SARS-CoV-2 is part of a family of coronaviruses, many of which infect mainly animals and are less capable of infecting humans (Dicken et al. 2021). Therefore, to identify the most likely mutations responsible for the infection of human hosts (i.e., putative adaptive mutations for humans), we estimated the (neutral) evolutionary probability (EP) scores of mutations found within the S protein (Liu et al. 2016). EP scores of the amino acid variants of S protein are obtained by constructing a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (Goldman 1990) containing 19 orthologous coronavirus sequences, which were selected based on the amount of divergence over evolutionary history to ensure that each amino acid position had ample time to experience purifying selection (Patel et al. 2018) (Figure 1A). The likelihood of finding a particular amino acid in the sequence is then determined using a Bayesian framework, with calculations carried out by MEGA X software (Kumar et al. 2018). As apparent in the name, EP scores obtained for the amino acids in the sequence provide information regarding the likelihood of finding them at their position, given the history of the sequence. Amino acid residues receiving low EP scores (<0.05) at a position are less likely to be found in a given position within the sequence because they are non-neutral. Generally, positions with low EP amino acids are far less common than those containing mutations with high EP, a trend also realized in the CoV-2 S protein (Figure 1B).

Of particular interest is an observed evolutionary change where an amino acid with high EP is replaced by an amino acid residue with low EP. While amino acids with low EP should be harmful or deleterious to viral fitness due to functional disruption or change, fixation of a low EP amino acid at a position suggests an underlying mechanism for natural selection to operate. These fixed, low EP mutations are called candidate adaptive polymorphisms (CAPs) as they are predicted to alter protein function, and adaptive pressures may drive their prevalence (Patel et al. 2018). Indeed, there is an overlap between these CAPs and the mutations suggested by other methods to be adaptive for the S protein (Cagliani et al. 2020; Singh and Yi 2021; Starr, Zepeda, et al. 2022).

Interestingly, most of the CAP residues are in functionally critical sites, including the receptor binding domain (RBD) and the Furin cleavage site (Figure 1C). As mentioned earlier, the RBD plays a key role in initiating the infection of a healthy cell by binding it with the host organism’s ACE2 protein. Before ACE2 binding, one chain of the homotrimer comprising the S protein must open to expose the RBD (Kirchdoerfer et al. 2016; Henderson et al. 2020; Hoffmann et al. 2020; Sztain et al. 2021). The Furin cleavage site plays a key role in the opening process as it aids in the cleavage of the S protein into two domains: S1 and S2 (Wrobel et al. 2020: 13). Similar cleavage sites have been found in related coronaviruses, including HKU1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), which infect humans (Chan et al. 2008: 1; Millet and Whittaker 2014; Millet and Whittaker 2015), and the acquisition of similar cleavage sites is associated with increased pathogenicity in other viruses such as the influenza virus (Steinhauer 1999). Interestingly, however, CAPs do not display such an overwhelming tendency to occur at well-known critical sites within human proteins studied with similar methods (Ose, Campitelli, et al. 2022), yet mutations at those sites are associated with disease, indicating their critical role in inducing functional change. Therefore, the identified CAPs in the S protein, which are signs of recent evolution, can provide mechanistic insights regarding the molecular adaptation of the virus. In particular, we aimed to analyze how these CAP positions in the S protein modulate the interaction with hACE2 using our protein dynamics-based analysis (Gerek and Ozkan 2011; Nevin Gerek, Z., Kumar, S., Banu Ozkan, S. 2013; Larrimore et al. 2017; Kumar, A., Glembo, T.J., Ozkan, S.B. 2015b).

A mutation at a given amino acid position inevitably not only alters local interactions, but this change cascades through the residue-residue interaction network, which gives rise to a variation in native ensemble dynamics to modulate function (Dror et al. 2012; Labbadia and Morimoto 2015; Sekhar and Kay 2019; Campitelli et al.). Thus, we analyze the internal dynamics of the system to understand the functional role of CAPs in S proteins. This analysis allows us to gain a mechanistic understanding of the relationship between CAP mutations and biophysical outcomes (Teruel et al. 2021). First, we implement the Dynamic Coupling Index (DCI) approach to study long-distance coupling between the CAPs and the hACE2 binding sites emerging from the 3D network of interactions across the S protein system. The DCI parameter combines Perturbation Response Scanning and Linear Response Theory to capture the strength of a displacement response for position i upon perturbation of position j, relative to the average fluctuation response of position i to all other positions in the protein. It represents the strength of dynamic coupling between positions i and j upon perturbation to j.

