<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN"  "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd"><article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" pub-type="epub">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">99971</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.99971</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="version">10.7554/eLife.99971.3</article-id><article-version article-version-type="publication-state">version of record</article-version><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Genetics and Genomics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title><italic>fmo-4</italic> promotes longevity and stress resistance via ER to mitochondria calcium regulation in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tuckowski</surname><given-names>Angela M</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9125-4780</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund2"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Beydoun</surname><given-names>Safa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kitto</surname><given-names>Elizabeth S</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>Ajay</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Howington</surname><given-names>Marshall B</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sridhar</surname><given-names>Aditya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bhandari</surname><given-names>Mira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con7"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chambers</surname><given-names>Kelly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con8"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>Scott F</given-names></name><contrib-id authenticated="true" contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8003-2955</contrib-id><email>leiser@umich.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund1"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="fund3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con9"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf2"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00jmfr291</institution-id><institution>Cellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00jmfr291</institution-id><institution>Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00jmfr291</institution-id><institution>Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00jmfr291</institution-id><institution>Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan</institution></institution-wrap><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Denzel</surname><given-names>Martin Sebastian</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Altos Labs</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="senior_editor"><name><surname>Kornmann</surname><given-names>Benoit</given-names></name><role>Senior Editor</role><aff><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/052gg0110</institution-id><institution>University of Oxford</institution></institution-wrap><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="publication"><day>14</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>RP99971</elocation-id><history><date date-type="sent-for-review" iso-8601-date="2024-06-12"><day>12</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></date></history><pub-history><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-06-13"><day>13</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.594584"/></event><event><event-desc>This manuscript was published as a reviewed preprint.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-08-27"><day>27</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99971.1"/></event><event><event-desc>The reviewed preprint was revised.</event-desc><date date-type="reviewed-preprint" iso-8601-date="2025-01-27"><day>27</day><month>01</month><year>2025</year></date><self-uri content-type="reviewed-preprint" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99971.2"/></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2024, Tuckowski et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tuckowski et al</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read/><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife-99971-v1.pdf"/><self-uri content-type="figures-pdf" xlink:href="elife-99971-figures-v1.pdf"/><abstract><p>Flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMOs) are a conserved family of xenobiotic enzymes upregulated in multiple longevity interventions, including nematode and mouse models. Previous work supports that <italic>C. elegans fmo-2</italic> promotes longevity, stress resistance, and healthspan by rewiring endogenous metabolism. However, there are five <italic>C. elegans</italic> FMOs and five mammalian FMOs, and it is not known whether promoting longevity and health benefits is a conserved role of this gene family. Here, we report that expression of <italic>C. elegans fmo-4</italic> promotes lifespan extension and paraquat stress resistance downstream of both dietary restriction and inhibition of mTOR. We find that overexpression of <italic>fmo-4</italic> in just the hypodermis is sufficient for these benefits, and that this expression significantly modifies the transcriptome. By analyzing changes in gene expression, we find that genes related to calcium signaling are significantly altered downstream of <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression. Highlighting the importance of calcium homeostasis in this pathway, <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpressing animals are sensitive to thapsigargin, an ER stressor that inhibits calcium flux from the cytosol to the ER lumen. This calcium/<italic>fmo-4</italic> interaction is solidified by data showing that modulating intracellular calcium with either small molecules or genetics can change expression of <italic>fmo-4</italic> and/or interact with <italic>fmo-4</italic> to affect lifespan and stress resistance. Further analysis supports a pathway where <italic>fmo-4</italic> modulates calcium homeostasis downstream of activating transcription factor-6 (<italic>atf-6</italic>), whose knockdown induces and requires <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression. Together, our data identify <italic>fmo-4</italic> as a longevity-promoting gene whose actions interact with known longevity pathways and calcium homeostasis.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><kwd>aging</kwd><kwd>flavin-containing monooxygenase</kwd><kwd>stress resistance</kwd><kwd>calcium</kwd><kwd>ER</kwd><kwd>mitochondria</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd><italic>C. elegans</italic></kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="fund1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>R01AG075061</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>Scott F</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution>National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>T32AG000114</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Tuckowski</surname><given-names>Angela M</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001642</institution-id><institution>Glenn Foundation for Medical Research</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>Scott F</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="fund4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007270</institution-id><institution>University of Michigan</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>Rackham Research Grant</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Tuckowski</surname><given-names>Angela M</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value><italic>fmo-4</italic> slows aging downstream of dietary restriction and mTOR and regulates calcium-mediated signaling in the hypodermis.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>publishing-route</meta-name><meta-value>prc</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Aging is a major risk factor for the onset of cancer, cardiovascular disease, dementia, and many other serious illnesses. Studying the aging process is crucial because a more comprehensive understanding can lead to the development of therapeutics that treat multiple diseases simultaneously. The use of model organisms, from yeast to mammals, has helped define genetic and environmental pathways that influence aging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Kenyon, 2010</xref>). Many of these pathways, such as dietary restriction (DR), defined as a decrease in nutrient intake without malnutrition, involve active modification of metabolism that robustly and reproducibly improve health and longevity across species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Bodkin et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Swindell, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Kapahi et al., 2017</xref>). Similarly, the response to oxygen deficiency, or hypoxic response, can lead to increased longevity, healthspan, and stress resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Shen et al., 2005</xref>). Interestingly, in <italic>C. elegans,</italic> both DR and the hypoxic response converge upon a single gene, <italic>fmo-2,</italic> that is necessary and sufficient to improve health and longevity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>).</p><p>FMOs are a family of enzymes that use oxygen and NADPH to oxygenate nucleophilic substrates. FMOs oxygenate a wide array of xenobiotic substrates and were discovered ~50 y ago for their role in drug metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Krueger and Williams, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Rossner et al., 2017</xref>). Consequently, a majority of published data on FMOs relate to this role. Recently, studies have begun to focus on the endogenous role(s) of FMOs. Results show that multiple mammalian FMO proteins are involved in systemic metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Steinbaugh et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Choi et al., 2023</xref>). We initially discovered a role for <italic>C. elegans fmo-2</italic> in regulating stress resistance and longevity downstream of DR and hypoxia and have continued to identify role(s) for FMO-2 in <italic>C. elegans</italic> metabolism and longevity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Choi et al., 2023</xref>). However, the conserved mechanisms for FMO-mediated health benefits are still unclear, as are the roles of individual FMO enzymes. Thus, to best understand how FMOs could be leveraged to improve health, we need to understand the conserved mechanism of these enzymes in longevity and metabolism.</p><p>There are five <italic>C. elegans</italic> FMOs, and three of the five share significant structural overlap with mammalian FMOs. This overlap involves a predicted endoplasmic reticulum (ER) localization and a membrane-spanning domain, which are each found in <italic>fmo-1, fmo-2</italic>, and <italic>fmo-4</italic>. In comparison to the more well-studied longevity gene <italic>fmo-2, fmo-4</italic> in particular shares 88% identity in the catalytic domain amino acids, suggesting that FMO-2 and FMO-4 may bind similar substrates and could plausibly have overlapping endogenous roles. Published data also show that DR induces both <italic>fmo-2</italic> and <italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression, implying a role for <italic>fmo-4</italic> in longevity regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Rossner et al., 2017</xref>). Based on this, we hypothesized that <italic>fmo-4</italic> may play a role in <italic>C. elegans</italic> longevity and that studying this role can help to understand this gene family and its relevance to aging.</p><p>FMOs are transmembrane enzymes thought to primarily reside in the ER. While mainly studied for its involvement in protein and lipid synthesis, the ER also plays a key role in metabolism and maintaining homeostasis within the cell. For instance, the ER responds to misfolded proteins by eliciting its unfolded protein response (UPR<sup>ER</sup>), thereby removing dysfunctional proteins and restoring homeostasis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Read and Schröder, 2021</xref>). The ER is also responsible for storing and releasing calcium in a coordinated manner with the cytosol and mitochondria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Groenendyk et al., 2021</xref>). The ER establishes calcium homeostasis through processes involving (1) sequestering calcium in the lumen with the calreticulin chaperone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Groenendyk et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Park et al., 2001</xref>), (2) releasing calcium into the cytosol through the inositol triphosphate receptor (IP<sub>3</sub>R) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Groenendyk et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Berridge, 1993</xref>), and (3) bringing calcium into the ER lumen through the sarcoplasmic endoplasmic reticulum ATPase (SERCA) pump (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Groenendyk et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Marchi and Pinton, 2014</xref>). Interestingly, the ER’s role in regulating metabolic and calcium homeostasis in the cell has recently been linked to longevity in <italic>C. elegans</italic>. Knocking out <underline>a</underline>ctivating <underline>t</underline>ranscription <underline>f</underline>actor (<italic>atf</italic>)–6, one of the three branches of the UPR<sup>ER</sup>, modulates calcium signaling from the ER to the mitochondria, resulting in increased mitochondrial turnover and lifespan extension in <italic>C. elegans (</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>).</p><p>Given that (1) <italic>fmo-4</italic> is induced by a longevity-promoting pathway (DR), (2) <italic>fmo-4</italic> is predicted to be an ER transmembrane protein, and (3) the ER’s role in cellular homeostasis is linked to aging, we hypothesized that <italic>fmo-4</italic> regulates longevity by modulating ER-related processes. Here, we test this hypothesis by modifying <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression and interrogating interactions between <italic>fmo-4,</italic> stress resistance, longevity, and the ER. Our resulting data show that <italic>fmo-4</italic> promotes longevity and paraquat stress resistance downstream of mTOR and DR through calcium homeostasis. We find that not only is <italic>fmo-4</italic> a regulator of multiple longevity-promoting pathways, but it is also sufficient to extend lifespan and confer paraquat stress resistance when overexpressed either ubiquitously or in the hypodermis. Transcriptomics data and stress assays reveal that calcium signaling is altered downstream of <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression, and that <italic>fmo-4</italic> interacts with calcium regulation between the ER and mitochondria to promote longevity and paraquat stress resistance. Together, these results establish <italic>fmo-4</italic> as a longevity-promoting gene and provide evidence as to how <italic>fmo-4</italic> extends <italic>C. elegans</italic> lifespan through calcium-mediated ER to mitochondrial processes.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title><italic>Cefmo-4</italic> is required for DR and mTOR-mediated lifespan extension</title><p><italic>C. elegans fmo-4</italic> shares significant similarities to its family member and longevity gene, <italic>fmo-2,</italic> including 88% conservation in catalytic residues (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1</xref>), a transmembrane domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>) and predicted subcellular localization in the ER (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Kishore et al., 2020</xref>). Additionally, <italic>fmo-4</italic> is induced by the longevity intervention DR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Rossner et al., 2017</xref>). These structural similarities and DR-mediated induction led us to hypothesize that <italic>fmo-4</italic> may play a role in aging. To test this, we first asked whether <italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for well-studied longevity pathways, including DR. We utilized <italic>fmo-4</italic>(<italic>ok294</italic>) knockout (KO) animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">C. elegans Deletion Mutant Consortium, 2012</xref>) on five conditions reported to extend lifespan in <italic>C. elegans</italic>. Since <italic>fmo-4</italic> is induced by dietary restriction, we started with fed and DR (sDR <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Greer and Brunet, 2009</xref>) conditions. Our results show that loss of <italic>fmo-4</italic> has no significant effect on control-fed worms but prevents nearly all the lifespan extension seen under DR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). Wild-type (WT) worms on DR experience a ~35% lifespan extension compared to fed WT worms, but when <italic>fmo-4</italic> is knocked out this extension is reduced to ~10% and this interaction is significant by Cox regression (p-value &lt;4.50e<sup>–6</sup>). These data support that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for the DR longevity pathway (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). Having established this role, we continued lifespan analyses of <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms exposed to RNAi knockdown of the S6-kinase gene <italic>rsks-1</italic> (mTOR signaling; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Pan et al., 2007</xref>), the Von Hippel-Lindau gene <italic>vhl-1</italic> (hypoxic signaling; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Leiser et al., 2013</xref>), the insulin receptor <italic>daf-2</italic> (insulin-like signaling; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Kimura et al., 1997</xref>), and the cytochrome c reductase gene <italic>cyc-1</italic> (mitochondrial electron transport chain, cytochrome c reductase; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Lee et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C–F</xref>). The resulting data show that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is fully required for <italic>rsks-1</italic>-mediated longevity as marked by a complete abrogation of the <italic>rsks-1</italic> RNAi lifespan extension when <italic>fmo-4</italic> is knocked out (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>), placing <italic>fmo-4</italic> downstream of mTOR. <italic>fmo-4</italic> was not required for the hypoxic response (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>), insulin-like signaling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>), or cytochrome c reductase inhibition pathways (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>) to increase lifespan. It is notable that, unlike <italic>fmo-4, fmo-2</italic> is required for <italic>vhl-1</italic>-mediated longevity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). This result, coupled with <italic>fmo-4</italic> and <italic>fmo-2</italic> each being required for DR, suggests that these two genes in the same family are overlapping but distinct in their requirement. Together, these data suggest that <italic>fmo-4</italic> plays a necessary role in <italic>C. elegans</italic> longevity regulation downstream of at least two pathways: DR and mTOR signaling.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title><italic>Cefmo-4</italic> regulates mTOR and dietary restriction-mediated longevity.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Hydropathy plots of FMO-2 and FMO-4 predicting endoplasmic reticulum (ER) transmembrane (TM) domains based on protein sequence analysis. Analysis was done using Deeploc-2.0. (<bold>B</bold>) Lifespan analysis of wild-type (WT) worms and <italic>fmo-4</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO) worms on fed and dietary restricted (DR) conditions. (<bold>C</bold>) Lifespan analysis of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on empty vector (EV) RNAi and <italic>rsks-1</italic> RNAi. (<bold>D</bold>) Lifespan analysis of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>vhl-1</italic> RNAi. (<bold>E</bold>) Lifespan analysis of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>daf-2</italic> RNAi. (<bold>F</bold>) Lifespan analysis of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>cyc-1</italic> RNAi. For each lifespan, n = ~120 worms per condition per experiment, and three replicate experiments were performed. Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis and significant interactions between the condition of interest and genotype were determined at p&lt;0.01 using Cox regression analysis. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata1">Figure 1—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata2">Figure 1—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata3">Figure 1—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata4">Figure 1—source data 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig1sdata5">Figure 1—source data 5</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata1"><label>Figure 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>DR lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig1-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata2"><label>Figure 1—source data 2.