfusion and recording, and only one cell was used per utricle. Aliquots of test agents in solution were prepared, stored at –20°C, and thawed and added to external solution on the recording day (see Key Resources Table).</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Analysis</title><p>Data analysis was performed with software from OriginLab (Northampton, MA) and custom MATLAB scripts using MATLAB fitting algorithms.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Fitting voltage dependence and time course of conductances</title><p><italic>G–V curves</italic>. Current was converted to conductance (<italic>G</italic>) by dividing by driving force (<italic>V</italic> – <italic>E</italic><sub>K</sub>; <italic>E</italic><sub>K</sub> calculated from solutions). For type I HCs, tail <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves were generated from current 1 ms after the end of the iterated voltage test step. For type II HCs, peak <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves were generated from peak current during the step and steady-state <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves were generated from current 1 ms before the end of a 200-ms step. We fit <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> curves to the first-order Boltzmann equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ1">Equation 1</xref>) using a custom MATLAB function (fitzmann.m, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="scode2">Source code 2</xref>).<disp-formula id="equ1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="m1"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><p><italic>V</italic><sub>half</sub> is the midpoint, and <italic>S</italic> is the slope factor, inversely related to curve steepness near activation threshold.</p><p><italic>Activation time course of type II HCs</italic>. We fit current traces using a custom MATLAB function (fitkin.m, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="scode1">Source code 1</xref>). For type II HCs lacking fast inactivation, outward current activation was fit with <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ2">Equation 2</xref>.<disp-formula id="equ2"><label>(2)</label><mml:math id="m2"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><p><italic>I</italic><sub>SS</sub> is steady-state current; <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf24"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is activation time constant (referred to elsewhere as <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf25"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>); <italic>n</italic> is the state factor related to the number of closed states (typically constrained to 3); and <italic>I</italic><sub>o</sub> is baseline current.</p><p>To measure activation and inactivation time course of g<sub>A</sub>, we used <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ3">Equation 3</xref> to fit outward K<sup>+</sup> currents evoked by steps from –125 mV to above –50 mV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Rothman and Manis, 2003</xref>).<disp-formula id="equ3"><label>(3)</label><mml:math id="m3"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><p><italic>Z</italic> is total steady-state inactivation (0 ≤ <italic>Z</italic> &lt; 1 means incomplete inactivation, which allows the equation to fit non-inactivating delayed rectifier currents); <italic>f</italic> is the fraction of fast inactivation relative to total inactivation; <italic>I</italic><sub>max</sub> is maximal current; <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf26"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> (referred to elsewhere as <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf27"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf28"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> are the fast and slow inactivation time constants. We chose to compare fit parameters at 30 ± 2 mV (91), where fast and slow inactivation were consistently separable and g<sub>A</sub> was maximized. In most <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> and some striolar <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>+/+,+/–</sup> cells, where fast inactivation was absent and adjusted <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> did not improve on a single-exponential fit by &gt;0.01, we constrained <italic>f</italic> in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ3">Equation 3</xref> to 0 to avoid overfitting.</p><p>For <italic>Peak G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> relations, peak conductance was taken from fitted curves (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ2 equ3">Equations 2 and 3</xref>). To construct ‘<italic>Steady-state</italic>’ <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> relations, we used current at 200 ms, which was only 6 ± 1% (94) greater than steady-state estimated from fits to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ3">Equation 3</xref> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C, D</xref>).</p><p>Percent inactivation was calculated at 30 mV with <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ4">Equation 4</xref>:<disp-formula id="equ4"><label>(4)</label><mml:math id="m4"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><p><italic>I</italic><sub>Peak</sub> is maximal current, and <italic>I</italic><sub>SS</sub> is current at the end of a 200-ms voltage step.</p><p>The electrical resonance of type II HCs was quantified by fitting voltage responses to current injection steps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib71">Songer and Eatock, 2013</xref>). We fit <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ5">Equation 5</xref>, a damped sinusoid, to the voltage trace from half-maximum of the initial depolarizing peak until the end of the current step.<disp-formula id="equ5"><label>(5)</label><mml:math id="m5"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin</mml:mi><mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><p><italic>V</italic><sub>SS</sub> is steady-state voltage; <italic>V</italic><sub>p</sub> is the voltage of the peak response; <inline-formula><mml:math id="inf29"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is the decay time constant; <italic>f</italic><sub>e</sub> is the fundamental frequency; and <italic>θ</italic> is the phase angle shift.</p><p>Quality factor, <italic>Q</italic><sub>e</sub>, was calculated with <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ6">Equation 6</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Crawford and Fettiplace, 1981</xref>).<disp-formula id="equ6"><label>(6)</label><mml:math id="m6"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Statistics</title><p>We give means ± SEM for normally distributed data, and otherwise, median and range. Data normality was assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk test for <italic>n</italic> &lt; 50 and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for <italic>n</italic> &gt; 50. To assess homogeneity of variance we used Levene’s test. With homogeneous variance, we used two-way ANOVA for genotype and zone with the post hoc Tukey’s test. When variance was non-homogeneous, we used one-way Welch ANOVA with the posthoc Games–Howell test. For data that were not normally distributed, we used the non-parametric one-way Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (KWA) with posthoc Dunn’s test. Effect size is Hedge’s g (g). For age dependence, we used partial correlation coefficients controlling for genotype and zone. Statistical groups may have different median ages, but all have overlapping age ranges. In figures, asterisks represent p-value ranges as follows: *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001; ****p &lt; 0.0001.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Immunohistochemistry</title><p>Mice were anesthetized with Nembutal (80 mg/kg), then perfused transcardially with 40 ml of physiological saline containing heparin (400 IU), followed by 2 ml/g body weight fixative (4% paraformaldehyde, 1% picric acid, and 5% sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.4, sometimes with 1% acrolein). Vestibular epithelia were dissected in phosphate buffer, and tissues were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose-phosphate buffer overnight at 4°C. Otoconia were dissolved with Cal-Ex (Fisher Scientific) for 10 min. Frozen sections (35 μm) were cut with a sliding microtome. Immunohistochemistry was performed on free-floating sections. Tissues were first permeabilized with 4% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 hr at room temperature, then incubated with 0.5% Triton X-100 in a blocking solution of 0.5% fish gelatin and 1% bovine serum albumin for 1 hr at room temperature. Sections were incubated with two to three primary antibodies for 72 hr at 4°C and with two to three secondary antibodies. Sections were rinsed with PBS between and after incubations and mounted on slides in Mowiol (Calbiochem).</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other"><p>All procedures for handling animals followed the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Chicago (Animal Care and Use Procedure #72360) and the Office of Animal Care and Institutional Biosafety at the University of Illinois Chicago (Protocol for Animal Use #17106).</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>This file contains descriptive and comparative statistics on three additional analyses of the dataset.</title><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Test of sex differences in hair cell K<sub>V</sub> channel data. (<bold>b</bold>) We did not detect a genotype effect on soma size of type I hair cells (HCs). (<bold>c</bold>) I<sub>Kir</sub> and I<sub>H­</sub> were greater in the extrastriola (ES) than striola (S), but did not vary by genotype.</p></caption><media xlink:href="elife-94342-supp1-v1.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-94342-mdarchecklist1-v1.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="scode1"><label>Source code 1.</label><caption><title>Fitkin<italic>.</italic>m is a MATLAB function to fit the activation and inactivation kinetics of K<sub>V</sub> currents to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ2 equ3">Equations 2; 3</xref>.</title><p>Fitkin.m processed current–time traces and output parameters found in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1</xref>, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></caption><media xlink:href="elife-94342-code1-v1.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="scode2"><label>Source code 2.</label><caption><title>Fitzmann<italic>.</italic>m is a MATLAB function to fit the activation voltage dependence of K<sub>V</sub> currents to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equ1">Equation 1</xref>.</title><p>Fitzmann.m processed <italic>G</italic>–<italic>V</italic> data points and output parameters found in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1a</xref>.</p></caption><media xlink:href="elife-94342-code2-v1.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>Data generated and analyzed in this study are available on Dryad (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.37pvmcvrw">https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.37pvmcvrw</ext-link>). Dryad hosts downloadable spreadsheets that are organized as follows: F1_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 1; F1-fs1_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 1-figure supplement 1; F2_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 2; F3_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 3; F3-fs1_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 3—figure supplement 1; F3-fs2_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 3—figure supplement 2; F3-fs3_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 3—figure supplement 3; F4_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 4; F6_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 6; F7_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 7; F7-fs1_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 7—figure supplement 1; F7-fs2_sourcedata, numerical data for Figure 7—figure supplement 2.