Further, asymmetry can be captured in the DCI values, as dynamic coupling is not necessarily due to an anisotropic network. That is, each amino acid has a set of positions to which it is highly coupled, and this anisotropy in connections gives rise to unique differences in coupling between a given i, j pair of amino acids which do not have direct interactions. By calculating the coupling of the hACE2 binding interface in the RBD with respect to the CAP residue positions and vice versa, we can generate DCI_asym (Figure 2A) as the difference between the normalized displacement response of position j upon a perturbation to position i (DCI_ij) and the normalized displacement response of position i upon a perturbation to position j (DCI_ji) (See Methods). If the DCI_asym values significantly differ from zero, it shows asymmetry in coupling and presents a cause-effect relationship between the i, j pair in terms of force/signal propagation. This metric has been used previously in a variety of systems to analyze the unique behavior of positions within a protein and a given position’s propensity to effect biophysical changes upon mutation, particularly at long distances (Modi and Ozkan 2018; Campitelli and Ozkan 2020; Kolbaba-Kartchner et al. 2021; Ose, Butler, et al. 2022; Kazan et al. 2023; Campitelli et al. 2020b).

Recent work from our group has shown an enhancement in cross-chain communication within the main protease of SARS COV-2 compared to SARS COV-1 (Campitelli et al. 2022). Furthermore, previous studies have shown that allosteric inter-chain communication is important to S protein function (Zhou et al. 2020; Spinello et al. 2021; Tan et al. 2022; Xue et al. 2022). In support of these findings, we observe through DCI_asym that when the S protein is in its pre-fusion conformation with one chain open, the CAPs in the closed chains have negative coupling asymmetry with respect to the hACE2 binding site interface in the RBD-open chain. This indicates an allosteric control where the hACE2 binding site is dominated by the dynamics of the CAPs in closed chains (Figure 2B, yellow bars). As this open-state RBD is critical for the viral infection of host cells (Kirchdoerfer et al. 2016), our results suggest that this type of closed-to-open cross-chain interaction is important for viral proliferation. Our prior studies on DCI_asym show a similar trend in Lactose Inhibitor (LacI), a protein with a functional role in gene expression through binding DNA. The allosteric mutations (i.e., mutations on the sites that are far from the DNA binding sites) that alter DNA binding affinity not only exhibited unique asymmetry profiles with the DNA binding sites of LacI, but also regulated the dynamics of these binding sites (Campitelli et al. 2020b).

Similarly, it is possible that mutations to such residue positions within the S protein can be used to regulate the dynamics of the hACE2 bindings sites of the open RBD state. We, therefore, propose that the residue positions with CAP substitutions hold the potential for mutations in the spike sequence which can alter the opening and closing dynamics of the RBD domain. This hypothesis is further supported by many mutations already observed at these residue positions which alter the infection rate (Brister et al. 2015). Interestingly, residues responsible for extremely low asymmetry values (< -4) lie overwhelmingly in the region 476–486. These same residues were suggested to stabilize S protein dynamics and prime it for host Furin proteolysis (Raghuvamsi et al. 2021).

Moreover, as a control, we performed the same analysis on the S protein with the RBD domains of all chains in the closed configuration. In this case, we observed that the DCI_asym of the CAPs residue positions with respect to the hACE2 interface in the other chains yields a largely symmetric distribution about 0 (Figure 2B, green bars). This verifies that the asymmetry in the coupling of CAPs with the exposed binding site interface in pre-fusion configuration results from one of the RBDs opening up and further suggests the allosteric role played by CAPs in locking the S protein in the RBD open state.

CAPs represent important S protein amino acid changes between related coronaviruses across multiple species and the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference sequence (MN908947). Since SARS-CoV-2 first spread to humans, it has continued to mutate and evolve rapidly, particularly regarding the S protein (Amicone et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2022; Tay et al. 2022). Like the mutations leading to the Wuhan strain caused an increase in binding affinity to hACE2, continued evolution in human hosts has resulted in further altered binding affinities as well as different phenotypic outcomes for those infected (Ali et al. 2021; Barton et al. 2021; Ozono et al. 2021).