</label><caption><title>mTOR (<italic>rsks-1</italic> RNAi) lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig1-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata3"><label>Figure 1—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>vhl-1</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig1-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata4"><label>Figure 1—source data 4.</label><caption><title><italic>daf-2</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig1-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig1sdata5"><label>Figure 1—source data 5.</label><caption><title><italic>cyc-1</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig1-data5-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Full-length alignment of AncFMO5, Human FMO5, and <italic>C. elegans</italic> FMO-1, FMO-2, and FMO-4.</title><p>Alignment was conducted using Clustal Omega and ESPript 3.0 to determine an 88% overlap in catalytic residues between <italic>C. elegans</italic> FMO-2 and FMO-4.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig1-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Subcellular localization prediction based on protein sequence of <italic>C. elegans</italic> FMO-4.</title><p>Based on the protein sequence, <italic>C. elegans</italic> FMO-4 is predicted to be located in the endoplasmic reticulum and the golgi apparatus. Analysis was done using Deeploc-2.0.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig1-figsupp2-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for <italic>fmo-2</italic>-mediated longevity, stress resistance, and healthspan</title><p>Having established that, like <italic>fmo-2, fmo-4</italic> is required for DR-mediated longevity, we next hypothesized that <italic>fmo-2</italic> and <italic>fmo-4</italic> may be acting in the same pathway. To test this, we crossed <italic>fmo-2</italic> overexpressing (OE) worms with <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms to create an <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE; <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO strain (<italic>fmo-2</italic>OE;4KO). We validated this strain via qPCR analysis (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>). Upon measuring their lifespan compared to <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE animals, we find that knocking out <italic>fmo-4</italic> completely abrogates the lifespan extension from <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>). This result suggests that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for <italic>fmo-2-</italic>mediated longevity and thus may act downstream of <italic>fmo-2</italic> to promote longevity in <italic>C. elegans</italic>.</p><fig id="fig2" position="float"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for the health benefits of <italic>fmo</italic>-2 overexpression.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Lifespan analysis of wild-type (WT), <italic>fmo-2</italic> overexpressing (<italic>fmo-2</italic> OE), <italic>fmo-4</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO), and <italic>fmo-</italic>2 OE;<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO (<italic>fmo-</italic>2OE;4KO) worms on <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 (n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt; 0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>B</bold>) Survival of WT, <italic>fmo</italic>-2 OE, <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO, and <italic>fmo</italic>-2OE;4KO worms exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage (n = ~90 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>C</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 37 °C heat shock for 3 hr (hours) at L4 stage (n=100 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 0, 1, and 5 µg/mL tunicamycin from the egg until day 1 of adulthood (n = ~60 eggs per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>E</bold>) Healthspan analysis of worm thrashing in a drop of M9 solution for 30 s on day 2 of adulthood (n=10 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>F</bold>) Healthspan analysis of worm thrashing in a drop of M9 solution for 30 s on day 10 of adulthood (n=10 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). For heat stress, tunicamycin stress, and healthspan assessments, * denotes significant change at p&lt;0.05 using unpaired two-tailed t-test or one-way ANOVA. N.S. = not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig2sdata1">Figure 2—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig2sdata2">Figure 2—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig2sdata3">Figure 2—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig2sdata4">Figure 2—source data 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig2sdata5">Figure 2—source data 5</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata1"><label>Figure 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4KO lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig2-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata2"><label>Figure 2—source data 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4KO paraquat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig2-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata3"><label>Figure 2—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4KO heat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig2-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata4"><label>Figure 2—source data 4.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4KO tunicamycin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig2-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig2sdata5"><label>Figure 2—source data 5.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4KO healthspan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig2-data5-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig2-v1.tif"/></fig><p>We previously showed that <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE is not just sufficient for lifespan extension but is also sufficient to promote resistance to multiple forms of stress, including oxidative stress (paraquat), heat stress, and ER stress (tunicamycin; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). Since <italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for <italic>fmo-2-</italic>mediated longevity, we hypothesized that <italic>fmo-4</italic> would also be required for <italic>fmo-2-</italic>mediated stress resistance. Following exposure to 5 mM paraquat, 37 °C heat stress, or 5 µg/mL tunicamycin, we find that the <italic>fmo-2</italic>OE;4KO worms survive similarly to WT worms and are no longer resistant to these stresses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B–D</xref>). Thus, knocking out <italic>fmo-4</italic> blocks <italic>fmo-2-</italic>mediated broad stress resistance.</p><p>Healthspan is a crucial component to longevity, and we previously found that <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE is sufficient to promote healthspan benefits with age in <italic>C. elegans</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). As <italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for both the lifespan extension and stress resistance observed with <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE, we hypothesized that <italic>fmo-4</italic> would also be required for <italic>fmo-2-</italic>mediated healthspan benefits. To test this, we measured the thrashing rate of <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4KO worms at day 2 and day 10 of adulthood. We find that knocking out <italic>fmo-4</italic> abrogates the healthspan benefits of the <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE worms with age (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E, F</xref>). Thus, <italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for <italic>fmo-2-</italic>mediated health and resilience benefits, further supporting its acting downstream of <italic>fmo-2</italic> to promote health and longevity.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Overexpression of <italic>fmo-4</italic> promotes longevity, healthspan, and paraquat stress resistance</title><p>While being necessary for increased healthspan, lifespan, and stress resistance shows that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for these benefits, it does not test whether it can modulate aging directly. Therefore, to better understand <italic>fmo-4’s</italic> role in longevity and health, we next asked whether <italic>fmo-4</italic> is sufficient for lifespan extension, stress resistance, and healthspan benefits. We created a ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worm strain with <italic>fmo-4</italic> expressed under the <italic>eft-3</italic> promoter via multicopy extrachromosomal array followed by random integration. qPCR analysis shows that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is overexpressed ~150 fold over WT in the ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>)<bold>,</bold> and their development time is slightly (~1.5 hr) but statistically significantly delayed compared to WT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1</xref>). Interestingly, we find that ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE is sufficient to reproducibly extend lifespan by ~20% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). Epistatic analysis with <italic>fmo-2</italic> shows that <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE lifespan extension is not additive with <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2A</xref>), as determined by comparing the individual OE strains to the <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;<italic>fmo-</italic>4 OE (<italic>fmo-2</italic>OE;4 OE) worm strain (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>). This further supports that these two genes in the same family act in the same pathway. To test whether <italic>fmo-4</italic> requires <italic>fmo-2,</italic> we overexpressed <italic>fmo-4</italic> in the context of <italic>fmo-2</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE;2KO) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>). The results show that <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE does not require <italic>fmo-2</italic> for its longevity benefits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3A</xref>). This further validates that <italic>fmo-4</italic> likely acts downstream of <italic>fmo-2</italic>.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>Overexpressing <italic>fmo-4</italic> is sufficient for lifespan extension, paraquat stress resistance, and improved healthspan.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Lifespan analysis of wild-type (WT), <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpressing (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE), and <italic>fmo-4</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO) worms on <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 (n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>B</bold>) Healthspan analysis of worms thrashing in a drop of M9 solution for 30 s (seconds) on day 2 of adulthood (n=10 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>C</bold>) Healthspan analysis of worms thrashing in a drop of M9 solution for 30 s on day 10 of adulthood (n=10 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 5 mM paraquat starting from L4 stage (n = ~90 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>E</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 37 °C for 3 hr (hours) at L4 stage (n=100 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>F</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 0, 1, and 5 µg/mL tunicamycin starting from the egg until day 1 of adulthood (n = ~60 eggs per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>G</bold>) Brightfield images of WT and ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms exposed to DMSO or 1 mg/mL thapsigargin (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Quantifications of (<bold>G</bold>) images in (<bold>H, I</bold>). (<bold>J</bold>) Development (Dev) time in hours (hrs) of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms grown on DMSO control or 1 mg/mL thapsigargin (Thaps) from L2 stage (n=~10 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). * denotes significant change at p&lt;0.05 using t-test. N.S. = not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata1">Figure 3—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata2">Figure 3—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata3">Figure 3—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata4">Figure 3—source data 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata5">Figure 3—source data 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata6">Figure 3—source data 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3sdata7">Figure 3—source data 7</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>mo-4</italic> OE ubuitous lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata2"><label>Figure 3—source data 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE ubiquitous healthspan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata3"><label>Figure 3—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE ubuitous paraquat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata4"><label>Figure 3—source data 4.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OEubuitous heat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata5"><label>Figure 3—source data 5.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE ubuitous tunicamycin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-data5-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata6"><label>Figure 3—source data 6.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE ubuitous thapsigargin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-data6-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3sdata7"><label>Figure 3—source data 7.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE ubuitous thapsigargin development replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-data7-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Development time of experimental worm strains compared to wild-type.</title><p>Development (Dev) time in hours (hrs) of wild-type (WT), <italic>fmo-2</italic> overexpressing (OE), ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE ubiq), hypodermal-specific <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE Hyp), <italic>fmo-2</italic> knockout (KO), <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO, <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO (<italic>fmo-2</italic>OE;<italic>4</italic>KO), <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE (<italic>fmo-2</italic>OE;<italic>4</italic> OE), and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE;<italic>fmo-2</italic> KO (<italic>fmo-4</italic>OE;<italic>2</italic>KO) worms. (n = ~10 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). * denotes significant change in development time compared to WT. p&lt;0.05 using unpaired two-tailed t-test. NS  = not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s1sdata1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s1sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Replicates of development time of experimental worm strains compared to wild-type.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> acts in the same pathway as <italic>fmo-2</italic>.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Lifespan analysis of wild-type (WT), <italic>fmo-2</italic> overexpressing (<italic>fmo-2</italic> OE), <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpressing (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE), and <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE (<italic>fmo-</italic>2OE;4 OE) worms starting from egg (n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>B</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 5 mM paraquat starting from L4 stage (n = ~90 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>C</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 37 °C heat for 3 hr (hours) at L4 stage (n=100 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 0, 1, and 5 ug/mL tunicamycin starting from egg until day 1 of adulthood (n = ~60 eggs per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>E</bold>) Brightfield images of WT, <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE, <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE, and <italic>fmo</italic>-2OE;4 OE worms exposed to DMSO or 1 mg/mL thapsigargin (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Quantification of (<bold>E</bold>) in (<bold>F–I</bold>). (<bold>J</bold>) For heat stress, tunicamycin stress, and thapsigargin stress, * denotes significant change at p&lt;0.05 using unpaired two-tailed t-test or one-way ANOVA. N.S. = not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s2sdata1">Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s2sdata2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s2sdata3">Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s2sdata4">Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s2sdata5">Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 5</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s2sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4OE lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp2-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s2sdata2"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4OE paraquat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp2-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s2sdata3"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4OE heat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp2-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s2sdata4"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 4.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4OE tunicamycin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp2-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s2sdata5"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 5.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-2</italic> OE;4OE thapsigargin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp2-data5-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp2-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig3s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Knocking out <italic>fmo-2</italic> does not affect <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpression.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Lifespan analysis of wild-type (WT), <italic>fmo</italic>-4 overexpressing (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE), <italic>fmo-2</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-2</italic> KO), and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE;<italic>fmo-2</italic> KO (<italic>fmo-4</italic>OE;<italic>2</italic>KO) worms starting from egg (n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>B</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 5 mM paraquat starting at L4 stage (n = ~90 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>C</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 37 °C heat for 3 hr (hours) from L4 stage (n=100 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 0, 1, and 5 ug/mL tunicamycin starting from egg until day 1 of adulthood (n = ~60 eggs per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>E</bold>) Brightfield images of WT, <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE, <italic>fmo-2</italic> KO, and <italic>fmo-4</italic>OE;<italic>2</italic>KO worms exposed to DMSO or 1 mg/mL thapsigargin (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Quantification of (<bold>E</bold>) in (<bold>F–I</bold>). For heat stress, tunicamycin stress, and thapsigargin stress, * denotes significant change at p&lt;0.05 using unpaired two-tailed t test or one-way ANOVA. N.S. = not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s3sdata1">Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s3sdata2">Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s3sdata3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s3sdata4">Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig3s3sdata5">Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 5</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s3sdata1"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE;2KO lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp3-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s3sdata2"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE;2KO paraquat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp3-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s3sdata3"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE;2KO heat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp3-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s3sdata4"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 4.