</p><p>The following dataset was generated:</p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset1"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>HR</given-names></name><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year><data-title>The potassium channel subunit Kv1.8 (Kcna10) is essential for the distinctive outwardly rectifying conductances of type I and II vestibular hair cells</data-title><source>Dryad Digital Repository</source><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5061/dryad.37pvmcvrw</pub-id></element-citation></p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported by NIH grant R01 DC012347 to RAE and AL and an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to HRM. We thank Drs. Thomas Friedman and Sherri Jones for the generous gift of the <italic>Kcna10</italic><sup>–/–</sup> mouse line, and Drs. Zheng-Yi Chen and Deborah I Scheffer for bringing the expression of this subunit in mouse vestibular hair cells to our attention. We acknowledge Dr. Vicente Lumbreras for insights from his prior experiments on g<sub>A</sub> in mouse utricular hair cells, and thank him for helpful further discussions. We acknowledge Steven D Price for his help with immunocytochemistry. We thank Drs. Rebecca Lim and Ebenezer Yamoah for their critical feedback on the manuscript, and Drs. Rob Raphael and Aravind Chenrayan Govindaraju for feedback and many helpful discussions. We thank Drs. Joe Burns, Gabi Pregernig, and Lars Becker (Decibel Therapeutics, Inc) for helpful discussions.</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>SPH</given-names></name><name><surname>Mathie</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Peters</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Veale</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Striessnig</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelly</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Armstrong</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Faccenda</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Harding</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Pawson</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharman</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Southan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Davies</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><collab>CGTP Collaborators</collab></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>The concise guide to pharmacology 2019/20: ion channels</article-title><source>British Journal of Pharmacology</source><volume>176 Suppl 1</volume><fpage>S142</fpage><lpage>S228</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/bph.14749</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31710715</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al Sabi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaza</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Berre</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>O’Hara</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bodeker</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dolly</surname><given-names>JO</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Position-dependent attenuation by Kv1.6 of N-type inactivation of Kv1.4-containing channels</article-title><source>The Biochemical Journal</source><volume>438</volume><fpage>389</fpage><lpage>396</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1042/BJ20102169</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21352098</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashmore</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1983">1983</year><article-title>Frequency tuning in a frog vestibular organ</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>304</volume><fpage>536</fpage><lpage>538</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/304536a0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6603578</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldberg</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Voltage-gated calcium channel currents in type I and type II hair cells isolated from the rat crista</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>90</volume><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>164</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00244.2003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12843307</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baukrowitz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yellen</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year><article-title>Modulation of K+ current by frequency and external [K+]: A tale of two inactivation mechanisms</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>951</fpage><lpage>960</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0896-6273(95)90185-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7576643</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Behrend</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwark</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kunihiro</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Strupp</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Cyclic GMP inhibits and shifts the activation curve of the delayed-rectifier (I[K1]) of type I mammalian vestibular hair cells</article-title><source>Neuroreport</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>2687</fpage><lpage>2690</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00001756-199708180-00010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9295101</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Selyanko</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hadley</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Tatulian</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Some pharmacological properties of neural KCNQ channels</article-title><source>Neurophysiology</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>94</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1020768914645</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carlisle</surname><given-names>FA</given-names></name><name><surname>Steel</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Specific expression of <italic>Kcna10</italic>, <italic>Pxn</italic> and <italic>Odf2</italic> in the organ of Corti</article-title><source>Gene Expression Patterns</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>172</fpage><lpage>179</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gep.2012.03.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22446089</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>JWY</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Major potassium conductance in Type I hair cells from rat semicircular canals: Characterization and modulation by nitric oxide</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>84</volume><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>151</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.139</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Contini</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Zampini</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Tavazzani</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Magistretti</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Russo</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Prigioni</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Masetto</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Intercellular K+ accumulation depolarizes type I vestibular hair cells and their associated afferent nerve calyx</article-title><source>Neuroscience</source><volume>227</volume><fpage>232</fpage><lpage>246</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.051</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Contini</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Art</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Accumulation of K<sup>+</sup> in the synaptic cleft modulates activity by influencing both vestibular hair cell and calyx afferent in the turtle: K<sup>+</sup> modulation of synaptic transmission between hair cell and afferent</article-title><source>J Physiol</source><volume>595</volume><fpage>777</fpage><lpage>803</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/JP273060</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Contini</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Holstein</surname><given-names>GR</given-names></name><name><surname>Art</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Synaptic cleft microenvironment influences potassium permeation and synaptic transmission in hair cells surrounded by calyx afferents in the turtle</article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>598</volume><fpage>853</fpage><lpage>889</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/JP278680</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31623011</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lang</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1990">1990</year><article-title>An electrophysiological comparison of solitary type I and type II vestibular hair cells</article-title><source>Neuroscience Letters</source><volume>116</volume><fpage>106</fpage><lpage>111</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0304-3940(90)90394-O</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ricci</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Rennie</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996</year><article-title>Filtering properties of vestibular hair cells: an update</article-title><source>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</source><volume>781</volume><fpage>138</fpage><lpage>149</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb15698.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Weng</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Prusak</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wood</surname><given-names>TG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year><article-title>Kvβ1.1 associates with Kvα1.4 in Chinese hamster ovary cells and pigeon type II vestibular hair cells and enhances the amplitude, inactivation and negatively shifts the steady-state inactivation range</article-title><source>Neuroscience</source><volume>152</volume><fpage>809</fpage><lpage>820</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18313857</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crawford</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Fettiplace</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1981">1981</year><article-title>An electrical tuning mechanism in turtle cochlear hair cells</article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>312</volume><fpage>377</fpage><lpage>412</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013634</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7265000</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Desai</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeh</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Comparative morphology of rodent vestibular periphery. I. Saccular and utricular maculae</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>93</volume><fpage>251</fpage><lpage>266</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00746.2003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15240767</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dierich</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Altoè</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Koppelmann</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Evers</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Renigunta</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Schäfer</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name><name><surname>Naumann</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Verhulst</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliver</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Leitner</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Optimized