We explore whether protein dynamics has played a role in the selection of mutational sites during the evolution of the S protein since 2019. Our previous work has indicated that rate of evolution per positional site exhibits a positive correlation with positional flexibility; generally, positions that exhibit higher flexibility are also sites that experience a higher number of amino acid substitutions (Liu and Bahar 2012; Maguid et al. 2008; Maguid et al. 2006; Mikulska-Ruminska et al. 2019; Nevin Gerek, Z., Kumar, S., Banu Ozkan, S. 2013). To confirm these findings for the evolution of the S protein using the sequenced variants of infected humans, we analyze the site-specific amino acid flexibility using the Dynamic Flexibility Index (DFI). Using the same mathematical foundation as DCI, DFI evaluates each position’s displacement response to random force perturbations at other locations in the protein (Gerek and Ozkan 2011; Nevin Gerek, Z., Kumar, S., Banu Ozkan, S. 2013), and it can be considered a measure of a given position’s ability to explore its local conformational space. We found that the covid-19 S protein shows the expected high correlation between the occurrence of mutations and site flexibility (Figure 3) when we compare %DFI (DFI ranked by percentile) to the average number of variants per position found within a given %DFI bin. Previous studies have indicated that rigid residues are critical for functional dynamics, thus more likely to impact function if mutated and, generally, can lead to a loss of function and thus more conserved (Kim, H. et al. 2015; Butler et al. 2018; Modi, Risso, et al. 2021; Modi, Campitelli, et al. 2021; Kazan et al. 2022; Ose, Butler, et al. 2022; Stevens et al. 2022; Campitelli et al. 2020a; Kumar, A., Glembo, T.J., Ozkan, S.B. 2015b). This analysis also agrees with these previous studies and highlights the power of negative selection, in line with the neutral theory of molecular evolution, stating that deleterious mutations (i.e., those on the rigid positions) should be eliminated and therefore not observed (Kimura, Motoo 1983).

Continued mutations within human hosts have resulted in a multitude of variants. Indeed, by fitting various molecular clock models to genome sequence data, VOC emergence is punctuated by an episodic period of rapid evolution, with a substitution rate of up to 4-fold greater than the background substitution rate (Kumar et al. 2021; Tay et al. 2022). With such an aggressive evolutionary rate, we are finding VOCs to consist of a number of different characteristic mutations, almost all of which are CAPs.

To explore the dynamic effects of the evolution of the Spike in humans, we examine asymmetry with these new potentially adaptive sites, namely the low EP (CAP) characteristic mutation sites observed in the Delta variant, the widely dominant variant from December 2021 to January 2022 (Thye et al. 2021), and the Omicron variant, a highly transmissible variant whose lineages have remained dominant since January 2022) (Kim et al. 2021) (Figure 4). This analysis revealed a mechanism similar to that for the CAPs in the reference protein (Figure 2), as the open-chain binding interface is also allosterically controlled by these potentially new adaptive sites. Regarding this, we see that the asymmetry is much more pronounced in observed mutations of Omicron variants suggesting that these new mutations have a stronger power in controlling the dynamics of open chain hACE2 binding interface compared to those observed in Delta variants. We can speculate that the difference in virulence and infection rates between Omicron and Delta (Earnest et al. 2022; Bager et al. 2021; Sheikh et al. 2021; Twohig et al. 2022;(Houhamdi et al. 2022; Menni et al. 2022) might be due to these specific CAPs within each variant and their differences in allosterically controlling the dynamics of open RBD binding sites as observed in the DCI_asym analysis.

The fact that the identified CAPs in the reference protein and the more recently evolved CAPs of Delta and Omicron variants both show a high degree of control over the active sites begs the question: what is the complex interaction between these previous and new CAP sites? Motivated by this concept, we explore the interplay of mutational pairs to understand the effects of the specific amino acid backgrounds associated with these two predominant variants. Some CAP sites in Delta and Omicron have already been considered adaptive (Kemp et al. 2021; Kistler et al. 2022; Maher et al. 2022; Neher 2022).

It is well understood that the impact of even a single mutation to a protein sequence can sometimes dramatically alter the biophysical behavior of the system. However, the mechanistic impact of point mutations can only be fully understood when the sequence background upon which it is made is accounted for. This means that, in the case of strains with multiple mutations, the interplay between mutated positions will ultimately impact a protein as an aggregate behavior, where the presence of previous mutations may strongly (or weakly) influence some mutations. This concept of non-additivity is known as epistasis. In fact, studies of evolutionary pathways of mutations have suggested that a majority of the mutations have a second or a higher order epistasis among them (Bershtein et al. 2006). Nature exploits this higher order complex relationship between the mutations to evolve their function.