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE;2KO tunicamycin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp3-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig3s3sdata5"><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 5.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE;2KO thapsigargin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp3-data5-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig3-figsupp3-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>Increased longevity is frequently observed in tandem with increased healthspan and resistance to toxic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Soo et al., 2023</xref>). We assessed the healthspan of the ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms at days 2 and 10 of adulthood by measuring thrashing rates (movement). We find that ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE is sufficient for an improvement (p=0.011) in healthspan benefits with age (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B, C</xref>). We next measured the stress resistance of the ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms to 5 mM paraquat (oxidative stress), 37 °C heat stress, 5 µg/mL of tunicamycin (ER glycosylation stress), and 1 mg/mL thapsigargin (ER calcium stress). We included two ER stresses because FMO-4 is predicted to be an ER transmembrane protein. We find that ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE is sufficient to convey paraquat stress resistance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>) but does not offer any protection from heat (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3E</xref>) or tunicamycin stress (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>). Interestingly, ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpressing animals are sensitive to thapsigargin, as shown by the worms’ significantly diminished size and inability to develop compared to WT control worms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3G–J</xref>). These results suggest a narrow stress resistance and even some sensitivity for <italic>fmo-4</italic> in comparison to other longevity genes. To test whether <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE would interact with <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE, we combined the strains and measured their stress resistance. We find that the <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE strain is still resistant to paraquat, heat, and tunicamycin stress in the presence of increased <italic>fmo-4,</italic> suggesting that overexpression of <italic>fmo-4</italic> does not affect resistance to these stresses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2B–D</xref>). Interestingly, the <italic>fmo-2</italic> OE strain is sensitive to thapsigargin stress in the presence of increased <italic>fmo-4,</italic> suggesting that <italic>fmo-4</italic> likely also acts downstream of <italic>fmo-2</italic> in this stress pathway (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2E–I</xref>). Overall, these results suggest that <italic>fmo-4</italic> (1) is sufficient to improve healthspan, (2) is both necessary and sufficient to promote paraquat resistance, (3) is necessary but not sufficient to improve heat and tunicamycin resistance, and (4) promotes sensitivity to calcium-mediated ER stress from thapsigargin. As expected under the hypothesis that <italic>fmo-4</italic> acts downstream of <italic>fmo-2,</italic> the <italic>fmo-4</italic>OE;2KO strain phenocopies the <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE strain in all stress assays (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s3">Figure 3—figure supplement 3B–I</xref>). Together, these data suggest that <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE is sufficient to promote lifespan extension and paraquat stress resistance as well as a healthspan benefit, while exhibiting sensitivity to ER calcium stress.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Hypodermal overexpression of <italic>fmo-4</italic> is sufficient for longevity and paraquat resistance</title><p>While using the ubiquitous overexpressing worm strain is helpful to probe into <italic>fmo-4’s</italic> involvement in longevity, stress resistance, and healthspan, it is also important to note that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is normally localized and expressed primarily in the hypodermis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A–C</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Petalcorin et al., 2005</xref>). Thus, we asked whether hypodermal-specific <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpression is sufficient for these health benefits. We created a hypodermal-specific <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worm strain expressing <italic>fmo-4</italic> under the <italic>dp</italic>y<italic>-7</italic> promoter via multicopy extrachromosomal arrays followed by random integration. qPCR data show that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is expressed ~45 fold over WT in the hypodermal-specific <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp1">Supplementary file 1</xref>), and their developmental time does not differ from WT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3—figure supplement 1</xref>). We measured lifespan, resistance to paraquat, heat, tunicamycin, and thapsigargin stress, as well as the healthspan of the hypodermal-specific <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE<sup>Hyp</sup>). We find that the <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE<sup>Hyp</sup> strain exhibits a lifespan extension (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>), resistance to paraquat (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4E</xref>) but not heat or tunicamycin stress (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4F, G</xref>), and sensitivity to thapsigargin stress (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4H–J</xref>). However, the <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE<sup>Hyp</sup> strain did not have a statistically significant effect on healthspan unlike the ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE strain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4K, L</xref>). Overall, these results agree with the <italic>C. elegans</italic> single-cell atlas as well as previously published work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Petalcorin et al., 2005</xref>) showing that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is mostly localized to the hypodermis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>) and is consistent with the ubiquitous strain primarily benefiting from expressing additional <italic>fmo-4</italic> in the hypodermis. Thus, ubiquitous or hypodermal-specific overexpression of <italic>fmo-4</italic> is sufficient for longevity and paraquat stress resistance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3A, D</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4D, E</xref>), does not affect heat or tunicamycin resistance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3E, F</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4F, G</xref>), and results in thapsigargin sensitivity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3G–J</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4H–J</xref>).</p><fig id="fig4" position="float"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>Overexpressing <italic>fmo-4</italic> in the hypodermis is sufficient for lifespan extension and paraquat stress resistance.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Complete cell atlas of <italic>C. elegans</italic> aging cluster map highlighting regions of <italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression. (<bold>B</bold>) Image of the ubiquitous <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpressing (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE) worm by the <italic>eft-3</italic> promoter showing expression throughout its body. (<bold>C</bold>) Image of the hypodermal-specific <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worm by the <italic>dpy-7</italic> promoter showing expression in the hypodermis. (<bold>D</bold>) Lifespan analysis of wild-type (WT), <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE, hypodermal-specific <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE<sup>Hyp</sup>), and <italic>fmo-4</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO) worms (n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>E</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 5 mM paraquat starting at L4 stage (n = ~90 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis. (<bold>F</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 37 °C heat for 3 hr (hours) at L4 stage (n=100 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>G</bold>) Survival of worms exposed to 0, 1, and 5 ug/mL tunicamycin starting at egg until day 1 of adulthood (n = ~60 eggs per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>H</bold>) Brightfield images of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE<sup>Hyp</sup> worms exposed to DMSO or 1 mg/mL thapsigargin (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Quantification of (<bold>H</bold>) in (<bold>I–J</bold>). (<bold>K</bold>) Healthspan analysis of worms thrashing in a drop of M9 solution for 30 s (seconds) on day 2 of adulthood (n=10 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>L</bold>) Healthspan analysis of worms thrashing in a drop of M9 solution for 30 s on day 10 of adulthood (n=10 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). For heat stress, tunicamycin stress, thapsigargin stress, and healthspan assessments, * denotes significant change at p&lt;0.05 using t-test. N.S. = not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig4sdata1">Figure 4—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig4sdata2">Figure 4—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig4sdata3">Figure 4—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig4sdata4">Figure 4—source data 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig4sdata5">Figure 4—source data 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig4sdata6">Figure 4—source data 6</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata1"><label>Figure 4—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE hypodermal lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig4-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata2"><label>Figure 4—source data 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE hypodermal paraquat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig4-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata3"><label>Figure 4—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE hypodermal heat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig4-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata4"><label>Figure 4—source data 4.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE hypodermal tunicamycin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig4-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata5"><label>Figure 4—source data 5.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE hypodermal thapsigargin stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig4-data5-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig4sdata6"><label>Figure 4—source data 6.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE hypodermal healthspan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig4-data6-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig4-v1.tif"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE transcriptomics reveals a link to calcium regulation</title><p>To identify the downstream effects of <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression, we analyzed the transcriptome of <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE animals and compared them with control animals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). Based on a p-value of &lt;0.05, we find ~800 transcripts are upregulated and ~500 transcripts are downregulated when <italic>fmo-4</italic> is overexpressed (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sdata1">Source data 1</xref>). Of the upregulated and downregulated transcripts unique to the <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE profile, we noticed that some of the significant pathways include transcription, Wnt signaling, TGFβ signaling, protein processing in the ER, and other subsets of signaling, as determined by the <bold><underline>D</underline></bold>atabase for <bold><underline>A</underline></bold>nnotation, <bold><underline>V</underline></bold>isualization and <bold><underline>I</underline></bold>ntegrated <bold><underline>D</underline></bold>iscovery (DAVID) Functional Annotation Bioinformatics Microarray Analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). Based on its known role as a xenobiotic enzyme, we were intrigued to find that <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE is modulating signaling pathways. We were further intrigued to find that one of the signaling pathways affected by <italic>fmo-4</italic> is calcium signaling (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sdata2">Source data 2</xref>). This was interesting considering that <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms are sensitive to thapsigargin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3G–J</xref>), implicating an interaction between calcium signaling and <italic>fmo-4</italic>. To further verify this possibility, we used another tool called PANTHER Classification System Protein Class, which identified FMO-4 as a putative transmembrane signal receptor (G-protein coupled receptor), ion transporter, and/or calcium-binding protein (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sdata2">Source data 2</xref>). Together, these results support the possibility that FMO-4 is involved in calcium-related processes.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE transcriptomics reveals a link to calcium regulation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Gene ontology (GO) analysis of significantly regulated pathways unique to <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpression (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE). (<bold>B</bold>) Fluorescence images of <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> reporter worms exposed to a water control, dietary restriction (DR) control, 300 µM carbachol, or 10 mM EDTA, which is quantified in (<bold>C</bold>) (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Lifespan assessment of wild-type (WT) and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms exposed to a water control or 50 µM carbachol. (<bold>E</bold>) Lifespan assessment of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO) worms exposed to a water control or 50 µM carbachol (<bold>F</bold>) Lifespan assessment of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms exposed to a water control or 50 µM EDTA. (<bold>G</bold>) Lifespan assessment of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms exposed to a water control or 50 µM EDTA. For all lifespan analyses, n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments performed. Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis and significant interactions between the condition of interest and genotype was determined at p&lt;0.01 using Cox regression analysis. For imaging experiments, * denotes significant change at p&lt;0.05 using unpaired two-tailed t-test. N.S. = not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5sdata1">Figure 5—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5sdata2">Figure 5—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5sdata3">Figure 5—source data 3</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata1"><label>Figure 5—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Carbachol and EDTA imaging replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig5-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata2"><label>Figure 5—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Quantification of Carbachol and EDTA imaging replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig5-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5sdata3"><label>Figure 5—source data 3.</label><caption><title>Carbachol and EDTA lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig5-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig5-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Carbachol and EthyleneDiamineTetraAcetic acid (EDTA) alter GCaMP7f fluorescence intesity.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Fluorescence images of neuronal GCaMP7f calcium indicator worms on water control, 300 µM carbachol, or 10 mM EDTA. Fluorescence intensity is quantified in (<bold>B</bold>) (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>C</bold>) Fluorescence images of the neuronal GCaMP7f calcium indicator worms on 300 µM carbachol assessed at multiple time points including 0 min (minutes), 0.5 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, and 20 min. Fluorescence intensity is quantified in (<bold>D</bold>) (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>E</bold>) Fluorescence images of the neuronal GCaMP7f calcium indicator worms on 10 mM EDTA assessed at multiple time points including 0 min (minute), 0.5 min, 5 min, 10 min, and 20 min. Fluorescence intensity is quantified in (<bold>F</bold>) (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). * denotes significant change in fluorescence compared to control. p&lt;0.05 using an unpaired two-tailed t-test. N.S.=not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5s1sdata1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig5s1sdata2">Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 2</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s1sdata1"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>GCaMP7f on Carbachol imaging replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig5-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig5s1sdata2"><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 2.</label><caption><title>GCaMP7f on EDTA imaging replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig5-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig5-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>To begin exploring this interaction, we determined how changes in intracellular calcium levels impact <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression and lifespan. We first manipulated calcium levels by supplementing the acetylcholine agonist, carbachol. Carbachol activates acetylcholine receptors, increasing overall intracellular calcium levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Masoumi et al., 2023</xref>). We first validated that carbachol increases calcium levels by utilizing worms that neuronally express the calcium indicator GCaMP7f (SWF702; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Dag et al., 2023</xref>). When these worms were exposed to 300 µM carbachol, a significant increase in GFP fluorescence was reported, indicating an increase in calcium levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–D</xref>). We then measured <italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression upon exposure to carbachol using an <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> transcriptional reporter strain. Interestingly, we find that supplementation of 300 µM carbachol induces <italic>fmo-4</italic> promoter expression fluorescence nearly twofold over a water control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B, C</xref>). This was similar to the level of induction of <italic>fmo-4</italic> in fasted (DR-like) conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B, C</xref>). We postulate that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is induced by carbachol because increased intracellular calcium activates <italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression. Since carbachol supplementation induces <italic>fmo-4</italic>, we hypothesized that carbachol may affect lifespan and would interact with <italic>fmo-4</italic>. We measured the lifespan of worms supplemented with 50 µM carbachol and find that while WT lifespan is significantly extended by carbachol, this extension is not additive with <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5D</xref>), and requires <italic>fmo-4,</italic> as the <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO is shorter-lived when exposed to carbachol (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5E</xref>).