tuning of auditory inner hair cells to encode complex sound through synergistic activity of six independent K<sup>+</sup> current entities</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>32</volume><elocation-id>107869</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107869</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32640234</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dwenger</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name><name><surname>Raph</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Baba</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Nystoriak</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Diversification of potassium currents in excitable cells via Kvβ proteins</article-title><source>Cells</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>2230</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cells11142230</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35883673</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Songer</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Vestibular hair cells and afferents: two channels for head motion signals</article-title><source>Annual Review of Neuroscience</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>501</fpage><lpage>534</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113710</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21469959</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erickson</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicolson</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Identification of sensory hair-cell transcripts by thiouracil-tagging in zebrafish</article-title><source>BMC Genomics</source><volume>16</volume><elocation-id>842</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-015-2072-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26494580</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fettiplace</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1987">1987</year><article-title>Electrical tuning of hair cells in the inner ear</article-title><source>Trends in Neurosciences</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>421</fpage><lpage>425</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0166-2236(87)90013-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Géléoc</surname><given-names>GSG</given-names></name><name><surname>Risner</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Holt</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Developmental acquisition of voltage-dependent conductances and sensory signaling in hair cells of the embryonic mouse inner ear</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>11148</fpage><lpage>11159</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2662-04.2004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15590931</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goldberg</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Afferent diversity and the organization of central vestibular pathways</article-title><source>Experimental Brain Research</source><volume>130</volume><fpage>277</fpage><lpage>297</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s002210050033</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10706428</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>González-Garrido</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Pujol</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>López-Ramírez</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Finkbeiner</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Stone</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The differentiation status of hair cells that regenerate naturally in the vestibular inner ear of the adult mouse</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>7779</fpage><lpage>7796</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3127-20.2021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34301830</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Govindaraju</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Quraishi</surname><given-names>IH</given-names></name><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Raphael</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Nonquantal transmission at the vestibular hair cell–calyx synapse: K<sub>LV</sub> currents modulate fast electrical and slow K<sup>+</sup> potentials</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>120</volume><elocation-id>e2207466120</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2207466120</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gulley</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Bagger-Sjöbäck</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1979">1979</year><article-title>Freeze-fracture studies on the synapse between the type I hair cell and the calyceal terminal in the guinea-pig vestibular system</article-title><source>Journal of Neurocytology</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>591</fpage><lpage>603</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01208511</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">317909</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Holt</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Vollrath</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Stimulus processing by type II hair cells in the mouse utricle</article-title><source>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</source><volume>871</volume><fpage>15</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09172.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Holt</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Stauffer</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Abraham</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Géléoc</surname><given-names>GSG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Dominant-negative inhibition of M-like potassium conductances in hair cells of the mouse inner ear</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>8940</fpage><lpage>8951</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2085-07.2007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17699675</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horwitz</surname><given-names>GC</given-names></name><name><surname>Risner-Janiczek</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Holt</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>HCN channels expressed in the inner ear are necessary for normal balance function</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>16814</fpage><lpage>16825</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3064-11.2011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22090507</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hudspeth</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1988">1988</year><article-title>A model for electrical resonance and frequency tuning in saccular hair cells of the bull-frog, <italic>Rana catesbeiana</italic></article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>400</volume><fpage>275</fpage><lpage>297</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017120</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2458455</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hurley</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaboyard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Wooltorton</surname><given-names>JRA</given-names></name><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>M-like K+ currents in type I hair cells and calyx afferent endings of the developing rat utricle</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>10253</fpage><lpage>10269</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2596-06.2006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17021181</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Imbrici</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>D’Adamo</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kullmann</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Pessia</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year><article-title>Episodic ataxia type 1 mutations in the <italic>KCNA1</italic> gene impair the fast inactivation properties of the human potassium channels Kv1.4-1.1/Kvβ1.1 and Kv1.4-1.1/Kvβ1.2</article-title><source>The European Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>3073</fpage><lpage>3083</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05186.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17156368</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jan</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Eltawil</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ling</surname><given-names>AH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellwanger</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Heller</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Spatiotemporal dynamics of inner ear sensory and non-sensory cells revealed by single-cell transcriptomics</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>36</volume><elocation-id>109358</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109358</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34260939</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Grunnet</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Olesen</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Inactivation as a new regulatory mechanism for neuronal Kv7 channels</article-title><source>Biophysical Journal</source><volume>92</volume><fpage>2747</fpage><lpage>2756</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1529/biophysj.106.101287</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17237198</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kharkovets</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hardelin</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Safieddine</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Schweizer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Amraoui</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Petit</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jentsch</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>KCNQ4, a K+ channel mutated in a form of dominant deafness, is expressed in the inner ear and the central auditory pathway</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>4333</fpage><lpage>4338</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.97.8.4333</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10760300</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kole</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Waase</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Klassen</surname><given-names>TL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>TT</given-names></name><name><surname>Augustine</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Noebels</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Selective loss of presynaptic potassium channel clusters at the cerebellar basket cell terminal pinceau in <italic>Adam11</italic> mutants reveals their role in ephaptic control of purkinje cell firing</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>11433</fpage><lpage>11444</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1346-15.2015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26269648</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kubisch</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schroeder</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name><name><surname>Friedrich</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Lütjohann</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Amraoui</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Marlin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Petit</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jentsch</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>KCNQ4, a