To computationally capture and interpret the pairwise effects of mutations, we have developed an in-house computational tool called EpiScore (Figure 5A). Here, we evaluate how a given position pair i j may affect other critical positions k of the protein. EpiScore is the relative coupling strength to a position k when positions i and j are perturbed simultaneously compared to the average dynamic coupling strength of i to k and j to k. EpiScore has previously been used successfully to capture overarching trends in GB1 deep mutational scan data as well as specific instances of the development of antibiotic resistance in various enzymatic systems (Campitelli and Ozkan 2020). An EpiScore of 1 indicates perfect coupling additivity, and deviations from this value represent non-additive behavior between position pairs and functionally important sites. Prior EpiScore work has shown a difference in EpiScore between the sites of compensatory and non-compensatory mutations, where both yield distributions with peaks around 1, but non-compensatory mutations show higher deviation in their EpiScore distribution (Ose, Campitelli, et al. 2022).

Many studies have confirmed epistasis between residues within the S protein (Moulana et al. 2022a; Starr, Greaney, Hannon, et al. 2022; Moulana et al. 2023; Witte et al. 2023). These epistatic residues can have various effects on hACE2 or antibody binding. To further motivate our use of EpiScore within SARS-CoV-2, we calculate the EpiScore (Figure 5B) of a set of mutation pairs used by Moulana et al. (Nature comm 2022) and compare our results to quantified epistatic effects determined by the experimental hACE2 binding affinity of “first-order” single mutation variants compared to “second-order” mutation pair. Our EpiScore results and the experimentally determined epistasis have a reasonable similarity. Both methods captured highly epistatic behavior among residues 493, 496, 498, 501, and 505, as well as a lack of epistatic behavior for residues 339, 371, 373, and 375.

Seeking further to understand the role of epistasis within S protein variants, we explored the possibility of epistatic relationships between the CAPs of the Wuhan variant and the new CAPs in VOCs. Thus, we computed the Episcore of these CAP positions in the closed RBD domains (i.e., chain B and C) with respect to functional hACE2 binding interface sites of the open RBD domain chain (chain A) (Figure 5B) and obtained Episcore distributions.

To contrast these variants, Omicron (Figure 6, cyan) shows a high proportion of additive, potentially compensatory, mutations compared to the Delta variant (Figure 6, magenta), with a peak centered on 1. The comparatively more pathogenic Delta variant exhibited many non-additive, suspected non-compensatory mutations with EpiScores below one. This again suggests that the cross-communication between the open and closed chain of the S protein is important for regulating the function. Four out of seven low EP Delta mutation sites used in this analysis often resulted in EpiScores below 1. Each of those is found in the N-terminal domain (NTD) on or near the N3 loop and is implicated in antibody escape in recent studies (Chi et al. 2020; Weisblum et al. 2020; Harvey, Carabelli, Jackson, Gupta, Thomson, Harrison, Ludden, Reeve, Rambaut, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, et al. 2021; Klinakis et al. 2021; Cantoni et al. 2022). The low EpiScores of NTD mutations suggest that they dampen the control of Wuhan variant CAPs over the active site in addition to their effects on antibody binding. It is possible that what the Delta variant gained in transmission rate also came with being more harmfully pathogenic due in part to negatively epistatic interactions. It follows that the mutations leading to the development of the Omicron strain were compensatory in nature, possibly leading to a lower pathogenicity and higher effective immune escape, resulting in a higher transmission rate. It is worth noting that other variants contain NTD mutations which result in low EpiScores, however the proportion of these mutations within the set is considerably less than in Delta (Supplementary Figure S2).

One of the more notable similarities of generated EpiScore distributions is a tail of EpiScore values upward of 2.0, indicating highly epistatic behavior. Interestingly, these tails are largely due to three different CAPs: 346R, 486F, and 498Q. Those residues are nearby one another within the protein structure and have been reported to play a role in antibody binding, either being known antibody binding sites (346R and 486F) or having received very high antibody accessibility scores (498Q) (Harvey, Carabelli, Jackson, Gupta, Thomson, Harrison, Ludden, Reeve, Rambaut, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, et al. 2021; Raghuvamsi et al. 2021). These observed high Episcore values also support the other studies that the epistatic interactions between these CAPs and the mutations of the VOCs within the S protein are crucial for maintaining binding affinity of hACE2 whilst evading immunity (Hong et al. 2022; Moulana et al. 2022b; Starr, Greaney, Stewart, et al. 2022).