</p><p>To test whether reducing calcium has an opposing effect to increasing it, we utilized <underline>E</underline>thylene<underline>D</underline>iamine<underline>T</underline>etra<underline>A</underline>cetic acid (EDTA) to deplete calcium levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Mellau and Jørgensen, 2003</xref>). We validated that EDTA depletes calcium levels by exposing GCaMP7f expressing worms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Dag et al., 2023</xref>) to 10 mM EDTA and we observed a significant decrease in GFP fluorescence, indicating a decrease in calcium levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1A, B, E, F</xref>). Then, we placed <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> reporter worms on plates containing 10 mM EDTA and measured fluorescence. Surprisingly, we find that EDTA also significantly induces <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B, C</xref>). We then assessed the survival of WT, <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE and KO worms on plates supplemented with 50 µM EDTA. We find that EDTA significantly extends WT lifespan without further extending <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE lifespan (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5F</xref>), while shortening the lifespan of <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO animals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5G</xref>). Overall, these data suggest that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is highly sensitive to changing calcium levels in either direction, and that both increasing and depleting calcium (1) induces <italic>fmo-4,</italic> (2) extends WT lifespan, (3) is not additive with <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE lifespan, and (4) is deleterious to <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO animals. Thus, these results support an interaction between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and calcium signaling.</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> genetically interacts with calcium signaling to promote longevity and paraquat resistance</title><p>Having established an interaction between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and calcium perturbations, we next asked if <italic>fmo-4</italic> interacts with genes involved in calcium signaling. These genes include calreticulin (<italic>crt-1</italic>), inositol triphosphate receptor (IP<sub>3</sub>R, <italic>itr-1</italic>), and the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (<italic>mcu-1</italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>). Calreticulin is responsible for binding and sequestering calcium in the ER lumen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Groenendyk et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Park et al., 2001</xref>). It was previously shown that FMO protein extracted from rabbit lung can form a complex with calreticulin, suggesting a physical interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Guan et al., 1991</xref>). When testing for genetic interactions between <italic>crt-1</italic> and <italic>fmo-4,</italic> we find that <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi extends WT lifespan, as previously reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>), and that this lifespan extension is not additive with <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref>). Treating <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms with <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi can significantly extend lifespan (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1A</xref>), but this result was inconsistent (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sdata3">Source data 3</xref>). Overall, this suggests that <italic>fmo-4</italic> and <italic>crt-1</italic> are acting in the same genetic pathway. IP<sub>3</sub>R, or <italic>itr-1</italic> in <italic>C. elegans,</italic> is located in the ER membrane and is critical for exporting calcium from the ER lumen into the cytosol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Groenendyk et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Berridge, 1993</xref>). Previous results suggest that loss of <italic>itr-1</italic> decreases WT lifespan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>), which our results confirm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>). Importantly, we also find that <italic>itr-1</italic> RNAi decreases lifespan of <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms similarly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1B</xref>) and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>) worms to a greater extent than WT, negating the relative longevity of <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms compared to WT. Thus, <italic>itr-1</italic> is required to increase lifespan downstream of <italic>fmo-4</italic>. MCU (<italic>mcu-</italic>1) is located in the inner mitochondrial membrane and allows cytosolic calcium into the inner mitochondrial matrix (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Groenendyk et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Marchi and Pinton, 2014</xref>). We also find that <italic>mcu-1</italic> is required downstream of <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE, as <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi abrogates the <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE lifespan (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6C</xref>). The <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO lifespan is slightly decreased on <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1C</xref>). These data support that <italic>fmo-4</italic> extends lifespan through its interactions with the calcium signaling genes, <italic>crt-1, itr-1,</italic> and <italic>mcu-1</italic>.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> interacts with calcium signaling genes to promote longevity and paraquat resistance.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Survival analysis of wild-type (WT) and <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpressing (<italic>fmo-4</italic> OE) worms on empty vector (EV) and <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi. (<bold>B</bold>) Survival analysis of worms on EV and <italic>itr-1</italic> RNAi. (<bold>C</bold>) Survival analysis of worms on EV and <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi. For all lifespan analyses, n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments were performed. (<bold>D</bold>) Survival of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms on EV and <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage. (<bold>E</bold>) Survival of worms on EV and <italic>itr-1</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage. (<bold>F</bold>) Survival of worms on EV and <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage. For all paraquat survival assays, n = ~90 worms per condition, three replicate experiments performed. Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis and significant interactions between the condition of interest and genotype were determined at p &lt;0.01 using Cox regression analysis. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6sdata1">Figure 6—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6sdata2">Figure 6—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6sdata3">Figure 6—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6sdata4">Figure 6—source data 4</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata1"><label>Figure 6—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms on <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata2"><label>Figure 6—source data 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms on <italic>itr-1</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata3"><label>Figure 6—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms on <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6sdata4"><label>Figure 6—source data 4.</label><caption><title>Paraquat stress replicates of <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms on <italic>crt-1, itr-1</italic> and <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Lifespan and paraquat survival assessments of <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on <italic>crt-1, itr-1,</italic> and <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Lifespan assessment of wild-type (WT) and <italic>fmo-4</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO) worms on empty vector (EV) and <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi. (<bold>B</bold>) Lifespan assessment of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>itr-1</italic> RNAi. (<bold>C</bold>) Lifespan assessment of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi. For all lifespan assays, n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments performed. (<bold>D</bold>) Survival of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage. (<bold>E</bold>) Survival of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>itr-1</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage. (<bold>F</bold>) Survival of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage. (<bold>G</bold>) Survival of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpressing (OE) worms on EV and <italic>vdac-1</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage. (<bold>H</bold>) Survival of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>vdac-1</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage. For all paraquat survival assays, n = ~90 worms per condition, three replicate experiments performed. Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis and significant interactions between the condition of interest and genotype was determined at p&lt;0.01 using Cox regression analysis. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6s1sdata1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6s1sdata2">Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6s1sdata3">Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig6s1sdata4">Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 4</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6s1sdata1"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6s1sdata2"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on <italic>itr-1</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6s1sdata3"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-figsupp1-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig6s1sdata4"><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 4.</label><caption><title>Paraqaut stress assays of <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on <italic>crt-1, itr-1</italic>, <italic>mcu-1</italic>, and <italic>vdac-1</italic> RNAi replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-figsupp1-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig6-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>In addition to lifespan assessment, we were curious whether these genes also interact with <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression to modify resistance to paraquat. We exposed WT, <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE, and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms to 5 mM paraquat plates with RNAi for <italic>crt-1, itr-1</italic> or <italic>mcu-1</italic> and assessed survival over time. Interestingly, we find that <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi promotes resistance in WT worms and this effect is not additive in <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6D</xref>). Furthermore, <italic>crt-1</italic> RNAi extends the lifespan of <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1D</xref>), suggesting that <italic>crt-1</italic> and <italic>fmo-4</italic> act in the same pathway and that <italic>crt-1</italic> may act downstream of <italic>fmo-4</italic> to promote paraquat stress resistance. Neither <italic>itr-1</italic> RNAi nor <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi confers resistance to paraquat, and <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE resistance is lost when exposed to these RNAi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6E, F</xref>). The <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms show a decrease in paraquat survival when treated with <italic>itr-1</italic> and <italic>mcu-1</italic> RNAi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1E, F</xref>). We also measured paraquat stress resistance of <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE and KO worms exposed to RNAi of the voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (<italic>vdac-1</italic>)<italic>,</italic> which is located in the outer mitochondrial membrane and also regulates calcium flow into and out of the mitochondria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Shoshan-Barmatz et al., 2018</xref>). Interestingly, <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE resistance is lost when exposed to <italic>vdac-1</italic> RNAi and the <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms show no difference in paraquat survival compared to the EV RNAi control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1G, H</xref>). These data support a model where <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE converges onto a shared pathway mediating paraquat stress resistance and longevity regulation. Together, we conclude that <italic>fmo-4</italic> interacts with ER to mitochondrial calcium signaling through <italic>crt-1, itr-1,</italic> and <italic>mcu-1,</italic> to promote longevity and paraquat stress resistance.</p></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title><italic>atf-6</italic> KD regulates <italic>fmo-4</italic>-mediated longevity and paraquat resistance</title><p>Our data establish that <italic>fmo-4</italic> interacts with ER and mitochondrial calcium signaling to promote lifespan extension and resistance to paraquat. A previous study linked many of these components to a major regulator of UPR<sup>ER</sup>, activating transcription factor-6 (<italic>atf-6</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>). When <italic>atf-6</italic> is lost, lifespan is extended through changes in calcium signaling between the ER and mitochondria requiring <italic>crt-1, itr-1,</italic> and <italic>mcu-1</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>). Based on our transcriptomics data and <italic>fmo-4’s</italic> interactions with calcium signaling genes, we hypothesized that <italic>fmo-4</italic> could interact with <italic>atf-6</italic> to promote longevity and paraquat resistance. To test whether <italic>atf-6</italic> is regulating <italic>fmo-4,</italic> we utilized our <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> transcriptional reporter strain. We measured <italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression after RNAi knockdown of <italic>atf-6</italic> and find that <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> worms on <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi show a consistent ~two fold increase in fluorescence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A, B</xref>), similar to what we observe from calcium perturbations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B, C</xref>). Since <italic>atf-6</italic> is one of three branches of UPR<sup>ER</sup>, we were curious to see if <italic>fmo-4</italic> interacts specifically with <italic>atf-6</italic> or also with the other two branches, <italic>ire-1</italic>/<italic>xbp-1</italic> and <italic>pek-1</italic>/<italic>atf-4</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Read and Schröder, 2021</xref>). We treated the <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> reporter worms with <italic>ire-1, xbp-1, pek-1,</italic> or <italic>atf-4</italic> RNAi and measured fluorescence. We find that knocking down the components of the IRE-1 or PEK-1 branches does not induce <italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7s1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, B</xref>). Thus, only knockdown of the ATF-6 branch of UPR<sup>ER</sup> induces <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression.</p><fig-group><fig id="fig7" position="float"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title><italic>atf-6</italic> KD regulates <italic>fmo-4</italic>-mediated longevity and paraquat stress resistance.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Fluorescence imaging of the <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> reporter worms on empty vector (EV) and <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi. (<bold>B</bold>) Quantification of (<bold>A</bold>) (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>C</bold>) Lifespan analysis of wild-type (WT) and <italic>fmo-4</italic> knockout (<italic>fmo-4</italic> KO) worms on EV and <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi (n = ~120 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Survival of WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on EV and <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi exposed to 5 mM paraquat at L4 stage (n = ~90 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). Significance was determined at p&lt;0.05 using log-rank analysis and significant interactions between the condition of interest and genotype was determined at p&lt;0.01 using Cox regression analysis. (<bold>E</bold>) Working model showing that <italic>fmo-4</italic> acts downstream of multiple longevity promoters including dietary restriction, reduction in <italic>rsks-1,</italic> and reduction in <italic>atf-6</italic>. Reduced expression of <italic>atf-6</italic> induces <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression, which regulates calcium regulation from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the mitochondria to promote lifespan extension and paraquat stress resistance. For imaging experiments, * denotes significant change at p&lt;0.05 using unpaired two-tailed t test. N.S. = not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata1">Figure 7—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata2">Figure 7—source data 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata3">Figure 7—source data 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7sdata4">Figure 7—source data 4</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata1"><label>Figure 7—source data 1.</label><caption><title><italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi imaging replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig7-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata2"><label>Figure 7—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Quantification of <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi imaging replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig7-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata3"><label>Figure 7—source data 3.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi lifespan replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig7-data3-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7sdata4"><label>Figure 7—source data 4.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms on <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi paraquat stress replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig7-data4-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig7-v1.tif"/></fig><fig id="fig7s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression is not induced by the other branches of UPR<sup>ER</sup>.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Fluorescence images of the <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> reporter worms on empty vector (EV) RNAi, <italic>atf-4</italic> RNAi, <italic>pek-1</italic> RNAi, <italic>ire-1</italic> RNAi, and <italic>xbp-1</italic> RNAi, quantified in (<bold>B</bold>) (n = ~20 worms per condition, three replicate experiments). * denotes significant change in fluorescence compared to EV RNAi control. p&lt;0.05 using unpaired two-tailed t test. N.S. =not significant. All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7s1sdata1">Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="fig7s1sdata2">Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2</xref>.</p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7s1sdata1"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1.</label><caption><title>Fluorescent images of reporter worms on <italic>atf-4, pek-1, ire-1</italic>, and <italic>xbp-1</italic> RNAi replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig7-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p><p><supplementary-material id="fig7s1sdata2"><label>Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 2.</label><caption><title>Quantification of fluorescent images of reporter worms on <italic>atf-4, pek-1, ire-1,</italic> and <italic>xbp-1</italic> RNAi replicates.