novel potassium channel expressed in sensory outer hair cells, is mutated in dominant deafness</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>96</volume><fpage>437</fpage><lpage>446</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80556-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10025409</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lang</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rafi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Orias</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Segal</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Desir</surname><given-names>GV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>KCNA10: A novel ion channel functionally related to both voltage-gated potassium and CNG cation channels</article-title><source>American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology</source><volume>278</volume><fpage>F1013</fpage><lpage>F1021</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajprenal.2000.278.6.F1013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>SI</given-names></name><name><surname>Conrad</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lagziel</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Starost</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>Belyantseva</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Friedman</surname><given-names>TB</given-names></name><name><surname>Morell</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>A null mutation of mouse <italic>Kcna10</italic> causes significant vestibular and mild hearing dysfunction</article-title><source>Hearing Research</source><volume>300</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23528307</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levin</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Holt</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>The function and molecular identity of inward rectifier channels in vestibular hair cells of the mouse inner ear</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>108</volume><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>186</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00098.2012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22496522</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1988">1988</year><article-title>Tuning in the bullfrog ear</article-title><source>Biophysical Journal</source><volume>53</volume><fpage>441</fpage><lpage>447</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83120-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3258166</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kindig</surname><given-names>AE</given-names></name><name><surname>Donne</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Callister</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Brichta</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Potassium accumulation between type I hair cells and calyx terminals in mouse crista</article-title><source>Experimental Brain Research</source><volume>210</volume><fpage>607</fpage><lpage>621</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00221-011-2592-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Giffen</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Stringham</surname><given-names>ST</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Judge</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name><name><surname>Beisel</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>DZZ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Cell-specific transcriptome analysis shows that adult pillar and deiters’ cells express genes encoding machinery for specializations of cochlear hair cells</article-title><source>Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience</source><volume>11</volume><elocation-id>356</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnmol.2018.00356</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30327589</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>López-Barneo</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoshi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Heinemann</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Aldrich</surname><given-names>RW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>Effects of external cations and mutations in the pore region on C-type inactivation of Shaker potassium channels</article-title><source>Receptors &amp; Channels</source><volume>1</volume><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8081712</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldberg</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><chapter-title>Morphophysiology of the vestibular periphery</chapter-title><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Highstein</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Fay</surname><given-names>RR</given-names></name><name><surname>Popper</surname><given-names>AN</given-names></name></person-group><source>The Vestibular System</source><publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>152</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/0-387-21567-0_3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaboyard-Niay</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Calin-Jageman</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Chatlani</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year><article-title>Molecular microdomains in a sensory terminal, the vestibular calyx ending</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>10101</fpage><lpage>10114</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0521-11.2011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21734302</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="preprint"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marino</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Misuri</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Brogioli</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>A new open source software for the calculation of the liquid junction potential between two solutions according to the stationary nernst-planck equation</article-title><source>arXiv</source><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.3640">http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.3640</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Masetto</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>Electrophysiological properties of vestibular sensory and supporting cells in the labyrinth slice before and during regeneration</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>78</volume><fpage>1913</fpage><lpage>1927</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.1997.78.4.1913</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McInturff</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Burns</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelley</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Characterization of spatial and temporal development of Type I and Type II hair cells in the mouse utricle using new cell-type-specific markers</article-title><source>Biology Open</source><volume>7</volume><elocation-id>bio038083</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/bio.038083</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30455179</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meredith</surname><given-names>FL</given-names></name><name><surname>Rennie</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year><article-title>Channeling your inner ear potassium: K+ channels in vestibular hair cells</article-title><source>Hearing Research</source><volume>338</volume><fpage>40</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heares.2016.01.015</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mitra</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ubarretxena-Belandia</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Taguchi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Warren</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Engelman</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Modulation of the bilayer thickness of exocytic pathway membranes by membrane proteins rather than cholesterol</article-title><source>PNAS</source><volume>101</volume><fpage>4083</fpage><lpage>4088</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0307332101</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15016920</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Orvis</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gottfried</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Kancherla</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Adkins</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Dror</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Olley</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Chrysostomou</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelly</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Milon</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Matern</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Azaiez</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Herb</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Colantuoni</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Carter</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Ament</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelley</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Bravo</surname><given-names>HC</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahurkar</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hertzano</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>gEAR: gene expression analysis resource portal for community-driven, multi-omic data exploration</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>843</fpage><lpage>844</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41592-021-01200-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34172972</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pastras</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Curthoys</surname><given-names>IS</given-names></name><name><surname>Asadnia</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>McAlpine</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Rabbitt</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Evidence that ultrafast nonquantal transmission underlies synchronized vestibular action potential generation</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>7149</fpage><lpage>7157</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1417-23.2023</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37775302</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perez-Flores</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>XD</given-names></name><name><surname>Sihn</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Ledford</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Timofeyev</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Yarov-Yarovoy</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Chiamvimonvat</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Rabbitt</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamoah</surname><given-names>EN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Cooperativity of K<sub>V</sub>7.4 channels confers ultrafast electromechanical sensitivity and emergent properties in cochlear outer hair cells</article-title><source>Science Advances</source><volume>6</volume><elocation-id>eaba1104</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.aba1104</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32285007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pujol</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Pickett</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>TB</given-names></name><name><surname>Stone</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>Large