Viewing EpiScores of Delta and Omicron potentially adaptive mutation sites with only CAP site 486F (a binding site for both hACE2 and antibodies) (Huang et al. 2020; Ali et al. 2021; Harvey, Carabelli, Jackson, Gupta, Thomson, Harrison, Ludden, Reeve, Rambaut, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, et al. 2021; Raghuvamsi et al. 2021) shows highly epistatic interactions at other hACE2 binding sites (Figure 6). However, within a recent and rapidly spreading subvariant of Omicron, XBB 1.5, we see a mutation of F to S, a rare double nucleotide mutation, at site 486. This new variant has unprecedented immune escape capabilities, resisting neutralizing antibodies almost entirely (Qu et al. 2023). EpiScores of other XBB 1.5 specific mutation sites with 486S are almost entirely greater than 1, showing an even higher degree of epistasis with the binding sites of RBD (Figure 7). These results present a threefold importance for the F486S mutation: Not only does this residue alter antibody (i.e., immune escape) and hACE2 binding by directly modifying a binding site, but it may also be responsible for modifying hACE2 binding via epistatic cooperation with other co-occurring mutations.

Experimental studies have tracked hACE2 binding for different variants since the virus first spread (Ali et al. 2021; Barton et al. 2021; Ozono et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2022). Within the Omicron variant, for example, characteristic mutations on the RBD are shown to increase the overall binding affinity of the virus to the ACE2 receptor, which is suspected to allow it to spread more easily (Kim et al. 2021). Furthermore, the new Omicron XBB and Omicron XBB 1.5 variants contain additional mutations in the RBD and antibody binding residues, which may further impact their dynamics and interactions with the host.

To gain deeper insights into the impact of dynamics on the binding affinity of hACE2 and antibodies with the recent Omicron XBB variants, we conducted molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. By analyzing the resulting trajectories, we investigated how these mutations influence the flexibility and rigidity of the RBD and antibody binding residues, consequently affecting their binding affinity and potential for immune evasion (Figure 8). To understand the overall flexibility changes, we measured the sum of DFI of the ACE2 binding residues, as well as the sum of DFI of the antibody binding residues, calculated from the MD trajectories and compared then with experimental viral binding (disassociation constants) and immunity evasion antibody IC50 values (Yue et al. 2023).

This investigation elucidated the impact of mutations in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and antibody binding residues on the binding affinity of the S protein and immune evasion by modulating their flexibility and rigidity (Figure 8A). The Omicron XBB variant exhibits heightened flexibility in hACE2 and antibody binding residues, reducing infectivity and enhancing immune evasion. Conversely, the Omicron XBB 1.5 variant induces distinct dynamics in these regions, rendering the RBD-ACE2 interface more rigid while increasing flexibility in antibody binding residues. These effects indicate that Omicron XBB1.5 retains its antibody escape capabilities while regaining ACE2 binding affinity comparable to previous Omicron variants, in accordance with experimental findings (Yue et al. 2023). These findings suggest that mutations in the RBD and antibody binding residues can have complex effects on the dynamics of the protein and, ultimately, on the virus’s ability to infect and evade the host immune system through an alteration of biding site dynamics.