</title></caption><media mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig7-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip"/></supplementary-material></p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="elife-99971-fig7-figsupp1-v1.tif"/></fig></fig-group><p>We hypothesized that <italic>atf-6</italic> limits <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression and thus <italic>fmo-4</italic> acts downstream of <italic>atf-6</italic> knockdown to modulate lifespan extension. To test this, we assessed survival and find that while <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi extends the lifespan of WT worms, as reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>), this effect is abrogated when <italic>fmo-4</italic> is knocked out (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7C</xref>). This result suggests that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is indeed acting downstream of <italic>atf-6</italic> to promote longevity. To determine if <italic>atf-6</italic> is also involved in <italic>fmo-4-</italic>mediated paraquat resistance, we exposed WT and <italic>fmo-4</italic> KO worms to 5 mM paraquat plates with <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi. We find that <italic>atf-6</italic> RNAi promotes stress resistance to paraquat, but this effect is lost when <italic>fmo-4</italic> is knocked out, supporting the hypothesis that <italic>atf-6</italic> is involved in <italic>fmo-4-</italic>mediated paraquat resistance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7D</xref>). Together, these data suggest that <italic>fmo-4</italic> modulates lifespan and paraquat stress resistance downstream of the reduction in <italic>atf-6</italic>, ultimately regulating ER to mitochondria calcium signaling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7E</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Together, our data present a model where <italic>fmo-4</italic> acts downstream of DR and mTOR to positively affect healthspan and longevity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B–C</xref>). <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpression is sufficient to provide these benefits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) and does not require the DR-mediating family member, <italic>fmo-2</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Our results also suggest that <italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression is upregulated upon changes in intracellular calcium, and that <italic>fmo-4</italic> interacts with calcium signaling through key genes like <italic>crt-1, itr-1,</italic> and <italic>mcu-1</italic>, to promote longevity and paraquat stress resistance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figures 5</xref>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">6</xref>). The relationship between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and calcium is further illustrated by <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE’s susceptibility to thapsigargin, a calcium-mediated ER stress. Furthermore, we find that knocking down the UPR<sup>ER</sup> transcription factor and calcium regulator, <italic>atf-6,</italic> induces <italic>fmo-4</italic> gene expression and requires <italic>fmo-4</italic> to promote longevity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Collectively, our data suggest that <italic>fmo-4</italic> promotes longevity and paraquat stress resistance by regulating calcium homeostasis between the ER and mitochondria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7E</xref>).</p><p>Previous studies from our lab have elucidated how <italic>C. elegans fmo-2</italic> promotes longevity through endogenous metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Choi et al., 2023</xref>). Based on the conservation within the <italic>fmo</italic> gene family and that multiple Fmos are induced in long-lived worms and mammals, it was reasonable to hypothesize that Fmos could play overlapping roles in longevity regulation. Our data here support the broader hypothesis that Fmos have a conserved role in aging, but interestingly, that the mechanisms by which they modulate aging are separable. Importantly, we find that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is required for multiple longevity-promoting pathways, including DR and mTOR, but is not required for lifespan extension through the hypoxic response, insulin-like signaling, or cytochrome c reductase pathways. We also find that <italic>fmo-4</italic> does not require <italic>fmo-2,</italic> but that <italic>fmo-2</italic> does require <italic>fmo-4</italic>. This is interesting because not only do these data tell us that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is important in the context of longevity, but also that it acts distinctly from <italic>fmo-2</italic>.</p><p>After creating ubiquitous and hypodermal-specific <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpressing strains, we find that <italic>fmo-4</italic> is sufficient for longevity and paraquat stress resistance but not heat, tunicamycin, or thapsigargin stress. These results further differentiate <italic>fmo-4</italic> from <italic>fmo-2</italic> and also provide insight into <italic>fmo-4’s</italic> potential roles in the cell. For instance, <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms’ resistance to paraquat could suggest a role in responding to or controlling reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in the mitochondria. Additionally, <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms’ sensitivity to thapsigargin likely points towards an involvement in ER calcium regulation. These are both interesting plausible roles for <italic>fmo-4,</italic> and may go hand in hand, as calcium levels are known to impact ROS levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Görlach et al., 2015</xref>), and changes in ROS levels are known to impact ER calcium release (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Görlach et al., 2015</xref>). Based on this and the data with calcium perturbations, we speculate that FMO-4 acts as a calcium sensor, and when calcium levels are too high or too low, FMO-4 responds by regulating downstream calcium signaling proteins to restore homeostasis in the cell. As FMO-4 is a predicted ER transmembrane protein, we hypothesize that FMO-4 is sensing changes in calcium levels in the ER and/or cytosol.</p><p>We note that our data reveal genetic interactions between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and other longevity pathways like DR, mTOR, FMO-2<italic>,</italic> and ATF-6. However, it is important to also understand on the protein level how FMO-4 is interacting with these pathways and how FMO-4 is regulating downstream calcium signaling components to promote longevity and paraquat stress resistance. For instance, it was previously shown that rabbit FMO protein forms a complex with calreticulin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Guan et al., 1991</xref>). It is possible that an increase in FMO-4 leads to more binding between FMO-4 and calreticulin, which ultimately prevents calreticulin from binding ER calcium. This would then allow for proper calcium flux from the ER to the mitochondria via the IP<sub>3</sub>R and MCU, respectively. Our future work will look into these protein interactions so that we can further tease apart the FMO-4-mediated longevity pathway. We also note that we have utilized RNAi knockdown rather than knockout mutants to assess these genetic interactions with <italic>fmo-4</italic>. In particular, we were wary of knocking out crucial calcium regulating genes, like <italic>itr-1</italic> and <italic>mcu-1,</italic> that already result in some level of sickness in the worms when knocked down (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>) or could potentially lead to other confounding metabolic changes if knocked out. We were able to obtain robust and reproducible results using RNAi knockdown, but recognize the caveats that come with not testing full deletion mutants.</p><p>While our transcriptomics analysis and calcium manipulations suggest <italic>fmo-4</italic> involvement in calcium regulation, there are other measures that can better assess an interaction between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and calcium. Carbachol and EDTA supplementation are not perfect assessments of altered calcium levels, as carbachol does not act in every tissue and EDTA may be depleting more than just calcium from the cell. Thus, future studies should measure calcium levels and calcium flux in <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE and KO worms using GCaMP expressing worms to determine the direct link between <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression and calcium in the cell. Additionally, to determine if FMO-4 is acting as a calcium sensor or interacting with one to regulate calcium homeostasis, development of FMO-4 antibodies for immunoprecipitation assays would be useful (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Kaufmann and Sauter, 2017</xref>). Together, it will be important to establish the biochemical parameters of the FMO-4 calcium interaction.</p><p>As calcium signaling occurs between the ER and the mitochondria, our results could have interesting implications in ER-mitochondrial metabolism. We would expect that FMO-4 regulates ER-mitochondria metabolism because (1) FMO-4 is a predicted ER transmembrane protein and blocking the expression of another ER transmembrane protein, ATF-6, induces the expression of <italic>fmo-4</italic>, (2) <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms are highly sensitive to ER calcium stress but resistant to ROS induced stress, (3) lifespan extension driven by <italic>fmo-4</italic> depends on mitochondrial calcium import (<italic>mcu-1</italic>), and (4) Fmo gene expression is induced by mitochondrial inhibitors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Huang et al., 2021</xref>). Additionally, changes in mitochondrial calcium import affect various mitochondrial measures like respiration, dynamics (i.e. fission and fusion), membrane potential, and TCA cycle activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Duchen, 2000</xref>). Future studies will delve into how <italic>fmo-4</italic> perturbations impact each of these measures and if they act in the <italic>fmo-4-</italic>mediated longevity pathway. Based on our data, we speculate that <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE may increase mitochondrial calcium by regulating <italic>mcu-1</italic> activity, and that <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms may in turn be regulating ROS production in the mitochondria. We hypothesize that changes in <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression will alter mitochondrial respiration, dynamics, membrane potential, and TCA cycle activity. Taken together, future experiments will shed light on the role that FMOs play in calcium regulation and mitochondrial metabolism and will help to further tease apart the FMO-mediated longevity pathway.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and methods</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Strains and growth conditions</title><p>Standard <italic>C. elegans</italic> cultivation procedures were used as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). Briefly, all worm strains were maintained on solid nematode growth media (NGM) using <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 throughout life except where double stranded (ds) RNAi (<italic>E. coli</italic> HT115) were used. Worms were transferred using a platinum wire. All worm strains were kept at 20 °C. RNAi used is listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp3">Supplementary file 3</xref>. Worm strains are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp4">Supplementary file 4</xref>. Genotyping primers are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp5">Supplementary file 5</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Development assays</title><p>Animals were synchronized by placing 10 gravid adult worms on NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 to lay eggs for 1 hr at 20 °C. The gravid adult worms were then removed, and the eggs were allowed to hatch and develop at 20 °C until larval stage 2 (L2). At this point the L2 worms were moved to individual 35 mm NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50, one worm per plate. This was done for each worm strain tested and ten total 35 mm plates per worm strain were prepared. The worms were then followed through development and watched hourly during young adulthood to score the time of the first egg lay, as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). Development time was reported in hours since egg lay. Three replicate experiments were performed. For development on DMSO control or thapsigargin, the same protocol was followed except that the L2 worms were moved to individual 35 mm NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 that were spotted with either DMSO or 1 mg/mL thapsigargin, one worm per plate.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Stress resistance assays</title><sec id="s4-3-1"><title>Paraquat stress assay</title><p>Paraquat (Methyl viologen dichloride hydrate, 856177, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to induce oxidative stress. Worms were synchronized from eggs on either NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 or RNAi plates seeded with HT115 strain expressing dsRNAi for a particular gene. At L4 stage, 30 worms were transferred to either NGM plates or RNAi-FUdR (40690016, Bioworld) plates containing 5 mM paraquat dissolved in water. Three plates per strain per condition were prepared, for a total of 90 worms per condition. As previously described, worms were then scored every other day and considered dead when they did not move in response to prodding under a dissection microscope (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). Worms that crawled off the plate were not considered, but ruptured worms were noted and considered. Three replicate experiments were performed. Log-rank test was used to derive p-value for paraquat stress resistance survival assays using p&lt;0.05 cut-off threshold compared to EV or wild-type controls. Cox regression was also used to assess interactions between genotype and condition for paraquat stress resistance survival assays using p&lt;0.01 cut-off threshold compared to controls.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3-2"><title>Heat stress assay</title><p>Worms were synchronized from eggs on NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50. Once the worms reached day 1 of adulthood, 25 worms of each strain were transferred to 35 mm NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>). Four plates per strain per condition were prepared, for a total of 100 worms per condition. The plates were placed in a single layer on a tray and incubated at 37 °C for 3 hr. After 3 hr, the plates were removed and placed at 20 °C for 24 hr to give the worms time to recover. After 24 hr, the number of dead and alive worms was counted. % Alive was calculated as (# alive/# total)×100 and graphed in Graphpad Prism using unpaired two-tailed t tests with Welch’s correction as well as one-way ANOVA to determine significance. Three replicate experiments were performed.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3-3"><title>Tunicamycin stress assay</title><p><italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 was cultured at 37 °C shaking overnight and then centrifuged and concentrated to 100 x. 100 µL of bacteria was added to 9.9 mL of S-media to create a 1 x mixture. 100 µL of this bacteria/S-media mixture was added to the wells of a Falcon non tissue culture treated clear flat bottom 96 well plate (Falcon, 351172). Approximately 20 eggs per worm strain were added to the wells of the 96 well plate as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). Three replicates per worm strain were added to the 96-well plate, for a total of 60 eggs per worm strain. Then either 0, 1, 2, or 5 µg/mL of tunicamycin (Sigma, T7765) diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma, D2650) was added to the wells. Total volume per well was 100 µL. The plate was incubated covered at room temperature on an orbital shaker for 72 hr. After 72 hr, each well containing worms was rinsed with 100 µL M9 and then added to individual 35 mm NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 to sit covered at room temperature overnight. The following day, plates were assessed for live adults. % Alive Adults was calculated by determining how many of the three technical replicates of a given strain showed at least one live adult and then graphed in Microsoft Excel. Three replicate experiments were performed.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3-4"><title>Thapsigargin stress assay</title><p>To assess development of worms during chronic ER calcium stress, NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 were spotted with 25 µL 1 mg/mL thapsigargin in DMSO (Sigma) or DMSO only directly on to the <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 lawns and allowed to dry overnight. Then, 30 synchronized L1’s per worm strain were added directly to the spotted lawns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Burkewitz et al., 2020</xref>). Forty-eight hours later, worms were picked off these plates, added to a 2% agarose pad on a glass slide, anesthetized in 0.5 M sodium azide (Sigma), and imaged at 6.3 x magnification (brightfield) with the LASx software and Leica scope. Three replicates were performed. Each worm was recorded in ImageJ. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism using unpaired two-tailed t tests with Welch’s correction.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Thrashing assays</title><p>Animals were synchronized by placing 10 gravid adult worms on NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 and allowing them to lay eggs for 2 hr at 20 °C. The gravid adult worms were then removed, and the eggs were allowed to hatch and develop at 20 °C until day 1 adulthood. Worms were placed in a drop of M9 solution, as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). The individual body bends were counted at maximum rate for 30 s. Thrashing was assayed on day 2 and day 10 of adulthood. The animals that were not used for the day 2 assay were transferred to fresh fed FUdR plates four times until they were ready to be assayed. Three replicates were performed. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism using unpaired two-tailed t tests with Welch’s correction as well as one-way ANOVA.</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Lifespan assays</title><p>Gravid adults were placed on NGM plates containing 1 mM β-D-isothiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), 25 μg/ml carbenicillin, and the corresponding RNA interference (RNAi) clone from the Vidal or Ahringer RNAi library. 200 µL of HT115 bacteria expressing double stranded (ds) RNA of either the control empty vector (EV) or the RNAi of interest at optical density (OD) of 3.0 and concentration of 3 X was added to each plate. After 3 hr, the adults were removed, and the eggs were allowed to develop at 20 °C until they reached late L4/young adult stage. From here, 70 worms were placed on each RNAi plate and transferred to fresh RNAi +FUDR plates on day 1, day 2, day 4, and day 6 of adulthood. A minimum of two plates per strain per condition were used per replicate experiment. Experimental animals were scored every 2–3 d and considered dead when they did not move in response to prodding under a dissection microscope. Worms that crawled off the plate were not considered, but ruptured worms were considered as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>). A similar method was used for non-RNAi lifespan experiments, except the plates did not contain IPTG and worms were fed <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50. 200 µL of <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 at OD of 3.0 and concentration of 3 X was added to each plate. A similar method was also used for carbachol (Thermo Fisher, L06674.14) and EDTA (Thermo Fisher, AM9260G) supplementation lifespan experiments, except 50 µM carbachol or 50 µM EDTA was added to the NGM plates without IPTG, and worms were fed <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50. 200 µL of <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 at OD of 3.0 and concentration of 3 X was added to each plate. Optimal concentrations of carbachol and EDTA (50 µM) were determined by assessing survivability of worms exposed to a range of concentrations. Log-rank test was used to derive p-value for lifespan assays using p&lt;0.05 cut-off threshold compared to EV or wild-type controls. Cox regression was also used to assess interactions between genotype and condition for lifespan assays sing p&lt;0.01 cut-off threshold compared to controls.