basolateral processes on type II hair cells are novel processing units in mammalian vestibular organs</article-title><source>The Journal of Comparative Neurology</source><volume>522</volume><fpage>3141</fpage><lpage>3159</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cne.23625</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24825750</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramanathan</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Fuchs</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Modeling hair cell tuning by expression gradients of potassium channel beta subunits</article-title><source>Biophysical Journal</source><volume>82</volume><fpage>64</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75374-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11751296</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ranjan</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Logette</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Marani</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Herzog</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tâche</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Scantamburlo</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Buchillier</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Markram</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year><article-title>A kinetic map of the homomeric voltage-gated potassium channel (Kv) family</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>358</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fncel.2019.00358</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31481875</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rennie</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1994">1994</year><article-title>Potassium currents in mammalian and avian isolated type I semicircular canal hair cells</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>71</volume><fpage>317</fpage><lpage>329</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.1994.71.1.317</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rennie</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Weng</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Effects of KCNQ channel blockers on K<sup>+</sup> currents in vestibular hair cells</article-title><source>American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology</source><volume>280</volume><fpage>C473</fpage><lpage>C480</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpcell.2001.280.3.C473</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ricci</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Rennie</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996</year><article-title>The delayed rectifier, I<sub>KΙ</sub>, is the major conductance in type I vestibular hair cells across vestibular end organs</article-title><source>Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology</source><volume>432</volume><fpage>34</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004240050102</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rothman</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Manis</surname><given-names>PB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Kinetic analyses of three distinct potassium conductances in ventral cochlear nucleus neurons</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>89</volume><fpage>3083</fpage><lpage>3096</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00126.2002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rüsch</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996a</year><article-title>A delayed rectifier conductance in type I hair cells of the mouse utricle</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>76</volume><fpage>995</fpage><lpage>1004</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.1996.76.2.995</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8871214</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rüsch</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1996">1996b</year><article-title>Voltage responses of mouse utricular hair cells to injected currents</article-title><source>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</source><volume>781</volume><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>84</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb15694.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8694485</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rüsch</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>Postnatal development of type I and type II hair cells in the mouse utricle: acquisition of voltage-gated conductances and differentiated morphology</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>7487</fpage><lpage>7501</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-18-07487.1998</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9736667</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scheffer</surname><given-names>DI</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Corey</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>ZY</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Gene expression by mouse inner ear hair cells during development</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>6366</fpage><lpage>6380</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5126-14.2015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25904789</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scheibinger</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Janesick</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Benkafadar</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellwanger</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Heller</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Cell-type identity of the avian utricle</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>40</volume><elocation-id>111432</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111432</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36170825</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schroeder</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name><name><surname>Hechenberger</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Weinreich</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Kubisch</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jentsch</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>KCNQ5, a novel potassium channel broadly expressed in brain, mediates M-type currents</article-title><source>Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>275</volume><fpage>24089</fpage><lpage>24095</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M003245200</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schweizer</surname><given-names>FE</given-names></name><name><surname>Savin</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Luu</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sultemeier</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoffman</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Distribution of high-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels in rat vestibular epithelia</article-title><source>The Journal of Comparative Neurology</source><volume>517</volume><fpage>134</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cne.22148</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19731297</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>GT</given-names></name><name><surname>Proffitt</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Rusch</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>Genes linked to species diversity in a sexually dimorphic communication signal in electric fish</article-title><source>Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology</source><volume>204</volume><fpage>93</fpage><lpage>112</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00359-017-1223-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29058069</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib71"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Songer</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Tuning and timing in mammalian type I hair cells and calyceal synapses</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>3706</fpage><lpage>3724</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4067-12.2013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23426697</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sousa</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrade</surname><given-names>LR</given-names></name><name><surname>Salles</surname><given-names>FT</given-names></name><name><surname>Pillai</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Buttermore</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kachar</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>The septate junction protein Caspr is required for structural support and retention of KCNQ4 at calyceal synapses of vestibular hair cells</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>3103</fpage><lpage>3108</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4868-08.2009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19279247</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spaiardi</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Tavazzani</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Manca</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Milesi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Russo</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Prigioni</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Marcotti</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Magistretti</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Masetto</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>An allosteric gating model recapitulates the biophysical properties of I<sub>K,L</sub> expressed in mouse vestibular type I hair cells</article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>595</volume><fpage>6735</fpage><lpage>6750</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/JP274202</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28862328</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spaiardi</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Tavazzani</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Manca</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Russo</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Prigioni</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Biella</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Giunta</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Marcotti</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Masetto</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>K<sup>+</sup> accumulation and clearance in the calyx synaptic cleft of type I mouse vestibular hair cells</article-title><source>Neuroscience</source><volume>426</volume><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>86</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.11.028</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31846752</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spitzmaul</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tolosa</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Winkelman</surname><given-names>BHJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Heidenreich</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Frens</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chabbert</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeeuw</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name><name><surname>Jentsch</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Vestibular role of KCNQ4 and KCNQ5 K<sup>+</sup> channels revealed by mouse models</article-title><source>Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>288</volume><fpage>9334</fpage><lpage>9344</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M112.433383</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stone</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Pujol</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>TB</given-names></name><name><surname>Cox</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The transcription factor sox2 is required to maintain the cell type-specific properties and innervation of type II vestibular hair cells in adult mice</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>6217</fpage><lpage>6233</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1831-20.2021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34099510</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stühmer</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruppersberg</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Schröter</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakmann</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Stocker</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Giese</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Perschke</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Baumann</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Pongs</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1989">1989</year><article-title>Molecular basis of functional diversity of voltage-gated potassium channels in mammalian brain</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>3235</fpage><lpage>3244</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08483.