The Dynamic Flexibility Index utilizes a Perturbation Response Scanning technique that combines the Elas-tic Network Model (ENM) and Linear Response Theory (LRT) (Gerek and Ozkan 2011; Nevin Gerek, Z., Kumar, S., Banu Ozkan, S. 2013). In ENM, the protein is considered as a network of beads at Cα positions interacting with each other via a harmonic spring potential. Using LRT, ΔR is calculated as the fluctuation response vector of residue j due to unit force’s F perturbation on residue i, averaged over multiple unit force directions to simulate an isotropic perturbation. H is the Hessian, a 3N × 3N matrix that can be constructed from 3-D atomic coordinate information and is composed of the second derivatives of the harmonic potential with respect to the components of the position’s vectors of length 3N. The hessian inverse in this equation may be replaced with the covariance matrix G obtained from MD simulations as follows. MD simulations were used to obtain the DFI profiles of Omicron, Omicron XBB, and Omicron XBB 1.5. In order to obtain DFI, each position in the structure was perturbed sequentially to generate a Perturbation Response Matrix A where is the magnitude of fluctuation response at position i due to perturbations at position j. The DFI value of position i is then treated as the displacement response of position i relative to the net displacement response of the entire protein, which is calculated by sequentially perturbing each position in the structure. It is also often useful to quantify position flexibility relative to the flexibility ranges unique to individual structures. To that end, DFI can be presented as a percentile rank, %DFI. All %DFI calculations present in this work used the DFI value of every residue of the full spike structure for ranking. The DFI parameter can be considered a measure of a given amino acid position’s ability to explore its local conformational space.

Similar to DFI, the dynamic coupling index (DCI) (Larrimore et al. 2017; Kumar, A., Glembo, T.J., Ozkan, S.B. 2015b) also utilizes Perturbation Response Scanning with the Elastic Network Model and Linear Response Theory. DCI captures the strength of displacement response of a given position i upon perturbation to a single functionally important position (or subset of positions) j, relative to the average fluctuation response of position i when all of the positions within a structure are perturbed. When only positional pairs are concerned, this expression reduces to: As such, this parameter represents a measure of the dynamic coupling between i and j upon a perturbation to j. As with DFI, DCI_ji can also be presented as a percentile-ranked %DCI_ji.

One of the most important aspects of DCI is that the entire network of interactions is explicitly included in subsequent calculations without the need for dimensionality reduction techniques. If one considers interactions such as communication directionality or dynamic coupling regulation between position pairs as inherent properties of an anisotropic interaction network, it is critical to include the interactions of the entire network to accurately model the effect one residue can have on another.

Here, we present two further extensions of DCI which allow us to uniquely model coupling directionality and epistatic effects: DCI_asym and EpiScore, respectively. Interestingly, we can capture asymmetry between different residues within a protein through DCI, as a coupling in and of itself is asymmetric within an ani-sotropic network. That is, each amino acid has a set of positions to which it is highly coupled, and this anisotropy in connections gives rise to unique differences in coupling between a given i j pair of amino acids which do not have direct interactions (Figure 2A). DCI_asym, then, is simply DCI_ij (the normalized displacement response of position j upon a perturbation to position i) − DCI_ji (Equation (7)). Using DCI_asym we can determine a cause-effect relationship between the i j pair in terms of force/signal propagation between these two positions.

where a positive DCI_asym value indicates communication from position i to position j. EpiScore can identify or describe potential non-additivity in substitution behavior between residue pairs. This metric can capture the differences in a normalized perturbation response to a position k when a force is applied at two residues i and j simultaneously versus the average additive perturbation response when each residue i, j, is perturbed individually (Figure 5A, Equation 9). EpiScore values < 1 (> 1) indicate that the additive perturbations of positions i and j generates a greater (lesser) response at position k than the effect of a simultaneous perturbation. This means that, when treated with a simultaneous perturbation at both sites i and j, the displacement response of k is lower (higher) than the average effect of individual perturbations to i and j, one at a time. As EpiScore is a linear scale, the further the value from 1, the greater the effect described above.

The production simulations of the variants Omicron, Omicron XBB, and Omicron XBB 1.5 were generated using the AMBER software package. The mutations in the variants were modeled using PYMOL taking the template as PDB 6M0J. The initial input proteins were parametrized utilizing the ff14SB force field (Maier et al. 2015). To ensure adequate solvation of the protein, the solvation box was defined to encompass the protein, maintaining a minimum distance of 16Å from the protein to the box edges, utilizing the explicit TIP3P water model (Sun 1995). The neutralization of the solvated system was achieved through the addition of sodium and chloride ions. The system was subjected to a steepest descent algorithm for 11000 steps for minimization purposes. The minimized system was then heated to 300K and subjected to a constant number of particles, pressure, and temperature ensemble (NPT) production simulations. These simulations were conducted using the Langevin thermostat (Hünenberger 2005) and Berendsen barostat (Berendsen et al. 1984). The hydrogens were constrained using the SHAKE algorithm (Pearlman et al. 1995). The production trajectories were simulated for 1µs at 300K and 1 bar.