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Dietary restriction (sDR) lifespan assay</title><p>Gravid adults were placed on NGM plates seeded with 200 µL <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50. After 3 hr, the adults were removed, and the eggs were allowed to develop at 20 °C until they reached late L4/young adult stage. From here, 70 worms were transferred to fed FUdR plates seeded with 200 µL of <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 at OD of 3.0 and concentrated 3 X on days 1 and 2 of adulthood. On day 3 of adulthood, DR conditions were transferred to plates with 10<sup>9</sup> seeded lawns and transferred every other day four times while the corresponding controls were transferred equally to fed ad-lib plates. This form of DR is termed solid DR (sDR; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Greer and Brunet, 2009</xref>). 80 µL of 10 mM palmitic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 100% EtOH was added to the outer rim of the plate to prevent fleeing. A minimum of two plates per strain per condition were used per replicate experiment. Experimental animals were scored every 2–3 d and considered dead when they did not move in response to prodding under a dissection microscope. Worms that crawled off the plate were not considered, but ruptured worms were considered as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Leiser et al., 2015</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Transcriptomic analysis</title><p>Approximately 600 day 1 adult worms per biological replicate were washed with M9 buffer three times, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at –80 °C. RNA was extracted by adding 500 mL of Trizol reagent to the frozen worm pellets, followed by three freeze-thaw cycles with liquid nitrogen and water bath at 42 °C. Then, 500 µL of ethanol was added to the samples, and RNA was isolated using the Direct-Zol Miniprep Plus Kit (Cat#R2072). Purified RNA was sent to Novogene (Novogene Corporation Inc) for sequencing on the Illumina HWI-ST1276 instrument. Messenger RNA was purified from total RNA by using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. After fragmentation, first strand cDNA was synthesized using random hexamer primers, followed by second strand cDNA. The library was constructed, which entailed end repair, A-tailing, adapter ligation, size selection, amplification, and purification, and then was sequenced on an Illumina device using paired-end sequencing. Gene ontology analysis was done using the National Institutes of Health DAVID Bioinformatics tool. The dataset has been submitted to GEO NCBI (GEO accession #GSE288007).</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Gene expression assays</title><p>RNA was isolated from day 1 adult worms (approximately 600 worms per strain) following three rounds of freeze-thaw in liquid nitrogen using Invitrogen’s Trizol extraction method, similar to the method described above. 1 µg of isolated and purified RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (18064071, Invitrogen,). Gene expression levels were measured using 600 ng of cDNA and SYBR Green PCR Mastermix (A25742, Applied Biosystems) with primers at 10 μM concentration. mRNA levels were normalized using Y45F10D.4 as a reference gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Taki and Zhang, 2013</xref>). List of qPCR primers used are in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp6">Supplementary file 6</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> induction on RNAi</title><p>Gravid <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> transcriptional reporter adult animals were placed on NGM plates containing 1 mM β-D-isothiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), 25 μg/ml carbenicillin, and the corresponding RNAi clone from the Vidal or Ahringer RNAi library. After 3 hr, the adults were removed, and the eggs were allowed to develop at 20 °C until they reached late L4/young adult stage. Then 40–50 worms per plate were transferred to similar plates that contain FUdR for overnight. The following day, ~20 worms per condition were picked off these plates, added to a 2% agarose pad on a glass slide, anesthetized in 0.5 M sodium azide (Sigma), and imaged at 6.3 x magnification with the LASx software and Leica scope using the mCherry fluorescence channel (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Miller et al., 2022</xref>). Three replicates were performed. Fluorescent intensity in the mCherry channel was measured in ImageJ. Brightness of images within a dataset was increased to the same level. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism using unpaired two-tailed t tests with Welch’s correction.</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> induction on carbachol</title><p>Gravid <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> transcriptional reporter adult animals were placed on NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50. After 3 hr, the adults were removed, and the eggs were allowed to develop at 20 °C until they reached late L4/young adult stage. Then 30 worms were transferred to NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 also containing either 300 µM carbachol (Thermo Fisher, L06674.14) or water. An optimal concentration of carbachol was determined by first assessing survivability of worms exposed to a range of concentrations and then by assessing fluorescence of the <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> reporter worms exposed to a range of concentrations. The worms were incubated for 24 hr at 20 °C. After 24 hr, ~20 worms per condition were then picked off these plates and added to unseeded NGM plates, anesthetized in 0.5 M sodium azide (Sigma), and imaged at 6.3 x magnification with the LASx software and Leica scope using the mCherry fluorescence channel (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Miller et al., 2022</xref>). Three replicates were performed. Each worm was measured for fluorescence in ImageJ. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism using t tests.</p></sec><sec id="s4-11"><title><italic>fmo-4</italic> induction assay on EDTA</title><p>Gravid <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> transcriptional reporter adult animals were placed on NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50. After 3 hr, the adults were removed, and the eggs were allowed to develop at 20 °C until they reached late L4/young adult stage. Then 30 worms were transferred to NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 topically spotted with 150 µL of 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (ThermoFisher, AM9260G) or 150 µL of water. An optimal concentration of EDTA was determined by first assessing survivability of worms exposed to a range of concentrations and then by assessing the fluorescence of the <italic>fmo-4p::mCherry</italic> reporter worms exposed to a range of concentrations. The worms were incubated for 24 hr at 20 °C. After 24 hr, ~20 worms per condition were then picked off these plates and added to unseeded NGM plates, anesthetized in 0.5 M sodium azide (Sigma), and imaged at 6.3 x magnification with the LASx software and Leica scope using the mCherry fluorescence channel (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Miller et al., 2022</xref>). Three replicates were performed. Each worm was recorded in ImageJ. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism using t tests.</p></sec><sec id="s4-12"><title>GCaMP7f induction assay on carbachol and EDTA</title><p>Gravid GCaMP7f (SWF702; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Dag et al., 2023</xref>) adult worms were placed on NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50. After 3 hr, the adults were removed, and the eggs were allowed to develop at 20 °C until they reached late L4/young adult stage. Then 30 worms were transferred to NGM plates seeded with <italic>E. coli</italic> OP50 topically spotted with 150 µL of 0.5 M EDTA(Thermo Fisher, AM9260G), 300 µM carbachol (Thermo Fisher, L06674.14), or water. The worms were incubated for 24 hr at 20 °C. After 24 hr, ~20 worms per condition were then picked off these plates and added to unseeded NGM plates, anesthetized in 0.5 M sodium azide (Sigma), and imaged at 6.3 x magnification with the LASx software and Leice scope using the GFP fluorescence channel. Three replicates were performed. Each worm was recorded in ImageJ, with focus on the head region to assess neuronal expression. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism using t tests. For time course assays, gravid GCaMP7f adult worms were placed on unseeded NGM plates, anesthetized in 0.5 M sodium azide (Sigma), and imaged at 6.3 x magnification with the LASx software and Leica scope using the GFP fluorescence channel. Then 2 µL of either 300 µM carbachol or 10 mM EDTA were added to the worms and they were imaged using the GFP fluorescence channel at 0.5 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, and 20 min. Three replicates were performed. Each worm was recorded in ImageJ, with focus on the head region to assess neuronal expression. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism using t tests.</p></sec><sec id="s4-13"><title>Statistical analyses</title><p>Log-rank test was used to derive p-value for lifespan and stress resistance survival assays using p&lt;0.05 cut-off threshold compared to EV or wild-type controls. Cox regression was also used to assess interactions between genotype and condition for lifespans and stress resistance survival assays using p&lt;0.01 cut-off threshold compared to controls. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="sdata3">Source data 3</xref> provides the results of the Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis, which were run in RStudio.</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="additional-information" id="s5"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf1"><p>No competing interests declared</p></fn><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="conf2"><p>Reviewing editor, eLife</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>Investigation, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>Investigation, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>Investigation, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con7"><p>Investigation, Writing – review and editing</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con8"><p>Investigation</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con9"><p>Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review and editing</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s6"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="supp1"><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>qPCR validation of worm strains.</title><p>All replicate data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="supp7">Supplementary file 7</xref>.</p></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-supp1-v1.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp2"><label>Supplementary file 2.</label><caption><title>RNA-sequencing calcium-related transcripts from DAVID analysis.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-supp2-v1.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp3"><label>Supplementary file 3.</label><caption><title>List of RNAi used.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-supp3-v1.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp4"><label>Supplementary file 4.</label><caption><title>List of worm strains used in this paper.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-supp4-v1.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp5"><label>Supplementary file 5.</label><caption><title>List of genotyping primers used to validate worm strains.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-supp5-v1.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp6"><label>Supplementary file 6.</label><caption><title>List of qPCR primers used to validate worm strains.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-supp6-v1.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="supp7"><label>Supplementary file 7.</label><caption><title>qPCR validation of worm strains replicates.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-supp7-v1.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="mdar"><label>MDAR checklist</label><media xlink:href="elife-99971-mdarchecklist1-v1.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="sdata1"><label>Source data 1.</label><caption><title>RNA-sequencing results showing the significantly upregulated and significantly downregulated transcripts when <italic>fmo-4</italic> is overexpressed in <italic>C. elegans</italic>.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-data1-v1.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="sdata2"><label>Source data 2.</label><caption><title>DAVID analysis shows that calcium ion binding transcripts are regulated when <italic>fmo-4</italic> is overexpressed in <italic>C. elegans</italic>.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-data2-v1.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="xlsx"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="sdata3"><label>Source data 3.</label><caption><title>Log-rank and Cox regression analyses of all lifespans and stress resistance assays which were run in RStudio.</title></caption><media xlink:href="elife-99971-data3-v1.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip"/></supplementary-material></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7"><title>Data availability</title><p>Replicate data for all figures and figure supplements can be found in the source data files. Additionally, the RNA-sequencing dataset has been submitted to GEO NCBI (GEO accession #GSE288007).</p><p>The following dataset was generated:</p><p><element-citation publication-type="data" specific-use="isSupplementedBy" id="dataset1"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tuckowski</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Beydoun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitto</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Howington</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Sridhar</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhandari</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chambers</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year><data-title>fmo-4 promotes longevity and stress resistance via ER to mitochondria calcium regulation in <italic>C. elegans</italic></data-title><source>NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus</source><pub-id pub-id-type="accession" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE288007">GSE288007</pub-id></element-citation></p></sec><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by grants from NIH. AMT was supported by NIH T32AG000114 and the University of Michigan Rackham Research Grant. SFL was supported by R01AG075061 and the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research.</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berridge</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1993">1993</year><article-title>Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>361</volume><fpage>315</fpage><lpage>325</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/361315a0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8381210</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bodkin</surname><given-names>NL</given-names></name><name><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ortmeyer</surname><given-names>HK</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansen</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Mortality and morbidity in laboratory-maintained rhesus monkeys and effects of long-term dietary restriction</article-title><source>The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>212</fpage><lpage>219</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gerona/58.3.b212</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12634286</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkewitz</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Dutta</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelley</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Steinbaugh</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Cram</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mair</surname><given-names>WB</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Atf-6 regulates lifespan through ER-mitochondrial calcium homeostasis</article-title><source>Cell Reports</source><volume>32</volume><elocation-id>108125</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108125</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32905769</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>C. elegans Deletion Mutant Consortium</collab></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>large-scale screening for targeted knockouts in the <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> genome</article-title><source>G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>1415</fpage><lpage>1425</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/g3.112.003830</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23173093</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Howington</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Schaller</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Cox</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Beydoun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Tuckowski</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Mecano</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Beard</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>FMO rewires metabolism to promote longevity through tryptophan and one carbon metabolism in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>14</volume><elocation-id>562</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-023-36181-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36732543</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dag</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Nwabudike</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomes</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Atanas</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Bueno</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Estrem</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pugliese</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Towlson</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Flavell</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Dissecting the functional organization of the <italic>C. elegans</italic> serotonergic system at whole-brain scale</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>186</volume><fpage>2574</fpage><lpage>2592</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.023</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37192620</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duchen</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year><article-title>Mitochondria and calcium: from cell signalling to cell death</article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>529 Pt 1</volume><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00057.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11080251</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Görlach</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertram</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hudecova</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Krizanova</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Calcium and ROS: a mutual interplay</article-title><source>Redox Biology</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>260</fpage><lpage>271</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26296072</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Greer</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Brunet</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year><article-title>Different dietary restriction regimens extend lifespan by both independent and overlapping genetic pathways in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>Aging Cell</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00459.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19239417</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Groenendyk</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Agellon</surname><given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Michalak</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Calcium signaling and endoplasmic reticulum stress</article-title><source>International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology</source><volume>363</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/bs.ircmb.2021.03.