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2555158</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vollrath</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Time course and extent of mechanotransducer adaptation in mouse utricular hair cells: comparison with frog saccular hair cells</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>90</volume><fpage>2676</fpage><lpage>2689</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00893.2002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib79"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1998">1998</year><article-title>KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits: molecular correlates of the M-channel</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>282</volume><fpage>1890</fpage><lpage>1893</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.282.5395.1890</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib80"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weng</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year><article-title>Regional distribution of ionic currents and membrane voltage responses of type II hair cells in the vestibular neuroepithelium</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>82</volume><fpage>2451</fpage><lpage>2461</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2451</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10561418</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib81"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wersall</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1956">1956</year><article-title>Studies on the structure and innervation of the sensory epithelium of the cristae ampulares in the guinea pig; a light and electron microscopic investigation</article-title><source>Acta Oto-Laryngologica. Supplementum</source><volume>126</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">13326368</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib82"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name><name><surname>Hurley</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year><article-title>Differences between the negatively activating potassium conductances of mammalian cochlear and vestibular hair cells</article-title><source>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>270</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10162-004-4051-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15492886</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib83"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Nie</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Mo</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrov</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Calisto</surname><given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>Kachar</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Beisel</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Vazquez</surname><given-names>AE</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamoah</surname><given-names>EN</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Roles of alternative splicing in the functional properties of inner ear-specific KCNQ4 channels</article-title><source>Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>282</volume><fpage>23899</fpage><lpage>23909</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M702108200</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib84"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>H-Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Biemesderfer</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Desir</surname><given-names>GV</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year><article-title>Expression of KCNA10, a voltage-gated K channel, in glomerular endothelium and at the apical membrane of the renal proximal tubule</article-title><source>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>2831</fpage><lpage>2839</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.ASN.0000036866.37886.C5</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.94342.4.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>eLife assessment</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>King</surname><given-names>Andrew J</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>University of Oxford</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="evidence-strength"><kwd>Compelling</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="claim-importance"><kwd>Important</kwd></kwd-group></front-stub><body><p>This study provides direct evidence showing that K<sub>V</sub>1.8 channels provide the basis for several potassium currents in the two types of sensory hair cells found in the mouse vestibular system. This is an <bold>important</bold> finding because the nature of the channels underpinning the unusual potassium conductance g<sub>K,L</sub> in type I hair cells has been under scrutiny for many years. The experimental evidence is <bold>compelling</bold> and the analysis is rigorous. The study will be of interest to cell and molecular biologists as well as vestibular and auditory neuroscientists.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.94342.4.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>In this paper the authors provide a thorough demonstration of the role that one particular type of voltage-gated potassium channel, Kv1.8, plays in a low voltage activated conductance found in type I vestibular hair cells. Along the way, they find that this same channel protein appears to function in type II vestibular hair cells as well, contributing to other macroscopic conductances. Overall, Kv1.8 may provide especially low input resistance and short time constants to facilitate encoding of more rapid head movements in animals that have necks. Combination with other channel proteins, in different ratios, may contribute to the diversified excitability of vestibular hair cells.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The experiments are comprehensive and clearly described, both in text and in the figures. Statistical analyses are provided throughout.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>None.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.94342.4.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The focus of this manuscript was to investigate whether Kv1.8 channels, which have previously been suggested to be expressed in type I hair cells of the mammalian vestibular system, are responsible for the potassium conductance g<sub>K,L</sub>. This is an important study because g<sub>K,L</sub> is known to be crucial for the function of type I hair cells, but the channel identity has been a matter of debate for the past 20 years. The authors have addressed this research topic by primarily investigating the electrophysiological properties of the vestibular hair cells from Kv1.8 knockout mice. Interestingly, g<sub>K,L</sub> was completely abolished in Kv1.8-deficient mice, in agreement with the hypothesis put forward by the authors based on the literature. The surprising observation was that in the absence of Kv1.8 potassium channels, the outward potassium current in type II hair cells was also largely reduced. Type II hair cells express the largely inactivating potassium conductance g<sub>K,A</sub>, but not g<sub>K,L</sub>. The authors concluded that heteromultimerization of non-inactivating Kv1.8 and the inactivating Kv1.4 subunits could be responsible for the inactivating g<sub>K,A</sub>. Overall, the manuscript is very well written and most of the conclusions are supported by the experimental work. The figures are well described, and the statistical analysis is robust.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa3"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.94342.4.sa3</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #3 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>This paper by Martin et al. describes the contribution of a Kv channel subunit (Kv1.8, KCNA10) to voltage-dependent K+ conductances and membrane properties of type I and type II hair cells of the mouse utricle. Previous work has documented striking differences in K+ conductances between vestibular hair cell types. In particular amniote type I hair cells are known to express a non-typical low-voltage-activated K+ conductance (G<sub>K,L</sub>) whose molecular identity has been elusive. K+ conductances in hair cells from 3 different mouse genotypes (wildtype, Kv1.8 homozygous knockouts and heterozygotes) are examined here and whole cell patch-clamp recordings indicate a prominent role for Kv1.8 subunits in generating G<sub>K,L</sub>. Results also interestingly support a role for Kv1.8 subunits in type II hair cell K+ conductances; inactivating conductances in null mice are reduced in type II hair cells from striola and extrastriola regions of the utricle. Kv1.8 is therefore proposed to contribute as a pore-forming subunit for 3 different K+ conductances in vestibular hair cells. The impact of these conductances on membrane responses to current steps is studied in current clamp. Pharmacological experiments use XE991 to block some residual Kv7-mediated current in both hair cell types, but no other pharmacological blockers are used. In addition immunostaining data are presented and raise some questions about Kv7 and Kv1.8 channel localization. Overall, the data present compelling evidence that removal of Kv1.8 produces profound changes in hair cell membrane conductances and sensory capabilities. These changes at hair cell level suggest vestibular function would be compromised and further assessment in terms of balance behavior in the different mice would be interesting.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>This study provides strong evidence that Kv1.8 subunits are major contributors to the unusual K+ conductance in type I hair cells of the utricle. It also indicates that Kv1.8 subunits are important for type II hair cell K+ conductances because Kv1.8-/- mice lacked an inactivating A conductance and had reduced delayed rectifier conductance compared to controls. A comprehensive and careful analysis of biophysical profiles is presented of expressed K+ conductances in 3 different mouse genotypes. Voltage-dependent K+ currents are rigorously characterized at a range of different ages and their impact on membrane voltage responses to current input is studied. Some pharmacological experiments are performed in addition to immunostaining to bolster the conclusions from the biophysical studies. The paper has a significant impact in showing the role of Kv1.8 in determining utricular hair cell electrophysiological phenotypes.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>(1) From previous work it is known that G<sub>K,L</sub> in type I hair cells has unusual ion permeation and pharmacological properties that differ greatly from type II hair cell conductances. Notably G<sub>K,L</sub> is highly permeable to Cs+ as well as K+ ions and is slightly permeable to Na+. It is blocked by 4-aminopyridine and divalent cations (Ba2+, Ca2+, Ni2+), enhanced by external K+ and modulated by cyclic GMP. The question arises-if Kv1.8 is a major player and pore-forming subunit in type I and type II cells (and cochlear inner hair cells as shown by Dierich et al. 2020) how are subunits modified to produce channels with very different properties? A role for Kv1.4 channels (gA) is proposed in type II hair cells based on previous findings in bird hair cells. However, hair cell specific partner interactions with Kv1.8 that result in GK, L in type I hair cells and Cs+ impermeable, inactivating currents in type II hair cells remain for the most part unexplored.</p><p>(2) Data from patch-clamp and immunocytochemistry experiments are not in close alignment. XE991 (Kv7 channel blocker) decreases remaining K+ conductance in type I and type II hair cells from null mice supporting the presence of Kv7 channels in hair cells (Fig. 7). Also, Holt et al. (2007) previously showed inhibition of G<sub>K,L</sub> in type I hair cells (but not delayed rectifier conductance in type II hair cells) using a dominant negative construct of Kv7.4 channels. However, immunolabelling indicates Kv7.4 channels on the inner face of calyx terminals adjacent to hair cells (Fig. 5). Some reconciliation of these findings is needed.</p><p>(3) A previous paper reported that a vestibular evoked potential was abnormal in Kv1.8-/- mice (Lee et al. 2013) as briefly mentioned (lines 94-95). It would be really interesting to know if any vestibular-associated behaviors and/or hearing loss were observed in the mice populations. If responses are compromised at the sensory hair cell level across different zones, degradation of balance function would be anticipated and should be elucidated.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="author-comment" id="sa4"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.94342.4.sa4</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Hannah R</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Chicago</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lysakowski</surname><given-names>Anna</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Illinois at Chicago</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Eatock</surname><given-names>Ruth Anne</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Chicago</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Chicago</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The following is the authors’ response to the previous reviews.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Recommendations for the authors:</bold></p><p><bold>Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):</bold></p><p>Line 127. Provide a few more words describing the voltage protocol. To the uninitiated, panels A and B will be difficult to understand. &quot;The large negative step is used to first close all channels, then probe the activation function with a series of depolarizing steps to re-open them and obtain the max conductance from the peak tail current at -36 mV. &quot;</p></disp-quote><p>We have revised the text as suggested (revision lines 127 to Line 131): “From a holding potential within the g<sub>K,L</sub> activation range (here –74 mV), the cell is hyperpolarized to –124 mV, negative to EK and the activation range, producing a large inward current through open g<sub>K,L</sub> channels that rapidly decays as the channels deactivate. We use the large transient inward current as a hallmark of g<sub>K,L</sub>. The hyperpolarization closes all channels, and then the activation function is probed with a series of depolarizing steps, obtaining the max conductance from the peak tail current at –44 mV (Fig. 1A).”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Incidentally, why does the peak tail current decay?</p></disp-quote><p>We added this text to the figure legend to explain this: “For steps positive to the midpoint voltage, tail currents are very large. As a result, K<sup>+</sup> accumulation in the calyceal cleft reduces driving force on K<sup>+</sup>, causing currents to decay rapidly, as seen in A (Lim et al., 2011).”</p><p>The decay of the peak tail current is a feature of g<sub>K,L</sub> (large K<sup>+</sup> conductance) and the large enclosed synaptic cleft (which concentrates K<sup>+</sup> that effluxes from the HC). See Govindaraju et al. (2023) and Lim et al. (2011) for modeling and experiments around this phenomenon.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Line 217-218. For some reason, I stumbled over this wording. Perhaps rearrange as &quot;In type II HCs absence of Kv1.8 significantly increased R<sub>in</sub> and tau<sub>RC</sub>. There was no effect on V<sub>rest</sub> because the conductances to which Kv1.8 contributes, g<sub>A</sub> and g<sub>DR</sub> activate positive to the resting potential. (so which K conductances establish V<sub>rest</sub>???).</p></disp-quote><p>We kept our original wording because we wanted to discuss the baseline (V<sub>rest</sub>) before describing responses to current injection.</p><p>-&gt;V<sub>rest</sub> is presumably maintained by ATP-dependent Na/K exchangers (ATP1a1), HCN, Kir, and mechanotransduction currents. Repolarization is achieved by delayed rectifier and A-type K<sup>+</sup> conductances in type II HCs.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Figure 4, panel C - provides absolute membrane potential for voltage responses. Presumably, these were the most 'ringy' responses. Were they obtained at similar Vm in all cells (i.e., comparisons of Q values in lines 229-230).</p></disp-quote><p>We added the absolute membrane potential scale. Type II HC protocols all started with 0 pA current injection at baseline, so they were at their natural V<sub>rest</sub>, which did not differ by genotype or zone. Consistent with Q depending on expression of conductances that activate positive to V<sub>rest</sub>, Q did not co-vary with V<sub>rest</sub> (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.08, p = 0.47, n = 85).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Lines 254. Staining is non-specific? Rather than non-selective?</p></disp-quote><p>Yes, thanks - Corrected (Line 264).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Figure 6. Do you have a negative control image for Kv1.4 immuno? Is it surprising that this label is all over the cell, but Kv1.8 is restricted to the synaptic pole?</p></disp-quote><p>We don’t have a null-animal control because this immunoreactivity was done in rat. While the cuticular plate staining was most likely nonspecific because we see that with many different antibodies, it’s harder to judge the background staining in the hair cell body layer. After feedback from the reviewers, we decided to pull the K<sub>V</sub>1.4 immunostaining from the paper because of the lack of null control, high background, and inability to reproduce these results in mouse tissue. In our hands, in mouse tissue, both mouse and rabbit anti-K<sub>V</sub>1.4 antibodies failed to localize to the hair cell membrane. Further optimization or another method could improve that, but for now the single-cell expression data (McInturff et al., 2018) remain the strongest evidence for K<sub>V</sub>1.4 expression in murine type II hair cells.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Lines 400-404. Whew, this is pretty cryptic. Expand a bit?</p></disp-quote><p>We simplified this paragraph (revision lines 411-413): “We speculate that g<sub>A</sub> and g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>1.8) have different subunit composition: g<sub>A</sub> may include heteromers of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 with other subunits that confer rapid inactivation, while g<sub>DR</sub>(K<sub>V</sub>1.8) may comprise homomeric K<sub>V</sub>1.8 channels, given that they do not have N-type inactivation .”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Line 428. 'importantly different ion channels'. I think I understand what is meant but perhaps say a bit more.</p></disp-quote><p>Revised (Line 438): “biophysically distinct and functionally different ion channels”.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Random thought. In addition to impacting R<sub>in</sub> and Tau<sub>RC,</sub> do you think the more negative V<sub>rest</sub> might also provide a selective advantage by increasing the driving force on K entry from endolymph?</p></disp-quote><p>When the calyx is perfectly intact, g<sub>K,L</sub> is predicted to make V<sub>rest</sub> less negative than the values we report in our paper, where we have disturbed the calyx to access the hair cell (–80, Govindaraju et al., 2023, <italic>vs.</italic> –87 mV, here). By enhancing K<sup>+</sup> accumulation in the calyceal cleft, the intact calyx shifts E<sub>K</sub>—and V<sub>rest</sub>—positively (Lim et al., 2011), so the effect on driving force may not be as drastic as what you are thinking.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):</bold></p><p><bold>(</bold>1) Introduction: wouldn't the small initial paragraph stating the main conclusion of the study fit better at the end of the background section, instead of at the beginning?</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for this idea, we have tried that and settled on this direct approach to let people know in advance what the goals of the paper are.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) Pg.4: The following sentence is rather confusing &quot;Between P5 and P10, we detected no evidence of a non-g<sub>K,L</sub> K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent.....&quot;. Also, Suppl. Fig 1A seems to show that between P5 and P10 hair cells can display a potassium current having either a hyperpolarised or depolarised V<sub>half</sub>. Thus, I am not sure I understand the above statement.</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for pointing out unclear wording. We used the more common “delayed rectifier” term in our revision (Lines 144-147): “Between P5 and P10, some type I HCs have not yet acquired the physiologically defined conductance, g<sub>K,L</sub>.. N effects of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 deletion were seen in the delayed rectifier currents of immature type I HCs (Suppl. Fig. 1B), showing that they are not immature forms of the K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent g<sub>K,L</sub> channels. ”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) For the reduced Cm of hair cells from Kv1.8 knockout mice, could another reason be simply the immature state of the hair cells (i.e. lack of normal growth), rather than less channels in the membrane?</p></disp-quote><p>There were no other signs to suggest immaturity or abnormal growth in K<sub>V</sub>1.8–/– hair cells or mice. Importantly, type II HCs did not show the same C<sub>m</sub> effect.</p><p>We further discussed the capacitance effect in lines 160-167: “C<sub>m</sub> scales with surface area, but soma sizes were unchanged by deletion of K<sub>V</sub>1.8 (Suppl. Table 2). Instead, C<sub>m</sub> may be higher in K<sub>V</sub>1.8+/+ cells because of g<sub>K,L</sub> for two reasons. First, highly expressed trans-membrane proteins (see discussion of g<sub>K,L</sub> channel density in Chen and Eatock, 2000) can affect membrane thickness (Mitra et al., 2004), which is inversely proportional to specific C<sub>m</sub>. Second, g<sub>K,L</sub> could contaminate estimations of capacitive current, which is calculated from the decay time constant of transient current evoked by small voltage steps <italic>outside</italic> the operating range of any ion channels. g<sub>K,L</sub> has such a negative operating range that, even for Vm negative to –90 mV, some g<sub>K,L</sub> channels are voltage-sensitive and could add to capacitive current.”