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34392927</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guan</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Falick</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>DE</given-names></name><name><surname>Cashman</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1991">1991</year><article-title>Evidence for complex formation between rabbit lung flavin-containing monooxygenase and calreticulin</article-title><source>Biochemistry</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>9892</fpage><lpage>9900</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi00105a012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1911780</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Howington</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobry</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>Flavin-containing monooxygenases are conserved regulators of stress resistance and metabolism</article-title><source>Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology</source><volume>9</volume><elocation-id>630188</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcell.2021.630188</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33644069</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kapahi</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaeberlein</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Dietary restriction and lifespan: lessons from invertebrate models</article-title><source>Ageing Research Reviews</source><volume>39</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.arr.2016.12.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28007498</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaufmann</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sauter</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Pull-down assay to characterize ca</article-title><source>Methods in Molecular Biology</source><volume>1621</volume><fpage>151</fpage><lpage>159</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-4939-7063-6_15</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kenyon</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>The genetics of ageing</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>464</volume><fpage>504</fpage><lpage>512</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature08980</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20336132</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kimura</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Tissenbaum</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruvkun</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="1997">1997</year><article-title>daf-2, an insulin receptor-like gene that regulates longevity and diapause in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Science</source><volume>277</volume><fpage>942</fpage><lpage>946</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.277.5328.942</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9252323</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kishore</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Arnaboldi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Slyke</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nash</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Urbano</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Dolan</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Engel</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimoyama</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sternberg</surname><given-names>PW</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year><article-title>Automated generation of gene summaries at the alliance of genome resources</article-title><source>Database</source><volume>2020</volume><elocation-id>baaa037</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/database/baaa037</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32559296</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krueger</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>DE</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Mammalian flavin-containing monooxygenases: structure/function, genetic polymorphisms and role in drug metabolism</article-title><source>Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics</source><volume>106</volume><fpage>357</fpage><lpage>387</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.01.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15922018</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hwang</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kenyon</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2010">2010</year><article-title>Inhibition of respiration extends <italic>C. elegans</italic> life span via reactive oxygen species that increase HIF-1 activity</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>2131</fpage><lpage>2136</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.057</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21093262</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name><name><surname>Fletcher</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Begun</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaeberlein</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Life-span extension from hypoxia in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> requires both HIF-1 and DAF-16 and is antagonized by SKN-1</article-title><source>The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences</source><volume>68</volume><fpage>1135</fpage><lpage>1144</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gerona/glt016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23419779</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Rossner</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Fletcher</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Leonard</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Primitivo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rintala</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>FJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaeberlein</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year><article-title>Cell nonautonomous activation of flavin-containing monooxygenase promotes longevity and health span</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>350</volume><fpage>1375</fpage><lpage>1378</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aac9257</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26586189</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marchi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinton</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year><article-title>The mitochondrial calcium uniporter complex: molecular components, structure and physiopathological implications</article-title><source>The Journal of Physiology</source><volume>592</volume><fpage>829</fpage><lpage>839</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1113/jphysiol.2013.268235</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24366263</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Masoumi</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghollasi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Eftekhari</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghiasi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Carbachol, along with calcium, indicates new strategy in neural differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells <italic>in vitro</italic></article-title><source>Regenerative Therapy</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>60</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.reth.2023.04.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37122359</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mellau</surname><given-names>LS</given-names></name><name><surname>Jørgensen</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year><article-title>Does EDTA-infusion affect calcium homeostatis leading to increased resistance to challenge?</article-title><source>Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Supplementum</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14621393</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Schaller</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Tuckowski</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Munneke</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Beydoun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pletcher</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year><article-title>Serotonin and dopamine modulate aging in response to food odor and availability</article-title><source>Nature Communications</source><volume>13</volume><elocation-id>3271</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-022-30869-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35672307</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>KZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Palter</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Rogers</surname><given-names>AN</given-names></name><name><surname>Olsen</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lithgow</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapahi</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year><article-title>Inhibition of mRNA translation extends lifespan in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Aging Cell</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>119</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00266.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17266680</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Jung</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>YS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JI</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Singson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>WK</given-names></name><name><surname>Eom</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Bandyopadhyay</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahnn</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2001">2001</year><article-title>Calreticulin, a calcium-binding molecular chaperone, is required for stress response and fertility in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>2835</fpage><lpage>2845</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.12.9.2835</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11553721</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petalcorin</surname><given-names>MIR</given-names></name><name><surname>Joshua</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name><name><surname>Agapow</surname><given-names>P-M</given-names></name><name><surname>Dolphin</surname><given-names>CT</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>The fmo genes of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> and <italic>C. briggsae</italic>: characterisation, gene expression and comparative genomic analysis</article-title><source>Gene</source><volume>346</volume><fpage>83</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2004.09.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15716098</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Read</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Schröder</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year><article-title>The unfolded protein response: an overview</article-title><source>Biology</source><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>384</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology10050384</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33946669</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rossner</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaeberlein</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year><article-title>Flavin-containing monooxygenases in aging and disease: emerging roles for ancient enzymes</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>292</volume><fpage>11138</fpage><lpage>11146</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.R117.779678</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28515321</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Nettleton</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Powell-Coffman</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year><article-title>Roles of the HIF-1 hypoxia-inducible factor during hypoxia response in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>280</volume><fpage>20580</fpage><lpage>20588</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M501894200</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shoshan-Barmatz</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Krelin</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Shteinfer-Kuzmine</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2018">2018</year><article-title>VDAC1 functions in Ca</article-title><source>Cell Calcium. Jan</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ceca.2017.06.007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soo</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Rudich</surname><given-names>ZD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Moldakozhayev</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>AlOkda</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Raamsdonk</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year><article-title>Biological resilience and aging: activation of stress response pathways contributes to lifespan extension</article-title><source>Ageing Research Reviews</source><volume>88</volume><elocation-id>101941</elocation-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.arr.2023.101941</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37127095</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steinbaugh</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>LY</given-names></name><name><surname>Bartke</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Activation of genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism is a shared signature of mouse models with extended lifespan</article-title><source>American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism</source><volume>303</volume><fpage>E488</fpage><lpage>E495</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpendo.00110.2012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22693205</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swindell</surname><given-names>WR</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year><article-title>Dietary restriction in rats and mice: a meta-analysis and review of the evidence for genotype-dependent effects on lifespan</article-title><source>Ageing Research Reviews</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>254</fpage><lpage>270</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22210149</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taki</surname><given-names>FA</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year><article-title>Determination of reliable reference genes for multi-generational gene expression analysis on <italic>C. elegans</italic> exposed to abused drug nicotine</article-title><source>Psychopharmacology</source><volume>230</volume><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00213-013-3139-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23681163</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="editor-report" id="sa0"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.99971.3.sa0</article-id><title-group><article-title>eLife Assessment</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Denzel</surname><given-names>Martin Sebastian</given-names></name><role specific-use="editor">Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Altos Labs</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="evidence-strength"><kwd>Convincing</kwd><kwd>Solid</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="claim-importance"><kwd>Important</kwd></kwd-group></front-stub><body><p>This <bold>important</bold> study offers <bold>convincing</bold> evidence that <italic>fmo-4</italic> plays essential roles in established lifespan interventions and downstream of its paralog <italic>fmo-2</italic>. The work is of substantial benefit for our understanding of this enzyme family, underscoring their importance in longevity and stress resistance. The study also suggests a connection between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and dysregulation of calcium signalling, with conclusions and interpretations based on <bold>solid</bold> genetic methodology and evidence.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.99971.3.sa1</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #1 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>This interesting and well-written article by Tuckowski et al. summarizes work connecting the flavin-containing monooxygenase FMO-4 with increased lifespan through a mechanism involving calcium signaling in the nematode <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>.</p><p>The authors have previously studied another fmo in worms, FMO-2, prompting them to look at additional members of this family of proteins. They show that fmo-4 is up in dietary restricted worms and necessary for the increased lifespan of these animals as well as of rsks-1 (s6 kinase) knockdown animals. They then show that overexpression of fmo-4 is sufficient to significantly increase lifespan, as well as healthspan and paraquat resistance. Further, they demonstrate that overexpression of fmo-4 solely in the hypodermis of the animal recapitulates the entire effect of fmo-4 OE.</p><p>In terms of interactions between fmo-2 and fmo-4 they show that fmo-4 is necessary for the previously reported effects of fmo-2 on lifespan, while the effects of fmo-4 do not depend on fmo-2.</p><p>Next the authors use RNASeq to compare fmo-4 OE animals to wild type. Their analyses suggested the possibility that FMO-4 was modulating calcium signaling, and through additional experiments specifically identified the calcium signaling genes crt-1, itr-1, and mcu-1 as important fmo-4 interactors in this context. As previously published work has shown that loss of the worm transcription factor atf-6 can extend lifespan through crt-1, itr-1 and mcu-1, the authors asked about interactions between fmo-4 and atf-6. They showed that fmo-4 is necessary for both lifespan extension and increased paraquat resistance upon RNAi knockdown of atf-6.</p><p>Overall this clearly written manuscript summarizes interesting and novel findings of great interest in the biology of aging, and suggests promising avenues for future work in this area.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>This paper contains a large number of careful, well executed and analysed experiments in support of its existing conclusions, and which also point toward significant future directions for this work. In addition it is clear and very well written.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>Within the scope of the current work there are no major weaknesses. That said, the authors themselves note pressing questions beyond the scope of this study that remain unanswered. For instance, the mechanistic nature of the interactions between FMO-4 and the other players in this story, for example in terms of direct protein-protein interactions, is not at all understood yet. Further, powerful tools such as GCaMP expressing animals will enable a much more detailed understanding of what exactly is happening to calcium levels, and where and when it is happening, in these animals.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.99971.3.sa2</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #2 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>Members of a conserved family of flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMOs) play key roles in lifespan extension induced by diet restriction and hypoxia. In <italic>C. elegans</italic>, fmo-2 has received the majority of attention, but there are multiple fmo genes in both worms and mammals, and how overlapping or distinct the functional roles of these paralogs are remains unclear. Here Tuckowski et al. identify that a new family member, fmo-4, is also a positive modulator of lifespan. Based on differential requirements of fmo-2 and fmo-4 in stress resistance and lifespan extension paradigms, however, the authors conclude that fmo-4 acts through mechanisms that are distinct from fmo-2. Ultimately, the authors place fmo-2 genetically within a pathway involving atf-6, calreticulin, the IP3 receptor, and mitochondrial calcium uniporter, which was previously shown to link ER calcium homeostasis to mitochondrial homeostasis and longevity. The authors thus achieve their overarching aim to reveal that different FMO family members regulate stress resistance and lifespan through distinct mechanisms. Furthermore, because the known enzymatic activity of FMOs involves oxygenating xenobiotic and endogenous metabolites, these findings highlight a potential new link between redox/metabolic homeostasis and ER-mitochondrial calcium signaling.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>The authors demonstrate links between multiple conserved life-extending signaling pathways and fmo-4, expanding both the significance and mechanistic diversity of FMO-family genes in aging and stress biology.</p><p>The authors use genetics to discover an interesting and unanticipated new link between FMOs and calcium pathways known to regulate lifespan.</p><p>The genetic epistasis patterns for lifespan and stress resistance phenotypes are generally clean and compelling.