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) Methods: The electrophysiological part states that &quot;For most recordings, we used .....&quot;. However, it is not clear what has been used for the other recordings.</p></disp-quote><p>Thanks for catching this error, a holdover from an earlier ms. version. We have deleted “For most recordings” (revision line 466).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Also, please provide the sign for the calculated 4 mV liquid junction potential.</p></disp-quote><p>Done (revision line 476).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer #3 (Recommendations For The Authors):</bold></p><p><bold>(</bold>1) Some of the data in panels in Fig. 1 are hard to match up. The voltage protocols shown in A and B show steps from hyperpolarized values to -71mV (A) and -32 mV (B). However, the value from A doesn't seem to correspond with the activation curve in C.</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for catching this. We accidentally showed the control I-X curve from a different cell than that in A. We now show the G-V relation for the cell in A.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Also the V<sub>half</sub> in D for -/- animals is ~-38 mV, which is similar to the most positive step shown in the protocol.</p></disp-quote><p>The most positive step in Figure 1B is actually –25 mV. The uneven tick labels might have been confusing, so we re-labeled them to be more conventional.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Were type I cells stepped to more positive potentials to test for the presence of voltage-activated currents at greater depolarizations? This is needed to support the statement on lines 147-148.</p></disp-quote><p>We added “no additional K+ conductance activated up to +40 mV” (revision line 149-150). Our standard voltage-clamp protocol iterates up to ~+40 mV in K<sub>V</sub>1.8–/– hair cells, but in Figure 1 we only showed steps up to –25 mV because K<sup>+</sup> accumulation in the synaptic cleft with the calyx distorts the current waveform even for the small residual conductances of the knockouts. K<sub>V</sub>1.8–/– hair cells have a main KV conductance with a V<sub>half</sub> of ~–38 mV, as shown in Figure 1, and we did not see an additional K<sub>V</sub> conductance that activated with a more positive V<sub>half</sub> up to +40 mV.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(2) Line 151 states &quot;While the cells of Kv1.8-/- appeared healthy...&quot; how were epithelia assessed for health? Hair cells arise from support cells and it would be interesting to know if Kv1.8 absence influences supporting cells or neurons.</p></disp-quote><p>We added our criteria for cell health to lines 477-479: “K<sub>V</sub>1.8–/– hair cells appeared healthy in that cells had resting potentials negative to –50 mV, cells lasted a long time (20-30 minutes) in ruptured patch recordings, membranes were not fragile, and extensive blebbing was not seen.”</p><p>Supporting cells were not routinely investigated. We characterized calyx electrical activity (passive membrane properties, voltage-gated currents, firing pattern) and didn’t detect differences between +/+, +/–, and –/– recordings (data not shown). K<sub>V</sub>1.8 was not detected in neural tissue (Lee et al., 2013).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(3) Several different K+ channel subtypes were found to contribute to inner hair cell K+ conductances (Dierich et al. 2020) but few additional K+ channel subtypes are considered here in vestibular hair cells. Further comments on calcium-activated conductances (lines 310-317) would be helpful since apamin-sensitive SK conductances are reported in type II hair cells (Poppi et al. 2018) and large iberiotoxin-sensitive BK conductances in type I hair cells (Contini et al. 2020). Were iberiotoxin effects studied at a range of voltages and might calcium-dependent conductances contribute to the enhanced resonance responses shown in Fig. 4?</p></disp-quote><p>We refer you to lines 310-317 in the original ms (lines 322-329 in the revised ms), where we explain possible reasons for not observing I<sub>K</sub>(Ca) in this study.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(4) Similar to G<sub>K,L</sub> erg (Kv11) channels show significant Cs+-permeability. Were experiments using Cs+ and/or Kv11 antagonists performed to test for Kv11?</p></disp-quote><p>No. Hurley et al. (2006) used Kv11 antagonists to reveal Kv11 currents in rat utricular type I hair cells with perforated patch, which were also detected in rats with single-cell RT-PCR (Hurley et al. 2006) and in mice with single-cell RNAseq (McInturff et al., 2018). They likely contribute to hair cell currents, alongside Kv7, Kv1.8, HCN1, and Kir.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(5) Mechanosensitive (&quot;MET&quot;) channels in hair cells are mentioned on lines 234 and 472 (towards the end of the Discussion), but a sentence or two describing the sensory function of hair cells in terms of MET channels and K+ fluxes would help in the Introduction too.</p></disp-quote><p>Following this suggestion we have expanded the introduction with the following lines (78-87): “Hair cells are known for their large outwardly rectifying K+ conductances, which repolarize membrane voltage following a mechanically evoked perturbation and in some cases contribute to sharp electrical tuning of the hair cell membrane. Because g<sub>K,L</sub> is unusually large and unusually negatively activated, it strongly attenuates and speeds up the receptor potentials of type I HCs (Correia et al., 1996; Rüsch and Eatock, 1996b). In addition, g<sub>K,L</sub> augments a novel non-quantal transmission from type I hair cell to afferent calyx by providing open channels for K<sup>+</sup> flow into the synaptic cleft (Contini et al., 2012, 2017, 2020; Govindaraju et al., 2023), increasing the speed and linearity of the transmitted signal (Songer and Eatock, 2013).”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(6) Lines 258-260 state that GKL does not inactivate, but previous literature has documented a slow type of inactivation in mouse crista and utricle type I hair cells (Lim et al. 2011, Rusch and Eatock 1996) which should be considered.</p></disp-quote><p>Lim et al. (2011) concluded that K<sup>+</sup> accumulation in the synaptic cleft can explain much of the apparent inactivation of g<sub>K,L</sub>. In our paper, we were referring to fast, N-type inactivation. We changed that line to be more specific; new revision lines 269-271: “K<sub>V</sub>1.8, like most K<sub>V</sub>1 subunits, does not show fast inactivation as a heterologously expressed homomer (Lang et al., 2000; Ranjan et al., 2019; Dierich et al., 2020), nor do the K<sub>V</sub>1.8-dependent channels in type I HCs, as we show, and in cochlear inner hair cells (Dierich et al., 2020).”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(7) Lines 320-321 Zonal differences in inward rectifier conductances were reported previously in bird hair cells (Masetto and Correia 1997) and should be referenced here.</p></disp-quote><p>Zonal differences were reported by Masetto and Correia for type II but not type I avian hair cells, which is why we emphasize that we found a zonal difference in I-H in type I hair cells. We added two citations to direct readers to type II hair cell results (lines 333-334): “The g<sub>K,L</sub> knockout allowed identification of zonal differences in I<sub>H</sub> and I<sub>Kir</sub> in type I HCs, previously examined in type II HCs (Masetto and Correia, 1997; Levin and Holt, 2012).”</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Also, Horwitz et al. (2011) showed HCN channels in utricles are needed for normal balance function, so please include this reference (see line 171).</p></disp-quote><p>Done (line 184).</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(8) Fig 6A. Shows Kv1.4 staining in rat utricle but procedures for rat experiments are not described. These should be added. Also, indicate striola or extrastriola regions (if known).</p></disp-quote><p>We removed K<sub>V</sub>1.4 immunostaining from the paper, see above.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(9) Table 6, ZD7288 is listed -was this reagent used in experiments to block G<sub>h</sub>? If not please omit.</p></disp-quote><p>ZD7288 was used to block g<sub>H</sub> to produce a clean h-infinity curve in Figure 6, which is described in the legend.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(10) In supplementary Fig. 5A make clear if the currents are from XE991 subtraction. Also, is the G-V data for single cell or multiple cells in B? It appears to be from 1 cell but ages P11-505 are given in legend.</p></disp-quote><p>The G-V curve in B is from XE991 subtraction, and average parameters in the figure caption are for all the K<sub>V</sub>1.8–/– striolar type I hair cells where we observed this double Boltzmann tail G-V curve. I added detail to the figure caption to explain this better.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>(11) Supplementary Fig. 6A claims a fast activation of inward rectifier K+ channels in type II but not type I cells-not clear what exactly is measured here.</p></disp-quote><p>We use “fast inward rectifier” to indicate the inward current that increases within the first 20 ms after hyperpolarization from rest (I<sub>Kir</sub>, characterized in Levin &amp; Holt, 2012) in contrast to HCN channels, which open over ~100 ms. We added panel C to show that the activation of I<sub>Kir</sub> is visible in type II hair cells but not in the knockout type I hair cells that lack g<sub>K,L</sub>. I<sub>Kir</sub> was a reliable cue to distinguish type I and type II hair cells in the knockout.</p><p>For our actual measurements in Fig 6B, we quantified the current flowing after 250 ms at –124 mV because we did not pharmacologically separate I<sub>Kir</sub> and I<sub>H</sub>.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Could the XE991-sensitive current be activated and contributing?</p></disp-quote><p>The XE991-sensitive current could decay (rapidly) at the onset of the hyperpolarizing step, but was not contributing to our measurement of I<sub>Kir</sub>­ and I<sub>H</sub>, made after 250 ms at –124 mV, at which point any low-voltage-activated (LVA) outward rectifiers have deactivated. Additionally, the LVA XE991-sensitive currents were rare (only detected in some striolar type I hair cells) and when present did not compete with fast I<sub>Kir</sub>, which is only found in type II hair cells.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Also, did the inward rectifier conductances sustain any outward conductance at more depolarized voltage steps?</p></disp-quote><p>For the K<sub>V</sub>1.8-null mice specifically, we cannot answer the question because we did not use specific blocking agents for inward rectifiers. However, we expect that there would only be sustained outward IR currents at voltages between E<sub>K</sub> and ~-60 mV: the foot of I<sub>Kir</sub>’s I-V relation according to published data from mouse utricular hair cells – e.g., Holt and Eatock 1995, Rusch and Eatock 1996, Rusch et al. 1998, Horwitz et al., 2011, etc. Thus, any such current would be unlikely to contaminate the residual outward rectifiers in Kv1.8-null animals, which activate positive to ~-60 mV.</p><p>(I-HCN is also not a problem, because it could only be outward positive to its reversal potential at ~-40 mV, which is significantly positive to its voltage activation range.)</p></body></sub-article></article>