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>The authors achieve a necessary and valuable first step with regard to linking FMO-4 to calcium homeostasis, but the mechanisms involved remain preliminary at this stage. Specifically, the genetic interactions between fmo-4 and conserved mediators of calcium transport and signaling are convincing, but a putative molecular mechanism by which the activity of FMO-4 would alter subcellular calcium transport remains unclear and potentially indirect. The authors effectively highlight this gap as a key pursuit for subsequent studies.</p><p>The authors have shown that carbachol and EDTA produce the expected effects on a cytosolic calcium reporter in neurons, supporting the utility of the chemical approach in general, but validating that carbachol, EDTA and fmo-4 itself have an impact on calcium in the tissues and subcellular compartments relevant to the lifespan phenotypes would still be valuable in supporting the overall model. Notably, however, the hypodermal-specific role of FMO-4 suggests potential cell non-autonomous regulation of lifespan, such that this pathway may ultimately involve complex inter-cellular signaling that would necessitate substantially more time and effort.</p><p>Employing mutants and more sophisticated genetic tools for modulating calcium transport or signaling (in addition to RNAi) would strengthen key conclusions and/or help to elucidate tissue- or age-specific aspects of the proposed mechanism.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="referee-report" id="sa3"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.99971.3.sa3</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reviewer #3 (Public review):</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><anonymous/><role specific-use="referee">Reviewer</role></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>Summary:</p><p>The authors assessed the potential involvement of fmo-4 in a diverse set of longevity interventions, showing that this gene is required for DR and S6 kinase knockdown related lifespan extension. Using comprehensive epistasis experiments they find this gene to be a required downstream player in the longevity and stress resistance provided by fmo-2 overexpression. They further showed that fmo-4 ubiquitous overexpression is sufficient to provide longevity and paraquat (mitochondrial) stress resistance, and that overexpression specifically in the hypodermis is sufficient to recapitulate most of these effects.</p><p>Interestingly, they find that fmo-4 overexpression sensitizes worms to thapsigargin during development, an effect that they link with a potential dysregulation in calcium signalling. They go on to show that fmo-4 expression is sensitive to drugs that both increase or decrease calcium levels, and these drugs differentially affect lifespan of fmo-4 mutants compared to wild-type worms. Similarly, knockdown of genes involved in calcium binding and signalling also differentially affect lifespan and paraquat resistance of fmo-4 mutants.</p><p>Finally, they suggest that atf-6 limits the expression of fmo-4, and that fmo-4 is also acting downstream of benefits produced by atf-6 knockdown.</p><p>Strengths:</p><p>• comprehensive lifespans experiments: clear placement of fmo-4 within established longevity interventions.</p><p>• clear distinction in functions and epistatic interactions between fmo-2 and fmo-4 which lays a strong foundation for a longevity pathway regulated by this enzyme family.</p><p>Weaknesses:</p><p>• no obvious transcriptomic evidence supporting a link between fmo-4 and calcium signalling: either for knockout worms or fmo-4 overexpressing strains.</p><p>• no direct measures of alterations in calcium flux, signalling or binding that strongly support a connection with fmo-4.</p><p>• no measures of mitochondrial morphology or activity that strongly support a connection with fmo-4.</p><p>• lack of a complete model that places fmo-4 function downstream of DR and mTOR signalling (first Results section), fmo-2 (second Results section) and at the same time explains connection with calcium signalling.</p><p>Comments on revisions:</p><p>The authors have addressed and fixed all the private comments we had made. In terms of the public comments, I think nothing has changed in terms of strengths and weaknesses. They have multiple independent results (drugs, RNAi and transcriptomics) that suggest a connection between fmo-4 and calcium regulation, but there is no strong evidence for what this connection is. The work still lacks direct measures of calcium, ER or mitochondrial function in relation to fmo-4 (which they acknowledge in the discussion). The first four sections strongly place fmo-4 within established longevity interventions, but their model doesn't explain how calcium regulation would fit into these.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="author-comment" id="sa4"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.99971.3.sa4</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tuckowski</surname><given-names>Angela M</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan-Ann Arbor</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Beydoun</surname><given-names>Safa</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan-Ann Arbor</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kitto</surname><given-names>Elizabeth S</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>Ajay</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan-Ann Arbor</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Howington</surname><given-names>Marshall B</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan-Ann Arbor</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sridhar</surname><given-names>Aditya</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan-Ann Arbor</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bhandari</surname><given-names>Mira</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan-Ann Arbor</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chambers</surname><given-names>Kelly</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan-Ann Arbor</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Leiser</surname><given-names>Scott F</given-names></name><role specific-use="author">Author</role><aff><institution>University of Michigan-Ann Arbor</institution><addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Ann Arbor</named-content></addr-line><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><p>The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Public Reviews:</bold></p><p><bold>Reviewer 1:</bold></p><p>Comment 1: Within the scope of the current work there are no major weaknesses. That said, the authors themselves note pressing questions beyond the scope of this study that remain unanswered. For instance, the mechanistic nature of the interactions between FMO-4 and the other players in this story, for example in terms of direct protein-protein interactions, is not at all understood yet.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for the positive review, and fully agree and acknowledge that there are unanswered questions for future studies that are beyond the scope of this manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer 2:</bold></p><p>Comment 1: The effects of carbachol and EDTA on intracellular calcium levels are inferred, especially in the tissues where fmo-4 is acting. Validating that these agents and fmo-4 itself have an impact on calcium in relevant subcellular compartments is important to support conclusions on how fmo-4 regulates and responds to calcium.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for this important suggestion. We agree that carbachol and EDTA can be broad agents and validating that they are altering calcium levels is very useful. While this is technically challenging, we attempted to address this by using neuronally expressed GCaMP7f calcium indicator worms and measuring their GFP fluorescence upon exposure to carbachol and EDTA. Assessing both short term and long term exposure to these agents, we were able to show that carbachol increases GFP fluorescence, indicating an increase in calcium levels, and EDTA decreases GFP fluorescence, indicating a decrease in calcium levels. Unfortunately, because FMO-4 is not neuronally expressed, we were not able to test the effects of FMO-4 on calcium in this strain, which would require hypodermal expression and possibly short-term modification of <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression to test. We have made sure to temper our language about the indirect measures we used.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 2: Experiments are generally reliant on RNAi. While in most cases experiments reveal positive results, indicating RNAi efficacy, key conclusions could be strengthened with the incorporation of mutants.</p></disp-quote><p>We appreciate and value this suggestion and agree that mutants could be helpful to strengthen our conclusions. We address this caveat in the discussion of the revised manuscript. We explain that we were concerned about knocking out key calcium regulating genes like <italic>itr-1</italic> and <italic>mcu-1</italic> that either already result in some level of sickness in the worms when knocked down (<italic>itr-1</italic>) or could lead to confounding metabolic changes if knocked out. We do find that our RNAi lifespan results are robust and reproducible, but we also understand and recognize the caveats that come with using RNAi knockdown instead of full deletion mutants.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer 3:</bold></p><p>Comment 1: no obvious transcriptomic evidence supporting a link between fmo-4 and calcium signaling: either for knockout worms or fmo-4 overexpressing strains.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for this feedback. While there is some transcriptomic evidence, we agree that it is not overwhelming evidence. We do think that this evidence, combined with the phenotype observed under thapsigargin (i.e., significant reduction in worm size and significant delay or prevention of development), in addition to the genetic connections to calcium regulation, provide additional compelling evidence that FMO-4 interacts with calcium signaling.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 2: no direct measures of alterations in calcium flux, signalling or binding that strongly support a connection with fmo-4.</p></disp-quote><p>As described in reviewer 2 comment 1, we have successfully used GCaMP7f worms to assess calcium flux upon exposure to carbachol and EDTA. This approach confirmed the changes in calcium expected from these compounds. Unfortunately, because FMO-4 is not neuronally expressed, we were not able to test the effects of FMO-4 on calcium in this strain, which would require hypodermal expression and possibly short-term modification of <italic>fmo-4</italic> expression to test. We have made sure to temper our language about the indirect measures we used.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 3: no measures of mitochondrial morphology or activity that strongly support a connection with fmo-4.</p></disp-quote><p>This is a great point, and something we are currently working on to include for a future manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 4: lack of a complete model that places fmo-4 function downstream of DR and mTOR signalling (first Results section), fmo-2 (second Results section) and at the same time explains connection with calcium signalling.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for this helpful feedback. We have included a more complete working model in our revision.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Recommendations for the authors:</bold></p><p><bold>Reviewer 1:</bold></p><p>Comment 1: &quot;We utilized fmo-4 (ok294) knockout (KO) animals on five conditions reported to extend lifespan in <italic>C. elegans</italic>.&quot; Here I believe &quot;fmo-4 (ok294)&quot; should be &quot;fmo-4(ok294)&quot;. (No space).</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for this helpful revision. We have made this change as suggested.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 2: &quot;Wild-type (WT) worms on DR experience a ~35% lifespan extension compared to fed WT worms, but when fmo-4 is knocked out this extension is reduced to ~10% and this interaction is significant by cox regression (p-value &lt; 4.50e-6).&quot; Here &quot;cox regression&quot; should be &quot;Cox regression&quot;.</p></disp-quote><p>We have made this change as suggested.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 3: &quot;Having established this role, we continued lifespan analyses of fmo-4 KO worms exposed to RNAi knockdown of the S6-kinase gene rsks-1 (mTOR signaling), the von hippel lindau gene vhl-1 (hypoxic signaling), the insulin receptor daf-2 (insulin-like signaling), and the cytochrome c reductase gene cyc-1 (mitochondrial electron transport chain, cytochrome c reductase) (Fig 1C-F).&quot; Here &quot;von hippel lindau&quot; should be &quot;Von Hippel-Lindau&quot;.</p></disp-quote><p>We have made this change as suggested.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 4: In three instances in the caption of Figure 5, the &quot;4&quot; in fmo-4 is not italicized when it should be.</p></disp-quote><p>We have made this change as suggested.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 5: In two instances in the caption of Figure 7, the &quot;4&quot; in fmo-4 is not italicized when it should be, and in one instance in the caption of Figure 7, the &quot;6&quot; in atf-6 is not italicized when it should be.</p></disp-quote><p>We have made this change as suggested.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 6: &quot;Supplemental Data 3 provides the results of the Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis, which were run in Rstudio.&quot; Here Rstudio should be RStudio.</p></disp-quote><p>We have made this change as suggested.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 7: In the references, within article titles italicization (e.g. of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>) is frequently missing. While this is often an artifact introduced by reference management software, it should be corrected in the final manuscript.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for all the helpful revision suggestions. We have made sure all the references are properly italicized where necessary.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p><bold>Reviewer 2:</bold></p><p>Comment 1: While FMO-4 is clearly placed in the ER calcium pathway genetically, the molecular mechanism by which FMO-4 would alter ER calcium is unclear. Notably, Tuckowski et al. highlight this gap in the discussion as well.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for identifying this important caveat. We hope to address the molecular mechanism by which FMO-4 alters ER calcium in upcoming projects.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 2: Determining whether overexpression of catalytically dead FMO-4 or introduction of an inactivating point mutant into the endogenous locus phenocopy FMO-4 OE and KO animals would help distinguish between mechanisms involving protein-protein interactions or downstream metabolic regulation.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for this valuable suggestion. This is an experiment we are hoping to do in the near future to better understand molecular mechanisms and protein-protein interactions.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Reviewer 3:</p><p>Comment 1: When measuring the effect of thapsigargin on development of fmo-4 mutants it would be great to use a developmental assay rather than quantifying normalized worm area. Also please add scale bars to Figure 3G and 4H, it seems that fmo-4 overexpression decreases worm size even in control conditions, clarify if this is the case.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for this feedback. In addition to quantifying normalized worm area in Figure 3G-I, we have added a developmental assay (Figure 3J) that shows the development time of wild-type worms on DMSO or thapsigargin as well as the <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms on DMSO or thapsigargin. These data validate that the <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worm development is either delayed significantly or even prevented when the worms are treated with thapsigargin.</p><p>We have added scale bars to Figure 3G and 4H as suggested.</p><p>We also appreciate the reviewer’s observation of the <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpression worms appearing smaller than wild-type worms in control conditions. We looked through the replicates and found that just one replicate showed a significant decrease in worm size, as observed in our unrevised manuscript. We repeated this experiment twice more to gather more data and determined that the <italic>fmo-4</italic> overexpression worms were ultimately not significantly different in size compared to wild-type worms. We have included the new images and quantifications in Figure 3G-I and Figure 4H-J in the revised manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 2: correct or replace Supplementary Table 2, which is not showing a DAVID analysis as the title and text would suggest. We should see biological/molecular processes, effect sizes, p-values, ...</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for identifying this issue. We have added more detail to the Supplementary Table 2 so that it is clearer what is being shown in each tab.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 3: clarify the data presented in Supplementary Data 2 because it does not clearly explain what is shown</p></disp-quote><p>This is a great point, and we have added more detail to the Supplementary Data 2 to make sure the data are more clearly explained in each tab.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 4: in Figure 5B the fluorescent images do not seem to reflect the quantification in panel 5C.</p></disp-quote><p>Thank you for this feedback. We re-analyzed our data to make sure the proper fluorescent images are included with their matching quantifications in Figure 5B-C.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 5: where is Supplementary Data 3?</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for noticing this. Supplementary Data 3 was accidentally missing from the first submission, and has now been added.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 6: conceptually the last results section (regarding atf-6) does not add much to the story, I would consider removing these results</p></disp-quote><p>We appreciate this feedback. We have decided to keep Figure 7 because we think it helps to validate <italic>fmo-4</italic>’s role in calcium movement from the ER. While we show genetic interactions between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and key genes involved in calcium regulation (<italic>crt-1, itr-1,</italic> and <italic>mcu-1</italic>), we think that showing how <italic>fmo-4</italic> also interacts with <italic>atf-6,</italic> a known regulator of calcium homeostasis, strengthens and supports the genetic mechanisms of <italic>fmo-4</italic> proposed in this manuscript.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 7: the model proposed in Figure 7E is not convincingly supported by the results:</p><p>o the arrows connecting atf-6, fmo-4 and crt-1 (calreticulin) suggest that fmo-4 is downstream of atf-6 and upstream of crt-1: Berkowitz 2020 showed that atf-6 knockdown downregulates calreticulin, so unless the authors show that this downregulation is mediated directly by fmo-4, the more likely explanation is that atf-6 knockdown affects calcium levels which in turn induces fmo-4 expression.</p></disp-quote><p>We thank the reviewer for this helpful feedback. We have addressed this by updating our proposed model. We used a solid arrow leading from the reduction of <italic>atf-6</italic> to induction of <italic>fmo-4,</italic> as this is supported by our data in Figure 7A-B. We then used dashed arrows between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and <italic>crt-1</italic> as well as between <italic>atf-6</italic> and <italic>crt-1</italic> to indicate that more data is needed to clarify this part of the pathway.</p><disp-quote content-type="editor-comment"><p>Comment 8: Avoid pointing at a mitochondrial connection in the title as the only evidence supporting this interaction comes from the mcu-1 RNAi epistasis.</p></disp-quote><p>We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestion. We added another piece of evidence suggesting an interaction between <italic>fmo-4</italic> and the mitochondria to Supplementary Figure 7G-H. Here we show that while <italic>fmo-4</italic> OE worms are resistant to paraquat stress, knocking down <italic>vdac-1</italic> (a calcium regulator located in the outer mitochondrial membrane), abrogates this effect. We have kept mitochondria in our title but have made sure to temper our language in the main text to avoid pointing to a strong mitochondrial connection, since we have two pieces of evidence connecting <italic>fmo-4</italic> to the mitochondria.</p></body></sub-article></article>